2996:
just flippantly dismiss those of us with high userspace edits as MySpacers... my edits at least in part are because I work on articles in userspace before I take them live, and because I collaborate a lot with other editors, as you can see if you walk the tree on the link you and I both gave (I remind you that I gave my own "glass house" link before you did)). I'm in general interested in how "I do not get a feeling you don't really fully understand the nature of
Knowledge (XXG) yet." is an "attack", because I'm not making the connection. To be explicit, focusing on counts, ratios and the like is missing the point. What is needed is to examine the contributions themselves, not the numbers. I did that examination and satisfied myself about MoP, but Tony's remarks suggested (without further elaboration about examination he carried out, which he may well have done) that perhaps he only looked at ratios and didn't drill deeper. Your mileage may vary about this editor's suitability for adminship. (After all, you and I differed about YOUR suitability, as I recall) But I would ask you to be a bit more civil and to think a bit more about what is said before you jump to conclusions. And most especially, drop the MySpace aspersion stuff please, because it just doesn't hold water with me. I was on the net before you were born, I suspect. And I'm a little tired of some people focusing so much on ratios and counts and time onwiki and so little on how and what the editor has done, and what they are likely to do in future.
3516:. Several users have cited troubling evidence, and I would have opposed the nomination on this basis alone. Some of Master of Puppets' comments here are even more troubling. He compared page-blankers with pedophiles (despite realizing that "it isn't really a good analogy"), and that certainly isn't indicative of the level of tact that I expect from an admin. Several users criticised him for arguing with so many opponents, and he responded to these new opponents by arguing that this was untrue! His answers to some of the questions are unimpressive, and I'm stunned by his belief that 64% support for his RfA (as of the time of his comment) constitutes "a close call." This (along with other comments) leads me to believe that his grasp of Knowledge (XXG) policy is insufficient. —
2124:
that would've been better. However, it seemed like standard run-of-the-mill talk page blanking. Even after being asked to explain why, the user only stated it was "old news". I'm not blaming the user at all, however; I had not realised that blanking your talk page had become legal as of then. And the comment was not taunting, but just alerting the welcomer to the user's past, which had not been 100% resolved yet. Then, it all started up again when
Drmagic blanked this comment. I acknowledge that I did not handle this exactly the way it should have been handled. However, I believe I've resolved my problems with this user.
772:. He seems competent and trustworthy, and he seems to have very good interpersonal skills. I generally prefer more mainspace edits by admins-to-be; however, I think his number of user talkspace edits indicates that he typically takes the time to contact users before making major changes to articles, and it further shows that he is involved in the community and avoids unilateral action whenever possible. His involvement in Knowledge (XXG) projects indicate that he would be an excellent candidate to deal with AfD closings and to mediate in disputes. I really hate Metallica, but unlike the album, this
3293:. Master of Puppets is a good user, appears to be polite, and is active reverting vandalism. However, I do not believe he is yet ready to be an administrator. Among and in addition to the above comments, several matters strike me. I prefer editors who talk first and block later; an administrator should familiarize himself with the details of the situation, and if necessary, should err on the side of discussion. The only experience I can recall with this editor occurred when I objected to an administrator about a user he had blocked unfairly, in my opinion. MoP saw this and left
3344:
further damages your credibility as a candidate for administrator, in my opinion. The next time you run for the position of administrator, consider responding to criticism with a polite note on the user's talk page or in a comment below, not connect to anyone's vote. Perhaps keep an eye on RFA for awhile to see how others handle this. Unfortunately, there has been no improvement in your signature for me; the amount of area in which one can click to access your talk page is quite small, and having the nonstandard is confusing at best. —
71:) – I'm nominating Master of Puppets for adminship. This excellent user has amassed over 3766 edits acccording to Interiot's Javascript tool. He is an active user, and looking through his contributions shows excellent user interaction and is always willing to help. MoP would certainly benefit from the mop, as he has been known to help with RC Patrol using Lupin's popups. His edits are wide and varied, and he is an active participant in RfA and AfD. All in all, he is an excellent user and a great addition to the admins.
2713:.I am not so concerned by what proportion of your user talk edits are warnings, rather the ratio of reverts to warnings. If you don't think the last 50 contributions are representative then please clarify and I will be happy to reconsider. Incidentally, could you please also clarify why you chose to perform the last revert listed using a popup (with a standard popup edit summary) and not provide further explanation to the user when it doesn't look like clear vandalism ? Thanks
821:
1438:
626:-- Strongest possible support. MOP does a great job at stopping vandals. That's why he'd be a good admin. I disagree with the "less than 1000 article space" edits oppositions: MoP has enough to show that he's understands that namespace, and he'll be even more effective vandal fighting: having 2 million constructive article edits has no bearing on whether you can deal with vandals effectively or not. I urge MoP not to withdraw.
3751:
815:
1455:. After reading the objections and the candidate's responses thereto, I see no harassment or incivility; quite the opposite, he seems genuinely ready to address those concerns leveled. I also find the comparison to in-vote-out-and-done-with-it elections to be oddly strong-smelling oranges. I'm reasonably sure MoP won't abuse the mop (to reuse the bad pun ), and that's pretty much my threshold.
826:
4217:
think; I've already started addressing the edit count problem, and the other main incident (the
Drmagic conflict), though a bit messy, has passed, resolved, and figured out (I also provided some other examples of conflicts which DID go over well). If I get a large sense that people wish me to withdraw, I shall, but for now I'd like to see what comes out of this whole experience.
3433:
831:
207:
1444:
1479:, Master of Puppets will make an excellent administrator. After checking his contributions, I noticed he has been reverting a lot of vandalism, which is one of the main jobs as an admin. He is also a very helpful Wikipedian and has helped me with all of my questions on Knowledge (XXG). And yes, I thought he was already admin as well! --
1809:, "I'm going to have to write a standard page about good article editors and admins not necessarily being the same thing (they can be, but don't have to be). Helping out with blocking (WP:AIV), actually deleting the pages/closing most AfDs etc does need admin tools. Vandal whacking is a lot easier and more complete with admin tools."
865:. The low number of article and talk edits gives cause for concern but he is working on that and is willing to grow from his mistakes. I have no reason to believe that Master of Puppets would not be trustful with admin tools. I know him and he is civil, patient and friendly and those are excellent qualities in an administrator.--
2571:
incident. However, when the user took off my comment without saying anything, I thought it was starting again. Had
Drmagic just once fought his case instead of constantly blanking his talk page, maybe things would've been different (again, I'm not saying its only his fault, but a combination of things led to the incident).
4056:
I'm most happy about my (general) rounded nature on
Knowledge (XXG); I help out on articles with typos and grammar, patrol for vandalism and try to make others happy as well; I have successfully come to peaceful resolutions about problems with other editors, and am even friends with said editors now.
4039:
I plan to continue contributing to any article I can improve. One thing that I've never really seen as ok was NPOV disputes; as such, I look forward to neutralising such disputes either by de-POVing the article myself, or working with others to achieve the best possible thing. Also, I believe I could
2685:
With regard to the terminology, I'm sorry but it just makes me nervous about a user's approach - just my opinion. With regard to how often you warn after reverting, I haven't done thorough research of your contributions but I looked back over you last 50 during which time I count 13 reverts. Of those
2570:
Firstly, I felt that SwatJester deserved to know about the user's past (I know it isn't really a good analogy, but does the government notify you if there is a pedofile living nearby?). I realise now that it probably wasn't the best course of action, but I was still a bit iffy on the edits before the
2159:
At the time, WP:V had been changed without consensus to say that blanking warnings was not vandalism. It's since been removed back the other way. While
Drmagic was not wrong (because as far as he knew, he was ok to remove them), he was following an incorrect policy. Personally, I was involved with it
3685:. However, I don't think MoP is quite ready for adminship. Regardless of my opinion, it looks as though this RfA will most likely not succeed. I certainly hope MoP will use the criticism received here constructively. With more experience, he could stand a better chance for promotion in the future. --
2652:
Again, I'm not sure how I don't warn vandals, as a good third of my usertalk contributions are warnings. Also, I don't really see how terminology affects what I do; regardless of what you call it, I'm reverting vandalism to pages. It may be a more colorful term, but it doesn't necessarily impact how
4108:
Well, that is a good question. As you've probably noticed by now, I'm a very big fan of music, and more specifically, rock/heavy metal. Master of
Puppets is just one of my very, very favorite albums; one of best ever, in fact. Master of Puppets (album) has a theme running through it featuring being
3274:
RfAs are not straight votes, letting users respond and explain/justify their actions seems reasonable. This is after all, an attempt to determine whether the candidates will make a good admin. As long as the candidate is essentially civil, I see no problem with this sort of behavior, and find it to
2774:
I was reading this RFA and started looking at contribs. I did a rough count of the last 500 edits and ~335 of them were to non-IP user/user talk pages, mostly formatting and userboxes. In the same 500 edits there were ~90 vandalism reverts. He's hanging this on vandalism patrol but seems to be much
2221:
mistake he may have made. I agree his actions were inappropriate; however, he is human. This conflict contradicts all of the encounters I have had with the user, and as such I assume this was one time accident, something unlikely to occur again. I feel SwatJester's remarks also to be valid, that as
1844:
I agree wholeheartedly with you on this issue; however, it has been rising much more quickly during the last few days. Also, as stated before, some article work has been done in userspace and then placed into mainspace. However, I respect your opinion, and will try to raise it a lot in the next few
2791:
per Dragon's flight. First, editor has too little experience in the article-space, which is the heart of the project. Second, editor admits that it was only a few weeks ago he discovered that all his edits were being marked minor. Third, the troubling evidence of Dragon's flight suggests editor
2123:
Well, the first thing that I noticed was
Drmagic blanking his talk page of some warnings. I saw this from a page that popped up on my watchlist with him discussing this issue with another user. However, when I reverted his talk page, he started blanking. Had he provided an edit summary or comment,
