739:. I like Ronline. He is a good person, and deserving of adminship probably. But as Zserghei and Iulian U. said, the fact that the nominator is Bonaparte makes this request suspect. If this RfA fails (which it probably won't), I would vote "support" in a new RfA later if the nominator's motives were less suspcious. Now, if it didn't look like this RfA was definitely going to win, I would truly consider a "support" vote because it's Ronline we're talking about, but since it looks like it is with or without me, I'm just registering my opposition here more as a matter of principle. --
882:
by anonymous IPs tend to raise the bar of my giving them a support vote, and I tend to subject those people to closer scrutiny. I don't think I would ever negatively discount a person based on the nominator however, which is what the above appears to be doing. So (in a very roundabout way!), I am agreeing with you: any oppose votes based solely on who the nominator is should be discarded or at least heavily discounted. Glad to see the above are nuetral votes. :)
963:
937:
268:
1086:
article, which has been through some tough times lately. There, I've tried to stand for the truth, to prevent both sides taking things too far on their own way. In the future, I hope to maintain that. Mediating conflict is one thing I really enjoy doing, if only because it achieves a sense of social
1081:
A. Yes I have, for that matter. I've been involved in a dispute at the
Moldovan Knowledge (XXG), and I've tried to deal with that in as neutral a way as possible. The only thing I believe in more than neutrality is communication - without direct, reasonable communication, everything fails. I've also
881:
Fair enough, but I also feel that who the nominator is does matter to people. For example, if I don't know a person who is being nominated personally, but I do know and trust the nominator, I will tend to give the person nominated a little more credit. Similarly, unsigned nominations and nominations
72:
to be
Administrator! He has always been a reliable, friendly editor, contributor of countless articles, I've seen him act as the mediator on a number of difficult topics. He is also sysop at Romanian Knowledge (XXG). He is a good researcher and very good defender of the truth. Let's go and vote for
749:
Good points. I am aware that you had your share of verbal abuse from certain people at certain articles, but it was precisely there that
Ronline had a moderating influence. That is to say, keep in mind that this is not a vote for Bonaparte to be an admin. :)
1087:
justice and constructive stability. Have any users caused me stress - yes, but I've never sought to aggrevate conflict. If there's one thing people must learn at
Knowledge (XXG), is that we should try to talk to each other in a nicer way.
1045:
A. I would be willing to work against vandalism in all of its forms. However, I'd also like to help with requested moves and things like that, the only an administrator can do and that people sometimes wait too much time
1059:
A. Well, I've contributed mostly to the
Romanian Knowledge (XXG) and I haven't really been a content contributor - I've mostly been involved in organisation, planning, stuff like that. I'm really proud, however, of the
629:
Ronline's able and common-sense mediation in the matter of the anon
Romanian contributor with a prediliction for unjustifiably augmenting Romanian stats demonstrates he's made of the right admin material.--
847:
I know. I would like to make it clear that this also applies to a negative vote, not necessarily a neutral vote. Voting against a candidate because you have differences with the nominator (but nothing
403:
more often though. And about the nominator, I suspect
Bonaparte's motivation is to have a friend with big stick at certain controversal articles, but I don't think Ronline will fall into that trap.
784:
Changing to abstain, following (iterated) modifications to answer, with which I'm now completely happy, pending a closer look at candidate's contribs/developing an actual substantiative opinion.
518:: I don't know the candidate from Adam's Off Ox, but no one could fake tolerance and fair mindedness through all the inappropriate questions below. Holy smokes, but that takes some equanimity.
813:
We are supposed to be judging the candidate here. In my view the nominator should not come into it. If you have a dispute with
Bonaparte that is fine, but this is not the place to bring it up.
904:
I think
Ronline would be a good admin, but the fact that Bonaparte is the nominator makes me wonder what his intentions are. I don't want my Support vote to endorse Bonaparte's stance (see
420:. Having not been involved in the apparant conflicts, I'm going to side with the majority on this one. This user shows promise, and promise should always get a chance to prove itself. --
1078:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
1102:
486:- Very moderated edits, even in harsh disputes. I do not agree with users arguing that the RfA should be rejected because of who submitted it. This is not about
1068:
article, but I was one of the major contributors that brought it up to featured status. I'm doing that with
Bucharest now, but there's still some work to go :)
605:. Seems like a good editor, and he did a nice job handling the questions below. I don't really care about the source of the nom, since it's not germane. -
1145:
1039:
1131:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.
