Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/E 2

255:. As most of the pages of the administrative backlog are currently on my watchlist, I will action on any outstanding requests during my free time alongside the other sysops in order to clear the backlogs. If any user, whatsoever, requires any help at any time, whether it be wiki-related or IRC related, they are free to make a post on my talk page and I can assist them to the best of my ability. In my opinion, Knowledge (XXG) is growing everyday with contributions from users all around the world. Vandals are just here to make our job even harder - that's why there is such processes for eliminating these users. In another point, I am a channel operator for some of Wikimedia's IRC channels on the 3246:

writing does not relate directly to administrative tasks, but it seems clear to me that administrators should contribute to the encyclopedia. Some of our best and/or most prominent administrator, recently, have come to the same conclusion. In my opinion it is, in part, because if an administrator or non-administrator does not regularly (though not necessarily often) contribute to the encyclopedia, he or she tends to become jaded, incompassionate and, generally (in the case of an administrator), not the person he or she used to be when he or she was given the +sysop flag. I do not wish this outlook upon E or the encyclopedia he is to administer, and so oppose this request. --

1008:) and I thought to myself at the time "this person is seriously unfit be an admin." I've tried several times to figure out who it was, but I've been unsuccessful. Looking over your contribs here, I don't think it was you. As I suppose this is my own mental deficiency I certainly won't oppose for it. If you do pursue a rename at some point, you could address W.marsh's concerns with a simple link to your RfA or mention of your previous user name on your user page. -- 2208:- Most of the reasons under Oppose are underwhelming; the only one that concerns me is the question of interaction with other editors, and I feel that IRC helps to offset that (even though it's off-wiki). Your contributions have been pretty good - I'm not too worried whether they've been done with tools like AWB, so long as they've been used correctly - and having the support of both of these noms, who tend to make good decisions, is encouraging. 2376:, though I acknowledge (from personal experience) that a one or two letter name or pseudonym can cause confusion, and an admin can ill-afford to have editors confused about who he/she is. Though I support the candidate even without a name change, I would ask that they at least consider it. Either way, the candidate's body of work strongly indicates that we should expect no problems with this user as an admin. 3945:. LOL. I think "E" is a slick name, though it's drug connotations are not desirable, the name is hardly an issue. B, Y and I'm sure there's someone else out there, but it's not the first single letter username, and is very unlikely to be the last (Maybe I'll usurp to L...?) I don't think this should be sufficient to bring a vote from support to neutral, but then again, that's my opinion. -- 2965:

and prejudicial comments. Of course Everyone wants to be an Administrator and most just "kiss posterior" to become one and others work hard for it which is what E did and people like this should become admins since they deserve it for all their "real" hard-work and they don't do it for Fame/power/recognition...Sorry, but harshness is really the only way to point out the truth and if being

3900:

Sarsaparilla, why would I do such a thing? Just for your information, I would never do such a thing and the only reason I thought the name 'E' would be beneficial to me is because it is a unique username which only 26 users could have, and I had no intention of it looking like it was a 'snatch up'. —

3376:

I hope you understand as I have just woken up (UTC+10). I have since spoken to Cometstyles on IRC about this comment, and have told him briefly that I do not want (s)he commenting in this manner which would come across as a bit 'out of line'. Please regret any such comments as everyone is entitled to

2964:

Just look at the fact that "his last RfA was 6 months ago".. (no rush there)...thus it means that he knew what he did wrong in the previous ones and he managed to improve those within the timespan and that is a really good thing....if you want to oppose....oppose on facts and not make belief opinions

2773:

With all due respect, I think this is a pretty poor reason to oppose. Do you think E is trustworthy, to the extent where he would use the admin tools well, or not? Questions as to whether he is going to change a name that many people have already stated they would like him to change anyway are hardly

2633:

per lack of encyclopedic work and weak answer to Q5. A better approach would be something like "I research whether the claims are true, feel slightly ashamed that we don't have an article about this notable author yet, and expand the article myself, dropping a note on the author's talk page inviting

2609:

Fixing typos aren't sysop duties, and doing that doesn't take the nuance that would show the judgement needed in an admin. And fixing typos doesn't give an opportunity for editing and interaction with the regular community of editors that a potential admin needs. And to justrespond to E's comment, I

4010:

Neutral - I'd like to see more work in AN/I and substantive edits in mainspace. The lack of experience with conflict (outside of IRC, of course) is a little troubling but editors edit in their area of interest, and some areas just aren't prone to conflict. Still, much of the fires are put out at AN

3976:

Per concerns raised by Blnguyen, Iamunknown and Gnangarra - I don't feel strongly enough to oppose outright, but I believe the concerns are valid and the candidate would be well advised to take them on board. I think it comes back to the principle that some excellent editors do not necessarily make

3186:

high volume of mechanical edits aren't the way to gain experience, its the lack of significant interaction with the community thats my part of my concern if it was this alone I'd have gone neutral.The other factor is the answer to my question about IRC, its well documented that when an admin reacts

2936:

it through whatever means possible and frankly, your "opinions" don't matter and would never matter since I believe its about time you said Good-bye and retire before people lose all the respect that they might still have in you (though I doubt it anyone in their right mind respects you)..so as the

2544:

I see an overwhelming amount of minor typos fixed with AWB, I don't think that's really the way to gain experience editing in the mainspace. Doesn't seem to have made any real progress on that front since the last RFA. Also, the repeated references to IRC duties don't have much to do with Knowledge

1867:

I previously commented that article talkpage edits were disproportionately low - and this still seems to be the case. However since nobody else seemed to think it a big deal I should conclude that I was wrong and that the other good (and improved) aspects of this editors contributions mean I should

552:

I did know about it in a breif form through both the mailing lists and on-wiki, but did not take much interest in it. Since you have posted this question, I have read up about it and I my understanding is that any such unsourced material added to such articles or articles created with such material

280:

Since my joining of the project on 6 October 2006, I have made numerous contributions in most namespaces. Since my last RfA, I have begun to edit more in the mainspace, where the most editing happens. This has brought my edit count to a stable level and I believe it is enough experience to become a

749:

From what I understand from your question, I believe that such IRC discussions should have a weak, but positive influence on any such sysop actions. If any such action was to be taken by any admin, it would be their responsibility on behalf of the IRC influence, if I understand correctly. I do not

2559:

I have made other edits in the mainspace also, it is not always AWB and typo fixing. That is simply edits made on behalf of the Typo WikiProject. I have also stuck my head into most policy pages and will be editing most other mainspace articles by using suggestions by SuggestBot and also cleanup

3245:

I am opposing because I think that an administrator should have substantial (though not extraordinary) experience writing articles and interacting and attempting to resolve interpersonal conflicts. I conclude, by examining E's edits, that he or she lacks these experiences. Admittedly, article

916:

Before I decide my stance here, I'd just like to say that I think that this new trend of usurping single-letter usernames really wasn't a very good idea. I've come across quite a few single-letter users and I always forget who is who. Even now, I know I've seen "E" many times before but I can't

3131:

and many of those are reverting vandalism). I know that vandal-fighting admins don't need to be prodigious writers or wise mediators, but I doubt this user has enough experience to work harmoniously with others. And per Blnguyen, user's many automated edits and RFAs give me the heebie jeebies.

2047:

Provided he stays away from the stickier disputes until he's gained more experience. Oh, and I know that IRC has very little to do with Knowledge (XXG), but I find him to be a good op in #wikipedia, measured and appropriate responses to incidents, and that is probably indicative of his overall

135:

for adminship. As one of E's admin coaches, I strongly recommend E for the mop. I've found that he likes tedious repetitive tasks, and he's competent in the activities he selects. He knows his limitations. He's perfectly suited for many of the chores admins are expected to do. I trust him

3187:

to an IRC discussion the resulting action ends up at AN/I. Also an admin is the one responsible for their actions alone, not on behalf of any one. All of this gives me the impression that when push comes to shove and due to a lack of significant experience E is more likely to respond to herd.

3099:

Out curiosity, what level of activity outside of mechanical edits would you expect for an administrator? Is there a minimum level of edits for admins/admin candidates in admin-related areas? How about ArbCom members in ArbCom related areas? (Per Signpost, no ArbCom activity since Oct 2006).

