Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Bgwhite

3282:. Sadly my search method is flawed due to the fact that it depends on the article to be picked up by the WP1.0 bot first so that its removal can be registered. So I suspect a lot more that fall through that net as he gets to the articles before the bot does. Removing sportspeople representing the USA from WP:USA is at least controversial if not worse. It is against AWB rules to make controversial edits with AWB as the shear volume and in this case a misleading editsummary makes it impossible to check back on the editors edits. So if the editor is already misusing the tools he is given he is in my mind not fit to be given extended tools. 3038:. I thought the answers to questions were excellent and all the previous comments in this RfA were pointing me to support, when I crashed up against Were's oppose. I have a lot of respect for Were, and that brought me up short, so I spent some time looking at the candidate's talk page, and deciding for myself how well they communicate with other users. Long story short, I end up here in support. Yes, I agree that one should try to work with another editor asking for advice about how to avoid deletion, so I hope the candidate takes that advice on board, but the overall pattern is one that I can trust. -- 947:, from my point of view he is following the Knowledge (XXG) guidelines to delete unencyclopedic entries, content etc. It might be incorrect to link these with his "friendliness" or "helpfulness". He had PRODed my article too. I have talked with him many times and found him very helpful and friendly. If I start giving details here, my post will be too long. You have said, he spends most of the time in deleting content, but, he is equally/more active in saving content. Multiple times he has asked in my talk page to check notability or find references or save articles.-- 3861:

encountering a valid CSD tag, they'll correctly delete it (98% of the time, say), and if they encounter an invalid CSD tag, they'll often (~50% of the time) incorrectly delete it. That seems like "not ready to be doing this" to me. If I'm off base - well, they'll be successful with scores of supports and a handful of opposes. But as far as I can tell, they're likely to screw up a lot of deletions. In the chart, I think points three and five are the correct metric to use (and anyone who's going to be working in deletion should be able to hit both pretty well).

263:

trying to do what is right and a good cop is better suited. At the other end of the spectrum, a bad cop is required. For the editors in between, you should always start out being courteous and helpful. After that, it is dependent on the situation. I really wish I knew what to do in what situation. No matter what, sometimes I will get it wrong and be the wrong cop. In the end, I try to be helpful, but if an editor will not listen or just doesn't get it, a more firm voice is needed. As my mom always said to me, sometimes I have to slap some sense into you.

294:. It has been tagged for over 10 days. The subject seems marginally notable just by reading the text. They are an actor and you can recall two minor named roles they've played in big films. The content is well written, it contains an infobox with a link to the subject's website, and there is a quality freely license photograph available. There are no citations/references of any kind. A Google search reveals next to nothing except trivial or routine coverage. However, you are unable to check magazine or newspaper sources at this time. What do you do? 3267:

concerned it is not on my watchlist so it must have been someone else noticing his edits and complaining. Chances are there are even more projects involved which could be established by someone with tolserver access going his AWB edits and checking for banner removals. I have noticed the pattern of project tag deletion early this year, but I looked for some recent cases which happened after I informed the editor that I consider these edits in breach of AWB rules, which were

108:

for the categorisation of difficult cases such as Icelandic, Korean, Arabic names etc. The great thing with Bgwhite is that he discusses a lot with other editors (he got a lot of barnstars due to that) and he never had big conflicts because he is capable of explaining his actions which are always well balanced. He certainly needs the tools so he can resolve moves, delete pages, be able to check deleted content, edit protected pages such as templates etc. --

1361:, nothing but collegial, clueful and constructive contributions in my experience. I run into this editor everywhere, and it's left a very positive impression. (I found this RfA by accident, I was recommending him elsewiki and wondered why he wasn't already an admin, pulled up an RfA page, briefly thought it might be very old (only 25 votes on an RfA? That must be ancient!), and only a few moments later realized the RfA was live.) -- 256:. I realise that you are discussing a particular scenario there, and I can see the humour in what you say, but the question I wanted to ask was: if you become an admin, will you be a "good" cop or a "bad" cop (or both)? I should say that I think we probably need both, but I'm interested in your thoughts, so I suppose I'm using that discussion to try and get a general feel for your views in that area. Thanks. 1375:. Bgwhite is a very helpful geek with enough content knowledge to know what it's like to create. I have no reason to believe they'll abuse the tools--not everyone always gets his sense of humor (I'm sure Mrs. Bgwhite doesn't) and he can be a bit rough around the edges, so I assume he'll polish it up some when acting as an admin. And while adminship is not a reward, maybe this will help him overcome... 1714:. His edits are done thoughtfully, carefully, and knowledgeably. He makes very few errors, but when he's informed of a mistake, he readily admits it and fixes it and/or takes steps to prevent it from happening again. Giving Bgwhite the tools may allow Drmies to be more productive in content creation, as he will no longer have to spend so much time processing Bgwhite's administrative requests. 4267:. WereSpielChequers and Casliber make a lot of good points that can't be easily overlooked. While I have far more deletionist tendencies than I do inclusionist, I feel that an administrator needs to be a light hand rather than a blunt weapon. Though this candidate will probably succeed in his bid, I strongly suggest he take the above comments to heart. 1295: 236:

get called every name in the book, be told of the bodily harm that would fall upon me and let it be known I wouldn't be working for anybody, anywhere. If I wasn't anywhere near calm, I wouldn't responded right away. Having a calm, level head prevented me from responding back in a hostile manner. I've carried this experience onto Knowledge (XXG).

3410:

prodded, such as only saying "non-notable" or "doesn't meet nobility guidelines". To the person who wrote the article, what does "non-notable' mean? To the admin looking to delete the article based upon the PROD, why is the article "non-notable"? So, Samsara concerns are valid, but for some odd reason I don't agree with the oppose.

3336:− "article", 1 article, not "articles" (thankfully). But there his points were logical and he did not hurry to delete the article or discard my points and replied to all my questions, that's why discussion became too long. And finally he removed the template himself. Please have a look at the discussion here 4319:

Based on WereSpielChequers's observations. I really hate to do this, but I believe that helping someone keep an article that you have nominated to AFD is more important that any other use of the tools. Whether we want it or not, we admin are looked upon as the first source for help. We are willing

4106:

remove it, and received a warning; then he asked again how to prevent the article from being deleted. Then he asked the same thing again in the post mentioned above. How many times should a user who doesn't appear to pay any attention to what he's told be given an answer to the same question? I don't

3646:

You've commented in 30 AfDs that were ultimately kept, where you argued "delete" for 13, plus one merge, one redirect. 15/30 = a half. When confronted with articles that should be deleted, you seem to almost always get it right; but when confronted with articles that should be kept, you're doing no

1071:

I see massive amounts of good maintenance work, good experience, support from users who I respect (and who can see the deleted stuff), and signs of a good sense of humour (which is always a plus for me). If he was going to wreak havoc, I think that would be apparent after 216,000 edits, so I have to,

4361:

I've had a difficult time deciding. I do appreciate your comprehensive answer to Q10. Concerns I had about being overly focused on deletion are balanced with an impression of you generally being sensible, including with regard to not acting outside of consensus. In the end, though, I can't quite put

3948:

It is a little more troubling that from the questions the candidate seems to think that a reliable source is need to prevent a BLPprod, rather than just to remove a legitimate BLPprod. Admittedly that is one of our more awkward compromises on policy and a common mistake, but someone who is active at

3860:

Well, AfD is a better place to estimate how good they are at deletion, but problems are more likely to arise at CSD (where it's much easier to make sloppy errors - forget to check histories, skim and miss assertions of significance, whatever); from the numbers, the best guess I can make is that when

3680:

Of course, it's just a model, but I remain convinced the way I'm combining the data is a sensible one; whether it's articles you submitted to AfD that shouldn't have been submitted there, or !votes on someone else's submission, you're still doing a very poor job of assessing the articles that should

3665:

as it matches up to the numbers you mention. My "13 delete votes" includes the articles I also submitted for AfD, but were kept. I submitted over 110 articles during that period. If you count the numbers manually, I did a total of 4 non-AfD delete votes where the article was ultimately kept and

3537:

I don't see how that comment is even relevant, since the candidate has stated that he regularly reviews all his PROD actions. Therefore the occasions where the article still exists must represent cases where he agreed with the decliner and knowingly did not pursue an AfD nomination, i.e. he conceded

4028:

gives me pause for concern. Bgwhite prodded a number of articles, the editor who'd written them then came to his talkpage for advice on how to save those articles and I don't see any subsequent interaction on either of their talkpages. We need admins, but we need admins who communicate, and that is

3945:

Actually that one was a legitimate BLPprod, it would have been better to see the candidate reference it, but the prod was legit. The subject is clearly notable, but that is irrelevant to a BLPprod - if it is a new unreferenced biography of a living person then it needs a source of some sort, even a

3929:

candidate either was not checking what he was doing or he just didn't care. The statistical analysis by others above further indicates that this is not an isolated example. I therefore do not consider that the candidate can be trusted with more powerful tools as his actions need review by others.

