330:- that something is the right thing to do, but it's in direct contradiction to the stated rules. IAR is the red light that you run on a dark country road on your way to the hospital because your appendix has not burst. It is not to be used casually - indeed, it is diminished when used casually. IAR is a last resort, and anyone that uses it must be prepared to fully defend one's actions. It should be established that you considered all options and in the end IAR was the only policy to be invoked. I feel very strongly about this one. I've seen, in my on-wiki time, (at best) a handful of times when IAR was correctly invoked. It is not a policy to be used lightly, and absolutely not one to be trotted out twice a week. I don't mean to diminish the importance of IAR: it's critical. It's the safety valve from over-aggressive policy-mongering. We must have it, but it should be a last resort. I prefer that we attempt to change the policy that's getting in the way through our normal consensus model prior to using it. If, however, something is so critical and time sensitive that policy change can't be done, then we have IAR as our last resort. -
280:
attempt to build edit count, but rather a studied resource decision. If I want to find the largest volume of spelling corrections, the single fastest way to do that is using an automated tool. Why would I look for them and make the changes manually, when I can use an automated tool to find more changes, more quickly. That doesn't really answer the thrust of your question though: you asked what about the use of those tools qualifies me for adminship, and my answer is this: the use of those automated tools does not prepare me. Other things that I do on wiki do, in fact, prepare me. I work collaboratively with other editors (Brad has attested to that clearly), and I work hard to do those things that interest me. Article writing is not my forte - there are others who do that better than I. My forte is in finding the messes and cleaning them up, freeing up those who write articles well to do exactly that. Thank you for your question, and for taking the time to so closely look at this nomination. -
375:
choose to disregard it for that reason. That's okay. Obviously, I'd prefer that they take it into account, but people can make their decisions based upon whatever criteria they're personally comfortable with. But to answer your question more specifically, during the election we discussed a large number of policies - everything from the voting system to be used to who should be allowed to vote and even a major change to the process (the introduction of endorsements, which was not without its challenges, but was an interesting venture into a pre-election system). At all times, we (myself included) were very aware of the gravity of the policy decisions we were making: enfranchisement is one of the most important things I can personally think of.
151:. I have been a registered user since May of 2006 (with an underwhelming two edits), and have been much more active since December, 2006. My activities online tend to include āgnomishā things ā spelling corrects, non-controversial moves, and some vandal-thwacking. In addition, I am privileged to serve the community as a member of the Wikimedia Foundationās Election Steering Committee and took an active role in the design and implementation of the recent election. I continue to work with that committee toward next yearās election, though the official steering committee for next year has not yet been announced.
1808:
dedicate to activities on-wiki, I want to spend those hours in the most effective way I possibly can, and if that means using automated technology to help locate spelling errors or vandalism, so be it. With that said, I too, am puzzled by your reference to me as a "twinkle kiddie". I think that my experience as an election committee member, my constant participation in discussions about policy both on the mailing lists and on-wiki (as Ryan pointed out in his generous nomination), and my involvement in many facets of the
Foundation all promote that I am more than simply a script kiddy, racking up the edit count.
1923:(indeed see below) - I find it helpful to get a candidates position on how they feel about these positions and I can't get that from his contribution history. Ryan you know I respect your jusgement but I'm very disapointed in your argument whih seems to me a "don't you dare ask a question of a candidate I've nominated" attitude. The point of this is that by providing the excellent answer the candidate has hopefully it will deter oppose / neutral comments based on the "arguments" I presented. Switching, or course, to support for the expectedly good answer.
273:. Why do you feel your very heavy use of machine tools (i.e. AWB and Twinkle), and your clear lack of sustained article building contribution (as evidenced by the count tool) prepares you for adminship? Bearing in mind that there is a current tendency in RFA for people to oppose on the basis of 1) Machine related edits and 2) Editors who don't add signifiant copy/material. (Please don't see this as malicious - regulars here will know my own position on this but I'd like to know yours.)
1038:
that you should not take the article writers away from writing to give them the mop. I believe we should judge each nomination on it's merits. I don't want to see a wikipedia where non-article writers administer the project over the article writers, and equally, i don't want to minimize the contributions of hard workers like
Phillippe, whose talents are more gnomish. On the basis of his attitude, unceasing civility, and hard work, I honestly believe he has earned our trust.
1873:
demonstrated he has good judgement in area's related to adminship and a need for the tools. Just because he doesn't create a FA everyweek doesn't mean he'd make a poor administrator. We need editors who are willing to jump in on the labourous tasks that admins have to do, and
Philippe has shown he is willing to do that. This candidate is actually the one of the best I've nominated, I'm proud to do so. I respect Philippe a lot and his judgement is one of the best I've seen.
