Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Magioladitis 2

2479:. Looking at AfDs placed just during this discussion, I see he nominates on the basis of having no citations to prove notability, without making any demonstrated attempt to find them, not realising that the requirement is verifiable, not verified. Just above, in his answer to several editors, he confirms that, saying that for an article to have been tagged for notability and not improved for 13 months is grounds for deletion. That's nonsense, of course, it's grounds for examination and looking for sources, and then, if not found, nominating for deletion. I suppose the candidate will be confirmed. I do not dislike him, and I would never oppose just for being a deletionist, or having a different opinion about fiction. I doubt everyone saying keep above has actually examined his record at AfD. I hope he learns more about deletion policy before he starts closing AfDs, or there will be a good deal of activity at deletion review, and not just about fiction. I now regret having waited so long to comment, but I hoped to not have to oppose. 2307:. The candidate was edit warring with Badagnani and reported him to not ANI but AN3. I watched the whole show at that time of edit warring. There was no 3RR violation, and the user barely used talk pages with him. That is not only an evidence that the candidate lacks of understanding of policies but also I think he would use his admin tool to block somebody in dispute instead of resolving the matter with a discussion. I also have had hard time with the mentioned user and agreed with his insistence wrong. However, the report was gaming a system from bad faith to block the disputed editor. As for Q 6, that is not even an answer. You have to say about the question since you are asked to do so. Admin with specialty is okay, but at least you have to show willingness to answer the question as searching for the image policies.-- 741:. O am quite confident that my point of view, won't affect my judgment. The opposite may happen. I tend to respect consensus. To answer your question: Right now I am don't feel confident in closing an AfD in Fiction. I won't do it in the short future. I don't want people to complain. Do you want me to promise that I won't close any AfD in the rest of my life even if there is a consensus for snowball keep, nomination withdrawn or something like this? I can't do that. -- 595:

generally discourages admins from taking this course of action, due to the belief it only inflames the situation. However, there is still the small chance that the subject will indeed take the oppurtunity to review his/her actions, and may change his/her way of acting to something more appropriate. Assuming that Knowledge (XXG) had no clear policy on this, would you use such a block? Or wait until the IP/User simply becomes too irksome to ignore?

1867:, I see no reason not to. The issue brought up by Caspian Blue is perhaps borderline but not totally out of line, and most of us have found ourselves in similar situations from time to time. I also see nothing wrong with the answer to Q6, and in fact am quite glad to see an admin candidate who's not afraid to answer "I don't know" when that's the truth. 85:. However, looking through his contribs I did not have the best gut feeling, so I did something I don't do; change my mind. I figure I'll give him a few months and check up on his contribs later to see how he's improved. I can guarantee, I've went from thinking he's pretty qualified for adminship to saying that he's very qualified. 1789:. When I joined Knowledge (XXG), Magioladitis was one of the first editors whose example inspired me to get involved, learn policy, and contribute. This is a great editor, and I support wholeheartedly, but suggest that he address some of the issues brought up by Caspian Blue below, including the answer to Q6. 77:) - For my fiftieth nomination for adminship.. yes, 50.. I decided to do something different. Back in May, I stumbled upon a user by the name of Magioladitis, a very productive editor, one who does the little things well and handles what needs to be handled in the more tedious areaas of Knowledge (XXG), such as 2330:) in these discussions as well, which means I do not trust his neutrality. If the candidate vowed to never close discussions on television characters or episodes, just as you won't see me do, I might feel otherwise, but as of right now I am concerned with the obious bias concerning these particular topics. -- 3113:

I have concerns about his reliance on tools that are bringing people to his talk page because of issues with the tools and/or his execution with the tools. Tools also make it difficult to see how he would respond... and unfortunately, the answers to some of the questions were a little weak. In this

2586:

Sasha, your argument might have more merit if you did something other than link to the same essay 5 or 6 times---and on all but one occasion to the same section. Links showing what you allege carry more weight---instead, you gave one link that is almost a year old and another one that, IMHO, doesn't

594:

As an administrator, you will most probably come across rash users/IPs, who will not take kindly to reversions by yourself, for whatever the reason. Indeed, you may already have been in such situations before. I want to know what exactly your personal stance is on the cool down block. Knowledge (XXG)

2771:

per concern over AfD. I've supported editors who are highly deletionist in the past but I see no evidence that Magio's deletionism is well-thought or that it will be reasonably laid aside when judging community consensus. This person is simply not someone I would trust with the delete button at this

662:

I proposed deletion and since there was a consensus for keeping, I started improving the article. Moreover, I really take in account your comments and Pixelface's as well. I spent some time yesterday rereading the instructions about AfDs and I promise not to participate in heavily closing AfDs about

637:

You have frequently expressed a strong opinion on the deletion of articles on fiction. It often disagrees with my view , but I don't hold that against anyone at an AfD, any more than my view was held against me. But I refrain from closing afds in that subject. Not that I couldn't judge fairly, but i

273:

I think I got your point. A page tagged with for speedy deletion and a hangon tag may still be deleted if it fulfills the criteria for speedy deletion and I would delete it. What I tried to say in my answer is that I would be more careful when a hangon tags is there and if an article just seems poor

101:

up to date. I know there were CSD concerns back in his first run for adminship, but a look through his deleted contribs shows proper use of both CSD and PROD, with no issues I can see. He does contribute to fiction which gave me pause at first (the issues there we all know), but he contributes there

198:

I have been in some conflicts in these 2 years. I always behave calmly trying to explain the rules and my point of view. Recently a user kept reverting an edit based on the new Manual of Style for dates. This caused me stress because the user ignored my messages to its page, which provided links to

2693:

Thanks, I'll take a look at these this evening. Links to the differences have more meaning than links to the policy/guideline. Most of us are familiar with the policy/guideline or know how to find it. Links to the policy simply show that it exists, Having links that support the concern validate

2649:

There were a few AFDs the candidate nominated in the past two weeks that he had to withdraw because he did not even do a simple google search to look for references. I have issues with users that rush into nominating AFDs without at least doing a moment of research to make sure the article doesn't

379:

after some minutes). The same I did with the Treaty of Lisbon. Since a vandal is under surveillance, its actions are limited. Administrators response time in WP:AIV is good in general. I can help in improving this more by participating there but it's always better to leave a third person to handle

88:

First off, he's a janitor. Dealing with articles of questionable notability, tagging ridiculous redirects for speedy deletion, this is all work that is tedious, and not very fun, but it needs to be done. The fact that he is willing to do it as a non-admin shows how well he would be as an admin. He

598:

From my experience until now, I have realized that a message to the talk page really helps. The editor needs some time to read it and slows down a bit. Blocking someone only to coll down, IMO, it's not a good idea. The result would be a person doing Wikistalking to your contributions, vandalising

460:

I want to support, I really do. Wizardman's nom is very compelling and I have a lot of respect for his opinion when it comes to RfA's. That being said, I have some trouble you talk page. Namely, the talk page is not one that I would expect from an admin candidate. There are a number of people

332:

An IP vandalises a page. You revert the vandalism and give the IP a final warning on its talk page. After that the IP vandalises your userpage. Summarising, the IP was sufficiently warned and vandalised (your userpage) after a final warning. Would you block the IP yourself or rather report it to

3158:

enough to see that you _were_ trying to apply the policy correctly. But you should not forget people may need more explanation/description to understand what you, or rather your bot, is doing. We've had problems with minimal explanations from bot owners before. Hesitation in stopping a bot or

3093:

Of course, according to policy, a page tagged with for speedy deletion and a hangon tag may still be deleted. When I tried to say is that I would be more careful when a hangon tags was there. I would not only rely on the reason given but I would like to contact the person who added the tag. Some

435:

and I also proposed an improvement to the R3 criterion. I think that redirects having quotes, apostrophes, brackets or parentheses around the name should not exist (unless, of course, the original title has them). Acceptable typos of course are these caused because of common spelling errors (for

2365:

I didn't vote. I just categorized the Afd. Moreover, 20 of the links are not AfDs. Also notice that the vast majority of the articles finally kept are not for fictional characters but for real persons. I sent for AfD many article tagged as failing notability since June 2007 as part of a cleanup

2938:

Regretfully I can't support based on answers to questions. Firstly the answer to Q1 is not very satisfying. Secondly the answer to Q3 does not really provide evidence of being able to solve conflicts. Furthermore the answers to Q4 and Q6 indicate that the user does not have sufficient policy

305:

I would check if the editor had a satisfying number of edits, of the editor really needs to revert because his contributions involve a lot of page patrolling and vandalism counterediting, and if they were ok, any involvements to edit warring. If all above were ok, I would grand him the

2543:"s, as well. Even some of the longer votes are still weightless, as it's just policies written as a sentence to make it look like a 'real' opinion. "Delete. It is unencyclopedic, unreferenced (thus maybe inaccurate). Knowledge (XXG) is not a directory." --Translation: "Delete. 461:

coming to your page with warnings or requests to stop---these are often related to your use of various bots. That being said, how can you satisfy my concern that the numerous warnings that you received as recently as a few months ago are a thing of the past?---

553:(I corrected the word in Q7. I make many mistakes when typing). Ban is a restriction to an editor's rights, a set of extra rules the editor has to follow. Block is a technical method to prevent an editor editing in Knowledge (XXG). For example there was a 2444:, 7 which kept, were nominated together and kept wit no consensus since there was no list of characters article to host them. The rest are articles I nominated because they were tagged for notability for 13 months and have nothing to do with fiction. -- 161:

I am willing to keep deleting redirects caused by typos (for example redirects with quotes just because new editors are not familiar with creating new articles), closing some XfDs, especially TfDs (I have done a few non-admin closures). I can also block

1932:, where we've cooperated to maintain the template (or did, until it was fully protected). I think we have a slightly different views on which templates can be included in articleissues, but otherwise I've found him a fair editor, willing to cooperate.-- 3159:

explaining it further is what is stopping me now. I could be enthused with your interactions in June regarding the talk-page-of-redirect-blank-except-for-project-template issue. You got people's attention and a good resolution at MFD. Problem-: -->

343:

If the vandalism was on an article I have contributed I would report the vandalism to WP:AIV. It's always better not to take the whole responsibility for blocking a user alone. In any other case I would block the IP after the final warning given.

1730:

Good, honest, and concise answers to questions... and per Balloonman's question, candidate openly admits when they screw up without trying to over-context it. I trust this candidate and believe they will use the tools responsibly.

2436:

This counting you did is completely unfair. If you check 11 out of 70 (~16%) articles which are marked as Kept are active now. 8 (11,43%) that were recreated, at most cases were recreated with completely different subject (example

105:

If you're still not convinced, remember that as I said earlier, I held off on this until I knew he was ready, and as a result I can really give you my word that he will be a fine admin who isn't going to go do something stupid.

2327: 693:

I don't know if it is my English or you understood wrong. "Heavily closing" = doing many. I won't close AfDs until I am sure I can do it right. I am sorry if the problem is my English, which is not my mother's tongue. --

3178:

for now. Seems like an excellent contributor for the most part, and I suspect giving Magioladitis the tools will be a net benefit. Despite all this, the answer to question 4 is very concerning. Guest9999 said it all.

441: 3195:

Past interactions brushing with 3RR and questionable bot activities, iffy communication skills, and some worrying concerns over strength of deletionism per DGG. I revisit RfAs often, and may change my stance here.

489:. I cooperated with the team and corrected them immediately. I can ensure you that I am getting better in this area every day. I am reporting bugs (because is not always by bot's mistake) and make suggestions in 1844:

I have had only one interaction with Magio, but that was positive. He showed me that it was incorrect to use a specific category on articles in a kind and helpful fashion. Articlebuilding is weak, though.

663:

fiction. In general, I will be very careful in anything I do until I get used with the tools and gain more experience. I think you are going to be supriced in how good I am in respecting the consensus. --

257:. How about Article contents: "Joe Smith is a leading junior high school athlete at X school, and is certain to have a famous career in high school" -- and a hangon tag without any further explanation? 1057:

changing to weak support in light of the oppose by Pixelface. Those AfDs are concerning and I expect the candidate to read up on the relevant policies and guidelines before making a single AfD closure.

554: 1237: 199:

MOSNUM, used multiple IPs and kept reverting. After reverting 2 times I searched for other ways to solve the problem (report user, request article protection) and things wend fine. You can check

179: 416:: What, for you, constitutes an acceptable redirect from a typo and an unacceptable redirect from a typo? I know you mentioned quotes in Q1 but I'm looking for something more general. Thanks. 3058:

I'd like to support as I think the user is generally a good candidate who would not abuse the tools. Unfortunately the answer to question 4 leaves me with some concerns over their knowledge of

729:

that in this case a different article should not exist. I have the opinion that not all characters of a tv series are notable. Jericho TV series is a great example of my point of view. Check

182:. I also enjoyed creating articles for many Greek politicians and political parties. I improved articles for minor Greek parties adding images. There is much janitorial work I enjoy as well. 322:

I haven't worked a lot with photographs and images. Until now I cared more on adding Fair Rationale templates to some images. I am not planning to deal with photographs in the short future.

2326:) of fictional characters and television episodes, which means I do not trust the candidate's judgment regarding the worthiness of these articles, and he seems to only "vote" one way (see 1409:

by tagging articles and assessing them. He has improved Knowledge (XXG) articles in a number of ways, always with attention to detail. He is hard-working and rightly deserves to be admin.

2555:" The whole mindset for even nominating articles for deletion is also completely out of whack, as DGG demonstrates. It's just way too much of a risk for you to have the tools right now. 2401:

in deletion nominations, but Knowledge (XXG) does not currently have a notability guideline for fiction. Only 18% of the articles this user nominates for deletion end up being deleted.

1122:

Has been around since July 2006 and has over 20000 mainspace edits and over 33000 overall further as per track see no concerns of misuse of tools and concerns of earlier RFA overcome .