3928:

The candidate's SOP is to load up AWB with a big stack of articles and then perform some repetitive action on them. In this case, the subject was the Foreign Minister of Thailand, someone who had recently been in talks with Hillary Clinton. To blithely propose this for deletion indicates that the

546:

Oh yes. This is one of my primary reasons for requesting nomination as evidenced in question #1. I can pretty much tell that an athlete had become notable since the previous AfD (except for a brain fart I had on a track athlete). Athletes are 70%-80% of re-created articles. The non-athletes are

4072:

Compared to the previous threads that looks to me like you were making progress, now said Google sites may or may not have been relevant for biographies on the subject. But this looks to me like a goodfaith editor who was trying to learn our ways, I'm not keen on deletionist admins who ignore such

4023:

There are lots of positives about this candidate, a huge number of contributions to this project and I believe they have the potential to be a good admin. But I believe they need to work on some issues first. There have been a number of threads above which highlight a potential over-enthusiasm for

3748:

Just to add something which I believe we all agree but I want to underline it: Participating in an XfD is not the same with closing in XfD. In the first case the editor expresses an opinion based on policies, etc. In the second case the closing administrator summarises the discussion and closes by

3695:

This is really just a case of presenting statistics in a way that favors your argument. As the creator of the AfD stats tool, I have a super-secret way of extending the search beyond 250 AfD's, and I have used the tool to analyze all of Bgwhite's AfD votes. The following statistics are all true:

3619:

to the talk pages of new articles that have been deleted before via AfD. The majority of cases are athletes that were deleted but have since met notablity guidelines. The majority of my declined CSDs are G4 (db-repost). Being able to see the deleted versions would help. " Both of the instances

3305:

Like Ottawahitech, I would be concerned about an editor who, as the nominator states, does a lot of prodding, including the nominator's own articles. A lot of WP content disappears simply because people aren't around to contest the PRODs. Giving this person deletion rights would mean that one less

570:'delete', it is final with nobody looking over your shoulder. You become more conservative about actually deleting the speedy. You see it in life and Knowledge (XXG) all the time. So, while I'd like to say the "right answer", I will end up being even more conservative about deleting an article. 349:

When IPs are involved, a semi-protection should be used. A short protection period (2-5 days) should be used at first. If the edit war continues after the protection is lifted, a longer protection period (ie a month) should be used. Full protection should be used when an edit war has broken out

307:

If one of these same refs does not support any statement in the article, but does make mention of film roles. I personally would add the ref and remove the BLPPROD. I try to err on the side of caution when it comes to deleting an article. However, I would seriously consider if a regular PROD or

235:

Yes and there are some instances where I'm not proud. My first rule is: If stressed, upset or agitated, walk away until I'm settled down. The times when I get into trouble are when I violate this rule. I learned this in my previous life when dealing with professor's email IT requests. I would

193:

107:

I know Bgwhite quite a long time now. Bgwhite is one of the most active editors in Knowledge (XXG). He is mainly working with biographies and he is doing very well in categorising them and sending pages in AfD. He makes a well use of Prod/Afd in general. He has contributed in making concrete rules

514:

The more contentious the fact being sourced, the more reliable a source needs to be. An interview of Paul Erik done by a fanzine or a PR person would be good to cite basic facts, such as a birth date. The same sources citing that Paul Erik was the main person behind Knowledge (XXG) could not be

3266:

The case involving WP:GERMANY was particular interesting as that involved editwaring against a member of the project while at the same time due to the removal of the banner the AFD that got started on that article did not make it into the article alerts for the project. As far as WP:Australia is

904:

too I mentioned this. Noms' and con-noms' votes should be automatically counted (unless otherwise indicated by them). My nomination comment clearly indicates that I am supporting the candidate. So, writing a support statement again is unnecessary. But, I need to keep doing this until the rule is

521:

Context. I find this most often with iTunes or Amazon being used as a reference. If iTunes/Amazon is being used to cite a specific item, such as a release date, then they can be used as a reference. If they are being used to not cite anything specifically, iTunes/Amazon can be viewed as being

262:

First off, this was a conversation with PamD. PamD has to be one of the nicest editors I've come across and is always helping out new editors. I don't think it is in PamD's nature to be a "bad cop". I'll end up being both a bad cop and good cop. There are instances where an editor is really

3409:

No, Samsara is correct. There is something to worry about on a PROD. I've seen several times people say to the effect, "PROD an old article. Nobody is looking at an old article and it is easier to delete this way." There are also way too many "non-reasons" given on why the article should be

569:

The right answer should be, "No, the threshold for both should be equally set just as high". But in reality, there is a difference. When you nominate an article for a speedy, you know there will be somebody else to review you and actually do the deleting. But if you are the person pressing

3779:

As a minor point (although I'm trying to be polite, I think it is a bit more than minor), I suggest we try to avoid the designation of "right" and "wrong" as used here. If the consensus is "keep", and Bgwhite weighed in with "delete' then Bgwhite did not match the consensus, but it is a bit

4245:. I can find nothing in the candidates contributions that demonstrates the application of any thought about how to develop an encyclopedia, rather than a robotic application of rules. The edit linked in Colonel Warden's first comment seems typical. Yes, the rules allow the application of a 1875:

for many reasons. First (but in no particular order), almost any friend of Drmies's is a friend of mine. Second, I don't see the Lady too often at RfAs; her support is telling. Third, I like the way Bgwhite expresses himself and answers the questions (although he didn't answer

3591:(both from the last month). They don't have good judgement with respect to deletion, but are clearly enthusiastic about it; I fear given a hammer they will see everything as a nail. We don't need admins who'll delete first and not ask whether or not it should be deleted. 311:

If I'm not in a position where I can check all the sources that are normally at my disposal, I would do nothing. I'd let another admin check out the article. There is no rush to take care of the BLPPROD, even if it has been tagged for over 10 days. It is better to do it

4098:– and got an answer about what would be required to avoid deletion, with an explanation about reliable sources and instructions on how to add refs. A few hours after receiving a Talkback that his question had been answered, the user asked the same question of Bgwhite, who 4249:

tag to an article about a government minister, but that doesn't make it a good idea. Anyone who was here to build an encyclopedia rather than to enforce rules would take a few seconds to find and add a source to such an article rather than propose it for deletion.

3469:

can decline a PROD (including the editor who created the article), regardless of whether or not it ought to be deleted. Considering that the bar for declining a PROD is so low, I don't think it's a meaningful measure of the candidate's knowledge or expertise.

3812:

Agreed. I often use the term "right" and "wrong" in this context just because it is easier to type than "matched the eventual consensus" or "didn't match the eventual consensus"; not because I believe that someone's vote can actually be right or wrong.

4324:

of the community. This means we must help others before working on our own projects, particularly when it is time sensitive and affects the content of the encyclopedia, as well as the morale of fellow editors. I won't stand in the way of your RfA, but

419:. This initiated me into the seedy underbelly of Knowledge (XXG), AWB. This was also my reason for doing my first bot request. After both categories were cleaned out, I moved my attention to newly created biography articles. Every day I look at a 368:

Your contributions record shows a pattern of registration, followed by long inactivity, followed by a sudden eruption of many thousands of edits per month. Have you ever edited under another user name at WP? If so, what names have you edited under?

219:. Rescuing it from AfD, doing a DYK and being able to have some great conservations with the article's creator and Herlinatiens was very rewarding. But in the end, I'm a gnome. There are no best contributions, just alot of little contributions. 1880:

of Dennis's). Fourth, I like his understated sense of humor. Fifth, every interaction I've had with him has been positive. Sixth, he's smart. Finally, anyone who wants to stay away from ANI clearly has good judgment (yeah, yeah, I understand the

3396:

There's nothing to worry about on a PROD since anyone can reverse it, but I hope Bgwhite won't be too trigger happy on speedies except for maybe those amatueish one liners. (e.g. John Doe Born on January 1, 2000 is a resident of Anytown, USA)

3428:

a much larger percentage than normal were contested and/or not deleted, then that would be indicative of a problem. However, to oppose simply because the candidate has proposed too many articles for deletion is nonsensical, in my opinion.

3243:

from talk pages where {{WikiProject Football|class=stub|Germany=yes}} was added. There are two cases where this happens, WikiProject Germany and WikiProject Australia. In Australia's case, I will remove the banner for a sport. The

420: 160: 968:- he and I have had some interaction in the past and I've always found him pleasant and easy to work with. I've participated in a few of his AFDs and they have always seemed well-explained and well considered. Happy to support. 497:

How do you go about determining whether a citation to a particular source warrants removal from a Knowledge (XXG) article? Please feel free either to refer to those examples, or to discuss in general, or a combination of both.

214:

I'm most proud of helping an article achieve GA status and another article achieve FA status. I'm dyslexic and a horrible writer, so I'd love to see the look my English teachers would give. My most rewarding was

3829:

And alot of this will boil down to how problematic or beneficial any individual editor views the disappearance of content from wikipedia, eg.g so that would differ significantly between me and, say, Scottywong.

3373:

contains the most recent. Every so often I review the PRODS that were done... should an AfD be done, see if I'm doing anything wrong, should I change the way I'm doing them, etc. This is the same reason I keep

3976: 4102:. The user said he was going to remove the AfD notice from the article, and Bgwhite instructed him not to, explaining that that's not how the procedure works. The user replied, then subsequently said that he 3780:

presumptuous to call the position "wrong". We have consensus decision making for a reason, but let's not pretend that the results of the consensus are always right, and a differing position is always wrong.--

511:

There are references that are easy to recognize as unreliable and should be removed. Most common examples I find are IMDb references and blog posts published by the subject of the article (with exceptions).

518:

Is there a better source? If there are two acceptable sources, one being marginal or less reliable (an interview) and another being more reliable, it may be a good idea to remove the less reliable source.

3583:- Literally half the time at AfD, when confronted with an article where the consensus will be it should be kept, they've argued for deletion. My last interactions with this user where to have to decline 300:

Oi. BLPPROD's trip up alot of people, especially on when to apply the tag. How well the article is written doesn't matter. The two keys in removing the tag is "reliable" and "supports one statement".

1568:

seems like a good candidate. Answers seems okay. I tried to skim the contributions as well but with the number of them was a bit hard to get a good feel. Is there a way to look at only non-AWB edits?

