Knowledge

:Requests for adminship/Juliancolton 3 - Knowledge

Source 📝

85::) Less than a year ago, I first encountered Juliancolton, who was annoying, a tad clueless, but was full of enthusiasm for Knowledge and tropical cyclones in general. Right away I knew there was potential, so I helped him get his feet of the ground. Very quickly, he became a constructive editor, and this can especially be seen in the past few months. Juliancolton is now one of the head members of the tropical cyclone Wikiproject, which can be shown through his 12 FA's/FL's. But, perhaps more importantly, is his knowledge of policy. I'm sure by now he has the entire 3518:: Even from very limited interactions, I have a very positive impression of Julian. Adminship is no big deal, especially for someone who so clearly shows good judgment. I do find Erik the Red's concern a tad troubling, and would be interested if Julian cares to comment. But it's not nearly enough for me to oppose; I don't believe there's anything approaching a pattern along these lines. Keep up the good work, and thank you using your real name in editing Knowledge -- may many others follow your example :) - 651:, but rather a guideline that users should generally follow. As for your second question, if there is a consensus to delete, and the editors arguing to keep the page provide sufficient evidence as to why they want it kept, I would not use my personal opinion to override consensus. However, as I said, if there is also an overwhelming consensus to keep, but the voters do not provide sufficient evidence and rationale to do so, I would consider relisting the AfD to gain a more thorough consensus. 3218:. I am a bit worried by statements like his answer to question 6, i.e. assertions along the line that "Knowledge is perfect". I can understand his reluctance to state anything that is wiki-politically controversial, which also may explain his answer to 7. On the other hand, based on answers to 8 & 11, Julian doesn't seem prone to applying WP:Rules without careful consideration of the context, so I think he'll do fine as an administrator. 488:
have, help both sides come to a consensus based on various policies. I would have to evaluate the source, and determine if it is indeed possible to obtain such a statistic, and if the information would come across as the same to anybody who reads it. Even if it is such, the final decisions would depend on if the information is likely to be challenged; if so, a direct source would be needed. Feel free to ask any follow-up questions. –
1423:– Besides fantastic mainspace contributions, I think that Juliancolton has enough quality experience at AIV and AfD to make good decisions and use the tools well. I've also followed a lot of his interactions with others, and he has consistently demonstrated civility and level-headedness, which is essential for an admin. I don't have any concerns here, and really have to agree with what Keeper said. Good luck with your mop! 613:, one of Wikiepdia's core policies. However, that in itself is not a reason to delete without further examining the situation. You say that the editors arguing to delete mention notability policy. Does the article pass notability criteria? If it fails to do so, and if the editors arguing to keep only mention that they believe it is notable without providing evidence to prove such, I would close as delete. 170:, where I've based my editing since I joined Knowledge. I've created dozens of articles for that project, and I have either written or significantly contributed to 5 tropical cyclone-related FLs, and 5 FAs. However, my contributions are not limited to tropical cyclones. While I was more active a number of months ago, I participate in the 1876:- On every occasion I have interacted with Julian there has been a consistent and refreshing positivity in his attitude. Through observation, he is thorough is most areas and when editing has insight, exploring every possible avenue of possibility; the opportunities for wikipedia once he becomes an admin, are endless. A great candidate. 3494:: Prince of editors, I have to trust you with the tools. One of the biggest things I learnt from my experience in wiki is to control impatience. If somebody has similar concerns about it for you, prove them wrong. But don't hesitate to 'block a malicious vandal' ! Let not the extra button hamper your writing skills. Best wishes. -- 4299:. Candidate does seem a wee bit block happy, and his XfD votes can seem a little drive-by and shallowly considered, but overall I think he's a big net win for the admin camp. And I think he's responsible and responsive enough to take to heart editors' (comparatively minor) concerns here and improve in these areas. Good luck. 448:, vandal fighting, AFD, etc. As an administrator, I expect to become even more active in closing XfDs, and appropriately blocking vandals at AIV. As I noted in my answer to question 1, I might branch out into other areas that I currently don't have much experience in, though still have a sufficient knowledge of. 3391:. Although we've never met in person, Julian and I live in the same region of New York and often edit articles on many of the same subjects, some of which (OK, two state roads) have reached FA. I have been impressed by his skill, dedication and patience, particularly in taking on the responibilities of being 603:
see that both sides have a convincing argument. The deletors cite numerous guidelines and policies including Notability, and Reliable sources. The keepers say that the subject is notable for many, and that there is nowhere else to get plot info but the story featuring the character. Do you delete or keep?
4945:
I have been impressed with Juliancolton's work at FAC and his knowledge of content policies. I am concerned, however, that he is an active user of IRC. I am a firm believer that wikipedia should be policied from wikipedia, and I hesitate to give the tools to someone who does not necessarily see the
556:
Page protection should only be used in extreme cases of vandalism, edit wars, or other disruptive editing. Page protection limits the ability for anybody to edit a page, thus violating one of Knowledge's main features, and should be used judiciously. Page protection comes in various levels and types,
487:
First off, I would evaluate the situation by checking the article history, reading prior discussion, and checking the validity of the source from which the calculation is being attained. I would read up on both side's argument, and from there, with a neutral point of view as all administrators should
391:
In his daily editing, a newbie user edits a prominent page, and his edit is reasonably trivial. It does not violate any policies, and it contains reliable sources. Unbeknownst to them, the edit they just made was against an overwhelming consensus on the talk page. Disgruntled editors then take action
255:
A new editor's first edit is a stub that is tagged for speedy deletion as A7. The new editor, who has not received a welcome, reverts the change. Is it more appropriate to revert and warn, or to re-add the CSD template with a {{{hangon}}}, while typing the new editor a note explaining that one should
4541:
Well for the "block happiness", he explained blow (in neutral) already that this was several months ago and does probably not reflect his current knowledge of policy. As for the IRC threat, could you provide us with the relevant logs about that, if you have them? Just the part that you are referring
4495:
I fully understand what you're saying. I was not fully aware of the discussion, and because I had only read it at a glance, I thought it only applied to the 2005 list. That aside, I assure you I would never take administrative actions for anything based on an IRC decision, and I will make a point to
471:
issue. One group of editors insists on adding a statistic (a mean for instance) that one of them calculated from raw data contained in one of the references cited in the article. Even though the accuracy of the reference data is not disputed, the other group opposes the edit, arguing that performing
305:
I wouldn't. Knowledge is clearly the most comprehensive encyclopedia in the world that covers endless topics, because of its ability for anyone to edit. Paper encyclopedias are limited in their scope; they only include the most noteworthy of topics. Knowledge, because of its unlimited space, is open
4784:
Wait, wait, wait, wait, I know this one: A man walks into an office to apply for a job, and the man at the desk asks him if he's qualified. When the man answers yes, the man at the desk tells him that the job isn't for him. When the man asks why, the other man replies that he hates qualified people
96:
shows me he is clearly busy in other areas). Does he have a spotless record? Hell no! But who among us has a spotless record? Julian is committed to the project, and has learned from his mistakes. I believe it is time for him to bite the bullet and accept this RFA, since I am positive the community
602:
This one is about your choices, not reciting policy wording. A user creates a page about a fictional chracter who is within the fanbase. Despite haing many citations, it is called for deletion due to the fact that the sources are first-party (e.g. the character creator in an interiew e.c.t.). You
417:
As an administrator, many inexperienced editors will come to you for advice. Some of them will be highly puzzled as to what is going on, or even angry because of something that has happened to them in the course of their time here. It is important to keep a cool head and handle the situation well,
4520:
I am sorry, but I don't think Juliancolton has the right mindset to be an admin. He threatened (on IRC) to withdraw this RfA due to the above oppose, which indicates that he's unable to handle opposition and resistance well enough to be able to fulfill his admin duties without generating drama. I
2426:
he has the one feature I find the most important in an admin candidate, he is already an admin. He acts like one and has the trust of the community that an admin needs, thus going through an RfA is only a formality to give him a title that he already deserves. In other words, wow, I thought you
325:
Here at RfA there has been an ongoing "catfight" for quite a while over age and adminship, at various RfAs. I obviously don't want to start that massive(And I do mean massive) debate here but I am interested in your view of the topic. What is your opinion of Age + Adminship?(I am very unlikely to
149:
Over the past several months, I've learned what I'm good at, and what I feel comfortable participating in. They include primarily XFD, and AIV, and that is what I will start out working on as an administrator. Granted, I will start out slow, and get a feel for the mop before I dive right in. As I
4473:
Administrative matters work within a strict schedule, but just because a AFD was due to be closed 5 minutes ago does not mean you should rush to close it. Its much better you make a well-considered decision after 30 minutes than a knee-jerk reaction after 30 seconds. Rushing into things is a bad
4443:
Points well taken, and I apologize if you feel that I've been impatient at times. I simply felt that particular case was a rather minor one, despite it's effect on several hundred articles, and that when several users supported the change, it was a clear consensus. I will make sure to allow such
4966:
To quote something made very poignant in various IRC channels: "On-wiki actions which cannot stand on their own merits should not make reference to, or be instigated by, IRC discussions." Julian knows to do nothing solely because there's a positive attitude toward it in Internet chatrooms that
4582:
I didn't intend it as a "serious accusation". In reality, it was only a brief discussion, where Juliancolton was convinced in the end not to withdraw his RfA (of course). However, the idea of withdrawing ones RfA over *one* oppose indicates to me that the user is not yet ready for adminship, as
1207:
Endorse block, possible ban. Kurt has shown bad behavior, poor judgment, incivility, and most of his comments, posts, and RfA !votes are solely to prove a point. We welcome good-faith contributors, but Kurt was anything but, and was clearly not here to build a better encyclopedia. –Juliancolton
5054:
I wouldn't call IRC a place for "policing," more like a more direct and instantaneous method of contact. Knowledge does use its IRC channels when it is experiencing errors. During its off-hours, I see IRC more of a "horsing" around place than "policing". Usage of official channels in using
557:
and can limit anything from IP and un-autoconfirmed editing, to office actions that limit even administrators. Generally, semi-protection is used to prevent general vandalism, while page move and creation protections should be used in more extreme cases, and when it is absolutely necessary.
203:
Have I been in editing conflicts? Of course! Have they caused me stress? Hardly. I've been in a number of (minor) conflicts, though I've pretty much avoided them in the past several months. And when I do get into a conflict of sorts, I either take it to the talk page or simply leave it be.
4421:
one hour after a discussion starts, on a issue that is not time critical (and develops further in multiple directions) its worrying. I'm concerned he may act too fast on the speedy delete finger, close discussions early and so on generating needless drama. A lack of understanding of the
392:
and replace the edited text with their own version which was decided with consensus. Their version, however, does not include any sources at all, and is unverifiable. What should be done to resolve the issue effectively, and which editor is doing the right thing according to policy?
