Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Giggy

3835:

where little work is done and little experience is gained. I thought that my position was clear and wouldn't lead to misinterpretation but apparently I was wrong. And you are wrong to believe that there are enough vandalfighters. Try checking the last 500 changes to Knowledge (XXG) and you will notice that some of the vandalism that occured in the past few minutes has gone unnoticed. Experienced vandalfighters are needed, and few know how badly needed they are. I do though agree with you on the "divisive us vs them mentalities". I always seek for balance and that was exactly why I reacted against Hesperian's position who presented himself as all-for-mainspace-editing-only. Building the encyclopedia is what makes this place, but it cannot be kept without fighting the vandals and eliminating unsuitable content. All tasks are important and no tasks should be treated with contempt.--

3644:

way you deal with POV disagreements than him. Regarding that particular disagreement, I agree with Giggy. Experience in the mainspace is definitely important, but that's not where you're going to attain the experience you need to use the tools properly. Disputes happen everywhere, not just in the mainspace. There is absolutely no evidence that it's a content dispute that's going to teach you how to deal with content disputes. I think that has more to do with each one's character and maturity. Blocking vandals and deleting garbage are so NOT trivial tasks. I wish they were. I can see in your logs that you haven't been blocking that many vandals or deleting that much garbage. But many other admins had to lose many hours doing it. Trivializing our work just doesn't sit well.--

4852:: The chat incident is unfortunate, though upon reviewing the logs, there's nothing really nasty in there, though it certainly wasn't flattering for Majorly. I'm more concerned by the fact the essay which is being used by many, many people above has been deleted and I strongly urge Giggy to consider asking to have the essay undeleted until the end of this RfA. It's grossly inappropriate to have an essay deleted when it is being used as a rationale to oppose your candidacy, the only real benefit of having the essay deleted is to bolster support for yourself, Giggy, which I strongly dislike and find deeply undesirable in a potential admin. 4279:. I'm pretty sure I gave a reasonable and articulate reason for my oppose. Giggy's response above was "I really don't see how my opposing an RfA you supported will have any impact on my ability to help the project as an administrator". i.e. he responded to my good faith opposition by mischaracterising it as a bad faith attempt at petty revenge. That is the kind of rubbish that creates and escalates disputes. Previously I opposed on the absence of evidence that he understood the role and is equipped to undertake it. Now I'm strongly opposing on the grounds of clear evidence that he simply isn't up to the job. 4317:. Its not just about assumptions of faith, its about basic courtesy and ability to work in a collegial manner. Warning templates are generally designed to remind people of policy and contain icons to make them stand out so newbies understand they are warnings. They have no place on the page of someone who understands policy and who would know that a note reminding them not to do X or Y from a fellow Knowledge (XXG) does not need a red triangle to make it important. "Templating the regulars" has a connotation of naming and shaming for pretty trivial mistakes - it should not be done. We don't 1210:. I suggest redirecting the essay to the other one, and allowing the various discussions that have now started about this or that involve this essay (including this one) to finish. Hopefully what will come out of this is a stronger essay on these issues. On a more general point, writing Knowledge (XXG) essays can be an enlightening and strange experience because they can easily get out of control and be adopted by others who change it into something the original author disagrees with. This is one reason why they tend to start off in user space first. 4059:, see Christopher's and my comments in the general discussion section before the Supports. Short version: why is a criticism of Knowledge (XXG) essay "Don't template the regulars" offered as a separate essay at all, why is it in Knowledge (XXG) space rather than the userspace, and are you aware of or concerned about the actual trolling and provocation arising from the way people most often do template the regulars? If I get some good answers to these questions, I'll consider withdrawing my oppose. Meanwhile, I encourage people to read 1043:, and IMO it's too crude an effort to have gone directly into Knowledge (XXG) space, scare quotes and strawman arguments and all. That has me somewhat worried, both about conflict-resolution, like Christopher, and about general familiarity with our procedures and principles. I frankly would be concerned to have an admin who will encourage users to troll experienced contributors by slapping early warning templates on them — you know the kind I mean, the warnings with "Welcome to Knowledge (XXG)... Take a look at the 3634:

Administrators much be able to assess and respond to difficult situations such as complex content disputes where all parties are pushing a subtle POV, all parties have behaved badly towards each other, and everyone is upset at everyone else. In such situations, administrators are trusted by the community to find a way forward that helps build the community and the encyclopedia. I don't think Giggy even comprehends the role, let along possesses the maturity, diplomacy and skill to fulfill it.

3448:

advanced a viewpoint that sounds good in theory but backfires in practice. The promotion of such ideals will only result in a recipe for further conflict in Knowledge (XXG). It is not prudent for an admin to advance such destructive viewpoints. Also, the expression of this opinion sheds like on other aspects of Giggy's philosophy, a cumulative effect that pushes people to oppose. Please also note that I have nothing against Giggy, and I would have voted support if not given these factors. —

134:, and has worked on that WikiProject, and the articles within its scope. Giggy has also worked on a lot of articles about computer games as well. His edit count should be sufficient too, at a number of 5286 at last count, with 1067 being to the mainspace, 1152 to Knowledge (XXG)-space, roughly 2000 to the various talks, and a good amount of edits in the image and template spaces. I believe Giggy will make a fine administrator, and am pleased to do this co-nomination. 4266:- i'm afraid i quite agree with Bishonen about the 'template the regulars' essay, and am surprised that you (Giggy) can't see how the essay comes across as misguided, and almost petulant. The tone of your responses above seems a little unhelpful also - i'd really like to see some thought going into to you considering whether or not you might be wrong? - about this issue, and others as yet undiscussed. I'm concerned you seem dogmatic at the mo..... - 4637:, where I have found your contributions to frequently IMO be juvenile or ill informed. I hate to say that it seems like you are trying too hard, because I am sure that the rebuttals will follow of "g-d forbid we have admins who actually want to be admins", but something just doesn't feel right here. Overall, I just have too many concerns about your judgement and your intentions to support you having the tools. -- 3415:- a perfect example of "the longer someone is around, the less likely they are to get the bit." Strong oppose because he opposed someone else for not vandal fighting enough. Methinks this is a revenge oppose. Publication of private material? Well, user has admitted mistake, was before arbcom ruling, etc. TTR? Gosh, what a stupid essay. And yet, admins are human too. 4156:

Then I think you should wait a little. Incidentally, about not being "an ANI regular" — no, obviously not. I think it's a good idea to follow ANI at least a little, for some time before requesting adminship. It's a great way to gain vicarious admin experience, and might have made you more aware of the problems pointed out here by me, Christopher, and Purples.

4604:. Every single point made on that essay is wrong, ranging from logical fallacies (assuming what it is trying to prove), to outright incorrect statements (“If influential user x is accused of sockpuppeting, what do you do?” ... “It doesn’t matter how influential they are, I request a checkuser.” - speaking as an administrator who has closed maybe a hundred 79:, he always promptly responded to any concerns and swiftly improved to overcome and master those worries. Giggy learns with his mistakes, and fast. Communicating with him couldn't be any better, he's always very civil, polite and attentive. Giggy is an experienced and trustworthy user, a very efficient vandalfighter with tens of reports to 624:: I would have deleted the article, with a similar rationale to that of Jaranda (who deleted it). Most of the arguments of keeping were ILIKEIT arguments, or "temporary notability" arguments; both of which carried little merit against delete arguments that went with policy (for the record, I argued for deletion per 1010:(Talk | contribs) deleted "Knowledge (XXG):Template the regulars" (CSD G7: Author Requests Deletion)." In my personal opinion, I think the essay needs to be restored until the RFA has closed so that people can see what the essay contained in order to justify a decision rather to support or oppose this candidate. 1048:

to enlighten people to the fact that templating the regulars is most often a form of trolling and provocation. Better places for this opposite view, which shows no effects of enlightenment, would IMO have been Giggy's userspace, or (very cautiously) merged with "Don't template the regulars", or, best, the

4539:: Contentiousness and a desire to "get" people are entirely out of line with administrative status. It is a position of trust, and not merely trust from one's friends, but trust from even those who disagree. Based on the "template the regulars" and the reaction to it, I cannot extend trust at all. 5092:

Basically, it's a private chat log published between Giggy and Majorly, who were in a dispute about a couple of RfA's. I think it would defeat the purpose of deleting it if I started explaining the details of the private discussion. I want to hear what Giggy has to say, so hopefully we'll all be more

4565:

vandals is a sure predictor of disaster and a short time before arbitration. Is RFA broken? Sure. I respect people who disagree with me and conduct themselves well. Most folks who have dealt with me know that I have strong feelings, but they also know that I'm not going to go POINT or block or do

3733:

It has a lot to do if Hesperian undervalues the importance of vandalfight and page deletion to the point of sounding as if those areas have little to do with adminship. I usually expect users to be deeply involved with something before criticizing it. Blocking vandals and deleting pages are among the

1318:

Thanks to everyone who participated in here. I've decided that the best way forward is to withdraw the nom (although the current count is a 75%, I can't see it going up). I'll be writing up an analysis of this RfA similar to my previous one, to highlight how I can improve. Thank you to everyone who

1132:

Ah, ok. I won't start any back-and-forth — this isn't the place for it. I just wanted to see if I figured adminship to be right for you at this time. I don't. And with the tone you take for being asked these questions, here in your RFA, where people are generally at their most considerate and polite,

1047:

to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia" in them. I don't suppose this is the scenario Giggy envisaged in writing the essay, but you don't have to follow WP:ANI for very long to be aware how common such abuse is. That was presumably the reason "Don't template the regulars" was written —

4240:

Can you point to some of the situations you've observed where sending a regular user a template message was, in your view, more effective than a personal note would have been? I ask this simply because such a situation seems difficult to imagine. It's analogous to receiving a personal Christmas note

3643:

Actually Hesperian, I endorse Giggy's positions in the diff you provided and I must say that opposing a user simply because you disagree on each one's beliefs on what it takes to become an admin instead of carefully analyzing a candidate's preparedness is rather inconsistent and shows more about the

3437:

Because, frankly, we set our admin standards too high. It's a stupid essay, but how in the world will this make Giggy a worse admin? I'm not seeing it. I'm a bit frustrated by the many users who go through this forum almost unopposed, because they haven't been here long enough to have people see any

4349:

seems more like a futile attempt at egalitarianism without thinking of the consequences that result when you do "template" a regular. And, strangely, I have to agree with Hesperian. While wikiphilosophy is rather a weird reason to oppose (even for me, and I rarely oppose), I did find those comments

4155:

that people use templates to troll others — yeah, that's easy to refute, no doubt, and of course it's not what I think. As I said above, people generally put their best foot forward in their RFA. Are these cocksure replies and this tone your best, at this time? The most thoughtful? Most admin-like?

3591:. Furthermore, it should be noted that an oppose !vote does not balance out a support !vote - a valid oppose will effectively neutralize three supports (since users are generally promoted with approval percentage of around 75%, not 50%). Please think about it Matt. You're not being fair, nor sound. 1058:

by a user who just happened to have been criticized by me a few hours earlier for templating the regulars in a very provocative way. He liked the essay just the way it was. The incident wasn't the candidate's fault — Giggy had nothing to do with reverting me — but still, it's food for thought about

129:

in his second request for adminship. I supported back then, saying that he was a civil user with a decent knowledge of policy. That holds true now, and in the months since then, he is even more civil and experienced with policy. He is also versatile with editing, for he is both a vandal-fighter and

5218:

The posting of a chatlog was a really.bad.idea on my behalf (yes, I make mistakes too). I wasn't aware of anything ArbCom related when I posted it up (I believe I posted it before the ARBCOM decision), but I was just a bit pissed off by what had happened in the RfA in question (for the benefit of

4666:

disturbing and patronizing position, show me that Giggy has bad judgement and would likely misuse the admin tools. A few instances are understandable, because everybody makes mistakes, but those five things, all of them quite recent, convince that Giggy does not have the judgement necessary to not

3834:

Casliber that was not what I said, and not even close to what I said. I did not and do not underrate the importance of writing articles, which is the very essence of this place. I simply strongly reject the notion that vandalfight and page deletion can be depreciated and regarded as unworthy tasks

1306:

mind at all? Were editors right to be confused / irritated by the essay? - This isn't a big deal really, and I don't think anyone here doubts that your intentions are good - but what's neccessary (i think) for people to support you as an admin would be a period of reflection - your position at the

1108:

the essay was written, indicate that it's nothing to do with the essay that "trolling" takes place. I'm not asking for users to troll experienced users for no reason, but I'm suggesting (essays suggest, not enforce) that maybe they remind regulars the same way you'd remind anyone else. You know,

4560:

on our side and seen with our own eyes what happens, he puts his fists higher in the air. That's simply out of bounds. Further, the assumption that templating people has anything to do with vandal hunting is absurd. Furthermore again, the idea that a template makes a vandal is absurder still.