2797:— Answers to questions seem very short, immediately makes me wary. But I have absolutely no reason not to support, I just want to see some other answers to 'optional' questions first. 3224: 860: 148:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge (XXG) as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1065:, which shows a mistake that is easy to make (made it myself some times) but while I still support, I strongly advise you to re-read the policies and guidelines regarding deletion. 2304: 239: 2679:. There is the chance he will not do this, but the erratic copy and paste cookie cutter voting and nominating on many fictional subject articles for deletion tell me otherwise. 2350: 1520:

I particularly and very strongly support the nominee's position that it is always better to let another admin handle issues in which one is involved (see answer to question 7):

2587:

show a clear and obvious problem. Even if the one did, one instance is not enough to convince me there is a problem. Now if you could substantiate some of your claims...---

658:

for example. I proposed deletion, the result was keep indicating merge and I discussed it in the talk page. After the discussion I removed the merge tag. Check that for the

677:

I interpret "not heavily closing" meaning that you do not intend to close many, not that you promise to avoid closing evenly balanced ones in favor of your own viewpoint.

773: 725:

I have the opinion that most spin-offs (episodes, plot devices, etc.) to main article of TV series are non notable, independently from the tv series itself. I agree with

2500:, giving as one reason for deletion "orphan" -- a matter easily enugh solved by putting in a link. Other reasons there may be for deletion, but that is not one of them. 2569: 2392: 730: 242:

where I propose a merge, an anonymous IP asks 2 day to fix it, I reply that there is no rush, after a week I take the same message and I still don't touch the article.

192:

Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

768: 655: 2441: 2358: 814: 2977:

Would make a fine admin one day, but the answer to question 4 makes me slightly uneasy. Definitely not worthy of an oppose, but I'm not ready to support.

2354: 2346: 3242: 2362: 2342: 1806:

The oppose raised (#1) below gives me a bit of concern, but I believe it would be a net positive to Knowledge (XXG) if this editor were given to mop. --

78: 801: 709:

You have a general opinion very frequently expressed that most fiction articles are not notable. Do you intend to close any AfDs on this subject?

2853:

Don't patronise me, please. I have reviewed his contributions, they're good. I simply want to view some answers to more questions first. Thanks. —

1573: 1438: 90: 2214:

Sensible enough to stay out of the wiki fiction drama despite his strong views on fiction, which is admirable. No other possible red flags. –

599:

your page for a long period, etc. The block would be a solution only in the case that the editor starts disrupting edits in many articles. --

2572:, nominated by the candidate on the 18th, asserts that the user is still far too inexperienced to be given the authority to delete articles. 844: 432: 2890: 2842: 1370: 1088:

Solid Wikipedian and a workhorse to boot. CSD concerns from last RFA have been addressed. There is nothing to oppose and a lot to support.

966: 838: 808: 733:

for exactly how I see things. Separate articles for main characters and redirects and lists for the rest. I helped in the improvement of

33: 17: 3185: 2826: 876: 794: 734: 583: 74: 1974:- good contributions, not overly eager to become an adminstrator, as intermittence length would indicate. Support as last time (#7). 2738: 485:'s warnings because they were unfair and he got blocked after that). Recently my bot did some bad edits in working with articles in 2668:

It is likely that this RFA will still pass, despite the candidate asserting that he will have poor judgment on the closure of AFDs.

3128:

00:06, 19 October 2008 (UTC)EDIT: Leaning Oppose per some of the opposes above... won't change without first confirming myself.---

2912: 2864: 2813: 1206: 1127: 358: 238:

The hangon stays there for days and the user didn't reply my messages in its talk page. I 've been patient in many cases. Check

1939: 1456:-- you can call me "Miss Ross" -- and I'm here to be worshipped by my millions of fans...oh, wrong queue. But while I'm here: 1233: 856: 2226: 1406: 486: 440:

or alternative spelling. By working in the red link recovery project I have created hundreds of redirects. You can also check

2901:

Not a problem, I just didn't really need a link to find the user's contributions, nor do I need the reminder. Kind regards, —

939: 659: 519: 2023:

Giving this candidate the mop would free up admins to help in other areas. I see no obvious reason for concern. Good luck!

1752:

quite a bit over the last couple of years, and no worries about mop abuse. Janitors can definitely make good use of mops.--

347:

What if the user vandalised pages you hadn't edited on but then vandalised your user page? Would you still report to AIV? —

2160: 1024: 2724:

per all the above re: AfD closure, in particular DGG's comment about the answer to Q12. Give it another 3 months, maybe.

2916: 2868: 2817: 2033: 1210: 362: 490: 1568: 1540: 1433: 1123: 2387:, I could not trust this user to close any AFDs whatsoever. As of October 16, 2008, this user was still referring to 980:: We need more hard working admins like this who know how to -and want to- use the mop where few of us ever venture. 654:

I always try to work with consensus and I always respect consensus. I am trying hard to cooperate with people. Check

82: 2239: 2127: 1889: 738: 2398:

has not been a guideline since July. As of October 19, 2008, this user was saying "Fails notability for fiction"

626: 2405: 1236:), per answers to the first three questions, and some great positive contributions to the project. Nice work on 1157: 2885: 2837: 2651: 2399: 1639: 1365: 985: 961: 200: 2143: 1335: 2657:

There were a few other votes that had (somewhat) valid rationales, but then threw in irrelevant padding like

2523:

I do not trust this user to close AFDs in a competent manner. Constant, very brief deletion votes that carry

1489: 1093: 444:

where I participate in the creation of this essay and I hope that one day becomes policy in Knowledge (XXG).

3209: 3187: 3170: 3142: 3103: 3088: 3071: 3046: 2994: 2968: 2954: 2920: 2896: 2872: 2848: 2821: 2781: 2762: 2745: 2708: 2688: 2601: 2581: 2564: 2511: 2490: 2429: 2375: 2334: 2314: 2288: 2279: 2255: 2241: 2218: 2206: 2186: 2170: 2146: 2131: 2114: 2102: 2082: 2065: 2038: 2015: 1994: 1980: 1966: 1949: 1914: 1891: 1873: 1859: 1836: 1815: 1798: 1781: 1764: 1740: 1722: 1708: 1676: 1647: 1631: 1614: 1596: 1592: 1579: 1553: 1531: 1512: 1493: 1473: 1447: 1418: 1397: 1377: 1349: 1344: 1326: 1312: 1295: 1268: 1251: 1214: 1187: 1168: 1151: 1131: 1114: 1097: 1078: 1053: 1028: 1010: 989: 972: 945: 911: 720: 688: 672: 649: 608: 566: 547: 502: 475: 425: 389: 366: 283: 268: 138: 116: 102:

properly and takes no extreme positions, which is great for being both an editor and an admin in that area.

638:

do not want people saying i might have not judged fairly. What is your view about that as applies to you?

3183: 3099: 2964: 2606:

Here's a sample from September 1st - October 1X of votes by the user that I consider completely unhelpful.

