868:. I opposed first time round based on the false impression he was a POV warrior, but after several hours researching to correct a perceived NPOV violation in a Balkans article i found even sources I expected to favour the "injured" party treated the subject the same way as the candidate. Intelligent and mostly even handed, he seems to have a rare combination of respect for consensus with independence of mind. I regretted opposing the candidate on the first RFA so much i put a reminder to nominate him in June, as a nom from someone with a contrasting outlook might help with the partisanship we sometimes get there (though tactically I would have asked a more moderate and respected colleague as first choice for the nom to maximise chances). Good all round wiki skills.
244:
and look into improving the article, unless it is a clear CSD and then I may try to give more advice to the article creator. I have tagged a few borderline articles for poor referencing and notability issues marking them as patrolled to give the creators a chance to follow the advice whilst more keen taggers may have CSD tagged. I keep an eye on the articles and go back and Prod tag them if the creator has added nothing to the article. I may not have completely finished with an article when I hit the page patrolled button but I never hit it if I don't think I will sort out the major problem issues one way or another. Sometimes that may be going back and improving it myself a week later or even going back and taking it to AfD.
1623:. I supported last time when I was a relative RfA novice and I'm supporting this time. It appears to me that Polargeo has gone out of his way to address the issues raised in the last RfA. I'm certain I've interacted with him at some point in the past but I can't for the life of me remember where. Anyway, wherever it was, he made a good enough impression that I can say without doubt that giving him a few extra buttons to press will be a genuine asset to the project. If RfA weren't so ridiculous these days, this would certainly be the easiest pass of 2010 so far.
212:
over 100 articles since my last RfA and have now patrolled around 500 new pages. I don't know the exact percentage but the vast majority of the articles I have CSD tagged have been deleted. I have tried to diffuse situations and not get as personally affected by issues such as the one I describe in my answer to Q3. I think I have managed this although I do often deal with very difficult areas of wikipedia and people who sometimes have quite distasteful agendas.
106:) – I primarily started editing as a content contributor and still expand and create articles. Recently I have become more involved with AfD, CSD and new page patrolling. My first RfA failed with 64% support. With over 2500 edits and more than three months past since then I believe I have addressed the major issues on which I failed and humbly put myself up again for interrogation.
345:) which had been incorrectly CSD tagged and that was then prod tagged but the prod tag was removed again by the person who tagged it. I have never personally deleted any addition to my talkpage so if there were any notices you would find them there or in the archives. I may have tried unsuccessfully to rescue an article I found at AfD but I don't remember a specific example.
2032:- I was another of those !voting against Polargeo in December. I did so with the urging that a return here under the right circumstances would gain my support. Mine was one of the last !votes, and I was quite aware how close Polargeo was. So, it gives me great pleasure to go the other way this time, and to see that I am hardly alone in feeling this way. Well done!
290:
magazine arguing that even if a picture of her could be taken, it wouldn't represent the "characteristics" for which she is notable. It is taken to IfD where 2 admins argue it is replaceable and 3 other users argue that any picture would be hard to get and the characteristics issue is valid. How do you close it and why?
494:, rather than repeating incorrect information. If you think it is best for wikipedia not to mention this at all then okay I am happy for it to be removed but someone could easily add the incorrect information at a later date and source it, I think it is better to start off with the correct sourced information.
138:
My main focus would be on AfD and CSD but I am willing to help out in other areas where I feel I have the necessary experience to make the decision. I have a wide range of AfD experience and I have worked on increasing my CSD experience because that was a cause for several opposes to my previous RfA.
1924:
as someone who opposed (albeit weakly) last time around. I had barely encountered
Polargeo before his prior RfA; in the months since, my impression of Polargeo (based on his AfD and DRV work, largely) has been very positive. I fully trust Polargeo to fairly and accurately weigh arguments at AfD when
243:
I am sure you could get better advice from many others but here goes. I consider whether the page looks like a genuine attempt to add to wikipedia by an editor who may improve the article. If it is I will often hold back on CSD tagging (for example a potential A7) until I have had a chance to google
3576:
I believe you were asked for diffs not to justify your opinion, but to help other editors form their own. If you chose to provide them, it will provide those other editors with more specific evidence for them to weigh as they form their own opinions. It wasn't a request intended to put you on the
305:
being acceptable. So the arguments appear valid on both sides but the odds against obtaining a free image in this case and the fact that it would be unrepresentative anyway creates a policy based argument which is backed up by a greater number of !votes. There is certainly not a consensus to delete
3403:
I would see a good candidate for the mop from the evidence, after a fairly interesting interaction in relation to an issue that we (poleargo and I) had an interaction over - the outcome - after many words, was positive to the wiki project concerned - and on that basis I would support, but hope the
1321:
This is an editor who has clearly listened to the feedback from the first RfA and who has acted on it very constructively. It's also pretty good going to contribute to such contentious topics as the
Balkans and Climate Change and remain sane, let alone civil. Experience, track record, temperament,
3912:
Insufficient edits to Book talk namespace ~~~~" in the support section, it would stand, and affect the outcome (in fact, someone has done pretty much that). Interesting that support votes with nonsensical or joke rationales (or no rationale at all) are accepted, and neutrals that don't affect the
2857:
One of the most insightful
Wikipedians I've encountered. When this guy gets to work on something, you can be sure he'll take the time to understand the situation and that his position will not be formed on a whim. This kind of thoroughness and dedication to the encyclopedia is exactly what admins
448:
Yes I did, I never considered it a cast iron source that the verification of the information in the article relied upon (hence doubling it up with a
Romanian source). I realized the married thing was due to an incorrect translation of a Romanian source but still felt it better to have the English
236:
When patrolling new pages, what things do you look to do and what do you consider before you hit the "Page patrolled" link, or nominate for CSD, or whatever? (I ask partly for my own education, because I've only recently started doing NPP, and a few tips from an admin candidate would be welcome).
211:
The one issue I have not addressed is the self-nom issue. But I see no problem with a self-nom. Another issue for some was my relatively low edit count. I have addressed this by adding another 2700 edits across a range of areas. I was also opposed on limited CSD experience. I have CSD tagged well
415:
You will see that this inline source citation is doubled up with another citation but the other more reliable source is in
Romanian. When searching for the sources there are several in Romanian but I considered it good to have an English source alongside (accepted it is of a lower standard) that
289:
Say we have an in-arguably notable porn actress from the 1960s who is still alive today. No known public domain pictures of her are known to exist and she is known to not be interested in having pictures taken of her. A user has posted a (clothed) full-body picture of the actress from a 1960's
940:
I supported last time, as I remember it your opposers then included some who thought that you had insufficient tenure and and some who thought you had insufficient experience of deletion. You've now been here 14 months which should reassure those who prefer their admins to have over a years
1602:. I seem to see you express a lot of strong opinions. I disagree with a few of them. But that's a good thing. Your contributions are always well considered. And you have an excellent record of building this project in the mainspace. I'd be delighted for you to have the tools. --
1246:
I was neutral last time, but said that I'd support this time if
Polargeo learnt to take a breath/step away when being poked, which I believe is a critical response to the inevitable poking. He (she?) appears to have done that, so I'm happy to support this time, as promised.
373:
I am not convinced there is a clear consensus here and would have considered relisting. However, at the time I may have !voted delete and so would not be against the close. Obviously my voting inclination would not affect my evaluation of consensus, hence the difference.
902:. Liking everything I've seen on a review of recent contribs. I had vague memory of concerns going in, but rapidly realised I was getting Polargeo confused with another user with a slightly similar name! Looks like a mature editor with sensible stuff to contribute. ~
515:
More generally, when a person's dating/relationship history has no bearing on the matters for which they are notable and shows no indications of significant impact on their life and career, what encyclopedic value do you believe there is in including such material?
3756:
Doesn't meet my minimum criteria for admins both in tenure (a little over a year) and edit count. I'm pleased to see that you're getting more involved here and I do see improvement, but your last RfA was only 3 1/2 months ago. It seems too soon to reconsider.