4432:

per publication of private material on-wiki. I was frankly amazed to see it; hardly something I'd want to see in any user, let alone a potential administrator. I shudder to think that one with such a blasé attitude with regards to private information may gain access to deleted revisions, personal

3911:

was indeed a mistake, but I'm not sure it's appropriate to oppose based on one incorrect reversion. Obviously, that's your opinion, not mine. As for a "Lack of contributions to the encyclopaedia" - I really don't see where you got that comment from. I've contributed significantly to 3 GAs (and

3577:

As I said earlier, every Wikipedian in good standing has a right to evaluate the candidate according to their own criteria, and make a decision on how to vote. A.Z has a right to vote, even if his rationale is regarded as "frivolous"; likewise, Matt57 has a right to vote to cancel out A.Z's vote,

3809:

Well sorry Husond if some of us are doing things like writing articles - as far as being undervalued vandalfighting is a pretty common (well default) cited reason for becoming an admin so I think there are plenty of folk doing it. Reinforcing divisive us vs them mentalities on a systems level is

1260:

being nominated for deletion at MfD. I was proposing a merge, while pointing out that a joint MfD might be a possibility, but events have moved a bit too quickly for that. Anyway, thanks for taking the time to explain, and I hope any washback from this doesn't come back here. By the way, another

5062:

feels important. Both what he includes and his opinion on such will determine where I cast my hat in this RfA. Per principles confirmed by the Arbitration Committee only this month and given how recent this incident was (late last month), I feel it is highly relevant and important to this RfA.

3697:

and edit wars. I've also seen many hours of editing wasted with over-zealous deletion too. I haven't interacted much with Giggy nor looked at the contribs and hence haven't voted as yet. I wouldn't worry much about Hesp's lack of vandal whacking and am concerned about the you/us message coming

3671:

Husond, you didn't read my oppose at all carefully enough. I can accommodate philosophical differences, and agree that mere differences in philosophy are not sufficient grounds to oppose. But in this case, Giggy's philosophy reveals a misunderstanding of the administrative role. It is entirely

3447:

Everyone will meet opposition in some way or another if they do have actual experience. When you voice your viewpoint, you are bound to get opposition from people who disagree with that viewpoint. It is standard. Let me explain why that essay is the crux people gagged on: The essay essentially

3633:

To my mind, this reveals his blissful ignorance of what being an administrator actually entails. It is not a great big fun game of vandal whack-a-mole. Blocking vandals and deleting garbage articles are the most trivial of all administrative responsibilities. No, it is much more than that.

4106:- I'm not an ANI regular, so I wasn't aware, but I am now. Concerned? Yes, I'm not particularly happy that a simple template can turn into trolling or provocation, but that's partly what my essay is about; the blaim also rests with the regular who lets themself get provoked, and doesn't 2458:- I just missed the nomination. I had been planning to co-nom along with Husond but I was out of town, but anyway. Giggy certainly has come along way since the last nom. He has been very active in article writing as well as vandal fighting. This is a user I really trust with the tools. -- 1155:

issue really bugs me. After I weigh the positives (See Husond's brilliant nom), and the one major negative dogging this RfA, I believe users should stop piling on opposes. We should looking at whether we can trust Giggy to be a sysop, and not dog him over an essay, which I disagree with

3504:

Alright there you go, struck out. Knowledge (XXG) policies are still irrational to allow anyone to vote like AZ did. And I really didnt want to make a point but did want to cancel out AZ's vote. How do I cancel my vote here? Please cancel it for me. The numbering isnt going back to 1.

4608:

cases, the experience of a user is a huge factor in whether or not they are a sock puppet of another account). As so many above have stated, the underlying motivation to use templates to "punish" others is a disqualifier for adminship, punishment is not what admins are here for.

5291:

and leaning towards oppose, based not on the essay but the response to a question about the essay, on the article writing concerns, and an imbalance in namespace edits (more edits to Knowledge (XXG) namespace than article space). Could still be persuaded either way.

2826:

It's not an invalid vote, and the bureaucrat has no right to discount anything. Every Wikipedian in good standing has the right to make their own judgment on an RfA candidate and to vote accordingly. The bureaucrat's job is to carry out the will of the community.

3465:

Ummm, he has only been here editing for less than 4 months. Barely the minimum to even be considered as a candidate per many people's standards. I don't see how you can throw away anything that this user has done yet and say that it is too far in the past.

3672:

appropriate that I choose to oppose on those grounds. Furthermore, if you really think that "experience in the mainspace is definitely important", then you do not at all agree with Giggy, and I wonder why you're not opposing him yourself, since he had none.

4326:'s neutral comment below). The rule against it is not new and administrator candidates should be aware that doing so without the consent of the other party (and especially when the intention is to damage the reputation of the other party) is unacceptable. 4458:, the only rebuttal I have is that I'm interested in the system, just like everyone else who participates there. If I'm noticed because I participate there, it's not exactly my fault...I mean, we contribute to parts of the 'pedia they enjoy, and for me, 3964:

Again, I don't see how a "bizarre" RfA oppose will affect my ability to do admin work. Perhaps in an RfB, but an administrator has no more power then a regular user in RfAs, so my opinions and comments there really have no greater impact if I'm an admin.

4880:). Though the sample size is small, it suggests to me that Giggy may not be ready for the block button. I also disapprove of how Giggy issued three separate (and escalating!) spam warnings to a user who had not edited at all since his prior warning ( 4580:"Template the regulars" has its heart in good egalitarian roots, but the page's details betray some ignorance of fundamental Wikipedian principles. "...it doesn’t matter how influential or popular someone is around here; they still receive the same 4453:

In all honesty, when you first saw, and when we first spoke about, the chatlog issue, you really didn't seem that shocked, and certainly didn't seem to oppose it. Then again, I'm not about to prove this statement with a chatlog. In regards to

3950:

I believe that administrator tools should not be granted to editors who don't work in those areas, because they may be overwhelmed by the work when the receive them. Better for everyone to let them not have the tools, and continue building the

4188:? There is absolutely no standard for what gets chucked into the Knowledge (XXG) space, and it just hinges on MFDs and they get a shiny rejection notice on them. I wouldn't mind if and admin just went and burned through a shitload of these. - 2271:

Not to beat a dead horse, but what leads you to believe that the section your place your comment in, rather than the content of the comment, is what "counts"? If anything I would hope the bureaucrats interpret things the other way around.

4138:

Well, I'd hoped for answers that made me feel comfortable with withdrawing my Oppose. These don't, and your reply higher up above, under "Discussion", is brash and discourteous. Nowhere do you engage with my criticism of the essay for

1663:

To retool my response, seeing that TTR essay does hurt my choice for you somewhat, it is worrying to think you have to problem with doing something that could make wars worse. Not enough from the opposes to change my mind yet though.

1365:. I wish, however, he would not use GHits so much in AfD discussions, but the rest of his edits are OK. I really like how carefully analyzed his last RfA and effectively addressed all the concerns raised at his last RfA. Good luck! -- 750:

You have the following motto on your userpage "Knowledge (XXG): Factual, neutral, well-written articles on important real-world topics" But 2 of your 3 GAs have been articles on video games. Which represents your actual attitude?

5144:

2.1) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence) or their lapse into public domain, the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki. See

557:

I saw this one coming :D Since the last RfA I've read BLP several times, and made sure I'm fully familiar with it. I would enforce it with the utmost (appropriate) severity, because as quoted by Jimbo, we are dealing with

5227:. It's a good thing Newyorkbrad deleted it, or bad things could have happened...in any case (after discussing the matter further with Majorly, whom I actually get on quite well with), I certainly won't be doing something 4147:: an argument that your opponents don't, and wouldn't, actually make, but that you ascribe to them because it's so easy to refute. (I explained this in my reverted edit to your essay.) Instead, you reply to me by offering 4682:(switched from neutral) - Picaroon summed it up best for me. I feel that this is a little too soon after the last RfA, but it is mainly the judgement issues that concern me. Gaining more experience may help change that. 3734:

most important and tiresome roles of an admin. Underrating them seems rather inadequate, especially by someone who's not in the ground carrying out those so-called "most trivial of all administrative responsibilities".--

4321:

each other. That Giggy holds these views concerns me about how he would use his admin tools. In addition I have grave reservations about supporting someone who recently posted off-wiki discussions to his userspace (see

406:

Yes, I've been in a few conflicts during my time here. Rather then get stressed out about them, I’ve tried to use each conflict as a learning experience, to help me improve my skills for the future. I’ve also done some

3757:

I underrate neither the importance of vandalfighting and page deletion, nor the contributions of those who engage in it. I am familiar with these roles, and my appreciation of them is on the record, e.g. most recently

610:. As of that revision, there was an even split in numbers of those in favour of keeping the article and those in favour of deleting it. How, though, would you close the AFD, and why? (The AFD closed as a "delete") 3770:

of crap they delete, not the wisdom or maturity they display in doing their job. Therefore I stand by my original statement, but wholeheartedly apologise if you felt I was belittling the contributions of others.

195:- Well firstly, a huge thanks to Husond and Alcalmari for nominating me. I truly am honoured to have such nice things written about me by people who are completely sober and haven’t been bribed. It's amazing! 5168:

Just to clarify, the deleted chat log was created a month before the ARBCOM handed down its ruling. I don't think Daniel is suggesting any violation - right? Just seeking an understanding of Giggy's thoughts.

3630:. Giggy believes that adminship should only be granted to editors who engage primarily in vandal-fighting and cleanup, and should be withheld from those editors who primarily contribute encyclopedic content. 4633:, which was quickly re-closed by a bureaucrat. 2) I've never been convinced that you are really here to build an encyclopedia. It seems that from early on, you have been very active in RFAs and especially 836:: Sockpuppets should be reported when there is strong, objective evidence of Sockpuppetry. IE., not in the TharkunColl case. My (incorrect, I admit) rationales for that case can be found at bottom, under 4970:

In fairness to Giggy, I think that that was light hearted banter between friends rather than a personal attack, but agree that it was probably inappropriate language in a public forum as talk pages are.

1682:

Participation in the Knowledge (XXG) namespace (XFD, RFA, etc.) is a huge plus. With good judgment as I've already seen, there is absolutely no way we can't trust this user with the tools. Good luck,

75:) - It is with great anticipation that I submit Giggy for your consideration, a user whom I believe has remarkably exceeded any conceivable requirements to become an administrator. Giggy was extremely 4584:." (emphasis mine) Knowledge (XXG) does not "punish"; blocks are preventative, not punitive (if the author means something less than a block, well, warnings -- templated or not -- are intended to be 4588:; calling them punishments is absurd.) There are many other bad ideas sprinkled throughout that essay. I cannot trust its author with the tools, at least until he learns to express himself better. 4728:

the whole incident with Majorly; attempting to smear someone by posting a private conversation is unacceptable and even illegal in some jurisdictions, and not conduct befitting an administrator.

3438:

issues they have, but then when a user comes along who actually has experience (e.g., writing essays), we oppose him. If we held everyone to this sort of test, no one would become and admin.

362:, where I’m able to take the articles produced by others, and improve them as much as I can. We all know that every article can be an FA, but I try to work by the concept that every article 95:, etc.. Knowledge (XXG) would undoubtedly benefit with Giggy as an admin, so I now ask my fellow Wikipedians to give him the support he certainly deserves for his hard work and dedication. 1756:

make sure I am the first person to support my own nominee/co-nominee. Last time I missed it because it started while I was having lunch, this time dinner was the reason I wasn't first! :)

4437:, which rather smacks of gaming the system and attempting to gain popularity (and it's obviously worked, as I'm in the minority here). Weak answers to questions. The utterly ridiculous 4007:

because I agreed with DGG (when he brought it up) that it was a mistake. I like to think it shows good judgement to admit, acknowledge, and act upon mistakes, but that's just me :)

1233:) because it was clear that consensus was very strongly against it, and thus that keeping it there could easily influence users to react in negative ways (as suggested by Bishonen). 248:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge (XXG) as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

827: 5187:

No violation, no, but from the fact that the decision was made shortly after suggests that common sense and good judgement would have resulted in actions different to Giggy's.

