Knowledge (XXG)

:Requests for adminship/Babajobu 2 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

1668:
if another Wikipedian has a radically different worldview or we think they're just plain out-to-lunch, they're still here trying to contribute in their own way. Remembering that point helps a lot. Still, I recently got frustrated over the deletion of the SIIEG project, which I thought served a legit purpose though it was certainly saddled with some destructive members. I took a pretty brief "semi-wikivacation", which basically meant a vacation from my watchlist. I explored new areas of Knowledge (XXG), found some new interests, and soon came back refreshed and ready to go! Still, I'll say this: I don't think it's appropriate for admins to use their admin fuctions in contentious areas in which they have an ongoing involvement, and thus I would not use admin functions in either Islam-related articles or animal-rights-related articles.
1708:
more recent handling of this issue is evidence of my willingness to compromise: though in my non-wiki life I almost always spell out numbers under one hundred, in Knowledge (XXG) I leave numerals between 11 and 100 alone. I only "correct" counting numbers under ten that are rendered as numerals. This was, in fact, precisely the position taken by those with whom I disagreed at the Village Pump! But since consensus developed around their position rather than mine, that's the standard I've adopted in my own edits. So I think this is solid evidence that my grammar/style fanaticism has matured into a desire only to make corrections that are consistent with those grammar and style guidelines that have been accepted by the Knowledge (XXG) community.
70:) is one of the most courteous and reasonable editors. He joined Knowledge (XXG) almost a year ago (exactly in January 28, 2005). He is also known for his mediating efforts between other users. He decided to have a wikibreak recently but because of his addiction he decided to come back with more positive energies. He simply deserves a new interesting experience in order to help at many issues and conflicts. He is very active in talk pages (articles and user ones) and I have no doubt about his merits as well as his capacities as an admin. I remember I had voted 1276:
and forth at each other and it's all quite unappealing. Two months is not a long enough time, nowhere near in my mind, to demonstrate similar behavior won't surface again. Again, I applaud the effort by all concerned to bury the hatchet and move forward but I believe that some more time for reflection and proof of an even temperament are in order before being elevated to admin. I regretfully oppose. --
1611:
work. I also acted on some move-to-wiktionary templates, and I would like to start doing more of this as I think we have too many such templates hanging around long term. Admin privileges aren't necessary for this, of course. Basically, I believe in the goals and vision of Knowledge (XXG), and would like to use admin privileges in whatever way will further those goals and realize that vision!
1286:
encyclopedia rather than rehashing the old battle. So I think that's a sign that we really do have the best interests of Knowledge (XXG) at heart; though of course that doesn't excuse a catfight in the Knowledge (XXG) namespace, either. And p.s., as per Fayssal's comments, I've never had a 3RR violation; nor even come close, so far as I can recall! :-).
856: 1688:
about donkeys). I realized that such "jokes" were counterproductive, and there's honestly been no more of that stuff. Also, I think, my use of edit summaries has been near 100% for the past couple months, so hopefully I'm in-the-clear in that area. Thanks for reading, and if you have any more concerns or questions, please do ask!
