Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Tim Song

104:

that he will often spend time after a deletion has been endorsed trying to guide the user through creating an acceptable userspace draft. I looked at nominating Tim for adminship a couple of months back but he asked me to wait. Coming in late to the RFA gives me an opportunity to comment on some of the opposes and I wanted to ask those opposing for lack of mainspace contributions to consider the following. We rightly consider candidates with limited mainspace experiences more carefully because writing effectively in mainspace is hard and admins need to be sensitive to this and have an understanding of how uncaring and discouraging deleting content that someone has spent time and energy working on can be. I genuinely believe this isn't an issue with Tim Song - he seeks to preserve content where he can, he works with new users to help them do userspace drafts and is sympathetic and helpful. He is the least bity editor I regularly interact with.

3701:

short time that Tim Song has been actively involved in the project, and are also prepared to overlook the low involvement of Tim Song during the eight months he has been active. People have their reasons for !voting the way they do, and in this specific case some people appear to be prepared to overlook Tim Song's minimal involvement for other qualities they perceive in his contributions. I haven't seen those additional qualities, so I am opposing on the generally accepted grounds that we need substantial evidence of someone's character and abilities, especially under stress, before giving someone the tools to block another user.

3916:

real personal experience as an editor: article-writing, working with other editors, dealing with disagreements, arguing over the weight and applicability of sources, and so on. Tim seems to have a lot of experience in dealing with project issues, and to have been calm and fair in doing that work ... but wikipedia will be dead if editors are not at its core, and from what I have seen Tim has hardly any experience at the coalface. I would be delighted to be able to change my mind at a further RFA if Tim has gained real experience in content creation, but right now he looks far too much like a process-oriented civil servant. --

445:

difficult to detect and extremely hard to track. Even worse, of course, is intentional insertion of false offline references to support a false statement, which is difficult to detect. If I should encounter unsourced negative information anywhere, I would remove them aggressively; and if I encounter sourced negative information, I would do my best to verify the sourcing. As to the tools, repeat offenders - or even egregious first-time offenders - should be blocked, the BLP violating revisions deleted or suppressed, and the article semi- or full-protected as appropriate, depending on the particular circumstances.

2643:- Positive prior impression and answers to questions are more than satisfactory (my own opinion is that answers to questions far more often serve to disqualify a candidate than to qualify one). Regarding automated edits, while I'm not a fan at all for myself, they definitely have their place, and anyone who takes the time to navigate the intricacies of the API cannot be said to be unaware of how Knowledge works. That technical knowledge, combined with AfD and other policy work, provides a candidate with great all-around experience. It takes all kinds here just as in life. 466:

information, I would recommend to them that it is probably best to remove the information. If the information is sensitive (a relatively common name is obviously different from a phone number or date of birth), I would delete the revisions and request suppression, and explain to the user why I have done so. Of course, individual circumstances vary, and if an established admin or editor, though legally a minor, wishes to post some information while fully understanding the risks, I would not interfere except in the most exceptional of circumstances.

548:

application of the letter of a rule would contravene its spirit, and, in rare cases, cases where there is consensus not to apply a rule in a particular case. In cases where there is no existing consensus to IAR, it should be invoked only if one is reasonable confident that consensus would consider the action appropriate (i.e., that consensus would be that the action "maintains or improves" Knowledge). It should never be used as an excuse to act against established consensus, at least in the absence of evidence that consensus has changed.

3894:, somewhat regretfully because I appreciate the candor in response to Q14, and Tim Song seems to be sharp and well-intentioned. However, the fact the candidate says he isn't adept at doing the research involved in article-writing raises a concern - we don't all need to be article writers, but volunteering that he's not a researcher makes me wonder if he should be hanging around AFD. Additionally, the end of the belated co-nom gives me pause, because my lone interaction with Tim Song outside of this RFA ended with 3039:- I particularly agree with Spartaz's nom statement. While opposing over a lack of content focus is not a new thing, I feel it's particularly unfair on this candidate. Tim does indeed tend not to work heavily on articles, but his work with new editors and on preserving content has a direct, immediate, and tangible effect on our encyclopedic content. When you combine this with his mature and calm attitude and his wide range of project-space experience, I can think of few more suitable admin candidates. ~ 229:, other than that I can't think of a conflict - disagreements, sure, as anyone who patrols AFD even occasionally would know, but I'd like to think that I've so far avoided conflicts on a personal level. In any disagreement, I'll try my best to avoid personifying the dispute, and I'll do my best to disengage and cool down if it gets personal despite that. And most certainly I would never use any extra tools I have against the opponent, be it rollback, or (if this succeeds) the admin buttons. 2877:. As with DGG, I am also initially somewhat sceptical of candidates who do little in the field of article building, simply because that kind of experience, with the problems that brings, is useful when dealing with discussions and content disputes. Nonetheless, there are a handful of candidates whose maturity, intelligence, and fundamental respect for the article writers make them suitable for adminship anyway. Tim Song is one of those who have demonstrated all those qualities. 4099:. This is an intelligent editor who has shown consistently good judgment within Wikipedian policies and guidelines, with which he very quickly became familiar--and I personally do not believe that editors need substantial content contributions before they can participate in the back-office, processy parts of the encyclopedia. Also, I usually agree with Tim Song and I find him likeable. These factors would normally have pushed me to a "strong support" position. 424:

question of notability, especially the CJR source (I actually find the pro-notability side somewhat more persuasive, but a good number of established editors disagreed, and it is not within the closer's remit to ignore arguments he disagrees with). The BLP argument is substantial, but is undercut by the fact that the subject did not wish the page deleted. Taking everything into account, then, the only conclusion I feel I can reach is that there is no consensus.

496:

of a cited fact in the article for inclusion. The nomination is then reviewed by another editor, who will verify that the hook is sourced and appears in the source, and that the article satisfies the DYK requirements. The approved hooks are moved to the prep areas, and then reviewed by an admin who would move approved hooks to a queue, for eventual appearance on the main page. The last step is carried out by a bot.

879:

Song and there seems to be a unanimous support from those who have worked closely with Tim. I would ask the closing 'crat to consider whether the views of those who know Tim best might be weighed a little more heavily then opposing views from users who do not know know Tim and will therefore be less familiar with his work and approach. Thanks and, of course, you are welcome to ignore or discard this as you wish.

1642:. Normally I look for a little more content work and (shock horror!) Tim has never edited the portal talk namespace! However, from what I've seen of Tim, I believe he is more than qualified to work in the areas he wants to and intelligent enough to ask for help when he needs it. Admins (and RfA candidates) should not have to be perfect and Tim obviously excels in the niche he has carved out for himself. 389:

a website in English was not very attractive to me, especially since free time is a rather scarce resource for me during high school. In late July 2009, I decided to start editing regularly, and decided to use my largely dormant account. So it's not really my intentionally taking a long break, it's that it had never occurred to me before last July that editing WP regularly is an option at all.

1572:- I understand the opposes, but I guess I set the bar lower for content contribution. I look for any evidence of actual article creation, and creating a reasonable sourced stub of a notable subject passes for me. Aside from that, Tim has had plenty of great contributions to non-article space and I've seen firsthand his temperament and good reasoning. No reason to object to adminship. -- 587:: Ugh, that's what I get for answering while sleep-deprived. I can research easily accessible online sources (e.g., with the google family of services) just fine, but for topics I'm interested in (indeed for most non-Western-popular-culture related topics) these searches are not quite sufficient for writing, and searching in the more professional databases (JSTOR, etc.) is not my forte. 3445:. This person has only ever made over 15 edits to two articles. There's questionable wisdom to entrusting administrative powers to someone who has demonstrated so little interest or aptitude for writing an encyclopedia. Tim Song may be the nicest person in the world, but when someone who has had an account since 2005 has so little to show for it I just can't support the RFA. 3743:- Although I do not believe that admins need to be huge content creators - there's plenty of room and need for wikignomes and policy scrutineers - I think you need to have done a big content-creation push at least once. That will give you insight into issues and disagreements arising between article writers and enable you to administrate with fairness and experience. 3782:

already have too many people filling administrative and other roles while contributing virtually nothing to content. In my view, it would be better to have those roles filled by people with first-hand experience of what it's like down in the trenches. If Tim had more extensive content-building experience (not necessarily GA or FA) I'd support without question.