3766:

itself is trivial - it requires very little perspicacity or maturity to recognise a junk page and hit the delete button. What makes new pages patrollers important is the sheer

2222:

Upon reading Spebi's talk page, this may in fact be a joke oppose, but really a support (as where it was originally placed). I would appreciate a clarification on this matter.

4506:. I apologize to Giggy, as I don't usually change my vote. However, I have to agree with Thewinchester: that comment was completely unecessary. And of course the chatlog... · 1611:

I have supported him before and I support him now. Great editor with lots of edits and good work on several articles. Totally trustworthy (would never abuse of tools) civil,

4205:

Giggy's essay recommends that editors engage in a practice which in my experience is basically always unhelpful, so in that sense it is significantly worse than the others.

3953:

is to me the most bizarre reason for an oppose I've seen yet and I have to question his judgement for that reason. Giggy strikes me as being a bit immature for the tools. —

2917:. I've seen Giggy giving good input in AFD discussions; seems to have an all-around experience on WP as well. Hard to oppose with recommendations from Husond and Acalamari. 1206:

May I ask why you nominated that essay for deletion? Personally, I feel that the essay, while wrong-headed, has helped point out a few things that aren't quite right about

1256:

Fair enough. I don't agree that deletion right at this moment was the best option, but we will have to agree to disagree. I now see that the other discussions have led to

4655: 4630: 5254:

I accept that it was an error in judgement and something you regret, which was good to hear. However, given how recent it was, and the nature of it, I'm going to remain

3000:- the chatlogs incident is not enough to sway me. He would definitely use the tools and I think there's plenty of experience to suggest he's ready to use them properly. 1851:- a lot of water has gone under the bridge since the last RfA. Excellent & hard-working candidate. Knows the rules well and gets involved in many areas. Mop time! - 486: 4366:

Per Moondyne and Hesperian. I too have seen the issues they note regarding this user and I agree with their assessment. This is not withstanding that the user seems to

3578:

even if this is seen as "inappropriate" by some users. There is no policy or guideline that prevents the application of rationales which fall outside community norms.

400:

Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

1878:. Giggy has the knowledge, the will, the energy and the touch to be an excellent admin. I'm very, very glad to see this RfA up and running. Best of luck, Giggy! :) 5152: 4647: 4004: 3989: 2163:- I was Neutral last time due to his lack of experience but since then he has grown mature considerably well and now I believe he can use the tools ..Good Luck..-- 5058:. Rather than ask a leading question in the questions section, I would like Giggy to make a general statement about this entire chat logs issue, and include what 2946:. If you don't want to vote this user support, you haven't been around when Giggy has. IRC, help desk and more. Definately deserves the tools. Good luck Giggy! — 415:

if this RfA is successful), and I believe this has also helped me develop my conflict resolution skills (which I envisage as being extremely useful as an admin).

5352: 4181: 4088:

the essay is the appropriate thing to do. It seems (to me) that doing so would cloud up the original essay, and draw away from its meaning, hence the new essay.

881: 54: 3517:. You needed to remove the "#" bits from the replies to your comment, as well as your comment. Some people also indent ":" to make it clearer what is going on. 1797:

which he is a reviewer on and he adopted me shortly after. He is a great editor and wikipedia would benefit hugely from having him as an admin. Good luck Alex!

5220: 1732:

It's gonna be a long week - try not to break the watchlist button. Haha! You're patience and positive attitude, as well as regard for policy sit well with me.

5370: 3784:

Apologies Hesperian, but I really don't see how my opposing an RfA you supported will have any impact on my ability to help the project as an administrator.

4552:

that I find devastating. The essay is against consensus, which is our one goal in user interactions, but, instead of conceding to consensus, he chooses to

5055: 4110:. I should also point out that there is no reason to believe that TTR in any way increases the level of trolling (unless you can find some that cites it). 346:

also recently went through an FAC (Unsuccessful, but a great learning experience), so I’m really proud of that one! If you look through the articles I’ve

1257: 1207: 1040: 933: 892: 199: 1959:- I've worked with Giggy for some time in the GA project and was recently surprised to find that he wasn't a sysop. I think he'll be a great admin! 3988:

It demonstrates poor judgement. Just like the posting of a private chat log below, your defense of the divisive essay into the project space, and

198:

For those who don’t already know, this is my second RfA, despite the lack of a “2” in the URL (how mischievous). My first RfA can be found at

4918:- this sort of stuff drains energy from the project big time....and now the above evidence this becoming a real net negative for the project 4172:

The Knowledge (XXG) space is a fucking joke and treated as such. Giggy's piece is certainly a lot better than pointless geek bullshit such as

3689:

I don't think a split with article builders on one side and admins with all the powers on the other side is conducive to good 'pedia building

2235:

Yes, it is a support. It doesn't matter what is placed in bold text, it matters what subsection it is placed under – in future, Steve, please

281:

active), so I think I would be capable of dealing with any tricky decisions that would come out of them. I would also occasionally appear at

2981:

I've seen Giggy around, and he seems to be a pretty civil guy. Mistakes in the past don't matter, because of course, he's learned from them.

1160:, which was written in good faith 6 weeks ago. Therefore, I feel Giggy will be a good sysop, and consequently I endorse Giggy being sysoped. 1358: 131: 4834: 2659:

This may so8und incredibly cheesy, but Giggy has done incredible work with everything Knowledge (XXG). He is also incredibly involved with

2239:

before you move, instead of move, then ask. I tend to do this to users who I strongly support, and hopefully the candidate sees the joke.

4095:- The original essay was in the project space, so I thought it would be appropriate to respond to it on level ground. You're welcome to 1230: 653: 5231:

stupid again, I'm very regretful for what I did, I've apologized to those involved (namely, Majorly), and I hope I've paid my penance.

4104:

are you aware of or concerned about the actual trolling and provocation arising from the way people most often do template the regulars

3587:

Actually, Matt's is a good example of a !vote that can be easily disregarded by the closing bureaucrat as a self-declared violation of

3360:- He may not have a huge amount of edits, but it's quality, not quantity that matters. His edits, for the most part, are quite good. -- 30: 17: 3320: 1302:

Hi Giggy - i think it's good that the essay has gone, but I was wondering if (in requesting the essay to be deleted) you have changed

920: 4915: 4659: 4601: 4346: 4314: 4060: 4056: 1172: 989: 963: 3562:

And you are not balancing anything amtt - this has already got 60 support and no opposes other than yours - it is going to pass. --

957: 335: 4385:

of Jmlk17's to Giggy's talk page. Giggy was joking, as was Jmlk17. Giggy wouldn't say something like that on purpose. Please see

3396: 1591:

Yes, I had this watchlisted too. Comes in handy when you see an RfA you've been looking forward to show up in your watchlist. :)

639: 5223:). I was angry with what I believed had been blackmail, and I somehow was put under the impression that somebody other then me 4350:

condescending, and Knowledge (XXG) can do without condescending admins. We can do without more false dichotomies than we have. —

2148: 4929: 3825: 3709: 1270:

I considered userfication, but it would still be "equally" accessible that way, so it would serve the same negative purpose.

262: 4345:

I came here to support, but given my habit of looking at the opposes for frivolity, it seems like they rather convinced me.

1059:

the kind of use the essay is most likely to be put to. At least I think so. Giggy, I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.

877: 4905:

as I've seem you active in the building bits 'round FAC etc. as well so am happy yer interested in article building as well

927: 5076:

Since the page can only be seen by administrators, could you please give me the basic details of what happened? Thanks. --

4810: 4749: 4433:

information, and material deleted due to OTRS concerns/BLP enforcement. Giggy also spends an inordinate amount of time at

3570: 2631: 1938: 1831: 1077:, or to the reversion. But I agree with it. Quite frankly, I don't think very much of your changes to it, for 2 reasons. 4245: 4209: 3402: 3154: 2276: 2097: 996: 1615:

very friendly. I have witnessed him build his way up in editing and I think he is totally ready now; Good luck, Giggy!

1101:

2) The essay in no way encourages trolling. The fact that people may do so, and the fact that such things happened at

5215:

Sorry all, I had tennis, then I was tired and slept (sinful, yes, but I can't ALWAYS be online :P). So here I am now!

4958: 3148:

Uh, obviously. Every interaction is great, and all I have ever seen and been involved with Giggy has been wonderful.

2782:

a while ago. Though I had some constructive criticism there, I was overall impressed by his maturity and dedication.

2466: 1052:

of "Don't template the regulars." Just to illustrate the use the essay is likely to be put to: when I edited it today,

976: 913: 781:

Yes, that was today's motto. I actually really liked it too, I gave a barnstar to its creator if I recall correctly.

213: 72: 5026:. I have serious concerns from reading the last RfA - in particular the comment that "IAR will apply heavily to BLP" 4864:. Judgement concerns, partly due to the issues already mentioned. Furthermore, though Giggy has been contributing to 4177: 2102:. Anyway, against usual line of reasoning strong personal interaction and the nominators said it. Best of luck mate! 1055:

trying for a form that would allow for the strawman arguments while injecting a critical note, I was briskly reverted

706:

at the time (not policy, but useful in this regard), and I'll be withdrawing the AfD after I answer these questions.

1545: 1468: 1373: 216:). You can find my analysis of this RfA, as well as my thoughts on how I’ve addressed the issues raised in it, at 4556:

That's rather bad news. Instead of realizing that those of us arguing the other side might have...I don't know...

4185: 2779: 5258:

on this RfA. However, opposing for one such incident would be mean, so I won't do that :) Cheers, and good luck,

4766:: Krimpet also supported (see support #13), although this came later so I assume this is his/her final verdict. 4662:, the responses to critcism of the essay (see above), the posting of a private conversation, and, worst of all, 3309:- obviously slightly concerned about that there chat log dealie, but far too good a candidate to oppose for it. 2684:

I think he'll do OK. Though I would encourage a greater amount of work on real-world articles in article space.

975:

Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review

5319:

What do you mean? He has plenty of mainspace editing; from improving articles and even creating a WikiProject.

5029:. Some time has passed but I want to see a pretty good answer to Q.6 before I would be comfortable supporting. 4838: 3564: 2601: 1932: 1567: 1490: 1398: 4030:

I hadn't meant to imply that I was unaware you had withdrawn the nomination. I'm sorry if you thought that. —

2897:

Experienced editor with many contributions in different areas of Knowledge (XXG). Will not abuse the tools. --

4374: 4297:

Methinks it is better to keep one's mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt.

4242: 4206: 4082:

why is a criticism of Knowledge (XXG) essay "Don't template the regulars" offered as a separate essay at all

2864:

seems to be familiar with a variety of admin activities, talkative, and willing to improve with experience.

2273: 1917: 1810:. I see Giggy all over WP; he shows a great deal of experience and dedication in many areas of the project. 1695: 1580: 1551: 1503: 1474: 1411: 1379: 1224: 993: 647: 5146: 2585: 1634:

I've run across him a lot lately, in different contexts. Seems well rounded, hard working, and pleasant. -

3334: 3316: 3259:- Good user, although his position on article writing and admins is a bit weird given that he does write. 2648: 2460: 1738: 217: 5224: 4173: 3913: 2647:

It looks like this vote is meaningless, but you deserve it anyway. You are clearly intitled to Adminship.

2495:

This is an editor I run into all over project space, and every single encounter has been a positive one.

992:-- reading this essay did not increase my confidence in the candidate's approach to resolving conflicts. 347: 4289: 3842: 3741: 3651: 3598: 3439: 3416: 3269: 2935: 2552: 2168: 1444: 693: 102: 5351:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either

4634: 4459: 4455: 4434: 1539: 1462: 1367: 1320: 703: 495:

I think the category is a wonderful idea, and I promise to add myself to it if this RfA is successful.

440: 4402:. Yes, I counted my chickens before they hatched, but at that stage I thought they were almost out... 4370:

which we should be able to expect from an admin (this is in addition to the essay already discussed).

2664: 2347: 3390: 2532: 1098:

Essays aren't supposed to be "put to use" as you suggest, that's why we have policies and guidelines.