2497:

additional current AfD, to show that the problem in judging deletion is still present: the nomination for

2449: 2371: 2308: 1926: 1811: 1563: 1428: 788: 746: 699: 668: 604: 577: 562: 498: 385: 279: 134: 98: 68: 2684: 2577: 2560: 2552: 2548: 2532: 2524: 2140: 953:

Has been contributing forever, works like a slave, all around great contribs in multiple areas. Erik the

2732: 2271: 2234: 2123: 1882: 1794: 1759: 1627: 1485: 1089: 1004: 3223:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either

2528: 1339: 872: 2653: 2011: 1769:

Everything about this candidate screams "trustworthy and competent". Punish him with the tools I say!

1178:

Quite a large amount of experience, fills a needed admin job, and overall I trust the nom and them. --

3203: 3137: 3123: 2908: 2860: 2809: 2703: 2596: 1852: 1469: 1202: 470: 354: 2680: 2573: 2556: 2544: 2540: 2395: 2388: 726: 3067: 2878: 2830: 2425: 2263:: Adminship is a natural progression for hardworking and solid contributors like the candidate. -- 2111: 1936: 1551: 1528: 1510: 1461: 1360: 1264: 1227: 981: 954: 920: 3059: 2676: 2413: 1899:. Good contributions and answers. Magioladitis has a broadened his experience since the last RfA. 316:

Under what circumstances may a non-free photograph of a living person be used on Knowledge (XXG)?

3042: 3019: 2990: 2331: 2091: 1868: 1830: 1777: 1736: 1704: 1395: 929: 543: 513: 2230: 557:

which resulted in User:TTN ban. The editor wasn't blocked until he ignored his restrictions. --

1823:

Solid editor, can always use those that do the non-glamorous 'janitorial' aspects of the 'job'

1605: 1303:, has shown a remarkable dedication to wikipedia. Would certainly make a constructive admin. -- 1036:

I trust a janitor candidate to handle a mop - he wouldn't be a full janitor without a mop (and

3180: 3095: 2960: 2777: 2758: 2445: 2367: 2165: 2078: 1988: 1807: 1020: 852: 784: 742: 695: 664: 600: 573: 558: 494: 421: 407: 381: 275: 130: 64: 2417: 2195: 1140: 3166: 2946: 2727: 2264: 2029: 1975: 1960: 1790: 1753: 1656: 1623: 1183: 1037: 1000: 493:

very often. Yes, I believe you won't see requests to stop in the future in my talk page. --

94: 2409: 1749: 481:

I am improving by bot all the time. Of course there always some bad moments (please ignore

334: 3197: 3130: 3116: 3083: 2903: 2855: 2804: 2696: 2671:

I'm just looking for a responsible administrator, not one that's possibly on a mission to

2589: 2250: 1669: 1465: 1308: 1283: 1197: 1110: 1072: 1047: 463: 449: 349: 2366:

process. In many cases, after references were given I have withdrawn my nominations. --

3155: 3151: 3063: 2421: 2402: 2323: 2285: 2139:. Experienced contributor that also participated substantially in admin-related areas. 2047: 1933: 1718: 1612: 1543: 1525: 1503: 1414: 1260: 1247: 1223: 902: 482: 437: 107: 1957:

per 30,000 edits. There's nothing wrong with janitorial work; someone's got to do it.

1943: 3236: 3030: 3007: 2978: 2507: 2486: 2474: 2215: 2007: 1911: 1824: 1773: 1732: 1692: 1386: 1161: 1144: 716: 684: 645: 620: 531: 509: 337:? Respectively, would you consider blocking the IP yourself a conflict of interests? 264: 2773: 2754: 2180: 2155: 2074: 1653: 1481: 1016: 417: 403: 372: 1691:

Would make a great admin, and is willing to do the tasks no-one else wants to do.

2877:

I'm sorry if you felt patronized. I didn't intend to insult you at all. Erik the

1561:

over 30,000 edits and no blocks. I'm happy to support, esp as per answers to Qs.

225:

Is there any circumstance in which you would delete a page despite a Hangon tag?

3162: 2940: 2200: 2024: 1588: 1318: 1179: 215: 1663: 1453: 1304: 1278: 1106: 1067: 1042: 54: 3217:

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.

3114:

case, it's not enough to make me oppose, but I can't support at this time.---

2003: 1484:. From now on any possible comment in an RfA would seem dull by comparison. 1410: 1242: 207:

for the case with the editor who kept ignoring the Treaty of Lisbon article.

1015:

Not too dramatic. Answers to questions meet my criteria on maximum words.

2502: 2481: 2469: 2073:

Does good work in the X part of XfD (as in, things other than articles).

1900: 1040:;-) I trust the nominator and the contributions I reviewed confirmed it. 711: 679: 640: 616: 442:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Redirects from foreign languages

299:

What would your personal standards be on granting and removing rollback?

259: 203:

for how I handled a case about a controversy of an active politician and

2650:

just need cleanup, which AFD is certainly not the place to ask for that.

245:

The article is an attack page or insulting for a person, alive or dead.

2440:), 13 are now redirects, 1 is about to be merged and then redirected ( 3227:

or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

2361:

in the examples you demonstrate where i didn't vote for deletion. In

3079:- Seems like a good contributor, I'm a little wary over Q4 though. 875:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review 555:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2

2408:

are simply embarassing. If this user can't take the time to read

1460:

for a savvy and dedicated editor for whom we don't need to ask "

57: 2959:

I added some more information in Q3 hoping that this helps. --

2463:

subject to possible change depending on the answer to Q12 above

1604:

High number of edits, good decision maker, happy to support :D

375:. I even left my talk page for some minutes without reverting ( 1881:. Looks like a good editor and is honest. What's not to like? 172:

What are your best contributions to Knowledge (XXG), and why?

2467:

all the more so because of the evasive answer to Q 12 above.

1105:

as per your first RfA, I have no reason to alter my opinion.

274:

I would give the opportunity to its editor to improve it. --

123:

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

1238:

List of aviation accidents and incidents during the Iraq War

180:

List of aviation accidents and incidents during the Iraq War

2753:

per statements in response to DGG and questions 12, above.

2002:

as for the same reasons I already nominated him once :-) --

178:

I really enjoyed adding references to every single case in

3062:

in an area where I think it is likely that they may work.

3029:- I'm willing to ignore the slightly wobbly answer to Q4. 2939:

knowledge. All in all it's not enough to support. Sorry. —

29:

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a

155:

What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

2672: 2662: 2658: 2645: 2643: 2641: 2639: 2637: 2635: 2633: 2631: 2629: 2627: 2625: 2623: 2621: 2619: 2617: 2615: 2613: 2611: 2609: 2536: 2498: 2438: 1062: 832: 826: 820: 376: 204: 1317:

The nominations haven't gotten any more flattering.

