75:) - This is a self-nom, and I think that I am ready to handle administratorship. I have had this account since this summer, and have made roughly over 1000 edits. On my userpage, I've made mention that I used to edit at Encyclopædia Dramatica, but I don't want to scare anybody. I'm not going to abuse power, and I plan on helping in AFD, and vandalism, as well as helping block and unblock users.
173:) jokingly blanked my userpage, and I gave him the vandal warning, and my little brother used to constantly vandalize Knowledge under his "Bulish" accounts, but I've gotten him to stop, so no, I've never really gotten into altercations with any other users. If someone finds an incident in my contributions, just post it in comments, and I'll gladly respond.
409:
You've made a start on admin-related tasks, vandal fighting, warning and contributing to XfD and other policy areas but your contributions are too few in number at the present time to give a good idea of how you would use the tools effectively. Take some more time to contribute in the above fashion
238:
Note to anyone who's going to close this; this user has been blocked by myself as an account whose sole purpose was to disrupt
Knowledge. This was his first edit ever, and his last edit was to add {{subst:WoW}} to the top of an article. His other contribs were to list the sockpuppet categories for
200:
Like I mentioned earlier, I edit at
Uncyclopedia, and used to edit at ED, but don't let that scare you into opposing. I'd never abuse my abilities as an admin, and I would take it very seriously. And if I don't make it now, I'll work on my shortcomings, and I'll be back to try again! So, happy
576:. The candidate needs more practice doing the kind of activities admins do. If he wants to handle deletions and undeletions, why hasn't he been much on AFD? If he wants to protect and unprotect pages, why hasn't he been much on RFPP? Experience is critical, and it can only come with time.
319:
give it more time, and I'll support probably. Your edit count, while not particularly low, shows you aren't as active as I'd like a new admin to me. You'd like to close AfDs? You haven't had nearly enough experience in that area. I suggest you withdraw, and get an
128:
I'd like to help new users, help block and unblock vandals, and delete and/or recreate deleted pages. I'd also be glad to help settle fights between
Wikipedians, and assist in any other administrative chores I'd be dealt
275:
I think this user won't misuse sysop tools based on his edit history, and will help the admin backlog get smaller. I wish we had an RFA were we judged a user by the content of the edits they make, not how many they
149:
article, as I have rewritten it several times, and added a ton of information to it, although I did fail to get it to featured status, I feel that I did a nice job. I think my
99:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:
663:
194:
163:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
681:
119:
296:
Nat1 - opposing based on pure edit count is over-the-top. Opposing based on the experience demonstrated by edit count, however, is legitimate.
344:
Also, I don't think anyone has been promoted with less than 1500 edits for over a year, and I don't think you'll be the exception. Sorry. --
549:
72:
30:
17:
530:
1000 edits and 57% edit summary is questionable. Answers to questions were confusing and unimpressive. No choice but to oppose.
111:
437:
544:
286:
190:
107:
139:
Of your articles or contributions to
Knowledge, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
411:
115:
539:
633:
589:
562:. You are a good editor (keep it up!) but you need a little more experience, especially in admin areas.
477:
662:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
639:
617:
592:
580:
568:
554:
522:
498:
484:
461:
449:
414:
401:
385:
373:
359:
339:
302:
291:
265:
233:
79:
630:
577:
564:
298:
230:
66:
506:
You seem to be a great user, but your edit count is a bit low and you don't have much experience.--
423:
382:
243:
531:
431:
150:
394:
353:
333:
256:
636:
610:
472:
410:
and to the article space as well before reapplying or being nominated in six months or so.
625:, needs more experience in admin activities. Needs some xFD participation and take a look
606:
282:
186:
76:
62:
469:
sorry, just too inexperienced, keep editing and try getting involved more with WP edits.
369:- Sorry, very little experience in administrative-type activities. Suggest withdrawal. —
422:
You are inexperience in many areas. Come back in 6 months or so. Good luck in editing.--
493:
458:
170:
675:
516:
626:
443:
346:
326:
321:
250:
601:
370:
277:
656:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
508:
169:
I haven't really been into any conflicts with other users. My friend (
666:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
153:
article was pretty good, considering that I had little to work with.
588:- this looks premature. I'll be willing to be persuaded next time.
106:
What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out
146:
600:
Sorry, but you're severely lacking in the experience department.
86:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
393:, please spend some more time before expecting admin tools.
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
629:. You will know how admins work. Suggest withdrawal.
229:, been here long enough to understand policies.
145:I am very pleased with my contributions to the
207:Please keep criticism constructive and polite.
58:(2/16/0); Ended 06:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
8:
492:, not experienced enough yet in wikispace.--
7:
682:Unsuccessful requests for adminship
457:1000 edits isn't going to cut it.
381:- Not enough edits in WP space. --
24:
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
112:Category:Administrative backlog
193:. For the edit count, see the
1:
640:04:04, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
618:03:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
593:03:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
581:03:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
569:03:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
555:02:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
523:02:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
499:02:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
485:01:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
462:01:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
450:04:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
415:23:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
402:22:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
386:22:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
374:22:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
360:22:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
340:22:12, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
303:03:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
292:02:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
266:01:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
234:00:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
80:20:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
120:administrators' reading list
627:administrator's noticeboard
189:'s edit summary usage with
95:Questions for the candidate
698:
114:, and read the page about
108:Category:Knowledge backlog
598:Oppose, suggest withdrawl
659:Please do not modify it.
