266:
edits: 90.23% Minor edits: 98.3% Average edits per day: 107.21 (for last 1000 edit(s)) Article edit summary use (last 475 edits): Major article edits: 100% Minor article edits: 100% Analysis of edits (out of all 5000 edits shown on this page and last 1 image uploads): Notable article edits (creation/expansion/major rewrites/sourcing): 0.02% (1) Significant article edits (copyedits/small rewrites/content/reference additions): 0.4% (20) Superficial article edits (grammar/spelling/wikify/links/tagging): 57.42% (2871) Unique image uploads (non-deleted/reverts/updates): 1 (checks last 5000) Superficial article edits marked as minor: 37.58% Special edit type statistics: All edits to deletion pages: 2.42% (121 edit(s)) Marked XfD/DRV votes: 0.06% (3 edit(s)) Article deletion tagging: 0.06% (3 edit(s)) Edits to "copyright problems" pages: 0.06% (3 edit(s)) Page (un)protections: 0% (0 edit(s)) Edits to RfAs: 0.1% (5 edit(s)) Marked RfA votes: 0.04% (2 support vote(s)) || (0 oppose vote(s)) Page moves: 0.96% (48 edit(s)) (24 moves(s)) Page redirections: 0.36% (18 edit(s)) User talk warnings: 0.24% (12 edit(s)) Breakdown of all edits: Unique pages edited: 3389 | Average edits per page: 1.48 | Edits on top: 40.78% Edits marked as major (non-minor/reverts): 47.22% (2361 edit(s)) Edits marked as minor (non-reverts): 30.96% (1548 edit(s)) Marked reverts (reversions/text removal): 9.54% (477 edit(s)) Unmarked edits with no summary: 11.8% (590 edit(s)) Edits by
Knowledge namespace: Article: 64.28% (3214) | Article talk: 3.7% (185) User: 2.02% (101) | User talk: 3.92% (196) Knowledge: 4.36% (218) | Knowledge talk: 3.06% (153) Image: 0.02% (1) Template: 2.08% (104) Category: 16.42% (821) Portal: 0% (0) Help: 0% (0) MediaWiki: 0% (0) Other talk pages: 0.14% (7)
79:) – TomTheHand has been working quietly in the background for some time (his first edit was on the 8th of January 2005), and has done a lot of work on vehicle related articles, most recently warships. He has made over 8000 edits and has demonstrated an ability to work with others. I think it is time we give this trustworthy editor the mop.
192:
at the end of May, and since then I've been working hard on a general cleanup and categorization of all naval articles. It's been a big project, and I've got a long way to go, but I think some great progress has been made. I've touched hundreds of ship articles and gone a long way toward populating
226:
and its archives: I come up with a proposal, argue in its favor for a few days, and then head back to work, implementing the compromise. I hope that I can continue to do this in the future, and be more aware of myself in the process; I tend to get wrapped up in the debate in the first few hours and
221:
I certainly have had some wiki-stress in the past, but I believe for the most part it's been handled reasonably. I tend to debate hard for a couple of days to try to get my ideas out, which is a little stressful for me, and then I try to go where consensus takes me, which is a big relief. Some of
1207:
Would you care to elaborate on the criticisms you've provided on the talk page? 400 Knowledge space edits certainly demonstrates an adequate involvement in the community; moreover, it seems bizarre to me that you'd oppose someone because they don't post at the
Village Pump (say what?). Finally, is
265:
Viewing contribution data for user TomTheHand (over the 5000 edit(s) shown on this page) (FAQ) Time range: 66 approximate day(s) of edits on this page Most recent edit on: 1hr (UTC) -- 18, Aug, 2006 || Oldest edit on: 20hr (UTC) -- 12, June, 2006 Overall edit summary use (last 1000 edits): Major
230:
I've also had less productive conflicts. Most recently I've had run-ins with sock puppets of two banned users. In those cases, I feel that I stuck to my guns, followed
Knowledge policy, and in the case of
1208:
this user's choice of a "vanilla" warning template over a "-n" one really a big enough deal to oppose adminship over, given that the "-n" variation isn't required by any policy or guideline?
235:'s socks, went through the procedure to have the banned user's new accounts blocked. I'm not really proud of that, but I suppose that's sometimes the only way you can deal with such issues.
1005:
I can see no reason to not give this nominee the mop. Masssiveego's "criteria" looks like a bunch of conversations about nothingness to me. Maybe time for a little ego deflation.--
215:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
630:: has found positive niche here on ships, and looking through edits does not shy away from controversial subjects. Flexible approach to maintenance task areas also good.
