240:. This was also the article that prompted me to sign up to Knowledge (XXG) and start editing. I am (as mentioned by Quarl) a third year molecular and cell biology student, so noticing that non-viral methods was severely lacking from that article prompted me to leave a note on the talk page asking someone to expand that section. When noone did, I did it myself. It took several hours of research, looking through review papers on pubmed and my own lecture notes to write but I think it has been a worthwhile contribution and I hope those who read it find it useful and interesting. My involvement in writing the encyclopedia will probobly continue to revolve around my studies - as I learn fascinating things, I come and look at the relevant wikipedia articles (if they exist) and if I notice that they lacking in some department, I will research and add to them as needed.As mentioned in the nomination I have recently concluded my 3rd year of studies and I will hopefully be heading into honours next year. As my expertise grows in my field (I will be working in the same subject area as I hope to do my honours in over the summer break) I will feel more confident in adding to the relevent wikipedia articles. Just as I have used wikipedia as an entry point for my research for papers etc, I hope to expand and improve the quality so other may do the same. That said, the research and translation of material from scientific jargon into quality articles takes a lot of time and brain power and the latter is not something I have a whole heap spare of these days so for the most part my involvement in the encyclopedia is with minor edits and vandalfighting. But I will continue to slowly add as I see fit.
1616:
patroller, pre-existing warnings do have a bearing on how I give further warnings - Indeed, I believe
Vandalproof, the program that I use during RC patrol relies on pre-existing warnings to give you a summary of the warnings already given to allow you to choose an appropriate one. I have never said that I would take it to the point of edit waring with someone over warnings on their talk page, but had that been a choice that would have been stated. My point with that poll was that a vandalism warning is of benefit to the community, thus I would prefer if they stayed on the talk page/were moved to an archive but NOT simply deleted. I never condone edit waring with someone and I always feel that if a revert war is pointless. That is why I always restrict myself to a 2RR rule at a maximum unless it is a case of clear vandalism. I have already stated that my personal views about how policy should be conducted (as in this case) will never be allowed to affect my actions as an admin, and if I feel they are or coould be I will always ask for further advice.
338:
which means that unless the subject changes their name, a move will not be required. It is therefore allowable to move protect it while it is on the front page. Anyone who wished to legitimately move it could take up the issue on the talk page. (something which would not in the slightest practical with regards to small changes that anonymous ips/users could contribute if the article had been edit protected.) I also believe that the move protection was removed appropriately after the article was no longer on the front page.
284:
discussions in AfD nominations and at times some frustration on my part. I always try and remain calm however and argue the point in a rational manner. If I do have the fortune to be granted with a few extra buttons, I will never close an AfD discussion in which I have been involved that does not have a clear consensus. A point that paticuarly applies to the articles about schools - in which I obviously have a vested interest. I believe conflict of interest when making decisions such as that can only be harmfull.
378:
minutes will always do more harm than good. The front page article always has a lot of people with it on their watchlist so vandalism should never take too long to be reverted - ussually within seconds. I feel that most people understand that an "anyone can edit" policy also means that "anyone can screw about with it" and are therefore for the most part mindfull of this and may even be encouraged to participate by removing the vanalism themselves, rather than waiting for someone else to do so.
1696:
guideline to follow on removing warnings from talk pages as it is common practice to archive conversation from your talk. I feel giving him adminship under his mindset is currently unneeded to what were trying to present to people. Telling people they could be blocked for that or revert warring over it is more disruption than it is helpful. Willingness to block someone for removing warnings is
1701:
someone for the all the wrong reasons. In fact, I've been encouraging editors who report this as "vandalism" and want admin intervention to go about other ways with users who persistantly remove warning from thier talk page, other than blocking. I would like him to take that in consideration when dealing with editors (not saying that he doesn't though).
