406:
812:. Does a lot of good work, but edit warring far too recently, and may be a POV purveyor. Also, I am concerned that some of his email correspondences with other editors (mentioned on his talk page) may concern wikipedia article discussions, which would be highly innapropriate. Either way, not ready for the responsibility just yet IMHO. --
1279:
An editor asks you to mediate in a dispute that has gone from being a content dispute to an edit war (but not necessarily a revert war), with hostile language in edit summaries (that are not personal attacks). One involved party welcomes the involvement of an admin, but the other seems to ignore you.
1265:
You speedy a few articles. An anon keeps recreating them, and you re-speedy them. After dropping a note on their talk page, they vandalise your user page and make incivil comments. You realise they've been blocked before. What would you do? Would you block them, or respect that you have a conflict of
383:
We disperatly need an administrator like him, even thought I have disagreed with him in some of his decisions, I strongly believe that he would be one of the best administrator in heated debates with touches the middle East and
Caucasus. That some Turks and Kurds (who opposes eachothers) both opposes
1271:
Personally, I don't consider vandalism to my userpage vandalism in the strict sense, so I wouldn't block for that. I think that I'd probably leave the article for a couple of hours before deleting it after the anon had recreated it after having been asked not to. That way, he may have got fed up and
1207:
A. Yes, I've normally had conflicts over controversial articles. During the dispute, I've kept cool, not made any personal attacks (even when I was attacked), and tried to work things out and explain things to the user or users. Sometimes a dispute will be resolved immediately, sometimes the user or
828:
certain for many subjects which really really contain many uncertainties. i am from turkey and i am not so certain and strict about many turkey related problems which i know and search about for years. i know they are very complicated. i know that many things the turkish goverment and people assert
1295:
between the two parties, probably by email or IRC if necessary, but once they've been unblocked I'd use the talk page. I would try RFC before RFAR, if Arbcom rejected the case, then I would ask for other administrators and trusted users to help me out with the meditation if it still wasn't working.
1294:
I think that the admin should only have blocked them if they were warned prior, and continued to revert. What if they were newbies? In this case, it's not really clear if they were warned, so it depends if I'd respect the admin's decision or not. I would try to see if we could come to a compromise
105:
under his current name. I think this satisfies the most stringent requirements regarding the edit count. Khoikhoi does RC patrol, helps in various maintenance tasks, notably VFDs, and has a very civil manner. I have never seen him be uncivil or make personal attacks, even when attacked himself. He
1157:. As I've been doing, I'll look for vandalism to revert, usually from pages in my watchlist, although recently I have been looking at the Recent Changes page, the latter of which I'm going to do more often. I've also worked very hard in the past month on trying to meditate in a conflict on the
1272:
left by the time I re-deleted it and not recreate it. If that failed, I would probably AFD the article(s) and if the outcome was delete and the anon kept on recreating it, then I'd be able to protect it against recreation. I would not block in these circumstances without actual vandalism.
841:. While I have nothing particular against this user, I am not totally convinced of Khoikhoi's neutrality on several subjects. It is my belief that adminship should require crystal-clear neutrality. Also, I came to recognize this user's name primarily because of edit wars.
1227:
The following are hypothetical situations you might find yourself in. I'd like to know how you'd react, as this may sway my vote. There is no need to answer these questions if you don't feel like it, that's fine with me, (especially if I've already supported you ;)).
951:
I think the he's handled these problems quite well and has been civil at all times. If he gave into some of the demands then all articles would have content that is not favoured by the people of Turkey removed, which would not make the the articles neutral.
304:
1288:
as a third party. Would you respect the other admin's decisions, or would you continue to engage in conversation (over email or IRC) and submit a comment/statement to the RFAR? Let's say the ArbCom rejects the case. What would you do then?
1252:. A small minority, of, say, three or four disagree. Upon looking the article over, you side with the minority and feel that the article is salvagable. Another admin then speedies it while you are making your decision. What would you do?
1257:
I would talk to the admin who deleted the article. If I haven't been able to convince him or her, then I would probably have a word with other admins, to see what they think. If they all disagree I suppose I'd just forget about
829:
are not true, and many of the opposers are not also. so the only thing this behaviour tells me that whether this user has a narrow view over these subjects or is not trying to be neutral at all.