3779:
Everything that I have seen is good and article contributions are excellent. Opposes don't worry me because I don't think to Julian will be involved much in these areas very much. I hope that you don't end up using the tools much but you keep your focus on improving articles.
4371:. I'm very glad I didn't miss this RfA. This user has contributed a huge amount of work and encyclopedic value to the project, especially within the scope of tropical and non-tropical cyclones in particular. Also does all that work in an incredibly short amount of time. ~ 244:
While my opinion is obviously biased, I say I have definitely improved since my last RfA in the area of AfD. Since then, I've made it a daily goal to participate in at least a few deletion discussions daily, during which time I've gained a significant knowledge of the
4858:
LOL, a month for 3RR. That is awesome. Perhaps just a touch excessive. "Julian, here is another scenario, a user makes a personal attack against a newbie--no, Julian, you aren't allowed to reach through the internet and punch them. How about a 24 hour block?" :)
1293:
accurate product. I focused my research into you on your "Knowledge:" edits and your "User:talk" edits. You come across as intelligent and civil, huge assets that are hard to come by - you seem to possess them naturally. Excellent candidate HH, simply excellent.
306:
to entries on millions of topics that paper encyclopedias would never include. For this reason, Knowledge is one of the highest-viewed websites. While Knowledge has its minor quarks, issues, and roadblocks, the open-editing format of this encyclopedia has led to its
178:
FT. When I'm not working on featured content, I work on GAs, and as of now I have significantly contributed to or wrote 30 of them. When I'm not article writing, I usually participate in FAC or GAN reviews, or various XfDs. In addition I've started two WikiProjects,
4690:. In the question I asked, he basically recited policy. It seems obvious that he just chose the "correct" answer, for the sake of becoming an admin. He has yet to learn that adminship is not a trophy, and not something one can get merely be reciting policy. 4458: 2647:
I've asked about 10 people to help me some time ago, this guy was the only one who helped me. And he did it during the next few hours and he did it very well. Except for that I can see that his work on Knowledge is better than excellent. It is admin-like.
2177:
nicely for a number of articles, too. Juliancolton uses Huggle extremely effectively, but Huggle edits are not his most substantive contributions. Some edits I saw at the beginning of my search are particularly noteworthy for being typical of minor edits:
3765:- I find myself very rarely supporting admin candidates these days, but I am happy to support this one, I mean finally not a "anti-vandalism only" candidate. I just hope that the admin tools will not get in the way of all of his great article work. 406:
should be followed to assure the article does not violate any core policies. If the information is suitable without a source, further discussion on the talk page should be made to try and incorporate the source into the consensus version of the
150:
become more familiar with the tools, I'll branch our into various processes, though I still indent to spend the majority of my time doing what I do know—article writing and maintenance. Of course, I'll also benefit from the tools in those areas.
262:
If the editor is clearly new to Knowledge and does not have an understanding of speedy deletion, the best thing to do would be to re-add the CSD template, and write the user a friendly welcome with a note not to do such, and informing them of
4560:
Yes, I was looking forward to support the candidate, but then this is a serious accusation by an admin which cannot be ignored as bad faith. To be fair to Julian , we would like to see any logs if possible and may be also reply by Julian --
4079:– Very dedicated and trusted editor to Knowledge. Has done a lot to help Knowledge, and has definitely improved from his last RfA. Will do just fine as an administrator. The opposes brought up below don't concern me, therefore, I support. – 627:
a. Is notability policy? b. If the clear majority of the arguments citing policy at the AfD are for keeping the article on the grounds that it does meet notability criteria, and you think it does not, would you overrule the majority?
428:, where I helped a new and upset user calm down, and help resolve the problem. Otherwise I do minor things to help, even if so small as welcoming them on their talk pages, and so big as attempting to "coach" to become a better editor. 1550:), sometimes within a minute of his previous edit, but occasionally he does make more insightful votes which seem show show that he does know how to think critically during an AfD, even if he does not often exercise that ability. - 5055:
Knowledge talk pages are generally followed to the dot. I wouldn't exactly recommend replacing talk pages with IRC chats, but I certainly wouldn't discount an editor because he opened up an alternative method of contact online.
204:
Thankfully, none of these have been of earth-shattering nature, though I have been involved in a couple talk page battles, the most substantial of which I can remember being the great green-dot debate and an ongoing discussion at
2677:
that he has the ability to learn, and more importantly the ability to learn from his mistakes. This is undoubtedly a vital skill and one that will serve JC well in his tenure as an admin. I wish him good luck with the tools.
2172:
Going through Juliancolton's contributions extensively, I think he has done good work in a number of different administrative areas and I like the fact that he is active in WikiProjects, GA noms, and AfD discussions. He has
3688:
as likely to do a fine job as admin and trustworthy. Do take to heart the concerns about acting a little quickly brought up in the opposition, though, particularly when you are tasked with determining consensus. Cheers,
2449:- I support his adminship all the way. He's made many valuable contribs, has a good attitude, and I know that he is also skilled at keeping his cool. Sure, he may have a couple faults behind him, but, don't we all? -] 1827:
I was wondering just the other day if you were going to run for RfA - this is a pleasant surprise. From all I've seen of Julian's editing he is nothing less than civil, helpful, and hard-working. Obviously trustworthy.
3913:
I read all the RfAs but don't pitch in as I'm new 'round here :). Seeing as my opinion in this case (a solid yes) has proved very nearly unanimous, I feel it's safe to add my support, albeit late and unneeded!
2288:
As Julian's admin coach, I believe he is a highly trustworthy candidate for adminship. I planned on co-nominating Julian, but due to my busy schedule, I couldn't find the time to write a nomination statement.
1446:
based on the fact that every single dealing I've had with Julian has been pleasant & positive and he is clearly committed to improve Knowledge. His promotion would be a clear net gain for the project.
4465:
too quickly, the wikiproject is still debating the ideal approach; and those supporting that layout to the articles do not think that that is a "final" version. Editorial matters rarely are time critical
609:
This would depend on a number of factors. I would carefully evaluate both the article and the deletion discussion. If, indeed, all of the sources are self-published by the creator, it would violate
4639:
Well, I don't think I can argue with that - it seems I'm not as good at recognising sarcasm as I though I was. I apologise. However, my oppose still stands due to the other issues I mentioned. --
1573:
an admin?!?! And I've been nice to you all these months thinking you were. ;) I support any candidate whose demeanor leads me to believe that they already had the mop almost automatically.
1377:
based on my own check of the contribution history, including recent talk page comments and warnings to other editors, and the fact that the nominator opposed this candidate twice previously.
4423: 3399:. Julian is a deserving candidate for adminship; Knowledge needs people like him with the tools. I would feel remiss if I had not added my support and he got them, which looks very likely. 687: 4785:
because they make him feel bad. The next day, the man learns that the company he applied to sued for bankruptcy. Or something like that. I might have messed up the punchline. :) Erik the
2673:
This is one user I have witnessed grow from the beginner that we all start out as, to a very mature and experienced editor. I can speak from my experiences of working with this editor at
1530:
has a great deal of clue and his mainspace contributions are quite impressive. I cant say that I am that particularly pleased with his AfD !voting as the majority of it comes in the form
444:
Absolutely. I love the article writing that I currently do, and even with the tools I will continue to base my contributions off article building. I'll also continue my participation in
175: 571:
Disruptive editing that applies to protection of items in the mainspace is mainly edit warring, page move warring, persistent vandalism, persistent addition of content that violates
187:, the later of which is far more active than the former. However, not all of my edits are manual. I usually spend a bit of time every day fighting vandalism with Huggle or Twinkle. 2267:- I've came to know this guy pretty well. Brilliant article work with the Tropical Cyclones WikiProject, level headed and I have the utmost trust in him. Will make a great admin. 2386:- no worries the user would abuse the tools. Only concern is that admin duties might take him away from creating more hurricane FACs... oh, wait. Nevermind, no concerns at all! 5084: 707: 136:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
81:) - I would like to nominate Juliancolton for adminship, who has quickly become a great editor to work with, and a likely successor for me when I reach the top and abdicate 332:
I have my opinion, a strong one at that, regarding the issue, but due to reasons including not wanting to start a drama, I am choosing to leave this question unanswered.
1074:
I don't know Julian enough to vote yea or nay, I'm just noting that this RfAr seems to have tripped the magical line that says "close it early as success." IMO anyway.--
4725:
Yes yes. Heaven forbid our admin candidates understand policy, and know where to find answers when they are asked questions. We wouldn't want that. </sarcasm: -->
4395:- Being of Julian's best friends, its hard not to vote. I know him well, and he knows all policies well. Even though I wanted to do the nomination, Hink beat me to it. 2012:
Easily has enough experience (more than 20,000 edits) to be an admin. Also, 5 FAs and 5 FLs are incredibly impressive. I'm surprised that no one nominated him before.
197:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
4523:
I also agree with Nilfanion's concerns regarding impatience, and he also does seem a little too block happy (potentially related to the aforementioned impatience). --
4010:
I'm new here, but seeing your interview and you're contributions, I think you'd make a great editor, though I don't exactly agree to you on question 6. Good luck.
681: 676: 5038:
As you can see msot of it is just harmless nonsense, and occasionally we have serious discussions about happenings on wikipedia etc, but never any "policing".--
4657:
If the oppose was the one it seems to have been, then i think that wondering whether to get involved with that kind of opposition is not necessarily petulance.
671: 438:
Will your current activities continue if you are appointed with the mop and bucket? If not so, which will you drop/be less active in/be more active in/take up?
92:
Juliancolton is very dedicated to the project. He is active in XFD's, and tons of other stuff I don't even know about (I usually only see his great edits, but
4583:
explained above. As for logs, I don't have access to the relevant logs where I currently am, although I suppose Juliancolton would be able to confirm it. --
3931:
I've interacted with Julian at FLC and IRC. Both places he has proved himself kind, courteous, and helpful. He'd be a great addition to the list of admins.
745: 5102: 4947: 2610: 418:
and also be knowledgeable in how to resolve the problem; so I ask - can you give us evidence that you have successfully aided annoyed users in the past?
732: 2156:. Julian really blows me away with his contributions :D Also, he is friendly and stern in cases where he needs to be and can tell the difference. 1285:. Just looked through your diffs (I see you everywhere). You are an excellent and clueful writer, you understand the work that goes into creating 3230:
I think that answer shows confidence in the project. Believing we are perfect is the first step to making it so. It also calms people down a lot.--
3297: 3184:. Recent interactions with and observations of this candidate lead me to being very pleased to support. A definite net positive to Knowledge! -- 2458:
I've been waiting for this one. I would have offered to nom/co-nom, but I suck at writing noms. Balloonman pretty much sums it up: Julian already
2250: 4019: 4717: 1336: 4798: 4521:
sincerely dislike opposing an excellent article writer, but keep in mind that there is no need to be an admin to continue writing articles.
