1792:--Viewing contribution data for user Winhunter (over the 5000 edit(s) shown on this page)-- (FAQ) Time range: 64 approximate day(s) of edits on this page Most recent edit on: 3hr (UTC) -- 20, Jun, 2006 || Oldest edit on: 13hr (UTC) -- 16, April, 2006 Overall edit summary use (last 1000 edits): Major edits: 31.45% Minor edits: 93.75% Average edits per day: 559.01 (for last 500 edit(s)) Article edit summary use (last 334 edits) : Major article edits: 54.55% Minor article edits: 99.07% Analysis of edits (out of all 5000 edits shown of this page): Notable article edits (creation/expansion/rewrites/sourcing): 0% (0) Small article edits (small content/info/reference additions): 0.22% (11) Superficial article edits (grammar/spelling/wikify/links/tagging): 12.4% (620) Minor article edits marked as minor: 97.68% Breakdown of all edits: Unique pages edited: 3441 | Average edits per page: 1.45 | Edits on top: 34.82% Edits marked as major (non-minor/reverts): 9.16% (458 edit(s)) Edits marked as minor (non-reverts): 57.52% (2876 edit(s)) Marked reverts (reversions/text removal): 9.5% (475 edit(s)) Unmarked edits: 19.34% (967 edit(s)) Edits by Knowledge (XXG) namespace: Article: 22.24% (1112) | Article talk: 2.32% (116) User: 44.48% (2224) | User talk: 15.4% (770) Knowledge (XXG): 4.84% (242) | Knowledge (XXG) talk: 0.78% (39) Image: 2.58% (129) Template: 2.52% (126) Category: 3.94% (197) Portal: 0.06% (3) Help: 0% (0) MediaWiki: 0% (0) Other talk pages: 0.84% (42)
2210:
is my WP and image namespace edits which shows my efforts in keeping
Knowledge (XXG) to the highest quality possible. (Though I have to say that the image edits stat is understated because in many instances I have to tag image with tags that would lead to their deletions later.) Lastly is the talk page comments. This is important because it shows my ability and willingness to communicate with other users when required, which is especially important when being an admin.
1643:. Edit summaries are key, because I am very picky about admins who use rollback for non-vandalism purposes. Edit summary should be used for all edits (with a 5 percent margin for error). I'm not an evil person, I've just become very picky about edit summaries, because admins who use rollback for everything often embarrass other users and show unprofessional behavior. If you can prove that you can use edit summaries well, you'll have my strong support. —
2087:), they usually took place when I am using VandalProof in vandalism fighting (as part of RC patrol), but came a across articles with needs to be tagged. Sometimes I just omitted to mark them as minor and enter edit summary and hurried to move on. (esp. when I see those "red" recent changes popping up) There are other times where I literally forgot to use summaries. I promise to be more aware of adding editing summaries in my future edits.
1928:, I am trying to make the information about Hong Kong as accrucrate as possible. I also tried to make the contents "right", which in one instance when I reviewed the image in the article, I was shocked to see that many did not have either source or copyright information. Reluctantly I tagged them with the corresponding tag to reflect such status. The high standard of the article it is currently in makes me especially pleased.
765:. Seems to have the right attitude to adminship, with good answers to questions. If you haven't already you might be interested in the option in your preferences to make wikipedia prompt you if you don't enter an edit summary. Also why do you have so many images at the top of your talk page... Those are fairly minor points, and I don't think they'll stop you being a good admin. See also
1213:
1488:. You are well-intentioned and have a very specific idea of what you want to do (in your answer to question one.) You also have the necessary experience and I see a lot of vandal-fighting in your contributions. However, 27% edit summary usage is simply too low (as I greatly value contributors who explain their actions well.) Also,
1934:: I was shocked to learn that a country where apprixmately a quarter of the world's population live does not have an article about its nationality law. Not long after I discovered that I created this article, filling up the vacuum. Making the information on Knowledge (XXG) more complete this way makes me particularly pleased.
75:) – I joined Knowledge (XXG) since April 2005, but between then and now there was a couple months of inactive period because of personal reasons. I was active again earlier this year and remained active ever since. Other than my role as an editor I also joined the never ending fight of fighting vandalism, joined
2209:
The most important is my main namespace edits. Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia, everything here is built to support that purpose. The mainspace edits shows my efforts in putting knowledge into this great (& free!) encyclopedia and the will to maintain it (e.g. fighting vandalisms). The other
1561:, for example, looks like vandalism at first sight - deletion of text, with no explanation. However, nom is otherwise great, and has been doing tons of vandal-fighting recently. I will change to support if nom promises to boost his edit summary usage up to 95% for major edits by 19 September 2006.