676:
I said I was winnable and you've just about won me over, though answer to question 5 unsettles me somewhat; however my question was answered well and that and talk page respone have allayed my main concerns that
Viridae would show a lack of an overview of Knowledge (XXG). Will make, I suspect, a good
425:
It was actually in reponse to university work taking over - being a third year student, I found that I could no longer accomodate the levels I had been participating in wikipedia and had to limit myself. Althought I was not necessarily editng as much, I still found time to do what I what I did when I
305:
The aim of this question is to gauge something about your attitude towards
Knowledge (XXG). It may seem a bit specific and it is just for myself so if you don't feel like going through the whole effor of answering it, then don't; I won't hold it against you. Furthermore note that I have been invovled
273:
with another editor with him implying I was a vandal and my pointing out to him that the inclusion of hoax material in an article was vandalism, not its removal. This dispute finished when I decided that I did not want to be involved in a dispute over something so trivial, especially when the AfD was
92:
To summarize my previous nomination: Viridae, an undergraduate student, is a dedicated RC patroller, communicates intelligently and civilly, is helpful, reacts well in the face of conflict, and has participated in many administrative areas. Viridae is unlikely to abuse admin tools and would use them
1700:
policy is anything, as they are meant to be preventive, not treated as a punishment, and theres nothing preventive about blocking for archiving/removing talk page comments. I'm not saying that he would, but taken into consideration what he said on the poll, it sure seems like he could possibly block
1461:
To be honest I didnt even think to check where the image came from - and I am fully aware of fair use and what it entails - indeed I have asked other users to remove fair use images from their userpages before. Rest assured I did not create that userbox, and will now remove the image from it. I hope
256:
I have been in some minor editing disputes at times, some of which have temporarily raised my blood pressure but nothing serious. I find the best way to deal with disputes is to approach them calmly and thoughfully. Calling names, and getting very angry is useless. The first violates
Knowledge (XXG)
1592:
to reflect this particular thing. I count 25 other people to agree with this user, including 5 admins. If we're not going to let someone become an admin because of how they feel on a personal matter, I'm afraid our standards are so stringent that almost no one will become an admin. I'm afraid it's
1695:
Hi Pat. As
Radiant! has stated, its not about his position in the poll, but about what his immediate opinion on the situation about it was and when he would use the block button. I feel that blocking for the reason of removing warnings from your talk page is wrong. There is currently no policy or
377:
but I was not aware of the discussions surrounding it. The front page is the face of wikipedia (sorry Jimbo) and since
Knowledge (XXG) proclaims itself to be an encyclopedia anyone can edit, I believe protecting or semi protecting the front page article in reponse to vandalism for more than a few
1602:
How this user voted in whatever poll is irrelevant. What is important, is that this user believes it is appropriate to revert war to keep warnings on a talk page, and to block people for removing warnings from their talk page. I am concerned that this person will, if promoted, make inappropriate
337:
The page protection was not justified. It wass a front page article, which means it has high exposure and articles featured on the front page generally improve greatly because of their exposure. The move protection however, especially because of the WOW moves, was justified. The article is a bio
1615:
At the risk of being seen to be argumentative by arguing with the oppose votes on my RfA, I have to say this because I feel you have misinterpereted my position. Those were not my words that you quoted, but the words most appropriate in the poll at the time. I do feel that as a dedicated RC
283:
A more ongoing dispute is my involvement in the notability of schools, and thus their relevance to
Knowledge (XXG). I am a strong supporter in analyzing each article/school on its merits and not the blanket "all schools are notable" viewpoint taken by some editors. This has lead to frequent
1569:
I respect that, but may I point out that as in the case of schools (see the questions) I will never let my view on a matter such as that cross over into my actions as an admin. If I felt that something I was doing may not be in line with consensus or my judgement could be questioned due to
89:). Obviously I believed then that we should have promoted him, but some users felt 3 months was not enough experience. Viridae has been editing for over half a year now and has over 5,000 edits. He just finished the school year and will have plenty of time for helping Knowledge (XXG).
1593:
also compromising the integrity of the poll - "if you vote this and this way on the poll, and I disagree with you, then later I will vote against you if you come up for RfA). I hope I'm not too strongly worded here; it's possible I missed something. But that's how I see this one. -
334:. Without looking at policy or the debates around the page (i.e., using your current level of knoweldge), what do you feel about the period of semi-protection and latter period of move protection on the page? What (if any) actions would you have taken on the page that day?
