2281:, his average edits-per-article count is 1.33. So, that sounds to me like he either makes very small edits (such as spelling etc) over numerous articles or that he's some kind of savant who can write 50 lines in a single edit. In fact the most edits he's made on a single article is 10. I'd presume that for someone with around 3,000+ edits in the mainspace, that he'd have a better average than 1.33, or, like I said, he's a savant. I don't think he's written a featured article either. However, I have seen him around (or his signature to be more precise), & he seems like a pretty nice guy & capable to boot. I'd be more than willing to change my vote to support if Husond sees it fit to answer some of my concerns above... Thanks,
357:). I'm very calm by nature, and when I'm in the presence of civil editors then there are virtually no chances for a conflict to escalate. I always try to understand the other party's arguments, and it's not rare for me to be shown that I was wrong. Realizing my own mistakes represents absolutely no problem to me. On the other hand, if I am not convinced that I am wrong, then I will stay firm and stand by my position. But that doesn't mean that a conflict will have to be generated. Once again, I'm too calm by nature. :-)
2291:
from the extra buttons. He doesn't pretend to be a great article writer. Different editors contribute to
Knowledge differently: you are one of our great article-writers, while Husond works his butt off trying to keep those articles clean! The granting of sysop rights is a purely technical issue, and it will assist Husond greatly in his activities. I'll let Husond follow this up himself, of course, but this is my $ 0.02. Cheers!
347:
different environment here. However, I learned a lot from that bad experience. I learned that sometimes presenting your arguments in a polite, civil way will have no effect on users who do not wish to embrace a peaceful, mature discussion. As a result, I now have a strict policy against feeding the trolls, and it's not uncommon for me to abandon a discussion when I realize that it is taking a nasty turn or leading nowhere.
2488:. I feel obliged to echo Giano's concerns. No evidence has been presented that the nominee has substantial experience in mainspace, other than vandal-fighting, and that he has been sufficiently involved in dispute resolution procedures. With recent instances of admins running amock, I don't think we should be so facile in entrusting tools to newbies. --
2166:- I meant to add my support in here during the RfA, but was out of town for most of it and missed out — but I still want to add in my belated support of an editor who engaged me in a reasonable, friendly dialogue when we (gently) butted heads once. I think Husond has what it takes to make a great admin.
2290:
Hi Spawn Man! Allow me to attempt to change your opinion :) I didn't co-nom Husond for his work on another
Knowledge, but for the simple reason that Luna Santin and Exir Kamalbadi state above - vandalfighter, needs tools. Husond is a hard-working and important vandalfighter, and would benefit greatly
283:
If I become an administrator, I anticipate helping with a vast array of sysop chores, although it'll be some time until I participate in every single one of them. Countervandalism would be my immediate application of the tools, as I'm very familiar with the circumstances under which vandals should be
78:
Husond has only been an active editor on the
English Knowledge since July 2006 (though he has also been involved in other language wikipedias), but he has already made over 7500 edits. They cover a wide range of articles, and he has also used User talk pages effectively, one of the main requirements
2408:
for now. I am concerned that he has been here only since July 2006. However, I do have a question for the candidate - If consensus is found to promote you, will you use the admin channel of IRC? If so - What do you feel you can discuss there which will positively benefit
Knowledge that cannot
2306:
Husond replied on my talk, & as per my above comment, I will now change my vote to support. On one condition however; that sometime in the future Husond will try & work on his article writing skills (although he states this will happen when he creates the Sky scraper project.... you have to
346:
I had a bitter conflict in another
Knowledge. I was bashed when I was trying to help, and I ultimately abandoned the project. After that, I decided to devote all my contributions to the English Knowledge, and I created this account as a brand new start. I'm very glad I did it because it's a totally
478:
applies mercelessly. If a reasonable number of
Wikipedians are willing to keep them, then that's a sign the respective articles are indeed useful to some people and therefore should be kept at least until the fad wears off. As for the Knowledge games deletion debate, I had already seen it but I am
112:
The main thing that impresses me about Husond is his willingness to be helpful to others. As demonstrated in some of my recent talk archives, Husond is clearly willing to go the extra mile to be nice and explain
Knowledge policy to ignoramuses like myself. Speaking of which, he has a very thorough
643:
A great user. Plenty of afd experience, good amount of vandalism reversion (always followed by warnings, as far as I can tell), and very civil and levelheaded. When I learned he wasn't an admin (somewhere around a month ago, give or take two weeks) I was quite surprised. And in addition to all of
2501:
I'm not going to change my !vote, but I somewhat agree with some of Ghirla's comments. It's hard to sift through your edits and find the editorial contributions. For the most part you stopped writing articles around
September. While zapping vandals is certainly a useful contribution, you should
108:
Husond is a fantastic editor and about as active a user as I've ever come across. Last month alone, Husond made nearly 4,000 edits--an amount that I have not yet attained in over 9 months of active editing! Many of his edits have been fighting vandalism on RC Patrol. Obviously with the type of
473:
Yes, I have seen quite a few of those flash animation videos for deletion lately, as well as youtubes, etc. Although they might have considerable popularity at one time, most of them are ephemeral fads, and their articles are usually poor in content, crufty, and fail to assert notability.
