1762:. When I went to his talk page to ask him to stop deleting my talk page comments, he told me he was doing it because Kyereh was blocked before I left the message (he wasn't, he was blocked a few minutes after), but IMO this is completely beside the point. I cannot see any reason to repeatedly delete, from another person's talk page, a non-vandalism, non-disruptive message that has been left by another editor. Forget that I was leaving Kyereh a warning as an administrator, it's not appropriate to do that to any editor: new, established, admin, whatever. Apparently Jimmy has also had some queries about Ryulong's practice of deleting inoffensive comments from other people's talk pages.
2202:. Ryulong appears to have trouble with the distinction between what is blatant vandalism and what is simply inappropriate experimentation. I watch AIV regularly, and I have seen too many instances of Ryulong reporting users who have stopped after a test1, or sometimes with no warnings at all, to be comfortable with the tools in his hands. I would fear for the welfare of our newbies were he to have the ability to block users; being blocked as a vandalism-only account after adding "asdfghjkl" to an article once really doesn't send the message we want. He is simply too trigger-happy for me to support at this time. --
482:, where you removed a section where the last post was only ten minutes before you posted (as far as I can tell, you didn't reply or give any reason why you didn't feel it merited a response). One of the subjects was your RfA, which will surely be a current issue for a while yet. Why do you feel the need to archive so quickly, and would you consider changing this practice? My 'oppose' position is not going to be shifted by the answer to this question, but I would still be very pleased to support you in a future RfA, so I would be interested in your answer. --
2066:
of warnings, or they haven't vandalized after their last warning. It always appeared that you were just inflating your edit count with unnecessary reports to AIV, that are just holding us back from working on other projects. Sorry if I sound a bit harsh, but I really can't support someone who I think would probably do unreasonable bans and start edit wars with other users. We just can't have an admin who will probably block in excess and block users unreasonably.
83:, over fifteen thousand of which are mainspace. He is also a very personable person who is able to make quick decisions when needed. He is also well respected both on Knowledge and also the Knowledge IRC. He is a vandal-fighter, an intelligent user, and a definite good person. I'd feel much safer with him as a sysop. I'm also quite sure he wouldn't abuse the tools in any way. ~
2178:. A good administrator isn't determined by the number of edits and reverts, but by wisdom and knowledge. I am not convinced that this candidate has demonstrated the wisdom and knowledge that administrators should exhibit. Instead, the evidence above tells me that his enthusiasm for reverting vandals will be directed to blocking newbies for minor infractions. -
1896:, as pointed out by others, clearly shows that even recently and certainly post-RFA he is still trigger-happy in labeling vandalism where there is no clear vandalism present. We do need vandal fighters, but part of the fight is to know the difference between good faith edits and vandalism, and certainly an admin candidate would be expected to know that.
870:. You've done good work. I hope you register for recall tho. You don't have to answer that - I am not interested in strongarming you or whatever, but obviously there were serious concerns about aberrational edits leading to a risk of administrative abuse, so it would make a lot of people sleep easier if you did. Good luck. -
1892:. I was really eager to post a Support vote, per my promise at the last RFA, after hopefully seeing that Ryulong got the message about what is vandalism and what is not. As a vandal fighter, that is one critical point I would hope he could grasp, certainly after a failed RFA for that very reason. Unfortunately, reading
1794:
that he had nothing more to say on the matter. I appreciate and acknowledge
Ryulong's hard work, but Adminship isn't a reward. I would like to support Ryulong in the future, but most of these incidents have happened in the last month or so and are just too recent for me to feel comfortable supporting at this time.
1710:. I have too many concerns about Ryulong's trigger-happiness, and that counts double given the Javascript speed-reverting tools he uses (trigger-happiness can cause even more damage when you have a General Electric minigun). I was especially concerned when Ryulong reported an anon in mid-September for
1490:
tag to a newbie for switching "s" to "z". For a new user, these sorts of things are common and this appears too aggressive. Sometimes when you are an admin, you may face strong dissent, so I am a bit worried about where you might be too authoritarian. Generally, this wouldn't bother me that much, but
444:
I would look at the overall layout of the article (if it's wikified, or if its just a mass of text because its a new user who doesn't know about formatting) and then I would try to read the article (if it is in any way legible). If it fails these criteria, I would try a Google search for the company.