2024: 525:, or perhaps provide such an opinion myself, depending on the subject. If that is unsuccessful, then perhaps an RFC is in order. I would do my best to avoid taking sides in the dispute, and make clear that edit warring and personal attacks are unacceptable, and that I would not hesitate to apply protections and blocks if necessary. 2214:. Already a valued contributor in areas where admin tools would be useful. More article content contribution would be great, but the fact is that we have a number of current admins whose article edits at the time of RFA were fewer than what Tim has now (there have been over a half dozen such cases just in the last few months). -- 3631:

per Durova. There is a yin and yang to article creation and destruction, and I really prefer to see balanced candidates who have both a good handle on the deletion process, as well as the article creation, improvement, and/or rescue processes. That just isn't there yet, Tim, but put forth the effort

3590:

And something bothers me, why would we not be hesitant to apply blocks and protections? Not all disputes involve blockable and protectable issues. Perhaps we should hesitate on the blocks and locks until editors can be warned? So with all that... I don't feel comfortable and would like to continue

1236:

I've read some of the objections such as "very small number of edits to top-edited articles" and "only 16% of his edits are to mainspace". Non-sequiturs all, in my judgement. He has been a Wikipedian since the end of 2005 and has 14,000 edits. The bottom line is that this is one of the most dedicated

1198:

I've had the pleasure of running into and working with Tim Song at both AfC and SPI, and if he shows half the excellent ethic and desire as a sysop as he has there, then we're all in for another excellent admin. His judgment is always thought out, and usually gives me pause as to my own rationale. ~

498:

DYK is important in several ways. It provides recognition in a fairly lightweight process, and therefore serves as a good incentive to create new articles of a reasonable quality, and to expand existing short articles - in short, the creation of new content. Further, by placing links to newly created

103:

Tim Song contributes extensively at DRV and I have always been extremely impressed by his calm and respectful demeanour and the sensible policy based approach that he takes to reviewing deletions that places a premium on preserving content and helping new users through the DRV process. What I like is

4218:

I am shocked DGG! But I have sen no detriment. My opinion is that admin candidates should try out a range of activities, including file uploads. suppose I myself have never done anything with DYK, or proposed anything for the spam blacklist. But anyway there can be some big holes in contributions

4071:

I have seen him around and I think we can trust him to use the tools properly. Unfortunately, he does not meet my criteria for participation in article making. He might be a good behind-the-scenes editor, but the goal here is to make an encyclopedia. I'd like an admin to be primarily focused as a

4013:

Until I'm shown otherwise, I'll vote neutral. I really appreciate Tim Song's contributions to the project, and I really like his work in admin areas, but he hasn't contributed semi-sizeably to content. To me it feels like even a little more wikignoming around mainspace would be fine, because of the

2823:

I rarely support a candidate with as little content work , but Tim is an exception. His work at AfD and DRV--regardless of whether i always agree with it--is so intelligent and reasonable that he would clearly make a good admin, and the overall quality of his judgement is so manifest that he would

878:

This is about to close and since I'm a bit vague about where the passing percentage, would ask the closing crat to consider the following if this is marginal. Although very valid concerns about mainspace editing have been universally expressed by the opposing side, this is the only issue against Tim

520:

Let me be clear first that I'm not planning to do DR anytime soon. Moreover, it's rather difficult to write a personalized note in response to a general question. If the dispute has become personal, I would strongly recommend that they disengage first, and discuss the matter in a calm, civil manner.

495:

The DYK process allows recently (within 5 days, though in practice more like ~10 days or even longer) created or 5x expanded articles of a reasonable quality (i.e., 1500 prose characters, reasonably sourced, etc.) to get a mention and a link on the main page. Anyone may nominate and propose a "hook"

388:

Basically, I rediscovered Knowledge. When I registered my account in 2005, I intended to make occasional edits only (and part of my motivation was an IP edit of mine being wrongly reverted as sneaky vandalism...). Moreover, my English was not very good back in 2005, so I'm sure you'd understand that

3556:

Thank you for answering, I have some concerns about Q12 and I think this is the type of thing that light editing can cause, not a full understanding. So I do note that the you don't plan on doing DR soon, but DR is going to be unavoidable in the course of being a sysop, unfortunately. Any editor

2926:

As Tim's somewhat absentee trainer at SPI, I was impressed with how quickly he learned and how consistently he kept up with a relatively boring but still key set of tasks. Tim looks before he leaps, is careful about doing his research and always has clear and thoughtful reasons for his actions; not

1533:

Review of talk page shows an intelligent, articulate, knowledgeable editor that is receptive to feedback. Reveiw of deletion log shows a considerable number of successful speedy taggings. Already working at AFD with no talk page complaints about it. With the profoundest respect to Durova, Candidate

4101:

However, I am concerned about the very speed with which Tim Song picked up Wiki-culture, and with the fact that he has never to my knowledge expressed a controversial view. There's a nasty, suspicious part of me that thinks that if I, knowing what I know now, created a new account specifically in

3915:

per Short Brigade Harvester Boris. We are here to build an encyclopedia, and that consists of organised content. I am alarmed by Tim's lack of experience in building that content. I don't care whether he has been anywhwere near a GA or a FA, but I do think it's important that an admin should have

2805:

Tim is a reasonable, thoughtful, and articulate candidate at AfD and DRV; in my experience, he is unfailingly civil and helpful. I'm surprised to learn that English isn't his first language. In any case, in spite of his general lack of content work, I feel that it's fine to promote such candidates

423:

I commented in the first DRV, commented in the AFD after it was reopened, and commented in the second DRV as well, so there's absolutely no way I'd be closing that AFD. That aside, after re-reading the debate, my view is that there is no consensus of any sort. There is heated disagreement over the

268:

before its functionality was integrated into v2 of the script - I figured that no one would care if I spammed the talk page of my alternate account with "submission accepted" notices. (Unfortunately, the script has to move the page first, and only does notification etc. if the move was successful,

4044:

is the relatively low edit count when you consider the automated edits. When you design your own tools they don't always show up in the toolserver automated edit system. It's pretty easy to do that, and the 2,400 odd article edits are probably the more accurate article count, although determining

3781:

This is one of the toughest calls I've ever made. Everything I've seen of Tim says that he has his head screwed on straight. But the lack of content contributions ultimately leads me to oppose. Knowledge is in danger of growing a "political class" that is detached from actual content building. We

3700:

It is generally considered that less than 12 months contributions, unless the editor has made outstanding contributions in that time, is not quite enough time for someone to be given the extra tools. What we have here is a specific case in which the majority of people are prepared to overlook the

2523:. To be honest, I was just wondering a couple of days ago why you aren't an admin yet. The concerns about your content contributions surprised me somewhat (and that's something I usually give a lot of weight to), but I've seen enough of your work in other valuable areas to convince me to support. 547:

IAR says that one should ignore a rule if it prevents one from maintaining or improving Knowledge. However, the question what "maintains or improves" Knowledge must be determined by consensus. As a consequence, IAR should be limited to cases that are not within the scope of any rule, cases where

1167:

Absolutely. Even without much content work, he plans to work in SPI and UAA, delete obvious speedies, and you don't need much content work for that. While he also plans to work in AfD, I'd like to see an instance where he closed a discussion incorrectly or caused some sort of massive chaos as a

426:

For BLP AfDs in general, my view is that one really ought to do one's best to discern the rough consensus - just because the consensus is not easily determined does not necessarily mean one cannot discern a "leaning" from the AfD. If the AfD appears to lean towards delete - even though there is

2047:

OK the candidate is a specialist, and hasn't ticked all the boxes to get adminship in a more fashionable way. But in my view his contributions are are good and I actually prefer that he hasn't come via some sort of admin coaching scheme - a bit of skill diversity in the admin cadre is healthy.

444:

Entirely unreferenced BLPs can be easily tracked with a bot, and most of those are generally uncontroversial information that, while ideally we should not have, are mostly harmless. On the other hand, unsourced negative or controversial information in an otherwise sourced article is sometimes

465:

Posting of personally identifiable information online in general is a serious problem, minors or not. If it was outing by another user, there is little to discuss: the revisions should be suppressed and the offending editor blocked indef. However, if it is the user themselves that posted the

1940:

Tim has demonstrated that he is a clueful and trustworthy editor. He has a clear use for the tools and I have no doubt that him having them would be a net positive. He is light on content work, but his contributions in other areas have been excellent and have been beneficial to the project

521:

In many cases, what seem to be an intractable dispute can be easily resolve once both sides calm down and reflect a little bit. Once that takes place, I would first suggest that they try to reach a compromise. If that fails, I would recommend that they find an uninvolved party to provide a

975:, is helpful for new page patrollers, and he does a fair bit of good new page patrol himself. His AfD arguments appear to be well thought out, and he seems to be able to remain calm and civil. I don't know much about SPI, but he appears to do a lot there. No blaring issues, trustworthy. - 427:

arguably no consensus - I would close it as delete. But if there is a thorough lack of consensus, then "no consensus" would be the only possible option. As to what I would do on a no consensus, I would default to whatever the policy provides for at the time of the closure (currently keep).

83:

and stub maintenance. The user also actively works in other helpful maintenance, up to and including counter vandalism work and helping new users. I am confident that Tim is ready to further assist in maintaining the encyclopedia with expanded use of the tools available.

377:

Your 1st edit was in December of 2005 but you only became active on Knowledge in July of 2009. I am curious in regards to your slow start on the project when compared to the 15,000 edits that you have amassed since July of 2009. What caused your slow start and

4053:

that bother me, are all especially acute here. I would like to see some more opinions, which will undoubtedly lose some !votes either way, but would at least give us a better idea broadly. But the programing skills and general decorum keep me from opposing.

2759:

I trust that with Tim's courtesy and compassion in helping new users at AfC, as well as his solid rationales at AfD and DRV, he will be an exemplary admin. The administrative tools will aid him greatly when he closes or participates in AfD and DRV debates.

3165:- He will hopefully not abuse the tools, like deleting the main page, blocking Jimbo, and being compromised. The lack of experience in July 2009 and earlier does not concern me as he already has over 10,000 edits mostly to admin-related areas. 3493:. Admins must have some hands-on experience with rowing the boat, in particular in a volunteer-run organization like WP, they should not jump right into the ranks of policy wonks (I'm no Maoist) - and Tim can easily rectify that situation. 3087:, and "I thought he was already an administrator." I have found him to be consistently sensible and clueful. Furthermore, although most of his article-space edits are related to vandal-fighting and other maintenance activities, edits like 2072:

While I agree with the basis of the opposition rationale, I believe in Tim Song's case it does not apply. Tim Song has demonstrated through thoughtful XfD and AfC work that he appreciates what we are here for: to build an encyclopedia.

