Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Titodutta

4975:; I hate to oppose such a good contributor in many areas, but I too have a major issue with the answer to Q11. Simply thinking that the Yellowknifer may be the same as the Yellowknife Journal-Gazette may be a reasonable belief, but if there is no evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that they are the same, it is not appropriate for Knowledge to have an article that is based on the original research that they may be the same. In addition, one mention of a paper does in no way constitute significant coverage of a subject (although being behind a paywall has no effect whatsoever). If it lacks sufficient context and does not credibly indicate importance, then it is a clear candidate for speedy deletion per A7 as an organization. Therefore, I unfortunately cannot trust the candidate with the delete and undelete buttons, and it is most unfortunate that the tools are not unbundled so that Titodutta could get the block and protect buttons, which I have no reservations about. 5403:"polling isn't a substitute for discussion." Another thing that worries me about the candidate's answer to question six is its overcautiousness. Making well-informed decisions, and being ready to either exhaustively explain or change them when challenged, is all that's required from an administrator; overthinking one's decisions is not a desirable trait for a person whose position requires making multiple tough calls daily. As some of the opposers, I too find the answer to question eleven problematic. The candidate was presented with a clear-cut case of a test page created by a new editor, but instead of providing a simple answer such as "I delete the page as per G2 (test), A1 (no context), A3 (chat-like comment), etc. and leave the user a welcoming message," s/he decided to produce an elaborate proof that s/he tends to overthink simple matters to the point where the ultimate effect is likely to be inaction. On another note, the candidate's pre-RfA canvassing, 580:(Firstly, although you have not mentioned, let's consider those 4 votes are not sock/SPA votes), now in such situation a) if I find only one editor is making policy-based arguments, and all others are just talking unnecessarily, (following what I was doing so far), I'll try to get involved in that discussion and support that editor's policy-based arguments with more points (of course as an involved editor, I'll not be able to close it then, there are many more admins who can close the discussion), b) now, suppose I am not permitted to to get involved in the discussion, I'll definitely not close the discussion immediately, and will encourage those four editors to try to reply to "editor 1"'s comments/arguments. I'll also inform related noticeboards about this discussion so that experienced editors from the project come and check the discussion (on WikiProject India noticeboard, we get such requests). I may also ask other experienced admins or go to 5291:

emboldened and venture too much in "involved" territory. So, I feel a general note to be circumspect might be good. I had meant my comment to be taken in that spirit. Besides that, "India" is a broad area, and it can be taken to mean "Indian subcontinent", which is an even broader area. There is not much wrong adminning that whole area, but the "Indian subcontinent" also includes Pakistan. Indo-Pak relations are quite similar to Israel-Palestine situation. For example, in theory, an Indian admin can admin around Pakistan too, and vice versa, but is not a good idea IMO. I think I have seen something like that, and the results seem not-good to me,. So, I feel, some degree of circumspection / discretion may be good. From a sitewide perspective, I think the need for new admins is dire and I had no intention to oppose. I might even have supported if there were not so many supports already. Regards.

2078:. If you want more information then you may well have to turn to email, I think. There is an ongoing situation and it is not one of Titodutta's making. He is one of the good guys and it falls under the "defender of the wiki" banner, although for legal reasons much of it should not be discussed here. I'm happy to fill in some of the gaps via email but I can't reveal all and I doubt that WMF would reveal as much as I might. That he, like me, pretty much put his real life on the line should be a positive, not a negative. My apologies for sounding so mysterious but much of this has gone on through entirely acceptable and necessary backchannels and I think that WMF will at least acknowledge that point even if their hands are otherwise tied. - 5020:, which is more a hagiographic collection of accolades than a soberly written tertiary source. I don't mean to say the candidate is not a valuable editor, but proficiency in these matters needs to be higher in an admin. Common themes among supporters are politeness, helpfulness and dedication to the project in underrepresented areas. These are very beneficial. But for me, in this forum, they all need to take a back seat to the fundamental question of whether the candidate displays a strong track record of applying core policies. It is on this question that the evidence in support of the candidature is quite thin and that the evidence against is sufficient to cause me to oppose. -- 5276:

India. However, "articles relating to India" is an extremely broad area of "focus," given that India has a billion people. It could hardly be the case that a candidate, even if he or she is Indian and focuses on topics with a connection to India, thereby has a conflict of interest or failure of neutrality regarding all articles with a focus on something or someone from India. I think that no one would raise concerns about an American (U.S.) candidate who focuses principally on American topics, or a U.K.-based admin who focuses on U.K.-related topics. As such, I'd urge ORY to reconsider this comment. Regards,

4245:. What I found was a fair-minded concerned editor, an all-round plus to the project. His interest and knowledge of the Indian culture and his positive way of being will bridge some of the gaps in editors seeing each other as cohorts and collaborators rather than adversaries. I'm more concerned in how a prospective Administrator will behave when dealing with his/her fellow editors rather than whether or not he knows all the rules and regulations. I doubt that Tito will ever become gruff or dis-respectful (as some admins have chosen to be). A recent desop is a case in point. 685:

work as an administrator is AfD. Your overall AfD record is solid, and has improved over time. Could you provide some insight into how your understanding of the concept of notability has evolved over the last three years? Can you briefly discuss the relationship between specific notability guidelines and the general notability guidelines? And, finally, in addition to the notability of a list subject, can you briefly discuss some of the factors that you would use to evaluate the suitability of a list topic for inclusion. Thanks and good luck.

242:. I do believe that it was one of the wikiwonders, as I cannot think of any sound reason for me in my real life to watch a Bengali-language film (I adore books actually). This quality of motivating people met by chance, cross-project, cross-language is just really fascinating. and though day-by-day administrator's duties are not that fancy, it can help. to keep going on. thus I would believe in the user and give him a chance to find out for himself whether this role really fits him and whether he can do more for the project he likes. best, -- 2249:. Saying AfD in Q1 makes me look at AfDs, but there were only 7 in 2014; not a good sign. Looking at the conflicts gave me further pause because args were weak or non-existent on policy; there were some appropriate sounding withdrawls. I saw the INSZoom with its prweb sources and stopped looking; to me, it's close to a fatal mistake but can be saved with a Q. DGG framed Q5 appropriately, the answer hits, so I'll support -- but get more experience before closing AfDs. The as yet unanswered Q6 is also appropriate, but it's a softball. 1048:— it is a community newspaper, published from Yellowknife, NWT, Canada. I feel this might be the same newspaper, but I have not found anything that clearly mentions "Yellowknife Journal-Gazette" is an alternative name of "Yellowknifer". There is another paper "Yellowknife Journal", published from Canada. But I can find only one mention about it (and can not access the content). So probably I should ask someone who knows about Canadian newspapers or magazines. Reading those two lines and after doing some studies, I feel 574:. Five editors take part in a discussion. Four of them argue in favor of outcome A, one of them argues in favor of outcome B. The arguments of the advocates of outcome A are weak and are easily refuted by the one editor who argues in favor of outcome B. The one editor who argues in favor of outcome B offers numerous policy-, guideline-, and common-sense-based arguments, none of which are refuted. You are the administrator whose role is to formally close the discussion. What is the outcome of the debate, A or B? 4293:. I was thinking about going neutral, but Titodutta's behavior in this rfa has been exemplary. His response to a critical neutral vote – which insinuated that he might be unable to admin/edit fairly in Pakistani areas – was so calm and polite that it won me over. As DGG says about Q11, it's really not so bad that he wants to start a deletion discussion about a topic that he finds questionable. That's the whole point of AfD, and it would be wrong to speedily delete an article about which you had any doubts. 4905:" clause. And no, being a community newspaper isn't by itself a credible claim of significance: any handwritten and photocopied street newsletter could call itself that, and we've no evidence that it's any more than that, if it exists at all. 14(c) AFD is good for when community discussion is worth the energy spent. CSD and PROD save us wasting that energy unnecessarily and exist by community consensus. An article like that, which doesn't plausibly identify its subject, is surely a waste of such energy. 14(d) 4011:, and what I saw there is consistent with what the nominations say. My decision here reflects a balance between the supports of Sitush and Abecedare, and the opposes by Stfg and Mkativerata, all four of which I take seriously. I think I can attribute some of the issues about the deletion-related answers to differences in English usage, and I recognize the value of having an additional administrator in the India content area. I'm satisfied that this is someone who does not want to overreach. -- 474:

noticed that most of these people do not know about Knowledge policy. There people/students/teachers asked/complained to me "your Knowledge have wrong information about our college/school?" "Why don't you write an article on our "this" professor or teacher, he teaches very well?" Just on 9-10 January (2015) when I was attending Bengali Knowledge 10th anniversary conference, a few guys were asking me about creating an article on their University's printing department.

2554:- Candidate has a strong record of cautious incremental learning, asking questions, seeking advice, and listening to others. What he doesn't know, he will learn before launching into new areas. He's not going to break the wiki, and his calm personality and demeanor is exactly what we need in some of the more volatile subject areas of the project in which he works. I feel as warm and fuzzy about Titodutta as I have ever have about any given RfA candidate. 4184:. I don't vote on many of these anymore, but was brought to the page because of some socking (addressed), so I figured this was a good opportunity to participate. The user's responses to questions are entirely reasonable (I really liked the answer to Q.11, myself, because I've often run into salvageable articles or ones that need more discussion when going through CSD), and I've seen this user's work in various areas and been satisfied that they "get it". 4948:. We aren't talking about not deleting articles that could be improved, but about not deleting articles even when there's no chance to improve them, because the topic isn't identified. If any of the various "Yellowknife Journal"s were suitable subject for an article, there'd be no problem creating such an article, but the hypothetical example in Q11 would hardly be a useful starting point for it, imo. This is a rather easy case of 812:

I'll go for a short Wikibreak. Knowledge will not stop if I take a Wikibreak, but it'll help me a lot and c) most importantly, right at this moment this RFA discussion is giving me a lot of strength. I do hope that the "admin" status and the responsibilities and respect associated with it, will make me more powerful to face such difficult situations and encourage me to do continue doing (good?) works. Hope for the best.

1826:. Because Titodutta is so all-round and prolific and checks all my boxes, I had to look a lot more to see if there were any reasons I might wish to be more cautious about !voting 'support'. Naturally I didn't find any. What I did find however, is that it is almost essential for Titodutta with his knowledge of the Indian sub continent and its culture, to be an admin on en.Wiki. There's a lot of work waiting for him. -- 4514:. This seems to be a scholarly work, being published by a university press. It contains controversial material which might diminish the subject's reputation. For example, in his photo, the subject seems quite well fed. The book tells us that he was indeed fond of food and, as a child, organised a "Greedy Club" of gluttons (p.53). It goes on to say that the subject was not a vegetarian, as is common in the 5415:

way of contacting the administrator who left them a message. The lack of such, though easily fixed, is indicative of the candidate's unwillingness to receive messages from outside his/her social circle. Andrew Davidson's (oppose #1) concerns are also valid, not only for the reasons stated in his comment, but also because the candidate's openly declared bias is likely to render him/her

661:. On one hand some of them were continuously harassing (including real-life harassments) us and making legal threats against us every now and then, on the other hand some of them were expecting that I would help them to rewrite the article (there is no consensus to do so). Please see Sitush's comment after Support #24. I do not know about those WMF activities or legal activities. 1116:. I need to think before I can tell you exact criteria and process. But, most probably initially I'll allow anyone (anyone with a registered account) to initiate a request or start an RFC. If majority of people participating in that RFC feel that my adminship eligibility needs to be re-assessed, I'll follow their decision (sock and SPA votes will not be counted). Regards. 3717:

something. My support became stronger the more I looked. I agree with opposers that he isn't perfect; he will make mistakes. But I am certain that he will learn from and not repeat them. Since it appears that this RfA will succeed without my adding more detailed comments and dif's, I won't add any for now. He has my trust. He will serve well with a mop'n'bucket.

2946: 816: 751: 445: 2571:- I have looked through Titodutta's contributions but I can't find anything that suggests he's not a level headed editor with a track record for staying calm in disputes, willing to help others and contributing to both content and administrative areas, particularly for India-related topics which we badly need. There are a number of highlights, but for me 5016:

unacceptability of pr sources. And there is more to Andrew D's content concerns than, with respect, his would-be refuters recognise. I sampled 5 of the candidate's DYKs and am not comfortable with his ability to distinguish good sources from bad, use self published and pr sources appropriately, and write in an encyclopaedic manner. An example:

208:) for RfA, both being successful. All in all, I think Tito is one of the most civil users around, something which has become almost extinct here. He has enough experience in the admin domain and I think he would make a great admin. We surely need more admins to work in the Indian space and I think Tito perfectly fits in the role. Cheers, 4536:

extraordinary efforts you have taken to suggest Titodutta is not worthy of adminship due to his work bringing an article to GA standard, but I neither like the tone of it nor your rejection of Knowledge's system of consensus. This article was created in 2002, Titodutta didn't come into it until June 2011 when it had already reached

3337:: the longer comments above sum up my reasons. I'm a self-described speedy deletion grump, and your answer to my question neatly sums up the thorough research I would expect of someone who has access to deletion. (If I may be so vain, it also neatly sums up my own thought processes when I assess a speedy deletion request.) As 3592:

the colors of the Indian flag appearing in his signature. We have an obvious need for level-headed, diplomatic editors knowledgeable about India. This editor shows every sign of learning, developing, and collaborating more and more effectively as time goes by. I support his candidacy for administrator without reservation.

