321:
edits: 100% Minor edits: 100% Average edits per day: 20.25 (for last 500 edit(s)) Article edit summary use (last 170 edits): Major article edits: 100% Minor article edits: 100% Analysis of edits (out of all 3379 edits shown on this page and last 1 image uploads): Notable article edits (creation/expansion/major rewrites/sourcing): 0.03% (1) Significant article edits (copyedits/small rewrites/content/reference additions): 0.47% (16) Superficial article edits (grammar/spelling/wikify/links/tagging): 5.03% (170) Superficial article edits marked as minor: 75.97% Unique image uploads (non-deleted/reverts/updates): 1 (checks last 5000) Breakdown of all edits: Unique pages edited: 1101 | Average edits per page: 3.07 | Edits on top: 10.98% Edits marked as major (non-minor/reverts): 40.13% (1356 edit(s)) Edits marked as minor (non-reverts): 32.82% (1109 edit(s)) Marked reverts (reversions/text removal): 21.16% (715 edit(s)) Unmarked edits: 4.53% (153 edit(s)) Edits by
Knowledge namespace: Article: 20.54% (694) | Article talk: 8.38% (283) User: 8.23% (278) | User talk: 25.3% (855) Knowledge: 32.88% (1111) | Knowledge talk: 3.28% (111) Image: 0.09% (3) Template: 1.09% (37) Category: 0.03% (1) Portal: 0% (0) Help: 0% (0) MediaWiki: 0% (0) Other talk pages: 0.18% (6)
250:(one big long question about categories of admins and your thoughts about them) Are you aware of the notion of adminstrators saying they're willing to be voluntarily recalled or reviewed, by a less onerous process than a new RfA (or worse) arbComm action? What do you think of the idea? Would you consider placing yourself (placement should only be done by oneself) in such a category if you were made an admin? Why or why not? Are you aware of the notion of Rouge admins? What do you think of the notion? Do you see it as purely humorous or do you see what it's driving at? Would you consider allowing yourself to by placed in this category (placement is traditionally done by someone else) if you were made an admin? Why or why not? (note: both these categories have some controversy attached to them, for different reasons, and note also, although I am a policy and process
272:
is not what it should be at all. I feel that the system is unnecessary, since if an administrator's powers should be taken away for some reason, there are already processes in place to de-sysop him or her. I have my doubts that this new system of administrators open to recall will result in any administrators being recalled because those who put themselves on the list automatically realize they may be under more scrutiny, so it seems to be more of a badge than a process. I believe that all administrators are always open to recall, as of course arbcom or the community can recognize problems and address them, and that this new category is unnecessary and just separates people into the good and the bad. So, no, I wouldn't add myself to that list.
2072:
about my neutral comment on your RFA. As an admin you will be making decisions that relate to edits made to articles in the encyclopdeia, sooner or later, everything here boils down to what goes into the articles. I think it's reasonable to expect some experience in making substantive contributions
271:
I believe the concept of administrators putting themselves on a page to be voluntarily recalled or reviewed is inherently flawed as it creates a divide between those who are on the list and those who aren't. It basically says that if you're not on the list, you're scared of getting de-sysopped, which
182:
I admit I don't forsee myself hunting out vandalism as much as other syops do, but of course I would deal with persistant vandals that I come across through my watchlist. As people often say, I would also lend a hand at the speedy deletion backlog when I have the chance. I sporadically participate in
1632:
Cowman109's attempt to obtain adminship. This support does not contain any fine print whatsoever however it comes with no warranty whatsoever and may be backed by uncited claims. Use of this support is at your own risk and Tawker will assume no responsibility for it (and man I write bad legal crap
2115:
wasn't, this possibly shows a lack of initiative and confidence in making a simple judgement? (this quasi-incident was very lame and flimsy so I don't want to make a big deal from that, esp. since Cowman was doing admirable copyvio work). My second reason for oppose is that he didn't respond to my
320:
Viewing contribution data for user Cowman109 (over the 3379 edit(s) shown on this page) (FAQ) Time range: 257 approximate day(s) of edits on this page Most recent edit on: 6hr (UTC) -- 06, Aug, 2006 || Oldest edit on: 3hr (UTC) -- 23, October, 2005 Overall edit summary use (last 1000 edits): Major
230:
As I stated in my last RFA, I'm generally a laidback person and few things cause me stress, but when things do, I don't hesitate to take a break to put things back into perspective. As for getting into conflicts, well, that pretty much goes without saying. I'm usually the one trying to fix the
2116:
reply; just a quick note to say 'OK thanks' would have been appreciated. I think this shows a lack of an important communication skill: asking if a user is being honest in their submissions should be treat with care and optimum politeness. Nothing personal at all, and keep up the great work.