423:
The only situation where I can see that a punitive block be applied is the evasion of a block through sockpuppetry (such as to continue to violate 3RR), but I think that's still a preventative block (other than reinstating the block performed on the original violator of 3RR). Other than that, I would
1793:
and I think an apology and retraction was warranted, but it wasn't forthcoming, though
Ryulong did consent to Romtobbi removing the warning himself ("If Romtobbi wants, he can get rid of the message. I can't do anything after the fact"), then four minutes later Ryulong archived the discussion saying
2065:
You are a fantastic user and an even better vandal fighter, but I can not support you because of your AIV requests. I have blocked a few hundred vandals in my time as admin, and I see that you usually report a good deal of the vandals to AIV. However, most of them do not even have the proper amount
1908:
per Sam
Blanning and Sarah Ewart. Sorry to say that the above comments indicate Ryulong is (at least sometimes) both a newbie-biter, and unduly argumentative with established users. In my view, that sort of harshness is an automatic disqualifier for mophood. I hope candidate's temperment mellows
310:
Well, the Steve Irwin revert, at the time, was based on the proximity to the actual event of his death, which I was not sure of the actual reliability of the statement. Where I may have given him a bv, I more than likely should have asked him to provide information or (if I knew that it was false)
1550:
Rapid edits in very short period. I feel everyone should get a hang of
Knowledge b4 becoming admin. 30000 edits may translate to an editing spree rather than understanding the processes involved in Knowledge. Too much adrenaline. I won't last long. I suggest more time. If it had been 5000 - 6000
279:
A number of users have voiced concerns about you having been a bit too trigger-happy with vandalism accusations in the past. I appreciate that among the sheer volume of vandal reverts you do, the occasional mistake is unavoidable. But could you nevertheless comment on what your understanding of
212:
and other
Japanese television programs (and their English derivatives) to keep the articles as free of unencyclopedic trivia as possible, as well as my plans to start up a WikiProject in this area of interest, that I know of a handful of editors to assist me with in building up, and keeping it
265:
When I get into conflicts, I try to separate myself from
Knowledge for a period of time and just listen to music or surf the web away from the Wiki. Usually, once I'm done with my massive playlist, I forget why I was stressed in the first place, and I can contribute to the conversations more
494:
The RFA question was posed last night by AuburnPilot, and I also copied the contents of my response to his/her user talk, and the issue with
Bobabobabo was dealt with three times over with the sockpuppetry. I usually don't archive as quickly, but I did not feel a need to really to reply to
2117:
Ryulong has frequently demonstrated, to me at least, that he lumps together new user test and blatant vandalism and treats them all the same, fails to understand that blocks are preventive in nature and not to punish someone and frequently requests blocks that do not have sound reasoning
2326:— Ryulong is a great vandalfighter (and we always need those) and has an astonishing edit count. But unfortunately, I share the concerns of the many people above that his standards for judging edits for being vandalism or not are truly draconian. You must really embrace
1723:"Senator Raymond A. Meier brings extensive private and public sector experience to his service in the Senate... Meier has served as a leader in promoting economic development initiatives and job growth opportunities... A widely respected member of the Republican party"
1457:
where other users point this out. The page flows pretty well and is a neasy read. It'll take a while dig up the diffs from the talk page and put the links on this page, and my fingers are't working very well. I'll try tomorrow when I'm not working and better rested.
1573:
While it may not change your mind, I would like to point out that a good portion of those 30000 edits are vandalism reversions through RC Patrolling (I know that a few thousand are AIV reports :P). I do have a bulk of my edits fixing up articles (over 400 are to
1743:. I appreciate Ryulong's hard work, but I cannot support. He has a propensity to engage in edit wars with both new and established users and often over issues that seem bizarre. When Giano blanked his talk page, Ryulong began edit warring over restoring it.
1831:
as vandalism only accounts on their first and only edit without even placing a warning at the user's talk page? I could only imagine that these such accounts would be blocked on sight if given admin rights. This report, by the way, was from 10 days ago.
1990:
The evidence other opposer have presented have given me serious pause, indicating you may be a bit too aggrevise in the noble task of vandal fighting. I also am concerned that the number of your edits indicate you may emphasize quantity over quality.--
331:. The Bindi Irwin page is also of a similar situation, it was too close to her father's death, and I was not knowledgeable of the other information (such as in the deletion log or talk page that stated that an article could be made about her). Also, the
2035:: Excellent editcount within a passable 8½-month stay. However, he doesn't always fill in summaries, and his civility issues are cause for concern. There is more to WP than just vandal patrolling, a lot of which he is involved in. --Slgr
1877:) was in favor of keeping that statement.(see talk) I'm sorry to say that I dont think that is the action of a responsible editor let alone Admin. Only after he was badgered/hounded by a user on IRC in front of others that he Rev himself
1683:
leaning to
Neutral — My problem is that there is more to Knowledge then waging a constant war with vandals, I also see numerous instances where you've failed to use an edit summary on edits, annother problem is your approach to newbs.
1780:
article from globalization to globalisation. When
Ryulong dropped the bv template, the IP had (and still to this day has) no history of vandalism and had made only one prior edit and that was a spelling correction (Septemper :
1434:
Would you mind pointing out a few of the instances there? I've been making as much progress as I can on not biting the newbies, and I do remember rescinding a lot of the messages I had given out after I had been notified of my
402:
mean that it would be up to my own discretion to make important decisions, such as deleting something up for XFD if there are maybe 30 delete votes in the span of a day instead of letting the discussion drag on for four more
341:
tagging at the Use of biotech... page is my normal response to a new massive addition through my IRC RC patrolling. I later suggested that the page be wikified or cleaned up after the g1 was removed.—
2415:
I did think he was already an admin - a valiant vandal-fighter whom I would hate to oppose but can't support as yet. I'd say re-apply in Feb-March '07 with marked improvement in conduct/attitude.
1167:. Give the man the mop already—he can only do good things with it. Of course editors are going to make small mistakes every now and then, but that's just a remainder of how we're all human. :-)
424:
perhaps impose a punitive block on an account of intermittent, yet repeated violations of
Knowledge policies (which would be indefinite, until the person returns and requests to be unblocked).
1811:. Frequently posts cases on AIV that should not be blocked; I can only assume that as an admin, he would block them. Archiving his talk page seemingly more than once a day also worries me. —
259:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
1951:. Due to diffs regarding incorrect vandal reporting. Will most probably support you on a future RFA given that you've learned how to be more careful when patrolling. Cheers!
1090:
Let he who has not bitten a single newbie cast the first stone... I don't know, we all get stressed. He's a great vandal fighter, and I think he would benefit from the tools.
