311:
edits: 66.41% Minor edits: 72.29% Average edits per day: 175.95 (for last 1000 edit(s)) Article edit summary use (last 531 edits): Major article edits: 99.58% Minor article edits: 73.68% Analysis of edits (out of all 5000 edits shown on this page and last 5 image uploads): Notable article edits (creation/expansion/major rewrites/sourcing): 0.42% (21) Significant article edits (copyedits/small rewrites/content/reference additions): 2.28% (114) Superficial article edits (grammar/spelling/wikify/links/tagging): 30.68% (1534) Unique image uploads (non-deleted/reverts/updates): 4 (checks last 5000) Superficial article edits marked as minor: 7.21% Special edit type statistics: All edits to deletion pages: 12.28% (614 edit(s)) Marked XfD/DRV votes: 0.48% (24 edit(s)) Article deletion tagging: 0.94% (47 edit(s)) Edits to "copyright problems" pages: 0% (0 edit(s)) Edits to RfAs: 0.18% (9 edit(s)) Marked RfA votes: 0% (0 support vote(s)) || (0 oppose vote(s)) Page moves: 2.08% (104 edit(s)) (67 moves(s)) Page redirections: 0.86% (43 edit(s)) Page (un)protections: 0% (0 edit(s)) User talk warnings: 0.72% (36 edit(s)) Breakdown of all edits: Unique pages edited: 3785 | Average edits per page: 1.32 | Edits on top: 27.36% Edits marked as major (non-minor/reverts): 39.3% (1965 edit(s)) Edits marked as minor (non-reverts): 2.92% (146 edit(s)) Marked reverts (reversions/text removal): 28.56% (1428 edit(s)) Unmarked edits with no summary: 27.32% (1366 edit(s)) Edits by
Knowledge (XXG) namespace: Article: 59.36% (2968) | Article talk: 0.98% (49) User: 1.7% (85) | User talk: 18.16% (908) Knowledge (XXG): 18.7% (935) | Knowledge (XXG) talk: 0.08% (4) Image: 0.02% (1) Template: 0.02% (1) Category: 0.96% (48) Portal: 0.02% (1) Help: 0% (0) MediaWiki: 0% (0) Other talk pages: 0% (0)
90:, and every time he performs a revert (which he has hundreds, if not thousands, of times), he makes sure to talk to and/or warn the vandals. In addition to all of the above excellent traits, he marks his edits as minor whenever it is appropriate, and he always uses edit summaries. I have never nominated someone to be an admin before, but I don't know if I've ever seen a non-sysop as qualified to become one as NawlinWiki. Suffice it to say, I think this user is highly qualified to be an administrator; he not just has a need for the admin tools, but would use them extremely well.
82:) – Over the past few months, I have had the good fortune of interacting with NawlinWiki, and after seeing his contributions, achievements, and dedication to Knowledge (XXG), there is no doubt in my mind that he would be an excellent administrator. First off, while Nawlin has only been seriously contributing for about 4 1/2 months, he has thousands upon thousands of edits- almost 2,500 in August alone. He is an incredibly friendly and helpful user; Nawlin's talk page (and talk archive) are full of barnstars, thank yous, and other commendations. He is highly active in
1491:. I think it's worth raising as a concern that NawlinWiki is sometimes more deletionist than I would like. MarkGallagher/Fuddlemark raises an excellent point that NawlinWiki is far too prone to rely on "NN, delete" as his deletion justification, and I would hope that he/she will cease that behavior. However, on the whole this editor has contributed strongly to the Knowledge (XXG), is polite and productive. If I think it's a problem I'll have to monitor AfD more closely and try to counterbalance.
155:, or, for example, being able to stop someone who is repeatedly recreating a nonsense article. I am aware that I have a little bit of a deletionist leaning, and would keep that in mind and would deliberately try to compensate for that by avoiding deleting borderline articles or images and letting the XfD processes take their course.