199:
Well, in terms of contributions I'm pleased with, I recently found a chain of copyvio articles (which is pretty evident by my recent contribs) which I am still dealing with. Otherwise, generally my article contributions are usually spread between many articles instead of focusing on one in
165:, as I've seen times when the list is not looked at for several days and people are left without assistance. As I'm also usually involved in dispute resolution, proper use of page protection could stop an edit war in its tracks before it escalates further. I would also get involved in
281:
As for rouge admins, I suppose it could be interpreted as having a deeper purpose of making people realize that sysops aren't out to get you and they are here to build the encyclopedia as well, only stated in a more humorous tone. I'm indifferent towards it, however.
726:
The main concerns for opposes in Cowman's last RfA we're not enough mainspace work and lack of time here. Neither of these are reasonable causes to oppose at this point. He has helped at many articles making both major and minor changes. In some cases such as
343:
Username Cowman109 Total edits 3330 Distinct pages edited 1075 Average edits/page 3.098 First edit 04:12, October 23, 2005 (main) 671 Talk 282 User 269 User talk 842 Image 3 Template 37 Template talk 1 Category 1 Knowledge 1108 Knowledge talk 111 Portal talk 5
2037:
Miborovsky means that he'd like to see at least one featured article. That's actually not a bad criterion for a featured article type admin (see RFA talk for my comments on that). Do note that Cowman109 more of a mediator/wikigovernance kind of person.
2073:
to articles. In the past, some RFA voters have voiced the opinion that an sucessful candidate ought to have made a real contribution to an article that has reached featured article status. My expectations are not nearly that high.
213:
In terms of major edits, the majority of my article contributions are indirectly through discussion in talk pages or mediation cabal cases. Though, as
Jaranda stated, I have made efforts beyond the mediation cabal for pages as
1935:: - ) I agree that it is important for all users to work on articles. Our community's primary mission is writing an encyclopedia. That's why I was pleased when I saw the work he did on this article with a cleanup tag.
183:
AFDs and RFDs as
Jaranda stated above, more so on RFDs, though only on overlooked or borderline cases. As for AFDs I admit it's usually only ones that I've come across or if it's one I've proposed myself. :).
224:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
2059:
Little actual editorial contribution to articles, and <1k mainspace edits. Popular enough with the RFA crowd to get adminship, but I'm unmoved by editorial contributions.
2091:
of 1000 article edits is not overly excessive. Looks like the nom will get the tools, but if he doesn't I will support on re-app with a few more edits under his belt.
136:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
661:
My sincere apologies. I'm just working out the kinks of posting this count, and I mistakenly forgot to correct the userspace transclusion. It should work now.
1213:
Excellent editor. Will be an excellent admin. Has a good understanding of
Knowledge policy and guidelines. I'm impressed with the nom's mediating skills. --
2180:
1427:
Ack! I got up in the night and look at the auto-updated userpage of mine, and it says "Hey dummy, Cowman109's on RfA" and I just had to stop and give my
101:
650:
Hm, well that's definitely not my edit count. It's completely different from what's listed above, at least. There seems to have been a mixup somewhere.
1879:
152:
1917:
In my opinion administrators should have experience on article creation, commitment and improvement and I don't see enough of these to support.
83:. He has been with us since late October and has more than 3 thousand edits. He is best known as the former head and current coordinator of the
1765:
1736:
As I said when I opposed Cowman109's RFA last time for lack of experience, "I anticipate supporting in the future", and here I am doing so. --
2107:(edit conflict saved this from being a weak oppose) - Nothing personal, and has been doing some admirable work identifying copyvios in the
1275:
104:
in which he was opposed for inexperince and withdrew early but he is much more experinced now. I think Cowman109 would make an good admin.
1028:
2162:
1606:
1380:. Seems like a good maintanence person. He has helped to point out some oversighted overprotected pages. I hope you help me out with
1803:
33:
17:
1938:
IMO, the nom did a good job cleaning up the article and getting rid of one of our many articles tagged for cleanup. Take care,
76:
767:. I looked over your contibutions and I am very impressed by your involvement with other users/mediation cabal. Good luck.
1843:
1774:
1567:
1321:
800:
931:
330:
201:
144:
1851:
1692:
1479:
853:
Yes. Very yes!!! Cowman is a helpful, knowlagable, excellent user, who totally deserves the tools. Best of luck.
263:
193:
Of your articles or contributions to
Knowledge, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
84:
1076:. This is one of those "thought you were an admin" situations. Any interaction with Cowman has been a pleasure.
