1087:
with
Knowledge there is a HUGE community of users who will almost always reach a reasonable group consensus (as compared with many situations in the real world where a single dictator makes all final decisions regardless of anyone else's input). It may not be the consensus I might hope for in any given situation, but I recognize and respect that the wishes of the community at large outweigh my desires as an individual editor. I'm okay with that and it doesn't bother me. I have enough stress in my regular life; Knowledge provides an outlet and even an escape at times, and if I ever feel stressed I can simply walk away without it taking a toll on me.
182:
187:
1072:
page and its effect on section heading display. Despite being called a moron during the course of the discussion, I feel I kept a reasonably level head and within 12 hours of tossing ideas back and forth we had worked out a resolution with which everyone was satisifed and with no hard feelings. This
904:
In the interest of fairness, I'm striking an unsigned vote that I am sure came from a newly registered friend. While I deeply appreciate the gesture, it's not fair for anyone to "stuff the ballot box" with new user votes. I have also reformatted a couple early votes to better meet accepted practice.
1086:
With regard to others causing me stress and my dealing with it, I feel that's one of the wonderful things about
Knowledge in specific and the Internet in general. Unlike my real-life stressors, with Knowledge I can always get up and walk away if something is bothering me. Also unlike in real life,
596:
No, not yet. Though you are on the right road, you aren’t there yet. The edit count certainly suggests commitment and availability. Your edits suggest the ability to write readable articles, good temperament, and the ability to work well with others. However, I’d like to see more time to show the
955:
A. Since joining
Knowledge in 2005 I have expanded my involvement from editing a single article to expanding, editing, and reorganizing a number of additional articles. More recently I have become involved with a number of other tasks as well in order to benefit the Knowledge project, including
627:
Despite the user's inherently kind and easy demeanor, I cannot stand by this. More and more nominations are being input with users that have had too little experience and are performing "burnout" editting habbits within the recent month proceeding the nomination. Please gain more experience.
977:
Having said all of that, I would like to continue to expand my involvement with
Knowledge. I feel that adminship would allow me to more effectively and efficiently contribute to the cause, making thoughtful changes that I must currently ask other admins to do (for example,
1037:. It covers all the bases without being overly wordy, excessive linking, or countless other problems plaguing many articles. There is certainly room for expansion and improvement, but I feel it represents well the quality of my work and my attention to detail.
909:
uncomfortable manipulating my own voting page, but I feel it is important in this situation; please note that I did not change the vote tally in my favor in any way, shape, or form and I'm deeply interested in preserving the integrity of this vote.
1023:
to its current condition (obviously with help from others). This project will continue as I work outside of
Knowledge with a large group of Nova enthusiasts to gather facts, add information, and document sources for upcoming additions to the
1059:
A. As with virtually any
Knowledge editor with more than a dozen edits under his/her belt, I have made edits with which others have disagreed. In no case has the disagreement gone to arbitration, gotten out of hand in an all-out
250:
is certainly better than I'd have done. I would usually perfer to see more experience in the WP namespace, but if
Brossow finds a situation where he doesn't know what to do I'm sure he'll ask before acting.
999:
A. In addition to the sizable contributions I've made recently to some of the aforementioned projects (hundreds upon hundreds of edits related to image tagging and disambiguation) I've also done a
539:. Some things are learned and seen to be learned only over time, and it is better for both the project and the editor that active participation before adminship be some months, not some weeks.
986:), more easily making rollbacks to counter vandalism, dealing more directly with copyright infringement issues (especially in the Image namespace), stopping vandals in their tracks, and so on.
1074:
1056:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
652:
Changing my vote, sorry. I don't see enough community intteraction, and the notice on your talk page that you will delete (rather than archive) old threads is classic newbie.
402:
is/are in Texas. I've got 2700+ edits and have no reason whatsoever to use a sockpuppet to nominate myself. I truly hope you'll reconsider your vote or at least withdraw it.
71:) – I have known Brossow for a few years now through another internet forum, and I have found him to be of good character. He has a distinguished history of over 2,700 edits
398:
This is patently false, not to mention offensive. Perhaps someone in authority would be so kind as to compare IP addresses. You'll find mine are in
Minnesota whereas
1007:
article. While many people may not find it interesting, important, or even worthy of the space on the servers, I believe a quick comparison of the article between
933:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
1102:
422:
247:
597:
sustainability of your effort and greater breadth of experience to show more of your critical thinking skills, your clarity of thought, and your people skills.