1945:
who are willing to clear the backlogs, sort out the vandalism - many things which machine editing can help - these users show a clear need for the tools. Almost all users are here to help the project, whether that be writing articles or simply helping to maintain the things - and I've got to say, the maintaners need the tools more than the writers. What I find strange about your neutral here (I know you've switched now) is the fact that you supported
2063:
your rights to decide to "disallow" that from your decision, but if you'd like, I very much encourage you to glance at the archives of the list and evaluate there. I care very much about encyclopedic article-writing; that's why I spend a ton of time making sure that the articles are correctly spelled, and that the links, etc, work. In any case, thank you for taking the time to review both my contributions and this RfA. -
213:
sentence structure, etc. I enjoy the fact that I may be looking at an article that hasnāt gotten much attention and that I have an opportunity to get it in a position where someone else who knows the topic better than I do will be able to work on content without having to worry about misspelled words and sentence fragments! I get a tremendous amount of satisfaction from getting all the way through the list.
1794:
there's no puzzling about the meaning.Ā :-) I think that my nominator and co-nominator both went to great pains to point out that while writing is not my usual activity, I have in fact involved myself fairly heavily in the "nuances" of policy, even to the level of helping to create it for the most recent election (which, admittedly was a WMF activity, not strictly a
Knowledge (XXG) one, per se).
130:: I am pleased to co-nominate Philippe for adminship. He has an excellent and well-rounded record on En-Wiki and I also enjoyed working closely with him on the Elections Committee, where he consistently displayed commitment, dedication, fine people skills, and excellent judgment. I look forward to now working with him as an administrator as well and endorse his candidacy without reservations.
186:
myself helping out at page protection (after some more time monitoring it) and AIV as well. I also watch AN/I closely, though I rarely comment there; with the additional tools I could probably pitch in and do some housework there as well (in fact, in areas that I *can* help there currently, I do ā usually if something is on AN/I, though, it really does need an admin).
381:
sometimes fall in that trap.) I have previously been active (though less so lately because of my elec comm commitments) at WP:RFCN, which I believe Ryan mentioned in his nominating statement. I believe that some of the recent changes to RFCN have been for the better and applaud those who have stuck with it.
369:- Hi SlimVirgin, and thanks for taking the time to read and question. (Incidentally, I know it sounds awfully trite to keep thanking people for their comments, but it's quite sincere. I appreciate that people are interested enough in the wiki to care and develop feelings and questions about these thing.)
1944:
This has nothing to do with me nominating the candidate - what concerns me here is the current attitude of some users who think that potential admins must be our best article writers, this isn't true and our best article writers would probably make poor admins. The fact is, admins are often the users
1191:
Philippe is possessed of a civil and cordial demeanor, sound judgment, a deliberative disposition, and a proper conception of adminship as purely ministerial, such that (and inasmuch as I continue to believe one's capacity to contribute, and history of contributing, in mainspace to be almost entirely
248:
Early in my on-wiki experience, I nominated an article for speedy deletion and the creator was a little peeved. At one point, the creator was āsigningā comments with my name and having a little argument with himself. A couple of other editors were fooled by it and I got a couple of notes to my talk
238:
Sure ā like most people Iāve had the occasional conflict on Wiki. Through my professional training (and general temperament) I tend to first look for commonalities and use that to defuse the situation. If I canāt find any commonalities, wellā¦ proceed to step 2; attempt to defuse the situation. Iām
185:
But, with additional tools comes additional responsibility ā particularly the responsibility to the community to pay attention to and act upon backlogs. Most likely, Iāll stick close to CSD (at least in the beginning) because that tends to be one of the areas that interest me most. I can easily see
2062:
That's a fair comment, and I appreciate your deliberation. While there's absolutely no reason that anyone would know this, I think my history with Meta (which may or may not be allowable) and the foundation-l both show a history of deliberative discussion with other users. You're absolutely within
1922:
With respect guys this is a discussion. Yes of course I realised it could be taken the wrong way. What would you have me do
Undertow? Not ask the question at all or just leave it looking like an attack? There is no question that article writing and machine edits have been raised as opposition before
493:
Comment: During the
Election, Philippe showed his excellent ability in facilitation, rule management and other admistrative things, interactions with people including conflict resolutions and housekeeping. His gentle and modest manner to respond people has been impressive. I'm convinced he will be a
258:
I think the real story here wasnāt how I dealt with the creator, but how I dealt with setting the record straight. Iām pleased to say that Iāve forged a nice association with a couple of the editors who initially were fooled by the creator of that article. Obviously, when I pointed out the history
1757:
Oppose the promotion of twinkle kiddies who rack up a few thousand reverts and a few thousand more with AWB. His AfD participation is being praised, and yet to me it seems somewhat hypocritical to sit around discussing whether other's writing is worthy enough, when you haven't lifted a finger to do
212:
In addition to that, Iām pleased with my āgnomicā work ā I have the odd type of personality that enjoys confronting a list and working my way through it. Lately, Iāve taken on categories like āarticles that need copyeditingā, and I work my way through them looking for spelling issues, questionable
1793:
KamrynMatika, I hope you'll allow me just a moment to address your concerns and give my reaction to them. I certainly support your right to oppose for any reason that you'd like, and appreciate that you took the time to spell out so clearly your opposition. It makes it much easier to respond when