3666:

9 AdD submissions that were kept (adding upto your 13 delete votes). Subtract the 9 AfDs from the 30 keeps and use the 4 non-AfD delete votes, it comes out to be 4/21. This does not equal half.

2827:- I'm not the biggest fan of users who use AWB for most of their content edits (well at least recently, 4.5k out of 5k edits are with AWB) but I am going to hold my peace on that one. Good user. 3424:

The reasoning for this oppose strikes me as "Oppose because the candidate does too much work." I have never heard of an oppose like this. Surely, if the candidate prodded a lot of articles,

3306:

pair of eyes sees these articles before they go "poof". So a "no" from me unless more details can be provided of these PRODs - what were they, and how many were successfully contested?

2286:. Right temperament, many, many gnomish clean-up edits, strong command of Knowledge (XXG) technical policies. I have a very high degree of confidence that he won't break the wiki. 2155:

User has made substantial contributions, and based on my limited interaction with them as well as the above answers, is both knowledgeable and helpful, especially in the BLP arena. -

922:@Tito Dutta, You wrote in your nomination: "He is a very friendly and helpful editor”. To me this is a contradiction in terms, when the subject is one promoted for his outstanding(?) 540:

I thoroughly reviewed the past 6 months of your CSD log. If an admin, you will have access to deleted versions of articles. Will you use them to analyze to see if a G4 applies?

86:) – Bgwhite has been editing since 2005, actively editing since March 2010. He is a very friendly and helpful editor. I believe he'll be a great admin, I am nominating his name! 416: 412: 3971:"It is a little more troubling that from the questions the candidate seems to think that a reliable source is need to prevent a BLPprod". Take a look at the edit history of 175:

is warranted. So, currently I'm familiar and comfortable with AfDs, PRODs and CSDs. Those would be the areas I would initially work in. I do keep a log of AfD's I start at

2363:- we all make mistakes; what matters is how we deal with them. Some people cover up, some people ignore, and others correct the mistake. I have faith in people who correct 3487:

Surely, if the candidate prodded a lot of articles, and a much larger percentage than normal were contested and/or not deleted, then that would be indicative of a problem.

163:

and a few other sources for new biographies. I do copy-edits and add appropriate tags. On the talk pages, I add appropriate banners and parameters. I then check if an

508:

was an interview done by a PR person not affiliated with the magazine. An interview is considered a primary source, but after that interviews get way more complicated.

334:

some. Share with us your impressions of when semi or full protection is a good idea, and in particular, how to determine when to choose from "block" or "full protect".

229:

Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

4385: 179:. I did this so I could track my progress and see where I needed improvement. One reason for requesting admin tools is to look at previously deleted articles. 901: 3248:

covers alot of sports and doesn't need a redundant sports banner. In Germany's case, I removed the country's banner and added Germany to the football banner.

767: 762: 2329:. Great contributor to the project, can't see any reason why the candidate will make anything other than a sensible addition to the admin corps. Good luck! 1750:. I have some slight concerns about a few of his CSD nominations, but overall his work seems to be good enough for me to feel confident in his abilities.-- 1179:

I have worked with Bgwhite before and while this was a little frustrating occasionally, I have no reason to believe they won't make a fine administrator.

4403: 4107:

think a failure to say "please refer to one of the previous times this question was answered for you" to one user is sufficient cause to deny adminship.

146:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge (XXG) as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

4095: 1588:

rock solid editor that knows his limits and isn't likely to blow up the wiki. Unquestionably, the mop will make him more effective in his daily duties.

616: 4351: 4326: 1641: 1610: 3252:

and I had a discussion with Agathoclea were Agathoclea thought this was wrong and where we thought we were following WikiProject Germany's rules.

3749:

consensus. This means that any administrator may disagree with the consensus but this doesn't mean they will close the discussion against it. --

3662: 3629: 2537:

Good experience, and I like the spirit embodied in candidate's user talk page instructions, which seem well-designed to avoid pointless drama.

705: 3912:

I don't really care much for the "article," but you're right, this is an auto-keep. Is that really sufficient for an oppose recommendation?

2082:

My interractions with this candidate have shown that he is not afraid to delete questionable content. We need more wikipedians like this. --

1515:- my interactions with this editor have been nothing but positive, and he does a loot of good work here. The mop will allow him to do more. 504:

I don't recall what the particular refs you mention were trying to cite. However, the blog reprint was an interview from the local paper.

2478: 1954: 603: 304:

If one of the trivial/routine references is reliable and supports one of the statements in the article, then the BLPPPROD is to be removed.

423:

and a few other sources for new biographies. One of the things I do is fill out the talk page with appropriate banners and parameters.

3543: 3498: 3450: 3311: 2444: 1481: 1231: 1464:

He obviously has a need for the tools, and I trust him not to misuse them, therefore I would support giving said tools to said editor.

828:- checking deleted content, and logs looks like speedy delete and prod nominations are suitable. Heaps of gnome type work is evident. 646: 33: 17: 4344: 1634: 1603: 640: 757: 475:

and it brought to mind some of the complexities about identifying reliable sources. During that AfD discussion, you note that you "

3183:- I see him on new patrol a lot, his prods/csd's are mostly accurate and he would be a fair and valuable addition to the project. 4064:

Thanks, that history between you and that editor does put it into a bit more context. But on this occasion they were saying that

2955: 1916:

Absolutely no issues. I, like Scottywong, thought you already were an admin. And share the same sentiment as AutomaticStrikeout.

252:

First of all - wow, 216,000 edits - kudos. I've seen you around doing good stuff. I took a look at your talk page, and saw this

4298: 3699:

87% of Bgwhite's AfD votes matched the eventual consensus of the AfD. 8% did not match. The remaining 5% were "No consensus".

2315: 1927: 1838: 1701: 1673: 610: 4216: 4177: 3841: 3245: 2255: 2238: 4029:

especially true when you get rid of goodfaith contributions (apologies if that communication took place on some other page)

2909: 2091: 672: 655: 596: 480: 83: 2197:

This is a bit of a no-brainer. Bgwhite's contributions are excellent, and their answers to the above questions are good.

879:

I've seen Bgwhite's name pop up frequently enough at AfD, and he seems sensible. He'll do good work as an administrator.

4099: 4051: 3549: 3504: 3456: 3401: 3317: 3237: 1140: 1121: 4080: 4036: 3999: 3957: 2951: 2815: 2400: 1262: 803: 793: 4194: 3605:

As I said above in Question #1, "One reason for requesting admin tools is to look at previously deleted articles.

2750: 2619: 2051: 488: 340:

I can only recall requesting articles for semi-protection. In these cases, various IPs were involved in edit wars.

58: 4282:, per WereSpielChequers - that incident is just too recent for me to ignore. Great contributor though, good luck! 3155: 926:

work. How can one be friendly and helpful and yet spend most of the time deleteing others' work? Just wondering.

833: 698: 3465:

I'm not sure that looking at a simple percentage is meaningful in this case. PRODs get declined all the time.

3934: 3901: 3732:

This oppose rationale seems to focus solely on statistic #3, without considering all of the other statistics.

2859: 2474: 1949: 1418: 1345: 731: 2523:

and add me to the "thought he already was an admin" category. Since he isn't it is high time to correct that.

752: 3588: 3398: 3207:

per the users longstanding opposition to country wikiprojects and underhanded way of removing project tags.

3171: 2837: 2439: 1554: 1472: 1324: 1226: 1187: 1133: 1118: 1059: 4286: 2342: 943:: Following Knowledge (XXG) policy and guidelines should be the primary object of an editor. You have said 405:

I've never seen a count approaching 108,000 edits to talk pages before. What's the answer to this mystery?

4339: 4255: 4075: 4031: 3994: 3952: 3754: 3625: 3621: 3613: 3375: 3225: 3079: 1629: 1598: 1519: 1340: 1258: 1167: 931: 850: 747: 187: 176: 113: 4205:

BGWhite, you can't ignore requests like that - this sort of behaviour could drive away potential editors

2470: 4191: 3370: 3355: 2768: 2743: 2615: 2434: 2291: 2088: 1931: 1502: 1435: 1401: 1221: 974: 777: 54: 4384:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either

4329:

to not support either. I'm very sorry and still think very highly of you, but I have no choice here.

3763:

And any admin who repeatedly closes XfD's against consensus probably won't be an admin for very long.

3379: 668: 3946:

link to the subject’s home page on the Foreign ministry's site would prevent a BLPprod being applied.

3819: 3786: 3769: 3738: 3681:

be kept, something that I believe would likely be the case if you were CSD patrolling, for instance.

3527: 3476: 3435: 3362: 3287: 3212: 3148: 3043: 2790: 2528: 1859: 1660: 1365: 1304: 1279: 1208: 1157:

Understands the nuts n' bolts of the wiki, is pleasant to work with, and has a good grasp of policy.

