74:
the articles were otherwise speedy deletable. I checked her CSD's going back to
January, and every one she tagged deserved to be deleted. I also noticed that Slp often 'fixed' tags of other people who used the incorrect criteria (including removing tags if necessary.) If Slp1 were solely an anti-vandal fighter (or a deletionist), her use of G1 might be enough to get me to oppose, but Slp1 appears to fight vandalism as a change in routine from her normal activities! One of the things that I really liked about reviewing Slp's edits was the fact that there were a few articles that were tagged for deletion that she saved by working on them!
192:
last few decades! Yes, I am interested in lots of things, and aware that there is plenty more to learn in so many different areas. That's probably why I have so much enjoyed being part of this project: the opportunity to research and write about a variety of topics, the chance to learn to help and collaborate with editors from all over the world with very different backgrounds and perspectives, as well as of course the goal of providing unknown readers with an accurate, fair and balanced encyclopedia to consult.
1904:"My proudest moment as a content editor was when the École Polytechnique massacre article became a featured article and subsequently appeared on the mainpage". That kind of "dedication to the cause", plus no other obvious issues, equals a support every day of the week. Definitely not your stereotypical sign-up-and-revert-using-twinkle-till-I-can-pass-RfA candidate which tend to cause most of the problems due to a lack of discretion, understanding of more complex users and ability to interact intelligently.
714:
Rigorous referencing from high quality sources can also help in part with maintaining a neutral point of view and avoiding undue weight in articles. All very important in any credible encyclopedia. A reference or two can help to prove notability and that an article needs to be kept. And finally, my experience is that getting editors agreeing to cite all statements in an article can be a useful step to resolution and consensus during a dispute.
131:, which was revealed by Slp1's due diligence to be based upon marginal sources, including a poor copy of a Usenet FAQ, and which involved a COI with the manufacturer of an electronic fluency device for stuttering. Through that FAR, I observed how Slp1 worked diligently but firmly (with a difficult COI editor) to restore the sourcing and accurate text to several stuttering-related articles. Since then, I've seen Slp1 everywhere: popping up at
150:. The medical articles are always in need of more admins, where Slp1 is knowledgeable of sourcing and other policy issues. Slp1 is another of Wiki's valued, civil, courteous content contributors who also understand policies and guidelines and has demonstrated ability and willingness to contribute across the board to Wiki processes and to keep calm in difficult situations.
2093:. I like what I see in contribs, and I'm very impressed with the tone of communication with other editors. I've tracked a number of threads on her talk page, and I find her helpful and civil. I like the attitude towards speedy deletions reflected in the answer to question #1 above, as it suggests the nom intends to bring critical thinking into responding to CSD tags. --
534:
well researched, clearly thought out and carefully expressed. Leaving an edit one hates in an article while discussing it one the talkpage can be irritating, but may be a better way forward in the longterm. Not always, of course, and there are many instances (e.g. BLP violations) when quick and decisive action is required.
2332:: I havent had any interactions with the person yet but I dont find any reason I should oppose her. Her answers impress me , indicates me how serious she is for the job. You have a steady editing pattern. Have seen many people suddenly increasing edit counts and then coming to RFA. Full support and best wishes to you --
825:
actually do would depend on the specifics of the situation: the nature of the negative information, the status and previous edits of the editor (new/SPA/established/IP), whether multiple IPs were involved, the duration of time between insertions of the material, what kind of warnings had been issue before etc.--
1201:- I usually don't support based on co-nominations, but those explanations and diffs leave a really really good taste in my mouth. I can sympathize with a few misplaced CSD tags, but you know what? She removed faulty ones. Good for you. You have Wisdom89's support, for whatever it is worth. Good luck.
824:
either add a further graduated/final warning to the editor (my experience is that often it takes more that 2 warnings for things to sink in with people that "it ain't gonna happen"), engage the editor in some personal discussion about BLP policy etc, block the editor or protect the page. What I would
313:
to become a featured article in less than 6 months. It was there that I learnt the joys of researching and writing and especially collaborating with other editors: though I was perhaps the major contributor of content, the article wouldn't have been anything special at all without the involvement of
280:
would be to save some articles that are tagged too quickly. I have already removed tags I didn't agree with when patrolling newly created pages. As noted below and above, sometimes with a little research and help, an unpromising looking sentence or two can prove to be about a notable and verifiable
216:
Though it seems from the comments above that my editing shows more than usual variety, I actually consider myself to be a content editor first and foremost. And I don't plan to change that, or frankly to be a particularly active user of administrative tools. But the researching I like to do also has
73:
She is active with CSD's, which means, as many of you know, I had to check her edits closely. Since an over eager CSD'er can chase a way a great newbie, I generally don't like CSD'ers and only will recommend the best of the best. While I question some of her use of G1 (blatant nonsense/gibberish),
2655:
Thanks for positive feedback, Appletrees, even if you oppose. While I may hesitate at times (often not such a bad thing at times, I think!), I also sometimes make a conscious decision that my involvement and contributions may be more fruitful if I remain neutral and don't explicitly commit myself to
2640:
is only lain for her contributions "as an editor", not " meditator" to resolve the dispute around the issues. I felt she hesitated about her position at that time. I also saw her several commenting some matters at ANI a couple of time, but also have the same impression. I don't have anything against
1702:
I personally prefer the slow and easy method. Great answer. Regarding the rest of your qualifications: Over 2 years of consistent, quality contributions – the times you had to be tough you were – no incivility issues – an edit count that shows article building. Overall excellent job. Good luck
713:
positively affects many aspects of WP's articles, can even help focus issues in dispute situations. WP:V increases the likelihood of accuracy of the articles, and reduces the ability of editors to introduce original research, opinion, rumour, into articles, particularly important in BLP articles.
568:
Well, I must say that someone telling me that I "need to block" a certain user would raise a variety questions and doubts in my mind. It doesn't seem to be a usual route for administrator action, as far as I aware, and careful investigations would be needed to try and figure out what was going on.