1638:, which were contributed by a very knowledgeable Wikipedian from Madras who speaks English as a second language. There's still plenty of work to do there, but I think I made his wonderful contributions accessible to a much wider readership. Silly as it is, I suppose I'm proud of my "Louis Epstein Punctuation Patrol": 1707:
A. Good and important question! I still do quite a bit of editing for grammar, but I've softened the missionary zeal I often brought to that task in my earlier days in Knowledge (XXG). I think you may have in mind the Village Pump dustup over whether to spell out numbers under one hundred. I think my
1667:
goes very, very far in helping Wikipedians settle disputes and interact with each other in a productive way. Except for the rare Willy-on-Wheels type character, we're all here because we're attracted to the idea of a universally available encyclopedia and we want to make that enyclopedia better. Even
1642:
that once a day I would clean up after a very good but eccentric Wikipedian so that the arbcom would not be required to ban the user. Arbcom agreed, and Louis Epstein is still with us. I say I'm proud of this because I think it demonstrates that I really care about the success of Knowledge (XXG), and
1377:
Hi Guettarda, fair enough. I'd just say that I don't want to "cleanse" anything, per se, though I do think that some articles on religion tend to get weighed down by a celebratory POV to the given religion. SIIEG focused on Islam-related articles, but I've removed praises and honorifics from articles
1275:
It is heartening to see this user and the others who got in a row at the end of October to bury the hatchet and try to work together. However, it's been a mere two months since that happened and I wasn't aware of the incident until this round of nominations. I went back and read these comments back
1392:
You're right, "cleanse" has connotations that I did not intend to convey. Of course, I have seen a lot more shockingly anti-Muslim rhetoric in Knowledge (XXG) than I have seen pro-Muslim positions. I felt sickened by what I read on the SIIEG page, and while I do not hold you personally responsible
1476:
Yeah, it does look icky...AE and I were both involved in an unfortunate clash of editors on Islam-related articles...I think the thing was trying to establish that this is in the past and that we're all friends again. But yeah, this series of "let's be friends again" edits all happened very quickly
1382:
as well. I don't see myself as "overcoming" the pious contributors of content, but rather taking their very informed contributions and providing a dispassionate tone suitable for Knowledge (XXG). Ultimately it's a collaborative process rather than an adversarial one, though disagreements do happen,
1610:
A. Well, I already do a good bit of vandalism patrol and new pages patrol. The admin rollback button would be a wonderful help, making vandalism reversion a much less laborious process. Someone pointed me to the monobook fix that provides a rollback button, but it's a jerry-fix that doesn't always
1687:
A. I've banished the sense of humor! Well, not exactly, but I've made sure not to use it in any way that could be viewed as inappropriate or as a personal attack (for example, when in the past I referred to the "hateful anti-donkey bigotry" of an editor with whom I was collaborating on an article
1285:
Thanks for the comments, Wgfinley. It's a legit issue to raise. I guess I would just mention that during and after the RfA debates of that time, when AE and I found ourselves interacting in the article space I was pleased to see that we were civil and workmanlike and focused on improving the
1662:
A. I enjoy Knowledge (XXG) a great deal, and in almost all cases I find it much more pleasurable than stressful. However, I have contributed in some contentious areas (animal rights and religion-related articles, in particular), and disagreement over content naturally arises. I think
1634:, I do lots of different stuff. I do a lot of copyediting: correcting grammar, spelling, punctuation, formatting, and so on. I feel that I've taken many articles with good content and made them much more readable. For example, I worked on some of the articles relating to 1303:
to nominate wikipedians for adminship. Anyway, I am glad someone opposed so I can express myself (as truster and trustee), to say that only a few of Wikipedians (including admins) take care of what's going on on Islam-related articles. I nominated both
571:. When Babajobu edits a page on my watchlist, I don't even need to check it because I know it'll be well-written, relevant, NPOV, and sourced if necessary. Add to that that he's always civil and interacts well, and it's clear he'll make a great admin. 1359: 398:: I really like editors who care about picky little details like punctuation and such. Though I disagreed with him on a few points about how to write numbers, I am impressed that he listened to others and learned from the exchange. 1308:
if you want) users for adminship to make a balance and not to abuse their positions. I had a lot of talks in private with both users (refering to the nomination above) to make sure that both nominators become aware of the policies
1518:
I don't know if I support or oppose. I can't support because I'm not too familiar with his edits with the exception of his Islam-related edits. I can't oppose because he might be a good admin. He has lots of patience.
1313:. I got their words. If not, the RfArb is there to judge if someone is abusing their power. I trust Babajobu as much as I trust Anonymous editor. Please, blame me if once you'd ever encounter any default. Cheers -- 1322:
I've had a chance to talk to Babajobu over the past few days and get to know him, I'm changing my position to support and am hopeful he will continue to demonstrate the attitude he's adopted since the dustup.
1295:
Thanks for the vote Wgfinley. And also thanks for your words about the move for reconciliation between two wikipedians. I am not sure about any existing guideline or policy explaining
175:
I was very impressed by Babajobu's offer to "supervise" LE's punctuation at the Arbcom hearing. I do hope, though, that he doesn't get into many grammatical arguments anymore! :)
1659:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
1639: 1552:
usage: 100% for major edits and 100% for minor edits. Based on the last 100 major and and 100 minor edits outside the Knowledge (XXG), User, Image, and Talk namespaces.