1760:
1312:
1271:
879:
816:
148:
2019:
1431:. You couldn't ask for a fairer, more reasonable admin! I'd offer you luck, Cowman, but you won't need it. :)
1057:
857:
1817:
1604:
1419:
1665:
2111:
articles. He did (politely) ask me if an article I'd created was a copyvio from certain sources. Since it
1996:
1988:
1515:
1386:
1296:
940:
842:
303:
2028:
1066:
2148:
2095:
2077:
2063:
2042:
2030:
2013:
2000:
1978:
1962:
1948:
1926:
1902:
1890:
1859:
1820:
1808:
1778:
1751:
1728:
1716:
1703:
1676:
1653:
1637:
1620:
1608:
1588:
1571:
1554:
1534:
1522:
1499:
1494:
1482:
1461:
1458:
1449:
1422:
1410:
1398:
1372:
1354:
1342:
1325:
1305:
1279:
1259:
1245:
1223:
1205:
1176:
1164:
1152:
1125:
1113:
1092:
1080:
1077:
1068:
1048:
1045:
1036:
1012:
991:
974:
943:
919:
891:
865:
845:
829:
806:
784:
759:
747:
735:
718:
699:
674:
656:
365:
349:
315:
288:
266:
125:
110:
2161:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
1991:
1597:
1351:
792:. - Cabal experience as well as large amount of Wiki-experience indicates a good admin in the making.
2010:
1799:
1713:
1697:
1550:
1509:
1339:
1317:
251:
2088:
1787:
1768:
1300:
1268:
1199:
1102:
987:
885:
728:
169:, as that area seems a bit undermanned. I would refrain from using sysop powers on disputants in a
94:
70:
694:
105:
1946:
1221:
1146:
1122:
1111:
794:
781:
59:
2144:
2126:
1958:
1922:
1835:
1367:
936:
928:
838:
771:
697:
108:
2039:
1975:
1725:
1650:
1491:
1233:
1173:
1161:
1056:
I've seen this user around and believe he's certainly to be trusted with the extra buttons.
1041:
951:
713:
170:
2092:
2006:
1899:
1795:
1709:
1687:
1580:
1543:
1407:
1334:
1000:
662:
353:
2074:
2060:
1867:
1617:
1441:
1185:
1021:
983:
875:
756:
651:
336:
326:
283:
120:
80:
66:
1562:- Has significant experience in controversial matters, and definitely can be trusted.
2174:
1939:
1475:
1255:
1214:
1141:
1107:
971:
912:
900:
862:
854:
259:
166:
162:
254:
I am in both categories, and finally, note that there is no wrong answer here...) ++
2135:
2117:
1954:
1932:
1918:
1829:
1381:
1362:
1292:
1172:. I've actually entrusted cowman109 with much harder tasks than adminship already.
955:
768:
732:
1737:
1670:
1662:
1646:
1634:
904:
744:
708:
1418:
positive contributor to
Knowledge, including posts aimed at educating editors.
143:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
2155:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1828:- He's good to work with on MedCab and he's definitely ready for the upgrade.
1563:
1531:
1333:
He always do lots of work in
Knowledge, and never abused tools. Good editor.
873:. A kind, capable user whose committment to the project is admirable indeed.
173:
case I'm involved with, of course, as that would conflict with my neutrality.
1724:
I've had nothing but good experiences with you. You seem very level-headed.
1435:
554:
Non-deletion voting-related edit summaries: keep: 10, oppose: 3, support: 13
200:
particular. I recently went on a sort of mini clean-up campaign to clear up
1507:. Dedicated to helping the project in whatever ways he can - absolutely! --
1231:
a great editor that looks like he definitely could use the admin tools. --
506:
Non-deletion voting-related edit summaries: keep: 2, oppose: 0, support: 0
467:
Non-deletion voting-related edit summaries: keep: 1, oppose: 0, support: 0
1471:
1135:
1089:
255:
240:
204:
with the help of the people in #Knowledge-en, which was quite successful.
897:
Where-did-I-put-that-"thought you were already an admin"-cliche support
2165:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
2087:. Great answers, seems like a great candidate, but I believe that
87:
where he has done some excellent work in. He also fights copyvios
2005:
You might want to consider grounding your opposition in logic.--
1288:
2018:
One could apply the very same advice to your own participation
117:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
1628:
with the power invested in me to vote in this RFA do indeed
161:
The area I'm most interested in is helping protections in
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
2069:
1936:
98:
91:
88:
1661:
as solid contributor, will make responsible admin. —
339:'s edit summary usage with Interiots Edit Count Tool
1953:Nice, but ultimately not enough to change my vote.