1807:
As to your comment about automated tools, I understand that they are and will continue to be a hot topic. I do not now, nor have I ever, apologized for using carefully monitored automated tools to help me. As I said below, it's an issue of resource optimization: with a finite number of hours to
1037:
I want proper attention paid to article writing, because we are, after all, an encyclopedia! But I don't want non-article writers shut out. Article writing is my primary contribution, along with reviewing and attempting to encourage consensus on contenious articles - and I don't want a standard
380:
In addition to that, I am a subscriber to (and commenter on) both the
English wikipedia list and the Foundation list. There are certainly those more active than I, but I do keep up on it and comment when I think I have a comment to make that is unique (I try not to be a "me-too" poster, though I
92:
where his commenting always stuck to policy and was well reasoned - this is important when administrators have to explain reasoning for actions. I have always found
Philippe to keep a cool head in debates and often calms them down - again, something which is a key still to an administrator whilst
374:
You asked me to expand upon my involvement in policy discussion or development, and I'm happy to do so. As I've said other places on this RfA, much of my policy development experience has been election committee related and therefore not be specific to en-wiki and I expect that some people will
1902:
Asking someone to not take your comment as 'malicious' means that while constructing the comment, you realized it was probable it would be taken that way. It's like prefacing a jab with, 'don't take offense, but...' Asking 'why' he feels he is qualified seems to be much more appropriate that a
1872:
Pedro, I'm quite disapointed by this question you've just asked. Philippe has edited articles, but he does mainly gnome tasks - if you check the contribs, you'll see. The hardcore article writers don't need the tools - anyway, it would be a shame to lose them from article writing. Philippe has
279:
Pedro, thank you for the question, and for taking the time to carefully review contributions. Clearly, you take RfA seriously, and I appreciate that. With that said, let me say that based on my usual activities (gnomic spelling corrections, reverting vandalism)that what I have done is not an
1489:. Concerned with hisā¦umā¦lemme thinkā¦signature. Yeah, signature. He uses a non-standard signature, which I very strongly disapprove of. I think such signatures are annoying. However, due to his involvement inā¦umā¦important things and such, I can't make myself oppose at this point. Maybe later.
175:
Like most people, I view the admin tools as logical outgrowths of the editing I do now, and currently I do a fairly decent amount of vandal reverting and new page patrol. As an admin, I will continue to do that, but with the additional ability to act upon the really snarky ones that come
97:
for our recent elections - I'm sure you will agree that everyone on it has done a fantastic job organising the elections. All in all, Philippe is a well rounded user, and I hope you can help me give him the tools - he certainly deserves them and will do great work with those buttons.
936:
Maintenance work is fast becoming more and certainly at least as important as creating articles. The No.1 thing on
Knowledge (XXG) is not creating articles - It's people reading them. This candidate offers to bring extra clarity to the works of others and I applaud him. Best Wishes.
325:
is one of my pet peeves. I see it bandied about by people who are basically saying "I know it's against the rules, but I like it!" IAR is not a blanket justification for anything that someone wants. Rather, it is the "nuclear option" - it's the one that we pull out when we know -
1821:
While I disagree with your characterization of me, I do not at all disagree with your right to have and express your opinion. Dissenting voices are critical, and yours is welcome. I hope that you can tell by the length of this reply to you how seriously I took your comment. -
87:
to the community to serve as an administrator. Philippe joined the project in
December 2006 and has since made over 5,000 valued contributions to the project. He is active at AfD's and has proved himself a good judge of notability whilst commenting. Philippe has participated at
1776:
Please sign in with your account and confirm this comment - there's no way to confirm the identity of the IP address and users must have accounts to have "standing" to express opinions on RfAs. As a side note, I find the characterisation of Philippe as a "kiddie" puzzling.
2111:. While I appreciate this editor's commitment to copy editing and vandalism reversion, I'm worried by the lack of substantive article writing, and I don't see much evidence of consensus building discussion with other users, at least not on Knowledge (XXG).
386:
I hope that answers your question. Unfortunately for the next 24 hours I'll be on and off line a bit, so I may be delayed in offering any clarification if you have follow-up questions, but I'll do my very best to watch for them. -
202:
Well, Iām very proud to have served on the election committee that just finished the most recent Wikimedia Foundation election, and I think my contributions to that have had a significant impact on Knowledge (XXG) (and the other WMF
1193:
162:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge (XXG) as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
1758:
any writing yourself. Answers to questions are underhwelming, particularly Q4. We need more admins, but not at the expense of promoting people who haven't had to deal with the
867:. You have a very high edit summary usage. As a fellow "gnome", I think Q4 is a bit out of line. Just because of your use of Twinkle doesn't mean you won't make a fine admin.
848:
Your edit summary usage is very high, I see no vandalism on your record, and by your edit history, you it looks like you will be a great admin! You have my trust. Good luck!
572:
I see nothing to worry about in this users' edit history and the Ryan and Brad co-nom merely confirms my opinion that Philippe will become a good user of the admin tools.
1235:
Just because a lot of his edits are made with AWB it does not mean he is unqualified these are still very important edits that improve the encyclopedia, and I trust him.
924:
As if this editor's contributions were not already enough, I am extremely impressed by this user's very measured and level-headed responses to questions under pressure.