533:
I think the most important lesson I have learnt is that very often in everyday editing, there is no rush. Responding too quickly, editing too quickly, reverting too quickly can be a mistake. Talkpage and article edits tend to be better and more productive when one takes the time to ensure they are
495:
says that the best predictor of future behaviour is past behaviour, and I think he's right, even if I feel slightly embarrassed to quote him! An RFA is an opportunity to collect multiple editors' opinions of an editor's past behaviour, by looking at edits and by hearing from other editors who have
191:
When I was at high school, the only prize I ever got was for "All Round
Achievement": in other words, I had very broad interests/involvements and was pretty good (though not perhaps outstanding) at many of them. So I was very amused to realize, having read the above, how little had changed in the
426:
and state clear opinions based on this and with reference to policy and guidelines. Remember that there are real people at the other end of the screen, with real concerns, opinions, motivations, pressures and feelings. Whether or not I agree with them, whether or not firmness is required, I can
633:, and they advise that protecting the articles, particularly the Main Page featured article, is done only rarely, when extreme vandalism is being experienced. Other methods, such as blocking editors/IPs may be preferred. Getting consensus for protection of the Main Page featured article (on
275:
qualifier. Having absorbed this, I checked my last 100 speedy nominations (which took me back to the beginning of
December, I'm not that prolific!) and found that 96 have been deleted, one was changed into a redirect and 3 others were copyright vios that either I or others rewrote to avoid
1510:
these days) are both, IMHO, highly trustworthy and experienced contributors, whose judgement I fully trust. Finally, her answers to the questions exhibit a well-versed understanding of policy and a willingness to assist the project. Absolutely no reason whatsoever to oppose this contributor.
421:
This provided a steep learning curve in
Knowledge content editing, policy and guidelines and how to best to deal with conflict. In particular, be civil and polite, keep calm, seek help (from projects, noticeboards, RFCs, Third opinions etc), think carefully before editing, consider delaying
1759:. Slp is a good editor, who has impressed me with any work I have seen around the project. Strong article contributions and co-nominations; sound answers to the questions, which demonstrate competence; contribution history shows that he's trustworthy. I have no problems here; good luck!
399:
I have long found it a bit ironic that as a peaceable person who tends to avoid conflict in real life, it was a dispute that changed my editing style and frequency from that of an irregular gnomish-type editor as it was during my first nine months here (I actually edited first as
573:'s edits like? Has the editor been adequately warned? Are blocks going to prove preventive or would another intervention be more helpful? Depending on the situation, including whether I felt confident enough of making the right decision, I might easily also consider directing
628:
Once again, I would be cautious. I know that I should be partly because I once requested protection for the Main Page featured article and was politely informed that it wasn't done! There are specific guidelines for protecting articles linked to the mainpage at
345:
I have seen people having difficulties with the myriad policies, guidelines etc. I have enjoyed helping some of these editors navigate the rules of copyright violations, proving notability and verifiability, avoiding corporate promotion etc. (e.g.
756:. However, I confess that my understanding of things like Tor and anonymizing proxies and range blocks is weak in the extreme (wrong background/age, perhaps?) and I would refer such cases on to people who would have a better grasp of these things.
2038:
per nominations and the responses to all of the questions. They show that you have a deep understanding of all the relevant policies that administrators have to deal with, and I would be glad if you became an administrator. Good luck!
1741:
At times I will pick a random RFA to comment on. After reviewing this candidates contributions, and asking a couple of clarifying question, I feel comfortable this editor will not abuse the tools. This one has my support.
439:
and other noticeboards. In quite a number of cases, helping out in the dispute led to doing a good deal of content editing on the articles themselves, and in doing so I have learnt all sorts of fascinating things about an
777:
Someone inserts unsourced negative information into a biography, and you have already reverted them, twice... what options are available to you when he/she reinserts this information a third time, after being warned?
751:
In general, when an IP block is affecting a user with good editing history who promises not to mis-use the exemption by editing through a blocked anonymizing proxy. All I know about this comes from this policy page
1660:. Thoughtful and impressive answers to the questions. Seems level-headed and mature. If there was anything to waver over (there wasn't) her statements about verifiability would have clinched it for me.--
2210:
In my experience, Slp1 is a hardworking editor who is consistently civil and fair in her dealings with others. I have much respect for the work she does and believe she is a true asset to the project.
1698:, believe that it is all about edit count – or how many GA & FA’s the individual participated in, in so many months. And they are important to a certain degree. However, when it comes to our
637:, say) would be probably be advisable. Short-term semi-protecting other mainpage linked articles are probably less controversial given high levels of vandalism, and in fact the
427:
still be respectful in my interactions. I have found these approaches have served me well in subsequent disputes that I have become involved in when responding to posts at the
1506:
level, which is excellent and necessary particularly in the administrative tasks she intends to take part in. The two nominators (who appear to be nominating contributors like
203:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
1997:- per answers to questions and looking at past edits. Careful attention to detail, lots of activity on article talk pages. Let's have more Wikipedians like this as admins!
2570:
Excellent editor with many abilities to developte to
Knowledge but I have a doubt that she is capable of handling disputed and heated matters when a conflict is raised. --
341:
The other thing I am quite proud of is the way I have been able to help some new editors and get some new pages get started. While engaging in my occasional patrolling of
1097:-- to name a few. She is one of the most civil, policy-oriented, article-oriented, and professional editors that I know. I support her nomination without reservation.
393:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
2633:
98:
She is active all over the place. She is involved with BLP, COI, and RS discussion boards. She has worked with usernames. Her comments on various talk pages are
106:. While I am very impressed with the rationale behind her contributions, the thing I like the most about Slp1 is that people perceive her as an admin already.
701:
Mmm. Not an easy question, as policies focus on such very different aspects of editing as editor behaviour and article content policies, as well as the famous
1420:- very conscientious, places strong emphasis on communication and collaboration, and has a good grasp of policy. I trust her to make considered decisions.
378:
2802:
2784:
859:
91:"that reflect eclectic interests, including some subjects had no interest in at all until waded in to help other editors in the middle of a dispute"
1143:
78:
899:
70:) - Getting a handle on Slp1 was quite a challenge. Most editors have a niche that they tend to fill, but not Slp1. Slp1 is all over the place.