75: 1745: 1604: 1440:
Absolutely, AE, I appreciate the sentiment and I echo it! And I'll also say that I think our interactions in the past two months have been pretty good!
1427:
Babajobu and I have clearly had a big conflict before. I would like him and I to both leave the argument behind and start new. So how about it Baba? --
1490:
for meeeh?! I appreciate your actions guys. There was no need for any RfC, RfArb or any thing of those kinds. Enjoy! You both deserve it. --
1727: 1157: 78:
but this time I am officially nominating him for the reasons stated above. Babajobu has around 4300 edits in 1637 different articles!!! --
1402:
Okay. Thanks for the strike-out of "cleanse". I didn't suspect you intended the uglier connotations, but I appreciate the gesture anyway.
33: 17: 1393:
for that content, I found you defended it too strongly and combatively for me to feel confident that you are ready for admin tools.
1366:
remove a pro-Muslim bias from Knowledge (XXG). This makes me very uncomfortable with this editor, and I feel obligated to oppose.
485:
Passed my quiz on IRC quiz, and has managed to settle a fight with another user. Both show remarkable ability to handle conflict--
1684:
How have you addressed the sense-of-humor problems that were raised in your last RfA? And what about your use of edit summaries?
67: 1596: 1627:
Of your articles or contributions to Knowledge (XXG), are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
1600: 1249:. I was impressed by his offer to clean up after Louis Epstein; clearly shows his commitment to the encyclopedia. 538: 461: 1079: 443: 1467: 1199: 760: 657: 385: 228: 1254: 1008:
Nice to have the opportunity to give a vote of support to an editor who faced a difficult afd with class.
1183: 955: 924: 839: 815: 744: 514: 139: 1450: 1428: 986: 293: 265: 1726:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
1712: 1692: 1672: 1647: 1615: 1576: 1563: 1536: 1532: 1523: 1495: 1481: 1471: 1457: 1444: 1435: 1406: 1397: 1387: 1370: 1344: 1327: 1290: 1280: 1258: 1241: 1229: 1213: 1178: 1161: 1142: 1130: 1118: 1106: 1083: 1066: 1051: 1046: 1033: 1021: 1012: 1000: 988: 977: 965: 941: 929: 912: 900: 888: 872: 849: 827: 799: 788: 774: 739: 723: 711: 681: 669: 660: 653: 644: 628: 610: 590: 577: 563: 551: 519: 501: 489: 477: 465: 447: 417: 402: 390: 366: 358: 346: 334: 318: 295: 284: 272: 256: 232: 215: 203: 179: 161: 149: 121: 101: 83: 880:. Anyone doing Louis Epstein punctuation patrol deserves a reward for their service to the community. 1222: 1075: 575: 511: 1126:, as per nominator. Appears to be a trustworthy individual who will make good use of the toolset. 1635: 1063: 703: 587: 439: 343: 290: 212: 1042: 1500: 1463: 1315: 1192: 960: 847: 786: 753: 474: 380: 224: 126: 88: 61: 1531:- owing to previous incidents.. I'm not sure long enough has passed since then. Wont oppose. -- 782:- definitely a character I had already thought was an admin. Interacts well with the community. 1477:
in the space of about five minutes...and I think maybe it wasn't the best way to go about it.
1250: 1173: 1127: 974: 736: 624: 281: 248: 144: 983: 414: 399: 363: 313: 1664: 544: 1520: 1340:
Wow, thank you, Wgfinley!! It's much appreciated, and I'll make sure you don't regret it!
1139: 865: 820: 572: 507: 430: 1704:
Some editors may also wonder if you are still a vocal grammar fanatic. Please address.
1394: 1367: 1060: 909: 885: 689: 678: 532: 355: 327: 158: 1739: 1709: 1689: 1669: 1644: 1612: 1560: 1492: 1478: 1441: 1403: 1384: 1341: 1324: 1287: 1277: 1238: 1009: 997: 950: 844: 836: 783: 498: 200: 118: 98: 80: 57: 46: 157:
I thought he wasn't coming back until a few weeks from now, I would have nominated!
1170: 1018: 732: 720: 641: 619: 241: 134: 1643:
am willing to "take one for the team" when it serves Knowledge (XXG)'s interests.