2925:

The other issue raised was the use of the Indian flag as a significant part of the candidate's signature. The apparent inference being that any display of affection for one's country makes one a nationalist and is a disqualifier from adminship. I find the arguments presented thus far in opposition to be unconvincing. -

95: 1292:, I want to see people giving more importance and care to such projects and initiatives. To me, this "Editor retention" is one of the most important part of the entire Knowledge, and we all must be much more alert, careful and supportive. Let's encourage more and more editors to participate and work here. 5275:

I don't usually "badger" even RfA opposers, much less neutrals, but I think this comment warrants clarification or discussion. You are concerned that the candidate would focus his adminship around his "main area of editing." You haven't identified that area, but I assume you mean articles relating to

5034:

Speaking just as someone who does a great many speedy deletes, I think the ans. to Q11 shows admirable caution. When working with unfamiliar subjects it's a good idea to take into account that the the contributor may have gotten the name slightly wrong, and it is very rarely in my opinion a serious

4613:

If you have any actual evidence that Tito has shown nationalist POV of the disruptive type that is quite common among new contributors then please present it; otherwise, I think you should probably apologise for the slur. For example, he gets on well with me and is very fair, whereas many nationalist

4518:

priesthood, but even ate beef! There's plenty more in the book which might raise eyebrows but none of this material seems to appear in the article. The article was evaluated for FA status but failed on the ground that there were copyright concerns. Now, I understand that a lot of editors have had

3890:

is wrong. It was he who first promoted patriotism in Knowledge. His signatures and edits reveal it. For us Indians, we love nothing more than our country and we are more patriotic than any other country in the planet (IMHO). It may be due to our freedom struggle or so-related issues. Not getting more

2976:'s analysis of the oppose vote. While such concerns might arise in some cases, I believe the examples do not support them as to this candidate. I am not concerned that the candidate is a POV pusher. Also, the candidate appears to have a good demeanor, which is an important trait for an administrator. 2648:

I really like the answer to 15 and I think that many of the concerns about two few RfAs are actually because of that issue.. And while I do have a small amount of concerns related to a part of the answer to 11 and 14. I do appreciate the research for example, just don't think that the mom works there

2030:

Tito's dedication to wikipedia, vast experience, and civil conduct will assuredly make him a good admin, as the nominators and supporters point out. In addition, I'd like to highlight two other qualities of Tito's that I have observed over the years: (1) his coordination and cajoling abilities (which

725:

d) "list-topic": a name or entry may be included in a list if it is important to the subject, its relationship with the subject is well-established and well-sourced, and (preferable, but not mandatory) the entry itself follows general notability guidelines of Knowledge. Red-links may also be included

707:

etc. In April 2013, I did not have enough knowledge on press release or promotional newspaper coverages, then after an AFD discussion I learned about it. By participating in discussions, talking to others or reading something, I am getting more and more experienced. Things are mainly changing in that

684:

Hey, Titodutta. You have a strong track record of work and accomplishment, and barring any unforeseen issues, I intend to support your candidacy. That having been said, I would like to gain some additional insight into your thinking. You wrote above that one of the areas in which you would like to

5398:

The candidate's answer to question six is passable. The candidate understands that providing an adequate closing statement is important and that the power of arguments as viewed through the lens of policy ought to be the sole determinant of the outcome of any debate, which puts him/her ahead of most

5166:

My main concern with this line of reasoning is that appears to tarnish any candidate who makes such a declaration or answers any question posed to them in the affirmative with some kind of cynical political motivation. I find this line of reasoning problematic, not least because the community itself

4571:

forbids names which are overtly promotional by declaring themself to be representing a group. Putting a flag or other group logo in your signature seems to be violating the spirit of this policy. It is blatantly partisan and so seems quite improper for an admin who plans to police articles in this

4456:

after a modest review of contributions. I understand why Q11 has caused concern, but what I read was an editor who is willing to not exercise his powers to delete an article when he thinks that it might be, with his efforts, salvageable. If that's the worst we can find on this editor, and in view of

3716:

I see TitoDutta often in many parts of the English Knowledge and other WMF projects. After what I considered my due diligence before participating in an RfA discussion, I prepared to support. After reading the opposes, I went back to review Tito's activity more thoroughlly to be sure I didn't miss

2924:

and appears to be a content dispute. I note however that the article has been around since at least the early 2000s and has been edited thousands of times by numerous editors. It has passed review to obtain GA status. This seems to suggest that the concerns expressed are inconsistent with consensus.

2145:

He is exactly the kind of admin we need. He is an all-around contributor with strong experience in articles, files, and projects - very much here to build an encyclopedia. He has repeatedly demonstrated his ability to work collaboratively with others. He works in an area where admins are scarce. And

1331:

for further discussion. Currently we generally do not relist a debate more than twice. In between, related WikiProject noticeboards may be informed about the discussion. And even after relisting the debate twice, there is little or no discussion and there is no clear consensus either, the debate may

473:

Now, let me answer the second part of your question: last December (2014), I attended a conference where I represented Wiki(m/p)edia India. There I was in charge of the Knowledge help (question/answer) desk. Obviously many people (students. teachers etc.) came to us and asked many questions. There I

199:, inline with his civil behavior. Tito is a regular attender to the real-life events too. I was really taken aback by the way he called me and requested me to attend a recent conference, all with his own resources. I guess 99% of us wouldn't do that and that shows his dedication towards the project. 160:

of his that I checked all showed sound reasoning with a clear base in deletion policy. On top of all this, he is unfailingly civil, and very helpful to new users. I think he would do very well as an admin, and we certainly need more admins who work in India-related topics. I hope you will join me in

3591:

I have read the opposes and the neutrals carefully, as I am sure the nominee has, and I also expect that he will take away some useful lessons from some of the comments. But I find those comments as a whole unpersuasive regarding the matter at hand: this candidacy. I have absolutely no problem with

1202:

b) It is about a company, and companies may come under A7. Is being a community newspaper a credible claim of importance? — there I was trying to concentrate. c) AFD and not PROD because — in the PROD process, I can not say that someone or the article writer will surely contest it and will provide

663:

About drawing a line between being nice and feeding trolls — if someone follows guidelines and policies — they'll find me as one of they best friends they can have on Wiki. If they try to vandalize Wiki, they'll find me reverting their edits, giving them warnings, reporting against them. (I try not

476:

Now, these two events were "eye-openers" for me. I witnessed that the moment you start explaining things to them (for example, "this" and "this" are Knowledge notability criteria etc. Or "we need "these" references" to create an article on your professor), they also start co-operating with you. So,

5414:

presumably with a view to garnering an influx of early support votes, doesn't inspire confidence. The lack of a clearly visible "talk" button in the candidate's signature also poses a problem; administrators often interact with new users, and it's pivotal that these users be presented with a clear

4917:

of Canadian Manda Group, a "commission sales agency"? I did manage to read it. All it contains is a listing of the book, with genre ("history"), price, physical dimensions, ISBN. No summary, description, review or any detail at all. I'm sad to have to do this, but based on this, I don't think Tito

4892:

with great regret, because Titodutta is a very helpful and patient editor with a lot of article work to his credit. But the answers to Q11 and Q14 are hopeless. That any of the things identified in those Google searches are this "journal-gazette" is pure speculation, as bad as wp:or. The answer to

811:

Thanks for you concerns and kindness. I have removed this banner now. Yes, this may happen, but a) I do not have any fixed target or goal here. I'll try my best to improve this project, that's all b) (thankfully) now I know the importance of Wikibreaks, if I just can not handle Wikistress anymore,

202:

On the admin front, Tito is an ardent anti-vandalism fighter using STiki and Twinkle. He has quite a lot of edits to RPP among others. He is very helpful at the WikiProject India noticeboard and works hard to get everything solved by consensual discussion rather than trying to impose seniority and

5290:

Hi Nyb. Thanks for taking interest. I respect your opinion and am trying to reconsider. Yes, I was talking about the "India" article sphere. In the support sections, I see some users encouraging the candidate to admin around India related articles, and I was worried that the candidate may get too

5141:

Rationales like this one haven't been an issue in RfAs lately (though they were a few years ago) ... so I have no objection. It might happen some day that we get a series of RfAs failing for odd reasons, which of course would be a problem since we're not promoting at anywhere near the replacement

3931:

I've had a look at the opposes, and I understand the concerns. However, I've also taken a look at Tito's editing history, talk page archives going back to mid-2014, some of the articles he's worked on, among some of the other work he's done here. That history fully backs up the above comments and

5084:

No, it's not. People who pledge to be open to recall are doing it to win over the masses, and pledging to do so is an inherently untrustworthy act. Because the last step in any recall action is "convince the person holding the tools to give up the tools," the ONLY step in recall is "convince the

4535:

Flag waving? Would you like to 'play safe' and have me desysoped if I put the red, white, and blue colours of the UK and Thai flags around my signature? Would you suggest that I am biased because I write articles about Thailand or bring articles about UK towns and schools to GA? I appreciate the

1250:

on this English Knowledge. In late 2012 he told me— "Thank you for your kind words and thoughtfulness Tito. It comes as encouragement at a time when my wiki-energy seems to be running a bit low." He was thinking to take an extended Wikibreak at that time. For more than 2 years, he has not made a

691:

Hello Dirtlawyer1, a) I think, I'll not start my works with AFD closures. In answer #1, I mentioned AFD-works at the end. I'll follow the same order that I have mentioned. I have read "Cautious support" suggestion of Glrx (support #32). Thanks for the suggestion. I'll try to gain more experience

519:

and yes one more thing, I have started feeling that copyright problems are a common issue when dealing with students. I have seen it on Knowledge where school or college students want to create/expand their school/college website and copies content from their school website or somewhere else. In

504:

Thanks for following up and giving the hint. Sorry for delay in replying. For more than last 3 hours I am trying to concentrate on your this question and the hint. There are so many discussions both on-wiki and off-wiki, that I am facing some difficulties to follow your hint. Here are few recent

5126:

I would have considered supporting, yes. There's an even better answer, which is "I would support a binding recall process, and would agree be bound by one if it existed. However, because there is not currently binding recall and I will not make meaningless promises to collect a mop, I will not

1300:

I know that this RFA is not the right place to propose something new. It is also not the best place to suggest new activities related to "Editor retention". But, I have experienced "off-wiki harassment", "on-wiki harassment" "disappearance of my own closest Wiki-friends" and all these things. I

1225:

Tito, I have already supported you and I think you will be a great administrator. I would like to ask you a question that was asked on my RfA: "If you could change one thing about Knowledge, what would it be and why?" Feel free to ignore this question. It's just a chance for you to "soapbox" a

470:

Thank you for your question. No, I have not worked with articles from students in school classes. Someone from WMF or Wikimedia India mailed me last year and requested me to conduct few workshops. At that time I failed to co-operate there because of real life difficulties and other issues. From

3430:

An excellent candidate nominated by very well respected members of the community. Candidates attitude looks good, with more than adequate experience in a variety of areas. As has been noted, Experts on the Indian Sub-Continent would be a great asset to the En. Knowledge admin corps. Good luck!

3448:- I've noticed Titodutta around quite a few places recently; and I'm impressed by his work. After doing a quick examine of Tito's contributions and tone with other users, there's no concerns that I found - I think that Tito would be a great admin in many ways. Keep up all of the good work! :) 233:

Hello there. First of all, alas, but I am not an active contributor to English Knowledge. I have my hands full with contributing to Ukrainian Knowledge and other projects, but I am a really active (and thoroughly dedicated) reader of English Knowledge. And I would like the project to grow and

5015:

Sorry. I don't think the proficiency in content policy and practice is there yet. Stfg's oppose illustrates shortcomings in deletion. The candidate just hasn't progressed far enough on the deletion learning curve yet, as illustrated by the relatively recent gaining of an understanding of the

3936:

as a wielder of the mop. I also like that he has reached out to some of our newer members and has worked with editor retention. Tito has a good, level-headed temperament which leads me to believe that he learns well from mistakes and strives to be a productive editor. That, combined with his

4649:

Generally, and as pointed out by Kudpung above and Ad Orientem in the Support section, your "oppose" is flimsily based in fact, is primarily in the straight "content dispute" category, and seems almost contrarian by design. If I were you, I'd probably avoid Indian topics until I'd done some

1694:

I'd also like to add that I don't see anything wrong with his answer to Q11. If anything, it shows that he'll be very cautious about deleting articles that may or may not be salvageable in some form or another, and will seek outside opinions before acting in cases that aren't so obvious. My

2012:

I've known Tito since he first started. I've had the pleasure of working with him in various activities off Knowledge. The thing that most stands out about his work on and off Knowledge is also what will make him a good admin, his temperament. He has a great demeanor, is polite, mellow,

4067:

I like the answers to most of the questions, and know enough about Titodutta to know that he won't break Knowledge if given admin tools. While I am not fussy on the response to Q11, I also think the question should have been taken more theoretically than literally. Further, the response:

5167:

has strong feelings about admin self-responsibility, and it ignores the genuine feelings of admins or potential admins regarding the matter. I cannot agree. In any event I suggest a better forum for this would be the RfA noticeboard, after the current RfA's have run their course. Regards

2092:

More than sufficient. I was aware of some of the issues, but I wasn't aware of the broader impact. Certainly not to the extent that it impacted on editing capacity like that. I also don't think its relevant, except to say that anyone who still seeks to volunteer is worthy of our support.

3916:

Good content work and a willingness to learn new skills - that's a valuable starting point for any admin candidate. Titodutta has declared a willingness to perform admin work in India-related articles, which is an area desperately in need of experienced contributors. I wish him luck,

4084:-- The answer to the RfA question gives me some pause; while the thesis may be true, the lack of elaboration or analysis of the situation is not ideal. Other than that, I have seen Titodutta around for many years, and have never seen anything that would inhibit my supporting an RfA. 2649:

lol sentence is a good start point and doesn't clarify which possible subject it would be so better to start from scratch. But I think that Titodutta won't misuse the tools so my weakening really doesn't make sense, and their are enough opposes that in effect urge caution anyways.