633: 3895:

It would appear to be a legitimate edit to me. You've also demonstrated to me you do not understand

2982: 2667:. If it weren't for him, I'd probably still be fumbling around with the Knowledge (XXG) basics. ---- 2253: 1044: 359: 277:. I'm believe I have decent amounts of experience in these three areas (especially AfD, where I am 5036: 4888: 4638: 4333: 4298: 4280: 3864: 3772: 3673: 3635: 3467: 3261: 3137: 2987: 2593: 2429: 2331: 2145: 1798: 1307:

mo. seems in danger of appearing to be akin to upsetting the chess board when you lose a bishop. -

765:

A friend has just alerted me to the fact that this motto came from the daily motto template. Oops.

529: 4724:(changed from support), due to the maturity and judgment issues that others have highlighted, and 2969: 2668: 1319:

participated, and I invite everyone to give feedback on my analysis (which will be linked to from

412: 408: 4972: 4923: 4671: 4371: 4217:

In my experience it isn't unhelpful. I wouldn't encourage people to do things I disagreed with.

4161: 4068: 4031: 3993: 3954: 3819: 3814:, which is what the RfA comment (and this template written only a month ago) highlight. cheers, 3721: 3703: 3540: 3071: 2953: 2851: 2783: 2124: 2056: 1965: 1912: 1572: 1495: 1403: 1220: 1138: 1064: 1007: 643: 5337: 5334: 5323: 5314: 5296: 5281: 5266: 5249: 5200: 5182: 5163: 5138: 5123: 5101: 5087: 5071: 5040: 5010: 4994: 4977: 4965: 4933: 4901:- at the end of the day I feel that WP will trundle along a wee bit better with you as an admin 4892: 4856: 4844: 4819: 4784: 4758: 4716: 4686: 4674: 4641: 4617: 4592: 4570: 4543: 4529: 4520: 4498: 4480: 4448: 4420: 4393: 4376: 4358: 4337: 4301: 4292: 4283: 4270: 4248: 4235: 4212: 4200: 4164: 4131: 4071: 4036: 4025: 3998: 3983: 3959: 3938: 3903: 3867: 3853: 3829: 3802: 3775: 3752: 3726: 3713: 3676: 3662: 3638: 3609: 3588: 3582: 3572: 3557: 3551: 3545: 3521: 3509: 3492: 3470: 3456: 3442: 3432: 3419: 3407: 3373: 3364: 3352: 3325: 3299: 3276: 3251: 3230: 3211: 3190: 3164: 3140: 3128: 3101: 3074: 3060: 3006: 2992: 2973: 2959: 2938: 2926: 2909: 2887: 2868: 2856: 2831: 2821: 2807: 2798: 2786: 2770: 2742: 2715: 2695: 2676: 2651: 2639: 2606: 2578: 2558: 2536: 2515: 2499: 2487: 2473: 2450: 2436: 2416: 2404: 2388: 2366: 2350: 2334: 2325: 2316: 2307: 2279: 2266: 2247: 2230: 2217: 2204: 2188: 2172: 2155: 2132: 2118: 2082: 2059: 2040: 2028: 2009: 1990: 1970: 1951: 1940: 1922: 1903: 1870: 1840: 1801: 1783: 1760: 1744: 1724: 1703: 1674: 1638: 1626: 1595: 1586: 1557: 1532: 1509: 1480: 1455: 1429: 1417: 1385: 1342: 1311: 1288: 1265: 1251: 1214: 1201: 1164: 1141: 1127: 1067: 1032: 999: 858: 799: 776: 724: 674: 616: 584: 513: 475: 238: 186: 138: 113: 2795: 1437:

as nom and oppose the above guys who were probably refreshing this page 50 times a minute. :-P

1151:

I wanted to nominate Giggy. However, after I sort of missed the chance due to a WikiBreak, the

4802: 4741: 3312: 2700:"sinful, yes, but I can't ALWAYS be online" I'm sorry Giggy, but you're now out of favor with 2672: 2623: 2482: 2375: 2215: 2186: 1823: 1733: 5246: 4781: 4629:

as well as the following: 1) I was less than impressed by your revert of the snow closure of

4508: 4477: 4417: 4288:

Methinks Hesperian is mad about Giggy's !vote, and this might be a revenge !vote of his own.

4232: 4128: 4022: 3980: 3935: 3799: 3296: 3199: 3178: 2739: 2330:

There is no need to bury veiled personal attacks of another user in the heart of this RFA. --

2079: 1780: 1529: 1339: 1285: 1248: 1198: 1124: 1102: 855: 823: 796: 721: 671: 581: 510: 472: 451:

Have you ever been accused of being a sockpuppet or puppeteer by a non-new user? If so, why?

430: 388: 370: 351: 308: 235: 183: 163: 5194: 3847: 3746: 3656: 3603: 3159: 3122: 2701: 2545: 2509: 2359: 2165: 1867: 1722: 1449: 343: 331: 107: 76: 4865: 4626: 4605: 4491: 4438: 4107: 4096: 2660: 1362: 1180: 1176: 1152: 1074: 625: 598: 548: 544: 355: 293:

experienced around there (I would probably only close clear, pile on consensus decisions).

286: 282: 274: 266: 92: 88: 84: 80: 5293: 5232: 5176: 5006: 4767: 4683: 4614: 4463: 4442: 4403: 4318: 4218: 4192: 4114: 4008: 3966: 3921: 3785: 3579: 3518: 3384: 3361: 3282: 3245: 3226: 2907: 2828: 2725: 2524: 2413: 2322: 2299: 2111: 2065: 1766: 1765:

I responded to comments here whilst having lunch. You guys just aren't dedicated enough.

1515: 1325: 1271: 1262: 1234: 1211: 1184: 1110: 907: 841: 782: 707: 657: 629: 567: 496: 458: 416: 374: 350:, you can probably guess that expanding articles isn’t my strong point; instead I work on 294: 221: 207: 169: 149: 66: 4611:

Oh, and the essay was written on the wrong kind of paper, and used the wrong kind of ink.

2019: 1794: 327: 5320: 5113: 5077: 5031: 4991: 4884: 4526: 4390: 4328: 3554: 3080: 2922: 2817: 2705: 2496: 2445: 2141: 2004: 1879: 1757: 1665: 1652: 1635: 1592: 1084: 642:) raised a good argument; send it to a Harry Potter Wiki (or transwiki in some way per 524: 339: 135: 120: 3917: 3896: 2967:, good user, see him all over the place. No reason to suggest he'd abuse the tools. - 1537:

Seriously, guys. I think I had this page watchlisted before it was even created :-) --

5364: 4919: 4668: 4197: 4189: 4157: 4064: 3815: 3720:

Husond, what on earth has Hesperians contributions got to do with his oppose vote? —

3699: 3535: 3369:

True, edit counts don't matter. But votes by newly joined editors are disconcerting.

3088: 3001: 2846: 2691: 2304: 2296: 2262: 2053: 2024: 1960: 1948: 1619: 1134: 1060: 772: 4398:

Yes, it was a joke (see Alcalmari's diffs), and it was made when the tally here was

3337:

to addressing concerns from the last RfA, which is both refreshing and reassuring.

5311: 5278: 5135: 4945:. It's kind of depressing, as I was prepared to give a strong support to this RFA. 4883:), and then reported the user to AIV, still with no further edits from the user. - 4794: 4733: 4697: 4651: 4267: 4241:

from a friend and being angry that you didn't get their form holiday card instead.

3900: 3370: 3041: 3017: 2865: 2754: 2615: 2399: 2210: 2181: 2151: 1986: 1815: 1308: 1013: 813: 612: 594: 547:? How strictly should the policy be enforced? When should it be disregarded under 373:, which I set up in May 2007...ok, I’m only mentioning it here to advertise it :P 4831:. User embodies (very nearly) everything wrong with Knowledge (XXG) at present. — 4548:

Incidentally, it's not the essay, especially, which is merely misguided, but the

5260: 5189: 5157: 5095: 5065: 4567: 4540: 4352: 4323: 3837: 3736: 3646: 3593: 3506: 3489: 3450: 3426: 3346: 3149: 3119: 2804: 2224: 1852: 1712: 1698: 1439: 97: 5310:

Insufficient content contribution, edits or article improvement to see stake.

5240: 5170: 5004:

per Hesperian, Bish and Riana and most of the people commenting in opposition.

4946: 4775: 4589: 4495: 4471: 4411: 4226: 4122: 4016: 3974: 3929: 3793: 3290: 3239: 3222: 2898: 2884: 2878: 2733: 2313: 2240: 2197: 2105: 2073: 2037: 1774: 1523: 1426: 1333: 1279: 1242: 1192: 1161: 1118: 903: 873: 849: 790: 715: 665: 575: 504: 466: 424: 382: 302: 229: 203: 177: 157: 126: 62: 5345:

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.

5108:

Actually, you answered my question precisely. I was trying to find out what

4853: 4381:

Actually, that diff you provided was supposed to be humorous in response to

4140: 3281:

I write for enjoyment, but I don't expect admins to have to do so...*shrug*

2919: 2814: 2425: 1982:

pending response to Q7. (A well-worded answer will get the "weak" stricken)

656:)), and I would have attempted something along those lines after deleting. 2686: 2312:

Great user, you should think yourself lucky that Kurt Weber cant oppose!

1096:

a policy or guideline; it merely reflects some opinions of its author(s).

767: 734: 684: 366:

be a GA, so most of my work is getting articles to that consistent level.

4144: 4077:

I responded up there, but I'll do it again here, in order of questions.

3238:

The candidate seems prepared for the task ahead and will do just fine.

2721: 2094: 270: 5355:

or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

3339: 2947: 2704:(Shakes head in disappointment).... No concerns about this editor. -- 2567: 1692: 1109:

equality? I'm sure you've seen in preached elsewhere, why not here?

5052:(PS: neutral updated below after response 07:49, 29 July 2007 (UTC)) 3174:. Great user, just not particularly pleased about "Chatlog Majorly". 4987: 4386: 2481:

I think Alex's got what it takes to be an excellent administrator.

2092:

Although I ought to oppose you for maiciously bringing this to RFA

4983: 4667:

misuse the admin tools. My regrets, I had not intended to oppose.

4382: 3534:

It seems entirely inappropriate to cast a !vote to void another.

3695:(as if there isn't enough "us vs. them" mentality flying around) 3916:), as noted in Q2. Finally, a diff proving I don't understand 2180:

a good candidate, who has learnt and grown from his last RfA --

2140:. No reason not to - a great candidate I thought was an admin! 4113:

Thanks for your time, and I hope this answers your questions.

3070:

He is one of the best editors I've seen on Knowledge (XXG)!!!

2358:- Great editor. Good contribs, good history, good experience. 1911:

I can definitely trust Giggy as an admin. I have no concerns.

1219:

I nominated it for deletion (by the way, it's been deleted by

320:

What are your best contributions to Knowledge (XXG), and why?

289:, but this wouldn’t be something I would focus on, as I'm not 148:

I'm humbled by the kind words of my nominators, and I accept.

4389:

discussion on Jmlk17's talk page; it's supposed to be funny.

2209:

Moved from the support section. Care to elaborate at all? --

1039:

Strongly agree with Christopher. This essay is a "reply" to

145:

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

4093:

why is it in Knowledge (XXG) space rather than the userspace

3550:

I agree. As much as I don't care for A.Z's reasoning above,

2005: 1261:

option for that essay was userfication instead of deletion.

2321:

Technically he can, just not with his usual reasoning. :-)

83:

and a wide participation in a vast array of areas, such as

1793:

Giggy has done great things for wikipedia. We met through

1999: 29:

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a

3424:

How is it "human" to post an essay which has no merit? —

5027: 4942: 4881: 4878: 4875: 4872: 4869: 4663: 4399: 4367: 4143:

arguments. Not of interest? A strawman is a rhetorical

3908: 3892: 3861:

who presented himself as all-for-mainspace-editing-only

3759: 3631: 3514: 3488:: To balance out A.Z's frivolous support vote above. -- 1687: 1056: 1053: 951: 945: 939: 607: 541: 4868:, maybe 50% of his most recent reports were rejected ( 1393:

This guy should have been sysopped a long time ago...

5132:

Per principles confirmed by the Arbitration Committee

4656:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Common outcomes

4631:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Caldorwards4 2

4441:

convinces me that Giggy is not yet admin material. ~

2544:

A really valuable editor in various GAN task forces.

1711:

I thought you were an admin, and a good one at that!