2130:
416:
232:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
544:
Seen Philippe many times while new page patrolling. His comments have always suggested to me that he understand the policy areas he intends to assist with.
2148:
456:
2028:
tools doesn't show me you can interact with other users well. The only recent edits on user talk pages don't appear to be too "encyclopedic" related
259:
of the article, it was immediately clear what had happened, and Iām proud that I went on to forge a nice friendship with the editors involved.
443:
811:- An excellent editor and has been very proficient in all areas.. I support the nominators for making this great decision..Good Luck..--
486:
480:
33:
17:
1270:
450:
1588:
I think the only way I would say no is if Philippe persuaded me to. Philippe, up for the challenge of sabotaging your own RfA?--
2084:, and that's what we're all trying to do. Reverting vandalism or doing other things behind the scenes is equally as important.
1154:
634:
412:
507:
436:
353:
Hi Philippe, you wrote somewhere that you've been involved in policy discussion or development. Can you say more about that?
80:
1988:
what concerns me here is the current attitude of some users who think that potential admins must be our best article writers
94:
1073:
721:
239:
never afraid to admit that I didnāt know something, or that perhaps I didnāt handle a situation in the best way possible.
1104:
688:
557:
1192:
irrelevant to a determination of his fitness for adminship) I think that one can conclude with much confidence that
1982:
Ryan - can we take this elsewhere? Commenting on my decisions in two sperate RFA's merely clogs this page up and
1292:
93:
dealing with conflicts. Philippe has already been shown to be a trusted member of the community by acting on the
1952:, so what's the difference with Philippe? Especially when he does many other things as well as machine editing.
506:
Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review
1067:
573:
1953:
1874:
1490:
585:
99:
2039:
1909:
1619:- but please change the "|" in your signature to a "|", or else it will break block templatesĀ ;)
1266:
834:
682:
1558:
After reading his answers and his metered responses to criticism. How can I say no?(this is rhetorical)--
1713:
1026:
816:
2129:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
1763:
1039:
2112:
2115:
2097:
2071:
2055:
2006:
1990:- yes, ditto, hence question, hence justification of question, hence reply above, hence my support.
1976:
1949:
without asking a single question - and just about every single one of his edits is done using a tool
1939:
1915:
1897:
1867:
1830:
1788:
1766:
1745:
1719:
1698:
1688:
1676:
1664:
1644:
1631:
1605:
1592:
1583:
1562:
1550:
1536:
1524:
1508:
1493:
1481:
1466:
1454:
1435:
1421:
1388:
1374:
1362:
1350:
1335:
1323:
1308:
1305:
1296:
1275:
1251:
1227:
1213:
1200:
1183:
1161:
1138:
1126:
1114:
1090:
1075:
1056:
1042:
1029:
1017:
1002:
976:
953:
928:
916:
897:
880:
859:
840:
820:
803:
784:
765:
751:
729:
696:
670:
658:
639:
620:
608:
576:
564:
536:
498:
395:
361:
338:
288:
222:
Thatās one of the reasons why I think Iāll enjoy working some backlogs as an administrator, as well.
134:
122:
64:
1784:
1708:
1567:
I'll have none of that! If you plan on asking questions to yourself, you better be answering them!
1239:
1178:
1151:
1087:
1014:
780:
653:
632:
302:
1693:
1443:. Excellent editor, I've seen him couple of times before. Also note his answers to the questions.
1371:
761:
2068:
1827:
1641:
1602:
1505:
1320:
1135:
1048:
854:
430:
392:
335:
285:
74:
647:
Philippe has done excellent work on Knowledge (XXG), and could definitely use the admin tools.
1904:
1770:
1696:
1545:
1262:
1123:
829:
798:
738:
713:
249:
page scolding me for the way āIā (actually the other editor, signing my name) was handling it.
60:
973:
89:
2095:
1589:
1581:
1559:
1433:
1222:
1109:
878:
813:
617:
131:
1762:
of policy and the temperament it requires to collaborate with other people on an article.
322:
312:
1999:
1932:
1903:
parental 'what makes you think...' I'm very disappointed in the wording of your question.
1860:
1620:
1478:
1344:
959:
946:
552:
354:
907:
891:
Seriously, fantastic handling of question 4 and the other reasons mentioned previously.
1779:
1449:
1444:
1397:
1236:
1170:
1147:
1084:
1011:
925:
775:
667:
649:
629:
298:
1500:
Is it generally considered bad form to "thwack" those who give you support !votes? -
321:- bainer, you've asked one of the questions that I was frankly hoping someone would.
2142:
2064:
1946:
1823:
1657:
1637:
1598:
1533:
1521:
1501:
1396:
I don't have to think it twice.. heck, I don't even need to think about it at allĀ :)
1359:
1317:
1197:
912:
849:
426:
408:
388:
331:
281:
148:
84:
70:
1726:
1383:
1283:- Great editor, and Knowledge (XXG) will benefit from giving him the admin tools.
1157:
986:
793:
705:
56:
2085:
2076:
Wow, Philippe, you're really level headed about all this criticism towards you.