1237:
I would leave a message on their talk page, in which I would tell them that it would be a good idea to stop. However, I would not block the user, or take any administrative action.
1204:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
965:
Comment: This user has and keeps a POV in all
Iranian and Kurdish and maybe other related articles. When he is asked for citiation he rejects and claims the article is well-cited
106:
makes good article contributions and has been helping in dispute resolution my mediating on at least one occasion. I cannot think of a good enough reason not to promote him. --
1284:
as they do not think it would solve anything. Just as you are about to approach the user ignoring you, another admin blocks them both for edit warring and sends the case to
1208:
users will continue to revert the page without further discussion. When this happens I notify other users and ask them for help. In the future, I will continue to do this.
1127:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge (XXG) in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
824:- I searched this users edits about turkey related pages, which are a lot and i think he is not neutral at all. the most disturbing thing is that this user seems to be
1084:
If you think I've recieved a message from Khoi, please check my talk page. You will then find out that I have NEVER had any contact with him on my talk page.
1312:
582:
He has been in Edit wars since he came here,was banned several times and always tries to push his POV in articles,also always disturbs the
Turkish users. (
1143:
384:
him is enought evidences that he is doing something right. While we could propose him in few months as some might suggest, we disperatly need him NOW!!!
1174:
A. Despite that I don't spend most of my time contributing material to articles, I'm pretty pleased with what I've done to the articles on the various
1186:. I spend most of my time fixing and cleaning up ethnic group and language related articles however. Two of the ones that I've worked on include
1194:. In addition to this, I have also tried to assist administrative maintenance tasks, for example in TFDs, by substituting deleted templates.
1045:
Sorry for wasting your time, Khoi. who has always problems with Turk related articles will be an admin, unless you vote for opposition.
29:
17:
647:
Some sort of edit warring occurred less than two weeks ago. Not comfortable with promotion yet; more learning time is always good.
1232:
You find out that an editor, who's well-known and liked in the community, has been using sockpuppets abusively. What would you do?
1006:
usage: 100% for major edits and 100% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.
290:
Good editor with an extremely high edit count. As the others have stated, I'm surprised that you haven't become an admin yet. --
94:
80:
1020:
98:
705:, Unfortunately this user only keeps pushing his POV. I have provided some links below. He facttionalize the discussions.
102:
1135:
1171:
Of your articles or contributions to
Knowledge (XXG), are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
1139:
938:
786:
doing the same. I'm not sure if a person who so quickly takes sides in different disputes would make a good admin.
538:
532:
694:
693:- I am hesitant about adminship for anyone who has an easily defineable POV bias, especially a nationalistic one.
338:
A very good editor who has kept his cool on a number of articles where others would have most defintley lost it.
972:
between users as now we see between some users. He even uses irrelevant links to the matter to support his POV
1175:
372:
842:
792:
782:. I agree that he keeps his cool, but revert wars seem to attract him (or he attracts them). I saw him on
1219:
1107:
521:
352:
1183:
1078:
1048:
927:
914:
747:
600:
1118:
1033:'s talk page. The message is in Turkish, but what appears to be an English translation was left on
1010:
998:
956:
945:
930:
917:
901:
877:
845:
833:
816:
804:
765:
753:
728:
697:
685:
663:
651:
639:
627:
615:
603:
586:
574:
560:
497:
445:
433:
421:
409:
375:
363:
342:
330:
321:
318:
309:
282:
270:
254:
230:
218:
206:
184:
167:
144:
125:
110:
60:
1034:
1030:
897:
874:
202:
88:
141:
107:
1191:
830:
442:
361:
267:
74:
636:
543:
430:
1112:
1029:. An anonymous editor is trying to advertise this RfA by leaving notes on everyone who is in
895:
to a person based on peoples comments presented here regading if he is a pov pusher or not. --
557:
197:
180:
160:
97:), for adminship. He has been with us since last April (in his previous account) and has made
1285:
1085:
1074:
1061:
953:
571:
510:
429:. Good user. 5 blocks per 27 thousand edits? i think it just demonstrates 3rr rottenness. --
400:
339:
227:
214:
because he has all that is required to be a good administrator and for his civil manners.--
1281:
1249:
1154:
1150:
988:
858:
737:
718:
454:
441:- Excellent hardworking editor, good mediator, I actually thought he is an admin already.