3942: 1637: 1225: 1198: 739: 928:
I just wanted to make my answer to question #6 more clear. Of course there are bugs and nitpicks that need to be worked out, but overall,
1845:
an admin already? I'm not just invoking the cliche, for the very first time, I honestly thought that the candidate already was an admin.
1046:
I think so that there won't be as much pile-on voting, but then again no one really calls pile-on voting unless they're oppose votes :D
869:
I agree, I've always thought it was an interesting question, especially since it's so open-ended and people come up with unique answers.
3456: 2707: 2503:. I've admired the candidate's contributions for some time. Julian works well with others and knows policy. He will make a great admin. 402:
That depends. Is the information a quote or likely to be challenged? Does it violate BLP without the source? If so, despite consensus,
4879: 4777: 4750: 4632: 4502: 4450: 1067: 968: 938: 895: 792: 775: 725: 494: 123: 93: 78: 769: 3569: 3246: 3332:
per many of the above. A fantastic user who can do well with a few extra tools. I've read the opposes, but they don't concern me.
3997: 3948: 3050: 1476: 1400: 33: 17: 4496:
let other editors examine a situation before I make significant decisions. Again, thank you for your opinion and suggestions. –
3164: 2474: 2042: 1253: 914: 703: 89:
memorized, and so I think it is pretty clear he is a great editor. However, we know there is more to adminship than editing.
4036: 3671: 3612: 3124: 2795: 2618: 1610: 2307:
Hello, I'm Dorothy from Kansas and I'd like to sell the Tin Man for scrap metal -- oh, wrong queue. But while I am here --
529:
I believe my answer to the very similar question #6 covers this, though if you want a more detailed answer, let me know. :)
4873:
Indeed! :) That was several months ago, however, and I've since read up on the policies that I lacked knowledge of then. –
3080: 2917: 4626:
I'm terribly sorry, that idea was completely sarcastic, and I didn't think anybody would take it seriously. Apologies, –
3361: 3272: 1924: 1674:
per my nothing but excellent experiences with this user. We need more admins with a sense of humor! ;) Oh an per Jamie!
1404: 4648: 4592: 4532: 3806: 3416:
because Juliancolton will be an excellent. I don't feel Juliancolton is very likely to prove to be inept or the like.
3292: 3030: 2997: 2245: 2029:- Good contribs on the cyclones articles among other places. And since Hurricanehink nominated you, here is my trust. 4444:
discussions to remain open before making a decision from this point on. Cheers, and thanks for your participation, –
424:
I certainly take pride in assisting new users and getting them on the right track. Most recently, such can be found
2353: 1895:
Oh, and give him a real life already! He does so much work here, thousands of edits and I have not seen a bad one.
1452: 283:
up the original creator, as after they receive a note, they may wish to change their opinion regarding the article.
2635: 4762: 4713: 4695: 4143: 2605: 1850: 1342: 587: 4793: 4372: 4342: 4304: 3936: 3858: 2885: 2809: 2523: 2017: 1632: 1219: 1192: 4382: 4066: 3256: 3222: 476: 1792:
It says a lot when editors who opposed in his previous 2 RFAs are now supporting and one is the nominator. --
1464:
Hello, can i get a fake ID? I need it for going...damn, wrong queue. Seriously, this one's for you, bud ;)
5065: 5049: 4982: 4959: 4930: 4915: 4900: 4881: 4868: 4853: 4840: 4804: 4779: 4766: 4752: 4739: 4699: 4668: 4652: 4634: 4621: 4596: 4577: 4555: 4536: 4504: 4490: 4452: 4438: 4402: 4387: 4363: 4346: 4329: 4308: 4291: 4272: 4257: 4242: 4217: 4200: 4169: 4149: 4124: 4096: 4071: 4057: 4002: 3979: 3952: 3923: 3905: 3885: 3871: 3862: 3845: 3828: 3811: 3793: 3771: 3757: 3740: 3718: 3700: 3680: 3651: 3635: 3618: 3592: 3575: 3554: 3539: 3527: 3510: 3486: 3474: 3462: 3451: 3436: 3424: 3421: 3408: 3383: 3366: 3343: 3334: 3324: 3303: 3277: 3259: 3241: 3225: 3210: 3193: 3176: 3149: 3128: 3105: 3088: 3055: 3033: 3016: 3002: 2972: 2951: 2924: 2893: 2876: 2864: 2842: 2813: 2797: 2776: 2751: 2728: 2714: 2700: 2684: 2665: 2639: 2623: 2595: 2572: 2548: 2512: 2495: 2479: 2450: 2441: 2418: 2394: 2378: 2355: 2337: 2320: 2302: 2280: 2259: 2229: 2222: 2206: 2164: 2148: 2132: 2109: 2083: 2065: 2061: 2048: 2021: 2003: 1989: 1972: 1963: 1946: 1926: 1908: 1887: 1868: 1854: 1836: 1822: 1801: 1784: 1768: 1751: 1734: 1712: 1695: 1666: 1644: 1616: 1582: 1561: 1522: 1504: 1481: 1456: 1438: 1408: 1381: 1369: 1351: 1327: 1308: 1277: 1260: 1232: 1175: 1157: 1138: 1117: 1112: 1083: 1069: 1056: 1041: 1022: 1004: 970: 956: 940: 919: 897: 884: 863: 848: 821: 639: 591: 496: 479: 350: 221: 125: 108: 103: 4877: 4775: 4748: 4630: 4500: 4448: 4377: 4324: 4235: 3841: 3483: 3312: 3287: 3026: 2981: 2772: 2276: 2240: 2073:- nothing but awesome interactions with this user. Will definitely be a net positive to this community. 1998: 1065: 966: 936: 893: 719: 492: 121: 72: 4065:
have done some work with Julian in the NRHP project and elsewhere, no issues. Seems like a solid editor.
3253: 3219: 2659: 473: 456: 4613: 4569: 4213: 4052: 3523: 3502: 3404: 2966: 2947: 2508: 2491: 2346: 2333: 2125: 1797: 1448: 1153: 5083:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
4771:
I respect your opinion, but isn't being a good candidate a reason to support, or at least not oppose? –
2179: 216: 3012: 2631: 4896: 4758: 4709: 4705: 4691: 4110: 4024: 3787: 3047: 2436: 2316: 1846: 1472: 1396: 1339: 1323: 814: 583: 565:
Follow-up question: What do you consider "disruptive editing" in terms of a page protection trigger?
2649: 4832:, however I am assuming the candidate has learned in the months since then so no oppose from me. -- 4786: 4486: 4434: 4338: 4300: 4251: 3932: 3855: 3766: 3735: 3648: 3601: 3170: 2912: 2806: 2472: 2297: 2199: 2102: 2036: 2013: 1985: 1764: 1708: 1627: 1591: 1494: 1289:
maintaining articles. Your FA work and your huggle/vandal work attest to your dedation to a clean
1248: 1211: 1184: 1131: 912: 467:
Assume you are called to mediate a discussion where two groups of editors are debating a potential
205: 5039: 3584: 3351:
No reason for alarm, I believe the project will benefit from candidate's access to extra buttons.
3231: 1656: 902:
I just want to say that I really liked your answer to that question. Very, very well thought out.
299:
If you could change one thing on Knowledge that you think would make it better, what would it be?
4955: 4734: 4269: 4032: 4015: 3753: 3668: 3446: 3417: 3189: 3118: 3008: 2790: 2744: 2720: 2693: 2391: 2215: 1957: 1944: 1877: 1818: 1689: 1600: 1556: 1514: 1489:
All of my interactions with Juliancolton and his contributions make me believe he is mop-worthy.
1431: 1365: 1303: 1107: 1036: 998: 877: 842: 788: 98: 4482: 4474:
thing for an admin to have, with that mindset I could see you blocking someone on the basis of
4430: 2311:
for a great editor. (Say, is there a circus around here where I can sell the Cowardly Lion?).
5044: 4874: 4864: 4772: 4745: 4627: 4497: 4445: 4359: 4318: 4227: 4189: 4137: 3837: 3824: 3716: 3695: 3588: 3548: 3320: 3249: 3236: 3144: 3074: 2873: 2768: 2268: 1661: 1578: 1062: 963: 933: 890: 859: 854:
Call me crazy but I like that weird optional question and I hope the candidate answers it. :)
715: 699: 489: 374: 307: 118: 68: 4417:. Julian seems to be impatient at times. That's not a big deal, but when a prospective admin 2851: 2557:. Better answers this time round. Julian has a better understanding of the deletion process. 2399:
I've found him to be quite reasonable, and as an added bonus, he's good at writing articles.
4975: 4606: 4562: 4209: 4047: 3990: 3631: 3564: 3519: 3495: 3400: 3357: 2962: 2944: 2536: 2504: 2487: 2411: 2370: 2329: 2118: 1922: 1882: 1793: 1149: 1079: 1018: 5056: 4989:
Since when is wikipedia "policed" from IRC? It's a chat channel, I'll show you some logs:
4906: 4888: 4837: 4644: 4588: 4549: 4528: 4105: 3967: 3782: 3378: 3101: 3042: 2429: 2312: 2074: 1902: 1747: 1742:. A strong overall record and the AfD concerns from the previous RfA have been addressed. 1465: 1391: 1315: 1047: 947: 806: 507: 277: 267: 180: 82: 575:, persistent blatant copyright violates, and persistent re-creation of a deleted article. 4830: 4921: 4479: 4459:
Knowledge:Featured list candidates/List of storms in the 2002 Atlantic hurricane season
4427: 4286: 4165: 4088: 3895: 3868: 3802: 3728: 3644: 3396: 3206: 3158: 2938: 2903: 2835: 2760: 2674: 2463: 2291: 2195: 2093: 2030: 1981: 1864: 1810: 1760: 1704: 1490: 1378: 1345: 1241: 1166: 1127: 903: 339: 291: 184: 171: 167: 4950:
yesterday, and that conflict of interest means it is not appropriate for me to do so.
174:, to which I've acquired 3 FAs. Additionally, I wrote two of the four articles in the 5096: 4951: 4946:
same value in that. I will not oppose because Julian and I were on opposite sides of
4726: 4664: 4475: 4467: 4266: 4028: 4011: 3749: 3726:
My interactions with the candidate have been positive and I don't have any concerns.
3662: 3185: 3114: 2785: 2739: 2587: 2569: 2542: 2387: 2117:
Juliancolton has been an amazing contributor to the project. Deserves it. Good luck!
