655:- it doesn't allow for even the semi-protection of featured articles on the main page. Vandalism to such articles sometimes occurs too quickly for bots and users to keep up with it, and by the time the article is gone from the main page, it may still contain mis-reverted or uncaught vandalism. I personally think it would be a good idea to at least semi-protect those articles, since they are featured articles, after all, and they are supposed to reflect the best Knowledge (XXG) has to offer. Again, this is just a minor issue, and not really something I lose sleep over - just something that made me think for a little bit.
465:, if used at all, should only apply to those processes that have absolutely no debate or opposition (as the essay itself states; and even then, it shouldn't be cited, as it's an essay - cite IAR instead), because even if there is only one opposing argument, it may be a strong one, and it could change the minds of the other participants. Invoking IAR here would probably not go over well with people. In the case of the hypothetical AFD, it would not be a good idea to invoke IAR if a strong keep argument appeared.
461:, there are those times where, say, letting an AFD debate go the whole five days when there are 12 delete arguments and no keep arguments (and none of the deletes are socks or votes without explanation) would be pointless - in this case, the unanimity of the votes would show a lack of controversy and a clear consensus, and one could invoke IAR and close the discussion early. However, I think
1444:(I thought I was a devout inclusionist until I started AfD & RC Patrols and discovered how bad the nonsense and vandalism can get), gave this nomination a little better than average look. Sane and reasonable in the AfD column. We can trust Coredesat to button & unbutton with good sense. Do it -
431:
means that ignoring rules is justified if the integrity of the encyclopedia is at stake (policies can be wrong at times), or if the outcome of a process appears to be obvious (see later). However, I don't feel that ignoring the rules is always a good idea without consensus, because as "ignore all
2222:
Seems to be a flawless user and I would support his RfA, if there was anything more special to recommend him, other than a perfect wikivita. WP needs greater diversity on its admin level and
Coredsat seems to blend almost too perfectly into the bulk of admins.
384:, and was able to get assistance that led to his indefinite block. I also don't lash out against users who vandalize my user or user talk pages (or leave incivil comments or personal attacks), which is a common occurrence in RC patrol/vandalfighting.
524:
user for trivial reasons (such as "I just felt like it", or "you're annoying"). No user would receive preferential treatment over any other user (unless the user in question happened to be Jimbo or Danny, but I highly doubt that would be the
76:
since the start of this year with over 4200 edits to the
Knowledge (XXG) namespace alone. More recently he has also turned to vandal fighting and somehow also manages to pen significant contributions (including GA/FA-classed articles) for
323:, and I spent several weeks doing extensive research (not much information is available for a storm from 45 years ago), cleanup, and additions. It went from a short article about to be merged, to a featured article in about seven weeks.
1159:
I've seen this user around quite a bit and have seen nothing but good things. He strikes me as a dedicated
Wikipedian who will use the extra buttons to further help the project as well as enhance his own productivity. A no brainer
1650:. I'm confident that candidate will use the tools and use them wisely. Per nomination, "tireless and dedicated", especially in WP-namespace (with all the backlogs we have) is a good description of exactly what an admin should be. --
507:
Early on, while gaining experience as an admin, I would more than likely defer to more experienced admins to decide whether blocking a user is a good idea (or at least consult with them). Later, I would block a user
802:- I've seen nothing but level-headed, well thought out reasoning from him in AFD, showing an excellent grasp of policies and their applications (and his work on hurricanes/storms/bad weather/whatever is top-notch).
432:
rules" might imply, there could be some serious consequences (especially if it was a controversial) and I think it's generally a good idea to make sure ignoring (rule) was also a good idea, for example through
1002:, I've been waiting for this one. Strong presence at AfD and constantly running into him during RCP, which are surely two of the main areas admins hang out in. Should be a fantastic asset to the project. —
618:
that encyclopedia - by stating what it is not, and without it, things would definitely be different around here (and more than likely not in a good way). Needless to say, it's a good policy to have around.
878:
Uh, clarification please? In spite of what 1FA stuff? If you mean my nomination, I was referring to the fact that he does indeed meet that criterion for people who choose to enforce it. –
520:
decisions (for those special cases like repeated insertions of libelous remarks), 3RR violations, repeated personal attacks and vandalism, confirmed sockpuppetry, etc. I would never block
352:(another storm for which not much information is available), and got Saomai, Bilis, and Marty to GA status. I have also done some cleanup work and updating to various other articles.
362:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
440:
are a good explanation of this). However, it's a very bad idea to invoke IAR completely at will and without any consensus or agreement, because then it would potentially be a
2251:
1035:
694:
204:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge (XXG) in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
377:
1598:, seen him around AfD/DRV, tends to do a good job. My minor concern over question 4 is quelled a bit due to my experiences with him thus far. Good luck! --
2269:
320:
224:
78:
776:
598:). This policy lays the foundation for everything else - the vast majority of the other policies and guidelines stem from this one. For instance,
1293:
1285:
651:
Again, difficult question. It's quite hard to say what policies or guidelines I don't like. However, I do have a very minor problem with the
591:
299:
in ways that standard users can't, such as blocking a problematic user if such a consensus is reached after discussion and investigation.
985:
729:
457:, it's not a policy or guideline, but an essay. It's simply an attempt to apply IAR to uncontroversial processes. While I do think that
1495:
Excellent contibutions to AfD, other edits are solid as well. I have no doubt that
Coredesat will be a capable and trustworthy admin.
33:
17:
1288:
1015:
437:
73:
2034:
1923:
1425:
570:
1198:
1053:
216:
69:
2061:, user has already shown to me his familiarity with Knowledge (XXG) processes and willingness to take on maintenance tasks. --
233:
I've done a great deal of vandal fighting, RC patrol, and XFD, so my primary concern would be taking care of related backlogs:
155:
Personally, I've found
Coredesat to be helpful, communicative, and friendly, both onwiki and on IRC. Overall, a good user. –
652:
2122:- Seen him around regularly in AfD debates. Other edits have been solid and would be definitely be useful with the mop. --
2087:
1302:
1103:
890:
Just a tiny joke regarding my mild dislike of 1FA as an admin criteria in general. I did vote for
Coredesat, after all! --
212:
2231:
2170:
2155:
1986:
1971:
1667:
1533:
936:
915:
402:
1230:
2131:
1057:
716:- I trust the nominators judgements, and the user looks like a valuable wikipedian, A* admin material -- much needed.
333:
309:
Of your articles or contributions to
Knowledge (XXG), are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
121:
688:
220:
82:
2002:
1377:
1219:
1788:
1715:
1280:
1148:
590:
It's fairly hard to say what my favorite guideline or policy is. If I had to pick one, I would have to go with
1603:
1161:
660:
624:
547:
470:
176:
1224:
726:
2224:
2152:
2144:
1893:
1810:
1683:
1640:
766:
341:
316:
133:
542:
above all else unless it's clearly obvious to the community that the user's behavior is not in good faith.
2065:
2019:
1936:
Sufficient edits? check. Good answers? check. Barnstars from Ste4k? check. Satisfies all my requirements.
1386:
1009:
602:
stems from "Knowledge (XXG) is not a directory" and "Knowledge (XXG) is not a repository of links". Also,
349:
117:
1907:
1823:
1599:
1170:
964:
771:
433:
2007:
1575:
1449:
1445:
1398:- I've seen this user in different parts of Knowledge (XXG), and I can only say good things about him. —
825:
747:
723:
337:
125:
2250:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
610:
on
Knowledge (XXG) (not just articles) with its extensions (what the Knowledge (XXG) community is not,
373:
2236:
2196:
2184:
2158:
2135:
2114:
2097:
2070:
2053:
2041:
2022:
2010:
1990:
1952:
1940:
1928:
1898:
1872:
1858:
1844:
1828:
1815:
1796:
1777:
1763:
1735:
1723:
1703:
1686:
1671:
1654:
1642:
1624:
1607:
1590:
1578:
1566:
1537:
1514:
1487:
1471:
1453:
1432:
1407:
1390:
1365:
1347:
1326:
1314:
1306:
1271:
1235:
1204:
1172:
1151:
1139:
1127:
1107:
1086:
1074:
1062:
1019:
994:
975:
954:
940:
919:
894:
885:
873:
860:
848:
836:
810:
794:
782:
751:
734:
669:
633:
556:
499:
479:
190:
162:
102:
2127:
1982:
1967:
1919:
1867:
1529:
1417:
1214:
1120:
1083:
380:. Despite quite a few personal attacks against me and other users, I kept my cool and reported it to
458:
1782:
1756:
1619:
1360:
1343:
1192:
1049:
808:
743:
665:
629:
552:
475:
186:
63:
614:). In a nutshell, it states what Knowledge (XXG) is - an encyclopedia and a community centered on
368:
I've had a few conflicts, mainly stemming from AFDs and vandal patrol, but I have a reputation of
1881:
1853:
1841:
1805:
1775:
1680:
1633:
1403:
1311:
1248:
1124:
1116:
1028:
973:
762:
496:
95:
2123:
844:, contributions speak for themselves. Has a great attitude and is always willing to help out. -
535:
441:
1296:
1135:
Terrific candidate with great answers to the questions, will make a magnificent administrator.