240:

Talk:List of Heroes characters with special abilities

2570:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Lansing Family

1480:

This has taken the standards of RfA comments to the

731:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Johnston Green

1502:

SOlid work. Glad your work payed off, aren't ya'? —

3006:I might support pending an answer to my question. 2442:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Ginyuu Meika 530:What is the difference between a block and a ban? 231:In the most case... No. There are some exceptions: 2322:due to spotty success rate with nominations (see 656:Talk:List of minor EastEnders characters (1988) 919:- Solid long time contributor. Hard working. 79:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Red Link Recovery 8: 3094:people are not making do use of the tag. -- 997:. User with a good reputation. Good luck, 2416:, how does anyone expect this user to read 3150:I finally unraveled the July threads with 2249:- trustworthy and much needed in XfDs. -- 2305:WP:AN3#Badagnani reported by Magioladitis 2046:Absolutely. Excellent work all around. 871:Please keep discussion constructive and 433:Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion 766: 660:List of games supporting force feedback 129:I accept the nomination. Thank you. -- 91:Members of the Greek Parliament, 2007- 18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship 2827:Let his contribs speak for themselves 1922:I've interacted with Magioladitis at 1539:seems like a great candidate; per my 774:Requests for adminship/Magioladitis 2 93:, among other similar lists, and the 7: 1524:admin should take that position. — 3161:resolution - that's the right way. 769:Requests for adminship/Magioladitis 765: 1462:do you know where you're going to? 1407:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Greece 1160:. Happy Editing and Good Luck! :P 877:Special:Contributions/Magioladitis 735:Robert Hawkins (Jericho character) 487:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Comics 24: 3243:Successful requests for adminship 2975:Neutral, leaning towards support: 1684:Neutral, leaning towards support 1405:. Many contributions, helps the 431:I participated for some time in 2477:) 21:10, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 2303:per Q3, Q6, Q9, especially per 1195:— No concerns. Best of luck! — 859:. For the edit count, see the 83:Knowledge (XXG):Dead-end pages 53:Final: (65/8/7); ended 19:16, 1: 2673:destroy all perceived 'cruft' 3210:11:31, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 3188:17:53, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 3171:06:47, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 3143:01:47, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 3104:22:50, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 3089:22:43, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 3072:22:27, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 3047:13:49, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 3023:11:13, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 2995:11:07, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 2969:21:05, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 2955:21:00, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 2921:21:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 2897:20:55, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 2873:20:27, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 2849:20:08, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 2822:21:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 2782:01:43, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 2763:19:20, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 2746:10:47, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 2709:14:20, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 2689:13:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 2602:07:16, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 2582:04:36, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 2565:18:15, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 2512:03:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 2491:16:14, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 2430:09:56, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 2376:21:49, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 2335:21:17, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 2315:15:23, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 2289:15:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 2280:15:09, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 2256:00:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 2242:13:19, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 2219:10:55, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 2207:08:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 2187:01:50, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 2171:04:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 2147:22:32, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 2132:20:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 2115:18:53, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 2103:18:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 2083:17:15, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 2066:15:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 2039:12:38, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 2016:12:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 1995:05:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 1981:14:16, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 1967:12:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 1950:09:18, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 1915:09:15, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 1892:06:25, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 1874:05:47, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 1860:23:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1837:23:44, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1816:23:23, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1799:22:49, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1782:20:47, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1765:20:18, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1741:17:23, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1723:17:15, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1709:13:51, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1677:13:45, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1648:13:31, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1632:13:09, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1615:13:04, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1597:09:09, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1580:09:04, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1554:03:37, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1532:02:11, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1513:01:51, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1494:01:41, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1474:00:19, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 