Knowledge (XXG)

:Requests for adminship/Ceranthor 3 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

163:: I was delighted when Ceranthor told me that he was considering running for adminship. I had supported his previous RfA as I thought he would be a net positive to the encyclopedia. My support was a rather hesitant one at the time, as I saw the opposition as certainly having some merit. Instances were brought up where Ceranthor's understanding of policy and interactions with others was shown to be not up to par. I won't put words in Ceranthor's mouth, but I truly believe that he has taken the constructive criticism from the past RfA to heart. After having observed Ceranthor's editing over the past 9 months, I do not believe that any such instances have reoccurred, and I believe that Ceranthor now knows to apply with due diligence and care our content and conduct policies. I feel confident in saying Ceranthor is an experienced and mature content contributor who would only improve the encyclopedia as a whole with the sysop tools. 4025:"Legal age in his place of residence?" I understand your concern, but I'm not following what you mean to say. First, what is "legal age?" Do you mean the "age of majority?" When one can consent to be bound contractually? Do you want to contract with him? Does Knowledge (XXG)? Or voting? Or drinking? And, why does it matter about "his place of residence?" One is accountable for their actions regardless of age -- so, that obviously can't be your reasoning. Please feel free to oppose admins for whatever reason you please, but be honest about it: you oppose admins which don't meet a certain age criterion. No need to obfuscate with quasi-legalistic terms that have no place in an RfA. 3571:. There's nothing in our "transparency ideals" which states than an admin must provide personal details regarding their personal life outside of Knowledge (XXG). This type of request is just as invasive as asking about an editor's sex life, and it's just as much none of our business. As the WMF has never required proof of age for adminship on any WMF site, it is not and should not be a requirement imposed here. Also, everything I've seen from this editor shows me that they "get it" and would not abuse the twiddled bits. ··· 3045:- I'm not one to be impressed by a large creation count, particularly of one-line stubs and redirects, nevertheless he has hugely contributed to quakes & volcanoes, he has a well balanced participation in a diversity of encyclopedia-building activities, and looks like a consistent editor with staying power. I can't see any strong reasons not to support.-- 3140: 227:
Because of my comfort in those areas, if I were to pass I would start using the mop in just those areas, albeit rather slowly. Once I feel comfortable in these areas I might help out with backlogs at other places. However, because I feel most comfortable in the content area, I plan to use my tools sparingly.
715:
The question by Explicit currently reads "In the past, you've stated you'd never run for adminship..." Presumably, it should read "In the past, you've stated you would never run for adminship" rather than the misinterpretation "In the past, you've stated you had never run for adminship". This is just
288:
I like to think I am not an argumentative person, though my opinion can get the best of me. On Knowledge (XXG), I don't think I've ever gotten into a legitimate conflict. Sure, I've been corrected for a mistake plenty of times, but I try to take each suggestion someone gives me and improve my editing
252:
1.) the creation of the Earthquakes WikiProject. The producer of four FAs and eleven good articles, it has really attracted talented editors from completely different areas of interest. I think any group that can just inspire random editors to want to write an article is really doing a good job, and
98:
More importantly Ceranthor's last RFA was some nine months ago. That's a fair old time in wiki-world. Opposition at that RFA was based around maturity concerns. These were fair concerns and not lightly raised - a look a the opposition at that RFA shows editors who are active, well versed in Knowledge
4099:
Due to Q6. I find the failure to give a straight answer to a serious question to be incompatible with our ideals of transparency, and a very undesirable quality for an admin, regardless of what the answer might have been. (For the record, if the question had been grossly intrusive, such as about the
883:, looks fine. I haven't done too much of a detailed review of contributions, but I've certainly noticed none of the maturity issues recently that were apparent prior to the second RfA. Plus, I trust both the nominators and all my experiences of Ceranthor recently have been positive - best of luck. ~ 226:
As an administrator, I would largely work with backlogs at DYK, C:SD, and UAA/AIV. Because I have been settling into what I really enjoy here since my last RfA in July - content work - I have been a bit inactive in administrative areas as of late. Nonetheless, I know which areas I intend to work in.
86:
for the extra tool set. An experienced Wikipedian with over 16,000 live edits (and the thick end of 2,000 deleted ones) it's been my pleasure to interact with him since the very start of his journey on Knowledge (XXG) over two years ago. Ceranthor has undertaken a couple of renames (User:LordSunday)
3909:
admins? Maturity and chronological age are two different things, IMO it's rather easier to spot the college students editing here. Unless you are raising a WMF-level concern, I don't think you should even be asking such intrusive questions as your #6 above. What about the candidate's recent actions
1465:
I am pleased to support Ceranthor — an editor who has demonstrated, over a lengthy period of time, a certain degree of conscientiousness that is not found in very many people. He is always willing to lead, to listen, and to learn. Even if he's not perfect, or if he's not been perfect before, or if
4075:
Hypothetically, if there was evidence that this candidate was a senior citizen and chose not to answer the age question would you also oppose? My own view is that since the WMF has not made an age criterion of admins, the age question is intrusive into the candidate's privacy, which shouldn't be
3946:
And my question is whether that legal standard is of import to the adminship role at en:wiki. Specifically, does minority in a jurisdiction carry impact to the activities of the project? If so, we need a hard-and-fast rule, if not, we shouldn't be asking the question. In any case, I'll carry this
436:
If you think my oppose is over your age, you would be wrong, but certainly not alone. I don't support Administrators who lack the ability to do various legal things equivalent to adminship (obtain and possess "adult materials" without restriction and enter into binding contracts being two of the
2235:- I supported last time round, and I'm happy to do so again. Ceranthor has contributed a huge amount to Knowledge (XXG) and I haven't found anything of concern. While I don't think the concerns of the previous RfA were baseless, it should still have passed in my opinion. Ceranthor has passed my 315:
In my humble opinion, the most important phrase would have to be "Before nominating a page for speedy deletion, consider whether it could be improved, reduced to a stub, merged or redirected elsewhere, reverted to a better previous revision, or handled in some other way." I believe there is an
3979:
I have to say, if this was a real issue, we'd have a policy, like we do for CheckUser and Oversight access, but since we don't, I can't see that age is a big deal. I don't know how old Ceranthor is and I don't give a shit- the maturity of his contributions is what I choose to judge him on. I
332:
In the past, you've stated you'd never run for adminship and that RfA was "full of people who just support without actually evaluating the candidate". Why have you decided to run for adminship a third time? Do you still fully believe that RfA is full of people who support candidates without
3222:
of commendable content work under his belt (I enjoyed skimming his six FAs), and his commentary in administrative areas is valuable as well. If he is underage, he's on the upper end of the maturity scale for such editors, at least given what I've seen. In any case, his vast experience with
3755:
Does having a backbone mean deleting my user page? The voiceless are those who have opposed in the past but are no longer part of the project, as well as those who would oppose but are no longer part of the project, as well as those who would oppose but do not know they can.
348:
1.) I had been considering running for RfA when Pedro contacted me. However, I wanted to give myself some more time to see if it would be something I enjoyed. It was not until recently, when it was suggested by a few others (such as Beeblebrox), that I decided to
262:
2.) my content work. I have dedicated a lot of my time into researching, writing, and fine-tuning the articles I have contributed to, and I think they all reflect the fact. Additionally I am proud of the help I have given to other articles at FAC, GAN, and
432:
Jclemens: here is my outlook on this situation. I agree that you have the right to oppose over my age; however, I think you should evaluate me on my contributions, maturity, and the like, versus my age. That is why I decided not to answer your question.
358:
2.) No, I do not. As my participation at RfA has increased over time, I have come to see that most reviewers actually scrutinize candidates. They really do a spectacular job of scouring through contributions, and I should probably apologize for such a
368:
3.) As I've come to openly admit and the nominators mention, I have made strides in maturity since running for RfA in July. I believe both of your diffs are from before that, so I can only say that I believe I have considerably improved since then in
1624:, as there is no doubt here he has done consistent and great work here over the last few years. A detailed search of his contributions shows little error on his part and he has the policy nailed down to its science. I would hand him the keys anyday. 94:
Not to gloss over the first RFA, but it was an earnest yet overly brave request. I myself ended up recusing from support despite my mentorship of Ceranthor and admiration of his abilities and dedication - I felt he just was not ready.