1043:. This guy does a lot on AfD and no matter his opinion, he is invaluable to the AfD community.
2110:
2083:
2062:
1382:
1374:
1335:
1099:
1004:
611:
599:
462:
454:
418:
369:
255:
2173:
1699:
1571:
1469:
932:
911:
882:
830:
791:
396:
159:
2147:
2030:. Seen this user around, will make a great admin, and I like the answers to my questions.
1240:
603:
539:
513:
428:
414:
381:
292:
260:
250:
244:
139:
129:
2031:
1977:
1962:
1915:
1732:
1720:
1712:
1524:
1461:
good answers, and good performance on GA/FA lead me to believe this will be a good admin,
1323:
1136:
1071:
567:
1244:
595:
517:
296:
288:
113:
Active in XFD, DRV, vandalfighting, recent changes patrol, PROD: lots of policy knowledge
1744:
1616:
1496:
1480:
1353:
1339:
1186:
1147:
Good contributions and answers to questions; would do well to assist with the backlog.
1044:
803:
684:
657:
621:
544:
467:
181:
173:
59:
2263:
1837:
1772:
1587:
1400:
969:
492:
88:
1731:. This could be listed as a textbook example of a "ready-for-admin-duties" nominee.
319:. That particular article was one I found earlier on in my days of participating in
2106:
2079:
2050:
1415:
Have seen this user every so often. Sensible and definitely worthy of adminship. --
1095:
2092:
1441:
594:, as it is one of the central tenets of Knowledge (XXG) (it's actually one of the
2167:
1937:
1820:
1695:
1663:
1651:
1463:
928:
907:
879:
857:
820:
788:
392:
345:
336:, which is an article that I mostly wrote and handled myself. I've also written
156:
2244:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2193:
1949:
1549:
951:
891:
870:
845:
1563:
512:
they violated policies that would result in them getting blocked - threats,
491:
Under what circumstances would you consider blocking an established user? --
1320:
I think this is an "Are you f***ing kidding me? Of course!" strong support.
274:
269:
265:
2254:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
584:
What is your favorite
Knowledge (XXG) guideline or policy, and why?
211:
What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out
1975:
07:38, 13 October 2006 (UTC) heheh nevermind, got here before. -
148:
Helps newbies (as seen by the barnstars on his page!) - friendly.
1694:. We need more people at XfD. + a great editor, nice candidate.
1352:
I was thinking of nominating him, but now there's no need. :) --
2018:
Per Chacor (Chacor got edit conflicted while NOMINATING him!).
1562:. One of the most valuable people at AfD's. Very level-headed.
169:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
1948:. Looks like he'll make positive contributions as an admin.
1743:. What's with all the expletives in the supports nowadays?
315:
Seeing as it is a featured article, I am most pleased with
72:) – Cordesat has been a tireless and dedicated reviewer at
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
151:
All-rounder in mainspace, talk, projectspace and images.
962:
One of the best editors here. Will be a great admin. --
107:
Okay, I just got edit conflicted while NOMINATING him!
950:
Amazing cliche moment -- obviously great candidate!
348:and others) and heavily cleaned up and expanded
1662:Great contributor to AfDs and the mainspace.--
332:Aside from Esther, I am also very pleased with
81:. This user can definitely be trusted with the
55:Final (75/0/1) Ended Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:43 UTC
1371:Absolutely in every sense of the word Support.