1950:
Of course. In most case the editors in conflict with me were pretty nice that we were able to resolve our differences through talking. Though sometimes this is not the case, at first I when I faced this kind of situation I was pretty irrational and keep on reverting (to the threshold of 3RR), but
915:
I feel that you will get the job done as an admin. However, there is also another aspect about how frighteningly low your edit summary was. It's helpful for other uses whom may have a page on their watchlist so they can see what's happening instead of relying on pop-ups or just clicking the link.
1665:
Seems like a great vandal fighter...but...his response to a question indicates that he values mainspace edits above other types as our aim here is to build an encyclopaedia. But his number of mainspace edits thus far have been rather smaller for my liking. Also would like to see more ES usage, I
1272:
I'm sorry I must say oppose, but the lack of usage of edit summaries is rather troubling, esspecially after the removal of RC patrol stuff. I have gravitated toward a belief that all edit summaries, short of reversion of pure vandalism, should have clear and useful edit summaries(with vandalism
1735:
If these stat are from my lastest 500 edits, then it's true. There has been major DoS attack on
Knowledge (XXG) these days, where during those periods I had to revert 1 time every 5 seconds just to clear the damage by a couple persistant vandals. It would not be surprised to result in this way.
1715:
So the 27% for the last 150, and 40% for the last 334 article edits (corresponds to 1000 edits total) are an exaggeration of the numbers as representative probabilities due to the user's main focus on RC patrol work. In other works, there are almost no edits marked as major, so that missing 1-2
1253:
Im changing my vote, sorry I was wrong about you
Winhunter. It looks to me that you are a fair person and I didn't see anything anywhere with you causing problems or treating anyone unfairly. In my own opinion how one treats others is a major factor (but not the only factor) in determining if
1874:
Second, I will increase my participation in *fD (mainly AfD) and DRV. Currently I am only reviewing the evidence and put forth my vote and rational, but if I am made an sysop I will be able to become an neutral party (in *fD that I have not participated in) and close a debate, and perform the
1818:
Username
Winhunter Total edits 5797 Distinct pages edited 3918 Average edits/page 1.480 First edit 01:19, 12 April 2005 (main) 1253 Talk 198 User 2322 User talk 987 Image 326 Image talk 9 Template 133 Template talk 34 Category 198 Knowledge (XXG) 295 Knowledge (XXG) talk 39 Portal 3
1856:
First and foremost, fighting vandalism. To get the continuous offenders (those who received the full range of vandal warnings in the last hour or so) banned in a timely manner. I still remember the frustration of kept reverting them and kept sending out T4 after reported to
2037:}}) Although this is a highly repetitive job but I see this as the solution to end the userbox war. So far, the comments I received after userfying userboxes are rather positive. Also, a few of the userspace edits came from reverting IP vandals vandalising userpage.
2126:: What part of Knowledge (XXG) do you dislike the most or feel most frustrated with in your time here thus far (this can be a user, type of user, policy, restriction etc.)? Have you tried to overcome these and would adminship make life any easier for you?
2278:
Though of course I will examine the candidates on a case by case basis. Statistics show something but not everything. Relying only on statistics is always very dangerous. I am looking for good
Wikipedians with the need of sysop tools who will be a good
2161:
from other Wiki activities. Sysop power would allow me to temporary/permanent (where appliable) block the user/IP concerned in a timely manner after full range of warnings were given, minimizing the frustrations coming from vandalism for me and other
1557:. Edit summaries are extremely useful tools, and nom should learn to use them before he is entrusted with the admin tools. The summary is very helpful when you are looking through a watchlist, and is also good for explaining controversial edits.
932:. I've looked at the warnings you leave to users after you revert their edits. I like that you generally avoid use of the term "vandalism" for early edits, and that you often provide a link to the edit you reverted.
1254:
someone should be an admin. I already see you are very productive. And some of the encounters with others showed
Winhunter to be very fair. It's not hard to find things like this when you know to filter :) --
1244:
I saw some edits about Taiwan, but now I see they were not POV. Taiwan is controversial. Let me look again, I may change my vote as this thing about Taiwan was the only reason I voted oppose. --
322:
per a little too few non-GUS edits and the edit summary thing, provided you please click the mandatory edit summary box. Reserve the right to withdraw if you don't report you've clicked it. -
1302:. Also, admins don't have to do everything that needs doing, they can do whatever they want, so I don't see how not mentioning one thing in his answer to a question is a reason to oppose. --
1201:
edit summary use is just way, way to low. I'd also like to see more major edits. We're here writing an encyclopedia, and this user does not seem to contribute much text to the project. -
989:. Beyond edit summary issues, this user has too few WP: edits. Also, I just don't see enough motivation or demonstration of policy to warrant promotion (in spite of those) at this time.
2175:. Though sysop power will not help me in this, because administrative actions should be reviewed in the appropriate places (e.g. talk pages, meditation, ArbCom) rather than engaing in
1865:
contains a backlog of at least an hour, therefore if I am made sysop I will definitely put the page into my watchlist to minimise the chances for such thing to happen when I am online.