265:. As you can see, I tried to remain calm and literate and present my argument as I saw it. The dispute was not resolved, but as you can see it was concluded when we agreed to disagree on the matter. I was also frustrated with the amount of ridiculous information in the
1743:
Suspended support awaiting further discussion and answer to questions, but I'd like to see evidence that the user has a full range of
Knowledge (XXG) experiences - his contributions show a large concentration in RC patrolling and votes for deletion.
1587:
Radiant, I haven't formed an opinion on this user yet, but is it really appropriate to vote against someone because of how they voted in a poll on how to make policy? The user didn't say, "I'm going to make it this way", he (or she?) said the policy
370:. To what extent were you aware of these (does not matter if you wern't) and how would these policies have affected your actions if you had been aware of them i) in the state that they were on 9 September and ii) in the state that they are now?
699:
Well you allayed my initial concerns, as I said. To me answer 5 raises a couple of questions about commitment and whether you'd actually enjoy being an admin; but that is just one possible interpretation, and not one I am accusing you of.
219:
too because that is frequently backlogged. Last but not least I would continue RC patrol and new pages patrol. This is all just a starting point , I hope to utilise my new mop, if I get it, wherever it may be needed within the
184:
but at the same time, not limiting myself to closing disscussions - also continuing to be involved. I will not close any discussion in which I had been involved unless the concensus is clear. I would also reguarly check on
1673:
Hey Moe. Could you please go into a bit more detail? I'm not sure what about voting in an honest poll is not grounds for becoming an administrator, especially like, as I said, 5 administrators voted this way themselves.
214:
on my watchlist now. I find the administrator noticeboards very useful for dealing with complex situations needing administrator, and I wish to help others as others there have helped me. I can see myself involved in
1557:("Deleting valid vandalism warnings is wrong, they should be restored and an additional warning given, and if repeated this should lead to blocking or talk page protection, even in the absence of other disputes"). (
197:
and n my watchlist, nothing is to be gained from a backlog building up there, something I have seen with increasing regularity recently. I would also have the various
Administrator noticeboards (such as
415:
and I see a sharp drop off in the past 3 months. Obviously things come up in one's life outside of
Knowledge (XXG), but I was wondering what your perspective is on the timing between that and your RFA.
1475:'s ok, I'm not encouraging others to oppose you because of it. To all others: I hope the lapse in judgment is covered with my oppose and everybody else evaluates you on your other contributions. ~
125:
The answers to the base questions in this this RfA will be very similar to/if not the same as those from my previous RfA. They will still echo my current feelings, or will be modified to suit.
1462:
you can overlook this as a simple mistake. I may be able to hunt down a demonstration of where I asked someone to remove fair use images from their userpage if it would satisfy you.
269:
article and ended up removing large chunks of hoax material, in the process leaving an edit summary of "removing crap" (which I immediately regretted). My deletions led to a minor
250:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
1809:. The unmotivated promotion of several problem admins last week makes me pause. Better be cautious, especially as Radiant's concerns are valid (as usual with this wikipedian). --
1187:
1853:
1767:
1291:
Changed from neutral after further review of the issue Radiant raised, plus the nominees execellent responses here and demonstration of the demeanor needed in an admin. —
620:
457:
143:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge (XXG) in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
595:
is eye-brow raising, but the user has accepted his fault there, and I believe this reason is not enough to blemish the wonderful contributions this user has made. —
788:
266:
257:
policy and achieves nothing and the second shortens your life span and also achieves nothing. I suppose the best example of how I handle a dispute would be
86:
1871:
596:
163:
904:
1106:
367:
306:
in some of the debates on relative policy pages for such issues - do not feel that you have to support my POV! Hope its not too confusing! ;) --
1488:. I have removed the userbox from my userpage and contacted those others that are using the image in that userbox, asking them to remove it.
1138:
1554:
33:
17:
412:
1102:
498:
per strong participation in admin-like duties already, XfD, anti-vandal and RC patrols, and strong skills in handling conflict. --
1178:
772:
155:
82:
426:
first came here - read the articles for hours on end. That is why I am doing a science course - my insatiable curiosity.