829: 772: 691: 4246: 3972: 291: 4370: 4356: 4302: 4294: 4273: 4259: 4237: 4220: 4197: 4182: 4158: 4135: 4089: 4059: 4045: 4008: 3987: 3966: 3938: 3930: 3921: 3905: 3897: 3870: 3845: 3824: 3807: 3803: 3791: 3774: 3758: 3743: 3690: 3675: 3656: 3641: 3600: 3553: 3532: 3508: 3481: 3460: 3440: 3419: 3404: 3391: 3364: 3349: 3345: 3321: 3291: 3261: 3228: 3216: 3192: 3175: 3158: 3139: 3132: 3123: 3100: 3083: 3066: 3047: 3030: 3013: 2996: 2973: 2959: 2942: 2930: 2913: 2879: 2863: 2853: 2843: 2819: 2796: 2775: 2757: 2736: 2721: 2709: 2692: 2667: 2646: 2623: 2606: 2577: 2557: 2546: 2532: 2515: 2499: 2482: 2458: 2423: 2419: 2406: 2379: 2351: 2333: 2321: 2310: 2295: 2278: 2259: 2206: 2189: 2162: 2147: 2138: 2117: 2111: 2096: 2074: 2057: 2042: 2010: 1993: 1978: 1960: 1944: 1941: 1923: 1908: 1890: 1867: 1842: 1835: 1822: 1808: 1784: 1770: 1759: 1742: 1706: 1695: 1678: 1669: 1646: 1577: 1560: 1539: 1522: 1507: 1488: 1456: 1439: 1422: 1414: 1405: 1388: 1367: 1353: 1330: 1309: 1283: 1266: 1250: 1236: 1212: 1195: 1171: 1149: 1124: 1112: 1102: 1082: 1063: 1046: 1029: 998: 981: 956: 952: 935: 914: 910: 888: 874: 854: 837: 726: 557:

Is your set threshold for deleting set higher than your set threshold for nominating for deletion?

449: 272: 135: 117: 99: 95: 62: 4070:

by using google and I found a few good websites on google. What should I do to prevent deletions?"

3979: 3667: 3633: 3411: 3383: 3253: 2592: 586: 472: 389:

What form of automation have you used to generate more than 200,000 edits in less than two years?

264: 127: 73: 4210: 4172: 4123: 3977:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people#Any source prevents a Prod

3835: 3167: 3026: 2989: 2950:

Trusted user has been around for a while .The Project will only gain with the user having tools.

2877: 2832: 2542: 2376: 2249: 2232: 2070: 1730: 1573: 1549: 1465: 1316: 1181: 1055: 532: 4228:

I find that the points raised by WereSpielChequers and WilyD are sufficient cause for concern.

3706:, he was right 68% of the time, wrong 24% of the time, and the remaining 9% were "No consensus". 1986:

I was going to support anyway, but I'm satisfied with the answer to my question as well.--v/r -

1037:

What? You weren't an admin years ago? Bgwhite is trustworthy and unlikely to break the wiki.

3720:, he was right 88% of the time, wrong 7% of the time, and the remaining 5% were "No consensus". 4330: 4251: 4235: 4067: 4055: 4025: 3983: 3917: 3750: 3671: 3637: 3539: 3494: 3446: 3415: 3387: 3307: 3257: 3249: 3222: 3188: 3075: 3009: 2905: 2718: 2638: 2599: 2508: 2495: 2180: 2143:

Solid article contributions, shows good experience with administrative related tasks as well.

2006: 1899: 1767: 1620: 1589: 1535: 1516: 1452: 1337: 1159: 1042: 927: 871: 846: 590: 484: 445: 322: 268: 253: 131: 109: 77: 2490:- Clean block log, no indications of assholery. Seems to be a backstage worker. No concerns. 331: 168: 3096: 2928: 2705: 2684: 2575: 2455: 2347: 2287: 2202: 2084: 1990: 1800: 1755: 1497: 1431: 1397: 1384: 1246: 1079: 969: 884: 3517:(including the article's creator) can decline a PROD, I haven't seen any evidence that 50% 3445:

I don't know what percentage you would consider normal, but 50% strikes me as rather high.

1274:

well clued up editor with no red flags, very surprised that they are not already an admin.

923: 471:

In reviewing some of your deleted contributions, I came across your deletion nomination of

195: 172: 164: 3865: 3814: 3781: 3764: 3733: 3685: 3651: 3595: 3522: 3471: 3430: 3359: 3337: 3328:

as the nominator states, does a lot of prodding, including the nominator's own articles...

3283: 3208: 3115: 3039: 2811: 2785: 2665: 2524: 1886: 1851: 1362: 1299: 1275: 1204: 1099: 2887:- Made some mistakes, but an overall positive editor and will be a net gain as an admin. 2215:(a) sheer volume of edits and time spent here indicate more than likely net positive (b) 495: 4363: 4290: 4268: 4154: 4050:

Note: Within the past month, I had previous contact with the user at my talk page at:

3799: 3341: 3061: 2727: 2415: 2330: 2305: 2106: 1918: 1832: 1817: 1688: 1665: 1108: 948: 906: 463: 91: 87: 4397: 4206: 4167: 4108: 3831: 3022: 2984: 2872: 2554: 2538: 2369: 2245: 2228: 2159: 2136: 2066: 2032: 1715: 1569: 1014: 994: 1659:

How many different ways can "thought he already was" be said? (And because he meets

566:

My initial plan is to only delete the most obvious cases and work my way from there.

4229: 3913: 3584: 3184: 3005: 2968: 2889: 2633: 2491: 2360: 2272: 2171: 2002: 1764: 1531: 1448: 1038: 905:

changed.. and as those TParis etc counters count supports in this section only). --

864: 441: 376: 358: 216: 3491:

confronted with articles that should be kept, 're doing no better than a coin flip

427:

is an example. There are also a few other tracking categories I keep cleaned out.

2967:

A great, trusted, tireless contributor, well competent and a nice user. Gosh! :)

1107:

You've got a really impressive collection of barnstars on your userpage. - Dank (

479:". The citations you removed included citations to university student newspapers 3606: 3092: 2921: 2802: 2701: 2676: 2570: 2452: 2198: 2144: 1987: 1793: 1779: 1751: 1380: 1074: 880: 798: 330:

Being a content focused editor, I would imagine you might drift into working at

282: 244: 180: 4052:

User talk:Bgwhite/Archive 11#Preventing Drew Bontadelli from being deleted help

2567:

opposition to country wikiprojects and underhanded way of removing project tags

1816:

Definetely deserves the mop. A great editor and the opposes aren't convincing.

3862: 3682: 3648: 3624:), 90% of my AfD submissions are deleted. If you care to look at my CSD log ( 3592: 3110: 3055:

Satisfactory answers to my questions and passes the remainder of my criteria.—

2939: 2806: 2655: 2391: 1970: 1882: 1091: 375:

No, I have never edited under another user name, but I do have a bot account,

4378:

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.

477:

removed the "references" as blogs and interviews are not reliable references

159:

I generally work with biographies. Part of my daily routine is to look at a

4150: 3056: 1413:- I've seen this user quite a bit and have never noticed anything untoward. 1095: 3798:

Very good point (@ SPhilbrick)! I second it and accept the "suggestion"! --

3620:

you point out are G4. If you care to look at the log of AfDs I submited (

2591:(2nd paragraph), or they are honest enough to be a good admin. I'll AGF. 2156: 2126: 2023: 1376: 1007: 990: 3661:

You are comparing apples with oranges. I'm assuming you are looking at

4362:

myself in the support column, as I agree with Dennis Brown's comments.

4026:

User_talk:Bgwhite#Deleting_James_Bate.2C_Grant_Boone.2C_and_Adam_Zucker

2801:

Lots of great work, and I liked our interaction on a sockpuppet issue:

4388:

or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

2387:

Trusted user. No concerns. We need more admins like this this user.

1778:. - Looks good to me. We need all the help we can get. Good luck! ~ 2675:

Great user, and interested in administrative tasks. What better? --

671:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review 3493:. Strikingly, the same image re-emerges when analysing his PRODs. 1054:

Great editor and also believe that he will a great admin as well.

683: 4094:

The user had asked a similar question about a previous article –

3628:), except for G4, less than 5% are declined. Take a look at my 3378:

of AfDs I submit. After I review the PRODS, I archive them into

3108:- A dedicated and trusted user who would be an asset to project. 395:

I use AWB. Generally, if I'm editing manually, I still use AWB.

1686:

Seen him around for a while, left a positive impression on me.

687: 3632:. Please tell me how I am anywhere near wrong 1/2 the time. 208:

What are your best contributions to Knowledge (XXG), and why?

4166:

also per WereSpielChequers, who makes a convincing argument.

3587:, which they took to AfD - where it was kept, and to decline 124:

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

4096:

WP:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 49#Deleting of Drew Bontadelli

1530:- agree with what is stated above, a "top notch candidate". 1244:

A constructive editor, should be a constructive admin. --–

3713:, he was right 50% of the time, and wrong 50% of the time. 3489:- your words. WilyD below says that when the candidate is 1496:

no significant reason to oppose at this point. Regards, —

1447:- Definately deserves the tools and will use them wisely. 1006:. I concur with Brookie, Bgwhite looks like a good egg. — 4058:

about the exact same thing for the same type of article.

4056:

User talk:Bgwhite#Deletion of Allison Williams (reporter)

3949:

prodding should be aware of that before they come to RFA.

3727:, he was right 98% of the time, and wrong 2% of the time. 1314:

Yes, Bgwhite "gets it" and will be an asset as an admin.

862:- Seems like just the sort of good egg to deserve a mop 411:

I initially started out working on the tracking category

29:

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a

2569:

contributions, loyalty, and dedication to the project.

153:

What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

3893: 3280: 3277: 3274: 3271: 3268: 2938:...no evidence they will abuse the tools or position.-- 2587: 634: 628: 622: 476: 424: 194:

good or bad, but one place I want to steer clear of is

1850:

A sense of humor is a good indicator of perspective.

