1001:. I see a lot of Kim's work on new page patrol, and he is doing excellent work there. Just the new page patrol would make me nod with this RFA and move on (I rarely vote in RfA's not between 65% and 75%) but his excellent communicative skills, civilty, and WP space edits made me decide to drop in and voice my support.
487:
dialogue might of course include giving them escalating warnings on their user talk page, interspersed with more encouraging attempts to engage them. A block would be a last resort as personally I can't see this having much direct effect on the editor other than giving them a sense of justified grievance.
806:
per Pedro, whom I trust a great deal. However, apart from that, user has the diversification I look for in an admin hopeful. Examination of talk page leads me to believe the user is level headed, friendly, and calm. The answer to the questions are honest and candid. Seems like the candidate can learn
533:
One further thought. All the above is very nice in principle. It might work with people whose improper behaviour includes things like content blanking, POV pushing, edit warring, silly test editing, inserting unsourced material and original research etc etc. But the question was about people who have
496:
Eventually of course a block might be necessary, even if some kind of dialogue is established but the behaviour doesn't change for the better. But it would be to protect the encyclopedia and its other editors, not because I see a block as some kind of 'short, sharp shock' to bring the rogue to his or
486:
My actions would depend on the context such as the nature of the attacks and the rest of the 'problem' user's edits. In principle, I would always prefer to work with someone and dialogue with them to try and improve their editing and make them a more constructive member of the community. Part of this
340:
which was recently rated a good article: I wrote very little of this, but have had a big hand in editing it into shape. It is now a reasonably slim 42k long with good structure and links. When I came to it, it was nearly twice the size and much of the work has involved negotiating with other editors,
442:
I am more conservative in my tagging now, and have not got into any similar conflict since, but I generally find that if in doubt, waiting half an hour before hitting the 'save' button works wonders. I have no problem in maintaining a stout defence against true vandals, but most people here seem to
2267:
I am no vandal!!!!! Why do I need to get blocked? is it because I have voted here or there?? A weak vote is justified here because I think a sysop should be an excellent editor as well, this user is clearly one of the anti-vandal ones but even 5000 new pages patrolled will not say anything about
515:
An editor who has constructive edits elsewhere in their contributions, but whose attacks are so extreme, widespread or unpleasant that immediate protective action is essential. (The kind of user who would merit at least an immediate 'final warning' template without escalation up the templates.)
1764:
has been very active in AfDs. I have reviewed his entire edit history. He has repeatedly demonstrated that he is evenhanded in the discussions of AfDs. He already appears to be functioning as a good admin even though he does not have the administrative tools. He consistently shows patience and
1406:. I just read through the last 6 weeks of your talkpage and history. You have a very easy demeanor about you (which is not exactly easy to do with a keyboard - kudos to you). You respond to criticism with poise and patience. Now that you will likely be spending time in the Janitor's realm
2648:. Because I was led to look at this because of reference to his alleged "vote-trading" in my RfA, I reviewed nominee's contributions and voted above to support as a result, not that I see it as necessary, there seems to be little serious opposition and lots of support. Good luck! --
534:
been making personal attacks on a range of other users. My guess would be that such folk would be the least likely of all to respond to the 'softly softly' approach above, and who in practice would end up sooner or later with a block to protect
Knowledge (XXG).
2282:
Guys, stop harrassing A man of honour. He's entitled to his opinion. A man of honour, what would you ideally like to see from this candidate in order to gain your support? I'm not trying to harangue you here, just asking for some more specific criteria.
2317:
Having taken a look at A man of honour's contribs, it seems his account is only 3 weeks old, yet he's been making edits solely on RFA matters after very few article edits. The average newbie won't even learn about RFA that quickly. Could he be a
1057:- I really don't need to say anymore than what Pedro has said. Kim reflects all those qualities that are needed in administrators these days, perhaps even passing more than all of them. Apologies to Mailer Diablo, but.. I
2394:#Appears to be a decent editor, but I am unable to support at this time, due to lack of incentives that have been offered me for doing so. However, I will support if the nominee switches over to support column in
1422:, your demeanor will go a long way towards increasing your notability to other Wikipedians at least. (I read your "10 odd" userpage too :)) Easily one of the strongest admin candidates I've seen in recent weeks.
2006:
Kim Dent-Brown is a polite editor and tries to help, when new contributors write their first articles, if they don't cover all the wikipedian standarts. He gives them time and advices how to continue their
312:
and similar areas where I have less experience. I doubt I would ever get involved in work involving the
Mediawiki interface, as I have little technical knowledge and less interest in acquiring any...
508:
An editor who has no other constructive contributions elsewhere in the encyclopedia, ie who seems to be running a vandalism-only account. (The kind of user whom previously I would have reported to
1471:
Though I would ask that he add a message or a userbox on his user page saying he is male. Kim can be a male or female name and its annoying to not know; I hate using the wrong prepositions.
210:, once again, I would only nominate if I believed a candidate could help us in our work by granting them admin tools. Kim has much to offer, and nothing indicates a hinderance. As ever, a
336:. I had some very generous help in the early days of drafting this and it was a good learning experience. (I now make much better use of the Preview button!) I've also been involved with
2623:
those who request adminship do so in good faith, and would certainly wish to be judged on their suitability based on their contribution history, and not how they comment at other RfA's
2739:
2251:"Okay, to be honest with you, I am not N00b, but have been on and off when it comes to editing WP, so I do not need you to start listing policies and stuff, I know what I am doing!!"