1094:. Solid candidate. Will make a great admin.
79:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Tropical cyclones
8:
1413:I-thought-you-were-already-an-admin Support
592:Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not
1711:What you mean he's not a admin already?!?
759:. Looks like an honest, hardworking user.
818:Excellent user, will make a fine admin.--
704:(for expressing views without numbering)
927:Answer to question 4 is satisfactory. —
645:What is your least favorite, and why?
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
1880:. Pick your favorite support cliche.
438:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Ignore all rules
74:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for Deletion
7:
1615:. Good and responsible contributor.
297:various administrators' noticeboard
287:I would also perform page moves on
116:Article space: Many good articles (
2049:. Adminship is not a big deal. --
372:. The best example of this is the
24:
2270:Successful requests for adminship
869:in spite of that 1FA stuff. :) --
1180:- A very good candidate indeed.
534:In short, I would adhere to the
213:Category:Knowledge (XXG) backlog
109:Let's see here, where to begin?
2105:, great contributor at XfD ---
1373:Nothing else needs to be said.
742:yes, looks great. Good luck! --
217:Category:Administrative backlog
1906:on behalf of Esperanza. --Slgr
1:
376:conflict, which stemmed from
321:WikiProject Tropical cyclones
2237:22:27, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
2197:00:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
2185:23:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
2159:23:51, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
2143:not an admin already? hmph.
2136:16:14, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
2115:14:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
2098:18:04, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
2071:18:58, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
2054:14:00, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
2042:13:33, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
2023:08:56, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
2011:08:10, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
1991:08:11, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
1953:01:39, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
1941:20:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
1929:19:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
1899:15:54, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
1873:15:20, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
1859:14:41, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
1845:11:38, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
1829:07:22, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
1816:00:13, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
1797:00:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
1778:23:27, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1764:23:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1736:19:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1724:18:30, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1704:16:55, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1687:16:32, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1672:14:20, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1655:12:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1643:12:32, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1625:12:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1608:12:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1591:09:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1579:09:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1567:07:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1538:06:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1515:04:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1488:04:03, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1472:03:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1454:01:39, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1433:01:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1408:00:30, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1391:23:53, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1366:23:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1348:22:24, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1327:21:48, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1315:21:42, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1307:21:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1272:20:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1236:20:34, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1205:20:12, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1173:20:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1152:19:24, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1140:19:12, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1128:18:48, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1108:18:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1087:18:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1075:18:24, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1063:18:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1036:18:07, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1020:17:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
995:16:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
976:16:29, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
955:16:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
941:18:20, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
920:15:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
895:21:52, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
886:15:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
874:15:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
861:15:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
849:15:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
837:15:20, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
811:15:10, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
795:15:09, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
783:15:07, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
752:14:59, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
735:14:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
670:21:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
634:21:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
557:19:21, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
500:12:55, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
480:18:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
436:(several of the comments on
225:administrators' reading list
191:14:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
163:07:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
103:07:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
1771:will use the tools well. --
1336:something about the weather
687:'s edit summary usage with
334:Tropical Storm Bilis (2006)
200:Questions for the candidate
122:Tropical Storm Bilis (2006)
2286:
1960:almost missed this RfA! -
1387:(Kick 'em in the dishpan!)
612:what your user page is not
219:, and read the page about
1247:support. Or thereabouts.
2247:Please do not modify it.
1440:—Since I incline toward
1041:Strong support on wheels
1070:, excellent candidate.
565:Optional questions from
342:Typhoon Xangsane (2006)
317:Hurricane Esther (1961)
134:Hurricane Esther (1961)
39:Please do not modify it
350:Hurricane Marty (2003)
295:, and help out on the
118:Hurricane Marty (2003)
1243:support. Well, okay,
413:What do the policies
338:Typhoon Saomai (2006)
145:Good edit summary use
126:Typhoon Saomai (2006)
34:request for adminship
459:process is important
1479:Passes my criteria
1210:Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
787:As co-nominator. –
378:this AFD discussion
171:I humbly accept. --
835:
2020:Charlie MacKenzie
1989:
1974:
1927:
1897:
1813:
1622:
1606:
1554:
1553:2006-10-11 07:10Z
1536:
1389:
1364:
1334:, now can you do
1203:
1185:
1106:
1061:
819:
733:
653:protection policy
540:assume good faith
374:User:Acadamenorth
142:and level-headed.
