231:
143:
264:
512:. Being relatively inactive is not a good reason against adminship. We most definitely do not demand that our admins put their lives on hold for Knowledge; likewise, there is no required quota for admin actions: any help is a good help. We should look to the quality of the user and whether adminship can help them help Knowledge in what they do manage to do on Knowledge. -
1572:
I would like a candidate to have at least a moderate level of activity before supporting him. At the very least, I would like to see the activity level rising, not dropping to less than one edit a day over the last month. Adminship should be for those already active in the community, not as incentive
1556:
A question for those who oppose on the basis of "low activity" (I've asked this before but not gotten an answer I understand): Given otherwise evidence of enough experience participating in
Knowledge, what is the value of a "particularly active" editor; or how does not having much activity reflect to
1482:
the mass afd of 4 schools right in the middle of the most constructive discussions for a compromise in a long time seems a little counter productive and not a move that it likely to be good with regard to gaining a consensus. Not really an admin-like move. Lugio was this an honest mistake, have you
958:
I would have no problem with that if that were in fact the case. School most definitely should take priority. However, in the same time period that you made 21 edits over 30 days, you made more than 1900 comments on IRC. If you had more interest in the
Encyclopedia, I would have no problem supporting
934:
Activity level is, for me, just too low. 21 edits in the last 30 days, and overall less than 2 edits per day average since your last RfA, where there were a number of people concerned about participation level. Kate's tool is down right now, so I can't see if there's a bunch of deleted edits to your
613:
Someone's who's as inactive as Luigi could have difficulty (due to time constraints) responding to questions about users they've (un)blocked, pages they've (un)protected or (un)deleted, or AfDs they've closed. I'm not looking for a lot here; just enough activity to know he wouldn't be a "hit-and-run"
1167:
He knows what the reality is. He can apologize or not apologize, but he knows it was wrong and he knows his accusations here are wrong. Beyond that, I don't care very much. It was a small incident a while back. But it gives me a very poor opinion of him, and I have never seen him doing anything else
1275:
school stubs for deletion, with the only deletion rationale given being "Not
Notable". It is hard to think why he should have done this unless he is either lazy, inexperienced, or given to acting in bad faith. Whatever the reason - and there may well be one, though I can't imagine what - I really
1509:
OK I'll switch to neutral. As an admin you need to have eyes in the back of your head, so be careful not to wade into a situation like schools before reading all sides of the argument. For your information there is no merge consensus, that is the compromise we are trying to broker. It is a slow
68:) – I have had much experience with Luigi30 in Knowledge, and some interaction with him on IRC. He has been around since about March of 2004. He has proved himself to be worthy of adminship, with a plentiful supply of edits and a good attitude. I notice that he had an
1365:
Well, a good portion of those are to this RfA or your mistaken AfDs. Look, make a few edits a day for a month or so and you'll pass without a problem. Take some that time you usually spend on IRC and work on the project a bit. It just seems to me that this RfA and
1428:. He just doesn't seem to have put much effort into them. Other nominations have very little in the way of reasoning/rational. The comment "Because it's faster to make quick comments on IRC than it is to edit" above makes me wonder where his focus is. IRC
1370:
are more for the perceived prestige of a title than a chance to do additional work. I have nothing against you, but we've both been here about the same length of time (over a year) and I can't recall ever seeing a edit of yours outside of your RfAs.
718:
to counteract remarkably stupid oppose votes noted below. There is no requirement that an admin candidate spend any particular amount of time editing, and rate of edits is certainly not a valid metric of appropriateness for an admin candidate.
1747:
A. IAR applies when bureaucracy causes horrible delays in acting on problem users. It applies when convoluted rules must be ignored to continue proper operation and keep problems from getting out of hand. (Will expand when have more
1367:
1019:
too low. Going back 100 edits takes us to 26 September 2005. Going back 500 edits takes us to 9 May 2005. This isn't about his total edit count (not even sure what it is), this is about his level of participation.