4105:

My previous remark is unfair, because if Tim Song is innocent of this there is no way for him to prove it; and it utterly fails to assume good faith; so I cannot in good conscience oppose this, but I am afraid I'm too suspicious to

277:

support. Since Twinkle only does A10 (and all other article criteria) in mainspace, I decided that again, no one's going to care if I placed a speedy tag for four seconds on a stub I wrote and spammed my own talk page with speedy

2483:

editor who will certainly do well with the tools. In fact, I was under the impression somehow that he already was an admin. While I understand where the opposes come from, I don't think every admin needs to have X GAs oder :

3609:

I thought I was clear that I would only block/protect "if necessary". In case it wasn't clear, it would not be necessary unless there are blockable/protectable issues, and the editors have previous notice of the problem.

3527:

The edits to mainspace are lacking. An administrator's job is maintenance and janitorial-ship. To understand the maintenance of a project (sysop), you have to understand the mechanics of the project (editor). Warmly,

578:, which allows unregistered users to submit new articles for inclusion in mainspace. I review a fair bit of submissions there. And of course when I help new users more often than not it is going to be related to content. 2806:

when they are clearly exemplary in other areas. Tim is exceptional at AfD and DRV, and that's why I support promotion. As a dedicated and trusted user with an excellent grasp of policy, he'll do fine with the tools.

75:) – I will keep this brief, contrary to my natural inclination to use too many words. Tim Song is a dedicated user, contributing to both mainspace and the internal operations of Knowledge. Tim Song is an active 1534:

has only been truly active since August, and has a huge number of edits in that amount of time. Candidate will use the tools effectively and will be an even greater benefit to the project with the extra buttons.

1664:. Been expecting to see this for some time. Opposes not convincing - I'm not a content producer myself, and I'm a native English speaker. Key qualities are good judgment and trustworthiness, and he has both. 2440:

I understand the rationale of some of the "oppose" !voters. Lack of real content work was one of the reasons I declined a nomination last year. However, he does a lot of good work in AFD and he has a clue.

2367:. Knowledge (and its content) will benefit from having Tim as an admin. He has an interest in doing behind the scenes work, and he has thus far done it well; I have no reason to believe that will change. 3471:

Has only been editing actively for a little over six months and still seems green. As he is especially interested in scripted editing, we should be cautious in extending access to dangerous functions.

261: 2303:. I can understand Durova's oppose, but Tim knows the ropes and I don't need an admin to have FA, GA and DYK plaudits. You don't need to be a content-creation machine to use the tools wisely. 859:: I'm going to be extremely busy during the next few days and have limited on-wiki time. I'll get to the remaining question(s) as soon as possible, but please note that it might take a while. 2201:, no evidence user would abuse the tools, and I totally reject the peculiar notion that you have to have extensive writing experience to correctly interpret an AIV, XFD, or somesuch. 4182:

I have had good interaction with the candidate and can remember no bad behaviour from Tim Song, but there ware some areas that should be tried out a bit more, such as file uploading.

2486:

XXX mainspace edits - they just need to know how it's done, not spend their time doing it. I think, despite his low activity in that area, Tim has demonstrated that he does. Regards

499:

articles on the main page along with an (ideally) attention-grabbing hook, it encourages our readers to read and perhaps improve them, and become editors rather than just readers.

3802:. Give this user another 6 months-1 year, and I'd support in an instant. But I feel that 6 months isn't quite long enough to have the tools. This is a very tough call, however. 137:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

3459: 1040: 570:

It would be disingenuous of me to deny my lack of article-writing experience, so I won't. I'm good at neither writing nor conducting the research necessary for writing

215:

Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

1516:-His conduct is very becoming of a potential admin, and his lack of contributions to wikipedia mainspace are made up by his contributions to the wikipedia mainspace. 784: 2424:– Appears clueful and he communicates well. I can understand the opposition, but I still find him to be sufficiently experienced in relevant areas of the project. 4274: 3489:

I only have positive memories of what I have seen of Tim Song's work, he has a clue -- but Durova's reasoning is very sensible and Tim Songs edit distribution is

3416: 2252: 779: 3569:. How about having the parties ask the subject's wikiproject (if there is one), what about editing with a cool attitude? What happened to looking at relevant 3962:

in articles. Given he can string thoughts together in places other than mainspace, I find it just too weird. Why not ask for guidance, or pick a topic from

564:

The opposition seems to be heavily based on a perceived lack of content-building. What are your best content-building contributions to Knowledge, and why?

633: 4292: 2255: 2152:

and doing it well. I said I'd co-nom him at his last editor review, and that still would have stood, but apparently someone else beat me to the punch. --

205:, which make reviewing AFC submissions much less painful. Other than that, there's my AFD work, which (I'd hope) made life a bit easier for other admins. 3966:? How about uploading photos of landmarks in one's local area, if writing is not one's bag? Also, user greatly enjoys early, non-admin closing of AfDs. 3663:

Eight months editing is generally considered not long enough for a RfA. I'd be happy to look into supporting after 12 months continuous contributions.

2504:

Good answers to the questions, understands policy, and I've seen some excellent and insightful comments from this editor. Will make a fine admin.

2089:. The opposition may have a point, but Tim Song is a great editor whose judgment and temperament is sound. I feel he can be trusted with the tools. 1875:

Well, good to see my nagging has paid off. The ideal candidate, Tim is clueful, intelligent, levelheaded, and always has something valuable to add.

3787: 3352:

I frequently run across his comments and contributions and have never seen him use bad judgement, will use the tools to better the encyclopedia.

3766:

please come back later after build some decent amount of contents. Knowledge is after all to write articles and admins are to aid the purpose.--

1277: 4024: 3928: 722: 620: 774: 2132: 456: 170:

closer, the tools would be extremely helpful. Last but not least, having the tools is very useful for writing and debugging scripts and

4049:, the lack of hard choices in AfD, among other places, the lack of broader opinion seeking (echoing Durova here) and a few comments at 3783: 2468: 2249: 1219: 928: 843: 3151:– I'm not worried about the lack of time here on-wiki, as the user has clearly demonstrated a sense of clue in his short time here. – 663: 627: 174:, as I would be able to clean up any messes I make and also actually test and debug the admin functions (such as deleting a page). 4164: 4117: 3836: 2395: 1184: 657: 222: 33: 17: 510:

Two editors are in a conflict over editorial content. They ask you, "How do we resolve this"... other than linking them to the

3439: 3396: 2611: 2012: 1472: 1081:. This is one of those cases that I thought he was already an administrator. Well, as above, he needs a checkmark in that box. 80: 2843:

I'm new to editing on wiki so there are a lot of things that I still don't know. I really appreciate Tim's edits. Thanks! --

269:

causing the need for a good number of moves back-and-forth.) Later, that page was used to debug a modification to Twinkle (at

4086: 4036:- I think Tim Songs has great programming skills, a definite plus for an admin. My reservations are on only three measures. ' 2811: 689: 613: 270: 72: 672: 3438:. Extremely lightweight on content. According to the Soxred report, only 16% of Tim Song's edits have been to mainspace. 2896:- Will make a good admin, and content contributing never used to matter in RFAs, don't see a reason for it to matter now. 2786: 2246: 1765: 810: 2667:

Per answer to my question and overall support above. I think Tim would be an asset as an admin from what i've seen here.

3963: 2312: 2035: 1674: 800: 1941:

nonetheless. I certainly see no reason to think that he doesn't understand policy or is likely to delete the mainpage.

438:

What in your opinion is the worst BLP issue at the moment, and what would you do to resolve it using your admin tools?

2391: 2055: 1971: 202: 2120:

Absolutely fit for adminship. Your work at AfC overrides any hesitation I would have about "content contributions".

3161: 1898:. At first I thought Durova's oppose had some merit, and then I read the talk page discussion and laughed out loud. 3392: 3166: 2988: 1804: 1638: 898:

I thought he already was an admin! I've seen nothing but good things from Tim, and I don't think this editor would

748: 4224: 4187: 3924: 3655: 2848: 2807: 2292: 1379: 769: 715: 4130:

Actually, if you look closely at the early edits there is clear evidence that Tim edited as an ip editor first.

265: 3807: 3596: 3547: 3533: 3498: 3477: 3419:. Would first like to see a bit more experience in this arena, particularly some quality content article work. 2892: 2271: 1757: 1462:- I was pondering nominating him myself, after I discovered that he was not already one (which I had assumed). 248: 1108: 764: 3442: 2689: 2556: 2304: 2232: 2127: 2031: 1540: 1316: 1064: 327: 240: 4040:, I'm worried about recent-edits, really only since August of 2009, about 8 months of admin-level editing. 3989:- per above comments - all editors should have decent main-space experience to be considered for adminship 3179:

The relation between content contributions and adminship is dubious at best, and I have no other concerns.

4014:

weight of the other contributions. (Or get a featured topic too?) Until shown otherwise, I stand neutral.

3767: 3326: 3290: 3019: 2865: 2844: 2672: 2411: 2050: 1351: 1213: 1152: 1015: 922: 837: 195: 3581:? Those are not directed questions, but thoughts I have (I think in questions, sometimes, so they don't 1104: 3994: 3690: 2446: 2189: 1925: 1907: 1792:

I was under the impression Tim already had administrator rights, and am surprised to see his name here.

1710: 1651: 1521: 1396: 1281: 1088: 947: 4273:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either

3941:- candidate is on the right track, after another six months with varied experiance I could reconsider. 1793: 1756:

One of the easier RfA !vote decisions - looks like a terrific "behind the scenes" Knowledge worker. --

1535: 743: 322: 3990: 972: 4220: 4183: 4161: 4114: 4059: 4017: 3946: 3917: 3879: 3829: 3234: 3200: 3121: 3113: 2717: 2630: 2595: 2285: 1372: 1177: 997: 708: 459:

about editors that are under the age of majority, and how will you deal with such cases as an admin?