426:- BLP issue (see talk page discussions too). This issue was taken to administrator's noticeboard twice (or thrice probably). Someone informed Jimbo Wales about the discussion. He came and his edit was reverted too. It was one of the most difficult debates I have participated in. 4858:

for that title. There have been numerous motions to change the title of that page and so there is not a settled consensus for the current title. Having a lobby of Indian nationalists is probably a factor in this. When one looks at a more historical English case such as the

2971:

I have seen the candidate's work and have been impressed not only by its quality but by the range of contributions. Knowledge certainly needs administrators with his background and with the ability to review Indian articles with some familiarity with the topics. I agree with

2057:- I'm interested in (but not concerned about) the nominee's decline in activity over the last 18 months from a high this time two years ago. I have no doubt he will be a good admin, regardless of the amount of time he has to commit to administrative activities, just curious. 630:. They have informed me that this needs detailed study, and I am invited to their National Archive of India, Delhi. I have not attended it still). If someone convinces me that my points are wrong or my knowledge on some topic are incomplete, I'll gladly change my opinion. 714:

page attempts to explain the concept of "notability" in brief and in general (however that is the central page to assess any subject's notability). Now it is not possible to explain everything in a paragraph (or a page), that's why we have special notability guidelines

82:) – I am proud to present to you Titodutta as a candidate for adminship. Tito has been contributing to Knowledge for almost four years, and has proven himself to be a dedicated member of the community. Tito's main area of contributions is to Indian articles. He brought 513:. c) I have talked to my admin coach many times on copyright related topics, d) recently in a real-life Wikimedia event, one or two college students asked me copyright-related questions (eg. what will be copyright status of my image if I upload on Knowledge?). Regards. 2035:

and I can attest to) that have for example helped in building the Swami Vivekananda project; and (2) his being pro-actively helpful in guiding users even in relation to articles Tito doesn't have a prior interest in, as can be seen for example in his participation at

1077:

No, I'll not speedily delete this article. a), currently I am not planning to work in CSD area, and then b) if I have to nominate the article for deletion, I'll make basic copyedit (typo fix, formatting fix, wording) and will send the article to AFD for discussion.

5142:

rate ... and if that happens, I think that's the time to make appeals to people to hold off on arguments along the lines of "I demand an answer of X, otherwise I'll oppose". I think people will be more likely to see the wisdom in that at that future time. - Dank (

2722:

Yes, there are a very, very small number of valid A10s, but 95+% are invalid (for instance, see Peridon's comment, neither of which is suitable for A10, and are often kept at RfD), and the remaining few could probably qualify as G2/G6 (such as your example, which

506: 1942:

Polite, but persevering, Tito is well respected in the world of India articles (no mean task that!) and is, as Kudpung says, almost an essential addition to the admin corps because of his level headedness and his knowledge of the Indian subcontinent.

1058:

I'm a little confused by your answer here. By saying "lacks sufficient context" and "no indication of importance", does that mean you would consider speedy deleting the article (or nominating it as such)? If so, which criteria would you use?

646:

You and two of your nominators are all at pains to stress your "civility", perhaps just because it's flavour of the month at RfA, but I'm wondering if you've ever encountered a situation in which it was impossible to get your point across

5317:. The attempt failed but editors from both Bangladesh and India (in alphabetical order) appreciated the attempt and that was the first such large-scale attempt where we invited editors from both countries to participate and talk. And (to 544:

Frankly speaking, that was one of my worst votes in AFD ever. In 2013, when I participated in this discussion, I was not aware of the difference between "independent news articles" and "press release". At the same time, I was working on

2668:- good record at AfD, CSD (well, except A10 nominations that should've just been redirected ... but why do we even have an A10 criterion??? Not entirely their fault.) Writes articles. Spot check of edit history reveals no concerns. 2619:

was Weak Support was Support - I trust the judgment of the nominators and several of the supporters. Answers to questions look really good. Spot checks of contributions look good. Seems like a definate positive to have as an admin.

1695:

inclination would probably be to make the same revisions as he has suggested so that the article sounds more encyclopedic in tone, then I'd search for possible citations, and in this particular case I'd replace the CSD tag with a

955: 546: 4540:

and then took it to GA. 3,885 revisions by 1,550 editors - did you examine every one of Titodutta's 600 edits on that page? ASFAICS, if there is anything wrong with the article then I suggest instead that you remonstrate with

5085:

person holding the tools to give up the tools," and thus every admin is "open to recall." Until such time as recall pledges can be made binding, they define a promise made in either reasoned bad faith or inexcusable ignorance.

1334:

In a deletion debate, if I find that I strongly support/oppose the nominator's rationale, but there is no discussion at all, I'll try to participate in the debate and cast a vote, so that determining consensus becomes easier.

896: 1014: 471:

September-October (2014), I have started attending real-life events of Wikimedia Foundation or Wikimedia India. Currently I am trying to work on a project, where I may need to conduct a few workshops in schools and colleges.

694:

b) in the last 3-4 years, I have become more familiar with various Knowledge notability guidelines and other policies. In 2011, I had little or no idea about any Knowledge notability guidelines, in 2012–2013 I read about

4645:

if you're going to comment on Indian caste identities in the 19th and 20th centuries, but this apparent misunderstanding does explain why we need more admins with knowledge of matters relating to the Indian subcontinent

4519:

a finger in this pie, and maybe the candidate has just been going with the flow. But I expect high standards from an admin and, as nationalism and religion are common sources of dispute, it seems best to play it safe.

477:

from these events, I learned— a) I must be patient and listen to other party's arguments without becoming annoyed or anxious b) I should try my best to explain Knowledge policies and guidelines to them in simple words.

5379:

I still can't support due to the answer to Q11, but the answer to Q15 was so heartfelt and honest that I cannot oppose anymore either. As this RfA is obviously going to pass, I wish you good luck in admin work, Tito!

792:

at the top. As you say yourself, you have become involved in difficult debates on ANI with long-term POV pushers. Are you worried that becoming an admin will put a target on your back and lead to burnout and stress?

2793:

that nasty, but sadly trolls who are two of the three pop up every day and those who tick all three boxes are not as rare as you might hope. Just remember that AGF if not a suicide pact and I'm sure you'll be fine.

1052:

the article has some content to identify the subject but lacks sufficient context and there is no indication of importance too. And if I am unsure I feel it is a good alternative to send the article AfD for further

5313:(last comment). I have good relationship with Bangladeshi editors too. In early 2013, I made an attempt of WikiProject Bangladesh and WikiProject India (in alphabetical order) dispute resolution. See the attempt 1281:

on this 12 Jan due to inactivity. Sitush sir was considering retirement too. This desysoping was alright. I am not talking about Sitush sir's edits or contributions either, but, sometimes these things are really

4771:

the opposer. Andrew D. is entitled to put forward his opinions, and to my knowledge, they do not violate any general or RfA specific policies or guidelines. This oppose will be taken into account by the closing

1994:

Probably doesn't know much about gaming or synchronised swimming, but if he knows about Indian films that'll do nicely. A lot more polite than I am, but gets his message over well. And it's the right message...

596:, after carefully studying all points (I need an example here) I'll either close the discussion as "no consensus" or I'll close it in favour of editor 1, the only editor who was making policy based arguments. 3642:

Though this candidate and myself have not previously interacted, I'm impressed with what I see during a reasonable examination. Seems to have a good temperament for using the toolbox, based on my reading.

553:

etc. No, press-release or self-promotions should not be considered as reliable refs. (Most probably) I was over-enthusiastic at that time. I did my studies (later) and I promise I'll be careful in future.

4932:

I don't understand how you draw the line from not deleting articles that could be improved to undeleting articles that aren't appropriate for the encyclopedia. Seems like a pretty big leap in the middle.

658: 429: 2311:

Very good member. He is very encouraging and even when he is discussing the article disputes he knows how to respond and how much is relevant. He can suggest a solution that won't put your work at risk.

138: 5321:

too), no one has told me that I do (Indian) "flag-waving ", but yes, a persn told me that I was/am an anti-Indian and had/ve "unnecessary love" towards foreign people. That edit (edit 16 Oct 2014) was

5314: 4594:. I don't see how this could apply to an entire nation. Furthermore, if the candidate is promoting their nation, I believe it would be interpreted as promoting editing in such areas. Barring blatant 4698:

is his common name, you will give up counting if someone would start naming those people whose common name include honorific title, in many cases it is also unsure if title is actually honorific.

1321:(sorry for asking so late in the game) Are AfDs with little or no discussion a problem in your opinion? If yes, what can be done to improve the situation? If not, how should those AFDs be closed? 5226:

with regret. Overall a great editor, but I'm uncomfortable with how he'd perform in the area of deletion, given his answers to questions above as well as his overall track record in that area.

2920:

Looks like a solid candidate with no red flags that I can discern. Regards the sole Oppose !vote I will make two brief observations. The bulk of the oppose comment is directed at the article

185:

has given a rather clear picture of Tito but I would try my best to mention anything he has forgotten. Titodutta is clearly the most civil user I have seen here for years. He never gets into

1809:

I have interacted with Tito a lot over the last few years, mostly but not entirely with regard to India-related matters. I wholeheartedly endorse the statements in Mr. Strad's nomination. -

1138:

Hello, I feel, a more important question is— do we have any better alternative? I personally do not know any. RFA may not be a perfect procedure, but it is not a broken one either. Regards.

4242: 1288:. They "address existing difficulties, the ever-changing needs of the general community". If you want to me to change or improve one thing about Knowledge, my answer will definitely be— 949: 535: 189:

mentality, no matter how heated the discussion gets. He is a great content writer which is readily evident from his staggering 98 DYKs, a GA and 527 articles! For those suffering with

5309:, I do not have any problem with Pakistani articles or editors (I have very good relationship with many of them). A year ago, a guy from Pakistan (according to his userbox) wanted to 4381:- I recall being impressed by the way this user dealt with another editor who was having trouble. They seem like a reasonable editor who would benefit the project if given the mop. 719:). SNG do not contradict WP:GNG, but try to explain the same points (or additional but similar points) with much more details and examples and in a subject-specific way. For example, 890: 1008: 1327:

In my opinion, yes, AfDs with little or no discussion may be problematic (specially if you don't know about the subject). If there is no/unclear consensus, the discussion may be

122: 1206: 597: 2634:

Not fully satisfied with the answers to Q11 and Q14 to be honest. Hence weakening my support slightly mostly as a suggestion to go very slow in the area of speedy deletions.

379: 3145:

with enthusiasm! Knowledge needs more editors like you! Intelligent, civil-minded content editors with knowledge of South Asian-related topics. Happy to have you aboard. --

651:

be nice? Can you provide an example of dealing with a particularly intransigent or tendentious editor? And where do you draw the line between being nice and feeding trolls?

419:

Most of these conflicts or disagreements were easy to handle. Firstly I try to talk to the user(s), either on article talk or user's talk page and try to reach a consensus.

3679:– The candidate sounds cautious, courteous, and well-informed. I particularly liked the answers regarding AfD closing. The experience with Indian topics is a big plus. – 726:

in a list with support of reliable sources (I have seen school/college alumni lists or notable people form any city-related lists often require clean-up and attention).

1163:

I nominate the article for CSD under criterion A1, pointing out that there is no Yellowknife Journal-Gazette, but there exist the following "Yellowknife Journal"s: (a)

410:

Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

153: 5443: 1550: 438: 4508:, and the candidate was among those arguing that this should be retained, contrary to our general practice. Among the sources listed, there's a revisionist work, 4025:

Yes. Seems to be a reasonable, thoughtful and reflective person. I'm not picking up any concerns, other than the signature, which is a bit garish and distracting.

1545: 1102:? If so, do you have any idea what your criteria would be? (I feel that admin accountability is very important, and I plan to ask every candidate this question.) 126: 1132:

While I totally support you, but it looks like some people opposes candidates for baseless reasons. So I want to know your opinion on "Is RfA a broken process?"

331:. Sometimes we need admin tools there. A year ago, I was inviting admins to join this board and help us. I'll try to serve this noticeboard. I'll participate in 5152:

Actually, I'd prefer the question wasn't asked at all, and prefer even more that the question was unanswered if asked, so I think you are aiming the wrong way.

1429: 2942:- Excellent candidate, No issues!, Good luck :), (BTW quick note - unlike the opposer below I actually like your signature – It's different & well unique 853:

was nominated for deletion twice, MichaelQSchmidt and I worked and that became a DYK article. That was a joy for us. I can give you more examples if you want.

5325:

from my talk page. They did not understand that I was not showing love to anyone, I was just trying to follow Knowledge policies and guidelines. Regards. --

1973:, helpful, useful, highly competent editor. I'd support Tito in any case, but specifically we need more admins who are knowledgeable wrt Indian topics, per 99: 130: 5461: 5035:

mistake to take a non-abusive non-copyvio article for a community decision. Most criteria involve judgment, and nobody should be too sure of their own.

1399: 5017: 4776:. Commentators on this oppose, please consider not adding any further comments, or in the alternative add only conservative and moderate comments. -- 195: 2751:- I have every expectation this well-rounded, level-headed editor will be a well-rounded, level headed admin. No concerns, thank you for running. 3483:- Sufficient editorial tenure and strong content editors' pie chart. Several of the names endorsing the candidate above calm any slight misgivings. 626:(Feroze Gandhi section). They provided some good references, and I conceded. (later I filed an application to the Central Government of India under 2880: 1172: 584:

to get suggestions c) now, suppose (for some reason), there is not a single active admin on En WP, and there is not a single active noticeboard or

294:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

836: 236:(as an administrator of Ukrainian Knowledge I do know what I am talking about. and keeping a project clean-and-shiny requires a lot of dedication) 91: 2683:

Because a lot of them are just a capitalisation difference or a greatly extended version of the title, neither of which will help in searching.

745: 1386: 1344: 970: 98:. Tito writes about all sorts of Indian topics, though, not just that one. To see what I mean, just take a look through his impressively long 1488: 5399:

of the Knowledge administrators I've had the pleasure of interacting with to date. That said, I'm unsure if the candidate truly understands

4792:

I don't mean to badger Andrew D or question/challenge his !vote, but I want to respond to the examples of article titles he has brought up:

3853:

It would be good to have additional admins who have knowledge of Indian topics. In my interactions with him I perceive he has common sense.

937: 398:

I have attended a few real-life events of Wikimedia India, including 2014 Wikimedia India conference, Bengali Knowledge 10 years celebration

5389: 5002: 4984: 4742:. That's what NPOV means — taking great pains to avoid flattering our subjects or presenting them in a promotional way. My !vote stands. 114: 911: 464:

Have you ever worked with articles from students in school classes? Please comment on any special concerns in dealing with such articles.

