82:. He is also very active in reverting vandalism, and he has previously expressed (e.g., in his intro paragraph for his self-nom RfA) that he would like to become a sysop to stop the vandals who "are given seemingly free rein over high-profile, featured articles" - and the rollback and the block tools would help Matt do just that. Most of the opposition over his last RfA dealt over Matt's seeming inability to maturely handle disputes. For example, two months ago, editors were concerned about
920:
1176:- I seriously thought he already was one. But seeing the history of incivility being brought up on this page, I cannot in good faith support. I would recommend that this RfA be withdrawn and Matt Yeager try again in a few months, being sure to remain civil at all times in the interim. I believe he has the potential to become an admin one day but he needs to work on the issues that are being brought up in this RfA. --
302:
1165:
631:
436:
925:
1414:(After reading the above votes) The fact that it keeps a history of edit summaries, maybe? ;) Actually, I think Knowledge's mostly working fine. I wish that Jimbo would start taking a little less credit for the project in the media reports--you always hear about "Jimbo's Knowledge" and such. It'd be nice if he let others take some credit, too.
889:. TigerShark's edit summaries make an RfA at the moment absolutely out of the question. The other material presented above is also very unfortunate; my impression of the user in general (before this RfA) is of a little too much anger and quickness. But given the very recent, very obviously bad material, now was a very bad time to nominate. -
1327:
1375:
team. They "lead" a group of players, but really they aren't the ones in charge--there's a head coach and assistants (Jimbo, ArbCom) that really make the rules. Everyone else contributes, but the captains contribute a bit more, a bit better, and there's a few things (coin toss) that only they can do
769:
to keep the template, which eventually was deleted.) Frankly, as nice a fellow as Matt is, he isn't up to the task of closing deletion debates. His vandalism cleanup is admirable, but this doesn't require sysop rights. I'm very sorry. However this turns out, I hope that you'll forgive me, Matt.
1466:
I've started taking a lot more care in the use of my edit summaries. I never really realized how seriously people took them. I recognize that to many people, this is "too little, too late", and I can accept that. I do wish that people would consider my apologies, the fact that the edits shown are a
1448:
The "don't pull crap" warning was absolutely unacceptable. I saw vandalism on a page I created and blew it. No excuses. Calling All
Engines? That, as I said, was a regrettable experience. I'm sorry. As far as other things go, I often haven't had a very serious attitude toward the project, although
165:
While I appreciate everyone who voted one way or the other, I think it's clear that I had some rather serious misconceptions about the adminship process and (more pertinently) about
Knowledge itself. If you voted here, expect to get a note in the near future explaining more. Thank you all for your
1077:
enough, as indicated by some of his edit summaries, and he tends to engage in edit wars, so I think he might abuse his powers. I really want to give him the rollback button, but he needs to prove he won't use his powers abusively.
1338:--I had placed a tidbit of trivia and it was removed without comment by an anon; after a couple reverts apiece over the course of several days, we were able to start sorting it out on the talk page. There's also a small one with
1029:
I've only had a brief look through the user's recent contributions so I will not vote oppose, but I'd prefer to see Matt err on the side of caution when communicating with other users - including avoiding edit summaries such as
74:) – Ever since Matt's failed RfA two months ago, I have been monitoring him on Knowledge. He now has more than 4000 edits and is a great help to Knowledge, contributing regularly to project-space pages such as
1467:
miniscule percentage of my overall edits and that my behaviour has changed as of late; however, I definitely do respect that they are too much for some voters to overcome. I will try and improve in any case.
710:
having to do this, as Matt is a terrific person. Unfortunately, I don't believe that his level of maturity and understanding of the site are sufficient. Less than a month ago, he duplicated the template
1330:) and tried to avoid similar stressful situations. The situation that most comes to mind as far as causing stress goes (besides the heart trauma that I get whenever someone wants to disambiguate
801:, which occured in the very discussion that the nominator put forward as an example of Matt's incresed maturity. I'd prefer to see a month or two of contributions free from such comments.
764:, he wanted to include the word "please." "Other editors against that," and he felt that forking the template (thereby circumventing the opposition) was a legitimate solution. (He also
988:
per RoyBoy and David Levy, with the same sincere regret expressed by David and
Massiveego's provisio that support may be more forthcoming upon another nomination in a month or so.
1314:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
797:
which could rub certain people up the wrong way. However I have grown even more concerned by other instances of questionable civility and maturity raised by other editors and
102:, ...). Most importantly, though, Matt has learned when to back off - a skill which, as shown by the pedophilia wheel war, many current admins don't even possess. --
1223:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
1346:
that's still ongoing, but it seems like that one's getting resolved. I can't think of any other conflicts that I've participated in within the last few months.