3181:
Another case of EnWP RFA standards on the rise to insanity. Previously, the answer was come back in three months and try again. Now it is "Only a three and a half month wait? Not long enough!" Come on people. You are asking to much. He wants to be an admin, not
1138:
per above. Has learned from and remedied past problems. Courteous user willing to engage in meaningful discussion and grow. Has created a GA that was praised by an opposer in previous RFA. Good experience in CSD. Little likelihood of misuse/abuse of the tools.
3861:
I've stricken this !vote as frivolous. Although a neutral would theoretically have no effect on the outcome anyway, and I understand the point that Gurch is making, posting sardonic comments of this nature as counted !votes is disruptive to the RfA process.
1925:
interpreting the consensus in deletion discussions. In my experience, Polargeo is reasonable, thoughtful, and always willing to improve himself. I no longer have any concerns at all about this candidate becoming an admin. I remain impressed with his GA,
3512:
Crafty, is it possible for you to provide a couple of diffs to show continuing problems? I might have missed them, and would be grateful to look at some examples of where the candidate has shown that they haven't improved since the last RfA --
962:
This one seems easy, per above. If an editor works for 14 months on difficult issues in climate science and the
Balkans and has somehow managed not to generate a huge counter-reaction, then their diplomatic skills are better than mine. - Dank
992:. I supported last time and have no reason to change my mind now. Knowledgeable and sensible contributor who is dedicated to maintaining quality content, who holds his own in interactions with forces hostile to verifiability and NPOV. --
340:
I have created 44 articles. Many articles I have edited have been deleted but nothing I have ever significantly expanded has been taken to AfD. No redirect I have created has gone to RfD either that I am aware of. I tidied up an article
159:
an article I expanded from a stub. Also I have reviewed 3 GAs and found this a rewarding experience. I have increased coverage of
Antarctica and Greenland across various articles and have created 44 articles mostly on major glaciers and
296:
You have chosen an area I have spent very little time in. I would certainly ask for advice and not attempt FfD closes until I had done more work in that area. Anyway as this is a test here goes. The guidance which I think applies is
485:
Some of her notability (though clearly not all) comes from her relationships so including this information is useful and I think justified in her case. On searches some sources incorrectly list her as having had a relationship with
192:. My reaction to what I considered to be an unreasonable WQA was not acceptable and gave rise to some opposes in my last RfA. I have not had another such difficult incident since and now always look to diffuse such situations.
1524:- Not only has Polargeo improved since the last RfA (which I opposed, FYI) but I've personally seen a lot of really good contributions all over the project, including non-article space. I think he'll make a great admin. --
941:
experience, and having just trawled through a bunch of your recent deleted contributions I can reassure those without access to deleted stuff that you now have more CSD tagging experience, and are doing good work there.
474:
In the same article, you added content regarding unverified press reports, which the article subject denied, of a prior "relationship" with a convicted sex offender. Why did you believe such content was acceptable under
164:. I have also tried to resolve problems in some of the Balkans articles through editing (adding reliable sources and a neutralPOV) and trying to get parties to reach consensus. I have ended up spending a lot of time on
2858:
need most, in my experience. This is in addition to all the above, of course, but is what I found to be the fellow's most admirable (and most necessary) characteristic. Admin material without a shadow of a doubt. --
139:
The opposes were not on the quality but I had tagged less than 20 articles and stupidly said I might do some work in the area. I have now tagged over 150 articles for CSD and have patrolled around 500 new pages.
576:
Thanks. I am sure I will find some of those scripts very useful. I have neglected this area a bit and only have a couple of items in my own monobook so there is nothing I can recommend to you at present.
333:
How many articles have you created from scratch? How many pages for articles, templates, redirects, etc. that you've significantly worked on have been nominated for deletion? Could you link to a couple?
3739:
I was concerned enough to oppose at the last RFA. Although I don't have any diffs of problematic edits between now and then, philosophically I think 3 months is too short of time to revisit my oppose.--
441:
uou used as a reference incorrectly reports that Puscau is married to director Brett Ratner. Did you take this into account in deciding whether the page was a reliable source for a BLP? Should you have?
2190:
Moved back down here by closing bureaucrat. I like a joke as much the next bloke, but please try to make it easy for folks who have to run the ship. Things are getting complicated enough as it is. --
1645:. Although I opposed Polargeo's previous RfA, I feel that he has sufficiently addressed the issues and concerns raised last time and would make a fine administrator. Good luck with the mop!
1214:
I reviewed candidate last time in some detail, had some minor concerns that didn't seem strong enough to oppose, but left me uncomfortable supporting. I do feel comfortable supporting now.
885:
I supported last time, and nothing I've seen since gives me reason to change my mind; I have lots of respect for anyone who can approach the former
Yugoslavia whilst maintaining a NPOV.
449:
source in as it contained a lot of easily readable and correct information as well. Maybe this was a bad decision and there were another couple of
Romanian sources I should have added
125:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge (XXG) as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
3927:
Although I can see, and am inclined to agree with, Newyorkbrad's point, I think striking a neutral may be a little OTT and RfA is seriously in need of a little comic relief.
3980:
62:
1588:
490:. I actually feel that a sourced denial of a relationship which has been incorrectly reported in the press shows wikipedia is actually trying to put the facts in correctly
182:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
2567:
From what I can see, he has successfully managed to overcome the objections raised in his last RFA, so there is no reason for me not to support this request. Regards
2204:
Moved back up here and change to support 'vote'. I think I know if I meant support or oppose. Bureaucrat have no right to change votes. Don't edit my comment again. -
3562:
Diffs? Why would I provide diffs? I am under no obligation to provide diffs. I have offered my considered opinion on this candidate and I see no reason to alter it.
188:
The most stress I had was after several difficult interactions on a talkpage I was taken to wikiquette alerts for a single very minor comment where I told a user to
3551:
1673:
1663:
800:
608:
795:
3371:, not that one more support matters at this point. Impressed by that Polargeo does not shy away from controversial topic areas, as most prospective Admins do.
1750:- I see absolutely no real reason to not support you. You're a good editor, you can keep cool in a debate, and I see no problems with CSD or AFD. Good luck.
603:
3998:
3554:
1676:
649:
3586:
3478:
1929:, and his extensive content work. (I also support Tim's quest to ditch the "juniormost admin" mantle.) Anyway, good luck and keep up the good work!
3677:
2702:
3380:
3810:
Darn, that gets admin candidates every single time! You'd think they'd learn by now how essential work in that area is to being a good admin.--
1717:
Good job constructively addressing the opposes from your first RfA, article content work includes a GA, diplomacy per dank... Give 'im the mop.
1384:
1075:
738:
636:
2602:
2779:
Polargeo always helped well in the disputed areas of wiki. He will be good expansion to wikipedia administrators. Only support from me. --
1871:: in particular - enough edits including high-quality article work, great Userboxen, Rollback rights, great user page, autoreviewer, etc.
1786:
923:
I wish I saw more experience and coolheadedness, but I appreciate the willingness to take on hard work such as Balkans and new BLP's. /
679:
673:
33:
17:
3673:
3548:
3533:
2698:
1670:
1124:
790:
851:
Read some of the balkan comments, very calm in a difficult field. A look at stats and prior RfA makes me confident he's qualified.--
3278:
643:
3850:
3645:
1703:
1408:
3079:
2550:: A bit soon after the last attempt for a self-nom, but I've looked into recent contribs and agree the he appears to be ready.
1354:
550:
2664:. Answers to questions show clue. Contributions are beneficial. Displays a positive attitude. All in all a fine candidate. --
3771:
3447:
1934:
705:
629:
103:
409:, which appears to be a self-published blog. Why did you believe this site to be an appropriate, reliable source for a BLP?
2426:. A good contributor who will make a good admin. I appreciate how he has responded to the concerns raised in the last RfA.
688:
3545:
2819:
1667:
1331:
1280:
931:
267:
3583:
3475:
2844:
816:
826:
3876:
Perhaps !striking the !vote was more disruptive. Since you acknowledged that neutrals have no effect. Just a thought.
