615:. The user is a nice editor, no doubt. But doesn't give sufficient reasons to convince that he would be a good admin. I would like to see him participate more in Knowledge (XXG) namespace. Currently the user has just 34 edits in Knowledge (XXG) namespace, and most of them are in Village pump with absolutely nothing in VfDs. Come back after a couple of months with sufficient experience and I might reconsider my vote. BTW, I prefer to attach maturity with edits rather than with age. -
77:) – I'm a very active user, both in writing articles and in fighting vandalism. I often spend time on RC Patrol, sometimes also using the #vandalism-en-wp IRC channel. I'm most interested in the mathematics articles, and have written some and edited many. I also enjoy editing and writing articles about airplanes and music (particularly the violin, which I play). I do cleanup to different articles as well.
1081:
The pure number of edits is not a judge of how many words are edited or what the edits are. Compared to some other people, if I'm adding a decent amount of information, I try to submit it all at once, using the "Show preview" button in various intervals. This probably means that I won't accumulate
995:
I would probably help most with blocking vandal IP addresses (after they have received proper warning, of course) and using the admin rollback function. I will happily, however, also delete articles and images when requested (and once consensus has been reached), and also research into and resolve
398:
I see no evidence that suggests that Mets501 would not be a fine admin, but I also see very little participation in the
Knowledge (XXG) space. This user is only 15. There is not enough evidence to judge his level of maturity. Given more time and participation in discussions. I would support. --
307:
Don't worry about offending me in any way at all. I would like to add, though, that I do more interaction on article talk and user talk spaces than on my own user page. If someone writes to me on my user page, I usually respond back on their's, which may make my user talk page look deceptively
212:. Although you have barely showed an experience in process, I think that you are a nice user and you won't misuse adminship. Having sysop abilities will enable you to deal with vandals and I'm sure you'll eventually get the hang of wikipedia process. Adminship is no big deal.
411:
Nothing too big to talk about, but I have a bone to pick; age should not play a part in voting, as there isn't a legal editing age for
Knowledge (XXG). I realise that most teenagers are stereotyped, but I just wondered what you would consider sufficient evidence.
103:
It seems that the general consensus is that I need more main and
Knowledge (XXG) namespace edits and possibly just more time here at Knowledge (XXG). I am withdrawing now and will try again sometime in the future. Thank you all so much for
826:
per Mailer Diablo. Look forward to offering my support on a second nom in a month or so if this one doesn't pass — at fifteen, he's smarter than me, has met more interesting people than I have, and writes better articles than I do. ...dang.
130:- Very active? Well lets put him/her to an even better use. Very active admins can build and maintain Knowledge (XXG) more effectively than very active non-admins. (That is, IMHO.) Good luck in your vandal-hunt! Btw, ESkog, I didn't realize
1082:
edits in the way some others will, but at least
Knowledge (XXG) articles will not have half of the content and just stop at a random point. (P.S. I figured this out after my first couple of edits, so if you go to my oldest edits on
263:
Sorry for doing this, but just a general lack of edits; very good start, but some more user talk (i.e. social interaction) would be well recieved; also, maybe another month or so of active contributions and I'd gladly support.
882:
Username Mets501 Total edits 1318 Distinct pages edited 870 Average edits/page 1.515 First edit 17:38, 3 February 2006 (main) 970 Talk 31 User 140 User talk 86 Image 21 Template 20 Knowledge (XXG) 34 Knowledge (XXG) talk 16
385:
He has plenty of edits for me and is a really great editor but only been here since
February, less than 3 months is just not enough time to have the needed experience for administratorship. I'm really sorry -
743:
It is great that you are doing counter-vandalism, but you have few talk and user-talk edits. Wait a few months and get some more experience on all areas of
Knowledge (XXG) and I will certainly support you.--
1042:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
970:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge (XXG) in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
1118:
563:. You are obviously a great editor, but you haven't showed enough knowledge or experience in process. I like to see at least 100 wikipedia namespace edits.
986:
1101:
29:
17:
521:
1016:, of which I created and wrote basically the entire thing and uploaded all (but one) of the images. I also put major work into the
336:
of your talk page, but the number of edits you have in that category. But just a bit more editing is pretty much all thats needed.