101:
2277:
2249:
2234:
2229:
2182:
2179:
2176:
2150:
2120:Definite support
2095:
2039:
1981:
1966:
1913:
1910:
1891:
1889:
1885:
1856:
1826:
1809:
1793:
1785:
1761:
1754:
1749:
1718:
1638:
1620:
1602:
1556:
1552:
1528:
1512:
1509:
1506:
1503:
1485:
1466:
1428:
1420:
1406:
1385:
1380:
1358:
1291:
1268:
1266:
1264:
1262:
1260:
1229:
1227:
1201:
1195:
1191:
1189:
1184:
1168:
1167:
1098:
1047:
1033:
993:
992:
990:
972:
967:
833:
828:
823:
806:
779:
774:
769:
732:
717:
678:General comments
663:
627:
575:
550:
473:
344:(with help from
293:deletion reviews
247:(CFD, TFD, etc.)
179:
100:
98:
92:
86:
41:
2285:
2284:
2280:
2279:
2278:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2260:
2259:
2258:
2252:this nomination
2245:
2232:
2225:
2180:
2177:
2174:
2166:, of course. —
2148:
2091:
2035:
1908:
1887:
1883:
1854:
1824:
1795:
1789:
1783:
1757:
1750:
1745:
1716:
1702:
1670:
1634:
1546:
1510:
1507:
1504:
1501:
1481:
1464:
1426:
1418:
1399:
1378:
1305:
1289:
1258:
1256:
1254:
1252:
1250:
1225:
1213:
1199:
1193:
1187:
1182:Give-em-the-mop
1163:
1162:
1084:trialsanderrors
1029:
1018:
986:
984:
983:
965:
963:
831:
826:
821:
804:
777:
772:
767:
730:52278 Alpha 771
724:Fenton, Matthew
718:
661:
625:
571:
548:
536:blocking policy
471:
370:keeping my cool
291:and help close
177:
96:
90:
87:
52:
37:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2283:
2281:
2273:
2272:
2262:
2261:
2257:
2256:
2240:
2239:
2217:
2209:
2208:
2200:
2199:
2187:
2161:
2138:
2117:
2100:
2073:
2056:
2044:
2025:
2013:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1943:
1931:
1901:
1875:
1861:
1847:
1834:Strong support
1831:
1818:
1799:
1787:
1780:
1766:
1741:Strong Support
1738:
1729:Strong support
1726:
1706:
1698:
1689:
1681:Angus McLellan
1674:
1666:
1657:
1648:Strong Support
1645:
1627:
1610:
1600:badlydrawnjeff
1593:
1581:
1569:
1557:
1540:
1517:
1497:Andrew Lenahan
1490:
1474:
1456:
1435:
1410:
1396:Strong Support
1393:
1368:
1350:
1329:
1317:
1309:
1301:
1274:
1238:
1207:
1175:
1154:
1149:(aeropagitica)
1142:
1133:Strong Support
1130:
1110:
1089:
1077:
1065:
1038:
1022:
1008:
1000:Hell fuzzy yes
997:
978:
960:Strong support
957:
945:
944:
943:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
863:
851:
839:
813:
797:
785:
754:
737:
699:
698:
697:
692:
689:mathbot's tool
680:
679:
675:
674:
673:
672:
639:
638:
637:
636:
562:
561:
560:
559:
529:
528:
527:
526:
510:if and only if
485:
484:
483:
482:
448:
447:
446:
445:
391:Question from
388:
387:
386:
385:
356:
355:
354:
353:
327:
326:
325:
324:
303:
302:
301:
300:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
272:
263:
258:
253:
248:
237:
236:
235:
234:
221:administrators
202:
201:
196:
194:
193:
153:
152:
149:
146:
143:
137:
114:
108:
83:mop and bucket
51:
46:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2282:
2271:
2268:
2267:
2265:
2255:
2253:
2248:
2242:
2241:
2238:
2235:
2230:
2228:
2221:
2218:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2213:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2198:
2195:
2191:
2188:
2186:
2183:
2172:
2169:
2165:
2162:
2160:
2157:
2154:
2151:
2146:
2142:
2139:
2137:
2133:
2129:
2125:
2121:
2118:
2116:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2101:
2099:
2094:
2089:
2085:
2081:
2077:
2074:
2072:
2069:
2068:
2064:
2060:
2057:
2055:
2052:
2048:
2045:
2043:
2040:
2038:
2033:
2029:
2026:
2024:
2021:
2017:
2014:
2012:
2009:
2005:
2004:
1999:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1980:
1979:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1964:
1959:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1951:
1947:
1944:
1942:
1939:
1935:
1932:
1930:
1925:
1921:
1917:
1912:
1905:
1902:
1900:
1895:
1890:
1886:
1879:
1876:
1874:
1871:
1870:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1855:Mustafa Akalp
1851:
1848:
1846:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1832:
1830:
1827:
1822:
1819:
1817:
1812:
1807:
1806:Hurricanehink
1803:
1800:
1798:
1794:
1792:
1786:
1781:
1779:
1776:
1774:
1770:
1767:
1765:
1762:
1760:
1755:
1753:
1748:
1742:
1739:
1737:
1734:
1730:
1727:
1725:
1722:
1719:
1714:
1710:
1707:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1690:
1688:
1685:
1682:
1678:
1675:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1653:
1649:
1646:
1644:
1641:
1639:
1637:
1631:
1628:
1626:
1623:
1618:
1614:
1611:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1594:
1592:
1589:
1585:
1582:
1580:
1577:
1573:
1570:
1568:
1565:
1561:
1558:
1555:
1551:
1544:
1541:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1526:
1521:
1518:
1516:
1513:
1498:
1494:
1491:
1489:
1486:
1484:
1478:
1475:
1473:
1470:
1468:
1467:
1460:
1457:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1436:
1434:
1430:
1429:
1422:
1421:
1414:
1411:
1409:
1405:
1402:
1397:
1394:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1381:
1376:
1372:
1369:
1367:
1362:
1357:
1356:
1351:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1330:
1328:
1325:
1321:
1318:
1316:
1313:
1312:John Anderson
1310:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1295:
1292:
1287:
1282:
1278:
1275:
1273:
1270:
1269:
1246:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1233:
1228:
1223:
1222:
1218:
1217:
1211:
1208:
1206:
1202:
1196:
1190:
1183:
1179:
1178:Solid Support
1176:
1174:
1171:
1169:
1166:
1158:
1155:
1153:
1150:
1146:
1143:
1141:
1138:
1134:
1131:
1129:
1126:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1111:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1090:
1088:
1085:
1081:
1078:
1076:
1073:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1046:
1045:Shin'ou's TTV
1042:
1039:
1037:
1034:
1032:
1026:
1023:
1021:
1017:
1016:damage report
1014:
1011:
1007:
1006:
1001:
998:
996:
991:
989:
988:Doctor Bruno
982:
979:
977:
974:
971:
968:
961:
958:
956:
953:
949:
946:
942:
938:
934:
930:
926:
923:
922:
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
902:
896:
893:
889:
888:
887:
884:
881:
877:
876:
875:
872:
868:
864:
862:
859:
855:
852:
850:
847:
843:
840:
838:
834:
829:
824:
817:
814:
812:
809:
807:
801:
798:
796:
793:
790:
786:
784:
781:
780:
775:
770:
765:
764:
758:
755:
753:
749:
745:
741:
738:
736:
731:
728:
725:
721:
715:
712:
711:
710:
709:
705:
703:
696:
693:
690:
686:
682:
681:
677:
676:
671:
668:
667:
664:
659:
654:
650:
647:
646:
644:
641:
640:
635:
632:
631:
628:
623:
617:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
586:
585:
583:
580:
579:
578:
576:
574:
569:
566:
558:
555:
554:
551:
546:
541:
537:
533:
532:
531:
530:
523:
519:
515:
511:
506:
503:
502:
501:
498:
494:
490:
487:
486:
481:
478:
477:
474:
469:
464:
460:
456:
452:
451:
450:
449:
443:
439:
435:
430:
426:
423:
422:
421:mean to you?