151:
1396:
1372:
972:
721:
887:. People are overreacting. He said that his view on talk page warnings would not interfere with his acts as an admin.
230:
Of your articles or contributions to Knowledge (XXG), are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
159:
453:
573:
512:
1126:
1393:
1385:
1319:
Excellent answers given above and the way the nominee addressed concerns brought up earlier, looks good. ▪◦▪
1239:
969:
894:
844:
559:
1574:
or get someone else to act for me (ie another admin). This policy of mine will cover all my admin actions.
1206:
647:
582:
536:
1089:
1045:
1022:
899:
1826:
per Radiant's concerns above, but leaning support anyway because of demeanor and answers to questions. —
1815:
1706:
1663:
1307:
1097:
236:
My largest and most time consuming edit was definately the addition of the Non-viral methods section to
1852:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
1449:
1836:
1817:
1799:
1778:
1759:
1748:
1731:
1711:
1690:
1678:
1668:
1636:
1624:
1610:
1597:
1582:
1564:
1543:
1519:
1496:
1479:
1470:
1456:
1427:
1401:
1376:
1359:
1350:
1338:
1329:
1311:
1295:
1283:
1256:
1244:
1223:
1211:
1194:
1154:
1142:
1111:
1094:
1086:
1077:
1053:
1033:
1012:
1000:
987:
975:
960:
946:
934:
922:
910:
879:
852:
835:
815:
804:
779:
742:
725:
704:
694:
681:
668:
655:
607:
586:
561:
543:
520:
434:
420:
386:
346:
310:
133:
119:
1476:
1453:
1168:
997:
764:
750:- as per ST47 and others - it's crazy that someones opinion should count against them come RfA time.
530:
1132:
1071:
1252:
Although Radiant brought up some good issues, I still believe that Viridae will make a good admin.
1684:
1630:
1604:
1558:
1277:
1236:
1031:
952:
890:
613:
552:
374:
363:
1796:
1790:
1774:
1728:
1620:
1578:
1570:
involvement such as that I would always try and guage the feelings of the greater majority at
1492:
1466:
1253:
1201:
1009:
690:
632:
578:
570:
430:
382:
342:
129:
115:
76:
1810:
1533:
1368:
1303:
832:
505:
417:
401:
1388:
612:
A one-off mistake hardly erases the value of his contributions and aptitude for adminship.
211:
203:
194:
181:
177:
173:
1683:
As above. It's not about the poll, it's about when this user would use the block button. (
1410:
1347:
1163:
1050:
1042:
943:
756:
716:
One image problem is not fatal to the RfA, just be careful about the Fair Use policies.--
1571:
216:
207:
199:
1235:
blemishes, but fewer than I did when I was promoted. I think he'll make a fine admin. –
1150:
as Viridae has shown great qualities and a will to learn and adapt following feedback --
1833:
1827:
1756:
1745:
1675:
1594:
1335:
1292:
1220:
1121:
1063:
802:
738:
701:
678:
500:
307:
295:
1865:
1272:
1151:
1027:
919:
827:
were positive, and there is an excellent contribution history to show that we have a
665:
323:
1771:
1617:
1575:
1489:
1463:
1320:
860:
824:
812:
687:
449:
427:
379:
339:
237:
126:
112:
72:
1526:
1364:
1356:
984:
717:
362:
Now consider the relative policies and recent discussion about such issues (See
258:
62:
1766:
Rather than clutter this page further, I have answered your second part on the
1061:
Learning from his/her mistakes. That's what I like to see in admin candidates.
1846:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1516:
1485:
931:
485:
262:
97:
795:
734:
1266:
1448:
a userbox with a copyrighted image to your user page ten days ago. See
206:
for instance) on my watchlist in a similar way to how I currently have
186:
1524:!Vote stricken; !vote made in bad faith with the intent to vandalize.
1346:
Good answers to the questions asked, great user to give the tools to.
1856:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
733:- someone's opinions on an issue shouldn't count against them at RfA
1384:
Ding Dong. Special Delivery From FedEx: A New Mop! hehe, good work.