569:
283:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge (XXG) as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
2477:) without linking it to a different one where you don't like how it's turning out? They are not related and your !vote here is unfounded, unusual, unnecessary, and (if I may be so
2129:
I respect your contributions, sir, but I hope you understand that to become an admin, one must have an excellent edit history. You come close to that, but not really crossing it.
1549:. Nothing but good interactions with this editor, and I know the mop will be in excellent hands. (Insert standard text expressing surprise this editor isn't already an admin.)--
2225:
268:
438:
When I started editing here and moved beyond article writing, I was certainly too trigger happy with CSD tags at first. This led to (only occasional) conflicts such as
432:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
1668:. Other than never editing in the nude, liking kittens, and speaking English, we don't have much in common. However, WP could use an admin to mop up some of the
2104:
609:
2113:
757:. After seeing a note on Pedro's talk about adminship, I checked the user's contributions and was impressed. I think this user will make a fine administrator.
2179:
2368:
Anyway, if this vote continues like that, I will change my Oppose, this user deserves to land on 100. if anyone else opposes, my !vote will remain the same.
596:
214:
awaits us here, and I hope and trust the community will find themsleves in agreance with me that granting adminship to Kim is yet another step forward for
2757:
2335:
Alasdair, please assume good faith. Read A man of honour's talk page, and you will see that he stated that he contributed under several IPs in the past.
1766:
439:
107:
edits will not be shown on the "wanabee kate" tool due to his active participation in new page patrol and CSD nominations. So, as ever, my rationale;
2395:
138:
2619:
Well, that's fair enough, but I'd ask you reconsider your view that RfA voting is tit-for-tat. It's a bit insulting to RfA candidates. I think all
1016:
469:
for a short period of time, or would you attempt to work with the user to try and make them into a better
Wikipedian? Please explain your reason.
272:
603:
639:
2173:
2151:
633:
656:
589:
370:
81:
132:
497:
her senses. There would be obvious exceptions to this gradual approach, where an immediate block would be warranted. These might include:
2239:
1117:
346:
2155:
33:
17:
1987:
intended) I'm a tad prejudiced because he works on articles in my areas of interest but this also means I'm impressed with his work.
565:
2546:
2095:
1353:
Just worked with editor on his GA nomination. Very conscientious and thorough. And works extremely quickly and efficiently as well.
2644:
I apologize for any wikifuss caused by my nominator, Sarsaparilla. I have no clue what he is doing with this, beyond some kind of
2403:
308:
I feel I know these areas pretty well and they would be a safe place to start. In due course I expect I would get involved in
203:
A desire only to apply for adminship as and when Kim felt he was ready - editors may peruse his talk archives to confirm this.
989:
1228:, great candidate. Use of the clichéd "I thought you were already an admin!" held back so strongly you wouldn't believe.
2197:
1765:
courtesy when interacting with other editors. He writes well and makes quality edits. My sole interaction with him was on
1027:
718:
373:. I also like helping out new editors who are obviously in good faith, but needing a hand with the process such as these:
2456:
2086:
1325:
1067:
1048:
922:
2688:! I'm going to assume that Sarsaparilla thought they could get away with this due to my notoriously good humor? :-) --
2185:
949:, seems to have a decent grasp of CSD policy, which is a must working in that area. A good, solid admin candidate.
1777:) 06:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC) Note: I updated the tally from (63/1/0) to (66/1/0) to reflect the current count.--
1652:
1006:
2473:
Or, how about a contribution to this particular discussion (in favor, opposed, abstained, or legitimately neutral
2378:
2308:
2303:
is not enough). Vandal fighting is really appreciated, but these are my criteria. I hope my opinion is repected.
2273:
2167:
2147:
2134:
1749:
1341:
2406:, I am willing to negotiate in reference to other nominees you would like my support for. Please note that this
791:
1021:
712:
583:
540:
522:
461:
Hi there. If you noticed a vandal was causing a bit of bother for several different users, for instance making
416:
391:
329:
249:
75:
267:
contributions here unless specifically asked to by editors. If successful, I would add myself to the category
2697:
2657:
2639:
2614:
2595:
2554:
2540:
2515:
2501:
2468:
2446:
2419:
2382:
2344:
2330:
2312:
2292:
2277:
2244:
2235:
2138:
2077:
2053:
2030:
2016:
1998:
1971:
1955:
1938:
1925:
1913:
1909:
1890:
1873:
1856:
1839:
1822:
1805:
1786:
1753:
1736:
1724:
1715:
1698:
1681:
1656:
1639:
1610:
1593:
1581:
1558:
1537:
1513:
1480:
1463:
1442:
1394:
1378:
1362:
1345:
1329:
1309:
1295:
1274:
1258:
1244:
1220:
1203:
1187:
1184:
1172:
1155:
1138:
1122:
1113:
1084:
1070:
1036:
1010:
993:
970:
953:
941:
932:
909:
888:
872:
856:
837:
816:
798:
786:
772:
749:
727:
705:
544:
526:
478:
420:
253:
234:
65:
131:
His desire for collaboration is demonstrated by his active use of article talk pages and at such venues as
2610:
2511:
2464:
2415:
2398:. Given the presently high supply of Kim Dent-Brown supporters in the RfA marketplace, which according to
2025:
1694:
1665:
1617:
1358:
966:
2716:
2693:
2669:
2550:
2254:
2209:
1648:
1554:
1289:
1090:
1002:
2738:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
781:
652:
2402:
economics would tend to lower the marginal price of each additional supporter and require additional
2374:
2340:
2304:
2288:
2269:
2162:
2143:
2130:
1852:
1782:
1774:
1745:
1371:
1337:
1304:
1168:
881:
2253:
Not sure what to make of it, so I asked the user at their talk page for some more explanation. User:
1577:
1567:
1419:
2012:
1886:
1869:
1799:
1761:
1572:
1370:
I can't find the slightest possibility of misuse of the tools ,and I can find great need for them.