420:
416:
412:
409:
408:
407:
406:
404:
401:
398:
394:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
364:
363:
361:
358:
357:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
330:
329:
328:
322:
318:
314:
311:
310:
308:
305:
304:
298:
294:
290:
286:
285:
284:
283:
276:
273:
271:
267:
264:
262:
259:
257:
254:
252:
249:
246:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
232:
229:
228:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
206:
205:
199:
198:
197:
192:
188:
184:
183:
180:
175:
170:
167:
166:
165:
164:
161:
158:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
112:
111:
110:
105:
104:
99:
94:
93:
84:
80:
75:
71:
68:
65:
61:
57:
56:
50:
47:
43:
40:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2246:
2243:
2226:
2219:
2211:
2210:
2202:
2201:
2189:
2163:
2145:Wikipediarul
2140:
2119:
2102:
2075:
2066:
2063:Deathphoenix
2058:
2046:
2036:
2027:
2015:
2001:
1997:
1978:CrazyRussian
1976:
1963:CrazyRussian
1961:
1957:
1945:
1933:
1903:
1882:
1877:
1868:
1863:
1849:
1833:
1801:
1790:
1768:
1758:
1751:
1746:
1740:
1728:
1708:
1691:
1676:
1659:
1647:
1635:
1629:
1612:
1595:
1583:
1559:
1547:
1542:
1525:CrazyRussian
1523:
1519:
1500:
1492:
1482:
1476:
1462:
1458:
1442:inclusionism
1437:
1424:
1416:
1412:
1395:
1370:
1354:
1338:for me? :)--
1331:
1319:
1284:
1283:
1276:
1249:
1231:
1220:
1215:
1209:
1181:
1177:
1164:
1156:
1144:
1132:
1119:
1112:
1091:
1079:
1067:
1040:
1031:Rama's arrow
1030:
1024:
1012:
1005:riana_dzasta
1003:
999:
987:
980:
959:
947:
924:
903:
866:
853:
841:
815:
799:
761:
760:
756:
739:
719:
713:
707:
706:
701:
700:
656:
648:
642:
620:
615:
607:
596:five pillars
587:
581:
572:
564:
563:
543:
521:
509:
504:
488:
466:
424:
410:
399:
390:
389:
365:
359:
312:
306:
230:
208:
203:
195:
172:
168:
154:
106:
89:
66:
58:
54:
53:
48:
38:
30:
28:
1572:Merovingian
1446:Williamborg
1010:wreak havoc
2078:per nom --
2008:BLabberiNg
1869:Alphachimp
1733:Themindset
1324:Kicking222
1137:Hello32020
1072:NawlinWiki
727:Lexic Dark
702:Discussion
695:Edit count
608:everything
136:) as well.
31:successful
1617:Sjakkalle
1483:†he Bread
1355:Mr. Lefty
1340:Nilfanion
1281:íslenskur
1188:JungleCat
1165:hoopydink
1027:per nom.
865:Happy to
856:per nom.
805:Yomangani
685:Coredesat
434:consensus
128:), meets
91:Netsnipe
60:Coredesat
49:Coredesat
2264:Category
2132:contribs
2088:contribs
2003:Blnguyen
1924:contribs
1920:messages
1894:ahoy-hoy
1888:american
1838:utcursch
1621:(Check!)
1588:RaNdOm26
1303:(samtal)
1058:Kotobuki
937:contribs
925:Addendum
916:contribs
616:building
493:Mcginnly
442:WP:POINT
403:contribs
275:CAT:ORFU
270:CAT:PROD
223:and the
70:contribs
2233:versive
2220:Neutral
2212:Neutral
2190:Support
2164:Support
2141:Support
2107:Deville
2103:Support
2080:Ageo020
2076:Support
2059:Support
2047:Support
2028:Support
2016:Support
1998:Support
1946:Support
1934:Support
1904:Support
1878:Support
1866:. Duh.
1864:Support
1850:Support
1802:Support
1769:Support
1709:Support
1692:Support
1677:Support
1660:Support
1630:Support
1613:Support
1596:Support
1586:. LOL.