4590:

would pertain to say a company or group of people, with vested interest in promoting a product, recruiting others, or otherwise implying

1042:

Here I can not find too many web or news sources discussing "Yellowknife Journal-Gazette". I have found that there is a newspaper called

1029: 105:

Tito is not just an article writer, but an article reviewer as well. He has quite a few Good Article reviews under his belt, for example

4098: 878: 320: 1540: 996: 839:. Its content is "the Yellowknife Journal-Gazette is comunty nwspapper in Canda my mom writes 4 it LOL". How would you deal with this? 316: 2280:; whenever our paths have crossed, I've seen Titodutta working tirelessly on tough problems; I think the mop would be in safe hands. 1876: 1055:

If I find similar articles, I'll follow the same procedure. (However I was not planning to work in CSD area in near future). Regards

3804:

After examine this user's history and given consideration the reasoning of the opposition I see no reason not to support this user.

3279:

a strong candidate with knowlege and experience in dealing with a topic area that presents many problems, give this guy a mop asap!

2601: 1393: 846: 110: 1423: 1343:

the editors who are regularly participating in AFD debates, b) encourage more editors to participate in AFD debates, c) highlight

4670:

I have more evidence but this was obtained by googling and so I am not sure of the propriety of presenting it — see this current

4391: 4364: 3401: 3165: 2821: 2583: 1067: 931: 801: 33: 17: 5185:

It's very obvious that the oppose has nothing to do with the candidate so I wouldn't worry about any "tarnishing". Let it go. --

3267: 3084:– In the days of editors forgetting about the actual content of articles and more on processes, and some editors forgetting to 2417: 1455: 1379: 1175:). Therefore I claim that the article doesn't give enough information to identify the topic. How do you handle this nomination? 324: 79: 4691: 3870: 1756: 872: 720: 510: 367: 4738:. The ruler of Scotland is now Queen Elizabeth but notice that her article does not contain the honorific, it's just plain 2194:: Titodutta is indeed one of the good guys. I have found them willing to listen and to learn, and to be pretty even-keeled. 990: 927: 4893:

14(a) coyly fails to address the question of which of these non-newspapers the article might have been about. It's a good

3726: 2789:. I wish I could tell you that loonies lie that were rare. It's unusual that you get them that persistent, that prolific, 1873: 1576: 1243: 849:. If I find an article that can kept on Knowledge by doing copyedits or adding references, I'll try to do so. For example 786: 776: 4910: 1586: 1164: 616:

Could you discuss a time when you have been swayed from your original opinion to another during a discussion or dispute?

1438: 868: 157: 3891:

political, Tiro is one of the most patriotic Wikipedian I have ever met and hence I feel no shy to give this nom a big

3245:

While I don't believe I've ever met Tito personally, my research shows a top-notch Knowledge who deserves the buttons.

1699:

tag. But there's nothing inherently wrong with what Tito would do, and no harm will come of him not acting decisively.

986: 977: 4833: 3397: 3367: 2817: 2767: 1259:) and count emails too. I have not got any response. I am feeling seriously uncomfortable now as his last edit was on 149: 4897:, imho. 14(b) A newspaper may be a company, but it's also about that company's creative work, so it's ineligible for 4629:, well, plenty of people who have claimed to be Brahmin have eaten beef but, in any event, Vivekananda was born to a 2450:

Yep. Someone with Tito's knowledge of India related topics able to wield a mop will be a great asset to the project.

4298: 2378: 918: 665: 4734:, is the common name of this saint but notice that our article title does not contain the honorific - it's called 4563:

have a national flag in his signature. When I look at all the other signatures in this RFA above, I don't notice

3937:

experience and track record (I've seen him helping out a number of times), is more than enough for me to offer my

1792:

I have complete confidence in Tito's dedication, competence, knowledge, and demeanor. He'll make a great admin. --

1514: 1036: 5261:

The guy does not look bad, but someone adminning around their main area of editing does not sound too good. Best.

4872: 4747: 4679: 4671: 4577: 4524: 4498:

as its lead tells us that the subject is regarded as a "patriotic saint". The title of the article includes the

3705: 2361: 1752: 1611:

As co-nominator. Surely deserves the mop. Pretty sure would be one of the most civil and friendly admins around.

1481: 1768:

No evidence they abuse the tools or position. Caution in use of either on India related articles to avoid COI.--

5385: 5350: 5310: 5296: 5266: 4998: 4980: 4444: 4138: 2268: 2117:

Tito was very helpful when I was a new user, and I am confident that he will use the admin tools responsibly. —

1535: 1154:

Hi Titodutta. I need to press you a bit on your answer to Q11. I know you've said you don't plan to handle CSD

627: 144:

He is also not shy of contributing to admin areas. Tito has extensive recent page patrol experience with STiki

4909:

does misbehave, but did you notice that it's the quarterly newsletter of Signature Editions, the publisher of

1530: 943: 4934: 4091: 3088:, your article work is impressive, and you have managed to stay civil in the most heated disputes. Support. 2607: 1974: 1896: 1670: 1560: 1109: 733: 623: 600:. Of course, I'll try my best to write a detailed and clear statement while closing the discussion. Regards. 190: 106: 4404:

highly experienced and dedicated wikipedian. I don't see why they would do anything stupid with the tools.

588:

too (I really can not think about it, and hopefully this will never happen), and I am the only admin and I

4855: 4829: 4825: 4598:, encouraging others to contribute to the project in any given area is most certainly not frowned upon. — 4004: 3878: 3472: 3363: 3090: 1716: 1619: 1555: 216: 134: 2040:. These qualities will make him an even more effective admin, and I look forward to him gaining the bit. 884: 5424: 5420: 5281: 5191: 5113:

So would you're vote be support if T had said they would not be open to recall? very bizaree reasoning.

5025: 4703: 4427: 4294: 3990: 3933: 3754: 3525: 3320: 2930: 2843: 2803: 2595: 2559: 2525: 2438: 2421: 2374: 2317: 2122: 1949: 1637: 1002: 182: 164: 5442:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either

5419:

in the area of India-related articles. I'm afraid I cannot support Titodutta's candidacy at this time.

2074:

Much of the decline, which is pretty irrelevant to RfA given the general activity, probably relates to

206: 5428: 5393: 5374: 5354: 5339: 5300: 5285: 5270: 5249: 5235: 5196: 5176: 5161: 5147: 5136: 5121: 5108: 5094: 5079: 5065: 5046: 5029: 5006: 4988: 4965: 4939: 4927: 4876: 4837: 4785: 4751: 4707: 4683: 4663: 4606: 4581: 4554: 4528: 4463: 4448: 4431: 4414: 4396: 4373: 4339: 4319: 4302: 4285: 4262: 4233: 4216: 4193: 4176: 4159: 4142: 4126: 4104: 4076: 4059: 4037: 4020: 3995: 3974: 3953: 3926: 3908: 3882: 3862: 3845: 3827: 3810: 3796: 3782: 3764: 3733: 3708: 3688: 3671: 3652: 3634: 3605: 3583: 3560: 3543: 3529: 3512: 3492: 3475: 3460: 3440: 3422: 3405: 3388: 3371: 3354: 3329: 3304: 3288: 3271: 3254: 3237: 3223: 3204: 3187: 3169: 3153: 3137: 3127: 3113: 3096: 3076: 3053: 3036: 3020: 3004: 2985: 2963: 2934: 2912: 2898: 2871: 2847: 2825: 2808: 2772: 2737: 2727:

been created in error). In any event, Titodutta made multiple bad A10 nominations - but life goes on.

2715: 2692: 2677: 2658: 2643: 2629: 2611: 2585: 2563: 2546: 2529: 2512: 2491: 2473: 2456: 2442: 2425: 2398: 2382: 2365: 2348: 2321: 2303: 2289: 2272: 2258: 2241: 2222: 2203: 2182: 2155: 2137: 2126: 2105: 2087: 2069: 2049: 2022: 2004: 1985: 1965: 1954: 1932: 1907: 1880: 1863: 1835: 1818: 1801: 1784: 1772: 1760: 1743: 1726: 1705: 1689: 1675: 1661: 1644: 1626: 1509: 1069: 803: 562: 496: 283: 246: 223: 171: 58: 5318: 5231: 4868: 4816:("Article titles are not normally prefixed with "King", "Queen", "Emperor" or equivalent") and their 4801: 4773: 4743: 4675: 4573: 4520: 4461: 4387: 4368: 4172: 4016: 3902: 3887: 3858: 3698: 3684: 3418: 3250: 3162: 2581: 2500: 2482: 2357: 2173: 1657: 1474: 1065: 799: 90:, many of them also related to Vivekananda. That is no coincidence; Tito was one of the founders of 5381: 5346: 5335: 5306: 5292: 5262: 5157: 5132: 5118: 5090: 5061: 4994: 4976: 4813: 4568: 4499: 4440: 4155: 4134: 3598: 3539: 3507: 3151: 3072: 2867: 2711: 2521: 2469: 2413: 2298: 2285: 2264: 2045: 1856: 1373: 1285: 1232:

For the last few days I have been (thinking about/missing) someone, so I'll talk on it here (too).

1022: 963: 904: 723:, that is a specific notability guideline, but explains things much more clearly and specifically. 704: 571: 279: 265: 204: 73: 2014: 1780:

as a co-nominator. a friendly and well-mannered user. I believe he can help with cleaning up ;) --

358:

I have been mainly working in India-related articles. Some of my best contributions to Knowledge—

269:

09:30, 12 January 2015 (UTC) Thanks Strike Eagle and Antanana for your support. I accept these. --

5416: 5245: 5172: 5104: 5075: 4945: 4821: 4817: 4735: 4587: 4542: 4315: 4114: 4086: 4034: 4008: 3436: 3300: 3284: 3198: 3109: 2981: 2838: 2654: 2639: 2625: 2151: 2037: 1982: 1890: 1781: 1451: 1352: 1340: 1295: 1247: 1113: 373: 328: 243: 87: 4906: 4634: 479:

I'll try follow these things in future (but of course, I'll not encourage vandalism). Regards.

4805: 4781: 4550: 4491: 4336: 4254: 3874: 3805: 3722: 3648: 3624: 3576: 3488: 3469: 3350: 2921: 2892: 2688: 2235: 2134: 2075: 2018: 2000: 1831: 1614: 1313: 1256: 1252: 1237: 1196:

Hello, a) it has some context to identify the subject. I don't think it clearly qualifies for

361: 211: 83: 3468:- no real concerns, have encountered them a few times and never seen anything to concern me. 5277: 5186: 5021: 4768: 4699: 4659: 4630: 4600: 4595: 4423: 4279: 4229: 4189: 4055: 3983: 3968: 3950: 3823: 3665: 3556: 3521: 3384: 3313: 3232: 3123: 3029: 3001: 2973: 2926: 2907: 2795: 2591: 2555: 2542: 2434: 2313: 2199: 2118: 2095: 2083: 2059: 1944: 1814: 1703: 1687: 1328: 1099: 863:

is the capital city of Northwest Territories, Cananda. The newspaper must be related to it.

741: 700: 696: 676: 638: 550: 4627:

the subject was not a vegetarian, as is common in the Brahmin priesthood, but even ate beef

4422:—have interacted with him in few articles, appreciate his professionalism and hard-work. -- 3028:- Great Wikipedian, fantastic all-rounder. And, no, the signature is of no concern to me. 2329:, excellent work on India articles, a tricky topic field where tensions sometimes run hot. 1267:

as my RFA nominator. And today I am here, and I have just no idea that where my brother is.

5345:

Well, all the best then. I also hope I have addressed NYB's request sufficiently. Regards.

5227: 4642: 4458: 4382: 4350: 4168: 4073: 4012: 3922: 3896: 3854: 3791: 3680: 3414: 3246: 3159: 3085: 2859:- if it's a request for assistance, it's always a sensible one, and I help where I can. -- 2763: 2732: 2672: 2576: 2406:

Has come along way in the last 3-6 months, definitely ready for the mop. Wield it well :)

2164: 1653: 1124: 1090: 1060: 850: 794: 764: 608: 118: 728:

If a new list article is created, that must follow Knowledge's content policies such as

5327: 5153: 5143: 5128: 5114: 5086: 5057: 4961: 4923: 4860: 4820:("Living royal consorts are referred to by their present name and title") - thus it is 4797: 4715: 4479: 4209: 4151: 3773: 3593: 3535: 3501: 3263: 3147: 3133: 3062: 3016: 2951: 2860: 2704: 2465: 2408: 2391: 2330: 2281: 2254: 2230:

have overall positive impressions of them from their work on India related articles. --

2041: 1962: 1928: 1918: 1905: 1844: 1739: 1696: 1369: 308: 271: 257: 69: 54: 538:. Do you consider all the sources you mentioned there suitable to support notability? 5455: 5368: 5322: 5241: 5168: 5100: 5071: 5056:. Pledges to be open to recall are made ad captandum vulgaris and are unenforceable. 5042: 4949: 4851: 4651: 4311: 4027: 3838: 3742: 3730: 3660: 3432: 3296: 3280: 3219: 3185: 3105: 2977: 2856: 2834: 2650: 2635: 2621: 2147: 2032: 1978: 1797: 1348: 1274: 1217: 737: 729: 716: 711: 492: 485:

Did anyone ask you about anything relating to copyright or copyvio? (that's a hint)

385: 332: 1581: 1246:) has been (I'll not say "was") a very good Wiki-friend and Wiki-mentor of mine. He 1188:

you said exists but couldn't access the content. Could you provide the link, please?

4898: 4894: 4846:

The example of Gandhi seems a good one as it is so similar. My view is that plain

4809: 4777: 4739: 4723: 4719: 4546: 4510: 4407: 4329: 4246: 3718: 3644: 3615: 3569: 3484: 3449: 3346: 2884: 2684: 2451: 2217: 2131: 1996: 1827: 1270: 1233: 1197: 1044: 827: 585: 581: 570:

Consider the following hypothetical scenario which will test your understanding of

336: 312: 4310:- Everything looks good to me, and the answers to the questions are satisfactory. 2879:

A doughty fighter for Knowledge, an all-rounder, and an initiator who has started

4654:

work that you do at present: that area seems likely to be a more natural home. -

4070:

So probably I should ask someone who knows about Canadian newspapers or magazines

4793: 4655: 4619: 4495: 4487: 4483: 4272: 4225: 4185: 4047: 3963: 3942: 3819: 3696:

Fine editor epitomizing the best of what Knowledge seeks and needs in an admin.

3568:

I think this candidate will be fine after getting some real admin experience.