824:
I was on the fence over this one... I mean come on, never edited wikipedia naked? Live a little :P
808:
579:
561:
535:
517:
411:
244:
71:
60:
296:
I would start with work which relates to the non-admin activity in which I have been most active:
2527:
2488:
2433:
2229:
1988:
1900:
1500:
1429:
1390:
1317:
1255:
1201:
1181:
1151:
1135:
1107:
1062:
1043:
983:
812:
765:
362:
2645:
2576:
1881:. Not an editor with who I am familiar, but certainly seems to be a user I am willing to trust.
1415:
466:
407:
84:) - Fellow editors, it is my pleasure to nominate Kim for adminship. Joining Knowledge (XXG) in
2606:
2572:
2545:
Don't ever change it. That username's definitely a, uh... username that you should hold onto.
2507:
2460:
2452:
2411:
2039:
1951:
1818:
1711:
1690:
1677:
1354:
1239:
962:
744:
2478:
2319:
1411:
366:
309:
164:
2689:
2602:
1993:
1550:
1533:
1476:
1457:
1321:
1285:
1216:
1080:
927:
474:
354:
847:
509:
462:
403:
342:
305:
301:
297:
174:
168:
158:
2632:
2588:
2336:
2284:
1964:
1848:
1778:
1770:
1587:
1164:
903:
833:
698:
227:
395:
333:
2724:
2677:
2262:
2217:
2008:
1882:
1865:
1795:
1721:
1098:
950:
938:
866:
55:
2751:
2653:
2533:
2521:
2494:
2482:
2439:
2427:
2323:
1835:
1606:
1506:
1494:
1435:
1423:
1385:
1252:
1196:
1147:
1131:
979:
852:
760:
116:
Active, as we mostly all are, in an area of interest, Kim has heavily contributed to
2665:
2399:
2072:
2067:
2062:
1947:
1934:
1814:
1733:
1707:
1673:
1268:
1230:
736:
350:
341:
forking off articles and protecting what's left from the inevitable vandalism and
215:
1794:, good answers, good edit history. Seems level-headed, fair and knowledgeable.
2720:
2712:
2673:
2299:
Thanks. My criteria are simple: A user with some 4 GA's, and/or two/three FA's (
2258:
2213:
1922:
1529:
1472:
1452:
1212:
1094:
1076:
917:
470:
451:
243:
I accept with pleasure and (I must admit) some trepidation for what is to come!
121:
1979:
Has done good work, has sound judgment and works well with others. His work on
1566:
Good user, seen her around as a constructive contributor, no reason to oppose.
1195:- Kim is an excellent editor and I expect that he will be an excellent admin! —
2626:
2582:
2407:
898:
829:
692:
221:
125:
2732:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2664:
Incidentally, I almost opposed because at first I mistook Kim Dent-Brown for
1163:
Great nom from a trusted user, and contribs look good as well. Best of luck!
345:
that such an article attracts. I'm also pleased with contributions such as
2649:
2038:
Never had any dealings myself but seems able, civil and conscientious. --
1831:
1602:
358:
2706:
Kims totally rock. Kim Jong-il just happens to rock at being evil. O:-)
1407:
1898:
from experience working with this editor, can trust with the tools. --
365:. The last I'm pleased with because it felt like a small blow against
2742:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
2300:
85:
2575:, but what exactly is your (very advisedly and very blue for once)
655:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review
152:
151:
Active at AFD, and in particular, as noted above, many hundreds of
99:. Overall, his edit count may seem slightly slim for some at about
2451:
I decided to elaborate on my wiki-philosophy in reference to such
1980:
1669:
399:
337:
117:
93:
369:. You can look at a partial list of articles I've contributed to
137:
A desire to determine the value of his contributions, as seen at
2685:
96:
89:
1813:
looks a goodie. And we could do with an admin called "Kim". --
541:
523:
417:
322:
What are your best contributions to
Knowledge (XXG), and why?
250:
443:
be of good intent and I prefer to try and work on this basis.
241:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
2506:
I thought you just said it was a keeper. Make up your mind.
1983:
has crafted it into a better and more focused article. (pun
1601:
Reviewed contributions, see not a trace of any problem. --
2107:
2098:
2089:
880:
How could I not, with this user's record and such a nom?
