311:
edits: 81.75% Minor edits: 86.46% Average edits per day: 17.04 (for last 500 edit(s)) Article edit summary use (last 519 edits): Major article edits: 99.56% Minor article edits: 88.89% Analysis of edits (out of all 5000 edits shown on this page and last 33 image uploads): Notable article edits (creation/expansion/major rewrites/sourcing): 1.18% (59) Significant article edits (copyedits/small rewrites/content/reference additions): 3.14% (157) Superficial article edits (grammar/spelling/wikify/links/tagging): 41.54% (2077) Superficial article edits marked as minor: 17.33% Unique image uploads (non-deleted/reverts/updates): 18 (checks last 5000) Breakdown of all edits: Unique pages edited: 1568 | Average edits per page: 3.19 | Edits on top: 11.06% Edits marked as major (non-minor/reverts): 60.04% (3002 edit(s)) Edits marked as minor (non-reverts): 9.1% (455 edit(s)) Marked reverts (reversions/text removal): 11.48% (574 edit(s)) Unmarked edits: 16.22% (811 edit(s)) Edits by
Knowledge namespace: Article: 59.5% (2975) | Article talk: 21.82% (1091) User: 0.86% (43) | User talk: 11.78% (589) Knowledge: 3.86% (193) | Knowledge talk: 0.88% (44) Image: 0.26% (13) Template: 0.78% (39) Category: 0.06% (3) Portal: 0% (0) Help: 0% (0) MediaWiki: 0% (0) Other talk pages: 0.2% (10)
234:(one big long question about categories of admins and your thoughts about them) Are you aware of the notion of adminstrators saying they're willing to be voluntarily recalled or reviewed, by a less onerous process than a new RfA (or worse) arbComm action? What do you think of the idea? Would you consider placing yourself (placement should only be done by oneself) in such a category if you were made an admin? Why or why not? Are you aware of the notion of Rouge admins? What do you think of the notion? Do you see it as purely humorous or do you see what it's driving at? Would you consider allowing yourself to by placed in this category (placement is traditionally done by someone else) if you were made an admin? Why or why not? (note: both these categories have some controversy attached to them, for different reasons, and note also, although I am a policy and process
259:! In seriousness, though, I am vaguely aware of this review category, yes. I recall looking at it approximately 2 months ago (I think) and noting that it wasn't particulalry populated. I think that some sort of admin review system would be a theoretically good feature in Knowledge; clearly, though, we should always make sure that any new administrative proecdure that we create is 'cost effective' - so we would need to create a method that does not take editors away from improving the encyclopedia more than it benefits the community as a whole. I think - without having ever read too much about it - that I would be vaguely supportive of the admins for recall thing and would certainly
79:) – I've been thinking about applying for this for a while, but what with a couple of holidays that I had in June and July, didn't think it was appropriate till I was back contributing more regularly. I think that in my year or so here I have amassed enough experience and knowledge of policy to be a useful admin. The majority of my work is on creating articles, and I'm enjoying
274:
such is not likely to ever help relations. Indeed, if Admins for Recall suceeds in creating a good impression of
Knowledge, then Rogue Admin runs the risk of unintentionally giving a bad impression. As with AfR, I don't see it doing much harm. However, I would not liked to be placed in this category as I don't see it helping the project in anyway. --
909:
The 3RR backlog could use some attention and as such, I'd love to see this candidate be equipped with the means necessary to address the situation He seems like he would be a great resource there with his seemingly level head and NPOV (I haven't yet met the user but per a look at his edits and talk
151:
As I noted in my opening statement, I often feel that the place where most users interact with admins is at the various 'request' pages, such as the request for page protection or the 3RR reporting board. As a result, I'd like to help patrol these areas and more complex ones, such as the request for
310:
Viewing contribution data for user
Robdurbar (over the 5000 edit(s) shown on this page) (FAQ) Time range: 193 approximate day(s) of edits on this page Most recent edit on: 7hr (UTC) -- 06, Aug, 2006 || Oldest edit on: 12hr (UTC) -- 26, January, 2006 Overall edit summary use (last 1000 edits): Major
273:
As for Rouge Admin - I was previously unaware of this. However, I think it has been created in good faith as a joke and that this is clear to anyone reading the page. That said, I have my reservations about it - it could be viewed as little more than a personal attack on
Knowledge's critics and as
205:. The former was very early on in my Knowledge career and I think shows how I started out - bold, fair, but a bit too eager to edit out of my depth and not appreciative enough of the importance of sourcing. I withdrew from this article as I felt that I was unable to help furhter in its development.