1988:
I'm glad that you're now using edit summaries on 100% of your edits, but you have not done so in the past. Your explanation regarding minor edits seems rather unrelated to this in my opinion. Anyway, I'm sticking to my oppose vote. Please don't take this as an insult to your contributions, I think
4081:
I have been in some conflicts with users, but I have not yet been stressed, and plan not to be. Mankind was given intelligent speech for a reason, to sort out conflicts through peace, not war. Mainly, I look at the problem from the other party's side and try to see if I am at fault; I also try to
3528:
Worries from above users, combined with this user's hideous signature (yes, I know he changed it; it's still hideous) lead me to oppose. If you need to express yourself with custom cursors and other features that take up three or more lines in an editing window, you're not mature enough to be an
3297:
on my talk page defending the block, for what I consider very dubious reasons. The arguing with oppose votes here is quite concerning, especially that the user has continued this behavior despite several warnings. Finally, a minor point: I consider the user's signature problematic; the very small
2995:
ratios (and yet is clearly a valuable contributor) as a way to point out that I don't think ratios are a good metric, by and of themselves, without an examination of what is behind them. MoP has given an explanation of his skew. You'll have to decide if you think it's valid or not. (or, you could
2642:
Very little use of user talk warnings following reversion of vandalism. Reverting without warning is next to useless - the user isn't told about other outlets for their testing (i.e. the sandbox) and the warning escalation process doesn't take place, so persistent vandals don't get blocked (until
2366:
Jimbo has directly said that he finds political/belief userboxes harmful to the encyclopedia and has expressed a strong desire for users to stop using them on their own rather than having to delete them all by fiat. Continuing to use loads of these userboxes against Jimbo's advice expresses some
4216:
As nominee, I have decided to draw as much constructive criticism as possible out of this experience; secondly, the RfA looks like it will be a close call. Thirdly (?), some people have suggested I withdraw, but some have told me not to, as well. As stated previously, I'd like to see what others
4193:
I, too, am curious, but I think I know why; when I was new, I was a bit too eager with my userspace, and created a lot of subpages; however, this only accounts for about 100 edits. I believe the rest are renovations, vandal reversions, and I can think of an article or two I wrote in my userspace
3343:
I find it inexplicable that you persist in this behavior despite the considerable criticism to it above and despite the considerable damage it is doing to your request. This lack of consideration for the opinion of others and the lack of behavior change in response to criticism is troubling and
2883:
Over concerns raised by Dragon Flight(which while I think was done in good faith, could have been more politely handled), Jaco's concern over minor edits v. major edits, Tigershark's concerns (although I see nothing wrong with term "vandal wacking"), and especially that of Rx
StrangeLove which
3310:
Again, I am not arguing with oppose votes; I am merely stating both sides of the story (this is written a few lines up, I believe). If people want to vote oppose, saying "No, don't" won't help. I'm just trying to present both sides. Also, I've found a solution to the small signature problem.
420:
Darn it, I was going to nominate this user myself :-). Master of
Puppets is truly the nicest Wikipedian around and a pleasure to work with. This user can easily be trusted with admin. tools. While he may not have the highest amount of article edits he has been a great contributor, a large
1790:. With less than a thousand edits in the main article space, I'm concerned about this user's purpose here. There's nothing inherently wrong with favoring community interaction over article development, but it doesn't require admin tools, nor admin-level access to deleted content. Sorry.
2828:. Although I welcome the vandla fighting, admin tasks require a deeper understanding of WP policies, experience in editing articles, and engaging fellow editors on the Knowledge (XXG) namespace. I will support down the line, once user has shown some interest in the community.
2775:
busier working on user pages. If he could reverse that ratio I'd support in a heartbeat because he seems to have a good attitude. I think he needs a little more activity spread around a little more evenly. There are other issues (questioning so many oppose votes for one, and
1541:
Just because because MoP has a high userspace edit count doesn't mean he does not work in improving articles and to go against the people below who say his name is "too colourful, childish..." I believe a cool sig demonstrates his passion towards helping the project.
2096:. To be clear, Drmagic has never been a vandal and was not engaged in any vandalism or other ongoing disputes except that he chose to remove those messages from his own talk page. The blocking admin eventually realized this and unblocked Drmagic with an apology
3025:
I was simply pointing out that you were trying to compare the ratio of userspace/article edits with the ratio of project/article edits, which are two entirely different comparisons. And Tony Sidaway also has about ten times the sheer numbers going for him too.
2476:
I'm not too sure by what you mean when you say "Bullying". I wasn't bullying the good doctor, but instead trying to uphold what I thought at the time was valid policy. The user's lack of comment and edit summary until a good point in was also one of the factors.
4113:
page), while Master of Puppets (song) in specific refers to the idea of drugs being your master. As per my strong opposition to harmful substances, I chose this name in a kind of way to remind myself that no matter how many people say it's cool, I'm not going
2990:
Um, no, I wasn't kidding in what I said. However, I think you may want to re-read what I said more carefully because I don't think you got my point yet. It is also possible I didn't make it very well, so I'll try again. I point out that Tony has skew in
1935:. As Mackensen points out, MoP doesn't have a lot of main article contributions. The work you do is important for Knowledge (XXG) as a community, but I'm not convinced you need admin tools. I would also recommend that you use edit summaries more often.
3298:
size of the talk page link combined with the nonstandard pointer style make communication with this user a bit irksome for me. I think Master of Puppets could make a good administrator in the future, if the opposition points here are addressed. —
2222:
of yet the community generally agrees that removing warnings does go against policy and repeated user talk page blanking should result in a block; thus, MoP's actions, though misguided, were in the spirit of what the community had agreed upon.
1640:- I've had personal contact with this user, and know him to be an examplary Wikipedian and Esperenzian. (Unfortunately, it doesnt look like this RfA is going to pass, but I will ceartinly vote support in any future RfA for Master of Puppets.) -
2288:
per Mackensen and Jacoplane. I would really like to see more involvement in writing the encyclopedia. And this user hasn't done enough anti-vandal work to make me think about supporting him solely on that criterion (unlike, say, CSCWEM).
3476:. MOP has great potential as a vandal fighter, but it's too early. Vandal fighters tend to have alot of edits. So 700 in the main namespace in basically 2 months of full time work on the site is very low. Come back in a couple of months. --
2412:
Jimbo expressed dissatisfaction with userboxes which create differences among groups of Wikipedian. Most of MoP's userboxes are humourous/vanity. What concerns me more is that someone would oppose an RfA on the basis of userboxes. Maybe on
2643:
somebody else provides the warnings). {{test1}} is a far more effective tool than the block button. Also the use of terminology like "vandal whacking" always makes me a bit concerned about a user's philosophy towards RC patrolling.
2462:. Excluding reversions and minor edits, he has relatively little involvement in the article niche of Knowledge (XXG). He seems to be a great vandal fighter, but his role in the bullying of Drmagic is extremely concerning as well.
2160:
too, and it drove me nuts till we sourced down that someone had removed that line from WP:V. MoP was just following the policy as he knew it, the policy as it remains right now. He should not be held negatively responsible over it.
1955:
I do use edit summaries on 100% of my edits; however, until recently I had the "Mark all edits minor" checkbox in My Preferences checked off, so all of my edits were minor. I realised the error of my ways about a week or two ago.
3138:
I might suggest that you reply on their talk pages, as questioning on the RfA can be intended as, and interpretted as, an attempt to influence how the oppose votes are evaluated by others—something that should be done sparingly.
3051:??) When faced with someone that doesn't seem to get what I am saying, my first instinct is to try to explain more carefully. Sorry if that gives offense. I note you didn't address any of my concerns with your comments either.
1989:
you've been doing great work, I just don't think you're ready for adminship. If you work on editing articles in the main namespace some more and become more active in the Knowledge (XXG) namespace I could support a future RfA.
2976:
shouldn't be throwing stones. And there is a significant difference in lots of edits in project space, which implies a familiarity with the project, and lots of edits in userspace, which implies a familiarity with MySpace.
2079:
Please review the discussion in the talk page for Michael Jackson prior to editing; the discussion of the nicknames posted at the top of the article has come to a general concensus that will leave those names present in the
1877:
In that case, I wonder if you might consider withdrawing and returning in a month, when you've focused on the article space. With 1500-2000 good article edits (and those summaries!) I would be hard-pressed indeed to oppose.
1613:. He will be one of the best adminstrators in Knowledge (XXG), because he has proved to be an excellent user. Surely you would not want to have an excellent user to miss out more chances to contribute to Knowledge (XXG)?
3221:
I'm not really trying to intimidate or pressure anyone. If somebody presents a case that only documents one side, shouldn't that allow me to present my argument? I don't believe I should just sit back and do nothing.
3978:
I just wanted to lay out some conflicts that went over well, so that at least I don't go out looking like a rude punk. In that one conflict, I agree I probably should've left it to older, wiser people. However; (see
3097:. Also, I'm biased against disruptively formatted signatures. Also, some concerns about civility. Also, the number of comments on people's oppose votes seems to be bordering on harassment of opposition voters. —
2939:... Your number of edits to Wikipediaspace substantially exceeds your number of edits to articlespace, but I do not get a feeling you don't really fully understand the nature of Knowledge (XXG) yet. (disclaimer:
3774:- I admire this editor's vandal fighting and commitment to other administrative tasks, but would like to see a little more participation in the improvement of articles. As such I cannot go either way. --
1729:. It's 5:29 here. The ending time is nearly an hour away. Anyways, he offered to be my mentor but one had to be an admin. I'm glad he's getting RFA'd right now; he'd be a kind, compassionate admin. --
4032:(to see if anything needs to be closed) and just general vandal patrol to see if there are any prowlers on the loose. If awarded with the appropriate tools, I anticipate a fair amount of activity at
2722:
Whoo, I didn't realise it was that bad... from my first reversions I've been dropping test templates. I'll be sure to restart warning vandals. And sorry for making you dig through my contributions.
