Knowledge (XXG)

:Requests for adminship/RadioKirk 2 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

71:) – Well, as I was recently made an admin, I thought I'd try and pass the favor along (my first nom, forgive me). But enough about me... RadioKirk has been with us since June 2005 and has since racked up around 4260 edits. I came across RadioKirk fighting vandalism, and he has shown himself to be an effective, yet calm, vandal-fighter. Knowledge (XXG) would be in better shape if we just gave RK the real rollback button. He has contributed very nicely in many of the pop-culture articles, substantially helping a few Featured Articles along the way. He seems to be a very nice, and receives and responds to advice very well. RadioKirk was 958: 377: 964: 1523:
mentioned below). I appreciate RadioKirk's honesty about the conflict. But I still have significant concerns about his behavior during the conflict (especially his use of edit summaries and his reply to my comments in a manner that I believe qualified as harrassment). In other words, I think this
1944:
I would not jump in and make any huge changes over what I'm doing now. As a start, I would expect that I would block the more persistent vandals that I'm reporting now; then, as I become more familiar with the tools, I would probably toe-first into backlogs and mediations, growing as gradually then
2013:
completely convinced me that he believed "be bold" meant "my way or the highway", and that he was being less than honest when he said he wanted the instant data improved (as opposed to "gone altogether"). Eventually, it worked out, as I rather expected it might. More importantly, we were perfectly
75:
back in December, but only 19 people voiced their opinion. Most of the oppose comments were about his lack of time and experience here. I think since then he has shown great growth. As he is unlikely to abuse sysop tools, I am happy to nominate RadioKirk for adminship.
1524:
user is an excellent contributor, but not yet qualified to be an admin. When he cultivates a calmer, less over-protective approach (which I firmly believe he has the potential to do), I will support any further nominations made for adminship. --
2053:: Actually, I'm sure of it. I've caught a few using VandalProof that I nom'ed for speedies because they were painfully obvious, and I remember one that I actually researched before nom'ing.) 2022:
during the dispute; it is important to me that I try to consider each discussion to be a separate and distinct entity, even those occurring with someone with whom I may have a dispute.
1350:, fantastic article namespace contributor. Usually I like to see a little more Knowledge (XXG) namespace, but this user's outstanding article contributions more than make up for it. 93:
With thanks and, I hope, appropriate humility, I accept—without reservation this time. I believe I'm ready, and I'll answer the questions below a little later, on a full stomach. ;)
1999:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
1204:*cough* . Seriously, I should also note that obsessing over a person and obsessing over her article are entirely different things—but, you probably won't believe that, either. ;) 1643:. However, he does achieve a modicum of balance with contributions in other areas. May change to support if he promises (a) to significantly expand his "comfort level" zone (b) 1577:
leaning support for now, I need to think about this. He is an otherwise great candidate but his area of focus has been narrow. Poke me in two days if I haven't made up my mind.
437: 1919:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge (XXG) in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
1639:
I've had nothing but positive interactions with RadioKirk and would like to support, but to be completely honest, some things about him scare the shit out of me, thus,
1486: 1802:
Right. There's a world of difference between a bio that does not assert notability (which is an nn-bio and is speediable) and a bio of someone who's non-notable.
1781:
That's essentially what I understood "non-notable" to mean from a WikiPOV—and I'd like to think my db noms bear that out. I guess I needed to be more specific...
72: 2103: 1935: 341:- I've seen RadioKirk around a lot and he's really involved and always friendly. I think he even knows that nn-bio equals non notable bio too :) -- 1485:. I believed then and I believe now that a small handful of admins had (and still have) an itchy trigger finger. That's why I decided to help 2086: 1683:(b) Unless it was to block persistent vandals (which hasn't happened to date), it wouldn't be necessary. Even then, I'd post the details at 1665: 1187: 370: 1361: 32: 17: 307:, it would be great if he could just take care of it himself, as it would free up other admins so they can worry about other things. 750: 594: 2059: 1787: 1753: 1705: 1622: 1539: 1495: 1210: 1155: 99: 68: 1280: 1251: 1927: 755: 1955:
Of your articles or contributions to Knowledge (XXG), are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
1455: 599: 589: 177: 1931: 1836: 291:- Terrific vandal fighter, makes few mistakes. Well-rounded also, with contributions to project/image spaces too. -- 1961:
Aside from my persistence in fighting vandals' persistence, I'm particularly happy with my work on three articles:
582:. Looks like a very trustworthy editor who understands Knowledge (XXG) policies, guidelines, etc. </clichĂŠ: --> 1141: 950: 648: 820: 1464: 361: 192: 127: 82: 2006: 1356: 879: 247: 214: 1401:
Dealing with vandals is important, but an admin should have a variety of expereinces, i.e. RfA and Arbcom.