1744:
I have never assumed bad interactions, i am saying there is not enough information for me to make a decision. Maybe i should be considering a neutral stance but i have to say i am swayed to oppose by the severe lack of talk edits. In my view it is the job of the nominator to give the examples that i
1713:
I think you misundertand my objections. My complaint is i have not seen him interact with other users from looking through his talk page diffs. However the nominator seems to imply he is very helpful and friendly. I am not out to search for bad things I want to be shown the good things. With regard
231:
I'm a youth soccer referee in real life -- I'm used to dealing with abuse. :) Basically, I try not to feel like I have ownership of articles here. While I can't say I have been perfectly polite and gentle in every exchange, I don't think I've been involved in any flame wars and wouldn't expect to
150:
requests), categorizing, and working on articles and images for deletion. It seems that the
Articles for Speedy Deletion page is often backlogged, and I would be very willing to help monitor and deal with that page. What I would like most to use admin powers for is being able to stop a rapidfire
1734:
here. You can't enough find any examples of interactions, so you assume this means he will have bad interactions. He's created articles in the past few days so you assume they were created for this RfA. At every turn you're assuming the worst of the candidate... which is what we try to avoid here.
894:
and always assumed he/she was addressing the reports, rather than making the reports. I like his/her eagerness to stop real-time vandalism, an action I feel to be very important in terms of
Knowledge (XXG) maintenance. I also appreciate the candidate's honesty and self-realisation in regards to
536:
I trust Nawlin with the mop and flamethrower just as much as anyone else, but I know that RfAs have been damaged by early votes, and Nawlin hasn't even accepted yet (although he seems more than willing to on
Kicking222's talk page). Anyhow, just a suggestion/concern, I'd never impose anything on
310:
Viewing contribution data for user NawlinWiki (over the 5000 edit(s) shown on this page) (FAQ) Time range: 34 approximate day(s) of edits on this page Most recent edit on: 4hr (UTC) -- 20, Aug, 2006 || Oldest edit on: 23hr (UTC) -- 16, July, 2006 Overall edit summary use (last 1000 edits): Major
1681:
Inflated edit counts due to vandal fight and such look impressive but what does it tell us about the candidate? NawlinWiki has only 120 article talk page edits and hardly any of those few are actually part of a conversation but mostly vandalism reverts. Most of the articles mentioned above, in
1745:
need to make a decision. I have looked for examples and see practically none of collaborative interations with other wikipedians. I am assuming good faith that they they are out there. I am asking people to show me where they are. Anyone can rack up tons of edits with vandal fight
1910:
I like NawlinWiki, and it's good to see more referees editing :-). However, I think he may have a little ways to go yet before becoming Cluey enough for adminship. I'm also unimpressed by some of his AfD nominations, such as the one he cited in his answers to the questions, and
623:
I've noticed his contributions for some time now (actually I thought he was following me around at one point - he just makes so many contributions to new/troubled articles that he was inevitably working on a lot of the same articles I was).
502:... Shouldn't we wait? I'm as excited as anyone (actually, yesterday I looked to see if Nawlin had ever been nominated, so this is great timing), but shouldn't we hold off until the questions are answered, just for good form?
1714:
to the articles, I am not seeking vast contributions but enough to know he can collaborate. Since many of the articles he has started in the last few days it is impossible to know how he collaborates. He states that "
1851:. Per David D. 14,000 edits, but only 120 to article Talk: pages? Knowledge (XXG) is about building an encyclopedia, and this editor needs to interact far more in the actual creation of encyclopedia articles.
1682:
response to question 2, have been created in the last few days. I need to see a lot more evidence that this user is actually interacting with other users in wikipedia. The nominator says above "
527:
Tell you what: If he answers that he's planning to use his admin tools to create entries for all gaming clans and myspace bands, I'll change my vote, but for now I'll let it stand ;-)
1082:
I would like to see more work on edit summaries and writing articles, I am happy that NawlinWiki is a referre, and user seems to be qualifiied enough to hold the mop and bucket.--
1251:
without question. One of our most useful vandal fighters, NawlinWiki has shown a strong understanding of policy and is a reliable contributor. Will make an excellent admin, IMHO.
225:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
1686:". I think it would be a good idea to be more specific with regard to where these interactions have occurred. It is hard to find any looking through the NawlinWiki's edits.
1099:. I've run into NawlinWiki many times on AIV and always found them a good spotter for naughty things going on. Please try to up the percentages on edit summaries though. :)
537:
anyone here and I'll cast my support in just as soon as Nawlin finishes typing his acceptance. (Unless I'm asleep, which frequently happens when good candidates come up.)