1119:
678:, I like all the work he has done in the Image area, but he still needs to be active a bit more, all but about 400 of his edits have come in the last month.
1012:
355:
516:
as per the above, only two months real activity with the majority this month, limited contributions in the project namespace, needs more experience. --
965:
1046:
Most of all, I'm simply proud to be a part of this community and contribute my time and talents to what I feel is an enormously worthwhile project.
551:: Temperament seems a little on the edge in this RFA, but the reason for opposition is inactivity in encyclopedic content and lack of experience.
74:, including many original contributions. He has a strong grasp of the Knowledge Manual of Style and Knowledge's rules and regulations. I feel that
949:
234:. Committed? Yes. Any ethical questions raised? No. Useful editor? Yes. What's the problem with the "too recent" issue is beyond me. --
757:
798:, looks good. However, like DaGizza said, around 80% of his edits come from this month alone. An admin must have more experience. --
29:
17:
1064:, or led to long-term hard feelings. An example of where there was some strong disagreement over changes I made can be found in
884:
usage: 100% for major edits and 97% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.
1004:
761:
614:
222:
No second thoughts in supporting this nom. Brossow is supportive of others, level-headed and stays on point and trustworthy.
898:
919:
488:
411:
102:
68:
72:
693:
481:
176:
1033:
In terms of completely original contributions, I'm rather proud of the short but thorough article I contributed about
1011:
and the current version will reveal a noticeable improvement in the article (despite its all-around trouncing in its
941:
721:
715:
390:
156:
996:
Of your articles or contributions to
Knowledge, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
961:
983:
945:
810:
979:
753:
957:
686:
506:
462:
1101:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
598:
1065:
439:
354:. Whilst a member since October, only active since December. Lacks experience per my requirements at
119:
923:
888:
869:
857:
845:
813:
807:
802:
799:
790:
764:
747:
704:
688:
662:
644:
632:
622:
601:
588:
570:
567:
555:
543:
520:
508:
503:
494:
467:
442:
415:
393:
381:
362:
339:
315:
300:
288:
277:
267:
255:
238:
226:
214:
202:
190:
159:
144:
128:
82:
211:
1061:
286:
726:
617:. Generally a good contributor but I'd like to see more levelheadedness before giving the mop. (
839:
787:
737:
629:
387:
153:
62:
772:
Great user, but around 80% of his edits coming only from this month. Needs more time really.
613:
issues in a couple of recent interactions surrounding a discussion of copyrights relating to
679:
540:
451:
359:
172:
141:
181:
1069:
436:
399:
199:
125:
79:
905:
If someone disagrees with these actions, please let me know and/or revert my edits. I'm
1016:
968:. I also make touch-up (and other) edits when I come across pages in need of attention.
854:
711:
564:
529:
252:
263:
I don't like his car, but his Knowledge activities are adequate enough for adminship!
1113:
828:
659:
610:
579:
336:
297:
282:
913:
894:
885:
833:
823:
773:
583:
532:
405:
312:
264:
223:
96:
75:
58:
47:
1066:
Talk:Apple Macintosh#Images: preventing weird formatting vs. keeping things lively
1034:
866:
641:
552:
476:
168:
138:
940:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
618:
235:
186:
1015:
to regain Featured Article status). I've also begun a major overhaul of the
701:
536:
696:
barely met for "decent activity throughout". Seems a good one, though, so,
386:
Just because the nominator has no user page doesn't mean it's an alias. --
1077:
of this year, including the changes I made and the compromise we reached.
517:
324:
1068:, where a "spirited discussion" arose regarding image placement on the
475:
He's a great contributor, but he simply has not been here long enough.
378:
309:
1105:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
1095:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
358:. Sorry I can't support you at the moment. Try again in the future.
964:
and notifying the respective uploaders, and most recently helping
89:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
78:'s adminship would be a positive contribution to Knowledge.
528:, much as I would like to support a fellow self-described
28:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
210:- I can't help it, I trust him (recent developments). --
1020:
1008:
377:, but may not be, sockpuppetry on his own nomination.
563:on grounds of inexperience. Give it a few months.
435:not now... if I get to know him then maybe later.
275:A great user who would not abuse admin tools. --
582:above. A lot of edits, but not enough time. --
54:Final (14/16/8) ended 20:16, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
296:Would be a valuable asset to the admin team.
8:
246:, his response to the issues raised on the
1073:article subsequently went on to become a
897:'s edit count and contribution tree with
865:, lack of Knowledge namespace edits.