1239: 1447: 584: 311: 167: 1264: 979: 939: 770: 736: 679: 465: 229: 2069: 2041: 1811: 1797: 1776: 1763: 1734: 1715: 1632: 1608: 1594: 1581: 1558: 1549: 1528: 1505: 1472: 1441: 1422: 1405: 1393: 1389: 1377: 1366: 1342: 1318: 1306: 1283: 1271: 1220: 1165: 1144: 1126: 1121: 1107: 1089: 1077: 1065: 1049: 1037: 1025: 1022: 1013: 996: 984: 967: 925: 906: 894: 882: 867: 855: 840:- terrific efforts in the fight against vandalism. A smart, well-rounded and clearly capable candidate. 832: 799: 790: 781: 760: 726: 714: 689: 670: 632: 619: 604: 574: 569: 557: 545: 533: 517: 505: 488: 476: 473: 453: 425: 412: 400: 380: 345: 333: 319: 295: 283: 269: 237: 217: 204: 156: 129: 109: 84: 2085:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
1402: 1269: 1247: 470: 462: 1301: 1099: 1009: 944: 934: 745: 708: 667: 2064: 1792: 1769: 1758: 1710: 1627: 1544: 1500: 1215: 1160: 922: 450: 354: 122: 104: 77: 62: 1515:- My only previous interaction with this user was during an edit conflict over a reference in the 1259: 1243: 328: 2019: 2010: 1555: 1525: 1351: 876: 779: 542: 527: 434: 409: 396: 2015: 1413:
I've had nothing but positive experiences with this guy. Is an asset to the product. Give him a
1005: 1616:, if I may? One user's (or two ) narrow scope is another's expansion within comfort levels. ;) 891: 501: 331: 278: 1973:
process during a massive rewrite, was a huge experience- and confidence-builder as it became
1684: 1519:
article. The conflict that occured between us was eventually resolved in a civil manner (as
1201: 2037: 1807: 1730: 1385: 825: 815: 810: 566: 1970: 1696: 304: 1744: 1740: 1438: 1315: 1292: 1094: 957: 731: 723: 698: 655: 641: 514: 234: 226: 2049:
I believe that's non-notable biography and, if memory serves, I've dealt with a couple. (
1986: 1974: 1966: 1688: 1234:
Trustworthy, great editor and reverts vandalism---Admin Role Model (though not an admin)
1314:, the extra tools will be good for him because he will delve into backlogs. Go for it!-- 1149:
You wouldn't believe me if I told you it was more parental than anything, would you? ;)
2054: 1832: 1782: 1748: 1700: 1617: 1534: 1520: 1490: 1338: 1205: 1170: 1150: 919: 848: 686: 446: 255: 94: 58: 47: 2097: 1989:
status in three days (I'm still hunting for more background info before I go to FAC).
1978: 1962: 1699:
and I'm sure I have failed on occasion in my efforts to avoid being overprotective.)
1648: 1605: 1516: 1137: 1113: 1086: 1074: 1046: 993: 903: 775: 420: 389: 366: 1591: 1578: 1374: 864: 497: 316: 308: 292: 262: 1489:. Nevertheless, yours is a legitimate concern, and I thank you for voicing it. :) 2033: 1982: 1803: 1726: 1587: 976: 795: 626: 614: 554: 525:, have watched him on RC patrol for a while now and been grateful for his work. 342: 1926:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
1418: 1034: 915: 485: 1533:
As honest from your POV as was mine from mine. Well worded and appreciated.
1328: 1058: 841: 150: 1446:
Umm... how do userboxes interfere with his ability to be an administrator?
376: 1854:
Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.