279:
509:
Questionable block history, plus I've previously encountered this user revert-warring at
1158:
866:
854:
813:
783:
774:
528:
215:
194:
84:
1306:
1187:
1016:
682:
672:
357:
251:
122:
70:
57:
47:
550:
Do you have some evidence, ie. can you show me the links to these edit wars please?
1102:
1007:
799:
787:
612:
551:
176:
153:
1057:
942:
624:
596:
583:
418:
391:
303:
1134:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
1179:
984:
977:
762:
714:
707:
660:
648:
405:
873:
A admiminstrator is to be neutral, in this respect, i don.t want this user...
1216:
518:
327:
1161:, tasks such as this I intend to continue whatever the outcome of this RfA.
773:- Ths user doesn't know the difference between a Greek POV and the truth.
869:, this user doing to propagandize.Please don.t making to administrator...
291:
239:
623:- Edit wars and POV pushing on articles concerning Macedonian issues. --
1245:
1149:
A. Probably the mandatory stuff, such as closing AfDs, checking on the
262:- a good editor. I'm waiting for someone to say that his edit count is
659:- This user POV pushes (Greek POV) the articles related to Macedonia.
175:, and actually somewhat surprised Khoikhoi wasn't an admin already --
913:
Latinus, are sure that those are edits or reverts wars of Khoi ? --
862:
371:
A fantastic candidate. He always keeps it cool and neutral. --
117:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
891:
I do not know anything about this user and I refuse to vote
513:, so until I can be otherwise inclined to change my mind,
28:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
993:
973:
966:
723:
599:
is right. He always has problems with
Turkish editors.
1248:, you come across an article that many users agree is
761:- This user always has problems with Turkish editors.
417:
per all of his supporters ! He is a great candidate.
192:; meets most, if not all of my criteria. Nice job! —
1060:
is also going round adding this message in
Turkish.
1077:, but we all know that you had SOS from Khoi.. --
278:- excellent editor who has earned the promotion--
83:) – I am nominating Khoikhoi, formerly known as
66:Final (21/20/1) ending 04:28, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
1244:While speedying articles/clearing a backlog at
326:Long overdue (see my talk page for details;).
8:
1182:article, and my cleanup to the articles in
671:- POV-push in articles regarding Macedonia
226:- surprised you're not already an admin -
1019:'s edit count and contribution tree with
937:You can see one of Khoikhoi's edit wars
681:- Mainly for edit warring and POV-push.
54:I have decided to withdraw my nomination
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
968:. Such a actions usually starts long
392:
7:
1313:Unsuccessful requests for adminship
101:edits with under his old name and
24:
924:fantastic and neutral personality
736:Track-record is in poor shape. --
393:
1136:Category:Knowledge (XXG) backlog
611:so far from the administration--
404:
302:
246:
243:
240:
298:
1:
793:
489:
484:
479:
474:
469:
466:
463:
460:
457:
1144:administrators' reading list
922:How come I haven't seen his
295:
292:
1124:Questions for the candidate
1081:20:33, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
1051:14:13, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
1329:
1138:, and read the page about
1119:18:29, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
1088:20:53, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
1064:20:16, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
1011:04:30, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
999:15:23, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
957:16:02, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
946:15:20, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
931:17:42, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
918:14:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
902:20:41, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
846:20:28, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
834:19:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
817:19:56, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
805:19:46, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
766:18:41, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
754:18:25, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
729:17:54, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
698:17:48, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
686:17:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
664:16:33, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
652:16:26, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
640:15:28, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
628:15:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
616:15:12, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
604:14:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
587:13:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
575:08:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
561:12:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
498:19:59, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
446:19:47, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
434:18:53, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
422:18:48, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
410:18:41, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
376:17:02, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
364:16:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
343:16:02, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
331:14:24, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
322:14:07, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
310:09:07, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
283:08:28, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
271:07:10, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
266:for him to be an admin. -
255:07:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
231:05:54, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
219:04:37, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
207:04:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
185:04:31, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
168:04:30, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
145:00:31, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
126:04:27, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
111:00:31, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
61:20:41, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
878:13:06, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
675:18:56 26 March 2006 (UTC)
1280:They have both rejected
39:Please do not modify it.
1098:
1037:'s talk page and says:
1184:Category:Extinct fish
1040:
853:. This person liked,
30:request for adminship
238:, looks good to me.