2851:- I think Bgwhite would be a good, effective admin. 2414:. Would make a great addition to the admin corps. -- 490:, and an interview with the subject in the magazine 417:

Category:Biography articles without listas parameter

413:

Category:Biography articles without living parameter

3354:Samsara: The candidate has a PROD/BLP PROD log at 2654:

Trustworthy, clueful, and will make a find admin.--

786: 740: 719: 1220:- nothing screams problem to me at this time. -- 945:yet spend most of the time deleteing others' work 867:Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} 2585:- Either Bgwhite was lying through their teeth 3326: 2270:Seems trusty, would be helpful with the mop. 699: 8: 653:Edit summary usage for Bgwhite can be found 4068:I have been trying to find reliable sources 3166:See no real reason not to. Good candidate. 2717:- I could've sworn this guy was an admin. 2700:I see no reason why you shouldn't be one. 706: 692: 684: 53:Final (111/13/2); Closed as successful by 2765:. Should have been an admin ages ago. — 1117:Another editor that fits my criteria. – 667:Please keep discussion constructive and 1015: 3647:better than a coin flip. That's bad. 2125:. Good contributions. Helpful in AfD. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship 522:promotional only and then be removed. 7: 1292: 482:, a blog reprint of an article from 3723:In AfD's that eventually closed as 3709:In AfD's that eventually closed as 3369:There are actually two PROD logs. 1291:- Thought he was already an admin. 3340:, it'll show his patience, IMO. -- 3131:- Trusted and experienced editor. 2726:Opposes very far from convincing. 24: 4404:Successful requests for adminship 2065:. User has lots of experience. -- 4100:patiently and helpfully answered 2433:, seems to meet my criteria. -- 2341:, great work in the area of the 1293: 3630:AfD stats via snottywang's tool 3233:This was a case of me removing 2634: 2451:Strike duplicate !vote.--v/r - 2241:) 04:39, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 1072:and am very happy to, support. 3992:Thanks, that's a fair answer. 3246:Template:WikiProject Australia 2829: 1: 4371:20:16, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 4357:19:36, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 4303:08:35, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 4274:04:07, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 4260:22:13, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 4238:20:28, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 4221:18:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 4198:18:23, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 4183:12:08, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 4159:21:20, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 4136:01:41, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 4090:09:09, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 4060:00:27, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 4046:12:41, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 4009:10:37, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 3988:09:40, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 3967:12:22, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 3939:11:49, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 3922:20:13, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 3906:19:22, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 3871:10:01, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 3846:04:24, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 3825:01:17, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 3808:20:13, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3792:20:07, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3775:17:43, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3759:15:48, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3744:15:30, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3716:In AfD's where Bgwhite voted 3702:In AfD's where Bgwhite voted 3691:10:31, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3676:10:19, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3657:09:30, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3642:09:22, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3601:08:53, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3554:15:23, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 3533:15:01, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 3509:05:34, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 3482:01:14, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 3461:22:50, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3441:15:01, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3420:05:44, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3405:03:33, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3392:00:40, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3365:00:29, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3350:23:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 3334:He had PRODed my article too. 3322:23:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 3292:18:44, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3262:21:14, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 3229:20:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 3217:20:15, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 3193:04:40, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 3176:23:46, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 3159:23:09, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 3140:20:22, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 3124:10:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 3101:08:42, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 3084:01:18, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 3067:00:58, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 3048:22:51, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 3031:21:41, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 3014:20:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 2997:15:05, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 2974:13:22, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 2960:05:36, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 2943:02:29, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 2931:20:12, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 2914:18:29, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 2880:17:27, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 2864:15:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 2844:15:32, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 2820:14:18, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 2797:14:06, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 2776:13:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 2758:12:25, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 2737:02:56, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 2722:02:38, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 2710:00:58, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 2693:21:37, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 2668:18:17, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 2647:12:12, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 2624:10:47, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 2607:09:51, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 2578:08:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 2558:08:46, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 2547:05:01, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 2533:00:06, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 2516:20:39, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2500:20:11, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2483:19:29, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2459:17:11, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2449:16:52, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2424:16:14, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2407:14:31, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2380:11:18, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2352:10:46, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2334:10:20, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2322:09:01, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2296:05:00, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2279:04:45, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2260:18:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 2207:03:11, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2190:02:39, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2163:02:14, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2148:02:02, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2139:01:05, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 2118:21:16, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 2097:20:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 2075:19:45, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 2058:19:15, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 2043:18:49, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 2011:18:24, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 1994:15:13, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 1979:07:59, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 1961:05:22, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 1909:03:18, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 1891:02:39, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 1868:02:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 1843:02:33, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 1823:02:29, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 1809:01:50, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 1785:01:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 1771:23:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1760:23:04, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1743:22:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1707:22:25, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1679:22:05, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1647:19:19, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 1615:21:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1578:21:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1561:21:08, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1540:20:56, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1523:20:25, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1508:20:22, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1489:20:03, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1457:19:39, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1440:19:05, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1423:19:02, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1406:18:58, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1396:. Fully qualified candidate. 