1521:
1321:
1210:
692:. In many respects Matt is a good editor, unfortunately he falls some way short of the standards of decorum and civility I expect from a potential admin.
731:, created with the edit summary "started template. Jigga what? Yep, it's funky." He never did explain what any of this was supposed to mean, but in
1431:
Except for an offensive/impersonating username, nothing comes to mind. I'm not so sure that there are such things as lost causes as far as users go.
661:
template you keep using is broken. You get angry too easily, and you assume too easily that you're making improvements when you act unilaterally. -
1239:
1393:
Being able to see a deleted page upon request--for whatever reason--would be at the top of the list. I can't think of anything else I'd give to
1141:. I appreciate your apology for the rude edit summaries, but after taking notice of your behavior, I'm afraid I cannot change back to support.
1292:, which I wrote up from a stub into what I'd like to say is a very nice article. More recently, I ran a lot of "damage control" stuff on the
1073:. This is one of the few rare cases that I vote neutral. He certainly does a lot of useful edits, and is a good vandal fighter, but he isn't
1158:
624:
429:
1504:
1364:
You have many edits related to sports articles. If you had to make a sports analogy to explain what admins do, what would the analogy be?
222:
123:
71:
324:
29:
17:
1256:
often have a huge backlog, and I would like to help close debates and such. In addition, I would also want to close debates at
1199:
369:
1441:
How would you respond to concerns that your history shows you to act impulsively to other users, often in a negative fashion?
83:
504:
207:
108:
373:
976:. Unfortunately, the nominator's link intended to show Matt's improved dispute skills had the opposite impact on me.
329:
319:
1285:
1231:
1324:, you can see the result of a couple of edit wars, but I admitted my mistakes, learned from them (really, I did!
1278:
Of your articles or contributions to
Knowledge, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
1084:
1235:
1149:
615:
420:
355:
87:
1487:
1203:
1182:
1168:
1133:
1106:
1091:
1059:
1050:
1011:
992:
980:
968:
955:
943:
928:
906:
895:
880:
870:
850:
835:
817:
805:
774:
696:
684:
665:
634:
594:
575:
563:
533:
512:
492:
473:
455:
439:
403:
378:
346:
334:
305:
277:
252:
232:
212:
186:
133:
113:
314:
1335:
1480:
297:
272:
179:
156:
65:
1503:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
294:
286:
217:
202:
118:
103:
1424:
Under what circumstances will you indefinitely block a user without any prior direction from Arb Com?
1289:
1079:
831:
678:
559:
546:
469:
397:
744:
737:
725:
1293:
1142:
1089:
1001:
940:
608:
522:
509:
501:
413:
365:
343:
289:
227:
128:
1343:
952:
662:
531:
246:
1300:
atop the page to restrain the flow of unencyclopedic information while keeping the page in the
1372:
1339:
1468:
1195:
965:
877:
847:
591:
261:
167:
144:
61:
47:
919:
1074:
1056:
1047:
977:
915:
863:
827:
802:
771:
674:
604:
556:
465:
452:
387:
607:'s comments about his edit summaries. I have reviewed his summaries and I have to agree.
1473:
1459:
What steps have you taken to prevent the sort of rash behavior mentioned in question 5?
1008:
937:
360:
172:
149:
95:
1515:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1249:
1154:
1130:
989:
620:
527:
425:
241:
79:
75:
1386:
Are there any admin powers that you would like to give to all users? Why or why not?
1354:
1253:
903:
754:
715:
782:
Switched from neutral. I was originally a bit concerned by edit summaries such as
1103:
890:
844:
572:
301:
99:
1230:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
960:
Sorry, but after reading all of the above and checking the diffs given, I must
914:
Some of his contributions already listed above don't make me too comfortable.--
1331:
814:
551:
543:
1177:
924:
867:
485:
1164:
630:
435:
94:
improved over the past two months, as he now refers to official policies (
1118:
693:
1248:
Besides simple vandalism rollbacks, blockings, etc., I've noticed that
1507:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
1497:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
936:
per all the rest, but I encourage him to try again in a few months.
1407:
If you could change any one thing about
Knowledge what would it be?
1000:. Stay clean for a few months, and I'll happy to support your RfA.
1326:
1301:
866:-making agitation against a wikiproject and deletion process.