821:
a trustworthy user. Hoping especially to counteract
Everyking's blackmail attempt below. Offering to withdraw his Oppose vote for the price of an apology when the percentages are tight is ... ... is wrong, IMO.
1384:
That's because you don't normally see newpages patrol edits. They're usually deleted along with the article, going into /dev/null. I've speedied 30 or 40 articles in the past 3 days, but you don't see that.
1191:
Everyking, do you have proof that Luigi's allegations were wrong? Saying "he knows what the reality is" is all well and good, but it's not a compelling arguement when Luigi has the Arbcom on his side.
1441:
The articles looked like your standard garage band vanity and personal vanity, respectively, when I AFDed them. I don't google ones that look like blatant vanity and have no assertion of notability.
1730:
A. The worst conflict I've been in is
Everyking accusing me of "digging" for edits about Ashlee Simpson by him. It ended in a clarification of his ArbCom case, where my position was fully supported.
1606:
This is a proven vandal IP who has been disqualified and temporarily blocked from editing
Knowledge for disruption of the Requests for Adminship page and its subpages and for continued
1727:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
1033:
Also, needs more experience with policy. For example, he nominated several schools for deletion on the mistaken belief that it was policy to delete middle schools as non-notable.
998:
Please be more civil. Thank you. I stand by my vote. I've explained similar votes before. I see no reason to explain my vote to someone who is intentionally being antagonistic. --
1425:
1289:
1285:
1281:
704:, the creator of the tool, finds it somewhat wrong as she was also denied adminship on the basis of not enough edits (correct me if I am wrong). Enough of the RfA cult. --
1277:
1467:
as per Durin's remarks; 1,500 edits total, minimal activity since last RFA, and a fair use of edit summaries. Will support in the future if participation improves.
1432:
Wiki but we are a encyclopedia first and a community second, spending most of his time on IRC rather than working on
Knowledge makes me concerned about priorities.
1149:
That's not making it any better. How about an apology? I will withdraw my vote in exchange for an apology. An admin ought to be able to recognize his own mistakes.
1717:
A. I made it my job for a month to comb
Knowledge:Requested Articles of blue links. I also have done quite a bit of stub categorization and a few spoken articles.
1740:
You're a
Knowledge vet, and some Knowledge vets are quick to use WP:IAR to justify actions some consider harmful. What is your view of WP:IAR as it relates to
393:
1421:
1776:
73:
1495:
It was a mistake. I didn't see that schools were supposed to be merged instead of AFDed. It was an honest mistake which I probably shouldn't have made.
1762:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.
1122:
It was a misrepresentation of the situation. Anyway, accusing me of lying seems rather poor conduct for an admin, so I also oppose for that reason.
69:
1698:
1648:
474:
944:
I've been too busy with school to edit in the past couple weeks. You shouldn't oppose me just because school is stressful and eats my time.
425:
1106:
32:
17:
935:
credit. Your use of edit summaries has improved since your last RfA (66% since last RfA), but it's lower than I like to see. --
1342:
65:
383:
Satisfied with the answer to my question. He's been around for a long time -- he's got a LAW, for goodness' sake. :)
1420:
I'm not comfortable with the AFD work, a couple nominations that could have been avoided with a quick Google search
1690:
1563:
552:
371:. A good editor, a reasonable fellow, an asset to Knowledge, a deserving mop-wielder. Also, editcountitis is evil.
1714:
Of your articles or contributions to
Knowledge, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
1538:
1168:
to counterbalance that impression, so absent an apology there's no way I'd feel comfortable withdrawing my vote.
637:
327:
178:
170:
voting thing is fandangled, needs to be fixed, since its just a redirect. But whatever, good user, so I support.
583:
I think that comment is completely uncalled for. Also, note that since this RfA began three days Luigi has made
1694:
539:
1108:, where I reported he reverted Ashlee, and Arbcom unanimously agreed with me, so his reason is a blatant lie.
436:
Users should not be shackled to their edit count nor to their activity level, he'd use the admin powers well.