184:(which are recently big problems), monitor the XfD logs for discussions in need of closing, as well as continue my efforts in cleaning up vandalism, and clear backlogs at
124:
I am withdrawing this nomination. It is obvious that there are still several flaws in my etiquette on Knowledge that several users have brought up, and I am not ready
2423:
2094:
I am too also concerned with his hostility towards vandals, et al. Great editor, but needs to tone things like this down a bit, such as the premature AIV reports. //
1938:. There are many legitimate, non-trivial opposition reasons by users above, including over a dozen diffs. I am not convinced that admins tools will be used properly.
2438:
519:
147:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
2360:
His dedication to this project is admirable, but the aggressive nature of warning some of the less serious vandals is a concern to me. It is a bit draconian. --
1491:
you appear to be a vandalism specialist, and the non-roundedness would tip things over the bar on the negative side, as I would have liked to see more writing.
2265:- Excellent vandal fighting however I've noticed when RC patrolling with him, he tends to be a bit too draconian. Also reports some users to AIV, then gives a
1510:- Good editor, but after reading through the RFA1 and the talk page archives since then I get the impression that Ryulong's trigger finger is still too twitchy
1419:
shows him to still be overly aggressive and prone to biting newbies just last month. Vandal warnings for newbie mistakes would become blocks with admin tools
2456:
1765:
I'm concerned about his interaction with new people and anons as he has a tendency to use high level warnings when low level ones should be used. He gave
213:
running. To start this, I have been working with editors to try and cut down on the size of various articles by splitting them off into their own pages (
1667:
newbees who made honest mistakes, victims of the googlebar blanking, edits that are not vandalism. I would like to see more thoughful attitude to the
1786:
was deleted, Mike Rosoft posted on the talk page saying that the deletion was without prejudice and a new article could be written. So a new editor,
1295:
Excellent user, I believe that he is responsible enough to be more careful henceforth with the trigger-happiness concerns raised by those opposing.--
2238:. Before seeing this, I was prepared to give full support, and after a little more of my own research, I may return to that position. I'm very much
768:
536:
857:
780:
167:
2130:
I've seen Ryulong on IRC sometimes, and I know he's a good vandal fighter. But the difs and newbie biting would just be not a good thing for the
1248:
1240:
2312:
I was a big supporter of Ryulong's last go at RfA, but the problems highlighted by those opposing his adminship have me a bit too worried. --
1790:, wrote an article and Ryulong promptly redirected it to Steve Irwin and gave Romtobbi a vandalism/nonsense warning. Romtobbi was very upset
1728:. Even less convincing was his suggestion that inappropriate material should remain in Knowledge unless someone finds the time to rewrite it
729:
599:
467:
95:
1116:
628:
and others. I would prefer in the face of this evidence that Ryulong wait at least a few more months and gain a better perspective on when
2301:
1731:. I hope Ryulong continues his vandal-fighting work, but at the moment I think he should be kept one step away from the block button. --
1697:
965:
495:
Bobabobabo, as s/he would have seen my actions on his/her own user talk (reverting threatening edits from the user s/he notified me to).
299:
1725:
etc.) When he did justify his restoration of the material, the reason seemed to be "it's a lot of text" which I don't find convincing
1243:
523:
80:
1663:. Ryulong is a very enthusiastical vandal fighter who saved thousands of articles from defacing. Still he in many cases reported to
818:
2052:
2024:
752:
702:
677:
30:
17:
1281:
649:
159:
2298:
296:
1592:
I agree; in all fairness, Ryu's been around since February of 2006 and is quite active. I'm pretty sure he's here to stay.
1614:
1257:
76:
1996:
370:
226:
2230:
To oppose because of one incorrect vandal template out of 30,000 edits seems to be a fairly extreme position. However,
2231:
2144:
1893:
1575:
1454:
1416:
1185:
853:
776:
667:. Good vandal-fighting skills. Only one snag: please do warn the vandal first before listing on AIV next time. ;) --
2134:. I really hope that you'll take some of the advice from this and your last RFA, and I hope to support next time. -
512:
155:
1828:
per most of what has been said already like Bunchofgrapes' comments directly above me. Reporting users like this
1969:
1617:
when it was downgraded, for example, when it's obvious it'd still end up with the Hurricane prefix). Not good. –
1393:
1346:
1151:
1099:
1005:
930:
723:
593:
546:
461:
230:
89:
1605:
This was a difficult one. You're a great vandalfighter, but sometimes you act before you think (giving in to an
202:
Of your articles or contributions to Knowledge, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
1610:
1557:
1235:
527:
163:
1694:
1816:
1459:
1420:
960:
906:
891:
2140:
1978:
1852:
1194:
1096:
939:
849:
772:
246:
2248:
1799:
1753:
1714:- the removal of some campaign puff from a senator's page. Ryulong used a javascript tool to revert him
1691:
1498:
1302:
1222:
835:
814:
2437:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
2405:
2386:
2373:
2352:
2316:
2304:
2284:
2215:
2194:
2182:
2170:
2149:
2122:
2109:
2086:
2057:
2000:
1982:
1957:
1942:
1930:
1913:
1900:
1884:
1859:
1836:
1820:
1803:
1735:
1702:
1675:
1653:
1624:
1596:
1587:
1568:
1538:
1523:
1502:
1468:
1444:
1429:
1400:
1374:
1353:
1330:
1313:
1287:
1261:
1226:
1209:
1197:
1176:
1159:
1136:
1105:
1079:
1067:
1053:
1031:
1008:
996:
982:
970:
943:
915:
900:
881:
861:
840:
823:
809:
801:
784:
759:
734:
709:
684:
655:
604:
564:
550:
530:
486:
350:
302:
280:
vandalism is, and how it has changed since your last RfA, for instance in light of your contributions
137:
118:
100:
2048:
2020:
2012:
1846:
1766:
1732:
1535:
1520:
1383:
1336:
1146:
991:
877:
744:
718:
694:
669:
588:
542:
483:
457:
84:
1833:
1721:(the third time he did manage to use an edit summary). (Sample of the material restored by Ryulong:
2362:
2210:
2079:
2036:
1952:
1925:
1782:
September). If he listed this at AIV, would he have blocked this user if he had the tools??? After
1493:
1388:
1341:
1275:
1218:
1156:
804:
645:
632:
to use the tools; still, I remain (barely) in this column as I do not see the editor intentionally
2416:
2371:
2103:
1812:
1672:
1206:
1172:
1063:
955:
242:
2234:
does show several cases of non-vandal activity being labeled vandalism, as well as a few newbie
2191:
2155:
1639:
B) The MoS for tropical cyclone articles that they remain at the name at their highest strength.