1045:. Seems to be acting like an admin already and won't abuse the buttons. -- 1725:, partially per freakofnurture, also per incorrect answer to question 4. 1586:
Still neutral, the Lindsay Lohan thing made me want to oppose almost but
1133: 1085:, solid editor background, participates in Knowledge (XXG) namespace. -- 138: 1658: 1414: 1180: 963: 992:, of course, per Reyk, Davewild, Tantalum, and Fetofs, to name four. 2089:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
2079:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2032:
What do you understand the abbreviation "nn-bio" to mean, in full?
1604:. Wondering about scope and experience. I may change this later. -- 1768:"Non-notable" is not the same as as "does not assert notability". 1687:
for review of equitability. (If it helps, getting that article to
1981:, a featured article only five weeks after I'd created it; and, 875:
Doing good work, so might as well have the tools and the badge.
91:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
28:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1647:
to use admin tools on anything even remotely related to
1773: 1668: 1190: 1680:with which I'll expand, but expansion is the idea; 388:I've had positive interaction with this editor. 1437:: too hung up on user boxes. See his user page. 245:--Seems like a good guy with good intentions.-- 612:. Lots of reasons to support, none to oppose. 327:I opposed last time but he is ready this time 8: 1112:There are better women to obsess about than 54:Final: (62/2/4) ended 0:42, 6 May 2006 (UTC) 484:Trustworthy editor, trustworthy nominator. 353:. An oppose is physically impossible. :-) 496:, excellent editor, great interactions -- 137:, great editor with lots of experience -- 18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship 7: 914:. His statesmanlike handling of the 1116:, but a guy's gotta have a hobby!. 751: 1843:Edit summary usage for RadioKirk: 756: 24: 2104:Successful requests for adminship 1928:Category:Knowledge (XXG) backlog 962: 956: 390: 375: 1332: 1329: 656: 642: 421: 371: 362: 355: 179: 168: 1875:First edit 2005-06-14 17:34:55 1448: 165: 145: 1: 1465: 1362: 980: 902:No reason why should not be. 737: 650: 620: 397: 312: 270: 256: 248: 202: 193: 1936:administrators' reading list 1695:of work; I am familiar with 1357: 933:. This dude kicks a$ $ . :D 746: 732: 662: 627: 615: 263: 142: 139: 1916:Questions for the candidate 1835:'s edit summary usage with 1554:Agreed, and thank you. -- 1352: 918:business has convinced me. 2120: 2070:02:09, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 2042:00:36, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 1985:, created and improved to 1930:, and read the page about 1869:Distinct pages edited 1409 1633:02:02, 30 April 2006 (UTC) 1609:20:52, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 1582:04:23, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 1291:Good quality candidate. -- 985:21:43, 30 April 2006 (UTC) 968:18:37, 30 April 2006 (UTC) 926:18:14, 30 April 2006 (UTC) 907:16:47, 30 April 2006 (UTC) 895:16:15, 30 April 2006 (UTC) 883:16:08, 30 April 2006 (UTC) 868:12:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC) 856:10:59, 30 April 2006 (UTC) 833:06:44, 30 April 2006 (UTC) 800:03:26, 30 April 2006 (UTC) 782:01:54, 30 April 2006 (UTC) 761:00:28, 30 April 2006 (UTC) 727:22:59, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 715:22:58, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 690:22:55, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 671:20:58, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 633:16:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 605:16:20, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 575:14:15, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 558:14:10, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 546:08:06, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 534:07:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 