1448:23:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1419:23:19, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1398:23:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1378:22:57, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1350:22:38, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1327:22:28, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1313:22:17, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1296:22:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1269:22:03, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1252:21:56, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1215:21:51, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1188:21:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1169:21:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1152:21:11, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1132:21:00, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1115:20:52, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1098:20:42, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1079:13:34, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 1054:20:37, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1029:20:34, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1011:20:21, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 990:20:11, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 973:20:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 946:20:04, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 912:19:57, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 721:21:26, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 689:21:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 673:17:09, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 650:02:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 609:22:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 567:13:13, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 548:11:10, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 503:08:08, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 476:06:59, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 426:00:42, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 390:21:34, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 380:issues you are involved. -- 367:21:22, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 284:22:31, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 269:22:26, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 139:19:48, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 117:19:16, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 97:. He's also helped keep the 855:'s edit summary usage with 144:Questions for the candidate 3259: 2659:"the article is an orphan" 739:List of Jericho characters 377:another editor reverted it 371:Check what happened with 3220:Please do not modify it. 2694:that it is a concern.--- 2391:in deletion nominations 1587:, see no reason not to. 782:Links for Magioladitis: 705:let me try again, then: 214:Optional questions from 201:Talk:Evangelos Venizelos 2154:Excellent contributor. 2090:per good work at AfD. 1748:. Seen Magioladitis at 615:Optional question from 572:Optional question from 508:Optional question from 448:Optional question from 402:Optional question from 99:Article issues template 38:Please do not modify it 1124:Pharaoh of the Wizards 2110:per all of the above 89:has creating most of 34:request for adminship 2539:. Way too many "per 1338:. no reason not to. 1143:, and net positive. 2663:"This is listcraft" 1038:a certain crazyness 764:RfAs for this user: 737:and the cleanup of 2122:good contributor. 1857: 879:before commenting. 39: 3045: 3022: 2993: 2895: 2847: 2800:Switch to support 2404:Nominations like 2254: 2196:Why the hell not? 2037: 2012:que dius que què? 1913: 1872: 1846: 1721: 1707: 1675: 1259:I see no issues. 1058: 971: 941: 936: 546: 37: 3250: 3222: 3206: 3200: 3133: 3119: 3087: 3041: 3018: 2989: 2893: 2888: 2884: 2881: 2845: 2840: 2836: 2833: 2751:Regretful Oppose 2744: 2741: 2735: 2730: 2699: 2675:on an imaginary 2592: 2533:fails notability 2253: 2237: 2227:Why the hell not 2203: 2183: 2168: 2163: 2158: 2124:Tohd8BohaithuGh1 2099: 2094: 2063: 2060: 2057: 2054: 2027: 1993: 1978: 1965: 1963: 1962:User:Ameliorate! 1931: 1925: 1910: 1909: 1905: 1887: 1885:DiverseMentality 1871: 1855: 1853:editorofthewikis 1850: 1833: 1827: 1762: 1756: 1717: 1703: 1674: 1672: 1661: 1645: 1642: 1610: 1576: 1571: 1566: 1549: 1546: 1508: 1441: 1436: 1431: 1393: 1373: 1368: 1363: 1347: 1342: 1323: 1292: 1289: 1286: 1281: 1166: 1149: 1141:why the hell not 1075: 1070: 1063:this CSD tagging 1056: 1050: 1045: 1009: 969: 964: 960: 957: 940: 934: 930: 924: 909: 848: 807: 760:General comments 542: 466: 114: 95:Treaty of Lisbon 3258: 3257: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3225:this nomination 3218: 3204: 3198: 3131: 3117: 3080: 2891: 2886: 2879: 2843: 2838: 2831: 2790: 2739: 2733: 2728: 2725: 2697: 2590: 2537:"speedy delete" 2297: 2235: 2231:its no big deal 2201: 2181: 2166: 2161: 2156: 2095: 2092: 2061: 2058: 2055: 2052: 1985: 1976: 1961: 1958: 1929: 1923: 1907: 1901: 1883: 1851: 1848: 1831: 1825: 1774:X MarX the Spot 1760: 1754: 1670: 1662: 1660:. Best wishes. 1643: 1640: 1606: 1574: 1569: 1564: 1547: 1544: 1504: 1439: 1434: 1429: 1387: 1371: 1366: 1361: 1345: 1340: 1334:per nom. meets 1319: 1290: 1287: 1284: 1279: 1162: 1145: 1073: 1068: 1048: 1043: 998: 967: 962: 955: 944: 935: 932: 922: 903: 895: 886: 800: 783: 779: 762: 464: 146: 108: 50: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3256: 3254: 3246: 3245: 3235: 3234: 3230: 3229: 3213: 3212: 3190: 3173: 3145: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3074: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3037: 3034: 3014: 3011: 2985: 2982: 2971: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2789: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2765: 2748: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2669: 2666: 2655: 2647: 2607: 2529:It's listcraft 2527:, exampes of " 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2328:these examples 2317: 2296: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2284:Will be fine. 2282: 2275: 2268: 2258: 2244: 2221: 2209: 2189: 2173: 2149: 2134: 2117: 2112:Charles Edward 2105: 2085: 2068: 2048:Andrew Lenahan 2041: 2018: 2000:Strong Support 1997: 1983: 1969: 1952: 1917: 1894: 1876: 1862: 1839: 1818: 1801: 1784: 1767: 1743: 1725: 1711: 1699: 1696: 1679: 1650: 1634: 1617: 1599: 1582: 1556: 1534: 1515: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1450: 1443: 1421: 1403:Strong Support 1400: 1380: 1352: 1329: 1315: 1298: 1271: 1254: 1240:, by the way. 1217: 1190: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1134: 1117: 1100: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1031: 1013: 992: 982:Hiberniantears 975: 951:Strong Support 948: 931: 927: 914: 894: 891: 890: 889: 885: 882: 868: 867: 866: 864: 857:mathbot's tool 849: 778: 777: 776: 771: 763: 761: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 703: 652: 612: 611: 596: 551: 550: 538: 535: 483:User:Badagnani 479: 478: 438:Nicole Kidmann 429: 428: 411: 399: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 326: 325: 324: 323: 310: 309: 308: 307: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 287: 286: 247: 246: 243: 235: 234: 233: 232: 220: 218: 211: 210: 209: 