115:
A little to soon for me. 2 1/2 months of activity hardly seems like enough time. I would prefer if you had waited until maybe late July/early August before running for adminship. —
1944:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
1631:
Wiki-space edits and edit summaries are both below acceptable levels for me; but, I've had positive personal experiences with this editor, so I can neither support nor oppose.
2171:
Also, sometimes overly broad interpretation of some policy (e.g. T1/T2) by some admins also makes me frustraing. In some instances I believe some of the action have violated
1931:
851:
RC patrol, Untagged Images
Wikiproject, particpates in *fDs and DRV discussions, help desk... Strong answeres to questions. Is a great Wikipedian: will be a great admin.
1831:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge (XXG) in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
1884:
Third is to serve as a neutural party to meditate in editing conflicts, and to protect/semi-protect any page as necessary to temporary halt any ongoing editing wars.
1757:
Addressing the editing summary concerns, I tried my very best in putting in edit summaries in all of my edits. The current editing summary usage for my major edits
1951:
over time I have learned not to do that. From that point onwards I kinda regard this kind of conflicts as a blessing because it allows me to learn more about
2323:
2157:
backlog, which can be anywhere from 2 mins to an hour. This allows some vandals to "survive" for longer than they should have, and diverting attentions from
2067:
975:
920:. However, I believe you will be an active participant in the admin community and will be willing to assist in numerous admin duties. So, I weakly support.
1847:
869:
Well, I said I'd support if edit summary went up over 50%, I wasn't expecting that to occur during same RfA, but there you go. So changing to support. -
1984:
I see you have over 2,000 edits in the user namespace, almost twice as many as to articles. Just wondering what you've been doing with that many? -
1902:
467:
1156:
887:. Seems civil, answered the questions well, and is open to changing his behaviour when asked (as the edit summary issue has demonstrated).
711:
other than the edit summary usage, and I'll buy Voice of All's explanation of that below. Be sure to use edit summaries more in the future.
2305:
530:
266:, one more member for the Chinese Admin Cabal. Please maintain a good ratio of personal-to-wiki (ie. User: to everything else) ratio. --
1541:
1507:
945:
30:
17:
829:
I really looked at this editor history. Hardly any problems at all, fair and civil and productive. I think he has good judgement. --
638:
308:
2136:
The most frustration comes from vandalsim. I need to keep reverting persistant vandals and keep sending out T4 (after reporting to
2056:
It seems that your use of edit summaries is relatively low, currently only 27% for major edits. Could you please comment on this?--
2057:
1142:. Edit summaries are a demonstration of common courtesy toward other Wikipedians, and one of the most basic elements of editing.—
965:
723:
good, hard-working, conscientious editor at the coal-face, dealing with vandalism. Let's help him to deal with them a bit more.
1286:
941:
815:
72:
2262:
4. Their answers to questions, which would show their understandings on the role of admin and their need for the sysop tools.
2144:) but powerless to do anything else. This especially hurts in major DoS attacks where I have to revert once every 5 seconds.
1517:
I believe the high number of userspace edits is because the user has been moving
Template space userboxes to User space per
670:
user has everything I look for in an admin candidate, be sure to use edit summaries and you will make an excellent admin.
1184:
1164:
790:
752:
641:
407:
1839:
2005:
1991:
1493:
1396:
1019:
876:
356:
333:
1915:
Of your articles or contributions to
Knowledge (XXG), are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
1012:
Just passes my edit standards, but the 27% summary use is a bit too low. I'd support after seeing that rise over 50%. -
83:
and particpat in *fDs and DRV discussions. After I go through the administrator readings and realizing that there is a
2062:
2048:
970:
766:
463:
1843:
1801:
1758:
1346:
964:; very low use of edit summaries for major edits (as of now 27%); would also like to see a few more project edits--
2221:: Lastly, do you have any criteria when voting in RFAs? If so please present them, if not then it doesn't matter.
522:. You would be great as an admin, but I noticed the low use of edit summaries and the various spelling mistakes.
2026:
1179:
1159:
747:
708:
656:
526:
2199:: Above you can see a number of statistics about your edits. Do you consider any of these important? Which do
2034:
1596:
1568:
937:
503:
245:
1536:
1502:
1290:
1955:
and makes me able to advise other users the correct course of action should they be in an editing conflict.