1571:
1463:
1430:
1207:
1099:
892:
868:
533:
495:
143:
I accept, and my thanks to Ryan and Brad for their very kind and generous words.
1993:
1926:
1854:
1685:
1673:
1475:
1332:
967:
940:
545:
270:
2123:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1285:
888:
1194:
the net effect on the project of his being sysop(p)ed should be positive
1628:
494:
great asset for this particular community with newly granted access. --
737:
Absolutely. Excellent candidate, answers are great. Good find, Ryan. ā
2133:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
2080:
isn't exactly the most important thing, but everything constructive
679:- I have seen him around the wiki, and I'm impressed by his work. --
154:
I appreciate your consideration, and look forward to your feedback.
1010:
Yet another guy whom I thought was an admin already. Mop wisely.
532:
Philippe is a fantastic editor and will make a great admin. --
1134:- He looks like a great editor, and time to give him the mop!
196:
What are your best contributions to Knowledge (XXG), and why?
141:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
1146:. Fantastic editor, plenty of experience, no reason not to.
1083:; good candidate, completely trustworthy and level-headed.
773:. I have nothing but good things to say about this editor.
1122:
good contributor, perhaps will be a good admin. Good luck
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
2024:
Article writing is the most important thing here. Using
2031:
2029:
2025:
1950:
474:
468:
462:
1450:
1370:Great editor. I thought he was already an admin.
1520:Absolutement! Philippe est un tres bon homme.
169:What admin work do you intend to take part in?
8:
1445:
1098:I see nothing to get worked up againstĀ :).
83:) - It is with great pleasure that I offer
828:Appears the tools with be in great hands.
666:excellent user with excellent nominators.
1358:Nothing to suggest will abuse the tools.
55:Ended (65/0/2); Nomination successful. --
1986:. Briefly, You hit the nail on the head
1429:. I think he'll use the tools well. --
905:It is time to give this user the mop. --
792:Looks like yet another great candidate!
681:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
1984:adds no value at all to other editors
7:
1654:- Trustworthy. Welcome to WP:60. --
1532:Certainly. Excellent Wikip/median --
311:Under what circumstances should one
1304:good candidate, good references. --
760:
1655:
24:
2149:Successful requests for adminship
1169:Good editor - can't see why not.
95:board election steering committee
889:As long as you've got a voucher!
2050:
2047:
2043:
2040:
2035:
1739:
1736:
1733:
1730:
1727:
1343:Absolutely wonderful editor. ~
1244:
992:
990:
988:
987:
722:
714:
706:
558:
553:
547:
1725:
1544:look like a trustworthy user.
893:
508:Special:Contributions/Philippe
415:. For the edit count, see the
1:
1061:Seems to be a good editor. I
960:
689:
1658:
1597:Respectfully, no. Ā :-) -
683:
628:. Should make a good admin.
968:
411:'s edit summary usage with
158:Questions for the candidate
147:Ladies and gentlemen, I am
2165:
347:A question from SlimVirgin
2116:03:30, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2098:03:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
2072:00:53, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
2056:00:26, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
2007:19:22, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1977:18:44, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1940:09:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1916:22:38, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
1898:22:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
1868:21:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
1831:17:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1789:15:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1767:14:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1746:19:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
1720:03:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
1699:20:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
1689:16:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
1677:14:19, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
1665:05:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
1645:14:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
1632:13:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
1606:02:57, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
1593:02:56, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
1584:02:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
1563:02:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
1551:16:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
1537:14:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
1525:14:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
1509:19:17, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
1494:14:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
1482:11:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
1467:02:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
1455:01:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
1436:00:03, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
1422:23:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1389:18:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1382:He will do a great job. -
1375:17:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1363:17:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1351:13:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1336:11:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1324:07:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1309:01:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1297:21:30, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
1276:17:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
1252:16:10, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
1228:15:56, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
1214:04:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
1201:04:06, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
1184:00:08, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
1162:23:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1139:22:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1127:22:29, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1115:20:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1091:17:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1076:16:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1057:14:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1043:12:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1030:12:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1018:11:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1003:10:07, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
977:09:53, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
954:09:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
929:07:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
917:05:48, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
898:05:07, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
881:03:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
860:03:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
841:22:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
821:22:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
804:22:01, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
785:21:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
766:21:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
759:good user, no problems -
752:20:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
730:20:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
697:20:30, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
671:20:28, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
659:20:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
640:20:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
621:19:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
609:19:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
577:19:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
565:19:35, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
537:03:50, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
499:07:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
396:05:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
362:05:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
339:05:11, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
289:22:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
135:02:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
123:22:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
65:20:28, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
2126:Please do not modify it.
2082:improves Knowledge (XXG)
1462:will be a good admin --
584:as nom - best of luck.
39:Please do not modify it
616:per my co-nomination.
1706:- an excellent user.
1636:Thanks, and done. -
1259:- exceptional editor
570:Beat the noms support
34:request for adminship
424:Links for Philippe:
1069:Anonymous Dissident
1672:. Good candidate.
