898:. I'd like to support because this editor is a very valuable and dedicated contributor, but there are a couple concerns. The edit summary usage is really, really low for an editor with that much experience, which makes things more difficult for someone trying to follow your logic. User talk edits is also quite small, only 162 that aren't to his page, but that isn't what prevents my support. The answers to his questions don't explicitely, or even implicitely, show his need of the admin tools. His head and heart are certainly in the right place, but I think he should be involved in more "adminly" things and have a more clear idea on what he wants to do with the admin tools.
732:. Your low use of edit summaries was also noted, and you have not improved there either, so you should set your user preferences to remind you to use edit summaries. I understand you want to help the project, but you must demonstrate your awareness of policy and procedure before you're given a mop, and you have not done that to my satisfaction. Please take our comments into your editing approach and style. -
667:- unfortunately, I feel that the answers don't show a clear enough understanding of policy to cover the (comparatively) low projectspace count. This user is an outstanding editor, but doesn't strike me as appropriate for adminship. Keep up the good work, and get a little more involved in the administrative side of things, and I may support next time.
142:
Trying to clean up articles the best I can. I usally work on the retail and country music related articles, trying my hardest to remove any vandalism, and rewrite any confusing sections as possible. I also plan on creating articles on any notable retailers or country music artists, songs, and albums
213:
Yes, specifically a fued I had with an IP user last year on
Albertsons related articles. I was removing stuff that to me wasn't real and it got me blocked. I had sent an email to the user who blocked me explaining my actions and talked it out with the IP user settle an
85:) - Caldorwards4 seems to be a very trustworthy editor. I've seen him work hard on reverting vandalism, mostly related to country music and retail pages. He seems to be quite the dedicated Wikipedian, and is quite swift at his reversions of vandalism too. He was also
397:. Not overly impressed with answer to Q1, as most of the tasks listed there are things a non-admin can do. However, given this candidate's extensive experience and high editcount, I'm inclined to give the benefit of the doubt. Remember, adminship is no big deal.
143:
missing articles. I am quick on catching vandalism of any nonsence or anything not true, also listing pages for deletion when needed and lastly I plan on taking part in blocking any users that are be disruptive and causing problems to
Knowledge.
813:
I am not sufficiently convinced by the answer to question one that the admin tools are best given to this editor. Article clean-ups and vandal reverting can be done by non-admins and blocking assistance can be given by reporting vandals to
552:
Very low project space edit count means we have minimal actions to judge your ability as an admin with. I am also concerned by the Q1 answer, where you don't mention anything that can't be done by normal users.
800:
I am on the fence right now. I would like to hear more in-depth answers to Q1-3. How well spoken someone is in their RfA is an indicator of how well spoken they will be in pressure situations as a sysop.
715:
Your last RFA pointed out your lack of communication with other users as demonstrated by the number of user talk page edits; that has not improved very much, plus you don't seem to understand the need to
721:
231:
In your own words, what is the difference between a block and a ban? In what situations do you feel a block would be appropriate? In what situations do you feel a ban would be appropriate?
753:
sorry. A clear lack of experience in project namespace, and your answers to the questions don't demonstrate knowledge of what adminship is ("creating articles on artists and songs").
917:
272:
409:. You do not seem to have much need for the tools, however you are definately wanting to help, and therefore you are suitable for adminship. "Need" has no importance in RfA.
129:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
207:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
288:
648:
283:
86:
935:
329:
849:- I would say support except for Q1. The answer is incredibly weak and shows no real understanding of what admins do. I'm sorry, but for now Neutral. --
316:
323:
874:
I can't get past the opposing side's points; I like the editor, but I dislike the knowledge, or rather lack thereof, of duties and such.
678:
372:
359:
309:
82:
353:
703:
The answer to Q1 is mostly concerned with activities that have nothing to do with adminship. Edit summary usage is also really low.
93:
support, in part due to his rather terse answers to the questions, but he seems to have become a bit more verbose in the past year.
268:
30:
17:
417:
176:, a page I created. I have been adding info about its previous operations, locations list, and more in the last several months.
880:
858:
483:
371:
Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review
819:
902:
890:
866:
841:
822:
805:
785:
766:
745:
740:
707:
695:
683:
655:
641:
619:
603:
588:
571:
540:
520:
502:
485:
460:
447:
436:
424:
401:
116:
100:
66:
250:
When uploading fair use images, like logos, what size would You consider to be representing low resolution?
852:
674:
536:
303:
185:
Some other ones were providing information on notable malls that didn't have articles at the time such as
173:
76:
760:
478:
916:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
194:
755:
414:
94:
782:
733:
692:
62:
491:
444:
704:
670:
595:
To be honest; I dont think your answers have improved much since you last RfA, as well as per
531:
299:
264:
113:
72:
885:
635:
613:
585:
454:
241:
652:
554:
398:
611:
the answers to the questions don't show a clear understanding of
Knowledge's processes.