491:
Goodness. I'm not sure how one could prove that anybody one knows only on the internet is worthy of trust. But there are some good indicators:
496:
interacted with the person, with the goal of determining if the candidate is worthy of trust. Hopefully my past edits indicate that I can be. --
256:. Balloonman has kindly pointed out my overuse of G1(Patent Nonsense) tag and underuse of G3 (Vandalism) tag when tagging silly articles such as
2585:
I'm going to respect your stance, but may I ask how and why you formulated such an opinion? Any diffs that you could provide would be useful.
1273:
569:
Is this an attempt at oneupmanship in a dispute? What are the specific actions/edits that are being used to justify this request? What are
2669:
89:
to meet
Knowledge standards. This has led her to make major contributions to what she herself calls "a very bizarre mixture" of articles
1295:. A steady hand on the wheel for a long time. Love the answer to question #5 as well. I really wish more admins had that attitude. --
1251:
992:
1485:
as I could not come up with any compelling reason not to (as apparently so far no one else has either). Bonne chance! Sincerely, --
1487:
886:
2479:
33:
17:
217:
applications in other domains where I have been active, such as responding to requests for help at various noticeboards such as
2388:
302:
929:
2605:
2118:
2081:
1930:
1789:
1731:
1594:
1221:
923:
301:
I am particularly proud of two quite different types of contributions. My proudest moment as a content editor was when the
855:
404:, but forgot my password (oops) and so started again in April 2006 with this unoriginally named account.) As noted above,
257:
1614:
1570:
1147:
684:
366:). And a quick bit of research and editing myself has sometimes contributed to helping an article avoid an early deletion.
2237:
2175:
Oh, damn...I wish I would have asked then, cause I spent a good amount of time trying to find some reason to oppose. :D
1985:
1036:. Balloonman + SandyGeorgia? Co-noms? Seriously? Good gravy, just give Slp the mop! No need to bother with an rfa...
893:
753:
638:
405:
2475:
2250:
1498:
There are many excellent reasons to support this user - Firstly, they are exceptionally well-rounded, contributing to
1360:
467:
life's too short to let online disputes of this sort bother me! And I don't really see that changing in the future.
309:
and subsequently appeared on the mainpage. Born out of a very difficult dispute (see below), the article went from
2268:
1618:
1352:
946:
879:
688:
423:
67:
2321:
1976:. Love her answers to the questions, trust Sandy's perception of her as a careful architect of articles. - Dan
1726:
1665:
1279:
970:
453:
374:
351:
82:
77:
When she stumbles across articles that need help, she will help out. For example, she recently participated in
2687:
2665:
2661:
1827:
1747:
1564:
1013:
978:
807:
422:
responses to de-escalate the situation (or even not responding at all), do careful research of the topic using
229:
noticeboards, and in some cases administrative tools would be useful. See for example the BLP violations on
2621:
1725:. Good content editor, and, besides quoting Dr Phil, see no reason to deny user the tools if she needs 'em.
1699:
1550:
1255:
123:; most of my interaction with Slp1 (who has edited since April 2006) has been related to the September 2007
2021:- Sandy + I've seen this editor around and I'm confident she will use the tools in a responsible manner. --
1694:– Your answer to question #5 gave me all the reasons I needed to express a support opinion. Many here, at
2315:
1848:
1122:
359:
158:
2616:
I was very impressed by her advanced level of French ability and acute insight which helped to clean the
709:. But if I must choose one I will say Knowledge:Verifiability. I think appropriate sourcing of edits to
2264:
1804:
1349:
1071:
373:
Not all the editors have ended up happy with the decisions made. But I was pleased when a proud father,
363:
331:
2783:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
2660:
article is a specific example of just such a decision. In other situations I make other choices. See
2137:
820:
myself and add the citation if so (though hopefully I would have done that already!). If not, revert
2765:
2729:
2711:
2695:
2646:
2641:
her great jobs, but I'm not sure of her with admin tool when people need her help as administrator.--
2637:
2617:
2575:
2540:
2495:
2430:
2413:
2375:
2358:
2166:
2048:
1964:
1661:
1276:
1240:
1102:
475:
230:
111:
2227:
I'm thoroughly impressed with the well-roundedness of the candidate's contributions to the project.
737:
You don't have to write a long narrative on these, unless you want to. The answers can be short. :)
2706:
Thank you for the enlightenment, but I need "many time" to read through them for reconsideration.--
2586:
2215:
2176:
2151:
2094:
1823:
1743:
1705:
1402:
1373:
1336:
1202:
1086:
1009:
974:
803:
574:
570:
547:
445:
441:
355:
323:
147:
381:, nevertheless returned to my page some months later to thank me for the help I had tried to give.
2595:
2552:
2518:
2445:
2130:
2113:
2075:
2059:
2026:
1926:
1888:
1784:
1592:
1533:
1516:
1442:
1300:
1211:
1043:
942:
802:
Thank you for the answer above. For (9) this is a recently deceased or currently living person.
238:
2769:
2733:
2715:
2699:
2681:
2650:
2611:
2579:
2557:
2544:
2527:
2499:
2483:
2466:
2449:
2433:
2417:
2400:
2379:
2362:
2345:
2324:
2300:
2272:
2255:
2242:
2219:
2202:
2181:
2170:
2156:
2142:
2125:
2097:
2085:
2062:
2030:
2013:
1989:
1968:
1951:
1934:
1913:
1899:
1869:
1852:
1831:
1808:
1791:
1751:
1736:
1717:
1686:
1669:
1652:
1635:
1599:
1579:
1554:
1537:
1520:
1493:
1477:
1446:
1429:
1412:
1389:
1364:
1340:
1323:
1304:
1287:
1259:
1246:
1227:
1193:
1174:
1151:
1126:
1106:
1077:
1056:
1017:
1003:
982:
834:
811:
797:
765:
723:
653:
598:
505:
416:
180:
162:
115:
2462:
2309:
2195:
1947:
1844:
1682:
1611:
1528:
per great nomination, see nothing to make me think user will not use the tools appropriately.
