132:
I started to understand how things work here and have adapted to the
Knowledge culture by attempting to try and solve disputes amicably. I have been fighting vandalism for a long time and I would like to pick up the administrator privileges as an upgrade to my anti-vandalism weaponry. Other than that, I have also been contributing to articles, especially ones related to electronic dance music and music in general. My moves history is not really significant as I have moved less than one hundred pages. However, the administrator tools can make it easier for me to move pages without leaving a redirect which was the main issue of my history of moving pages because it wouldn’t let me to get the task done smoothly.
93:) – I present myself as an aspiring candidate of adminship and a passionate editor on the English Knowledge who regularly contributes to electronic dance music articles. During my first few months as a registered editor, I have created one article which was deleted shortly after, before I went on a three-month hiatus to return as a regular contributor who knew very little about the Wikipediatic environment. -
428:
639:
is sufficient to Oppose (particularly worrying is failing to disclose the full details of the block log which includes an indefinite block only weeks ago (subsequently rescinded, rather obviously). Block log on
Commons fully worse, user is currently blocked there for "intimidation/harassment" and has
131:
I intend to get involved with requests for page protection and moves. Over the past few months I have been familiarizing myself with the guidelines and policies set out here despite getting into several conflicts with editors and having a bad behavioral history of which I’m not proud of, but recently
148:
My best contributions to
Knowledge would be to the electronic dance music articles. I have helped improved stub class articles to C-class and have created almost thirty page. I also regularly participate in deletion discussions to help and save an article from deletion unless there’s no hope at all
165:
There were several but the most notable ones would be with an editor on a Lady Gaga song about the genre and another editor about several measly issues. I have dealt with them properly by discussing it through. I have been blocked two times (one for three days and the other indefinitely). I was
644:. There's also the issue of describing ambitions of becoming an administrator as if it's some sort of career move or something. Technical stuff limited, little/no CSD nominations to sift through etc. Content contributions are decent but the user is fundamentally untrustworthy.
665:
to withdraw and come back in 18 months if they have no new issues in their background. I see no realistic likelihood of their passing RfA at this time and if the community believes its time is being wasted the oppose !votes can get rough.
483:
I don't normally oppose for edit count, but you need at least 5,000 edits to become an admin, in my opinion. Has had an indef block fairly recently, and doesn't have a need for the tools, as less than 5% of their edits are to WP space.
721:
I don't believe you have enough experience yet and your block log is concerning. Although you may have good intentions, I would urge you to withdraw. Also, the personal attack (per Samtar) is extremely concerning.
149:
for the article to be saved. Last month, I began reviewing at
Articles for Creation with over fifty reviews. I also welcome newcomers by posting on their talk pages encouraging them to create an account.
166:
blocked because for edit warring and personal attacks but that was months ago. I have overcome my behavioral issues in order to pursue my ambition of becoming an administrator on the
English Knowledge.
661:
This is not a NOTNOW !vote... However, the account is less than a year old with less than 5,000 edits which is my minimum for serious consideration. There are also recent blocks. I would encourage
587:
497:
182:
per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.
175:
780:
368:
363:
254:
159:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
211:
613:. Less than a year tenure (approximately 9 months) and less than 5,000 edits is a bit low. Other, perhaps more serious concerns, have already been raised above.