3886:' decision to give up its single-letter listing "S" on the New York Stock Exchange when it combined with KMart. I would only request that when you do sell it, that you remember me and share a small portion of your wealth so that I can pay off my credit card debt accumulated during college. 2116:

Strongly per Riana, and with a weak request that he changes his username as discussed below. Should make a fine administrator. I do understand the concerns raised by opposers about manual editing, but E (unlike so many candidates who fall into a similar category) has proven he has Clue.

2823:

reason I have made the suggestion of renaming myself is due to an earlier discussion where a few users would prefer that the username be changed due to reasons of, in my understanding, it 'being too small'. Although I have a new username in mind, I have since noted to myself that both

109:

images for use across Wikimedia. E has contributed significantly to the help desk and AIV, demonstrating a sound knowledge and application of policy, and has also assisted significantly in bot related issues. I believe E would make an excellent administrator, and I thus nominate him.

3989:

I would have hoped for an answer from the candidate himself to the question I asked; it was not rocket science. However, he seems to have a firm grasp of the basics. For negligent delegation, I mark him down, as my talk page is always open. For being well-spirited, I mark him up.

3618:

Well, to play devil's advocate... would you expect an RfA to be passed with a tally of 10/2/70? One could think of neutrals as bearing no weight, but one could also think of them as lending some weight to each side -- some inclination to support but with some reservations. —

2694:

I absolutely agree that attempting to source, improve and expand the article oneself would be the right thing to do, but there's a lot of editors and admins who don't bother and it's a bit hard on E to hold him to a higher standard than the depressingly trigger happy norm.

750:

believe that any such debate on IRC should ever be brought to the wiki, because it could potentially cause discourse. There is already have a tough job as a sysop for cleaning up backlog and 'eradicating' vandals. I hope my interpretation is correct. Seasons Greetings! —

2763:

Changed his username already, plans to change it again in a few months? We have enough anono-admins already with little connection to the identity they went through RFA as. Wait until you've figured out who you're going to be before you ask us to trust you as an admin.

690:

over the last couple of months. I would regard that as minimal for an aspiring admin, but since it seems that the Foundation, including Jimbo himself, sees this as important issue, but not so important as to hammer home the importance of saving life, then I can't blame

4027:

Neutral and suggest abandoning this account should this RfA not succeed (i.e. in case you're interested in helping out using the admin tools). Good faith, as far as not putting the ability to learn past fellow users goes, is practically nonexistent on Knowledge (XXG).

2648:

That was never my instinct in the first place. What if I never knew about this author? I would first offer the user to contribute further, including references and other sources, then tag it if it has not significantly improved from the state of the first revision. —

3912:

Sorry, I was just kidding around. My impression is that usernames are on a first-come, first-served basis around here. It's similar to getting a username on an email server, or indeed any other reservation of a finite resource. If you're the first person to grab

263:

chanop in late October 2007, and have since had to deal with many conflicts. In regard to the wiki, if there is any other areas that sysops would like me to try out, I'd be glad to take a look and familiarise myself with such processes/tools - just let me

3923:

or some other awkward number-appendaged thing. Reserving website urls is more closely akin to buying land, in that the value goes up and it can be easily resold (a wiki username by contrast carries the baggage associated with the previous user's legacy)

233:

In my spare time on the project, I am a recent changes and new pages typo patroller as both typo fixing and vandal fighting are in my field of interest. I revert any vandalism that I may find, followed by warning the user and then reporting them to

2890:

Maybe we should consider adding to the changing username directions to bureaucrats that a protected redirect to the user's RfA should be part of renaming a user with admin bit? I don't actually see the problem as the user can still be scrutinised.

3169:– relatively little activity in the mainspace beyond fighting vandalism and typos, and almost no substantive edits to the talk namespace. All administrators need a background in the mainspace, constructing articles and working with others. 238:

upon their fourth vandal edit. I will always attach a detailed description to my report as to why this user should have their editing privileges revoked. As a sysop, I anticipate to help out in various ways and in various areas, including

3877:

The short username shows that you had the foresight to snatch it up before anyone else, which puts you in a good position to auction it off on eBay or other venues in the wake of Knowledge (XXG)'s future expansion, much as some of the

2610:

never said AWB was automated, it's just a repetitive action that doesn't really give a user much insight into normal editing practice. Anyway, I'd invite readers to go through the contribs themselves and come to their own conclusions.

667:

was asking for. I think E wants to know whether the threat is of violence against the schoolkid who posted to AN/I, or of violence against the community. In other words, is the schoolkid reporting a threat against themself, or not?

3311:

99% per Blnguyen, but I would have liked to have seen the candidate step in and just give some of those users who have questioned those Opposing a little tap on the shoulder, and telling them to leave those Opposing alone.

322:

On-wiki, the conflict is not really common in my point of view. In my time here, I have been in around five conflicts with users for reasons such as article errors and image rationales. Also being a channel operator for

2634:

him to expand the page further. If the claims appear not to be true, I just delete the page." If you find a poor article on a worthy topic, your instinct should be to improve the article, not to tag it for deletion.

3361:

No, I believe Nick is saying E should have reigned his supporters in. I agree with Nick. If E had lightly chastised Cometstyles for his irrelevantly personal and uncivil remarks, I would have switched to support.

2189:- All arrows point to the bullseye. I don't think I've seen E around, even as Extranet, but looking through contributions, I suspect this is due to his gnomish editing nature. I think he'll excel as an admin. -- 1412:

disappointed if I see anyone opposing because of their disdain for single-letter usernames (indeed, such an oppose will destroy any remaining faith I have in the essential sanity and order of the Universe. :-))

1983:

Even though he lacks mainspace edits, his/her well rounded experience makes me think he/she is ready to be an admin. Still, mainspace edits are important though due to conflict issues you might entangled.

480:

In regard to this type of action, I would wait and see if the article creator was going to add any further detail to the article. During this process, it would also be in the author's interest to add the

1591:. Adminship is no big dea; I don't believe nom will abuse the tools. Adminship is not a reward for being a heavy-duty editor, and I don't believe the nom will confuse speedy deletion with hasty deletion. 897:

I must also add that in the event of one of my close family's friends' passing, I may not be able to answer user questions in a swift manner. I apologise for this and will try my best to stay focused. —

2301:

Moved to "weak support" based on s,uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs comment. I see no other problems with this candidate. I still don't like the updating of one's own tally, otherwise it would be just plain "support". --

2667:

If the author or article subject were unfamiliar to you, do a little research, then expand the article. Tagging an article before doing any research seems unwarranted; AfD is not article clean up. --

407:, improve the article and save it from deletion. Most articles that I do typo fix with this template intact do not last, so I have made the decision to exempt it. Hope this answers your question. — 105:. E's primary work on the encyclopedia is on a minor, background level, working to make it easier for us to contribute. He also creates articles, as is noted on his userpages, and has submitted 2869:

Totally understood. Sorry if I had offended anybody with my statement above regarding it being 'pinned on me'. I have only just found that they were, at the time, under a different username. —

622:

citing an editor who has put a real-life threat of violence on either an article or his/her talk page. It appears the original editor is a schoolkid. What's the appropriate response here?

2905:— This user has four RfAs in the past year. Admittedly, two of them were within about three weeks of other, and the last one was about six months ago; however, this user very clearly 302:

digital camera. I have also updated and provided logos of many different kinds to improve the quality of an article. In regard to my typo fixing, I use the semi-automated wiki editor,

3001:

Cometstyles, not everyone wants to be an administrator, and some people deliberately don't kiss ass. Your generalisations do not withstand scrutiny. --21:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

2987:

I've never heard an IAR justification for incivility before. I can't imagine how this is helping the encyclopedia. For what it's worth, I don't think you're doing E any favors here.

1751:, et cetera). Trustworthy and likeable, and will communicate as well with his syop. peers as he has with the community at large, to date. Best of all, will use the tools. Good luck! 579:

Firstly, I would have the community gather a clear consensus on whether the material should be reinstated and then someone with more knowledge in this area would be able to restore (

220:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge (XXG) as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1145:. It took me a second to remember which single-letter user was which... then I remembered E is that hard-working one with plenty of experience and dedication to the project. :) -- 1110:

Seeing as most of the opposition in the Previous attempts were simple no experiance i think it is clear that you now have significant experiance for this position. good luck!

539: 456:. The history indicates only two entries - the creation of the article by a new editor and the SD tag. What action would you take? Would A7 be the best criteria for deletion? 2497:- The lack of article-writing doesn't bother me. I think that E will know his limits, and not get involved in situations that he's not ready for and end up over his head. 306:

and absolutely enjoy using it! It functions by retrieving the latest 1000 new pages and using the RegExTypoFix module, it scans each of these pages and finds common typos.