925:
treat this as an RfA and not a Senate confirmation hearing. The questions and insinuations below are ridiculous and have no bearing on this nom.
32:
17:
312:. His responses to the baiting, probing, irrelevant questions below demonstrate that he has the proper temprament for being an admin.
285:. I know his good job as a sysop on the Romanian Knowledge (XXG). This argument counterbalances the nominator and the bad timing. --
770:
On the basis of the user to question 6 (which I've just taken the liberty of correcting the numbering of by hand). Please review
551:
104:- Like I said in nomination, I am strongly support his nomination. He's very helpful, nice, and will help with a lot of things!
118:
851:
the candidate) is totally unfair to the RFA in question. If you have doubts on the candidate feel free to ask him questions.
771:
432:. I believe he is fair, rational and doesn't resort to ad hominems. I expect him to continue to be so once he's elected. --
65:
1031:
556:
1056:
Of your articles or contributions to Knowledge (XXG), are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
775:
1112:
682:
1035:
186:
998:
755:
587:
569:. However, for the record I would like to show that I am pretty sure that Bonaparte has ulterior motives here. --
408:
377:
433:
969:
943:
274:
905:
537:
384:
695:
636:
324:
994:
751:
583:
546:
421:
404:
370:
1116:
1091:
1061:
1002:
972:
955:
946:
929:
915:
886:
862:
842:
833:
817:
803:
788:
759:
743:
728:
702:
686:
667:
655:
643:
621:
609:
606:
591:
573:
561:
522:
510:
501:
478:
475:
467:
458:
447:
436:
424:
412:
391:
362:
351:
339:
327:
316:
304:
289:
277:
257:
245:
226:
218:
206:
193:
164:
148:
132:
110:
89:
77:
966:
940:
359:
301:
271:
1083:
912:
857:
828:
723:
444:
59:
630:
399:. Cool-headed user in many hot disputes. I would like to ask Ronline to promise to fill the
223:
145:
470:
1109:
679:
532:
336:
814:
487:
180:
105:
74:
1139:
926:
883:
839:
800:
664:
313:
298:
286:
254:
236:
234:
Despite who the nominator is, after all, this is based on the user, not the nom ;] --
1088:
952:
922:
909:
852:
823:
740:
718:
570:
491:
400:
265:. What Turnstep said. I, for one, wouldn't have taken those questions as calmly...
215:
129:
86:
69:
55:
44:
838:
These are nuetral votes, so what would be the point of considering them invalid?
652:
618:
519:
498:
495:
348:
141:
1030:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
1105:
962:
936:
778:, fix your answer to be in line with these, and I'll be glad to review this.
675:
582:
Oh, I am sure of that. :) But I am sure that Ronline is smarter than that. :)
267:
203:
807:
785:
779:
455:
335:
He deserves this nomination and he can be a real help for the other admins.
173:
157:
993:
Because Anittas has no respect for people who don't have Romanian name. :)
810:
a featured article, but personality of nominator (Bonaparte) is suspect.
466:- I don't get why his religion should affect his chances at adminship. --
960:
What's the way I prefer to format my signature got to do with anything?
347:
He already does a tremendous job as a bureaucrat on Romanian wiki! --
1125:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
806:
I don't have anything against Ronline. I support his goal of making
717:– Please enable your email id. (Please inform me once this is done)
663:. Excellent job of handling the inappropriate questions below. --
156:
the guy who once flooded Wikinews with Romania-related articles :)
951:
Says the guy who writes his nickname in a 'weirdo' kind of way. --
527:
Never seen this editor, but by studying the contributions, I must
253:, due in no small part to the handling of the questions below.
202:
and find the comments about the nominator to be out of place.
84:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
822:
I agree with Raven. Such votes may be considered invalid.
28:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1022:
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
51:
Final (37/0/1) ended 13:49 2 December 2005, 13:40 (UTC)
140:: I trust Ronline to use adminship appropriately. --
8:
214:I've seen he did a great job up until now --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
509:- He is the right man for the job! --
7:
24:
1146:Successful requests for adminship
934:I agree. It's really ridiculous.
772:Knowledge (XXG):Protection policy
1101:{Big wedge of crap moved to the
1032:Category:Knowledge (XXG) backlog
961:
935:
651:Should make an excellent admin.