1631: 1206: 767: 1115: 1092: 921: 486: 411: 304: 1595:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
1573: 1030: 1029:
What can be said , other than this editor demonstrates integrity under fire.--
938: 897: 862: 810: 796: 560: 425: 176: 1720:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1379: 1152: 881: 666: 603: 525: 456: 1226: 188: 937:. Good contributor, very helpful. Will make good use of admin tools. 855: 638: 1730:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
506:
Good guy, and it's always fun to get into a discussion with him :).--
1138:. As admin, Baba will be useful to the en.wikipedia community. 1311:(though I am sure both of them went maybe once to a 3RR stuff) 1449:
Thanks Baba. I will support now. Thanks for your vote too. --
95:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
1572:
Added a new question to clarify (though I support already!)
1074:
Good editor. I know him from the Louis Epstein case arbcom.
354:- does he do good work? Yes. Will this help the wiki? Yes. 53:
final (70/1/2) ending 15:19 Friday, January 6, 2006 (UTC)
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1587:
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
455:
Very good at talk page discussion, keeping neutral.
896:. Kind and courteous. Will make a great admin. -- 524:(edit confl) In all seriousness, not already one? 1358:- I found Babajou to be overly combative in the 1059:. Consistently writes helpful edit summaries. -- 835:Yay! I found a sturdy rail on the bandwagon! 371:Actually, being a stickler for grammar is one 8: 1364:"cleanse" Knowledge (XXG) of pro-Muslim bias 1150:- Sounds like he could help us all out. -- 438:. Calm, detail-oriented. Give him a mop. 169:- brill user! 16:45, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 677:Great user with a good sense of humour. -- 1378:on Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, and 97:With much gratitude, I happily accept! 807:Good bloke. Always keeps a cool head. 280:no question about it, solid editor. - 18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship 7: 1640:I promised the arbitration committee 1362:; he seems to think it important to 973:Good contributions, nice guy. :-) 76:his former nomination 2 months ago 24: 1746:Successful requests for adminship 996:Change to support, see below. -- 1597:Category:Knowledge (XXG) backlog 854: 637:-- cheerful, civil, good work. 410:will not abuse admin privileges. 240:, extremely reasonable editor. « 1221:- Admired his patient work on 1: 1713:17:10, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1693:16:13, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1673:16:13, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1648:16:13, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1616:16:13, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1577:16:51, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1524:02:47, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 1496:17:40, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1482:17:37, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1472:17:34, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1462:This looks ... ehm ... icky. 1458:17:26, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1445:17:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1436:17:02, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 775:21:57, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 740:17:50, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 731:. Hurray, another bandwagon! 724:16:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 712:14:08, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 682:13:08, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 670:12:40, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 661:12:37, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 645:09:49, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 629:08:54, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 611:08:43, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 591:04:21, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 578:03:58, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 564:00:51, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 552:00:14, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 520:00:13, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 502:23:11, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 490:22:53, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 478:22:28, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 466:22:21, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 448:21:00, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 418:19:47, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 