150:
What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out
1755:
Following answers to questions etc, have gone with full support --
1629:
I think that's a reasonable answer, and withdraw my opposition. (
1603:
blocks. And therefore I believe he is not a suitable candidate. (
831:
editor here. No qualms about giving this one some extra tools :)
1182:
65:
109:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
1008:- live and learn, per Rama's arrow, Nearly Headless Nick.
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1445:
1119:
A good Wikipedian who will help the community well. –-
602:
331:
327:
270:
773:
765:
757:
751:
1219:- seems to have all the qualities of a good admin. -
603:
1789:per Robdurbar (minus the Suspended Support part).
1511:, coona. Auroranorth 11:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
686:Can I clarify something to set your mind at rest?
1484:Thanks. I found the userbox on this userpage:
172:As an admin I would help close discussions in
87:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Viridae
85:) – I nominated Viridae a couple months ago (
8:
274:progressing rapidly to a deletion consensus.
368:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Semi-protection policy
193:deletions are exactly that. I would have
983:- seems like he would be a good admin --
664:. Nominee is well suited for the tools.
593:adding of copyrighted image to a userbox
918:seems like he would make a good admin.
629:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
1169:
823:- The few interactions I've had with
7:
628:I believe user is a good candidate.
261:dispute with the now blocked editor
1553:, per Viridae's strong opinion on
787:, strong work in AFD (notably the
24:
1872:Successful requests for adminship
1173:
942:per last RfA and answers above.
649:
633:
513:
501:
328:Protection logs from September 9
152:Category:Knowledge (XXG) backlog
1534:
1527:
1450:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use#Policy
1411:
1273:
1133:
156:Category:Administrative backlog
1707:
1664:
1397:
614:
506:
499:
456:. For the edit count, see the
1:
1837:19:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
1830:19:16, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1818:18:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1800:04:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1793:17:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1779:13:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1760:18:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1749:12:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1732:04:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1712:20:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1691:09:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1679:02:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1669:02:40, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1637:11:52, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
1625:17:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1611:09:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1598:22:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1583:12:10, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1565:12:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1544:05:44, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
1520:12:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1497:11:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1480:11:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1471:11:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1457:11:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
1428:02:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
1417:
1402:02:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
1389:
1377:23:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
1360:18:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
1351:15:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
1339:13:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
1330:07:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
1312:05:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
1296:19:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
1284:04:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
1278:
1257:04:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
1245:21:42, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
1224:21:08, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
1212:11:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
1195:10:52, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
1170:
1155:06:16, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
1143:06:04, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
1127:
1112:03:26, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
1078:02:13, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
1054:22:29, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
1034:18:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
1013:15:11, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
1001:07:29, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
988:01:58, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
976:16:19, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
961:10:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
947:09:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
935:09:13, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
923:09:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
911:08:06, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
880:06:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
853:02:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
836:02:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
816:02:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
805:01:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
780:22:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
743:21:37, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
726:20:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
705:19:21, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
695:21:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
682:18:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
669:18:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
656:17:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
621:16:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
608:16:22, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
597:
587:15:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
574:
562:14:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
553:
544:14:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
521:13:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
435:13:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
421:13:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
387:13:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
347:13:17, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
311:12:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
134:11:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
120:11:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
93:to benefit Knowledge (XXG).
1421:
1267:
1122:
332:its history from September 9
164:administrators' reading list
1555:removing talk page warnings
1444:Sorry to say, but you just
1199:Per Rama's Arrow and Nick.
1164:
452:'s edit summary usage with
139:Questions for the candidate
1888:
158:, and read the page about
648:
569:User's answers are good.
1849:Please do not modify it.
794:). Solid contributor.
39:Please do not modify it
1365:Matthew Brown (Morven)
591:I like this user. The
61:(48/2/1) Ended 13:30,
996:on further review. ~
34:request for adminship
1832:Change to support. —
1795:Changed to oppose.
1020:No problems here. --
598:Nearly Headless Nick
1282:
1141:
1131:
970:Christopher Parham
1776:
1622:
1580:
1538:
1494:
1468:
1265:
1192:
1185:
1180:
1162:Right on target.