2924:. The number of edits in userspace substantially exceeds the number of edits in article space. I get a feeling that the editor hasn't really fully understood the nature of Knowledge (XXG) yet. --
2201:
would have been bad. The fact remains that MoP pushed an ill chosen conflict to a poor resolution, and then came back several days later and still felt compelled to ineffectively press the issue
3039:
That's not how it came across to me at all. How it came across to me was that you were trying to suggest I was attacking Tony (dropping "LMAO" in there didn't help) and that you hadn't actually
3258:
feel as though you are pressuring me, because you and others who read this might count this oppose vote against me in future, and it seems that you do not accept my right to oppose. Changed to
1890:
I'd like to see how further response goes, and will continue to develop my article contributions number; if I feel like I should withdraw, I will do so quickly so as not to waste more time.
2548:
Perhaps bullying is the wrong word, but regardless of whether it is was policy (or whether he believed it was policy), the way the issue was pushed and escalated was a shame. The worst was
3628:, this user knows how to interact with people going by his large number of user talk edits, but low number of main namespace edits and the Drmagic incident deter me just this little : -->
1529:
as "Joe 1" and thought that vote to have been mine. In any case, Covington, Evan, UKPaolo and Srikeit, inter al., effectively state the as well as I might, and more succinctly at that.
1230:
I recall when I first saw MoP, I was RC patrolling and I had to log out. So I left a note somewhere, pointing out a suspicious username. Completely true, I wish I could find the diff.
2754:
Thanks. I am going to leave my vote as it is for now, but I'll keep an eye on this nomination and re-evaluate in a couple of days - when there has been more input from others. Cheers
1248:. I suppose I have to, lest I remain unforgiven forever. ... Actually, this editor happens to be a force for good in the wikipedia, and I think I trust him, at least, with the tools.
1047:
I've found MoP to be extremely civil and level-headed, and committed to Knowledge (XXG). I'm sure he would make great use of the admin tools, and get on well with the admin tasks. --
385:
I'm going to have to write a standard page about good article editors and admins not necessarily being the same thing (they can be, but don't have to be). Helping out with blocking (
3743:- More main namespace!! You edit well! Take interest in an article and go nuts in improving it. After some main contribs, come back, and I'm sure you'll get the power tools! --
3613:
4075:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
2792:
cannot yet distinguish vandalism from good-faith confusion. All this indicates that, despite his good intentions, candidate needs much more experience before taking up the mop.
2534:
2185:
651:
4028:
As my current main activity is mostly vandal-whacking, I would probably look for pages listed for speedy deletion (I plan on patrolling the New Pages section extensively),
4003:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge (XXG) in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
3254:
If this were a 'proper' election, it would be profoundly evil for you to examine votes and argue with voters at the ballot box. I don't see how this is any different. I
1832:
This comment, which is a repeat of the comment above, does not address the basis of my opposition. As with Tango, I'd like for Master of Puppets himself to respond.
2305:- the evidence from Dragons flight above is very troubling to me, and suggests a need for this user to demonstrate some more maturity before we give more buttons. (
3161:
Sorry, but your contributions appear very fluffy and insubstantial to me. I want admins to have a deep keel in the issues of article space encyclopedia editing.
1513:: I have seen this user around and they have always behaved professionally. Also, I don't think the number of his edits to the main article space is a problem. --
1738:
I believe the ending time is figured with UTC. We're well past the close but that doesn't matter necessarily... a 'crat will close in due time. There's no rush.
3094:
4250:
3487:
Per Mackensen, Dragon's Flight, Sean Black, Meegs, Tony Sidaway, Michael Snow, Silsor, and Kelly Martin, all of whom cover points I agree with completely.
2077:. I am not satisfied that this user has a good understanding of policy and how to deal with disputes. About a week ago, this user decided that removing "
4019:
4137:
Er Joel, did you look at his answers to questions 2 and 3? He has spent a lot of time dealing with vandalism. So he has given many vandalism warnings.
3445:, the candidate says on this page that they've been creating articles in user space, hence the high number of user space edits. I checked the move log
3363:
due to lack of main and Knowledge (XXG) space edits, particularly Knowledge (XXG) space, without which your policy knowledge is called into question.
4210:
As nominator, I have recommend you withdraw your RfA several times. I'm sure this is on others' minds as well - why have you not withdrawn your RfA?
4233:
3584:
I'm really sorry too oppose, but I feel the number of his edits in the main space is too low. Gain experience, and return in a couple of months. --
68:
3714:- I suspect MoP would do OK with the mop, but there are sufficient concerns raised in opposition that I don't feel I can support at the moment. —
3639:
Changed to oppose, considering the discrepancy between what the candidate says about his user space article creation activity and the move log.
2846:
Question: I was just wondering, as 1/2 of my edits are to the user talk space, how much would be needed to signify interest in the community...
393:
need admin tools. Vandal whacking is a lot easier and more complete with admin tools. To be honest I thought you were one already as well (TM).
1373:
3426:
1623:
Oppose, not enough edits to template talk space using edit summaries that contain the letter 'R' and he has too many commas on his userpage
1025:
a great user who definitely should have admin rights: he would definitely not abuse them at all and would be great for fighting vandals. --
3848:- how can this RfA end on 1st May? There seems to be some error here... Incorrect date in addition to dual ending times? I'm confused. --
3950:
Hey, are you allowed to post additional voting rules? I mean, someone could just as easily just say, "Don't vote unless you support me!"
3212:- owing to the candidate's argumentation with the oppose votes, which could be seen as trying to intimidate or pressure the opponents. -
2197:
Even if a policy stating that blanking warnings was vandalism had been etched on stone by the hand of God, how this situation played out
3294:
2936:
3152:
The comments above and his general conduct suggest to me that Master of Puppets hasn't sufficiently absorbed Knowledge (XXG) values. --
1155:, I have had nothing but good interactions with Master of Puppets, he has proved his maturity and adminability time and time again. --
29:
17:
3392:
due to evidence of poor conflict management, inappropriate signature. Do not feel comfortable extending admin trust to this person.
4062:
3880:
The low contrast between the text and background in your signature (which makes it a little hard to read) may be grounds for opposes.
3795:
2236:
Also, so that there isn't only negative evidence on this page; I have handled a few disputes that ended much more successfully (see
1128:
great user. The main reason he doesn't have many mainspace edits is because he he makes articles in his or other peoples userspace.
3920:
I put the vote back not knowing of the user's history. The closing bureaucrat can decide if he/she keeps or disregards the vote.
3696:
3106:
I'm replying to oppose voters to see what people think. Believe me, harrassment is the worst thing I could do in this situation.
2525:
2176:
2024:
642:
558:
Sorry, it's just the "Master of Puppets" name that gets me! ;-) Seriously, I like MoP. I think he'll be a great admin! --D-Day)
1566:
1461:
942:
per Dakota's comments. I would prefer a bit more in article namespace edits, but you do not seem likely to abuse admin powers.
769:
440:
MoP is very open, very friendly on IRC and (bias alert) did an amazing job renovating my user page, full unreserved support --
3799:
2973:
2940:
1647:
4011:
2028:
4194:
before releasing to the mainspace. With these combined, that shaves maybe 200 or so userspace edits off of that number.
4050:
Of your articles or contributions to Knowledge (XXG), are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
3895:
Removed trolling vote of Profundity06. I'm not obliging his trolling further by "tagging it with a remark" next to it.
3701:
3691:
3322:
3233:
3117:
2857:
2733:
2664:
2614:
2582:
2488:
2391:
2345:
2254:
2135:
2051:
1967:
1901:
1856:
107:
62:
4015:
2111:. All together though, I believe this behavior demonstrates that Master of Puppets is not ready to be given a mop.
3348:
3302:
2089:. Master of Puppets reverted Drmagic's removal of that message from Drmagic's talk page three times before using
1139:
839:
3755:
3072:
3017:
2964:
1759:
1430:
1369:
504:
421:
particapant in the community and has shown an understanding of policy. I strongly support this user's nomination.
278:
4183:
4159:
4150:
4141:
3966:
3959:
There's a long-standing tradition of discounting votes from new users–not just here, but also at Afd, DRV, etc.
3954:
3941:
3924:
3913:
3889:
3874:
3778:
3766:
3735:
3706:
3669:
3657:
3588:
3576:
3552:
3538:
3520:
3508:
3496:
3482:
3466:
3436:
3401:
3384:
3372:
3351:
3338:
3305:
3279:
3266:
3249:
3216:
3202:
3177:
3165:
3156:
3143:
3133:
3101:
3075:
3034:
3020:
2985:
2967:
2928:
2916:
2904:
2888:
2873:
2841:
2820:
2808:
2796:
2783:
2758:
2749:
2717:
2680:
2647:
2630:
2598:
2565:
2541:
2504:
2471:
2454:
2435:
2407:
2375:
2361:
2326:
2310:
2297:
2270:
2231:
2209:
2192:
2151:
2115:
2067:
2032:
2001:
1983:
1947:
1917:
1885:
1872:
1839:
1827:
1797:
1771:
1762:
1733:
1721:
1700:
1688:
1671:
1650:
1632:
1617:
1605:
1593:
1571:
1552:
1533:
1517:
1505:
1483:
1471:
1447:
1405:
1386:
1347:
1320:
1308:
1287:
1268:
1240:
1222:
1176:
1164:
1147:
1120:
1105:
1093:
1072:
1039:
1017:
1005:
982:
970:
946:
934:
907:
893:
876:
857:
808:
785:
760:
740:
710:
698:
686:
658:
618:
583:
571:
559:
550:
525:
488:
469:
456:
444:
432:
409:
397:
377:
354:
342:
326:
303:
281:
254:
223:
196:
176:
156:
123:
89:
3991:
3983:
3980:
3417:
3328:
3239:
3123:
2863:
2739:
2670:
2620:
2588:
2494:
2397:
2351:
2260:
2240:
2141:
2057:
1973:
1907:
1862:
113:
1525:
I was altogether certain I'd already expressed my support here, but I think I must have seen the signature of
694:
The kid is as old as I am, and he definately breaks the mold in the quality of his edits, I give 4 thumbs up.
