367:) but should stand as a guiding principle that our goal is improving Knowledge, and not building an edifice of rules and policies. It's also important to remember that IAR remains a controversial policy; the straw poll in the Talk page archive shows a very diverse set of views. It's difficult for me to imagine a situation that IAR would cause me to take an administrative action out of process... but it's not literally impossible, either. The good thing is that almost every action here, whether an edit or an admin action, can be reversed.
814:; 1602 AfD nominations, votes or discussion seems rather high. Since I lean toward saving articles whenever possible, I usually find that such a heavy AfD tendency is a bad indicator, particularly when the contributions, although solid, aren't spectacular. However after reading a number of the AfD discussions I see enough logic and balance to believe that this is not representative of a seriously over-narrow focus. I am willing to trust with the ability to block/unblock/delete/undelete.
250:
RfArb, ANI, etc.) Naturally, some of conflicts have been stressful, but the key realization I came to was that there are so many good editors at
Knowledge, that I didn't have to fight every battle; over the long run, the majority of good editors tend to win out over the bad ones. So I don't tend to worry about it as much, and I am encouraged by the depth and breadth of Knowledge's avenues of dispute resolution. I'd be happy to answer questions or discuss any specific cases.
76:, has been editing on Knowledge since August 15, 2005. The user has amassed 4400+ edits during that period, contributing mostly in the article and Knowledge namespaces. If you check out his user page, you can see some of his major article contributions and a little personal bio. I met MCB a few weeks ago and was immediately impressed by what I saw. This user has contributed to vandal fighting, article-building, AfD discussions, and has helped a great deal of users at
1511:
mechanisms like AfD, and it held a very strong attraction just to see and participate in the dynamics. AfD is one of the most revealing places in
Knowledge, I think, sort of "where the sausage is made". So to some extent I served sort of an apprenticeship there, and in the natural course of events my interests broadened to other parts of the projects, and of course, more article editing. For a long time I tried to keep up with
225:). I also do a fair amount of wikignome-type editing, from simple copyediting to structural changes, as well as finding and citing sources. In the project namespace, I am a regular participant in AfDs/xfDs and in my early months learned an amazing amount about Knowledge from that. As a relatively new editor, I also created a
412:
So issuing a punitive block is, as such, a policy violation, and I can't think of a justification for violating it. That doesn't mean that long-term or permanent bans/blocks are not justified -- only that they should be applied in order to protect
Knowledge (which extends to a large number of areas),
379:
is similar, in that it is a reminder that our business here is to build and maintain an encyclopedia, and not to provide practice in bureaucracy, and that common sense should prevail. Many processes here have explicit time frames, but in order not to tie up the time, attention, and energy of editors,
443:
That said, it's also important not to let humor become an excuse for biting the newbies, or be aggressive or a cover for personal attacks, or be used to make fun of people with less-than-stellar
English language skills. Some edits are clearly made by people who are beginners at English, and while we
249:
I've probably been involved in significantly fewer conflicts than most editors with the same level of participation, but there have been a few, largely over NPOV issues. All have (I hope) remained civil, and none have progressed to the level of anyone seeking outside intervention (mediation, RfC,
531:
Philosophically, I don't believe there is such a thing as "sacrosanct knowledge"; knowledge is constantly being reassessed, refined, reconsidered, and revised, in the light of new information. That's one of
Knowledge's great advantages -- it's never frozen in time, like a particular edition of a
479:
I don't think so, because article editing is something I truly enjoy and find relaxing, but of course it's hard to predict something like that. My best prediction is that since I spend a fair amount of time in semi-administrative tasks like reversion of vandalism, marking and analyzing copyvios,
1510:
Ageo020, I think that's a fair question, and I'd agree that it definitely looks somewhat odd & unbalanced in retrospect. It wasn't an attempt to run up an edit count, if that's what your concern is; more the case that as a new editor I was fascinated by the workings of actions-by-consensus
433:
Wikipedian to maintain a sense of humor. It's especially important for admins and those engaged in tasks like anti-vandalism patrol, because otherwise seeing and reverting "HAHAHAHA SAMMY SUCKS" for the 47th time that week (and issuing the appropriate warning) just gets depressing and leads to
80:. I believe MCB would make an excellent admin, based on the user's knowledge and experience in all things Wiki. This user has the level of maturity that most other users can not equal, and I have strong confidence that Michael's age and wisdom would not lead to any possibility of admin abuse.