498:
Extreme "Not another 'I thought he was one'? Please..." support
1296:
article by removing vandalism, copyediting, and putting up an
1117:, needs a little more time to settle down after the disputes.
736:, he indicated that he " imagine what would be properly named
140:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
760:, but soon decided to undo that change. As he explained in
740:." (So why did he name it that?) He briefly redirected
28:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
673:
1043:
1040:
1037:
1034:
1031:
859:
798:
795:
792:
789:
786:
783:
765:
761:
733:
658:
654:
650:
646:
649:
and the others you changed should be reverted back.
858:as per the civility concerns, and participation in
1102:pending answers to questions from JoshuaZ below.--
1268:, especially in cases where a consensus is clear.
1045:which could rub certain people up the wrong way.
813:per ample above evidence of civility concerns.
541:Meets/surpasses criteria; a friendly user. -
8:
1209:Previous request for adminship can be found
1371:I suppose they're like the captains on an
1334::P) is a thoroughly regrettable affair at
57:(14/20/4) ended 00:21, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
1198:'s edit count and contribution tree with
721:with a new template inexplicably called
311:Strong "I-was-going-to-nominate" Support
1449:I've tried to fix that in recent weeks.
166:time and consideration in any regard.
7:
354:Don't see anything wrong with ya :)
201:as the nominator and first voter! --
1522:Unsuccessful requests for adminship
520:It is time to give him the mop. --
24:
1298:<!-- invisible warning --: -->
1376:(close debates, undelete, etc.).
1325:
1202:and the edit summary usage with
1163:
923:
918:
629:
434:
412:, all around great contributor.
386:I thought he was one already. --
300:
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
1286:User:Matt Yeager/Contributions
1:
590:Maybe after another month. --
1240:administrators' reading list
1220:Questions for the candidate
571:Meets/surpasses criteria.--
1538:
1488:02:28, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
1342:over daughter articles at
1288:, but few of them can top
1234:, and read the page about
1232:Category:Knowledge backlog
1183:06:05, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
1169:02:48, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
1012:23:40, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
993:22:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
981:21:17, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
969:18:05, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
956:11:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
944:11:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
929:04:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
907:02:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
896:02:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
876:Oppose, As per all above.
576:16:37, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
564:07:28, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
240:. vote early, vote often.
187:00:21, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
1134:15:56, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
1107:13:26, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
1092:10:17, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
1060:15:16, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
1051:04:41, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
881:17:43, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
871:19:14, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
851:16:36, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
836:16:16, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
818:15:49, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
806:15:16, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
775:14:03, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
697:13:07, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
685:11:58, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
666:08:23, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
635:07:10, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
595:06:25, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
534:13:59, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
513:11:48, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
493:07:57, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
474:04:59, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
456:04:31, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
440:03:54, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
404:03:42, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
379:03:38, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
347:02:43, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
342:same as the last nom. --
335:02:37, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
306:01:58, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
278:01:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
253:00:04, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
233:23:09, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
163:22:54, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
134:19:56, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
1500:Please do not modify it.
39:Please do not modify it.
313:. Absolutely! Again. --
464:, no problems here. —
143:I gratefully accept.
88:this newer discussion
30:request for adminship
1290:Running up the score
1110:Changed to support.
1055:Switched to oppose.
951:per above, sorry. -
862:exercise by SPUI in
1336:Calling All Engines
443:Changing to oppose.
1344:Rutgers University
974:Regrettably oppose
238:support, as before
1373:American football
1340:User:Jersey Devil
1284:I have a list at
894:
562:
377:
249:
1529:
1502:
1486:
1483:
1329:
1167:
1161:
1152:
1147:
1127:
1124:
1121:
1087:
1082:
927:
922:
893:
826:per all above. —
768:
759:
753:
749:
743:
730:
724:
720:
714:
704:. I absolutely
681:
657:is unnecessary.
633:
627:
618:
613:
555:
549:
530:
525:
507:
490:
438:
432:
423:
418:
401:
391:
363:
358:
332:
327:
322:
317:
304:
292:
285:, great user. --
275:
270:
267:
264:
247:
230:
225:
220:
215:
210:
205:
185:
182:
162:
159:
131:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
41:
1537:
1536:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1512:
1511:
1505:this nomination
1498:
1481:
1478:
1353:Questions from
1322:my previous RFA
1200:Interiot's tool
1159:
1150:
1143:
1125:
1122:
1119:
1085:
1080:
843:per all above.
757:
751:
747:
741:
732:
728:
722:
718:
712:
679:
653:is not proper.