2255:
3. Participation in Knowledge (XXG) maintenance. These include WP edits and others not on WP space. (e.g.
1775:
1717:
991:
454:
268:
1440:
623:
561:
423:
294:
164:
2030:
1321:
933:
736:
635:
608:
304:
144:
122:
2304:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
481:
2291:
2189:
2097:
2073:
2009:
1787:
1765:
1752:
1729:
1684:
1657:
1635:
1623:
1607:
1579:
1546:
1525:
1512:
1472:
1459:
1428:
1400:
1367:
1353:
1340:
1325:
1306:
1293:
1258:
1248:
1239:
1229:
1216:
1189:
1169:
1146:
1134:
1121:
1097:
1083:
1070:
1037:
1022:
1003:
981:
949:
924:
907:
891:
879:
861:
843:
833:
821:
794:
773:
757:
739:
727:
715:
699:
674:
662:
646:
615:
587:
572:
551:
534:
514:
484:
472:
445:
431:
411:
390:
360:
337:
313:
299:
291:
286:
274:
258:
233:
219:
207:
195:
183:
150:
104:
91:
2112:
2001:
1677:
1392:
693:
352:
329:
1620:
1298:
Once again, the low edit summary usage for major edits means only that he didn't use edit summaries
1811:
1653:
1453:
1057:
Knowledge (XXG) namespace edits are now satisfactory, but I am not happy with people who implement
811:
523:
177:
66:
1666:
suggest check your preferences and make it so that you HAVE to provide an edit summary each edit.
899:. I think he would be a good admin. Edit summaries are something which can be easily worked upon.
838:
1601:
1573:
1531:
1497:
859:
570:
508:
254:
2176:
2172:
1648:
1303:
1273:
having a simple or scripted note about revert). Please use more edit summaries and make them
1236:
841:
786:
441:
403:
2141:
1898:
1745:
1988:
1376:
1317:
1255:
1245:
1226:
1209:
1131:
1066:
1052:
1016:
873:
830:
630:
620:
596:
384:
139:
117:
2158:
2154:
2137:
2022:
2018:
1862:
1858:
1518:
1282:
1076:
1058:
917:
2104:
1996:
1668:
1387:
683:
671:
543:
428:
420:
347:
324:
2256:
1965:
1952:
1894:
84:
80:
76:
2288:
2186:
2094:
1807:
1797:
1762:
1749:
1645:
1522:
1447:
1435:
1350:
1117:
1105:, too many concerns about project involvement, editing habits and attention to detail.
1080:
1034:
807:
770:
653:
601:
584:
283:
171:
159:
101:
88:
62:
48:
1492:
I would prefer to see a little bit more contributing to WP-space. Does not fully meet
1281:. Using them makes reading the history all the more easier. Last, there's more than
1047:
shortage of Knowledge (XXG) namespace edits suggests a low level of policy knowledge.
2317:
1591:
1563:
1469:
1425:
1143:
852:
724:
566:
498:
250:
242:
229:
216:
2081:
Some of those edits are actually minor one which I forgot to mark it as minor (e.g.
781:. Good user with a good background. Edit summaries are the only worrie for me. ---
1337:
921:
782:
399:
204:
1490:
the very overwhelming number of Userspace edits leaves me scratching my head, and
1985:
1364:
1203:
1094:
1062:
1048:
1013:
901:
870:
712:
375:
192:
1838:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
2298:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1632:
916:
Also, I don't think overal edit count is really that high if you take out the
888:
215:. Nominee has now accepted and I believe this editor will make a fine admin.
1925:
1921:
1716:
summaries alone makes the percent go WAY down. I hope this clears things up.
1212:
1107:
581:
398:. Looks like the project would benefit from Winhunter having admin tools.
1225:
per some of the above reasons and my own review of the user's history. --
496:
on my talk page affirming that he will work on his edit summary usage.
2308:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
1699:
further analysis of namespace edits (last 500) reveals the following:
137:, sorry. If you've been here for that long, you deserve it by now. —
1968:. No sysop power will be used since I am not an disinterested party.
1363:
prospective admins should have at least a 90% edit summary rate --
2239:
4. Knowledge (XXG) would benefit if the candidate becomes admin.
1619:
More namespace edits, a biggie in my criteria, would be a plus.
1861:
but powerless to do anything else. In one instance I have seen
1385:
per combination of edit summaries and lowish WP:space edits -
2236:
3. Show sufficient understanding of Knowledge (XXG) policies.
98:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
2230:
1. Candidate show signs that he/she won't abuse sysop tools.
1710:
Marked reverts (reversions/text removal): 63% (315 edit(s))
1704:
Edits marked as major (non-minor/reverts): 0.8% (4 edit(s))
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1707:
Edits marked as minor (non-reverts): 33.4% (167 edit(s))
453:. Thoughtful answers to questions. Busy and civil. --
2085:
2082:
1905:
and perform necessary actions as circumstances require.
1741:
1737:
1558:
493:
735:
good at combating those who ruin all of our hard work!
419:. Looks like a great user and will make a good admin.
133:
I feel stupid, I thought you said you joined in April
282:
contribs look good. Please use edit summaries more.
1333:. I'm not generally prone to editsummaryitis, but
1932:Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
1875:necessary actions (e.g. delete/undelete/relist).
2233:2. Candidate possess enough editing experience.
1994:20:14, 19 June 2006 (UTC) - No, really, why? -
8:
2252:2. On Knowledge (XXG) for at least 3 months.
1964:In the future I will follow steps listed in
1424:, but nomination has not yet been accepted.