1453:
Weak support really. Just concerned that around 40% of the user's edits are on voting for AFD's. especially the first 1000 edits shows that around 70% of the user's edits were on AFD. Could shift vote to support, if satisfactory answer given. Also No barnstars received by this user.
434:
burnout. Often we can share the humor in a situation, or a light remark -- or even a tongue-in-cheek edit summary -- and that helps break up tedious tasks. None of us are getting paid, so the more fun and enjoyable editing
Knowledge is, the greater their participation will be.
264:: While I like your three "showcase" articles from Q2 editorially, I see a lack of sources. Do you have any other articles you would like to showcase for the work you did in sourcing, or examples of research on articles you did in AfD or other debates? Thanks.
480:
participating in AfD/xfD/RQM/etc., with the admin tools some of that time would be diverted toward admin-level actions like closing xfDs, performing non-trivial page moves, deleting copyvios, and so forth. Or, for example, responding to things on
177:; second, to be able to respond and intervene quickly in cases of vandalism or other abuse (RC and NP patrol, various flavors of page protection, issuing blocks, responding to unblock requests, and monitoring and responding to requests on
156:
I see adminship as having essentially three roles: first, the everyday responsibility of reducing backlogs in the areas that can only be done by admins (closing AfDs/xfDs, closing move discussions and performing complex moves from
388:!" and closing the discussion. It's a common sense reminder, but it is not a policy or guideline, and should not be invoked as such; instead, it can be a shorthand citation in an explanation of one's action.
185:); and third, helping build the Knowledge community, enouraging collegiality and civility, and providing a positive example in preventing and resolving disputes. (Of course, that's not a sysop chore
189:, but I think it is something all admins should do.) In addition to the above, I have a particular interest in the area of copyrights and analysis of free-use and fair-use issues on Knowledge.
1284:
243:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
384:
mean, to my mind, is that the proponent of a particular position is justified in watching a discussion, seeing three or four favorable votes, and swooping in with "Aha!
221:. I've contributed a number of photographs of food, particularly cuts of meat, and hope to identify a good FA candidate in the food/drink category (we're leaning toward
226:
127:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
205:
In the article space, much of what I've worked on has been related to food and travel, including creating some small but hopefully well-crafted articles such as
229:
that did not reach consensus, but did illuminate a number of issues regarding sports result articles. In the community area, I enjoy answering questions at the
444:
might have to edit their contributions heavily, it's important not to make them feel unwelcome; as their skills improve they may well become excellent editors.
275:
1610:
1592:
560:
147:
363:
is not something that you wield like a sword to justify a controversial action. Ideally, it should not be invoked explicitly (unlike, perhaps,
316:; I think my later edits have shown improvement, and one of my planned tasks is to go back and cite sources for some of my earlier articles.
1546:
pending responses to optional questions, but your answers so far are highly impressive. I'm sure I'll support, this is just a formality :p
1281:
1150:
709:
1485:
A good deal of the last 500 Knowledge namespace edits made by this user have been in other AfD's, project pages and the help desk.
722:
33:
17:
506:
139:
1515:
AfD on the daily log; needless to say, I don't do that any more, and I'm happy to keep an eye on it in a more balanced way. --
1201:
as there is a reasonable explanation for the imbalance in editing, which isn't really a problem on this scale in any event. -
517:
Do you feel
Knowledge should be regarded as a source of sacrosanct knowledge, or a structured yet exploratory knowledge (e.g.
218:
1471:
754:
584:
696:
462:
334:
380:
it is sometimes an entirely reasonable idea to end a process early when there is substantial unanimity. What SNOW does
955:
271:
135:
308:
Beyond that, I'd agree that a number of my early articles did not adequately cite sources. They were written from
1555:
1007:
845:
69:
199:
Of your articles or contributions to
Knowledge, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
931:
553:
143:
1182:
410:"Blocks are used to prevent damage or disruption to Knowledge. They should not be used as a punitive measure."