266:
776:Knowledge (XXG):Blocking policy
1:
1092:07:47, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
1003:16:06, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
973:00:08, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
956:18:48, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
947:16:18, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
930:15:44, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
916:14:44, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
887:19:34, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
863:17:52, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
843:16:05, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
834:10:29, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
818:09:57, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
804:23:50, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
789:05:20, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
782:04:06, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
760:23:28, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
744:19:47, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
729:09:48, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
622:04:37, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
610:03:07, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
592:02:03, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
574:01:35, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
562:16:27, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
523:12:31, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
502:08:13, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
479:16:38, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
459:12:55, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
448:11:28, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
437:07:52, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
425:03:07, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
413:23:28, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
392:23:14, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
363:22:58, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
352:22:34, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
340:21:09, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
328:20:40, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
317:20:38, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
305:18:30, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
290:17:00, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
278:16:18, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
258:16:14, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
246:12:02, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
227:10:27, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
219:10:26, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
207:10:16, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
194:09:26, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
165:09:24, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
149:09:15, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
133:15:18, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
90:07:47, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
78:13:49, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
1117:13:07, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
1040:administrators' reading list
703:03:52, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
687:13:07, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
668:20:00, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
656:19:29, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
644:03:05, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
1018:Questions for the candidate
68:) – I am proud to nominate
1162:
1034:, and read the page about
1128:Please do not modify it.
37:Please do not modify it.
906:Talk:Moldovan language
1082:been involved in the
33:request for adminship
1064:article. This isn't
1062:Caile Ferate Romane
921:May I suggest that
1119:
1115:
1084:Moldovan language
685:
641:
121:
117:
113:
1153:
1130:
1108:
1100:
965:
939:
860:
855:
831:
826:
726:
721:
700:
678:
637:
635:
559:
554:
549:
544:
535:
473:
389:
382:
375:
333:Strongly Support
270:
242:
239:
189:
183:
176:
162:
119:
115:
111:
108:
1161:
1160:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1136:
1135:
1126:
995:Oleg Alexandrov
858:
853:
829:
824:
752:Oleg Alexandrov
724:
719:
696:
633:
584:Oleg Alexandrov
557:
552:
547:
538:
533:
471:
422:Martin Osterman
405:Oleg Alexandrov
385:
378:
371:
244:
240:
237:
192:
187:
181:
174:
158:
106:
48:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1159:
1157:
1149:
1148:
1138:
1137:
1134:
1133:
1121:
1120:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1036:administrators