595:; a positive influence on the encyclopedia.
1235:What did you find in the user's history? --
58:(41/15/5) ended 18:59, 26 June, 2006 (UTC)
1345:My editing summary usage is currently at
1903:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion
1093:for low usage of major edit summaries--
1061:which does not have consensus support.
1464:Excellent. Now I change my comment to
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
1079:, TGS/GUS is not meant to be policy.
7:
1744:. There should be more if you check
374:but work on those edit summaries :D
2324:Unsuccessful requests for adminship
1130:when edit summary use is this low.
2245:So these would be looked at first:
1893:Besides these I will also monitor
203:Please use edit summaries more. --
100:I hereby accept the nomination. --
24:
2017:I userfied a few userboxes using
1840:Category:Knowledge (XXG) backlog
1211:
345:Withdrawn per other concerns. -
2265:5. Their list of contributions.
1924:: Since I have close ties with
439:per question 1, I agree with.--
87:, I also joined it recently. --
651:Unlikely to abuse the tools --
191:- excellent vandal fighter. --
1:
2227:My criterias are as follows:
2072:(aka Tree Biting Conspiracy)
1375:For some of the reasons above
980:(aka Tree Biting Conspiracy)
1848:administrators' reading list
1827:Questions for the candidate
1800:'s edit summary usage with
1279:(wrong word entirely there)
1055:) 18:54, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
81:Untagged Images Wikiproject
2340:
1842:, and read the page about
2292:10:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
2203:consider most important?
2190:10:21, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
2179:with the admin concerned.
2098:00:02, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
2074:22:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
2010:20:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
1788:03:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
1766:16:29, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
1753:03:54, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
1730:03:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
1685:00:47, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
1658:19:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1636:15:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
1624:03:12, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
1608:14:40, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
1580:02:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
1547:01:19, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
1526:23:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
1513:23:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
1473:22:14, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
1460:20:34, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
1429:20:23, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
1401:17:32, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
1368:00:23, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
1354:01:27, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
1341:22:09, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
1326:12:13, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
1307:03:11, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
1294:01:37, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
1259:05:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
1249:05:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
1240:05:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
1230:04:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
1217:21:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1190:18:34, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1170:16:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1147:00:01, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1135:18:04, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
1122:13:07, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
1098:22:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
1084:18:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
1071:17:55, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
1038:16:51, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
1023:10:22, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
1004:03:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
982:21:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
950:13:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
925:11:15, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
908:01:36, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
892:19:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
880:18:22, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
862:06:34, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
844:06:15, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
834:05:41, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
822:23:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
795:20:13, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
774:18:57, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
758:18:34, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
740:17:02, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
728:12:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
716:05:55, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
700:01:12, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
675:23:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
663:22:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
647:07:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
616:05:36, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
588:20:45, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
573:19:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
559:Would be a good admin. --
552:19:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
535:16:30, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
515:14:37, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
485:11:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
473:10:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
446:07:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
432:07:30, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
412:04:45, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
391:01:21, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
361:14:37, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
338:00:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
314:00:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
287:23:30, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
275:22:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
259:22:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
234:22:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
220:22:14, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
208:22:11, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
196:22:07, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
184:20:34, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
151:20:23, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
128:20:21, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
105:20:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
92:18:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
2301:Please do not modify it.
2249:1. 1000+ mainspace edits
2027:User:Winhunter/Userboxes
40:Please do not modify it.
2103:Optional Question from
1773:User's last 5000 edits.
227:great vandal fighter. —
1420:, willing to consider
1287:administrative backlog
1277:as clear as possible.
480:- He needs the tools.
241:Meets all my critera.
2159:Recent changes patrol
2025:, they are listed in
1810:'s edit counts (from
1033:, fails my criteria.
31:request for adminship
1285:, have you seen the
158:Looks good to me. --
1812:User:Interiot/Tool2
1379:17:17, 26 June 2006
1316:on edit summaries.
2153:The other is the
2008:
1976:Optional Question
1759:have risen to 51%
1399:
1280:
1175:Changing vote to
1120:
913:Very Weak Support
819:
644:
471:
458:
410:
359:
336:
2331:
2303:
2117:
2116:
2110:
2107:
2070:
2060:
2000:
1784:
1781:
1778:
1726:
1723:
1720:
1698:
1682:
1681:
1674:
1671:
1651:
1604:
1599:
1594:
1576:
1571:
1566:
1544:
1539:
1534:
1510:
1505:
1500:
1445:
1391:
1278:
1215:
1206:
1187:
1182:
1167:
1162:
1126:Sorry, but I do
1116:
1113:
1110:
1000:
997:
994:
978:
968:
904:
857:
805:
802:. Works for me.