712:
article; constructive edits and good answers to questions (especially question #1) all lead me to support. --
522:
1369:
1029:
1552:
1396:
1004:
518:
73:
1191:
1321:
943:
918:
832:
819:
815:
1591:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
1533:
959:
840:
714:
261:
1498:
1293:
914:
850:
646:
500:
214:
93:
1136:
1022:
870:
861:
671:
1577:
1561:
1548:
1536:
1519:
1505:
1479:
1463:
1427:
1415:
1403:
1387:
1375:
1355:
1337:
1326:
1308:
1296:
1272:
1260:
1235:
1223:
1211:
1193:
1157:
1140:
1123:
1111:
1104:
1099:
1094:
1082:
1070:
1058:
1046:
1034:
1013:
1000:
990:
978:
962:
946:
934:
922:
905:
902:
893:
864:
852:
835:
823:
802:
786:
774:
762:
746:
729:
700:
679:
665:
653:
625:
622:
592:
576:
113:
100:
1412:
1318:
1209:
1079:
975:
828:
456:
328:
210:
206:
166:
799:
688:
675:
662:
405:
270:
Of the articles I created, one of the most enjoyable to research and find sources for was
1292:. Good editor, thoughtful comments, no doubt about sensible use of the extra buttons. --
1280:. MCB an admin soon. :o) Great contributions in many different facets of Knowledge.
1486:
1424:
1346:
1334:
1305:
1232:
1043:
634:
496:
385:
376:
364:
350:
313:
81:
217:, and contributions to a number of airport and aviation articles and participation in
1604:
1133:
485:
481:
360:
346:
296:
279:
182:
178:
158:
63:
1455:
1384:
1269:
1241:
811:
771:
738:
568:
309:
230:
162:
77:
564:
1574:
1203:
1120:
1067:
1055:
987:
971:
692:
452:
324:
1585:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1220:
1168:
795:
783:
1181:
seems to be an excellent candidate who can certainly be trusted. Good luck!
1423:: Great on the upside, little or nothing of significance on the downside.
532:
paper encyclopedia. But in some ways we approach the universal scope of the
1516:
549:
289:
110:
59:
536:, by not being restricted to particular topics or branches of knowledge.
1231:- Excellent editor and extremely unlikely to abuse the mop and bucket.
942:
I am impressed with his answer to question 1. A good editor as well. --
274:. A more recent example of source research (in a policy sense) is from
174:
1595:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
1383:
Looks like a well-rounded, responsible editor. Send more like him. -
170:
782:
Smart, trustworthy fellow with whom I've had positive discussions.
423:
How important is it for an administrator to keep a sense of humor?
134:
What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out
901:
great judgement, could always use another attorney as an admin ˉˉ
222:
398:
Is there ever a case where a punitive block should be applied?
288:. And sometimes a couple of good sources can save an article:
302:, but I was able to save it with a short rewrite and sources
107:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
661:
Good amount of edits, and great answers to the questions.
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1411:
Great answers to the questions, excellent background. -
1268:. His smile is enchanting! Edits are more beautiful. --
473:
Will sysop tools likely reduce your mainspace editing?
303:
286:
283:
161:, deletion of copyvios and associated issues listed on
1078:
per nom and strong answers, good user, no concerns.
737:
per good and friendly response to my previous vote--
55:Final (50/0/0) Ended Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:53:34 UTC
312:, but I was unfamiliar with the requirements of
359:The first thing to remember, I think, is that
1317:- User has made many valuable contributions.
621:Good edits, very good answer to question 1.--
109:I accept with appreciation and enthusiasm. --
8:
282:; my analysis can be found in the two posts
276:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/David Asimov
810:—Had a similar initial reaction to that by
1573:pending responses to optional questions.--
353:mean to you and how would you apply them?
605:(for expressing views without numbering)
278:, involving sourcing and application of
227:centralized discussion on sports results
408:, which is an official policy, states,
954:Moved from Neutral per ruling of the
7:
165:, analysis of image use problems in
913:per nom, and great answer to Q1. --
710:San Francisco International Airport
563:as of 23:30 October 18 2006, using
413:not to act as amateur penologists.
24:
1611:Successful requests for adminship
846:
841:
72:) – Michael C. Berch (MCB), from
1304:, can't see any reason not to.
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
1397:
1183:
723:
715:
488:rather than posting them there.