1072:
510:before commenting.
2005:
1938:
1912:
1866:
1850:awaiting opt. Q4
1771:User:KamrynMatika
1274:
1160:
1066:
952:
837:
684:TĪ»Īµ RĪ±nĪ“om EĪ“Ī¹Ļor
561:
360:
63:
2156:
2128:
2092:
2089:
2054:
2052:
2049:
2045:
2042:
2037:
2004:
2002:
1991:
1973:
1971:
1969:
1967:
1965:
1937:
1935:
1924:
1913:
1911:
1894:
1892:
1890:
1888:
1886:
1865:
1863:
1852:
1787:
1743:
1741:
1738:
1735:
1732:
1729:
1716:
1711:
1663:
1660:
1630:
1626:
1623:
1578:
1575:
1452:
1447:
1417:
1415:
1413:
1411:
1409:
1386:
1348:
1288:
1273:
1260:
1249:
1248:
1210:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1150:
1112:
1107:
1102:
1070:
1055:this message! -
1027:The Rambling Man
999:
998:
996:
994:
970:
964:
951:
949:
938:
915:
910:
895:
875:
872:
857:
852:
838:
836:
819:
783:
764:
748:
745:
726:
718:
710:
694:
691:
685:
675:(edit conflict)
657:
605:
603:
601:
599:
597:
562:
559:
554:
549:
490:
449:
402:General comments
359:
357:
297:A question from
119:
117:
115:
113:
111:
59:
41:
2164:
2163:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2131:this nomination
2124:
2113:Espresso Addict
2090:
2087:
2034:
2000:
1992:
1963:
1961:
1959:
1957:
1955:
1933:
1925:
1910:
1884:
1882:
1880:
1878:
1876:
1861:
1853:
1778:
1714:
1709:
1624:
1621:
1576:
1573:
1491:Jon Harald SĆøby
1407:
1405:
1403:
1401:
1399:
1384:
1346:
1295:
1286:
1261:
1243:
1208:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1110:
1105:
1100:
1068:
972:
947:
939:
908:
906:
873:
870:
855:
850:
835:
812:
809:Mammoth Support
774:
746:
740:
648:
637:
595:
593:
591:
589:
587:
517:
442:
425:
404:
355:
160:
109:
107:
105:
103:
101:
52:
37:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2162:
2160:
2152:
2151:
2141:
2140:
2136:
2135:
2119:
2118:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2100:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
1919:
1918:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1749:
1748:
1722:
1701:
1691:
1679:
1667:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1553:
1539:
1530:Strong support
1527:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1484:
1469:
1457:
1438:
1424:
1391:
1377:
1365:
1353:
1341:Strong support
1338:
1326:
1311:
1299:
1291:
1278:
1254:
1230:
1221:Sound editor.
1216:
1203:
1186:
1164:
1148:Matt/TheFearow
1141:
1132:Strong Support
1129:
1117:
1093:
1078:
1059:
1045:
1040:old windy bear
1032:
1025:, good luck!
1020:
1005:
979:
966:
956:
931:
919:
900:
886:Strong Support
883:
862:
843:
823:
806:
787:
768:
754:
732:
699:
673:
664:Strong support
661:
642:
635:
623:
611:
579:
574:(aeropagitica)
567:
539:
521:
520:
516:
513:
503:
502:
501:
491:
421:
420:
413:mathbot's tool
403:
400:
399:
398:
383:
382:
377:
376:
371:
370:
364:
348:
344:
343:
342:
341:
306:
294:
293:
292:
291:
263:
262:
261:
260:
253:
252:
251:
250:
243:
242:
241:
240:
226:
225:
224:
223:
217:
216:
215:
214:
207:
206:
205:
204:
190:
189:
188:
187:
180:
179:
178:
177:
159:
156:
145:
144:
51:
46:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2161:
2150:
2147:
2146:
2144:
2134:
2132:
2127:
2121:
2120:
2117:
2114:
2110:
2107:
2099:
2096:
2094:
2093:
2083:
2079:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2070:
2066:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2053:
2046:
2032:
2030:
2027:
2023:
2020:
2019:
2008:
2003:
1997:
1996:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1980:
1978:
1975:
1974:
1951:
1948:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1936:
1930:
1929:
1921:
1920:
1917:
1914:
1908:
1907:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1896:
1895:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1864:
1858:
1857:
1851:
1849:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1832:
1829:
1825:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1786:
1783:
1782:
1775:
1774:
1772:
1768:
1765:
1761:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1747:
1744:
1742:
1723:
1721:
1718:
1717:
1712:
1705:
1702:
1700:
1697:
1695:
1692:
1690:
1687:
1683:
1680:
1678:
1675:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1662:
1661:
1653:
1650:
1646:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1627:
1618:
1615:
1607:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1591:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1582:
1580:
1579:
1570:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1561:
1557:
1554:
1552:
1549:
1548:
1543:
1540:
1538:
1535:
1531:
1528:
1526:
1523:
1519:
1516:
1510:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1492:
1488:
1485:
1483:
1480:
1477:
1473:
1470:
1468:
1465:
1461:
1458:
1456:
1453:
1448:
1442:
1439:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1428:
1425:
1423:
1419:
1418:
1395:
1392:
1390:
1387:
1381:
1378:
1376:
1373:
1369:
1366:
1364:
1361:
1357:
1354:
1352:
1349:
1342:
1339:
1337:
1334:
1330:
1327:
1325:
1322:
1319:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1303:
1300:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1289:
1282:
1279:
1277:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1258:
1255:
1253:
1250:
1247:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1231:
1229:
1226:
1225:
1224:~ Infrangible
1220:
1217:
1215:
1212:
1211:
1205:Trustworthy.