3466:
1901:
1404:
948:
365:
169:
3376:
2936:
2497:
I remember supporting your last RfA, and I was very disappointed when it did not succeed. Good luck with this one.
2045:
1955:
1392:
1023:
I supported last time, and I'm pleased to again. Calm, sensible, unlikely to break anything by accident or design.
393:
306:
so I suppose a keep close would be in order, but I am saying this with little practical experience in FfD debates.
3052:. Well-rounded, with a proven record of being able to edit constructively in areas where there is controversy. --
1930:
1560:
764:
731:
1403:
Polargeo's made edits every month since he joined Knowledge (XXG) and he's hasn't been blocked a single time. --
258:
Thanks, that's a very helpful answer - it's good to get the thoughts of someone at your stage of experience. --
2639:
2597:
1323:
1272:
561:
522:
I personally believe that in general there is little value but understand others may have a different opinion.
259:
890:
785:
3580:
3472:
3337:
2911:
has shown fortitude and character after unsuccessful (albeit close) nomination; hung in there and improved--
2177:
1781:
1650:
1146:
165:
780:
3567:
3527:
3503:
3498:- I don't see a susbtantial improvement in the last three months. This new self-nom is premature I think.
3423:
3372:
2975:- I have seen Polargeo around here and there, and I am confident that this user has epic amounts of clue.
2621:
2239:
1868:
1760:
1183:
1118:
982:
943:
873:
1620:
886:
3951:
3936:
3881:
3867:
3828:
3744:
3662:
3312:
3189:
3147:
3130:
3003:
2929:
2195:
2020:
1833:
1816:
1632:
1607:
1376:
1169:
1104:
I opposed at the last RfA, but I feel that my concerns have been met, and I can see no problems here --
73:
3979:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
3955:
3941:
3922:
3885:
3871:
3856:
3819:
3802:
3776:
3748:
3721:
3700:
3681:
3667:
3651:
3624:
3590:
3571:
3557:
3539:
3507:
3482:
3460:
3451:
3428:
3411:
3395:
3363:
3346:
3319:
3296:
3284:
3263:
3236:
3215:
3191:
3173:
3151:
3134:
3120:
3096:
3084:
3061:
3044:
3026:
3007:
2990:
2967:
2941:
2920:
2903:
2883:
2866:
2849:
2830:
2802:
2785:
2771:
2754:
2737:
2720:
2706:
2689:
2672:
2656:
2643:
2625:
2608:
2580:
2559:
2542:
2528:
2505:
2489:
2475:
2452:
2435:
2418:
2392:
2375:
2358:
2333:
2319:
2302:
2279:
2262:
2246:
2213:
2199:
2183:
2172:
2161:
2144:
2135:
2123:
2092:
2072:
2053:
2036:
2024:
2007:
1981:
1961:
1944:
1938:
1916:
1907:
1880:
1859:
1847:
1838:
1820:
1806:
1792:
1766:
1742:
1726:
1709:
1679:
1654:
1637:
1611:
1594:
1563:
1543:
1516:
1498:
1464:
1446:
1429:
1412:
1395:
1358:
1336:
1309:
1285:
1262:
1241:
1227:
1206:
1188:
1174:
1152:
1141:
1130:
1096:
1079:
1039:
1018:
1001:
984:
968:
957:
935:
918:
894:
877:
860:
701:
586:
568:
531:
503:
462:
425:
383:
354:
315:
272:
253:
221:
115:
77:
1232:
No concerns. Can tell the speedy criteria apart, and I found no problems in recent AfD participation.
553:
helpful? If so, please feel free to add them to your own monobook/vector.js, and suggest some for me.
3843:
3695:
3638:
3619:
3359:
3168:
3160:
3057:
3021:
2798:
2555:
2275:
1696:
1553:
1425:
1221:
1200:
759:
724:
438:
3705:
Yes, Polargeo did an admirable job of rectifying the concern, by travelling through time no less! ~
3392:
3113:
3102:
3075:
2879:
2767:
2716:
2670:
2635:
2592:
2589:
2448:
2351:
2141:
2132:
1977:
1926:
1913:
1855:
554:
541:
156:
3767:
3456:
I see Polargeo's name around often, and he always comes across as reasonable and sensible to me.
3441:
3408:
3328:
3230:
3208:
2959:
2781:
2733:
2685:
2388:
2156:
2067:
1802:
1776:
1735:
1722:
1646:
1462:
623:
582:
527:
499:
458:
421:
379:
350:
311:
249:
217:
111:
97:
1071:
3607:
3105:
and thinking you had a clueful approach. There's no reason to oppose, as far as I'm concerned.
3815:
3563:
3516:
3499:
3420:
2916:
2826:
2617:
2484:
2473:
2300:
2231:
1876:
1754:
1237:
1107:
975:
928:
869:
856:
1888:
my rationale remains the same as my support from this users last RfA. I trust this editor.
3947:
3928:
3877:
3863:
3740:
3657:
3306:
3183:
3143:
3126:
2999:
2998:
This user has made many good contributions. I think he deserves this position. Thank you, --
2901:
2839:
2750:
2516:
2498:
2329:
2191:
2119:
2016:
1828:
1812:
1624:
1603:
1580:
1509:
1491:
1442:
1253:
1161:
1092:
997:
69:
3012:
2366:
Back for more so soon? I supported last time and I see nothing since then to change that.
1970:
973:
Definitely. Calm, collected and balances content work with behind-the-scenes maintenance. –
476:
303:
retired individuals whose notability rests in large part on their earlier visual appearance
298:
3918:
3836:
3798:
3688:
3631:
3612:
3355:
3053:
3036:
3016:
2794:
2574:
2551:
2315:
2271:
2255:
2209:
2088:
1689:
1538:
1470:
1421:
1302:
1216:
1195:
1032:
1014:
487:
3457:
3389:
3293:
3268:
3256:
3107:
3070:
2983:
2875:
2763:
2712:
2665:
2444:
2371:
2344:
1973:
1851:
1347:
964:
3992:
3759:
3437:
3405:
3225:
3202:
2952:
2860:
2729:
2681:
2431:
2384:
2062:
2033:
1798:
1718:
1456:
1268:
1160:. I opposed the last RfA; candidate has since proven themselves an exemplary editor.
619:
578:
523:
495:
454:
417:
375:
346:
325:
307:
245:
213:
107:
93:
3811:
2912:
2811:
2461:
2401:
2288:
1992:
1872:
1846:
You look stellar. And, you might be the answer to all the talk about "drought" at
1364:
1290:
1233:
924:
852:
402:
342:
3544:
I would have to agree with Phantomsteve, I see no problems with this candidate. --
821:
3199:. Polargeo seems to have the ample experience needed. He'll make a good admin. --
2894:
2746:
2649:
2537:
2521:
2325:
2099:
1572:
1504:
1475:
1438:
1248:
1088:
993:
161:
1087:
I had no qualms in supporting the first RfA and I am glad to support this one.
3914:
3794:
3706:
3093:
2569:
2311:
2205:
2084:
1892:
1526:
1296:
1182:. We've had our scuffles, but from the looks of it, you'd be a fine admin. --
1026:
1010:
903:
3973:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
405:
article you mentioned in your answer to question 7, you added a reference to
3247:
2976:
2367:
1734:
I supported you last time, and I see no reason not to this time as well ;)--
2949:
effectively dealt with Balkan related disputes (not an easy thing to do).
3946:
I shall go back to casting most of my support !votes in rhymed couplets.
2427:
1049:
3436:
clearly worth a trial with the tools, more than likely a net positive.
2928:
Appears to be qualified for the job, not that this !vote is necessary.
3983:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
3834:
yet? We can't possibly sysop someone who's never prodded a book yet!
1420:
I can trust this editor with Admin tools based on the track record.--
453:
as extra. To get this right it really needs a native speaker though.
2270:
Substantial improvement (not that it needed a lot) and trustworthy.
2728:: Polargeo is fair-minded and articulate, and ready for the tools.
704:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review
3610:
why I have to encourage everybody to reconsider their !votes!!!---
3606:
I can't believe how many people are supporting this, there is one
1503:
Excellent editor, sufficiently experienced. Meets my criteria. --
716:
406:
2015:. The candidate now has the experience needed for the sysop gig.
2460:
I think he would be a good choice for being an administrator. --
2241:
vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll
301:
part 12. In particular the italicized statement about images of
1687:
neutral last time, but I think that he's a fine candidate now.
720:
2287:- No major issues with candidate, overall a good contributor.
2155:, it was originally placed up here, so I've moved it back up.
149:
What are your best contributions to Knowledge (XXG), and why?
3404:
negotation skills improve in relation to the volume of words
3159:- Supported the last one, no reason not to support this one,
1193:
Finally, a candidate who has a chance of becoming an admin!
205:
How have you addressed the major issues from your last RfA?
1797:
At last, someone to take the "junior admin" title from me.
3656:
Baloonman, I'm sure you'll strike it tomorrow, right? :)
1474:
Insert cliché "I thought he was already an admin" here --
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1437:
It's been a while since I've said that. It feels great!
132:
What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
2838:
Thoughtful. Clueful. Interestedintheencyclopediaful. -
2762:: keeps a cool head while working in hot-potato areas.
2151:
2080:
1370:
1047:. I have no problems with this user receiving the mop.
667:
661:
655:
549:
Do you think that you would find any of the scripts in
189:
54:
3577:
spot; rather, PhantomSteve was asking for your help.--
2044:- Very good candidate, and will not abuse the tools.
1293:
but I'd say Boing! is probably on to something... :)
416:
simply repeats the claims in many Romanian sources.
3672:Please do; this nomination is hanging by a thread.
3629:This was admittedly an unfortunate time for RfA :/
809:
773:
752:
2170:OMG. Is this a joke oppose/support? Is RFA back?!
3686:Striking !vote as reason no longer stands ;-)---
364:Please evaluate this RfD discussion and close:
732:
686:Edit summary usage for Polargeo can be found
8:
3327:Trustworthy editor. Will make a fine admin.
2097:One bad summary, and you oppose? Seriously?
2648:No reason not to - definitely has a clue.
2400:Definitely. He's a very good contributor.--
3793:Insufficient edits to Book talk namespace
2810:- Hardworking editor - has my support. --
739:
725:
717:
230:Optional question from Boing! said Zebedee
1368:I had supported the first RfA but it was
1344:I really wish you had made it last time.
2341:. Go for it. I see nothing wrong here. —
700:Please keep discussion constructive and
155:I am pleased with my GA contribution of
601:
2636:-- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri)
68:Final vote tally (125/3/0), closed by
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
7:
1811:Support. Fully qualified candidate.
56:Voice your opinion on this candidate
3292:, I don't see any reason why not.
600:
540:Additional optional questions from
392:Additional optional questions from
324:Additional optional questions from
1454:I thought he was ready last time.
24:
3999:Successful requests for adminship
3388:Highly qualified, in my opinion.
609:Requests for adminship/Polargeo 2
2634:ers. Candidate looks qualified.
199:Optional question from DarkFalls
2874:Hopefully will do a good job...
604:Requests for adminship/Polargeo
551:User:NuclearWarfare/monobook.js
439:specific Look Back Fashion post
3373:Демоны Врубеля/Vrubel's Demons
1271:is a bit of a giveaway ;-) --
706:Special:Contributions/Polargeo
1:
3674:Short Brigade Harvester Boris
3092:. See no reason for concern.
2891:-Definitely well qualified.--
2699:Short Brigade Harvester Boris
1551:with admiration for bravery.
2745:, an excellent candidate. --
2192:Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick.
2081:inappropriate edit summaries
1322:answers above - all good --
283:Optional question from Hobit
70:Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick.
3170:(I am Czar of all Russias!)
121:Questions for the candidate
4015:
3608:obvious and glaring reason
3558:20:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
3540:14:24, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
3508:10:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
2644:22:33, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2609:21:40, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2581:20:40, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2560:19:59, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2543:18:56, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2529:18:16, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2506:17:59, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2490:17:28, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2476:17:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2453:17:13, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2436:16:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2419:16:48, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2393:16:14, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2376:14:59, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2359:14:34, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2334:14:19, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2320:12:19, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2303:11:09, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2280:06:58, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2263:06:10, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2247:06:07, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2214:18:45, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
2184:13:57, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2162:09:22, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2145:09:56, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2136:09:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2124:06:53, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2093:06:05, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2073:11:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2054:04:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2037:03:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2025:03:33, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
2008:03:18, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
1982:03:15, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
1962:02:16, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
1939:00:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
1917:00:36, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
1908:00:28, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
1881:23:29, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1860:23:20, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1839:23:16, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1821:22:38, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1807:22:29, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1793:22:15, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1767:21:56, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1743:21:46, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1727:21:12, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1710:20:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1680:20:52, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1655:20:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1638:19:48, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1612:19:12, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1595:18:40, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1564:18:32, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1544:17:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1517:17:52, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1499:17:20, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1465:17:15, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1447:17:03, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1430:16:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1413:16:33, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1396:16:30, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1359:15:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1337:15:26, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1310:15:46, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1291:Well, it's not a guarantee
1286:15:29, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1263:14:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1242:14:49, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1228:14:46, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1207:14:25, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1189:14:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1175:14:07, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1153:13:58, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1131:13:51, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1097:13:47, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1080:13:25, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1040:13:22, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1019:13:01, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1002:12:58, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
985:12:52, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
969:12:40, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
958:11:56, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
936:11:38, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
919:11:30, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
895:10:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
878:10:52, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
861:10:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
384:14:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
355:14:05, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
316:09:42, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
273:15:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
254:14:52, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
222:14:28, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
116:09:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
3956:18:38, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
3942:17:48, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
3938:Penny for your thoughts?
3923:11:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
3886:04:33, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
3872:02:33, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
3857:23:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
3820:23:25, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
3803:22:58, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
3777:10:03, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
3749:13:48, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
3722:19:01, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
3701:06:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
3682:04:46, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
3668:01:22, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
3652:23:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
3625:22:45, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
3591:17:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
3572:03:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
3483:06:23, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
3461:16:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
3452:11:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
3429:11:08, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
3412:02:32, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
3396:17:33, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
3381:09:09, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
3364:07:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
3347:04:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
3320:02:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
3297:00:36, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
3285:00:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
3264:18:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
3237:18:31, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
3216:17:21, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
3192:13:23, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
3174:10:53, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
3152:00:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
3135:22:54, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
3121:21:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
3097:21:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
3085:18:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
3062:18:01, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
3045:10:40, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
3027:08:04, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
3008:08:00, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
2991:07:35, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
2968:06:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
2942:05:07, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
2921:03:17, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
2904:01:35, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
2884:00:07, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
2867:22:50, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
2850:22:04, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
2831:17:24, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
2803:11:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
2786:09:57, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
2772:09:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
2755:08:09, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
2738:05:55, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
2721:04:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
2707:01:23, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
2690:01:07, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
2673:01:03, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
2657:00:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
2626:13:32, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
2200:15:02, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
1634:Penny for your thoughts?
587:07:59, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
569:03:39, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
532:05:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
504:05:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
463:05:04, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
426:04:57, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
78:09:47, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
3976:Please do not modify it.
3125:Sure. nary a concern. --
2513:- will be a good admin.
2152:was not intended as such
2129:It's a valid opposition.
1943:He should do just fine.
2140:Apparently not valid. —
1371:secretly already closed
166:Rape in the Bosnian War
38:Please do not modify it
3913:outcome are stricken.
2793:- trustworthy editor.
2630:Add me to the list of
2616:I thought he was one.
2383:. Meets my criteria.
1493:Questions or Comments?
1405:Andromedabluesphere440
3142:A worthy candidate...
2680:The time has come. -
2443:Without reservation.
2048:December21st2012Freak
1774:Welcome back to RfA.
394:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
170:Karađorđevo agreement
34:request for adminship
3354:It's all been said.
1931:A Stop at Willoughby
822:Global contributions
617:Links for Polargeo:
3103:Pine Island Glacier
3101:I remember passing
1927:Pine Island Glacier
1662:You far surpass my
1267:He or she? I think
786:Non-automated edits
599:RfAs for this user:
157:Pine Island Glacier
3824:Yeah, has he used
3419:– what they said.
3280:Operation Big Bear
2254:. Good candidate.
2229:good article work
1461:
765:Edit summary usage
708:before commenting.
39:
3244:Good nom, I like!
3214:
3083:
3043:
2848:
2828:
2824:
2818:
2501:Aditya Ex Machina
2357:
2261:
2002:
1587:
1579:
1513:
1497:
1455:
1308:
1038:
934:
835:
834:
407:Look Back Fashion
37:
4006:
3978:
3939:
3933:
3908:If I'd written "
3855:
3853:
3847:
3840:
3833:
3827:
3762:
3719:
3691:
3665:
3660:
3650:
3648:
3642:
3635:
3615:
3536:
3530:
3522:
3519:
3344:
3335:
3316:
3281:
3275:
3262:
3259:
3233:
3228:
3213:
3211:
3200:
3186:
3171:
3166:
3118:
3110:
3073:
3042:
3039:
3024:
3019:
2981:
2966:
2962:
2955:
2939:
2934:
2932:The 888th Avatar
2897:
2865:
2863:
2842:
2827:
2823:
2820:
2816:
2814:
2784:
2668:
2654:
2605:
2600:
2595:
2577:
2572:
2524:
2519:
2503:
2487:
2471:
2466:
2416:
2414:
2412:
2410:
2356:
2354:
2349:
2342:
2298:
2293:
2260:
2258:
2242:
2234:
2180:
2175:
2159:
2154:
2122:
2117:
2114:
2111:
2108:
2105:
2102:
2070:
2065:
2050:
2006:
2003:
1997:
1958:
1952:
1948:
1904:
1895:
1836:
1831:
1789:
1784:
1779:
1763:
1757:
1740:
1708:
1706:
1700:
1693:
1664:RfA expectations
1635:
1629:
1593:
1591:
1585:
1583:
1577:
1575:
1556:
1541:
1535:
1532:
1529:
1514:
1511:
1507:
1494:
1489:
1487:
1484:
1481:
1478:
1459:
1439:Kevin Rutherford
1394:
1389:
1381:
1373:
1334:
1329:
1307:
1305:
1294:
1283:
1278:
1260:
1251:
1226:
1224:
1219:
1205:
1203:
1198:
1186:
1172:
1166:
1149:
1144:
1127:
1121:
1113:
1110:
1067:
1061:
1055:
1037:
1035:
1024:
990:Emphatic support
978:
955:
951:
946:
927:
916:
781:Articles created
741:
734:
727:
718:
691:
683:
642:
595:General comments
564:
270:
265:
60:
57:
4014:
4013:
4009:
4008:
4007:
4005:
4004:
4003:
3989:
3988:
3987:
3981:this nomination
3974:
3937:
3929:
3851:
3845:
3838:
3835:
3831:
3825:
3785:
3760:
3707:
3689:
3663:
3658:
3646:
3640:
3633:
3630:
3613:
3534:
3528:
3520:
3517:
3492:
3426:
3390:Walter Siegmund
3338:
3329:
3314:
3283:
3279:
3269:
3257:
3245:
3231:
3226:
3209:
3201:
3184:
3169:
3163:Lord Spongefrog
3161:
3114:
3108:
3037:
3022:
3017:
2987:
2977:
2965:
2960:
2953:
2950:
2937:
2930:
2895:
2861:
2859:
2821:
2812:
2780:
2666:
2650:
2603:
2598:
2593:
2575:
2570:
2536:per the crowd.
2522:
2517:
2499:
2485:
2467:
2462:
2408:
2406:
2404:
2402:
2352:
2345:
2343:
2324:Sure, why not.
2294:
2289:
2256:
2240:
2232:
2182:
2178:
2173:
2157:
2150:
2115:
2112:
2109:
2106:
2103:
2100:
2098:
2068:
2063:
2046:
2001:
1996:
1993:
1990:
1956:
1950:
1946:
1906:
1902:
1893:
1834:
1829:
1787:
1782:
1777:
1761:
1755:
1736:
1704:
1698:
1691:
1688:
1633:
1625:
1589:
1581:
1573:
1571:
1554:
1539:
1533:
1530:
1527:
1510:
1505:
1492:
1485:
1482:
1479:
1476:
1457:
1385:
1377:
1375:
1369:
1357:
1332:
1324:
1303:
1295:
1281:
1273:
1254:
1249:
1222:
1217:
1215:
1201:
1196:
1194:
1184:
1170:
1162:
1151:
1147:
1142:
1125:
1119:
1111:
1108:
1065:
1062:
1059:
1056:
1053:
1050:
1033:
1025:
976:
953:
949:
944:
904:
845:
836:
831:
805:
769:
748:
747:RfA/RfB toolbox
745:
715:
687:
635:
618:
614:
597:
562:
488:Jeffrey Epstein
401:In editing the
268:
260:
123:
91:
55:
52:
50:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
4012:
4010:
4002:
4001:
3991:
3990:
3986:
3985:
3970:
3969:
3968:
3967:
3966:
3965:
3964:
3963:
3962:
3961:
3960:
3959:
3958:
3897:
3896:
3895:
3894:
3893:
3892:
3891:
3890:
3889:
3888:
3784:
3781:
3780:
3779:
3751:
3734:
3733:
3732:
3731:
3730:
3729:
3728:
3727:
3726:
3725:
3724:
3627:
3599:
3598:
3597:
3596:
3595:
3594:
3593:
3491:
3488:
3487:
3486:
3463:
3454:
3431:
3424:
3414:
3398:
3383:
3366:
3349:
3322:
3305:neither do I.
3300:
3287:
3277:
3266:
3239:
3218:
3194:
3176:
3154:
3137:
3123:
3099:
3087:
3064:
3047:
3029:
3010:
2993:
2985:
2970:
2957:
2947:Strong support
2944:
2923:
2906:
2886:
2869:
2852:
2833:
2805:
2788:
2774:
2757:
2740:
2723:
2709:
2692:
2675:
2659:
2646:
2628:
2611:
2588:. Definitely.