2943:... I have more edits to userspace than to articlespace too.) You can prove a lot of things with statistics!
2217:
Doesn't it seem awfully harsh to object to his adminship (and to encourage others to do the same) because of
1184:--Works well with other users (look at his talkpage), he went out of his way to help me set up my monobook.--
706:
to closing crat. This user had less than 50 edits at the time of voting and their first edit was 8 days ago.
3744:
3562:
per all the above. While there may be a time for adminship, I simply feel that now is not the time. Thanks!
2837:
2779:'s comments) but I think he'll be a good choice after a little more work on the encyclopedia end of things.
1186:
1134:
214:
3987:
2972:
Please tell me you're kidding? Are you actually attacking Tony Sidaway's contributions? LMAO. People in
2085:
was the kind of "warning message" that should be preserved at all costs and triggered a grand dispute with
1361:
847:
3791:
3686:
3397:
3312:
3223:
3107:
2925:
2847:
2816:
per low mainspace contributions, reversion of vandalism is a mainspace edit as well (and the easiest one)
2723:
2654:
2604:
2572:
2478:
2381:
2335:
2244:
2125:
2041:
1957:
1891:
1846:
1365:
1334:
1159:
1029:
873:
793:. This user is friendly and knowledgeable. Could benefit from the tools, and is not likely to abuse them.
97:
58:
47:
4175:
3543:
To clarify, signature is one of many reasons I'm opposing- there's too much evidence against adminship.
2603:
And also, as SwatJester says, I was trying to follow policy (I hadn't yet realised it had been changed).
2429:
1821:
1664:
1419:
1277:
1082:
923:
752:
238:
150:
83:
4168:
I find the extreme amount of edits to user namespace a bit odd. You can see all the edits to user here:
3345:
3299:
3197:
3058:
3053:
3003:
2998:
2950:
2945:
2901:
2322:
1745:
1740:
1498:
1480:
1261:
1208:
1060:
931:
727:
695:
264:
249:
4232:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
3930:
1669:
1413:. I've seen this guy around and he has done nothing but good for Knowledge (XXG). He deserves the mop.
3610:
928:
920:
768:
I've come to know this user fairly well over the past few weeks as he has been helping me out with my
3718:
3677:. I've interacted with MoP a little, and I feel obligated to say something here. I think some of the
3568:
2515:
2452:
2166:
2020:
1629:
1424:
1414:
1341:
1117:
889:
866:
794:
632:
518:
298:
3681:
reasons in this RfA are not very good reasons to oppose, so I'm tempted to "cancel them out" with a
3963:
3938:
3910:
3900:
3886:
3654:
3644:
3634:
3492:
3463:
3453:
3410:
2780:
2227:
2206:
2112:
1996:
1942:
1882:
1836:
1794:
1686:
1589:
1492:
1466:
1383:
781:
1679:. I think interacting with the community is just as important for an admin as editing articles. -
1659:
3263:
3213:
3162:
2817:
2509:
See above comment by me. Blanking user talk warnings is against policy. MoP did the right thing.
1718:
1129:
1091:
904:
852:
844:
836:
680:
545:
351:
336:
1767:
Indeed, it specifically says UTC. It's nearly 2300hrs UTC now, this RfA finished 4.5hrs ago. --
1331:
1601:
I thought he was an administrator already. Also, he's very helpful in the "War on Vandalism."
884:, low mainspace edits? What? I became admin with almost exactly 1000 edits...period. Criminy. —
4110:
3870:
3856:
3393:
3153:
2913:
1645:
1584:
1549:
1401:
1238:
1217:
998:
773:
541:
243:
192:
171:
96:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I very, very gratefully accept.
3185:
Because you told me that you would wait until July or around that time to run for adminship.
3548:
3534:
3477:
3368:
3186:
2897:
2319:
1313:
1303:
1298:
1249:
610:
598:
591:- Per Jedi6. To add on, he also goes to take the extra steps of kindness with a patience. —
568:
496:. His service to the community as a vandal-whacker will be made easier if he is an admin.
4033:
4029:
3448:
and couldn't find any user space to main space moves. There's an obvious discrepancy here.
2414:
2090:
481:
386:
4180:
4172:
3730:
3563:
3517:
2833:
2776:
2755:
2714:
2644:
2510:
2449:
2161:
2015:
1697:
1614:
1437:
1173:
1114:
885:
805:
757:
749:
707:
627:
511:
497:
427:
373:
292:
3649:
Regarding article creation, I've been informed that the user makes copy and paste moves.
1502:
2107:
bordering on harrassment. The only saving grace in all this is that MoP did eventually
820:
3960:
3934:
3906:
3896:
3882:
3666:
3650:
3640:
3630:
3488:
3459:
3449:
3140:
3098:
2223:
1990:
1936:
1879:
1833:
1806:
1791:
1730:
1680:
1602:
1581:
1561:
1456:
1380:
1284:
1254:
1194:
777:
605:
394:
363:
3750:
4244:
4109:
controlled by a specific thing (i.e. anger, mental illness, a cult; read more on the
3505:
3422:
3068:
3013:
2960:
2424:
1816:
1755:
1530:
1526:
1102:
1087:
967:
675:
464:
274:
145:
78:
2804:
per all above, especially low main contribution and puzzling answer to my question.
1113:: User seems to be willing to work on his criticisms, and is a good vandal fighter.
4156:
4147:
4138:
4120:
4090:
3951:
3921:
3866:
3852:
3775:
3276:
3174:
2885:
2805:
2334:
Not that I oppose you or anything, but I don't see how userboxes fit into the mix.
2086:
1641:
1543:
1397:
1231:
1201:
1156:
1036:
1026:
1014:
991:
814:
537:
478:
453:
406:
233:
219:
211:
188:
3806:
1355:- Great designer, superb editor, always willing to help - Admin again and again.
3544:
3530:
3381:
3364:
1065:
1053:
1048:
979:
943:
734:
722:
593:
441:
4131:
Why do you have such a large number of edits (872/3773 23%) in the user space?
4010:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
4171:. There are at least 500 edits to this namespace in the last month and a bit.
4058:
3725:
3715:
3585:
2829:
2793:
2562:
2468:
2306:
2237:
1768:
1514:
825:
801:
580:
422:
368:
323:
313:
4100:
Why the username "Master of Puppets"? (hope it doesn't refer to sockpuppets!)
3027:
2978:
2368:
2290:
830:
3933:
are hardly trollish, so I don't think there's a reason to keep it removed.
3432:
206:
4200:
3064:
3009:
2956:
2419:
1811:
1751:
1144:
955:
669:
270:
140:
73:
1443:
666:
of course. Great user and will certainly make a great admin per above.
322:
after seeing Mackensen's comment. I'd like to see a response to it. --
4236:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
3760:
720:. Admin tools are not much useful to the content of an encyclopedia.
4226:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2912:
per all above and yes, go right ahead and tag this with a comment =)
4040:
do extensive work on the articles to be merged/split/etc. section.
3863:
3849:
1013:
I'm almost sure I've seen him around... Anyway, definete support.
185:
1717:, good user and a vandal-fighter who needs the mop and bucket. --
4146:
That would be user talk edits, I am wondering about user edits.
2529:
2180:
646:
1656:
Support Support Support Support Support Support Support Support
164:
have seen him around loads, seems to me he'd make a good admin
579:
vandal watching without admin tools just isn't as effective --
1172:, and PS, thanks for reverting vandalism on my user talk :)--
2417:
we should add that Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictatorship.
28:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
2099:. Several days later, Master of Puppets comes back and
4169:
3993:
3446:
2711:
2708:
2705:
2702:
2699:
2696:
2693:
2690:
2687:
2553:
2549:
2108:
2104:
2100:
2097:
2094:
2083:
1658:
A great user, really friendly, will not abuse tools. --
4057:
My main body of article contributions would be to the
3990:. I have also helped a few users with their problems (
2241:
where I encouraged a troubled editor to get an account
2013:
Sorry, too few article and project namespace edits. -
334:
per all the above, thought he was an ad... nevermind.
2556:, which restarted what seemed to have been resolved.
389:), actually deleting the pages/closing most AfDs etc
2686:13 reverts I can't see a warning in these 9 cases
2367:dissent with the project's encyclopedic goals. --
1276:. Friendly guy and vandal whacker extraordinaire.
4082:negotiate a compromise and ensure a calm atmosphe
4061:articles, reverting vandalism and some stuff for
3595:The following votes were added after ending time.
2380:Ah, I see. Very well, I'll get to removing them.
1707:The following votes were added after ending time.
3665:. Low edit count in mainspace, among others. --
2884:removes the main basis for my initial support.
2101:taunts Drmagic about having had "some troubles"
540:, I believe it might have something to do with
834:
54:Final: (73/38/6) ended 18:19, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
8:
3504:per above. Too many issues at this time. --
3905:Vote has been put back by another editor.