3552: 3380: 2996: 2538: 2195: 2191: 2079: 1810: 1700: 1684: 860: 441:. And the most important thing, I always prefer policy-based arguments. Thanks. 423: 1669:

per Mr. Strad's nomination -- no reason to think they will misuse the tools. --

4690:

Andrew, we cannot insert much disputed/irrelevant thought on main pages, read

3918: 3045: 2906:

67,735 edits 99% with summary, no wonder I keep seeing your name everywhere.--

2752: 2729: 2669: 1769: 1294:

WMF is doing good works. I expect to see more activities and initiatives like

129:. His interests also extend to editor retention; he was a regular reviewer at 5436:

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.

4614:

Indians attack me simply because I am a Brit and therefore, in their eyes, a

4957: 4919: 4903:

not to articles about their books, albums, software, or other creative works

4812:

is the result of Knowledge's (rather strange?) policy on article titles for

4638: 4202: 3012: 2250: 1924: 1914: 1900: 1735: 1168: 1146: 203:

authority to get things done. Among others, he has (co)nominated two users (

193:, he has more than 67k edits too! Tito comes first in editor retention and 1347:

more on WikiProjects' main pages and noticeboards (for example there is a

5037: 4045:- This user deserves to be an admin. I wish him the best of fortunate. -- 3214: 3178: 2537:- I see decent contributions and conversations. Long term good editor. - 2520:

Very good editor, possess good knowledge of policies. Dedicated person. -

1793: 487: 456: 1203:

sources within 1 week. My aim here was to get second/community opinion.

137:

quite a few newer users. Not to mention that he single-handedly created

4515: 3342: 3132:

Support. No concerns at all, and very glad to see you running. - Dank (

2212: 3061:. For me, this is one of those "though-they-were-already" situations. 1178:

Instead, I nominate it under criterion A7. How do you handle this one?

859:

needs to be removed immediately. That has no encyclopedic value. Now—

5446:

or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

4847: 4545:- one of our most experienced GA reviewers and content providers. -- 4457:

all the excellent work this editor has done, I'm happy to support. --

3745:

nomination for Titodutta as an Editor of the Week back in July 2013 (

3338: 1843:

kind and friendly user, my interactions with the user were splendid!

1454:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review 4504: 2356:

Welcoming nature and polite even in offline events and activities

1466: 422:

Sometimes these conflicts are really complicated. For example the

4952:, it seems to me. My step is from not deleting articles that are 3982:, qualified candidate. Opposition comments are not compelling. -- 437:

When disagreement occurs, I try to stay calm and relaxed. I also

255:

Thank you Mr. Stradivarius. I accept this nomination. Regards. --

4956:

appropriate for the encyclopedia to undeleting such articles. --

4864: 4567:

of them waving flags or otherwise declaring an allegiance. Our

2481:

Going by his contributions, seems to be an excellent candidate.

1158:, but you're requesting tools that allow you to eventually. So: 238:. The user was the reason I had watched a Bengali-language film 4150:. Nothing here suggests that the editor would abuse the tools. 2816:

No concerns, I'm sure the candidate will make a great admin. --

1470: 4914: 4224:-impressed with work. Good knowledge of India-related topics. 3835:- helpful, dedicated and competent. A deserving candidate. -- 253:

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

240:(to create an article about the film by the user's request ;) 1251:

single edit. I have tried to contact him several times (see

3345:, "待っていました!" ("I've been waiting for this!") Pete AU aka -- 4167:. Good attributes, lots of good work, a good candidate. -- 746:

List of people who voted in User:Titodutta's Knowledge RFA

520:

real-life, I haven't dealt with any such student. Regards.

416:

Yes, I have been in conflicts over editing several times.

29:

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a

4270:

WE definitely need more specialists in Indian culture.--

3044:

Will clearly be a welcome addition to the admin team. --

536:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/INSZoom (2nd nomination)

349:

What are your best contributions to Knowledge, and why?

301:

What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

5412: 5410: 5408: 5406: 5404: 4537: 3750: 3746: 2700: 2572: 1417: 1411: 1405: 1278: 4641:, not Brahmin. (You really should perhaps learn about 1021: 962: 903: 327:. There are not too many active administrators on the 4048: 1209:

mentions it. I could open the page properly. Regards.

4867:. We should not be playing favourites in this way. 4692:

Knowledge:No original research#Neutral point of view

3932:

nomination statements. I'm confident Tito will be a

3362:. Well-rounded editor; lone oppose is unconvincing. 2855:

I've often come across posts from Titodutta at e.g.

1277:

could not tolerate off-wiki harassment and retired.

598:

Knowledge:Polling is not a substitute for discussion

4241:- I remember vetting him when he was nominated for 4112:

I have no doubt that he'll be a very good admin. --

3231:

I have seen Tito work on India-related articles. --

1569: 1523: 1502: 1734:diligent and helpful; strong knowledge of policy. 622:Yes, the most important one I can remember now is 181:I'm quite glad to co-nominate Tito for adminship. 4332:Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} 744:). I just can not go ahead and create an article 315:-related works. Then I'll focus in areas such as 96:celebration of the 150th anniversary of his birth 5417:effectively incapable of acting administratively 94:, and has created many articles about him for a 5127:promise to be open to recall during this RFA." 1108:Hello, yes, I like the process. I was checking 4072:is exactly the sort of thing I like to see. -- 1436:Edit summary usage for Titodutta can be found 1355:, you find no link or mention there). Regards. 388:report (after 2014 Wikimedia India conference) 127:Knowledge:Noticeboard for India-related topics 4003:. I looked over the candidate's histories at 3500:-Nothing left to write in-here after 90 +1s. 1482: 1035: 976: 917: 505:on-wiki discussions/messages or copyright a) 430:India against corruption and related articles 8: 4726:of Scotland, as my father is Scottish. Now 4586:I just have to but in and say the policy on 1290:(please do not consider it an advertisement) 4800:contains an honorific - which are okay per 4347:A helpful, patient and enthusiastic editor. 3396:Good Dedicated Contributor.See no concerns. 3177:I thought a Mop was already in their hands 2703:- should I have done anything different? -- 131:Knowledge:Merchandise giveaways/Nominations 3195:No concerns. Another excellent candidate. 3104:Impressed by the candidate's work at DYK. 1489: 1475: 1467: 1337:What can be done to improve the situation? 1184:I couldn't find the "Yellowknife Journal" 855:CSD criteria? Anyway, the last part of it 53:Final (139/6/4) - Closed as successful by 5018:Influence and legacy of Swami Vivekananda 4714:My forename is Andrew. This is a common 3312:a well qualified candidate, no concerns. 428:A similar example is disruptive edits at 4637:and points out that his claim was to be 4635:even acknowledges those Kayastha origins 3262:- I don't see any issues. Give it a go. 1450:Please keep discussion constructive and 756:Thank you for your good wishes. Regards. 511:a message form Article for creation team 4633:family, not a Brahmin one. Your source 3961:- Yes, great contributions, Good Luck! 3818:Per positive interactions in the past. 547:an Indian English newspaper search tool 4626: 4478:I have concerns about the candidate's 3551:. Capable editor. Suitable for admin. 2146:I totally trust him with the tools. -- 1345:Knowledge:WikiProject Deletion sorting 1336: 1171:' (c) a column in the New York Times ( 772:I'm concerned that your talk page has 534:Could you comment on your AfD keep at 102:; as of today, there are 527 of them. 86:to Good Article status, and he has an 4863:, one finds again that we have plain 3212:Fully qualified and highly sensible. 1207:The first article of this search page 710:c) the general notability guidelines 7: 4650:background reading and stick to the 2943: 1895:This editor greatly exceeds most of 813: 748: 442: 380:Noticeboard for India-related topics 133:before it moved to Meta, and he has 115:Talk:Independence Day (Pakistan)/GA1 4854:, is the best title as this is the 657:Hello, the worst one is surely the 507:Wikimedia Commons related question 4918:should get the undelete button. -- 2013:level-headed and is always calm. 117:. He is also a well-known face at 24: 5462:Successful requests for adminship 5070:A bizarre reason for opposition. 4511:Swami Vivekananda: A Reassessment 3772:The opposes don't cut it for me. 1751:—Sensible, level-headed editor. 1339:— three suggestions— a) continue 1200:. So I would not delete under it. 847:Knowledge:Article Rescue Squadron 664:to personally attack anyone). We 111:Talk:Independence Day (India)/GA1 4486:as it is styled to resemble the 2944: 1305:where the shoe pinches. Regards. 814: 749: 443: 18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 325:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 4482:. His signature is literally 3520:. Fully qualified candidate. 2699:If you're an admin, check out 1921:) 21:17, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 721:notability criteria of numbers 152:, with 6426 uses. He also has 88:impressively long list of DYKs 1: 5342:10:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2575:sums up the attitude I like. 2433:I was waiting for this RfA.-- 1871:- I see no obvious problems. 1353:WikiProject India noticeboard 1273:. Or they are just retiring. 177:Co-nomination by Strike Eagle 92:WikiProject Swami Vivekananda 5429:19:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 5394:00:48, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 5375:17:19, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 5355:05:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 5340:10:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 5301:07:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 5286:21:36, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 5271:12:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 5250:05:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 5236:21:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 5197:20:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 5177:19:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 5162:19:26, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 5148:18:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 5137:16:45, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 5122:16:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 5109:16:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 5095:16:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 5080:16:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 5066:16:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 5047:05:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC) 5030:04:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 5007:00:48, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 4989:03:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 4966:20:25, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 4940:19:38, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 4928:19:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 4877:12:14, 17 January 2015 (UTC) 4838:12:43, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 4786:12:21, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 4752:08:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 4708:05:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 4684:08:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 4664:03:54, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 4607:19:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 4582:08:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 4555:02:21, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 4529:19:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 4490:. The GA which he claims — 4464:19:43, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 4449:19:39, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 4432:17:19, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 4415:17:09, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 4397:15:48, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 4374:14:55, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 4340:11:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 4320:06:31, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 4303:21:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC) 4286:17:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC) 4263:15:10, 18 January 2015 (UTC) 4234:14:20, 18 January 2015 (UTC) 4217:08:53, 18 January 2015 (UTC) 4194:05:12, 18 January 2015 (UTC) 4177:04:37, 18 January 2015 (UTC) 4160:23:09, 17 January 2015 (UTC) 4143:22:18, 17 January 2015 (UTC) 4127:15:23, 17 January 2015 (UTC) 4105:15:02, 17 January 2015 (UTC) 4077:12:41, 17 January 2015 (UTC) 4060:11:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC) 4038:07:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC) 4021:23:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 3996:21:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 3975:19:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 3954:15:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 3927:15:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 3909:12:57, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 3883:11:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 3863:07:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 3846:06:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 3828:23:31, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 3811:22:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 3797:20:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 3783:20:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 3765:18:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 3734:18:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 3709:17:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 3689:17:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 3672:15:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 3653:05:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 3635:04:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 3606:03:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 3584:03:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 3561:01:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 3544:01:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 3530:21:38, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3513:20:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3493:19:42, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3476:18:36, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3461:18:25, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3441:18:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3423:17:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3406:17:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3389:16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3372:12:38, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3355:10:36, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3330:10:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3305:09:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3289:08:33, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3272:07:12, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3255:05:15, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3238:05:09, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3224:04:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3205:03:54, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3188:03:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3170:03:33, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3154:02:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3138:02:42, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3128:02:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3114:00:54, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3097:00:36, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3077:00:07, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 3054:23:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 3037:23:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 3021:23:09, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 3005:22:52, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2986:22:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2964:21:21, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2935:21:12, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2913:19:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2899:19:37, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2872:18:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2848:17:44, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2826:16:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2809:15:20, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2781:loonies? And you want to do 2773:14:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2738:22:39, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2716:18:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2693:17:22, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2678:14:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2659:23:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC) 2644:05:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2630:13:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2612:13:00, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2586:12:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2564:12:37, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2547:12:35, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2530:12:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2513:12:12, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2492:11:56, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2474:11:42, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2457:11:07, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2443:10:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2426:08:30, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2399:07:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2383:06:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2366:04:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2349:04:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2322:03:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2304:02:36, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2290:02:20, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2273:01:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2259:01:44, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2242:01:35, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2223:01:30, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2204:00:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2183:23:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 2156:23:45, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 2138:23:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 2127:22:52, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 2106:05:05, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2088:00:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2070:22:46, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 2050:22:43, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 2023:22:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 2005:21:45, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1986:21:37, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1966:21:34, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1955:21:29, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1933:19:20, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 1908:21:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1881:21:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1864:21:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1836:21:10, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1819:21:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1802:20:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1785:20:43, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1773:20:29, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1761:20:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1744:20:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1727:20:13, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1706:02:35, 17 January 2015 (UTC) 1690:20:06, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1676:20:06, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1662:20:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1645:20:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1627:19:59, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1332:be closed as "no consensus". 1248:made more than 100,000 edits 1070:10:40, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 804:10:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 497:00:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 284:19:35, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 247:19:31, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 224:13:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 172:09:25, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 59:19:51, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 3264:Command and Conquer Expert! 1263:talk page. I wanted to see 290:Questions for the candidate 161:giving him your support. — 5478: 1284:There is a project called 455:Additional questions from 4944:Thanks for raising this, 2805:Penny for your thoughts? 