755:
750:
697:
687:
659:
634:
628:
614:
611:
569:
564:
549:
546:
511:
506:
501:
461:
456:
444:
426:
402:
387:
381:
351:
328:
297:
271:
248:
232:
169:
149:
147:
142:
127:
125:
120:
42:
2339:
2338:
2334:
2333:
2332:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2306:this nomination
2299:
2114:
2113:
2108:
2105:
2068:
2058:
1820:
1793:
1782:
1779:
1776:
1724:
1721:
1718:
1696:
1679:
1678:
1672:
1669:
1649:
1602:
1597:
1592:
1574:
1569:
1564:
1542:
1537:
1532:
1508:
1503:
1498:
1458:
1441:
1383:Hesitant Oppose
1204:
1185:
1180:
1165:
1160:
1157:My RFA criteria
1111:
1108:
998:
995:
992:
976:
966:
902:
853:
767:my RfA criteria
753:
748:
691:
685:
657:
624:
609:
606:
562:
560:
547:
544:
509:
504:
499:
440:
424:
389:
385:
376:
312:
295:
269:
246:
228:
182:
165:
145:
140:
138:
129:
123:
118:
116:
52:
38:
35:did not succeed
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2337:
2335:
2327:
2326:
2316:
2315:
2311:
2310:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2282:
2281:
2280:
2271:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2263:
2260:
2253:
2250:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2237:
2234:
2231:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2140:and sometimes
2128:
2127:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2054:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2035:User recycling
1979:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1929:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1844:administrators
1829:
1828:
1824:
1823:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1805:
1802:Mathbot's tool
1791:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1738:My report here
1712:
1711:
1708:
1705:
1693:
1692:
1688:
1687:
1660:
1638:
1626:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1452:
1434:Now it has. --
1412:
1406:
1404:
1403:
1380:
1370:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1328:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1233:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1137:
1124:
1100:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1040:
1028:
1027:
1026:
984:
958:
957:
953:
952:
927:
910:
894:
882:
864:
846:
836:
824:
820:
797:
776:
760:
742:
730:
718:
702:
677:
665:
649:
618:
590:
575:
554:
537:
517:
487:
475:
448:
434:
414:
393:
383:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
302:
289:
277:
261:
236:
222:
210:
198:
186:
176:
153:
114:
111:
110:
107:
51:
46:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2336:
2325:
2322:
2321:
2319:
2309:
2307:
2302:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2290:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2273:
2272:
2264:
2261:
2258:
2254:
2251:
2248:
2247:
2246:
2243:
2238:
2235:
2232:
2229:
2228:
2226:
2223:
2222:
2220:
2216:
2215:
2208:
2205:
2204:
2202:
2198:
2194:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2188:
2178:
2174:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2160:
2156:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2143:
2139:
2135:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2129:
2125:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2111:
2100:
2099:
2096:
2086:
2083:
2080:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2071:
2066:
2065:
2061:
2055:
2053:
2050:
2046:
2043:
2042:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2007:
2003:
1999:
1998:
1993:
1990:
1987:
1983:
1980:
1977:
1974:
1973:
1967:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1954:
1949:
1946:
1945:
1943:
1940:
1939:
1933:
1930:
1927:
1923:
1920:
1917:
1916:
1914:
1911:
1910:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1864:
1860:
1855:
1852:
1851:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1837:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1826:
1825:
1822:
1821:
1813:
1809:
1806:
1803:
1799:
1795:
1794:
1790:
1789:
1786:
1785:
1767:
1764:
1761:as of now. --
1760:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1728:
1727:
1709:
1706:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1690:
1689:
1686:
1683:
1676:
1675:
1664:
1661:
1659:
1656:
1655:
1652:
1647:
1642:
1639:
1637:
1634:
1630:
1627:
1625:
1622:
1618:
1615:
1609:
1606:
1605:
1600:
1595:
1588:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1578:
1577:
1572:
1567:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1545:
1540:
1535:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1511:
1506:
1501:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1484:
1483:
1474:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1457:
1456:
1451:
1450:
1446:
1444:
1439:
1438:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1389:
1384:
1381:
1378:
1374:
1371:
1369:
1366:
1362:
1359:
1355:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1339:
1336:
1332:
1329:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1312:
1308:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1276:
1275:more conscise
1271:
1268:
1260:
1257:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1247:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1238:
1234:
1232:
1231:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1208:
1207:
1200:
1197:
1191:
1188:
1183:
1178:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1168:
1163:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1145:
1141:
1138:
1136:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1114:
1104:
1101:
1099:
1096:
1092:
1089:
1085:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1054:
1050:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1032:
1029:
1025:
1024:
1021:
1018:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1002:
1001:
988:
985:
983:
979:
974:
973:
969:
963:
960:
959:
955:
954:
951:
947:
943:
939:
935:
934:Armedblowfish
931:
928:
926:
923:
919:
914:
911:
909:
906:
905:
898:
895:
893:
890:
886:
883:
881:
878:
875:
872:
868:
865:
863:
860:
858:
856:
850:
847:
845:
842:
840:
837:
835:
832:
828:
825:
823:
817:
813:
809:
803:
801:
798:
796:
792:
788:
784:
780:
777:
775:
772:
768:
764:
761:
759:
756:
751:
746:
743:
741:
738:
737:Abcdefghijklm
734:
731:
729:
726:
722:
719:
717:
714:
710:
706:
703:
701:
698:
695:
689:
688:
681:
678:
676:
673:
669:
666:
664:
661:
660:
655:
650:
648:
643:
640:
637:
632:
629:
627:
622:
619:
617:
612:
605:
604:
600:
599:
594:
591:
589:
586:
583:
579:
576:
574:
571:
568:
565:
558:
555:
553:
550:
542:looks good.--
541:
538:
536:
532:
528:
525:
521:
518:
516:
513:
512:
507:
502:
495:
491:
488:
486:
483:
479:
476:
474:
469:
465:
460:
452:
449:
447:
443:
438:
435:
433:
430:
427:
422:
418:
415:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
394:
392:
388:
382:
380:
373:
370:
362:
358:
354:
350:
349:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
335:
331:
327:
326:
321:
317:
316:
315:
310:
306:
301:
298:
293:
290:
288:
285:
281:
278:
276:
273:
272:
265:
262:
260:
256:
252:
249:
244:
240:
237:
235:
231:
226:
223:
221:
218:
214:
211:
209:
206:
202:
199:
197:
194:
190:
187:
185:
181:
180:
175:
174:
170:
168:
163:
162:
157:
154:
152:
148:
143:
136:
132:
126:
121:
113:
112:
108:
106:
103:
99:
96:
95:
94:
93:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
71:
68:
64:
60:
59:
56:
50:
47:
43:
41:
36:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2300:
2297:
2286:
2244:
2224:
2218:
2206:
2200:
2196:
2184:
2162:Wikipedians.
2133:
2123:
2102:
2101:
2092:
2078:
2063:
2051:
2044:
2014:
1997:CrazyRussian
1995:
1981:
1978:from Goldom:
1975:
1947:
1941:
1918:
1912:
1853:
1835:
1830:
1774:
1772:
1714:
1713:
1695:
1694:
1667:
1662:
1644:
1640:
1628:
1616:
1590:
1586:
1562:
1554:
1553:
1489:
1485:
1465:
1454:
1448:
1442:
1436:
1421:
1417:
1416:
1405:
1388:CrazyRussian
1386:
1382:
1372:
1360:
1334:
1330:
1313:
1299:
1274:
1269:
1222:
1221:
1202:
1198:
1176:
1152:
1151:
1139:
1127:
1106:
1102:
1090:
1046:
1042:
1030:
1009:
1008:
990:
986:
971:
961:
929:
912:
900:
896:
884:
866:
854:
848:
826:
799:
779:Weak support
778:
762:
744:
732:
720:
704:
690:
684:
679:
667:
652:
625:
602:
597:
592:
585:(talk to me)
577:
556:
539:
520:Weak support
519:
497:
489:
482:Afonso Silva
477:
450:
436:
416:
395:
378:
371:
348:CrazyRussian
346:
325:CrazyRussian
323:
320:Weak support
319:
318:
279:
267:
263:
238:
224:
212:
200:
188:
178:
172:
166:
160:
155:
134:
130:
97:
69:
61:
57:
54:
53:
39:
34:
28:
2033:}} & {{
1585:Changed to
1494:my criteria
1455:Talk to me!
1377:Agoodperson
1318:Sarah Ewart
1289:on images?
1256:HResearcher
1246:HResearcher
1227:HResearcher
1132:Jonathunder
1075:Similar to
1010:Weak Oppose
831:HResearcher
709:my criteria
598:Matt Yeager
386:(lets talk)
270:Миборовский
179:Talk to me!
2052:(optional)
2029:. (e.g. {{
1291:Kevin_b_er
1186:_Anonymous
1181:Anonymous_
1166:_Anonymous
1161:Anonymous_
754:_Anonymous
749:Anonymous_
672:Eluchil404
2289:WinHunter
2187:WinHunter
2095:WinHunter
2031:User vote
1926:Hong Kong
1922:Hong Kong
1808:Winhunter
1798:Winhunter
1763:WinHunter
1750:WinHunter
1621:SushiGeek
1559:This edit
1523:Kimchi.sg
1351:WinHunter
1081:Kimchi.sg
804:RadioKirk
771:Petros471
654:digital_m
631:rovingian
284:Kimchi.sg
102:WinHunter
89:WinHunter
85:help desk
77:RC patrol
63:Winhunter
49:Winhunter
2318:Category
2177:WP:WHEEL
2173:WP:POINT
2045:Question
1846:and the
1691:Comments
1617:Neutral.