1460:. I've run into NawlinWiki several times in the course of my vandal hunts on Knowledge (XXG), and I've seen excellent work as a countervandal and in working with others.
615:
192:
121:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge (XXG) in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
1912:
1409:
per all of above. Good editor, can use the tools, no worries. Suggest adjusting
Preferences to remind when an edit's about to be posted without a summary.
1111:. I've seen NawlinWiki around a lot and developed a sense of trust for his judgement. Edit summaries % is a worry as above but I've go no other concerns -
1969:
137:
1421:
per above and below. Skilled and productive editor. Has neither glaring personality defects nor perverse fixations on article content disputes. —
972:
1951:
1718:". I'd say it is hard to tell since most are so recent. Just out of interest, were those recent articles created specifically for this RfA?
1424:
1749:. I'm afraid huge numbers of edits are the not part of my criteria when considering a candidate. I look for the quality of the edits.
1362:- Time.OnWiki != Experience. I should mention that I was promoted at 2 months... with heavy vandal fighting... it's not a big deal --
86:, in both adding to discussions and nominating articles for deletion. Nawlin is also an incredible reverter of vandalism- he frequents
33:
17:
1305:
1006:
1832:
The only contributions from this user have been attacks against NawlinWiki on this RfA, and the user was subsequently blocked. --
1069:
79:
646:
203:. Finally, "rescuing" and expanding articles about noteworthy people that were incomplete or about to get deleted, such as
1039:
490:
as nominator. If only I'd remembered to put in this official vote when I was creating said nom, I could've been first! --
129:
1087:
878:
1887:
from seeing this editor around in the various
Wikispaces but I require a fuller answer to question 1 before committing.
841:. Excellent editor and vandal fighter. He/she has a great deal of edits to user_talk and Knowledge (XXG) namespaces. --
165:
Of your articles or contributions to
Knowledge (XXG), are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
320:
133:
1698:
So you're unhappy that the candidate hasn't got heavily involved with writing articles, and you are not sure that "
1223:
951:
1890:
1836:
1496:
1386:
1329:
1461:
896:
204:
1920:
1652:
1303:
1870:
for now, very weak answer to question 1, brief answers to other questions give me very little to go on. --
1159:
1020:
293:
1053:
992:
945:
905:
763:
1398:
1316:
1202:
1002:
258:
243:
1950:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
1936:
1924:
1903:
1874:
1855:
1839:
1827:
1814:
1799:
1790:
1776:
1756:
1739:
1725:
1708:
1693:
1666:
1654:
1626:
1603:
1591:
1570:
1557:
1539:
1527:
1511:
1499:
1464:
1451:
1413:
1401:
1389:
1377:
1366:
1354:
1342:
1319:
1307:
1296:
1287:
1267:
1264:
1255:
1243:
1231:
1205:
1192:
1183:
1166:
1139:
1127:
1118:
1103:
1091:
1074:
1043:
1023:
1011:
980:
956:
931:
919:
907:
882:
859:
833:
819:
804:
786:
774:
761:
A very good vandal fighter, impressive contributions and edit stats. It is time to give him the mop. --
753:
724:
692:
665:
649:
628:
599:
587:
575:
557:
531:
522:
494:
482:
305:
285:
261:
246:
107:
94:
1702:" is a true statement. Any difs to back this up? Such as incivil edit summaries/messages? Thank you.--
997:
989:
1619:
1587:
1153:
1065:
940:
874:
800:
73:
1833:
1549:
1492:
1351:
1197:
1115:
867:
Not an admin? You're the second recipient of the Crazy
Russian Cliche. Really, I never use it... -
747:
1736:
625:
146:
The things I've been doing on a non-sysop basis so far: reverting vandalism (including monitoring
1916:
1753:
1722:
1690:
1649:
1536:
1440:
I had a so-so encounter in an AfD involving
Clearview Mall, but aside from that, I'm all for it.
1213:: Have seen NawlinWiki's work and see no reason not to support him. A strong candidate indeed. --
928:
772:
642:
608:
1772:-- only 4 months here, edit count is not everything, try again in 6 months I'll likly support --
1479:
62:
1786:
1704:
1446:
1036:
280:
200:
1663:
1410:
1394:
1284:
916:
180:
1731:
891:
257:: I noticed that your e-mail is not activated. Would you be so kind as to activate it now?