140:Category:Administrative backlog
1282:Can't sleep, clown will eat me
1:
1556:
1008:
561:MCB's editcount summary stats
1578:19:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
1562:12:52, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
1537:09:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
1520:01:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
1506:00:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
1480:00:10, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
1428:19:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
1416:14:04, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
1404:12:35, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
1388:01:11, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
1376:23:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
1356:22:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
1338:05:45, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
1327:02:13, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
1309:00:50, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
1297:19:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
1285:08:03, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
1273:15:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
1261:06:19, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
1236:05:22, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
1224:05:17, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
1212:05:07, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
1194:00:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
1158:16:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
1141:02:23, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
1124:02:08, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
1112:22:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
1083:22:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
1071:15:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
1059:06:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
1047:05:51, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
1035:05:51, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
1014:04:47, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
991:04:12, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
979:21:56, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
963:21:25, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
947:18:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
935:15:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
923:12:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
906:11:52, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
894:09:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
865:08:35, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
853:07:48, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
836:07:37, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
824:04:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
803:04:27, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
787:03:39, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
775:03:27, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
763:02:57, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
730:02:42, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
701:01:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
680:23:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
666:22:50, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
654:22:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
626:22:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
593:00:10, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
173:, etc., and the everpresent
148:administrators' reading list
114:22:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
101:21:10, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
1532:awaiting response to Q4. ~
794:- per nom and experience --
552:'s edit summary usage with
123:Questions for the candidate
1627:
956:Court of Historical Review
272:Court of Historical Review
142:, and read the page about
136:Category:Knowledge backlog
1021:Will use the mop wisely.
1588:Please do not modify it.
1345:Will make a good admin.
869:May consequently block.
1091:definatly a good user ~
39:Please do not modify it
523:The Hitchhiker's Guide
519:Encyclopedia Galactica
345:What do the policy of
74:Pleasanton, California
1395:Looks fine to me :-)
260:Optional question by
34:request for adminship
930:Good answers above.
708:Met him through the
219:WikiProject Airports
429:It's important for
215:ORBIS International
678:
1399:Wissahickon Creek
1173:
1172:2006-10-21 19:04Z
970:. Looks good. --
687:Good user, meets
670:
1618:
1590:
1558:
1503:
1496:
1491:
1476:
1468:
1460:
1401:
1353:
1257:
1255:
1253:
1251:
1206:
1189:
1188:
1175:
1171:
1156:
1155:
1139:
1107:
1102:
1097:
1087:California Uber
1032:
1027:
1010:
890:
888:
886:
884:
882:
848:
843:
759:
751:
743:
725:
717:
651:
644:
639:
589:
581:
573:
543:General comments
310:reliable sources
301:
295:
292:was tagged with
98:
91:
86:
41:
1626:
1625:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1593:this nomination
1586:
1534:trialsanderrors
1499:
1492:
1487:
1472:
1464:
1456:
1374:
1366:
1347:
1324:
1249:
1247:
1245:
1243:
1229:Pile-on support
1204:
1184:
1165:
1149:
1148:
1132:
1105:
1100:
1095:
1030:
1023:
998:with pleasure.
960:trialsanderrors
880:
878:
876:
874:
872:
755:
747:
739:
699:
647:
640:
635:
585:
577:
569:
565:Interiot's tool
299:
293:
285:and especially
262:trialsanderrors
211:Arthur Bryant's
94:
87:
82:
52:
37:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1624:
1622:
1614:
1613:
1603:
1602:
1598:
1597:
1566:
1565:
1540:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1441:
1440:
1433:
1431:
1430:
1418:
1406:
1390:
1378:
1368:
1364:
1358:
1340:
1329:
1322:
1312:
1299:
1294:VirtualDelight
1287:
1275:
1263:
1240:Can't oppose.