121:Thanks, I accept. --
843:Atilim Gunes Baydin
453:Great contributor.
1192:Western New Guinea
900:
547:
402:
308:
1320:
1222:
1151:3RR reports page
1110:
982:
896:
797:
751:
741:
712:
541:
524:
511:Germanic peoples
495:
493:
488:
483:
478:
473:
468:
465:
462:
459:
456:
408:
401:
398:
397:
360:
355:
307:
306:
300:
297:
294:
248:
245:
242:
200:
166:
163:
156:
41:
1328:
1327:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1303:
1302:
1250:patent nonsense
1220:
1215:Questions from
1108:
1079:TuzsuzDeliBekir
1049:TuzsuzDeliBekir
1021:Interiot's tool
978:
970:factionalizings
928:TuzsuzDeliBekir
915:TuzsuzDeliBekir
859:Armenian People
745:
739:
708:
703:Strongly oppose
601:TuzsuzDeliBekir
536:
522:
494:
455:
353:
351:
350:A good user. --
198:
161:
158:
154:
51:
37:
34:did not succeed
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1326:
1324:
1316:
1315:
1305:
1304:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1226:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1176:Pashtun tribes
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1159:Persian people
1140:administrators
1126:
1096:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1039:
1038:
1024:
1013:
1001:
962:
961:
960:
959:
935:
934:
933:
905:
904:
875:Isimsizzorbebe
871:
870:
867:Turkish People
848:
836:
819:
807:
784:Persian people
777:
768:
756:
731:
700:
688:
676:
666:
654:
642:
630:
618:
606:
590:
577:
565:
564:
563:
526:
501:
500:
448:
439:Strong Support
436:
424:
412:
385:
378:
366:
345:
333:
324:
312:
285:
273:
257:
233:
221:
209:
187:
170:
147:
140:per myself. --
129:
128:
119:
50:
45:
44:
43:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1325:
1314:
1311:
1310:
1308:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1287:
1283:
1278:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1264:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1224:
1223:
1218:
1206:
1205:
1203:
1200:
1199:
1193:
1189:
1188:Mari language
1185:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1172:
1170:
1167:
1166:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1147:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1125:
1121:
1120:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1111:
1106:
1105:
1097:
1087:
1083:
1082:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1063:
1059:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1050:
1046:
1043:
1036:
1035:User:Cool Cat
1032:
1031:Category:tr-N
1028:
1025:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1012:
1009:
1005:
1002:
1000:
997:
996:
992:
991:
987:
986:
983:
981:
974:
971:
967:
964:
963:
958:
955:
950:
949:
947:
944:
940:
936:
932:
929:
925:
921:
920:
919:
916:
912:
911:
910:
909:
903:
899:
894:
890:
887:
886:
885:
884:
880:
879:
876:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
849:
847:
844:
840:
837:
835:
832:
831:tembelejderha
827:
823:
820:
818:
815:
811:
808:
806:
803:
802:
798:
796:
791:
790:
785:
781:
778:
776:
772:
769:
767:
764:
760:
757:
755:
752:
749:
743:
742:
735:
732:
730:
727:
726:
722:
721:
717:
716:
713:
711:
704:
701:
699:
696:
692:
689:
687:
684:
680:
677:
674:
670:
667:
665:
662:
658:
655:
653:
650:
646:
643:
641:
638:
635:- as Realek.