152:
147:
87:
83:
1612:
1580:
1175:
1124:
1061:
869:
795:
715:
548:
513:
491:
316:
196:
176:
172:
104:
91:
69:
1535:, and how. Good guy and well-deserving. I have no doubt he'll wield the mop responsibly.
915:—If not good enough to be an Admin, then we may be setting the standards a bit too high.
1220:
1112:
965:
842:
816:
733:
674:
584:
188:
1963:
1824:
1750:
1719:
1687:
1567:
1276:
1275:-- not only a vandal fighter, but also helped out with putting actual truth into the
1136:
1100:
829:
794:
I can't usefully add anything to what Andrew Lenahan and Siva1979 have already said.
768:
658:
637:
528:
479:
1662:
This user has contributed in many edits and is obviously now ready for adminship --
1385:. Noticed as a result of baseball-related contributions; seems like a good editor. -
1052:, despite being a little weak in minor edit summaries and talk participation. --Slgr
1635:
1524:
1523:
worthwhile additions in content and seems active in the community. No red flags. -
1508:
1441:
1374:
1252:
1240:
1133:
Overall edit summary use (last 1000 edits): Major edits: 66.41% Minor edits: 72.29%
1032:
1031:
Very rare I say anything in these parts, back to the shadows. --Signed and Sealed,
572:
275:
208:
328:
1327:
Changing my vote from neutral in the light of expansion of answer to question 1.
1811:
1810:. Repeated tagged pages for deletion, attempting to remove them from the site.
1600:
1363:
1280:
1083:
783:
604:
212:
184:
128:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
1944:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1852:
1796:
1773:
1475:
705:
596:
538:
503:
1933:
1215:
813:
1871:
1823:
user repeatedly recreated an article that is now salted, no other edits.
191:. Also, catching largescale, creative vandalism/nonsense: for example,
607:
is the most beautiful city in the U.S., and quite possibly the world.
1954:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
1784:? Starting editing from 4 April 2006, so been here nearly 5 months.--
571:
Very very impressive contribs and edit stats. He has my support --
1579:. I see his name on WP:AIV all the time. Give him the mop :) --
1350:. I was quite impressed when I first saw him on my watchlist.
1135:
is I believe the number I was commenting on, from VoA's tool.
1123:
99% for major edits and 73% for minor edits is a concern? --
101:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
1048:
I've met him a few times before, and I give him a very nice
939:. Great vandalfighter and good communication with others. -→
657:
per previous good interactions and the No Big Deal clause.
242:: Would you mind elaborating on the first question please?
1648:
though it already looks headed for a successful close --
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1716:
I try not to feel like I have ownership of articles here
890:
I often see the candidate's name in the edit history of
1428:
964:
as an excellent vandal-squisher. We always need more.
171:
Creating articles on significant people: for example,
1700:
NawlinWiki is an incredibly friendly and helpful user
1684:
NawlinWiki is an incredibly friendly and helpful user
193:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/VGC Premiership
1295:
A great vandal fighter who will use the mop wisely.
1279:
article when I've been fighting vandalism to it. --
1151:, does a good job with a lot of thankless work. --
274:I've semi-protected this due to heavy vandalism.
827:excellent editor who has earned the promotion. —
673:due to overall excellent contributions to AfD.
704:this was going to go live while I was asleep.
255:Second optional question from SynergeticMaggot
151:vandal in progress, rather than reporting to
8:
888:Hrm, thought he was already an admin Support
1019:. I'd say something, but it's been said.
1730:Wow, I'm sorry but this just seems like
732:He always beats me to vandal reverts! --
1795:Well I'm looking for around 9 months --
1422:
240:Optional question from SynergeticMaggot
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
7:
331:(as of 16:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC))
24:
1970:Successful requests for adminship
1577:Omg I overlooked this one Support
1782:First edit 15:42, June 30, 2005
130:Category:Knowledge (XXG) backlog
1:
1507:per nom...good contributor!