4259: 4228: 4213: 4191: 4171: 4148: 4134: 4124: 4091: 4063: 4028: 3998: 3981: 3950: 3933: 3907: 3886: 3861: 3842: 3811: 3791: 3773: 3758: 3735: 3714: 3695: 3676: 3658: 3641: 3619: 3600: 3551: 3537: 3519: 3502: 3481: 3451: 3430: 3400: 3383: 3363: 3344: 3330: 3309: 3295: 3278: 3261: 3238: 3221: 3204: 3187: 3174: 3155: 3143: 3126: 3100: 3074: 3055: 3031: 3010: 2994: 2967: 2950: 2935: 2918: 2886: 2869: 2852: 2835: 2815: 2797: 2769: 2751: 2734: 2720: 2693: 2676: 2659: 2635: 2616: 2597: 2578: 2560: 2543: 2532: 2515: 2472: 2450: 2432: 2416: 2399: 2382: 2359: 2317: 2295: 2275: 2258: 2223: 2205: 2193: 2176: 2138: 2112: 2100: 2081: 2064: 2039: 2017: 1994: 1977: 1950: 1932: 1912: 1890: 1870: 1853: 1836: 1827: 1810: 1787: 1770: 1748: 1731: 1714: 1697: 1681: 1656: 1632: 1616: 1591: 1564: 1545: 1525: 1508: 1496: 1477: 1454: 1427: 1401: 1381: 1363: 1359: 1342: 1322: 1301: 1285: 1246: 1228: 1190: 1159: 1133: 1112: 1095: 1073: 1046: 1017: 1001: 984: 963: 951: 934: 883: 868: 849: 332: 252: 126: 108: 93: 4050: 3976: 3857: 3803: 3592: 3543: 3529: 3494: 3473: 2943: 2881: 2540: 2509: 2350: 2267: 2007: 1990: 1883: 1833: 1823: 1468: 980: 244: 171: 3542:

I have posted some questions above that I will use assist me in revaluation of my recommendation.

4202:

I have never uploaded a file in my life; do you think it has been detrimental to my work here?

4082: 3903: 3711: 3673: 3637: 3615: 3305: 3152: 3139: 3070: 2761: 2685: 2576: 2552: 2377: 2122: 2096: 1866: 1491: 1310: 1127: 1055: 864: 685: 607: 315: 122: 66: 3371:. Sensible, knowledgeable contributor whose work in various areas makes him a strong candidate. 1722:. Amongst his other talents, has been very helpful as an SPI clerk, where I have seen his work. 1273: 3269:. As he is already a user who works behind the scenes, Tim would be a great asset as an Admin. 1355: 3322: 3287: 3274: 3027: 3006: 2963: 2861: 2793: 2668: 2528: 2463: 2408: 1242: 1207: 1143: 1008: 911: 826: 533: 274: 4144: 3799: 3682: 3591:

my oppose. Please continue however, with enough experience I think you will make it. Warm,

3578: 3570: 3557:

who heavily edits mainspace will realize this. I was looking for a basic understand of the

3340: 3180: 3096: 2933: 2905: 2765: 2747: 2442: 2219: 2185: 2169: 2075: 1918: 1899: 1849: 1783: 1727: 1706: 1670: 1643: 1559: 1517: 1390: 1335: 1297: 1082: 1032: 943: 514:

guidance... how would you write a personalized note to them to explain what they should do?

198: 89: 1334:. His edits to AfC, to me, have stood out, and I can trust him fully with the admin tools. 4154: 4107: 4055: 3942: 3871: 3822: 3515: 3441:

It's not a question of quantity vs. quality either. The most heavily edited article is a

3230: 3217: 3196: 2702: 2652: 2625: 2587: 2493: 2144: 1861:

light on content but I've often seen this user around doing good stuff so on balance yes.

1744: 1586: 1170: 993: 899: 343: 4246:. Generally good contributions. However the limited content creation gives me concern. 3968: 3853: 3751: 3731: 3574: 3426: 3358: 2981: 2878: 2606: 2505: 2480: 2459: 2425: 2330: 2202: 2002: 1986: 1877: 1819: 1625: 1609: 1463: 1447: 1331: 976: 352: 191: 4153:

I know, and those were among the many considerations that prevented me from opposing.—

2537: 574:. Much of my work directly related to content does not occur in the mainspace, but at 4286: 4257: 4209: 4074: 3899: 3704: 3666: 3651: 3633: 3611: 3566: 3374: 3301: 3135: 3084: 3066: 2940: 2911: 2831: 2570: 2368: 2283:

and happy to do so for a level-headed editor whose efforts improve the encyclopedia.

2149: 2091: 1946: 1862: 1505: 1486: 1255: 1122: 960: 860: 603: 575: 556: 410: 311: 167: 162:- that is, if someone else does not get to them first. In addition, I plan to patrol 159: 155: 151: 118: 76: 62: 805: 489:

process. Why is this process important with regards to the content of the project?

4131: 3562: 3558: 3270: 3112:

much of a negative effect on this user's ability to perform admin tasks. Probably,

3023: 3002: 2959: 2778: 2524: 2236: 2109: 1412: 1238: 1168:

result of some mistake. Such an argument doesn't sway me for this particular user.

992:

A completely qualified and trustworthy user, incredibly knowledgeable and helpful.

942:. Of course. From my observation, is essentially a de facto admin at the moment. -- 880: 522: 511: 166:

occasionally, and delete the obviously speediable ones. Also, as a rather prolific

105: 1553:

I've seen him around, and I have no reason to believe he would misuse the tools.

4140: 3446: 3336: 3092: 2928: 2899: 2743: 2729: 2326: 2215: 2153: 1845: 1779: 1723: 1690: 1665: 1554: 1293: 1024: 398: 85: 264:) was used to debug a predecessor of my AFC helper script, which used to be at 79:, so naturally the tools would help there. He has also contributed greatly to 3817: 3511: 3247: 3213: 3040: 2958:. Make it 101 :) Great editor; no reason not to support in my humble opinion. 2646: 2488: 1962: 1740: 1574: 369: 4267:

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.

3744: 3727: 3421: 3354: 2976: 1602: 1438: 2684:. Knowledgeable, sensible, and trustworthy editor. Good luck with the mop! 2390:

See no concerns and feel the project will gain with the user having tools.

4247: 4204: 3647: 2826: 2777:

Hard-working and trustworthy administrator candidate. Has my support. --

1942: 1260: 417:), where there is no easily determined consensus how would you close it? 163: 3091:

give me confidence that he is cognizant of content creation issues. --

2023: 1254:- I'm suprised this user isn't already an admin. Lots of edits to the 150:

Several things. I plan to start by dealing with sockpuppet reports at

4277:

or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

4139:

He also says he edited as an IP in his answer to question 7 above. --

4102:

order to become an admin, its edits would look a lot like Tim Song's.

3898:

I asked a good-faith question and essentially got a "duh" in return.

3632:

to get something to a GA and I'd be enthusiastically supporting you.

2407:– won't abuse the tools, is experienced, but a bit light on content. 1054:

Trustworthy, helpful, knowledgeable admin who needs the bit flipped.

1778:, an excellent candidate, will benefit the project in many areas. -- 1689:

had nothing but positive interaction with him - no reason not to.

1624:, opposition is unconvincing. Song will make a good administrator. 688:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review 3108:- Net positive. I don't think the lack of content work would have 2824:

not try to intervene in areas that he is not yet prepared for.

700: 486: 310:

I'm confused....can you elaborate on what you want me to explain?

1985:

support. I have seen him a lot in AfD making sensible decisions.

704: 300:

Hello Tim. Can you explain you Articles for Creation Barnstar?

3286:– has an idea what he's doing, and shouldn't abuse the tools. 4219:

that can easily be filled by trying out most of the buttons.

959:- User is trustworthy and the tools will assist in his work. 115:

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

2568:

Valued and sensible contributor I've run across a fair bit.

455:

What measures do you think Knowledge should take to protect

262:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Liu Yong (Qing Dynasty)

53:

Final (122/21/6); Closed by X! on 20:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

3958:, user claimed to me that he found it difficult to write 2742:

Does not seem like someone who would abuse the tools. --

29:

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a

2266:

as I see no reason not to trust the user with the tools

184:

What are your best contributions to Knowledge, and why?

144:

What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

3895: 3681:"Generally considered"? He has seventy three supports. 3088: 2586:, of course. Dedicated user, no problems whatsoever. — 904: 651: 645: 639: 414: 226: 1389:

Clueful, probably not insane, so meets my standards.--

1006:

Absolutely. Admin without the flag for a while now. –

971:

I've had good interactions with this user. His tool,

3335:

A university needs cleaners as well as researchers.

1237:

vandal fighters and newcomer helpers in Knowledge.--

321:

me too. question withdrawn. Too tired to make sense.