214:
The
British Isles conflict (the ends of which are still ongoing, but it appears to be settling down) has been much more recent. It flared up whilst I was away from Knowledge (at the World Cup - jealous?) and was baisically caused by a lack of understanding between British and Irish users. I would
83:, which I only recently discovered. My main hope as an admin would be further work on similar 'request' style pages - I feel that this is where most users have intereaction with admins and thus is where work can be most effective. I would initially hope to work on
349:
Username
Robdurbar Total edits 7313 Distinct pages edited 2208 Average edits/page 3.312 First edit 16:16, July 5, 2005 (main) 4673 Talk 1416 User 80 User talk 672 Image 17 Image talk 3 Template 46 Template talk 10 Category 7 Knowledge 333 Knowledge talk 56
1262:
I questioned Kovaf's labelling of the edit as 'vandalism' - as I explained at the time, I think Wikima was attempting to improve the article and, though I didn't necessairily agree with him, I felt it was an inappropriate revert carried out by Koavf (re
263:
adding myself. What would probably stop me at the moment is the vagueness of the category - excatly what is a ' "re-confirmation" '- is it an RfA style vote, or a discussion? As it's voluntary I can see no harm in such a category as it currently
1411:
I was being a bit silly opposing on such narrow criteria, especially when you're very close to the mark. I just feel that
Knowledge space edits tell a true understanding of Knowledge policy, but your other edits in other categories outweigh it.
172:
probably stands out as one of pride to me; OK its not perfect, but I'd like to think that the turn around I performed on the page has been pretty impressive, considering too that it's a relatively high profile page.
215:
like to think that my approach - always considering other points of views, trying to merge the ideas of others - was key in moving away from arguments over the merits of terminology to actually settling the article.
191:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
98:
Anyway, I hope that I have proved myself to be a solid and dedicated user over the months that I have been here and feel that I will be of even more help to
Knowledge as an admin
1282:
on my user talk page seems fairly irrelevant - it discusses edits to
Knowledge policy pages, with which I had not been involved with Wikima or Kovaf (indeed Wikima, has just
152:
investigation, at a later stage. I'd also appreciate the ability to rollback more easily where I see vandalism, and would throw in the odd helping and at AfD's etc. if I can.
376:
1458:
126:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
1476:
1200:
Read the subheading "Vandalism and personal attacks" under the most recent archive posted by Robdurbar. Then read the "Recent edits" Robdurbar posted on
88:
684:
300 WP namespace edits and many more talk prove familiarity with WP, an understanding of the community and the skills needed for advanced editing. --
142:
1286:
which were 6 months prior to my interaction with him/her. Thus I think it was Kovaf, if anyone, who had been slighlty confused over policy. --
537:
92:
487:
970:
169:
659:
947:
33:
17:
76:
1279:
745:
320:
1434:, would prefer to see a higher Knowledge namespace edit count in order to show a better policy knowledge all-round.
672:, I've seen him around, he's done good things and I don't see any indication that he'd abuse or misuse the tools. -
1300:
134:
599:
247:
162:
Of your articles or contributions to Knowledge, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
1208:
or chose to ignore it when reprimanding another user. Considering that incident, it is too soon for adminship.