386:
Manual reverts not marked as vandalism reverts: 103
1542:, I think we have nice admin material there :) --
614:Manual reverts not marked as vandalism reverts: 1
575:Manual reverts not marked as vandalism reverts: 1
533:Manual reverts not marked as vandalism reverts: 1
488:Manual reverts not marked as vandalism reverts: 3
455:Manual reverts not marked as vandalism reverts: 3
422:Manual reverts not marked as vandalism reverts: 1
352:(click the "Show" link below and to the right)
1020:I trust the nom, and see no reason to oppose.
566:Edits to sections, with no further summary: 15
518:Edits to sections, with no further summary: 16
440:Edits to sections, with no further summary: 16
1865:Holy cow - I thought I had already supported!
596:Edits to sections, with no further summary: 2
410:Edits to sections, with no further summary: 2
383:Automatic (rollback/script/tool) reverts: 186
100:. He had one prior RFA nomination in Mid-may
8:
485:Automatic (rollback/script/tool) reverts: 17
452:Automatic (rollback/script/tool) reverts: 28
611:Automatic (rollback/script/tool) reverts: 1
602:Automatic (rollback/script/tool) reverts: 2
530:Automatic (rollback/script/tool) reverts: 4
419:Automatic (rollback/script/tool) reverts: 5
1086:Strong There Is No Mediation Cabal Support
731:he has completely rewritten the articles.
102:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Cowman109
2134:withdrawn due to subsequent polite msg.
560:Unknown abbreviation (≤4 characters): 2
512:Unknown abbreviation (≤4 characters): 3
434:Unknown abbreviation (≤4 characters): 1
404:Unknown abbreviation (≤4 characters): 1
348:Cowman109's detailed edit count using
7:
1686:per Xyra: will make a solid admin.
1530:-- per comment on the oppose vote --
509:Unrecognised tag ({{ in summary): 16
470:Unrecognised tag ({{ in summary): 10
401:Unrecognised tag ({{ in summary): 15
814:Looks like a good admin candidate.
617:Unrecognised tag ({{ in summary): 4
590:Unrecognised tag ({{ in summary): 1
557:Unrecognised tag ({{ in summary): 1
551:Addition-related edit summaries: 31
548:Deletion-related edit summaries: 72
431:Unrecognised tag ({{ in summary): 4
587:Addition-related edit summaries: 1
584:Deletion-related edit summaries: 1
545:Speedy deletion-related tagging: 8
503:Addition-related edit summaries: 1
500:Deletion-related edit summaries: 2
464:Addition-related edit summaries: 5
461:Deletion-related edit summaries: 2
398:Addition-related edit summaries: 1
395:Deletion-related edit summaries: 3
24:
2181:Successful requests for adminship
1786:; low on the article work. --Slgr
999:. Will he abuse the tools? Nope.
1816:looks great. No problems here.
925:You betta smile, smile, smile...
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
903:needs all the help it can get!
581:XfD deletion-related tagging: 1
542:XfD deletion-related tagging: 1
497:XfD deletion-related tagging: 2
392:XfD deletion-related tagging: 1
202:Category:Cleanup from June 2005
1267:, great asset to the project.
593:Unrecognised edit summary: 102
563:Unrecognised edit summary: 934
515:Unrecognised edit summary: 555
473:Unrecognised edit summary: 181
437:Unrecognised edit summary: 244
407:Unrecognised edit summary: 311
1:
2068:Hi Cowman, in answer to your
1986:? None I can see, anyway. --
620:Unrecognised edit summary: 31
572:Knowledge talk namespace: 111
79:) – I would like to nominate
1568:Knowledge Neutrality Project
641:Unrecognised edit summary: 4
632:Unrecognised edit summary: 1
626:Unrecognised edit summary: 1
605:Unrecognised edit summary: 1
380:Manual vandalism reverts: 35
153:administrators' reading list
2043:20:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1903:13:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1891:04:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1860:03:51, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1821:19:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1809:18:32, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1779:16:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1752:05:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1287:Thanks for helping me cite
899:for a very dedicated user.