1238:
1226:
1214:
1196:
1179:Strong Support
1176:
1160:
1143:
1126:
1114:
1085:
1073:
1061:
1049:
1037:
1016:
993:
981:
965:
949:
937:
932:(aeropagitica)
925:
908:
896:
867:
855:
838:
826:
805:
789:
777:
765:
732:
706:Strong Support
703:
695:
682:
668:
656:
628:
610:
609:
600:
599:
598:
558:
557:
554:mathbot's tool
545:
544:
540:
539:
538:
537:
495:Question from
492:
491:
490:
489:
451:Question from
448:
447:
446:
445:
438:
437:
436:
435:
417:
416:
415:
414:
404:First of all,
392:
391:
390:
389:
371:
370:
369:
368:
349:and the essay
323:Question from
320:
319:
318:
317:
306:
254:
253:
252:
251:
237:
236:
235:
234:
193:
192:
191:
190:
144:administrators
125:
124:
119:
117:
116:
51:
46:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1623:
1612:
1609:
1608:
1606:
1596:
1594:
1589:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1576:
1572:
1564:
1563:
1560:
1559:
1554:
1550:
1545:
1541:
1539:
1538:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1521:
1518:
1514:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1504:
1502:
1497:
1495:
1490:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1477:
1475:
1469:
1467:
1461:
1459:
1452:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1429:
1426:
1422:
1419:
1417:
1414:
1410:
1407:
1405:
1402:
1400:
1394:
1391:
1389:
1386:
1382:
1379:
1377:
1373:
1372:
1362:
1359:
1357:
1354:
1352:
1351:
1344:
1341:
1339:
1336:
1333:
1330:
1328:
1325:
1320:
1316:
1313:
1310:
1307:
1303:
1300:
1298:
1295:
1291:
1288:
1286:
1283:
1279:
1276:
1274:
1271:
1267:
1264:
1262:
1259:
1258:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1222:
1218:
1215:
1213:
1210:
1208:
1207:
1200:
1197:
1195:
1192:
1190:
1187:
1180:
1177:
1174:
1170:
1164:
1161:
1159:
1154:
1153:
1152:Doctor Bruno
1147:
1144:
1142:
1138:
1135:
1130:
1127:
1125:
1122:
1119:- why not? --
1118:
1115:
1113:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1103:
1098:
1090:
1086:
1084:
1081:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1069:
1065:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1053:
1050:
1048:
1045:
1041:
1038:
1036:
1033:
1028:
1026:
1020:
1017:
1015:
1012:
1011:
1006:
1002:
997:
994:
992:
989:
985:
982:
980:
977:
973:
969:
966:
964:
961:
957:
953:
950:
948:
945:
944:203.125.28.98
941:
938:
936:
933:
929:
926:
924:
920:
916:
912:
909:
907:
904:
900:
897:
895:
892:
891:
868:
866:
863:
862:Mailer Diablo
859:
856:
854:
851:
849:
844:
839:
837:
834:
830:
827:
825:
821:
817:
813:
809:
806:
804:
801:
797:
793:
790:
788:
785:
781:
778:
776:
773:
769:
766:
764:
760:
758:
752:
750:
744:
742:
736:
733:
731:
727:
726:
719:
718:
711:
707:
704:
702:
698:
694:
690:
686:
683:
681:
677:
673:
669:
667:
664:
660:
657:
655:
652:
650:
645:
643:
638:
632:
629:
627:
624:
620:
617:
616:
615:
614:
608:
607:
606:
604:
597:
596:
595:
594:
590:
588:
582:
580:
574:
572:
566:
562:
555:
551:
547:
546:
542:
541:
535:
530:
527:
526:
524:
520:
516:
513:
512:
511:
510:
508:
505:
502:
498:
487:
483:
478:
475:
474:
472:
469:
468:
467:
466:
464:
461:
458:
454:
442:
441:
440:
439:
432:
428:
425:
424:
422:
419:
418:
411:
407:
403:
400:
399:
397:
394:
393:
387:
383:
378:
375:
374:
373:
372:
366:
362:
358:
355:
354:
352:
348:
344:
341:
340:
339:
338:
336:
333:
330:
326:
315:
311:
307:
304:
298:
291:
287:
284:
281:
277:
273:
269:
266:
265:
263:
259:
256:
255:
248:
245:
244:
242:
239:
238:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
207:Hôtel Lutetia
204:
201:
200:
198:
195:
194:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
155:
152:
151:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
130:
129:
128:
122:
121:
120:
115:
112:
108:
105:
104:
103:
102:
99:
97:
92:
90:
85:
79:
75:
71:
68:
65:
61:
57:
56:
50:
47:
43:
40:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
1587:
1584:
1570:
1568:
1567:
1547:
1543:
1542:
1529:
1528:
1512:
1500:
1493:
1488:
1473:
1465:
1457:
1450:
1449:
1443:
1442:
1434:
1432:
1420:
1408:
1398:
1392:
1380:
1370:
1360:
1349:
1348:
1342:
1331:
1314:
1301:
1289:
1277:
1265:
1242:
1228:
1216:
1202:
1198:
1185:
1178:
1166:
1162:
1151:
1145:
1131:per above. —
1128:
1116:
1093:
1092:
1088:
1075:
1063:
1051:
1039:
1024:
1018:
999:
995:
983:
967:
951:
939:
927:
910:
898:
871:
857:
812:User:Ageo020
807:
791:
779:
767:
756:
748:
740:
734:
721:
713:
705:
684:
658:
648:
641:
636:
630:
623:Grand Slam 7
618:
612:
611:
602:
601:
586:
578:
570:
559:
533:
528:
514:
503:
494:
493:
476:
470:
459:
450:
449:
430:
426:
420:
409:
401:
395:
381:
356:
342:
331:
322:
321:
267:
257:
246:
240:
202:
196:
186:
153:
131:
126:
118:
106:
95:
88:
83:
66:
58:
54:
53:
48:
38:
30:
28:
1413:Blackjack48
1080:Newyorkbrad
1042:Great user
829:Merovingian
816:Williamborg
689:my criteria
986:- fits --
847:Kamalabadi
663:Hello32020
603:Discussion
31:successful
1425:Ombudsman
1363:per nom.