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
2324:
2208:? This doesn't merit any further discussion imho. User:
2203:
2191:
627:
621:
615:
378:
376:
374:
536:
518:
412:
245:
2522:
2483:
2428:
1495:
1424:
1042:Because of one of those AfD's I saved from Kim. :)
1720:I have always been impressed with Kim Dent-Brown.
353:, and smaller articles rescued from CSD such as
1586:Good one. See that sig everywhere, it seems! ~
290:What admin work do you intend to take part in?
2528:
2489:
2434:
1689:- Per Nomination. There is no reason not too.
1501:
1430:
1180:. No concerns here, he's an exemplary editor.
1075:Erm, OK. This was a little bit of a surprise.
349:to act as boilerplate text for winners of the
2711:Ah, the bitter regret. I should have written
1767:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Havidol
269:Knowledge (XXG) administrators open to recall
8:
2396:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Abd 2
1146:I've had moments where I thought he was one
1130:- high quality of edits. I'm convinced. -
139:Knowledge (XXG):Editor review/Kim Dent-Brown
2365:(outdent), Again, I am not anybody's sock!!
177:edits showing an understanding of the role.
864:Looks like Kim will make a fine admin. --
651:Please keep discussion constructive and
53:Final (68/0/0); Closed as successful by
2684:Eh, my name gets mentioned? But I'm no
2063:
1732:No immediately clear reason to oppose.
1017:User:Kim Dent-Brown/Criteria for recall
133:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Neopaganism
1519:Good point, I now change my vote from
1383:This is a duplicate vote (see above).
1303:- excellent editor, no problems here.
826:now I am off to go put on some clothes
259:I do not propose to comment on either
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
2668:. They're all the same to me... User:
200:civil and communicative talk history.
7:
2475:based on the merits of the candidate
1706:Trusted user. No concerns at all. --
1578:
896:- I think he'd make a good admin.
657:Special:Contributions/Kim Dent-Brown
1450:Great one! Good luck with the mop.
2457:User talk:Sarsaparilla/Tit for tat
1847:, will make a good administrator.
398:. Still only two of these so far,
332:and may soon I hope be rated as a
328:My first major article was on the
24:
2758:Successful requests for adminship
2520:Keeper's my name. Nothing more.
390:Update: I'm pleased to say that
120:and associated articles such as
2534:
2495:
2440:
2161:#:Could some please just block
1963:. Good editor, good candidate.
1507:
1436:
1240:
1229:
306:intervention against vandalism.
2605:. (Sorry, you all look alike)
2601:Oops, I mistook this user for
2410:expires on February 17, 2008.
2040:
2024:Per the nom... Looks good. :)
1901:
568:. For the edit count, see the
465:towards other user, would you
161:reports, as and when required.
1:
2698:01:07, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
2658:04:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
2640:21:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
2615:20:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
2596:20:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
2555:05:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
2541:21:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
2516:20:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
2502:20:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
2469:20:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
2447:19:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
2420:19:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
2383:20:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
2345:19:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
2331:19:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
2313:11:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
2293:18:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
2278:17:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
2245:15:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
2139:14:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
2114:21:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
2078:19:35, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
2054:14:35, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
2031:09:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
2017:05:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
1999:00:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
1972:20:45, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
1956:11:37, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
1939:02:37, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
1926:00:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
1914:22:36, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
1891:21:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
1874:21:42, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
1857:15:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
1840:13:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
1823:12:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
1806:08:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
1787:17:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
1754:03:44, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
1737:01:18, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
1725:00:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
1716:11:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
1699:09:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
1682:19:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
1657:16:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
1640:06:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
1611:04:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
1594:04:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
1582:02:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
1559:00:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
1538:20:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
1514:23:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
1481:23:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
1464:21:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
1443:18:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
1395:19:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
1379:18:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
1363:16:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
1346:10:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
1330:02:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
1310:00:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
1296:22:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
1275:22:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
1259:22:16, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
1245:22:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
1234:WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN
1221:21:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
1204:19:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
1188:18:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
1173:18:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
1156:17:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
1139:16:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
1123:15:11, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
1085:13:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
1071:12:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
1051:11:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
1037:11:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
1011:10:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
994:09:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
971:08:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
954:07:15, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
942:05:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
933:03:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
910:03:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
889:03:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
873:02:44, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
857:02:37, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
838:02:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
817:01:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
799:01:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
773:00:25, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
750:00:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
728:11:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
706:22:11, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
688:pre transclusion as nominator
545:15:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
527:14:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
479:10:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
421:17:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
254:23:14, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
235:21:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
66:23:51, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
2249:Hm. On the userpage it says
2085:Would make a great admin. -
2073:
1231:
1089:Yep, no problems here. User:
867:
190:Sensible User and Talk Page.
2702:And Dorftrottel: obviously
2068:
1994:
1830:. He's a worthy candidate.
978:seems thoughtful. cheers,
564:'s edit summary usage with
279:Questions for the candidate
2774:
1420:locking the doors at night
734:Supporting Kim Dent-Brown
577:Links for Kim Dent-Brown:
402:being the other, and four
92:Kim has been active since
410:, but I'm working on it.
2735:Please do not modify it.