2418:
I would likely use the admin channel. Odd situations occur all the time and the admin channel would be a fast, effective way to seek immediate advice. Although advice can be sought in other channels, #wikipedia for instance has so much gossip that sometimes requests for assistance may go
143:
It's a real pleasure to be co-nominating Húsönd for adminship. I first came across him when he reverted some vandalism on my userpage. Since then, I have been consistently impressed by his contributions; I'd like to give you a few examples below.
170:, where he always manages to exhibit a sound knowledge of policy, while maintaining a level head (even in the noxious atmosphere of AfD). A good understanding of the procedural side of the encyclopedia will assist greatly in administrative duties.
91:. The reaction of vandals in attacking his user page and impersonating him shows how well he has dealt with them. Giving him the additional tools of an admin will make him even more effective in his work, which can only benefit the project.
203:
about this one! Since administrators present the public face of the encyclopedia, and are often the first people newbies become acquainted with, this pattern of extending basic courtesy to his peers should be an asset to his administrative
327:, although I've only translated two articles so far, for many articles written in Portuguese or Spanish that are listed there turn out to be copyvio or fail notability criteria. I go there to translate but I end up tagging for speedy...
2453:
I can't think of anything particular "that could not be discussed in an open forum" at the moment. But if I have a particular request/query that can only be attended to by administrators, I reckon that it's pertinent to take it to
439:
443:
630:
fine feedback on my editor review, which initially led me to think that he was already an admin. Given his positive attitude and keen knowledge of
Knowledge policies, I have no doubt that he would use a mop well.
2277:- I don't particularly like it when people get nominated here for their great work on another Knowledge. However, Husond has many edits here & therefore has earned his salt on the English Knowledge. Again,
116:
Husond has never had any problems with civility or serious conflicts (as far as I can see) and always keeps his cool. I think that he has the experience and dedication to be an excellent administrator. -
79:
for being a successful administrator. His user page speaks for itself about his dedication and commitment to
Knowledge. He is an effective new page and recent changes patroller, and makes good use of
151:
is just a small example of his willingness to get his hands dirty and make accurate and helpful reversions. While VP2 is a powerful tool, sysop privileges would undoubtedly assist with this work.
373:
I am no longer active in other Wikipedias, I now devote all my contributions to the English Knowledge. I plan to start getting more involved with Meta, Commons and the Galician Knowledge though.
1716:
As ridiculous as I think the "he's not already an admin?" support statement is, I actually was shocked to see this RfA. If anything, it's overdue. Plus, he used the word "honour" with the
483:, I don't think that it's harming anybody. And, if they can help users to relax before/while/after doing serious contributions to Knowledge, they might even prove useful for the project.
211:
I request the community to assist our encyclopedia by granting Húsönd sysop rights. I've only seen good things from this user, and I believe he would make a very fine administrator.
340:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
2241:
I guess I should note though that although I've edited the Portuguese Knowledge for a couple of months, I gained all my WP maintenance experience on the English Knowledge.--
292:
as well. I intend to close AfD discussions, and since I like working with portals I might offer to collaborate with the main page every now and then. I also intend to check
1888:
I have seen him (or her) a number of occasions busily trying to better Knowledge. I see no reason from the edit count and from the question answers to oppose him. (or her)
2361:
858:
315:
I am not an outstanding article builder, and I regret that I focus too much on maintenance rather than trying to keep it even with article building. I have created
258:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
1353:
per the excellent nomination and answers. Normally I would look for a little more time on the project but the circumstances here make that much less relevant.
199:
Húsönd's well known for his kindness and willingness to help others. He's nice enough to go the extra mile and help out by explaining policy to others. Nothing
516:
They can be reformed, of course. If a policy is no longer proving effective and there is consensus to reform/amend it, I can't see why it shouldn't be altered.
2523:
2307:
make it now I've said it ;)). Other than that, as I said, Husond is a nice guy & is very capable & I feel he would benefit from the extra tools...
2541:
1914:
Hmm. Thought I voted already a while back. Maybe I was edit conflicted by one of the many people who obviously feel he'll be a great admin like I do.
977:. Impressive vandal fighter. I have no problems providing tools for specialist editors when I am confident they would not misuse them in other areas.
805:
I have had a few run-ins with Husond before, and nothing to me suggests that this valued vandal-fighter would be anything less than a superb admin.
75:
I am honoured to be nominating Husond for adminship. He is an excellent editor and I have every confidence that he will make a fine administrator.
274:
2355:
2335:
392:
1648:
1590:
1177:
569:
113:
understanding of all of the most important policies and guidelines, even those that apply only to admins such as the blocking policy.
2389:
2351:
1541:
894:
for it. And as I recall somebody saying quite simply in my own RfA: "vandalfighter needs tools." User is effective and reasonable.
367:-- your nomination indicates that you are active on other language wikipedias. How active are you as a member of those projects?
2343:
790:
403:
33:
17:
2137:
1951:
1623:
503:
460:
420:
323:(which is probably the contribution I'm most pleased about). Apart from this and wikignoming, I also collaborate actively with
1102:
1757:
890:
Given past experiences with him, I'll gladly look forward to working with Husond as an admin -- you could even say I've been
1571:
1318:
69:
878:
per answers given above and effective vandalfighting, something that can only be strengthened with the admin tools.