403:18:43, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 391:18:36, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 367:18:33, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 359:18:13, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 347:18:09, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 335:18:04, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 319:17:51, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 296:17:34, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 285:17:28, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 273:17:26, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 257:17:18, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 233:17:11, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 216:17:07, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 204:16:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 180:16:51, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 162:16:41, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 150:16:23, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 122:15:58, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 102:15:19, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 84:07:55, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1605:administrators' reading list 920:, give him the mop already. 1583:Questions for the candidate 1564:04:33, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 1537:00:13, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 1407:07:11, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1398:06:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1388:06:44, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1371:06:31, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1345:01:43, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 1328:01:25, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 1291:12:45, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 1281:02:58, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 1259:13:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 1242:03:39, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 1230:22:29, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1214:21:08, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1179:20:23, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1162:06:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1143:20:57, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 1131:18:44, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 1119:06:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 1114:, actually edits articles. 1107:08:18, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 1084:04:40, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 1067:21:04, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 1052:19:52, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 1034:19:16, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 1022:14:36, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 1013:06:35, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 1001:01:25, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 989:00:55, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 978:00:26, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 966:00:09, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 942:22:07, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 930:21:47, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 913:18:53, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 901:17:46, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 889:16:56, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 873:16:45, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 850:09:21, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 828:08:47, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 800:07:14, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 789:07:12, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 1762: 1599:, and read the page about 1723:Please do not modify it. 1630:A. Well, I'm a bit of a 859:Sure, I'll support. -- 38:Please do not modify it 364:King of All the Franks 497:A model of civility. 303:, this will do fine. 34:request for adminship 1223:Islamofascism_(term) 594:I voted twice sorry. 1636:Ayyavazhi mythology 665:Now I can support. 