1485:FYI - His userpage says
682:
681:per my great nomination
406:, so a little way off a
392:Royal Wiltshire Yeomanry
330:Royal Wiltshire Yeomanry
310:page protection requests
101:four and a half thousand
1864:No problems with this.
38:Please do not modify it
1647:well done, good luck!
1489:in the section called
1211:- trustworthy editor.
780:per Pedro's great nom.
2156:few or no other edits
1769:which was positive.--
450:Optional Question by
302:articles for deletion
103:, however, just over
34:request for adminship
2571:Humour is one thing
2158:outside this topic.
1933:- no reason not to.
1416:patrolling the halls
845:No problems here. --
1762:User:Kim Dent-Brown
1266:per excellant nom.
1022:dihydrogen monoxide
713:dihydrogen monoxide
2453:indecent proposals
1282:No problems here.
1273:
710:You stole my gig!
659:before commenting.
394:is now rated as a
363:Zaka Ullah Bhangoo
187:A clean block log.
39:
2708:
2638:
2622:
2594:
2579:in this neutral?
2537:
2498:
2443:
2243:
2159:
2049:
2045:
1970:
1804:
1510:
1439:
1412:mopping the floor
1408:cleaning up vomit
1376:
1267:
1121:
1035:
886:
795:
771:
726:
704:
689:
233:
37:
2765:
2737:
2713:User:Kim Jong-il
2700:
2637:
2635:
2624:
2620:
2593:
2591:
2580:
2538:
2535:
2530:
2524:
2499:
2496:
2491:
2485:
2444:
2441:
2436:
2430:
2328:
2233:
2207:
2180:deleted contribs
2141:
2109:
2100:
2091:
2075:
2070:
2065:
2061:My support.. :)
2051:
2047:
2043:
2028:
1996:
1969:
1967:
1905:
1802:
1798:
1649:The Rambling Man
1635:
1632:
1629:
1626:
1623:
1620:
1591:
1579:
1575:
1570:
1511:
1508:
1503:
1497:
1460:
1455:
1440:
1437:
1432:
1426:
1377:
1375:
1294:
1271:
1243:
1241:
1237:
1199:
1111:
1065:
1046:
1025:
1003:Martijn Hoekstra
930:
925:
920:
906:
901:
887:
885:
871:
869:
855:
850:
796:
793:
789:
784:
770:
768:
758:
739:
716:
703:
701:
690:
687:
686:
643:
602:
555:General comments
542:
538:
524:
520:
463:personal attacks
418:
414:
355:Haley Industries
251:
247:
232:
230:
219:
63:
2773:
2772:
2768:
2767:
2766:
2764:
2763:
2762:
2748:
2747:
2746:
2740:this nomination
2733:
2666:yet another Kim
2633:
2625:
2589:
2581:
2570:<undent: -->
2391:
2375:A man of honour
2305:A man of honour
2270:A man of honour
2165:
2163:A man of honour
2144:A man of honour
2131:A man of honour
2122:
2026:
1965:
1800:
1746:Masterpiece2000
1633:
1630:
1627:
1624:
1621:
1618:
1589:
1573:
1568:
1458:
1453:
1374:
1372:Nousernamesleft
1338:David Underdown
1283:
1269:
1236:
1197:
1063:
1044:
1031:
928:
923:
918:
904:
899:
884:
882:Nousernamesleft
865:
848:
846:
807:from mistakes.
792:
787:
782:
766:
759:
737:
722:
699:
691:
675:
666:
595:
578:
557:
367:systematic bias
298:speedy deletion
281:
228:
220:
216:Knowledge (XXG)
193:E-mail enabled.
54:
50:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2771:
2769:
2761:
2760:
2750:
2749:
2745:
2744:
2729:
2728:
2727:
2682:
2681:
2680:
2662:
2661:
2660:
2568:
2567:
2566:
2565:
2564:
2563:
2562:
2561:
2560:
2559:
2558:
2557:
2390:
2387:
2386:
2385:
2372:
2369:
2366:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2359:
2358:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2352:
2351:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2322:of somebody?--
2121:
2118:
2117:
2116:
2080:
2056:
2033:
2019:
2001:
1974:
1958:
1941:
1928:
1916:
1893:
1876:
1859:
1842:
1825:
1808:
1789:
1756:
1739:
1727:
1718:
1701:
1684:
1659:
1642:
1613:
1596:
1584:
1561:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1527:</joke: -->
1466:
1445:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1348:
1332:
1312:
1298:
1277:
1261:
1247:
1232:
1223:
1206:
1190:
1182:Angus McLellan
1175:
1158:
1141:
1125:
1101:
1087:
1073:
1061:this message.