3216:

With some regret -- I'm opposing mainly because I don't think E has had any real experience in disputes, even minor, and I think that's important for an administrator.

2166:

I have known E for some time now and he has plenty of experience and knowledge of the project that will make him an excellent administrator. Definitely has my support.

316:

Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

3588: 3461: 2809: 2751: 1494: 1316: 1063: 955: 403:

is on article' to the syntax of the process. To answer your question in full, I actually felt the need to edit such pages because it could potentially, not saying it

199: 121: 2951:

Kurt has a valid concern here, one expressed by many in numerous other RfAs. The harshness of your comment is unwarranted, especially in this context. The community

2832:

are sysops, and have had no previous debate regarding their usernames being 'too short' and was thinking to myself, why does it have to be brought out on me? I see

2560:

category pages. Also, with AWB, it is not such 'automated'. I do each page manually and then decide whether the typos presented are legitimate for the article.

2855:

used these names at the time of their RfAs. If they had, I likely would have encouraged them to consider a rename. It's nothing against you personally, E. --

792: 99: 3014:

to become admins do become admins because those who don't want to will just decline every nomination offer; this is why I see no merit to Kmweber's oppose. —

2586:, these such activities demonstrate an excellent willingness to perform many mundane sysop activities, and they everything to do with editing and experience 4053: 787: 96: 2952: 777: 4071: 2406:

The concerns brought up here are not big enough for me to oppose, or go neutral. You are not the ideal candidate for adminship, but who is? Good luck!--

1946:

Of course - I've seen E around for many months now and I'm always pleased when I see his name in discussion - he knows his stuff and he's always civil.

557:

without prior discussion as it could be a clear violation of some content policies. It may only be re-added or restored if it conforms to such policies.

3416:

I would like to see more encyclopedia-building from this candidate, especially as he seems rather ambitious in his desire to become an administrator.

944:

They probably are a bit confusing, but...well...OK, I don't really have a solid rebuttal, other than "how will it affect his ability to use the mop?"

3077:

hardly any contributions that were not mechanical - about 300 or so non mechanical article edits. Coupled with the high levels of RfAs, that is bad.

3061:

I disagree - some become administrators because they would like to help clear backlogs, not because they desire the position of administrator. --

2283:

No. The tally is just a count, I don't see how there would be a problem. Everyone does it, anyway. (Well, maybe not EVERYONE, but most people) --

1408:- Good work. I'd ideally like to see more substantial mainspace editing (i.e. building articles) but this isn't essential in an admin. I will be 984:

At the time of their requests for adminship Y and B had different user names. I echo Húsönd on this. I had an extremely bad run in with either

837: 491:

tag to denote their active creation of the article. If after a certain amount of time, this article is not further developed, it can be sent to

3724:

rename himself, I'm not adverse. But going under a single letter doesn't rub off well on me, showing some poor judgment from the candidate. --

53: 797: 106: 102: 3977:

good admins, I'd like to see more demonstration of dispute resolution and good judgement in situations which require judgement (on-wiki).

442:. As an admin, whilst perusing the current candidates you find an article with the following text (ignoring the name which I've made up); 4011:

and AN/I (except for the ones that just flame higher to ArbCom) and some experience there would show your temperment much more clearly.

40: 17: 2382: 2105: 1682: 1223:

An ironic support. I was thinking of nomming him/her last night, how co-incidental! Great work is evident right across the namespace.

1918:

Sure a diff username would make him easier to ID, but then again, does it hurt the encyclopedia anymore than 20 character usernames?

327:

has brought me into many conflicts with IRC users about how they react and complain after they have been given a temporary "quiet"

1387:

This is quite remarkable, a subsequent nom where the user actually heeded advice from his previous nom! I say we should support. -

867: 861: 1005: 3780:

I think E is an awesome name, and I think opposing on the basis of your particular name is lame. I think you should keep it.

3345:

and try to prove his innocence but people will take it out of context and oppose him for something he says here..bad idea...--

447:

Joe Symes is a noted author, who has written dozens of books for children and won an award for doing so. More to follow soon.

3629: 1999: 1274: 824: 3042:— someone who does not want the "reins of power", and only accepts them reluctantly at the strong behest of the community. 1026:

where I told W.marsh himself that I would have such links as a permanent fixture to my userpages if I was ever to rename. —

3671:

I understand your situation with this vote. I assure you I do understand the process and ways of the mainspace, however. —

917:

recall exactly where or what was my impression of his work. Quite confusing, even for someone who enjoys playing scrabble.

3581: 3492:

I may eventually get another usurpation in the next few months to a more common username if this does become a problem. —

3454: 2932:

want to do something for this wikipedia which in recent years has become a craphole filled with people like you trying to

2802: 2782: 2744: 2676:

AfD would be the last action I would take. Cleanup would always be in the first steps to take in improving the article. —

1844: 1487: 1309: 1171: 1056: 948: 192: 114: 3259: 2364: 2347: 1635: 1229: 773: 335:

for their actions towards other users. As usual, you need to resolve such issues in a sensible and professional manner.

3854: 3727: 3602: 3287: 2020: 1699: 1378: 643:

Sorry if I was unclear there; I meant a threat to commit violence to people in real life, e.g. a school massacre. --

2290: 3917: 1731: 831: 1859: 625:

Could you please clarify that this is a threat of violence to the individual themselves, or to the community. —

3578: 3451: 3367: 3155: 3137: 2992: 2799: 2776: 2741: 2615: 2550: 2428: 1873: 1484: 1306: 1165: 1053: 945: 290:

My favourite hobby is photography, and as you can see in the nominators statement, I have uploaded a few of my

189: 111: 2150:

I trust E not to go rouge or do anything stupid(well maybe a few muck ups while he gets used to the tools) --

4001: 3256: 2460: 2360: 2213: 1947: 1597: 1541: 884: 817: 706: 654: 88: 3978: 3951: 3929: 3891: 3822: 3599: 3237: 2892: 2700: 2195: 2100: 2081: 1714: 1696: 1677: 1451: 1430: 1196: 324: 260: 139: 3748:

Maxim, at this stage, I can give my definite answer of a username change within the next month or two. —

2247: 23: 4033: 3515: 3350: 3335: 3087: 2978: 2942: 2525: 2230: 1904: 1578: 1081: 924: 4052:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either

2790: 2765: 1592: 880: 743:

What influence should an IRC discussion have on admin actions and who is responsible for these actions?

3271: 2521: 3946: 3389: 3247: 3062: 2668: 2306: 2274: 2190: 2035: 1727: 1369:, nothing wrong with AWB contributions as long as he contributes in other ways too, which he does. -- 673: 3388:

Um, this comment...? Are you not aware of his much more offensive comments to Kurt Weber above? --

2721: 2324: 2243: 3545: 3363: 3191: 3151: 3133: 3079: 2988: 2726: 2611: 2583: 2546: 2424: 2226: 1985: 1869: 1658: 1334: 1291: 1132: 729: 67: 3609:

You are aware neutral votes contribute absolutely nothing towards the final result, aren't you? –

3992: 3771: 3699: 3691:

Leaning toward oppose, not confident that the user has enough experience in admin related tasks.