3860:
So what about all the editors who supported in the past but are no longer part of the project, those who would support but are no longer part of the project, or those who would support but do not know they can? Are you going to vote
2676:- Ceranthor's heart is in the right place, and his actions mirror this. I think that he will be responsible, and will always act in the best interests of content generation and general happiness on this encyclopedia. 102:
I firmy believe Ceranthor has addressed these concerns, as shown through his last several thousand edits, and that he has built upon the strengths identified by his supporters. Some bullets for you all to assess;
3890:
until and unless candidate asserts that he is of legal age in his place of residence. Nothing personal, contributions look great, but I will always oppose child admins, and as of 9 months ago, that was you.
4060:
due to failure to answer question 6. If the candidate was willing to answer a yes or a no, then maturity of contributions could be assessed. I can't say that there is much adults only admin work though.
2737:. I've wanted to support Ceranthor for adminship before but had some hesitations related to maturity. However, the fortunate thing about such an issue is that it naturally resolves itself with time. 2121:, absolutely. I looked at your speedy nominations since September, and based on that I have no concerns about your knowledge of the speedy criteria. Also liked the answer to Q4. Good luck! 272:
3.) my diverse interests! I have nominated 9 FPs (of astronomy, earth science, and history), 9 VPs, contributed to 21 GAs (earth science, mythology), and 27 DYKs (earthquakes, volcanoes).
3810:
And considering your userpage was deleted for making personal attacks/disparagement, I really don't think you understand some basic principles that go beyond editing Knowledge (XXG).
213:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge (XXG) as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
1533:
I don't see any current problems remaining from the last RfA, just lots of good work and plenty of relevant knowledge and experience - looks like being a good month for RfA :-) --
4157: 2458:
Constantly surprised Ceranthor isn't already. JulianColton is one of our best admins, and isn't (or wasn't for a long time) legally of age, so I don't see that as an issue.
3596: 1112: 2861:
15,000 edits. Broad range of experience. Solid credentials. Showed fortitude, improvement after two unsuccessful attempts. Hopefully, the third time will be the charm.--
2263:
Ceranthor is a pleasant user that understands what Knowledge (XXG) is about. He'll make a fine administrator, and his passing will surely be a net gain for the project.
282:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
4115:
Joe summed it up well in support above, RadMan; thank goodness this RFA is about to be closed as a pass before we get more clueless drivel like the stuff you typed.
673: 4039:
For those of you who missed it, Franmax pointed to the separate and specific discussion where I've explained my reasoning at exhaustive, perhaps pedantic, length.
3925: 480: 475: 1059: 668: 470: 2161:, Ceranthor has matured since his LordSunday Meldshal42 days into a fine and helpful contributor to Knowledge (XXG)-- I believe he's ready for the tools! 2845:- I have no concerns. Quite the contrary, this candidate seems to be easy to work with and has made good contributions. I'm not sure why his age matters. 4175: 3218:
This is probably overdue, though I understand the reasons for waiting. Ceranthor is friendly, hard-working, and seems sufficiently trustworthy. He has a
1062: 522: 1427:, ceranthor has overcome the issues from last RfA (which was a while ago—plenty of time elapsed), and I have no concerns with him holding the mop. :-) 3766:
So you're arbitrarily declaring yourself to be representing the unwashed masses, alright. So, do the unwashed masses have any valid reason to oppose?
3313:
closures. Ones which are obviously going to succeed (like this one, barring anything bizarre in the next 1.5 hours) are left to run the full time. ···
3924:
Childishness is not a legal standard. Age of majority is. You are entitled to think that such questions are out of line, but if you'll look back at
4085: 3421: 3962: 3716:
TharsHammar, I want you to know that I respect your oppose - but if you could specify the meaning of it, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you.
3285:
I think it's been established numerous times that early closures are inappropriate. Besides, someone has opposed, it's not like this is unanimous.
2804: 253:
because of the work of others such as Mikenorton, the content aspect of the project has really excelled in the roughly two years it has existed.
1331: 509: 3473:
After checking through contribs and particularly talk-page comments, I have no concerns about maturity or any other issues. Happy to support.
611: 2200:. I've seen Ceranthor mature on an almost daily basis; no concerns that he'll abuse the tools, and every indication that he's all clued up. 552: 2751:
Seems to have overcome all concerns raised on his second RFA as far as I can see, so there is no reason not to support him. :-) Regards
546: 87:
and (User:Meldshal42), but the vast majority of his work has been under this name - and all have been under just one account. This is a
2790:
for the third (and hopefully last) time. Great content contributor, as well as other places around the 'pedia. Deserves the admin bit.
2522:
admin coaching means support comes in for me. Haven't seen any evidence of cooling issues though, but he is trusted, to say the least.
663: 33: 17: 3382: 2723: 1696: 1056: 135:
All, these are simple highlights. I urge you to consider the last two RFA's and to review the contributions since then. I see exactly
516: 3443: 2999: 1839: 1167: 289:
from it. I've also been involved in a few disputes, but I would like to think I have handled them all with civility and respect.
139:
detriment to Wikipeidia in Ceranthor having the extra tools - I see only a positive. Please join me in supporting this request.
3553: 578: 502: 79: 3842:
Opposing because "someone else who hasn't would have" still does not give the reason for the oppose; would you care to share?
3706: 3681: 3608: 3579: 3321: 3236: 2313: 1806: 1413: 561: 3026: 2936:- good editor, no reason to believe that adminship would destroy the wiki (although it may reduce article contributions). 2924: 2528: 1654:. I supported both of your previous times and you've just gotten so much better so a regular "Support" just won't cut it. 1542: 1053: 967:
per nom. An article builder who also has experiecne with the admin related areas. Trust the nominators. Boring talk page.
689: 699: 4082: 3418: 3151: 2351: 2296: 3341:. Ceranthor seems to have genuinely matured since last July. I have no concerns with hanging him the mop and bucket. — 2612:- a clueful and experienced editor. I have no concerns regarding their ability to be responsible and fair as an admin. 950:. Excellent content contributor. Scan of admin-like contributions (just to be sure!) looks fine, including CSD work. -- 3409: 2799: 2107: 1835: 915: 2693:
I've seen Ceranthor about in various areas, and have had no bad experiences of him - I don't think this editor would
1939:. The concerns expressed in previous RfAs appear to have been overcome. I think Ceranthor is ready for the mop now. 3661:
Seriously, this is dumbest oppose I've seen in a long time. Essentially opposing because no one has. Jesus Christ.
1763: 1482: 837: 637: 4066: 3232: 604: 437:
closest). If anything, my opinion of your maturity was just fine, but has not been helped your responses here.
3461: 3364: 2633:- I often see Ceranthor in admin-related areas, making helpful suggestions and showing quite a bit of clue. -- 2555: 2236: 1534: 751: 658: 171: 3910:
give you concern about their level of maturity? Is there evidence of impulsiveness, lack of judgement, etc. ?
1348: 968: 2447:
Looking over concerns about age and the concerns of "the voiceless", I still think this is a fine candidate.
653: 4079: 3828:
Whenever I see an oppose rationale this stupid I assume the closing 'crat will have the sense to ignore it.
3817: 3799: 3415: 3147: 3008: 2960: 2480: 2082: 1745: 1596: 997: 978: 2568: 2478:
All looks good - a dedicated contributor who could really use the tools for every day tasks. Best of luck.
4030: 3654: 3412:- hate to pile on like this, but I don't think this candidate should be allowed to escape the mop again!-- 3182: 2794: 2739: 2717: 2169: 2048: 1690: 910: 873: 774: 131:- clearly an area where we can allways use more admin help to allow proper transclusions to the main page. 1344: 4131: 4110: 4089: 4070: 4048: 4034: 4020: 3994: 3989: 3974: 3956: 3941: 3919: 3900: 3880: 3851: 3837: 3823: 3805: 3775: 3761: 3750: 3745: 3731: 3711: 3687: 3656: 3640: 3618: 3589: 3559: 3533: 3524: 3507: 3490: 3465: 3448: 3425: 3403: 3386: 3368: 3359:
No obvious recent errors of judgement, but everything else seems to be fine so I will support anyway...