625:
616:
609:
547:
523:
521:
505:
486:
451:per all above.
430:
421:
414:
395:
389:
356:
330:
325:
320:
315:
290:
273:
268:
265:
262:
228:
223:
218:
213:
208:
203:
180:
177:
157:
154:
129:
124:
119:
114:
109:
104:
84:this discussion
51:
37:
34:did not succeed
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1535:
1533:
1525:
1524:
1514:
1513:
1510:
1509:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1461:
1460:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1443:
1442:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1426:
1425:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1409:
1408:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:users, though.
1388:
1387:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1366:
1365:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1236:administrators
1222:
1217:
1216:
1214:
1207:
1204:Mathbot's tool
1186:
1185:
1171:
1136:
1095:
1094:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1015:
1014:
995:
983:
971:
958:
946:
931:
909:
898:
884:
873:
853:
838:
820:
808:
777:
738:Template:Funky
699:
687:
668:
640:
639:
638:
579:
578:
566:
536:
515:
500:per cliche. --
495:
484:, great user.
479:
478:
477:
446:
445:
444:
381:
349:
344:King of Hearts
337:
308:
280:
255:
235:
190:
189:
50:
45:
44:
43:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1534:
1523:
1520:
1519:
1517:
1508:
1506:
1501:
1495:
1494:
1489:
1484:
1477:
1476:
1472:
1471:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1458:
1455:
1454:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1440:
1437:
1436:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1423:
1420:
1419:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1406:
1403:
1402:
1396:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1385:
1382:
1381:
1374:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1363:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1328:
1323:
1319:
1316:
1315:
1313:
1310:
1309:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1294:April 1, 2006
1291:
1287:
1283:
1280:
1279:
1277:
1274:
1273:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1244:
1243:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1221:
1215:
1212:
1208:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1184:
1181:
1180:
1175:
1172:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1156:
1153:
1148:
1146:
1140:
1137:
1135:
1132:
1128:
1116:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1109:
1108:
1105:
1101:
1093:
1090:
1088:
1083:
1076:
1072:
1069:
1068:
1061:
1058:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1038:
1035:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1013:
1010:
1007:
1006:
1005:
999:
996:
994:
991:
987:
984:
982:
979:
975:
972:
970:
967:
963:
959:
957:
954:
953:Mailer Diablo
950:
947:
945:
942:
939:
935:
932:
930:
926:
921:
917:
913:
910:
908:
905:
902:
899:
897:
892:
888:
885:
883:
882:
879:
874:
872:
869:
865:
861:
857:
854:
852:
849:
846:
842:
839:
837:
833:
829:
825:
821:
819:
816:
812:
809:
807:
804:
800:
796:
793:
790:
787:
784:
781:
778:
776:
773:
767:
763:
756:
746:
739:
735:
727:
717:
709:
708:
703:
700:
698:
695:
691:
688:
686:
682:
676:
672:
669:
667:
664:
663:Richardcavell
660:
656:
652:
648:
644:
641:
637:
636:
632:
628:
622:
619:
614:
612:
606:
602:
598:
597:
596:
593:
589:
586:
585:
584:
583:
577:
574:
570:
567:
565:
561:
558:
554:
553:
550:
545:
540:
537:
535:
532:
529:
526:
519:
516:
514:
511:
508:
503:
499:
496:
494:
491:
489:
483:
480:
476:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
458:
457:
454:
450:
447:
442:
441:
437:
433:
427:
424:
419:
417:
411:
407:
406:
405:
402:
399:
393:
392:
385:
382:
380:
375:
371:
367:
362:
359:
353:
350:
348:
345:
341:
338:
336:
333:
328:
323:
318:
312:
309:
307:
303:
299:
296:
293:
288:
284:
281:
279:
276:
271:
259:
256:
254:
251:
250:
243:
239:
236:
234:
231:
226:
221:
216:
211:
206:
200:
197:
196:
195:
194:
188:
183:
176:
175:
171:
170:
164:
160:
153:
152:
148:
147:
141:
138:
137:
136:
135:
132:
127:
122:
117:
112:
107:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
58:
55:
49:
46:
42:
40:
35:
31:
26:
25:
19:
1499:
1496:
1474:
1469:
1456:
1438:
1421:
1404:
1394:
1383:
1361:
1352:
1351:
1317:
1311:
1297:
1281:
1275:
1245:
1227:
1219:
1218:
1188:
1187:
1178:
1173:
1144:
1138:
1114:
1099:
1097:
1096:
1070:
1026:
1025:
1017:
1016:
1003:
1002:
997:
985:
973:
961:
948:
933:
911:
900:
886:
875:
855:
840:
823:
810:
779:
762:this message
734:this message
706:
705:
701:
689:
670:
642:
610:
600:
599:
587:
581:
580:
568:
542:
538:
517:
497:
487:
481:
461:
460:
448:
415:
409:
408:
394:
388:
383:
351:
339:
310:
282:
257:
245:
237:
198:
192:
191:
173:
168:
150:
145:
142:
139:
91:
90:shows, Matt
86:. Well, as
68:
60:
56:
53:
52:
38:
33:
27:
1470:Matt Yeager
1196:Matt Yeager
986:Weak oppose
966:Jonathunder
878:Vulcanstar6
822:Changed to
592:Masssiveego
260:Again. :-D
169:Matt Yeager
146:Matt Yeager
62:Matt Yeager
48:Matt Yeager
1332:Washington
1086:Kamalabadi
1057:TigerShark
1048:TigerShark
828:BorgHunter
803:TigerShark
772:David Levy
680:Μελ Ετητης
675:Mel Etitis
605:TigerShark
466:BorgHunter
453:Funnybunny
1179:Cyde Weys
1009:Covington
938:Mackensen
799:this edit
510:tianpower
1516:Category
1238:and the
1189:Comments
864:WP:POINT
361:dmrb♉ltz
316:Tantalum
242:Grutness
72:contribs
1355:JoshuaZ
1174:Neutral
1139:Neutral
1115:Neutral
1100:Neutral
1071:Neutral
1027:Neutral
1018:Neutral
1004:(^'-')^
904:JoshuaZ
569:Support
539:Support
528:iva1979
518:Support
482:Support
462:Support
449:Support
410:Support
384:Support
352:Support
340:Support
331:lluride
283:Support
258:Support
199:Support
193:Support
96:WP:NPOV
1304:style.
1266:WP:RFD
1264:, and
1262:WP:MFD
1258:WP:AFD
1250:WP:SFD
1104:Jusjih
998:Oppose
962:oppose
949:Oppose
941:(talk)
934:Oppose
912:Oppose
901:Oppose
891:Splash
887:Oppose
856:Oppose
845:Hiding
841:Oppose
824:oppose
811:Oppose
780:Oppose
702:Oppose
690:Oppose
671:Oppose
643:Oppose
601:Oppose
588:Oppose
582:Oppose
573:Jusjih
557:(talk)
80:WP:AFD
76:WP:RFA
1482:Talk?
1254:WP:RM
1075:civil
978:Derex
815:Xoloz
766:voted
745:funky
726:funky
560:(ubx)
488:Grue
398:Reply
298:e Ong
181:Talk?
158:Talk?
54:Final
32:that
16:<
1302:wiki
1252:and
1211:here
1194:See
1131:Talk
1081:Exir
1042:and
916:Adam
868:Alai
860:this
848:talk
832:talk
794:and
707:hate
659:This
655:This
651:This
647:This
603:per
470:talk
248:wha?
100:WP:V
78:and
66:talk
1395:all
1320:At
1160:fan
1157:ash
1151:boy
1145:Roy
990:Joe
755:for
750:to
716:for
694:Rje
626:fan
623:ash
617:boy
611:Roy
552:zzo
502:Cel
431:fan
428:ash
422:boy
416:Roy
390:Jay
287:Ter
244:...
219:wiz
120:wiz
92:has
1518::
1318:A:
1312:3.
1282:A:
1276:2.
1260:,
1246:A:
1242:.
1228:1.
1155:cr
1129:|
1078:--
1033:,
964:.
834:)
785:,
758:}}
752:{{
748:}}
742:{{
729:}}
723:{{
719:}}
713:{{
683:)
645:-
621:cr
506:es
472:)
426:cr
372:|
368:|
295:nc
229:20
224:20
214:th
130:20
125:20
115:th
98:,
36:.
1485:)
1479:(
1475:♫
1457:6
1439:5
1422:4
1405:3
1384:2
1362:1
1213:.
1206:.
1126:P
1123:I
1120:J
1098:#
1039:,
1036:,
830:(
791:,
788:,
770:—
677:(
548:e
544:W
524:S
468:(
400:)
396:(
376:)
374:k
370:C
366:T
364:(
357:A
326:e
321:T
291:e
274:ε
269:e
266:o
263:M
209:@
204:M
184:)
178:(
174:♫
161:)
155:(
151:♫
110:@
105:M
69:·
64:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.