1562:

Watch it, Giggy. Don't make me change to oppose. :-P

1073:

As you say, I had nothing to do with your changes to

5115: 5079: 3891:— Lack of contributions to the encyclopaedia. Also, 3691:(which is the underlying purpose of the whole thing) 2883:

I have to switch my vote on the basis of new info.--

2707: 2000: 696:

do you still think you were correct to nominate it?

369:

On another note, I’m also proud of the work done by

5112:

of content the log was, not the content. Thanks. --

3333:. Very involved, thoughtful, and trustworthy. He 1913: 1323:

when it's done). Thanks again for the opportunity,

358:, and the like. Thus, the majority of work I do is 5153:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar 2 2803:Closing admin, please ignore this invalid vote. -- 1006:The essay has been deleted. "16:32, July 30, 2007 168:Withdrawn, more comments under discussion header. 4982:I mentioned above that it was a joke. Please see 4789:I apologize, I forgot I had supported before. =/ 4063:before commenting on this request for adminship. 3693:as it increases the chance of blocs and factions 822:Under what circumstances is it correct to report 487:Category:Wikipedian administrators open to recall 4182:Knowledge (XXG):Don't worry about writing essays 3863:. No I didn't. And I wouldn't. Because I'm not. 58:FINAL (77/25/3); Ended 03:44, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 1133:I figure it even less. Sorry. Maybe next time. 255:What admin work do you intend to take part in? 4184:. Why do we have an "essay" which just states 1514:That's why you came second. Not good enough. 4566:anything other than use the power of words. 4490:Not seeing what I would like to see with the 3383:A great helper, I thought you were an admin! 2528: 1183:can also be deleted (per R1) when it's gone. 457:No, I've never been accused of sockpuppetry. 8: 1651:was gonna nom him myself in a couple weeks. 540:Picking up on a question from your last RfA 326:The articles I’m most proud of are my three 261:I would mainly focus on the areas I work in 220:. Thanks for considering me for adminship! 200:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/G1ggy 5056:Special:Undelete/User:G1ggy/Chatlog Majorly 1391:Edit conflicted "Beat both co-noms support" 1258:Knowledge (XXG):Don't template the regulars 1208:Knowledge (XXG):Don't template the regulars 1041:Knowledge (XXG):Don't template the regulars 4084:- I wasn't aware that criticisng an essay 2525: 1918: 1620: 2934:. Has made great strides since last nom. 2566:Excellent, helpful and experienced user. 2444:- I trust Giggy to not misuse the tools. 2397: 1998:What a waste to have him not an admin. -- 1485:Nah. Just 3 times per minute for me. :-) 132:Knowledge (XXG): WikiProject Powderfinger 125:It is my honor to be able to co-nominate 2812:Erm, don't you mean closing bureaucrat? 2459: 1752:as the co-nominator. One of these days, 5134:" What principles confirmed by ArbCom? 4151:strawman: the notion that I think it's 4055:because of concerns over Giggy's essay 2507:By the power of my voodoo monkey skull 890: 4507: 4275:Now changing my above !vote to a very 3335:seems to really have dedicated himself 3198: 3177: 2576: 2568: 1425:per noms... amg edit conflict!(twice) 18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship 4916:Knowledge (XXG):Template the regulars 4658:, all users should know better), the 4602:Knowledge (XXG):Template the regulars 4561:Finally, the idea that regular users 4368:lack an appropriate level of maturity 4347:Knowledge (XXG):Template the regulars 4315:Knowledge (XXG):Template the regulars 4057:Knowledge (XXG):Template the regulars 2794:Everyone should be an administrator. 1173:Knowledge (XXG):Template the regulars 1171:If anyone is interested, I've tagged 990:Knowledge (XXG):Template the regulars 7: 4694:due to the "Majorly chat" incident. 4176:, or totally redundant ones such as 3685:I must say I agree with Hesperian - 265:(yes, a totally unrelated link :D); 5371:Unsuccessful requests for adminship 3552:I am equally unhappy with Matt57's. 2968: 2396:- A true case of cliché #1 for me! 889: 2017:It is time to give him the mop. -- 702:: No, I wasn't. I wasn't aware of 24: 1357:- Excellent user. Good work with 737:regarding criteria for deletion. 411:(and I may consider applying for 336:Dream Days at the Hotel Existence 816:regarding suspected sockpuppets. 687:regarding criteria for deletion. 5277:pending answer to my question. 4959: 4952: 4947: 4710: 4707: 4704: 4701: 4698: 3054: 3051: 3048: 3045: 3042: 3030: 3027: 3024: 3021: 3018: 2760: 2758: 2756: 2755: 2632: 2624: 2616: 2547: 2523:Would make an excellent admin. 2446: 2346:has contributed a lot recently 1709:Seriously? You weren't already? 1026: 1023: 1020: 1017: 1014: 5151:Chat logs fall into that. See 4696: 4525:Please see my response to it. 4178:Knowledge (XXG):Charitableness 3628:changed to strong oppose below 3541: 3536: 3221:- good, thoughtful candidate. 3136:Will make an excellent admin. 3040: 3016: 2900: 2752:I trust Giggy with the mop. -- 1966: 1961: 1616: 1012: 880:. For the edit count, see the 193:Candidate’s optional statement 1: 5233: 5117: 5081: 4941:- Alas, I must oppose due to 4768: 4464: 4404: 4219: 4193: 4186:Knowledge (XXG):Be reasonable 4115: 4009: 3967: 3922: 3786: 3283: 3109: 2780:Knowledge (XXG):Editor review 2726: 2709: 2554: 2467: 2461: 2300: 2066: 2064:You want your pants back? :P 1767: 1621: 1581: 1573: 1568: 1516: 1504: 1496: 1491: 1412: 1404: 1399: 1326: 1272: 1235: 1185: 1111: 842: 783: 708: 658: 599:Articles for deletion process 568: 497: 459: 417: 375: 295: 222: 170: 150: 4654:for deletion (regardless of 3948:per Hesperian. Giggy says: 3118: 2361: 893:Requests for adminship/G1ggy 566:be used in relation to BLP. 130:article-builder. He created 5241: 4776: 4472: 4412: 4227: 4123: 4017: 3975: 3930: 3920:would be helpful. Thanks, 3794: 3291: 2734: 2533: 2074: 1775: 1524: 1334: 1280: 1243: 1193: 1119: 977:Special:Contributions/Giggy 876:'s edit summary usage with 850: 826:? Could you comment on the 791: 716: 694:For this nomination for AfD 666: 597:regarding consensus in the 576: 543:, what are you opinions on 505: 467: 425: 383: 303: 244:Questions for the candidate 230: 202:, under my old username of 178: 158: 5387: 5147:Knowledge (XXG):Copyrights 5093:illuminated after that :) 2412:. An excellent candidate. 1460:I think it was more :-P -- 5338:09:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 5324:17:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 5315:07:32, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 5297:01:47, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 5282:17:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 5267:07:49, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 5250:23:25, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 5201:21:36, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 5183:15:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 5164:08:11, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 5139:07:44, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 5124:07:47, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 5102:07:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 5088:07:37, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 5072:07:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 5041:04:31, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 5011:03:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 4995:02:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 4978:02:32, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 4966:02:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 4934:14:37, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 4893:01:27, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 4857:00:30, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 4845:00:29, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 4820:00:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 4785:23:30, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4759:23:27, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4717:21:37, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4687:21:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4675:19:57, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4642:19:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4618:19:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4593:14:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4571:19:45, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4544:13:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4530:23:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4521:12:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4499:12:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4481:22:29, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4449:09:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4421:22:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4394:17:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4377:07:49, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4359:07:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4338:06:32, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4302:01:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 4293:18:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4284:05:47, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4271:00:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4249:04:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4236:03:53, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4213:03:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4201:23:55, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 4174:Knowledge (XXG):Cluocracy 4165:08:53, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4132:23:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 4072:23:33, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 4037:07:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 4026:07:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3999:06:59, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3984:22:14, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3960:14:51, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3939:22:14, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3904:14:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3868:06:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3854:02:05, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3830:01:38, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3803:22:14, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3776:05:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3762:. I merely feel that the 3753:23:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3727:14:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3714:14:33, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3677:05:47, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3663:13:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3639:12:27, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3610:12:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3583:12:07, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3573:08:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3558:06:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3546:06:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3522:03:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3510:03:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3493:05:16, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3471:20:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3457:19:18, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3443:19:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3433:18:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3420:18:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3408:17:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3374:10:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3365:08:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3353:05:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3326:05:24, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3300:03:53, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3277:02:23, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3252:02:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3231:23:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3212:12:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3191:23:14, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3165:22:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3141:21:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3129:20:49, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3102:20:26, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3075:19:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3061:21:37, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 