414:- low activity level or not, good, long-term editors shouldn't be shackled if they want to do sysoppy things.
1333:. Committment is not a just a word. Show me you are serious by participating actively. Then, I will support.
324:
237:
131:
1408:. Short answers, coupled with less edit activity do not give me confidence; better-safe-than-sorry vote. --
1338:
1177:
My accusations are not wrong. If you say my accusations are wrong, you're saying the Arbcom is also wrong.
724:
700:'s point below. Sorry not everyone is as wikipediholic as some of us. Please no more editcountitism. Even
563:
884:
159:
1158:
His position was supported by the Arbcom, so there was no mistake, and no apology should be necessary.
1670:
1654:
1614:
1600:
1597:
1585:
1567:
1551:
1542:
1517:
1504:
1490:
1471:
1450:
1436:
1412:
1394:
1379:
1360:
1346:
1334:
1325:
1313:
1301:
1259:
1247:
1235:
1223:
1195:
1186:
1172:
1162:
1153:
1144:
1126:
1117:
1100:
1091:
1082:
1070:
1058:
1044:
1028:
1002:
993:
977:
963:
953:
939:
922:
899:
887:
872:
855:
846:
830:
813:
797:
785:
756:
747:
728:
710:
688:
664:
644:
622:
608:
595:
578:
566:
542:
528:
516:
504:
492:
480:
445:
428:
404:
387:
375:
363:
330:
315:
303:
276:
267:
240:
220:
199:
162:
146:
118:
103:
80:
77:
1704:
A. I would help with RC patrol, blocking repeated vandals, and using the good old Mop and Bucket(tm).
1628:
1534:
1067:
777:
454:
171:
839:
1582:
1433:
1376:
1041:
1025:
868:
780:
706:
619:
592:
559:
536:
344:
155:
827:
660:
312:
234:
76:
that I'm not sure of how it failed. I'd be happy to nominate him. Here's to you, Luigi30! :-) --
605:
575:
1666:
1500:
1468:
1446:
1390:
1356:
1297:
1182:
1140:
1113:
1055:
973:
949:
852:
720:
652:
It's no big deal, right? Plus, the Everyking situation below seems silly. We need admins. -
400:
259:
99:
59:
1577:
more active. Just my opinion, though; other oppose voters may have quite different reasons.
1322:
895:. Edit count not indicative of abilities to be an admin. He seems to know what he is doing--
881:
810:
794:
753:
360:
273:
230:
215:
1607:
1514:
1487:
1409:
1087:
Absolutely not. Made a false accusation against me and tried to get me sanctioned for it.
773:
421:
136:
1578:
1372:
1192:
1169:
1159:
1150:
1123:
1097:
1088:
1037:
1021:
864:
641:
615:
588:
556:
337:
285:
1770:
1256:
1232:
1079:
983:
913:
823:
737:
685:
653:
438:
372:
185:
263:
142:
1662:
1611:
1496:
1442:
1386:
1310:
1293:
1268:
1178:
1136:
1109:
1052:
969:
945:
525:
396:
252:
192:
95:
55:
44:
982:
Durin, you're crazy. What the fuck does IRC activity have to do with the wiki? --
1244:
896:
807:
489:
357:
208:
1689:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
574:
on the basis of some of the oppose votes being among the most stupid yet seen.
1548:
1511:
1484:
999:
960:
936:
697:
501:
415:
384:
126:
1558:
701:
548:
513:
1220:
673:
207:, been here long enough and done enough to know how to use admin tools.
87:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination below this line:
1627:
section so as not to screw up the numbering of the legitimate votes. →
968:
Because it's faster to make quick comments on IRC than it is to edit.
72:
that didn't succeed, possibly because it was a self-nomination, and a
1756:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1510:
process, that is why you got jumped on. Sorry if it was too blunt.
154:
responces were a bit short but a good user, third time the charm --
908:
604:
to do with his ability to use the mop and bucket effectively?
863:. Will not abuse the tools; nay, will make Knowledge better.