2583:
2562:
2545:
2531:
2508:
2492:
2478:
2455:
2438:
2421:
2395:
2378:
2361:
2336:
2322:
2305:
2282:
2265:
2249:
2224:
2223:
2222:
2221:
2220:
2219:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2171:
2168:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2138:
2075:
2056:
2039:
2027:
2010:
1999:
1994:
1984:
1964:
1941:
1919:
1910:
1900:
1886:Strong Support
1883:
1867:- fully meets
1862:
1841:
1823:
1809:
1795:
1769:
1745:
1729:
1712:
1682:
1657:
1640:
1614:
1597:
1566:
1546:
1522:Strong support
1519:
1501:
1467:
1449:
1432:
1415:
1398:
1361:
1353:
1339:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1244:
1230:
1209:
1191:
1177:
1155:
1140:
1133:
1099:
1082:
1063:
1057:
1051:
1042:
1021:
1004:
987:
971:
960:
938:
921:
897:
887:Bradjamesbrown
880:
866:Strong support
863:
844:
841:
840:
839:
833:
832:
830:
829:
824:
819:
813:
811:
807:
806:
804:
803:
798:
793:
788:
783:
777:
775:
771:
770:
768:
767:
762:
756:
754:
750:
749:
746:
744:
743:
736:
729:
721:
714:
711:
697:
696:
695:
693:
684:
613:
612:
611:
606:
598:
596:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
544:
542:NuclearWarfare
537:
536:
535:
534:
509:
508:
507:
506:
468:
467:
466:
465:
431:
430:
429:
428:
396:
389:
388:
387:
386:
359:
358:
357:
328:
321:
320:
319:
318:
284:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
231:
227:
226:
225:
224:
200:
196:
195:
194:
193:
190:please go away
176:
175:
174:
173:
143:
142:
141:
140:
122:
119:
90:
87:
85:
49:
44:
43:
42:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4011:
4000:
3997:
3996:
3994:
3984:
3982:
3977:
3971:
3957:
3953:
3949:
3945:
3944:
3943:
3940:
3934:
3932:
3926:
3925:
3924:
3920:
3916:
3911:
3907:
3906:
3905:
3904:
3903:
3902:
3901:
3900:
3899:
3898:
3887:
3883:
3879:
3875:
3874:
3873:
3869:
3865:
3860:
3859:
3858:
3854:
3849:
3848:
3842:
3841:
3830:
3823:
3822:
3821:
3817:
3813:
3809:
3808:
3807:
3806:
3805:
3804:
3800:
3796:
3792:
3789:
3782:
3778:
3775:
3773:
3769:
3764:
3763:
3755:
3752:
3750:
3746:
3742:
3738:
3735:
3723:
3720:
3718:
3714:
3710:
3704:
3703:
3702:
3699:
3698:
3697:
3693:
3692:
3685:
3684:
3683:
3679:
3675:
3671:
3670:
3669:
3666:
3661:
3655:
3654:
3653:
3649:
3644:
3643:
3637:
3636:
3628:
3626:
3623:
3622:
3621:
3617:
3616:
3609:
3605:
3604:
3600:
3592:
3589:
3588:
3585:
3582:
3575:
3574:
3573:
3569:
3565:
3561:
3560:
3559:
3556:
3553:
3550:
3547:
3543:
3542:
3541:
3537:
3531:
3525:
3524:
3523:
3511:
3510:
3509:
3505:
3501:
3497:
3494:
3493:
3489:
3485:
3484:
3480:
3477:
3474:
3470:
3468:
3464:
3462:
3459:
3455:
3453:
3449:
3446:
3443:
3439:
3435:
3432:
3430:
3427:
3421:
3418:
3415:
3413:
3410:
3407:
3402:
3399:
3397:
3394:
3391:
3387:
3384:
3382:
3378:
3374:
3370:
3367:
3365:
3361:
3357:
3353:
3350:
3348:
3345:
3343:
3342:
3336:
3334:
3333:
3326:
3323:
3321:
3318:
3317:
3310:
3309:
3304:
3301:
3298:
3295:
3291:
3288:
3286:
3282:
3276:
3274:
3273:
3267:
3265:
3260:
3254:
3253:
3251:
3243:
3240:
3238:
3235:
3234:
3229:
3222:
3219:
3217:
3212:
3206:
3205:
3198:
3195:
3193:
3190:
3187:
3180:
3177:
3175:
3172:
3167:
3164:
3158:
3155:
3153:
3149:
3145:
3141:
3138:
3136:
3132:
3128:
3124:
3122:
3119:
3117:
3112:
3111:
3104:
3100:
3098:
3095:
3091:
3088:
3086:
3081:
3077:
3072:
3068:
3065:
3063:
3059:
3055:
3051:
3048:
3046:
3041:
3040:
3033:
3030:
3028:
3025:
3020:
3014:
3011:
3009:
3005:
3001:
2997:
2994:
2992:
2989:
2988:
2982:
2980:
2974:
2971:
2969:
2963:
2956:
2948:
2945:
2943:
2940:
2935:
2933:
2927:
2924:
2922:
2918:
2914:
2910:
2907:
2905:
2902:
2900:
2899:
2898:
2890:
2887:
2885:
2881:
2877:
2873:
2870:
2868:
2864:
2856:
2853:
2851:
2846:
2841:
2837:
2834:
2832:
2829:
2825:
2815:
2809:
2806:
2804:
2800:
2796:
2792:
2789:
2787:
2783:
2778:
2775:
2773:
2769:
2765:
2761:
2758:
2756:
2752:
2748:
2744:
2741:
2739:
2735:
2731:
2727:
2724:
2722:
2718:
2714:
2710:
2708:
2704:
2700:
2696:
2693:
2691:
2687:
2683:
2679:
2676:
2674:
2671:
2669:
2663:
2660:
2658:
2655:
2653:
2647:
2645:
2641:
2637:
2633:
2629:
2627:
2623:
2619:
2615:
2612:
2610:
2606:
2601:
2596:
2591:
2587:
2584:
2582:
2579:
2578:
2573:
2566:
2563:
2561:
2557:
2553:
2549:
2546:
2544:
2541:
2540:
2535:
2532:
2530:
2527:
2526:
2525:
2520:
2512:
2509:
2507:
2504:
2502:
2496:
2493:
2491:
2488:
2482:
2479:
2477:
2474:
2472:
2470:
2465:
2459:
2456:
2454:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2439:
2437:
2433:
2429:
2425:
2422:
2420:
2417:
2399:
2396:
2394:
2390:
2386:
2382:
2379:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2365:
2362:
2360:
2355:
2350:
2348:
2340:
2337:
2335:
2331:
2327:
2323:
2321:
2317:
2313:
2309:
2306:
2304:
2301:
2299:
2297:
2292:
2286:
2283:
2281:
2277:
2273:
2269:
2266:
2264:
2259:
2253:
2250:
2248:
2244:
2243:
2236:
2235:
2228:
2225:
2215:
2211:
2207:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2197:
2193:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2181:
2176:
2169:
2163:
2160:
2153:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2143:
2139:
2137:
2134:
2130:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2121:
2118:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2082:
2079:
2076:
2074:
2071:
2066:
2060:
2057:
2055:
2051:
2049:
2043:
2040:
2038:
2035:
2031:
2028:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2014:
2011:
2009:
2005:
2004:
1989:. Why not? -
1988:
1985:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1972:
1968:
1965:
1963:
1959:
1953:
1949:
1942:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1928:
1923:
1920:
1918:
1915:
1911:
1909:
1905:
1903:Contributions
1898:
1897:
1896:
1887:
1884:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1863:
1861:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1842:
1840:
1837:
1832:
1827:
1824:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1810:
1808:
1804:
1800:
1796:
1794:
1791:
1790:
1785:
1780:
1773:
1770:
1768:
1765:
1764:
1759:
1758:
1749:
1746:
1744:
1741:
1739:
1738:White Shadows
1733:
1730:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1713:
1711:
1707:
1702:
1701:
1695:
1694:
1686:
1683:
1681:
1678:
1675:
1672:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1647:Laurinavicius
1644:
1641:
1639:
1636:
1630:
1628:
1622:
1618:
1615:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1598:
1596:
1592:
1584:
1576:
1570:
1567:
1565:
1562:
1561:
1558:
1557:
1550:
1547:
1545:
1542:
1537:
1536:
1523:
1520:
1518:
1515:
1508:
1502:
1500:
1495:
1488:
1473:
1472:
1468:
1466:
1463:
1460:
1453:
1450:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1433:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1416:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1393:
1390:
1388:
1382:
1380:
1372:
1367:
1366:
1362:
1360:
1356:
1355:Contributions
1351:
1350:
1349:
1343:
1340:
1338:
1335:
1330:
1328:
1320:
1317:
1311:
1306:
1300:
1299:
1292:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1284:
1279:
1277:
1270:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1261:
1259:
1258:
1252:
1245:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1229:
1225:
1220:
1213:
1210:
1208:
1204:
1199:
1192:
1190:
1187:
1181:
1178:
1176:
1173:
1167:
1165:
1159:
1156:
1154:
1150:
1145:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1128:
1122:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1103:
1100:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1083:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1068:
1046:
1043:
1041:
1036:
1030:
1029:
1022:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1005:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
988:
986:
983:
980:
979:
972:
970:
966:
961:
959:
956:
952:
947:
939:
937:
933:
930:
926:
922:
920:
917:
915:
911:
907:
901:
898:
896:
892:
888:
884:
881:
879:
875:
871:
867:
864:
862:
858:
854:
850:
847:
846:
842:
838:
837:
828:
825:
823:
820:
818:
815:
814:
812:
808:
802:
799:
797:
794:
792:
789:
787:
784:
782:
779:
778:
776:
772:
766:
763:
761:
758:
757:
755:
751:
742:
737:
735:
730:
728:
723:
722:
719:
712:
710:
709:
707:
703:
694:
690:
685:
681:
678:
675:
672:
669:
666:
663:
660:
657:
654:
651:
648:
645:
641:
638:
634:
631:
628:
625:
621:
616:
615:
610:
607:
605:
602:
594:
588:
584:
580:
575:
572:
571:
570:
567:
565:
558:
557:
552:
548:
545:
543:
539:
538:
533:
529:
525:
521:
518:
517:
514:
511:
510:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
484:
481:
480:
478:
473:
470:
469:
464:
460:
456:
452:
447:
444:
443:
440:
436:
433:
432:
427:
423:
419:
414:
411:
410:
408:
404:
400:
397:
395:
391:
390:
385:
381:
377:
372:
369:
368:
367:
363:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
339:
336:
335:
332:
329:
327:
323:
322:
317:
313:
309:
304:
300:
295:
292:
291:
288:
285:
282:
281:
274:
271:
266:
264:
257:
256:
255:
251:
247:
242:
239:
238:
235:
232:
229:
228:
223:
219:
215:
210:
207:
206:
204:
201:
198:
197:
191:
187:
184:
183:
181:
178:
177:
171:
167:
163:
158:
154:
151:
150:
148:
145:
144:
137:
134:
133:
131:
128:
127:
126:
120:
118:
117:
113:
109:
105:
102:
99:
95:
88:
86:
83:
82:
79:
75:
71:
66:
64:
59:
58:
48:
45:
41:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
3975:
3972:
3930:
3909:
3844:
3837:
3790:
3787:
3786:
3765:
3758:
3753:
3736:
3716:
3712:
3708:
3696:
3694:
3687:
3639:
3632:
3620:
3618:
3611:
3602:
3601:
3578:
3515:
3514:
3495:
3481:
3465:
3444:
3433:
3416:
3400:
3385:
3368:
3351:
3340:
3339:
3331:
3330:
3324:
3313:
3307:
3302:
3289:
3271:
3270:
3249:
3248:
3241:
3224:
3220:
3203:
3196:
3178:
3162:
3156:
3139:
3115:
3106:
3089:
3066:
3049:
3035:
3031:
2995:
2984:
2978:
2972:
2946:
2931:
2925:
2908:
2893:
2892:
2888:
2871:
2854:
2835:
2807:
2790:
2776:
2759:
2742:
2725:
2697:Not insane.
2694:
2677:
2661:
2651:
2631:
2618:Doc Quintana
2613:
2585:
2568:
2564:
2547:
2538:
2533:
2515:
2514:
2510:
2500:
2494:
2483:Shows clue.
2480:
2468:
2463:
2457:
2440:
2423:
2397:
2380:
2363:
2346:
2338:
2310:Seems fine.
2307:
2295:
2290:
2284:
2267:
2251:
2238:
2233:YellowMonkey
2230:
2226:
2128:
2077:
2061:Looks good.
2058:
2047:
2041:
2029:
2012:
1991:
1986:
1966:
1945:
1921:
1890:
1889:
1885:
1869:my standards
1864:
1843:
1825:
1775:
1771:
1752:
1751:
1747:
1737:
1731:
1714:
1697:
1690:
1684:
1659:
1642:
1626:
1621:WP:RIGHTNOW!
1616:
1599:
1568:
1559:
1552:
1548:
1525:
1521:
1469:
1451:
1434:
1417:
1400:
1386:
1378:
1365:nihil obstat
1363:
1346:
1345:
1341:
1333:said Zebedee
1326:
1318:
1297:
1282:said Zebedee
1275:
1256:
1255:
1211:
1179:
1163:
1157:
1135:
1106:
1105:
1101:
1084:
1048:
1044:
1027:
1006:
989:
977:Juliancolton
974:
965:push to talk
942:
913:
909:
905:
899:
882:
870:FeydHuxtable
865:
848:
699:
698:
676:
670:
664:
658:
652:
646:
639:
632:
626:
573:
559:
555:
546:
519:
512:
491:
482:
471:
450:
445:
434:
412:
403:Alina Puscau
398:
370:
361:
343:Alina Puscau
337:
330:
302:
293:
286:
269:said Zebedee
262:
240:
233:
208:
202:
185:
179:
152:
146:
135:
129:
124:
100:
92:
84:
80:
67:
53:
51:
46:
30:
28:
3948:Newyorkbrad
3931:HJ Mitchell
3878:Killiondude
3864:Newyorkbrad
3741:Cube lurker
3659:Airplaneman
3356:Graham Colm
3185:Gordonrox24
3144:Smallman12q
3127:RegentsPark
3069:- why not?
3000:Patriot8790
2711:Per Boris.
2017:Majoreditor
1947:Master&
1830:Airplaneman
1813:Newyorkbrad
1627:HJ Mitchell
1604:Mkativerata
827:User rights
817:CentralAuth
366:T:cite_news
162:ice shelves
3690:Balloonman
3614:Balloonman
3054:Tryptofish
3038:Aaroncrick
2795:PhilKnight
2552:Nikkimaria
2272:Shadowjams
2257:SlimVirgin
1422:Mike Cline
1218:SPhilbrick
1185:King Öomie
810:Cross-wiki
801:AfD closes
713:Discussion
299:WP:NFC#UUI
89:Nomination
81:Successful
31:successful
3829:book-prod
3458:Acalamari
3294:Lankiveil
3272:Wizardman
3071:Connormah
3013:Congrats!
2876:Modernist
2764:Gonzonoir
2713:Guettarda
2445:Hipocrite
2347:Cargoking
2179:cierekim
1974:Midhart90
1852:Buggie111
1574:The Thing
1379:delirious
1269:the beard
1148:cierekim
1072:✉ message
796:AfD votes
791:BLP edits
662:block log
63:talk page
3993:Category
3761:Kraftlos
3546:The High
3535:contribs
3448:contribs
3438:Casliber
3204:Kanonkas
3080:contribs
2954:PRODUCER
2862:DIREKTOR
2730:Awickert
2682:Ret.Prof
2678:Support:
2385:Lambanog
2158:Amalthea
2064:Bejinhan
2034:Jusdafax
1971:WHY NOT?