3391:. Sensible, experienced, constructive contributor. 3063:- Good guy to be around with when you're a newbie. 1504:. No concerns, not even about mainspace edits. -- 1103:flipping the bit doesn't change much in this case. 793: 757: 736: 201:back on New Year's Eve. I'm also quite proud of my 2148:long overdue; Tim has been working his ass off at 355:. Did you ever participate in the project itself? 117:Thanks for the kind nomination, Keegan. I accept. 580:Italicized parts added, 23:02, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 3573:and noticeboards, should they be available like 3458:Discussion on this oppose has been moved to the 3083:- I mostly "know" Tim Song from his clerking at 3561:process, and I found none. You mentioned only 3195:- No concerns. Tim's work shows good judgment. 351:You had made some comments on the talk page at 3229:. Not everyone is an article writer. Regards, 1599:Per nom, and experience of helping new users. 2927:much more we should ask of admin candidates. 716: 670:Edit summary usage for Tim Song can be found 8: 2030:Deo Volente & Deo Juvente, Tim Song. — 1120:, sure. Trustworthy guy, no concerns here. 2184:. Fully qualified candidate, no concerns. 1739:Was going to nominate him soon. Darn it! 723: 709: 701: 221:Well, back in my early days I was rather 1983:Stereotypical thought-he-already-was-one 684:Please keep discussion constructive and 3510:severe lack of content contributions. - 3020:User:Bearian/Standards#WP:RFA_standards 896:Beat the nom (and be the first) Support 3300:Thanks, but you !voted already (#72). 2268:-- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) 1832:Tim just got Keegan-ed. Poor guy... — 7: 2485:XX% mainspace contributions or : --> 2245:Trustworthy and experienced user. -- 2108:. yeah, you all beat the co-nom :-) 1917:Excellent and qualified candidate. 532:Additional optional questions from 457:personally identifiable information 396:Additional optional questions from 368:Additional optional questions from 342:Additional optional questions from 239:Please explain the edit history of 555:Additional optional question from 409:If you were to close an AFD, on a 24: 4293:Successful requests for adminship 3816:Actually, he's been active about 2728:...I thought he was one already! 3415:. Very small number of edits to 2022: 1705:Per nom. Will not abuse tools.-- 190:I'm most proud of Kissle, which 18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 4072:regular editor of articles. -- 3134:Close to an ideal candidate. - 2860:Level-headed and trustworthy. 690:Special:Contributions/Tim Song 271:User:Tim Song/twinklespeedy.js 225:because I made a questionable 1: 3784:Short Brigade Harvester Boris 2106:belated co-nomination support 823:Stats posted on talk page -- 3964:Knowledge:Requested articles 572:in topics I am interested in 3123:(I am Czar of all Russias!) 1958:Good answers to questions. 318:) 02:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 154:and also handle reports at 133:Questions for the candidate 4309: 4260:13:21, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 4229:09:49, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 4214:23:13, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 3999:15:51, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 3982:04:38, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 3951:23:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 3934:21:20, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 3401:20:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 3384:19:35, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 3364:16:17, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 3345:15:31, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 3331:12:59, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 3310:12:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 3296:12:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 3279:09:30, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 3262:01:52, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 3239:22:56, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 3222:18:36, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 3205:14:57, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 3188:09:31, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 3175:01:26, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 3156:00:33, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 3144:00:15, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 884:20:16, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 476:Additional questions from 286:Question from Dlohcierekim 266:User:Tim Song/afchelper.js 4192:09:23, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 4172:12:46, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 4149:18:36, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 4135:18:21, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 4125:16:07, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 4092:11:24, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 4064:09:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 4029:00:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 3908:22:37, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 3887:02:57, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 3862:11:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 3843:06:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 3812:04:35, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 3792:18:39, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 3774:15:10, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 3759:08:25, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 3736:08:13, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 3715:08:57, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 3696:19:08, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 3677:18:32, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 3659:05:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 3642:05:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 3620:21:37, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 3601:21:14, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 3552:21:14, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 3538:04:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 3520:03:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 3503:15:00, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 3482:13:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 3452:21:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 3431:20:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 3321:both polite and adminly. 3127:20:29, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 3101:16:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 3075:16:00, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 3056:08:59, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 3032:02:20, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 3011:23:00, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 2995:22:06, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 2968:20:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 2951:16:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 2936:15:42, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 2919:10:32, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 2887:09:44, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 2870:07:38, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 2853:07:08, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 2836:04:17, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 2816:04:16, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 2798:03:15, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 2770:00:21, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 2752:00:13, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 2735:23:28, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 2721:20:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 2694:18:54, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 2677:18:07, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 2660:18:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 2636:07:34, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 2617:04:21, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 2598:04:16, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 2579:04:10, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 2561:03:28, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 2544:01:06, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 2533:00:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 2516:23:27, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 2473:20:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 2451:19:08, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 2433:19:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 2417:14:57, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 2400:12:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 2383:09:06, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 2360:08:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 2318:04:10, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 2296:01:48, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 2276:01:27, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 2259:01:20, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 2239:00:09, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 2224:23:34, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 2206:23:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 2194:22:46, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 2177:21:36, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 2139:21:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 2113:18:50, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 2101:18:41, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 2082:17:19, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 2065:15:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 2040:15:26, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 2018:15:09, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1995:14:51, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1978:14:43, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1951:14:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1933:14:22, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1913:13:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1891:12:08, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1871:11:52, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1854:11:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1837:10:34, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1828:09:51, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1811:09:44, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1788:09:29, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1771:08:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1749:07:38, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1732:07:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1715:06:07, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1698:05:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1682:04:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1657:04:13, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1653:Penny for your thoughts? 