1172:
1139:
1115:
1094:
960:
681:
449:
401:
151:
2720:
As the mentioned pages cleared my doubt over her ability as a meditator, I change my vote to
2396:
2335:
2233:
1981:
1909:
1800:
1760:
1425:
1385:
1134:-- per the first three answers! I trust the rest shall be just as good? = ) Best of luck. --
1067:
347:
265:
412:, were the subject of a heated dispute between December 2006 and January 2007, including a
2761:
2725:
2707:
2691:
2657:
2642:
2625:
2571:
2536:
2491:
2426:
2409:
2371:
2354:
2162:
2040:
2006:
1960:
1865:
1503:
1188:
1098:
630:
515:
107:
644:
while linked to the main page due to many disruptive edits from changing IP addresses. --
2677:
2281:
2211:
1648:
1455:
1398:
1397:
All of my interactions with Slp1 indicate that she is extremely qualified for the mop,
1332:
1282:
999:
873:
830:
793:
761:
719:
649:
594:
501:
436:
428:
413:
409:
249:
226:
218:
176:
140:
61:
2796:
2510:
2441:
2108:
2071:
2022:
1922:
1878:
1817:
1774:
1586:
1529:
1512:
1499:
1438:
1319:
1314:
1296:
1049:
1037:
964:
706:
702:
634:
586:
582:
578:
432:
335:
310:
277:
261:
253:
245:
222:
136:
132:
124:
2193:
per noms and everyone else in this list. Cant find a single reason to oppose. ;)
2458:
1943:
1779:
1678:
1629:
1608:
1559:
1461:
1377:
1160:
1135:
710:
678:
667:
525:
Over your time here at
Knowledge, what is the most important lesson you've learnt?
327:
315:
306:
144:
2392:
2285:
2228:
1977:
1905:
1546:
1421:
1381:
817:
785:
460:
along with many others! In general, while a few people have become a bit nasty,
2457:. She looks like a great editor. She meets all my standards. Best of luck!
2000:
1861:
1584:
A dedicated cleaner, with a cool head and good approach to improving content.
260:. I blame these errors in part on relying on my memory of an older version of
128:
2777:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2673:
2474:
Has been around since April 2006 with over 4000 mainspace edits.No concerns.
1695:
1644:
1085:. I've had the pleasure of working with Slp1 on several articles, including
995:
869:
851:
826:
789:
757:
715:
645:
590:
497:
319:
172:
90:
57:
1380:
watchlisted, so I see daily what a smart and collaborative editor Slp1 is.
276:
deletion. However, I think the reason that I would really enjoy working at
264:
which referenced only the rather strict definition of "pure vandalism" per
2425:
Very good answers to questions - seems serious, dedicated, and respected.
2629:
1840:
1064:. No problems here whatsoever. Glad to have you (almost) on the team!
492:
1502:, vandal-fighting, and article work. Another terrific anecdote is her
2787:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
1090:
457:
2150:- Can not find a reason to oppose (even after digging pretty deep).
618:
Requested you to protect an article that is linked to the main page?
1799:. The candidate builds quality content and works well with others.
945:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review
342:
2308:
Nuff said, she'll be a great admin. I wish her the best of luck. -
677:
What do you consider the most important
Knowledge Policy and why?
322:
and others. I have been having a similar positive experience on
1159:
I think she would be a great administrator for our community. --
234:
1266:
Ips cannot vote. Howver, I am willing to fill the place of the
973:) (note I have sneakily done so in a small way) for this RfA?
1643:. Best answers to the questions that I've seen in some time.
169:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
2507:
Fine candidate. No concerns, no big deal. I made it, great.
1877:- Balloonman + SandyGeorgia, I have nothing to worry about.
1180:
Conditional support upon good answers to optional questions.
1860:- a very good editor who'll make good use of the tools. -
991:
Would this link to
Wannabe Kate's tool result do the deed?
784:
Can I ask if this is a bio of a living person, or a person
546:
Can you tell me what procedures you would follow if user
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1942:
wonderful user, will definitely use the tools wisely. --
1822:, plus everything appears fine in all the right places.
745:
When can you apply an IP block exemption to a username.
295:
What are your best contributions to Knowledge, and why?
143:, and I've watched her quality content contributions to
85:
and helped educate him on Wikipolicy. She then helped
917:
911:
905:
642:
465:
463:
461:
382:
371:
369:
367:
286:
284:
282:
269:
103:
99:
86:
1843:. You absolutely deserve this. Have fun with the mop!
1331:, exactly the kind of user and admin we need more of.
53:
Final (73/0/1); Ended Sat, 24 May 2008 02:40:49 (UTC)
816:
The options that I see are: see whether the edit is
81:. Not only did she defend the actor, but she also
273:"This includes blatant and obvious misinformation"
959:Would it be worthwhile to include the details of
2634:Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/Christian_Polak
210:What admin work do you intend to take part in?
485:How can we trust you as a Admin on Knowledge?
2280:- super editor. Kinda and considerate, never
252:and perhaps some straightforward closures at
8:
2724:. She will be a good admin with the tools--
2387:. I'm always amazed by Slp1's patience on
1437:wowed by nom - cool person. All the best!
1627:well-rounded, nice answers to questions.
941:Please keep discussion constructive and
379:his daughter's article had been deleted
244:I could also envisage participating at
732:Question from 14:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
334:suggestions before submitting it as a
2632:. However, that good impression from
330:and are busy responding to excellent
258:Alvin and the Chipmunks meet Garfield
7:
2670:Talk:Treatment of multiple sclerosis
2686:As her nom, it was her contribs to
1185:per answers to questions. Regards,
24:
2803:Successful requests for adminship
2535:Good editor, no major concerns.--
271:and did not include the present
187:Optional statement by candidate:
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
2284:. She will make a fine admin -
1959:Looks all in order. Good luck!
1677:Strong candidate, no concerns.
2656:one position or another. The
858:. For the edit count, see the
227:Knowledge:Conflict of interest
1:
558:Need to block a certain user?