3426: 3417: 2860: 2598: 2485: 2466: 2339: 2209: 2016: 1992: 1933: 1536: 1252: 1224: 1013: 985: 697: 645: 604: 363: 2966: 2933: 682:

This unfocussed approach from all tells me that nobody really has a clue, or has been watching

4022: 4005: 3981: 3956: 3933: 3925: 3907: 3895: 3887: 3870: 3844: 3775: 3761: 3743: 3711: 3684: 3666: 3634: 3613: 3604: 3593: 3572: 3550: 3535: 3531: 3519: 3505: 3487: 3466: 3442: 3428: 3403: 3392: 3383: 3371: 3354: 3321: 3303: 3276: 3262: 3250: 3240: 3234: 3225: 3211: 3194: 3178: 3159: 3141: 3111: 3094: 3065: 3056: 3039: 3029: 2996: 2982: 2959: 2946: 2923: 2895: 2875: 2864: 2842: 2814: 2793: 2784: 2768: 2756: 2731: 2704: 2696: 2689: 2671: 2662: 2643: 2619: 2604: 2577: 2554: 2529: 2512: 2505: 2489: 2472: 2444: 2432: 2423:-3 unsuccessful Rfas is quite enough, I strongly support this user, he will make good admin!-- 2415: 2401: 2386: 2377: 2368: 2351: 2330: 2310: 2296: 2278: 2251: 2234: 2217: 2200: 2181: 2158: 2151: 2142: 2138: 2125: 2111: 2095: 2085: 2077: 2069: 2065: 2055: 2042: 2024: 2006: 1975:

Seeing as it's the most common letter in the alphabet, Ryan must be quite the happy chappy :o)

1970: 1941: 1927: 1923: 1910: 1889: 1877: 1862: 1853: 1839: 1821: 1810: 1794: 1778: 1773: 1759: 1735: 1718: 1710: 1701: 1687: 1672: 1662: 1645: 1621: 1602: 1583: 1559: 1546: 1523: 1499: 1478: 1455: 1447: 1434: 1426: 1417: 1400: 1382: 1361: 1339: 1321: 1296: 1279: 1258: 1232: 1218: 1188: 1173: 1158: 1152: 1137: 1123: 1102: 1098: 1085: 1068: 1032: 1017: 979: 960: 935: 911: 756: 733: 710: 677: 658: 638: 596: 522: 508: 472: 420: 375: 295: 204: 183: 161: 126: 72: 2836:

nothing wrong with my username, and would certainly like to know why it is such a problem. —

566: 352: 244: 4029: 4017: 3512: 3347: 3331: 3221: 3106: 3022: 2975: 2939: 2398: 2343: 1899: 1640: 1574: 1516: 1471: 1117: 1093:: Great work on improving since your last RfA, and improving Knowledge (XXG) in general! - 1078: 929: 3755: 3678: 3566: 3499: 3397:

It applies to all such comments on this RfA - everyone is entitled to their own opinion. —

3270:. Nom doesn't meet my criterion of a productive, successful editor in the mainspace. -- 2970: 2683: 2656: 2571: 1748: 1744: 1612: 905: 695:

for not answering the question; therefore, I neither support nor oppose his candidature. --

683: 632: 619: 590: 554: 543: 502: 492: 453: 414: 303: 248: 240: 235: 177: 3861: 3734: 3610: 3484: 3294: 3207: 2956: 2639: 2302: 2270: 2049: 1414: 1394: 1374: 669: 465: 687: 3317: 3188: 3034:

Not necessarily. As I have explained before, my ideal admin candidate is someone like

2287: 2167: 1654: 1461:

I-would-have-beat-the-nom-with-support-but-he-supported-before-this-RfA-was-transcluded

1331: 1288: 726: 485: 62: 2394:

There is nothing wrong with wanting to be an admin. I would trust E with the tools. --

4065: 3879: 3767: 3693: 3620: 2856: 2593: 2588: 2481: 2454: 2441: 2411: 2012: 1792: 1617: 1267: 1247: 1242: 1193:

As co-nom and E's admin coach, I give him my full support. He's ready for the mop.

1009: 357: 343: 2928:

What worries me is why our failing Arbcom didn't block you for harassing people who

3659: 3527: 3043: 2910: 2498: 2134: 1919: 1830: 1818: 1768: 1181: 1147: 1094: 583:) the article or texts. Please do let me know if my interpretation is incorrect. — 299: 1653:, no evidence that I can see that this editor would abuse the tools. Good luck! 1076:- He deserves to be an admin for all the hard work he has done over the years...-- 4037: 4012: 3943: 3921: 3914: 3559:

has been an administrator for a while now. I haven't seen no debate about it. —

3438: 3339: 3217: 3101: 3035: 3015: 2395: 2119: 1937: 1630: 1509: 1464: 1111: 919: 811: 518: 397: 387: 82: 1240:

looks like a great candidate with reputable users backing him. All the best, -

3766:

I think it's quite stylish. Besides, it's about what you do not what you are.

3510:

A very good point..his username is too short and too easily forgotten :P ...--

3203: 3175: 2635: 1804: 1553: 1388: 1370: 495:

where it should be nominated for deletion. Hope this answers your question. —

459: 430: 252: 4046:

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.

2452:

per Cometstyles (and Kurt Weber's oppose, which I completely disagree with).

438:

Hi E, and thanks for your request. I note from your Q1 you intend to help at

3882:

did in the early days of the dotcom boom. To relinquish it would be akin to

3658:

I would have supported him but the mainspace contributions are a bit low. --

3313: 2284: 2173: 1886: 170:

I kindly accept this nomination. Thank you Giggy.. and The Transhumanist. —

2955:

with you, let alone arbcom, and it's unclear why you mention them at all. –

351:

Why do you feel the need to run AWB typo fixing on articles that have been

1355:, I wanted to be the first to support ;) Seriously, though, good luck, E. 2407: 1787: 1752: 1356: 256: 3123:

I'm not normally a stickler for experience, but user appears to have no

393:

tags on them) a few weeks ago, I have added the exemption of 'Skip if

4056:

or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

3902: 3749: 3672: 3560: 3556: 3541: 3493: 3435: 3398: 3378: 3327: 3202:

Inexperienced, too eager for adminship, some temperamental concerns.

2870: 2852: 2848: 2837: 2829: 2825: 2677: 2650: 2565: 1302: 1027: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 974: 970: 966: 899: 807: 769: 751: 692: 664: 626: 584: 565:

If you wish to undelete an article citing the biographies policy (or

496: 408: 171: 78: 2265:

I would like to support you, but is it normal for RfA candidates to

3598:

Wait, so we don't count this in the tally? My mind, it explodes...

883:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review 439: 3883: 3330:

should step in and tell the opposers to leave themselves alone? I

383:

Since realising that I have been editing such articles (ones with

2225:

No reason to oppose or to believe that tools would be abused. --

3377:

their own opinions, and I can see where Nick is coming from. —

1352: 274:

What are your best contributions to Knowledge (XXG), and why?

168:

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

1535:

I supported last time and my support is stronger this time.

1858:

I thought he was ready 5 months ago, so why not now? ;-) --

2269:

on their own RfA? Isn't that a conflict of interest? --

1442:; having admins who understand what the bots do (really, 36:

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a

2847:

I commented on this in the discussion section. Neither

1483:

Yeah, that and another 19 people got in ahead of you ;)

3128: 2564:

as AWB is just another 'browser' as you may call it. —

2266: 1023: 855: 849: 843: 540:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Badlydrawnjeff

534: 1425:

I like your answer to Q5, I like your username too :)

1743:, good participation in administrator-related areas ( 1629:

Glad to be able to support this time. Best of luck!

663:

I'm not sure whether that provides the clarification

452:

The text has been tagged with a speedy request under

3450:- Vote was placed after RfA was scheduled to close. 2909:to be an administrator. Frankly, that worries me. 1885:— I thought he already was an administrator ... -- 3284:

per my neutral comments below, and per Blnguyen. --

1537: 1004:(one of the freebie letters in the final puzzle on 3920:, as it were, and everyone else has to settle for 2937:saying goes "quit while you are ahead"..Vinaka..-- 2061:I forgot that I hadn't already supposrted support 259:network. I started the trustworthy position of a 95:for adminship. This is his fourth RfA; see also: 793:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Extranet2 569:as well), what steps would you take? What steps 3326:Not sure I understand this. You're saying that 1767:Certainly ready for admin tools, will do well. 788:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Extranet 227:What admin work do you intend to take part in? 3577:Wow, people taking a Gurch-joke seriously :O 2520:I don't feel that you would abuse the tools. 1709:- Per Master of Puppets. I like his answers. 1266:Great editor, lots of experience. Good Luck! 1163:I figuratively got out of bed for this :P -- 8: 3127:experience in content disputes of any kind ( 1022:Thank you for your opinion. Please refer to 2740:oppose for a lack of mainspace contribs... 1726:I think he will do a fine job as an admin. 1573: 3621: 1542: 1305:- don't wanna go causing confusion here! 60:Final (72/19/6); Closed as successful by 24:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/E2 3233:per Blnguyen, although not as strongly. 2242:Looks like E would make a fine admin. -- 879:Please keep discussion constructive and 798:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/E 1351:. How rude, putting this up when I was 546:, and what is your understanding of it? 544:biographies of living persons concerns 18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship 1829:as the previous comments have shown. 7: 2562:I am gaining experience through this 2032:Per Nom, E deserves to be an admin. 3125:article-writing experience, nor any 725:Additional optional question from 298:. These photos were taken with my 31: 4072:Successful requests for adminship 2093:No qualms with this candidate. -- 1567:. Sure, won't abuse the tools. 607:, posted 12:56, 21 December 2007 542:about undeleting articles citing 91:) - It's my pleasure to nominate 3418: 2133:per above. Lots of good edits. 1845: 1840: 1832: 1753: 1446:understand) is a Good Thing. -- 1335: 1292: 3993: 2589: 2545:(XXG) editing and experience. 2506: 2499: 1357: 1243: 776:. For the edit count, see the 698: 646: 1: 4023:16:45, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 4006:03:05, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 3982:00:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 3957:14:26, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 3934:16:11, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 3908:07:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 3896:03:35, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 3871:03:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 3845:03:09, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 3776:20:53, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 3762:22:12, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 3744:22:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 3712:03:47, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 3685:00:24, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 3667:00:10, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 3635:09:07, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 3614:21:43, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 3605:07:16, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 3594:05:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 3573:00:24, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 3551:23:58, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 3536:18:12, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 3520:14:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 3506:13:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 3488:11:54, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 3467:02:03, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 3443:02:01, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 3429:22:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 3404:00:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 3393:00:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 3384:21:22, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 3372:21:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 3355:19:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 3322:19:10, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 3304:13:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 3277:05:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 3263:07:37, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 3251:07:15, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 3241:02:29, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 3226:22:40, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 3212:16:10, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 3195:12:47, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 3179:16:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 3160:10:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 3146:Wrong about article-writing. 3142:10:11, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 3112:16:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 3095:03:42, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 3066:21:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 3057:03:46, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 3030:17:52, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2997:11:53, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2983:11:22, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2960:10:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2947:10:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2924:03:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2896:00:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 2876:01:03, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2865:01:02, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2843:06:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 2815:06:49, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 2794:06:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 2785:06:32, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 2769:06:29, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 2757:05:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 2732:05:11, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 2705:05:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 2690:04:59, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 2672:03:46, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 2663:00:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 2644:21:05, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 2620:14:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 2605:10:41, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 2594: 2578:05:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 2555:05:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 2530:23:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 2513:21:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 2490:20:01, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 2473:18:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 2445:18:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 2433:18:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 2416:17:44, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 2402:16:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 2387:15:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 2369:11:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 2352:02:14, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 2338:More than enough experience. 2331:00:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 2311:22:16, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 2297:19:33, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 2279:19:19, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 2252:04:51, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 2235:04:12, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 2218:03:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 2201:13:51, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 2182:12:39, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 2159:10:40, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 2143:10:21, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 2126:10:16, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 2112:07:03, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 2086:03:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 2070:20:11, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2056:13:43, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2043:04:02, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2025:03:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2007:01:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 1971:17:18, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1942:14:07, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1928:08:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1911:06:57, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1905: 1900: 1890:05:53, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1878:00:52, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1863:00:17, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1854:00:16, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1822:00:15, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1811:20:29, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 1805: 1795:17:54, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 1779:15:52, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 1760:13:10, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 1736:12:35, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 1719:09:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 1702:07:16, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 1695:Strong answers to questions. 