1028:
1018:
434:
What criteria do you use to determine whether or not a business article should be deleted under
1251:
292:(which was in reference to a page that had been previously speedied under G5). Also, this edit
2401:
2342:
2135:
1974:
1966:
1939:
1867:. Sorry, but few hours ago he went into a contriversial article and re-inserted a wrong quote
1649:
1606:
1583:
1531:
1519:
aren't a big issue for a normal editor, but they are pretty much unacceptable for an admin. ~
1440:
1190:
1182:
1133:
1092:
935:
927:
610:
I see this one daily; strong vandal-fighter, very little by way of error (and even then, it's
560:
346:
133:
114:
70:
1578:) and the edit counter linked above does show that my significant article edits are focused.—
2243:
1795:
1621:
1593:
1551:
edits in such a short time, I'd have supported. I'm sorry, but I have to oppose. Cheers. --
1369:
1307:
1076:
832:
625:
364:
2345:
2313:
2163:
2044:
2016:
1041:
872:
325:
2382:
2331:
2235:
2203:
2067:
1562:
1552:
1326:
1269:
979:
641:
541:
I would suggest you use edit summaries a bit more often. If you don't mind, of course.
399:
386:
335:
315:
222:
2450:
2367:
2327:
2179:
2095:
1881:
1787:
1777:
1668:
1664:
1169:
664:
611:
446:
435:
395:
382:
185:
1880:
I'm afraid that as an admin he may abuse his powers to push his POV into articles.
478:
Others have raised the issue of how quickly you archive, and I particularly noticed
2397:
2339:
2322:
1897:
1645:
1579:
1516:
1436:
556:
508:
414:
342:
209:
129:
110:
66:
1791:
1144:. As usual, I always support vandal fighters, as they need the tools VERY MUCH --
445:
If it passes that criteria, I'd tag it with a clean-up tag. If it fails, it goes
2269:
1992:
1922:
1873:
He simply did that, it would seem to push this own POV, even tho only 1 person (
1783:
1618:
1484:
1364:
1297:
360:
2431:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2281:
2119:
1910:
1874:
1004:- Positive contributor, good judgement of late. Summon a mop for Halloween!
214:
56:
1061:, Knowledge would benefit greatly from this user gaining the mop and bucket.
2131:
1322:
234:
218:
742:
I know that. I'm just too lazy to type backspace on the address bar. :P --
295:
pointed out by trialsanderrors might warrant some comment, if you could.
181:
1129:
717:
It's not too hard to find...it's the same link, only without the 2. ~
238:
177:
1871:
2441:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
154:
What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out
1132:
RYULONG!!! BURNINATING THE CRUFT!!! BURNINATING THE VANDALS!!! --
1921:, mostly due to the trigger-happiness issues brought out above.
1870:
that is currently being disputed by many users on the talk page.
208:
I am pleased with my efforts at various articles in the area of
59:
1515:
and s/he still needs to take hints about policies from admins.
2254:
1844:. Sorry, but no apparent change in attitude since last RfA. --
1039:
you weren't an admin already? Fooled me. Decent edit count :)
954:. Just remember to use the tools conservatively at first. ;-)
107:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
2297:
waiting for clarifications with respect to concerns raised.
266:
coherently, than if I write it out when I'm in over my head.
1530:
In a follow-up, I removed Ryulong's vandalism warning from
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1759:. When I restored my message, Ryulong reverted me again
2393:
2278:
2276:
1878:
1868:
1829:
1774:
1770:
1763:
1760:
1757:
1750:
1748:
1746:
1744:
1729:
1726:
1718:
1715:
1711:
1513:
1511:
1120:
479:
293:
289:
285:
281:
189:
79:) – This user is dedicated, and very experienced, with
2190:
per Sarah's analysis and a trawl through Archive 4 --
1027:
per Sarah's analysis and a trawl through Archive 4 --
2334:
and start giving people warnings before jumping to "
692:By the way, where's the link to your first RfA? --
2008:- Maybe next time (20:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC))
2338:" conclusions. I wish you all the best of luck.
1671:reporting and then I will happily vote support.
990:. He's going to make an awesome administrator.
1776:because the anon had changed spelling in the
978:should have been an admin ages ago already.--
8:
1075:- very good user, positive contributions.
389:mean to you and how would you apply them?
81:over thirty thousand edits since February
800:, good editor will make a good admin. --
1756:a warning message, Ryulong reverted me.