3862:Problem fixed. Thus the strikethrough. --
3794:'s edit count and contribution tree with
2318:too little experience, too many boxes. --
184:. "I thought he was an admin already". --
692:Chop-My-Head-Off-If-He-Don't-Win Support
452:definitely deserves the full toolbox!
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
2516:
2167:
2103:to a third party. This precipitates
633:
7:
3173:per Mackensen and Dragon's flight. –
2448:Per Mackensen and Dragon's flight.--
2205:, to everyone's further detriment.
748:. You have done a great job so far.
4251:Unsuccessful requests for adminship
362:only thing holding me back here is
3982:and the subsequent IP talk page),
3819:First edit 04:30, 12 November 2005
2040:Read my reply to Mackensen above.
1628:, perfect attitude for the mop. --
1328:found to be a very helpful editor
611:
599:
24:
3409:, not enough projectspace edits.
259:More like this candidate, please
4012:Category:Knowledge (XXG) backlog
3798:and the edit summary usage with
3749:
3431:
3047:a link to my contributions that
3043:what I said (else why would you
1442:
1436:
829:
824:
819:
813:
776:is on I can definitely support.
286:Thought he was already an admin
205:
3275:be a strange reason to oppose.
1:
3609:comments and MOP response. --
4020:administrators' reading list
3380:per numerous reasons above.
624:Support your Master! Master!
567:Youre not an admin already?
4000:Questions for the candidate
3807:Interiot's internal counter
1696:: seems like a nice bloke.
1080:Deserves to be an admin. --
536::). Oh, and in response to
4267:
4184:09:20, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
4160:21:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
4151:20:50, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
4142:20:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
4014:, and read the page about
3967:11:22, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
3955:11:18, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
3942:14:35, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
3925:14:21, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
3914:14:18, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
3903:09:22, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
3890:00:26, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
3875:20:53, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
3860:18:38, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
3815:Distinct pages edited 1603
3736:12:36, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
3707:00:32, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
3670:00:12, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
3658:23:41, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
3647:01:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
3637:23:15, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
3629:< from voting support.
3497:00:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
3483:09:11, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
3467:23:41, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
3456:01:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
3437:00:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
3402:17:32, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
3385:15:43, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
3373:14:12, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
3352:05:18, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
3339:05:07, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
3306:05:05, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
3280:01:11, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
3267:01:01, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
3250:00:41, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
3217:00:36, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
3203:22:08, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
3178:19:46, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
3166:17:48, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
3157:17:33, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
3144:18:44, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
3134:16:00, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
3102:15:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
3076:00:28, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
3035:21:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
3021:19:38, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
2986:18:56, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
2968:14:47, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
2929:14:13, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
2917:09:14, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
2905:07:10, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
2889:03:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
2874:07:19, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
2842:03:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
2821:03:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
2809:02:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
2797:00:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
2784:00:17, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
2759:23:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2750:23:10, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2718:23:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2681:22:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2648:22:41, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2631:23:52, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2599:23:50, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2566:23:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2542:23:07, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2505:22:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2472:22:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2455:22:35, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2436:23:41, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2408:23:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2376:22:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2362:22:03, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2327:21:56, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2311:21:55, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2298:21:54, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2271:21:17, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
2232:01:28, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
2210:01:15, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
2193:23:07, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2152:22:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2116:21:48, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2068:21:53, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2033:21:32, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
2002:23:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
1984:21:53, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
1948:19:53, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
1918:22:22, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
1886:22:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
1873:21:53, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
1840:20:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
1828:20:42, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
1798:19:41, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
1448:19:12, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
1406:19:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
1387:18:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
1348:07:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
1321:06:10, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
1288:22:43, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
1269:07:42, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
1241:01:08, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
1223:17:40, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
1177:04:05, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
1165:00:57, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
1148:23:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
1121:17:31, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
1106:16:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
1094:15:33, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
1073:14:46, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
1040:11:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
1018:11:08, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
1006:07:13, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
983:07:00, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
971:05:21, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
947:05:09, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
935:05:07, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
908:05:27, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
894:02:18, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
877:01:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
858:01:19, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
809:00:51, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
786:00:22, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
761:00:08, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
741:23:47, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
711:23:31, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
699:23:10, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
687:23:04, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
659:23:03, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
619:22:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
584:22:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
572:21:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
560:21:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
551:21:30, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
526:21:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
489:21:07, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
470:21:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
457:21:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
445:20:56, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
433:20:43, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
410:20:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
398:20:12, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
378:19:52, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
355:19:18, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
343:19:12, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
327:20:29, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
316:18:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
304:18:54, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
282:18:44, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
255:18:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
224:18:31, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
197:18:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
177:18:21, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
157:16:41, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
124:16:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
90:16:38, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
4155:My bad. Never mind then.
3458:Changed back to neutral.
4229:Please do not modify it.
3984:User talk:Fame live4ever
3839:Knowledge (XXG) talk 11
3817:Average edits/page 2.623
3805:Updated edit count with
2937:Interiot's tree for Tony
2554:its needless restoration
1353:Massively Strong Support
204:MoP deserves the mop!!!
39:Please do not modify it.
4199:Additional question by
4119:Additional question by
4089:Additional question by
3929:His latest comments on
3779:00:53, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
3767:20:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
3614:19:00, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
3589:13:19, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
3577:00:46, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
3553:02:59, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
3539:20:54, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
3521:18:09, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
3509:07:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
2941:Interiot's tree for Lar
2653:I deal with vandalism.
2093:to get Drmagic blocked
1772:22:54, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
1763:22:52, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
1734:22:28, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
1722:19:11, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
1701:17:23, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
1689:17:09, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
1672:03:05, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
1651:23:35, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
1633:15:02, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
1618:11:25, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
1606:01:09, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
1594:00:50, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
1572:19:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
1553:08:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
1534:03:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
1518:01:36, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
1506:01:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
1484:01:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
1472:00:40, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
954:, I'll give it a shot.
2109:reconcile with Drmagic
4063:Wikiproject Star Wars
3988:Talk:Christina Ritter
3183:An "I'm Sorry" Oppose
1101:And justice for all.
806:(Leave me a message!)
556:Support on WHEEELS!!!
30:request for adminship
901:When I were a boy...
137:Support as nominator
3837:Knowledge (XXG) 296
3093:. Doesn't meet my
1638:Very strong support
770:VandalProof project
2105:another a big mess
1295:. Because I do. --
477:Give him the MoP!
4111:Master of Puppets
3881:
3873:
3859:
3792:Master of Puppets
3734:
3575:
3514:Strong opposition
3325:
3236:
3120:
2860:
2840:
2736:
2667:
2617:
2585:
2539:
2532:
2527:
2491:
2394:
2348:
2324:
2257:
2190:
2183:
2178:
2138:
2054:
2031:
1970:
1904:
1859:
1378:
1364:comment added by
1346:
1221:
774:Master of Puppets
656:
649:
644:
195:
110:
59:Master of Puppets
48:Master of Puppets
4258:
4231:
4178:
3879:
3869:
3855:
3813:Total edits 4205
3765:
3763:
3758:
3753:
3747:
3728:
3723:
3722:
3704:
3699:
3694:
3689:
3572:
3566:
3435:
3429:
3420:
3415:
3346:Knowledge Seeker
3336:
3326:
3324:
3320:
3300:Knowledge Seeker
3247:
3237:
3235:
3231:
3200:
3195:
3192:
3189:
3131:
3121:
3119:
3115:
3061:
3056:
3032:
3006:
3001:
2983:
2953:
2948:
2871:
2861:
2859:
2855:
2832:
2747:
2737:
2735:
2731:
2678:
2668:
2666:
2662:
2628:
2618:
2616:
2612:
2596:
2586:
2584:
2580:
2535:
2530:
2526:
2523:
2522:
2519:
2513:
2502:
2492:
2490:
2486:
2432:
2427:
2422:
2405:
2395:
2393:
2389:
2373:
2359:
2349:
2347:
2343:
2323:
2295:
2268:
2258:
2256:
2252:
2186:
2181:
2177:
2174:
2173:
2170:
2164:
2149:
2139:
2137:
2133:
2065:
2055:
2053:
2049:
2019:
1999:
1993:
1981:
1971:
1969:
1965:
1945:
1939:
1915:
1905:
1903:
1899:
1870:
1860:
1858:
1854:
1824:
1819:
1814:
1748:
1743:
1683:
1667:
1662:
1611:Ultimate Support
1587:
1579:a solid user. —
1499:Have your say!!!
1495:
1469:
1464:
1459:
1446:
1440:
1433:
1427:
1422:
1417:
1377:
1358:
1337:
1329:
1316:
1311:
1306:
1301:
1267:
1264:
1236:
1215:
1213:
1206:
1199:
1191:
1162:
1142:
1137:
1132:
1090:
1085:
1070:
1063:
1058:
1051:
1034:
1003:
996:
964:
961:
958:
926:
871:
856:
850:
842:
833:
828:
823:
817:
799:
755:
737:
732:
725:
683:
678:
672:
652:
647:
643:
640:
639:
636:
630:
615:
614:
608:
603:
602:
596:
548:
523:
516:
508:
502:
486:
467:
430:
425:
339:
301:
295:
267:
241:
231:, of course.™ --
217:
209:
191:
153:
148:
143:
121:
111:
109:
105:
86:
81:
76:
41:
4266:
4265:
4261:
4260:
4259:
4257:
4256:
4255:
4241:
4240:
4234:this nomination
4227:
4176:
3796:Interiot's tool
3761:
3756:
3754:
3745:
3720:
3719:
3702:
3697:
3692:
3687:
3570:
3526:Absolutely not.