533:
437:
138:
911:
968:
510:
198:
984:
1365:
1357:
754:
608:
293:
256:
920:
1181:
1139:
869:
655:
550:
1457:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
1360:
961:
177:
is now a well sourced and full article, and I believe that I have highest contribution levels to that;
1443:
1426:
1394:
1381:
1369:
1347:
1331:
1317:
1290:
1231:
1212:
1186:
1169:
1157:
1143:
1127:
1107:
1095:
1070:
1058:
1027:
1011:
995:
972:
952:
922:
901:
889:
872:
860:
848:
833:
821:
809:
797:
785:
771:
757:
736:
724:
704:
692:
676:
664:
650:
642:
633:
612:
587:
565:
553:
541:
521:
495:
471:
450:
427:
398:
363:
343:
305:
278:
250:
115:
102:
1089:
943:
845:
717:
595:
Wohvere, I stume ót kastern, thaw ebt thwí lal het epople thwí eseth trosnomčilālý gehu tídē tunsćo?
857:
235:
1327:
lol, 12 edits off. Ironically, by the end of this RfA I'll probably have 350. Can't win 'em all. --
1264:
1119:
931:
685:
645:
622:
530:
421:
178:
70:
1066:- impressed by his contriubtions. I'm sure giving him the admin tools will benefit the articles.
793:
His efforts to improve DPT were evenhanded and useful; even if they have been swallowed up again.
1155:
1007:
721:
713:
690:
631:
574:
515:
369:
59:
1421:
1312:
750:
742:
604:
596:
1243:
Having inverstigated this a bit, I think this came from a time when I engaged with Koavf and
1439:
1344:
1227:
1178:
1135:
562:
546:
386:
1378:
1259:
1219:
1201:
1124:
1116:
1079:
939:
881:
842:
806:
794:
584:
459:
331:
1391:
1328:
1287:
1271:
1248:
1205:
1036:
701:
480:
407:
316:
275:
174:
112:
99:
66:
1470:
1152:
1067:
1020:
1003:
780:
767:
627:
505:
243:
202:
84:
80:
238:
I am in both categories, and finally, note that there is no wrong answer here...) ++
1414:
1305:
1166:
1040:
733:
327:
1435:
1244:
1223:
1044:
989:
981:
898:
360:
133:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
1451:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1275:
1104:
818:
673:
1236:
This was edit conflicted with the above but I thought I'd include it anyway -
1209:
1024:
830:
239:
223:
181:
is decent enough and almost entirely me, which adds a sense of pride too.
1218:
Stricken as the user has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of
197:
The two most obvious conflicts that I have been involved with were at
1461:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
255:
I think calling that a 'question' (single) might fall foul under the
1251:. The following diff shows Kovaf reverting an edit by Wikima
435:
Seems like a sensible, level-headed candidate for adminship.
109:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
1390:
Just to clarify, it wasn't me who struck out your vote. --
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1283:
1255:
1252:
91:, before getting into more complex admin areas such as
479:
Nothing to make me vote against, always a good sign.
700:
Reliable user, no qualms about handing him the mop.
856:. Fair minded editor, will make fair minded Admin.
841:. Good candidate that is deserving of the status.
805:. Good answers, solid user, and meets my criteria.
1303:with not enough Knowledge space edits. Sorry. —
1258:, on the grounds given in the edit summary. At
8:
910:page, I feel comfortable with my two cents)
1265:Knowledge:Vandalism#What vandalism is not
1103:- no indication editor will abuse tools.
1377:And dont ever strike out my vote again.
384:There appears to be nothing to fear. --
7:
1355:. 0FA and too few WPspace edits. --
93:Knowledge:Requests for investigation
1035:, edit history looks good; grasps
170:List of best selling music artists
24:
1477:Successful requests for adminship
1254:and labelling it as vandalism. I
573:- good editors make good admins
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
1247:on a couple of pages involving
1204:. He either did not understand
1019:. More patient than I am with
1165:Seems solid and experienced.--
732:no problems that I can see. --
1:
779:fine editor hand him the mop
458:. Nothing really seems awry.
1260:User Talk:Koavf#Recent edits
143:administrators' reading list
1187:19:50, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
1170:15:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
1158:13:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
1151:will use the tools well. --
1144:09:06, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
1128:00:31, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
1108:19:41, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1096:21:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1071:17:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1059:05:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
817:. Experienced, solid user.