560:
1250:
160:, though things there are often less than clear cut and so I understand why backlogs develop. With some recent sockpuppet issues I've had, I've become interested in
115:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
156:
when there's a backlog, but I feel like on most days things there are under control. I'm also interested in copyright issues and I'd like to lend a hand at
164:, and I'd like to help out there if I can. It's like detective work, which is a lot of fun. Of course I'll also keep an eye out for vandalism and watch
1268:
945:
It looks like TomTheHand is a solid candidate. Good communication & enough edits. Wiki needs more good admins. Also, this candidate failed to meet
1064:
per all of above. Highly qualified, no issues. There is a nice string of strongly supportable candidates on RfA today, which is a pleasure to see.
131:
1216:
1025:
525:
1138:
681:
223:
76:
33:
17:
962:
194:
607:
Doesn't have a large user Talk edit count. This will have to rise as admins talk to many users on a variety of subjects.
1103:
751:
good editor :). Maybe should add some more info on ships of the
Napoleonic era (my own personal interest). Cheers. --
503:
275:
123:
657:
182:
Of your articles or contributions to
Knowledge, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
609:
127:
631:
523:
198:
1195:
1128:
1049:
248:
1135:
873:
861:
813:
452:
202:
1249:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
1224:
1202:
1179:
1165:
1153:
1141:
1119:
1107:
1090:
1068:
1056:
1033:
1009:
997:
983:
968:
937:
920:
908:
896:
876:
864:
852:
836:
816:
803:
791:
779:
767:
755:
737:
721:
698:
686:
652:
634:
622:
599:
573:
545:
527:
516:
507:
484:
463:
455:
443:
260:
105:
89:
1132:
1043:
892:
800:
714:
677:
499:
70:
1086:
956:
665:
588:
752:
1177:
917:
833:
788:
597:
578:
553:
59:
1081:
826:
647:
441:
87:
1199:
1065:
946:
857:
746:
477:
232:
205:. It's my hope that this will be a big help to people with an interest in military history.
1150:
929:
885:
735:
707:
695:
673:
494:
271:
189:
102:
66:
1209:
1162:
1078:
1018:
980:
950:
460:
1262:
1174:
993:
830:
764:
593:
570:
169:
165:
161:
149:
141:
1098:
appears to be an experienced and qualified user who will use the adminship well.--
642:
434:
157:
145:
80:
282:
1076:
wow, that's three awesome uers lined up at the top of the RfA page. Very nice! —
1116:
1099:
776:
472:
122:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
1243:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1006:
905:
849:
730:
977:
536:
152:. I think they must be less glamorous. I'll happily help out with AFD and
227:
lose sight of how by tomorrow morning, we'll have a compromise worked out.
1253:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
153:
96:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
822:
1173:
with my respect for the nominator and the nominee. --
281:Edit count as of 22:11, 16 August 2006 (UTC) using
763:- lend him a(nother) hand, give him the tools!
706:Assert to Knowledge, and just nice Wikipedian.
148:, because they seem to get less wiki love than
8:
848:- Impressive, definately an asset to Wiki.--
287:
586:This user is an asset to Knowledge. --
1161:no reason to oppose this candidate.
872:- looks trustworthy and experienced.
7:
1017:, no reason not to support at all.
884:, deserves the mop and bucket. --
24:
1269:Successful requests for adminship
775:- Agent 86 said it just fine --
224:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Ships
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
195:Category:Naval ships by country
799:per good answers and above. --
1:
535:civility did impress me :) -
172:to see if I need to step in.
140:I would like to help out on
132:administrators' reading list
1225:08:29, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
1203:06:58, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
1180:09:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
1166:23:38, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1154:04:34, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1142:05:52, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
1120:03:01, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
1108:02:14, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
1091:21:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
1069:20:16, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
1057:14:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
1034:08:24, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
1010:04:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
998:03:14, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
984:19:08, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
969:18:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
938:14:20, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
921:12:11, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
909:09:58, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
897:09:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
877:08:57, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
865:07:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
853:05:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
837:04:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
817:03:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
804:03:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
792:01:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
780:00:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
768:00:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
756:23:49, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
738:23:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
722:22:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
699:22:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
687:22:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
653:21:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
635:21:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
623:21:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
600:20:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
574:20:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
561:20:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
546:19:38, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
528:19:14, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
508:19:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
485:19:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
464:18:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
456:18:36, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
444:18:30, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
274:'s edit summary usage with
261:01:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
111:Questions for the candidate
106:18:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
90:17:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1285:
126:, and read the page about
124:Category:Knowledge backlog
1127:per above, and passes my
471:, per nom. Looking good.
283:Interiot's temporary tool
1246:Please do not modify it.
949:'s criteria. Very Good.
787:- satisfies my criteria
39:Please do not modify it
904:. A good contributor.
825:as an impersonator of
318:09:08, 8 January 2005
299:Distinct pages edited
101:I accept. Thank you.