452:
Considering this is technically not a vote, would you like to elaborate on that point?
802:
580:
any users that are be disruptive and causing problems to
Knowledge." (emphasis mine).--
568:
433:
410:
226:
190:
929:
837:
815:
775:
717:
57:
899:
832:
420:
186:
160:
528:. Impressed with edit history and vandal fighting. Clearly focused on our goal. ą„
875:
630:
581:
237:
600:
596:
562:
910:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
517:
499:
920:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
830:
per above comments. Weak answers to questions is a concern here. --
163:
article. I rewrote, and added to the history section of the page.
107:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
691:
Soory, by answer of questions, I don't think your ready.
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
153:
What are your best contributions to
Knowledge, and why?
729:
725:
347:
341:
335:
498:
votes on multiple RfA's. Is that really necessary? --
159:
One of my best contributions was my expansion of the
516:, I don't beleive this user will abuse the tools. --
465:For the record, it is normally recognised that an
136:What admin work do you intend to take part in?
8:
469:!vote should be detailed, but an unadorned
432:I have no concerns or reasons to oppose.
281:
289:Requests for adminship/Caldorwards4 2
7:
490:By the way, I've seen you challenge
936:Unsuccessful requests for adminship
284:Requests for adminship/Caldorwards4
280:
774:as per all the above concerns. --
576:From Q1 "I plan on taking part in
373:Special:Contributions/Caldorwards4
24:
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
271:. For the edit count, see the
1:
647:Sockpuppet of Bugman94 - see
55:FINAL (6/9/6); No consensus.
724:when you do use them - see
628:per Giggy and New England.
267:'s edit summary usage with
125:Questions for the candidate
112:I accept the nomination. --
952:
236:An optional question from
903:17:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
891:07:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
867:01:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
842:14:03, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
823:12:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
806:04:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
786:05:02, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
767:03:35, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
746:23:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
708:07:47, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
696:18:24, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
684:17:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
656:13:19, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
642:15:21, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
620:14:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
604:08:49, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
589:03:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
572:03:45, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
541:18:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
521:02:29, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
503:02:29, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
486:00:22, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
461:02:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
448:01:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
437:01:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
425:00:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
402:11:30, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
117:19:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
101:17:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
67:08:07, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
913:Please do not modify it.
297:Links for Caldorwards4:
40:Please do not modify it.
225:Optional Question from
174:Buttrey Food & Drug
31:request for adminship
195:Holiday Village Mall
722:user talk templates
279:RfAs for this user:
534:
375:before commenting.
854:TĪ»Īµ RĪ±nĪ“om EĪ“Ī¹Ļor
784:
682:
649:checkuser request
539:
532:
423:
943:
915:
888:
883:
878:
864:
861:
855:
840:
835:
781:
778:
763:
758:
743:
738:
681:
668:
638:
633:
616:
565:
559:
529:
480:Anthony.bradbury
457:
413:
363:
322:
258:General comments