636:, and maybe some others, also slightly more discussion with users would be good. I will probably support again in about 6 weeks.
843:. Sub-three months is, as others have mentioned, too little time for Adminship. Keep it up and come back in a few months. --
864:
505:
He indicates a desire to fight vandals. Another administrator fighting vandalism will lessen the humour I see around here.
74:
978:
1006:
Of your articles or contributions to
Knowledge (XXG), are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
875:
426:
350:
278:
982:
868:
731:
Probably a great future admin, but this candidacy is premature. More experience is certainly needed in this case.
648:
Intentions seem good and can't find anything overly negative. But it is just to soon, give it a couple of months.--
490:
484:
434:
358:
286:
632:
Just barely fails my criteria. I'd like to see more
Knowledge (XXG) namespace edits especially AfDs, a bit of
683:, very few edits, especially in project space. Will support in a couple months if you become more active. --
1013:
509:
946:
910:
620:
517:
416:
340:
312:
268:
81:
929:
690:
581:
567:
473:
216:
193:
925:
It looks like a vote made in bad faith to me. The closing beauracrat will most likely ignore that vote.
887:
718:
701:
547:
533:
1100:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
763:
956:
937:
920:
896:
847:
835:
818:
806:
787:
768:
747:
735:
723:
706:
675:
663:
640:
624:
607:
604:
589:
554:
541:
461:
447:
403:
390:
371:
322:
299:
248:
224:
204:
183:
167:
150:
138:
122:
91:
458:
829:
803:
400:
202:
164:
495:
903:
815:
695:
656:
616:
537:
513:
68:
1075:
You have slightly under 1500 edits. Is there any reason your edit count might be misleading?
814:
Not enough time & more edits required. Pease re-apply for adminship in the future. :) --
715:
245:
1053:
633:
934:
926:
783:
757:
744:
586:
578:
572:
564:
387:
221:
213:
551:
844:
672:
600:
480:
135:
1056:
and waiting it out until the user was blocked. It did not cause me any stress at all.
1052:
after I reverted many vulgar edits of his. I dealt with it simply by reporting it at
1112:
1083:
1017:
457:
Not enough time editing wikipedia. Not enough edits. Not enough user interaction.--
198:
180:
1064:
1021:
953:
943:
917:
907:
860:
685:
649:
637:
319:
309:
88:
78:
64:
47:
1048:
I have only been in one edit conflict, of which a user vandalized my talk page (
1025:
892:
235:
147:
977:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
778:
732:
118:
470:
191:
I feel it is time to give him the mop. Unlikely to abuse admin tools. --
1104:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
1094:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
232:
This user has worked tirelessly on cleanup and reverting vandalism.
906:'s comment (on #6 for oppose) just a joke? What do you think? --
98:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
1024:
articles. As far as cleanup, I have put the most work into
755:, needs some more time, and more edits in project space. --
101:
I nominated myself, so I should accept the nomination :-)
28:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1086:
there will be a few in a row, but I started after that.)
1049:
1029:
159:
874:
Since the toolserver is wonky, here's the report from
599:. A tad too new. Not enough talk and user talk edits.
162:. </just a playful jab, no hard feelings: -->
1068:As always, questions are completely optional.
532:has about 20 edits, started yesterday, created
54:Final (8/17/4) ended 00:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
134:already voted here. Small world, isn't it? --
8:
117:- I almost nominated this editor recently. (
942:Great. Thanks so much for the response. --
413:
337:
265:
802:, perhaps later, needs more experience. -
863:'s edit count and contribution tree with
1012:I am most pleased of my article on the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
540:deleted, then pestered Naconkantari.
7:
1119:Unsuccessful requests for adminship
24:
536:which was a bogus religion which
979:Category:Knowledge (XXG) backlog
867:and the edit summary usage with
776:prefer more experience. Thanks,
428:
417:
352:
341:
280:
269:
902:Am I missing something, or is
414:
338:
332:Oh, I wasn't judging from the
266:
1:
947:
911:
444:
435:
368:
359:
313:
296:
287:
82:
987:administrators' reading list
1095:
967:Questions for the candidate
177:adminship is not a big deal
175:per Shultz and inasmuch as
158:- another editor with good
1135:
981:, and read the page about
957:11:52, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
938:11:43, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
921:11:31, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
897:04:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
848:00:13, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
836:07:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
819:06:29, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
807:04:47, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
788:22:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
769:19:03, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
748:17:52, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
736:17:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
724:16:04, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
707:15:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
676:14:29, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
664:13:12, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
641:12:42, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
625:12:21, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
608:11:56, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
590:11:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
577:Changing to weak support.