3351: 3331: 3300: 3280: 3259: 3240: 3210: 3187: 3170: 3155: 3133: 3121: 3083: 3067: 3054: 3037: 3004: 2983: 2966: 2945: 2928: 2911: 2893: 2870: 2851: 2837: 2812: 2782: 2764: 2743: 2729: 2685: 2668: 2652: 2625: 2604: 2579: 2559: 2542: 2506: 2489: 2473: 2453: 2439: 2422: 2405: 2388: 2369: 2353: 2335: 2318: 2287: 2272: 2255: 2227: 2222: 2208: 2192: 2173: 2153: 2130: 2113: 2086: 2069: 2065: 2052: 2035: 2018: 2001: 1965: 1948: 1931: 1917: 1910: 1897: 1881: 1860: 1843: 1826: 1810: 1787: 1771: 1754: 1728: 1705: 1668: 1661: 1643: 1616: 1600: 1584: 1564: 1547: 1525: 1509: 1504: 1488: 1460: 1440: 1419: 1386: 1370: 1352: 1335: 1295: 1273: 1256: 1242: 1225: 1202: 1192: 1187: 1173: 1143: 1118: 1086: 1065: 1044: 1021: 1003: 984: 959: 955: 942: 924: 899: 875: 859: 843: 816: 808: 784: 758: 731: 446: 427: 398: 202: 178: 155: 58: 54: 4156:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
3812: 3794: 1471: 992: 973: 574: 297: 128: 632: 4062: 3833: 3440: 3293: 2994: 2941: 2401: 2031: 1892: 1724: 1639: 1629: 1625: 1455: 1382: 1288: 1160: 1016: 597: 3792:
Trying to figure out how denying this user the tools can in anyway be a net positive to the project.
3771: 3724: 3662: 3547: 3457: 3399: 3360: 3200: 3077: 2665: 2572: 2551: 2435: 2331: 2147: 1992: 1824: 1580: 1394: 1254: 932:
by the same reason I supported the previous RFAs. (This user can be trusted with the admin tools.)
744: 496: 195: 164: 73: 3310: 316:
alternative to deletion in a good number of cases, and it should be acted upon if at all possible.
4107: 4044: 4014: 3970: 3952: 3937: 3915: 3896: 3847: 3702: 3671: 3614: 3585: 3503: 3349: 3327: 3254: 3167: 2979: 2954: 2681: 2418: 2309: 2285: 2078: 1927: 1800: 1736: 1592: 1521: 1434: 1403: 1125: 1082: 852: 442: 423: 394: 124:
Just under a quarter of all edits to the Knowledge (XXG) namespace - active at AIV, UAA, ANI etc.
2694: 1818:. Noms made their case well. Seen a lot of good from this editor, pretty sure they're ready. -- 1327: 3635:. I feel as though I have no choice but to oppose this nomination for the voiceless among us. 3567:
because he refuses to answer Q6. "Our ideals of transparency" in this case only apply to admin
4026: 3647: 3520: 3377: 3179: 3050: 3033: 2921: 2886: 2866: 2779: 2706: 2536: 2448: 2251: 2188: 2162: 2138:
Competent. I'm satisfied with answers to Questions for Candidate. No concerns with this user.
2126: 2044: 1856: 1684: 1269: 937: 866: 769: 724: 3306: 3094: 3981: 3757: 3737: 3636: 3127: 3114: 2904: 2502: 2464: 2349: 2217: 2061: 1961: 1903: 1879: 1655: 1496: 1238: 1179: 1104: 951: 813: 3224: 2818: 2772:- I don't see any serious reason to oppose this motion. Everything looks to be in order. 2379: 1978: 1974: 306: 4124: 3829: 3435: 3288: 3089: 2989: 2937: 2830: 2758: 2647: 2623: 2397: 2027: 1887: 1720: 1635: 1449: 1378: 1362: 1283: 1153: 1011: 801: 148: 114: 110: 3929: 3873: 3767: 3736:
You don't respect it; you don't have to lie to appease stupid people. Have a backbone.
3718: 3542: 3530: 3483: 3395: 3196: 2661: 2432: 2327: 2268: 2140: 1982: 1819: 1780: 1576: 1560: 1251: 1218: 1198: 830: 492: 189: 69: 1575:. Wow! Such a great wiki-specimen! I would never be able to do such content contribs! 1470:
perfect, I know I can trust Ceranthor — and that's really what it's all about. Trust.
4169: 4101: 4040: 4009: 3966: 3948: 3933: 3932:
asked a substantially similar question which was answered honestly by the candidate.
3911: 3892: 3843: 3694: 3601: 3572: 3499: 3342: 3314: 3278: 3249: 3164: 2975: 2677: 2414: 2384: 2301: 2279: 2014: 1944: 1923: 1796: 1517: 1429: 1134: 1078: 438: 419: 390: 377: 324: 91:
RFA so as I would expect that the community will question what happened in the past.
3980:
understand some of our finest admins are under the age of majority where they live.
1052:
Lots of experience, and I think he has improved significantly since his last RfA. --
694: 3516: 3046: 3018: 2917: 2879: 2862: 2774: 2598: 2571:'s vote notwithstanding. User is an obvious good choice, and has been for a while. 2523: 2240: 2122: 1852: 1610: 1265: 1032: 933: 717: 3947:
forward at WT:RFA since the overarching question transcends this particular RFA.
3456:
Seems mature enough now and his commitment to content creation is most welcome.
3098: 3060: 2899: 2846: 2498: 2459: 2363: 2344: 1957: 1869: 1234: 1096: 864:
Nominated him last time, so naturally I think he'll do just fine with the bit. –
766:
per nom. Ceranthor is a great, trustworthy, and friendly editor. Good luck! :)
339:
This is a three part question, so I'll answer in three parts to retain clarity.
4118: 2824: 2753: 2635: 2613: 2201: 2098: 884: 795: 142: 4150:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
3866: 3476: 2264: 1556: 1211: 825: 418:
So why did you choose to answer it in RfA #2, but not RfA #3? What changed?
2953:
Seems mature enough to be an admin, whichever jurisdiction s/he lives in. —
2009:- it's ages since I've seen a name on this page that I actually recognise! 3231:
make him a good fit for fulfilling administrators' duties in both places.
3268: 2010: 1940: 1305: 187:
I humbly accept. Thank you Pedro and NuclearWarfare for your kind words.
2216:- Great contribs, from what I've seen from him around the encyclopedia. 1868:
this editor would do great with the mop, from the look of his contribs.
2588: 3139: 2550:
as the user is evidently dedicated to the project. I see no concerns.
4160:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
3075:- Good contributions, friendly, well-trusted by community - why not? 2043:
I thought he was an admin already. I've seen his name around enough.
121:
Over 1,100 edits to article talk - indicating a desire to collaborate
2974:
Fairly experienced, feel he could make good use of the admin tools.
577:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review 4100:
candidates sex life, I wouldn't object the the failure to answer.)
3178:– has all the pieces, and has put them together in the right way. 589: 3228: 3163:- No reason not to. Plus 42 is indeed always the right answer. 593: 389:
reached the age of majority in your jurisdiction of residence?
1871: 1714:
Because he resisted my efforts to goad him into it last month.
237:
What are your best contributions to Knowledge (XXG), and why?
2916:
Edit history looks great. No worries about this candidate. /
1634:
indenting, it appears this account may have been compromised
185:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
2898:
Seen this editor around, definitely have no concerns here.
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
305:
Hello,Ceranthor. What is the most significant phrase in
220:
What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
3692:
Who are the voiceless? Your answer makes no sense. --
3017:
Good content contributor with a mature attitude IMO. -
2699: 2515: 905: 540: 534: 528: 333:
evaluating them? If not, why has your outlook changed?