1020:
1016:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
919:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
820:
792:
791:
764:
763:
762:
706:
705:
689:
670:
658:
646:
624:
612:
607:Colin Kimbrell
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
564:
525:
513:
507:Strong Support
504:
488:User:Bonaparte
481:
461:
450:
439:
427:
415:
394:
365:
354:
342:
330:
319:
307:
292:
280:
260:
248:
235:
229:
221:
212:Strong support
209:
196:
178:
172:, looks good.
167:
151:
135:
123:
102:Strong Support
93:
92:
47:
42:
41:
40:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1158:
1147:
1144:
1143:
1141:
1132:
1129:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1111:
1107:
1104:
1099:
1098:
1093:
1090:
1085:
1080:
1079:
1077:
1074:
1073:
1067:
1063:
1058:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1044:
1043:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
974:
971:
968:
964:
959:
958:
957:
954:
950:
949:
948:
945:
942:
938:
933:
932:
931:
928:
924:
920:
917:
914:
911:
907:
903:
902:
901:
900:
888:
885:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
864:
861:
856:
850:
846:
845:
844:
841:
837:
836:
835:
832:
827:
821:
819:
816:
812:
811:
809:
805:
802:
799:
798:
797:
796:
790:
787:
783:
781:
777:
773:
769:
765:
761:
757:
753:
748:
747:
746:
745:
742:
738:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
727:
722:
716:
711:
710:
704:
701:
699:
694:per above. --
693:
690:
688:
684:
681:
677:
674:
671:
669:
666:
662:
659:
657:
654:
650:
647:
645:
642:
640:
632:
628:
625:
623:
620:
616:
613:
611:
608:
604:
601:
593:
589:
585:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
572:
568:
565:
563:
560:
555:
550:
545:
543:
542:
536:
530:
526:
524:
521:
517:
514:
512:
508:
505:
503:
500:
497:
493:
489:
485:
482:
480:
477:
474:
469:
465:
462:
460:
457:
454:
451:
449:
446:
443:
440:
438:
435:
431:
428:
426:
423:
419:
416:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
395:
393:
390:
388:
383:
381:
376:
374:
369:
366:
364:
361:
358:
355:
353:
350:
346:
343:
341:
338:
334:
331:
329:
326:
325:Alexander 007
323:
320:
318:
315:
311:
308:
306:
303:
300:
296:
293:
291:
288:
284:
281:
279:
276:
273:
269:
264:
261:
259:
256:
252:
249:
247:
243:
233:
230:
228:
225:
222:
220:
217:
213:
210:
208:
205:
201:
197:
195:
190:
184:
177:
171:
168:
166:
163:
161:
155:
152:
150:
147:
143:
139:
136:
134:
131:
127:
124:
122:
114:
109:
103:
100:
99:
98:
97:
91:
88:
85:
82:
81:
80:
79:
76:
71:
67:
64:
61:
57:
53:
52:
46:
43:
39:
38:
34:
31:
26:
25:
19:
1127:
1124:
1075:
1065:
1053:
1027:
1021:
1017:
1015:
923:User:Anittas
898:
897:
848:
794:
793:
767:
766:
736:
735:
714:
713:
712:
708:
707:
697:
691:
672:
660:
648:
638:
626:
614:
602:
566:
540:
539:
528:
515:
506:
492:User:Ronline
490:, but about
483:
463:
452:
441:
429:
417:
401:edit summary
396:
386:
379:
372:
367:
356:
344:
332:
321:
309:
294:
282:
262:
250:
231:
211:
199:
169:
159:
153:
137:
125:
101:
95:
94:
83:
62:
54:
50:
49:
36:
29:
27:
698:a.n.o.n.y.m
496:User:Dpotop
224:Merovingian
476:stianpower
337:Romihaitza
107:Bonaparte
30:successful
1103:talk page
815:Raven4x4x
808:Bucharest
75:Bonaparte
1140:Category
1038:and the
967:ナイトスタリオン
941:ナイトスタリオン
927:Marskell
899:Comments
884:Turnstep
854:=Nichalp
840:Turnstep
825:=Nichalp
801:Zserghei
720:=Nichalp
665:Kbdank71
649:Support.
627:Support.
558:(e-mail)
511:Dacodava
453:Support.
434:Chris S.
345:Support.
322:Support.
314:ZacharyS
287:AdiJapan
272:ナイトスタリオン
255:Turnstep
238:негідний
120:contribs
66:contribs
1089:Ronline
953:Anittas
859:«Talk»=
849:against
830:«Talk»=
795:Neutral
725:«Talk»=
692:Support
673:Support
661:Support
615:Support
603:Support
567:Support
529:Support
516:Support
484:Support
464:Support
442:Support
430:Support
418:Support
397:Support
373:Quentin
368:Support
357:Support
310:Support
295:Support
283:Support
263:Support
251:Support
232:Support
216:Orioane
200:Support
170:Support
154:Support
138:Support
130:Anittas
126:Support
96:Support
87:Ronline
70:Ronline
56:Ronline
45:Ronline
910:Iulian
768:Oppose
737:Oppose
715:Oppose
709:Oppose
653:Olessi
619:DS1953
520:Geogre
445:bogdan
360:Izehar
142:Jmabel
116:&
1106:Proto
676:Proto
631:cjllw
617:. --
499:Jacky
380:Pierc
299:mikka
204:MONGO
188:extra
160:Grue
73:him!
16:<
1046:for!
999:talk
786:Alai
780:Alai
774:and
756:talk
741:Node
639:TALK
588:talk
571:Node
534:Oran
456:El_C
409:talk
349:Vlad
241:лють
175:NSLE
146:Talk
112:talk
60:talk
908:).
553:(c)
548:(t)
494:.
468:Cel
302:(t)
1142::
1076:3.
1066:my
1054:2.
1042:.
1028:1.
1001:)
913:U.
758:)
634:|
590:)
531:.
411:)
297:.
198:I
182:讨论
144:|
128:--
35:.
1113:c
1110:t
997:(
970:✉
944:✉
918:.
754:(
683:c
680:t
586:(
541:e
472:e
407:(
387:e
275:✉
191:)
185:+
179:(
63:·
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.