575:09:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
555:08:29, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
462:07:08, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
448:05:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
404:05:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
391:05:04, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
372:12:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
323:11:20, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
300:04:27, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
249:21:54, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
225:11:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
205:09:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
184:05:27, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
168:04:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
151:03:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
139:03:37, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
123:03:19, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
92:03:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
1097:Please do not modify it.
671:, needs some more time.
146:- meets my standards --
39:Please do not modify it.
1014:polar coordinate system
876:Interiot's other tool
30:request for adminship
996:copyright problems.
61:Candidate withdrew
534:Timothean religion
102:
538:User:Naconkantari
526:
512:comment added by
499:
430:
354:
282:
100:
1126:
1099:
951:
932:
915:
890:
832:
766:
760:
721:
693:
661:
654:
584:
570:
548:Have your say!!!
544:
525:
506:
493:
476:
446:
445:
442:
432:
431:
429:
424:
415:
370:
369:
366:
356:
355:
353:
348:
339:
317:
298:
297:
294:
284:
283:
281:
276:
267:
261:Reluctant Oppose
241:
238:
219:
201:
196:
86:
41:
1134:
1133:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1109:
1108:
1102:this nomination
930:
888:
884:
865:Interiot's tool
830:
786:
764:
758:
719:
704:
691:
657:
650:
582:
568:
542:
507:
488:
474:
441:
427:
423:
365:
351:
347:
293:
279:
275:
239:
236:
217:
194:
192:
51:
37:
34:did not succeed
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1132:
1130:
1122:
1121:
1111:
1110:
1107:
1106:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1063:Question from
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
983:administrators
969:
964:
963:
962:
961:
960:
959:
881:
880:
879:
872:
869:Mathbot's tool
851:
850:
838:
821:
809:
791:
790:
782:
771:
750:
738:
726:
709:
702:
678:
666:
643:
627:
610:
594:
593:
592:
557:
500:
478:
464:
452:
451:
450:
436:
418:
401:Samuel Wantman
393:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
360:
342:
288:
270:
252:
251:
227:
207:
186:
170:
153:
141:
125:
106:
105:
50:
45:
44:
43:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1131:
1120:
1117:
1116:
1114:
1105:
1103:
1098:
1092:
1091:
1085:
1084:factorization
1080:
1077:
1076:
1074:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1067:
1066:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1044:
1043:
1041:
1038:
1037:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1018:factorization
1015:
1011:
1008:
1007:
1005:
1002:
1001:
994:
991:
990:
988:
984:
980:
976:
973:
972:
971:
968:
958:
955:
952:
950:
945:
941:
940:
939:
936:
933:
928:
924:
923:
922:
919:
916:
914:
909:
905:
901:
900:
899:
898:
894:
891:
877:
873:
870:
866:
862:
858:
857:
856:
855:
849:
846:
842:
839:
837:
834:
833:
831:Tijuana Brass
825:
822:
820:
817:
813:
810:
808:
805:
804:Mailer Diablo