1935: 1814: 1677: 1552: 1424: 1361: 1357: 1295: 1273: 1028: 986: 980: 929: 870: 830: 635: 572: 445: 235: 86: 4920:
Well, think of it this way. They probably wouldn't violate 3RR again after THAT :P
4860: 4846: 4731: 4355: 4180: 4131: 4120: 3820: 3710: 3690: 3536: 3316: 3138: 3065: 2959:. Sorry, but I didn't have internet access, or I would have nommed. Congrats! :) 2157: 2142: 1777: 1574: 1300: 1268:. Julian has done some great work here, and I definitely trust him with the tools. 1033: 855: 468: 365: 343: 208:. However, I firmly believe I've remained consistently civil through these ordeals. 58: 425: 3659:
Good editor, helper and good person. No major reasons not to support in my eyes.
4968: 4757:
The problem is, Juliancolton hasn't earned my trust. He just seems too perfect.
3985: 3915: 3880: 3627: 3433: 3352: 2680: 2530: 2404: 2364: 2057: 1917: 1830: 1727: 1533: 1075: 1014: 610: 537: 403: 54: 234:
On your previous RFA, some expressed concern over your knowledge/experience at
4833: 4640: 4584: 4544: 4524: 4046:
Sure. Knowledge builder with a big footprint. Will make an excellent admin. --
3962: 3471: 3375: 3097: 1897: 1743: 1512:— superb content contributions, excellent contributor, civil, and insightful. 1013:
Strong series of yea, very few nae. Someone welcome him to the team already.--
523:
What would you like Knowledge to accomplish or change in the next five years?
5077:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1997:. Trustworthy and has more than enough experience, I believe. Best of luck, — 1389:— Twelve FA/Fl? Wow. I'll support pending no major opposes just for that :) — 4281: 4160: 4080: 3202: 2824: 4659: 3643:- one of those folks who should have been given the bits donkeys ago. —— 2582: 2558: 1269: 630: 4158:
An excellent positive contributor to many areas of the project. Cheers,
1027:
So, you support him, but not in the support column? What am I missing?
550:
What is your understanding of when it is appropriate to protect a page?
166:
Hard to say. Right off the bat I'd say my best contributions are to the
1721:. Committed, responsible, can be trusted with the additional tools. 5087:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
1722: 1537: 946:
Pssss, I would reword that internal link on the #6 to "success". :D
4605:(on IRC) to withdraw " may look very serious to others like me. -- 2901:- Julian is an excellent editor and would be an excellent admin. -- 791:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review 3374:. Writes featured articles, no history of problematic behaviour. 2931: 3583:
seems to be a very good editor look at those FA anominations ;)
1776:
Good interactions with user on RfA(Or is my memory faulty...:P)--
3626:
Good editor, good answers, good admin potential. Good luck! ;-)
3041:: Hard to believe there are so many votes in such short time. -- 1809:
definally. Does good work at AfD, also good article building at
1426: 872: 472:
a calculation constitutes original research. What would you do?
61: 4744:
I thought policy is what administrators are supposed to know? –
3879:
levelheaded, would be an excellent addition to the admin pool.
1433: 1205:
15:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC) Change to weak per this quote: "
1165:. Another on my short list that definitely deserves the tools. 879: 3600:
From all appearances, a well-rounded experienced candidate. —/
3389:
Support more enthusiastic than anyone else's could possibly be
4337:
Appears extremely unlikely to use the tools inappropriately.
3708:
I have no doubts that this editor will use the tools wisely.
2629:
So strong support that I have broken a tv with the strongness
310:, and as a result, there is nothing that I see fit to change. 115:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
3562:- for all your hard work including multiple FA's and GA's -- 4250:
Very good article writer, knows what he's doing, etc. etc.
2520:- per me having a horrible, wretched, and disgusting cold. 2980:
Of course! Though, candidate has no chance. Just kidding.
2328:
Excellent editor, should do a great job with the tools. --
4177:- One of the most able candidates I have seen in months. 29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
4542:
to and what is connected to that would be nice. Regards
2462:
an admin. All we need to do here is make it "official".
2214:
I find this editor trustworthy enough to use the tools.
160:
What are your best contributions to Knowledge, and why?
143:
What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
117:
I accept, and thanks Hurricanehink for the nomination! –
4418: 2764: 2188: 2185: 2182: 1916:
Without question one of the best editors on Knowledge.
1548: 1546: 1544: 1542: 763: 757: 751: 396:: Which is more important, verifiability or consensus? 3063:
A very hard worker thats made so many contributions. -
1655:
user has brilliant contributions to the enecylopedia--
97:
will have their support in him. Here goes nothing. ♬♩
5045: 5040: 3960:- I don't see any reason he shouldn't be an admin. 3311:-- a bit opinionated, but highly qualified and meets 3237: 3232: 1662: 1657: 1954:
Will be a net positive to the Community. Good luck!
4845:
No offense, but I found that link quite funny. ;)--
4967:wouldn't garner favorable consensus on the wiki. — 4396: 3482:Excellent editor, not likely to abuse the tools. 256:not remove CSD tags on articles one has created? 4426:is also an indication of things left to learn.-- 4280:- Definitely trusted, would be a good admin. -- 1208:Tropical Cyclone 02:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 688:Requests for adminship/Juliancolton Alternative 2852: 1313:Good luck. i really hope you pass this time! — 889:Done. :) (And thanks, to the above comments) – 342:.:D Good choice, probably the best answer.:)-- 4129:Excellent candidate, I'm pleased to support. 3893:not that my vote is needed at this point.... 2363:Very trustworthy user, who does great work. — 1240:. Good user, and I trust him with the tools. 1148:Juliancolton has done some outstanding work. 8: 5009:the leader is a dude called Strawberry Clock 4461:is an example of you rushing into something 584:Tutthoth-Ankhre~ The Pharaoh of the Universe 4208:as a patient and approachable candidate. 2759:per nom and article work. This user has a 1956: 5013:and their God is in the shape of a huge B 3470:. FA writer, see no serious issues here. 2872:(can't think of anything else to say) -- 2603:He wasn't one already? Give him the mop! 4470:is the only cause that springs to mind). 787:Please keep discussion constructive and 4104:Best candidate I've seen in some time. 1958: 669: 318:Totally Optional Question from Xp54321 4601:I guess that was a fair reply. " He 4111: 682:Requests for adminship/Juliancolton 3 677:Requests for adminship/Juliancolton 2 7: 3535:. A very rare thing from me indeed. 3096:- good Wikipedian merits the tools. 2140:Seen him in action, is trustworthy. 238:. How have you improved since then? 3544:I don't see any serious obstacles. 672:Requests for adminship/Juliancolton 667: 4457:I hope you do take this on board. 1122:Excellent nomination, by the way. 793:Special:Contributions/Juliancolton 24: 5103:Successful requests for adminship 4325: 4319: 4089: 4081: 3991: 3986: 3024:- Per all the comments above. ~~ 172:New York State Routes WikiProject 4829:- may be a little to block happy 3748:. Impressive mainspace edits. - 3113:clearly a net positive. Cheers, 18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 3896: 1249: 273:. I would leave the tagging of 181:WikiProject Non-tropical storms 5066:21:21, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 5050:20:38, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 4983:00:22, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 4960:18:31, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 4931:18:04, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 4916:01:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 4901:00:51, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 4882:23:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 4869:23:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 4854:23:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 4841:20:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 4805:22:42, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 4780:18:25, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 4767:17:48, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 4753:15:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 4740:15:05, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 4700:14:58, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 4669:16:59, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 4653:13:44, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 4635:13:04, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 4622:11:10, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 4597:10:34, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 4578:09:35, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 4556:09:14, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 4537:09:06, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 4505:22:39, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 4491:21:43, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 4453:23:19, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 4439:23:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 4403:14:15, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 4388:01:14, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 4364:21:47, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 4347:20:42, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 4330:20:22, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 4309:17:07, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 4292:15:55, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 4273:13:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 4258:12:38, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 4243:03:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 4218:15:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 4201:12:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 4170:09:34, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 4150:06:22, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 4125:05:48, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 4097:01:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 