1799:Tim Song
1719:Jclemens
1668:The High
1590:Contribs
1555:Schmidt,
1348:3 ¢ soap
1126:contribs
954:Chequers
774:Analysis
753:Counters
630:contribs
620:Polargeo
579:Polargeo
524:Polargeo
496:Polargeo
455:Polargeo
418:Polargeo
376:Polargeo
347:Polargeo
326:Lambanog
308:Polargeo
246:Polargeo
214:Polargeo
108:Polargeo
104:contribs
94:Polargeo
47:Polargeo
3812:Wehwalt
3791:Neutral
3783:Neutral
3772:Contrib
3518:Phantom
3467:Support
3434:Support
3417:Support
3401:Support
3386:Support
3369:Support
3352:Support
3325:Support
3303:Support
3290:Support
3242:Support
3221:Support
3197:Support
3179:Support
3157:Support
3140:Support
3090:Support
3067:Support
3050:Support
3032:Support
2996:Support
2973:Support
2926:Support
2913:Hokeman
2909:Support
2889:Support
2872:Support
2855:Support
2836:Support
2808:Support
2791:Support
2777:Support
2760:Support
2743:Support
2726:Support
2695:Support
2662:Support
2632:support
2614:Support
2590:King of
2586:Support
2565:Support
2548:Support
2534:Support
2511:Support
2495:Support
2486:AniMate
2481:Support
2464:Crohnie
2458:Support
2441:Support
2424:Support
2398:Support
2381:Support
2364:Support
2339:Support
2308:Support
2285:Support
2268:Support
2252:Support
2227:Support
2078:Support
2059:Support
2042:Support
2030:Support
2013:Support
1987:Support
1967:Support
1922:Support
1873:Bearian
1865:Support
1844:Support
1826:Support
1772:Support
1756:Ledgend
1748:Support
1732:Support
1715:Support
1685:Support
1660:Support
1643:Support
1617:Support
1600:Support
1569:Support
1549:Support
1471:Support
1452:Support
1435:Support
1418:Support
1401:Support
1342:Support
1319:Support
1234:Jafeluv
1212:Support
1180:Support
1158:Support
1136:Support
1109:Phantom
1102:Support
1085:Support
1076:changes
1045:Support
1007:Support
900:Support
883:Support
853:Wehwalt
849:Support
843:Support
637:deleted
451:instead
3910:Oppose
3754:Oppose
3737:Oppose
3603:Oppose
3564:Crafty
3500:Crafty
3496:Oppose
3490:Oppose
3425:piggle
3393:(talk)
3341:Waters
3332:Calmer
3308:Valley
3182:god.--
3094:Jayjg
2938:(talk)
2896:SKATER
2782:Tadija
2747:Taelus
2539:Ks0stm
2326:Stifle
2296:orenti
1998:ASTILY
1951:Expert
1848:WT:RFA
1383:&
1089:Warrah
1060:CIENCE
994:Orlady
760:XTools
477:WP:BLP
3915:Gurch
3846:comms
3839:fetch
3795:Gurch
3641:comms
3634:fetch
3555:Whale
3552:Sperm
3521:Steve
3210:Talk
3109:ceran
3023:fisto
3018:Menti
2845:cont.
2813:Marek
2353:talk
2312:Hobit
2206:Atmoz
2085:Atmoz
1894:RP459
1788:Space
1762:Gamer
1699:comms
1692:fetch
1677:Whale
1674:Sperm
1325:Boing
1304:Chat
1298:Pedro
1274:Boing
1197:Aiken
1112:Steve
1034:Chat
1028:Pedro
1011:Nsk92
950:Spiel
702:civil
644:count
492:right
261:Boing
16:<
3952:talk
3919:talk
3882:talk
3868:talk
3816:talk
3799:talk
3768:Talk
3745:talk
3678:talk
3568:talk
3529:talk
3504:talk
3442:talk
3409:Suro
3406:Satu
3377:talk
3360:talk
3315:city
3258:Talk
3148:talk
3131:talk
3116:thor
3076:talk
3058:talk
3004:talk
2979:Reyk
2961:TALK
2917:talk
2880:talk
2799:talk
2768:talk
2751:talk
2734:talk
2717:talk
2703:talk
2686:talk
2640:talk
2622:talk
2556:talk
2518:Rami
2449:talk
2432:talk
2389:talk
2372:talk
2368:Gigs
2330:talk
2316:talk
2276:talk
2210:talk
2196:talk
2174:Dloh
2142:Dark
2133:Dark
2120:chat
2089:talk
2069:Talk
2021:talk
2000:sock
1978:talk
1969:per
1957:Talk
1935:talk
1914:Dark
1877:talk
1856:talk
1817:talk
1803:talk
1783:From
1778:Them
1723:talk
1666:. --
1651:talk
1619:per
1608:talk
1582:Talk
1443:talk
1426:talk
1409:talk
1387:lost
1238:talk
1143:Dloh
1120:talk
1093:talk
1054:ERDY
1015:talk
998:talk
945:Ϣere
891:talk
874:talk
857:talk
689:here
674:rfar
656:logs
624:talk
583:talk
563:Talk
528:talk
500:talk
459:talk
437:The
422:talk
380:talk
351:talk
312:talk
250:talk
218:talk
168:and
112:talk
98:talk
74:talk
3549:Fin
3252:oJo
3232:466
3015:--
2986:YO!
2840:2/0
2576:Why
2469:Gal
2428:Rje
2245:)
2149:It
2052:at
1891:--
1671:Fin
1512:Dom
1506:Big
1458:Ray
1250:Ged
1168:|
1164:Tan
1066:UDE
925:edg
680:spi
650:AfD
547:13.
513:12.
472:11.
435:10.
3995::
3954:)
3935:|
3921:)
3884:)
3870:)
3832:}}
3826:{{
3818:)
3801:)
3770:|
3757:--
3747:)
3680:)
3570:)
3538:\
3506:)
3469:--
3450:)
3379:)
3362:)
3261:•
3255:•
3246:—
3227:JN
3223:--
3207::
3188:|
3150:)
3133:)
3078:|
3060:)
3034:—
3006:)
2951:◅
2919:)
2882:)
2822:69
2801:)
2770:)
2753:)
2736:)
2719:)
2705:)
2688:)
2642:)
2624:)
2607:♠
2571:So
2558:)
2451:)
2434:)
2415:n
2391:)
2374:)
2332:)
2318:)
2278:)
2212:)
2198:)
2091:)
2023:)
1980:)
1960:)
1937:)
1879:)
1858:)
1850:.
1819:)
1805:)
1725:)
1653:)
1631:|
1610:)
1586://
1578://
1531:am
1528:At
1486:ik
1477:Sh
1445:)
1428:)
1411:)
1391:☯
1374:.
1301::
1257:UK
1240:)
1171:39
1129:\
1095:)
1078:)
1074:•
1031::
1017:)
1009:.
1000:)
981:|
967:)
893:)
876:)
859:)
668:lu
585:)
574:A:
556:NW
530:)
520:A:
502:)
483:A:
479:?
461:)
446:A:
424:)
413:A:
399:9.
382:)
371:A:
362:8.
353:)
338:A:
331:7.
314:)
294:A:
287:6.
252:)
241:A:
234:5.
220:)
209:A:
203:4.
186:A:
180:3.
153:A:
147:2.
136:A:
130:1.
114:)
76:)
65:)
36:.
3950:(
3917:(
3880:(
3866:(
3852:☛
3814:(
3797:(
3788:#
3774:)
3766:(
3743:(
3717:a
3715:c
3713:z
3711:a
3709:m
3676:(
3664:✈
3647:☛
3587:W
3584:P
3581:T
3579:~
3566:(
3532:|
3526:/
3502:(
3479:W
3476:P
3473:T
3471:~
3445:·
3440:(
3422:∙
3375:(
3358:(
3311:2
3299:.
3250:J
3165:,
3146:(
3129:(
3082:)
3074:(
3056:(
3002:(
2964:)
2958:(
2915:(
2878:(
2847:)
2843:(
2817:.
2797:(
2766:(
2749:(
2732:(
2715:(
2701:(
2684:(
2667:œ
2652:7
2638:(
2620:(
2604:♣
2599:♦
2594:♥
2554:(
2523:R
2447:(
2430:(
2413:o
2411:j
2409:k
2407:r
2405:a
2403:B
2387:(
2370:(
2328:(
2314:(
2291:F
2274:(
2237:(
2208:(
2194:(
2131:—
2116:3
2113:8
2110:F
2107:J
2104:T
2101:C
2087:(
2083:-
2019:(
1995:F
1976:(
1954:(
1933:(
1912:—
1899:/
1875:(
1854:(
1835:✈
1815:(
1801:(
1753:—
1721:(
1705:☛
1649:(
1606:(
1540:頭
1534:a
1496:)
1490:(
1483:r
1480:i
1441:(
1424:(
1407:(
1352:/
1327:!
1276:!
1236:(
1223:T
1202:♫
1123:|
1117:/
1091:(
1070:(
1064:D
1058:S
1052:N
1013:(
996:(
963:(
932:☭
929:☺
914:a
912:c
910:z
908:a
906:m
889:(
872:(
855:(
740:e
733:t
726:v
692:.
682:)
677:·
671:·
665:·
659:·
653:·
647:·
640:·
633:·
627:·
622:(
581:(
566:)
560:(
526:(
498:(
457:(
420:(
378:(
349:(
341:(
310:(
263:!
248:(
216:(
172:.
110:(
101:·
96:(
72:(
61:(
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.