571:
edits: 100% Minor edits: 100% Average edits per day: 14.47 (for last 1000 edit(s)) Article edit summary use (last 139 edits): Major article edits: 100% Minor article edits: 100% Analysis of edits (out of all 3828 edits shown on this page and last 2 image uploads): Notable article edits (creation/expansion/major rewrites/sourcing): 0.1% (4) Significant article edits (copyedits/small rewrites/content/reference additions): 0.94% (36) Superficial article edits (grammar/spelling/wikify/links/tagging): 6.48% (248) Unique image uploads (non-deleted/reverts/updates): 1 (checks last 5000) Superficial article edits marked as minor: 15.73% Special edit type statistics (as marked): Deletion pages: 7.97% (305 edit(s)) Article deletion tagging: 0.03% (1 edit(s)) "Copyright problems" pages: 0% (0 edit(s)) WP:AN/related noticeboards: 0.52% (20 edit(s)) FA/FP/FL candidate pages: 0% (0 edit(s)) RfC/RfAr pages: 0% (0 edit(s)) Requests for adminship: 1.7% (65 edit(s)) Identified RfA votes: 0.55% (19 support vote(s)) || (2 oppose vote(s)) Page moves: 0.26% (10 edit(s)) (5 moves(s)) Page redirections: 0.03% (1 edit(s)) Page (un)protections: 0% (0 edit(s)) User warnings: 17.27% (661 edit(s)) User welcomes: 0.68% (26 edit(s)) Breakdown of all edits: Unique pages edited: 2590 | Average edits per page: 1.48 | Edits on top: 21.39% Edits marked as major (non-minor/reverts): 51.31% (1964 edit(s)) Edits marked as minor (non-reverts): 24.74% (947 edit(s)) Marked reverts (reversions/text removal): 23.88% (914 edit(s)) Unmarked edits with no summary: 0.08% (3 edit(s)) Edits by
Knowledge (XXG) namespace: Article: 24.87% (952) | Article talk: 0.84% (32) User: 14.89% (570) | User talk: 44.85% (1717) Knowledge (XXG): 12.8% (490) | Knowledge (XXG) talk: 1.07% (41) Image: 0.21% (8) | Image talk: 0% (0) Template: 0.1% (4) | Template talk: 0.16% (6) Category: 0.16% (6) | Category talk: 0% (0) Portal: 0.03% (1) | Portal talk: 0% (0) Help: 0.03% (1) | Help talk: 0% (0) MediaWiki: 0% (0) | MediaWiki talk: 0% (0)
429:. For the second question, I'm afraid I must admit that I cannot find any examples of myself citing policy (except for noting my reason in terms of 'as neologism' or 'nn'). Although when voicing opinions on xfDs I do refer to policy as I go, I have thought to actually link to or quote from one, and I understand that this was probably a bad idea. Quoting policy is not something I'm fond of as I feel it can inhibit the work of a catalyst because it can make people feel threatened by the voice of authority coming from the policies and I prefer to give my reasoning as other words. However, I can see how it's better to be more precise in my comments and I will try to do this in the future; I will put what I am already thinking onto the page. It it ever more important that I learn from this than anything else. Thirdly, I must say with complete honesty that these concerns are perfectly valid and can only offer the assurance that I will try to improve myself after the nomination has completed, and will seek help from more experienced users and my nominator when closing xfDs that are in the borderline because this will indeed be something I will have not to much experience with. I hope my answer here has explained things to you some more, and I thank JoshuaZ for bringing up this issue so that I may comment on it out in the open.