1389:18:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1368:18:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1354:17:28, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1331:17:28, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1310:17:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1284:17:25, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1267:16:56, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1251:16:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1237:16:48, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1213:16:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1196:16:17, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1172:15:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1150:14:58, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1125:14:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1113:14:29, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1103:13:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1083:13:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1064:13:42, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1047:13:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1030:12:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 999:12:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 982:12:20, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 957:16:19, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 936:15:05, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 915:11:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 889:11:55, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 875:11:46, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 855:11:34, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 838:11:29, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 450:22:21, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 273:20:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 136:05:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 118:10:11, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 100:20:47, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 63:10:56, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 3538:that the PROD was in error. 2871:- you are not admin yet! -- 2783:I've always been impressed. 2639: 2565:per the users longstanding 547:the trouble spot for me now. 2018:Time for some more admins! 1377:well, let her rest in peace 142:Questions for the candidate 4420: 4190:as per WereSpielChequers. 4024:deletion. But this thread 2981:no problems, looks good.-- 531:Additional questions from 357:Additional questions from 4149:per WereSpielChequers. -- 1090:top notch candidate with 462:Additional question from 321:Additional question from 281:Additional question from 243:Additional question from 126:I accept this nomination 4381:Please do not modify it. 563:Interesting question... 2469:– Everything seems OK. 896:- I dislike to support 38:Please do not modify it 3521:a normal percentage. 3330: 2952:Pharaoh of the Wizards 1547:seems well qualified. 845:- as co-nominator. -- 350:among registered uses. 3371:User:Bgwhite/PROD log 3356:User:Bgwhite/PROD log 1203:no reason why not. -- 34:request for adminship 3626:User:Bgwhite/XFD log 3622:User:Bgwhite/XFD log 3091:- No problems here! 2244:switched to oppose. 2001:No problems for me. 1898:No problems here. -- 1430:. No reason not to. 989:- looks fine to me. 799:Global contributions 177:User:Bgwhite/XFD log 3238:WikiProject Germany 3004:. It's about time. 2361:This is a good sign 753:Non-automated edits 673:their contributions 584:Links for Bgwhite: 308:AfD should be used. 4317:Moved from Support 3513:Again, given that 2860:lisa needs braces! 2170:- No qualms here. 1619:Moved to neutral. 732:Edit summary usage 675:before commenting. 415:and then moved to 39: 4369: 4355: 4347: 4342: 4306: 4289:comment added by 4131: 4127: 4117: 4113: 3548: 3503: 3455: 3380:User:Bgwhite/PROD 3316: 2756: 2689: 2461: 2350: 2262: 2188: 2115: 1940:, great user. -- 1738: 1734: 1724: 1720: 1649: 1645: 1637: 1632: 1614: 1606: 1601: 1259:Thine Antique Pen 1194: 1132:It's about time. 812: 811: 485:The Daily Gleaner 290:You come up on a 37: 4411: 4383: 4368: 4366: 4349: 4345: 4340: 4305: 4283: 4271: 4180: 4175: 4170: 4133: 4129: 4125: 4122: 4118: 4115: 4111: 4087: 4083: 4078: 4043: 4039: 4034: 4006: 4002: 3997: 3964: 3960: 3955: 3868: 3822: 3817: 3789: 3784: 3772: 3767: 3741: 3736: 3688: 3654: 3618: 3612: 3598: 3546: 3530: 3525: 3501: 3479: 3474: 3453: 3438: 3433: 3314: 3242: 3236: 3151: 3137: 3122: 3119: 3113: 3059: 2994: 2992: 2987: 2971: 2926: 2901: 2898: 2895: 2892: 2875: 2862: 2856: 2840: 2835: 2831: 2793: 2788: 2771: 2770:Mr. Stradivarius 2755: 2753: 2748: 2741: 2734: 2702:Kevin Rutherford 2687: 2683: 2679: 2663: 2645: 2643: 2636: 2616:Morning Sunshine 2604: 2597: 2590: 2588:this post to me 2573: 2513: 2450: 2447: 2442: 2437: 2403: 2394: 2372: 2367:their mistakes. 2346: 2320: 2318: 2313: 2308: 2275: 2243: 2185: 2178: 2176: 2135: 2131: 2116: 2109: 2095: 2094: 2054: 2048:CharlieEchoTango 2037: 2028: 2021: 1975: 1974: 1957: 1952: 1947: 1906: 1863: 1855: 1841: 1820: 1806: 1798: 1782: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1729: 1725: 1722: 1718: 1704: 1698: 1691: 1677: 1639: 1635: 1630: 1618: 1608: 1604: 1599: 1559: 1557: 1552: 1505: 1500: 1486: 1479: 1470: 1352: 1350: 1343: 1329: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1307: 1302: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1234: 1229: 1224: 1192: 1190: 1184: 1170: 1165: 1162: 1147: 1138: 1081: 1077: 1027: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1012: 978: 873: 868: 748:Articles created 708: 701: 694: 685: 658: 650: 609: 579:General comments 192: 186: 55:The Rambling Man 4419: 4418: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4410: 4409: 4408: 4394: 4393: 4392: 4386:this nomination 4379: 4364: 4313: 4284: 4269: 4178: 4173: 4168: 4124: 4120: 4109: 4085: 4081: 4076: 4041: 4037: 4032: 4004: 4000: 3995: 3962: 3958: 3953: 3866: 3820: 3815: 3787: 3782: 3770: 3765: 3740:| communicate _ 3739: 3734: 3686: 3652: 3616: 3610: 3596: 3589:this invalid G4 3585:this invalid G4 3528: 3523: 3478:| soliloquize _ 3477: 3472: 3436: 3431: 3338:Talk:Riddhi Sen 3240: 3234: 3201: 3149: 3133: 3117: 3111: 3109: 3074:per Mandarax -- 3065: 3057: 3006:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 2990: 2985: 2983: 2969: 2922: 2899: 2896: 2893: 2890: 2873: 2858: 2852: 2838: 2833: 2791: 2786: 2769: 2751: 2744: 2742: 2728: 2685: 2677: 2661: 2642: 2632: 2600: 2593: 2586: 2571: 2509: 2507:- looks good. 2445: 2440: 2435: 2405: 2401: 2392: 2370: 2316: 2311: 2306: 2304: 2303:Great editor. → 2273: 2181: 2172: 2133: 2127: 2104: 2087: 2083: 2052: 2040: 2033: 2024: 2019: 1972: 1971: 1955: 1950: 1945: 1900: 1861: 1853: 1831: 1818: 1801: 1794: 1780: 1731: 1727: 1716: 1702: 1696: 1689: 1664: 1555: 1550: 1548: 1503: 1498: 1482: 1473: 1466: 1349: 1346: 1341: 1335: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1315: 1305: 1300: 1294: 1232: 1227: 1222: 1188: 1182: 1163: 1160: 1158: 1141: 1134: 1075: 1073: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1008: 976: 866: 863: 830:Graeme Bartlett 822: 813: 808: 782: 736: 715: 714:RfA/RfB toolbox 712: 682: 654: 602: 585: 581: 506:Caribbean Belle 492:Caribbean Belle 421:database report 190: 184: 173:speedy deletion 161:database report 144: 71: 50: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4417: 4415: 4407: 4406: 4396: 4395: 4391: 4390: 4374: 4373: 4359: 4327:I am obligated 4312: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4276: 4262: 4240: 4223: 4200: 4185: 4161: 4144: 4143: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4138: 4021: 4020: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4011: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3873: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3721: 3714: 3707: 3700: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3331: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3221:Diffs please. 