4072:00:54, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 4058:22:46, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 4020:22:20, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 4003:22:11, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 3980:22:11, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 3953:19:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 3924:18:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 3906:14:57, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 3886:11:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 3872:07:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 3863:02:27, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 3846:00:54, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 3829:00:34, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 3812:00:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 3794:23:54, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3772:22:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3758:22:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3741:22:12, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3719:20:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3701:20:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3681:19:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3652:17:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3636:17:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3619:17:40, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3593:17:26, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3576:12:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3555:12:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3540:07:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3528:06:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3511:05:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3487:01:31, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3475:01:17, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3463:23:53, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3437:22:52, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3425:22:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3409:19:54, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3384:18:29, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3367:18:16, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3344:18:04, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3325:17:09, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3304:16:34, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3285:- despite weak answer to q6. 3278:14:54, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3260:10:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 3242:15:55, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3226:14:19, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3211:13:47, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3194:07:00, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3177:05:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3150:04:59, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3129:04:58, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3106:04:23, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3089:02:42, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3056:02:14, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3034:02:06, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3017:00:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 3003:00:08, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 2973:23:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2952:23:05, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2925:22:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2894:22:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2877:18:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2865:18:32, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2843:17:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2814:15:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2798:14:04, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2777:13:56, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2752:13:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2729:13:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2715:12:52, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2685:12:50, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2666:11:44, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2640:10:28, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2624:10:23, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2596:10:00, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2573:08:07, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2549:05:39, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2513:05:07, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2496:04:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2480:03:16, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2451:01:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2442:00:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2419:00:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2395:00:24, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2379:23:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2356:23:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2345:. User has matured very well. 2338:22:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2321:22:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2303:21:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2281:21:55, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2260:21:46, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2230:21:27, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2207:21:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2165:21:12, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2149:21:04, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2133:20:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2110:20:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2084:20:35, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2066:20:19, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2049:20:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2022:20:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2004:20:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1990:19:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1973:19:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1947:18:51, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1927:18:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1909:18:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1888:18:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1869:18:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1855:18:14, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1837:17:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1823:17:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1802:17:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1785:17:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1769:17:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1752:17:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1735:17:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1713:17:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1696:17:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1667:17:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1645:17:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1617:17:04, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1583:17:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1562:17:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1523:16:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1513: 1505:16:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1482:16:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1457:16:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1439:16:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1409:16:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1382:15:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1370:15:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1352:15:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1328:15:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1309:15:27, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1278:15:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1261:15:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1233:15:42, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 1176:15:12, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1158:15:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1139:21:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1118:15:04, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1084:04:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 1070:00:58, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 1057:00:56, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 1042:21:37, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 1023:21:33, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 1005:20:54, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 971:16:47, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 957:16:45, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 941:16:40, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 920:03:23, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 898:22:27, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 885:18:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 864:18:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 849:17:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 822:16:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 706:. For the edit count, see the 640:17:39, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 592:17:53, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 497:19:16, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 480:18:35, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 351:02:39, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 126:15:01, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 109:02:18, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 5001:Someone register ##Clock_Crew 2160:weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 804:Really hope you pass, dude. — 290:Weird optional question from 176:1998 Pacific hurricane season 168:WikiProject Tropical cyclones 4424:etiquette surrounding images 2580:per all the other comments. 