503:I see no reason to oppose.
319:'s edit summary usage with
122:Questions for the candidate
1493:
1444:22:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
1427:18:43, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
1395:19:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
1382:23:20, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
1370:23:01, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
1348:06:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
1332:20:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1318:18:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1291:20:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1232:20:00, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1213:18:05, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
1028:23:12, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
1012:18:02, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
1002:No reason not to support.
996:17:53, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
973:23:25, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
953:22:00, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
923:19:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
902:16:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
890:14:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
873:02:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
861:01:14, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
849:22:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
834:19:53, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
822:10:51, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
810:05:18, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
798:00:23, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
786:22:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
772:21:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
758:17:47, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
737:16:51, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
725:16:32, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
705:13:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
693:11:40, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
677:07:54, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
665:07:30, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
634:06:30, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
613:06:09, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
588:05:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
566:02:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
554:00:28, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
542:00:07, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
529:per nomination statement.
522:23:31, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
496:23:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
472:22:26, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
451:21:57, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
428:21:54, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
399:21:39, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
377:21:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
364:20:53, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
344:21:15, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
306:07:41, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
279:20:38, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
251:18:40, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
137:, and read the page about
135:Category:Knowledge backlog
116:20:44, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
103:20:33, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
1454:Please do not modify it.
1043:, and the essentials. --
980:with no reason not to. —
1284:3 Knowledge space edits
222:Optional question from
199:Democratic Peace Theory
39:Please do not modify it
257:Trades Description Act
609:(The people rejoice!)
34:request for adminship
406:Looks good to me. --
368:Support looks good.
880:looks good to me.--
829:. Seen you around.
765:no reason not to. —
561:per nom and above.
179:British nationalism
89:the 3RR noticeboard
1023:, for one thing.
960:looks good to me.
1418:
1309:
951:
611:
397:
359:Support per nom.
328:Interiot's Tool 2
1484:
1456:
1425:
1416:
1363:
1316:
1307:
1122:
1093:
1083:
1056:
1053:
1050:
1047:
987:
966:
937:
934:
918:
917:
887:
884:
870:SynergeticMaggot
783:
770:
748:
648:
630:
625:
607:
602:
518:
513:
508:
493:
469:
464:
449:
447:
442:
415:
395:
392:
389:
374:
341:
336:
326:Edit count from
302:
299:
296:
291:Last 5000 edits.
41:
1492:
1491:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1459:this nomination
1452:
1413:
1361:
1304:
1270:The quote from
1202:User talk:Koavf
1184:
1120:
1087:
1081:
1054:
1051:
1048:
1045:
999:
985:
962:
932:
913:
912:
885:
882:
795:Septentrionalis
781:
766:
746:
663:
646:
641:, good user. --
623:
621:
620:A good user. --
600:
577:04:41, 6 August
516:
511:
506:
492:
484:
465:
460:
443:
440:(aeropagitica)
438:
436:
426:
411:
390:
387:
370:
351:
337:
332:
312:
300:
297:
294:
52:
37:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1490:
1488:
1480:
1479:
1469:
1468:
1464:
1463:
1447:
1446:
1429:
1405:
1404:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1385:
1384:
1372:
1350:
1343:Per above. --
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1299:does not meet
1293:
1268:
1249:Western Sahara
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1194:
1190:
1189:
1182:
1172:
1160:
1146:
1130:
1110:
1098:
1073:
1061:
1030:
1014:
1000:
998:
992:
975:
964:Baseball,Baby!