3200: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3178: 3161: 3142: 3126: 3103: 3086: 3069: 3063: 3050: 3033: 3021:Looks good! - 3016: 2999: 2976: 2962: 2945: 2933: 2916: 2882: 2866: 2846: 2822: 2799: 2778: 2760: 2739: 2724: 2712: 2695: 2670: 2649: 2640: 2626: 2609: 2580: 2560: 2549: 2535: 2518: 2502: 2485: 2471:The Anonymouse 2464: 2463: 2462: 2409: 2399: 2382: 2354: 2336: 2324: 2298: 2281: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2192: 2165: 2150: 2141: 2120: 2099: 2080:STRONG SUPPORT 2077: 2060: 2045: 2030: 2013: 1996: 1981: 1963: 1935: 1911: 1893: 1870: 1845: 1825: 1811: 1787: 1773: 1762: 1745: 1709: 1681: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1563: 1542: 1525: 1510: 1491: 1459: 1442: 1425: 1415:Reaper Eternal 1408: 1391: 1370: 1359:Absolutely Yes 1356: 1347: 1333: 1312: 1286: 1269: 1253: 1239: 1215: 1198: 1174: 1152: 1127: 1115: 1105: 1085: 1066: 1049: 1032: 1001: 984: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 891: 877: 857: 840: 821: 818: 817: 816: 810: 809: 807: 806: 801: 796: 790: 788: 784: 783: 781: 780: 775: 770: 765: 760: 755: 750: 744: 742: 738: 737: 735: 734: 729: 723: 721: 717: 716: 713: 711: 710: 703: 696: 688: 681: 678: 664: 663: 662: 660: 651: 580: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 567: 551: 550: 549: 548: 535: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 519: 516: 512: 466: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 431: 430: 429: 428: 399: 398: 397: 396: 383: 382: 381: 380: 362: 361: 354: 353: 352: 351: 344: 343: 342: 341: 325: 318: 317: 316: 315: 314: 313: 309: 305: 285: 278: 277: 276: 275: 247: 240: 239: 238: 237: 223: 222: 221: 220: 202: 201: 200: 199: 143: 140: 139: 138: 70: 67: 49: 44: 43: 42: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4416: 4405: 4402: 4401: 4399: 4389: 4387: 4382: 4376: 4375: 4372: 4367: 4360: 4358: 4354: 4353: 4348: 4343: 4337: 4336: 4333: 4328: 4323: 4318: 4315: 4314: 4310: 4304: 4300: 4296: 4292: 4288: 4281: 4277: 4275: 4272: 4266: 4263: 4261: 4257: 4253: 4248: 4244: 4241: 4239: 4236: 4233: 4232: 4227: 4224: 4222: 4218: 4215: 4212: 4208: 4204: 4201: 4199: 4196: 4193: 4189: 4186: 4184: 4181: 4176: 4171: 4165: 4162: 4160: 4156: 4152: 4148: 4145: 4137: 4134: 4119: 4105: 4101: 4097: 4093: 4092: 4091: 4088: 4084: 4079: 4071: 4069: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4057: 4053: 4049: 4048: 4047: 4044: 4040: 4035: 4027: 4022: 4010: 4007: 4003: 3998: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3985: 3981: 3978: 3974: 3970: 3969: 3968: 3965: 3961: 3956: 3950: 3944: 3940: 3936: 3932: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3903: 3899: 3895: 3892:I don't like 3891: 3888: 3872: 3869: 3864: 3859: 3847: 3843: 3840: 3837: 3833: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3823: 3818: 3811: 3810: 3809: 3805: 3801: 3797: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3790: 3785: 3778: 3777: 3776: 3773: 3768: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3756: 3752: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3742: 3737: 3731: 3726: 3722: 3719: 3715: 3712: 3708: 3705: 3701: 3698: 3697: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3689: 3684: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3664: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3655: 3650: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3615: 3614:old AfD multi 3608: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3599: 3594: 3590: 3586: 3582: 3579: 3555: 3551: 3545: 3541: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3531: 3526: 3520: 3516: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3506: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3480: 3475: 3468: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3458: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3439: 3434: 3427: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3417: 3413: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3403: 3400: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3372: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3363: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3335: 3332: 3329: 3325: 3324: 3323: 3319: 3313: 3309: 3304: 3301: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3278: 3275: 3272: 3269: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3251: 3247: 3239: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3227: 3224: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3203: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3179: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3168:John F. Lewis 3165: 3162: 3160: 3157: 3156: 3153: 3152: 3146: 3143: 3141: 3138: 3136: 3130: 3127: 3125: 3121: 3114: 3107: 3104: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3087: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3070: 3068: 3062: 3060: 3054: 3051: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3034: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3017: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3003: 3000: 2998: 2995: 2993: 2988: 2980: 2977: 2975: 2972: 2966: 2963: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2946: 2944: 2941: 2937: 2934: 2932: 2929: 2927: 2925: 2920: 2917: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2902: 2886: 2883: 2881: 2878: 2876: 2870: 2867: 2865: 2861: 2855: 2850: 2847: 2845: 2842: 2841: 2836: 2826: 2823: 2821: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2808: 2803: 2800: 2798: 2795: 2794: 2789: 2782: 2779: 2777: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2764: 2761: 2759: 2754: 2749: 2747: 2740: 2738: 2735: 2733: 2732: 2725: 2723: 2720: 2716: 2713: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2696: 2694: 2691: 2690: 2688: 2686:it's my world 2680: 2674: 2671: 2669: 2666: 2664: 2660: 2659: 2653: 2650: 2648: 2644: 2637: 2631:, not yet? -- 2630: 2627: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2610: 2608: 2605: 2603: 2598: 2596: 2589: 2584: 2581: 2579: 2576: 2574: 2568: 2564: 2561: 2559: 2556: 2553: 2550: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2519: 2517: 2514: 2512: 2506: 2503: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2486: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2465: 2460: 2457: 2454: 2448: 2443: 2438: 2432: 2431: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2410: 2408: 2404: 2402:Contributions 2397: 2396: 2395: 2386: 2383: 2381: 2378: 2377: 2374: 2373: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2355: 2353: 2349: 2344: 2343:WP:Persondata 2340: 2337: 2335: 2332: 2328: 2325: 2323: 2319: 2314: 2309: 2302: 2299: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2282: 2280: 2277: 2276: 2269: 2266: 2261: 2257: 2254: 2251: 2247: 2242: 2240: 2237: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2193: 2191: 2186: 2184: 2177: 2175: 2169: 2166: 2164: 2161: 2158: 2154: 2151: 2149: 2146: 2142: 2140: 2137: 2132: 2130: 2124: 2121: 2119: 2113: 2108: 2103: 2100: 2098: 2093: 2090: 2086: 2081: 2078: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2061: 2059: 2055: 2049: 2046: 2044: 2038: 2036: 2029: 2027: 2017: 2014: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1997: 1995: 1992: 1989: 1985: 1982: 1980: 1977: 1976: 1968:I think yes. 1967: 1964: 1962: 1958: 1953: 1948: 1943: 1939: 1936: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1920: 1915: 1912: 1910: 1907: 1905: 1904: 1897: 1894: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1879: 1874: 1871: 1869: 1865: 1864: 1857: 1856: 1849: 1846: 1844: 1840: 1837: 1834: 1829: 1826: 1824: 1821: 1815: 1812: 1810: 1807: 1804: 1799: 1797: 1791: 1788: 1786: 1783: 1777: 1774: 1772: 1769: 1766: 1763: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1746: 1744: 1741: 1726: 1713: 1710: 1708: 1705: 1700: 1699: 1693: 1692: 1685: 1682: 1680: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1662: 1658: 1655: 1648: 1644: 1643: 1638: 1633: 1627: 1626: 1623: 1616: 1613: 1612: 1607: 1602: 1596: 1595: 1592: 1587: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1564: 1562: 1558: 1553: 1551:Rotten regard 1546: 1543: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1526: 1524: 1521: 1518: 1514: 1511: 1509: 1506: 1501: 1495: 1492: 1490: 1487: 1485: 1480: 1478: 1477: 1471: 1469: 1463: 1460: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1443: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1426: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1409: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1392: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1371: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1360: 1357: 1355: 1351: 1344: 1339: 1334: 1332: 1328: 1320: 1313: 1311: 1308: 1303: 1290: 1287: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1270: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1257: 1254: 1252: 1249: 1248: 1243: 1240: 1238: 1235: 1230: 1225: 1219: 1216: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1199: 1197: 1191: 1186: 1185: 1178: 1175: 1173: 1169: 1166: 1156: 1153: 1151: 1148: 1146: 1145: 1139: 1137: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1123: 1120: 1116: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1104: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1086: 1084: 1080: 1078: 1070: 1067: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1056:Torreslfchero 1053: 1050: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1033: 1031: 1028: 1023: 1013: 1011: 1005: 1002: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 985: 983: 980: 979: 973: 972: 967: 964: 958: 954: 950: 946: 942: 939: 938: 937: 933: 929: 925: 921: 918: 917: 916: 912: 908: 903: 899: 895: 892: 890: 886: 882: 878: 876: 872: 870: 869: 861: 858: 856: 852: 848: 844: 841: 839: 835: 831: 827: 824: 823: 819: 815: 814: 805: 802: 800: 797: 795: 792: 791: 789: 785: 779: 776: 774: 771: 769: 766: 764: 761: 759: 756: 754: 751: 749: 746: 745: 743: 739: 733: 730: 728: 725: 724: 722: 718: 709: 704: 702: 697: 695: 690: 689: 686: 679: 677: 676: 674: 670: 661: 657: 652: 648: 645: 642: 639: 636: 633: 630: 627: 624: 621: 618: 615: 612: 608: 605: 601: 598: 595: 592: 588: 583: 582: 578: 568: 565: 564: 562: 559: 558: 556: 553: 552: 545: 542: 541: 539: 536: 534: 533:Cyberpower678 530: 529: 520: 517: 513: 510: 509: 507: 503: 500: 499: 496: 493: 489: 487: 486: 481: 478: 474: 470: 467: 465: 461: 460: 451: 447: 443: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 426: 422: 418: 414: 410: 407: 406: 404: 401: 400: 394: 391: 390: 388: 385: 384: 378: 374: 371: 370: 367: 364: 363: 360: 356: 355: 348: 347: 346: 345: 339: 336: 335: 333: 329: 326: 324: 320: 319: 310: 306: 303: 302: 299: 296: 295: 293: 289: 286: 284: 280: 279: 274: 270: 266: 261: 258: 257: 255: 251: 248: 246: 242: 241: 234: 231: 230: 228: 225: 224: 218: 213: 210: 209: 207: 204: 203: 197: 189: 188:old AfD multi 182: 178: 174: 170: 166: 162: 158: 155: 154: 152: 149: 148: 147: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 122: 121: 120: 119: 115: 111: 106: 105:Co-nomination 102: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 82: 79: 75: 68: 66: 65: 64: 60: 56: 48: 45: 41: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 4380: 4377: 4350: 4334: 4331: 4321: 4316: 4285:— Preceding 4279: 4264: 4252:Phil Bridger 4242: 4230: 4225: 4213: 4202: 4187: 4163: 4146: 4103: 4074: 4065: 4030: 3993: 3951: 3947: 3889: 3838: 3751:Magioladitis 3724: 3717: 3710: 3703: 3609:'s bot adds 3580: 3518: 3514: 3490: 3486: 3466: 3425: 3399:BuickCentury 3333: 3327: 3302: 3250:Magioladitis 3204: 3180: 3163: 3154: 3147: 3144: 3134: 3128: 3105: 3088: 3076:Gerda Arendt 3071: 3052: 3035: 3018: 3001: 2982: 2978: 2964: 2947: 2935: 2923: 2918: 2888: 2884: 2868: 2848: 2828: 2824: 2805: 2784: 2780: 2767: 2766: 2762: 2745: 2730: 2729: 2719:NFLisAwesome 2714: 2697: 2682: 2681: 2672: 2657: 2656: 2651: 2628: 2614:definitely-- 2611: 2601: 2594: 2582: 2566: 2562: 2551: 2520: 2511:Roger Davies 2510: 2504: 2487: 2466: 2429: 2428: 2411: 2389: 2388: 2384: 2375: 2368: 2364: 2356: 2338: 2326: 2300: 2283: 2271: 2267: 2252: 2235: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2211: 2194: 2182: 2173: 2167: 2152: 2128: 2122: 2101: 2079: 2062: 2047: 2034: 2025: 2015: 1998: 1983: 1969: 1965: 1937: 1917: 1913: 1903:Webclient101 1902: 1901: 1895: 1881:converse).