527:Manual vandalism reverts: 1
482:Manual vandalism reverts: 1
449:Manual vandalism reverts: 1
329:'s edit summary usage with
132:Questions for the candidate
2197:
2149:13:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
2130:23:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
2096:05:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
2078:16:32, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
2064:05:45, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
2031:21:47, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
2014:21:45, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
2001:23:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
1979:06:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
1963:21:38, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1949:19:19, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1927:17:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1729:23:03, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
1717:21:45, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
1704:20:16, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
1677:17:43, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
1654:13:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
1638:01:45, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
1621:01:16, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
1609:23:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
1589:14:13, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
1572:00:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
1555:17:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
1535:21:35, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1523:20:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1500:19:19, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1483:18:34, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1462:16:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1457:, positive contributor. --
1450:08:31, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1423:06:47, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1411:05:42, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1399:05:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1373:03:56, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1355:02:21, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1343:01:51, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1326:01:49, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1306:00:51, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1280:00:03, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1260:21:59, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
1246:21:48, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
1224:21:41, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
1206:20:06, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
1177:19:48, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
1165:18:58, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
1153:18:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
1126:18:14, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
1114:18:09, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
1093:17:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
1081:17:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
1069:14:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
1049:14:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
1037:13:38, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
1013:13:26, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
992:12:51, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
975:12:24, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
944:11:41, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
920:11:32, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
892:10:34, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
866:10:32, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
846:08:55, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
830:08:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
807:07:30, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
785:07:13, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
760:06:54, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
748:06:43, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
736:06:39, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
719:06:36, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
700:04:04, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
675:21:09, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
657:21:03, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
623:Template talk namespace: 1
372:Click Show to View Results
366:20:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
316:05:21, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
289:19:03, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
267:18:34, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
147:, and read the page about
145:Category:Knowledge backlog
126:06:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
111:04:03, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
1429:MedCab Obligatory Support
1121:. A truly hard worker. --
524:Knowledge namespace: 1110
93:, rewrites articles like
85:Knowledge:Mediation Cabal
2158:Please do not modify it.
952:Will not abuse the tools
635:Portal talk namespace: 5
491:Link as edit summary: 13
479:User talk namespace: 850
1406:excellent contributor.
1253:per all of the above. —
765:Edit conflicted Support
638:Link as edit summary: 1
428:Link as edit summary: 1
239:Optional question from
97:and partipates in AFDs
39:Please do not modify it
608:Template namespace: 37
377:Article namespace: 692
629:Category namespace: 1
34:request for adminship
1882:The Wiki Soundtrack!
1466:No reason not to...
1100:No problems here. --
962:11:41, 05 August '06
1384:after making admin.
729:Henry Ossawa Tanner
521:No edit summary: 58
476:No edit summary: 45
446:User namespace: 277
443:No edit summary: 10
416:Talk namespace: 283
413:No edit summary: 28
95:Henry Ossawa Tanner
1818:Wikipediarules2221
1420:Stephen B Streater
1160:per all of above.
1151:
599:Image namespace: 3
569:No edit summary: 8
1883:
1857:
1853:E-Support Options
1846:
1840:
1807:
1616:per the above. --
1324:
1244:
1134:
982:per nom., etc. —
773:
755:as per last nom.
301:All user's edits.
2188:
2160:
2142:
2124:
2026:
2025:
1994:
1944:
1887:
1884:
1881:
1877:
1871:
1854:
1850:
1845:My support calls
1844:
1838:
1833:
1793:
1790:
1749:
1746:
1743:
1740:
1668:
1602:
1586:
1583:
1548:
1521:
1518:
1512:
1497:
1459:TheM62Manchester
1444:
1438:
1395:
1392:
1389:
1370:
1365:
1316:
1303:
1258:
1242:
1239:
1236:
1219:
1193:
1149:
1144:
1138:
1110:
1105:
1078:SynergeticMaggot
1064:
1063:
1034:
1010:
1005:
963:
958:
934:
927:He'll be great,
917:
910:
888:
882:
860:
828:
826:
821:
803:
797:
772:
717:
672:
667:
654:
363:
358:
312:
309:
306:
286:
123:
41:
2196:
2195:
2191:
2190:
2189:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2163:this nomination
2156:
2136:
2118:
2021:
2020:
1992:
1940:
1898:. Good Cowboy.
1885:
1880:
1875:
1869:
1858:
1852:
1848:
1841:
1836:
1788:
1777:
1747:
1744:
1741:
1738:
1680:
1666:
1598:
1584:
1581:
1544:
1516:
1510:
1508:
1495:
1442:
1436:
1393:
1390:
1387:
1368:
1363:
1301:
1254:
1237:
1234:
1215:
1204:
1189:
1147:
1142:
1136:
1103:
1101:
1059:
1058:
1033:
1025:
1006:
1001:
964:
961:
956:
932:
913:
905:
886:
880:
858:
822:
819:(aeropagitica)
817:
815:
801:
795:
711:
668:
663:
652:
645:
644:
373:
359:
354:
345:
322:
310:
307:
304:
284:
121:
52:
37:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2194:
2192:
2184:
2183:
2173:
2172:
2168:
2167:
2152:
2099:
2098:
2082:
2081:
2080:
2053:
2052:
2048:
2047:
2046:
2045:
2035:
2034:
2033:
1981:
1974:Per above. --
1969:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1911:
1910:
1906:
1905:
1893:
1862:
1849:
1842:
1832:
1823:
1811:
1781:
1773:
1754:
1731:
1719:
1706:
1681:
1679:
1673:
1656:
1640:
1623:
1611:
1600:Baseball,Baby!