1633:03:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1617:03:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1592:03:08, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1565:02:52, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1546:02:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1526:02:18, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1509:02:00, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1497:01:57, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1478:01:51, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1455:01:48, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1428:01:26, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1402:01:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1382:01:18, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1364:00:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1343:23:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 1323:23:52, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 1302:23:34, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 1286:23:23, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 1247:23:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 1229:23:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 1191:22:41, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 1160:22:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 1134:22:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 1113:21:56, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 1096:21:44, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 1074:21:41, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 1047:21:34, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 1018:21:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 1002:21:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 985:21:12, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 964:20:36, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 952:20:31, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 935:20:30, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 869:02:39, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 850:20:30, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 541:What's your take on IAR? 333:02:34, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 253:23:52, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 127:20:22, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 109:18:49, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 94:05:26, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 4270:Please do not modify it. 2701:Will make a good admin. 260:That page (orginally at 3896:unconstructive sarcasm. 241:Liu Yong (Qing Dynasty) 38:Please do not modify it 4045:that exactly is hard. 3726:per Durova and Lar. -- 2392:Pharaoh of the Wizards 2171:Questions or Comments? 876:Note for closing 'crat 485:Can you summarize the 3417:"Top edited articles" 3393:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz 3169:December21st2012Freak 576:articles for creation 99:Belated Co-nomination 81:Articles for creation 34:request for adminship 3869:— lack of content. — 3567:requests for comment 2808:A Stop at Willoughby 900:delete the main page 806:Global contributions 601:Links for Tim Song: 770:Non-automated edits 3559:dispute resolution 3443:three line substub 2931: 2575: 2566:Absolutely support 2032:Mikhailov Kusserow 990:No-brainer support 749:Edit summary usage 692:before commenting. 512:dispute resolution 39: 3932: 3462: 3382: 3183:Aditya Ex Machina 3077: 2929: 2917: 2884: 2795: 2791: 2785: 2710:the new name for 2658: 2569: 2514: 2431: 2175: 1679: 1677:So let it be done 1672: 1615: 1476: 1422: 1409:. About time. - 1226: 1039: 1031: 819: 818: 581: 403: 335: 203:AFC helper script 37: 4300: 4272: 4256: 4252: 4169: 4159: 4122: 4112: 4077: 3980: 3973: 3923: 3920: 3882: 3874: 3841: 3839: 3833: 3826: 3749: 3713: 3707: 3693: 3687: 3675: 3669: 3457: 3449: 3381: 3378: 3372: 3362: 3259: 3185: 3171: 3124: 3119: 3064: 3053: 3018:- easily passes 2991: 2986: 2979: 2948: 2914: 2908: 2897: 2882: 2794: 2790: 2787: 2783: 2781: 2657: 2655: 2649: 2644: 2633: 2628: 2605:wholeheartedly. 2593: 2590: 2573: 2512: 2508: 2496: 2491: 2430: 2428: 2380: 2375: 2357: 2348: 2343: 2338: 2335: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2288: 2172: 2167: 2165: 2162: 2159: 2156: 2135: 2130: 2125: 2094: 2078: 2062: 2058: 2053: 2026: 2015: 2005: 1974: 1965: 1930: 1923: 1910: 1904: 1888: 1880: 1807: 1801: 1797: 1768: 1763: 1695: 1675: 1671: 1654: 1648: 1630: 1614: 1612: 1606: 1600: 1589: 1583: 1580: 1577: 1562: 1557: 1543: 1538: 1494: 1489: 1466: 1453: 1450: 1426: 1423: 1417: 1399: 1393: 1377: 1338: 1319: 1313: 1269: 1266: 1263: 1227: 1222: 1216: 1210: 1204: 1202: 1189: 1187: 1181: 1174: 1158: 1155: 1146: 1130: 1125: 1092: 1071: 1062: 1045: 1043: 1037: 1035: 1029: 1027: 1011: 931: 925: 917: 914: 907: 846: 840: 832: 829: 765:Articles created 725: 718: 711: 702: 675: 667: 626: 596:General comments 579: 397: 330: 325: 320: 199:Special:NewPages 4308: 4307: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4275:this nomination 4268: 4254: 4248: 4221:Graeme Bartlett 4184:Graeme Bartlett 4168: 4165: 4155: 4121: 4118: 4108: 4075: 4027: 4018:NativeForeigner 4007: 3969: 3967: 3918: 3880: 3872: 3837: 3831: 3824: 3821: 3755: 3745: 3705: 3702: 3691: 3683: 3667: 3664: 3447: 3409: 3376: 3373: 3353: 3293: 3254: 3248: 3181: 3167: 3149:Belated support 3132:Strong Support: 3122: 3116:Lord Spongefrog 3114: 3041: 2989: 2982: 2977: 2944: 2912: 2906: 2902: 2845:Filmnmusicritic 2788: 2779: 2716: 2653: 2647: 2645: 2631: 2626: 2615: 2591: 2588: 2571: 2510: 2494: 2489: 2471: 2458:Has sufficient 2426: 2414: 2378: 2369: 2355: 2351: 2344: 2339: 2336: 2331: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2286: 2170: 2163: 2160: 2157: 2154: 2133: 2128: 2123: 2090: 2076: 2060: 2056: 2051: 2013: 2003: 1976: 1972: 1963: 1926: 1919: 1908: 1900: 1884: 1878: 1805: 1799: 1795: 1766: 1758: 1691: 1678: 1652: 1644: 1626: 1610: 1604: 1601: 1587: 1581: 1578: 1575: 1560: 1555: 1541: 1536: 1492: 1487: 1448: 1436: 1421: 1416: 1413: 1410: 1397: 1391: 1375:Coldplay Expért 1373: 1336: 1317: 1311: 1274:✉ click to talk 1267: 1264: 1261: 1220: 1214: 1208: 1203: 1200: 1185: 1179: 1172: 1169: 1153: 1144: 1142: 1141:; no concerns. 1128: 1123: 1090: 1065: 1056: 1041: 1033: 1025: 1023: 1009: 929: 923: 915: 912: 903: 892: 844: 838: 830: 827: 820: 815: 789: 753: 732: 731:RfA/RfB toolbox 729: 699: 671: 619: 602: 598: 401: 328: 323: 135: 101: 77:checkuser clerk 60: 50: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4306: 4304: 4296: 4295: 4285: 4284: 4280: 4279: 4263: 4262: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4238: 4237: 4236: 4235: 4234: 4233: 4232: 4231: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4174: 4166: 4119: 4094: 4066: 4031: 4023: 4006: 4003: 4002: 4001: 3984: 3953: 3936: 3910: 3889: 3864: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3804:ErikTheBikeMan 3794: 3776: 3761: 3753: 3738: 3721: 3720: 3719: 3718: 3717: 3661: 3644: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3604: 3603: 3593:NonvocalScream 3587: 3586: 3554: 3544:NonvocalScream 3530:NonvocalScream 3522: 3505: 3495:Power.corrupts 3484: 3474:Colonel Warden 3466: 3465: 3464: 3433: 3408: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3386: 3366: 3347: 3333: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3291: 3264: 3252: 3241: 3224: 3207: 3190: 3177: 3158: 3146: 3129: 3103: 3078: 3058: 3034: 3013: 2997: 2970: 2953: 2938: 2921: 2900: 2889: 2872: 2855: 2838: 2818: 2800: 2772: 2754: 2737: 2723: 2707: 2696: 2679: 2662: 2638: 2619: 2609: 2600: 2581: 2563: 2553:Richard Cavell 2546: 2535: 2518: 2499: 2475: 2467: 2453: 2435: 2419: 2412: 2402: 2385: 2362: 2353: 2320: 2298: 2278: 2261: 2240: 2226: 2209: 2196: 2179: 2141: 2115: 2103: 2084: 2067: 2042: 2020: 1997: 1980: 1970: 1953: 1935: 1915: 1893: 1873: 1856: 1839: 1830: 1813: 1790: 1773: 1751: 1734: 1717: 1700: 1684: 1676: 1659: 1635: 1619: 1594: 1567: 1548: 1531:Strong Support 1528: 1511: 1499: 1480: 1457: 1430: 1419: 1414: 1404: 1384: 1366: 1345: 1330:— user with a 1325: 1304: 1288: 1249: 1234:Strong support 1231: 1193: 1162: 1136: 1115: 1105:Bradjamesbrown 1098: 1076: 1049: 1020: 1004: 987: 966: 954: 937: 891: 888: 887: 886: 872: 871: 853: 852: 817: 816: 814: 813: 808: 803: 797: 795: 791: 790: 788: 787: 782: 777: 772: 767: 761: 759: 755: 754: 752: 751: 746: 740: 738: 734: 733: 730: 728: 727: 720: 713: 705: 698: 695: 681: 680: 679: 677: 668: 597: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 559: 552: 551: 550: 549: 536: 529: 528: 527: 526: 504: 503: 502: 501: 480: 478:NonvocalScream 472: 470: 469: 468: 467: 449: 448: 447: 446: 432: 431: 430: 429: 404: 399: 393: 392: 391: 390: 382:long absence? 