518:06:21, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 506:04:15, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 489:03:52, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 477:03:17, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 454:03:10, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 438:02:43, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 426:02:41, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 413:01:24, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 401:01:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 381:01:08, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 346:00:58, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 334:00:42, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 320:00:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 303:with all those reports to 296:00:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 284:00:05, 29 April 2006 (UTC) 238:23:38, 28 April 2006 (UTC) 218:23:28, 28 April 2006 (UTC) 205:23:08, 28 April 2006 (UTC) 157:23:07, 28 April 2006 (UTC) 130:00:20, 28 April 2006 (UTC) 110:00:43, 28 April 2006 (UTC) 85:00:17, 28 April 2006 (UTC) 1676:(a) I cannot promise the 1281:Joseph Solis in Australia 1004:per all other reasons. -- 2082:Please do not modify it. 1965:which, with the help of 1872:Average edits/page 3.153 1747:). How was I incorrect? 180: 1911:Knowledge (XXG) talk 42 1858:Contribution Breakdown: 1812:11:48, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 1798:12:46, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 1777:07:09, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 1764:19:42, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 1735:18:36, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 1716:12:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1595:07:16, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 1559:04:52, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 1550:04:07, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 1529:03:58, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 1506:18:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1473:17:48, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1442:17:23, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1423:00:00, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 1406:15:50, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 1394:13:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 1378:11:16, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 1367:20:13, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 1343:16:54, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 1319:16:25, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 1307:12:46, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 1284:10:24, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 1272:11:10, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 1221:12:56, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 1166:04:07, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 1145:03:59, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 1108:20:26, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1090:18:12, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1078:08:50, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1066:07:53, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1050:07:33, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1038:05:28, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1026:05:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1014:03:12, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 997:03:05, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 513:excellent wikipedian - 73:nominated for adminship 38:Please do not modify it 1487:work toward a solution 1326:, this mop's for you. 565:reaches my standards. 678:. Great improvement. 33:request for adminship 2009:. In the beginning, 1945:as I have until now. 1850:100% for minor edits 1847:100% for major edits 209:Very experienced. I 164:Experienced editor. 