1470:Agent 86
1426:Agent 86
1144:Perceval
946:contribs
855:FloNight
725:Tyrenius
540:Support,
492:per his
468:contribs
421:DarthVad
309:Contribs
230:Khoikhoi
217:Agent 86
146:of Kings
141:The King
124:of Kings
119:The King
73:contribs
2142:WP:AN/I
1899:WP:AN/I
1746:WP:AN/I
1663:Neutral
1646:Deckill
1641:Neutral
1629:Neutral
1587:Support
1555:Neutral
1486:Neutral
1466:Support
1422:support
1418:Neutral
1411:Neutral
1338:Cynical
1304:Rory096
1237:Rory096
1177:Support
930:Support
922:Yanksox
897:Support
885:Support
867:Support
849:Support
839:Jaranda
827:Support
800:Support
763:Support
745:Support
733:Support
721:Support
705:Support
680:Support
668:Support
593:Support
578:Support
567:iva1979
557:Support
490:Support
478:Support
457:Charles
451:Support
437:Support
417:Support
400:Nephron
396:Support
372:Support
300:nce Ong
280:Support
264:Support
239:Support
225:Support
213:Support
205:Shizane
201:Support
189:Support
156:Support
131:Support
109:Support
2279:admin.
2155:WP:AIV
2138:WP:AIV
2115:(Talk)
2023:WP:GUS
1986:Goldom
1863:WP:AIV
1859:WP:AIV
1680:(Talk)
1538:master
1519:WP:GUS
1504:master
1407:(UTC)
1373:Oppose
1365:rogerd
1361:Oppose
1331:Oppose
1314:Oppose
1283:WP:AIV
1270:Oppose
1223:Oppose
1199:Oppose
1155:fails
1153:Oppose
1140:Oppose
1128:oppose
1103:Oppose
1095:Jusjih
1091:Oppose
1077:WP:TRI
1063:Stifle
1059:WP:GUS
1049:Stifle
1043:Oppose
1031:Oppose
1014:Goldom
987:Oppose
962:Oppose
956:Oppose
918:WP:GUS
903:fetofs
871:Goldom
713:BryanG
707:Meets
545:Kungfu
459:Parker
193:Ixfd64
2257:WP:UI
2109:eagle
2106:Noble
2047:from
2006:email
1966:WP:DR
1953:WP:DR
1895:WP:AN
1777:Voice
1719:Voice
1697:NOTE:
1673:eagle
1670:Noble
1633:Xoloz
1533:Grand
1530:Yep.
1499:Grand
1437:Mr. L
1397:email
1300:twice
993:Voice
889:moink
694:Reply
610:Talk?
494:reply
442:Andeh
379:james
357:email
334:email
161:Mr. L
55:Final
33:that
16:<
2021:per
2002:talk
1796:See
1780:-of-
1742:here
1740:and
1722:-of-
1603:cιτγ
1575:cιτγ
1393:talk
1349:. --
1335:27%?
1322:Talk
1118:talk
1067:talk
1053:talk
1035:NSLE
996:-of-
942:mail
938:talk
582:CFIF
548:Adam
510:cιτγ
464:talk
455:Hugh
353:talk
330:talk
305:Chat
255:talk
251:Halo
135:2006
67:talk
2217:3.
2201:you
2195:2.
2064:TBC
2049:TBC
2019:AWB
1989:‽‽‽
1783:All
1725:All
1593:Λυδ
1565:Λυδ
1449:fty
1347:51%
1112:zio
1109:Dei
1017:‽‽‽
999:All
972:TBC
874:‽‽‽
783:J.S
686:Jay
524:Roy
500:Λυδ
292:Ter
173:fty
2320::
2287:--
2225:A:
2207:A:
2185:--
2134:A:
2093:--
2084:,
2079:A:
2015:A:
1982:Q:
1948:A:
1942:3.
1919:A:
1913:2.
1901:,
1897:,
1854:A:
1850:.
1836:1.
1814:):
1748:--
1589:.
1543:ka
1521:.
1509:ka
1496:.
1468:.
1324:)
1069:)
1045:,
948:)
793:)
769:.
682:--
645:}
580:--
533:.
466:-
377:--
307:|
257:)
243:Th
79:,
37:.
2259:)
2219:Q
2197:Q
2124:Q
2069:☆
2059:☆
2004:/
1992:⁂
1804:.
1654:r
1650:e
1598:α
1570:α
1443:e
1395:/
1320:(
1205:M
1065:(
1051:(
1020:⁂
977:☆
967:☆
944:|
940:|
936:(
877:⁂
818:)
816:c
814:|
812:t
810:|
808:u
806:(
791:c
789:|
787:t
785:(
696:)
692:(
658:e
642:@
639:C
636:T
633:{
626:e
621:M
613:)
607:(
603:♫
563:S
531:A
529:.
527:A
505:α
470:)
462:(
429:r
425:e
408:C
406:|
404:T
355:/
332:/
311:)
303:(
296:e
253:(
247:e
167:e
70:·
65:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.