372: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361:No, I did not. 346: 339: 338: 337: 336: 282: 281: 280: 279: 245:Colonel Warden 233: 232: 231: 230: 209: 208: 207: 206: 178: 177: 176: 175: 134: 131: 130: 129: 100: 97: 59: 56: 49: 44: 43: 42: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4305: 4294: 4291: 4290: 4288: 4278: 4276: 4271: 4265: 4264: 4261: 4258: 4253: 4251: 4245: 4242: 4230: 4226: 4222: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4211: 4207: 4206: 4201: 4200: 4199: 4198: 4197: 4196: 4195: 4194: 4193: 4189: 4185: 4181: 4173: 4170: 4162: 4160: 4158: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4146: 4142: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4133: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4123: 4115: 4113: 4111: 4103: 4098: 4095: 4093: 4090: 4088: 4084: 4079: 4078: 4070: 4067: 4065: 4061: 4057: 4052: 4048: 4043: 4039: 4035: 4032: 4030: 4026: 4021: 4020: 4019: 4012: 4009: 4008: 4004: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3988: 3985: 3983: 3978: 3974: 3972: 3965: 3961: 3957: 3954: 3952: 3948: 3944: 3940: 3937: 3935: 3930: 3926: 3922: 3914: 3911: 3909: 3905: 3901: 3897: 3893: 3890: 3888: 3884: 3883: 3876: 3875: 3868: 3865: 3863: 3859: 3855: 3851: 3848: 3844: 3840: 3835: 3834: 3828: 3827: 3819: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3801: 3798: 3795: 3793: 3789: 3785: 3780: 3777: 3775: 3772: 3770: 3765: 3762: 3760: 3757: 3756: 3750: 3748: 3742: 3739: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3725: 3722: 3716: 3712: 3709: 3708: 3699: 3698: 3697: 3694: 3688: 3686: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3674: 3671: 3670: 3662: 3660: 3657: 3653: 3649: 3645: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3630: 3627: 3621: 3617: 3613: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3589: 3588: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3564: 3563:third opinion 3560: 3555: 3553: 3549: 3545: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3526: 3523: 3521: 3517: 3513: 3509: 3506: 3504: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3485: 3483: 3479: 3475: 3470: 3467: 3463: 3461: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3450: 3444: 3440: 3437: 3434: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3423: 3418: 3414: 3411: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3387: 3385: 3380: 3379: 3370: 3367: 3365: 3360: 3356: 3351: 3348: 3346: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3320: 3317: 3311: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3294: 3288: 3285: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3265: 3263: 3260: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3245: 3242: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3228: 3225: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3211: 3208: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3191: 3189: 3186: 3184: 3178: 3176: 3172: 3170: 3164: 3163: 3159: 3157: 3154: 3150: 3147: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3130: 3128: 3125: 3120: 3117: 3111: 3107: 3104: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3079: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3062: 3059: 3057: 3054: 3052: 3048: 3044: 3038: 3035: 3033: 3029: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3014: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3001: 2998: 2996: 2993: 2992: 2987: 2985: 2980: 2974: 2971: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2954: 2952: 2949: 2947: 2942: 2939: 2937: 2934: 2932: 2925: 2922: 2920: 2915: 2909: 2903: 2895: 2894: 2890: 2888: 2885: 2880: 2876: 2873: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2856: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2839: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2828: 2822: 2819: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2804: 2801: 2799: 2796: 2792: 2782: 2776: 2773: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2758: 2755: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2738: 2736: 2733: 2732: 2727: 2724: 2722: 2719: 2714: 2713: 2706: 2705: 2700: 2697: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2686:Laurinavicius 2683: 2680: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2663: 2661: 2656: 2650: 2642: 2639: 2637: 2634: 2629: 2623: 2620: 2618: 2613: 2608: 2604: 2601: 2599: 2596: 2594: 2585: 2582: 2580: 2577: 2574: 2567: 2564: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2547: 2545: 2542: 2539: 2536: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2519: 2517: 2513: 2507: 2503: 2500: 2498: 2497: 2492: 2482: 2479: 2476: 2474: 2470: 2469:contributions 2465: 2461: 2457: 2454: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2439: 2436: 2434: 2429: 2423: 2420: 2418: 2415: 2409: 2406: 2403: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2386: 2384: 2381: 2376: 2374: 2373: 2366: 2363: 2361: 2358: 2356: 2349: 2347: 2342: 2334: 2328: 2324: 2321: 2319: 2316: 2308: 2302: 2299: 2297: 2294: 2293: 2290: 2289: 2282: 2279: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2262: 2260: 2257: 2254: 2251: 2248: 2244: 2241: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2227: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2210: 2207: 2204: 2200: 2197: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2180: 2178: 2173: 2166: 2151: 2147: 2146: 2142: 2140: 2137: 2136: 2131: 2126: 2119: 2116: 2114: 2111: 2107: 2104: 2102: 2098: 2093: 2088: 2085: 2083: 2080: 2079: 2071: 2068: 2066: 2063: 2059: 2054: 2046: 2043: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2019: 2016: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2001: 1998: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1981: 1979: 1975: 1973:Contributions 1968: 1967: 1966: 1957: 1954: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1939: 1936: 1934: 1931: 1929: 1924: 1922: 1916: 1914: 1911: 1905: 1903: 1897: 1894: 1892: 1889: 1887: 1882: 1881: 1874: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1857: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1844:No problems. 1843: 1840: 1838: 1835: 1831: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1814: 1812: 1808: 1802: 1798: 1791: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1774: 1772: 1769: 1764: 1762: 1755: 1752: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1735: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1718: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1701: 1699: 1696: 1694: 1688: 1685: 1683: 1680: 1673: 1669: 1668: 1663: 1660: 1658: 1655: 1649: 1647: 1641: 1640: 1636: 1634: 1631: 1629: 1623: 1620: 1618: 1613: 1608: 1607: 1598: 1595: 1593: 1590: 1585: 1584: 1571: 1568: 1566: 1563: 1558: 1552: 1549: 1547: 1544: 1539: 1532: 1529: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1512: 1510: 1507: 1503: 1500: 1498: 1495: 1490: 1484: 1481: 1479: 1474: 1470: 1465: 1461: 1458: 1456: 1451: 1445: 1444: 1442: 1434: 1431: 1429: 1425: 1424: 1408: 1405: 1403: 1400: 1394: 1388: 1385: 1383: 1380: 1378: 1376: 1370: 1367: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1346: 1344: 1341: 1339: 1333: 1329: 1326: 1324: 1321: 1320: 1314: 1308: 1305: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1292: 1289: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1270: 1257: 1253: 1250: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1235: 1232: 1230: 1225: 1223: 1217: 1211: 1197: 1194: 1192: 1188: 1183: 1182: 1176: 1175: 1166: 1163: 1161: 1156: 1150: 1149: 1140: 1137: 1135: 1132: 1131: 1126: 1119: 1116: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1099: 1097: 1094: 1093: 1086: 1085: 1080: 1077: 1075: 1072: 1070: 1069: 1063: 1061: 1060: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1044: 1036: 1028: 1021: 1019: 1016: 1013: 1012: 1005: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 988: 986: 982: 978: 974: 970: 967: 965: 962: 958: 955: 953: 949: 945: 941: 938: 936: 932: 926: 920: 919: 918: 906: 901: 897: 894: 893: 889: 885: 882: 877: 874: 873: 870: 866: 862: 858: 855: 854: 851: 847: 841: 835: 834: 833: 822: 821: 812: 809: 807: 804: 802: 799: 798: 796: 792: 786: 783: 781: 778: 776: 773: 771: 768: 766: 763: 762: 760: 756: 750: 747: 745: 742: 741: 739: 735: 726: 721: 719: 714: 712: 707: 706: 703: 696: 694: 693: 691: 687: 678: 674: 669: 665: 662: 659: 656: 653: 650: 647: 644: 641: 638: 635: 632: 629: 625: 622: 618: 615: 612: 609: 605: 600: 599: 595: 586: 585:Clarification 583: 582: 577: 573: 569: 566: 565: 563: 560: 558: 554: 553: 546: 543: 542: 540: 537: 535: 531: 530: 524: 523:third opinion 519: 516: 515: 513: 509: 506: 505: 500: 494: 491: 490: 488: 487:Did you Know? 484: 481: 479: 475: 474: 473: 464: 461: 460: 458: 454: 451: 450: 443: 440: 439: 437: 434: 433: 428: 422: 419: 418: 416: 412: 408: 405: 402: 395: 394: 387: 384: 383: 381: 376: 373: 371: 367: 366: 360: 357: 356: 354: 350: 347: 345: 341: 340: 334: 331: 326: 319: 317: 313: 309: 305: 304: 302: 301: 299: 295: 294: 292: 291: 289: 288: 287: 276: 272: 267: 263: 259: 256: 255: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 235: 234: 228: 224: 220: 217: 216: 214: 211: 210: 204: 200: 197: 193: 189: 186: 185: 183: 180: 179: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 146: 145: 143: 140: 139: 138: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 113: 112: 111: 110: 107: 98: 96: 95: 91: 87: 82: 78: 74: 71: 68: 64: 57: 55: 54: 48: 45: 41: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 4269: 4266: 4249: 4243: 4203: 4156: 4109: 4104: 4100: 4096: 4080: 4073: 4068: 4046: 4041: 4037: 4033: 4016: 4015: 4010: 3986: 3970: 3959: 3955: 3938: 3912: 3891: 3878: 3870: 3866: 3852:per Durova. 3849: 3830: 3823: 3796: 3778: 3768: 3763: 3752: 3746: 3740: 3723: 3703: 3684: 3665: 3628: 3585:a response). 