1114:
1965:per Sarah Ewart's extensive evidence.
522:as of 07:22, October 30th 2006, using
413:Is there ever a case where a punitive
1480:- It appears that Ryulong dished out
1321:ONLY 30385 EDITS! NOT NEARLY ENOUGH!
7:
1453:. There are several converstions on
831:- this user is not an admin already?
2457:Unsuccessful requests for adminship
663:Has seen this user around a lot on
24:
616:Hand over the bloody mop, already
520:Ryulong's editcount summary stats
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
2310:Neutral, leaning toward support
176:I would help with cleaning out
160:Category:Administrative backlog
273:Optional question by Fut.Perf.
1:
1615:Tropical Storm Ernesto (2006)
2424:21:39, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2406:22:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2392:That's probably because you
2387:20:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2381:- Never heard of this user.
2374:19:04, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2353:15:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2317:12:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2305:11:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2285:09:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2216:23:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2195:23:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2183:23:04, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2171:23:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2150:22:45, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2123:22:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2110:21:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2087:21:19, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2058:20:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2001:20:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1983:19:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1958:18:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1943:17:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1931:16:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1914:15:54, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1901:15:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1885:15:23, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1860:15:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1837:15:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1821:14:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1804:14:30, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1736:12:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1703:12:06, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1676:10:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1654:10:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1625:10:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1597:07:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1588:07:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1569:07:19, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1539:08:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1524:06:54, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1503:06:11, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1469:11:49, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1445:06:45, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1430:06:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1401:23:11, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1382:about time he became admin ~
1375:23:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1354:23:11, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1331:19:12, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1314:18:49, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1288:15:11, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1262:12:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1227:12:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1210:11:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1198:10:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1177:10:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1160:09:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1137:07:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1106:07:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1080:07:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1068:07:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1054:06:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1032:23:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1021:05:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
1017:evidenced by 30,000 edits --
1009:05:58, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
997:05:58, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
983:05:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
971:05:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
944:05:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
916:06:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
901:05:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
882:05:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
862:05:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
841:05:04, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
824:04:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
785:05:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
760:05:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
735:04:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
710:04:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
685:04:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
656:04:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
605:04:30, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
565:05:11, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
551:05:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
531:07:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
487:00:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
351:23:12, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
303:11:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
227:List of GaoRanger characters
168:administrators' reading list
138:00:39, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
119:04:27, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
101:04:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
2232:User_talk:Ryulong/Archive_4
2128:Incredibly Reluctant Oppose
1894:User_talk:Ryulong/Archive_4
1636:A) An EddieSegoura sock and
1576:Power Rangers: Mystic Force
1455:User_talk:Ryulong/Archive_4
1417:User_talk:Ryulong/Archive_4
905:Reluctant switch to oppose
511:'s edit summary usage with
143:Questions for the candidate
2473:
1126:07:41, Oct. 30, 2006 (UTC)
162:, and read the page about
156:Category:Knowledge backlog
2275:as an afterthought, e.g.
1771:blatant vandalism warning
231:Special Police Dekaranger
2434:Please do not modify it.
1611:Hurricane Ernesto (2006)
1113:on productivity alone. —
359:Optional questions from
128:for this online stress.—
40:Please do not modify it.
2251:06:35, 30 October 2006
2228:Neutral leaning Support
1463:Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim
1424:Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim
910:Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim
895:Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim
555:Not a problem, at all.—
480:your archiving just now
456:Optional question from
55:(27/30/8) Ended 00:41,
2336:vandalism-only account
381:What do the policy of
247:30 Sentai Encyclopedia
1773:and listed it at AIV
31:request for adminship
2394:registered yesterday
1609:sock over a move of
1006:Georgewilliamherbert
1633:I knew that it was
848:— Heh, about time!
524:wannabe Kate's tool
417:should be applied?
190:causing them myself
1754:User:Kyereh Mireku
1661:Reluctantly Oppose
1312:
850:Michael Billington
773:Michael Billington
243:Negative Syndicate
2259:
2214:
2148:
2056:
2029:
2015:comment added by
1981:
1701:
1532:User talk:Harwood
1329:
1296:
1086:
942:
880:
653:
587:as nominator. ~
2464:
2436:
2421:
2370:
2365:
2350:
2289:Leaning towards
2274:
2268:
2250:
2246:
2208:
2168:
2160:
2138:
2106:
2100:
2084:
2077:
2072:
2042:
2039:
2028:
2009:
1977:
1972:
1928:
1858:
1855:
1849:
1700:
1685:
1565:
1560:
1555:
1489:
1483:
1466:
1465:
1427:
1426:
1413:Switch to Oppose
1398:
1391:
1386:
1373:
1351:
1344:
1339:
1325:
1310:
1305:
1300:
1284:
1278:
1272:
1246:
1188:
1175:
1154:
1149:
1102:
1084:
1050:
1047:
1044:
968:
963:
958:
938:
933:
913:
912:
898:
897:
876:
807:
755:
747:
732:
726:
721:
705:
697:
680:
672:
639:
602:
596:
591:
502:General comments
340:
334:
330:
324:
320:
314:
98:
92:
87:
42:
2472:
2471:
2467:
2466:
2465:
2463:
2462:
2461:
2447:
2446:
2445:
2439:this nomination
2432:
2417:
2363:
2361:
2346:
2272:
2266:
2258:
2244:
2164:
2156:
2105:Cleared to land
2104:
2096:
2080:
2073:
2068:
2037:
2010:
1999:
1979:(Упражнение В!)