138:administrators' reading list
1937:16:09, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
1925:13:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1904:10:55, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
1875:10:42, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
1856:22:22, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
1840:17:41, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
1828:17:38, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
1815:17:31, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
1800:01:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
1791:18:45, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1777:18:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1757:04:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1740:04:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1726:02:17, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1709:01:50, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1694:22:19, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
1667:10:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1655:10:01, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1627:18:25, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
1604:17:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
1592:14:11, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
1571:11:01, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
1558:00:34, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
1540:22:07, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
1528:21:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
1512:17:38, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
1500:17:31, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
1465:05:16, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
1452:17:55, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
1414:15:49, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
1402:13:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
1390:13:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
1378:03:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
1367:01:21, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
1355:00:44, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
1343:21:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
1320:19:40, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
1308:19:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
1288:18:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
1268:17:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
1256:17:25, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
1244:08:35, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
1232:04:33, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
1206:03:07, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
1184:23:13, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1167:23:07, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1140:11:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
1128:02:53, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
1119:21:47, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1104:20:33, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1092:20:13, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1075:19:53, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1044:17:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1024:14:52, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1012:14:23, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
981:07:58, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
957:07:23, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
932:07:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
920:04:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
908:02:23, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
883:01:33, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
860:00:07, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
834:00:05, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
820:21:01, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
805:20:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
787:17:56, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
775:17:53, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
754:16:47, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
725:16:32, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
693:16:31, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
666:16:13, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
650:14:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
629:13:11, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
616:13:09, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
600:12:32, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
588:11:35, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
576:11:26, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
558:22:25, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
532:22:17, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
523:22:14, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
495:22:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
483:22:10, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
319:'s edit summary usage with
306:04:33, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
286:18:21, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
262:10:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
247:10:48, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
117:Questions for the candidate
108:23:56, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
95:22:07, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
1986:
1489:Slightly qualified support
1434:16:02, Aug. 22, 2006 (UTC)
132:, and read the page about
812:over 21000 edits! Wow! --
583:. No problems I can see.
1947:Please do not modify it.
782:could use the tools. --
1191:- he was on my hitlist
595:- good vandal fighter.
39:Please do not modify it
1239:I like this editor. --
353:Distinct pages edited
1641:20:28, 25 August 2006
447:Knowledge (XXG) talk
372:15:42, June 30, 2005
34:request for adminship
1387:Hit bull, win steak
488:Superstrong support
361:Average edits/page
1808:Very strong oppose
1732:assuming bad faith
1218:
917:Williamborg (Bill)
478:. Got here first.
1483:
1216:
1193:User:Blnguyen/RfA
1073:
1021:Green caterpillar
881:
803:
462:
461:
327:Edit count using
205:W.A. "Tony" Boyle
201:User:24.181.67.89
1977:
1949:
1902:
1900:
1895:
1883:Tending towards
1789:
1707:
1638:
1624:
1617:
1585:
1552:
1485:
1478:
1462:Heimstern Läufer
1449:
1444:
1341:
1339:
1334:
1317:SynergeticMaggot
1301:
1230:
1181:
1178:
1165:
1162:
1156:
1059:
1056:
995:
978:
954:
948:
943:
903:
902:
873:
857:
852:
847:
832:
799:
771:
766:
741:
722:
712:
690:
687:
684:
681:
662:
640:
636:very good user.
613:
555:
545:
520:
510:
439:Knowledge (XXG)
334:
333:
329:Interiot's tool2
302:
299:
296:
291:Last 5000 edits.
283:
278:
259:SynergeticMaggot
244:SynergeticMaggot
181:Zelda Fichandler
41:
1985:
1984:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1952:this nomination
1945:
1896:
1893:(aeropagitica)
1891:
1889:
1785:
1703:
1642:
1636:
1620:
1613:
1581:
1550:
1472:
1447:
1442:
1335:
1332:(aeropagitica)
1330:
1328:
1297:
1228:
1214:
1179:
1176:
1160:
1154:
1152:
1090:
1054:
1010:
993:
977:
969:
952:
946:
942:Buchanan-Hermit
941:
898:
897:
853:
848:
843:
828:
764:
762:
752:
737:
716:
707:
688:
685:
682:
679:
660:
638:
609:
549:
540:
514:
505:
312:
300:
297:
294:
281:
276:
197:User:Woodylogan
195:; the socks of
177:Patience Wright
173:Edward Villella
52:
37:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1983:
1981:
1973:
1972:
1962:
1961:
1957:
1956:
1940:
1939:
1927:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1864:
1863:
1859:
1858:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1830:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1675:
1674:
1670:
1669:
1657:
1643:
1640:
1629:
1606:
1594:
1574:
1560:
1542:
1530:
1514:
1502:
1493:Captainktainer
1486:
1467:
1456:Very happy to
1454:
1435:
1433:
1419:Strong support
1416:
1404:
1392:
1380:
1369:
1357:
1352:Bibliomaniac15
1345:
1322:
1310:
1299:Baseball,Baby!