640:
alot lately. Luigi's a guy worth trusting with the mop, IMO.
28:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1681:
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
1636:
1629:
1352:
1231:
per Cryptic, and short answers to the questions below.
1034:
838:
So what if he didnt have many edits in the past month.
462:
455:
1426:
Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/Stavros_Niarchos_III
1290:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Irving Middle School
1286:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Lefler Middle School
1282:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mickle Middle School
614:
admin. Less than one edit a day isn't quite enough.
547:"'''Support'''. $ user is not already an admin?!" –
764:The important thing is that he will use his power
51:Final (42/16/2) ended 00:12, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
1278:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Lux Middle School
880:- thoughtful and conscientious in my experience.
1646:
1641:
472:
467:
1051:Not even 150 edits since his last nomination. —
1321:, user has been mildly disruptive as of late.
1096:Could you provide a link to this accusation?
840:
8:
1619:The above comments have been moved from the
1422:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Hoss (album)
1276:don't think he's ready for adminship. (See
587:edit outside of this RfA or his userspace.
248:you mean he's not already an admin?!?!?!?!
1015:I agree with Durin, the activity level is
672:, it's time he finally became an admin. —
323:, unlikely to abuse administrator tools.
1483:not been following recent school AFD's?
117:as nominator, if he accepts, that is. --
1643:
469:
752:Infrequent editors can be admins too.
228:, mop will be in good hands, I think.
392:Not just any law, a law quoted in an
7:
24:
1777:Successful requests for adminship
734:Extreme heterosexual man support
262:
229:
141:
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
1661:1659 edits as of this comment.
680:
677:
674:
453:as per all of the foregoing. →
356:, and damn the editcountitis.
299:
296:
293:
290:
1:
1596:. We don't need more admins.
1355:not participating actively? (
1309:because of what haeleth says
1255:as per Carbonite and Durin.
793:--block some vandals for me.
339:
193:
186:
179:
172:
132:
1699:administrators' reading list
1671:14:37, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
1655:12:27, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
1615:08:38, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
1601:07:22, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
1586:20:31, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
1568:19:36, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
1557:the detriment of an editor?
1552:04:13, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
1543:02:45, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
1533:More edit summaries please.
1518:04:17, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
1505:04:03, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
1491:01:02, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
1472:18:21, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
1451:12:22, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
1437:05:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
1413:10:56, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
1395:18:29, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
1380:17:52, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
1361:17:36, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
1347:22:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
1326:20:09, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
1314:00:11, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
1302:23:40, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
1260:21:47, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
1248:03:04, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
1236:19:15, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
1224:12:53, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
1196:02:03, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
1187:14:50, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
1173:08:37, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
1163:07:42, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
1154:06:27, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
1145:05:41, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
1127:05:17, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
1118:15:22, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
1101:07:16, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
1092:06:30, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
1083:03:43, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
1071:18:56, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
1059:15:23, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
1045:13:50, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
1029:15:14, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
1003:17:34, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
994:17:05, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
978:04:02, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
964:14:30, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
954:15:25, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
940:14:21, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
923:12:28, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
917:
914:
900:03:05, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
888:22:28, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
873:19:52, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
856:15:50, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
847:07:41, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
831:04:34, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
814:04:07, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
798:00:49, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
786:21:49, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
757:18:44, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
748:17:23, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
729:16:31, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
711:15:21, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
689:08:52, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
665:04:13, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
645:02:26, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
623:11:19, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
609:07:29, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
596:16:17, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
579:14:42, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
567:00:41, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
543:21:56, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
529:21:12, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
517:15:33, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
505:02:56, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
493:02:28, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
481:21:37, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
446:21:26, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
429:20:19, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
405:19:25, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
388:18:06, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
376:18:02, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
364:17:33, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
345:
331:14:30, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
316:13:54, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
304:13:14, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
277:12:50, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
268:08:19, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
241:06:51, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
221:04:35, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
200:02:47, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
163:02:29, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
147:02:28, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
104:23:16, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
81:22:48, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
1757:
1677:Questions for the candidate
1547:New question posted below.