519:
communities work because everyone at the bottom wants to be at the top'. While I can understand how in conventional communities (such as message boards and online games) this works, here on
Knowledge (XXG) we are very different and this statement I believe holds no meaning; the word administrator takes on it's literal meaning of an organiser, a maintainer rather than someone with authority. However, because other places see this word differently I see new users coming to Knowledge (XXG) and finding that administrators exist and that there are quite a few of them, and thinking that it is something like sites they have come from before - and I don't blame them themselves, of course, because they are only acting from their experience. Because administrators on sites like those I have mentioned above are often the founders and financiers of them, they hold a different degree of social and technical power: (benevolent) dictators and developers if compared with our power structure. So we have a psychological issue with people subconciously seeing administrators as those with higher levels of influence and power, even after reading their technical abilities. The document
161:, and I strongly believe that by empowering people with information the world can be made a better place. Wikimedia exists to bring the sum total of human knowledge to the world and every person in it and this is a most honourable goal for everyone here on the projects. However, power can be reckless and through our community I see us bringing wisdom to it and this we can then spread as the organisation grows. I enjoy contributing to Knowledge (XXG) and feel that as an administrator I would be able to do more to develop the information here and build on the community structure already established, and I feel that I have enough experience of working here to be productive and trustworthy. But I leave that up to you to judge, of course - I will appreciate all comments made here. I would like to thank all those who have got me here, and my nominator who considers me worthy of the tools. Thank you. —
524:
that I didn't mention I was a sysop unless it was obviously necessary; for example I may note on a talkpage that I fight vandalism, but then not mention that I block repeat offenders unless it was specifically asked. If the user is then surprised that I am a sysop, that's not necessarily a bad thing - they will hopefully have gained an idea of how an administrator should be presenting themselves from my behaviour and will hopefully treat others in the same way as they continue to contribute. However, I think that sometimes administrators can be too eager to flex their abilities when being a catalyst will help. I know I keep mentioning this in this nomination, but it really does help; one point mentioned on the page I link to on it is that catalysts don't use or wear authority when they don't need it, which is demonstrated in the guideline of dropping ops on the
355:
his talk would be more appropriate, thereby freeing the channel from harassment. As far as I know, he had been kicked (and possibly banned) but I feel I wrapped the situation up nicely. Another incident occured when the
English Wiktionary was being attacked by a rogue sysop. I was in #wikimedia-stewards at the time (I often am to try and help out where possible) and I started asking polite questions to work out what was going on. Users were contradicting each other but I was able to dig through and find the truth. By this time a developer had removed the sysop's access and a steward had arrived on the scene; I tried to help him with the information I was gathering and the situation was eventually resolved. I hope that I've shown the power of catalysts, for I feel that they are something that can be applied to many aspects of life. —
1736:, for now. You might not necessarily do harm, but there's really no way to know based on your edits. I browsed through your article edits and it seems that you did indeed list every one of your larger article contributions in question 2 here. The rest are automated reversions and adding templates. In your wikipedia space contributions, I looked at around 30 comments in (afd) discussions and they were ALL in the vein of "delete per nom" or "keep per above", with nothing added to the actual discussion. Based on that it would lead me to believe you would close any discussion based on a 'vote' count, and since there's no evidence to the contrary, I must oppose. Please take the time to edit the encyclopedia and try again in a few months, thanks. -
1788:
realize it it makes me question his knowledge of other areas. His AfD experience seems to be contained to a few binges where he went through and quickly mass voted on, at times, several pages per minute. These "binges" were on August 11, June 26, June 18, June 14, and June 1. The biggest flaw AfD has in my opinion is that most of the "votes" are entered by fly-by voters like Xyrael who think that it's better to vote on 101 AfD's in 3.5 hrs (June 14) rather than keep to those where he can offer meaningful input. I looked and couldn't find any meaningful AfD contributions at all; most were simply "Delete per nom" but even the rare instances where he decided to say something further usually wasn't very helpful.
449:. They posted attack messages on my simple userpage and at the time I don't think I noticed since I didn't log on very often, but other users were kind enough to revert. As time went on the attacks got heavier and I put in a request for full protection. I realise now that it would have been more appropriate for semi-protection, but at the time I was still relatively new. An administrator was kind enough to deal with the request very quickly and my page was frozen. A month or so later I asked for it to be unprotected as it was getting out of date. On reflection, I realise that perhaps it would have been better to post the request on
918:
nice track record of vandalism prevention, as well. Having said that, Xyrael has spent very little time creating and writing articles, which is the primary purpose of a
Wikipedian. Also, a close look at his *fD participation indicates that the candidate brings little to the discussion. If the candidate did not seem to exude such an excitement about wikis, a trustworthy nature, a level-headed demeanor, and an eagerness to help make Knowledge (XXG) a better place, I would firmly oppose the request, but I cannot in good faith do so with the aforementioned character traits so visible in the candidate
471:
confirmed what the policy said so that I was able to express in my own words to the user what the situation was. It started when I reverted a !vote on a article move debate that was made by an anonymous user when the policy states that this is not permitted, only comments may be made by them. The user took offence at the edit summary which contained 'VandalProof', and I regret that I didn't think to switch to my browser and revert manually. However, I do not think this was the root of the problem. The user
476:
another editor got involved to confirm what I said and quoted more literally from the policy. Although there is unfortunately little evidence left, I feel that I worked hard to be polite and courteous to the user and that we were eventually able to impress the relevant policy on the user in the politest possible way. Dispute resolution is an important part of
Knowledge (XXG) and is something that I wish to get more involved in, whether this nomination suceeds or not.