1591:
1574:
1557:
1537:
1525:
1502:
1485:
1464:
1452:
1425:
1413:
1401:
1375:
1357:
1345:
1328:
1310:Yes please. -
1308:
1285:Strong Support
1282:
1265:Strong Support
1262:
1251:Strong support
1248:
1229:Strong Support
1226:
1208:
1198:
1179:
1167:
1155:
1128:
1116:
1095:
1083:
1074:Strong Support
1071:
1051:
1039:
1027:
1015:
994:
977:
965:
960:
946:
922:
894:
868:
851:Strong support
848:
832:
809:
787:
775:
762:
753:Strong support
750:
738:
721:
702:
687:
686:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
643:
642:
639:
636:
633:
630:
627:
624:
621:
618:
615:
612:
609:
606:
603:
600:
597:
594:
591:
588:
585:
582:
579:
576:
573:
570:
567:
564:
561:
558:
555:
552:
549:
546:
543:
540:
537:
534:
531:
528:
525:
522:
519:
516:
513:
510:
507:
504:
501:
498:
495:
492:
489:
486:
483:
480:
477:
474:
471:
468:
465:
462:
459:
456:
453:
450:
447:
444:
441:
438:
435:
432:
429:
426:
423:
420:
417:
414:
411:
408:
405:
402:
399:
396:
393:
390:
387:
384:
381:
378:
374:
371:
370:
369:
368:
342:
341:
340:
334:
331:mathbot's tool
319:
299:
298:
294:
293:
292:
291:
276:
275:
274:
273:
245:
235:
234:
233:
232:
218:
217:
216:
215:
208:
207:
206:
205:
187:
186:
185:
184:
177:
176:
175:
174:
149:administrators
134:
133:
129:
128:
90:and vandalism
81:User:Cowman109
55:Final (65/3/2)
51:
46:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2193:
2182:
2179:
2178:
2176:
2166:
2164:
2159:
2153:
2151:
2150:
2147:
2146:
2143:
2140:
2131:
2129:
2128:
2125:
2122:
2114:
2110:
2106:
2101:
2100:
2097:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2083:
2079:
2076:
2071:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2062:
2058:
2055:
2054:
2050:
2049:
2044:
2041:
2036:
2032:
2029:
2027:
2024:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2012:
2008:
2004:
2003:
2002:
1999:
1998:
1995:
1990:
1985:
1982:
1980:
1977:
1973:
1970:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1947:
1945:
1943:
1937:
1934:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1913:
1912:
1908:
1907:
1904:
1901:
1897:
1894:
1892:
1888:
1878:
1873:
1872:
1866:
1863:
1861:
1855:
1847:
1839:
1837:Ding my phone
1831:
1827:
1824:
1822:
1819:
1815:
1812:
1810:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1792:
1785:
1782:
1780:
1776:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1767:
1762:
1758:
1755:
1753:
1750:
1735:
1732:
1730:
1727:
1723:
1720:
1718:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1705:
1702:
1700:
1696:
1695:
1691:
1690:
1685:
1682:
1678:
1675:
1672:
1669:
1664:
1660:
1657:
1655:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1641:
1639:
1636:
1631:
1627:
1624:
1622:
1619:
1615:
1612:
1610:
1607:
1605:
1603:
1601:
1595:
1592:
1590:
1587:
1578:
1577:50th support.