7:
308:. Adminship should be no big deal.
1120:Unsuccessful requests for adminship
853:. Give it a little more time :(. --
24:
185:
180:
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
1075:Featured Article on February 10
1005:All your base are belong to us
640:Better have more experience.--
615:All your base are belong to us
122:14:26, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
1:
924:16:44, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
889:17:00, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
870:23:27, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
858:07:04, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
846:03:39, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
814:17:34, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
791:06:30, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
765:03:25, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
689:23:14, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
589:22:52, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
571:14:15, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
556:13:51, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
544:03:56, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
521:01:10, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
509:21:28, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
495:02:43, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
468:21:03, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
443:20:19, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
416:21:21, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
394:20:40, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
382:20:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
363:17:20, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
316:19:31, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
301:05:58, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
289:14:50, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
268:08:50, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
256:01:42, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
239:00:44, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
227:00:15, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
215:22:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
203:20:06, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
191:19:47, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
167:. I like the cut of his jib.
160:17:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
145:17:04, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
129:17:06, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
124:Fifth contrib by the user. --
83:03:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
1009:my first involvement with it
950:administrators' reading list
698:neutral leaning weak support
930:Questions for the candidate
1136:
944:, and read the page about
942:Category:Knowledge backlog
1021:my first edit of the page
663:21:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
645:00:52, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
633:07:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
623:00:24, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
602:07:33, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
450:per all the above votes.
340:07:28, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
1098:Please do not modify it.
578:for the same reasons as
39:Please do not modify it.
960:for vandalism, tagging
1019:page, taking it from
30:request for adminship
821:. Needs more time.
421:discussion moved to
371:obvious sockpuppetry
966:disambiguate links
609:- Some borderline
323:, looks OK to me.
198:. Per my own nom.
152:per nominator. --
844:
730:
484:
131:
1127:
1100:
842:
836:
831:
826:
822:
805:
783:
780:
777:
750:
745:
740:
724:
707:
684:
586:
491:
480:
465:
460:
457:
454:
333:
330:
327:
285:
280:
189:
184:
137:second that nom!
123:
41:
1135:
1134:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1110:
1109:
1103:this nomination
1096:
1070:Apple Macintosh
1003:of work on the
962:untagged images
922:
899:Interiot's tool
840:
834:
829:
824:
803:
781:
778:
775:
748:
741:
738:
719:
705:
680:
584:
492:
487:
463:
458:
455:
452:
414:
331:
328:
325:
278:
276:
105:
51:
37:
34:did not succeed
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1133:
1131:
1123:
1122:
1112:
1111:
1108:
1107:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1017:Chevrolet Nova
1013:recent attempt
990:
989:
988:
987:
972:
971:
970:
969:
958:recent changes
946:administrators
932:
927:
926:
918:
902:
891:
873:
872:
860:
848:
816:
793:
767:
731:
709:
691:
667:
666:
647:
635:
625:
604:
591:
573:
558:
546:
530:anal-retentive
523:
511:
497:
486:
470:
445:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
410:
396:
365:
343:
342:
318:
303:
291:
270:
258:
241:
229:
217:
205:
193:
162:
147:
132:
107:
106:
101:
50:
45:
44:
43:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1132:
1121:
1118:
1117:
1115:
1106:
1104:
1099:
1093:
1092:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1076:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1058:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1036:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
997:
995:
992:
991:
985:
981:
976:
975:
974:
973:
967:
963:
959:
954:
953:
951:
947:
943:
939:
936:
935:
934:
931:
925:
921:
916:
915:
908:
903:
900:
896:
892:
890:
887:
883:
880:
879:
878:
877:
871:
868:
864:
861:
859:
856:
852:
849:
847:
843:
837:
832:
827:
820:
817:
815:
812:
809:
806:
801:
797:
794:
792:
789:
788:
785:
784:
771:
768:
766:
763:
759:
755:
751:
746:
744:
735:
732:
728:
723:
717:
713:
708:
703:
699:
695:
692:
690:
687:
685:
683:
677:
674:
673:
672:
671:
665:
664:
661:
657:
651:
648:
646:
643:
639:
636:
634:
631:
626:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
605:
603:
600:
595:
592:
590:
587:
581:
580:User:Kingboyk
577:
574:
572:
569:
566:
562:
559:
557:
554:
550:
547:
545:
542:
538:
534:
531:
527:
524:
522:
519:
515:
512:
510:
507:
505:
501:
498:
496:
490:
483:
478:
474:
471:
469:
466:
461:
449:
446:
444:
441:
438:
434:
431:
425:
424:
419:
418:
417:
413:
408:
407:
401:
397:
395:
392:
389:
385:
384:
383:
380:
376:
372:
369:
366:
364:
361:
357:
353:
350:
349:
348:
347:
341:
338:
334:
322:
319:
317:
314:
311:
307:
304:
302:
299:
295:
292:
290:
287:
284:
281:
274:
271:
269:
266:
262:
259:
257:
254:
249:
245:
242:
240:
237:
233:
230:
228:
225:
221:
218:
216:
213:
209:
206:
204:
201:
197:
194:
192:
188:
183:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
130:
127:
121:
117:
114:
113:
112:
111:
104:
99:
98:
93:
92:
87:
86:
85:
84:
81:
77:
73:
70:
67:
64:
60:
56:
55:
49:
46:
42:
40:
35:
31:
26:
25:
19:
1097:
1094:
1053:
1035:block quotes
1000:
993:
937:
929:
928:
911:
906:
882:Edit summary
881:
875:
874:
862:
850:
818:
795:
786:
774:
769:
742:
733:
697:
681:
675:
669:
668:
655:
653:
649:
637:
611:WP:OWNership
606:
599:Mikereichold
593:
575:
560:
548:
533:grammar nazi
525:
513:
499:
472:
447:
432:
420:
403:
374:
370:
367:
351:
345:
344:
320:
305:
293:
272:
260:
243:
231:
219:
207:
195:
164:
149:
134:
115:
109:
108:
94:
90:
88:
65:
57:
53:
52:
38:
33:
27:
956:monitoring
682:NoSeptember
541:Jonathunder
502:too soon --
360:Essexmutant
736:per NSLE.
727:2006-02-25
126:Gurubrahma
855:Dragon695
720:at 01:19
694:Standards
565:Mackensen
537:Minnesota
423:talk page
400:Nova SS's
356:Standards
253:Raven4x4x
248:talk page
1114:Category
1062:edit war
1024:article.
948:and the
876:Comments
660:kingboyk
298:Juppiter
69:contribs
914:BRossow
895:Brossow
886:Mathbot
863:Neutral
851:Neutral
819:Neutral
796:Neutral
770:Neutral
743:kantari
734:Neutral
676:Neutral
670:Neutral
656:Neutral
585:tomf688
504:Jaranda
406:BRossow
375:appears
321:Support
306:Support
294:Support
283:iva1979
273:Support
265:Waggers
261:Support
244:Support
232:Support
224:Stude62
220:Support
212:Latinus
208:Support
200:Nova SS
196:Support
165:Support
150:Support
135:Support
116:SUPPORT
110:Support
97:BRossow
80:Nova SS
76:Brossow
59:Brossow
48:Brossow
867:Stifle
650:Oppose
642:Jusjih
638:Oppose
607:Oppose
594:Oppose
576:Oppose
568:(talk)
561:Oppose
553:Geogre
549:Oppose
526:Oppose
514:Oppose
500:Oppose
477:Jtrost
473:Oppose
448:Oppose
433:Oppose
368:Oppose
352:Oppose
346:Oppose
169:JHMM13
142:(talk)
91:ACCEPT
811:e Ong
782:Gizza
739:Nacon
619:ESkog
535:from
388:Eddie
373:What
236:Irpen
154:Eddie
139:Gator
32:that
16:<
984:here
982:and
980:here
907:very
893:See
841:talk
825:psch
630:Zero
479:( |
437:gren
337:Talk
310:+sj
120:Ford
63:talk
1001:lot
800:Ter
722:UTC
702:NSL
518:pgk
440:グレン
391:UTC
157:UTC
1116::
1054:3.
994:2.
952:.
938:1.
912:⇒
838:|
835:mp
808:nc
756:||
700:.
658:--
621:)
493:)
485:|
404:⇒
379:KI
335:|
179:)
175:|
118:--
95:⇒
36:.
920:C
917:/
901:.
830:e
804:e
779:a
776:D
762:m
760:|
758:c
754:t
752:|
749:e
729:)
725:(
718:)
716:C
714:+
712:T
710:(
706:E
654:#
628:-
489:#
482:C
464:ε
459:e
456:o
453:M
412:C
409:/
332:P
329:I
326:J
313:+
279:S
177:C
173:T
171:(
103:C
100:/
66:·
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