3427:
3418:
3411:
3335:
3329:
3323:
3319:
3313:
3260:Strongly Oppose
3246:
3240:
3234:
3230:
3224:
3198:
3193:
3190:
3187:
3130:
3124:
3118:
3114:
3108:
3095:admin standards
3059:
3054:
3028:
3004:
2999:
2979:
2951:
2946:
2870:
2864:
2858:
2854:
2848:
2746:
2740:
2734:
2730:
2724:
2677:
2671:
2665:
2661:
2655:
2627:
2621:
2615:
2611:
2605:
2595:
2589:
2583:
2579:
2573:
2538:
2520:
2517:
2511:
2501:
2495:
2489:
2485:
2479:
2430:
2425:
2420:
2404:
2398:
2392:
2388:
2382:
2369:
2358:
2352:
2346:
2342:
2336:
2291:
2267:
2261:
2255:
2251:
2245:
2189:
2171:
2168:
2162:
2148:
2142:
2136:
2132:
2126:
2064:
2058:
2052:
2048:
2042:
1997:
1991:
1980:
1974:
1968:
1964:
1958:
1943:
1937:
1914:
1908:
1902:
1898:
1892:
1869:
1863:
1857:
1853:
1847:
1822:
1817:
1812:
1746:
1741:
1681:
1665:
1660:
1649:
1585:
1569:
1493:
1467:
1462:
1457:
1431:
1425:
1420:
1415:
1396:. Good guy. --
1366:Kingfisherswift
1359:
1345:
1335:
1314:
1309:
1304:
1299:
1262:
1259:
1232:
1209:
1202:
1195:
1187:
1182:Der Übersupport
1160:
1140:
1135:
1130:
1083:
1081:
1066:
1061:
1054:
1049:
1030:
999:
992:
962:
959:
956:
924:
867:
848:
840:
795:
753:
735:
728:
723:
681:
676:
670:
655:
637:
634:
628:
612:
606:
600:
594:
546:
519:
512:
506:
498:
482:
465:
428:
423:
376:
350:, of course. -
337:
299:
293:
265:
252:
239:
215:
202:Extreme support
175:
167:
151:
146:
141:
120:
114:
108:
104:
98:
84:
79:
74:
51:
37:
34:did not succeed
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
4264:
4262:
4254:
4253:
4243:
4242:
4239:
4238:
4221:
4219:
4218:
4211:
4196:
4195:
4188:
4187:
4186:
4166:
4165:
4164:
4163:
4162:
4116:
4115:
4102:
4101:
4086:
4085:
4084:
4083:
4069:
4068:
4067:
4066:
4044:
4043:
4042:
4041:
4037:
4016:administrators
4002:
3997:
3996:
3972:
3971:
3970:
3969:
3947:
3946:
3945:
3944:
3917:
3916:
3892:
3877:
3840:
3838:
3836:
3834:
3832:
3830:
3829:User talk 1944
3828:
3826:
3824:
3820:
3818:
3816:
3814:
3811:
3810:
3803:
3800:Mathbot's tool
3782:
3781:
3769:
3738:
3709:
3672:
3660:
3617:
3616:
3611:Dragon's Blood
3607:Dragons flight
3600:
3599:
3598:
3579:
3557:
3556:
3555:
3523:
3511:
3499:
3485:
3471:
3470:
3469:
3404:
3387:
3375:
3358:
3357:
3356:
3355:
3354:
3330:
3314:
3288:
3287:
3286:
3285:
3284:
3283:
3282:
3241:
3225:
3205:
3180:
3168:
3159:
3150:
3149:
3148:
3147:
3146:
3125:
3109:
3088:
3087:
3086:
3085:
3084:
3083:
3082:
3081:
3080:
3079:
3078:
3049:I already gave
2919:
2907:
2891:
2878:
2877:
2876:
2865:
2849:
2823:
2811:
2799:
2786:
2781:Rx StrangeLove
2769:
2768:
2767:
2766:
2765:
2764:
2763:
2762:
2761:
2741:
2725:
2672:
2656:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2622:
2606:
2601:
2590:
2574:
2546:
2545:
2544:
2536:
2496:
2480:
2457:
2446:
2445:
2444:
2443:
2442:
2441:
2440:
2439:
2438:
2399:
2383:
2353:
2337:
2313:
2300:
2283:
2282:
2281:
2280:
2279:
2278:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2273:
2262:
2246:
2207:Dragons flight
2187:
2143:
2127:
2113:Dragons flight
2072:
2071:
2070:
2059:
2043:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2004:
1975:
1959:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1909:
1893:
1864:
1848:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1724:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1691:
1677:Strong Support
1674:
1653:
1644:
1635:
1620:
1608:
1599:Cliché Support
1596:
1574:
1565:
1555:
1539:Strong Support
1536:
1520:
1508:
1486:
1474:
1450:
1408:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1350:
1339:
1323:
1290:
1271:
1243:
1225:
1193:
1179:
1167:
1150:
1123:
1108:
1096:
1075:
1045:Strong Support
1042:
1023:Strong Support
1020:
1008:
985:
973:
949:
937:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
879:
860:
811:
788:
763:
743:
715:
714:
713:
689:
661:
653:
621:
589:Strong support
586:
574:
562:
553:
528:
491:
472:
459:
450:Strong Support
447:
438:Strong Support
435:
418:Strong Support
415:
414:
413:
380:
372:
357:
345:
329:
306:
284:
257:
250:
226:
199:
182:Cliché support
179:
169:
165:
159:
128:
127:
115:
99:
50:
45:
44:
43:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4263:
4252:
4249:
4248:
4246:
4237:
4235:
4230:
4224:
4223:
4222:
4215:
4212:
4209:
4206:
4205:
4204:
4203:
4202:
4192:
4189:
4185:
4182:
4179:
4174:
4170:
4167:
4161:
4158:
4154:
4153:
4152:
4149:
4145:
4144:
4143:
4140:
4136:
4133:
4132:
4130:
4127:
4126:
4125:
4124:
4122:
4112:
4107:
4104:
4103:
4099:
4096:
4095:
4094:
4093:
4092:
4080:
4077:
4076:
4074:
4071:
4070:
4064:
4060:
4055:
4052:
4051:
4049:
4046:
4045:
4038:
4035:
4031:
4027:
4024:
4023:
4021:
4017:
4013:
4009:
4006:
4005:
4004:
4001:
3994:
3992:
3989:
3985:
3981:
3977:
3974:
3973:
3968:
3965:
3962:
3958:
3957:
3956:
3953:
3949:
3948:
3943:
3940:
3936:
3932:
3928:
3927:
3926:
3923:
3919:
3918:
3915:
3912:
3908:
3904:
3902:
3898:
3893:
3891:
3888:
3884:
3878:
3876:
3872:
3868:
3865:
3861:
3858:
3854:
3851:
3847:
3843:
3842:
3841:
3821:
3808:
3804:
3801:
3797:
3793:
3789:
3788:
3787:
3786:
3780:
3777:
3773:
3770:
3768:
3764:
3759:
3752:
3748:
3742:
3739:
3737:
3732:
3727:
3724:
3717:
3713:
3710:
3708:
3705:
3700:
3695:
3690:
3684:
3680:
3676:
3673:
3671:
3668:
3664:
3661:
3659:
3656:
3652:
3648:
3646:
3642:
3636:
3632:
3627:
3624:
3623:
3622:
3621:
3615:
3612:
3608:
3604:
3601:
3597:
3596:
3592:
3591:
3590:
3587:
3583:
3580:
3578:
3573:
3565:
3561:
3558:
3554:
3550:
3546:
3542:
3541:
3540:
3536:
3532:
3527:
3524:
3522:
3519:
3515:
3512:
3510:
3507:
3503:
3500:
3498:
3494:
3490:
3486:
3484:
3481:
3480:
3475:
3472:
3468:
3465:
3461:
3457:
3455:
3451:
3447:
3444:
3440:
3439:
3438:
3434:
3430:
3424:
3421:
3416:
3414:
3408:
3405:
3403:
3399:
3395:
3391:
3388:
3386:
3383:
3379:
3376:
3374:
3370:
3366:
3362:
3359:
3353:
3350:
3347:
3342:
3341:
3340:
3337:
3333:
3327:
3321:
3318:
3309:
3308:
3307:
3304:
3301:
3296:
3292:
3289:
3281:
3278:
3273:
3270:
3269:
3268:
3265:
3264:Richardcavell
3261:
3257:
3253:
3252:
3251:
3248:
3244:
3238:
3232:
3229:
3220:
3219:
3218:
3215:
3214:Richardcavell
3211:
3210:
3206:
3204:
3201:
3196:
3184:
3181:
3179:
3176:
3172:
3169:
3167:
3164:
3160:
3158:
3155:
3151:
3145:
3142:
3137:
3136:
3135:
3132:
3128:
3122:
3116:
3113:
3105:
3104:
3103:
3100:
3096:
3092:
3089:
3077:
3074:
3070:
3066:
3063:
3062:
3057:
3050:
3046:
3042:
3038:
3037:
3036:
3033:
3031:
3024:
3023:
3022:
3019:
3015:
3011:
3008:
3007:
3002:
2994:
2989:
2988:
2987:
2984:
2982:
2975:
2971:
2970:
2969:
2966:
2962:
2958:
2955:
2954:
2949:
2942:
2938:
2935:
2932:
2931:
2930:
2927:
2923:
2920:
2918:
2915:
2911:
2908:
2906:
2903:
2899:
2895:
2892:
2890:
2887:
2882:
2879:
2875:
2872:
2868:
2862:
2856:
2853:
2845:
2844:
2843:
2839:
2835:
2831:
2827:
2824:
2822:
2819:
2815:
2812:
2810:
2807:
2803:
2800:
2798:
2795:
2790:
2787:
2785:
2782:
2778:
2773:
2770:
2760:
2757:
2753:
2752:
2751:
2748:
2744:
2738:
2732:
2729:
2721:
2720:
2719:
2716:
2712:
2709:
2706:
2703:
2700:
2697:
2694:
2691:
2688:
2684:
2683:
2682:
2679:
2675:
2669:
2663:
2660:
2651:
2650:
2649:
2646:
2641:
2638:
2632:
2629:
2625:
2619:
2613:
2610:
2602:
2600:
2597:
2593:
2587:
2581:
2578:
2569:
2568:
2567:
2564:
2561:
2560:
2555:
2551:
2547:
2543:
2540:
2533:
2528:
2524:
2514:
2508:
2507:
2506:
2503:
2499:
2493:
2487:
2484:
2475:
2474:
2473:
2470:
2467:
2466:
2461:
2458:
2456:
2453:
2451:
2447:
2437:
2434:
2433:
2428:
2423:
2416:
2411:
2410:
2409:
2406:
2402:
2396:
2390:
2387:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2374:
2372:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2360:
2356:
2350:
2344:
2341:
2333:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2325:
2321:
2317:
2314:
2312:
2308:
2304:
2301:
2299:
2296:
2294:
2287:
2284:
2272:
2269:
2265:
2259:
2253:
2250:
2242:
2238:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2229:
2225:
2220:
2216:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2191:
2184:
2179:
2175:
2165:
2158:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2150:
2146:
2140:
2134:
2131:
2122:
2119:
2118:
2117:
2114:
2110:
2106:
2102:
2098:
2095:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2081:
2076:
2075:Strong Oppose
2073:
2069:
2066:
2062:
2056:
2050:
2047:
2039:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2017:
2012:
2009:
2003:
2000:
1994:
1987:
1986:
1985:
1982:
1978:
1972:
1966:
1963:
1954:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1946:
1940:
1934:
1931:
1919:
1916:
1912:
1906:
1900:
1897:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1884:
1881:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1871:
1867:
1861:
1855:
1852:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1838:
1835:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1826:
1825:
1820:
1815:
1808:
1804:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1796:
1793:
1789:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1773:
1770:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1750:
1749:
1744:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1732:
1728:
1725:
1723:
1720:
1716:
1713:
1709:
1708:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1699:
1695:
1692:
1690:
1687:
1684:
1678:
1675:
1673:
1670:
1668:
1663:
1657:
1654:
1652:
1648:
1646:
1643:
1639:
1636:
1634:
1631:
1627:
1624:
1621:
1619:
1616:
1612:
1609:
1607:
1604:
1600:
1597:
1595:
1592:
1591:
1588:
1583:
1578:
1575:
1573:
1568:
1563:
1560:No problems.