1204:
1202:
1199:
1195:
1190:
1187:
1185:
1182:
1174:
1168:
1165:
1163:
1159:
1156:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1136:Politics rule
1133:
1130:
1128:
1125:
1121:
1118:
1116:
1113:
1108:
1103:
1097:
1094:
1092:
1089:
1086:
1082:
1079:
1077:
1074:
1071:
1064:
1060:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1049:Mailer Diablo
1046:
1044:
1041:
1036:
1033:
1031:
1028:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1016:
1013:
1009:
1006:
1004:
1001:
1000:
983:
980:
978:
975:
971:
965:
963:
957:
955:
950:
944:
943:
935:
932:
930:
927:
923:
920:
918:
914:
911:
904:
901:
899:
896:
890:
887:
884:
882:
879:
877:
876:
866:
863:
861:
858:
853:
847:
844:
842:
839:
833:
832:
827:
824:
822:
818:
815:
810:
807:
805:
801:
800:
795:
791:
788:
786:
782:
779:
778:
772:
769:
767:
763:
758:
755:
753:
750:
749:
743:
736:
733:
731:
727:
725:
719:
717:
711:
709:
703:
700:
698:
695:
692:
686:
678:
674:
672:
669:
665:
662:
660:
655:
651:
646:
643:
641:
638:
633:
631:
627:
624:
622:
619:
615:
612:
610:
607:
606:
583:
580:
578:
575:
571:
568:
566:
563:
555:
551:
550:
543:
540:
538:
535:
531:
528:
527:
526:
525:
519:
518:
514:
512:
511:
509:
500:
497:
492:
488:
485:
482:
479:
476:
473:
470:
467:
464:
461:
458:
455:
452:
448:
445:
441:
438:
435:
432:
428:
423:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
405:
401:
397:
394:
390:
385:
384:
379:
378:
373:
372:
368:
365:
363:
358:
352:
349:
346:
345:
340:
337:
333:
329:
324:
320:
317:
316:
314:
313:ignore a rule
310:
307:
304:
300:
296:
295:
290:
287:
283:
278:
275:
274:
272:
268:
265:
264:
257:
256:
255:
254:
247:
246:
245:
244:
237:
234:
233:
231:
228:
227:
221:
220:
219:
218:
211:
210:
209:
208:
201:
198:
197:
195:
192:
191:
184:
183:
182:
181:
174:
171:
170:
168:
165:
164:
163:
157:
155:
152:
150:
149:User:Philippe
142:
139:
138:
137:
136:
133:
129:
128:Co-nomination
125:
124:
121:
120:
96:
91:
86:
82:
79:
76:
72:
68:
67:
66:
62:
58:
50:
47:
43:
40:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2125:
2122:
2108:
2086:
2081:
2077:
2038:
2021:
1994:
1987:
1983:
1954:
1927:
1906:the_undertow
1905:
1875:
1855:
1847:
1846:
1840:
1839:
1780:
1764:86.137.57.73
1759:
1751:
1750:
1724:
1707:
1703:
1681:
1669:
1656:
1651:
1616:
1572:
1568:
1555:
1546:
1541:
1529:
1517:
1487:Weak support
1486:
1471:
1459:
1440:
1426:
1398:
1393:
1379:
1367:
1355:
1340:
1328:
1313:
1306:Fire Star ē«ę
1301:
1284:
1280:
1263:ckĀ lostsword
1256:
1245:
1240:
1232:
1223:
1218:
1206:
1188:
1166:
1143:
1131:
1124:Carlosguitar
1119:
1095:
1080:
1062:
1052:
1034:
1022:
1007:
985:
981:
961:
941:
933:
921:
902:
885:
869:
864:
845:
831:the_undertow
830:
825:
808:
797:
789:
776:
770:
756:
741:
739:
734:
723:
715:
707:
701:
680:
676:
663:
644:
625:
613:
586:
581:
569:
546:
541:
529:
523:
522:
505:
504:
483:
477:
471:
465:
459:
453:
446:
439:
433:
366:
350:
327:
318:
308:
276:
266:
235:
229:
199:
193:
172:
166:
161:
153:
146:
140:
127:
126:
100:
77:
69:
54:
53:
48:
38:
30:
28:
984:Why not? --
958:Per Jimbo.
618:Newyorkbrad
267:Optional Q4
132:Newyorkbrad
1155:(Contribs)
1085:Antandrus
515:Discussion
356:SlimVirgin
203:projects).