2020:separate discussion 1908:Knowledge (XXG) 335 2011:user:Backburner001 1863:Username RadioKirk 1411:Support on Wheels! 807:. Because I do. -- 215:General Eisenhower 1739:I just looked up 1654: 1590:makes up for it. 1399:Qualified Support 1341: 1256: 1242:comment added by 1176: 1106: 282: 155: 2111: 2084: 2067: 2062: 2057: 1866:Total edits 4442 1795: 1790: 1785: 1761: 1756: 1751: 1713: 1708: 1703: 1673: 1652: 1630: 1625: 1620: 1547: 1542: 1537: 1503: 1498: 1493: 1470: 1462: 1453: 1364: 1359: 1354: 1337: 1334: 1331: 1304: 1299: 1267: 1262: 1255: 1236: 1218: 1213: 1208: 1195: 1174: 1163: 1158: 1153: 1129: 1124: 1103: 1097: 1063: 1023:Metamagician3000 1021:- solid editor. 982: 966: 960: 953: 947: 942: 937: 846: 828: 823: 818: 813: 793: 778: 773: 758: 753: 748: 743: 734: 712: 702: 666: 660: 652: 646: 629: 624: 617: 602: 597: 592: 587: 572: 530: 468: 423: 398: 394: 379: 373: 364: 359: 314: 276: 274: 267: 260: 252: 232: 203: 200: 190: 189: 188: 175: 166: 154: 147: 144: 141: 125: 107: 102: 97: 80: 40: 2119: 2118: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2094: 2093: 2087:this nomination 2080: 2065: 2060: 2055: 1905:Category talk 1 1793: 1788: 1783: 1759: 1754: 1749: 1745:Template:Nn-bio 1741:Template:Db-bio 1711: 1706: 1701: 1662: 1655: 1628: 1623: 1618: 1545: 1540: 1535: 1501: 1496: 1491: 1456: 1302: 1293: 1265: 1260: 1237: 1216: 1211: 1206: 1184: 1177: 1161: 1156: 1151: 1127: 1122: 1101: 1059: 951: 945: 940: 935: 852: 842: 826: 821: 816: 811: 791: 771: 769: 768:A good user. -- 706: 700: 600: 595: 590: 585: 570: 541:, of course. - 528: 466: 230: 199: 187: 178: 174: 153: 123: 105: 100: 95: 78: 51: 36: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2117: 2115: 2107: 2106: 2096: 2095: 2092: 2091: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1932:administrators 1918: 1913: 1912: 1909: 1906: 1903: 1900: 1897: 1894: 1891: 1888: 1887:User talk 1210 1885: 1882: 1879: 1876: 1873: 1870: 1867: 1864: 1860: 1859: 1852: 1851: 1848: 1841: 1840: 1837:Mathbot's tool 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1681: 1660: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1475: 1426: 1425: 1408: 1396: 1380: 1369: 1345: 1321: 1309: 1286: 1274: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1182: 1168: 1110: 1092: 1080: 1068: 1052: 1040: 1028: 1016: 999: 987: 970: 928: 909: 897: 885: 877:Angus McLellan 870: 858: 850: 835: 802: 784: 763: 729: 717: 692: 673: 635: 607: 577: 560: 548: 536: 520: 508: 491: 479: 456: 440: 433:all the best. 428: 415: 403: 383: 348: 339:Strong Support 336: 322: 301:Strong Support 298: 286: 254: 240: 220: 207: 194: 181: 169: 159: 149: 132: 113: 112: 50: 45: 44: 43: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2116: 2105: 2102: 2101: 2099: 2090: 2088: 2083: 2077: 2076: 2071: 2068: 2063: 2058: 2052: 2048: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2028: 2027: 2021: 2017: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2001: 2000: 1998: 1995: 1994: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1979:Karen Dotrice 1976: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1963:Lindsay Lohan 1960: 1957: 1956: 1954: 1951: 1950: 1943: 1940: 1939: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1917: 1910: 1907: 1904: 1901: 1898: 1895: 1892: 1889: 1886: 1883: 1880: 1877: 1874: 1871: 1868: 1865: 1862: 1861: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1849: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1796: 1791: 1786: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1762: 1757: 1752: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1721: 1717: 1714: 1709: 1704: 1698: 1694: 1691:status was a 1690: 1686: 1682: 1679: 1675: 1674: 1672: 1670: 1667: 1664: 1650: 1649:Lindsay Lohan 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1631: 1626: 1621: 1615: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1607: 1603: 1600: 1596: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1580: 1576: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1560: 1557: 1556:backburner001 1553: 