2150:
2106:
1749:: He's a nice guy, knows what he's doing, and is great on the anti-vandal front. This RfA is probably overdue. :) —
1480:, I have had frequent interaction with Husond, and he's extremely polite and civil. Would make a good mop-wielder.
764:
447:
266:
80:
1699:– I've seen him patrolling quite a few times, and he seems to have good judgment. "He's Not An Admin Already?" --
533:
1834:
1165:
951:
309:
Of your articles or contributions to Knowledge, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
1062:Естественно, я поддерживаю етого кандидата. Потому что у него есть тараканы. Я поддерживаю всех с тараканами. -
1877:
1704:
879:
386:
270:
2339:
2027:
2026:
Friendly user, good guy, seems to place the best interests of Knowledge at the forefront of his editing style
207:
As for the paperwork: e-mail enabled, short signature, clean and accessible userpage, 100% edit summary usage.
928:
566:
2122:
1643:
1403:
1257:
1201:
1094:
966:
649:
479:
currently neutral as I agree with arguments from both sides. Although the games section seems to go against
2217:- per lack of time editing here, may change vote if optional question reveals significantly more experience
2379:
2297:
1338:
1130:
1084:
912:
217:
2036:
402:
Recently, there's been a great amount of dispute over AFDs about articles pertaining to subjects such as
109:
janitorial tasks he performs regularly, the block and protect buttons would be of particular use to him.
2502:
eversooften remind yourself how hard it is to actually write good articles by trying your hand at it. ~
2494:
2461:
2426:
2248:
2144:
2100:
1905:
1812:
1772:
1537:
1392:
1218:
587:
563:
433:
Before I proceed with the answer, could you please provide examples regarding the web animation subject?
316:
240:
190:
186:
2522:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
1532:
1524:
2503:
2324:, I don't even know how such dictatorial, unfriendly, and unproductive Wikipedians get nominated!? --
1824:
1464:
1387:
1332:
1112:
1069:
986:
946:
782:
669:
1661:, what a very kind user. A great help to the project the tools will only make him a better editor.--
2325:
1944:
1829:
1737:
1700:
1617:
1527:
1271:
1230:
818:
753:
583:
496:
453:
413:
382:
2506:
2496:
2472:
2448:
2437:
2413:
2392:
2383:
2368:
2328:
2311:
2301:
2285:
2259:
2236:
2227:
2208:
2174:
2158:
2124:
2108:
2090:
2074:
2050:
2038:
2018:
1999:
1987:
1968:
1956:
1933:
1921:
1909:
1892:
1880:
1867:
1841:
1815:
1803:
1791:
1763:
1741:
1724:
1708:
1691:
1679:
1667:
1653:
1629:
1597:
1579:
1546:
1515:
1486:
1472:
1452:
1440:
1428:
1406:
1397:
1357:
1345:
1322:
1305:
1293:
1281:
1259:
1241:
1220:
1206:
1185:
1152:
1134:
1116:
1097:
1088:
1073:
1057:
1046:
1019:
1003:
991:
969:
957:
936:
916:
898:
882:
870:
842:
825:
797:
771:
758:
737:
725:
701:
689:
672:
652:
635:
618:
591:
574:
508:
465:
425:
410:
comes into play as a deletist argument. How stringently do you think WP:NOT should be adhered to?
350:
251:
221:
133:
98:
2388:
Sorry, but you're wrong on this one and no reasonable person would call me disruptive anyway. --
2168:
2117:
1754:
1638:
1492:
1482:
1302:
1250:
1239:
1194:
851:
838:
612:
1688:
710:
196:
As for those who have an edit-count standard, Húsönd has made 7,000+ edits in the past 4 months.
118:
2132:
He's very involved.. I don't actually know him very well, but I've seen his edits everywhere --
1161:
An excellent user, and a pleasure to see around -- Husond will make a very high quality admin.
2375:
2293:
1982:
1563:
1126:
1080:
1016:
1000:
908:
698:
296:
regularly, although I would not delete images until I gain more experience in the image space.
213:
1732:: I've had to revert his user page more than once so he must be doing something right! :) —
2489:
2466:
2431:
2253:
2009:
2007:
I've seen Husond around quite a bit, and have seen nothing but positive things from him. --
1901:
1808:
1676:
1378:
1354:
1277:
1215:
895:
354:
245:
63:
2224:
2205:
1850:
1662:
1170:
1162:
1107:
1064:
978:
768:
718:
349:
Anyway on the English Knowledge I've had no big conflicts, just some minor disputes (like
200:
181:, which looks like it may be on its way to something very impressive. He's also active on
126:
284:
blocked (and I'm also very familiar with non-admin rollback). I'd be regularly checking
2365:
2308:
2282:
2083:
1996:
1800:
1733:
1721:
1611:
1449:
1149:
867:
806:
746:
685:
645:
320:
178:
167:
177:
principle may be slightly disappointed, Húsönd is the creator and main contributor to
2535:
2445:
2410:
2068:
1965:
1789:
1750:
1437:
1421:
1417:
1235:
1121:
944:. Vandal fighter, vandal fighter... We need more vandal fighters with admin powers --
933:
925:
835:
607:
480:
475:
407:
324:
289:
285:
182:
174:
163:
159:
155:
2233:
1977:
1930:
1555:
1027:
1012:
734:
95:
1771:– Good editor, nice (helpful!) person; perfect mix. Will be a wonderful admin. —
1637:. I believe this will be the first admin from Portugal. Correct me if I'm wrong.