1759:
that they will be careful to research the policies relevant to any new area that they decide they want to enter. Xyreal's main specializations are vandal-fighting and dispute resolution, and I believe he knows the relevant policies quite well. In addition, he seems like the kind of person who would carefully research policies related to a
Knowledge (XXG) activity before engaging in it. I asked Xyrael and he said he is quite dilagent in doing this. --
1749:
would have to be well-researched and well thought out. This leads me to believe you aren't entirely familiar with the policies. The lack of normal edits also bothers me- I don't believe that a user should have full administrator privileges unless they have made hundreds of edits to a variety of articles. They should be fully exposed to revert wars, edit wars, user conflicts, etc. --
1818:(listed above in the answer to JoshuaZ) is especially puzzling: "Possible merge into area's main area, if this exists". The "main area" was in fact bluelinked in the nomination (as is the suggestion to merge for which Xyrael takes authorship). This leaves a very poor impression of Drive-by-AfDing and a general lack of interest in what this encylcopedia
333:) that spilled over onto user talk pages. Conflict is always going to be around on a project with so many folk involved, but I firmly believe that we can make a difference by using our common sense and thinking about what is best for everyone for building the encyclopedia, keeping people contributing and thinking of our eventual goals.
957:
Sure, I didn't mean to give a skewed description of your involvement. I'm aware that Where started the Test Wiki, but I am impressed that the Test Wiki community has entrusted you with stewardship (even though I think you advocated for Where) and also that you are hosting it with your own resources.
354:
I would hope to be a catalyst in every non-templated communication I post on talk pages, but I feel that my greatest successes have been on IRC. 'OnkleAdolf' was attacking #wikimedia-commons a month or so ago and by talking to him over a /query I was able to get him to leave for another network where
1792:
he votes on a borderline case as "Weak delete" and rather than explain why he thinks it ought to be deleted, he says "things like this have been left before I believe" -- not even bothering to find any specific examples, as apparently he feels his time is better spent doing fly-by votes on some more
336:
The notion of catalysts as a useful sort to have around is one not mooted here very often, but it is a powerful idea, when you look at many things here, you can, if you look for them, find the catalyst folk behind the scenes. Can you give some examples of where you have been a catalyst for change or
116:
Incidentally, in case anyone was missing the checklist - I have checked all the basics are okay. I've also given some fairly extensive admin coaching sessions on IRC, and will continue to make sure Xyrael knows what to do as an admin if any help is needed. So, if you agree let's get another admin to
1758:
I think that is a good point to raise. However, almost nobody knows all of the policies in all areas of
Knowledge (XXG). For instance, a minority of Wikipedians probably know all of the nuances in fair use policy. What is important is that Wikipedians know the policies relavent to what they do, and
1748:
largely on the stuff above. When I look at AfD nominations and opinions, I like to see whether or not users actually give their reasoning. I also noticed a distinct lack of actually quoting policies, or basing decisions on them, and little engagement in "borderline" AfD discussions where an opinion
917:
My own experience with Xyrael is limited, but I like how he has played a major part in getting the Test Wiki up and running, as it gives
Wikipedians and others an expanded playground to try stuff out, rather than relegating all tests to the sandbox Knowledge (XXG) provides. The candidate also as a
868:
As a person, Xyrael is kind, altruistic, and always tries to do the right thing. As a
Wikipedian, he has contributed around the board. We need more administrators, and Xyrael has shown a commitment to Knowledge (XXG) and a strength of character that indicates that he is more than ready for the job.