1105:I think he's talking about
907:. Would make a good admin,
137:
127:
1793:
1693:, and read the page about
1691:Category:Knowledge backlog
488:He will be a good admin --
1368:your candidacy for ArbCom
1759:Please do not modify it.
37:Please do not modify it.
1353:hundred edits in 3 days
1219:as per Durin's point.
93:Extreme Lesbian Accept
851:Support, of course -
524:. I like his edits.--
33:request for adminship
600:And this would have
335:Need more admins. —
1271:has just nominated
1078:Low activity level
959:you as an admin. --
500:no reason not to.
325:Christopher Parham
311:seems good to me.
1345:
1300:
991:
745:
709:
657:
443:
350:
349:• 2005-12-2 14:47
250:Support of course
1784:
1761:
1652:
1645:
1642:
1638:
1635:
1337:
1335:≈ jossi fresco ≈
1296:
989:
919:
916:
844:
783:
743:
705:
682:
679:
676:
655:
478:
471:
468:
464:
461:
441:
437:
347:
341:
336:
301:
298:
295:
292:
266:
257:
233:
213:
197:
190:
183:
176:
145:
139:
134:
129:
1792:
1791:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1767:
1766:
1651:
1623:section to the
1566:
1535:Oleg Alexandrov
988:
921:
781:
742:
477:
439:
253:
246:*Blink* *Blink*
209:
48:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1790:
1788:
1780:
1779:
1769:
1768:
1765:
1764:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1695:administrators
1679:
1674:
1673:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1647:
1617:
1610:violations. --
1590:
1589:
1588:
1562:
1554:
1545:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1474:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1434:Rx StrangeLove
1415:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1328:
1316:
1304:
1262:
1250:
1238:
1226:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1103:
1085:
1073:
1061:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
986:
980:
926:
925:
912:
902:
890:
875:
861:Strong support
858:
849:
833:
816:
800:
788:
759:
750:
740:
731:
713:
691:
667:
647:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
569:
545:
531:
519:
507:
495:
483:
473:
448:
431:
409:
408:
407:
378:
366:
351:
333:
318:
306:
286:Andrew Lenahan
279:
270:
243:
223:
202:
165:
149:
121:
90:
89:
47:
42:
41:
40:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1789:
1778:
1775:
1774:
1772:
1763:
1760:
1754:
1753:
1746:
1745:
1743:
1739:
1736:
1735:
1729:
1728:
1726:
1723:
1722:
1716:
1715:
1713:
1710:
1709:
1703:
1702:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1678:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1650:
1639:
1634:
1633:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1616:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1565:
1560:
1555:
1553:
1550:
1546:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1519:
1516:
1513:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1489:
1486:
1481:
1479:
1475:
1473:
1470:
1466:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1416:
1414:
1411:
1407:
1404:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1378:
1374:
1369:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1351:Uh... how is
1350:
1349:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1329:
1327:
1324:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1312:
1308:
1305:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1263:
1261:
1258:
1254:
1251:
1249:
1246:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1222:
1218:
1215:
1197:
1194:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1171:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1161:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1152:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1125:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1104:
1102:
1099:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1090:
1086:
1084:
1081:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1069:
1065:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1027:
1023:
1018:
1014:
1004:
1001:
997:
996:
995:
985:
981:
979:
975:
971:
967:
966:
965:
962:
957:
956:
955:
951:
947:
943:
942:
941:
938:
933:
932:
931:
930:
924:
920:
910:
906:
903:
901:
898:
894:
891:
889:
886:
883:
879:
876:
874:
870:
866:
862:
859:
857:
854:
850:
848:
845:
843:
837:
834:
832:
829:
825:
820:
817:
815:
812:
809:
805:
801:
799:
796:
792:
789:
787:
784:
779:
775:
771:
767:
763:
760:
758:
755:
751:
749:
739:
735:
732:
730:
726:
722:
717:
714:
712:
708:
703:
699:
696:regrdless of
695:
692:
690:
687:
683:
671:
668:
666:
662:
658:
651:
648:
646:
643:
639:
635:
632:
624:
621:
617:
612:
611:
610:
607:
603:
599:
598:
597:
594:
590:
586:
582:
581:
580:
577:
573:
570:
568:
565:
562:
561:
560:
558:
554:
550:
546:
544:
541:
538:
535:
532:
530:
527:
523:
520:
518:
515:
511:
508:
506:
503:
499:
496:
494:
491:
487:
484:
482:
476:
465:
460:
459:
452:
449:
447:
442:
435:
432:
430:
427:
423:
419:
418:
413:
410:
406:
402:
398:
395:
391:
390:
389:
386:
382:
379:
377:
374:
370:
367:
365:
362:
359:
355:
352:
348:
343:
342:
334:
332:
329:
326:
322:
319:
317:
314:
310:
307:
305:
302:
287:
283:
280:
278:
275:
271:
269:
265:
261:
258:
256:
251:
247:
244:
242:
239:
236:
232:
227:
224:
222:
219:
218:
214:
212:
206:
203:
201:
198:
196:
191:
189:
184:
182:
177:
175:
169:
166:
164:
160:
157:
153:
150:
148:
144:
140:
135:
130:
125:
122:
120:
116:
113:
112:
111:
110:
106:
105:
101:
97:
94:
88:
85:
84:
83:
82:
79:
75:
71:
67:
64:
61:
57:
53:
52:
46:
43:
39:
38:
34:
31:
26:
25:
19:
1758:
1755:
1741:
1737:
1724:
1711:
1686:
1680:
1676:
1675:
1631:
1630:
1624:
1620:
1593:
1592:
1574:
1527:
1526:
1477:
1476:
1469:Hall Monitor
1464:
1458:
1457:
1429:
1417:
1405:
1330:
1318:
1306:
1272:
1264:
1252:
1240:
1228:
1216:
1132:
1075:
1063:
1016:
928:
927:
904:
892:
877:
865:Alex Schenck
860:
853:David Gerard
841:
835:
818:
803:
790:
769:
765:
761:
733:
721:Kelly Martin
715:
693:
669:
649:
633:
601:
584:
571:
555:
551:
533:
521:
509:
497:
485:
457:
456:
450:
433:
416:
411:
380:
368:
353:
338:
320:
308:
289:
284:Absolutely.
281:
254:
249:
245:
225:
216:
210:
204:
194:
187:
180:
173:
167:
152:Mild Support
151:
123:
114:
108:
107:
92:
91:
86:
62:
54:
50:
49:
36:
29:
27:
1598:202.58.85.8
1323:Gateman1997
882:FreplySpang
808:User:Fennec
795:Matt Yeager
754:TacoDeposit
534:That's hot.
412:Yes, please
274:Merovingian
119:WikiFanatic
78:WikiFanatic
70:earlier RfA
1744:activity?
1410:Gurubrahma
1243:per Durin
1068:Astrotrain
811:(はさばくのきつね)
698:User:Durin
540:That's hot
74:second one
30:successful
1579:Carbonite
1575:to become
1373:Carbonite
1193:Raven4x4x
1170:Everyking
1160:Raven4x4x
1151:Everyking
1124:Everyking
1098:Raven4x4x
1089:Everyking
1066:as above
1038:Carbonite
1022:Carbonite
869:Linuxbeak
702:User:Kate
642:karmafist
616:Carbonite
589:Carbonite
272:Sure! --
1771:Category
1697:and the
1625:Comments
1608:WP:POINT
1528:Comments
1512:David D.
1485:David D.