1688:07:00, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 1663:04:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 1646:04:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 1622:02:54, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 1603:01:10, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 1584:22:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1560:21:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1547:20:31, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1524:16:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 1500:05:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 1479:20:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1456:20:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1435:17:54, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1418:14:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1401:13:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1383:13:44, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1362:13:12, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1340:12:04, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 1322:05:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 1297:12:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1280:12:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1259:10:42, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1248: 1233:10:05, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1219:09:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1189:09:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1174:08:50, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1159:06:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1138:06:07, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1124:05:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1103:05:12, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1086:05:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1069:02:05, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 1033:01:02, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 1018:00:54, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 980:06:52, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 961:07:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 936:06:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 912:04:40, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 757:20:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 734:13:59, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 711:03:01, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 678:02:11, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 659:22:47, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 639:00:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 597:14:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 523:12:02, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 509:14:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 473:08:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 421:06:09, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 376:06:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 205:09:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 184:04:37, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 162:09:29, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 127:01:59, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 73:02:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 3918:The early bird gets the worm 3546: 3274: 2599: 1897:. Would make a great admin. 1253: 1133: 3720:)As long as the candidate 2322:Seems to be a good editor. 2174: 2171: 1395: 772:'s edit summary usage with 216:Questions for the candidate 188:You're welcome Extranet ;) 4088: 3433:Per Blnguyen and Xoloz -- 2969:can get things done then 1504:I blame my need to sleep. 1287:(that is, not the user) -- 603:Additional questions from 517:Additional questions from 1610:Would be a good admin. -- 251:and of course the famous 4049:Please do not modify it. 3938:I'm getting the feeling 3526:It is a joke, right? - 1671:Of course. Good luck! 885:Special:Contributions/E 342:Optional question from 45:Please do not modify it 3555:That's exactly right. 532:Were you aware of the 449: 3851:Am I opposing? :-/ -- 3481:Username is too short 2819:The only, and I mean 2789:3 minutes... nice. -- 1786:I think you're ready 445: 41:request for adminship 784:RfAs for this user: 3583:Dihydrogen Monoxide 3540:Oh yeah? Check out 3456:Dihydrogen Monoxide 3129:32 talk page edits, 2804:Dihydrogen Monoxide 2798:3 minutes... nice. 2778:Anonymous Dissident 2746:Dihydrogen Monoxide 2720:per RxS's concern. 1489:Dihydrogen Monoxide 1311:Dihydrogen Monoxide 1167:Anonymous Dissident 1091:Very Strong Support 1074:Very Strong Support 1058:Dihydrogen Monoxide 965:Husond, what about 950:Dihydrogen Monoxide 618:An editor posts to 194:Dihydrogen Monoxide 116:Dihydrogen Monoxide 4020: 4015: 3942:had to settle for 3257:Christopher Parham 3109: 3104: 2781: 2329: 2036:Thedjatclubrock :) 1868:support. So I do. 1582: 1170: 934: 887:before commenting. 46: 4018: 4013: 3866: 3739: 3600:Master of Puppets 3299: 3107: 3102: 3040:George Washington 3028: 2775: 2488: 2385: 2326:S♦s♦e♦b♦a♦l♦l♦o♦s 2323: 2295: 2180: 2084: 1850: 1697:Master of Puppets 1522: 1477: 1164: 918: 471: 296:Wikimedia Commons 44: 22:(Redirected from 4079: 4051: 3997: 3954: 3949: 3916:, good for you. 3905: 3868: 3864: 3860: 3857: 3840: 3837: 3834: 3831: 3828: 3825: 3758: 3752: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3730: 3710: 3707: 3704: 3696: 3681: 3675: 3664: 3625: 3569: 3563: 3548: 3518: 3502: 3496: 3424: 3423: 3401: 3381: 3353: 3301: 3297: 3293: 3290: 3275: 3090: 3082: 3053: 3050: 3020: 2981: 2945: 2920: 2917: 2873: 2840: 2779: 2736:Oh come on! You 2729: 2724: 2686: 2680: 2659: 2653: 2601: 2596: 2591: 2574: 2568: 2510: 2503: 2484: 2469: 2463: 2457: 2381: 2359:per Kurt Weber. 2327: 2293: 2267:update the tally 2198: 2193: 2179: 2176: 2170: 2164:Festive support. 2155: 2122: 2108: 2103: 2098: 2080: 2053: 2039: 2021:Report a mistake 2004: 1997: 1990: 1967: 1965: 1963: 1961: 1959: 1936:, but I approve 1907: 1902: 1851: 1846: 1841: 1836: 1807: 1802:- definitely. 1790: 1757: 1675: 1643: 1638: 1633: 1620: 1615: 1600: 1595: 1571: 1570:Happy Holidays!! 1556: 1544: 1539: 1514: 1507: 1469: 1397: 1359: 1337: 1329: 1294: 1270: 1255: 1250: 1245: 1227: 1214: 1211: 1208: 1205: 1202: 1199: 1184: 1168: 1155: 1150: 1135: 1120: 1114: 1084: 1030: 1006:Wheel of Fortune 977: 932: 927: 922: 908: 902: 871: 830: 763:General comments 754: 702: 650: 635: 629: 593: 587: 537: 505: 499: 490: 484: 470: 468: 457: 417: 411: 402: 396: 392: 386: 374: 371: 368: 360: 180: 174: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 70: 27: 4087: 4086: 4082: 4081: 4080: 4078: 4077: 4076: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4054:this nomination 4047: 3952: 3947: 3903: 3867: 3862: 3855: 3853: 3838: 3835: 3832: 3829: 3826: 3823: 3760: 3756: 3750: 3740: 3735: 3728: 3726: 3718:moved to oppose 3705: 3700: 3694: 3692: 3683: 3679: 3673: 3660: 3632: 3592: 3571: 3567: 3561: 3511: 3504: 3500: 3494: 3477: 3465: 3419: 3399: 3379: 3346: 3300: 3295: 3288: 3286: 3088: 3080: 3051: 3048: 3010:Only users who 2974: 2938: 2918: 2915: 2871: 2838: 2813: 2777: 2755: 2728:Happy Holidays 2727: 2722: 2688: 2684: 2678: 2661: 2657: 2651: 2576: 2572: 2566: 2538: 2467: 2461: 2455: 2361:Jon Harald Søby 2325: 2196: 2191: 2153: 2120: 2106: 2101: 2096: 2051: 2033: 2000: 1993: 1986: 1957: 1955: 1953: 1951: 1949: 1788: 1728:Masterpiece2000 1685: 1680: 1673: 1641: 1636: 1631: 1613: 1611: 1598: 1593: 1569: 1554: 1505: 1498: 1399: 1327: 1320: 1277: 1268: 1225: 1212: 1209: 1206: 1203: 1200: 1197: 1182: 1178:But of course! 1166: 1153: 1148: 1122: 1118: 1112: 1077: 1067: 1049: 1028: 975: 959: 930: 925: 920: 910: 906: 900: 894: 823: 806: 802: 765: 752: 637: 633: 627: 595: 591: 585: 533: 507: 503: 497: 488: 482: 466: 458: 419: 415: 409: 400: 394: 390: 384: 369: 364: 358: 356: 304:AutoWikiBrowser 218: 203: 182: 178: 172: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 125: 61: 57: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4085: 4083: 4075: 4074: 4064: 4063: 4059: 4058: 4042: 4041: 4025: 4008: 3984: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3880:cybersquatters 3875: 3874: 3873: 3859: 3764: 3754: 3746: 3732: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3677: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3628: 3586: 3565: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3498: 3476: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3459: 3431: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3306: 3292: 3279: 3265: 3255:Per Blnguyen. 