172:My expansion of
97:
96:TenĀ PoundĀ Hammer
87:nominated before
42:
951:
950:
946:
945:
944:
942:
941:
940:
926:
925:
924:
918:this nomination
911:
886:
881:
876:
859:
853:
851:
833:
831:
776:
761:
756:
741:
734:
669:
636:
631:
614:
567:
563:
555:
455:
382:
315:
298:
294:
260:
127:
95:
52:
38:
35:did not succeed
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
949:
947:
939:
938:
928:
927:
923:
922:
906:
905:
893:
869:
844:
825:
820:(aeropagitica)
808:
789:
788:
769:
748:
710:
698:
686:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
606:
593:
592:
591:
561:
544:
543:
523:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
439:
427:
411:Matt/TheFearow
404:
386:
385:
381:
378:
368:
367:
366:
364:
293:
292:
291:
286:
278:
277:
276:
269:mathbot's tool
259:
256:
254:
252:
251:
245:
233:
232:
218:
217:
216:
215:
201:
200:
199:
198:
191:NorthTown Mall
180:
179:
178:
177:
167:
166:
165:
164:
147:
146:
145:
144:
126:
123:
121:
110:
109:
51:
46:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
948:
937:
934:
933:
931:
921:
919:
914:
908:
907:
904:
901:
897:
894:
892:
889:
884:
879:
873:
870:
868:
865:
862:
856:
848:
845:
843:
839:
836:
829:
826:
824:
821:
817:
812:
809:
807:
804:
799:
796:
795:
794:
793:
787:
783:
779:
773:
770:
768:
765:
764:
759:
752:
749:
747:
744:
739:
737:
731:
727:
723:
719:
714:
711:
709:
706:
702:
699:
697:
694:
693:Politics rule
690:
687:
685:
680:
676:
672:
666:
663:
657:
654:
650:
646:
645:
644:
643:
640:
639:
634:
626:
623:
622:
621:
618:
617:
610:
607:
605:
602:
598:
594:
590:
587:
583:
579:
575:
574:
573:
570:
566:
560:
558:
551:
550:
549:
548:
542:
538:
537:
535:
527:
524:
522:
519:
515:
512:
504:
501:
497:
493:
489:
488:
487:
484:
482:
481:
476:
472:
468:
464:
463:
462:
459:
458:
451:
450:
449:
446:
443:
440:
438:
435:
431:
428:
426:
422:
419:
416:
412:
408:
405:
403:
400:
396:
393:
392:
391:
390:
384:
383:
379:
377:
376:
374:
365:
361:
358:
355:
352:
349:
346:
343:
340:
337:
334:
331:
328:
325:
321:
318:
314:
311:
308:
305:
301:
296:
295:
290:
287:
285:
282:
274:
270:
266:
262:
261:
257:
255:
249:
246:
243:
239:
235:
234:
230:
228:
223:
220:
219:
212:
209:
208:
206:
203:
202:
196:
192:
188:
184:
183:
182:
181:
175:
171:
170:
169:
168:
162:
158:
155:
154:
152:
149:
148:
141:
138:
137:
135:
132:
131:
130:
124:
122:
119:
118:
115:
108:
105:
104:
103:
102:
98:
92:
88:
84:
81:
78:
74:
70:
69:
68:
64:
59:
56:
50:
47:
43:
41:
36:
32:
27:
26:
19:
912:
909:
895:
871:
850:
846:
827:
810:
797:
791:
790:
771:
754:
750:
735:
712:
705:Pax:Vobiscum
700:
688:
671:ckĀ lostsword
664:
629:
627:
624:
612:
608:
577:
556:
546:
545:
533:Metta Bubble
530:
525:
513:
495:
479:
474:
473:!vote means
470:
466:
453:
441:
429:
406:
395:Weak Support
394:
388:
387:
370:
369:
356:
350:
344:
338:
332:
326:
319:
312:
306:
300:Caldorwards4
265:Caldorwards4
253:
247:
224:
221:
214:negotiation.
210:
204:
187:Karcher Mall
161:J. C. Penney
156:
150:
139:
133:
128:
120:
114:Caldorwards4
111:
106:
90:
79:
73:Caldorwards4
71:
60:
54:
53:
49:Caldorwards4
48:
39:
34:
28:
615:New England
456:New England
718:substitute
418:(Contribs)
380:Discussion
803:Trusilver
434:Acalamari
342:blockĀ log
273:talk page
227:Trusilver
930:Category
777:FayssalF
736:Krakatoa
578:blocking
310:contribs
89:but got
83:contribs
900:Useight
896:Neutral
872:Neutral
847:Neutral
838:iva1979
828:Neutral
811:Neutral
798:Neutral
792:Neutral
526:Support
514:Support
496:Support
475:per nom
471:support
442:Support
430:Support
407:Support
389:Support
317:deleted
816:WP:AIV
772:Oppose
751:Oppose
713:Oppose
701:Oppose
689:Oppose
665:Oppose
653:Walton
625:Oppose
609:Oppose
582:Chaser
547:Oppose
467:oppose
415:(Talk)
399:Walton
238:feydey
193:, and
742:Katie
601:Rlest
597:Giggy
557:Giggy
421:(Bot)
324:count
58:Andre
33:that
16:<
877:Jmlk
860:ĻĪ±lĪŗ
762:Skan
757:Sala
730:here
728:and
726:here
720:the
599:. ā
518:SXT4
500:SXT4
492:A.Z.
477:. --
445:A.Z.
354:rfar
336:logs
304:talk
263:See
242:talk
77:talk
63:talk
637:Boy
632:Zap
494:'s
360:spi
330:AfD
99:ā¢
932::
818:.
780:-
651:.
584:-
348:lu
248:5.
222:4.
211:A:
205:3.
189:,
157:A:
151:2.
140:A:
134:1.
91:no
65:)
37:.
887:7
882:1
863:)
857:(
834:S
679:C
677:ā¢
675:T
673:ā¢
586:T
569:P
564:U
362:)
357:Ā·
351:Ā·
345:Ā·
339:Ā·
333:Ā·
327:Ā·
320:Ā·
313:Ā·
307:Ā·
302:(
275:.
244:)
240:(
229::
197:.
80:Ā·
75:(
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.