1676:
I only oppose without reviewing candidates. Sheesh! ~
415:
P.S. I also believe you are entitled to your opinion.
3645:
Sorry, but is this intended as a serious objection? –
2430:. As far as I can tell, he would make a fine admin. 243:
I feel that my best contributions to the project are:
1886:
I commend your proactivity in WP:AIV and WP:UAA. --
1851:
Sure. Ceranthor is a good member of our collective.
682: 646: 625: 3248:Seen him around several times. Looks quite good. 2277:I thought he was ready the first time, honestly. 1250:Another fine candidate for admin. Looks good! -- 2449: 2573: 2295:Looks like he knows what he's doing. Meets my 1094:Terrific editor, will be the same as an admin. 99:(XXG) and very aware of our adminship process. 3746: 3738: 1505: 1497: 559:Edit summary usage for Ceranthor can be found 107:A significant article builder and copywriter. 3541:A quick glance and he understands the stuff! 2599: 605: 8: 3146:Deo Volente & Deo Juvente, Ceranthor. — 2660:- Per above, great work on Knowledge (XXG)! 3515:What more can I add to what has been said? 4076:okay whether the candidate is 12 or 120.-- 3195:Mop-worthy, and a good solid contributor. 2361:No concerns from my reviews of his work, 2094:has my support, will not abuse the tools. 1795:- high probability of being net positive. 612: 598: 590: 3305:The only RfAs which are closed early are 3076: 1762:- Long overdue, will make a great admin. 53:Final (134/4/0), closed as successful by 2181:– undoubtedly one of the best around. – 573:Please keep discussion constructive and 2878:- Per contributions in the recent past. 2077:. No concerns. Good luck with the mop! 468: 2584:Since the only opposition is petty, I 2552:-- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) 2239:and he should make a compotent admin. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship 7: 3376:No problems here. Can be trusted -- 2518:is. A mixture of article promoting 466: 4007:He could so easily lie, you know. 1095: 481:Requests for adminship/Ceranthor 3 476:Requests for adminship/Ceranthor 2 376:Additional optional question from 323:Additional optional question from 296:Additional optional question from 24: 4176:Successful requests for adminship 3594:Also, I should note that "42" is 3078: 3007:PS I was indeed offended by your 1902:Excellent job, deserves the mop. 1608:Good experiences with candidate. 990:make that strong support for A4. 3138: 3093:Long since earned my trust, and 2326:Certainly knows the territory... 1834:No reasons to Oppose from me. -- 1233:I thought you were one already. 471:Requests for adminship/Ceranthor 3674: 3664: 2724: 2718: 2710: 2707: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2524: 2142: 1406: 1396: 1113: 1105: 1097: 1077:since I first saw him on Wiki. 579:Special:Contributions/Ceranthor 2343:thought he was one already... 1573:Gasp, fall over and pinch self 1197:Enthusiastic support. - Dank ( 831: 1: 2795: 2060:. Fully qualified candidate. 838: 826: 716:for records post archiving... 82:) – I'm pleased to recommend 3009:collection of ne'er-do-wells 2805: 2396:Friendly and knowledgeable. 2182: 1956:, an excellent candidate. -- 1632:) 02:16, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 851:too many edit conflicts :)-- 2800: 1073:Strong editor, has matured 971:Has remedied past problems. 969:Readily meets my standards. 209:Questions for the candidate 4192: 4132:18:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 4111:17:26, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 4090:14:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 4071:11:51, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 4049:04:59, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 4035:02:16, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 4021:20:24, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 3995:17:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 3975:07:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 3957:06:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 3942:06:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 3920:06:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 3901:04:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 3881:04:42, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 3852:06:12, 23 April 2010 (UTC) 3838:07:29, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 3824:15:27, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 3806:15:24, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 3776:13:06, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 3762:10:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 3751:02:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 3732:00:30, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 3712:00:27, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 3688:00:01, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 3657:23:59, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 3641:23:49, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 3619:18:15, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 3590:18:04, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 3560:16:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 3534:16:35, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 3525:14:39, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 3508:11:25, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 3491:08:55, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 3466:07:02, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 3449:17:23, 23 April 2010 (UTC) 3426:11:26, 23 April 2010 (UTC) 3404:05:33, 23 April 2010 (UTC) 3387:01:38, 23 April 2010 (UTC) 3369:20:15, 22 April 2010 (UTC) 3352:19:52, 22 April 2010 (UTC) 3332:18:11, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 3301:19:48, 22 April 2010 (UTC) 3281:19:25, 22 April 2010 (UTC) 3260:12:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC) 3241:00:37, 22 April 2010 (UTC) 3211:20:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC) 3188:18:22, 21 April 2010 (UTC) 3171:15:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC) 3156:08:51, 21 April 2010 (UTC) 3134:05:46, 21 April 2010 (UTC) 3122:05:22, 21 April 2010 (UTC) 3095:I have no reason to oppose 3084:02:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC) 3068:22:48, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 3055:19:55, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 3038:19:37, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 3005:18:43, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 2984:17:50, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 2967:17:46, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 2946:15:05, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 2929:13:52, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 2912:06:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 2894:03:42, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 2871:02:12, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 2852:01:28, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 2838:01:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 2813:00:21, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 2783:22:37, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2765:21:01, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2744:19:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2730:17:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2686:17:39, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2669:17:35, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2653:17:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2626:16:16, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2605:16:02, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2580:15:40, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2560:13:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2543:12:36, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2507:12:32, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2490:11:50, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2474:09:38, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2454:09:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2440:08:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2423:06:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2406:05:21, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2389:04:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2370:03:00, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2354:01:34, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2336:00:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 