3253: 3243: 3228: 3214: 3197: 3181: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3059: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 2999: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2807: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2749: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2682: 2655: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2570: 2537: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2515: 2492: 2475: 2447: 2435: 2425:Kushan I.A.K.J 2418: 2404: 2389: 2371: 2354: 2333: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2254: 2237: 2220: 2203: 2184: 2161: 2145: 2128: 2114: 2088: 2072: 2058: 2045: 2027: 2009: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1944: 1930: 1913: 1892: 1883:Strong Support 1880: 1870:LessHeard vanU 1865: 1856: 1824: 1813: 1797: 1781: 1762: 1738: 1721: 1704: 1690: 1683: 1678: 1666: 1648: 1624: 1605: 1586: 1562: 1549: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1492: 1458: 1437: 1420: 1403: 1393: 1385: 1364: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1314: 1282: 1273: 1261: 1235: 1221: 1191: 1176: 1161: 1140: 1126: 1116: 1105: 1088: 1071: 1061: 1052:As nominator. 1048: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 953: 939: 938: 914: 904: 893: 890: 876: 875: 874: 872: 801: 800: 795: 790: 783: 782: 781: 774:mathbot's tool 764: 761: 760: 759: 744: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 631: 600: 599: 589: 574: 559: 558: 547: 514: 513: 512: 511: 501: 444: 443: 433: 429:Question from 426: 425: 424: 423: 413: 355:for deletion? 346: 339: 338: 337: 336: 310: 309: 308: 307: 285: 284: 283: 282: 268: 267: 266: 265: 217: 214: 212: 210: 209: 208: 207: 197: 176: 119: 56: 51: 50: 49: 32: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4084: 4073: 4070: 4069: 4067: 4057: 4055: 4050: 4044: 4043: 4039: 4035: 4031: 4026: 4024: 4021: 4016: 4009: 4007: 4003: 3999: 3998: 3996: 3995:Rodhullandemu 3988: 3985: 3983: 3980: 3975: 3972: 3958: 3955: 3950: 3944: 3941: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3931: 3927: 3922: 3919: 3915: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3906: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3893: 3889: 3885: 3881: 3876: 3872: 3869: 3865: 3858: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3846: 3843: 3842: 3841: 3819: 3815: 3811: 3807: 3803: 3799: 3795: 3794:effervescence 3791: 3787: 3783: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3773: 3769: 3765: 3763: 3759: 3753: 3747: 3745: 3742: 3738: 3731: 3723: 3719: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3709: 3708: 3703: 3697: 3690: 3686: 3682: 3676: 3670: 3669: 3668: 3665: 3663: 3657: 3654: 3653: 3636: 3631: 3626: 3624: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3612: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3603: 3601: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3590: 3585: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3570: 3564: 3558: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3549: 3543: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3533: 3529: 3525: 3521: 3517: 3514: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3503: 3497: 3491: 3490: 3489: 3486: 3482: 3479: 3478: 3474: 3468: 3463: 3458: 3457: 3453: 3449: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3441: 3440: 3437: 3432: 3430: 3427: 3425: 3422: 3415: 3405: 3402: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3391: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3382: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3370: 3369: 3365: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3349: 3344: 3343: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3324: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3310: 3307: 3305: 3302: 3298: 3291: 3283: 3280: 3278: 3273: 3269: 3266: 3264: 3261: 3258: 3254: 3252: 3249: 3244: 3242: 3239: 3236: 3232: 3229: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3201: 3198: 3196: 3193: 3190: 3185: 3182: 3180: 3177: 3174: 3173: 3168: 3165: 3161: 3158: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3140: 3139: 3135: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3121: 3117: 3113: 3110: 3105: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3092: 3091: 3084: 3083: 3076: 3075:Strong oppose 3073: 3067: 3064: 3060: 3058: 3054: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3026: 3025: 3019: 3018: 3013: 3009: 3000: 2998: 2995: 2994: 2990: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2980: 2977: 2972: 2968: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2958: 2954: 2953:doesn't agree 2950: 2949: 2948: 2944: 2941: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2921: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2901: 2897: 2894: 2889: 2877: 2874: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2841: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2822: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2811: 2806: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2792: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2783: 2780: 2774:relevant. -- 2772: 2771: 2770: 2767: 2762: 2758: 2753: 2748: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2730: 2725: 2719: 2716: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2687: 2681: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2670: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2660: 2654: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2632: 2629: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2603: 2602: 2597: 2592: 2585: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2575: 2569: 2563: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2543: 2540: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2516: 2514: 2511: 2509: 2504: 2502: 2496: 2493: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2476: 2474: 2471: 2470: 2464: 2459: 2458: 2451: 2448: 2446: 2443: 2439: 2436: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2419: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2403: 2400: 2397: 2393: 2390: 2388: 2384: 2379: 2375: 2372: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2355: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2334: 2332: 2328: 2321: 2318: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2292: 2289: 2286: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2263:Weak support. 2261: 2259: 2255: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2238: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2221: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2210:Tijuana Brass 2207: 2204: 2202: 2199: 2194: 2188: 2185: 2183: 2177: 2169: 2165: 2162: 2160: 2157: 2156: 2149: 2146: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2129: 2127: 2124: 2123: 2115: 2113: 2110: 2109: 2104: 2099: 2092: 2089: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2076: 2073: 2071: 2068: 2067: 2062: 2059: 2057: 2054: 2046: 2044: 2041: 2038: 2037: 2031: 2028: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2008: 2005: 2003: 1998: 1996: 1991: 1989: 1982: 1979: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1969: 1968: 1945: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1934:Mailer diablo 1931: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1914: 1912: 1909: 1908: 1903: 1896: 1893: 1891: 1888: 1884: 1881: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1866: 1864: 1861: 1857: 1855: 1852: 1849: 1842: 1838: 1837: 1835: 1828: 1825: 1823: 1820: 1817: 1814: 1812: 1809: 1808: 1801: 1798: 1796: 1793: 1791: 1785: 1782: 1780: 1776: 1775: 1770: 1766: 1763: 1761: 1758: 1756: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1739: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1722: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1705: 1703: 1700: 1698: 1694: 1691: 1689: 1686: 1681: 1676: 1670: 1667: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1649: 1647: 1644: 1639: 1634: 1628: 1625: 1623: 1619: 1616: 1609: 1606: 1604: 1601: 1596: 1590: 1587: 1585: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1566: 1563: 1561: 1558: 1557: 1550: 1548: 1545: 1540: 1534: 1531: 1525: 1520: 1519: 1513: 1512: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1496: 1491: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1475: 1474: 1468: 1467: 1462: 1459: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1438: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1421: 1419: 1416: 1411: 1407: 1404: 1402: 1398: 1392: 1391: 1386: 1384: 1380: 1379:contributions 1376: 1372: 1368: 1365: 1363: 1360: 1354: 1350: 1347: 1341: 1338: 1333: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1318: 1313: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1295: 1290: 1286: 1283: 1281: 1276: 1271: 1265: 1262: 1260: 1257: 1256: 1251: 1246: 1239: 1236: 1234: 1231: 1228: 1222: 1220: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1192: 1190: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1177: 1175: 1172: 1169: 1162: 1160: 1157: 1156: 1151: 1144: 1141: 1139: 1136: 1130: 1127: 1125: 1121: 1115: 1109: 1106: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1089: 1087: 1083: 1080: 1075: 1072: 1070: 1065: 1060: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1034: 1031: 1025: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 987: 983: 982: 981: 978: 972: 968: 964: 963: 962: 957: 952: 951: 947: 943: 942: 941: 940: 937: 933: 928: 923: 915: 913: 909: 903: 896: 895: 891: 889: 888: 886: 882: 873: 869: 866: 863: 860: 857: 854: 851: 848: 845: 842: 839: 836: 833: 829: 826: 822: 819: 816: 813: 809: 805:Links for E: 804: 803: 799: 796: 794: 791: 789: 786: 785: 779: 775: 771: 767: 766: 762: 758: 755: 748: 745: 742: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 731: 728: 712: 708: 704: 703: 701: 700:Rodhullandemu 694: 689: 685: 681: 680: 679: 675: 671: 666: 662: 661: 660: 656: 652: 651: 649: 648:Rodhullandemu 642: 641: 640: 636: 630: 624: 623: 621: 617: 614: 613: 612: 611: 608: 606: 605:Rodhullandemu 598: 594: 588: 582: 578: 575: 572: 568: 564: 561: 560: 556: 551: 548: 545: 541: 536: 531: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 520: 510: 506: 500: 494: 487: 479: 476: 475: 474: 469: 463: 462: 455: 451: 450: 448: 441: 437: 434: 432: 428: 427: 422: 418: 412: 406: 399: 389: 382: 379: 378: 377: 373: 372: 367: 361: 354: 350: 347: 345: 341: 340: 334: 330: 326: 321: 318: 317: 315: 312: 311: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 288: 287: 286: 279: 276: 275: 273: 270: 269: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 237: 232: 229: 228: 226: 223: 222: 221: 215: 213: 206: 201: 196: 195: 191: 187: 186: 185: 181: 175: 169: 166: 165: 164: 163: 160: 159: 158: 136:completely. 