634:
631:
629:
626:
622:
619:
617:
614:
610:
607:
605:
602:
598:
594:
591:
588:
585:
581:
578:
576:
573:
570:Edit wars. --
569:
566:
562:
559:
558:
555:
554:
549:
548:
545:
540:
534:
530:
525:
520:
516:
512:
508:
507:
506:
505:
499:
496:
492:
487:
482:
477:
472:
452:
449:
447:
444:
440:
437:
435:
432:
428:
425:
423:
420:
416:
413:
411:
407:
403:
399:
396:
389:
386:
382:
379:
377:
374:
370:
367:
365:
362:
359:
356:
349:
346:
344:
341:
337:
334:
332:
329:
325:
323:
320:
317:Does good! --
316:
313:
311:
305:
301:
289:
286:
284:
281:
277:
274:
272:
269:
268:Richardcavell
265:
261:
258:
256:
253:
249:
237:
234:
232:
229:
225:
222:
220:
217:
213:
210:
208:
205:
204:
201:
196:
191:
188:
186:
182:
178:
174:
171:
169:
164:
157:
151:
148:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:
134:
133:
127:
124:
120:
118:
115:
114:
113:
112:
109:
104:
100:
96:
93:
90:
86:
82:
79:
76:
72:
68:
67:
63:
62:
59:
55:
49:
46:
42:
40:
35:
31:
26:
25:
19:
1214:
1213:
1201:
1168:
1131:
1123:
1122:
1113:
1103:
1101:
1099:
1095:
1044:
1041:
1026:
1004:Edit summary
1003:
994:
989:
979:
976:
969:
923:
907:
906:
892:
888:
882:
881:
872:
850:
838:
825:
821:
809:
800:
794:
788:
779:
770:
758:
744:
738:
733:
724:
719:
709:
706:
702:
690:
678:
668:
656:
644:
632:
620:
608:
592:
579:
567:
556:
552:
514:
503:
502:
490:
485:
480:
475:
470:
450:
438:
426:
414:
394:
387:
380:
368:
347:
335:
314:
287:
275:
263:
259:
235:
223:
211:
193:
189:
172:
149:
137:
131:
130:
116:
91:
77:
69:
65:
64:
53:
52:
38:
33:
27:
1086:Englishrose
1075:Englishrose
1062:Englishrose
1058:User:Metb82
954:Englishrose
861:, they are
691:Weak Oppose
572:Masssiveego
390:Per nom! --
340:Englishrose
228:Green Giant
1266:interest?
1180:Dall Sheep
1073:Excuse me
637:Luka JaÄŤov
544:2006-03-26
280:Looper5920
814:InShaneee
775:Macedonia
537:at 04:32
443:abakharev
216:Hectorian
85:Hottentot
1307:Category
1142:and the
1017:Khoikhoi
908:Comments
898:Cool Cat
683:High Elf
264:too high
123:Khoikhoi
95:contribs
81:contribs
71:Khoikhoi
58:Khoikhoi
48:Khoikhoi
1286:WP:RFAR
1246:CAT:CSD
1027:Comment
1008:Mathbot
926:yet. --
889:Neutral
883:Neutral
855:Kurdish
613:hakozen
451:Support
427:Support
415:Support
388:Support
381:Support
369:Support
358:iva1979
348:Support
336:Support
315:Support
288:Support
276:Support
260:Support
236:Support
224:Support
212:Support
195:Deckill
190:Support
177:Deville
173:Support
155:Ganeshk
150:Support
142:Latinus
138:Support
132:Support
108:Latinus
1282:WP:RFC
1178:, the
1155:WP:AIV
943:Metb82
893:oppose
857:, and
851:Oppose
839:Oppose
822:Oppose
810:Oppose
780:Oppose
771:Oppose
759:Oppose
734:Oppose
679:Oppose
673:Vlatko
669:Oppose
657:Oppose
645:Oppose
633:Oppose
625:Realek
621:Oppose
609:Oppose
597:Metb82
593:Oppose
584:Metb82
580:Oppose
568:Oppose
515:oppose
504:Oppose
419:Amir85
395:Scaife
103:14,134
99:13,398
863:enemy
763:Memty
748:Reply
661:Bomac
649:Xoloz
553:Gizza
32:that
16:<
1190:and
1153:and
1104:Rory
1042:Hi,
1015:See
990:Talk
985:ebat
939:here
789:Auca
720:Talk
715:ebat
695:Joey
431:tasc
373:Kash
328:El_C
319:Moby
252:Talk
181:Talk
162:talk
89:talk
75:talk
56:. --
1258:it.
1217:NSL
1047:]--
865:of
826:too
740:Jay
539:UTC
519:NSL
1309::
1202:3.
1169:2.
1146:.
1132:1.
1114:96
1100:--
948:)
801:an
517:.
476:il
250:|
183:)
152:-
36:.
1225::
1221:E
1109:0
1023:.
995:+
980:X
975:.
941:(
795:m
750:)
746:(
725:+
710:X
595:(
589:)
546:)
542:(
535:)
533:C
531:+
529:T
527:(
523:E
491:r
486:e
481:v
471:S
467:o
464:k
461:i
458:N
354:S
299:C
296:B
293:T
247:P
244:I
241:J
203:r
199:e
179:(
165:)
159:(
92:·
87:(
78:·
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.