955:
925:
904:
892:
875:
863:
851:
836:
824:
812:
800:
788:
774:
760:
739:
727:
707:
695:
679:
667:
653:
636:
615:
590:
578:
568:
556:
544:
524:
498:
486:
474:
453:
430:
420:
401:
379:
366:
356:
355:
348:
347:
346:
324:
321:mathbot's tool
309:
289:
288:
284:
283:
282:
281:
268:
267:
266:
265:
219:
218:
217:
216:
209:
208:
207:
206:
185:
184:
183:
182:
175:United Kingdom
156:
155:
154:
153:
139:administrators
124:
123:
119:
118:
111:What, here? --
55:Final (48/3/2)
51:
46:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1489:
1478:
1475:
1474:
1472:
1462:
1460:
1455:
1449:
1448:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1430:
1428:
1423:
1419:
1410:
1407:
1406:
1402:
1401:
1396:
1393:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1383:
1380:
1376:
1373:
1371:
1368:
1367:
1364:
1359:
1354:
1353:Sorry, oppose
1351:
1349:
1346:
1342:
1339:
1338:
1333:
1330:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1320:
1319:
1314:
1310:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1292:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1266:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1192:
1191:
1188:
1185:
1180:
1176:
1173:
1171:
1168:
1164:
1161:
1159:
1156:
1154:
1150:
1147:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1134:
1131:
1129:
1126:
1123:
1118:
1114:
1111:
1109:
1106:
1102:
1099:
1097:
1094:
1091:
1085:
1084:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1069:
1065:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1026:
1022:
1021:British Isles
1018:
1015:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
994:
991:
988:
983:
979:
976:
974:
971:
969:
967:
965:
959:
956:
954:
949:
945:
941:
936:
929:
926:
924:
921:
919:
916:
908:
905:
903:
900:
896:
893:
891:
888:
879:
876:
874:
871:
867:
864:
862:
859:
855:
852:
850:
847:
844:
840:
837:
835:
832:
828:
825:
823:
820:
816:
813:
811:
808:
804:
801:
799:
796:
792:
789:
787:
784:
778:
775:
773:
769:
764:
761:
759:
756:
755:
752:
749:
744:
740:
738:
735:
731:
728:
726:
723:
720:
719:
715:
711:
708:
706:
703:
699:
696:
694:
691:
689:
688:
683:
680:
678:
675:
671:
668:
666:
661:
657:
652:
649:
644:
640:
637:
635:
632:
629:
626:
619:
616:
614:
610:
606:
603:
598:
594:
591:
589:
586:
582:
579:
576:
572:
569:
567:
564:
560:
557:
555:
552:
548:
545:
543:
539:
535:
532:
528:
525:
523:
520:
519:
514:
509:
502:
499:
497:
491:
490:
482:
478:
475:
473:
470:
468:
463:
457:
454:
452:
448:
446:
441:
434:
431:
429:
425:
424:
419:
418:
414:
410:
405:
402:
400:
394:
393:
383:
380:
378:
375:
373:
367:
365:
362:
358:
357:
353:
352:
345:
342:
340:
335:
329:
325:
322:
318:
314:
313:
308:
307:
304:
303:
286:
285:
280:
277:
272:
271:
270:
269:
262:
258:
254:
253:
252:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
230:
229:
228:
227:
225:
213:
212:
211:
210:
204:
203:British Isles
200:
196:
193:
192:
190:
187:
186:
180:
176:
171:
167:
164:
163:
161:
158:
157:
150:
147:
146:
144:
140:
136:
132:
129:
128:
127:
121:
120:
117:
114:
110:
107:
106:
105:
104:
101:
96:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
75:
72:
68:
64:
63:
61:
58:Ended 20:45,
56:
50:
47:
43:
40:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
1453:
1450:
1431:
1408:
1374:
1356:
1352:
1340:
1322:
1301:my standards
1296:
1295:
1197:
1196:
1174:
1162:
1148:
1132:
1112:
1100:
1086:
1080:
1075:
1063:
1032:
1016:
977:
963:
957:
927:
914:
906:
894:
877:
865:
853:
838:
826:
814:
802:
790:
776:
762:
753:
729:
716:
709:
697:
686:
681:
669:
638:
617:
592:
583:- no doubt.
580:
570:
558:
526:
504:
500:
488:
476:
466:
461:
455:
444:
439:
432:
422:
416:
412:
408:
403:
385:
381:
372:Rama's arrow
371:
338:
333:
292:
290:
260:
231:
221:
220:
194:
188:
165:
159:
148:
130:
125:
108:
97:
73:
65:
57:
54:
53:
48:
38:
30:
28:
1345:Masssiveego
1321:Changed to
1297:Weak Oppose
1245:User:Wikima
1136:Sarah Ewart
843:violet/riga
563:Newyorkbrad
547:Merovingian
423:Talk to me!