208: 186: 185: 184: 183: 166: 165: 164: 163: 145: 142: 128: 126: 125: 49: 44: 43: 42: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3255: 3244: 3241: 3240: 3238: 3228: 3226: 3221: 3215: 3214: 3211: 3208: 3207: 3201: 3194: 3191: 3189: 3186: 3184: 3182: 3177: 3174: 3172: 3168: 3164: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3146: 3144: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3135: 3134: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3121: 3120: 3112: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3086: 3085: 3078: 3075: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3054: 3048: 3044: 3039: 3038: 3035: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3021: 3016: 3015: 3012: 3009: 3005: 3001: 3000: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2992: 2987: 2986: 2983: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2970: 2966: 2962: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2953: 2950: 2949: 2945: 2942: 2937: 2934: 2933: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2905: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2894: 2889: 2882: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2857: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2846: 2841: 2834: 2828: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2807: 2806: 2801: 2798: 2796: 2792: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2770: 2766: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2749: 2747: 2742: 2736: 2731: 2723: 2720: 2710: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2701: 2700: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2667: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2654: 2652: 2648: 2646: 2644: 2642: 2640: 2638: 2636: 2634: 2632: 2630: 2628: 2626: 2624: 2622: 2620: 2618: 2616: 2614: 2612: 2610: 2608: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2594: 2593: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2519: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2504: 2499: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2483: 2478: 2476: 2472: 2471: 2464: 2461: 2458: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2400: 2397: 2393: 2390: 2386: 2383: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2318: 2316: 2313: 2311: 2306: 2302: 2299: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2287: 2283: 2281: 2277: 2276: 2273: 2270: 2269: 2266: 2262: 2259: 2257: 2252: 2248: 2245: 2243: 2240: 2238: 2232: 2228: 2225: 2222: 2220: 2217: 2213: 2210: 2208: 2205: 2204: 2197: 2193: 2190: 2188: 2185: 2184: 2178:Per the Wiz. 2177: 2174: 2172: 2169: 2164: 2159: 2153: 2150: 2148: 2145: 2142: 2138: 2135: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2118: 2116: 2113: 2109: 2106: 2104: 2100: 2098: 2089: 2086: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2069: 2067: 2064: 2049: 2045: 2042: 2040: 2035: 2031: 2026: 2022: 2019: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1998: 1996: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1984: 1982: 1979: 1973: 1970: 1968: 1964: 1956: 1953: 1951: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945:the Orphanage 1941: 1938: 1935: 1928: 1927:articleissues 1921: 1918: 1916: 1912: 1906: 1904: 1898: 1895: 1893: 1890: 1888: 1886: 1880: 1877: 1875: 1870: 1869:Seraphimblade 1866: 1863: 1861: 1856: 1854: 1843: 1840: 1838: 1834: 1828: 1822: 1819: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1802: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1785: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1772: 1768: 1766: 1763: 1757: 1751: 1747: 1744: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1729: 1726: 1724: 1720: 1715: 1712: 1710: 1706: 1701: 1700: 1697: 1694: 1690: 1689: 1685: 1682:Changed from 1680: 1678: 1673: 1667: 1666: 1659: 1658: 1655: 1651: 1649: 1646: 1638: 1635: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1618: 1616: 1613: 1611: 1609: 1603: 1600: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1583: 1581: 1578: 1577: 1572: 1567: 1560: 1557: 1555: 1552: 1550: 1542: 1538: 1535: 1533: 1530: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1516: 1514: 1511: 1509: 1507: 1501: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1449: 1446: 1444: 1442: 1437: 1432: 1427: 1425: 1422: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1401: 1399: 1396: 1394: 1392: 1391: 1384: 1381: 1379: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1369: 1364: 1356: 1353: 1351: 1348: 1343: 1337: 1333: 1330: 1328: 1324: 1322: 1316: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1299: 1297: 1294: 1293: 1282: 1275: 1272: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1255: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1244: 1239: 1235: 1232: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1218: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1199: 1194: 1191: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1174: 1170: 1167: 1165: 1159: 1156:Also, passes 1155: 1154: 1153: 1150: 1148: 1142: 1138: 1135: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1101: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1084: 1080: 1077: 1076: 1071: 1064: 1060: 1059: 1055: 1052: 1051: 1046: 1039: 1035: 1032: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1012: 1008: 1006: 1002: 996: 993: 991: 987: 983: 979: 976: 974: 970: 965: 958: 952: 949: 947: 942: 937: 926: 925: 918: 915: 913: 910: 908: 907: 900: 897: 896: 892: 888: 887: 883: 881: 880: 878: 874: 865: 862: 858: 854: 850: 846: 843: 840: 837: 834: 831: 828: 825: 822: 819: 816: 813: 810: 806: 803: 799: 796: 793: 790: 786: 781: 780: 775: 772: 770: 767: 759: 748: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 724: 723: 722: 718: 714: 713: 708: 704: 701: 697: 692: 691: 690: 686: 682: 681: 676: 675: 674: 670: 666: 661: 657: 653: 651: 647: 643: 642: 636: 633: 632: 631: 630: 628: 625: 622: 618: 610: 606: 602: 597: 593: 590: 589: 588: 587: 585: 582: 579: 575: 569: 568: 564: 560: 556: 549: 545: 540: 539: 536: 533: 529: 526: 525: 524: 523: 521: 518: 515: 511: 505: 504: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 477: 474: 473: 472: 468: 467: 459: 456: 455: 454: 453: 451: 445: 443: 439: 434: 427: 423: 419: 415: 412: 409: 405: 401: 400: 391: 387: 383: 378: 374: 373:User: Max Mux 370: 369: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 351: 346: 345: 342: 339: 338: 336: 331: 328: 327: 321: 318: 317: 315: 312: 311: 304: 301: 300: 298: 295: 294: 285: 281: 277: 272: 271: 270: 266: 262: 261: 256: 253: 252: 251: 250: 249: 248: 244: 241: 237: 236: 230: 227: 226: 224: 221: 219: 217: 213: 212: 206: 202: 197: 194: 193: 191: 188: 187: 181: 177: 174: 173: 171: 168: 167: 160: 157: 156: 154: 151: 150: 149: 143: 141: 140: 136: 132: 124: 121: 120: 119: 118: 115: 113: 112: 103: 100: 96: 92: 86: 84: 80: 76: 73: 70: 66: 62: 61: 59: 56: 48: 45: 41: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 3219: 3216: 3202: 3192: 3181:Juliancolton 3175: 3147: 3138: 3136: 3129: 3124: 3122: 3115: 3110: 3096:Magioladitis 3081: 3076: 3055: 3031: 3026: 3008: 3003: 3002: 2999: 2979: 2974: 2973: 2961:Magioladitis 2951: 2947: 2943: 2935: 2902: 2854: 2803: 2799: 2794: 2793: 2768: 2750: 2721: 2704: 2702: 2695: 2677:battleground 2597: 2595: 2588: 2553:WP:VAGUEWAVE 2549:WP:VAGUEWAVE 2520: 2501: 2480: 2468: 2466: 2462: 2459: 2446:Magioladitis 2384: 2368:Magioladitis 2319: 2309: 