2319:22:22, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 2288:21:49, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 2273:21:02, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 2256:20:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 2228:19:38, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 2209:19:21, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 2193:18:03, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 2174:18:01, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 2154:16:26, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 2131:15:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 2114:15:53, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 2087:15:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 2070:15:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 2053:14:33, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 2036:14:32, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 2019:14:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 2002:12:22, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1966:12:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1949:11:59, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1932:11:55, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1918:11:37, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1898:08:54, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1882:08:15, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1861:07:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1844:07:38, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1827:07:01, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1811:06:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1788:05:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1772:04:13, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1755:03:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1729:03:22, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1706:03:18, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1669:03:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1644:22:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 1617:01:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1601:01:50, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1585:01:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1565:01:07, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1548:01:01, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1526:00:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1510:00:44, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1489:00:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 1461:23:58, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1441:23:10, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1420:23:08, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1387:22:24, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1371:22:23, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1353:22:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1336:22:07, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1296:22:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1274:21:45, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1257:21:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1243:21:10, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1226:20:55, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1203:20:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1193:20:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1174:20:32, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1151:Definitely, long overdue. 1144:20:24, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1119:20:23, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1087:20:18, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1066:20:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1045:20:13, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1022:20:08, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 1004:03:16, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 985:20:00, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 960:19:57, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 943:19:47, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 925:19:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 900:19:38, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 876:19:37, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 860:19:35, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 844:19:34, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 817:19:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 809:19:32, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 785:19:30, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 759:17:26, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 732:03:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 447:04:54, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 428:04:57, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 399:04:06, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 203:19:03, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 179:16:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 156:20:41, 14 April 2010 (UTC) 127:Greater than 150 edits to 59:18:29, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 3991:Penny for your thoughts? 3865:on their behalf as well? 3394:, clearly a good editor. 1189:Penny for your thoughts? 4153:Please do not modify it. 3905:Do you also oppose child 3059:Aren't you one already? 2514:He obviously knows what 1652:Seriously Strong Support 3267:. No problems at all. 38:Please do not modify it 3498:An ideal candidate. - 3444:egg-throwing coleslaw? 3116:Questions or Comments? 2859:- Wikipedian for : --> 2026:- trustworthy editor. 1973:. Good involvement in 1836:Andromedabluesphere440 1766:Décembër21st2012Freâk 490:Links for Ceranthor: 34:request for adminship 3529:Agree with Useight. 3233:A Stop at Willoughby 2695:delete the main page 2377:No concerns here. -- 695:Global contributions 3565:Very Strong Support 1178:Why yes of course! 792:per my nomination. 659:Non-automated edits 465:RfAs for this user: 3888:Provisional Oppose 3148:Mikhailov Kusserow 2882:♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ 2860:3 years with : --> 2849: 2781: 2284: 720:♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ 638:Edit summary usage 581:before commenting. 39: 4130: 3683: 3678: 3617: 3588: 3489: 3447: 3330: 3207: 3120: 3035: 3031: 3025: 2927: 2908: 2847: 2836: 2773: 2278: 2254: 1878: 1703: 1646: 1574: 1415: 1410: 1369: 1129: 1111: 1103: 1039: 807: 743:As co-nominator. 