1552: 1551: 1548: 1543: 1538: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1527: 1526:backburner001 1522: 1518: 1517:Lindsay Lohan 1514: 1511: 1507: 1504: 1499: 1494: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1474: 1471: 1468: 1463: 1461: 1460: 1454: 1452: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1440: 1436: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1409: 1407: 1404: 1400: 1397: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1384: 1381: 1379: 1376: 1373: 1370: 1368: 1365: 1360: 1355: 1349: 1346: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1335: 1325: 1322: 1320: 1317: 1313: 1310: 1308: 1305: 1300: 1297: 1290: 1287: 1285: 1282: 1278: 1275: 1273: 1270: 1268: 1263: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1233: 1230: 1222: 1219: 1214: 1209: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1194: 1192: 1189: 1186: 1172: 1171:It gets worse 1169: 1167: 1164: 1159: 1154: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1132: 1130: 1125: 1119: 1115: 1114:Lindsay Lohan 1111: 1109: 1104: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1088: 1084: 1081: 1079: 1076: 1072: 1069: 1067: 1064: 1062: 1056: 1053: 1051: 1048: 1044: 1041: 1039: 1036: 1032: 1029: 1027: 1024: 1020: 1017: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 1000: 998: 995: 991: 988: 986: 983: 978: 974: 971: 969: 965: 959: 954: 948: 943: 938: 932: 929: 927: 924: 921: 917: 913: 910: 908: 905: 901: 898: 896: 893: 889: 886: 884: 881: 878: 874: 871: 869: 866: 862: 859: 857: 854: 853: 847: 845: 839: 836: 834: 831: 830: 829: 824: 819: 814: 806: 803: 801: 797: 794: 788: 785: 783: 780: 777: 774: 767: 764: 762: 759: 754: 749: 744: 742: 741: 735: 730: 728: 725: 721: 718: 716: 713: 710: 704: 703: 696: 693: 691: 688: 685: 684: 683: 677: 674: 672: 669: 665: 661: 659: 654: 653: 647: 645: 639: 636: 634: 631: 630: 625: 623: 618: 611: 608: 606: 603: 598: 593: 588: 581: 578: 576: 573: 568: 564: 561: 559: 556: 552: 549: 547: 544: 543:Mailer Diablo 540: 537: 535: 532: 531: 529:Tijuana Brass 524: 521: 519: 516: 512: 509: 507: 503: 499: 495: 492: 490: 487: 483: 480: 478: 475: 472: 469: 464: 460: 457: 455: 452: 448: 444: 441: 439: 436: 432: 429: 427: 424: 419: 416: 414: 411: 410:Richardcavell 407: 404: 402: 399: 395: 393: 387: 384: 382: 378: 374: 368: 365: 360: 358: 352: 349: 347: 344: 340: 337: 335: 332: 330: 326: 323: 321: 318: 315: 310: 306: 302: 299: 297: 294: 290: 287: 285: 280: 275: 273: 268: 266: 261: 259: 253: 251: 246: 244: 241: 239: 236: 233: 228: 224: 221: 219: 216: 212: 208: 206: 201: 197: 191: 186: 185: 176: 173: 163: 160: 158: 152: 148: 136: 133: 131: 128: 126: 120: 119: 118: 117: 111: 108: 103: 98: 92: 89: 88: 87: 86: 83: 81: 74: 70: 67: 64: 60: 56: 55: 49: 46: 42: 39: 34: 31: 26: 25: 19: 2081: 2078: 2050: 2046: 2029: 2002: 1996: 1987:good article 1958: 1952: 1941: 1923: 1915: 1914: 1893:Image talk 1 1853: 1842: 1825: 1824: 1722: 1692: 1677: 1656: 1644: 1640: 1613: 1601: 1574: 1568: 1567: 1512: 1482: 1478: 1466: 1458: 1457: 1450: 1434: 1428: 1427: 1410: 1403:Dlohcierekim 1398: 1382: 1371: 1347: 1327: 1323: 1311: 1295: 1288: 1276: 1238:— Preceding 1235: 1231: 1178: 1120: 1117: 1082: 1070: 1060: 1054: 1042: 1030: 1018: 1001: 989: 972: 930: 911: 899: 892:Thunderbrand 887: 872: 860: 849: 843: 837: 809: 808: 804: 789:per nom. -- 786: 765: 739: 738: 719: 705: 699: 694: 681: 680: 675: 663: 657: 649: 643: 637: 621: 613: 609: 579: 562: 550: 538: 526: 522: 510: 493: 481: 458: 442: 435:Rama's Arrow 430: 417: 405: 391: 385: 356: 350: 338: 324: 300: 288: 271: 264: 257: 249: 242: 222: 210: 195: 183: 182: 171: 161: 134: 115: 114: 90: 65: 57: 53: 52: 37: 29: 27: 1983:Ike Altgens 1967:peer review 1896:Template 19 1878:(main) 2153 1743:(formerly ( 1653:May. 1, '06 1588:Emma Watson 1386:Sarah Ewart 1316:Kungfu Adam 1175:May. 2, '06 640:as above. 567:Computerjoe 2066:talk to me 1902:Category 6 1794:talk to me 1760:talk to me 1712:talk to me 1659:freakofnur 1629:talk to me 1546:talk to me 1502:talk to me 1439:Thumbelina 1217:talk to me 1181:freakofnur 1162:talk to me 1095:Flcelloguy 936:Buchanan-H 916:User:Jim16 515:Patman2648 106:talk to me 30:successful 1890:Image 103 1833:RadioKirk 1521:RadioKirk 1479:userboxes 952:SCREAM!!! 