1290:
1270:
1263:great editor.
1258:
1246:
1234:
1224:
1208:
1186:
1169:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1106:
1094:
1086:
1077:
1046:
1026:
1014:
1000:
983:
971:
959:
934:
922:
910:
885:
862:
839:Strong support
836:
822:
810:Strong Support
807:
789:
777:
756:
746:
727:
695:
675:Andrew Lenahan
671:Strong Support
668:
652:
631:
618:
602:
590:
578:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
485:
476:Strong support
472:
471:
467:
466:
465:
460:
459:
456:
452:
451:
448:
444:
443:
440:
436:
435:
432:
428:
427:
424:
420:
419:
416:
412:
411:
408:
404:
403:
400:
396:
395:
392:
388:
387:
384:
380:
379:
377:
374:
373:
370:
366:
365:
362:
358:
357:
354:
350:
349:
346:
342:
341:
338:
325:
324:
321:mathbot's tool
309:
289:
288:
271:
270:
266:
265:
251:
250:
236:
235:
234:
233:
219:
218:
217:
216:
189:Carla Overbeck
159:
158:
157:
156:
134:administrators
119:
118:
113:
111:
110:
103:I accept. :)
51:
46:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1982:
1971:
1968:
1967:
1965:
1955:
1953:
1948:
1942:
1941:
1938:
1935:
1931:
1928:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1909:
1905:
1901:
1899:
1894:
1888:
1886:
1882:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1873:
1869:
1866:
1865:
1861:
1860:
1857:
1854:
1850:
1847:
1841:
1838:
1835:
1831:
1829:
1826:
1822:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1798:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1788:
1783:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1775:
1771:
1768:
1758:
1755:
1752:
1748:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1738:
1733:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1724:
1721:
1717:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1706:
1701:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1692:
1689:
1685:
1680:
1677:
1676:
1672:
1671:
1668:
1665:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1647:
1644:
1639:
1633:
1630:
1628:
1625:
1623:
1618:
1616:
1615:Daniel's page
1610:
1607:
1605:
1602:
1598:
1595:
1593:
1590:
1589:
1586:
1584:
1578:
1575:
1573:
1572:
1569:
1564:
1561:
1559:
1556:
1554:
1553:
1546:
1543:
1541:
1538:
1537:VoiceOfReason
1534:
1531:
1529:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1515:
1513:
1510:
1506:
1503:
1501:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1487:
1484:
1481:
1477:
1471:
1468:
1466:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1453:
1450:
1445:
1439:
1436:
1432:
1430:
1426:
1420:
1417:
1415:
1412:
1408:
1405:
1403:
1400:
1396:
1393:
1391:
1388:
1384:
1381:
1379:
1376:
1373:
1370:
1368:
1365:
1361:
1358:
1356:
1353:
1349:
1346:
1344:
1340:
1338:
1333:
1326:
1323:
1321:
1318:
1314:
1311:
1309:
1306:
1304:
1302:
1300:
1294:
1291:
1289:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1277:John Goodsall
1274:
1271:
1269:
1266:
1262:
1259:
1257:
1254:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1238:
1235:
1233:
1229:
1227:
1221:
1219:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1204:
1200:
1199:
1194:
1190:
1187:
1185:
1182:
1173:
1170:
1168:
1163:
1157:
1150:
1147:
1141:
1138:
1134:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1126:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1117:
1114:
1110:
1107:
1105:
1102:
1098:
1095:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1078:
1076:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1058:
1051:
1047:
1045:
1041:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1027:
1025:
1022:
1018:
1015:
1013:
1008:
1004:
999:
996:
991:
987:
984:
982:
976:
975:
967:
963:
960:
958:
955:
949:
944:
938:
935:
933:
930:
929:Mailer Diablo
926:
923:
921:
918:
914:
911:
909:
906:
904:
901:
893:
889:
886:
884:
880:
876:
872:
871:
866:
863:
861:
858:
856:
851:
846:
840:
837:
835:
831:
826:
823:
821:
818:
815:
811:
808:
806:
802:
797:
793:
790:
788:
785:
781:
778:
776:
773:
770:
767:
760:
757:
755:
751:
750:
745:
744:
740:
736:
731:
728:
726:
723:
720:
714:
713:
711:
703:
699:
696:
694:
691:
676:
672:
669:
667:
664:
656:
653:
651:
648:
644:
641:
635:
632:
630:
627:
622:
619:
617:
614:
612:
606:
603:
601:
598:
594:
591:
589:
586:
582:
579:
577:
574:
570:
567:
559:
556:
553:
547:
546:
544:
535:
534:
533:
530:
526:
525:
524:
521:
518:
512:
511:
509:
501:
498:
497:
496:
493:
489:
486:
484:
481:
477:
474:
473:
469:
468:
464:
463:
457:
454:
453:
449:
446:
445:
441:
438:
437:
433:
430:
429:
425:
422:
421:
417:
414:
413:
409:
406:
405:
401:
398:
397:
393:
390:
389:
385:
382:
381:
378:
376:
375:
371:
368:
367:
363:
360:
359:
355:
352:
351:
347:
344:
343:
339:
336:
335:
332:
330:
322:
318:
314:
313:
308:
307:
304:
303:
287:
284:
279:
273:
272:
268:
267:
264:Done, thanks.
263:
260:
256:
253:
252:
249:Done, thanks.
248:
245:
241:
238:
237:
230:
227:
226:
224:
221:
220:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
166:
164:
161:
160:
154:
149:
145:
142:
141:
139:
135:
131:
127:
124:
123:
122:
116:
115:
114:
109:
106:
102:
99:
98:
97:
96:
93:
89:
85:
81:
78:
75:
71:
67:
66:
64:
61:Ended 10:36,
59:
56:
50:
47:
43:
40:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
1946:
1943:
1929:
1921:befuddle me!
1897:
1892:
1884:
1880:
1879:
1867:
1848:
1820:
1807:
1806:
1781:
1769:
1746:
1715:
1699:
1683:
1678:
1659:
1645:
1631:
1621:
1614:
1608:
1596:
1588:
1582:
1576:
1566:
1562:
1555:
1548:
1544:
1532:
1520:
1516:
1504:
1488:
1473:
1469:
1457:
1437:
1423:
1418:
1406:
1382:
1371:
1359:
1347:
1336:
1331:
1324:
1312:
1298:
1292:
1272:
1265:Budgiekiller
1260:
1248:
1236:
1225:
1210:
1196:
1188:
1171:
1148:
1132:
1108:
1096:
1080:Weak Support
1079:
1049:
1028:
1016:
985:
973:
961:
936:
924:
912:
899:
887:
870:CrazyRussian
868:
864:
854:
849:
844:
838:
824:
809:
791:
779:
758:
748:
742:
738:
734:
729:
718:
709:
706:
701:
697:
678:
670:
654:
633:
620:
611:Rama's arrow
610:
592:
580:
568:
551:
542:
539:
516:
507:
504:
499:
487:
475:
345:Total edits
326:
292:
290:
254:
239:
228:
222:
209:Will Wolford
168:
162:
143:
125:
120:
112:
100:
76:
68:
60:
57:
54:
53:
48:
38:
30:
28:
1664:Casmith 789
1611:Per above.
1411:Newyorkbrad
1395:Merovingian
749:Talk to me!
605:New Orleans
369:First edit
340:NawlinWiki
213:Gene Levitt
185:Dave Giusti
1917:fuddlemark
1480:2006-08-23
1285:(Elkspeak)
1155:Aguerriero
1125:Kicking222
796:Tonywalton
492:Kicking222
407:User talk
317:NawlinWiki
199:, such as
105:NawlinWiki
92:Kicking222
70:NawlinWiki
63:2006-08-26
49:NawlinWiki
31:successful
1932:per Pgk.
1599:per nom.
1519:Has made
1203:rant-line
1113:Peripitus
974:fix me up
966:RandyWang
900:hoopydink
663:you know?