1137:
1120:
850:
741:
692:
658:
641:
585:
518:
490:
489:2006-11-21 07:10Z
432:
411:I was looking at
398:Optional Question
384:
344:
322:Look at the page
292:Optional Question
131:
117:
102:
101:2006-11-21 07:10Z
1879:
1851:
1813:
1775:
1709:
1687:
1666:
1633:
1621:
1607:
1579:
1561:
1542:
1540:
1536:
1531:
1515:Please explain.
1493:
1467:
1425:
1419:
1415:
1399:
1391:
1327:
1326:
1280:
1275:
1269:
1231:– User has some
1210:
1188:
1183:
1179:
1176:
1175:
1172:
1166:
1134:
1129:
1124:
1092:
1074:
1069:
1066:
1048:
1030:
1025:
959:this message! -
907:
902:
897:
876:
874:
872:
870:
848:
800:
777:
769:
761:
755:
737:
691:
654:
652:
651:
644:
639:
631:
618:
606:
604:
599:
581:
576:
557:
542:
539:
533:
519:
517:
515:
510:
503:
492:
488:
481:, as nominator.
443:General comments
431:
383:
343:
130:
116:
104:
100:
41:
1887:
1886:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1854:this nomination
1847:
1811:
1685:
1631:
1605:
1559:
1525:
1477:trialsanderrors
1454:trialsanderrors
1322:
1321:
1200:
1191:
1110:
1090:
1072:
1067:
1064:
1046:
1023:
1021:
998:trialsanderrors
905:
900:
895:
868:
866:
864:
862:
796:
753:Kind Regards -
724:
601:
583:(Упражнение В!)
551:- Good user --
537:
531:
529:
482:
94:
55:
37:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1885:
1883:
1875:
1874:
1864:
1863:
1859:
1858:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1803:
1802:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1735:
1734:
1727:per Radiant!.
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1547:
1546:
1522:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1431:
1430:
1404:
1379:
1362:
1353:
1341:
1332:
1314:
1298:
1286:
1259:
1247:
1226:
1214:
1197:
1189:
1160:Sniper support
1157:
1145:
1114:
1100:
1080:
1056:
1036:
1015:
1003:
990:
978:
963:
949:
940:Strong Support
937:
925:
913:
882:
855:
843:looks good --
838:
818:
807:
782:
745:
728:
720:
711:
710:
709:
708:
707:
671:
659:
623:
610:
589:
564:
546:
523:
493:
465:
464:
463:
461:
454:mathbot's tool
445:
444:
440:
439:
438:
437:
405:
404:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
373:I am aware of
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
314:
313:
299:
298:
296:User:Robdurbar
288:
287:
286:
285:
278:
277:
276:
275:
244:
243:
242:
241:
224:
223:
222:
221:
160:administrators
141:
140:
123:
122:
54:
49:
47:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1884:
1873:
1870:
1869:
1867:
1857:
1855:
1850:
1844:
1843:
1838:
1835:
1831:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1816:
1814:
1808:
1805:
1804:
1801:
1798:
1794:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1780:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1758:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1747:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1733:
1730:
1726:
1723:
1722:
1713:
1710:
1704:
1699:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1688:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1677:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1667:
1661:
1658:Per Radiant!
1657:
1654:
1653:
1638:
1634:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1623:
1619:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1608:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1596:
1591:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1562:
1556:
1552:
1549:
1548:
1545:
1541:
1532:
1530:
1523:
1521:
1518:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1510:
1506:
1498:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1478:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1469:
1465:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1442:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1429:
1426:
1424:
1420:
1414:
1408:
1405:
1403:
1400:
1395:
1392:
1387:
1383:
1380:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1363:
1361:
1358:
1354:
1352:
1349:
1345:
1342:
1340:
1337:
1333:
1331:
1328:
1325:
1318:
1315:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1302:
1299:
1297:
1294:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1281:
1276:
1270:
1263:
1260:
1258:
1255:
1251:
1248:
1246:
1243:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1222:
1218:
1215:
1213:
1209:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1196:
1193:
1186:
1181:
1177:
1167:
1161:
1158:
1156:
1153:
1149:
1146:
1144:
1140:
1135:
1130:
1125:
1118:
1115:
1113:
1108:
1104:
1099:
1096:
1093:
1088:
1084:
1081:
1079:
1076:
1075:
1070:
1060:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1049:
1044:
1040:
1037:
1035:
1032:
1029:
1026:
1019:
1016:
1014:
1011:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
995:
991:
989:
986:
982:
979:
977:
974:
971:
968:, no issues.