2298:Make articles, not wikidrama 326:change my "vote" over this) 3836:. All Seems good to me. - - 2821:seems to have a good grasp. 2190:. I see no reason why not. 1061:i can haz pile-on voting? – 702:'s edit summary usage with 132:Questions for the candidate 53:Final (154/3/2); Closed by 5119: 5005:organisation on Newgrounds 2784:Somebody worth trusting.-- 1183:Yes, definitely. Erik the 3397:WikiProject Hudson Valley 1569:You mean to say that you 338:Aha! A user with lots of 185:WikiProject Hudson Valley 5080:Please do not modify it. 3136:per last time (co nom). 2805:- Of course. Good luck, 962:Meh, grammar nerds. ;) – 713:Links for Juliancolton: 647:No, notability is not a 215:Optional questions from 3853:Certainly trustworthy. 3274:how do you turn this on 2191: 1123: 930:Knowledge is succeeding 582:Optional question from 536:Optional question from 455:Optional question from 361:Optional questions from 38:Please do not modify it 4948:an IRC-related dispute 3984:Excellent candidate.-- 3051:egg-throwing coleslaw? 2736:- no-brainer support. 1862:- nice contributions. 1360:- maybe in the 120's? 1332:Wow. Yes. Your friend 505:Optional question from 3432:. Congratulations.-- 2524:will be a great admin 1417:, imitates me on IRC. 34:request for adminship 4419:declares a consensus 4316:. No concerns here. 2884:Seems Fine To Me :) 2056:, no reason not to. 1841:...wait, so Julian 1759:per all the above. 666:RfAs for this user: 4256:and his otters • 3715: 795:before commenting. 39: 4981: 4803: 4722: 4708:comment added by 4354:Yep, he's ready. 4290: 4199: 4152: 4122: 4056: 4027:comment added by 3947: 3941: 3819:. Good editor. -- 3808:The Transhumanist 3709: 3676: 3615: 3607: 3365: 3104: 3087: 3086: 3070: 3054: 2939:There is no cabal 2656: 2591: 2571: 2551: 2527: 2522:Oh and this user 2427:were an admin.--- 2417: 2047: 2000:Mizu onna sango15 1867: 1731: 1612: 1607: 1501: 1257: 1231: 1204: 1115: 1106:as nominator. ♬♩ 959: 384: 106: 37: 5110: 5082: 5061: 5060:- Jameson L. Tai 5047: 5042: 4973: 4928: 4911: 4910:- Jameson L. Tai 4891: 4851: 4801: 4796: 4792: 4789: 4737: 4733: 4729: 4721: 4702: 4552: 4547: 4398: 4393:Stronger support 4385: 4380: 4375: 4327: 4321: 4284: 4254: 4253:Ten Pound Hammer 4238: 4230: 4198: 4195: 4186: 4178: 4146: 4140: 4130: 4121: 4118: 4117: 4114: 4108: 4091: 4083: 4069: 4050: 4040: 3993: 3988: 3976: 3973: 3970: 3965: 3945: 3939: 3920: 3902: 3883: 3861: 3790: 3785: 3769: 3731: 3713: 3679: 3674: 3665: 3611: 3605: 3572: 3567: 3553: 3459: 3454: 3449: 3422:Talk to Madeline 3381: 3355: 3340: 3337: 3300: 3295: 3290: 3275: 3239: 3234: 3173: 3167: 3161: 3147: 3141: 3100: 3083: 3077: 3072: 3071: 3068: 3064: 3045: 2995: 2971: 2950: 2942:support \o/ ..-- 2923: 2915: 2910: 2907: 2891: 2888: 2862: 2841: 2838: 2832: 2793: 2788: 2747: 2742: 2727:this message! - 2712: 2705: 2698: 2662: 2654: 2650: 2622: 2614: 2608: 2592: 2589: 2585: 2568: 2567: 2563: 2545: 2539: 2529: 2521: 2470: 2432: 2409: 2351: 2349:DiverseMentality 2294: 2273: 2253: 2248: 2243: 2227: 2220: 2202: 2193: 2162: 2145: 2130: 2123: 2108: 2105: 2096: 2079: 2078:- Jameson L. Tai 2045: 2039: 2035: 2033: 2001: 1971: 1970: 1966: 1960: 1942: 1920: 1905: 1900: 1885: 1880: 1863: 1833: 1782: 1732: 1729: 1725: 1694: 1686: 1683: 1680: 1664: 1659: 1640: 1635: 1630: 1611: 1605: 1601: 1595: 1521: 1519: 1499: 1468: 1449:The Rambling Man 1435: 1428: 1318: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1258: 1255: 1250: 1245: 1228: 1222: 1217: 1214: 1201: 1195: 1190: 1187: 1173: 1134: 1125: 1111: 1052: 1051:- Jameson L. Tai 1039: 1035: 1031: 1003: 995: 992: 989: 952: 951:- Jameson L. Tai 945: 910: 881: 874: 847: 839: 836: 833: 817: 809: 779: 738: 662:General comments 617:Followup Q from 541: 512: 511:- Jameson L. Tai 383: 380: 371: 363: 348: 282: 276: 272: 266: 224: 219: 102: 5118: 5117: 5113: 5112: 5111: 5109: 5108: 5107: 5093: 5092: 5091: 5085:this nomination 5078: 5059: 5033:newgrounds owns 4922: 4909: 4889: 4847: 4823: 4799: 4794: 4787: 4735: 4727: 4710:Tutthoth-Ankhre 4703: 4550: 4545: 4411: 4383: 4378: 4373: 4252: 4236: 4228: 4191: 4182: 4179: 4144: 4138: 4134: 4115: 4112: 4106: 4067: 4022: 4000: 3974: 3971: 3968: 3963: 3916: 3881: 3854: 3799:Congratulations 3788: 3783: 3767: 3729: 3711: 3677: 3663: 3660: 3616: 3570: 3565: 3545: 3533:Pile-on Support 3457: 3452: 3447: 3395:coordinator of 3379: 3338: 3335: 3298: 3293: 3288: 3273: 3171: 3165: 3159: 3145: 3139: 3081: 3075: 3066: 3000: 2999:Call me MoP! :) 2982: 2960: 2943: 2916: 2911: 2905: 2902: 2889: 2886: 2836: 2825: 2822: 2791: 2786: 2745: 2740: 2708: 2701: 2694: 2664: 2660: 2652: 2615: 2612: 2606: 2604: 2588: 2583: 2565: 2559: 2543: 2537: 2533: 2477: 2464: 2430: 2347: 2301: 2290: 2269: 2251: 2246: 2241: 2223: 2216: 2200: 2158: 2143: 2126: 2119: 2103: 2094: 2092: 2077: 2043: 2037: 2031: 1999: 1964: 1959:« Gonzo fan2007 1955: 1936: 1934:: Excellent. — 1918: 1903: 1898: 1883: 1878: 1847:Nousernamesleft 1831: 1778: 1728: 1723: 1701:Why not Support 1684: 1681: 1678: 1675: 1638: 1633: 1628: 1615: 1606: 1603: 1593: 1515: 1498: 1479: 1466: 1419:(just kidding) 1356:Might well hit 1350: 1316: 1304: 1296: 1254: 1243: 1226: 1220: 1212: 1199: 1193: 1185: 1167: 1132: 1100: 1050: 1037: 1029: 993: 990: 987: 984: 950: 917: 904: 837: 834: 831: 828: 827:Totally agree. 815: 807: 802: 731: 714: 695: 693: 690: 664: 539: 510: 376: 367: 364: 344: 280: 274: 270: 264: 222: 217: 134: 50: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5116: 5114: 5106: 5105: 5095: 5094: 5090: 5089: 5073: 5072: 5071: 5070: 5069: 5068: 5036: 5035: 5034: 5032:<USER1: --> 5030: 5028:<USER1: --> 5026: 5024:<USER5: --> 5022: 5020:<USER5: --> 5018: 5017:yeh clock crew 5016:<USER5: --> 5014: 5012:<USER1: --> 5010: 5008:<USER1: --> 5006: 5004:<USER1: --> 5002: 5000:<USER3: --> 4998: 4996:<USER2: --> 4994: 4992:<USER1: --> 4987: 4986: 4985: 4943: 4942: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4938: 4937: 4936: 4935: 4934: 4933: 4903: 4886:Indeed, lol! — 4822: 4819: 4818: 4817: 4816: 4815: 4814: 4813: 4812: 4811: 4810: 4809: 4808: 4807: 4685: 4684: 4683: 4682: 4681: 4680: 4679: 4678: 4677: 4676: 4675: 4674: 4673: 4672: 4671: 4617: 4610: 4573: 4566: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4510: 4509: 4508: 4507: 4471: 4410: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4390: 4366: 4349: 4339:LessHeard vanU 4332: 4311: 4294: 4275: 4260: 4248:Strong support 4245: 4223:Strong support 4220: 4203: 4172: 4153: 4132: 4127: 4099: 4074: 4068:TravellingCari 4060: 4053:one for sorrow 4041: 4005: 3996: 3982: 3955: 3933:Matthewedwards 3926: 3908: 3888: 3874: 3865: 3856:Steven Walling 3848: 3838:The Spooky One 3831: 3814: 3796: 3774: 3760: 3743: 3721: 3703: 3683: 3672: 3654: 3638: 3621: 3610: 3595: 3581:Strong Support 3578: 3557: 3542: 3530: 3513: 3506: 3499: 3489: 3477: 3465: 3439: 3427: 3411: 3386: 3369: 3346: 3327: 3306: 3280: 3266: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3213: 3196: 3179: 3152: 3131: 3108: 3091: 3061:Strong support 3058: 3036: 3022:Strong Support 3019: 3005: 2998: 2975: 2957:Strong Support 2954: 2927: 2896: 2879: 2867: 2845: 2816: 2800: 2779: 2754: 2731: 2717: 2687: 2668: 2658: 2642: 2626: 2611: 2598: 2575: 2552: 2531: 2515: 2498: 2482: 2475: 2456:Strong Support 2453: 2447:Strong Support 2444: 2421: 2397: 2381: 2361:Strong Support 2358: 2340: 2323: 2305: 2295: 2286:Strong Support 2283: 2262: 2255: 2232: 2209: 2167: 2151: 2135: 2115:Strong Support 2112: 2086: 2068: 2051: 2024: 2014:ErikTheBikeMan 2007: 1992: 1975: 1949: 1929: 1911: 1890: 1871: 1857: 1839: 1825: 1804: 1787: 1774:Strong Support 1771: 1754: 1737: 1730:(aka justen) 1715: 1698: 1672:Strong support 1669: 1650:Strong support 1647: 1619: 1602: 1598: 1585: 1564: 1525: 1507: 1495: 1484: 1477: 1459: 1441: 1411: 1384: 1372: 1354: 1333: 1330: 1311: 1280: 1263: 1235: 1178: 1160: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1099: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 926: 925: 924: 923: 922: 915: 852: 851: 801: 798: 784: 783: 782: 780: 711: 704:mathbot's tool 694: 692: 691: 686: 684: 679: 674: 668: 665: 663: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 614: 579: 578: 577: 576: 560: 559: 558: 533: 532: 531: 530: 502: 501: 500: 499: 452: 451: 450: 449: 432: 431: 430: 429: 411: 410: 409: 408: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 320: 314: 313: 312: 311: 294: 292:User:Xavexgoem 287: 286: 285: 284: 249: 248: 247: 246: 212: 211: 210: 209: 191: 190: 189: 188: 154: 153: 152: 151: 133: 130: 129: 128: 49: 44: 43: 42: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5115: 5104: 5101: 5100: 5098: 5088: 5086: 5081: 5075: 5074: 5067: 5064: 5063: 5062: 5053: 5052: 5051: 5048: 5043: 5037: 5031: 5027: 5023: 5021:is old school 5019: 5015: 5011: 5007: 5003: 4999: 4995: 4991: 4990: 4988: 4984: 4979: 4978: 4972: 4971: 4965: 4964: 4963: 4962: 4961: 4957: 4953: 4949: 4944: 4932: 4929: 4927: 4926: 4919: 4918: 4917: 4914: 4913: 4912: 4904: 4902: 4899: 4898: 4897: 4893: 4892: 4885: 4884: 4883: 4880: 4878: 4876: 4872: 4871: 4870: 4866: 4862: 4857: 4856: 4855: 4852: 4850: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4839: 4835: 4831: 4828: 4825: 4824: 4820: 4806: 4802: 4797: 4790: 4783: 4782: 4781: 4778: 4776: 4774: 4770: 4769: 4768: 4764: 4760: 4756: 4755: 4754: 4751: 4749: 4747: 4743: 4742: 4741: 4738: 4730: 4724: 4723: 4719: 4715: 4711: 4707: 4701: 4697: 4693: 4689: 4686: 4670: 4666: 4662: 4661: 4656: 4655: 4654: 4650: 4649:contributions 4646: 4642: 4638: 4637: 4636: 4633: 4631: 4629: 4625: 4624: 4623: 4619: 4618: 4615: 4612: 4611: 4608: 4604: 4600: 4599: 4598: 4594: 4593:contributions 4590: 4586: 4581: 4580: 4579: 4575: 4574: 4571: 4568: 4567: 4564: 4559: 4558: 4557: 4554: 4553: 4548: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4534: 4533:contributions 4530: 4526: 4522: 4517: 4514: 4506: 4503: 4501: 4499: 4494: 4493: 4492: 4488: 4484: 4481: 4478:discussion.