1350:Iced Kola
1335:Tnfiddler
1306:Lankiveil
1233:FCYTravis
1186:hoopydink
1066:per nom.
1044:SOADLuver
770:per nom.
534:Galactica
497:Tnfiddler
231:Help Desk
1605:Category
1474:Contribs
1323:Bakatalk
1025:Krakatoa
1019:Support'
757:Contribs
633:as nom.
587:Contribs
507:contribs
463:contribs
406:WP:BLOCK
335:contribs
290:MV Umoja
146:and the
70:contribs
1571:Neutral
1544:Neutral
1530:Neutral
1458:Ageo020
1451:Neutral
1444:Neutral
1421:support
1409:Support
1393:Support
1385:MrFizyx
1381:Support
1361:Support
1343:Support
1332:Support
1319:Bakaman
1315:Support
1302:Support
1290:Support
1278:Support
1270:Bhadani
1266:Support
1217:Support
1199:Support
1163:Support
1146:Support
1129:Support
1117:Support
1089:Support
1076:Support
1068:Michael
1064:Support
1052:Support
1040:Support
996:Support
984:Support
968:Support
952:Support
940:Support
928:Support
911:Support
899:Support
858:Support
808:Support
792:Support
780:Support
772:John254
768:Support
741:Ageo020
735:Support
716:physicq
685:Support
659:Support
631:Support
619:Support
613:Support
571:Ageo020
386:WP:SNOW
377:WP:SNOW
365:WP:BOLD
351:WP:SNOW
314:WP:CITE
175:CAT:CSD
1575:Jusjih
1435:Oppose
1205:Tewfik
1121:Ixfd64
1056:Jusjih
988:Tawker
972:Calton
693:danntm
486:WP:ANI
482:WP:AIV
453:Imoeng
361:WP:IAR
347:WP:IAR
325:Malber
280:WP:BLP
187:per se
183:WP:ANI
179:WP:AIV
171:CAT:NL
167:CAT:NT
159:WP:RQM
1553:dzast
1549:riana
1513:every
1221:Zaxem
1169:Quarl
1096:IAMTH
1031:Katie
1005:dzast
1001:riana
873:: -->
784:Xoloz
431:every
213:, or
163:WP:CP
78:WP:HD
16:<
1489:Nish
1466:Talk
1371:talk
1137:khoi
1134:Khoi
1101:EEGG
976:Talk
958:. ~
919:Talk
915:Alex
889:<
860:. -
842:Exir
833:Talk
820:Bill
749:Talk
691:.--
676:Talk
672:Mike
637:Nish
579:Talk
548:See
501:talk
484:and
457:talk
329:talk
297:prod
223:Beef
181:and
138:and
84:Nish
64:talk
1517:MCB
1494:kid
1106:MAN
800:rex
642:kid
567:.--
550:MCB
525:)?
382:not
111:MCB
89:kid
60:MCB
49:MCB
1607::
1501:64
1478:)
1470:•
1454:--
1367:/
1256:a
1219:.
1054:--
974:|
921:)
903:╦╩
831:※
822:)
761:)
753:•
728:)
674:|
649:64
591:)
583:•
529:A:
521:v
515:9.
477:A:
471:8.
427:A:
421:7.
402:A:
396:6.
357:A:
343:5.
300:}}
294:{{
268:A:
258:4.
247:A:
241:3.
209:,
203:A:
197:2.
169:,
154:A:
150:.
132:1.
96:64
36:.
1569:#
1557:a
1551:_
1462:(
1365:└
1311:.
1254:g
1252:o
1250:c
1248:r
1246:o
1244:J
1167:—
1009:a
1003:_
917:(
887:t
885:n
883:a
881:i
879:d
877:a
875:R
818:(
798:-
796:T
745:(
724:c
720:(
697:C
575:(
556:.
509:)
504:·
499:(
465:)
460:·
455:(
337:)
332:·
327:(
305:.
233:.
67:·
62:(
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.