1970:
1926:
1853:
1847:
1845:
1767:User:80.6.32.80
1698:52278 Alpha 771
1692:Fenton, Matthew
1686:
1629:Well, that was
1563:
1558:
1553:
1536:trialsanderrors
1521:trialsanderrors
1487:
1481:
1461:
1460:
1422:
1421:
1394:
1389:
1384:
1367:
1347:
1342:
1337:
1308:
1303:
1298:
1282:
1276:
1270:
1260:
1244:
1186:
1181:Strong support
1168:
1152:
1147:
1100:
1048:
1045:
1042:
966:
961:
956:
940:(Упражнение В!)
931:
924:Strong support.
908:
907:
893:
892:
866:I'll venture a
838:
822:
805:
753:
745:
730:
724:
719:
703:
695:
678:
670:
600:
594:
589:
543:Oleg Alexandrov
458:Samuel Blanning
338:
332:
328:
322:
318:
312:
96:
90:
85:
52:
38:
35:did not succeed
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2470:
2468:
2460:
2459:
2449:
2448:
2444:
2443:
2427:
2426:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2376:
2355:
2319:
2307:
2287:
2260:
2252:
2219:
2218:
2197:
2185:
2173:
2166:Trick or Treat
2152:
2125:
2112:
2089:
2060:
2030:
2003:
1995:
1985:
1960:
1945:
1933:
1916:
1903:
1887:
1862:
1839:
1823:
1806:
1788:User: Romtobbi
1738:
1705:
1678:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1637:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1505:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1404:
1403:
1377:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1316:
1290:
1267:Strong Support
1264:
1256:
1229:
1212:
1200:
1179:
1165:Strong Support
1162:
1142:Strong Support
1139:
1127:
1125:
1108:
1082:
1070:
1059:Strong Support
1056:
1034:
1011:
999:
988:Strong Support
985:
976:Strong Support
973:
949:
948:
947:
920:
919:
918:
864:
843:
836:
826:
812:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
658:
654:
607:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
539:
528:(aeropagitica)
517:
516:
513:mathbot's tool
504:
503:
499:
498:
497:
496:
453:
452:
451:
450:
428:
427:
426:
425:
407:
406:
405:
404:
385:and the essay
356:
355:
354:
353:
274:
270:
269:
268:
267:
253:
252:
251:
250:
223:Ogre Tribe Org
196:
195:
194:
193:
164:administrators
145:
144:
122:
121:
51:
46:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2469:
2458:
2455:
2454:
2452:
2442:
2440:
2435:
2429:
2428:
2425:
2422:
2420:
2414:
2411:
2407:
2403:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2390:
2388:
2384:
2380:
2377:
2375:
2372:
2369:
2366:
2359:
2356:
2354:
2351:
2349:
2344:
2341:
2337:
2333:
2329:
2325:
2324:
2320:
2318:
2315:
2311:
2308:
2306:
2303:
2300:
2296:
2292:
2288:
2286:
2283:
2279:
2277:
2271:
2264:
2261:
2256:
2249:
2247:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2229:
2226:
2225:
2224:
2223:
2217:
2212:
2207:
2206:
2201:
2198:
2196:
2193:
2189:
2186:
2184:
2181:
2177:
2174:
2172:
2169:
2167:
2161:
2159:
2154:Per Sarah. -
2153:
2151:
2146:
2142:
2137:
2133:
2129:
2126:
2124:
2121:
2116:
2113:
2111:
2107:
2101:
2099:
2093:
2090:
2088:
2085:
2083:
2078:
2076:
2071:
2064:
2063:Strong Oppose
2061:
2059:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2041:
2034:
2031:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2014:
2007:
2004:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1989:
1986:
1984:
1980:
1976:
1973:
1968:
1964:
1961:
1959:
1956:
1955:
1950:
1946:
1944:
1941:
1937:
1934:
1932:
1929:
1924:
1920:
1917:
1915:
1912:
1907:
1904:
1902:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1888:
1886:
1883:
1879:
1876:
1872:
1869:
1866:
1863:
1861:
1856:
1850:
1843:
1840:
1838:
1835:
1830:
1827:
1824:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1813:Bunchofgrapes
1810:
1807:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1792:
1789:
1785:
1779:
1778:Globalization
1775:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1761:
1758:
1755:
1751:
1749:
1747:
1745:
1742:
1739:
1737:
1734:
1730:
1727:
1724:
1720:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1706:
1704:
1699:
1696:
1693:
1689:
1682:
1679:
1677:
1674:
1673:Alex Bakharev
1670:
1666:
1662:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1638:
1635:
1634:
1632:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1623:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1598:
1595:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1566:
1561:
1556:
1549:
1546:
1540:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1522:
1518:
1517:Type I errors
1514:
1512:
1509:
1506:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1495:
1486:
1479:
1476:
1470:
1467:
1464:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1428:
1425:
1418:
1414:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1392:
1387:
1381:
1378:
1376:
1371:
1366:
1362:
1359:
1355:
1352:
1350:
1345:
1340:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1319:STRONG OPPOSE
1317:
1315:
1311:
1306:
1301:
1294:
1291:
1289:
1285:
1279:
1273:
1268:
1265:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1250:
1247:
1242:
1237:
1233:
1230:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1213:
1211:
1208:
1207:Mailer Diablo
1204:
1201:
1199:
1196:
1195:
1192:
1189:
1184:
1180:
1178:
1174:
1171:
1166:
1163:
1161:
1158:
1157:
1155:
1150:
1143:
1140:
1138:
1135:
1131:
1128:
1124:
1122:
1118:
1112:
1109:
1107:
1104:
1103:
1098:
1094:
1089:
1085:edit conflict
1083:
1081:
1078:
1074:
1071:
1069:
1066:
1065:
1064:Daniel.Bryant
1060:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1038:
1035:
1033:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1010:
1007:
1003:
1000:
998:
995:
994:
989:
986:
984:
981:
977:
974:
972:
969:
964:
959:
953:
950:
946:
945:
941:
937:
934:
929:
925:
921:
917:
914:
911:
904:
903:
902:
899:
896:
890:
889:
885:
884:
883:
879:
875:
874:
869:
865:
863:
859:
855:
851:
847:
844:
842:
839:
834:
830:
827:
825:
820:
816:
811:
808:
803:
799:
796:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
766:
763:
762:
761:
757:
756:
749:
748:
741:
738:
737:
736:
733:
727:
725:DrillSergeant
722:
716:
713:
712:
711:
707:
706:
699:
698:
691:
688:
687:
686:
682:
681:
674:
673:
666:
662:
659:
657:
651:
647:
643:
637:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
617:
613:
612:in good faith
608:
606:
603:
597:
595:DrillSergeant
592:
586:
583:
582:
581:
580:
576:
575:
566:
562:
558:
554:
553:
552:
548:
544:
540:
538:
535:
534:
533:
532:
529:
525:
521:
514:
510:
506:
505:
501:
500:
493:
490:
489:
488:
485:
481:
477:
474:
473:
472:
471:
469:
466:
463:
459:
448:
443:
440:
439:
437:
433:
430:
429:
422:
419:
418:
416:
412:
409:
408:
401:
397:
394:
391:
390:
388:
384:
380:
377:
376:
375:
374:
372:
369:
366:
362:
352:
348:
344:
337:
327:
317:
309:
306:
305:
304:
301:
298:
294:
291:
287:
283:
278:
275:
272:
271:
264:
261:
260:
258:
255:
254:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
211:
207:
204:
203:
201:
198:
197:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
172:
171:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
150:
149:
148:
142:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
127:
120:
116:
112:
108:
105:
104:
103:
102:
99:
93:
91:DrillSergeant
88:
82:
78:
75:
72:
68:
64:
63:
61:
58:
50:
47:
43:
41:
36:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2433:
2430:
2419:Rama's arrow
2418:
2412:
2378:
2357:
2347:
2335:
2323:True neutral
2321:
2309:
2294:
2290:
2262:
2240:on the fence
2239:
2227:
2221:
2220:
2204:
2199:
2187:
2175:
2165:
2157:
2136:Royalguard11
2127:
2114:
2097:
2091:
2081:
2074:
2069:
2062:
2032:
2011:— Preceding
2005:
1987:
1962:
1953:
1948:
1940:SuperMachine
1935:
1918:
1905:
1889:
1864:
1841:
1825:
1808:
1752:When I left
1740:
1733:Sam Blanning
1722:
1707:
1687:
1680:
1660:
1630:
1607:EddieSegoura
1547:
1507:
1499:bananabucket
1492:
1477:
1462:
1450:
1423:
1412:
1406:
1405:
1395:
1379:
1360:
1348:
1318:
1292:
1271:Kari Hazzard
1266:
1239:
1238:
1231:
1214:
1202:
1193:
1164:
1153:Kamalabadi?!
1145:
1141:
1134:Slowking Man
1115:
1110:
1091:
1087:
1072:
1062:
1058:
1040:
1036:
1024:
1023:Switched to
1014:
1013:
1001:
992:
987:
975:
951:
926:Absolutely.
923:
922:
909:
894:
887:
886:
871:
867:
846:zOMG Support
845:
828:
797:
764:
751:
743:
739:
714:
701:
693:
689:
676:
668:
660:
633:
629:
622:weak support
621:
620:Changing to
615:
609:
584:
578:
577:
573:
572:
518:
491:
484:Sam Blanning
475:
464:
455:
454:
441:
431:
420:
410:
392:
378:
367:
358:
357:
307:
276:
262:
256:
210:Super Sentai
205:
199:
173:
151:
146:
125:
123:
106:
73:
65:
54:
53:
48:
39:
34:
28:
2245:AuburnPilot
2033:Soft Oppose
1909:with time.
1796:Sarah Ewart
1784:Bindi Irwin
1594:Luna Santin
1077:SunStar Net
626:Sarah Ewart
284:(regarding
188:instead of
2314:Kicking222
2017:Bobabobabo
1875:user:Jayjg
1848:Aguerriero
1695:Lexic Dark
1435:mistakes.—
1415:Review of
1335:sarcasm? ~
1130:RYULONG!!!
993:Alphachimp
980:Konst.able
574:Discussion
215:Ozu Family
57:31 October
2383:Zeldatime
2299:Fut.Perf.
2205:Mr. Lefty
1834:Metros232
1712:this edit
1236:íslenskur
771:then :-)
769:this link
638:RadioKirk
537:First RFA
297:Fut.Perf.
235:Alienizer
219:Infershia
2451:Category
2180:Amatulic
2098:Pilotguy
2053:contribs
2049:messages
2025:contribs
2013:unsigned
1954:zephyr2k
1882:JEBenson
1494:Blnguyen
1385:crazytal
1380:support!
1338:crazytal
1258:(samtal)
858:contribs
837:Bakatalk
781:contribs
468:contribs
371:contribs
249:, etc.).