224:
798:
515:
Block log that contains a NOTHERE block (and only in
October...?), zero need for the tools (only 212 edits to project space), and low edit count. Sorry. --
218:
118:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
358:
278:
204:
90:
384:
306:
248:
394:
30:
17:
263:
706:
565:
491:
488:
448:
332:
595:
573:
353:
348:
622:
503:
327:
299:
198:
102:
84:
744:
713:
689:
675:
653:
630:
599:
577:
556:
524:
506:
460:
441:
424:, but please don't get discouraged - please email me or leave me a talk page message, I will happily mentor you
108:
68:
591:
569:
662:
194:
80:
500:
609:- One half of what the user expressed they'd like the mop for can be accomplished by making a request at
540:
710:
671:
779:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
697:- Block log here and at Commons are enough for the oppose. Zero need for this user to have the mop. —
539:
due to recent block. User is also blocked indefinitely and suspected of sock puppetry on
Commons (see
292:
389:
702:
534:
452:
433:
274:
610:
552:
730:
667:
520:
641:
684:
649:
66:
55:
792:
698:
544:
417:
737:
723:
516:
616:
773:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
645:
59:
447:
Strike support, I can't even morally support when personal attacks such as
416:
but this is unlikely to pass. Your enthusiasm is appreciated, and your
783:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
277:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review
284:
288:
568:
doesn't exactly scream "conduct befitting an administrator" --
588:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/TheMagnificentist/Archive
420:
is miles better than mine! I would suggest you withdraw this
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
142:
What are your best contributions to
Knowledge, and why?
125:
What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
636:
242:
236:
230:
54:
Final (0/10/0); ended 21:14, 1 January 2017 (UTC) per
261:
Edit summary usage for TheMagnificentist can be found
377:
341:
320:
494:. Blatant personal attacks, indeffed on commons.
174:You may ask optional questions below. There is a
564:Unclear need for the tools, bad block log, and
300:
8:
307:
293:
285:
273:Please keep discussion constructive and
683:Seems a tad bit too early for an rfa.
7:
496:This user also has sockpuppets, see
425:
799:Unsuccessful requests for adminship
24:
426:
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
1:
192:Links for TheMagnificentist:
451:have been made recently --
745:21:05, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
714:21:04, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
690:21:04, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
676:21:03, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
654:21:02, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
631:21:00, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
600:21:05, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
578:20:59, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
557:20:55, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
525:20:54, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
507:20:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
461:21:00, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
442:20:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
114:Questions for the candidate
109:20:37, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
69:21:14, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
815:
695:Strongest Possible Oppose
776:Please do not modify it.
541:c:User:TheMagnificentist
39:Please do not modify it.
586:User has socked, see
31:request for adminship
432:Happy new year! --
390:Global contributions
592:AntiCompositeNumber
570:AntiCompositeNumber
354:Non-automated edits
333:Edit summary usage
281:before commenting.
40:
663:TheMagnificentist
629:
566:this Commons edit
538:
501:ThePlatypusofDoom
486:Strong Oppose for
403:
402:
279:his contributions
195:TheMagnificentist
81:TheMagnificentist
47:TheMagnificentist
38:
806:
778:
763:General comments
742:
735:
728:
687:
625:
619:
614:
549:
532:
431:
430:
429:
349:Articles created
309:
302:
295:
286:
266:
258:
217:
183:
107:
105:
100:
99:
62:
814:
813:
809:
808:
807:
805:
804:
803:
789:
788:
787:
781:this nomination
774:
765:
753:
738:
731:
724:
685:
628:
623:
617:
596:Leave a message
574:Leave a message
553:Happy New Year!