1055:Strong support
1039:
1029:
1013:
999:Strong support
996:
973:
957:
944:
937:Definitely. —
935:
912:
891:
875:
859:
840:
819:
801:
775:
752:
732:
731:
730:
720:
679:Strong Support
674:
671:
670:
669:
665:
662:
648:
647:
646:
644:
580:Kim Dent-Brown
574:
573:
566:mathbot's tool
562:Kim Dent-Brown
556:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
537:Kim Dent-Brown
530:
529:
519:Kim Dent-Brown
513:
501:
500:
499:
498:
491:
490:
489:
488:
467:block the user
447:
446:
445:
444:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
413:Kim Dent-Brown
383:
382:
381:
380:
316:
315:
314:
313:
280:
277:
273:these criteria
257:
256:
246:Kim Dent-Brown
205:
204:
201:
194:
191:
188:
179:
178:
172:
162:
156:
143:
142:
135:
129:
72:Kim Dent-Brown
49:
47:Kim Dent-Brown
44:
43:
42:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2770:
2759:
2756:
2755:
2753:
2743:
2741:
2736:
2730:
2726:
2722:
2718:
2714:
2710:
2709:
2707:
2705:
2699:
2695:
2691:
2687:
2683:
2679:
2675:
2671:
2667:
2663:
2659:
2655:
2651:
2647:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2636:
2630:
2629:
2618:
2617:
2616:
2612:
2608:
2604:
2600:
2599:
2598:
2597:
2592:
2586:
2585:
2578:
2574:
2556:
2552:
2548:
2544:
2543:
2542:
2539:
2531:
2525:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2513:
2509:
2505:
2504:
2503:
2500:
2492:
2486:
2481:), unwanted.
2480:
2476:
2472:
2471:
2470:
2466:
2462:
2458:
2454:
2450:
2449:
2448:
2445:
2437:
2431:
2425:
2424:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2417:
2413:
2409:
2405:
2404:consideration
2401:
2397:
2388:
2384:
2380:
2376:
2373:
2371:kinde regards
2370:
2367:
2364:
2346:
2343:
2342:
2338:
2334:
2333:
2332:
2329:
2327:
2321:
2316:
2315:
2314:
2310:
2306:
2302:
2298:
2297:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2291:
2290:
2286:
2281:
2280:
2279:
2275:
2271:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2248:
2247:
2246:
2241:
2237:
2231:
2230:Master Bigode
2227:
2224:
2223:
2222:
2221:
2220:
2219:
2215:
2211:
2205:
2202:
2199:
2196:
2193:
2190:
2187:
2184:
2181:
2178:
2175:
2172:
2169:
2164:
2160:
2157:
2153:
2149:
2145:
2140:
2136:
2132:
2128:
2119:
2115:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2094:
2093:
2092:
2084:
2081:
2079:
2076:
2071:
2066:
2060:
2057:
2055:
2052:
2050:
2037:
2034:
2032:
2029:
2023:
2020:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2005:
2002:
2000:
1997:
1992:
1991:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1975:
1973:
1968:
1962:
1959:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1942:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1929:
1927:
1924:
1920:
1917:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1906:
1904:
1903:Rodhullandemu
1897:
1894:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1877:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1860:
1858:
1854:
1850:
1846:
1843:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1826:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1812:
1809:
1807:
1803:
1797:
1793:
1790:
1788:
1784:
1780:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1763:
1760:
1757:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1740:
1738:
1735:
1731:
1728:
1726:
1723:
1719:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1702:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1685:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1660:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1614:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1597:
1595:
1592:
1585:
1583:
1580:
1576:
1571:
1565:
1562:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1545:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1526:
1525:still support
1522:
1518:<joke: -->
1517:
1516:
1515:
1512:
1504:
1498:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1467:
1465:
1462:
1461:
1456:
1449:
1446:
1444:
1441:
1433:
1427:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1402:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1387:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1373:
1369:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1349:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1336:
1333:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1316:
1313:
1311:
1308:
1307:
1302:
1299:
1297:
1293:
1291:
1287:
1281:
1278:
1276:
1272:
1265:
1262:
1260:
1257:
1254:
1251:
1248:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1235:
1227:
1224:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1207:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1194:
1191:
1189:
1186:
1183:
1179:
1176:
1174:
1171:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1159:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1126:
1124:
1119:
1115:
1109:
1108:Master Bigode
1105:
1102:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1072:
1069:
1066:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1050:
1047:
1040:
1038:
1033:
1024:
1023:
1018:
1014:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
997:
995:
991:
988:
985:
981:
977:
974:
972:
968:
964:
961:
958:
955:
952:
948:
945:
943:
940:
936:
934:
931:
926:
921:
916:
913:
911:
908:
907:
902:
895:
892:
890:
883:
879:
876:
874:
870:
863:
860:
858:
854:
851:
844:
841:
839:
835:
831:
827:
823:
820:
818:
814:
810:
805:
802:
800:
797:
790:
785:
779:
776:
774:
769:
764:
763:
756:
753:
751:
747:
746:
741:
740:
733:
729:
724:
715:
714:
709:
708:
707:
702:
696:
695:
685:
680:
677:
676:
672:
668:
667:
663:
661:
660:
658:
654:
645:
641:
638:
635:
632:
629:
626:
623:
620:
617:
614:
611:
608:
605:
601:
598:
594:
591:
588:
585:
581:
576:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
558:
554:
546:
543:
539:
532:
531:
528:
525:
521:
514:
511:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
495:
494:
493:
492:
485:
482:
481:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
441:
437:
434:
433:
431:
428:
422:
419:
415:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
379:
377:
375:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
339:
335:
331:
327:
324:
323:
321:
318:
317:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
292:
291:
289:
286:
285:
284:
278:
276:
274:
270:
266:
262:
255:
252:
248:
242:
239:
238:
237:
236:
231:
225:
224:
217:
213:
209:
202:
199:
195:
192:
189:
186:
185:
184:
183:
176:
173:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
150:
149:
148:
147:
140:
136:
134:
130:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
113:
112:
108:
106:
102:
98:
95:
91:
87:
83:
80:
77:
73:
69:
68:
67:
62:
59:
58:
48:
45:
41:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2734:
2731:
2703:
2701:
2627:
2607:Sarsaparilla
2583:
2573:Sarsaparilla
2569:
2508:Sarsaparilla
2474:
2461:Sarsaparilla
2412:Sarsaparilla
2400:vote trading
2393:
2392:
2339:
2325:
2287:
2250:
2232:from SRK.o//
2200:
2194:
2188:
2182:
2176:
2170:
2126:
2124:
2123:
2106:
2105:
2097:
2096:
2088:
2087:
2082:
2058:
2041:
2035:
2021:
2003:
1989:
1984:
1976:
1960:
1943:
1930:
1918:
1902:
1899:
1895:
1878:
1861:
1844:
1827:
1810:
1791:
1758:
1744:Looks good.