967:
964:
962:
958:
954:
953:Mailer Diablo
950:
948:
945:
941:
938:
936:
933:
929:
926:
924:
921:
917:
914:
912:
909:
908:
903:
898:
893:
892:
886:
883:
881:
878:
877:
859:
856:
854:
851:
847:
842:
839:
837:
834:
830:
826:
822:
819:
817:
814:
811:
808:
806:
803:
801:
799:
793:
790:
786:
783:
781:
778:
776:
770:
768:
762:
760:
754:
749:
746:
744:
740:
736:
732:
729:
727:
723:
719:
715:
712:
706:
703:
698:
697:
696:
693:
689:
685:
684:
683:
680:
675:
672:
670:
667:
663:
660:
657:
653:
645:
643:
638:
637:
627:
624:
622:
619:
617:
611:
609:
605:
600:
594:
590:
588:
584:
580:
577:
572:
568:
565:
563:
560:
558:
556:
550:
547:
545:
540:
534:
527:
524:
522:
516:
511:
509:
504:
497:
494:
491:
487:
480:
477:
476:
475:
474:
470:
469:
462:
459:
455:
451:
447:
446:
442:
441:
436:
433:
429:
424:
423:
422:
419:
414:
410:
407:
406:
403:
399:
396:
395:
388:
385:
381:
376:
372:
371:
369:
365:
361:
358:
357:
356:
355:
348:
345:
341:
336:
335:
333:
329:
325:
324:Karen Dotrice
321:
318:
317:
316:
315:
312:
309:
304:
301:
300:
297:
293:
290:
289:
282:
281:
280:
279:
272:
268:
264:
260:
255:
252:
251:
249:
246:
245:
239:
235:
232:
231:
229:
226:
225:
218:
213:
209:
205:
201:
196:
192:
189:to make sure
188:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
167:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
146:
145:
144:
138:
137:
136:
135:
132:
128:
121:
118:
114:
110:
107:
106:
105:
103:
99:
90:
88:
84:
81:
78:
74:
70:
69:
67:
64:
59:
53:
50:
48:
43:
40:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
1848:
1845:
1823:
1822:
1806:
1786:
1785:
1737:
1736:
1724:
1702:
1697:
1659:
1655:
1589:
1550:
1528:
1508:
1507:
1440:
1439:
1433:
1432:
1422:
1416:
1412:
1406:
1386:Wikipediarul
1381:
1343:
1323:
1316:
1300:
1288:
1261:
1254:Sharkface217
1249:
1240:
1232:
1228:
1216:
1205:
1159:
1147:
1116:
1082:
1062:
1058:
1038:
1017:
1010:Tom Harrison
1005:
993:
980:
965:
956:
939:
927:
915:
889:
888:
884:
861:
857:
845:
840:
833:Doc Tropics
828:
820:
809:
797:
791:
789:Mini Mammoth
784:
774:
766:
758:
752:
747:
730:
713:
673:
661:
642:
635:
634:
625:
616:Rama's arrow
615:
592:
566:
554:
548:
525:
507:
495:
483:
478:
472:
471:
467:
466:
418:Brad Beattie
408:
402:Brad Beattie
397:
359:
319:
302:
291:
267:Mini Mammoth
253:
247:
238:Gene Therapy
233:
227:
190:
169:
147:
142:
124:
108:
95:
91:
79:
71:
60:
57:
56:
51:
46:
38:
30:
28:
1304:Sarah Ewart
992:Changed to
930:per above.
792:spectacular
759:Heligoland
63:28 November
1486:User:Adamm
1348:Hello32020
1233:very minor
944:Eluchil404
532:Aguerriero
468:Discussion
413:your edits
111:I accept.