727:"No big deal" support
692:Edit conflict Support
203:Category:Ship classes
199:Category:Ships by era
34:request for adminship
823:Indefinitely blocked
222:that can be seen on
660:wishes you a happy
750:
632:Stephen B Streater
515:looks good to me.
967:
827:User:Ohnoitsjamie
745:
685:
580:
506:
418:
417:
1276:
1248:
1222:
1084:
1055:
1052:
1046:
1031:
996:
965:
959:
955:
953:
935:
932:
890:
874:Metamagician3000
719:
712:
671:
668:
650:
645:
621:
619:
614:
596:
591:
577:
558:
542:
521:
498:
481:
475:
453:SynergeticMaggot
439:
433:, as nominator.
288:
257:
254:
251:
246:Last 5000 edits.
233:User:Copperchair
85:
41:
1284:
1283:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1251:this nomination
1244:
1221:
1213:
1106:
1082:
1050:
1044:
1042:
1030:
1022:
992:
963:
957:
951:
933:
930:
886:
801:Musaabdulrashid
715:
708:
694:. Très solide.
666:
648:
643:
615:
612:(aeropagitica)
610:
608:
589:
587:
554:
538:
517:
479:
473:
435:
411:Knowledge talk
307:Avg edits/page
267:
255:
252:
249:
81:
52:
37:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1282:
1280:
1272:
1271:
1261:
1260:
1256:
1255:
1239:
1238:
1235:
1234:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1215:
1188:
1187:
1183:
1182:
1168:
1156:
1144:
1122:
1110:
1102:
1093:
1071:
1059:
1036:
1024:
1012:
1000:
986:
971:
940:
923:
911:
899:
879:
867:
855:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
794:
782:
770:
758:
740:
724:
701:
689:
655:
637:
625:
602:
581:
563:
548:
530:
519:Baseball,Baby!
510:
487:
466:
458:
446:
427:
426:
422:
421:
416:
415:
412:
408:
407:
404:
400:
399:
396:
395:Category talk
392:
391:
388:
384:
383:
380:
379:Template talk
376:
375:
372:
368:
367:
364:
360:
359:
356:
352:
351:
348:
344:
343:
340:
336:
335:
332:
328:
327:
324:
320:
319:
316:
312:
311:
308:
304:
303:
300:
296:
295:
292:
286:
285:
279:
276:mathbot's tool
264:
244:
243:
239:
238:
237:
236:
228:
209:
208:
207:
206:
176:
175:
174:
173:
128:administrators
113:
112:
99:
98:
55:Final (43/1/0)
51:
46:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1281:
1270:
1267:
1266:
1264:
1254:
1252:
1247:
1241:
1240:
1237:
1236:
1232:
1231:
1226:
1220:
1219:
1211:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1190:
1189:
1185:
1184:
1181:
1178:
1176:
1172:
1169:
1167:
1164:
1160:
1157:
1155:
1152:
1148:
1145:
1143:
1140:
1137:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1123:
1121:
1118:
1114:
1111:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1094:
1092:
1089:
1088:
1085:
1080:
1075:
1072:
1070:
1067:
1063:
1060:
1058:
1053:
1047:
1040:
1037:
1035:
1029:
1028:
1020:
1016:
1013:
1011:
1008:
1004:
1001:
999:
995:
990:
987:
985:
982:
979:
976:per above. --
975:
972:
970:
966:
960:
954:
948:
944:
941:
939:
936:
927:
924:
922:
919:
918:Mailer Diablo
915:
912:
910:
907:
903:
900:
898:
895:
894:
891:
889:
883:
880:
878:
875:
871:
868:
866:
863:
859:
856:
854:
851:
847:
844:
838:
835:
832:
828:
824:
821:
820:
819:
818:
815:
814:Ohnoitsjarnie
811:
807:
806:
805:
802:
798:
795:
793:
790:
786:
783:
781:
778:
774:
771:
769:
766:
762:
759:
757:
754:
748:
744:
741:
739:
736:
734:
733:
728:
725:
723:
720:
718:
713:
711:
710:Daniel's page
705:
702:
700:
697:
693:
690:
688:
683:
679:
675:
670:
663:
659:
656:
654:
651:
646:
641:
638:
636:
633:
629:
626:
624:
620:
618:
613:
606:
603:
601:
598:
595:
592:
585:
582:
579:
576:
575:
572:
567:
564:
562:
559:
557:
552:
549:
547:
544:
541:
534:
531:
529:
526:
524:
522:
520:
514:
511:
509:
505:
501:
497:
496:
491:
488:
486:
483:
482:
476:
470:
467:
465:
462:
459:
457:
454:
450:
447:
445:
442:
440:
438:
432:
429:
428:
424:
423:
420:
419:
413:
410:
409:
405:
402:
401:
397:
394:
393:
389:
386:
385:
381:
378:
377:
373:
370:
369:
365:
362:
361:
357:
354:
353:
349:
346:
345:
341:
338:
337:
333:
330:
329:
325:
322:
321:
317:
314:
313:
309:
306:
305:
301:
298:
297:
293:
290:
289:
284:
280:
277:
273:
269:
268:
263:
262:
259:
258:
241:
240:
234:
229:
225:
220:
217:
216:
214:
211:
210:
204:
200:
196:
191:
187:
184:
183:
181:
178:
177:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
136:
135:
133:
129:
125:
121:
118:
117:
116:
110:
109:
108:
107:
104:
97:
94:
93:
92:
91:
88:
86:
84:
78:
75:
72:
68:
64:
63:
61:
58:Ended 17:47,
56:
50:
47:
43:
40:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
1245:
1242:
1217:
1191:
1170:
1158:
1146:
1124:
1112:
1095:
1077:
1073:
1061:
1038:
1026:
1014:
1002:
988:
981:(talk to me)
973:
942:
925:
913:
901:
893:
887:
881:
869:
845:
809:
808:
796:
784:
772:
760:
742:
731:
726:
716:
709:
703:
691:
661:
639:
627:
616:
611:
604:
583:
569:
565:
556:Rama's arrow
555:
550:
539:
532:
518:
512:
495:CrazyRussian
493:
489:
478:
468:
448:
436:
430:
247:
245:
218:
212:
193:and sorting
185:
179:
137:
119:
114:
100:
95:
82:
73:
65:
57:
54:
53:
48:
38:
30:
28:
1200:Masssiveego
1192:Weak Oppose
1115:per above.
1066:Newyorkbrad
1041:per nom. --
947:Masssiveego
858:Merovingian
747:Copperchair
492:per nom. -
363:image talk
315:First edit
1151:Stubbleboy
1149:per nom.
1045:Aguerriero
749:Sockpuppet
696:Themindset
403:Knowledge
347:User talk
272:TomTheHand
103:TomTheHand
67:TomTheHand
60:2006-08-23
49:TomTheHand
31:successful
1218:fix me up
1210:RandyWang
1194:Fails my
1163:Dionyseus
1027:fix me up
1019:RandyWang
952:JungleCat
789:abakharev
387:Category
371:Template
188:I joined
1263:Category
1196:criteria
1129:criteria
994:Khoikhoi
926:Support.
765:Agent 86
682:contribs
678:messages
664:. --Slgr
513:Support'
242:Comments
190:WP:SHIPS
130:and the
77:contribs
1233:Neutral
1171:Support
1159:Support
1147:Support
1125:Support
1117:Michael
1113:Support
1096:Support
1079:Deckill
1074:Support
1062:Support
1039:Support
1015:Support
1003:Support
989:Support
974:Support
964:contrib
943:Support
914:Support
902:Support
888:Grafikm
882:Support
870:Support
846:Support
810:Support
797:Support
785:Support
773:Support
761:Support
753:Tbeatty
743:Support
704:Support
662:Support
640:Support
628:Support
617:(talk)
605:Support
594:iva1979
584:Support
566:Support
551:Support
533:Support
490:Support
469:Support
449:Support
437:Prodego
431:Support
425:Support
323:(main)
83:Prodego
1186:Oppose
1100:danntm
931:Kungfu
831:Kchase
777:Tawker
571:Szvest
461:Martin
355:image
310:1.801
291:Total
201:, and
170:WP:AIV
166:WP:ANI
162:WP:SSP
150:WP:AFD
142:WP:CFD
1198:. --
1007:MONGO
906:Zaxem
732:Zsinj
669:ndson
658:Taram
504:email
390:1055
339:User
331:Talk
326:5614
302:4736
294:8530
250:Voice
158:WP:CP
154:C:CSD
146:WP:RM
62:(UTC)
16:<
1136:heru
1133:Aran
1051:talk
978:CFIF
958:talk
934:Adam
916:. -
862:Talk
674:page
644:Yank
500:talk
414:204
406:401
374:104
350:348
342:145
334:645
270:See
253:-of-
168:and
144:and
71:talk
1175:Alf
1139:nar
991:. —
850:EVH
829:.--
649:sox
568:--
480:top
474:Big
256:All
1265::
1223:)
1131:.
1032:)
928:--
860:-
812:.
729:--
680:-
676:-
537:Gl
451:.
398:4
382:6
366:3
358:1
219:A:
213:3.
197:,
186:A:
180:2.
138:A:
134:.
120:1.
36:.
1214:/
1212:(
1104:C
1087:r
1083:e
1054:)
1048:(
1023:/
1021:(
961:/
834:T
717:☎
684:)
672:(
667:@
590:S
543:n
540:e
502:/
278:.
74:·
69:(
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.