920:Mackensen 687:Covington 447:Kimchi.sg 445:per nom. 225:per nom. 59:RadioKirk 48:RadioKirk 2098:Category 1975:featured 1969:and the 1934:and the 1884:User 196 1881:Talk 375 1826:Comments 1606:Danaman5 1252:contribs 1240:unsigned 1118:Support' 1087:ReyBrujo 1075:Khoikhoi 1047:kingboyk 904:Davewild 586:Tantalum 392:FloNight 227:DarthVad 69:contribs 1723:Neutral 1685:WP:AN/I 1641:Neutral 1602:Neutral 1592:JoshuaZ 1579:JoshuaZ 1575:Neutral 1569:Neutral 1383:Support 1375:Jared W 1372:Support 1348:Support 1324:Support 1312:Support 1289:Support 1277:Support 1244:Primate 1232:Support 1202:WP:NPOV 1083:Support 1071:Support 1055:Support 1043:Support 1031:Support 1019:Support 1002:Support 990:Support 973:Support 931:Support 912:Support 900:Support 888:Support 873:Support 865:Bhadani 861:Support 838:Support 805:Support 787:Support 776:iva1979 766:Support 720:Support 695:Support 682:(^'-')^ 676:Support 638:Support 610:Support 601:lluride 580:Support 571:'s talk 563:Support 551:Support 539:Support 523:Support 511:Support 498:Deville 494:Support 482:Support 459:Support 443:Support 431:Support 418:Support 406:Support 386:Support 351:Support 329:Jaranda 325:Support 293:Knucmo2 289:Support 243:Support 223:Support 211:Support 162:Support 135:Support 121:Yep. -- 116:Support 2034:Stifle 1899:Help 1 1804:Stifle 1770:Kimchi 1727:Stifle 1697:WP:OWN 1513:Oppose 1483:policy 1481:, but 1435:Oppose 1429:Oppose 1358:master 1294:Cactus 1261:Primat 1200:cough* 923:(talk) 880:(Talk) 812:George 555:Jusjih 343:Tawker 305:WP:AIV 2056:Radio 2018:in a 2016:civil 2005:Yes, 1784:Radio 1750:Radio 1702:Radio 1689:WP:FA 1678:speed 1671:: --> 1645:never 1619:Radio 1614:Reply 1536:Radio 1492:Radio 1419:D-Day 1353:Grand 1207:Radio 1193:: --> 1152:Radio 1102:note? 1061:Grue 1035:Irpen 1006:Arnzy 977:Kukin 946:rmit™ 796:lkman 724:Shawn 709:Reply 486:Xoloz 474:e Ong 422:Joe I 317:ts501 96:Radio 16:< 2061:Kirk 2051:Edit 2038:talk 2007:here 1831:See 1808:talk 1789:Kirk 1755:Kirk 1731:talk 1707:Kirk 1669:talk 1663:ture 1657:< 1651:. — 1624:Kirk 1541:Kirk 1497:Kirk 1477:Not 1415:mop! 1390:Talk 1339:talk 1248:talk 1212:Kirk 1191:talk 1185:ture 1179:< 1173:. — 1157:Kirk 1033:. -- 1010:Talk 863:: -- 844:Reyk 733:Oran 644:Buck 628:tofs 502:Talk 451:talk 279:talk 265:kiro 101:Kirk 63:talk 1971:FAC 1693:lot 1333:zio 1330:Dei 1298:man 1134:Lar 1073:. — 994:Joe 975:-- 851:YO! 817:Mon 798:- 757:(e) 752:(c) 747:(t) 701:Jay 664:ofg 463:Ter 372:fan 369:ash 363:boy 357:Roy 250:The 2100:: 2047:A: 2040:) 2030:4. 2003:A: 1997:3. 1977:; 1959:A: 1953:2. 1942:A: 1938:. 1924:1. 1810:) 1774:sg 1733:) 1469:-_ 1449:_- 1421:) 1417:-- 1392:) 1363:ka 1279:. 1258:-- 1254:) 1250:• 1136:: 1100:A 1057:. 1012:) 961:.. 955:.. 949:.. 890:. 722:== 697:-- 658:ts 583:-- 553:-- 504:) 471:nc 461:-- 449:| 408:- 367:cr 272:id 213:. 198:-_ 170:_- 124:LV 79:LV 35:. 2036:( 1839:. 1806:( 1772:. 1729:( 1666:| 1661:x 1467:P 1459:o 1451:M 1388:( 1303:✍ 1296:. 1266:e 1246:( 1188:| 1183:x 1142:c 1140:/ 1138:t 1131:' 1128:+ 1123:+ 1105:) 1098:( 1008:( 981:i 941:e 827:y 822:e 792:E 772:S 740:e 711:) 707:( 668:✐ 651:e 622:e 616:F 596:e 591:T 500:( 467:e 313:e 309:M 281:) 277:( 258:i 235:r 231:e 196:P 184:o 172:M 151:☆ 146:C 143:B 140:T 66:· 61:( 41:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
request for adminship
RadioKirk
RadioKirk
talk
contribs
nominated for adminship
LV

00:17, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Radio
Kirk
talk to me
00:43, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
LV

00:20, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
TBC
☆
23:07, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
_-M
o
P-_
23:08, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
General Eisenhower
23:28, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
DarthVad
e
r
23:38, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