1741:
1729:
1703:
1691:PookeyMaster
1686:
1666:my standards
1661:
1644:
1616:
1615:
1598:
1563:
1546:
1524:
1520:
1490:
1486:
1468:
1451:
1447:
1403:
1384:
1367:
1355:Lazulilasher
1350:
1334:
1314:
1305:
1300:
1284:
1279:
1263:
1249:
1233:
1225:
1208:
1192:
1177:
1167:
1160:
1143:
1127:
1110:from SRK.o//
1103:
1058:
1054:
1041:
1020:
998:
986:
975:
963:Nick mallory
959:
946:
914:
897:
893:
877:
861:
842:
825:
821:
803:
777:
761:
754:
743:
735:
711:
693:
683:
678:
650:
649:
636:
630:
624:
618:
612:
606:
599:
592:
586:
483:
458:
449:
448:
435:
429:
408:triple crown
396:good article
351:George Cross
334:good article
325:
319:
293:
287:
282:
264:
260:
258:
240:
222:
212:net positive
211:
207:
206:
197:
182:Housekeeping
181:
180:
145:
144:
110:
109:
104:
100:
78:
70:
56:
52:
51:
46:
30:
28:
2721:February 15
2717:Dorftrottel
2690:Kim Bruning
2674:February 14
2670:Dorftrottel
2603:Kim Bruning
2547:71.63.91.68
2259:February 11
2255:Dorftrottel
2214:February 11
2210:Dorftrottel
2154:) has made
2127:Weak oppose
1551:Fabrictramp
1286:Malinaccier
1095:February 11
1091:Dorftrottel
343:POV pushing
171:assistance.
155:nominations
146:Maintenance
122:Neopaganism
2621:(most all)
2536:Disclaimer
2497:Disclaimer
2442:Disclaimer
2408:firm offer
2226:Seriously.
2198:block user
2192:filter log
2027:Midorihana
1966:SlimVirgin
1849:Razorflame
1779:Dan Dassow
1771:Dan Dassow
1672:articles.
1509:Disclaimer
1438:Disclaimer
1306:Black Kite
664:Discussion
126:Witchcraft
111:Main Space
31:successful
2204:block log
2009:Drjmarkov
1985:certainly
1946:- Yes. --
1883:J Milburn
1866:Gary King
1796:Dreadstar
1722:Acalamari
1487:I am male
1253:Rigadoun
951:Lankiveil
868:Chetblong
788:cierekim
622:block log
570:talk page
440:this one.
347:this page
2752:Category
2646:WP:POINT
2326:Alasdair
2240:Contribs
2174:contribs
2152:contribs
2099:Favorite
2022:Support'
1493:Cheers,
1491:And now?
1315:Support.
1280:Support.
1148:Kwsn-pub
1132:Philippe
1118:Contribs
990:contribs
980:Casliber
809:Wisdom89
794:Deleted?
762:SorryGuy
590:contribs
359:Doon GAA
82:contribs
2719:12:18,
2715:. User:
2672:23:00,
2389:Neutral
2257:15:31,
2212:14:57,
2083:Support
2059:Support
2036:Support
2004:Support
1977:Support
1961:Support
1948:Bhadani
1944:Support
1935:Keilana
1931:Support
1919:Support
1896:Support
1879:Support
1862:Support
1845:Support
1828:Support
1815:Dweller
1811:Support
1792:Support
1759:Support
1742:Support
1730:Support
1708:PeaceNT
1704:Support
1687:Support
1674:Bearian
1662:Support
1645:Support
1599:Support
1564:Support
1547:Support
1521:support
1469:Support
1448:Support
1404:Support
1368:Support
1351:Support
1335:support
1301:Support
1270:Spencer
1264:Support
1250:Support
1226:Support
1209:Support
1193:Support
1178:Support
1161:Support
1144:Support
1128:Support
1104:Support
1093:14:58,
1059:approve
976:Support
960:Support
947:Support
915:Support
894:Support
878:Support
862:Support
853:iva1979
843:Support
822:Support
804:Support
778:Support
755:Support
738:Majorly
673:Support
597:deleted
261:Support
165:WP:RFPP
2523:Keeper
2484:Keeper
2429:Keeper
2301:Wiccia
2268:them.