2464:Thanks for volunteering. 1312:Additional question from 1216:Additional question from 1181:Why AfD rather than PROD? 1165:a book by Jean Steinbruck 1145:Additional question from 1123:Additional question from 1089:Additional question from 835:An article is listed for 826:Additional question from 763:Additional question from 675:Additional question from 637:Additional question from 607:Additional question from 561:Additional question from 321:categories for discussion 234:develop. And be clean ;) 229:Co-nomination by Antanana 148:- he is number 59 on the 5439:Please do not modify it. 3741:per the rationale at my 2883:on pages in WP namespace 1349:deletion sorting (India) 845:I have been a member of 628:Right to Information Act 317:redirects for discussion 4718:, being a reference to 3343:shout from the audience 3121:No obvious concerns. – 1975:Knowledge:Systemic bias 1110:User:Lar/Accountability 368:WP:Deceased Wikipedians 107:Talk:Mahatma Gandhi/GA2 38:Please do not modify it 4826:Queen Letizia of Spain 4730:, or the abbreviation 4327:Happy to support here 4005:Talk:Swami Vivekananda 3413:- trustworthy editor. 3398:Pharaoh of the Wizards 2818:Andromedabluesphere440 1271:going missing everyday 857:my mom writes 4 it LOL 666:should not feed trolls 4766:<Admin hat on: --> 2163:Overdue for the mop. 1913:Support obviously. -- 1367:Links for Titodutta: 1351:, but when you go to 1226:little, if you wish. 692:before closing AfDs. 592:close the discussion 439:try to watch my words 307:I want to start with 34:request for adminship 5319:User:Andrew_Davidson 4936:SarekOfVulcan (talk) 4201:- No concerns here. 1753:Lesser Cartographies 1672:SarekOfVulcan (talk) 1582:Global contributions 1100:admin recall process 787:Off and On WikiBreak 777:user health inactive 139:this user award page 100:list of new articles 5307:User:OrangesRyellow 4694:, the third point. 3941:. Good luck, Tito. 1923:Moved to oppose. -- 1652:. Absolutely yes.-- 1536:Non-automated edits 4993:Moved to neutral. 4901:by virtue of the " 4822:Felipe VI of Spain 4736:Andrew the Apostle 4243:Editor of the Week 4009:Talk:Bhagavad Gita 3534:Looks okay to me. 2844:Ping when replying 2590:No issues at all. 1515:Edit summary usage 1458:before commenting. 1156:for the time being 1114:User:TParis/Recall 394:Offline activities 196:promoting wikilove 39: 5195: 4830:FireflySixtySeven 4806:Swami Vivekananda 4696:Swami Vivekananda 4588:promotional names 4494:— is literally a 4492:Swami Vivekananda 4395: 4282: 4261: 3952: 3795: 3632: 3364:FireflySixtySeven 3092:HelloThereMinions 2922:Swami Vivekananda 2785:thankless tasks? 2728: 2718: 2695: 2220: 2038:India noticeboard 1953: 1894: 1595: 1594: 1456:his contributions 1291: 1098:Will you have an 378:Participation at 364:-related articles 362:Swami Vivekananda 356:Online activities 329:India noticeboard 241: 237: 154:147 edits to RFPP 150:STiki leaderboard 119:WikiProject India 84:Swami Vivekananda 37: 5469: 5441: 5371: 5338: 5333: 5330: 5189: 4937: 4769:Knowledge:BADGER 4631:Bengali Kayastha 4603: 4410: 4385: 4372: 4359: 4355: 4338: 4333: 4295:NinjaRobotPirate 4284: 4280: 4277: 4253: 4207: 4123: 4122: 4119: 4101: 4096: 4089: 4082:Tempered support 4054: 4052: 4030: 3993: 3988: 3973: 3971: 3966: 3949: 3947: 3841: 3820:Kevin Rutherford 3794: 3778: 3762: 3758: 3701: 3668: 3633: 3629: 3622: 3620: 3603: 3601:Let's discuss it 3581: 3574: 3510: 3504: 3457: 3454: 3327: 3318: 3281:Roger (Dodger67) 3235: 3203: 3201: 3183: 3150: 3093: 3091: 3069: 3051: 3034: 2961: 2956: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2910: 2895: 2890: 2863: 2846: 2806: 2800: 2759: 2758: 2735: 2721: 2707: 2698: 2682: 2675: 2509: 2506: 2503: 2487: 2454: 2395: 2375:I am One of Many 2346: 2343: 2340: 2337: 2301: 2247:Cautious support 2233: 2218: 2178: 2169: 2102: 2100: 2066: 2064: 1947: 1903: 1897:my RFA standards 1888: 1879: 1861: 1854: 1849: 1723: 1720: 1715:of course! :) -- 1683:— Long overdue. 1673: 1640: 1639:Mr. Stradivarius 1634:as nominator. — 1624: 1622: 1617: 1531:Articles created 1491: 1484: 1477: 1468: 1441: 1433: 1392: 1362:General comments 1289: 1286:editor retention 1279:He was desysoped 1269:Wikipedians are 1040: 1039: 1025: 981: 980: 966: 922: 921: 907: 819: 818: 817: 791: 785: 781: 775: 754: 753: 752: 734:WP:Verifiability 448: 447: 446: 370:page redesigning 339:discussions too. 282: 277: 274: 268: 263: 260: 239: 235: 221: 219: 214: 183:Mr. Stradivarius 167: 166:Mr. Stradivarius 5477: 5476: 5472: 5471: 5470: 5468: 5467: 5466: 5452: 5451: 5450: 5444:this nomination 5437: 5369: 5334: 5331: 5326: 5258: 5099:Quite bizarre. 4935: 4796:is an article, 4643:sanskritisation 4618:remnant of the 4601: 4569:username policy 4547:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 4543:the GA reviewer 4472: 4439:- No concerns. 4408: 4357: 4353: 4348: 4331: 4328: 4273: 4271: 4213: 4203: 4120: 4117: 4115: 4099: 4092: 4087: 4046: 4028: 3991: 3984: 3969: 3964: 3962: 3943: 3839: 3790:with pleasure. 3776: 3760: 3756: 3699: 3666: 3625: 3616: 3614: 3599: 3577: 3570: 3508: 3502: 3455: 3452: 3326: 3321: 3314: 3270: 3233: 3199: 3196: 3179: 3146: 3063: 3046: 3030: 2957: 2952: 2945: 2908: 2893: 2886: 2861: 2842: 2804: 2796: 2777:You dealt with 2771: 2754: 2753: 2733: 2705: 2673: 2507: 2504: 2501: 2485: 2452: 2393: 2358:AbhiSuryawanshi 2344: 2341: 2338: 2335: 2299: 2297:fine editor. -- 2240: 2231: 2176: 2167: 2098: 2096: 2062: 2060: 1901: 1872: 1857: 1850: 1845: 1828:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1721: 1718: 1671: 1638: 1620: 1615: 1613: 1605: 1596: 1591: 1565: 1519: 1498: 1497:RfA/RfB toolbox 1495: 1465: 1437: 1385: 1368: 1364: 982: 923: 864: 851:Adhisaya Ulagam 837:speedy deletion 815: 789: 783: 779: 773: 750: 444: 309:page protection 292: 278: 275: 270: 264: 261: 256: 217: 212: 210: 165: 67: 50: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5475: 5473: 5465: 5464: 5454: 5453: 5449: 5448: 5432: 5431: 5396: 5382:StringTheory11 5377: 5365: 5364: 5363: 5362: 5361: 5360: 5359: 5358: 5357: 5347:OrangesRyellow 5293:OrangesRyellow 5263:OrangesRyellow 5257: 5254: 5253: 5252: 5238: 5221: 5220: 5219: 5218: 5217: 5216: 5215: 5214: 5213: 5212: 5211: 5210: 5209: 5208: 5207: 5206: 5205: 5204: 5203: 5202: 5201: 5200: 5199: 5051: 5050: 5049: 5013: 5012: 5011: 5010: 5009: 4995:StringTheory11 4977:StringTheory11 4970: 4969: 4968: 4887: 4886: 4885: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4881: 4880: 4879: 4861:Venerable Bede 4841: 4840: 4798:Mahatma Gandhi 4767:Please do not 4764: 4763: 4762: 4761: 4760: 4759: 4758: 4757: 4756: 4755: 4754: 4716:Christian name 4688: 4687: 4686: 4647: 4623: 4611: 4610: 4609: 4538:this envergure 4471: 4468: 4467: 4466: 4451: 4441:TheGeneralUser 4434: 4417: 4399: 4376: 4342: 4322: 4305: 4288: 4265: 4258: 4250: 4236: 4222:Strong support 4219: 4211: 4196: 4179: 4162: 4145: 4135:Anna Frodesiak 4129: 4110:Strong Support 4107: 4079: 4062: 4040: 4023: 3998: 3977: 3956: 3929: 3911: 3885: 3865: 3848: 3830: 3813: 3799: 3785: 3767: 3736: 3711: 3691: 3674: 3655: 3637: 3608: 3586: 3563: 3546: 3532: 3515: 3495: 3478: 3463: 3443: 3425: 3408: 3391: 3374: 3357: 3332: 3322: 3307: 3291: 3274: 3266: 3257: 3240: 3226: 3207: 3190: 3172: 3156: 3140: 3130: 3116: 3099: 3082:Strong support 3079: 3056: 3039: 3023: 3007: 2988: 2966: 2937: 2915: 2901: 2881:141 new topics 2874: 2850: 2828: 2811: 2775: 2761: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2646: 2614: 2588: 2566: 2549: 2532: 2515: 2494: 2476: 2459: 2445: 2428: 2401: 2385: 2368: 2351: 2331:Andrew Lenahan 2324: 2306: 2300:AmritasyaPutra 2292: 2275: 2265:VegasCasinoKid 2261: 2244: 2234: 2225: 2206: 2185: 2158: 2140: 2129: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2052: 2025: 2007: 1989: 1971:Strong support 1968: 1957: 1940:Strong Support 1937: 1936: 1935: 1883: 1866: 1838: 1821: 1804: 1787: 1775: 1763: 1746: 1729: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1681:Strong support 1678: 1664: 1647: 1629: 1604: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1593: 1592: 1590: 1589: 1584: 1579: 1573: 1571: 1567: 1566: 1564: 1563: 1558: 1553: 1548: 1543: 1538: 1533: 1527: 1525: 1521: 1520: 1518: 1517: 1512: 1506: 1504: 1500: 1499: 1496: 1494: 1493: 1486: 1479: 1471: 1464: 1461: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1443: 1434: 1363: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1333: 1316: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1299: 1293: 1283: 1268: 1220: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1204: 1201: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1182: 1179: 1176: 1149: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1127: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1093: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1054: 1041: 854: 830: 823: 822: 821: 820: 767: 760: 759: 758: 757: 755: 727: 724: 709: 693: 679: 672: 671: 670: 669: 662: 641: 634: 633: 632: 631: 611: 604: 603: 602: 601: 565: 558: 557: 556: 555: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 514: 478: 475: 472: 459: 452: 451: 450: 449: 435: 434: 433: 427: 420: 404: 403: 402: 401: 400: 399: 391: 390: 389: 382: 376: 371: 365: 343: 342: 341: 340: 313:requested move 291: 288: 287: 286: 231: 230: 179: 178: 66: 63: 49: 44: 43: 42: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5474: 5463: 5460: 5459: 5457: 5447: 5445: 5440: 5434: 5433: 5430: 5426: 5422: 5418: 5413: 5411: 5409: 5407: 5405: 5402: 5397: 5395: 5391: 5387: 5383: 5378: 5376: 5373: 5372: 5366: 5356: 5352: 5348: 5344: 5343: 5341: 5337: 5329: 5324: 5320: 5316: 5312: 5311:co-nom my RFA 5308: 5304: 5303: 5302: 5298: 5294: 5289: 5288: 5287: 5283: 5279: 5274: 5273: 5272: 5268: 5264: 5260: 5259: 5255: 5251: 5247: 5243: 5239: 5237: 5233: 5229: 5225: 5222: 5198: 5193: 5188: 5184: 5183: 5182: 5181: 5180: 5179: 5178: 5174: 5170: 5165: 5164: 5163: 5159: 5155: 5151: 5150: 5149: 5145: 5140: 5139: 5138: 5134: 5130: 5125: 5124: 5123: 5120: 5116: 5112: 5111: 5110: 5106: 5102: 5098: 5097: 5096: 5092: 5088: 5083: 5082: 5081: 5077: 5073: 5069: 5068: 5067: 5063: 5059: 5055: 5052: 5048: 5044: 5040: 5039: 5033: 5032: 5031: 5027: 5023: 5019: 5014: 5008: 5004: 5000: 4996: 4992: 4991: 4990: 4986: 4982: 4978: 4974: 4971: 4967: 4963: 4959: 4955: 4951: 4947: 4946:SarekOfVulcan 4943: 4942: 4941: 4938: 4931: 4930: 4929: 4925: 4921: 4916: 4912: 4908: 4904: 4900: 4896: 4891: 4888: 4878: 4874: 4870: 4866: 4862: 4857: 4856:primary topic 4853: 4849: 4845: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4839: 4835: 4831: 4827: 4823: 4819: 4815: 4811: 4807: 4803: 4802:WP:COMMONNAME 4799: 4795: 4791: 4790: 4789: 4788: 4787: 4783: 4779: 4775: 4774:WP:Bureaucrat 4770: 4765: 4753: 4749: 4745: 4741: 4737: 4733: 4729: 4725: 4721: 4717: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4705: 4701: 4697: 4693: 4689: 4685: 4681: 4677: 4673: 4669: 4668: 4667: 4666: 4665: 4661: 4657: 4653: 4648: 4644: 4640: 4636: 4632: 4628: 4624: 4621: 4617: 4612: 4608: 4605: 4604: 4597: 4593: 4589: 4585: 4584: 4583: 4579: 4575: 4570: 4566: 4562: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4552: 4548: 4544: 4539: 4534: 4533: 4532: 4531: 4530: 4526: 4522: 4517: 4513: 4512: 4507: 4506: 4501: 4497: 4493: 4489: 4485: 4481: 4477: 4474: 4473: 4469: 4465: 4462: 4460: 4455: 4452: 4450: 4446: 4442: 4438: 4435: 4433: 4429: 4425: 4421: 4418: 4416: 4413: 4412: 4411: 4403: 4400: 4398: 4393: 4389: 4384: 4380: 4377: 4375: 4370: 4366: 4362: 4361: 4346: 4343: 4341: 4337: 4335: 4334: 4326: 4323: 4321: 4317: 4313: 4309: 4306: 4304: 4300: 4296: 4292: 4289: 4287: 4283: 4278: 4276: 4269: 4266: 4264: 4260: 4259: 4256: 4252: 4251: 4248: 4244: 4240: 4237: 4235: 4231: 4227: 4223: 4220: 4218: 4215: 4214: 4208: 4206: 4200: 4197: 4195: 4191: 4187: 4183: 4180: 4178: 4174: 4170: 4166: 4163: 4161: 4157: 4153: 4149: 4146: 4144: 4140: 4136: 4133: 4130: 4128: 4125: 4124: 4111: 4108: 4106: 4103: 4102: 4097: 4095: 4090: 4083: 4080: 4078: 4075: 4071: 4066: 4063: 4061: 4058: 4057: 4053: 4051: 4044: 4041: 4039: 4036: 4035: 4032: 4031: 4024: 4022: 4018: 4014: 4010: 4006: 4002: 3999: 3997: 3994: 3989: 3987: 3981: 3978: 3976: 3972: 3967: 3960: 3957: 3955: 3951: 3948: 3946: 3940: 3935: 3930: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3915: 3912: 3910: 3906: 3905: 3900: 3899: 3894: 3889: 3886: 3884: 3880: 3876: 3872: 3869: 3866: 3864: 3860: 3856: 3852: 3849: 3847: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3834: 3831: 3829: 3825: 3821: 3817: 3814: 3812: 3809: 3808: 3803: 3800: 3798: 3793: 3789: 3786: 3784: 3781: 3780: 3771: 3768: 3766: 3763: 3752: 3748: 3744: 3740: 3737: 3735: 3732: 3728: 3724: 3720: 3715: 3712: 3710: 3707: 3706: 3703: 3702: 3695: 3692: 3690: 3686: 3682: 3678: 3675: 3673: 3670: 3669: 3662: 3659: 3656: 3654: 3650: 3646: 3641: 3638: 3636: 3630: 3628: 3621: 3619: 3612: 3609: 3607: 3604: 3602: 3597: 3596: 3590: 3587: 3585: 3582: 3580: 3575: 3573: 3567: 3564: 3562: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3547: 3545: 3541: 3537: 3533: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3519: 3516: 3514: 3511: 3505: 3499: 3496: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3482: 3479: 3477: 3474: 3471: 3467: 3464: 3462: 3459: 3458: 3447: 3444: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3429: 3426: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3412: 3409: 3407: 3403: 3399: 3395: 3392: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3375: 3373: 3369: 3365: 3361: 3358: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3344: 3340: 3336: 3333: 3331: 3328: 3325: 3319: 3317: 3311: 3308: 3306: 3302: 3298: 3295: 3292: 3290: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3275: 3273: 3269: 3265: 3261: 3258: 3256: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3241: 3239: 3236: 3230: 3227: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3216: 3211: 3208: 3206: 3202: 3200:FreeRangeFrog 3194: 3191: 3189: 3186: 3184: 3182: 3176: 3173: 3171: 3168: 3167: 3164: 3161: 3157: 3155: 3152: 3149: 3144: 3141: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3129: 3126: 3125: 3120: 3117: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3103: 3100: 3098: 3095: 3094: 3087: 3083: 3080: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3068: 3067: 3060: 3057: 3055: 3052: 3050: 3043: 3040: 3038: 3035: 3033: 3027: 3024: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3011: 3008: 3006: 3003: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2992: 2989: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2970: 2967: 2965: 2962: 2960: 2955: 2941: 2938: 2936: 2932: 2928: 2923: 2919: 2916: 2914: 2911: 2905: 2902: 2900: 2897: 2891: 2889: 2882: 2878: 2875: 2873: 2869: 2865: 2858: 2854: 2851: 2849: 2845: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2829: 2827: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2812: 2810: 2807: 2801: 2799: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2774: 2769: 2765: 2760: 2757: 2750: 2747: 2739: 2736: 2731: 2726: 2720: 2719: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2702: 2697: 2696: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2676: 2671: 2667: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2647: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2618: 2615: 2613: 2609: 2606: 2603: 2600: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2587: 2584: 2582: 2580: 2579: 2574: 2570: 2567: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2550: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2533: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2516: 2514: 2511: 2510: 2498: 2495: 2493: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2480: 2477: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2460: 2458: 2455: 2449: 2446: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2429: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2410: 2405: 2402: 2400: 2397: 2396: 2390:no problems. 