3036:13:36, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 3007:13:34, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2993:13:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2974:12:14, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2960:11:43, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2939:10:42, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2927:09:50, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2910:08:15, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2888:12:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 2881:08:04, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2869:04:55, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2857:04:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2832:12:07, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2822:09:50, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2808:05:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2799:03:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2787:02:05, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2771:01:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2743:00:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2716:00:11, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2696:23:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2677:21:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2652:21:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2640:21:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2607:20:55, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2589:20:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2579:18:45, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2559:18:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2537:18:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2516:18:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2500:16:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2488:15:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2474:14:57, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2451:14:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2437:13:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2417:13:17, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2405:12:46, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2389:11:25, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2367:11:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2351:10:48, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2335:19:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 2326:13:17, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2317:10:44, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2308:10:26, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2280:02:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 2267:18:21, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 2248:10:15, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2231:10:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2218:10:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2205:09:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2189:10:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2173:09:54, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2156:09:03, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2133:09:00, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2119:07:58, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2083:23:25, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2060:07:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2041:06:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2029:06:18, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2010:05:53, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1991:05:47, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1971:05:44, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1952:05:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1941:05:24, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1923:03:54, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1904:03:53, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1871:03:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1841:03:33, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1802:03:25, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1784:03:28, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1761:03:25, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1745:03:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1725:03:12, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1704:03:11, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1675:11:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 1661:03:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1639:02:57, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1627:02:47, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1596:23:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1587:21:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1558:02:46, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1533:02:45, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1510:02:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1481:02:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1456:02:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1430:02:36, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1418:02:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1386:02:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1343:03:44, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 1312:02:00, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 1289:23:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 1266:23:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 1252:22:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 1215:22:27, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 1202:22:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 1165:15:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 1142:00:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 1128:23:38, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 1068:23:16, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 1033:00:28, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 1000:22:08, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 859:23:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 800:23:14, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 777:08:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 725:23:14, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 675:23:19, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 617:05:11, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 585:23:14, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 514:01:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 476:01:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 239:01:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 187:03:44, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 166:01:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 139:16:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 114:15:00, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 5348:Please do not modify it. 4943:this outstanding comment 4600:per being the author of 4180:. Then again, we have a 4097:request a userspace move 1359:WikiProject Powderfinger 439:Optional Questions from 371:WikiProject Powderfinger 40:Please do not modify it. 4462:is one of those parts. 4313:, primarily because of 812:Optional question from 733:Optional question from 683:Optional question from 593:Optional question from 522:Optional question from 409:mediation via the cabal 3698:through this cheers, 3013:Gigg-i-ly-Giggily-Goo! 1930:-- good candidate. -- 485:How do you feel about 4914:on discovery of this 4153:because of your essay 4099:if you see otherwise. 4061:Template the regulars 2036:Per AFD interactions 1355:Beat-the-noms Support 31:request for adminship 5225:gave a shit about it 3038:Switched to oppose. 2778:I reviewed Giggy at 2663:, as can be seen on 608:Please read this AFD 275:dealing with vandals 218:User:Giggy/RfA/G1ggy 5054:Strong neutral per 3566:Anonymous Dissident 3197:Moved to oppose. · 2161:Very Strong Support 1984:Good answer to Q7. 1934:Anonymous Dissident 888:RfAs for this user: 119:Co-nomination from 5301:changed to oppose. 5219:DarkFalls, it was 5045:changed to oppose. 4243:Christopher Parham 4207:Christopher Parham 3893:how's this a test? 3852: 3751: 3661: 3608: 3569: 2274:Christopher Parham 1937: 1454: 1080:1) As quoted from 994:Christopher Parham 979:before commenting. 112: 5302: 5155:, July 11, 2007. 5046: 4612: 3836: 3735: 3645: 3629: 3592: 3563: 3324: 2991: 2724:, it's all good! 2675: 2649:Deliciously Saucy 2462:Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor 2424:. Gets my Vote.-- 2154: 2117: 1931: 1741: 1577: 1565: 1500: 1488: 1438: 1408: 1396: 1321:User:Giggy/Header 1175:for deletion per 901:Links for Giggy: 628:). I also think 360:WikiProject based 96: 5378: 5350: 5300: 5263: 5243: 5237: 5197: 5192: 5160: 5120: 5119: 5098: 5084: 5083: 5068: 5044: 5039: 4963: 4956: 4951: 4817: 4813: 4809: 4805: 4801: 4797: 4793: 4778: 4772: 4756: 4752: 4748: 4744: 4740: 4736: 4732: 4714: 4712: 4709: 4706: 4703: 4700: 4610: 4519: 4474: 4468: 4446: 4414: 4408: 4355: 4336: 4290:The Evil Spartan 4229: 4223: 4195: 4125: 4119: 4019: 4013: 3977: 3971: 3932: 3926: 3850: 3845: 3840: 3796: 3790: 3749: 3744: 3739: 3659: 3654: 3649: 3627: 3606: 3601: 3596: 3567: 3543: 3538: 3453: 3440:The Evil Spartan 3429: 3417:The Evil Spartan 3351: 3349: 3344: 3323: 3310: 3293: 3287: 3272: 3264: 3210: 3189: 3162: 3157: 3152: 3125: 3115: 3099: 3097: 3095: 3058: 3056: 3053: 3050: 3047: 3044: 3034: 3032: 3029: 3026: 3023: 3020: 3004: 2985: 2972: 2956: 2950: 2936:Recurring dreams 2904: 2854: 2849: 2767: 2766: 2764: 2762: 2736: 2730: 2712: 2711: 2671: 2665:User:Giggy/Adopt 2636: 2628: 2620: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2577: 2574: 2556: 2555: 2550: 2549: 2534: 2530: 2527: 2472: 2469: 2463: 2448: 2432: 2403: 2385: 2382: 2363: 2302: 2243: 2227: 2200: 2194:Strongest Oppose 2171: 2144: 2131:this message! - 2116: 2114: 2103: 2076: 2070: 2027: 2022: 2007: 2002: 1968: 1963: 1935: 1920: 1915: 1899: 1897: 1895: 1893: 1891: 1865: 1862: 1860: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1777: 1771: 1742: 1740: 1719: 1716: 1702: 1691: 1672: 1659: 1624: 1623: 1618: 1583: 1578: 1575: 1570: 1563: 1554: 1548: 1542: 1526: 1520: 1506: 1501: 1498: 1493: 1486: 1477: 1471: 1465: 1452: 1447: 1442: 1414: 1409: 1406: 1401: 1394: 1382: 1376: 1370: 1336: 1330: 1282: 1276: 1245: 1239: 1195: 1189: 1121: 1115: 1089: 1083: 1030: 1028: 1025: 1022: 1019: 1016: 967: 926: 867:General comments 852: 846: 828:TharkunColl case 793: 787: 718: 712: 668: 662: 578: 572: 532: 507: 501: 469: 463: 427: 421: 385: 379: 344:Age of Mythology 332:Age of Mythology 305: 299: 232: 226: 180: 174: 160: 154: 110: 105: 100: 42: 5386: 5385: 5381: 5380: 5379: 5377: 5376: 5375: 5361: 5360: 5359: 5353:this nomination 5346: 5261: 5245: 5195: 5190: 5181: 5158: 5121: 5096: 5085: 5066: 5030: 4988:this discussion 4962: 4815: 4811: 4807: 4803: 4799: 4795: 4791: 4780: 4754: 4750: 4746: 4742: 4738: 4734: 4730: 4476: 4444: 4416: 4353: 4327: 4319:tar and feather 4231: 4127: 4021: 3979: 3934: 3848: 3843: 3838: 3798: 3747: 3742: 3737: 3657: 3652: 3647: 3604: 3599: 3594: 3565: 3451: 3427: 3347: 3340: 3338: 3311: 3295: 3270: 3262: 3250: 3160: 3155: 3150: 3093: 3091: 3089: 3002: 2958: 2954: 2948: 2905: 2852: 2847: 2738: 2713: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2592:But of course! 