182:CAT:ORFU
166:and the
77:contribs
2413:Neutral
2398:Ryūlóng
2379:Neutral
2368:iva1979
2358:Neutral
2332:WP:BITE
2295:neutral
2291:support
2263:Neutral
2222:Neutral
2132:project
1963:Oppose.
1898:Crum375
1646:Ryūlóng
1580:Ryūlóng
1451:Ryulong
1437:Ryūlóng
1361:Support
1293:Support
1232:Support
1215:Support
1203:Support
1111:Support
1088:Support
1073:Support
1037:Support
1015:Support
1002:Support
952:Support
888:Support
878:crztalk
868:Support
833:Bakaman
829:Support
810:nce Ong
798:Support
765:Comment
746:physicq
740:Comment
715:Comment
696:physicq
690:Comment
671:physicq
661:Support
634:abusing
585:Support
579:Support
557:Ryūlóng
509:Ryulong
436:CSD:G11
400:WP:SNOW
387:WP:SNOW
343:Ryūlóng
239:Sargess
178:CAT:CSD
130:Ryūlóng
111:Ryūlóng
67:Ryulong
49:Ryulong
2328:WP:AGF
2293:, but
2200:Oppose
2188:Oppose
2176:Oppose
2115:oppose
2092:Oppose
2006:Oppose
1993:danntm
1988:Oppose
1975:rbil10
1949:Oppose
1936:Oppose
1919:Oppose
1906:Oppose
1890:Oppose
1865:Oppose
1842:Oppose
1826:Oppose
1809:Oppose
1741:Oppose
1708:Oppose
1688:thanks
1681:Oppose
1669:WP:AIV
1665:WP:AIV
1631:before
1548:Oppose
1508:Oppose
1478:Oppose
1407:Oppose
1365:Keitei
1148:¿¡Exir
1025:Oppose
962:master
936:rbil10
665:WP:AIV
636:them.
396:WP:IAR
383:WP:IAR
361:Malber
326:verror
288:), or
186:WP:AIV
2282:MER-C
2236:bites
2192:Steve
2120:Benon
2040:ndson
1967:RyanG
1911:Xoloz
1719:twice
1396:56297
1349:56297
1117:freak
1097:dzast
1093:riana
1029:Steve
1019:Steve
957:Grand
928:RyanG
415:block
403:days.
336:db-g1
316:test2
62:(UTC)
33:that
16:<
2343:isza
2330:and
2211:talk
2158:Mike
2145:Desk
2141:Talk
2070:Nish
2045:page
2021:talk
1923:Tito
1854:talk
1817:talk
1800:Talk
1716:once
1622:acor
1534:. ~
1449:HI,
1370:talk
1363:. --
1327:Talk
1323:ST47
1249:ylur
1223:Talk
1219:Alex
1205:. -
1191:hway
1173:khoi
1170:Khoi
1121:talk
1046:tleG
854:talk
777:talk
767:Try
624:per
618:! :)
547:talk
507:See
462:talk
447:away
398:and
365:talk
290:here
286:this
282:here
180:and
158:and
71:talk
60:2006
2255:UTC
2075:kid
1781:-->
1613:to
1299:Hús
1252:#12
1245:lib
1241:fel
1049:irl
1043:Cat
873:crz
802:Ter
728:...
630:not
614:).
598:...
321:or
126:now
94:...
2453::
2404:)
2402:竜龍
2396:.—
2389:)
2348:13
2280:.
2273:}}
2270:bv
2267:{{
2242:.
2162:|
2108:)
2082:64
2051:-
2047:-
2027:)
2023:•
1927:xd
1819:)
1802:)
1769:a
1652:)
1650:竜龍
1619:Ch
1586:)
1584:竜龍
1567:•
1554:Ch
1501:)
1488:}}
1485:bv
1482:{{
1443:)
1441:竜龍
1390:es
1343:es
1309:nd
1286:)
1280:|
1234:--
1225:)
1217:--
1187:ig
967:ka
860:)
856:•
817:|
783:)
779:•
758:)
720:PH
708:)
683:)
590:PH
563:)
561:竜龍
549:)
526:.
492:A:
476:8.
442:A:
438:?
432:7.
421:A:
411:6.
393:A:
379:5.
349:)
347:竜龍
339:}}
333:{{
329:}}
323:{{
319:}}
313:{{
308:A:
277:4.
263:A:
257:3.
245:,
241:,
237:,
233:,
229:,
225:,
221:,
217:,
206:A:
200:2.
174:A:
170:.
152:1.
136:)
134:竜龍
117:)
115:竜龍
86:PH
37:.
2400:(
2385:(
2364:S
2340:M
2302:☼
2257:)
2253:(
2213:)
2209:(
2147:)
2143:·
2139:(
2102:(
2055:)
2043:(
2038:@
2019:(
1997:C
1971:e
1947:'
1857:)
1851:(
1815:(
1798:(
1690:/
1648:(
1644:—
1582:(
1564:z
1559:e
1497:(
1439:(
1372:)
1368:(
1304:ö
1283:C
1277:T
1274:(
1221:(
1183:H
1123:)
1119:(
1101:a
1095:_
932:e
852:(
821:)
819:C
815:T
813:(
806:e
775:(
754:c
750:(
731:§
704:c
700:(
679:c
675:(
652:)
650:c
648:|
646:t
644:|
642:u
640:(
601:§
559:(
545:(
515:.
470:)
465:·
460:(
449:.
373:)
368:·
363:(
345:(
300:☼
192:.
132:(
113:(
109:—
97:§
74:·
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.