708: 707: 154: 37: 4183: 4155: 4129: 4127: 4116: 4106: 4017: 4012: 3992: 3986: 3871: 3820: 3815: 3802: 3797: 3748: 3742: 3729: 3721: 3697: 3682: 3676: 3672: 3666: 3650: 3615:Talk to Nihonjoe 3611: 3607: 3604: 3586:Talk to Nihonjoe 3582: 3578: 3575: 3558:(typo intended) 3557: 3488: 3486: 3480: 3474: 3438: 3347: 3328:Talk to Nihonjoe 3324: 3320: 3317: 3298: 3296: 3291: 3277: 3273: 3257: 3252: 3205: 3142: 3130: 3117: 3112: 3110: 3107: 3104: 3101: 3082: 3080: 3065: 3034: 3030: 3027: 3023: 3021: 3002: 2997: 2992: 2963: 2957: 2920: 2909: 2906: 2902: 2883: 2835: 2833: 2827: 2822: 2809: 2807: 2802: 2797: 2777: 2761: 2756: 2726: 2720: 2712: 2709: 2702: 2650: 2644: 2641: 2638: 2621: 2601: 2595: 2577: 2539: 2534: 2531: 2526: 2486: 2483: 2471: 2462: 2451: 2387: 2382: 2366: 2347: 2304: 2282: 2261:Volcanic support 2250: 2247: 2244: 2225: 2220: 2206: 2186: 2166: 2152: 2150: 2144: 2110: 2101: 1999: 1991: 1987: 1915: 1908: 1895: 1890: 1876: 1874: 1873: 1822: 1785: 1768: 1752: 1743: 1704: 1699: 1693: 1687: 1681: 1679: 1665: 1633: 1613: 1572: 1545: 1540: 1507: 1501: 1485: 1479: 1475: 1458: 1452: 1437: 1432: 1414: 1408: 1404: 1398: 1368: 1365: 1323: 1317: 1311: 1293: 1291: 1286: 1235:Kevin Rutherford 1216: 1190: 1184: 1172: 1170: 1164: 1157: 1141: 1123: 1117: 1115: 1109: 1107: 1101: 1099: 1043: 1040: 1037: 1019: 1014: 1000: 995: 981: 976: 940: 922: 918: 913: 897: 869: 857: 840: 835: 828: 806: 804: 793: 780: 777: 772: 754: 721: 654:Articles created 614: 607: 600: 591: 564: 556: 515: 461:General comments 200: 192: 174: 153: 151: 140: 55:The Rambling Man 4191: 4190: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4182: 4181: 4180: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4158:this nomination 4151: 4142: 4125: 4117: 4104: 4063:Graeme Bartlett 4015: 4010: 3990: 3982: 3877: 3867: 3822: 3818: 3813: 3804: 3800: 3795: 3725: 3719: 3695: 3686: 3677: 3648: 3629: 3609: 3602: 3580: 3573: 3545: 3484: 3478: 3475: 3385: 3343: 3322: 3315: 3294: 3289: 3287: 3275: 3269: 3255: 3250: 3204: 3185: 3128: 3115: 3108: 3105: 3102: 3099: 3061: 3028: 3019: 3000: 2995: 2990: 2961: 2955: 2905: 2900: 2890: 2881: 2831: 2825: 2823: 2793: 2775: 2759: 2754: 2698: 2648: 2642: 2639: 2636: 2619: 2603: 2589: 2484: 2481: 2465: 2460: 2380: 2378: 2364: 2345: 2302: 2299:for admins. -- 2280: 2248: 2242: 2223: 2218: 2202: 2164: 2148: 2139: 2112: 2108: 2099: 1993: 1989: 1983: 1911: 1904: 1893: 1888: 1870: 1820: 1781: 1764: 1746: 1737: 1697: 1691: 1685: 1680: 1677: 1663: 1611: 1543: 1535: 1524: 1483: 1477: 1473: 1456: 1450: 1435: 1430: 1418: 1409: 1363: 1321: 1318: 1315: 1312: 1309: 1306: 1289: 1284: 1282: 1222: 1212: 1188: 1180: 1168: 1162: 1155: 1152: 1135: 1036: 1033: 1030: 1017: 1012: 1002: 998: 993: 983: 979: 974: 938: 920: 916: 911: 885: 867: 853: 802: 794: 778: 775: 770: 752: 740: 728: 719: 709: 704: 678: 642: 621: 620:RfA/RfB toolbox 618: 588: 560: 508: 491: 487: 485: 463: 211: 196: 190: 172: 149: 141: 67: 50: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4189: 4187: 4179: 4178: 4168: 4167: 4163: 4162: 4146: 4145: 4141: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4108:open frequency 4094: 4093: 4092: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4023: 4005: 4004: 4003: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3961:Discussion is 3930:User:Sandstein 3885: 3884: 3883: 3875: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3811: 3808: 3793: 3790: 3788: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3673: 3669: 3659: 3628: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3562: 3536: 3527: 3510: 3493: 3468: 3458:Colonel Warden 3451: 3429: 3406: 3389: 3381: 3371: 3361:LessHeard vanU 3354: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3303: 3262: 3243: 3213: 3201: 3190: 3183: 3173: 3158: 3136: 3124: 3086: 3079:PrincessofLlyr 3070: 3057: 3040: 3012: 2986: 2969: 2948: 2931: 2914: 2896: 2888: 2873: 2854: 2840: 2815: 2785: 2767: 2746: 2732: 2688: 2671: 2655: 2628: 2607: 2597: 2582: 2562: 2545: 2509: 2492: 2476: 2456: 2442: 2425: 2413:Net positive. 2408: 2391: 2372: 2356: 2338: 2321: 2290: 2275: 2258: 2230: 2211: 2195: 2179:Strong support 2176: 2156: 2133: 2116: 2106: 2089: 2072: 2055: 2038: 2021: 2004: 1968: 1951: 1934: 1920: 1900: 1884: 1863: 1846: 1829: 1813: 1790: 1774: 1757: 1731: 1708: 1671: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1603: 1587: 1567: 1550: 1528: 1520: 1512: 1494:Strong support 1491: 1463: 1443: 1422: 1405: 1401: 1389: 1373: 1358:Strong support 1355: 1345:Bradjamesbrown 1338: 1319: 1313: 1307: 1301:Strong support 1298: 1279:Strong support 1276: 1259: 1245: 1228: 1220: 1210:- absolutely. 1205: 1195: 1176: 1146: 1121: 1092:Strong support 1089: 1068: 1047: 1034: 1024: 1009: 1008: 1007: 991: 972: 962: 945: 927: 902: 878: 862: 846: 819: 811: 790:Strong Support 787: 761: 739: 736: 735: 734: 726: 706: 705: 703: 702: 697: 692: 686: 684: 680: 679: 677: 676: 671: 666: 661: 656: 650: 648: 644: 643: 641: 640: 635: 629: 627: 623: 622: 619: 617: 616: 609: 602: 594: 587: 584: 570: 569: 568: 566: 557: 486: 484: 483: 478: 473: 467: 464: 462: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 451: 450: 449: 410: 409: 408: 407: 380: 373: 372: 371: 370: 363: 362: 361: 360: 353: 352: 351: 350: 343: 342: 341: 340: 327: 320: 319: 318: 317: 300: 293: 292: 291: 290: 276: 275: 274: 273: 267: 266: 265: 264: 257: 256: 255: 254: 247: 246: 245: 244: 231: 230: 229: 228: 210: 207: 206: 205: 133: 132: 125: 122: 119: 66: 63: 49: 44: 43: 42: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4188: 4177: 4174: 4173: 4171: 4161: 4159: 4154: 4148: 4147: 4144: 4143: 4139: 4133: 4128: 4122: 4121: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4109: 4103: 4098: 4095: 4091: 4088: 4087: 4084: 4081: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4068: 4064: 4059: 4056: 4050: 4046: 4042: 4038: 4037: 4036: 4032: 4028: 4024: 4022: 4019: 4018: 4013: 4006: 3996: 3993: 3987: 3985: 3978: 3977: 3976: 3972: 3968: 3964: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3954: 3950: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3939: 3935: 3931: 3927: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3917: 3913: 3908: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3898: 3894: 3889: 3886: 3882: 3879: 3878: 3872: 3870: 3864: 3859: 3853: 3849: 3845: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3835: 3831: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3821: 3816: 3809: 3807: 3803: 3798: 3791: 3789: 3777: 3773: 3769: 3765: 3764: 3763: 3759: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3749: 3743: 3741: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3730: 3728: 3723: 3722: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3710: 3708: 3704: 3699: 3698: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3684: 3679: 3668: 3667: 3660: 3658: 3655: 3652: 3651: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3638: 3634: 3631: 3630: 3626: 3620: 3616: 3612: 3605: 3599: 3598: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3587: 3583: 3576: 3570: 3566: 3563: 3561: 3555: 3552: 3549: 3544: 3540: 3537: 3535: 3532: 3528: 3526: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3511: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3497: 3494: 3492: 3487: 3482: 3481: 3472: 3469: 3467: 3463: 3459: 3455: 3452: 3450: 3445: 3442: 3437: 3433: 3430: 3428: 3427: 3423: 3420: 3417: 3413: 3411: 3407: 3405: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3390: 3388: 3384: 3383:contributions 3379: 3375: 3372: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3355: 3353: 3350: 3348: 3346: 3340: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3318: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3302: 3299: 3297: 3292: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3279: 3274: 3272: 3266: 3263: 3261: 3258: 3253: 3247: 3244: 3242: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3221: 3217: 3214: 3212: 3209: 3208: 3198: 3194: 3191: 3189: 3186: 3180: 3177: 3174: 3172: 3169: 3166: 3162: 3159: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3135: 3132: 3131: 3125: 3123: 3118: 3111: 3096: 3092: 3091: 3087: 3085: 3081: 3074: 3071: 3069: 3066: 3064: 3058: 3056: 3052: 3048: 3044: 3041: 3039: 3036: 3032: 3022: 3016: 3013: 3010: 3006: 3003: 2998: 2993: 2987: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2970: 2968: 2965: 2964: 2958: 2952: 2949: 2947: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2932: 2930: 2926: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2913: 2910: 2903: 2897: 2895: 2892: 2891: 2885: 2884: 2877: 