2573: 2553: 2546: 2430: 2383: 2377: 2246: 2241: 2225: 2203: 2198: 2164: 2112: 2104: 2095:when some of us 2078: 2020: 2018: 1933: 1889: 1887: 1885: 1883: 1881: 1858: 1856: 1853: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1779: 1739: 1717: 1714: 1686: 1684: 1666: 1653: 1552: 1546: 1540: 1528: 1475: 1469: 1463: 1450: 1445: 1440: 1380: 1374: 1368: 1338: 1284: 1247: 1197: 1123: 1087: 1081: 986: 919: 902: 898: 869: 854: 795: 720: 670: 580: 523: 509: 471: 429: 387: 307: 271:Speedy deletion 246: 234: 182: 162: 108: 103: 98: 52: 38: 35:did not succeed 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5384: 5382: 5374: 5373: 5363: 5362: 5358: 5357: 5341: 5340: 5328: 5327: 5326: 5305: 5304: 5303: 5285: 5271: 5270: 5269: 5239: 5216: 5213: 5212: 5211: 5210: 5209: 5208: 5207: 5206: 5205: 5204: 5203: 5175: 5128: 5127: 5126: 5114: 5078: 5048: 5047: 5014: 5013: 4999: 4998: 4997: 4980: 4960: 4936: 4907:- switched to 4895: 4859: 4847: 4843: 4826: 4825: 4824: 4823: 4822: 4774: 4719: 4689: 4677: 4644: 4639:After Midnight 4620: 4595: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4534: 4533: 4532: 4501: 4485: 4484: 4483: 4470: 4427: 4426: 4425: 4424: 4423: 4410: 4361: 4340: 4308: 4307: 4306: 4305: 4304: 4273: 4261: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4225: 4170: 4169: 4168: 4121: 4111: 4100: 4089: 4078: 4047: 4046: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4042: 4041: 4040: 4039: 4015: 3973: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3928: 3914:other articles 3885: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3792: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3718: 3717: 3716: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3532: 3531: 3530: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3468:After Midnight 3463: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3410: 3405: 3399: 3393: 3387: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3355: 3328: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3289: 3254: 3244: 3233: 3219:Strong support 3216: 3215: 3214: 3194: 3193: 3146:Strong Support 3143: 3138:LessHeard vanU 3131: 3104: 3083:would be proud 3077: 3068:Strong Support 3065: 3064: 3063: 2995: 2976: 2962: 2952: 2944:Strong Support 2941: 2932:Strong Support 2929: 2915:Strong support 2912: 2899: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2859: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2789: 2773: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2732: 2706: 2698: 2679: 2657:Strong Support 2654: 2642: 2609: 2590: 2581: 2569: 2561: 2539: 2518: 2502: 2490: 2476: 2456:Strong Support 2453: 2439: 2419: 2407: 2391: 2369: 2353: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2332:After Midnight 2310: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2269: 2245: 2202: 2191: 2175: 2158: 2142:Matt/TheFearow 2135: 2121: 2090:Strong Support 2087: 2086: 2085: 2072: 2043: 2031: 2012: 1996:Strong Support 1993: 1973: 1957:Strong support 1954: 1943: 1925: 1906: 1873: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1791:Strong support 1788: 1787: 1786: 1773: 1750:Strong support 1747: 1727: 1706: 1680:strong support 1677: 1641: 1629: 1609:Strong Support 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1589: 1522: 1483: 1432: 1420: 1388: 1346: 1345: 1332: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1278: 1241: 1191: 1168: 1167: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1117: 1099: 1078: 1036: 1035: 1003: 1002: 985: 982: 972: 971: 970: 968: 897: 896: 895: 887: 886: 885: 878:mathbot's tool 868: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 848: 817: 809: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 789: 730: 729: 728: 727: 714: 688: 680: 679: 678: 677: 664: 602: 590: 589: 588: 587: 574: 562:. IAR should 519: 518: 517: 516: 503: 480: 479: 478: 465: 436: 435: 434: 433: 423: 394: 393: 392: 391: 381: 367: 352:citing sources 340:Call of Duty 2 314: 313: 312: 311: 301: 245: 242: 228: 190: 189: 176: 156: 51: 46: 45: 44: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5383: 5372: 5369: 5368: 5366: 5356: 5354: 5349: 5343: 5342: 5339: 5336: 5332: 5329: 5325: 5322: 5318: 5317: 5316: 5313: 5309: 5306: 5299: 5298: 5295: 5290: 5286: 5284: 5283: 5280: 5276: 5272: 5268: 5265: 5264: 5257: 5253: 5252: 5251: 5248: 5244: 5238: 5236: 5230: 5226: 5222: 5217: 5214: 5202: 5199: 5198: 5193: 5186: 5185: 5184: 5180: 5179: 5178:yak, yak, yak 5174: 5173: 5167: 5166: 5165: 5162: 5161: 5154: 5150: 5148: 5142: 5141: 5140: 5137: 5133: 5129: 5125: 5122: 5111: 5107: 5106: 5105: 5104: 5103: 5100: 5099: 5091: 5090: 5089: 5086: 5075: 5074: 5073: 5070: 5069: 5061: 5057: 5053: 5050: 5049: 5043: 5042: 5038: 5035: 5034: 5028: 5025: 5021: 5020: 5019: 5018: 5012: 5009: 5008: 5003: 5000: 4996: 4993: 4990:. Thank you. 4989: 4985: 4981: 4979: 4976: 4975: 4969: 4968: 4967: 4964: 4957: 4955: 4950: 4944: 4940: 4937: 4935: 4931: 4928: 4925: 4921: 4917: 4913: 4911: 4906: 4904: 4900: 4896: 4894: 4890: 4886: 4882: 4879: 4876: 4873: 4870: 4867: 4863: 4860: 4858: 4855: 4851: 4850:Strong Oppose 4848: 4846: 4842: 4840: 4836: 4832: 4830: 4827: 4821: 4818: 4814: 4806: 4798: 4788: 4787: 4786: 4783: 4779: 4773: 4771: 4765: 4764:Note to 'crat 4762: 4761: 4760: 4757: 4753: 4745: 4737: 4727: 4723: 4720: 4718: 4715: 4713: 4693: 4690: 4688: 4685: 4681: 4678: 4676: 4673: 4670: 4665: 4661: 4657: 4653: 4649: 4645: 4643: 4640: 4636: 4632: 4628: 4624: 4621: 4619: 4616: 4607: 4603: 4599: 4598:Strong Oppose 4596: 4594: 4591: 4587: 4583: 4579: 4576: 4572: 4569: 4564: 4559: 4555: 4551: 4547: 4546: 4545: 4542: 4538: 4535: 4531: 4528: 4524: 4523: 4522: 4518: 4517: 4514: 4511: 4505: 4502: 4500: 4497: 4493: 4489: 4486: 4482: 4479: 4475: 4469: 4467: 4461: 4457: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4447: 4440: 4436: 4431: 4430:Strong oppose 4428: 4422: 4419: 4415: 4409: 4407: 4401: 4397: 4396: 4395: 4392: 4388: 4384: 4380: 4379: 4378: 4375: 4373: 4372:Thewinchester 4369: 4365: 4364:Strong Oppose 4362: 4360: 4357: 4356: 4348: 4344: 4341: 4339: 4335: 4332: 4331: 4325: 4320: 4316: 4312: 4309: 4303: 4300: 4296: 4295: 4294: 4291: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4282: 4278: 4277:strong oppose 4274: 4272: 4269: 4265: 4262: 4250: 4247: 4244: 4239: 4238: 4237: 4234: 4230: 4224: 4222: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4211: 4208: 4204: 4203: 4202: 4199: 4196: 4191: 4187: 4183: 4179: 4175: 4171: 4166: 4163: 4159: 4154: 4150: 4146: 4142: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4130: 4126: 4120: 4118: 4112: 4109: 4105: 4101: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4087: 4083: 4079: 4076: 4075: 4073: 4070: 4066: 4062: 4058: 4054: 4051: 4048: 4038: 4035: 4034: 4029: 4028: 4027: 4024: 4020: 4014: 4012: 4006: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3997: 3996: 3991: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3982: 3978: 3972: 3970: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3958: 3957: 3952: 3947: 3944: 3940: 3937: 3933: 3927: 3925: 3919: 3915: 3910: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3902: 3898: 3894: 3890: 3887: 3886: 3869: 3866: 3862: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3851: 3846: 3841: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3827: 3824: 3821: 3817: 3813: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3805: 3804: 3801: 3797: 3791: 3789: 3783: 3777: 3774: 3769: 3765: 3761: 3756: 3755: 3754: 3750: 3745: 3740: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3725: 3724: 3719: 3715: 3711: 3708: 3705: 3701: 3696: 3692: 3688: 3684: 3678: 3675: 3670: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3660: 3655: 3650: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3637: 3632: 3626: 3625: 3621: 3611: 3607: 3602: 3597: 3590: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3581: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3571: 3568: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3556: 3553: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3544: 3539: 3533: 3523: 3520: 3516: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3508: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3491: 3487: 3486: 3481: 3480: 3472: 3469: 3464: 3458: 3455: 3454: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3441: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3431: 3430: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3418: 3414: 3411: 3409: 3406: 3403: 3400: 3397: 3394: 3391: 3388: 3385: 3382: 3379: 3375: 3372: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3363: 3359: 3356: 3354: 3350: 3345: 3343: 3336: 3332: 3329: 3327: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3308: 3305: 3301: 3298: 3294: 3288: 3286: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3274: 3273: 3266: 3265: 3258: 3255: 3253: 3249: 3248: 3247:yak, yak, yak 3243: 3242: 3237: 3234: 3232: 3228: 3224: 3220: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3208: 3205: 3202: 3196: 3195: 3192: 3188: 3187: 3184: 3181: 3175: 3173: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3163: 3158: 3153: 3147: 3144: 3142: 3139: 3135: 3132: 3130: 3127: 3126: 3124: 3121: 3114: 3113: 3108: 3105: 3103: 3100: 3087: 3084: 3082: 3078: 3076: 3073: 3072:Politics rule 3069: 3066: 3062: 3059: 3057: 3037: 3035: 3033: 3014: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3005: 2999: 2996: 2994: 2989: 2984: 2980: 2977: 2975: 2971: 2966: 2963: 2961: 2957: 2951: 2945: 2942: 2940: 2937: 2933: 2930: 2928: 2925: 2924: 2921: 2916: 2913: 2911: 2908: 2906: 2903: 2896: 2893: 2889: 2886: 2882: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2867: 2863: 2860: 2858: 2855: 2850: 2844: 2841: 2833: 2830: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2820: 2819: 2816: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2806: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2797: 2793: 2790: 2788: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2774: 2772: 2769: 2768: 2751: 2748: 2744: 2741: 2737: 2731: 2729: 2723: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2714: 2703: 2699: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2688: 2683: 2680: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2655: 2653: 2650: 2646: 2643: 2641: 2637: 2635: 2629: 2627: 2621: 2619: 2613: 2610: 2608: 2605: 2597: 2591: 2588: 2587: 2582: 2580: 2575: 2572: 2565: 2562: 2560: 2557: 2551: 2543: 2540: 2538: 2535: 2531: 2522: 2519: 2517: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511:~ Infrangible 2506: 2503: 2501: 2498: 2494: 2491: 2489: 2486: 2485: 2480: 2477: 2475: 2470: 2464: 2457: 2454: 2452: 2449: 2443: 2440: 2438: 2434: 2427: 2423: 2420: 2418: 2415: 2411: 2408: 2406: 2402: 2401: 2395: 2392: 2390: 2387: 2386: 2380: 2373: 2370: 2368: 2365: 2364: 2357: 2354: 2352: 2349: 2345: 2342: 2336: 2333: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2324: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2315: 2311: 2309: 2306: 2303: 2298: 2294: 2291: 2281: 2278: 2275: 2270: 2268: 2265: 2264: 2259: 2257: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2244: 2238: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2229: 2228: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2216: 2214: 2213: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2201: 2195: 2192: 2190: 2187: 2185: 2184: 2179: 2176: 2174: 2170: 2167: 2162: 2159: 2157: 2153: 2150: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2136: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2125:Mailer Diablo 2122: 2120: 2115: 2109: 2108: 2101: 2099: 2096: 2091: 2088: 2084: 2081: 2077: 2071: 2069: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2058: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2044: 2042: 2039: 2035: 2032: 2030: 2026: 2023: 2016: 2013: 2011: 2008: 2003: 1997: 1994: 1992: 1989: 1988: 1983: 1980: 1978: 1974: 1972: 1969: 1964: 1958: 1955: 1953: 1950: 1947: 1944: 1942: 1939: 1936: 1929: 1926: 1924: 1921: 1916: 1910: 1907: 1905: 1901: 1900: 1877: 1874: 1872: 1869: 1866: 1864: 1850: 1847: 1843: 1842: 1839: 1835: 1827: 1819: 1809: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1789: 1785: 1782: 1778: 1772: 1770: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1748: 1746: 1743: 1737: 1736: 1731: 1728: 1726: 1723: 1721: 1720: 1710: 1707: 1705: 1700: 1697: 1694: 1689: 1681: 1678: 1676: 1673: 1671: 1670: 1662: 1660: 1658: 1657: 1648: 1646: 1642: 1640: 1637: 1633: 1630: 1628: 1625: 1614: 1610: 1607: 1597: 1594: 1590: 1588: 1585: 1584: 1579: 1571: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1556: 1555: 1550: 1549: 1543: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1531: 1527: 1521: 1519: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1508: 1507: 1502: 1494: 1484: 1482: 1479: 1478: 1473: 1472: 1466: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1453: 1448: 1443: 1436: 1433: 1431: 1428: 1424: 1421: 1419: 1416: 1415: 1410: 1402: 1392: 1389: 1387: 1384: 1383: 1378: 1377: 1371: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1344: 1341: 1337: 1331: 1329: 1324: 1322: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1310: 1305: 1290: 1287: 1283: 1277: 1275: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1264: 