-- 1877: 1872: 1860: 1852: 1847: 1827: 1813: 1802: 1795: 1789: 1775: 1747: 1711: 1694: 1687: 1683: 1656: 1640: 1624: 1621: 1609: 1593: 1590: 1585: 1584: 1565: 1544: 1527: 1512: 1493: 1483: 1475: 1474: 1467: 1461: 1444: 1427: 1410: 1393: 1372: 1358: 1288: 1271: 1255: 1245: 1241: 1217: 1200: 1180: 1177:Weak support 1176: 1154: 1143: 1142: 1135: 1129: 1119:BuickCentury 1109:push to talk 1087: 1068: 1051: 1034: 1019: 1009: 1003: 986: 975: 970: 965: 944: 940: 928:Ottawahitech 919: 897: 893: 865: 859: 847:Magioladitis 842: 825: 666: 665: 643: 637: 631: 625: 619: 613: 606: 599: 593: 560: 554: 543: 537: 505: 501: 491: 483: 473:DJ Nasty Naz 468: 408: 402: 392: 386: 377:User:BG19bot 372: 365: 337: 327: 323:Dennis Brown 297: 287: 259: 249: 232: 226: 217:Herlinatiens 211: 205: 183:'s bot adds 156: 150: 145: 123: 110:Magioladitis 104: 103: 80: 72: 52: 51: 46: 30: 28: 3816:‑Scottywong 3766:‑Scottywong 3735:‑Scottywong 3529:| comment _ 3524:‑Scottywong 3473:‑Scottywong 3432:‑Scottywong 2854:Dental plan 2830:-- Cheers, 2331:— sparklism 2288:Dirtlawyer1 2085:Sue Rangell 1830:Very good. 1661:my criteria 1432:Someguy1221 1398:Newyorkbrad 1306:| express _ 1301:‑Scottywong 1256:Oh hell yes 1247:Philosopher 902:another RFA 804:User rights 794:CentralAuth 440:Thank you. 4278:Regretful 3973:WP:BLPPROD 3821:| babble _ 3800:Tito Dutta 3783:SPhilbrick 3771:| confer _ 3360:j⚛e decker 3342:Tito Dutta 3284:Agathoclea 3209:Agathoclea 3058:cyberpower 3040:Tryptofish 2752:.Wolfowitz 2525:Beeblebrox 1854:Miniapolis 1363:j⚛e decker 1276:Valenciano 1183:Rcsprinter 1100:kelapstick 1096:television 1092:fine taste 949:Tito Dutta 907:Tito Dutta 787:Cross-wiki 768:AfD closes 680:Discussion 292:WP:BLPPROD 254:discussion 92:Tito Dutta 88:Tito Dutta 69:Nomination 31:successful 4365:Paul Erik 4291:Sparklism 4270:Trusilver 4073:editors. 3894:this prod 3358:, FYI. -- 3135:INeverCry 2731:Wizardman 2658:Jezebel's 2416:Lord Roem 2107:Adjwilley 1919:Callanecc 1476:Phightins 1205:Dwaipayan 1189:(message) 1144:Strikeout 1136:Automatic 763:AfD votes 758:BLP edits 629:block log 464:Paul Erik 4398:Category 4352:Join WER 4322:servants 4299:contribs 4287:unsigned 4217:contribs 4207:Casliber 4195:Fatuorum 4086:Chequers 4042:Chequers 4005:Chequers 3963:Chequers 3842:contribs 3832:Casliber 3437:| talk _ 3150:Schmidt, 3023:Ret.Prof 3019:Support: 2910:contribs 2539:Townlake 2479:contribs 2371:SilkTork 2256:contribs 2246:Casliber 2239:contribs 2229:Casliber 2067:J36miles 1928:contribs 1819:Vacation 1674:Contribs 1642:Join WER 1611:Join WER 1570:PaleAqua 1338:filelake 1164:Interior 971:Stalwart 920:Question 778:PROD log 741:Analysis 720:Counters 597:contribs 84:contribs 4311:Neutral 4247:BLPPROD 4226:Oppose: 4192:Malleus 3980:Bgwhite 3914:Carrite 3668:Bgwhite 3634:Bgwhite 3540:Samsara 3495:Samsara 3447:Samsara 3412:Bgwhite 3384:Bgwhite 3308:Samsara 3254:Bgwhite 3226:Snowman 3185:Dengero 3181:Support 3164:Support 3145:Support 3129:Support 3106:Support 3093:Michael 3089:Support 3072:Support 3053:Support 3036:Support 3002:Support 2986:В и к и 2979:Support 2970:Mediran 2965:Support 2948:Support 2936:Support 2919:Support 2885:Support 2874:ɑηsuмaη 2869:Support 2849:Support 2839:Huntley 2825:Support 2781:Support 2763:Support 2715:Support 2698:Support 2673:Support 2652:Support 2635:Makecat 2629:Support 2612:Support 2583:Support 2563:Support 2552:Support 2521:Support 2505:Support 2492:Carrite 2488:Support 2467:Support 2430:Support 2412:Support 2385:Support 2357:Support 2339:Support 2327:Support 2301:Support 2284:Support 2274:Spencer 2268:Support 2213:Support 2195:Support 2174:Mlpearc 2168:Support 2153:Support 2123:Support 2102:Support 2063:Support 2053:contact 2016:Support 2003:Peridon 1999:Support 1984:Support 1966:Support 1942:King of 1938:Support 1914:Support 1896:Support 1873:Support 1848:Support 1828:Support 1814:Support 1792:Yup. — 1790:Support 1776:Support 1748:Support 1712:Support 1684:Support 1657:Support 1586:Support 1566:Support 1556:Softnow 1545:Support 1532:Kierzek 1528:Support 1520:Snowman 1513:Support 1504:Epsilon 1494:Support 1462:Support 1449:Kumioko 1445:Support 1428:Support 1411:Support 1394:Support 1373:Support 1326:Shalott 1289:Support 1272:Support 1242:Support 1218:Support 1201:Support 1155:Support 1130:Support 1088:Support 1069:Support 1052:Support 1039:Nyttend 1035:Support 1004:Support 987:Support 966:Support 894:Support 860:Support 843:Support 826:support 820:Support 773:CSD log 604:deleted 587:Bgwhite 442:Carrite 359:Carrite 332:WP:RFPP 265:Bgwhite 128:Bgwhite 74:Bgwhite 47:Bgwhite 4332:Dennis 4280:oppose 4265:Oppose 4243:Oppose 4203:Oppose 4188:Oppose 4164:Oppose 4147:Oppose 3931:Warden 3898:Warden 3890:Oppose 3788:(Talk) 3725:Delete 3718:Delete 3607:Anomie 3581:Oppose 3515:anyone 3467:Anyone 3402:Driver 3303:Oppose 3205:Oppose 3199:Oppose 3064:Online 2924:Rzuwig 2746:Kiefer 2678:Mark91 2441:unique 2348:mabdul 2219:voted 2199:Nick-D 2183:powwow 2145:Secret 1781:GabeMc 1752:Slon02 1690:Eagles 1622:Dennis 1591:Dennis 1381:Drmies 1228:unique 1168:(Talk) 1122:Driver 1076:Begoon 924:wp:AFD 898:as nom 881:Kurtis 727:XTools 312:right. 283:TParis 245:Begoon 181:Anomie 4335:Brown 4231:Julia 4082:Spiel 4038:Spiel 4001:Spiel 3959:Spiel 3519:isn't 3376:a log 3223:Giant 3112:Salih 2940:MONGO 2834:Riley 2807:Kusma 2792:broil 2787:Royal 2662:Ponyo 2572:Sædon 2446:names 2393:RP459 2365:there 2312:music 2227:AfDs 1973:Swarm 1883:Bbb23 1625:Brown 1594:Brown 1517:Giant 1233:names 941:Reply 900:. In 669:civil 611:count 515:used. 171:, or 61:) at 16:< 4295:talk 4256:talk 4211:talk 4155:talk 4151:John 4126:XAЯA 4116:ARAX 4077:Ϣere 4054:and 4033:Ϣere 3996:Ϣere 3984:talk 3975:and 3954:Ϣere 3935:talk 3918:talk 3902:talk 3863:Wily 3836:talk 3804:talk 3755:talk 3711:Keep 3704:Keep 3683:Wily 3672:talk 3663:this 3649:Wily 3638:talk 3593:Wily 3416:talk 3388:talk 3346:talk 3288:talk 3258:talk 3213:talk 3189:talk 3172:talk 3118:talk 3097:talk 3080:talk 3044:talk 3027:talk 3010:talk 2956:talk 2906:talk 2706:talk 2641:Talk 2620:talk 2602:talk 2543:talk 2529:talk 2496:talk 2475:talk 2420:talk 2292:talk 2250:talk 2233:talk 2225:some 2221:keep 2203:talk 2112:talk 2071:talk 2026:stay 2007:talk 1932:logs 1924:talk 1887:talk 1862:talk 1765:Step 1756:talk 1733:XAЯA 1723:ARAX 1697:24/7 1670:Talk 1666:Dori 1574:talk 1536:talk 1453:talk 1436:talk 1419:talk 1402:talk 1385:talk 1342:shoe 1318:Lady 1280:talk 1263:talk 1209:talk 1098:. -- 1060:talk 1043:talk 995:talk 953:talk 932:talk 911:talk 885:talk 851:talk 834:talk 656:here 641:rfar 623:logs 591:talk 446:talk 425:This 269:talk 169:PROD 132:talk 114:talk 96:talk 78:talk 59:talk 4179:fax 4169:Jus 4104:did 3426:and 2804:. — 2595:Doc 2390:-- 2317:ian 2223:in 2217:has 2129:Axl 2035:sic 1878:all 1839:ley 1836:and 1833:TBr 1796:ΛΧΣ 1768:hen 1703:(C) 1663:). 1499:Moe 1161:The 1094:in 1010:Hex 991:Deb 977:111 647:spi 617:AfD 555:12. 538:11. 469:10. 196:ANI 165:AfD 4400:: 4341:2¢ 4338:- 4301:) 4297:• 4258:) 4219:) 4174:da 4157:) 4130:ИA 4112:AN 3986:) 3937:) 3920:) 3904:) 3896:. 3844:) 3806:) 3757:) 3674:) 3640:) 3617:}} 3611:{{ 3552:) 3550:FP 3544:FA 3507:) 3505:FP 3499:FA 3459:) 3457:FP 3451:FA 3418:) 3390:) 3382:. 3348:) 3320:) 3318:FP 3312:FA 3290:) 3279:, 3276:, 3273:, 3270:, 3260:) 3241:}} 3235:{{ 3215:) 3191:) 3174:) 3099:) 3082:) 3046:) 3029:) 3012:) 2991:T 2958:) 2912:) 2908:• 2900:bl 2897:ee 2894:zw 2857:/ 2818:) 2708:) 2622:) 2555:Ed 2545:) 2531:) 2498:) 2481:) 2477:• 2436:No 2422:) 2359:. 2345:. 2294:) 2258:) 2205:) 2157:Mr 2089:✍ 2073:) 2056:) 2041:! 2020:;) 2009:) 1959:♠ 1930:• 1926:• 1889:) 1866:) 1803:21 1758:) 1737:ИA 1719:AN 1672:☯ 1631:2¢ 1628:- 1617:- 1600:2¢ 1597:- 1576:) 1538:) 1468:Go 1455:) 1438:) 1421:) 1404:) 1387:) 1379:. 1336:- 1322:of 1282:) 1265:) 1223:No 1211:) 1111:) 1062:) 1045:) 1025:❞) 1021:?! 1017:(❝ 997:) 955:) 934:) 913:) 887:) 853:) 836:) 635:lu 561:A: 544:A: 502:A: 494:. 448:) 409:A: 403:9. 393:A: 387:8. 373:A: 366:7. 298:A: 288:5. 271:) 260:A: 250:4. 233:A: 227:3. 212:A: 206:2. 191:}} 185:{{ 167:, 157:A: 151:1. 134:) 116:) 98:) 90:-- 36:. 4346:© 4293:( 4254:( 4234:\ 4214:· 4209:( 4153:( 4132:M 4128:b 4121:• 4114:d 4110:M 4066:" 3982:( 3933:( 3916:( 3900:( 3867:D 3839:· 3834:( 3802:( 3753:( 3687:D 3670:( 3653:D 3636:( 3597:D 3547:• 3542:( 3502:• 3497:( 3454:• 3449:( 3414:( 3397:– 3386:( 3344:( 3315:• 3310:( 3286:( 3256:( 3211:( 3187:( 3170:( 3120:) 3116:( 3095:( 3078:( 3042:( 3025:( 3008:( 2954:( 2904:( 2891:B 2816:c 2814:· 2812:t 2810:( 2704:( 2618:( 2541:( 2527:( 2494:( 2473:( 2456:P 2453:T 2418:( 2398:/ 2307:B 2290:( 2253:· 2248:( 2236:· 2231:( 2201:( 2187:) 2179:( 2160:X 2134:¤ 2114:) 2110:( 2105:~ 2092:✉ 2069:( 2050:( 2039:) 2031:( 2022:— 2005:( 1991:P 1988:T 1956:♣ 1951:♦ 1946:♥ 1934:) 1922:( 1885:( 1858:( 1805:™ 1754:( 1739:M 1735:b 1728:• 1721:d 1717:M 1676:☽ 1668:☾ 1636:© 1605:© 1572:( 1534:( 1484:! 1451:( 1434:( 1417:( 1400:( 1383:( 1348: 1278:( 1261:( 1207:( 1193:@ 1058:( 1041:( 993:( 951:( 930:( 909:( 883:( 849:( 832:( 707:e 700:t 693:v 659:. 649:) 644:· 638:· 632:· 626:· 620:· 614:· 607:· 600:· 594:· 589:( 444:( 379:. 338:A 328:6 267:( 198:. 130:( 112:( 94:( 81:· 76:( 57:( 40:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Requests for adminship/Bgwhite - Knowledge (XXG)

Index