801:
798:
797:
796:
795:
789:
785:
781:
780:
775:
772:
770:
767:
762:
761:
754:
751:
749:
746:
742:
739:
737:
734:
730:
727:
725:
722:
717:
713:
712:Strong oppose
710:
708:
705:
700:
699:
698:
694:
689:
688:
682:
679:
677:
674:
670:
667:
665:
662:
660:
655:
653:
647:
644:
642:
639:
635:
631:
628:
626:
622:
618:
614:
611:
609:
606:
602:
598:
595:
591:
588:
585:
580:
576:
574:
571:
566:
562:
558:
556:
553:
549:
545:
539:
535:
531:
528:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
504:
501:
497:
492:
486:
482:
477:
472:
468:
465:
463:
460:
456:
453:
449:
443:
439:
433:
425:
422:
410:
407:
406:
405:
402:
397:
394:
392:
389:
384:
381:
373:
367:
363:
357:
349:
346:
335:
331:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
321:
318:
316:
311:
306:
303:
302:
301:
295:
291:
285:
277:
274:
262:
259:
258:
257:
256:
250:
247:
244:
243:
242:
231:
228:
226:
223:
220:
215:
211:
208:
206:
203:
200:
197:
190:
187:
185:
182:
178:
174:
171:
169:
166:
165:Richardcavell
161:
157:
154:
152:
149:
145:
142:
140:
137:
133:
129:
126:
124:
120:
116:
113:
112:
111:
110:
99:
96:
95:
94:
93:
90:
87:
85:
80:
76:
73:
70:
66:
62:
60:
56:
55:
49:
46:
42:
40:
35:
31:
26:
25:
19:
1096:
1093:
1078:
1072:
1062:
1061:
1045:
1039:
1022:trigonometry
1009:
1003:
992:
974:
966:
965:
948:
912:
904:Profundity06
885:
853:
852:
840:
828:
823:
811:
799:
793:
792:
777:
773:
756:
752:
740:
728:
711:
696:
686:
684:
680:
668:
658:
651:
645:
629:
617:Ambuj Saxena
612:
596:
560:
559:
529:
514:Profundity06
508:— Preceding
502:
466:
454:
437:
420:
408:
395:
382:
361:
344:
333:
329:
314:
304:
289:
272:
260:
254:
253:
234:
233:
229:
210:Weak Support
209:
188:
176:
172:
155:
143:
131:
127:
114:
108:
107:
97:
83:
71:
63:
58:
57:
53:
52:
38:
33:
27:
1026:Yahoo! Mail
753:Weak Oppose
745:Kungfu Adam
741:Weak Oppose
716:Computerjoe
630:Weak oppose
597:Weak oppose
469:per above.
396:Weak Oppose
383:Weak Oppose
714:per Rory.
496:2006-04-26
388:Patman2648
845:MarcoTolo
673:Conscious
601:Kimchi.sg
552:review me
489:at 07:44
308:short. --
136:Shultz IV
1113:Category
985:and the
927:DarthVad
854:Comments
579:DarthVad
565:DarthVad
543:ßlηguγΣη
522:contribs
510:unsigned
214:DarthVad
75:contribs
1065:JoshuaZ
861:Mets501
841:Neutral
824:Neutral
812:Neutral
800:Neutral
794:Neutral
759:Andy123
720:'s talk
703:(block)
638:JoshuaZ
530:Comment
459:Tbeatty
409:Comment
305:Comment
230:Support
199:iva1979
189:Support
173:Support
160:grammer
156:Support
144:Support
128:Support
115:Support
109:Support
104:voting.
65:Mets501
48:Mets501
1054:WP:AIV
816:Andeee
774:Oppose
765:(talk)
729:Oppose
681:Oppose
669:Oppose
646:Oppose
634:WP:AIV
613:Oppose
561:Oppose
503:Oppose
467:Oppose
455:Oppose
334:length
255:Oppose
148:Tawker
954:ts501
918:ts501
893:lkman
779:AndyZ
733:Xoloz
330:Reply
320:ts501
119:ESkog
89:ts501
59:Note:
32:that
16:<
1050:diff
1030:diff
1020:and
859:See
687:Rory
652:blue
621:talk
605:talk
518:talk
69:talk
895:-
659:520
491:UTC
471:NSL
240:ZMO
237:SCH
181:Joe
179:.
132:you
1115::
1079:A:
1046:A:
1040:3.
1032:).
1010:A:
1004:2.
993:A:
989:.
975:1.
886:--
697:96
623:)
603:|
550:-
546:|
524:)
520:•
440:-_
419:_-
364:-_
343:_-
292:-_
271:_-
163:-
121:)
36:.
1073:1
1028:(
949:e
944:M
935:r
931:e
913:e
908:M
889:E
878::
871:.
784:t
692:0
619:(
587:r
583:e
573:r
569:e
516:(
498:)
494:(
487:)
485:C
483:+
481:T
479:(
475:E
438:P
421:M
362:P
345:M
315:e
310:M
290:P
273:M
246:✍
222:r
218:e
195:S
84:e
79:M
72:·
67:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.