31:successful
1522:Cary Bass
1237:Yamaka122
926:Trusilver
851:Tcrow777
668:Acalamari
650:Nishkid64
630:Flyguy649
530:Heck yes!
469:blockĀ log
417:talk page
2143:Category
2065:Philippe
2026:automate
1947:DerHexer
1824:Philippe
1659:Jreferee
1638:Philippe
1599:Philippe
1590:Cronholm
1560:Cronholm
1534:Mbimmler
1502:Philippe
1474:clear --
1451:irohisat
1394:Support!
1360:Davewild
636:contribs
437:contribs
427:Philippe
409:Philippe
389:Philippe
332:Philippe
282:Philippe
85:Philippe
81:contribs
71:Philippe
49:Philippe
2109:Neutral
2078:Writing
2022:Neutral
1841:Neutral
1760:nuances
1704:Support
1694:Jaranda
1682:Support
1670:Support
1652:Support
1617:Support
1556:Support
1547:Peacent
1542:Support
1518:Support
1472:Support
1460:Support
1441:Support
1427:Support
1385:Flubeca
1380:Support
1372:Bart133
1368:Support
1356:Support
1329:Support
1316:SOLID.
1314:Support
1302:Support
1281:Support
1257:Support
1233:Support
1219:Support
1189:Support
1176:fireboy
1167:Support
1144:Support
1120:Support
1096:Support
1081:Support
1063:support
1053:approve
1035:Support
1023:Support
1012:Blueboy
1008:Support
982:Support
934:Support
922:Support
913:iva1979
903:Support
865:Support
846:Support
826:Support
794:GDonato
790:Support
771:Support
762:Zeibura
757:Support
735:Support
708:AgĪµĪø020
702:Support
677:Support
645:Support
626:Support
614:Support
582:support
542:Support
524:Support
444:deleted
176:across.
57:Deskana
1785:scribe
1752:Oppose
1464:rogerd
1431:DS1953
1345:Riana
1209:Daniel
1152:(Talk)
1088:(talk)
1051:and I
894:Keegan
817:styles
781:scribe
534:Merope
496:Aphaia
323:WP:IAR
299:bainer
61:(talk)
2001:Chat
1995:Pedro
1934:Chat
1928:Pedro
1862:Chat
1856:Pedro
1686:@pple
1674:*drew
1625:notes
1622:Grace
1476:BozMo
1333:MONGO
1318:Dfrg.
1158:(Bot)
1065:. --
962:Giggy
948:Chat
942:Pedro
856:talk
814:Comet
548:Leebo
451:count
271:Pedro
269:From
16:<
2091:stan
2069:Talk
1828:Talk
1715:Skan
1710:Sala
1642:Talk
1603:Talk
1577:stan
1506:Talk
1479:talk
1180:Talk
1101:Jmlk
1047:I'm
874:stan
799:talk
690:ĻĪ±lĪŗ
654:talk
481:rfar
463:logs
431:talk
407:See
393:Talk
336:Talk
328:know
303:talk
286:Talk
90:RFCN
75:talk
2051:mit
2048:her
1781:WjB
1321:msc
1293:(c)
1287:Ali
1241:...
1198:Joe
1196:.
777:WjB
487:spi
457:AfD
2145::
2088:J-
2067:|
2044:ki
2041:Wi
2033:.
1998:|
1979:`
1972:te
1970:ai
1968:hw
1966:et
1964:tl
1962:os
1958:an
1956:Ry
1931:|
1893:te
1891:ai
1889:hw
1887:et
1885:tl
1883:os
1879:an
1877:Ry
1859:|
1826:|
1773:)
1740:da
1728:Mi
1684:.
1640:|
1601:|
1574:J-
1569::)
1504:|
1420:-
1331:--
1246::)
1172:Jh
1015:96
945:|
871:J-
802:)
747:as
728:)
724:Š¤C
720:ā¢
716:ĪT
704:--
604:te
602:ai
600:hw
598:et
596:tl
594:os
590:an
588:Ry
475:lu
391:|
367:A.
351:6.
334:|
319:A.
315:?
309:5.
284:|
277:A:
236:A:
230:3.
200:A:
194:2.
173:A:
167:1.
118:te
116:ai
114:hw
112:et
110:tl
108:os
104:an
102:Ry
36:.
2036:~
1960:P
1881:P
1848:N
1769:(
1737:n
1734:a
1731:r
1629:Ā§
1446:H
1416:l
1414:e
1412:i
1410:r
1408:d
1406:e
1404:a
1402:h
1400:P
1347:ā
1271:C
1269:ā¢
1267:T
1265:ā¢
1111:7
1106:1
997:s
995:i
993:r
991:h
989:C
974:P
969:U
909:S
796:(
744:n
742:A
712:(
693:)
687:(
656:)
652:(
592:P
560:C
556:/
489:)
484:Ā·
478:Ā·
472:Ā·
466:Ā·
460:Ā·
454:Ā·
447:Ā·
440:Ā·
434:Ā·
429:(
419:.
305:)
301:(
106:P
78:Ā·
73:(
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.