31:successful
1834:Doug Bell
1828:Doug Bell
1768:talk page
1757:Robdurbar
1746:Robdurbar
1703:semper fi
1676:Patstuart
1660:semper fi
1595:Patstuart
1336:Dario vet
1324:≡Ѕirex98≡
1293:Doug Bell
1237:Clockwork
1221:Patstuart
1123:kungming·
858:Hell Yes!
702:Robdurbar
679:Robdurbar
677:admin. --
458:talk page
308:Robdurbar
1866:Category
1551:I object
1152:Lostkiwi
1043:DarthVad
920:James086
775:Contribs
666:Agent 86
567:Support.
375:WP:NOPRO
364:WP:NOPRO
220:project.
162:and the
83:contribs
1824:Neutral
1807:Neutral
1787:Neutral
1772:Viridae
1738:Neutral
1698:against
1686:Radiant
1632:Radiant
1618:Viridae
1606:Radiant
1576:Viridae
1560:Radiant
1490:Viridae
1464:Viridae
1407:Support
1382:Support
1344:Support
1317:Support
1301:Support
1289:Support
1262:Support
1250:Support
1229:Support
1217:Support
1148:Support
1117:Support
1083:Support
1059:Support
1039:Support
1028:iva1979
1018:Support
1006:Support
994:Support
981:Support
966:Support
957:approve
928:Support
916:Support
891:Nautica
885:Support
841:Support
829:serious
825:Viridae
821:Support
813:John254
810:Support
785:Support
748:Support
731:Support
714:Support
688:Viridae
674:Support
662:Support
626:Support
549:Support
526:Support
496:Support
479:Support
473:Support
450:Viridae
428:Viridae
380:Viridae
340:Viridae
271:dispute
187:CAT:CSD
127:Viridae
113:Viridae
73:Viridae
52:Viridae
1812:Ghirla
1725:Oppose
1656:Oppose
1529:Essjay
1509:Oppose
1452:#9. ~
1441:Oppose
1434:Oppose
1357:Rudjek
1207:dzasta
1174:Jester
1139:Review
985:rogerd
973:(talk)
955:and I
718:danntm
579:rbil10
212:WP:VPA
204:WP:ANI
195:WP:AIV
191:speedy
182:WP:RFD
178:WP:CFD
174:WP:AFD
1590:ought
1572:WP:AN
1517:MER-C
1446:added
1202:riana
1190:Fire!
1098:e Ong
932:MER-C
846:Samir
571:RyanG
486:Quarl
400:from
294:from
263:Ste4k
217:WP:RM
208:WP:HD
200:WP:AN
98:Quarl
68:(UTC)
58:Final
16:<
1537:Talk
1413:Buck
1398:2221
1308:Talk
1241:Soul
1171:SWAT
1065:Nish
951:I'm
896:Shad
849:धर्म
798:Kuru
767:Talk
739:Talk
735:ST47
650:Talk
555:Lost
538:talk
514:girl
502:Elar
448:See
366:and
330:and
259:this
210:and
202:and
180:and
154:and
77:talk
66:2006
1797:1ne
1791:1ne
1729:1ne
1708:Moe
1665:Moe
1423:ofg
1418:ets
1409:.
1184:Aim
1087:Ter
1068:kid
771:|
763:|
640:NAS
1868::
1770:.
1744:--
1705:—
1689:)
1662:—
1635:)
1609:)
1563:)
1375:)
1355:--
1334:--
1310:)
1136:|
1105:|
1095:nc
1085:--
1073:64
1041:.
875:α
700:--
646:-
528:--
416:--
409:5.
326:,
303:4.
254:A:
248:3.
234:A:
228:2.
176:,
170:A:
166:.
148:1.
36:.
1674:-
1539:)
1535:(
1394:s
1390:e
1373:C
1371::
1369:T
1367:(
1306:(
1279:e
1274:H
1271:.
1268:G
1264:.
1204:_
1165:⇒
1128:2
1109:)
1107:R
1103:C
1101:(
1091:e
1051:r
1047:e
1024:S
906:s
901:e
873:g
871:o
869:c
867:r
865:o
863:J
722:C
636:A
630:↔
575:e
541:)
535:(
508:a
484:—
460:.
360:b
320:a
96:—
80:·
75:(
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.