-- 4477: 4472: 4469: 4464: 4460: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4451: 4449: 4447: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4436: 4432: 4429: 4425: 4420: 4416: 4413: 4412: 4408: 4404: 4401: 4394: 4391: 4389: 4386: 4381: 4376: 4370: 4367: 4365: 4361: 4357: 4353: 4350: 4348: 4344: 4340: 4336: 4333: 4331: 4328: 4323: 4322: 4315: 4312: 4310: 4306: 4302: 4298: 4295: 4293: 4288: 4283: 4279: 4276: 4274: 4271: 4268: 4264: 4261: 4259: 4255: 4249: 4246: 4244: 4240: 4239: 4232: 4231: 4224: 4221: 4219: 4215: 4211: 4207: 4204: 4202: 4197: 4196: 4194: 4188: 4187: 4185: 4176: 4173: 4171: 4167: 4163: 4162: 4157: 4154: 4151: 4147: 4141: 4135: 4128: 4126: 4123: 4119: 4109: 4103: 4100: 4098: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4084: 4078: 4075: 4073: 4070: 4064: 4061: 4059: 4054: 4049: 4045: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4030: 4026: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4006: 4004: 4001: 3999: 3994: 3989: 3983: 3981: 3978: 3977: 3966: 3959: 3956: 3954: 3950: 3944: 3938: 3934: 3930: 3927: 3925: 3921: 3919: 3912: 3909: 3907: 3904: 3903: 3901: 3900: 3892: 3889: 3887: 3884: 3878: 3875: 3873: 3870: 3866: 3864: 3860: 3857: 3852: 3849: 3847: 3843: 3839: 3835: 3832: 3830: 3826: 3822: 3818: 3815: 3813: 3810: 3809: 3804: 3800: 3797: 3795: 3792: 3791: 3786: 3778: 3775: 3773: 3770: 3764: 3761: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3744: 3742: 3739: 3738: 3737: 3733: 3732: 3725: 3722: 3720: 3717: 3714: 3707: 3704: 3702: 3699: 3698: 3694: 3693: 3687: 3684: 3682: 3678: 3669: 3667: 3666: 3658: 3655: 3653: 3650: 3646: 3642: 3639: 3637: 3633: 3629: 3625: 3622: 3620: 3614: 3608: 3604: 3599: 3596: 3594: 3590: 3586: 3582: 3579: 3577: 3574: 3573: 3568: 3561: 3558: 3556: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3543: 3541: 3538: 3534: 3531: 3529: 3525: 3521: 3517: 3514: 3512: 3508: 3507: 3504: 3501: 3500: 3497: 3493: 3490: 3488: 3485: 3481: 3478: 3476: 3473: 3469: 3466: 3464: 3461: 3460: 3455: 3450: 3443: 3440: 3438: 3435: 3431: 3428: 3426: 3423: 3419: 3418:Miss Madeline 3415: 3412: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3387: 3385: 3382: 3377: 3373: 3370: 3368: 3363: 3359: 3354: 3350: 3347: 3345: 3342: 3341: 3339:Postlethwaite 3331: 3328: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3307: 3305: 3302: 3301: 3296: 3291: 3284: 3281: 3279: 3276: 3270: 3267: 3261: 3258: 3255: 3251: 3248: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3240: 3235: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3224: 3221: 3217: 3214: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3197: 3195: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3180: 3178: 3174: 3168: 3162: 3156: 3153: 3151: 3148: 3143: 3142: 3135: 3132: 3130: 3126: 3123: 3120: 3116: 3112: 3109: 3107: 3103: 3099: 3095: 3092: 3090: 3084: 3082:contributions 3078: 3069: 3062: 3059: 3057: 3052: 3049: 3044: 3040: 3037: 3035: 3032: 3029: 3028: 3023: 3020: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3006: 3004: 3001: 2996: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2979: 2976: 2974: 2970: 2968: 2964: 2958: 2955: 2953: 2949: 2946: 2941: 2940: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932:Cabal Support 2928: 2926: 2922: 2920: 2914: 2909: 2908: 2900: 2897: 2895: 2892: 2883: 2880: 2878: 2875: 2871: 2868: 2866: 2863: 2861: 2858: 2855: 2849: 2846: 2844: 2839: 2833: 2831: 2829: 2820: 2817: 2815: 2811: 2808: 2804: 2801: 2799: 2796: 2794: 2789: 2783: 2780: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2755: 2753: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2743: 2735: 2732: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2721:Mailer Diablo 2718: 2716: 2713: 2711: 2706: 2704: 2699: 2697: 2691: 2688: 2686: 2683: 2682: 2676: 2672: 2669: 2667: 2663: 2657: 2655: 2646: 2643: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2632:Itfc+canes=me 2630: 2627: 2625: 2620: 2616: 2609: 2602: 2601:Srong Support 2599: 2597: 2594: 2593: 2586: 2579: 2576: 2574: 2570: 2564: 2562: 2556: 2553: 2550: 2546: 2540: 2534: 2525: 2519: 2516: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2499: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2486: 2483: 2481: 2478: 2473: 2471: 2468: 2461: 2457: 2454: 2452: 2448: 2445: 2443: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2434: 2433: 2425: 2422: 2420: 2415: 2414: 2408: 2407: 2402: 2398: 2396: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2382: 2380: 2377: 2374: 2373: 2369: 2366: 2362: 2359: 2357: 2354: 2352: 2350: 2344: 2341: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2324: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2304: 2299: 2293: 2287: 2284: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2272: 2266: 2263: 2261: 2258: 2256: 2254: 2249: 2244: 2239: 2236: 2233: 2231: 2228: 2226: 2221: 2219: 2213: 2210: 2208: 2205: 2203: 2197: 2189: 2186: 2183: 2180: 2176: 2171: 2168: 2166: 2163: 2161: 2155: 2152: 2150: 2147: 2146: 2139: 2136: 2134: 2131: 2129: 2124: 2122: 2116: 2113: 2111: 2106: 2100: 2099: 2091:Lookin' good 2090: 2087: 2085: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2072: 2069: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2052: 2050: 2046: 2040: 2034: 2028: 2025: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2008: 2005: 2002: 1996: 1993: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1976: 1974: 1968: 1967: 1961: 1953: 1950: 1948: 1945: 1943: 1941: 1940: 1933: 1930: 1928: 1925: 1923: 1921: 1915: 1912: 1910: 1907: 1906: 1901: 1894: 1891: 1889: 1886: 1881: 1875: 1872: 1870: 1866: 1861: 1858: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1838: 1835: 1834: 1826: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1805: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1788: 1786: 1783: 1781: 1775: 1772: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1755: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1738: 1736: 1733: 1726: 1720: 1716: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1699: 1697: 1693: 1691: 1687: 1673: 1670: 1668: 1665: 1660: 1654: 1651: 1648: 1646: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1636: 1631: 1623: 1620: 1618: 1613: 1608: 1597: 1596: 1589: 1586: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1565: 1563: 1560: 1558: 1554: 1549: 1547: 1545: 1543: 1540: 1539: 1535: 1529: 1526: 1524: 1520: 1518: 1517:sephiroth bcr 1511: 1508: 1506: 1503: 1502: 1492: 1488: 1485: 1483: 1480: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1469: 1463: 1460: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1445: 1442: 1440: 1437: 1436: 1430: 1429: 1422: 1418: 1416: 1412: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1388: 1385: 1383: 1380: 1376: 1373: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1353: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1344: 1341: 1338: 1331: 1329: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1320: 1319: 1312: 1310: 1307: 1299: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1281: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1264: 1262: 1259: 1251: 1247: 1246: 1239: 1236: 1234: 1229: 1223: 1215: 1209: 1202: 1196: 1188: 1182: 1179: 1177: 1174: 1172: 1171: 1164: 1161: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1144: 1140: 1137: 1135: 1129: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1114: 1109: 1108:Hurricanehink 1105: 1102: 1101: 1097: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1068: 1066: 1064: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1040: 1032: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1002: 1000: 996: 982: 972: 969: 967: 965: 961: 960: 958: 955: 954: 953: 944: 943: 942: 939: 937: 935: 931: 927: 921: 918: 913: 911: 908: 901: 900: 899: 896: 894: 892: 888: 887: 886: 883: 882: 876: 875: 868: 867: 866: 865: 861: 857: 850: 846: 844: 840: 826: 825: 824: 823: 820: 819: 818: 811: 810: 799: 797: 796: 794: 790: 781: 777: 774: 771: 768: 765: 762: 759: 756: 753: 750: 747: 744: 741: 737: 734: 730: 727: 724: 721: 717: 712: 709: 705: 701: 697: 696: 689: 685: 683: 680: 678: 675: 673: 670: 661: 650: 646: 643: 642: 641: 637: 633: 632: 626: 623: 622: 621: 618: 615: 612: 608: 605: 604: 601: 598: 597: 596: 594: 593: 589: 585: 574: 570: 567: 566: 564: 561: 555: 552: 551: 549: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 528: 525: 524: 522: 519: 518: 517: 515: 514: 513: 506: 498: 495: 493: 491: 486: 483: 482: 481: 478: 475: 470: 466: 463: 462: 461: 459: 458: 447: 443: 440: 439: 437: 434: 433: 427: 423: 420: 419: 416: 413: 412: 405: 401: 398: 397: 395: 394:In a nutshell 390: 387: 386: 385: 382: 381: 379: 373: 372: 370: 362: 352: 349: 347: 341: 337: 334: 333: 331: 328: 327: 324: 321: 319: 316: 315: 309: 304: 301: 300: 298: 295: 293: 289: 288: 279: 269: 261: 258: 257: 254: 251: 250: 243: 240: 239: 237: 233: 230: 229: 228: 227: 225: 220: 207: 202: 199: 198: 196: 193: 192: 186: 182: 177: 173: 169: 165: 162: 161: 159: 156: 155: 148: 145: 144: 142: 139: 138: 137: 131: 127: 124: 122: 120: 116: 113: 112: 111: 110: 105: 100: 99:Hurricanehink 95: 90: 88: 84: 80: 77: 74: 70: 66: 65: 63: 60: 56: 48: 45: 41: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 5079: 5076: 5058: 5057: 4976: 4969: 4924: 4923: 4908: 4907: 4895: 4894: 4887: 4875:Juliancolton 4848: 4826: 4773:Juliancolton 4746:Juliancolton 4687: 4658: 4628:Juliancolton 4614: 4607: 4602: 4570: 4563: 4543: 4519: 4515: 4498:Juliancolton 4462: 4446:Juliancolton 4414: 4399: 4392: 4368: 4351: 4334: 4317: 4313: 4296: 4277: 4262: 4247: 4237:bananabucket 4234: 4229:YellowMonkey 4226: 4225:great user. 4222: 4205: 4192: 4190: 4183: 4181: 4174: 4159: 4155: 4101: 4087: 4086: 4076: 4062: 4048:Regents Park 4043: 4007: 3995: 3961: 3957: 3928: 3917: 3910: 3898: 3897: 3894: 3890: 3876: 3850: 3833: 3816: 3807: 3798: 3781: 3776: 3762: 3745: 3736: 3734: 3727: 3723: 3705: 3696: 3691: 3686:Weak support 3685: 3661: 3656: 3640: 3623: 3602: 3597: 3580: 3563: 3559: 3547: 3546: 3532: 3515: 3503: 3496: 3491: 3484:Orderinchaos 3479: 3467: 3445: 3441: 3429: 3413: 3392: 3388: 3371: 3348: 3333: 3329: 3313:my standards 3308: 3286: 3282: 3268: 3216:Weak support 3215: 3198: 3181: 3154: 3137: 3133: 3121: 3110: 3093: 3060: 3038: 3025: 3021: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2977: 2961: 2956: 2937: 2930: 2929: 2918: 2904: 2898: 2881: 2869: 2859: 2856: 2853: 2847: 2827: 2826: 2818: 2802: 2781: 2769:Cosmic Latte 2756: 2738: 2737: 2733: 2724: 2709: 2702: 2695: 2689: 2679: 2670: 2651: 2644: 2628: 2600: 2590:/talk to me/ 2581: 2577: 2560: 2554: 2518:Cold Support 2517: 2500: 2484: 2466: 2459: 2455: 2446: 2437: 2435: 2428: 2423: 2412: 2405: 2400: 2383: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2360: 2348: 2342: 2325: 2308: 2285: 2271:Sunderland06 2270: 2264: 2257: 2238: 2237:Definitely. 