2389:École Polytechnique massacre
2070:clear net positive. Cheers,
1489:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
754:Knowledge:IP block exemption
639:Ecole Polytechnique Massacre
406:Ecole Polytechnique Massacre
303:École Polytechnique massacre
219:Biographies of Living People
137:Reliable Sources Noticeboard
2161:I could have told you that!
1607:per answer to my question.
854:'s edit summary usage with
311:several requests of comment
241:being blocked indefinitely.
199:Questions for the candidate
2819:
2306:Support, support, support.
1545:, seems no reason not to.
947:Special:Contributions/Slp1
336:Featured Article candidate
2690:that really impressed me.
641:page was semi- protected
375:User talk:Emmabentleysdad
352:User talk:Last Contrarian
79:an XfD on an Indian actor
2780:Please do not modify it.
2770:17:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
2734:14:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
2716:13:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
2700:13:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
2688:Talk:Genie (feral child)
2682:13:22, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
2666:Talk:Genie (feral child)
2662:Talk:Hoofer Sailing Club
2651:12:28, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
2612:07:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
2580:05:22, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
2558:20:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
2545:05:58, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
2528:03:08, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
2500:03:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
2484:02:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
2467:18:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
2450:16:40, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
2434:15:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
2418:14:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
2401:12:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
2380:22:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
2363:14:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
2346:12:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
2325:11:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
2301:07:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
2273:06:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
2256:00:45, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
2243:17:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
2220:12:24, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
2203:11:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
2182:19:07, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
2171:19:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
2157:18:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
2143:17:34, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
2126:16:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
2098:12:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
2086:10:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
2063:00:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
2031:23:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
2014:23:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1990:22:37, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1969:13:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1952:10:19, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1935:07:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1921:. A fine candidate. --
1914:03:35, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1900:02:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1870:01:11, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1853:00:36, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1832:23:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1809:22:28, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1792:17:16, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1767:17:03, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1752:17:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1737:16:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1718:14:11, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1687:13:49, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1670:13:47, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1653:13:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1636:12:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1600:10:33, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1580:10:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1555:09:20, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1538:07:33, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1521:07:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1494:05:42, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1478:05:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1447:04:33, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1430:03:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1413:02:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1390:00:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1365:00:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1341:00:08, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1324:23:47, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
1305:23:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
1288:23:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
1260:23:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
1247:22:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
1228:22:24, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
1194:22:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
1175:22:19, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
1152:22:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
1127:22:16, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
1107:22:12, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
1078:22:07, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
1057:22:05, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
1018:12:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1004:01:35, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
983:22:58, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
835:16:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
812:15:30, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
798:15:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
766:15:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
724:03:00, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
666:Optional questions from
654:23:45, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
599:23:17, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
577:to other venues such as
514:Optional questions from
506:22:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
454:Fathers' rights movement
450:an American conservative
414:user request for comment
181:22:02, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
163:00:05, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
116:06:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
408:and to a lesser extent
125:featured article review
38:Please do not modify it
2476:Pharaoh of the Wizards
2408:after consideration.--
2060:Report false positives
786:"who has ceased to be"
360:User talk:Michaelsshaw
235:noted in this BLP post
707:What Knowledge is Not
474:Optional Question by
364:User talk:Clearbluepr
83:contacted the creator
34:request for adminship
2638:Talk:Christian Polak
1727:Deacon of Pndapetzim
1312:No problems here. --
1238:Great answer to Q4.
703:Ignore all the Rules
550:requested that you:
437:Canadian Wikipedians
356:User talk :Glonneman
237:which ended up with
133:the Medicine Project
1617:2008-05-17T12:44Z (
1565:dihydrogen monoxide
1374:William Wilberforce
1087:Nicholas John Baker
687:2008-05-17T02:20Z (
446:a prisoner in Japan
424:WP:reliable sources
326:: we've made it to
324:William Wilberforce
148:William Wilberforce
141:the COI noticeboard
139:answering queries,
87:rewrite the article
2624:concern raised at
2526:
1634:
949:before commenting.
343:the new pages page
39:
2607:
2602:
2508:
2343:
2252:The Transhumanist
2241:
2141:
2012:
1893:Come Speak To Me'
1734:
1628:
1578:
1409:
1363:
1223:
1218:
1114:, obviously :-)
1095:G. Edward Griffin
1053:
305:article became a
231:Francisco Soberón
37:
2810:
2782:
2622:WP:Verifiability
2606:
2600:
2596:
2590:
2555:
2525:
2523:
2516:
2513:
2505:Post nom support
2342:
2333:
2320:
2314:
2298:
2295:
2293:
2265:SynergeticMaggot
2248:Are you married?
2231:
2198:
2179:
2154:
2135:
2133:
2121:
2116:
2111:
2011:
2009:
2003:
1998:
1896:
1885:
1881:
1820:
1787:
1782:
1777:
1765:
1730:
1716:
1632:
1568:
1492:
1490:
1475:
1473:
1470:
1467:
1464:
1407:
1359:
1357:
1348:good editor. -
1322:
1317:
1245:
1243:
1222:
1216:
1212:
1206:
1192:
1170:
1165:
1119:
1076:
1054:
1051:
1046:
1040:
933:
892:
867:Links for Slp1:
845:General comments
711:reliable sources
433:reliable sources
418:(not about me!!)
348:User talk:Nkelby
338:. Wish us luck!
307:featured article
223:Reliable Sources
155:
2818:
2817:
2813:
2812:
2811:
2809:
2808:
2807:
2793:
2792:
2791:
2785:this nomination
2778:
2754:
2658:Christian Polak
2626:Christian_Polak
2610:
2601:
2598:
2588:
2566:
2553:
2519:
2514:
2511:
2509:
2489:Per nom Support
2353:- No concerns.
2334:
2318:
2312:
2291:
2289:
2286:
2196:
2177:
2152:
2131:
2119:
2114:
2109:
2105:reliable user.