659:Just zis
585:Kimchi.sg
431:Category
423:Template
337:Username
1964:Category
1913:this one
1825:Syrthiss
1751:David D.
1720:David D.
1688:David D.
1632:Support.
1198:Blnguyen
1172:Support.
1137:Syrthiss
1101:Syrthiss
1070:contribs
1066:messages
1029:Support:
830:Khoikhoi
639:ForestH2
529:Fan-1967
480:Fan-1967
269:Comments
136:and the
80:contribs
58:(64/3/3)
1930:Neutral
1898:(talk)
1885:support
1881:Neutral
1868:Neutral
1862:Neutral
1737:W.marsh
1660:Support
1646:Support
1637:FireFox
1609:Support
1601:Michael
1597:Support
1583:Grafikm
1563:Support
1545:Support
1533:Support
1525:MrFizyx
1517:Support
1509:Anger22
1505:Support
1470:Support
1458:support
1438:Support
1407:Support
1383:Support
1375:JoshuaZ
1372:Support
1360:Support
1348:Support
1337:(talk)
1325:Support
1313:Support
1293:Support
1273:Support
1261:Support
1253:Gwernol
1249:Support
1241:Guinnog
1237:Support
1211:Support
1189:Support
1149:Support
1109:Support
1097:Support
1050:Support
1033:JJJJust
1017:Support
998:nce Ong
986:Support
962:Support
937:Support
925:Support
913:Support
895:XfD's.
825:Support
792:Support
780:Support
769:iva1979
759:Support
730:Support
698:Support
655:Support
634:Support
626:W.marsh
621:Support
593:Support
581:Support
573:Ageo020
569:Support
500:Comment
470:Support
455:Portal
383:(main)
1853:Jayjg
1849:Oppose
1837:(talk)
1812:TSD284
1770:Oppose
1754:(Talk)
1723:(Talk)
1691:(Talk)
1679:oppose
1673:Oppose
1568:Szvest
1482:05:40Z
1364:Tawker
1281:Elkman
1177:Kungfu
1116:(Talk)
1084:danntm
892:WP:AIV
784:zzuuzz
415:Image
386:13949
364:1.362
356:15504
348:21121
211:, and
187:, and
153:WP:AIV
148:WP:AIV
88:WP:AIV
84:WP:AFD
1834:Chris
1797:T-rex
1787:Andeh
1774:T-rex
1705:Andeh
1476:Quarl
1425:freak
1057:ndson
879:email
865:What?
735:Mr. L
700:. I
597:MER-C
442:2302
410:3689
399:User
391:Talk
295:Voice
65:(UTC)
55:Final
16:<
1934:VanM
1821:note
1650:Lost
1551:Alex
1521:some
1497:Talk
1443:Yank
1429:talk
1399:Talk
1217:Kinu
1180:Adam
1161:talk
1062:page
927:. -
875:talk
845:Nish
814:CFIF
801:Talk
719:talk
710:rose
702:knew
552:talk
543:rose
517:talk
508:rose
434:648
402:361
394:120
315:See
298:-of-
277:Yank
74:talk
1915:.
1872:pgk
1747:etc
1565:--
1448:sox
990:Ter
850:kid
743:fty
686:bli
661:Guy
426:31
418:13
301:All
282:sox
232:be.
1966::
1923:)
1735:--
1634:—
1547:--
1495:*
1397:-
1315:.
1283:-
1201:|
1174:--
1068:-
1064:-
1042:)
1005:|
988:--
979:)
953:?!
855:64
689:nd
683:ar
680:St
677:-
624:--
458:3
450:5
229:A:
223:3.
207:,
183:,
179:,
175:,
169:A:
163:2.
144:A:
140:.
126:1.
36:.
1919:(
1622:☎
1474:—
1431:)
1427:(
1226:c
1222:/
1195:.
1164:)
1158:(
1088:C
1072:)
1060:(
1055:@
1040:C
1037:T
1035:(
1009:)
1007:C
1003:T
1001:(
994:e
970:/
968:(
950:/
947:™
877:/
817:☎
798:|
765:S
739:e
721:)
717:(
708:S
647:c
645:/
643:t
554:)
550:(
541:S
519:)
515:(
506:S
323:.
215:.
77:·
72:(
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.