2300: 2272: 2265: 2260: 2246: 2223: 2211: 2199: 2191: 2179: 2175: 2151: 2136: 2119: 2107: 2096: 2087: 2070: 2051: 2043: 2020: 1999: 1987: 1986: 1971: 1954: 1944: 1942: 1919: 1902: 1896: 1884: 1878: 1864: 1847: 1841: 1820: 1808:Strikerforce 1803: 1786: 1770: 1745: 1727: 1713: 1693: 1687: 1683: 1681: 1664: 1652: 1636: 1619: 1607: 1601: 1584: 1562: 1558: 1541:RfA criteria 1536: 1521: 1517: 1505: 1482:stratosphere 1457: 1445: 1426: 1423: 1402: 1389: 1388: 1382: 1362:bibliomaniac 1359: 1358: 1354: 1336:my standards 1331: 1320: 1300: 1277: 1273: 1256: 1241: 1230: 1219: 1196: 1192: 1175: 1163: 1146: 1136: 1119: 1102: 1085: 1066: 1041: 1034:Weak Support 1033: 999: 994: 977: 950: 921: 916: 905: 904: 898: 870: 869: 853:Magioladitis 841: 835: 829: 823: 817: 811: 804: 797: 791: 785:Magioladitis 743:Magioladitis 710: 706: 696:Magioladitis 678: 665:Magioladitis 639: 634: 623: 614: 613: 601:Magioladitis 591: 580: 574:Blooded Edge 571: 570: 559:Magioladitis 552: 532: 527: 516: 507: 506: 495:Magioladitis 480: 471: 469: 462: 457: 447: 446: 430: 413: 382:Magioladitis 348: 340: 329: 319: 313: 302: 296: 276:Magioladitis 258: 254: 228: 222: 195: 189: 175: 169: 158: 152: 147: 131:Magioladitis 127: 122: 110: 109: 104: 87: 71: 65:Magioladitis 63: 52: 51: 47:Magioladitis 46: 30: 28: 3025:Changed to 2829:. Erik the 2722:Soft oppose 2525:zero weight 1849:one of many 1791:SunDragon34 1755:Fabrictramp 1716:- Why not? 1624:AdjustShift 1452:Hello, I'm 1222:Per nom by 1158:my criteria 1001:Malinaccier 3160:talk-: --> 3132:Balloonman 3118:Balloonman 2948:discussion 2904:Cyclonenim 2856:Cyclonenim 2805:Cyclonenim 2698:Balloonman 2591:Balloonman 2545:WP:UNENCYC 2541:WP:FICTION 2396:WP:FICTION 2389:WP:FICTION 2251:Biruitorul 2236:intraining 1761:talk to me 1644:HyBRiD II 1641:II MusLiM 1466:Ecoleetage 1454:Diana Ross 1198:Cyclonenim 884:Discussion 727:WP:FICTION 465:Balloonman 450:Balloonman 350:Cyclonenim 255:Followup Q 55:24 October 31:successful 3156:MarnetteD 3152:Badagnani 3064:Guest9999 2681:SashaNein 2574:SashaNein 2557:SashaNein 2422:Pixelface 2414:WP:BEFORE 2286:Acalamari 1934:Aervanath 1526:Athaenara 1506:Ceranthor 1346:cierekim 1276:- yep. 1261:America69 1224:Wizardman 1061:Also per 906:Wizardman 861:talk page 827:block log 306:rollback. 111:Wizardman 3237:Category 2913:contribs 2865:contribs 2814:contribs 2740:contribs 2729:Treasury 2363:this one 2332:A Nobody 2274:Cherian 2216:sgeureka 2034:contribs 1826:SkierRMH 1733:Townlake 1688:Support: 1657:positive 1575:Chequers 1518:Support. 1435:Mountain 1234:contribs 1220:Support. 1207:contribs 1164:RockManQ 1147:RockManQ 1025:contribs 923:Wisdom89 901:as nom. 795:contribs 627:contribs 584:contribs 520:contribs 510:Dendodge 436:rxample 359:contribs 162:vandals. 75:contribs 3193:Neutral 3176:Neutral 3148:Neutral 3111:Neutral 3077:Neutral 3056:Neutral 3027:Support 2936:Neutral 2795:Neutral 2788:Neutral 2774:JoshuaZ 2755:Bearian 2418:WP:DGFA 2310:Caspian 2261:Support 2247:Support 2224:Support 2212:Support 2192:Support 2182:MBisanz 2176:Support 2152:Support 2137:Support 2120:Support 2108:Support 2088:Support 2075:Protonk 2071:Support 2044:Support 2021:Support 2008:my talk 1989:Everyme 1972:Support 1955:Support 1920:Support 1897:Support 1879:Support 1865:Support 1842:Support 1821:Support 1804:Support 1787:Support 1771:Support 1746:Support 1728:Support 1714:Support 1637:Supoort 1622:- Yep! 1620:Support 1602:Support 1585:Support 1559:Support 1537:Support 1458:Support 1424:Support 1390:Realist 1383:Support 1355:Support 1332:Support 1301:Support 1274:Support 1257:Support 1193:Support 1176:Support 1137:Support 1120:Support 1103:Support 1086:Support 1017:Tombomp 995:Support 978:Support 917:Support 899:Support 893:Support 802:deleted 418:Protonk 404:Protonk 3163:Shenme 3060:policy 2941:αἰτίας 2772:time. 2769:oppose 2521:Oppose 2460:Oppose 2410:WP:ATD 2394:, but 2385:Oppose 2341:Check 2320:Oppose 2301:Oppose 2295:Oppose 2202:Flewis 2097:DrNick 2025:SWik78 1977:Caulde 1750:WP:DEP 1589:Stifle 1430:Little 1321:Garden 1180:Banime 335:WP:AIV 216:Aitias 3205:Cobra 3199:Glass 3084:neuro 3036:dodge 3013:dodge 3004:Note: 2984:dodge 2917:email 2869:email 2818:email 2010:) - ( 1937:lives 1698:dodge 1671:Chat 1665:Pedro 1570:Spiel 1522:every 1486:Dr.K. 1305:Soman 1280:jj137 1211:email 1107:RMHED 1090:Dr.K. 873:civil 809:count 537:dodge 363:email 60:(UTC) 16:< 3167:talk 3154:and 3100:talk 3068:talk 3043:Talk 3020:Talk 2991:Talk 2965:talk 2909:talk 2861:talk 2810:talk 2778:talk 2759:talk 2685:talk 2661:and 2578:talk 2561:talk 2531:", " 2508:talk 2487:talk 2475:talk 2450:talk 2426:talk 2420:? -- 2406:this 2372:talk 2324:here 2312:blue 2267:Tinu 2167:Mate 2128:talk 2079:talk 2030:talk 1832:talk 1812:talk 1795:talk 1778:talk 1737:talk 1719:macy 1705:Talk 1628:talk 1608:cf38 1593:talk 1565:Ϣere 1548:Loxy 1545:Foxy 1490:talk 1470:talk 1415:talk 1411:nips 1341:Dloh 1309:talk 1288:talk 1265:talk 1248:talk 1243:Cirt 1228:talk 1203:talk 1184:talk 1128:talk 1111:talk 1094:talk 1021:talk 1005:talk 986:talk 851:See 839:rfar 821:logs 789:talk 747:talk 717:talk 700:talk 685:talk 669:talk 646:talk 621:talk 605:talk 578:talk 563:talk 544:Talk 514:talk 499:talk 422:talk 408:talk 386:talk 355:talk 280:talk 265:talk 205:here 135:talk 81:and 69:talk 58:2008 3033:Den 3010:Den 2981:Den 2880:Red 2832:Red 2734:Tag 2535:", 2503:DGG 2482:DGG 2470:DGG 2412:or 2233:.-- 2059:bli 2006:- ( 2004:Xtv 1903:Axl 1695:Den 1686:to 1654:Net 1074:Why 1049:Why 956:Red 845:spi 815:AfD 712:DGG 680:DGG 641:DGG 635:12. 617:DGG 592:11. 534:Den 491:AWB 260:DGG 3239:: 3169:) 3102:) 3082:— 3070:) 2967:) 2919:) 2915:· 2911:· 2892:~~ 2887:~~ 2883:2 2871:) 2867:· 2863:· 2844:~~ 2839:~~ 2835:2 2820:) 2816:· 2812:· 2780:) 2761:) 2743:─╢ 2726:╟─ 2687:) 2580:) 2563:) 2551:, 2547:, 2510:) 2489:) 2465:, 2428:) 2374:) 2357:, 2353:, 2349:, 2345:, 2278:- 2229:, 2198:-- 2194:- 2162:ni 2141:VG 2130:) 2101:! 2093:Hi 2081:) 2062:nd 2056:ar 2053:St 2050:- 2032:• 2014:) 1959:~ 1940:in 1930:}} 1924:{{ 1858:~ 1835:) 1814:) 1797:) 1780:) 1758:| 1739:) 1668:: 1630:) 1595:) 1529:✉ 1492:) 1472:) 1464:" 1417:) 1385:— 1357:. 1325:. 1311:) 1267:) 1250:) 1213:) 1209:· 1205:· 1186:) 1139:; 1130:) 1113:) 1096:) 1069:So 1044:So 1027:) 988:) 968:~~ 963:~~ 959:2 938:/ 833:lu 719:) 687:) 671:) 648:) 607:) 565:) 528:10 501:) 424:) 388:) 365:) 361:· 357:· 341:A. 330:7. 320:A. 314:6. 303:A. 297:5. 282:) 267:) 229:A. 223:4. 196:A: 190:3. 176:A: 170:2. 159:A: 153:1. 137:) 36:. 3179:– 3165:( 3098:( 3066:( 3040:| 3017:| 2988:| 2963:( 2952:• 2944:• 2907:( 2859:( 2808:( 2802:— 2776:( 2767:' 2757:( 2737:► 2683:( 2665:. 2576:( 2559:( 2506:( 2485:( 2473:( 2452:) 2448:( 2424:( 2370:( 2359:5 2355:4 2351:3 2347:2 2343:1 2157:A 2144:☎ 2126:( 2077:( 2036:) 2028:( 1908:¤ 1845:~ 1829:( 1810:( 1793:( 1776:( 1735:( 1702:| 1626:( 1591:( 1488:( 1468:( 1440:5 1413:( 1372:5 1367:1 1307:( 1291:) 1285:( 1263:( 1246:( 1231:· 1226:( 1201:( 1182:( 1126:( 1109:( 1092:( 1023:/ 1019:( 1007:) 1003:( 984:( 943:) 933:T 928:( 863:. 847:) 842:· 836:· 830:· 824:· 818:· 812:· 805:· 798:· 792:· 787:( 749:) 745:( 715:( 707:Q 702:) 698:( 683:( 667:( 644:( 629:) 624:· 619:( 603:( 586:) 581:· 576:( 561:( 541:| 522:) 517:· 512:( 497:( 458:9 452:: 420:( 414:8 410:) 406:( 384:( 353:( 278:( 263:( 133:( 72:· 67:( 40:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Requests for adminship/Magioladitis 2 - Knowledge (XXG)

Index