2456:
2421:
2243:
1314:
1290:
1268:
1054:
529:
235:
59:
265:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
2516:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2220:
2201:
2047:
1889:
1675:(edit conflict) this guy helped me get my mop, and is a valuable asset to WP.
1469:
1461:
1377:, but I've watched him, and I see absolutely no reason to oppose. Per noms. —
866:- great user has been very effective in vandal fighting active in AfD as well
632:
293:
1918:
1267:- I have just good experinces with him. Will make an absolutely good admin.
681:
88:
84:
440:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/The Demented Cartoon Movie (2nd nomination)
1011:
Affable, committed, level-headed, civil, and an excellent vandal bopper.
2060:
1777:
601:
493:
Do you believe that policies can be reformed, or are they set in stone?
999:(edit conflict) per answers to questions and many of the above votes.--
2526:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
2098:
very kind user, has brought smiles to my face from some of his edits.
1799:, definitely. User has his act together and will use the tools well.
1436:
Have had good interactions with him. Good house-duck to have around.
444:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny
1663:
1416:: Civil and knowledgeable editor. He has done a great job so far on
1025:
These things can't be closed early! Curse you, Captain Planet!;}
1995:- Great wikipedian, has my support. Would do the job great.
680:- good user, seen him on IRC and wiki, would be a good admin
231:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
1214:
Demonstrated knowledge of WIKI and will continue to grow.
924:
Seen a lot of good things from this editor. Good luck :)
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1402:
Well, someone had opposed, but s/he changed to neutral.
448:
The second AFD for Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny
2350:
Note: user appears to be sockpuppet of disruptive user
474:
Nonetheless, I don't think that these are a case where
319:
though and, as Riana stated, I've created and maintain
149:
2232:
He has considerable experience on another Knowledge.--
189:. Lastly, he's created some respectable stubs, listed
767:. Quite surprised Husond isn't an admin already too.
55:
Final (82/0/2) Ended Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:19:30 (UTC)
1420:and other unpopular corners of wikipedia. Regards,
2444:and "that cannot be discussed in an open forum?"
1228:per all the above reasons. A very good editor. --
1778:
1773:
1448:- As per my stricken neutral comment below...
2058:. Great editor, very civil and experienced.--
8:
1093:Cockroaches as criteria? That's a new one.
1491:I agree to mopifying this versatile user.
1964:. European support from the EU member. -
1720:British spelling. How cool is that?! --
288:and #vandalproof for vandal reports, and
2046:. Seems to be sensible and experienced.
233:I accept with most sincere gratitude.--
1830:
160:pages needing translation into English
1783:
7:
2373:IP !votes aren't counted, anyway.
24:
2542:Successful requests for adminship
1835:
1825:
1554:Three noms, thats a good thing --
1365:. Amazing noöne has opposed yet.
952:
947:
94:I commend Husond unreservedly.--
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
2409:be discussed in an open forum?
2164:Belated, post-promotion support
2069:
2061:
2028:
1851:
1313:no bad experiences with him.--
791:
783:
608:
1941:. The coffee loungers say hi.
1649:
1639:
852:
745:, top-notch vandal fighter. --
1:
2507:09:40, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
2175:21:57, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
2159:17:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
2125:11:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
2109:04:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
2091:01:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
2075:20:01, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
2051:17:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
2039:06:06, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
2019:05:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
1857:
1780:
1644:
1612:
1251:
987:
983:
979:
929:
668:and whatever else applies. ~
613:
558:
406:or Knowledge games. In each,
2497:08:28, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
2473:14:30, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
2449:14:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
2438:13:05, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
2414:08:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
2393:21:15, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
2390:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
2384:08:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
2369:07:20, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
2352:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
2329:06:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
2312:03:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
2302:03:20, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
2286:02:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
2260:21:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
2237:20:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
2228:19:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
2209:04:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
2000:16:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
1988:12:21, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
1969:09:36, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
1957:06:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
1934:05:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
1922:03:48, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
1910:03:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
1893:02:43, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
1881:00:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
1868:19:27, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
1861:
1842:12:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
1816:01:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
1804:23:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
1792:21:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
1764:21:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
1742:17:18, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
1725:10:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
1709:07:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
1692:01:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
1680:21:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
1668:21:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
1654:18:49, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
1630:18:10, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
1624:
1618:
1598:16:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
1580:16:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
1547:13:24, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
1516:11:51, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
1487:10:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
1473:07:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
1453:03:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
1441:01:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
1429:00:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
1407:21:50, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1398:21:32, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1358:20:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1346:20:23, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1323:18:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1306:16:21, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1294:16:00, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1282:12:29, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1260:11:49, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1242:11:48, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1221:07:53, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1207:07:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1186:05:40, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1153:05:00, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1135:01:57, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
1117:22:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1098:21:50, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1089:04:57, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1074:04:44, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1058:03:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1047:03:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1020:03:01, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1004:01:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
992:01:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
970:01:25, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
958:00:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
937:00:16, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
917:23:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
899:23:11, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
883:23:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
871:22:48, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
859:22:39, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
843:22:07, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
826:22:02, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
798:22:00, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
772:21:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
759:20:58, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
738:20:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
733:, obviously, as nominator.--
726:20:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
702:20:23, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
690:20:11, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
673:20:02, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
653:19:57, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
636:19:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
619:19:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
602:
592:19:22, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
575:19:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
509:02:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
466:02:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
426:02:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
275:administrators' reading list
252:19:00, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
222:06:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
168:requests for page protection
139:Co-nominated by riana_dzasta
134:01:43, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
99:10:59, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
2084:
1605:This is a great candidate.