1480:Neutral
1257:Silensor
1233:Turnstep
1131:But you
1080:Olorin28
984:Phroziac
915:негідний
871:to you)
867:(that's
824:Bishonen
738:Phroziac
707:Cool Cat
636:I quote
440:Jtkiefer
373:Lord Bob
235:ナイトスタリオン
124:Suh-port
66:contribs
1663:Luigi30
1637:Unction
1632:Ξxtreme
1612:Orioane
1497:Luigi30
1478:opppose
1465:Neutral
1459:Neutral
1443:Luigi30
1387:Luigi30
1311:Yuckfoo
1307:opppose
1294:Haeleth
1269:Luigi30
1179:Luigi30
1137:Luigi30
1135:lying.
1110:Luigi30
1053:Cryptic
970:Luigi30
946:Luigi30
905:Support
893:Support
878:Support
836:Support
819:Support
804:support
791:Support
762:Support
716:Support
694:Support
670:Support
656:HAIRBOY
650:Support
638:his law
634:Support
572:Support
537:Mike H.
526:YHoshua
522:Support
510:Support
498:Support
486:Support
463:Unction
458:Ξxtreme
451:Support
434:Support
397:Luigi30
381:Support
369:Support
354:Support
321:Support
309:Support
282:Support
255:ALKIVAR
226:Support
205:Support
174:Quentin
168:Support
156:Jaranda
115:Support
109:Support
96:Luigi30
56:Luigi30
45:Luigi30
1621:Oppose
1594:Oppose
1515:(Talk)
1488:(Talk)
1418:Oppose
1406:Oppose
1331:Oppose
1319:Oppose
1288:, and
1265:Oppose
1253:Oppose
1245:AKMask
1241:Oppose
1229:Oppose
1217:Oppose
1076:Oppose
1064:Oppose
1056:(talk)
929:Oppose
897:Shanel
885:(talk)
490:Rogerd
426:popups
361:(talk)
358:Ral315
328:(talk)
313:Izehar
211:BD2412
1748:time)
1742:admin
1549:Xoloz
1430:isn't
1292:.) —
1000:Durin
961:Durin
937:Durin
842:Cobra
802:I'll
770:often
502:MONGO
444:----
417:Lupin
394:RFAr!
385:Xoloz
340:BRIAN
16:<
1667:Ταλκ
1649:blah
1583:Talk
1559:Demi
1539:talk
1501:Ταλκ
1447:Ταλκ
1391:Ταλκ
1377:Talk
1357:Ταλκ
1298:Talk
1273:four
1183:Ταλκ
1141:Ταλκ
1133:were
1114:Ταλκ
1042:Talk
1026:Talk
974:Ταλκ
950:Ταλκ
918:лють
909:IMHO
828:talk
774:Sean
768:not
766:well
725:talk
686:Talk
620:Talk
606:Ambi
602:what
593:Talk
576:Ambi
514:Mark
475:blah
422:talk
401:Ταλκ
346:0918
181:Pier
100:Ταλκ
60:talk
1221:Dmn
1017:way
806:. -
778:Bla
772:.--
585:one
297:bli
128:Job
1773::
1738:4.
1725:3.
1712:2.
1701:.
1687:1.
1669:)
1653:}
1581:|
1541:)
1503:)
1449:)
1424:,
1393:)
1375:|
1359:)
1341:•
1284:,
1280:,
1267:.
1185:)
1143:)
1116:)
1040:|
1036:.
1024:|
992:º
976:)
952:)
911:--
826:|
782:ck
746:º
736:--
727:)
684:|
663:)
618:|
591:|
549:AB
479:}
403:)
300:nd
294:ar
291:St
288:-
161:)
102:)
35:.
1665:(
1644:ł
1640:{
1564:C
1561:/
1537:(
1499:(
1445:(
1389:(
1343:@
1339:t
1181:(
1139:(
1112:(
990:o
987:.
972:(
948:(
776:|
744:o
741:.
723:(
681:P
678:I
675:J
661:☎
659:(
654:C
564:✉
557:D
553:C
470:ł
466:{
424:|
420:|
399:(
260:™
238:✉
217:T
195:e
188:c
158:(
138:6
133:e
98:(
63:·
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