2120:Oppose
2108:Cookie
2090:Milk's
1990:Pigman
1923:Zerida
1670:Wiccan
1588:Riana
1530:Jon513
1496:Keeper
1473:Jon513
1454:нмŵוτн
1425:Keeper
1418:, and
1318:Shalom
1256:(talk)
1213:Addhoc
1198:Travis
1185:(Talk)
1077:Daniel
1064:Rudget
1045:Rudget
905:(talk)
471:D.M.N.
452:D.M.N.
271:using
265:Oppose
198:deeply
175:WP:RFA
169:WP:UAA
159:WP:AIV
86:August
61:scribe
2723:, 200
2676:, 200
2634:Chat
2628:Pedro
2590:Chat
2584:Pedro
2577:POINT
2426:Wow.
2341:Cobra
2337:Glass
2289:Cobra
2285:Glass
2261:, 200
2216:, 200
2048:AVIES
2007:work.
1981:Wicca
1734:Xenon
1569:NHRHS
1386:Andre
1326:Peace
1322:Hello
1169:Cobra
1165:Glass
1097:, 200
900:jj137
830:Dureo
767:Talk
700:Chat
694:Pedro
653:civil
604:count
400:Wicca
338:Wicca
229:Chat
223:Pedro
153:C:CSD
118:Wicca
94:April
16:<
2694:talk
2686:Kibo
2654:talk
2611:talk
2551:talk
2512:talk
2479:bold
2465:talk
2416:talk
2379:talk
2320:sock
2309:talk
2274:talk
2236:Talk
2186:logs
2168:talk
2148:talk
2135:talk
2064:Λua∫
2044:OGER
2013:talk
1952:talk
1910:Talk
1887:talk
1870:talk
1853:talk
1836:talk
1819:talk
1783:talk
1775:talk
1750:talk
1712:talk
1695:talk
1678:talk
1664:per
1653:talk
1622:e Tr
1607:talk
1574:2010
1555:talk
1534:talk
1477:talk
1391:talk
1359:talk
1342:talk
1290:talk
1217:talk
1152:talk
1136:Talk
1114:Talk
1081:talk
1015:Per
1007:talk
984:talk
967:talk
939:Dark
919:Jmlk
834:talk
813:talk
783:Dloh
745:talk
634:rfar
616:logs
584:talk
560:See
475:talk
404:DYKs
371:here
361:and
304:and
124:and
97:2007
90:2006
76:talk
2704:all
2650:Abd
2532:|
2526:|
2493:|
2487:|
2455:at
2438:|
2432:|
2238:) (
1832:Axl
1634:ist
1631:man
1625:ans
1603:Abd
1528:.
1523:to
1505:|
1499:|
1434:|
1428:|
1116:) (
640:spi
610:AfD
510:AIV
263:or
208:All
105:900
88:of
64:at
57:WjB
2754::
2696:)
2656:)
2631::
2613:)
2587::
2553:)
2529:76
2514:)
2490:76
2467:)
2459:.
2435:76
2418:)
2381:)
2311:)
2276:)
2228:-
2150:•
2142:—
2137:)
2074:se
2069:Wi
2015:)
1954:)
1937:|
1921:—
1912:)
1889:)
1872:)
1855:)
1838:)
1821:)
1785:)
1752:)
1714:)
1697:)
1680:)
1655:)
1628:hu
1619:Th
1609:)
1557:)
1536:)
1502:76
1479:)
1431:76
1414:,
1410:,
1393:)
1361:)
1344:)
1328:)
1324:•
1219:)
1154:)
1134:|
1106:-
1083:)
1053:-
1019:.
1009:)
992:)
969:)
836:)
828:.
815:)
748:)
697::
684::)
628:lu
512:.)
484:A:
477:)
459:4.
436:A:
430:3.
357:,
326:A:
320:2.
300:,
294:A:
288:1.
275:.
226::
196:A
167:,
36:.
2725:8
2692:(
2678:8
2652:(
2609:(
2549:(
2510:(
2463:(
2414:(
2377:(
2307:(
2272:(
2263:8
2242:)
2234:(
2218:8
2206:)
2201:·
2195:·
2189:·
2183:·
2177:·
2171:·
2166:(
2146:(
2133:(
2125:#
2046:D
2042:R
2011:(
1995:☿
1950:(
1908:(
1885:(
1868:(
1851:(
1834:(
1817:(
1801:†
1781:(
1773:(
1748:(
1710:(
1693:(
1676:(
1651:(
1605:(
1590:⁂
1553:(
1532:(
1475:(
1459:τ
1389:(
1357:(
1340:(
1320:(
1292:)
1288:(
1215:(
1150:(
1120:)
1112:(
1099:8
1079:(
1068:.
1049:.
1034:)
1032:0
1030:2
1028:H
1026:(
1005:(
987:·
982:(
965:(
956:.
929:7
924:1
849:S
832:(
811:(
742:(
725:)
723:0
721:2
719:H
717:(
642:)
637:·
631:·
625:·
619:·
613:·
607:·
600:·
593:·
587:·
582:(
572:.
473:(
218:.
141:.
128:.
79:·
74:(
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.