532:'s edit summary usage with
154:Extensive participation in
2558:
765:Shine On You Crazy Diamond
269:, and read the page about
267:Category:Knowledge backlog
173:While those following the
1821:Incredibly strong support
148:Prolific vandal fighter:
2519:Please do not modify it.
2322:Incredibly strong oppose
1874:no reason to not support
1367:I hope it stays that way
888:Edit-conflicted support!
697:He's a good Wikipedian.
438:Sorry for the red link.
381:Optional Questions from
2454:#wikipedia-en-admins.--
39:Please do not modify it
2332:(IP counts not voted)
1193:Not much else to say.
582:at last! Good luck! --
2344:few or no other edits
1414:Unconditional Support
187:Portal:Current events
104:Co-nominated by Mike1
83:. He is a member of
34:request for adminship
2346:outside this topic.
1747:Super strong support
626:He provided me with
365:Optional Question 4.
2082:passes my criteria
1886:Of course I support
1687:a good candidate --
1587:per everyone above
942:Very strong support
2471:
2436:
2258:
2102:¤~Persian Poet Gal
1124:is up next, then?
721:Happy Thanksgiving
617:
250:
129:Happy Thanksgiving
2455:
2420:
2347:
2242:
1986:
1954:
1628:
1610:
1368:
1115:
1072:
757:
688:
648:looks very nice.
600:
573:
506:
463:
423:
234:
2549:
2521:
2492:
2469:
2464:
2459:
2434:
2429:
2424:
2333:
2256:
2251:
2246:
2171:
2156:
2153:
2147:
2140:
2136:
2120:
2088:
2071:
2063:
2034:
2033:
2015:
2012:
1980:
1952:
1947:
1865:
1859:
1855:
1839:
1832:
1827:
1801:Heimstern Läufer
1787:
1785:
1782:
1775:
1665:
1651:
1646:
1641:
1626:
1620:
1616:
1614:
1609:
1596:
1595:
1576:
1568:
1560:
1530:
1512:
1510:
1508:
1506:
1504:
1467:
1426:
1395:
1390:
1385:
1366:
1344:
1341:
1335:
1274:
1255:
1238:
1233:
1204:
1199:
1183:
1168:
1111:
1068:
1043:
1041:
1039:
1037:
989:
985:
981:
954:
949:
931:
856:
841:
823:
816:
811:
793:
785:
780:Why ever not? --
751:
723:
715:
684:
615:
610:
604:
572:
557:
523:General comments
504:
499:
461:
456:
421:
416:
248:
243:
238:
166:and lately even
131:
123:
41:
2557:
2556:
2552:
2551:
2550:
2548:
2547:
2546:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2524:this nomination
2517:
2504:trialsanderrors
2490:
2467:
2462:
2457:
2432:
2427:
2422:
2331:
2254:
2249:
2244:
2169:
2151:
2145:
2143:laughterlife♥ (
2142:
2138:
2134:
2118:
2067:
2029:
2013:
2010:
1976:. Good editor!
1945:
1760:
1607:Give-em-the-mop
1589:
1588:
1572:
1564:
1556:
1545:
1528:
1523:, good user. --
1502:
1500:
1498:
1496:
1494:
1465:
1422:
1393:
1388:
1379:
1339:
1333:
1331:
1321:
1280:
1272:
1231:
1229:
1202:
1195:
1182:
1174:
1166:
1035:
1033:
1031:
1029:
1009:Strong Support.
904:Support per nom
834:
819:
812:
807:
719:
711:
670:trialsanderrors
570:52278 Alpha 771
564:Fenton, Matthew
497:
454:
414:
246:
241:
236:
127:
119:
52:
37:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2555:
2553:
2545:
2544:
2534:
2533:
2529:
2528:
2512:
2511:
2510:
2509:
2483:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2479:
2478:
2477:
2476:
2475:
2402:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2395:
2336:172.145.125.13
2326:172.145.125.13
2320:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2315:
2314:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2211:
2189:
2188:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2177:
2127:
2111:
2093:
2077:
2065:
2056:Strong support
2053:
2041:
2021:
2002:
1993:Strong Support
1990:
1971:
1959:
1946:bibliomaniac15
1936:
1924:
1912:
1895:
1883:
1870:
1844:
1818:
1806:
1794:
1766:
1758:
1744:
1727:
1711:
1701:Omicronpersei8
1694:
1682:
1670:
1656:
1632:
1600:
1582:
1549:
1535:
1518:
1489:
1478:Strong support
1475:
1455:
1443:
1431:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1360:
1348:
1325:
1317:
1308:
1296:
1284:
1276:
1265:Strong Support
1262:
1244:
1226:Strong Support
1223:
1209:
1188:
1176:
1155:
1148:as per above.