2007:
2001:
1999:
1889:
1882:
1879:
1818:
1785:
1780:
1775:
1761:
1704:
1662:Fuhghettaboutit
1630:
1597:
1574:
1488:
1486:
1471:
1468:
1465:
1462:
1460:
1406:
1353:
1315:
1313:
1241:
1239:
1226:
1217:
1214:
1204:
1186:
1166:
1161:
1117:
1065:
1050:
1044:
1038:
1030:
956:
885:
868:
847:
201:
189:
153:
50:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2816:
2814:
2806:
2805:
2795:
2794:
2790:
2789:
2773:
2772:
2753:
2750:
2749:
2748:
2747:
2746:
2745:
2744:
2743:
2742:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2738:
2737:
2736:
2718:
2597:
2593:
2565:
2562:
2561:
2560:
2547:
2530:
2502:
2486:
2469:
2455:Strong support
2452:
2436:
2420:
2403:
2382:
2368:Strong support
2365:
2348:
2339:
2327:
2303:
2275:
2258:
2245:
2222:
2205:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2145:
2128:
2100:
2095:Moonriddengirl
2088:
2065:
2033:
2016:
1992:
1971:
1954:
1937:
1916:
1902:
1872:
1855:
1834:
1824:LessHeard vanU
1811:
1794:
1768:
1754:
1744:NonvocalScream
1739:
1720:
1700:Administrators
1689:
1672:
1655:
1638:
1622:
1602:
1595:
1582:
1572:
1557:
1540:
1523:
1496:
1480:
1449:
1432:
1415:
1403:
1395:Strong support
1392:
1367:
1343:
1326:
1307:
1290:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1230:
1213:
1209:
1196:
1183:Strong support
1177:
1154:
1129:
1112:Co-nom Support
1109:
1080:
1059:
1029:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1010:LessHeard vanU
986:
985:
975:LessHeard vanU
955:
952:
938:
937:
936:
934:
864:
863:
856:mathbot's tool
846:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
814:
804:NonvocalScream
771:
770:
769:
768:
739:
738:
729:
728:
727:
726:
693:
692:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
620:
619:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
575:Jirgrfdsfg9764
571:Jirgrfdsfg9764
560:
559:
548:Jirgrfdsfg9764
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
511:
510:
509:
508:
471:
470:
469:
468:
419:
387:
386:
385:
384:
339:
332:WP:Peer review
290:
289:
288:
242:
200:
197:
195:
188:
185:
184:
183:
49:
44:
43:
42:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2815:
2804:
2801:
2800:
2798:
2788:
2786:
2781:
2775:
2774:
2771:
2767:
2763:
2759:
2756:
2755:
2751:
2735:
2731:
2727:
2723:
2719:
2717:
2713:
2709:
2705:
2704:
2703:
2702:
2701:
2697:
2693:
2689:
2685:
2684:
2683:
2679:
2675:
2671:
2667:
2663:
2659:
2654:
2653:
2652:
2648:
2644:
2639:
2635:
2631:
2627:
2623:
2619:
2618:WP:Notability
2615:
2614:
2613:
2608:
2603:
2592:
2591:
2584:
2583:
2582:
2581:
2577:
2573:
2568:
2567:
2563:
2559:
2556:
2554:Antonio Lopez
2551:
2548:
2546:
2542:
2538:
2534:
2531:
2529:
2524:
2522:
2517:
2506:
2503:
2501:
2497:
2493:
2490:
2487:
2485:
2481:
2477:
2473:
2470:
2468:
2464:
2460:
2456:
2453:
2451:
2447:
2443:
2440:
2437:
2435:
2432:
2428:
2424:
2421:
2419:
2415:
2411:
2407:
2404:
2402:
2398:
2394:
2390:
2386:
2383:
2381:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2366:
2364:
2360:
2356:
2352:
2349:
2347:
2341:
2340:
2337:
2331:
2328:
2326:
2323:
2317:
2311:
2307:
2304:
2302:
2299:
2297:
2283:
2279:
2276:
2274:
2270:
2266:
2262:
2259:
2257:
2254:
2253:
2249:
2246:
2244:
2239:
2235:
2230:
2226:
2223:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2209:
2206:
2204:
2201:
2199:
2192:
2189:
2183:
2180:
2174:
2173:
2172:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2155:
2149:
2146:
2144:
2139:
2134:
2129:
2127:
2124:
2123:
2122:
2117:
2112:
2104:
2101:
2099:
2096:
2092:
2089:
2087:
2083:
2080:
2077:
2073:
2069:
2066:
2064:
2061:
2058:
2057:
2054:
2051:
2047:
2046:
2043:
2037:
2034:
2032:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2017:
2015:
2010:
2004:
1996:
1993:
1991:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1972:
1970:
1967:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1955:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1938:
1936:
1932:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1917:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1901:
1897:
1895:
1894:
1886:
1884:
1876:
1873:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1859:
1856:
1854:
1850:
1846:
1842:
1838:
1835:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1815:
1812:
1810:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1795:
1793:
1790:
1788:
1783:
1778:
1772:
1769:
1766:
1764:
1758:
1755:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1740:
1738:
1733:
1728:
1724:
1721:
1719:
1715:
1714:
1711:
1708:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1690:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1673:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1656:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1642:
1639:
1637:
1633:
1626:
1623:
1620:
1616:
1613:
1610:
1606:
1603:
1601:
1598:
1593:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1583:
1581:
1576:
1567:
1566:
1561:
1558:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1541:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1524:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1495:
1491:
1484:
1481:
1479:
1476:
1474:
1457:
1453:
1450:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1433:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1416:
1414:
1411:
1410:
1400:
1396:
1393:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1368:
1366:
1362:
1361:(and friends)
1358:
1356:
1351:
1347:
1344:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1327:
1325:
1321:
1318:
1311:
1308:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1291:
1289:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1281:
1278:
1275:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1252:86.137.221.99
1250:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1237:
1234:
1231:
1229:
1224:
1219:
1208:
1207:
1200:
1197:
1195:
1191:
1190:
1189:CycloneNimrod
1184:
1181:
1178:
1176:
1173:
1171:
1169:
1164:
1158:
1155:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1130:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1113:
1110:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1081:
1079:
1075:
1073:
1069:
1063:
1060:
1058:
1055:
1047:
1041:
1035:
1032:
1031:
1027:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
990:
989:
988:
987:
984:
980:
976:
972:
969:
966:
962:
958:
957:
953:
951:
950:
948:
944:
935:
931:
928:
925:
922:
919:
916:
913:
910:
907:
904:
901:
898:
895:
891:
888:
884:
881:
878:
875:
871:
866:
865:
861:
857:
853:
849:
848:
844:
836:
832:
828:
823:
819:
815:
813:
809:
805:
801:
800:
799:
795:
791:
787:
783:
780:
779:
776:
773:
772:
767:
763:
759:
755:
750:
747:
746:
744:
741:
740:
736:
735:
734:
733:
725:
721:
717:
712:
708:
704:
700:
697:
696:
695:
694:
690:
686:
683:
680:
676:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
655:
651:
647:
643:
640:
636:
632:
627:
624:
623:
622:
621:
617:
614:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
567:
564:
563:
562:
561:
557:
554:
553:
552:
551:
549:
545:
542:
541:
532:
529:
528:
527:
526:
524:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:CycloneNimrod
507:
503:
499:
494:
490:
487:
486:
484:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
466:
464:
462:
459:
458:Japanese word
455:
451:
447:
443:
438:
434:
430:
425:
420:
417:
415:
411:
407:
403:
398:
395:
394:
392:
389:
388:
383:
380:
377:, upset that
376:
372:
370:
368:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
344:
340:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
296:
294:
291:
287:
285:
283:
279:
274:
270:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
215:
212:
211:
209:
206:
205:
204:
198:
196:
193:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
166:
165:
164:
160:
156:
149:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
113:
109:
105:
104:policy driven
101:
96:
95:
92:
88:
84:
80:
75:
71:
69:
66:
63:
59:
55:
54:
48:
45:
41:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2779:
2776:
2757:
2721:
2587:
2569:
2549:
2532:
2520:
2504:
2488:
2471:
2454:
2438:
2422:
2405:
2384:
2367:
2350:
2338:TinuCherian
2336:
2329:
2322:Vandalize it
2310:iaNLOPEZ1115
2305:
2287:
2277:
2260:
2251:
2247:
2224:
2207:
2194:
2190:
2147:
2107:
2106:
2102:
2090:
2078:
2067:
2055:
2052:
2049:
2044:
2041:
2035:
2018:
1994:
1973:
1963:
1956:
1939:
1918:
1892:
1891:
1883:
1874:
1857:
1845:Paragon12321
1836:
1813:
1796:
1770:
1762:
1756:
1722:
1712:
1709:
1706:
1691:
1674:
1657:
1640:
1624:
1604:
1587:
1585:
1563:
1542:
1525:
1507:
1482:
1459:
1451:
1434:
1417:
1401:
1394:
1378:Learned Hand
1369:
1354:
1345:
1328:
1309:
1292:
1272:
1271:
1267:
1235:
1232:
1203:
1198:
1187:
1182:
1179:
1167:
1162:
1156:
1131:
1111:
1082:
1066:
1061:
1033:
967:
940:
939:
926:
920:
914:
908:
902:
896:
889:
882:
876:
821:
781:
774:
748:
742:
731:
730:
698:
674:
665:
664:
625:
615:
565:
555:
543:
530:
522:
513:
512:
488:
482:
473:
472:
442:abolitionist
396:
390:
328:Good Article
298:
292:
272:
213:
207:
202:
194:
190:
168:
145:Good article
120:
119:
100:well thought
97:
93:
76:
72:
64:
56:
52:
51:
46:
30:
28:
2628:created by
1801:Majoreditor
1068:Malinaccier
410:Marc Lépine
171:I accept.--
2762:Gurchzilla
2726:Appletrees
2708:Appletrees
2692:Balloonman
2643:Appletrees
2572:Appletrees
2537:CreazySuit
2492:Balloonman
2427:Olaf Davis
2410:Appletrees
2372:Ashton1983
2355:EdJohnston
2163:Balloonman
1839:Quite the
1560:Yes please
1242:Trees Rock
1099:J Readings
1052:Disclaimer
954:Discussion
818:verifiable
476:Trees Rock
129:Stuttering
108:Balloonman
31:successful
2212:Kafka Liz
1696:Knowledge
1405:<: -->
1399:Ruhrfisch
1372:. I have
1333:J Milburn
1270:. I'm an
912:block log
860:talk page
266:WP:VANDAL
127:(FAR) of
2797:Category
2630:User:PHG
2589:Wisdom89
2472:+Support
2442:Ling.Nut
2439:+Support
2316:TaLKBaCK
2238:contribs
2178:Tiptoety
2153:Tiptoety
2091:Suppport
2082:contribs
2072:Casliber
2023:CapitalR
1986:mistakes
1931:contribs
1923:jbmurray
1841:polymath
1703:to you.
1588:Gazimoff
1530:Davewild
1513:Valtoras
1504:civility
1439:Vishnava
1350:Diligent
1297:JayHenry
1205:Wisdom89
971:contribs
880:contribs
631:WP:MPFAP
435:and the
402:User:Slp
102:out and
68:contribs
2758:Neutral
2752:Neutral
2722:support
2550:Support
2533:Support
2459:Bearian
2423:Support
2406:Support
2385:Support
2351:Support
2330:Support
2278:Support
2261:Support
2225:Support
2208:Support
2191:Support
2148:Support
2103:Support
2068:Support
2036:Support
2019:Support
1995:Support
1974:Support
1957:Support
1944:PeaceNT
1940:Support
1919:Support
1880:Realist
1875:Support
1858:Support
1837:Support
1814:Support
1797:Support
1771:Support
1763:Anthøny
1757:Support
1723:Support
1692:Support
1679:Johnbod
1675:Support
1658:Support
1641:Support
1631:Spencer
1625:Support
1605:Support
1543:Support
1526:Support
1483:Support
1456:WP:WTHN
1452:Support
1435:Support
1418:Support
1370:Support
1355:Terrier
1346:Support
1329:Support
1320:iva1979
1310:Support
1293:Support
1268:support
1233:Support
1199:Support
1163:Crohnie
1157:Support
1136:Cameron
1132:Support
1118:Georgia
1083:Support
1062:Support
1034:Support
1028:Support
887:deleted
668:Zginder
493:Dr Phil
316:bobanny
281:topic.