2389: 2386: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2373:No issues. -- 2372: 2369: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2352: 2350: 2347: 2332: 2328: 2325: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2310: 2307: 2305: 2302: 2296: 2293: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2276: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2245: 2243: 2239: 2238: 2229: 2226: 2224: 2221: 2216: 2215: 2210: 2207: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2186: 2184: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2162: 2159: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2144: 2141: 2139: 2136: 2133: 2130: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2113: 2107: 2104: 2103: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2068: 2067: 2056: 2053: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2034: 2033:User:Antanana 2029: 2026: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2011: 2008: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1993: 1990: 1987: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1969: 1967: 1964: 1961: 1958: 1956: 1951: 1946: 1941: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1920: 1916: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1906: 1904: 1898: 1892: 1891:edit conflict 1887: 1884: 1882: 1878: 1875: 1870: 1867: 1865: 1862: 1860: 1855: 1853: 1848: 1842: 1839: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1822: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1805: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1788: 1786: 1783: 1779: 1776: 1774: 1771: 1767: 1764: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1747: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1730: 1728: 1725: 1724: 1714: 1711: 1707: 1704: 1702: 1698: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1688: 1686: 1682: 1679: 1677: 1674: 1668: 1665: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1648: 1646: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1633: 1630: 1628: 1625: 1623: 1618: 1610: 1607: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1597: 1588: 1585: 1583: 1580: 1578: 1575: 1574: 1572: 1568: 1562: 1559: 1557: 1554: 1552: 1549: 1547: 1544: 1542: 1539: 1537: 1534: 1532: 1529: 1528: 1526: 1522: 1516: 1513: 1511: 1508: 1507: 1505: 1501: 1492: 1487: 1485: 1480: 1478: 1473: 1472: 1469: 1462: 1460: 1459: 1457: 1453: 1444: 1440: 1435: 1431: 1428: 1425: 1422: 1419: 1416: 1413: 1410: 1407: 1404: 1401: 1398: 1395: 1391: 1388: 1384: 1381: 1378: 1375: 1371: 1366: 1365: 1361: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1330: 1326: 1323: 1322: 1320: 1317: 1315: 1311: 1310: 1304: 1297: 1287: 1280: 1276: 1275:User:Qwyrxian 1272: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1249: 1245: 1242: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1228: 1227: 1224: 1221: 1219: 1215: 1214: 1208: 1199: 1195: 1192: 1187: 1183: 1180: 1177: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1157: 1153: 1150: 1148: 1144: 1143: 1137: 1134: 1133: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1122: 1121: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1104: 1103: 1101: 1097: 1094: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1076: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1068: 1066: 1064: 1063: 1057: 1056: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1038: 1034: 1031: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1013: 1010: 1007: 1004: 1001: 998: 995: 992: 988: 985: 984:Find sources: 979: 975: 972: 969: 965: 961: 957: 954: 951: 948: 945: 942: 939: 936: 933: 929: 926: 925:Find sources: 920: 916: 913: 910: 906: 902: 898: 895: 892: 889: 886: 883: 880: 877: 874: 870: 867: 866:Find sources: 862: 858: 852: 848: 844: 841: 840: 838: 834: 831: 829: 825: 824: 810: 807: 806: 805: 802: 800: 798: 797: 788: 778: 771: 768: 766: 762: 761: 747: 743: 739: 735: 731: 722: 718: 713: 706: 702: 698: 690: 687: 686: 683: 680: 678: 674: 673: 667: 660: 656: 653: 652: 650: 645: 642: 640: 636: 635: 629: 625: 621: 618: 617: 615: 612: 610: 606: 605: 599: 595: 591: 587: 583: 579: 576: 575: 573: 569: 566: 564: 560: 559: 552: 548: 543: 540: 539: 537: 533: 530: 529: 518: 515: 512: 508: 503: 500: 499: 498: 494: 490: 489: 484: 481: 480: 469: 466: 465: 463: 460: 458: 454: 453: 440: 436: 431: 425: 421: 418: 417: 415: 412: 411: 409: 406: 405: 397: 396: 395: 392: 387: 383: 381: 377: 375: 372: 369: 366: 363: 360: 359: 357: 354: 351: 350: 348: 345: 344: 338: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 306: 303: 302: 300: 297: 296: 295: 289: 285: 281: 273: 267: 259: 254: 251: 250: 249: 248: 245: 228: 227: 226: 225: 222: 220: 215: 207: 205: 200: 198: 197: 192: 191:editcountitis 188: 184: 176: 175: 174: 173: 170: 169: 168: 159: 155: 151: 147: 142: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 103: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 81: 78: 75: 71: 64: 62: 61: 60: 56: 48: 45: 41: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 5438: 5435: 5400: 5367: 5223: 5144:push to talk 5053: 5036: 4972: 4953: 4915:the web site 4902: 4889: 4810:Elizabeth II 4740:Elizabeth II 4731: 4728:Saint Andrew 4727: 4724:patron saint 4720:Saint Andrew 4695: 4615: 4599: 4591: 4564: 4560: 4559:But Kudpung 4509: 4503: 4475: 4453: 4436: 4419: 4406: 4405: 4401: 4378: 4351: 4344: 4330: 4324: 4307: 4290: 4274: 4267: 4255: 4249:Buster Seven 4247: 4238: 4221: 4210: 4204: 4198: 4181: 4164: 4147: 4131: 4113: 4109: 4093: 4085: 4081: 4069: 4064: 4056: 4049: 4042: 4033: 4026: 4000: 3985: 3979: 3958: 3944: 3938: 3934:net positive 3913: 3903: 3897: 3892: 3875:Gerda Arendt 3867: 3850: 3837: 3836: 3832: 3815: 3806: 3801: 3787: 3774: 3769: 3738: 3713: 3704: 3697: 3693: 3676: 3664: 3657: 3639: 3627:open channel 3626: 3617: 3610: 3600: 3594: 3588: 3578: 3571: 3565: 3548: 3517: 3497: 3480: 3465: 3451: 3445: 3427: 3410: 3393: 3376: 3359: 3341:aficionados 3334: 3323: 3315: 3309: 3293: 3276: 3268:review me... 3259: 3242: 3228: 3213: 3209: 3192: 3180: 3174: 3158: 3142: 3134:push to talk 3122: 3118: 3101: 3089: 3081: 3065: 3064: 3058: 3048: 3041: 3031: 3025: 3009: 2995: 2994: 2990: 2968: 2958: 2953: 2939: 2917: 2903: 2887: 2876: 2852: 2830: 2813: 2797: 2790: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2755: 2748: 2724: 2665: 2616: 2604: 2598: 2577: 2568: 2551: 2534: 2517: 2499: 2496: 2484: 2483: 2478: 2461: 2447: 2430: 2407: 2403: 2392: 2387: 2370: 2353: 2334: 2326: 2308: 2294: 2277: 2246: 2236: 2227: 2213: 2208: 2190:. I'll echo 2187: 2175: 2174: 2166: 2165: 2160: 2142: 2114: 2094: 2058: 2054: 2027: 2009: 1991: 1970: 1959: 1939: 1912: 1885: 1868: 1858: 1851: 1846: 1840: 1823: 1806: 1789: 1777: 1765: 1748: 1731: 1717: 1712: 1680: 1666: 1649: 1636: 1635: 1631: 1612: 1608: 1449: 1448: 1426: 1420: 1414: 1408: 1402: 1396: 1389: 1382: 1376: 1341:appreciating 1324: 1318: 1314:Ottawahitech 1302: 1264: 1260: 1240: 1229: 1222: 1193: 1185: 1155: 1151: 1135: 1129: 1105: 1095: 1074: 1061: 1049: 1045:Yellowknifer 1043: 1032: 1026: 1018: 1011: 1005: 999: 993: 983: 973: 967: 959: 952: 946: 940: 934: 924: 914: 908: 900: 893: 887: 881: 875: 865: 856: 842: 832: 808: 795: 769: 705:WP:BLPFAMILY 688: 681: 654: 648: 643: 619: 613: 593: 589: 577: 572:WP:CONSENSUS 567: 541: 531: 516: 501: 486: 482: 467: 461: 413: 407: 393: 355: 352: 346: 304: 298: 293: 252: 232: 209: 201: 194: 187:battleground 186: 180: 163: 162: 158:AfD comments 145: 143: 104: 76: 68: 52: 51: 46: 30: 28: 5421:Iaritmioawp 5278:Newyorkbrad 5187:regentspark 5022:Mkativerata 4850:, like the 4794:Saint Peter 4700:Bladesmulti 4646:generally.) 4602:MusikAnimal 4496:hagiography 4488:Indian flag 4484:flag-waving 4424:TheMandarin 3986:Laser brain 3667:MusikAnimal 3522:Newyorkbrad 3509:Let's talk! 3316:Bellerophon 3234:Redtigerxyz 3124:Philosopher 3032:Orphan Wiki 2974:Ad Orientem 2927:Ad Orientem 2798:HJ Mitchell 2768:revolutions 2592:Pmlineditor 2556:Dirtlawyer1 2435:Skr15081997 2314:Bladesmulti 2309:Big support 2263:Good luck. 2119:Anne Delong 1963:— sparklism 1945:regentspark 1587:User rights 1577:CentralAuth 1296:WP:GIVEAWAY 1009:free images 950:free images 891:free images 861:Yellowknife 740:(specially 677:Dirtlawyer1 659:IAC dispute 639:HJ Mitchell 594:immediately 563:Iaritmioawp 424:Asaram Bapu 5370:·addshore· 5228:Jackmcbarn 4732:St. Andrew 4596:canvassing 4592:shared use 4480:neutrality 4459:j⚛e decker 4383:G S Palmer 4281:Talk Page. 4169:Malcolmxl5 4074:kelapstick 4013:Tryptofish 3898:The Herald 3855:EdJohnston 3792:Sarah (SV) 3747:Nomination 3681:Margin1522 3415:PhilKnight 3324:talk to me 3247:Oiyarbepsy 3047:Jezebel's 2578:Ritchie333 2076:WP:LTA/IAC 1570:Cross-wiki 1551:AfD closes 1463:Discussion 1125:Jim Carter 1091:Biblioworm 1062:Ritchie333 796:Ritchie333 765:Ritchie333 609:Samwalton9 384:Preparing 156:, and the 146:and Huggle 65:Nomination 31:successful 5154:Hipocrite 5129:Hipocrite 5115:MarnetteD 5087:Hipocrite 5058:Hipocrite 4907:This page 4869:Andrew D. 4744:Andrew D. 4676:Andrew D. 4639:Kshatriya 4574:Andrew D. 4521:Andrew D. 4500:honorific 4152:Guettarda 4094:Phightins 3904:here I am 3700:Schmidt, 3536:Connormah 3503:Anupmehra 3066:Steel1943 2486:Ethically 2466:Ben Moore 2409:Callanecc 2394:Jianhui67 2282:bobrayner 2042:Abecedare 1719:Amaryllis 1654:Dwaipayan 1616:ƬheStrike 1546:AfD votes 1541:BLP edits 1412:block log 1370:Titodutta 1186:newspaper 1053:opinions. 1050:currently 742:WP:NOTDIR 701:WP:NACTOR 697:WP:BKCRIT 551:WP:INDAFD 213:ƬheStrike 123:343 edits 70:Titodutta 55:Acalamari 47:Titodutta 5456:Category 5242:Townlake 5169:Irondome 5101:Irondome 5072:Irondome 4911:the book 4818:consorts 4814:monarchs 4804:, as is 4616:de facto 4392:contribs 4312:Inks.LWC 4029:SilkTork 3888:Andrew D 3871:precious 3433:Irondome 3297:JimRenge 3106:Hawkeye7 3086:be civil 2978:Donner60 2701:this A10 2651:PaleAqua 2636:PaleAqua 2622:PaleAqua 2573:this one 2522:sarvajna 2453:Philg88 2418:contribs 2295:Support 2148:MelanieN 1979:Bishonen 1722:Gardener 1561:PROD log 1524:Analysis 1503:Counters 1380:contribs 1329:relisted 1282:painful. 1265:this guy 1244:contribs 1218:MelanieN 1078:Regards. 554:Regards. 483:Followup 80:contribs 5323:deleted 5305:Hello, 5256:Neutral 5192:comment 4778:Shirt58 4625:As for 4561:doesn't 4516:Brahmin 4454:Support 4437:Support 4420:Support 4409:Snowolf 4402:Support 4379:Support 4345:Support 4325:Support 4308:Support 4291:Support 4268:Support 4239:Support 4199:Support 4182:Support 4165:Support 4148:Support 4132:Support 4065:Support 4043:Support 4001:Support 3980:Support 3959:Support 3939:support 3914:Support 3895:. -- - 3893:Support 3868:Support 3851:Support 3833:Support 3816:Support 3807:Chillum 3802:Support 3788:Support 3770:Support 3739:Support 3719:DocTree 3714:Support 3694:Support 3677:Support 3658:Support 3645:BusterD 3640:Support 3618:Mlpearc 3611:Support 3589:Support 3572:HalfGig 3566:Support 3549:Support 3518:Support 3498:Support 3485:Carrite 3481:Support 3473:Snowman 3466:Support 3446:Support 3428:Support 3411:Support 3394:Support 3377:Support 3360:Support 3347:Shirt58 3335:Support 3310:Support 3294:Support 3277:Support 3260:Support 3243:Support 3229:Support 3210:Support 3193:Support 3175:Support 3143:Support 3119:Support 3102:Support 3059:Support 3042:Support 3026:Support 3010:Support 2991:Support 2969:Support 2940:Support 2918:Support 2904:Support 2888:Noyster 2877:Support 2853:Support 2831:Support 2814:Support 2787:Support 2764:spin me 2749:Support 2725:must've 2685:Peridon 2666:Support 2617:Support 2569:Support 2552:Support 2535:Support 2518:Support 2497:Support 2479:Support 2462:Support 2448:Support 2431:Support 2404:Support 2388:support 2371:Support 2354:Support 2327:Support 2278:Support 2232:Vigyani 2228:Support 2209:Support 2188:Support 2161:Support 2143:Support 2115:Support 2055:Support 2028:Support 2015:Bgwhite 2010:Support 1997:Peridon 1992:Support 1960:Support 1950:comment 1886:Support 1869:Support 1847:///Euro 1841:Support 1824:Support 1807:Support 1790:Support 1778:support 1766:Support 1749:Support 1732:Support 1713:Support 1667:Support 1650:Support 1632:Support 1609:Support 1603:Support 1556:CSD log 1387:deleted 1234:WikHead 1173:example 1015:WP refs 1003:scholar 956:WP refs 944:scholar 897:WP refs 885:scholar 828:Shirt58 374:98 DYKs 135:adopted 121:, with 5224:Oppose 5054:Oppose 4973:Oppose 4950:WP:TNT 4890:Oppose 4848:Gandhi 4824:, but 4722:, the 4656:Sitush 4652:WP:ARS 4572:area. 4476:Oppose 4470:Oppose 4226:Kaayay 4186:Risker 4050:115ash 3992:(talk) 3945:Tyrol5 3840:Zayeem 3779:jones 3761:MERICA 3743:WP:WER 3661:WP:100 3595:Cullen 3553:AshLin 3381:Vyom25 3339:Kabuki 2997:Frosty 2909:AldNon 2894:(talk) 2864:rose64 2857:WP:VPT 2708:rose64 2539:Taketa 2219:(talk) 2196:Drmies 2192:Sitush 2177:apolis 2080:Sitush 1874:Arfæst 1811:Sitush 1701:Kurtis 1685:Kurtis 1510:XTools 1169:a blog 1167:; (b) 987:Google 928:Google 869:Google 738:WP:NOT 730:WP:GNG 717:WP:SNG 712:WP:GNG 386:WP:RMI 333:WP:ANI 5336:Dutta 5240:Q11. 5043:talk 4913:, on 4899:WP:A7 4895:WP:A1 4852:movie 4505:Swami 3919:RexxS 3751:Award 3470:Giant 3220:talk 3049:Ponyo 2954:Davey 2779:those 2756:78.26 2101:lwart 2065:lwart 2031:both 1782:アンタナナ 1770:MONGO 1621:Σagle 1452:civil 1394:count 1198:WP:A1 1030:JSTOR 991:books 971:JSTOR 932:books 912:JSTOR 873:books 586:WP:3O 582:WP:AN 509:, b) 493:talk 337:WP:AN 280:Dutta 266:Dutta 244:アンタナナ 218:Σagle 16:< 5425:talk 5351:talk 5328:Tito 5315:here 5297:talk 5282:talk 5267:talk 5246:talk 5232:talk 5173:talk 5158:talk 5133:talk 5119:Talk 5105:talk 5091:talk 5076:talk 5062:talk 5026:talk 4962:talk 4958:Stfg 4924:talk 4920:Stfg 4873:talk 4865:Bede 4834:talk 4782:talk 4748:talk 4704:talk 4680:talk 4660:talk 4578:talk 4551:talk 4525:talk 4445:talk 4428:talk 4388:talk 4369:talk 4316:talk 4299:talk 4257:Talk 4230:talk 4205:Reyk 4190:talk 4173:talk 4156:talk 4139:talk 4017:talk 4007:and 3923:talk 3879:talk 3859:talk 3824:talk 3757:ORTH 3727:ʇuoɔ 3723:ʞlɐʇ 3685:talk 3649:talk 3579:talk 3557:talk 3540:talk 3526:talk 3489:talk 3456:atic 3437:talk 3419:talk 3402:talk 3385:talk 3368:talk 3351:talk 3301:talk 3285:talk 3251:talk 3166:7754 3163:chen 3110:talk 3073:talk 3017:talk 3013:Gaff 2982:talk 2959:2010 2950:.) – 2931:talk 2868:talk 2839:talk 2835:L235 2833:. -- 2822:talk 2783:more 2730:Wily 2712:talk 2689:talk 2670:Wily 2655:talk 2640:talk 2626:talk 2560:talk 2543:talk 2526:talk 2470:talk 2439:talk 2422:logs 2414:talk 2379:talk 2362:talk 2318:talk 2286:talk 2269:talk 2255:talk 2251:Glrx 2237:talk 2200:talk 2168:Mini 2152:talk 2132:Step 2123:talk 2084:talk 2046:talk 2019:talk 2001:talk 1983:talk 1929:talk 1925:Stfg 1919:talk 1915:Stfg 1902:Mkdw 1893:× 2) 1832:talk 1815:talk 1798:talk 1757:talk 1740:talk 1736:Ijon 1697:PROD 1658:talk 1439:here 1424:rfar 1406:logs 1374:talk 1303:know 1238:talk 1147:Stfg 1112:and 1023:FENS 997:news 964:FENS 938:news 905:FENS 879:news 782:and 708:way. 624:this 590:must 549:and 517:Add: 335:and 323:and 311:and 272:Tito 258:Tito 113:and 74:talk 5401:why 5038:DGG 4954:not 4672:Rfc 4620:Raj 4565:any 4358:che 4354:ani 4349:··· 4275:TMD 4212:YO! 4121:yya 3970:zan 3965:Fai 3775:Ron 3753:). 3731:WER 3453:Fim 3379:.-- 3215:DGG 3181:Lor 2862:Red 2791:and 2706:Red 2508:ter 2505:Car 2502:Jim 2342:bli 2135:hen 1852:Car 1794:BDD 1430:spi 1400:AfD 1319:16. 1223:15. 1205:d) 1152:14. 1130:13. 1096:12. 1037:TWL 978:TWL 919:TWL 833:11. 770:10. 649:and 488:DGG 457:DGG 125:to 57:at 5458:: 5427:) 5392:) 5388:• 5353:) 5299:) 5284:) 5269:) 5248:) 5234:) 5175:) 5160:) 5146:) 5135:) 5107:) 5093:) 5078:) 5064:) 5045:) 5028:) 5005:) 5001:• 4987:) 4983:• 4964:) 4933:-- 4926:) 4875:) 4836:) 4828:. 4808:. 4784:) 4750:) 4706:) 4682:) 4674:. 4662:) 4580:) 4553:) 4527:) 4502:, 4447:) 4430:) 4390:• 4365:mc 4360:nu 4318:) 4301:) 4232:) 4192:) 4175:) 4158:) 4141:) 4118:at 4116:Pr 4088:Go 4019:) 3925:) 3917:-- 3907:) 3881:) 3873:-- 3861:) 3826:) 3749:, 3729:) 3687:) 3663:— 3651:) 3613:- 3559:) 3542:) 3528:) 3491:) 3439:) 3421:) 3404:) 3387:) 3370:) 3353:) 3303:) 3287:) 3253:) 3222:) 3160:Rs 3136:) 3112:) 3075:) 3019:) 2984:) 2933:) 2896:, 2885:: 2870:) 2841:) 2824:) 2802:| 2766:/ 2714:) 2691:) 2657:) 2642:) 2628:) 2610:) 2562:) 2545:) 2528:) 2472:) 2441:) 2424:) 2420:• 2416:• 2381:) 2364:) 2345:nd 2339:ar 2336:St 2333:- 2320:) 2288:) 2271:) 2257:) 2214:NQ 2211:- 2202:) 2154:) 2125:) 2097:St 2086:) 2061:St 2048:) 2021:) 2003:) 1981:| 1977:. 1943:-- 1931:) 1899:. 1877:! 1859:GT 1834:) 1817:) 1800:) 1759:) 1742:) 1660:) 1418:lu 1325:A: 1261:my 1255:, 1230:A: 1194:A: 1136:A: 1106:A: 1075:A: 1017:) 958:) 899:) 843:A: 809:A: 790:}} 784:{{ 780:}} 774:{{ 736:, 732:, 703:, 699:, 689:A: 682:9. 655:A: 644:8. 620:A: 614:7. 578:A: 568:6. 542:A: 532:5. 502:A: 495:) 468:A: 414:A: 408:3. 353:A: 347:2. 319:, 305:A: 299:1. 141:. 109:, 36:. 5423:( 5390:c 5386:t 5384:( 5349:( 5332:☸ 5295:( 5280:( 5265:( 5244:( 5230:( 5194:) 5190:( 5171:( 5156:( 5131:( 5117:| 5103:( 5089:( 5074:( 5060:( 5041:( 5024:( 5003:c 4999:t 4997:( 4985:c 4981:t 4979:( 4960:( 4922:( 4871:( 4832:( 4780:( 4746:( 4702:( 4678:( 4658:( 4622:. 4576:( 4549:( 4523:( 4443:( 4426:( 4394:) 4386:( 4371:) 4367:/ 4363:( 4356:s 4352:V 4314:( 4297:( 4228:( 4188:( 4171:( 4154:( 4137:( 4100:! 4015:( 3921:( 3901:( 3877:( 3857:( 3822:( 3777:h 3759:A 3755:N 3725:· 3721:( 3683:( 3647:( 3631:) 3623:( 3555:( 3538:( 3524:( 3506:- 3487:( 3450:- 3435:( 3417:( 3400:( 3383:( 3366:( 3349:( 3299:( 3283:( 3249:( 3218:( 3197:§ 3148:œ 3108:( 3071:( 3015:( 3002:☃ 2993:— 2980:( 2929:( 2866:( 2837:( 2820:( 2770:) 2762:( 2734:D 2710:( 2687:( 2674:D 2653:( 2638:( 2624:( 2608:l 2605:· 2602:c 2599:· 2596:t 2594:( 2558:( 2541:( 2524:( 2468:( 2437:( 2412:( 2377:( 2360:( 2316:( 2284:( 2267:( 2253:( 2198:( 2150:( 2121:( 2099:★ 2082:( 2063:★ 2044:( 2017:( 1999:( 1988:. 1952:) 1948:( 1927:( 1917:( 1889:( 1830:( 1813:( 1796:( 1755:( 1738:( 1656:( 1490:e 1483:t 1476:v 1442:. 1432:) 1427:· 1421:· 1415:· 1409:· 1403:· 1397:· 1390:· 1383:· 1377:· 1372:( 1298:. 1257:B 1253:A 1241:· 1236:( 1033:· 1027:· 1019:· 1012:· 1006:· 1000:· 994:· 989:( 974:· 968:· 960:· 953:· 947:· 941:· 935:· 930:( 915:· 909:· 901:· 894:· 888:· 882:· 876:· 871:( 715:( 668:. 491:( 462:4 432:. 276:☸ 262:☸ 77:· 72:( 40:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Requests for adminship/Titodutta - Knowledge

Index