1559:
1556:
1554:
1551:
1550:
1547:
1546:
1540:
1537:
1535:
1532:
1528:
1527:User:Searchme
1524:
1521:
1519:
1516:
1512:
1509:
1507:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1490:
1487:
1485:
1482:
1481:Evan Robidoux
1478:
1475:
1473:
1470:
1465:
1460:
1454:
1451:
1449:
1445:
1439:
1434:
1428:
1423:
1418:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1392:
1388:
1385:
1382:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1357:
1356:
1354:
1351:
1349:
1343:
1338:
1333:
1327:
1324:
1322:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1312:
1307:
1302:
1294:
1291:
1289:
1286:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1265:
1258:
1257:
1253:
1252:
1247:
1244:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1235:
1229:
1226:
1224:
1219:
1214:
1212:
1207:
1205:
1200:
1198:
1192:
1190:
1185:
1183:
1180:
1178:
1175:
1171:
1168:
1166:
1163:
1158:
1154:
1151:
1149:
1146:
1143:
1138:
1133:
1127:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1116:
1112:
1109:
1107:
1104:
1100:
1097:
1095:
1092:
1089:
1086:
1079:
1076:
1074:
1071:
1069:
1064:
1059:
1057:
1052:
1046:
1043:
1041:
1038:
1035:
1033:
1028:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1016:
1012:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1002:
997:
995:
989:
986:
984:
981:
977:
974:
972:
969:
965:
953:
950:
948:
945:
941:
938:
936:
933:
930:
927:
922:
918:
915:
909:
906:
905:Richardcavell
902:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
891:
887:
883:
880:
878:
875:
872:
870:
864:
861:
859:
855:
854:
851:
846:
843:
838:
832:
827:
822:
818:per EWS23. —
816:
812:
810:
807:
803:
800:
798:
792:
789:
787:
783:
779:
775:
771:
767:
764:
762:
759:
756:
751:
747:
744:
742:
739:
738:
733:
731:
726:
719:
716:
712:
709:
705:
702:
701:
700:
697:
696:brainybassist
693:
690:
688:
685:
684:
679:
673:
665:
662:
660:
657:
650:
645:
641:
631:
625:
622:
620:
617:
616:
609:
604:
597:
590:
587:
585:
582:
578:
575:
573:
570:
566:
563:
561:
557:
554:
552:
549:
543:
539:
535:
534:
529:
527:
524:
522:
517:
515:
510:
509:
503:
501:
495:
492:
490:
487:
485:
480:
476:
473:
471:
468:
463:
460:
458:
455:
451:
448:
446:
443:
439:
436:
434:
431:
429:-(need help?)
426:
419:
416:
412:
411:
408:
405:
401:
400:
399:
396:
392:
388:
384:
381:
379:
375:
371:
370:
365:
361:
358:
356:
353:
352:Mailer Diablo
349:
346:
344:
341:
340:
338:Tijuana Brass
333:
330:
328:
325:
321:
317:
315:
311:
307:
305:
302:
297:
296:
289:
285:
283:
280:
276:
272:
268:
262:
258:
256:
253:
248:
247:
246:
242:
237:
236:
230:
227:
225:
222:
221:
218:
213:
208:
203:
200:
198:
194:
190:
187:
183:
180:
178:
174:
173:
163:
160:
158:
155:
154:
149:
144:
138:
135:
134:
133:
132:
126:
125:
122:
118:
112:
106:
103:
94:
93:
92:
91:
88:
87:
82:
77:
70:
67:
64:
60:
56:
55:
49:
46:
42:
40:
35:
31:
26:
25:
19:
4228:
4225:
4220:
4213:
4207:
4198:
4197:
4190:
4134:
4128:
4118:
4117:
4105:
4097:
4088:
4087:
4078:
4072:
4053:
4047:
4025:
4007:
3999:
3998:
3975:
3894:
3845:
3844:
3822:
3812:
3784:
3783:
3771:
3740:
3711:
3682:
3678:
3674:
3662:
3638:
3625:
3619:
3618:
3606:
3602:
3594:
3593:
3581:
3559:
3525:
3513:
3501:
3478:
3473:
3442:
3441:
3412:
3406:
3394:Kelly Martin
3389:
3377:
3360:
3331:
3316:
3290:
3271:
3259:
3255:
3242:
3227:
3208:
3207:
3182:
3170:
3154:Michael Snow
3126:
3111:
3090:
3052:
3048:
3044:
3040:
3029:
2997:
2992:
2980:
2974:glass houses
2944:
2933:
2926:Tony Sidaway
2921:
2914:Profundity06
2909:
2896:per Xoloz.--
2893:
2880:
2866:
2851:
2825:
2813:
2801:
2788:
2771:
2742:
2727:
2673:
2658:
2639:
2623:
2608:
2591:
2576:
2558:
2557:
2497:
2482:
2464:
2463:
2459:
2418:
2400:
2385:
2370:
2354:
2339:
2331:
2315:
2302:
2292:
2285:
2263:
2248:
2218:
2214:
2202:
2198:
2156:
2144:
2129:
2120:
2087:User:Drmagic
2078:
2074:
2060:
2045:
2037:
2016:CrazyRussian
2014:
2010:
1976:
1961:
1952:
1932:
1910:
1895:
1865:
1850:
1810:
1802:
1787:
1781:
1780:
1739:
1726:
1714:
1706:
1705:
1693:
1676:
1655:
1637:
1630:Sam Blanning
1625:
1622:
1610:
1598:
1580:
1576:
1557:
1548:
1544:
1538:
1522:
1510:
1491:a good user.
1488:
1476:
1452:
1410:
1393:
1360:— Preceding
1352:
1325:
1297:
1296:
1292:
1279:
1278:
1273:
1255:
1250:
1245:
1233:
1227:
1210:
1203:
1196:
1188:
1181:
1169:
1152:
1125:
1110:
1098:
1077:
1067:
1055:
1044:
1031:
1022:
1010:
1000:
993:
987:
975:
951:
939:
916:
900:
881:
868:
862:
835:
796:
790:
765:
745:
729:
721:
717:
703:
691:
667:
663:
623:
592:
588:
576:
564:
555:
532:
530:
520:
513:
505:
499:
493:
483:
474:
461:
449:
437:
417:
403:
402:
390:
382:
367:
366:'s comment.
360:Weak support
359:
347:
335:
331:
320:Weak Support
319:
318:Changing to
309:
308:
291:
287:
260:
244:
234:
232:
228:
210:
201:
181:
170:
161:
139:
136:
130:
129:
116:
101:
95:
72:
65:
57:
53:
52:
38:
33:
27:
3871:(talk page)
3857:(talk page)
3757:(the scope)
3479:Woohookitty
1251:Matt Yeager
1174:Kungfu Adam
569:Jonathan235
312:per nom. --
193:(talk page)
4059:Guild Wars
3833:Template 4
3823:(main) 864
3564:Flcelloguy
3518:David Levy
3489:Rob Church
2830:≈ jossi ≈
2777:TigerShark
2756:TigerShark
2715:TigerShark
2645:TigerShark
2450:Sean Black
1698:Thumbelina
1615:Sjsharksrs
1468:talk to me
1416:Buchanan-H
1115:TimBentley
886:BorgHunter
708:TigerShark
547:Mysekurity
531:Metallica
3961:Mackensen
3935:Kimchi.sg
3907:Kimchi.sg
3897:Kimchi.sg
3883:Kimchi.sg
3667:MarcoTolo
3651:Kimchi.sg
3641:Kimchi.sg
3631:Kimchi.sg
3460:Kimchi.sg
3450:Kimchi.sg
3141:Doug Bell
3099:Doug Bell
3030:Cyde Weys
2981:Cyde Weys
2818:abakharev
2550:this edit
2371:Cyde Weys
2332:Question:
2293:Cyde Weys
2224:AmiDaniel
1880:Mackensen
1834:Mackensen
1807:Petros471
1805:To quote
1792:Mackensen
1731:Shultz IV
1682:Pureblade
1603:Mr. Lefty
1562:Werdna648
1503:review me
1432:SCREAM!!!