1584:Support
1560:Support
1543:Support
1493:Support
1477:Support
1459:Support
1438:Support
1419:physicq
1332:Support
1277:Support
1200:contrib
1157:Support
1145:Support
1117:Mailer
1113:Support
1096:Nephron
1092:Support
1080:Support
1068:Support
1025:Support
981:Support
970:iva1979
948:Support
904:Support
867:support
858:Michael
854:Support
842:Support
816:Support
800:Support
763:Nautica
757:Support
740:Support
714:Support
708:Support
606:covers
600:WP:SPAM
463:WP:SNOW
455:WP:SNOW
453:As for
427:To me,
419:WP:SNOW
266:CAT:CSD
256:WP:PAIN
2203:Oppose
2168:AySz88
1950:Jayjg
1938:Addhoc
1696:NCurse
1684:(Talk)
1664:danntm
1652:Storkk
1465:Tewfik
1383:rbil10
1241:WP:100
1232:O rly?
1054:Masago
1050:Futaba
929:Malber
908:Malber
720:thanks
604:WP:NOT
538:, and
525:case).
514:ArbCom
497:Natter
444:issue.
429:WP:IAR
415:WP:IAR
393:Malber
382:WP:ANI
346:Chacor
261:WP:RFP
251:WP:AIV
245:WP:AFD
130:WP:1FA
2124:Arnzy
2093:count
2037:juice
2032:Mango
1987:email
1972:email
1911:ndson
1884:young
1791:speak
1784:T REX
1713:Whisp
1550:Quarl
1534:email
1375:RyanG
1251:: -->
1245:WP:25
1226:56297
1221:tales
1216:crazy
1125:iablo
952:Xoloz
892:Aaron
871:Aaron
846:SpLoT
573:juice
568:Mango
289:WP:RM
140:Civil
85:. --
16:<
2156:2221
2128:talk
2111:Talk
2084:talk
1983:talk
1968:talk
1958:Oops
1916:page
1842:talk
1821:Tito
1811:talk
1747:Nish
1721:ring
1700:work
1636:Lost
1604:talk
1576:Talk
1564:Fram
1530:talk
1520:Yes!
1450:Bill
1404:khoi
1401:Khoi
1361:talk
1344:talk
1294:ylur
1267:<
1194:talk
1115:. -
933:talk
912:talk
883:acor
792:acor
768:Shad
748:Talk
744:Alex
683:See
658:Core
622:Core
545:Core
468:Core
417:and
397:talk
340:and
268:and
215:and
187:talk
174:Core
160:acor
64:talk
2227:Sub
2194:Ajm
1804::)
1773:Alf
1752:kid
1632:--
1508:bli
1322:--
1297:#12
1290:lib
1286:fel
906:--
822:Hús
662:des
626:des
549:des
522:any
516:or
472:des
178:des
2266::
2192:--
2134:)
2130:•
2113:)
2096:)
2090:•
2086:•
2051:RM
2006:|
1922:-
1918:-
1852:--
1840:|
1836:.
1825:xd
1814:)
1759:64
1679:.
1574:※
1545:.
1522:-
1511:nd
1505:ar
1502:St
1499:-
1452:)
1431:)
1346:)
1279:.
1082:~
939:)
935:•
918:)
914:•
880:Ch
832:nd
789:Ch
750:)
666:at
649:A:
643:7.
630:at
588:A:
582:6.
577::
553:at
518:AN
505:A:
495:|
489:5.
476:at
425:A:
411:4.
366:A:
360:3.
313:A:
307:2.
231:A:
227:.
209:1.
189:)
182:at
157:Ch
124:,
120:,
97:►
36:.
2181:^
2178:-
2175:^
2171:\
2153:s
2149:e
2126:(
2109:(
2082:(
2067:ʕ
2000:.
1985:/
1970:/
1926:)
1914:(
1909:@
1896:)
1892:(
1808:(
1717:e
1668:C
1548:—
1532:/
1448:(
1427:c
1423:(
1379:e
1363:)
1359:(
1342:(
1265:t
1263:n
1261:a
1259:i
1257:d
1255:a
1253:R
1212:~
1197:/
1121:D
1104:C
1102:|
1100:T
1060:)
1056:|
1052:|
1048:(
1013:-
966:S
931:(
910:(
827:ö
778:s
773:e
746:(
722:/
691:.
405:)
400:·
395:(
185:(
132:(
67:·
62:(
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.