2874: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2858: 2855: 2853: 2850: 2844: 2841: 2839: 2834: 2828: 2821: 2820: 2816: 2814: 2811: 2810: 2808: 2803: 2798: 2789: 2786: 2784: 2780: 2778: 2771: 2768: 2766: 2763: 2762: 2757: 2750: 2747: 2745: 2742: 2741: 2736: 2733: 2731: 2727: 2721: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2701: 2696: 2692: 2689: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2672: 2670: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2656: 2654: 2651: 2646: 2645: 2632: 2629: 2627: 2624: 2622: 2618: 2617: 2611: 2608: 2606: 2602: 2596: 2594: 2593: 2587: 2583: 2581: 2578: 2576: 2570: 2569:Helen Lovejoy 2566: 2563: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2546: 2544: 2540: 2532: 2527: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2510: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2493: 2491: 2488: 2487: 2485:Postlethwaite 2477: 2475: 2472: 2470: 2469: 2463: 2457: 2455: 2452: 2446: 2443: 2441: 2438: 2437: 2434: 2429: 2426: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2409: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2392: 2390: 2386: 2383: 2376: 2373: 2371: 2368: 2367: 2360: 2357: 2355: 2352: 2350: 2348: 2342: 2339: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2322: 2320: 2317: 2315: 2311: 2306: 2305: 2298: 2294: 2291: 2289: 2286: 2283: 2276: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2259: 2257: 2253: 2246: 2238: 2234: 2231: 2229: 2226: 2221: 2215: 2212: 2210: 2207: 2205: 2199: 2196: 2194: 2190: 2185: 2180: 2177: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2160: 2157: 2155: 2151: 2146: 2145: 2137: 2134: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2117: 2115: 2111: 2109:Contributions 2104: 2103: 2102: 2093: 2090: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2079:Laurinavicius 2076: 2073: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2056: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2039: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2022: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2005: 2003: 2000: 1998: 1997: 1988: 1986: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1969: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1952: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1935: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1919: 1916: 1914: 1909: 1907: 1901: 1899: 1896: 1891: 1885: 1883: 1880: 1875: 1867: 1864: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1847: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1830: 1828: 1825: 1823: 1817: 1814: 1812: 1808: 1805: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1791: 1789: 1786: 1784: 1778: 1775: 1773: 1769: 1767: 1761: 1758: 1756: 1753: 1751: 1750: 1744: 1742: 1741: 1735: 1732: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1715: 1713: 1709: 1707: 1702: 1700: 1694: 1688: 1675: 1672: 1670: 1667: 1666: 1659: 1658: 1653: 1650: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1615: 1614: 1607: 1604: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1593:Truthkeeper88 1591: 1588: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1571: 1568: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1551: 1549: 1546: 1541: 1539: 1532: 1529: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1516: 1513: 1511: 1508: 1502: 1500: 1495: 1492: 1490: 1486: 1480: 1476: 1469: 1464: 1462: 1459: 1453: 1448:- certainly. 1447: 1444: 1442: 1439: 1438: 1433: 1426: 1423: 1421: 1416: 1411: 1400: 1399: 1393: 1390: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1377: 1374: 1372: 1367: 1366: 1359: 1356: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1343:No concerns. 1342: 1339: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1324: 1302: 1299: 1297: 1294: 1292: 1287: 1280: 1277: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1260: 1258: 1255: 1253: 1249: 1246: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1229: 1227: 1224: 1223: 1217: 1215: 1209: 1206: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1194: 1191: 1185: 1183: 1177: 1175: 1171: 1166: 1165: 1159: 1158: 1150: 1147: 1145: 1142: 1140: 1139: 1133:- of course. 1132: 1127: 1126:edit conflict 1122: 1120: 1116: 1108: 1100: 1093: 1090: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1069: 1067: 1064: 1061: 1058: 1055: 1051: 1048: 1046: 1042: 1041: 1029:. Why not? - 1028: 1025: 1023: 1020: 1015: 1010: 1006: 1005: 1001: 996: 988: 987: 986: 982: 977: 970: 966: 963: 961: 957: 953: 949: 946: 944: 941: 935: 931: 928: 926: 923: 919: 914: 908: 907: 903: 901: 898: 896: 892: 888: 882: 879: 877: 874: 871: 870: 863: 861: 858: 856: 855:White Shadows 850: 847: 845: 842: 841: 836: 834: 829: 823: 820: 818: 815: 812: 810: 805: 799: 798: 791: 788: 786: 783: 782: 781: 773: 765: 762: 760: 757: 755: 748: 747: 742: 741: 737: 733: 730: 729: 723: 722: 714: 711: 710: 701: 698: 696: 693: 691: 688: 687: 685: 681: 675: 672: 670: 667: 665: 662: 660: 657: 655: 652: 651: 649: 645: 639: 636: 634: 631: 630: 628: 624: 615: 610: 608: 603: 601: 596: 595: 592: 585: 583: 582: 580: 576: 567: 563: 558: 554: 551: 548: 545: 542: 539: 536: 533: 530: 527: 524: 521: 518: 514: 511: 507: 504: 501: 498: 494: 489: 488: 482: 479: 477: 474: 472: 469: 460: 448: 444: 440: 435: 434: 431: 430: 429: 425: 421: 417: 416: 414: 413: 412: 411: 405: 402: 401: 400: 396: 392: 388: 384: 381: 379: 375: 374: 367: 366: 365: 364: 357: 356: 355: 354: 347: 346: 345: 344: 338: 335: 334: 331: 328: 326: 322: 321: 314: 311: 310: 308: 304: 301: 299: 295: 294: 287: 284: 283: 281: 278: 277: 271: 270: 269: 268: 261: 260: 259: 258: 251: 250: 249: 248: 242: 239: 238: 236: 233: 232: 225: 222: 221: 219: 216: 215: 214: 208: 204: 201: 199: 194: 193: 186: 183: 182: 181: 180: 177: 175: 168: 167: 162: 161:Co-nomination 158: 157: 152: 146: 145: 138: 130: 126: 123: 120: 118: 116: 112: 106: 105: 104: 100: 96: 92: 90: 85: 81: 78: 75: 71: 64: 62: 61: 60: 56: 48: 45: 41: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 4152: 4149: 4119: 4096: 4077: 4057: 4027:Lazulilasher 4008: 3983: 3906: 3887: 3874: 3868: 3862: 3739: 3726: 3717: 3700: 3693: 3663: 3649:Juliancolton 3646: 3632: 3595: 3568: 3564: 3550: 3538: 3512: 3495: 3477: 3470: 3453: 3431: 3424: 3408: 3391: 3378:Patar knight 3373: 3356: 3344: 3338: 3286: 3270: 3264: 3245: 3219: 3215: 3199: 3192: 3175: 3160: 3143: 3126: 3088: 3072: 3062: 3042: 3014: 2988:Good to go. 2971: 2959: 2950: 2933: 2887: 2880: 2875: 2856: 2842: 2817: 2792: 2791: 2787: 2769: 2752: 2748: 2740:Geometry guy 2738: 2734: 2705: 2704: 2690: 2673: 2657: 2634: 2630: 2615: 2614: 2609: 2591: 2590: 2585: 2574: 2564: 2547: 2519: 2511: 2494: 2479: 2467: 2466: 2444: 2431: 2427: 2410: 2393: 2374: 2365:~~ GB fan ~~ 2362: 2358: 2340: 2323: 2307: 2300: 2292: 2260: 2237:RfA criteria 2232: 2213: 2203: 2197: 2183: 2178: 2158: 2141: 2135: 2118: 2096: 2095: 2091: 2074: 2057: 2045:Doc Quintana 2040: 2023: 2006: 1995: 1994: 1984: 1970: 1953: 1936: 1912: 1905: 1865: 1848: 1831: 1815: 1803: 1792: 1782: 1776: 1765: 1759: 1748: 1747: 1739: 1738: 1733: 1716: 1711: 1710: 1682: 1673: 1662: 1656: 1651: 1621: 1609: 1605: 1589: 1569: 1552: 1544:said Zebedee 1537: 1530: 1514: 1498: 1493: 1472: 1467: 1445: 1428: 1424: 1395: 1391: 1375: 1361: 1357: 1340: 1304: 1300: 1281: 1278: 1261: 1247: 1230: 1219: 1213: 1207: 1199:push to talk 1181: 1161: 1154: 1148: 1137: 1136: 1130: 1091: 1074: 1070: 1049: 1031: 1026: 989: 964: 947: 929: 909: 904: 894: 890: 886: 880: 868:Juliancolton 865: 854: 848: 832: 824: 821: 796: 789: 768: 767: 763: 749: 745: 725: 718: 712: 572: 571: 549: 543: 537: 531: 525: 519: 512: 505: 499: 403: 386: 382: 336: 329: 312: 302: 298:Dlohcierekim 285: 279: 240: 234: 223: 217: 212: 197: 188: 184: 169: 165: 160: 159: 143: 136: 134: 108: 101: 97: 93: 88: 83: 76: 68: 52: 51: 46: 30: 28: 3984:HJ Mitchell 3758:TharsHammar 3637:TharsHammar 3129:Jujutacular 2700:block Jimbo 2245:Christopher 2219:Airplaneman 2062:Newyorkbrad 1906:Pmlineditor 1626:-The Iceman 1555:per nom. -- 1474:Master& 1466:he'll ever 1379:Graham Colm 1264:He'll do.