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1091:
1078:What he said.
1060:
1049:
1022:
1006:
994:
972:
960:
939:
919:
906:*shifty eyes*
901:
885:
880:(aeropagitica)
873:
861:
845:
833:- great user.
828:
803:Strong Support
800:
775:
761:
740:
728:
704:
692:
675:
655:
646:Portal:Iceland
638:
624:Strong Support
621:
594:
577:
541:
540:
539:
537:
534:mathbot's tool
525:
524:
520:
519:
518:
517:
498:bibliomaniac15
487:
486:
485:
484:
455:bibliomaniac15
436:
435:
434:
415:bibliomaniac15
397:
383:bibliomaniac15
377:
376:
375:
374:
361:
360:
359:
358:
348:
333:
331:
330:
329:
328:
321:Portal:Iceland
302:
300:
299:
298:
297:
271:administrators
257:
255:
254:
226:
209:
208:
205:
197:
194:
179:Portal:Iceland
171:
152:
51:
46:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2554:
2543:
2540:
2539:
2537:
2527:
2525:
2520:
2514:
2513:
2508:
2505:
2500:
2499:
2498:
2495:
2493:
2487:
2484:
2474:
2470:
2465:
2460:
2452:
2451:
2450:
2447:
2443:
2442:
2441:
2440:
2439:
2435:
2430:
2425:
2417:
2416:
2415:
2412:
2407:
2404:
2403:
2394:
2391:
2387:
2386:
2385:
2382:
2381:
2377:
2372:
2371:
2370:
2367:
2363:
2360:
2357:
2353:
2349:
2348:
2345:
2341:
2337:
2330:
2327:
2323:
2319:
2313:
2310:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2300:
2299:
2295:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2272:
2271:
2267:
2261:
2257:
2252:
2247:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2235:
2231:
2230:
2229:
2226:
2222:
2218:
2216:
2212:
2210:
2207:
2203:
2199:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2193:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2176:
2173:
2172:
2170:Tijuana Brass
2165:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2157:
2154:
2148:
2141:
2131:
2128:
2126:
2123:
2121:
2119:Mustafa Akalp
2115:
2112:
2110:
2107:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2097:
2094:
2092:
2089:
2087:
2081:
2078:
2076:
2073:
2072:
2064:
2057:
2054:
2052:
2049:
2045:
2042:
2040:
2037:
2035:
2032:
2025:
2022:
2020:
2017:
2016:
2006:
2003:
2001:
1998:
1997:Chris Kreider
1994:
1991:
1989:
1984:
1979:
1975:
1972:
1970:
1967:
1963:
1960:
1958:
1955:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1940:
1937:
1935:
1932:
1928:
1925:
1923:
1920:
1917:
1913:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1900:per Runcorn.
1899:
1896:
1894:
1891:
1887:
1884:
1882:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1869:
1866:
1864:
1860:
1854:
1848:
1845:
1843:
1840:
1838:
1833:
1828:
1822:
1819:
1817:
1814:
1810:
1807:
1805:
1802:
1798:
1795:
1793:
1790:
1788:
1776:
1770:
1767:
1765:
1761:
1755:
1752:
1748:
1745:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1731:
1728:
1726:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1712:
1710:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1695:
1693:
1690:
1686:
1683:
1681:
1678:
1674:
1671:
1669:
1666:
1660:
1659:Super-Support
1657:
1655:
1652:
1647:
1642:
1636:
1633:
1631:
1627:
1621:
1615:
1608:
1604:
1601:
1599:
1594:
1593:
1592:Doctor Bruno
1586:
1583:
1581:
1577:
1575:
1569:
1567:
1561:
1559:
1553:
1550:
1548:
1543:
1539:
1534:
1531:
1526:
1522:
1519:
1517:
1514:
1513:
1490:
1488:
1485:
1484:
1483:Daniel.Bryant
1479:
1476:
1474:
1471:
1468:
1463:
1459:
1456:
1454:
1451:
1447:
1444:
1442:
1439:
1435:
1432:
1430:
1427:
1425:
1419:
1415:
1412:
1408:
1405:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1396:
1391:
1386:
1384:
1383:
1376:
1373:this editor,
1372:
1364:
1361:
1359:
1356:
1352:
1349:
1347:
1342:
1336:
1329:
1326:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1309:
1307:
1304:
1303:Mailer Diablo
1300:
1297:
1295:
1292:
1288:
1285:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1270:
1266:
1263:
1261:
1258:
1256:
1254:
1248:
1245:
1243:
1240:
1237:
1234:
1227:
1224:
1222:
1219:
1217:
1213:
1210:
1208:
1205:
1200:
1198:
1192:
1189:
1187:
1181:
1180:
1172:
1169:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1154:
1151:
1147:
1144:
1136:
1133:
1132:
1128:
1123:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1109:
1104:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1096:
1092:
1090:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1061:
1059:
1056:
1053:
1050:
1048:
1045:
1044:
1026:
1023:
1021:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1007:
1005:
1002:
998:
995:
993:
990:
982:
976:
973:
971:
968:
967:CharlotteWebb
964:
961:
959:
956:
955:
950:
943:
940:
938:
935:
932:
927:
923:
920:
918:
915:
914:
910:
905:
902:
900:
897:
893:
889:
886:
884:
881:
877:
874:
872:
869:
865:
862:
860:
857:
855:
849:
846:
844:
840:
837:
832:
829:
827:
824:
822:
817:
815:
810:
804:
801:
799:
795:
794:
787:
786:
779:
776:
774:
773:
770:
766:
762:
760:
755:
750:
749:
744:
741:
739:
736:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
716:
714:
709:as co-nom. -
708:
705:
703:
700:
696:
693:
691:
687:
683:
679:
676:
674:
671:
667:
666:Unterstützung
663:
659:
656:
654:
651:
647:
642:
639:
637:
634:
629:
625:
622:
620:
616:
611:
605:
598:
595:
593:
589:
585:
581:
578:
576:
571:
568:
565:
561:
556:
553:
552:
551:
550:
546:
545:
538:
535:
531:
527:
526:
522:
521:
515:
512:
511:
510:
507:
502:
501:
500:
492:
489:
488:
482:
477:
472:
469:
468:
467:
464:
459:
458:
457:
449:
445:
441:
437:
432:
429:
428:
427:
424:
419:
418:
417:
409:
405:
404:Web animation
401:
398:
396:
394:
391:
388:
384:
379:
378:
372:
369:
368:
366:
363:
362:
356:
352:
345:
342:
341:
339:
336:
335:
334:
326:
322:
318:
314:
311:
310:
308:
305:
304:
303:
295:
291:
287:
282:
279:
278:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:
260:
259:
253:
249:
244:
239:
232:
229:
228:
227:
224:
223:
220:
219:
215:
206:
202:
198:
195:
192:
188:
184:
183:Portal:Europe
180:
176:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
150:
147:
146:
145:
141:
140:
136:
135:
132:
130:
124:
122:
114:
110:
106:
105:
101:
100:
97:
92:
90:
86:
82:
76:
73:
71:
68:
65:
61:
57:
56:
50:
47:
43:
40:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2518:
2515:
2485:
2419:unnoticed.--
2405:
2374:
2358:
2321:
2292:
2278:
2274:
2269:
2268:
2214:
2213:
2197:
2191:
2190:
2182:
2181:
2167:
2163:
2133:
2129:
2113:
2101:
2099:
2095:
2085:
2079:
2059:
2055:
2043:
2030:
2023:
2008:
2004:
1992:
1973:
1961:
1943:
1942:
1938:
1926:
1915:
1897:
1885:
1873:
1862:
1856:
1852:
1846:
1836:
1820:
1796:
1768:
1746:
1729:
1717:
1713:
1696:
1684:
1673:Uber support
1672:
1658:
1634:
1606:
1602:
1591:
1584:
1573:
1565:
1557:
1551:
1520:
1493:
1481:
1477:
1460:- Per noms.
1457:
1445:
1433:
1423:
1413:
1404:Picaroon9288
1381:
1380:
1374:
1370:
1369:. I haven't
1362:
1350:
1327:
1310:
1298:
1286:
1264:
1252:
1249:per noms --
1246:
1225:
1211:
1196:
1190:
1178:
1158:
1145:
1125:
1106:
1095:Picaroon9288
1079:
1063:
1051:
1028:
1024:
1008:
1001:Grand Slam 7
996:
974:
962:
953:Kamalabadi!?
945:
941:
921:
907:
903:
891:
887:
875:
863:
854:Rama's arrow
853:
847:
830:
820:
813:
808:
802:
789:
781:
777:
763:
747:
742:
730:
720:
712:
706:
699:Sharkface217
694:
677:
665:
661:
657:
650:Picaroon9288
640:
627:
623:
596:
579:
559:
554:
548:
547:
543:
542:
513:
495:
494:
490:
470:
452:
451:
430:
412:
411:
399:
389:
380:
370:
364:
343:
337:
332:
312:
306:
301:
280:
262:
256:
230:
225:
212:
210:
142:
138:
137:
128:
120:
115:
111:
107:
103:
102:
93:
77:
74:
66:
58:
54:
53:
48:
38:
30:
28:
2342:) has made
2215:weak oppose
1902:Sarah Ewart
1809:Merovingian
1677:Betacommand
1355:Newyorkbrad
1289:per above,
1216:Storm Rider
896:Luna Santin
658:Sustentação
81:VandalProof
1635:Eu suporto
1334:Aguerriero
1159:Hell yeah!
850:per noms.
769:Heligoland
662:Burðarstoð
567:Lexic Dark
544:Discussion
317:some stubs
294:CAT:SPEEDY
31:successful
2366:Patstuart
2309:Spawn Man
2283:Spawn Man
2116:, pr nom.
2086:†he Bread
2031:hoopydink
1983:Talk 2 22
1929:per nom.
1734:Wknight94
1722:NMChico24
1613:JungleCat
1450:Spawn Man
1150:Patstuart
868:TheRanger
748:Mr. Lefty
89:Concordia
85:Esperanza
2536:Category
2362:contribs
1966:Darwinek
1826:crazytal
1759:contribs
1751:Disavian
1574:Contribs
1424:Asterion
1197:Krakatoa
1122:Wishkres
997:Support.