3582: 3524: 3507: 3490: 3486: 3468: 3456: 3435: 3420: 3412: 3388: 3375: 3368: 3349: 3323:FeydHuxtable 3318: 3283: 3266: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3243: 3226: 3209: 3192: 3182: 3168: 3160: 3148: 3131: 3115: 3109: 3105: 3080: 3060: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3036: 3015: 2999: 2983: 2975: 2972: 2955: 2945: 2923: 2891: 2874: 2857: 2840: 2825: 2820: 2802: 2774: 2756: 2739: 2730: 2725: 2711: 2709: 2703: 2698: 2681: 2669:Doc Quintana 2664: 2640: 2621: 2602: 2583: 2565: 2548: 2520: 2501: 2487: 2477: 2464:Patar knight 2455: 2437: 2421: 2404: 2387: 2371: 2370: 2364: 2352: 2345: 2340: 2332: 2322: 2300: 2291: 2284: 2280: 2263: 2242: 2233:RfA criteria 2228: 2211: 2198: 2181: 2143: 2121: 2117: 2105: 2086: 2074: 2069: 2049: 2044: 2027: 2008: 1999: 1982: 1960: 1959: 1955: 1937: 1927: 1920: 1901: 1895: 1885: 1876: 1858: 1841: 1815: 1794: 1775: 1767:said Zebedee 1760: 1753: 1736: 1719: 1702: 1692: 1686: 1666: 1661: 1645: 1637: 1627: 1621: 1603: 1596: 1573: 1569: 1550: 1530: 1513: 1501: 1485:You bet. :) 1482: 1459: 1440: 1439: 1432: 1411: 1406: 1386: 1374: 1368: 1350:Passes most 1347: 1340: 1327: 1315: 1306: 1290: 1259: 1251: 1233: 1205: 1195: 1178: 1171: 1164: 1147: 1138: 1121: 1117: 1100: 1089: 1083: 1078: 1067: 1066: 1058: 1057: 1051: 1010:Juliancolton 1007: 989: 968: 956: 939: 910: 909: 895: 875: 856: 825: 824: 683: 682: 660: 654: 648: 642: 636: 630: 623: 616: 610: 584: 571: 567: 561: 544: 538: 534:Doc Quintana 517: 507: 497: 492: 482: 477: 471: 462: 452: 441: 435: 425: 420: 406: 385: 379: 374: 358: 348: 307: 306: 303: 297: 296: 293: 290: 285: 284: 283: 257: 236: 218: 212: 187: 181: 147: 141: 136: 114: 102: 69: 61: 52: 51: 46: 30: 28: 3991:SteveRwanda 3797:Weak Oppose 3741:Weak oppose 3646:Not yet. ++ 2538:m:Katerenka 2443:Ron Ritzman 2186:Newyorkbrad 2077:Jujutacular 1921:Pmlineditor 1796:Master& 1646:HJ Mitchell 1518:Smallman12q 1392:Fabrictramp 1337:Airplaneman 944:Mkativerata 905:block Jimbo 811:User rights 801:CentralAuth 413:, (such as 4157:S Marshall 4110:S Marshall 4056:Shadowjams 3943:Off2riorob 3921:HairedGirl 3873:Aaroncrick 3231:SunCreator 3197:EdJohnston 2907:have a cup 2712:Wikiwoohoo 2704:Cloudbound 2627:NotedGrant 1398:talk to me 1371:per nom.-- 1307:Absolutely 1022:Oh yes... 994:Beeblebrox 794:Cross-wiki 785:AfD closes 697:Discussion 344:Shadowjams 275:WP:CSD A10 223:distressed 58:Nomination 31:successful 4106:support.— 3977:reasoning 3971:Abductive 3854:Sole Soul 3579:mediation 3460:talk page 3377:Gongshow 3359:talk page 2879:Sjakkalle 2506:Dreadstar 2427:Paul Erik 2325:. as per 2231:. See my 2203:Lankiveil 1987:Gonzonoir 1820:SmokeyJoe 1628:Blurpeace 1542:cierekim 1464:Connormah 1026:The Thing 780:AfD votes 775:BLP edits 646:block log 329:cierekim 192:Ironholds 4287:Category 4076:Kraftlos 4025:Contribs 3960:anything 3929:contribs 3900:Townlake 3820:months. 3706:SilkTork 3668:SilkTork 3634:Jclemens 3612:Tim Song 3575:this one 3302:Tim Song 3153:MuZemike 3136:Ret.Prof 3089:this one 3067:TitanOne 2883:(Check!) 2372:Wine Guy 2287:Schmidt, 2247:The High 2092:decltype 2061:Chequers 1863:Polargeo 1506:Kbdank71 1488:Bejinhan 1473:contribs 1352:criteria 1312:Spaceman 1278:my edits 1042:Contribs 961:Jusdafax 930:contribs 861:Tim Song 845:contribs 758:Analysis 737:Counters 614:contribs 604:Tim Song 557:Townlake 312:Tim Song 278:notices. 194:used to 119:Tim Song 73:contribs 63:Tim Song 47:Tim Song 4244:Neutral 4132:Spartaz 4097:Neutral 4087:Contrib 4069:Neutral 4051:WT:NEWT 4034:Neutral 4011:Neutral 4005:Neutral 3800:Not yet 3769:Caspian 3491:extreme 3389:Support 3369:Support 3350:Support 3319:Support 3284:Support 3271:Jarkeld 3267:Support 3246:. Yep. 3244:Support 3227:Support 3210:Support 3193:Support 3162:Support 3106:Support 3081:Support 3061:Support 3037:Support 3024:Bearian 3016:Support 3003:JoshuaZ 3000:support 2973:Support 2960:Difu Wu 2956:Support 2924:Support 2893:Support 2875:Support 2858:Support 2841:Support 2821:Support 2803:Support 2775:Support 2757:Support 2740:Support 2726:Support 2699:Support 2682:Support 2665:Support 2641:Support 2622:Support 2603:Support 2584:Support 2549:Support 2525:Jafeluv 2521:Support 2502:Support 2481:Clueful 2478:Support 2456:Support 2438:Support 2422:Support 2405:Support 2388:Support 2365:Support 2323:Support 2314:Windows 2301:Support 2281:Support 2264:Support 2243:Support 2229:Support 2212:Support 2199:Support 2182:Support 2145:Support 2118:Support 2110:Spartaz 2087:Support 2070:Support 2045:Support 2028:Support 2000:Support 1956:Support 1938:Support 1896:Support 1859:Support 1842:Support 1816:Support 1776:Support 1754:Support 1737:Support 1720:Support 1703:Support 1687:Support 1662:Support 1639:Support 1622:Support 1597:Support 1570:Support 1551:Support 1514:Support 1502:Support 1483:Support 1460:Support 1433:Support 1407:Support 1387:Support 1369:Support 1348:Support 1328:Support 1291:Per nom 1268:Dude :) 1265:Science 1252:Support 1239:Hokeman 1196:Support 1165:Support 1148:Symonds 1139:Support 1118:Support 1101:Support 1079:Support 1052:Support 977:Kingpin 969:Support 957:Support 940:Support 913:Phantom 890:Support 881:Spartaz 828:Phantom 621:deleted 353:WP:NEWT 164:CAT:CSD 106:Spartaz 4141:RL0919 4042:Second 3987:Oppose 3956:Oppose 3939:Oppose 3925:(talk) 3913:Oppose 3892:Oppose 3867:Oppose 3850:Oppose 3779:Oppose 3764:Oppose 3724:Oppose 3629:Oppose 3571:policy 3525:Oppose 3508:Oppose 3487:Oppose 3469:Oppose 3448:Durova 3436:Oppose 3413:Oppose 3407:Oppose 3337:Stifle 3292:piggle 3093:Orlady 3085:WP:SPI 2946:Şłџğģő 2941:WP:100 2930:Nathan 2901:Coffee 2762:Cunard 2744:rogerd 2731:Ks0stm 2718:(talk) 2648:Frank 2592:Earwig 2413:piggle 2327:RL0919 2306:Fences 2216:RL0919 2150:WP:AFD 1846:Warrah 1800:Expert 1780:Taelus 1724:Risker 1707:Banana 1667:Xymmax 1435:. yes! 1418:ASTILY 1294:Keegan 1084:Valley 1068:Waters 1059:Calmer 973:Kissle 744:XTools 400:Coffee 273:) for 227:revert 172:Kissle 86:Keegan 4210:talk 4047:Third 4038:First 3919:Brown 3832:comms 3825:fetch 3818:eight 3512:Atmoz 3214:Nsk92 2832:talk 2780:Marek 2654:talk 2607:Gosox 2379:~Talk 2310:& 2256:Whale 2253:Sperm 2237:Peter 2134:Space 2057:Spiel 1964:RP459 1879:ceran 1818:. -- 1759:Boing 1741:Hobit 1605:Chzz 1318:Spiff 1262:Nerdy 1201:Amory 1180:comms 1173:fetch 1145:Peter 1124:Jamie 916:Steve 908:. -- 831:Steve 686:civil 628:count 380:years 370:RP459 196:clear 16:< 4225:talk 4188:talk 4167:Cont 4145:talk 4120:Cont 4083:Talk 4060:talk 3995:talk 3947:talk 3904:talk 3885:) 3881:talk 3858:talk 3808:talk 3788:talk 3771:blue 3747:Reyk 3732:talk 3728:John 3638:talk 3616:talk 3597:talk 3583:need 3565:and 3548:talk 3534:talk 3516:talk 3499:talk 3478:talk 3427:talk 3422:Cirt 3397:talk 3355:J04n 3341:talk 3327:talk 3306:talk 3275:talk 3255:warm 3235:talk 3218:talk 3201:talk 3140:talk 3097:talk 3071:talk 3028:talk 3007:talk 2984:Soap 2964:talk 2866:talk 2849:talk 2812:talk 2766:talk 2748:talk 2690:talk 2673:talk 2632:Talk 2589:The 2557:talk 2529:talk 2462:. -- 2460:CLUE 2447:talk 2396:talk 2354:Talk 2272:talk 2220:talk 2190:talk 2129:From 2124:Them 2097:talk 2052:Ϣere 2036:talk 1991:talk 1947:talk 1886:thor 1867:talk 1850:talk 1834:Dark 1824:talk 1806:Talk 1784:talk 1745:talk 1728:talk 1711:talk 1537:Dloh 1522:talk 1493:Talk 1469:talk 1449:Talk 1420:sock 1360:talk 1356:mono 1332:clue 1298:talk 1282:sign 1243:talk 1154:talk 1109:talk 1091:city 1034:Talk 998:talk 981:talk 948:talk 924:talk 865:talk 857:Note 839:talk 673:here 658:rfar 640:logs 608:talk 415:this 324:Dloh 316:talk 249:talk 158:and 123:talk 90:talk 67:talk 4250:Axl 4205:DGG 3927:• ( 3754:YO! 3689:| 3685:Tan 3648:Lar 3577:? 3173:at 3110:too 2916:// 2913:ark 2910:// 2904:// 2827:DGG 2572:Ray 2541:(d) 2495:Why 2484:--> 2466:- / 2337:aen 2329:-- 2250:Fin 2014:Man 1961:-- 1943:Rje 1906:| 1902:Tan 1561:meh 1556:Tim 1443:oJo 1354:.-- 1256:ANI 1129:S93 902:or 664:spi 634:AfD 562:14. 539:13. 508:12. 483:11. 453:10. 411:BLP 168:AFD 160:UAA 156:AIV 152:SPI 4289:: 4227:) 4212:) 4190:) 4147:) 4085:| 4062:) 3997:) 3949:) 3906:) 3860:) 3810:) 3790:) 3734:) 3692:39 3650:: 3640:) 3618:) 3599:) 3550:) 3536:) 3518:) 3501:) 3480:) 3429:) 3399:) 3343:) 3329:) 3308:) 3277:) 3237:) 3220:) 3212:. 3203:) 3142:) 3099:) 3073:) 3065:-- 3030:) 3022:. 3009:) 2966:) 2898:— 2868:) 2862:LK 2851:) 2834:) 2814:) 2789:69 2768:) 2750:) 2692:) 2675:) 2651:| 2624:-- 2612:55 2559:) 2551:- 2531:) 2490:So 2449:) 2441:-- 2398:) 2346:A. 2341:K. 2274:) 2235:. 2222:) 2192:) 2164:ik 2155:Sh 2099:) 2038:) 2004:TN 1993:) 1949:) 1909:39 1869:) 1852:) 1826:) 1809:) 1786:) 1747:) 1730:) 1713:) 1650:| 1611:► 1579:am 1576:At 1524:) 1471:| 1452:• 1446:• 1437:— 1395:| 1362:) 1300:) 1284:) 1280:• 1276:• 1258:. 1245:) 1218:• 1212:• 1111:) 1038:// 1030:// 1014:| 1000:) 983:) 950:) 933:\ 867:) 848:\ 652:lu 568:A: 545:A: 518:A: 493:A: 463:A. 442:A. 436:9. 421:A. 407:8. 386:A: 375:7. 359:A: 349:6. 308:A: 298:5. 258:A: 251:) 243:. 237:4. 219:A: 213:3. 188:A: 182:2. 148:A: 142:1. 125:) 92:) 36:. 4255:¤ 4223:( 4208:( 4186:( 4163:/ 4143:( 4116:/ 4089:) 4081:( 4058:( 4022:/ 3993:( 3979:) 3975:( 3945:( 3931:) 3902:( 3877:( 3856:( 3838:☛ 3806:( 3786:( 3730:( 3710:* 3672:* 3656:c 3654:/ 3652:t 3636:( 3614:( 3595:( 3546:( 3532:( 3514:( 3497:( 3476:( 3425:( 3395:( 3361:) 3357:( 3339:( 3325:( 3304:( 3289:∙ 3273:( 3253:S 3233:( 3216:( 3199:( 3138:( 3118:, 3095:( 3069:( 3051:a 3049:c 3047:z 3045:a 3043:m 3026:( 3005:( 2990:— 2978:— 2962:( 2864:( 2847:( 2830:( 2810:( 2784:. 2764:( 2746:( 2715:) 2708:( 2688:( 2671:( 2614:) 2610:( 2555:( 2527:( 2511:☥ 2445:( 2410:∙ 2394:( 2333:M 2270:( 2218:( 2208:. 2188:( 2174:) 2168:( 2161:r 2158:i 2095:( 2034:( 2009:X 1989:( 1969:/ 1945:( 1928:∞ 1865:( 1848:( 1822:( 1803:( 1782:( 1761:! 1743:( 1726:( 1709:( 1693:7 1588:頭 1582:a 1520:( 1475:) 1467:( 1441:J 1415:F 1358:( 1309:— 1296:( 1272:( 1241:( 1224:) 1221:c 1215:t 1209:u 1206:( 1186:☛ 1157:) 1151:( 1107:( 1087:2 996:( 979:( 946:( 927:| 921:/ 863:( 842:| 836:/ 724:e 717:t 710:v 676:. 666:) 661:· 655:· 649:· 643:· 637:· 631:· 624:· 617:· 611:· 606:( 314:( 247:( 121:( 88:( 70:· 65:( 40:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Requests for adminship/Tim Song - Knowledge

Index