1379:Tchadienne
1276:User:Koavf
1220:Tchadienne
807:Themindset
714:Mailer Dia
585:Stubbleboy
489:review me!
396:(joturner)
60:2006-08-12
31:successful
1392:Robdurbar
1375:Hells no.
1329:Robdurbar
1288:Robdurbar
915:hoopydink
858:MelForbes
741:per nom,
702:Oldelpaso
575:abakharev
481:RandyWang
317:Robdurbar
276:Robdurbar
168:Well the
113:Robdurbar
100:Robdurbar
67:Robdurbar
49:Robdurbar
1471:Category
1256:reverted
1183:Bakatalk
1177:per nom.
1117:DarthVad
1068:Aquilina
1004:Shimgray
948:contribs
944:messages
930:. --Slgr
878:Support,
768:Khoikhoi
687:Draicone
660:Contribs
593:Support.
287:Comments
261:consider
141:and the
77:contribs
1432:Neutral
1409:Neutral
1403:Neutral
1323:Neutral
1272:WP:VAND
1206:WP:VAND
1179:Bakaman
1175:Support
1167:Runcorn
1163:Support
1149:Support
1133:Support
1113:Support
1101:Support
1076:Support
1064:Support
1037:WP:NPOV
1033:Support
1017:Support
978:Support
958:Support
928:Support
907:Support
895:Support
866:Support
854:Support
839:Support
827:Support
815:Support
803:Support
791:Support
777:Support
763:Support
734:Guinnog
730:Support
710:Support
698:Support
682:Support
670:Support
651:nce Ong
639:Support
628:iva1979
618:Support
581:Support
571:Support
559:Support
527:Support
501:Support
477:Support
456:Support
445:(talk)
433:Support
404:Support
382:Support
361:Michael
354:Support
1436:Stifle
1358:Миборо
1341:Oppose
1224:Ral315
1198:Oppose
1193:Oppose
1105:Jayjg
899:Tawker
883:Kungfu
605:rbil10
391:abjotu
264:stands
85:WP:RfP
81:WP:AfC
1274:that
1090:Reply
1041:WP:RS
935:ndson
819:Zaxem
674:Bobet
597:RyanG
467:Chimp
462:alpha
409:Mr. L
388:tariq
339:Chimp
334:alpha
295:Voice
62:(UTC)
16:<
1440:talk
1422:talk
1415:Mets
1366:ский
1313:talk
1306:Mets
1280:here
1278:put
1228:talk
1210:NOBS
1140:Talk
1025:Alai
1008:talk
982:Xyra
940:page
886:Adam
868:. -
751:hway
712:. -
656:Chat
551:Talk
517:Gerg
315:See
298:-of-
236:wonk
201:and
87:and
71:talk
1417:501
1308:501
1222:.
1153:Alf
1082:Jay
1055:el
897:--
846:(t)
831:Deb
782:Æon
643:Ter
531:Roy
417:fty
301:All
240:Lar
224:Lar
95:.
1473::
1442:)
1230:)
1142:)
1115:.
1078:--
1052:er
1039:,
1010:|
1006:|
993:/
946:-
942:-
747:ig
722:lo
658:|
549:-
540:.
507:Th
494:)
330:.
242::
232:4.
195:A:
189:3.
166:A:
160:2.
149:A:
145:.
131:1.
36:.
1438:(
1424:)
1420:(
1412:—
1362:в
1315:)
1311:(
1267:)
1226:(
1138:(
1125:r
1121:e
1092:)
1088:(
1049:P
1046:M
990:l
986:e
950:)
938:(
933:@
743:H
718:b
662:)
654:(
647:e
624:S
601:e
538:A
536:.
534:A
512:e
485:/
483:(
413:e
323:.
248:c
246:/
244:t
226::
74:·
69:(
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.