980:Rockpock
393:contribs
273:and the
70:contribs
2486:Neutral
2406:Neutral
2279:however
2275:Support
2270:Neutral
2234:Runcorn
2198:Abstain
2192:Neutral
2130:Support
2114:Support
2096:Support
2080:Support
2044:Support
2024:Pile-on
2005:Support
1978:Anger22
1974:Support
1962:Support
1953:Review?
1939:Support
1931:John254
1927:Support
1916:Support
1898:Support
1847:Support
1797:Support
1769:Support
1730:Support
1718:correct
1714:Support
1697:Support
1685:Support
1625:contrib
1603:Support
1585:Support
1558:Ageo020
1552:Support
1533:nce Ong
1521:Support
1458:Support
1446:Support
1434:Support
1382:$ PЯING
1363:Support
1351:Support
1328:Support
1311:Support
1299:Support
1287:Support
1247:Support
1236:iva1979
1212:Support
1191:Support
1163:Daveydw
1146:Support
1113:crztalk
1070:crztalk
1055:Michael
1052:Support
975:Support
963:Support
922:Support
892:waiting
876:Support
864:Support
848:Support
831:Support
784:physicq
778:Support
743:Support
735:Runcorn
731:Support
707:Support
695:Support
678:Support
641:Support
597:Support
580:Support
555:Support
549:Support
505:Review?
462:Review?
422:Review?
204:duties.
96:Runcorn
2491:Ghirla
2380:dzasta
2298:dzasta
2183:Oppose
2048:Jayjg
2014:abjotu
1872:I see
1779:ditor
1645:master
1438:Haukur
1418:WP:RQM
1375:per se
1315:danntm
1291:Addhoc
1157:Yeah?
1131:dzasta
1105:... -
1085:dzasta
948:¿¡Exir
913:dzasta
644:that,
560:thanks
530:Husond
481:WP:NOT
476:WP:NOT
446:, and
408:WP:NOT
325:WP:PNT
290:WP:RPP
286:WP:AIV
218:dzasta
60:Husond
49:Husond
2446:Giano
2411:Giano
2376:riana
2294:riana
2070:talk?
2011:tariq
1890:Diez2
1837:56297
1689:Steve
1664:Arjun
1640:Grand
1495:: -->
1394:rαgђ
1269:NCurs
1203:Katie
1179:patch
1127:riana
1081:riana
909:riana
633:EVula
214:riana
201:ROUGE
16:<
2356:talk
2340:talk
2152:talk
2146:user
1919:Jcam
1906:Talk
1853:Buck
1813:Talk
1786:arge
1738:talk
1705:talk
1619:talk
1566:Talk
1511:<
1340:talk
1301:. -
1278:work
1253:Lost
965:. —
934:Halo
839:khoi
836:Khoi
809:Nish
754:talk
713:Mike
686:Talk
682:ST47
628:damn
588:Talk
584:Alex
528:See
387:talk
355:this
351:this
191:here
185:and
164:RfAs
156:AfDs
121:Mike
87:and
64:talk
2458:Hús
2423:Hús
2364:) -
2245:Hús
2225:rex
2206:rex
2135:lov
2062:TBC
1863:ofg
1858:ets
1849:.
1823:. ~
1525:Ter
1371:met
1108:crz
1103:lol
1065:crz
1017:Ape
1013:Dar
814:kid
353:or
237:Hús
175:1FA
2538::
2468:nd
2433:nd
2334:—
2255:nd
2219:--
2200:--
1908:)
1878:DS
1876:.
1831:es
1811:※
1781:at
1762:)
1740:)
1707:)
1650:ka
1578:)
1570:•
1540:|
1470:4b
1462:Ac
1330:--
1184:)
1167:ee
1042:α
926:Th
821:64
796:)
717:|
664:,
660:,
590:)
514:A.
491:2.
471:A.
450:.
442:,
431:A.
400:1.
371:A:
344:A:
338:3.
313:A:
307:2.
281:A:
277:.
263:1.
247:nd
162:,
158:,
125:|
72:)
36:.
2463:ö
2428:ö
2378:_
2359:·
2354:(
2338:(
2296:_
2273:→
2250:ö
2223:-
2221:T
2204:-
2202:T
2155:)
2149:|
2139:e
2066:Φ
1985:)
1981:(
1904:(
1784:L
1774:E
1756:/
1753:(
1736:(
1703:(
1622:/
1562:(
1544:)
1542:C
1538:T
1536:(
1529:e
1509:t
1507:n
1505:a
1503:i
1501:d
1499:a
1497:R
1466:s
1389:ε
1343:)
1337:(
1319:C
1273:e
1232:S
1175:/
1173:(
1171:b
1129:_
1083:_
1040:g
1038:o
1036:c
1034:r
1032:o
1030:J
1015:-
988:t
984:e
930:ε
911:_
792:c
788:(
756:)
752:(
614:e
609:H
606:.
603:G
599:.
586:(
562:/
536:.
395:)
390:·
385:(
242:ö
216:_
193:.
67:·
62:(
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.