116:- As nominator! -- 1048:£€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 39: 1502: 1317: 1049: 871: 128: 90: 37: 1753: 1725: 1499: 1455: 1433: 1314: 1211: 1204: 1197: 1190: 1176: 1104: 1101: 1098: 1095: 1047: 963: 958: 953: 927: 860: 858: 842: 823: 818: 813: 772: 765: 758: 751: 709: 706: 701: 698: 695: 692: 608: 547: 541: 535: 528: 517: 383: 332: 311: 270: 253: 246: 197: 194: 191: 147: 142: 137: 125: 87: 1761: 1760: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1728:this nomination 1721: 1451: 1429: 1207: 1200: 1193: 1184: 1174: 1160: 1102: 1099: 1096: 1093: 1076:Oleg Alexandrov 1061:Walter Siegmund 961: 956: 951: 925: 908:Long overdue. - 868: 840: 821: 816: 811: 768: 761: 754: 745: 707: 704: 699: 696: 693: 690: 604: 550: 545: 539: 533: 526: 515: 464: 381: 328: 305: 266: 249: 242: 195: 192: 189: 185:Okatepe, babun! 145: 140: 135: 50: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1759: 1757: 1749: 1748: 1738: 1737: 1733: 1732: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1601:administrators 1585: 1580: 1579: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1554: 1553: 1542: 1540: 1539: 1526: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1447: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1374: 1373: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1262: 1261: 1244: 1232: 1216: 1181: 1164: 1156: 1145: 1133: 1121: 1109: 1086: 1069: 1054: 1036: 1027:Strong Support 1024: 1015: 1003: 991: 980: 968: 944: 932: 915: 903: 891: 875: 866: 852: 830: 802: 791: 777: 742: 726: 714: 684: 672: 663: 647: 631: 613: 597: 596: 595: 566: 554: 530: 522: 504: 492: 480: 468: 460: 450: 440:TenOfAllTrades 433: 420: 405: 393: 369: 361: 349: 344:Kirill Lokshin 337: 321: 298: 287: 275: 259: 235: 218: 206: 182: 170: 167:Strong support 164: 155:Strong Support 152: 129: 105: 104: 49: 44: 43: 42: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1758: 1747: 1744: 1743: 1741: 1731: 1729: 1724: 1718: 1714: 1711: 1706: 1705: 1703: 1700: 1699: 1694: 1691: 1686: 1685: 1683: 1680: 1679: 1674: 1671: 1666: 1661: 1660: 1658: 1655: 1654: 1649: 1646: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1628: 1626: 1623: 1622: 1617: 1614: 1609: 1608: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1584: 1578: 1575: 1571: 1570: 1565: 1562: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1551: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1527: 1525: 1522: 1517: 1514: 1513: 1501: 1498: 1497: 1494: 1489: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1480: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1456: 1454: 1448: 1446: 1443: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1434: 1432: 1426: 1425: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1408: 1405: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1396: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1386: 1381: 1376: 1375: 1372: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1354: 1353: 1346: 1343: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1329: 1326: 1321: 1316: 1312: 1307: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1289: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1279: 1274: 1273: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1245: 1243: 1240: 1236: 1233: 1231: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1212: 1210: 1205: 1203: 1198: 1196: 1191: 1189: 1188: 1182: 1180: 1177: 1172: 1168: 1165: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1154: 1149: 1146: 1144: 1141: 1137: 1134: 1132: 1129: 1125: 1122: 1120: 1117: 1113: 1110: 1108: 1105: 1090: 1087: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1070: 1068: 1065: 1062: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1044: 1040: 1037: 1035: 1032: 1028: 1025: 1023: 1020: 1016: 1014: 1011: 1007: 1004: 1002: 999: 995: 992: 990: 987: 985: 981: 979: 976: 972: 969: 967: 964: 959: 954: 948: 945: 943: 940: 936: 933: 931: 928: 923: 919: 916: 914: 911: 907: 904: 902: 899: 895: 892: 890: 887: 883: 879: 876: 874: 869: 864: 857: 853: 851: 848: 846: 843: 838: 834: 831: 829: 826: 825: 824: 819: 814: 806: 803: 801: 798: 795: 792: 790: 787: 785: 781: 778: 776: 773: 771: 766: 764: 759: 757: 752: 750: 749: 743: 741: 738: 734: 730: 727: 725: 722: 718: 715: 713: 710: 702: 688: 685: 683: 680: 676: 673: 671: 668: 664: 662: 659: 655: 651: 648: 646: 643: 640: 636: 632: 630: 627: 626: 621: 617: 614: 612: 609: 607: 601: 598: 593: 592: 589: 585: 581: 580: 579: 576: 574: 570: 567: 565: 562: 558: 555: 553: 548: 542: 536: 529: 523: 521: 518: 513: 509: 505: 503: 500: 496: 493: 491: 488: 484: 481: 479: 476: 475:Mailer Diablo 472: 469: 467: 463: 458: 454: 451: 449: 445: 441: 437: 434: 432: 429: 428: 424: 421: 419: 416: 413: 409: 406: 404: 401: 397: 394: 392: 389: 388: 384: 382:Nightstallion 378: 374: 370: 368: 365: 362: 360: 357: 353: 350: 348: 345: 341: 338: 336: 333: 331: 325: 322: 320: 317: 316: 312: 310: 309: 302: 299: 297: 294: 292: 288: 286: 283: 279: 276: 274: 271: 269: 263: 260: 258: 254: 252: 247: 245: 239: 236: 234: 230: 226: 223:, of course. 