134: 129: 128: 123: 118: 117: 113: 108: 104: 101: 98: 94: 90: 87: 84: 80: 76: 75: 74: 69: 66: 65: 55: 52: 48: 42: 39: 34: 33: 25: 19: 4048: 4045: 3994: 3991: 3986: 3979:Orderinchaos 3973: 3939: 3926:Sarsaparilla 3888:Sarsaparilla 3852: 3821: 3820: 3817: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3801: 3797: 3793: 3789: 3785: 3781: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3701: 3698: 3661: 3655: 3622: 3582: 3480: 3455: 3447: 3434: 3420: 3366: 3308: 3285: 3281: 3267: 3235:Sean William 3230: 3199: 3183: 3171: 3170: 3166: 3154: 3147: 3136: 3124: 3119: 3118: 3089:bananabucket 3086: 3078: 3074: 3047: 3023: 3016: 3011: 2991: 2929: 2914: 2906: 2902: 2893:Orderinchaos 2833: 2820: 2803: 2745: 2737: 2717: 2697:Nick mallory 2630: 2587: 2561: 2541: 2517: 2507: 2500: 2494: 2477: 2465: 2453: 2449: 2437: 2420: 2391: 2378:UltraExactZZ 2373: 2356: 2335: 2319: 2262: 2257: 2256: 2239: 2222: 2205: 2186: 2163: 2152: 2147: 2130: 2118: 2094: 2090: 2078:RyanGerbil10 2074: 2066:Phoenix-wiki 2064: 2060: 2048:attitude. ~ 2040: 2034: 2029: 2011:Looks good. 2001: 1994: 1987: 1981:Weak Support 1980: 1948: 1915: 1898: 1894: 1882: 1847: 1833: 1831: 1826: 1815: 1803: 1799: 1783: 1772: 1764: 1754: 1740: 1723: 1711:PookeyMaster 1706: 1692: 1668: 1650: 1626: 1607: 1588: 1568: 1564: 1552: 1532: 1517: 1510: 1488: 1472: 1465: 1460: 1448:EncycloPetey 1443: 1439: 1427:Mr Senseless 1422: 1409: 1405: 1389: 1366: 1348: 1310: 1284: 1263: 1241: 1237: 1195: 1194: 1180: 1179: 1146: 1142: 1128: 1107: 1090: 1073: 1057: 949: 878: 877: 864: 858: 852: 846: 840: 834: 827: 820: 814: 746: 740: 724: 723: 699: 696: 647: 644: 615: 610: 602: 601: 580: 576: 570: 562: 549: 529: 516: 515: 477: 460: 446: 435: 404: 380: 365: 362: 348: 332: 331:or even ban 329:(/mode +b %) 328: 319: 313: 300:Casio Exilim 291: 277: 271: 230: 224: 219: 211: 193: 167: 138: 137: 132: 130: 115: 92: 85: 77: 63: 59: 58: 37: 35: 4038:December 27 4030:dorftrottel 3802:exemplarism 3340:December 27 3332:dorftrottel 3272:Iterator12n 3148:Weak oppose 3036:Cincinnatus 2934:destabilize 2718:Weak oppose 2631:Weak oppose 2522:Icestorm815 2082:(Говорить!) 1575:Malinaccier 1353:fast asleep 1326:Clarified. 1301:There is a 581:or undelete 3786:excellence 3390:Iamunknown 3248:Iamunknown 3063:Iamunknown 3044:Kurt Weber 2911:Kurt Weber 2834:absolutely 2723:NHRHS2010 2669:Iamunknown 2582:Actually, 2303:Coppertwig 2271:Coppertwig 1684:(contribs) 1674:Midorihana 892:Discussion 670:Coppertwig 333:(/mode +b) 325:#wikipedia 261:#wikipedia 38:successful 4036:I 19:54, 3810:energetic 3364:Cool Hand 3338:I 19:45, 3152:Cool Hand 3134:Cool Hand 2989:Cool Hand 2244:S.dedalus 1940:message. 1860:Agüeybaná 1655:Lankiveil 1599:cierekim 1024:this edit 850:block log 778:talk page 573:you take? 521:, posted 454:WP:CSD#A7 294:shots to 131:I co-nom 4066:Category 3768:Gutworth 3623:xDanielx 3421:gaillimh 3081:Blnguyen 2971:so be it 2967:uncivil 2930:actually 2857:JayHenry 2482:DerHexer 2442:Charitwo 2399:(Mschel) 2383:Evidence 2227:Strothra 2075:Support. 2013:JetLover 1932:I'm not 1269:Harland1 1010:JayHenry 818:contribs 571:wouldn't 553:must be 535:decision 353:proposed 344:Mr.Z-man 257:Freenode 107:numerous 89:contribs 3987:Neutral 3974:Neutral 3662:JForget 3656:Neutral 3528:Rjd0060 3475:Neutral 3342:, 2007 2791:W.marsh 2766:W.marsh 2518:Support 2495:Support 2478:Support 2450:Support 2438:Support 2421:Support 2392:Support 2374:Support 2357:Support 2336:Support 2320:Support 2258:Neutral 2240:Support 2223:Support 2206:Support 2187:Support 2148:Support 2135:Stupid2 2131:Support 2091:Support 2030:Support 1920:Mbisanz 1916:Support 1895:Support 1834:Marlith 1827:Support 1819:John254 1816:Support 1800:Support 1784:Support 1769:GDonato 1765:Support 1755:Anthøny 1741:Support 1724:Support 1707:Support 1693:Support 1669:Support 1651:Support 1627:Support 1618:iva1979 1608:Support 1589:Support 1565:Support 1538:Captain 1533:Support 1440:Support 1423:Support 1406:Support 1367:Support 1349:Support 1264:Support 1238:Support 1183:Snowolf 1149:krimpet 1143:Support 1129:Support 1108:Support 1095:Rjd0060 1047:Support 825:deleted 732:posted 555:deleted 264:know :) 4040:, 2007 4014:Avruch 3863:(talk) 3736:(talk) 3589:Review 3542:User:B 3516:styles 3462:Review 3351:styles 3309:Oppose 3296:(talk) 3282:Oppose 3268:Oppose 3260:(talk) 3231:Oppose 3218:Ral315 3200:Oppose 3184:Oppose 3167:Oppose 3120:Oppose 3103:Avruch 3052:Colts! 3017:Animum 2979:styles 2943:styles 2919:Colts! 2903:Oppose 2810:Review 2752:Review 2542:Oppose 2536:Oppose 2486:(Talk) 2340:Shalom 2294:(st47) 2288:ʎʇɹnoɟ 2121:Daniel 2050:Riana 1906:larity 1679:(talk) 1511:Animum 1495:Review 1466:Animum 1444:really 1415:Walton 1317:Review 1113:Sirkad 1082:styles 1064:Review 1002:User:T 998:User:R 994:User:L 990:User:E 986:User:N 971:User:Y 967:User:B 956:Review 693:User:E 684:WP:ANI 620:WP:ANI 519:Daniel 281:sysop. 253:SPEEDY 200:Review 122:Review 68:scribe 3953:linca 3948:linca 3884:Sears 3856:Maxim 3729:Maxim 3611:Gurch 3547:Maser 3513:Comet 3485:Gurch 3348:Comet 3289:Maxim 3204:Xoloz 3192:garra 3176:Meegs 2976:Comet 2973:...-- 2957:Pomte 2940:Comet 2907:wants 2738:never 2636:Kusma 2348:Peace 2344:Hello 2285:uǝʌǝs 2197:linca 2192:linca 2172:(aka 2154:Chris 2097:Shark 1901:Singu 1806:jj137 1555:Spebi 1551:Yah. 1543:panda 1390:JodyB 1371:Aqwis 1336:desat 1293:desat 1134:Maser 1079:Comet 881:civil 832:count 730:garra 688:WP:AN 609:(UTC) 486:inuse 467:Chat 461:Pedro 440:C:CSD 431:Pedro 16:< 4034:talk 4019:talk 4002:Talk 3930:talk 3892:talk 3827:e Tr 3818:etc. 3816:for 3808:for 3800:for 3792:for 3784:for 3772:talk 3722:will 3532:talk 3448:Note 3439:not? 3368:Luke 3336:talk 3318:talk 3314:Nick 3222:talk 3208:talk 3189:Gnan 3156:Luke 3138:Luke 3108:talk 3024:talk 3012:want 2993:Luke 2861:talk 2851:nor 2828:and 2821:only 2701:talk 2640:talk 2616:talk 2590:Pump 2551:talk 2526:talk 2508:lana 2468:Love 2456:Lara 2429:talk 2412:talk 2396:Mark 2365:talk 2307:talk 2275:talk 2248:talk 2231:talk 2214:talk 2175:Wimt 2168:Will 2139:talk 2102:face 2017:talk 1995:ston 1924:talk 1887:Cobi 1874:talk 1774:talk 1732:talk 1715:talk 1659:talk 1632:Jmlk 1594:Dloh 1579:talk 1518:talk 1473:talk 1452:talk 1431:talk 1410:very 1396:talk 1375:talk 1332:Core 1289:Core 1244:Pump 1201:e Tr 1119:talk 1099:talk 1014:talk 973:? — 969:and 862:rfar 844:logs 812:talk 768:See 727:Gnan 707:Talk 674:talk 655:Talk 567:OTRS 405:will 292:good 245:RFPP 144:e Tr 83:talk 3940:you 3839:ist 3836:man 3830:ans 3812:. 3804:. 3796:. 3788:. 3757:BAG 3706:man 3695:Mr. 3680:BAG 3568:BAG 3501:BAG 3038:or 2685:BAG 2658:BAG 2612:RxS 2584:RxS 2573:BAG 2547:RxS 2501:Kei 2408:SJP 2107:217 2019:) ( 1988:Pre 1789:SQL 1749:XfD 1745:AIV 1506::-P 1358:Qst 1213:ist 1210:man 1204:ans 1000:or 996:or 992:or 988:or 921:Hús 907:BAG 868:spi 838:AfD 686:or 634:BAG 592:BAG 538:in 504:BAG 493:AfD 416:BAG 370:man 359:Mr. 249:UAA 241:AIV 236:AIV 179:BAG 156:ist 153:man 147:ans 71:at 64:WjB 4068:: 4032:I 4028:I 4004:) 3990:-- 3932:) 3894:) 3833:hu 3824:Th 3774:) 3702:Z- 3633:\ 3544:. 3534:) 3483:– 3334:I 3320:) 3224:) 3210:) 3150:. 3093:) 3055:) 3049:Go 2922:) 2916:Go 2863:) 2764:-- 2703:) 2642:) 2618:) 2600:up 2595:me 2553:) 2528:) 2440:-- 2431:) 2414:) 2367:) 2350:) 2346:• 2309:) 2291:ʇs 2277:) 2260:: 2250:) 2233:) 2216:) 2141:) 2063:-- 2023:) 1966:te 1964:ai 1962:hw 1960:et 1958:tl 1956:os 1952:an 1950:Ry 1938:MY 1926:) 1876:) 1777:) 1747:, 1734:) 1717:) 1661:) 1454:) 1433:) 1381:) 1377:– 1330:-- 1328:;) 1278:) 1272:(/ 1254:up 1249:me 1226:Rt 1207:hu 1198:Th 1131:. 1101:) 1016:) 931:nd 856:lu 747:A. 741:9. 709:) 676:) 668:-- 657:) 616:8. 577:A. 563:7. 550:A. 530:6. 489:}} 483:{{ 478:A. 464:: 436:5. 401:}} 398:db 395:{{ 391:}} 388:db 385:{{ 381:A. 366:Z- 349:4. 320:A: 314:3. 278:A: 272:2. 247:, 243:, 231:A: 225:1. 150:hu 141:Th 43:. 4000:( 3928:( 3904:E 3890:( 3814:E 3806:E 3798:E 3790:E 3782:E 3770:( 3751:E 3716:( 3674:E 3630:C 3627:/ 3591:) 3587:( 3579:— 3562:E 3557:B 3530:( 3495:E 3464:) 3460:( 3452:— 3436:Y 3400:E 3380:E 3328:E 3316:( 3238:@ 3220:( 3206:( 3172:× 3085:( 3046:( 3027:) 3021:( 2913:( 2872:E 2859:( 2853:Y 2849:B 2839:E 2830:Y 2826:B 2812:) 2808:( 2800:— 2754:) 2750:( 2742:— 2699:( 2679:E 2652:E 2638:( 2614:( 2567:E 2549:( 2524:( 2480:— 2462:❤ 2427:( 2410:( 2380:~ 2363:( 2342:( 2305:( 2273:( 2246:( 2229:( 2212:( 2178:) 2137:( 2052:⁂ 2015:( 2002:H 1954:P 1922:( 1872:( 1848:C 1843:/ 1771:( 1730:( 1713:( 1665:. 1657:( 1642:7 1637:1 1614:S 1581:) 1577:( 1521:) 1515:( 1508:— 1497:) 1493:( 1485:— 1476:) 1470:( 1463:— 1450:( 1429:( 1373:( 1319:) 1315:( 1307:— 1303:S 1285:S 1275:c 1230:. 1154:✽ 1097:( 1066:) 1062:( 1054:— 1029:E 1012:( 976:E 958:) 954:( 946:— 926:ö 901:E 870:) 865:· 859:· 853:· 847:· 841:· 835:· 828:· 821:· 815:· 810:( 808:E 780:. 770:E 753:E 705:( 672:( 665:E 653:( 628:E 586:E 498:E 410:E 202:) 198:( 190:— 173:E 133:E 124:) 120:( 112:— 103:3 100:2 97:1 93:E 86:· 81:( 79:E 54:E 47:. 26:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Requests for adminship/E 2 - Knowledge (XXG)

Index