250:WP:PROD
154:Georgia
2672:. --
2564:Oppose
2521:(talk)
2393:Wafulz
2229:SWik78
2132:Rudget
2002:Frank
1978:Dank55
1906:Daniel
1819:Keeper
1710:hoesss
1547:Stifle
1500:WP:CSD
1454:- Per
1422:Risker
1382:qp10qp
1274:Editor
1093:, and
1091:gaijin
1039:Keeper
635:WP:ANI
587:WP:3RR
583:WP:ANI
579:WP:AIV
452:, the
278:WP:CSD
262:WP:CSD
254:WP:AFD
246:WP:CSD
239:a user
135:, the
121:Co-nom
2282:BITEy
2120:Shark
2008:talk
1965:Cobra
1961:Glass
1862:Bilby
1508:crazy
1404:: -->
1116:Sandy
943:civil
894:count
152:Sandy
16:<
2766:talk
2730:talk
2712:talk
2696:talk
2678:talk
2674:Slp1
2647:talk
2636:and
2620:and
2576:talk
2541:talk
2515:rium
2512:Cena
2496:talk
2480:talk
2463:talk
2446:talk
2431:Talk
2414:talk
2397:talk
2376:talk
2359:talk
2269:talk
2234:talk
2216:talk
2167:talk
2138:Help
2110:Sexy
2076:talk
2027:talk
1982:talk
1948:talk
1927:talk
1910:talk
1866:talk
1849:talk
1828:talk
1816:per
1805:talk
1786:Dude
1776:Koji
1748:talk
1732:Talk
1683:talk
1666:talk
1649:talk
1645:Deor
1596:Read
1551:talk
1534:talk
1517:talk
1472:nine
1443:talk
1426:talk
1386:talk
1376:and
1337:talk
1301:talk
1283:wiki
1256:talk
1236:Good
1123:Talk
1103:talk
1072:talk
1014:talk
1008:Yes?
1000:talk
996:Slp1
979:talk
965:talk
924:rfar
906:logs
874:talk
870:Slp1
852:Slp1
850:See
831:talk
827:Slp1
808:talk
794:talk
790:Slp1
762:talk
758:Slp1
720:talk
716:Slp1
705:and
650:talk
646:Slp1
595:talk
591:Slp1
502:talk
498:Slp1
456:, a
320:Dina
177:talk
173:Slp1
159:Talk
112:talk
62:talk
58:Slp1
47:Slp1
2760:--
2115:Sea
2042:Raz
1619:UTC
1615:der
1612:gin
1280:the
1168:Gal
1048:|
1042:|
961:Slp
930:spi
900:AfD
822:and
689:UTC
685:der
682:gin
616:6b.
556:6a.
429:BLP
2799::
2768:)
2732:)
2714:)
2698:)
2680:)
2664:,
2649:)
2604:/
2578:)
2543:)
2498:)
2482:)
2465:)
2448:)
2429:|
2416:)
2399:)
2391:.-
2378:)
2370:.
2361:)
2344:-
2292:is
2271:)
2263:.
2236:•
2218:)
2200:|
2197:Qb
2169:)
2140:?)
2084:)
2053:am
2050:fl
2045:or
2029:)
2005:|
1988:)
1984:)(
1950:)
1933:)
1929:•
1912:)
1898:)
1868:)
1851:)
1830:)
1807:)
1773:--
1750:)
1735:)
1685:)
1668:)
1651:)
1562:!
1553:)
1536:)
1519:)
1458:.
1445:)
1428:)
1388:)
1339:)
1303:)
1277:of
1258:)
1220:/
1150:)
1125:)
1105:)
1089:,
1045:76
1016:)
1002:)
994:--
981:)
918:lu
833:)
810:)
796:)
782:A:
775:9.
764:)
749:A:
743:8.
722:)
699:A:
675:7.
652:)
626:A:
597:)
589:--
585:,
581:,
566:A:
544:6.
531:A:
523:5.
504:)
489:A:
448:,
444:,
431:,
397:A:
391:3.
362:,
358:,
354:,
350:,
318:,
299:A:
293:2.
268:,
248:,
233:,
225:,
221:,
214:A:
208:1.
179:)
161:)
114:)
36:.
2764:(
2728:(
2710:(
2694:(
2676:(
2668:,
2645:(
2609:)
2599:T
2594:(
2574:(
2539:(
2494:(
2478:(
2461:(
2444:(
2412:(
2395:(
2374:(
2357:(
2319:·
2313:·
2296:n
2294:o
2290:l
2288:A
2267:(
2240:)
2232:(
2214:(
2165:(
2136:(
2079:·
2074:(
2056:e
2025:(
1980:(
1946:(
1925:(
1908:(
1890:'
1887:(
1864:(
1847:(
1826:(
1803:(
1781:†
1746:(
1729:(
1713:S
1707:S
1681:(
1664:(
1647:(
1621:)
1609:Z
1577:)
1575:O
1573:2
1571:H
1569:(
1549:(
1532:(
1515:(
1469:e
1466:s
1463:a
1441:(
1424:(
1408:°
1384:(
1335:(
1316:S
1299:(
1254:(
1225:)
1215:T
1210:(
1148:c
1146:|
1144:p
1142:|
1140:t
1138:(
1121:(
1101:(
1074:)
1070:(
1012:(
998:(
977:(
968:·
963:(
932:)
927:·
921:·
915:·
909:·
903:·
897:·
890:·
883:·
877:·
872:(
862:.
829:(
806:(
792:(
788:?
760:(
718:(
691:)
679:Z
648:(
593:(
500:(
483:4
175:(
157:(
110:(
94:.
65:·
60:(
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.