222: 219: 217: 214: 210: 207: 205: 202: 198: 186: 183: 181: 178: 174: 171: 168: 165: 163: 160: 156: 153: 151: 148: 143: 138: 133: 130: 127: 124: 123: 120: 115: 112: 111: 110: 109: 103: 100: 96: 93: 92: 91: 89: 86: 85: 82: 77: 73: 69: 66: 63: 59: 55: 54: 48: 45: 41: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 1722: 1719: 1701: 1681: 1656: 1632:wikifactotum 1624: 1592: 1586: 1582: 1581: 1550:Edit summary 1549: 1543: 1541: 1533:Irishpunktom 1528: 1515: 1491: 1487: 1452: 1430: 1423: 1422: 1416: 1415: 1363: 1355: 1310: 1305: 1300: 1296: 1271: 1270: 1264: 1263: 1251:Kelly Martin 1246: 1234: 1218: 1208: 1201: 1194: 1186: 1185: 1166: 1151: 1147: 1135: 1128:Hall Monitor 1123: 1111: 1088: 1071: 1056: 1038: 1026: 1005: 993: 970: 946: 934: 917: 905: 893: 877: 863:drini's page 832: 809: 808: 804: 793: 779: 769: 762: 755: 747: 746: 728: 716: 686: 674: 649: 634: 623: 615: 605: 599: 583: 582: 568: 556: 494: 482: 470: 452: 435: 426: 422: 407: 395: 386: 379:for me. ;) — 376: 372: 351: 339: 329: 323: 314: 307: 306: 300: 282:FrancisTyers 277: 267: 261: 250: 243: 237: 220: 208: 184: 172: 166: 154: 131: 117: 113: 107: 106: 94: 79: 71: 64: 56: 52: 51: 30: 28: 1453:a.n.o.n.y.m 1431:a.n.o.n.y.m 1383:obviously. 588:Terence Ong 400:Jonathunder 268:a.n.o.n.y.m 213:Terence Ong 1559:Whoo-hoo! 1521:JuanMuslim 1468:fuddle me! 1464:fuddlemark 1140:Kingturtle 573:SlimVirgin 375:reason to 356:Rob Church 229:fuddle me! 225:fuddlemark 31:successful 1395:Guettarda 1380:Ayyavazhi 1368:Guettarda 1360:SIIEG MfD 1306:monitored 1153:Cyde Weys 1019:JuntungWu 910:JCarriker 679:Kefalonia 633:Definite 330:Phaedriel 159:karmafist 1740:Category 1710:Babajobu 1690:Babajobu 1670:Babajobu 1645:Babajobu 1613:Babajobu 1603:and the 1561:Babajobu 1544:Comments 1488:BurnStar 1479:Babajobu 1442:Babajobu 1404:Babajobu 1385:Babajobu 1342:Babajobu 1325:Wgfinley 1288:Babajobu 1278:Wgfinley 1239:Kin Khan 1072:Suppport 1010:Smmurphy 998:Wgfinley 784:jnothman 396:Suppport 352:Suppport 99:Babajobu 68:contribs 58:Babajobu 47:Babajobu 1529:Neutral 1516:Neutral 1424:Neutral 1417:Neutral 1247:Support 1235:Support 1219:Support 1195:γκυκλοπ 1171:the wub 1167:Support 1148:Support 1136:Support 1124:Support 1112:Support 1089:Support 1057:Support 1043:Eliezer 1039:Support 1006:Support 994:Support 971:Support 947:Support 935:Support 918:Support 906:Support 894:Support 878:Support 833:Support 805:Support 794:Support 780:Support 756:γκυκλοπ 733:Palmiro 729:Support 721:Bhadani 717:Support 687:Support 675:Support 650:Support 635:support 620:MicahMN 616:Support 600:Support 584:Support 569:Support 557:Support 495:Support 483:Support 471:Support 453:Support 436:Support 423:Support 408:Support 377:support 340:Support 324:Support 301:Support 291:Jaranda 278:Support 262:Support 238:Support 221:Support 209:Support 173:Support 132:Support 108:Support 72:neutral 1665:WP:AGF 1493:Szvest 1356:Oppose 1272:Oppose 1265:Oppose 1202:αίδεια 1116:Alphax 1064:(talk) 1017:Cool. 975:bogdan 962:(talk) 939:Jayjg 763:αίδεια 658:वार्ता 654:Deepak 487:Tznkai 415:(talk) 308:BD2412 119:Szvest 114:Suppa! 81:Szvest 1574:Xoloz 1031:CltFn 952:Sango 898:Jbamb 882:David 797:Yuber 606:Grue 561:MONGO 412:Gator 177:Xoloz 16:< 1486:Any 1297:when 1255:talk 1175:"?!" 1158:vote 1091:. -- 1080:talk 1041:. -- 922:Tito 886:Talk 737:Talk 719:: -- 667:El_C 639:+sj 527:NSLE 508:Sean 473:. - 457:Demi 444:talk 431:(ix) 373:more 244:Lord 201:Talk 62:talk 1702:4a. 1301:how 1299:or 1227:FRS 1103:el 984:Doc 957:123 837:Tom 812:Ban 700:493 618:-- 546:CVU 512:Bla 499:Arm 427:Fad 387:(?) 342:. — 251:ViD 146:Fox 136:Fir 74:at 1742:: 1682:4. 1657:3. 1625:2. 1607:. 1593:1. 1535:\ 1519:-- 1470:) 1323:-- 1257:) 1237:-- 1225:-- 1169:. 1100:er 1082:) 1045:| 982:-- 949:- 926:xd 884:| 861:( 735:| 708:lk 705:Ta 697:ns 694:yo 691:Dl 652:-- 622:| 602:. 586:-- 559:-- 516:ck 446:) 326:. 289:-- 264:-- 255:» 231:) 211:-- 199:| 187:— 36:. 1466:( 1304:( 1253:( 1209:* 1187:ε 1097:P 1094:M 1078:( 870:) 867:☎ 845:r 841:e 822:s 817:e 770:* 748:ε 656:| 642:+ 625:μ 549:) 543:+ 540:C 537:+ 534:T 531:( 510:| 462:C 459:/ 442:( 315:T 227:( 196:P 193:I 190:J 141:e 65:· 60:( 40:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
request for adminship
Babajobu
Babajobu
talk
contribs
his former nomination 2 months ago
Szvest
07:55, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Babajobu
15:19, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Szvest
15:58, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Fir
e
Fox
16:23, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
karmafist
16:41, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Xoloz
16:51, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
JIP
Talk
16:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Terence Ong
17:07, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
fuddlemark
fuddle me!

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.