-- 1182:HJ Mitchell 952:Mkativerata 700:User rights 690:CentralAuth 3830:Beeblebrox 3597:the answer 3436:Slgrandson 2938:Nikkimaria 2848:P. D. Cook 2600:Talk To Me 2398:Shubinator 2143:IShadowed 2028:PhilKnight 1985:Vipin Hari 1721:Beeblebrox 1636:Beeblebrox 1451:liquidluck 1364:Aaroncrick 1303:per nom. ~ 683:Cross-wiki 674:AfD closes 586:Discussion 65:Nomination 31:successful 3819:cierekim 3801:cierekim 3768:Ironholds 3543:Andewz111 3531:Acalamari 3396:Everyking 3311:WP:NOTNOW 3203:<: --> 3197:Ruhrfisch 2976:Immunize 2662:Ajraddatz 2616:Jezebel's 2516:vandalism 2436:Grondemar 2328:Modernist 1877:was here! 1783:Blurpeace 1577:Buggie111 1328:✉ message 1252:Flyguy649 1098:The Thing 999:cierekim 980:cierekim 669:AfD votes 664:BLP edits 535:block log 493:Ceranthor 385:Have you 369:maturity. 84:Ceranthor 70:Ceranthor 47:Ceranthor 4170:Category 4102:RadManCF 4041:Jclemens 3967:Franamax 3949:Franamax 3934:Jclemens 3912:Franamax 3893:Jclemens 3844:Awickert 3696:Kraftlos 3665:Wisdom89 3554:contribs 3539:Support. 3513:Support. 3500:Ret.Prof 3496:Support: 3441:How's my 3251:Bejinhan 3165:Garion96 2956:Spaceman 2801:Mountain 2725:contribs 2678:Awickert 2415:Franamax 2303:Kraftlos 2297:criteria 1924:Tim Song 1807:contribs 1797:Casliber 1719:anyway. 1397:Wisdom89 1114:Contribs 1079:Dabomb87 1054:The High 921:Chequers 647:Analysis 626:Counters 503:contribs 439:Jclemens 420:Jclemens 391:Jclemens 378:Jclemens 359:comment. 325:Explicit 89:"mark 3" 80:contribs 4140:Neutral 3863:support 3707:Contrib 3569:actions 3517:Useight 3471:Support 3454:Support 3432:Support 3410:Support 3392:Support 3374:Support 3357:Support 3339:Support 3307:WP:SNOW 3265:Support 3246:Support 3216:Support 3193:Support 3176:Support 3161:Support 3144:Support 3090:Support 3073:Support 3047:Kudpung 3043:Support 3015:Support 2972:Support 2951:Support 2934:Support 2876:Support 2863:Hokeman 2857:Support 2843:Support 2788:Support 2776:Cocytus 2770:Support 2749:Support 2735:Support 2708:Phantom 2691:Support 2674:Support 2658:Support 2631:Support 2610:Support 2586:support 2565:Support 2548:Support 2512:Support 2495:Support 2450:AniMate 2445:Support 2428:Support 2411:Support 2394:Support 2385:iva1979 2375:Support 2359:Support 2341:Support 2324:Support 2314:Contrib 2293:Support 2241:Camaron 2233:Support 2214:Support 2198:Support 2184:B.hotep 2165:Georgia 2159:Support 2136:Support 2123:Jafeluv 2119:Support 2092:Support 2075:Support 2058:Support 2041:Support 2024:Support 2007:Support 1971:Support 1954:Support 1937:Support 1866:Support 1853:Hive001 1849:Support 1832:Support 1816:Support 1793:Support 1760:Support 1734:Support 1717:Support 1674:Support 1622:Support 1612:Spencer 1606:Support 1590:Support 1570:Suuport 1553:Support 1531:Support 1515:Support 1446:Support 1425:Support 1392:Support 1376:Support 1341:Support 1332:changes 1266:Wehwalt 1262:Support 1248:Support 1231:Support 1208:Support 1149:Support 1131:Support 1071:Support 1050:Support 1027:Support 965:Support 948:Support 930:Support 906:Support 881:Support 849:Support 822:Support 764:Support 738:Support 713:Comment 510:deleted 263:T:TDYK. 4097:Oppose 4058:Oppose 3926:RfA #2 3633:Oppose 3627:Oppose 3225:WP:DYK 3184:piggle 3168:(talk) 2826:Frank 2819:WP:100 2796:Little 2575:Şłџğģő 2525:Minima 2499:Drmies 2346:Thingg 1979:WP:AIV 1977:& 1975:WP:UAA 1958:Taelus 1872:Dwayne 1749:Waters 1740:Calmer 1712:Oppose 1657:Valley 1518:Ginbot 1478:Expert 1316:CIENCE 1038:ASTILY 934:Ruslik 814:Ucucha 633:XTools 307:WP:CSD 129:WT:DYK 4126:Chat 4120:Pedro 4011:Jamie 3720:ceran 3600:. ··· 3479:Chzz 3290:Aiken 3202:: --> 3020:Marek 2962:Spiff 2832:talk 2711:Steve 2703:. -- 2666:Talk) 2620:Ponyo 2204:Steve 2163:Sandy 2100:RP459 1981:too. 1922:Duh. 1894:fisto 1889:Menti 1678:Amory 1536:Boing 1431:Jamie 1285:Aiken 1163:comms 1156:fetch 1138:f o x 1075:a lot 1063:Whale 1060:Sperm 1018:scent 1013:iride 917:Spiel 803:Chat 797:Pedro 779:orium 575:civil 517:count 191:ceran 150:Chat 144:Pedro 115:WP:GA 113:- 21 111:WP:FA 16:< 4067:talk 4045:talk 4031:talk 3971:talk 3963:here 3953:talk 3938:talk 3916:talk 3897:talk 3869:Reyk 3848:talk 3834:talk 3814:Dloh 3796:Dloh 3772:talk 3760:and 3727:thor 3703:Talk 3639:and 3548:talk 3521:talk 3504:talk 3462:talk 3434:. -- 3400:talk 3365:talk 3256:Talk 3237:talk 3229:C:SD 3227:and 3152:talk 3051:talk 2980:talk 2942:talk 2867:talk 2719:talk 2682:talk 2556:talk 2538:talk 2503:talk 2482:Ryan 2419:talk 2402:talk 2332:talk 2310:Talk 2269:talk 2265:Mm40 2252:talk 2189:talk 2170:Talk 2127:talk 2083:talk 2066:talk 2049:talk 2032:talk 2015:talk 1996:talk 1962:talk 1945:talk 1928:talk 1857:talk 1840:talk 1801:talk 1725:talk 1664:city 1640:talk 1630:talk 1597:talk 1581:talk 1561:talk 1557:John 1484:Talk 1457:talk 1383:talk 1349:talk 1310:ERDY 1270:talk 1239:talk 1214:Reyk 1106:Talk 1083:talk 994:Dloh 975:Dloh 956:talk 939:Zero 912:Ϣere 833:Soap 776:left 753:Talk 562:here 547:rfar 529:logs 497:talk 443:talk 424:talk 395:talk 349:run. 198:thor 173:Talk 74:talk 4016:S93 3907:ish 3876:YO! 3744:| 3740:Tan 3603:日本穣 3574:日本穣 3380:- / 3316:日本穣 3271:Axl 3220:lot 3001:Dui 2996:Mac 2991:Ben 2918:edg 2907:Dom 2901:Big 2760:Why 2697:or 2592:~DC 2520:and 2461:Ged 2281:Ray 2097:-- 2011:Deb 1941:Rje 1777:Yep 1770:at 1503:| 1499:Tan 1436:S93 1322:UDE 1221:YO! 1057:Fin 771:The 553:spi 523:AfD 406:42. 387:now 109:(6 57:at 4172:: 4123:: 4069:) 4047:) 4033:) 3988:| 3973:) 3965:. 3955:) 3940:) 3928:, 3918:) 3899:) 3850:) 3836:) 3774:) 3747:39 3705:| 3680:/ 3653:| 3613:· 3610:投稿 3606:· 3584:· 3581:投稿 3577:· 3523:) 3506:) 3485:► 3464:) 3402:) 3367:) 3326:· 3323:投稿 3319:· 3309:+ 3239:) 3154:) 3109:ik 3100:Sh 3097:-- 3053:) 3029:69 3011::) 2982:) 2944:) 2889:―Œ 2869:) 2829:| 2755:So 2728:\ 2684:) 2640:am 2637:At 2567:, 2558:) 2541:) 2505:) 2497:. 2468:UK 2421:) 2404:) 2334:) 2312:| 2271:) 2191:• 2172:) 2149:✰ 2129:) 2085:) 2068:) 2051:) 2034:) 2017:) 1990:|| 1964:) 1947:) 1930:) 1859:) 1842:) 1809:) 1779:. 1727:) 1695:• 1689:• 1642:) 1599:) 1583:) 1563:) 1522:86 1506:39 1487:) 1468:be 1412:/ 1385:) 1351:) 1334:) 1330:• 1272:) 1241:) 1201:) 1186:| 1110:// 1102:// 1085:) 958:) 872:| 800:: 746:NW 727:―Œ 541:lu 445:) 426:) 404:A: 397:) 383:6. 337:A: 330:5. 313:A: 309:? 303:4. 286:A: 280:3. 241:A: 235:2. 224:A: 218:1. 166:NW 147:: 137:no 36:. 4105:☢ 4086:W 4083:P 4080:T 4078:~ 4065:( 4043:( 4029:( 3969:( 3951:( 3936:( 3914:( 3895:( 3846:( 3832:( 3770:( 3709:) 3701:( 3685:) 3675:T 3670:( 3556:) 3551:· 3546:( 3519:( 3502:( 3460:( 3446:) 3439:( 3422:W 3419:P 3416:T 3414:~ 3398:( 3363:( 3345:ξ 3295:♫ 3276:¤ 3235:( 3206:° 3181:∙ 3150:( 3119:) 3113:( 3106:r 3103:i 3063:7 3049:( 3024:. 2978:( 2940:( 2925:☭ 2922:☺ 2865:( 2806:5 2722:| 2716:/ 2680:( 2664:( 2649:頭 2643:a 2554:( 2535:( 2530:c 2501:( 2433:– 2417:( 2400:( 2381:S 2330:( 2316:) 2308:( 2267:( 2249:· 2243:· 2224:✈ 2187:• 2168:( 2125:( 2105:/ 2081:( 2064:( 2047:( 2030:( 2013:( 1960:( 1943:( 1926:( 1913:∞ 1855:( 1838:( 1821:œ 1804:· 1799:( 1723:( 1701:) 1698:c 1692:t 1686:u 1683:( 1660:2 1638:( 1628:( 1595:( 1579:( 1559:( 1538:! 1481:( 1454:✽ 1417:) 1407:T 1402:( 1381:( 1360:— 1347:( 1326:( 1320:D 1314:S 1308:N 1290:♫ 1268:( 1237:( 1169:☛ 1128:) 1124:( 1081:( 1035:F 954:( 936:_ 895:a 893:c 891:z 889:a 887:m 839:— 827:— 756:) 750:( 613:e 606:t 599:v 565:. 555:) 550:· 544:· 538:· 532:· 526:· 520:· 513:· 506:· 500:· 495:( 441:( 422:( 393:( 176:) 170:( 117:) 77:· 72:( 40:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
request for adminship
Ceranthor
The Rambling Man
18:29, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Ceranthor
talk
contribs
WP:FA
WP:GA
WT:DYK
Pedro
 Chat 
20:41, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
NW
Talk
16:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
ceran
thor
19:03, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Dlohcierekim
WP:CSD
Explicit
Jclemens
Jclemens
talk
04:06, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Jclemens
talk
04:57, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.