1381:Mackensen
1285:Covington
778:AmiDaniel
395:Petros471
364:Mackensen
4245:Category
4173:DarthVad
4036:as well.
4018:and the
3976:Comment:
3831:Image 63
3827:User 925
3785:Comments
3688:Tantalum
3529:admin.
3506:kingboyk
3295:messages
2025:contribs
1494:ßlηguγΣη
1374:contribs
1362:unsigned
1145:Plankton
750:DarthVad
69:contribs
4157:JoshuaZ
4148:Joelito
4139:JoshuaZ
4135:Comment
4121:Joelr31
4091:Srikeit
3952:Jared W
3922:Joelito
3867:Deskana
3853:Deskana
3846:Comment
3825:Talk 97
3776:Knucmo2
3772:Neutral
3741:Neutral
3712:Neutral
3703:lluride
3683:support
3675:Neutral
3663:Neutral
3626:Neutral
3620:Neutral
3277:JoshuaZ
3272:Comment
2934:Comment
2886:JoshuaZ
2806:Joelito
2215:Comment
2157:comment
2080:article
1803:Comment
1727:Support
1715:Support
1694:Support
1642:Reuvenk
1626:Support
1582:Deckill
1577:Support
1558:Support
1523:Support
1511:Support
1489:Support
1477:Support
1453:Support
1411:Support
1398:SonicAD
1394:Support
1326:Support
1293:Support
1280:(^'-')^
1274:Support
1246:Support
1234:Prodego
1228:Support
1170:Support
1153:Support
1126:Support
1111:Support
1099:Support
1088:iva1979
1078:Support
1015:Jared W
1011:Support
988:Support
976:Support
952:Support
940:Support
917:Support
882:Support
863:Support
791:Support
766:Support
746:Support
718:Support
664:Support
577:Support
565:Support
538:Srikeit
533:SupporT
494:Support
475:Support
462:Support
454:Anger22
407:JoshuaZ
404:Support
383:Support
348:Support
332:Support
310:Support
294:Andy123
288:support
261:support
251:(block)
229:Support
189:Deskana
162:Support
131:Support
4034:WP:AIV
4030:WP:AFD
3964:(talk)
3931:WT:RFA
3835:Help 1
3679:oppose
3603:Oppose
3582:Oppose
3560:Oppose
3545:Ral315
3531:Ral315
3502:Oppose
3474:Oppose
3443:Oppose
3407:Oppose
3390:Oppose
3382:Alphax
3378:Oppose
3365:Stifle
3361:Oppose
3291:Oppose
3209:Oppose
3171:Oppose
3163:silsor
3091:Oppose
3045:repeat
2922:Oppose
2910:Oppose
2894:Oppose
2881:Oppose
2826:Oppose
2814:Oppose
2802:Oppose
2789:Oppose
2772:Oppose
2640:Oppose
2552:, and
2521:Jester
2460:Oppose
2415:WP:NOT
2316:Oppose
2303:Oppose
2286:Oppose
2172:Jester
2121:Reply:
2091:WP:AIV
2038:Reply:
2011:Oppose
1933:Oppose
1883:(talk)
1845:days.
1837:(talk)
1795:(talk)
1788:Oppose
1782:Oppose
1719:Bjarki
1661:Primat
1384:(talk)
1300:George
1157:Nataly
1118:(talk)
1103:Haukur
980:Jusjih
944:BryanG
869:Dakota
638:Jester
442:Tawker
387:WP:AIV
300:(talk)
3864:Darth
3850:Darth
3746:Samir
3586:Aldux
3571:note?
2794:Xoloz
2563:Meegs
2537:Fire!
2469:Meegs
2307:ESkog
2203:again
2199:still
2188:Fire!
2029:email
1998:plane
1953:Reply
1944:plane
1769:Tango
1545:Gizza
1515:Hetar
1458:Radio
1426:rmit™
1263:Talk?
1037:ts501
932:e Ong
654:Fire!
581:T-rex
479:Misza
466:Joe I
424:Jedi6
369:AndyZ
324:Tango
314:Tango
186:Darth
32:that
16:<
3939:talk
3911:talk
3901:talk
3887:talk
3790:See
3762:धर्म
3731:talk
3655:talk
3645:talk
3635:talk
3605:per
3549:talk
3535:talk
3493:talk
3464:talk
3454:talk
3398:talk
3369:talk
3262:. -
3175:Joke
3041:read
2902:talk
2518:SWAT
2228:Talk
2169:SWAT
2021:talk
1992:jaco
1938:jaco
1463:Kirk
1402:talk
1370:talk
1342:talk
1332:porg
1218:talk
1204:kiro
994:blue
968:Talk
890:talk
853:tcom
837:nath
802:WS23
782:Talk
736:tofs
704:Note
635:SWAT
542:this
500:Buck
391:does
235:Rory
212:Srik
172:talk
63:talk
4201:TDS
4114:to.
3428:fan
3425:ash
3419:boy
3413:Roy
3065:Lar
3010:Lar
2993:his
2957:Lar
2531:Aim
2320:Doc
2243:).
2219:one
2182:Aim
2082:"
1752:Lar
1531:Joe
1379:--
1305:Mon
1189:The
1136:Lov
1050:Con
1001:520
921:Ter
845:nrd
648:Aim
595:Mir
544:. -
521:ofg
271:Lar
4247::
4214:A:
4208:Q:
4129:Q:
4106:A:
4098:Q:
4079:A:
4073:3.
4054:A:
4048:2.
4026:A:
4022:.
4008:1.
3995:).
3986:,
3937:|
3909:|
3899:|
3885:|
3726:uk
3716:Wh
3653:|
3643:|
3633:|
3569:A
3551:)
3537:)
3495:)
3462:|
3452:|
3423:cr
3400:)
3371:)
3334:-_
3315:_-
3256:do
3245:-_
3226:_-
3129:-_
3110:_-
3067::
3026:--
3012::
2977:--
2959::
2900:|
2898:cj
2869:-_
2850:_-
2836:•
2745:-_
2726:_-
2676:-_
2657:_-
2626:-_
2607:_-
2594:-_
2575:_-
2500:-_
2481:_-
2403:-_
2384:_-
2357:-_
2338:_-
2309:)
2289:--
2266:-_
2247:_-
2239:,
2230:)
2147:-_
2128:_-
2063:-_
2044:_-
1979:-_
1960:_-
1913:-_
1894:_-
1868:-_
1849:_-
1754::
1685:|
1570:\
1501:-
1497:|
1441:..
1435:..
1429:..
1404:)
1376:)
1372:•
1336:es
1211:id
990:--
978:--
966:|
929:nc
919:--
903:-
892:)
804:|
784:)
514:ts
484:13
290:--
273::
263:!
245:96
220:it
119:-_
100:_-
36:.
4191:A
4181:r
4177:e
4123:'
4065:.
3809::
3802:.
3733:)
3729:(
3721:o
3698:e
3693:T
3574:)
3567:(
3547:(
3533:(
3491:(
3396:(
3367:(
3349:দ
3332:P
3317:M
3303:দ
3243:P
3228:M
3199:ε
3194:e
3191:o
3188:M
3139:—
3127:P
3112:M
3073:c
3071:/
3069:t
3060:+
3055:+
3018:c
3016:/
3014:t
3005:+
3000:+
2965:c
2963:/
2961:t
2952:+
2947:+
2867:P
2852:M
2838:@
2834:t
2743:P
2728:M
2710:,
2707:,
2704:,
2701:,
2698:,
2695:,
2692:,
2689:,
2674:P
2659:M
2624:P
2609:M
2592:P
2577:M
2559:×
2512:⇒
2498:P
2483:M
2465:×
2431:S
2426:D
2421:T
2401:P
2386:M
2355:P
2340:M
2264:P
2249:M
2226:(
2163:⇒
2145:P
2130:M
2061:P
2046:M
2027:/
2023:/
1995:♫
1977:P
1962:M
1941:♫
1911:P
1896:M
1866:P
1851:M
1823:S
1818:D
1813:T
1760:c
1758:/
1756:t
1747:+
1742:+
1666:e
1590:r
1586:e
1567:C
1564:/
1421:e
1400:(
1368:(
1344:)
1340:(
1330:—
1315:y
1310:e
1266:)
1260:(
1256:♫
1220:)
1216:(
1197:i
1161:a
1141:E
1131:I
1084:S
1068:m
1062:e
1056:D
1032:e
1027:M
963:P
960:I
957:J
925:e
888:(
874:~
849:o
841:a
797:E
780:(
758:r
754:e
730:e
724:F
682:e
677:H
674:.
671:G
668:—
629:⇒
613:n
607:e
601:l
507:e
374:t
279:c
277:/
275:t
269:+
266:+
240:0
216:e
168:/
166:└
152:S
147:D
142:T
117:P
102:M
85:S
80:D
75:T
66:·
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.