1575:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1558:
1556:
1553:
1552:
1549:
1547:
1541:
1538:
1536:
1533:
1529:
1526:
1524:
1519:
1513:
1506:
1503:
1501:
1498:
1493:
1489:
1486:
1484:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1463:
1460:
1456:
1453:
1451:
1448:
1447:
1445:
1439:
1430:
1426:
1424:
1421:
1417:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1405:
1402:
1400:
1397:
1396:
1383:
1379:
1376:
1374:
1371:
1366:
1361:
1358:
1356:
1353:
1349:
1346:
1344:
1341:
1338:
1337:
1332:
1329:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1314:
1309:
1307:
1304:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1283:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1270:
1266:
1263:
1261:
1257:
1252:
1249:
1247:
1241:
1240:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1222:
1220:
1218:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1203:
1202:
1197:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1183:
1180:
1178:
1175:
1171:
1170:Perfect score
1168:
1166:
1163:
1159:
1156:
1154:
1150:
1145:
1139:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1124:
1123:Gray Porpoise
1120:
1117:
1115:
1112:
1109:
1106:
1099:
1096:
1094:
1091:
1087:
1084:
1082:
1079:
1075:
1072:
1070:
1067:
1065:
1062:
1055:
1052:
1050:
1047:
1043:
1040:
1038:
1032:
1031:
1023:
1019:
1016:
1014:
1011:
1009:
1004:
998:
995:
993:
989:
985:
981:
978:
976:
973:
969:
966:
959:
953:
950:
947:
945:
942:
941:
938:
935:
930:
926:
923:
921:
918:
916:
911:
909:
902:
898:
895:
893:
890:
889:
884:
883:
877:
872:
869:
867:
864:
861:
856:
852:
849:
847:
844:
840:
836:
833:
831:
827:
825:
820:
813:
810:
808:
805:
804:
802:Daniel.Bryant
798:
791:
788:
786:
783:
782:Mailer Diablo
779:
776:
774:
770:
766:
763:
761:
758:
754:
751:
749:
746:
742:
739:
737:
734:
730:
725:
722:
720:
715:
710:
706:
705:Cabal support
703:
701:
698:
696:
692:
689:
688:
684:
683:
676:
673:
671:
666:
660:
659:
658:
655:
649:
648:
647:
646:
640:
637:
634:
631:
628:
625:
622:
619:
616:
613:
610:
607:
604:
601:
598:
595:
592:
589:
586:
583:
580:
577:
574:
571:
568:
565:
562:
559:
556:
553:
550:
547:
544:
541:
538:
535:
532:
529:
526:
523:
520:
517:
514:
511:
508:
505:
502:
499:
496:
493:
490:
487:
484:
481:
478:
475:
472:
469:
466:
463:
460:
457:
454:
451:
448:
445:
442:
439:
436:
433:
430:
427:
424:
421:
418:
415:
412:
409:
406:
403:
400:
397:
394:
391:
388:
385:
382:
379:
376:
375:
367:
364:
362:
357:
351:
350:Ais523's Tool
347:
346:
338:
335:
332:
328:
324:
323:
318:
317:
314:
313:
296:
295:
290:
287:
280:
279:
278:
277:
270:
269:
268:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
246:
244:
242:
237:
236:
229:
226:
225:
223:
220:
219:
212:
211:
210:
209:
203:
198:
195:
194:
192:
189:
188:
181:
180:
179:
178:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
156:
154:
150:
146:
142:
139:
138:
137:
131:
130:
127:
124:
118:
115:
114:
113:
112:
109:
107:
103:
99:
96:
92:
89:
86:
82:
78:
75:
72:
68:
64:
63:
61:
58:Ended 06:23,
56:
50:
47:
43:
40:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2157:
2154:
2145:
2138:
2133:
2127:
2120:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2102:
2084:
2056:
2022:
1987:
1983:
1971:
1941:
1914:
1895:
1874:
1868:
1864:
1825:
1813:
1784:Weak Support
1783:
1764:
1763:
1756:
1733:
1721:
1698:
1693:
1688:
1683:
1658:
1642:
1629:
1625:
1613:
1599:
1593:
1576:
1559:
1551:
1545:
1539:
1527:
1504:
1487:
1467:
1454:
1433:
1432:
1428:
1415:
1403:
1385:
1377:
1359:
1347:
1335:
1330:
1313:CrazyRussian
1311:
1284:
1264:
1250:
1232:
1228:
1216:
1210:
1200:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1181:
1169:
1157:
1130:
1118:
1097:
1085:
1073:
1060:
1053:
1029:
1017:
1007:
1002:
996:
979:
967:
948:
939:
924:
914:
907:
896:
878:
874:
870:
850:
839:WAvegetarian
834:
823:
818:
811:
793:
789:
777:
764:
752:
740:
723:
704:
690:
669:
664:
578:Redirects: 1
536:Redirects: 5
494:Welcomes: 11
389:Redirects: 6
360:
355:
302:
300:
247:
238:
227:
221:
196:
190:
158:
140:
135:
116:
73:
65:
57:
54:
53:
48:
38:
30:
28:
2089:my criteria
2040:Kim Bruning
1976:Masssiveego
1726:Luna Santin
1492:Computerjoe
1490:hell yeah!
1352:ADNghiem501
1201:Talk to me!
1174:Kim Bruning
1162:Newyorkbrad
1042:Merovingian
539:Welcomes: 1
458:Welcomes: 1
425:Removals: 1
2093:Themindset
1900:Weird Bird
1651:(Elkspeak)
1511:Aguerriero
1408:Stubbleboy
1336:*~Daniel~*
1243:(joturner)
1030:review me!