40:Please do not modify it.
31:request for adminship
91:I accept, myself.
290:
689:
661:
616:
613:
590:Metamagician3000
552:
547:
542:
537:
534:
519:
511:
496:
480:
475:
446:
440:
434:
427:
399:
356:
349:
336:
329:
280:
262:
259:
253:
248:
242:
180:General comments
42:
697:
696:
692:
691:
690:
688:
687:
686:
672:
671:
670:
664:this nomination
657:
611:
604:
550:
545:
540:
535:
532:
517:
515:
509:
494:
478:
473:
444:
438:
432:
425:
395:
358:
354:
347:
338:
334:
327:
260:
257:
251:
246:
240:
52:
38:
35:did not succeed
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
695:
693:
685:
684:
674:
673:
669:
668:
652:
651:
643:
642:
620:
595:
583:
571:
557:
525:
513:
501:
487:
464:
452:
417:
412:(aeropagitica)
404:
388:
383:After Midnight
376:
364:
363:
362:
352:
332:
308:
307:
306:
305:
270:
269:
268:
218:
217:
204:
203:
202:
198:
191:mathbot's tool
182:
181:
177:
176:
175:
174:
171:User:Brianydan
157:
156:
155:
154:
133:
132:
131:
130:
116:administrators
97:
96:
89:
88:
51:
46:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
694:
683:
680:
679:
677:
667:
665:
660:
654:
653:
650:
649:
648:
647:
641:
638:
635:
632:
628:
624:
621:
619:
614:
608:
603:
599:
596:
594:
591:
587:
584:
582:
579:
575:
572:
570:
567:
566:
561:
558:
556:
553:
548:
543:
538:
529:
526:
524:
521:
520:
512:
505:
502:
500:
497:
491:
488:
486:
483:
482:
481:
476:
468:
465:
463:
460:
456:
453:
451:
447:
445:editor review
441:
435:
429:
428:
421:
418:
416:
413:
408:
405:
403:
400:
398:
392:
389:
387:
384:
380:
377:
375:
372:
368:
365:
361:
357:
351:
350:
343:
342:
341:
337:
331:
330:
323:
322:editor review
318:
315:
314:
313:
312:
304:
301:
300:
295:
294:
293:
288:
284:
279:
274:
271:
267:
263:
254:
245:
237:
236:
235:
232:
228:
225:
224:
223:
222:
216:
215:
214:
213:
209:
208:
199:
196:
192:
188:
184:
183:
179:
178:
172:
168:
165:
164:
162:
159:
158:
152:
148:
144:
141:
140:
138:
135:
134:
127:
124:
123:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
102:
101:
100:
94:
93:
92:
87:
84:
83:
82:
81:
78:
74:
71:
68:
64:
60:
59:
56:
50:
47:
43:
41:
36:
32:
27:
26:
19:
658:
655:
645:
644:
622:
597:
585:
573:
563:
559:
527:
507:
503:
489:
471:
470:
466:
454:
424:
419:
406:
396:
390:
378:
366:
345:
325:
316:
310:
309:
297:
272:
226:
220:
219:
211:
210:
206:
205:
166:
160:
142:
136:
125:
103:
98:
90:
85:
69:
61:
57:
54:
53:
48:
39:
34:
28:
324:instead. --
151:Star Warp'd
578:YechielMan
565:Yuser31415
299:Yuser31415
244:sockpuppet
231:Jim Pooele
212:Discussion
187:MasterA113
77:MasterA113
63:MasterA113
49:MasterA113
495:Wizardman
459:Dionyseus
283:Talk Page
249:for TFD.—
195:talk page
676:Category
439:contribs
426:PrestonH
355:(o rly?)
335:(o rly?)
287:Contribs
239:CFD and
201:votings!
118:and the
73:contribs
646:Neutral
631:Terence
551:veritas
533:Captain
348:Majorly
328:Majorly
276:make.--
273:Support
252:Ryūlóng
227:Support
221:Support
623:Oppose
586:Oppose
574:Oppose
560:Oppose
528:Oppose
504:Oppose
490:Oppose
467:Oppose
455:Oppose
420:Oppose
407:Oppose
391:Oppose
379:Oppose
367:Oppose
317:Oppose
311:Oppose
602:EVula
536:panda
518:talk?
474:Darth
397:Shyam
371:Dgies
278:Natl1
147:Metra
129:with.
55:Final
33:that
16:<
637:恭喜发财
607:talk
546:vino
479:griz
433:talk
185:See
110:and
67:talk
634:Ong
609://
605://
510:TBC
285:) (
678::
615://
541:In
448:|
442:|
436:|
430:|
264:)
247:}}
241:{{
167:A:
161:3.
143:A:
137:2.
126:A:
122:.
104:1.
37:.
612:☯
514:Φ
289:)
281:(
261:龍
258:竜
255:(
197:.
70:·
65:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.