1259: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1250: 1246: 1240: 1238: 1232: 1229: 1226: 1222: 1221:Pascal.Tesson 1218: 1217: 1216: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1200: 1196: 1190: 1188: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1169: 1166: 1163: 1159: 1154: 1150: 1143: 1140: 1136: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1126: 1122: 1116: 1114: 1107: 1104: 1100: 1097: 1095: 1086: 1079: 1076: 1072: 1071: 1069: 1066: 1062: 1057: 1054: 1051: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1037: 1034: 1031: 1029: 1009: 1008:Pascal.Tesson 1005: 1004: 1001: 998: 995: 991: 988: 987: 983: 981: 980: 978: 969: 965: 962: 959: 956: 953: 950: 947: 944: 941: 938: 935: 932: 929: 925: 922: 918: 915: 912: 909: 905: 900: 899: 894: 891: 883: 879: 875: 871: 870: 866: 860: 857: 853: 847: 845: 839: 835: 832: 831: 829: 825: 821: 818: 815: 811: 810: 801: 798: 794: 788: 786: 780: 779: 778: 774: 770: 769: 764: 763: 762: 760: 756: 755: 753: 752: 749: 745: 744: 742: 741: 739: 738: 736: 726: 723: 719: 713: 711: 705: 701: 698: 697: 695: 692: 689: 686: 682: 681: 676: 673: 669: 663: 661: 655: 652: 649: 645: 644:Phil Sandifer 641: 638: 635: 631: 627: 623: 620: 619: 618: 615: 614: 609: 606: 603: 600: 596: 592: 591: 586: 583: 579: 573: 571: 565: 561: 556: 553: 552: 550: 546: 542: 539: 536: 535: 534: 533: 531: 528: 527: 515: 512: 508: 502: 500: 494: 491: 490: 488: 484: 481: 477: 474: 470: 464: 462: 456: 453: 452: 450: 447: 446: 445: 443: 442: 432: 428: 422: 420: 414: 413:the committee 410: 405: 402: 401: 399: 396: 395: 390: 386: 380: 378: 372: 368: 365: 361: 357: 356:MoSsin' it up 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 328:good articles 325: 322: 321: 319: 316: 315: 310: 306: 300: 298: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 257: 256: 254: 251: 250: 249: 243: 241: 240: 237: 233: 227: 225: 219: 215: 212: 209: 205: 201: 196: 194: 188: 185: 181: 175: 173: 167: 165: 161: 155: 153: 146: 143: 142: 141: 140: 137: 133: 128: 124: 122: 116: 115: 111: 106: 101: 94: 90: 86: 82: 78: 77:easy to coach 74: 71: 68: 64: 60: 59: 56: 50: 47: 43: 41: 36: 32: 27: 26: 19: 5347: 5344: 5330: 5307: 5288: 5287: 5274: 5273: 5259: 5255: 5234: 5228: 5188: 5177: 5171: 5156: 5143: 5131: 5109: 5094: 5064: 5059: 5051: 5032: 5023: 5022: 5016: 5015: 5005: 5001: 4973: 4953: 4948: 4938: 4926: 4909: 4908: 4902: 4898: 4897: 4861: 4849: 4833: 4828: 4790: 4769: 4763: 4729: 4725: 4721: 4695: 4691: 4679: 4652:Gampalagudem 4622: 4597: 4585: 4581: 4577: 4562: 4557: 4553: 4549: 4536: 4515: 4512: 4509: 4503: 4487: 4465: 4429: 4405: 4363: 4351: 4342: 4329: 4310: 4276: 4263: 4220: 4152: 4148: 4116: 4103: 4092: 4085: 4081: 4052: 4049: 4032: 4010: 3994: 3968: 3955: 3949: 3945: 3923: 3888: 3860: 3822: 3811: 3787: 3767: 3763: 3722: 3706: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3623: 3622: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3478: 3477: 3449: 3425: 3412: 3380: 3357: 3341: 3330: 3313:ck lostsword 3306: 3284: 3271:bananabucket 3268: 3260: 3256: 3246: 3240: 3235: 3218: 3206: 3203: 3200: 3185: 3182: 3179: 3171: 3169: 3145: 3133: 3117: 3116: 3111: 3110: 3106: 3085: 3079: 3067: 3039: 3015: 3012: 3011: 2997: 2978: 2964: 2943: 2931: 2918: 2914: 2901: 2894: 2874: 2873: 2861: 2845:great user. 2842: 2813: 2791: 2775: 2753: 2749: 2727: 2685: 2681: 2661:Adopt-a-user 2656: 2644: 2633: 2625: 2617: 2611: 2584: 2570: 2563: 2541: 2520: 2510: 2508: 2504: 2492: 2483: 2478: 2455: 2441: 2421: 2409: 2398: 2393: 2378: 2376: 2371: 2360: 2355: 2343: 2292: 2261: 2255: 2236: 2223: 2211: 2193: 2182: 2177: 2160: 2137: 2128: 2106: 2093: 2089: 2067: 2049: 2045: 2033: 2014: 1995: 1985: 1981: 1976: 1975: 1956: 1945: 1927: 1908: 1880: 1875: 1854: 1848: 1811: 1807: 1806: 1790: 1768: 1753: 1749: 1735:the_undertow 1734: 1729: 1713: 1708: 1679: 1668: 1667: 1655: 1654: 1650: 1647:Weak support 1644: 1643: 1631: 1612: 1608: 1566: 1544: 1538: 1517: 1489: 1467: 1461: 1434: 1422: 1397: 1390: 1372: 1366: 1354: 1348: 1347: 1327: 1317: 1303: 1301: 1273: 1236: 1227: 1186: 1157: 1112: 1105: 1093: 1091: 1049: 1045:welcome page 1011: 974: 973: 960: 954: 948: 942: 936: 930: 923: 916: 910: 843: 837: 833: 824:sock puppets 819: 784: 766: 758: 757: 754: 747: 746: 743: 740: 732: 731: 709: 699: 690: 659: 650: 636: 621: 611: 604: 569: 563: 559: 554: 537: 525: 521: 520: 498: 492: 482: 460: 454: 448: 438: 437: 418: 403: 397: 376: 363: 323: 317: 296: 290: 278: 267:AfD closures 258: 252: 247: 223: 210: 197: 192: 191: 171: 151: 147: 144: 118: 117: 69: 61: 57: 53: 48: 39: 34: 28: 4582:punishments 4050:Preliminary 4003:I withdrew 3812:not helpful 2548:OhanaUnited 2362:Wikidudeman 2348:Harlowraman 2254:sarcasm is 2252:As always, 2098:are in bed. 1106:well before 838:conclusions 704:WP:OUTCOMES 626:WP:NOT#INFO 560:real people 5294:Carcharoth 4726:especially 4684:Carcharoth 4648:nomination 4615:AnonEMouse 4558:experience 3912:countless 3687:In general 3519:Carcharoth 3386:ionas68224 3362:Editmaniac 3170:Very weak 2603:bounceback 2428:Long Live 2149:(Contribs) 1263:Carcharoth 1212:Carcharoth 984:Discussion 630:Jelly Soup 263:these days 5321:Acalamari 4992:Acalamari 4984:this post 4885:SpuriousQ 4527:Acalamari 4494:issues.-- 4391:Acalamari 4383:this post 4299:Hesperian 4281:Hesperian 3865:Hesperian 3773:Hesperian 3674:Hesperian 3636:Hesperian 3555:Trusilver 3515:Like this 2983:GrooveDog 2848:Tcrow777 2497:Trusilver 2447:Nihiltres 1758:Acalamari 1669:Wizardman 1656:Wizardman 1636:Crockspot 1593:Acalamari 946:block log 882:talk page 136:Acalamari 121:Acalamari 55:talk page 5365:Category 5221:this one 4974:Moondyne 4930:contribs 4920:Casliber 4669:Picaroon 4586:friendly 4550:reaction 4158:Bishonen 4141:strawman 4065:Bishonen 4033:Moondyne 3995:Moondyne 3956:Moondyne 3826:contribs 3816:Casliber 3723:Moondyne 3710:contribs 3700:Casliber 3589:WP:POINT 3398:contribs 3263:Blnguyen 3236:Support. 3081:Quagmire 3003:James086 2586:AldeBaer 2433:speranza 2263:MastCell 2006:irohisat 1949:Nat Tang 1799:XAndreWx 1622:TomasBat 1231:contribs 1135:Bishonen 1061:Bishonen 1050:talkpage 914:contribs 654:contribs 640:contribs 214:contribs 73:contribs 5331:Neutral 5312:Shyamal 5308:Neutral 5289:Neutral 5279:Lisatwo 5275:Neutral 5256:neutral 5136:daveh4h 5024:Neutral 5017:Neutral 4910:Neutral 4899:Support 4268:Purples 4149:another 4145:fallacy 3951:'pedia. 3901:Matthew 3413:Support 3381:Support 3371:Shyamal 3358:Support 3331:Support 3307:Support 3257:Support 3172:support 3134:Support 3112:Cheers, 3107:Support 3086:Cheers, 2998:Support 2979:Support 2970:Zeibura 2965:Support 2895:Support 2875:Support 2866:Lisatwo 2862:Support 2843:Support 2792:Support 2776:Support 2750:Support 2722:atheist 2682:support 2669:HAL2008 2645:Support 2618:Agεθ020 2612:Support 2564:Support 2542:Support 2521:Support 2493:Support 2484:Peacent 2479:Support 2442:Support 2422:Support 2410:Support 2400:Greeves 2394:Support 2372:Support 2356:Support 2344:Support 2293:Support 2258:helpful 2212:Stephen 2183:Stephen 2178:Support 2138:Support 2129:approve 2046:Support 2034:Support 2025:iva1979 2015:Support 1979:Support 1946:Support 1928:Support 1914:Captain 1909:Support 1876:Support 1849:Support 1808:Support 1730:Support 1632:Support 1541:Boricua 1464:Boricua 1435:Support 1423:Support 1369:Boricua 1349:Support 1309:Purples 921:deleted 814:Lisatwo 595:Sceptre 348:started 5262:Daniel 5191:Daniel 5159:Daniel 5097:Daniel 5067:Daniel 5037:scribe 5002:Oppose 4939:Oppose 4912:Oppose 4903:mainly 4866:WP:AIV 4862:Oppose 4829:Oppose 4722:Oppose 4692:Oppose 4680:Oppose 4672:(Talk) 4635:WT:RFA 4627:WP:TTR 4623:Oppose 4606:WP:SSP 4578:Oppose 4568:Geogre 4554:fight. 4541:Geogre 4537:Oppose 4513:ndonic 4504:Oppose 4492:WP:TTR 4488:Oppose 4460:WT:RFA 4456:WT:RFA 4443:Riana 4439:WP:TTR 4435:WT:RFA 4400:72/4/2 4354:Kurykh 4343:Oppose 4334:scribe 4324:Daniel 4311:Oppose 4264:oppose 4246:(talk) 4210:(talk) 4190:hahnch 4086:inside 4053:Oppose 3946:Oppose 3889:Oppose 3768:volume 3624:Oppose 3580:Walton 3507:Matt57 3490:Matt57 3485:Oppose 3479:Oppose 3452:Kurykh 3428:Kurykh 3348:talk 3204:ndonic 3183:ndonic 2829:Walton 2805:Matt57 2784:Shalom 2505:Suport 2435:! :)/ 2414:Walton 2323:Walton 2297:hahnch 2277:(talk) 2256:really 2226:Daniel 2169:styles 2146:(Talk) 2127:and I 1754:I will 1645:Strong 1363:WP:AFD 1181:WP:TTR 1153:WP:TTR 1092:It is 1075:WP:TTR 997:(talk) 549:WP:IAR 545:WP:BLP 530:scribe 364:should 338:, and 273:, and 93:WP:RFA 89:WP:GAC 85:WP:XFD 81:WP:AIV 5335:Aminz 5235:Giggy 5172:JodyB 5118:Falls 5116:Dark 5082:Falls 5080:Dark 5007:Sarah 4835:freak 4770:Giggy 4660:essay 4590:Xoloz 4496:MONGO 4466:Giggy 4406:Giggy 4221:Giggy 4117:Giggy 4011:Giggy 3969:Giggy 3924:Giggy 3788:Giggy 3542:♥Love 3404:email 3285:Giggy 3241:JodyB 3223:IPSOS 2902:Hdt83 2885:MONGO 2879:MONGO 2853:talk 2728:Giggy 2710:Falls 2708:Dark 2529:flash 2526:Lemon 2314:Rlest 2166:Comet 2152:(Bot) 2113:Chat 2107:Pedro 2068:Giggy 2054:Dfrg. 2052:why. 2038:Corpx 1967:♥Love 1919:panda 1795:WP:GA 1769:Giggy 1576:NIMUM 1518:Giggy 1499:NIMUM 1427:Dureo 1407:NIMUM 1328:Giggy 1274:Giggy 1237:Giggy 1187:Giggy 1162:Maxim 1158:a lot 1113:Giggy 1085:essay 928:count 904:Giggy 874:Giggy 844:Giggy 785:Giggy 710:Giggy 660:Giggy 570:Giggy 564:never 499:Giggy 461:Giggy 441:Eddie 419:Giggy 377:Giggy 297:Giggy 279:quite 224:Giggy 204:G1ggy 172:Giggy 152:Giggy 127:Giggy 63:Giggy 49:Giggy 33:that 16:< 5229:that 5110:type 4986:and 4924:talk 4889:talk 4854:Nick 4839:talk 4664:this 4646:The 4625:per 4387:this 4162:talk 4069:talk 4005:this 3992:. — 3990:this 3918:WP:V 3909:This 3897:WP:V 3820:talk 3764:task 3760:here 3704:talk 3537:Lara 3392:talk 3227:talk 3151:Jmlk 2988:talk 2955:bots 2796:A.Z. 2720:I'm 2692:talk 2673:talk 2468:ταlκ 2426:JWJW 2242:Sebi 2199:Sebi 2123:I'm 2050:know 2048:You 1987:Will 1977:Weak 1962:Lara 1718:stan 1553:ddie 1476:ddie 1381:ddie 1361:and 1304:your 1225:talk 1139:talk 1065:talk 958:rfar 940:logs 908:talk 872:See 773:talk 648:talk 634:talk 613:Will 285:and 208:talk 67:talk 5033:WjB 4949:NSR 4650:of 4563:are 4330:WjB 4108:AGF 4102:3) 4091:2) 4080:1) 3839:Hús 3738:Hús 3648:Hús 3595:Hús 3123:hts 3120:Lig 2702:God 2687:DGG 2595:tim 2237:ask 2057:msc 1690:O - 1613:and 1441:Hús 1103:ANI 1094:not 964:spi 934:AfD 820:10. 768:DGG 735:DGG 685:DGG 526:WjB 287:CfD 283:TfD 99:Hús 5367:: 5196:→♦ 5060:he 4954:77 4932:) 4891:) 4874:, 4711:da 4699:Mi 4613:-- 4160:| 4074:. 4067:| 3899:. 3849:nd 3828:) 3748:nd 3712:) 3658:nd 3605:nd 3505:-- 3466:-- 3275:) 3229:) 3176:· 3094:ov 3092:tL 3090:Je 3055:da 3043:Mi 3031:da 3019:Mi 2923:13 2920:Sr 2877:-- 2818:13 2815:Sr 2694:) 2638:) 2634:ФC 2630:• 2626:ΔT 2614:-- 2384:as 2295:- 2260:. 2196:. 2110:| 1902:- 1859:is 1715:J- 1699:Y? 1649:, 1451:nd 1179:. 1177:G7 1137:| 1090:- 1088:}} 1082:{{ 1070:. 1063:| 1027:da 1015:Mi 952:lu 840:. 834:A. 830:? 775:) 761:: 759:A. 748:9. 700:A. 691:8. 622:A. 605:7. 555:A: 551:? 538:6. 493:A: 489:? 483:5. 455:A: 449:4. 444:: 404:A: 398:3. 354:, 342:. 334:, 330:; 324:A: 318:2. 291:as 269:, 259:A: 253:1. 109:nd 91:, 87:, 37:. 5333:- 5247:P 5242:U 5149:. 5130:" 4971:— 4961:C 4927:· 4922:( 4887:( 4877:, 4871:, 4841:) 4837:( 4816:t 4812:e 4808:p 4804:m 4800:i 4796:r 4792:K 4782:P 4777:U 4755:t 4751:e 4747:p 4743:m 4739:i 4735:r 4731:K 4708:n 4705:a 4702:r 4516:O 4510:A 4478:P 4473:U 4445:⁂ 4418:P 4413:U 4233:P 4228:U 4198:n 4194:e 4167:. 4129:P 4124:U 4023:P 4018:U 3981:P 3976:U 3936:P 3931:U 3844:ö 3823:· 3818:( 3800:P 3795:U 3743:ö 3707:· 3702:( 3653:ö 3600:ö 3401:| 3395:| 3389:| 3342:j 3321:C 3319:• 3317:T 3315:• 3297:P 3292:U 3267:( 3225:( 3207:O 3201:A 3186:O 3180:A 3161:7 3156:1 3098:r 3096:e 3052:n 3049:a 3046:r 3028:n 3025:a 3022:r 2990:) 2986:( 2949:E 2765:s 2763:i 2761:r 2759:h 2757:C 2740:P 2735:U 2690:( 2622:( 2599:. 2583:— 2571:i 2471:) 2465:( 2431:E 2381:n 2379:A 2374:— 2305:n 2301:e 2100:! 2080:P 2075:U 2021:S 2001:H 1898:l 1896:e 1894:i 1892:r 1890:d 1888:e 1886:a 1884:h 1882:P 1868:☺ 1863:n 1861:o 1857:l 1855:A 1837:t 1833:e 1829:p 1825:m 1821:i 1817:r 1813:K 1781:P 1776:U 1701:) 1696:L 1693:R 1688:→ 1685:( 1617:♠ 1582:» 1574:A 1569:« 1564:— 1547:e 1530:P 1525:U 1505:» 1497:A 1492:« 1487:— 1470:e 1446:ö 1413:» 1405:A 1400:« 1395:— 1375:e 1340:P 1335:U 1286:P 1281:U 1249:P 1244:U 1228:· 1223:( 1199:P 1194:U 1144:. 1125:P 1120:U 1024:n 1021:a 1018:r 966:) 961:· 955:· 949:· 943:· 937:· 931:· 924:· 917:· 911:· 906:( 884:. 856:P 851:U 797:P 792:U 771:( 722:P 717:U 672:P 667:U 651:· 646:( 637:· 632:( 601:. 582:P 577:U 511:P 506:U 473:P 468:U 431:P 426:U 389:P 384:U 309:P 304:U 236:P 231:U 211:· 206:( 184:P 179:U 164:P 159:U 123:: 104:ö 70:· 65:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Requests for adminship/Giggy - Knowledge (XXG)

Index