968:Definitely
837:per above—
119:I accept.
60:2006-08-12
49:Cowman109
31:successful
2075:Pete.Hurd
2061:Pete.Hurd
2023:hoopydink
1870:Phaedriel
1618:Coemgenus
1596:per nom.
1061:hoopydink
1022:RandyWang
984:Wknight94
796:Killfest2
757:Kimchi.sg
743:per nom.
653:Cowman109
337:Cowman109
327:Cowman109
285:Cowman109
231:conflict.
122:Cowman109
67:Cowman109
2175:Category
2070:question
1942:FloNight
1804:contribs
1800:messages
1775:(samtal)
1766:hurikein
1761:íslenska
1734:Support.
1722:Support.
1626:I Tawker
1256:Khoikhoi
1217:FloNight
949:Support.
297:Comments
151:and the
77:contribs
2113:clearly
2105:Neutral
2085:Neutral
2057:neutral
2051:Neutral
1955:Joelito
1933:Joelito
1919:Joelito
1896:Support
1830:Torinir
1826:Support
1814:Support
1757:Support
1684:Support
1659:Support
1643:Support
1633::o) --
1630:support
1614:Support
1594:Support
1560:Support
1546:Grafikm
1540:Support
1528:Support
1505:Support
1496:'s talk
1488:Support
1468:Support
1455:Support
1434:~Kylu (
1416:Support
1404:Support
1378:Support
1360:Support
1348:Support
1331:Support
1293:Deon555
1211:Support
1158:Support
1131:Support
1119:Support
1108:iva1979
1098:Support
1088:. Meh.
1054:Support
1018:Support
997:Support
980:Support
957:FireFox
871:Support
835:Support
824:(talk)
812:Support
790:Support
778:Support
769:Viridae
745:Michael
741:Support
733:JoshuaZ
724:Support
695:Jaranda
693:as nom
691:Support
685:Support
106:Jaranda
2109:Scrubs
1989:Миборо
1972:Oppose
1931:Hello
1915:Oppose
1909:Oppose
1647:Elkman
1635:Tawker
1582:Kungfu
1238:abjotu
901:WP:RFP
843:(talk)
709:Keitei
171:Medcab
167:WP:AN3
163:WP:RFP
1984:No FA
1791:ndson
1645:. --
1532:T-rex
1388:Voice
1382:WP:PP
1322:email
1291:;) --
1235:tariq
1187:Mr. L
1008:Chimp
1003:alpha
972:Steel
970:. --
876:Brisv
670:Chimp
665:alpha
361:Chimp
356:alpha
305:Voice
214:well.
62:(UTC)
16:<
2137:The
2119:The
1997:ский
1959:talk
1923:talk
1796:page
1689:Buck
1663:Xyra
1585:Adam
1564:CP/M
1517:talk
1391:-of-
1364:Yank
1318:talk
1297:talk
1289:DECv
1182:Moo.
1046:Talk
988:talk
954:. —
937:hway
863:Halo
780:. -
714:talk
707:. --
325:See
308:-of-
252:wonk
71:talk
1769:#12
1748:el
1699:ofg
1694:ets
1472:Lar
1394:All
1369:sox
1350:--
1269:Roy
1195:fty
1090:CQJ
908:jam
887:gas
311:All
256:Lar
241:Lar
2177::
2139:JP
2132:-
2121:JP
2009:|
2007:SB
1961:)
1925:)
1889:-
1834:(
1802:-
1798:-
1759:.
1745:er
1712:|
1710:SB
1708:--
1674:/
1649:-
1579:--
1570:|
1474::
1470:++
1446:)
1278:.
1184:--
1044:-
1035:)
990:)
933:ig
915:es
906:--
855:Th
258::
248:4.
228:A:
222:3.
197:A:
191:2.
159:A:
155:.
141:1.
36:.
2141:S
2123:S
2103:#
2011:T
1993:в
1957:(
1921:(
1886:♪
1876:♥
1856:)
1806:)
1794:(
1789:@
1742:P
1739:M
1714:T
1701:✐
1671:l
1667:e
1566:|
1520:)
1514:(
1480:c
1478:/
1476:t
1443:t
1440:|
1437:u
1340:☎
1320:/
1302:e
1299:|
1295:|
1276:A
1274:.
1272:A
1191:e
1148:e
1143:H
1140:.
1137:G
1133:.
1104:S
1026:/
1024:(
986:(
929:H
881:e
859:ε
841:•
799:—
716:)
712:(
333:.
264:c
262:/
260:t
243::
74:·
69:(
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.