2234: 2224: 2217: 2211: 2194: 2174: 2169: 2159: 2153: 2141: 2137: 2127: 2120: 2114: 2097: 2088: 2076: 2075: 2070: 2053: 2026: 2009: 1994: 1977: 1962: 1951: 1938: 1937: 1931: 1913: 1896: 1892: 1873: 1859: 1842: 1829: 1806: 1789: 1779: 1773: 1756: 1739: 1718: 1700: 1676: 1671: 1652: 1649: 1629:bibliomaniac 1626: 1625: 1621: 1592: 1587: 1570: 1566: 1551: 1531: 1527: 1516: 1509: 1493: 1486: 1471: 1470: 1461: 1443: 1432: 1425: 1420: 1414: 1413: 1390: 1386: 1374: 1335: 1334: 1322: 1321: 1314: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1265: 1242: 1237: 1206: 1181:Weak Support 1180: 1169: 1168: 1162: 1145: 1126: 1103: 1063:Juliancolton 1049: 1048: 1010: 985: 979: 964:Juliancolton 949: 948: 934:Juliancolton 906: 891:Juliancolton 878: 871: 853: 829: 813: 812: 805: 803: 786: 785: 772: 766: 760: 754: 748: 742: 735: 728: 722: 716:Juliancolton 700:Juliancolton 648: 644: 629: 624: 620: 616: 606: 599: 581: 580: 568: 562: 553: 547: 535: 534: 526: 520: 509: 508: 504: 503: 490:Juliancolton 484: 464: 454: 453: 441: 435: 421: 414: 399: 393: 388: 377: 375: 368: 366: 360: 359: 345: 335: 329: 322: 317: 302: 296: 259: 252: 241: 231: 214: 213: 200: 194: 163: 157: 146: 140: 135: 119:Juliancolton 114: 91: 75: 69:Juliancolton 67: 59:27 September 52: 51: 47:Juliancolton 46: 30: 28: 4997:wtf is that 4704:—Preceding 4210:Ncmvocalist 4023:—Preceding 3401:Daniel Case 3157:This user. 2963:Malinaccier 2763:(even when 2619:KoЯn flakes 2505:Majoreditor 2488:Brianherman 2330:Nehrams2020 2196:D. Trebbien 2181:(spot on), 1794:Ron Ritzman 1717:Definitely 1210:" Erik the 1150:AdjustShift 1128:D. Trebbien 5025:newgrounds 4993:Clock Crew 4603:threatened 3842:talk to me 3664:·Add§hore· 3043:Slgrandson 2906:ThinkBlue 2890:HyBRiD II 2887:II MusLiM 2653:LYKANTROP 2431:Balloonman 2372:discussion 2313:Ecoleetage 1622:Absolutely 1590:- Surely. 1467:Shapiros10 1392:Cyclonenim 800:Discussion 336:Follow up: 83:the throne 57:at 15:00, 31:successful 4925:Wizardman 4905:lawlerz! 3899:Gtstricky 3645:RyanLupin 3160:rootology 3098:≈ jossi ≈ 2292:Nishkid64 2032:JungleCat 1982:Admrboltz 1761:Xavexgoem 1705:America69 1497:<: --> 1491:Ruhrfisch 1379:Jehochman 1244:Plasticup 1170:Wizardman 758:block log 708:talk page 223:cierekim 5097:Category 5029:they own 4952:Karanacs 4718:contribs 4706:unsigned 4616:Cherian 4572:Cherian 4267:Garion96 4156:Support. 4037:contribs 4025:unsigned 3943:contribs 3768:Tiptoety 3750:Darwinek 3505:Cherian 3393:de facto 3362:contribs 3299:Chequers 3186:Winger84 3125:contribs 3115:Casliber 3048:How's my 2882:Suppport 2874:Scorpion 2648:Cheers-- 2645:Support. 2401:Support. 2388:Ealdgyth 2247:Mountain 2218:Schfifty 1815:RockManQ 1724:user:j 1594:Wisdom89 1553:Icewedge 1401:contribs 1375:Suppport 1362:Valtoras 1146:Support. 726:contribs 407:article. 245:process. 94:stalking 79:contribs 5041:Serviam 4861:Protonk 4849:Xp54321 4827:Neutral 4821:Neutral 4369:Support 4356:Epbr123 4352:Support 4335:Support 4320:Lucifer 4314:Support 4301:Ford MF 4297:Support 4278:Support 4263:Support 4206:Support 4175:Support 4133:east718 4102:Support 4077:Support 4063:Support 4044:Support 4029:Flffy'd 4012:Flffy'd 4008:Support 3958:Support 3929:Support 3911:Support 3891:support 3877:Support 3851:Support 3834:Support 3821:Carioca 3817:Support 3803:WP:SNOW 3777:Support 3763:Support 3746:Support 3724:Support 3712:BigDunc 3706:Support 3657:Support 3641:Support 3624:Support 3606:endaliv 3598:Support 3585:Alexnia 3560:Support 3549:Everyme 3537:Kafziel 3516:Support 3492:Support 3480:Support 3468:Support 3444:. :D ≈ 3442:Support 3430:Support 3414:Support 3372:Support 3349:Support 3330:Support 3317:Bearian 3309:Support 3283:Support 3269:Support 3233:Serviam 3199:Support 3182:Support 3155:Support 3134:Support 3111:Support 3094:Support 3067:CWY2190 3039:Support 2978:Support 2899:Support 2870:Support 2848:Support 2819:Support 2803:Support 2782:Support 2765:I don't 2761:WP:CLUE 2757:Support 2734:Support 2725:approve 2703:Helpful 2690:Support 2675:WP:TROP 2671:Support 2607:Special 2578:Support 2555:Support 2501:Support 2485:Support 2469:delanoy 2424:Support 2384:Support 2343:Support 2326:Support 2309:Support 2265:Support 2235:Support 2212:Support 2175:written 2170:Support 2154:Support 2144:MBisanz 2138:Support 2128:Thunder 2089:Support 2071:Support 2054:Support 2027:Support 2010:Support 1995:Support 1978:Support 1952:Support 1939:Realist 1932:Support 1914:Support 1893:Support 1874:Support 1860:Support 1811:WP:WPTC 1807:Support 1790:Support 1780:Xp54321 1757:Support 1740:Support 1719:support 1658:Serviam 1588:Support 1575:Protonk 1567:Support 1528:Support 1510:Support 1487:Support 1478:My work 1462:Support 1444:Support 1421:Support 1387:Support 1283:Support 1266:Support 1238:Support 1163:Support 1104:Support 1098:Support 1011:Comment 909:delanoy 856:Protonk 816:+speak+ 733:deleted 346:Xp54321 340:WP:CLUE 308:success 206:WT:USRD 5046:(talk) 4970:Animum 4890:Sunday 4728:Keeper 4688:Oppose 4516:Oppose 4468:WP:BLP 4415:Oppose 4409:Oppose 4326:(Talk) 4270:(talk) 4116:Jester 3998:review 3918:Maedin 3882:Durova 3859:(talk) 3801:- per 3730:Enigma 3649:(talk) 3628:gidonb 3571:flewis 3472:Jayjg 3453:storms 3434:MrFish 3353:SWik78 3238:(talk) 3102:(talk) 3009:Bstone 2994:uppets 2986:aster 2948:styles 2857:ndonic 2723:and I 2692:100%! 2681:Seddσn 2532:Coffee 2406:Animum 2365:αἰτίας 2242:Little 2187:, and 2058:Stifle 2044:Oohhh! 2038:Shiny! 1965:(talk) 1919:Thingg 1843:wasn't 1832:naerii 1663:(talk) 1571:aren't 1538:user:Y 1415:Oppose 1358:WP:100 1317:§unday 1297:Keeper 1227:CAESAR 1200:CAESAR 1076:Tznkai 1030:Keeper 1015:Tznkai 981:WP:100 808:Sunday 649:policy 573:WP:BLP 446:WP:FAC 278:hangon 268:hangon 236:WP:AFD 55:Rlevse 4641:Aqwis 4585:Aqwis 4525:Aqwis 4483:anion 4431:anion 4397:Mitch 4193:nine 4145:email 3964:jj137 3949:email 3789:broil 3784:Royal 3566:Super 3294:Spiel 3250:right 3247:Quite 3007:Yes. 2945:Comet 2225:Three 1744:Nsk92 1496:: --> 1427:Jamie 1405:email 983:! ;) 873:Jamie 789:civil 740:count 469:WP:OR 378:nine 64:(UTC) 16:< 4977:talk 4956:talk 4865:talk 4763:talk 4714:talk 4696:talk 4665:talk 4645:talk 4609:Tinu 4589:talk 4565:Tinu 4529:talk 4487:talk 4480:Nilf 4435:talk 4428:Nilf 4360:talk 4343:talk 4305:talk 4287:talk 4282:Aude 4214:talk 4166:talk 4161:Cirt 4139:talk 4113:SWAT 4090:talk 4082:RyRy 4033:talk 4016:talk 3972:talk 3937:talk 3869:Dark 3825:talk 3754:talk 3692:Sher 3632:talk 3591:) @ 3524:talk 3520:Pete 3498:Tinu 3448:Mind 3405:talk 3376:Wily 3358:talk 3336:Ryan 3321:talk 3289:Ϣere 3207:talk 3203:Bwrs 3190:talk 3146:ergy 3119:talk 3076:talk 3013:talk 2967:talk 2936:ahh 2919:BLUE 2913:(Hit 2850:. · 2837:Talk 2792:Dude 2787:Koji 2773:talk 2746:moff 2741:Gazi 2719:I'm 2636:talk 2538:talk 2509:talk 2492:talk 2476:adds 2413:talk 2392:Talk 2334:talk 2317:talk 2277:talk 2201:talk 2104:talk 2098:King 2095:Gary 2062:talk 2018:talk 1986:talk 1865:macy 1851:talk 1819:talk 1798:talk 1765:talk 1748:talk 1709:talk 1690:talk 1653:(ec) 1579:talk 1557:talk 1541:(eg. 1536:and 1534:WP:X 1532:per 1453:talk 1397:talk 1366:talk 1346:wiki 1337:Eddy 1274:talk 1154:talk 1133:talk 1113:talk 1080:talk 1019:talk 999:talk 916:adds 860:talk 843:talk 770:rfar 752:logs 720:talk 698:See 636:talk 611:WP:V 588:talk 538:Tito 426:here 404:WP:V 218:Dloh 183:and 104:talk 73:talk 62:2008 4838:rex 4788:Red 4660:DGG 4551:Why 4476:IRC 4463:way 4184:Ase 4148:// 4142:// 4136:// 3992:Fan 3987:LAA 3805:. 3697:eth 3675:ont 3613:Δ's 3458:Kid 3271:-- 3140:Syn 2830:ojo 2767:). 2710:One 2696:The 2584:abf 2561:Axl 2547:// 2544:ark 2541:// 2535:// 2121:Red 1904:Why 1884:lde 1879:Cau 1682:tth 1679:iMa 1434:S93 1343:the 1291:and 1287:and 1270:Qst 1221:AVE 1213:Red 1194:AVE 1186:Red 991:tth 988:iMa 932:. – 880:S93 835:tth 832:iMa 776:spi 746:AfD 631:DGG 619:DGG 600:15. 563:14: 548:13: 521:12: 465:11. 436:10. 369:Ase 87:MOS 5099:: 4958:) 4867:) 4800:~~ 4795:~~ 4791:2 4765:) 4736:76 4720:) 4716:• 4698:) 4667:) 4651:) 4647:– 4620:- 4595:) 4591:– 4576:- 4546:So 4535:) 4531:– 4518:, 4489:) 4437:) 4400:32 4362:) 4345:) 4307:) 4265:- 4241:) 4216:) 4168:) 4095:) 4039:) 4035:• 4018:) 3951:) 3922:\ 3844:) 3827:) 3756:) 3647:• 3634:) 3617:/ 3609:// 3526:) 3509:- 3420:| 3407:) 3360:• 3323:) 3315:. 3254:VG 3252:. 3220:VG 3209:) 3201:. 3192:) 3175:) 3169:)( 3127:) 3079:• 3027:ĈĠ 3015:) 2990:f 2840:• 2834:• 2823:— 2812:— 2775:) 2661:✉ 2638:) 2528:-- 2511:) 2494:) 2460:is 2390:- 2336:) 2319:) 2279:) 2184:, 2064:) 2020:) 1988:) 1980:-- 1969:@ 1899:So 1853:) 1821:) 1813:. 1800:) 1767:) 1750:) 1711:) 1703:. 1685:ew 1624:. 1609:/ 1581:) 1455:) 1407:) 1403:· 1399:· 1368:) 1340:of 1305:76 1276:) 1216:2 1189:2 1156:) 1116:) 1082:) 1038:76 1021:) 994:ew 862:) 838:ew 764:lu 645:A. 638:) 625:Q: 607:A. 595:: 590:) 569:A. 554:A. 540:xd 527:A. 516:: 485:A. 474:VG 460:: 457:VG 442:A: 422:A: 415:9. 400:A: 389:8. 330:A. 323:7. 303:A. 297:6. 281:}} 275:{{ 271:}} 265:{{ 260:A. 253:5. 242:A. 232:4. 201:A: 195:3. 164:A: 158:2. 147:A: 141:1. 107:) 36:. 4980:) 4974:( 4954:( 4863:( 4836:- 4834:T 4761:( 4759:] 4732:ǀ 4712:( 4694:( 4692:] 4663:( 4643:( 4587:( 4527:( 4485:( 4466:( 4433:( 4384:1 4379:H 4374:A 4358:( 4341:( 4303:( 4289:) 4285:( 4233:( 4212:( 4164:( 4107:⇒ 4085:( 4055:) 4051:( 4031:( 4014:( 3975:) 3969:( 3946:• 3940:• 3935:( 3867:— 3840:( 3823:( 3752:( 3673:C 3670:/ 3630:( 3603:M 3589:T 3587:( 3522:( 3403:( 3380:D 3364:) 3356:( 3319:( 3257:☎ 3223:☎ 3205:( 3188:( 3172:T 3166:C 3163:( 3122:· 3117:( 3085:) 3073:( 3053:) 3046:( 3031:☺ 3011:( 2992:P 2988:o 2984:M 2969:) 2965:( 2921:) 2860:O 2854:A 2828:J 2810:L 2807:C 2771:( 2634:( 2621:) 2617:( 2613:K 2566:¤ 2526:. 2507:( 2490:( 2467:. 2465:J 2416:) 2410:( 2403:— 2376:• 2368:• 2332:( 2315:( 2300:) 2296:( 2275:( 2252:5 2204:) 2198:( 2192:« 2107:) 2101:( 2060:( 2041:/ 2016:( 2006:. 1984:( 1849:( 1817:( 1796:( 1763:( 1746:( 1707:( 1692:) 1688:( 1639:5 1634:1 1614:) 1604:T 1599:( 1577:( 1559:) 1555:( 1500:° 1451:( 1395:( 1364:( 1301:ǀ 1272:( 1256:C 1252:/ 1230:) 1224:· 1218:( 1203:) 1197:· 1191:( 1152:( 1136:) 1130:( 1124:« 1110:( 1078:( 1034:ǀ 1017:( 1001:) 997:( 907:. 905:J 858:( 845:) 841:( 778:) 773:· 767:· 761:· 755:· 749:· 743:· 736:· 729:· 723:· 718:( 710:. 634:( 586:( 477:☎ 226:. 101:( 76:· 71:( 40:.

Index

Knowledge:Requests for adminship
request for adminship
Juliancolton
Rlevse
27 September
2008
Juliancolton
talk
contribs
the throne
MOS
stalking
Hurricanehink
talk
02:18, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Juliancolton


15:01, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Tropical cyclones
New York State Routes WikiProject
1998 Pacific hurricane season
WikiProject Non-tropical storms
WikiProject Hudson Valley
WT:USRD
Dloh
cierekim
WP:AFD
hangon
hangon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.