545:
474:
427:
409:
404:
399:
373:
337:
316:
315:RfA/RfB toolbox
313:
262:
210:
193:
189:
173:
116:
103:
101:
95:
94:
78:
60:
50:
35:did not succeed
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
812:
810:
802:
801:
791:
790:
786:
785:
769:
768:
764:
761:
759:
757:
756:
752:
749:
748:
747:
716:
692:
678:
656:
640:an issue with
633:
621:
604:
603:
602:
559:
527:
510:
473:
470:
468:
466:
465:
464:
463:
408:
405:
401:
400:
398:
397:
392:
387:
381:
379:
375:
374:
372:
371:
366:
361:
356:
351:
345:
343:
339:
338:
336:
335:
330:
324:
322:
318:
317:
314:
312:
311:
304:
297:
289:
270:
269:
268:
259:
188:
185:
171:
170:
169:
168:
167:
153:
152:
151:
150:
136:
135:
134:
133:
115:
112:
104:Magnificentist
77:
74:
49:
44:
43:
42:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
811:
800:
797:
796:
794:
784:
782:
777:
771:
770:
767:
766:
762:
760:
755:
754:
750:
746:
743:
741:
736:
734:
729:
727:
720:
717:
715:
712:
708:
704:
700:
696:
693:
691:
688:
682:
679:
677:
673:
669:
664:
660:
657:
655:
651:
647:
643:
638:
634:
632:
626:
620:
612:
608:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
584:Strong Oppose
581:
580:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
560:
558:
554:
550:
548:
542:
536:
535:edit conflict
531:
528:
526:
522:
518:
514:
511:
509:
508:
505:
502:
499:
493:
490:
487:
482:
481:Strong Oppose
480:
476:
475:
471:
469:
462:
459:
458:
455:
450:
446:
445:
444:
443:
440:
439:
436:
423:
419:
415:
414:Moral support
411:
410:
406:
396:
393:
391:
388:
386:
383:
382:
380:
376:
370:
367:
365:
362:
360:
357:
355:
352:
350:
347:
346:
344:
340:
334:
331:
329:
326:
325:
323:
319:
310:
305:
303:
298:
296:
291:
290:
287:
283:
282:
280:
276:
265:
260:
256:
253:
250:
247:
244:
241:
238:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
220:
216:
213:
209:
206:
203:
200:
196:
191:
190:
186:
184:
181:
180:two questions
177:
164:
161:
160:
158:
155:
154:
147:
144:
143:
141:
138:
137:
130:
127:
126:
124:
121:
120:
119:
113:
111:
110:
106:
98:
92:
89:
86:
82:
75:
73:
72:
70:
67:
65:
63:
58:
57:
48:
45:
41:
36:
32:
27:
26:
19:
775:
772:
758:
739:
732:
725:
718:
694:
680:
658:
606:
583:
561:
546:
529:
512:
495:
485:
478:
477:
467:
456:
453:
437:
434:
422:at this time
421:
413:
412:
272:
271:
251:
245:
239:
233:
227:
221:
214:
207:
201:
179:
172:
162:
156:
145:
139:
128:
122:
117:
96:
87:
79:
71:
53:
52:
51:
46:
34:
28:
668:Ad Orientem
418:mainspace %
395:User rights
385:CentralAuth
611:WP:PERM/PM
582:Change to
378:Cross-wiki
369:AfD closes
187:Discussion
76:Nomination
686:Full Rune
637:block log
364:AfD votes
359:BLP edits
237:block log
793:Category
699:Jkudlick
342:Analysis
321:Counters
205:contribs
91:contribs
751:Neutral
642:socking
547:MRD2014
407:Support
212:deleted
56:WP:SNOW
719:Oppose
681:Oppose
659:Oppose
635:Their
607:Oppose
562:Oppose
530:Oppose
517:Majora
513:Oppose
504:(talk)
479:Oppose
472:Oppose
328:XTools
618:Godsy
492:edits
489:these
275:civil
219:count
176:limit
33:that
16:<
672:talk
650:talk
646:Nick
624:CONT
543:). —
521:talk
498:here
449:this
264:here
249:rfar
231:logs
199:talk
85:talk
61:Mkdw
733:170
457:tar
454:sam
438:tar
435:sam
255:spi
225:AfD
178:of
97:The
795::
726:st
709:⚓
705:⚓
701:⚓
674:)
652:)
615:—
598:)
590:--
576:)
555:)
523:)
243:lu
163:A:
157:3.
146:A:
140:2.
129:A:
123:1.
37:.
740:e
711:s
707:c
703:t
670:(
666:-
648:(
627:)
594:(
572:(
551:(
537:)
533:(
519:(
308:e
301:t
294:v
267:.
257:)
252:·
246:·
240:·
234:·
228:·
222:·
215:·
208:·
202:·
197:(
88:·
83:(
64:'
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.