453:
and ask an admin to warn the user; I was not aware of this process at the time. However, I feel that by looking back on it like this I am able to learn more about the policy. If I had been an admin then or if a similar situation were to arise again, I probably would have semi-protected the page and
393:
First three interelated questions Could you give examples of *fDs where you have gone against the consensus at the time of your edit? Second, could you give examples of AfDs where you cited a specific policy for your reasoning? Third, how would you address concern that your AfD involvement has not
1787:
per above and review of unhelpful, "per nom" AfD contributions, I am convinced that Xyrael does not understand that AfD is meant to be a discussion to reach consensus and not a poll. The already disastrous AfD process cannot afford an admin who doesn't understand this, and that he doesn't already
523:
explains to some degree the way in which administrators are treated by the community as a whole and how they are expected to treat others, but this doesn't seem to sink in - and as I say, this is an issue that we need to tackle. To deal with this myself as an administrator, I would try and ensure
570:
Viewing contribution data for user Xyrael (over the 3828 edit(s) shown on this page) (FAQ) Time range: 348 approximate day(s) of edits on this page Most recent edit on: 19hr (UTC) -- 26, Aug, 2006 || Oldest edit on: 20hr (UTC) -- 13, August, 2005 Overall edit summary use (last 1000 edits): Major
470:
I would first cite my response to Lar's query above where I gently nudged the trouble-makers in the direction of improving their situation using kind words and suggestions rather than insults and orders. I can also link to myself attempting to explain policy to a user without giving up. First, I
518:
I'm glad you've brought this up as it is something that I think needs to be tackled by the community because I feel this could potentially stop a lot of disputes from occuring. When I was discussing my upcoming nomination with someone in real life recently, they made the obervation that 'online
475:
on my usertalk and I tried to explain myself on his talkpage. Unfortunately, that ip's talk doesn't seem to exist anymore and I would appreciate help in finding it to link to here, if anyone is able to. However, the responses of that user can be seen on my talk and eventually I was assured when
1563:
in view of the candidate's conception of adminship (viz., that admins are not infallible and in any event ought to act, in almost every case, to interpret discussions so as to ascertain for the completion of what actions a consensus exists and then to undertake those actions) and inasmuch as,
209:
Unfortunately, I foresee using blocking powers most as part of my fight against vandalism. I don't particularly look forward to cutting people off from editing, but I accept that it can be necessary and would use it to stop vandalism when warnings have been given out by myself or others to a
454:
then spoken to the user about what they were doing, and I should have done the latter at least back then. Additionally, my nominator has discussed various situations where protection would or would not be appropriate and I believe I responded correctly every time.
1924:
leaning twards Weak
Support. Looks like Xyrael would be a good vandal fighter. I believe this candidate wouldn’t abuse the tools, but there are some things this candidate can improve. Per, points mentioned by Bobet and Wafulz, I would like to see
317:. I solve conflicts with words rather than reversions and I don't think I've ever had to revert more than once consecutively (with the exception of vandalism). I think I can fairly cite the most involved events here: a dispute over civility (
400:
The opposing concerns are perfectly valid and I hope to take the criticism as positively as possible and explain myself in further detail here. First, I found that I was against consensus (although there wasn't much of one) in
250:
was almost entirely a copyvio and through other work I became involved in adding an image and organising the information, as well as rewriting it and then citing the page it was lifted from. I have added information to the
273:- I believe I have prompted renewed interest in the article as there have been several edits since mine that build on what I have written). Additionally, I correct spelling and grammar all over the place and have uploaded
528:
network and only regaining them from ChanServ when required. This is the approach I would hope to use in order to show that I'm the same as everyone else, but I'm just a bit more experienced and trusted by the
880:
Should be a fine admin now and even better as he matures into the job. The catalyst thing is a concept we don't hear enough about, it's so true, you find catalysts everywhere if you know to look for them.
1327:—I foresee Xyrael using blocking powers most as part of a fight against vandalism. I foresee this as an appropriate thing to do. I see the Wikicommunity never regreting this adminship. Do it. Do it now.
488:
What, in your opinion, compels people to look at admins as these people who are high and mighty, and why do they never realize that admins don't really have such special powers? What would you do to fix
426:
1929:
discussion in AfD’s. Also, more substantial edits in the main space would be good. If the decision was mine, I would be willing to give Xyrael the benefit of the doubt and trust ‘em with the mop.
1793:
AfD's rather than committing any sort of time to one of them to provide meaningful commentary. But at least he actually said something in this one; the vast majority of them are "Delete per nom".
1306:
I find no evidence that he will abuse or misuse admin tools. He is also a kind and civil user. And I have to agree with Where's statement as well with regards to the oppose comment by Wafulz. --
1565:
210:
sufficient degree. I should imagine that removing obvious CSD candidates during new page patrol will also be a handy skill. I would also like to take part in closing xfDs and working with
330:
277:
for articles. However, my biggest achievements have been with maintenance; as said before I am primarily a metapedian and I have put a lot of work into fighting vandalism, primarily with
255:
article on the server technology of the network and am working on the philosophy; it doesn't look that great at the moment but the information is there. I have some interest in the
299:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
402:
1904:
Good answering of questions, but a lack of significant contributions. Most mainspace edits are minor and very few article talk edits. May lack experience against vandalism.
184:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge (XXG) in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
414:
406:
1815:
1633:. I've decided that RfA has improved, and am now willing to return in order to support fantastic candidates like Xyrael. More candidates like this one please. —
422:
418:
445:
When I first registered my account and was only an occasional contributor, I found that my page was being vandalised repeatedly by a trollish user of another
1981:
1017:
200:
464:
Could you expand on your answer to default question 3 above with specific examples of conflicts and how your mentioned philosophy helped resolve them?
410:
1883:
A great editor, although I am concerned by the reasons stated by Bobet, especially in AfDs where it isnt really a vote, but more of a discussion. --
1163:- good answers to questions and would make an excellent admin, as evidenced by his VP moderatorship I honsetly thought he was already an admin!
1859:
A great editor with good contributions, but I cannot ignore the reasons listed by both Bobet and Wafulz. Improving these will gain my support. --
1826:. Kudos on the vandalfighting activities though. With more established interest in researched contributions I'm more than willing to support. ~
975:
Great, thanks for making that clearer. For the records and benefit of other visitors to this page, I cite a small discussion over the issue
1963:
1870:
655:
646:
439:
You also mention in your answer to standard question 1 page protection. What prior experience do you have with the protection policies?
33:
17:
1705:
243:
1913:
1029:
841:
446:
654:
I note in your upload log a fair use image that was tagged as an imagevio and deleted, but I think you've learnt from that by now.
1525:
1942:
305:
There are three links that in my opinion solve the vast majority of conflicts around here, as shown at the top of my talkpage:
118:
939:
originally configured and started up the test wiki, and that I just provide the hosting at the moment and act as a steward. —
1280:
1673:
1605:
976:
192:
1420:
1347:
73:
228:
Of your articles or contributions to Knowledge (XXG), are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
1892:
1601:- why did nobody tell me this was here? :P. Great user: kind, civil, helpful and active. Give him the mop! Regards, —
196:
544:
1692:
1481:
894:
346:
1170:
774:
472:
326:
318:
959:
919:
717:
1645:
1471:
261:
series of books and in libraries, and have made significant contributions and improvements to the article on
1865:
1401:
1152:
506:
987:
943:
667:
359:
165:
138:
1699:
1452:
552:
1515:
1386:
1308:
968:
928:
827:
491:
274:
1909:
1670:
1268:
1097:
1025:
980:
906:
837:
1962:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
242:
I have helped with the wikification and general improvement of a small number of articles, and started
1905:
1109:
As Vandalproof moderator, he gets my vote, but the edit count is quite low for adminship standards. --
832:
824:
663:
Thank you for noting that; for the record that was in December 2005 when I was a casual contributor. —
67:
1888:
1827:
1476:
1446:
1343:
1291:
1936:
1610:
1602:
1228:
1078:
728:
1948:
1916:
1896:
1875:
1844:
1839:
1830:
1802:
1779:
1765:
1753:
1740:
1721:
1709:
1679:
1649:
1625:
1613:
1593:
1572:
1555:
1543:
1530:
1501:
1489:
1459:
1436:
1424:
1407:
1376:
1362:
1351:
1331:
1319:
1298:
1271:
1259:
1233:
1219:
1207:
1193:
1181:
1155:
1140:
1113:
1101:
1084:
1055:
1043:
996:
970:
952:
930:
909:
897:
875:
860:
846:
815:
787:
764:
745:
733:
703:
676:
658:
649:
637:
624:
564:
512:
368:
349:
174:
147:
125:
1860:
1433:
1317:
1231:
1149:
1134:
1884:
520:
310:
56:
1842:
1689:
1520:
1396:
1148:. Civil, fairly experienced, even-tempered, and interested in tasks that require the tools.
856:
614:
501:
1926:
1814:
per Bobet. 2. I cannot find a single AfD where the editor provided evidence of own research.
1798:
1578:
425:
I made a suggestion of a merge which was taken up by users below me, and this happened again
278:
211:
101:
1796:
Sorry to be so harsh but this looks like it's going to pass pretty easily, unfortunately. —
1661:
1640:
1568:, I am confident that Xyrael will neither abuse nor misuse (even avolitionally) the tools.
1328:
1093:
1021:
902:
772:
Good spread of edits, well-spoken and edits show representation in a good spread of areas.
450:
314:
286:
282:
235:
1622:
1338:
1284:
1216:
742:
617:
281:
of which I am a moderator. I also try to be a friendly and useful face around many of the
795:
Despite relatively low edit count, The oppose section is (currently) empty for a reason.
550:
All user's edits. (note older stats removed since all the info and more is posted below).
413:
after the article was improved over the course of the debate and I was against consensus
1930:
1242:
1175:
1165:
1064:
1039:
Good responses to questions. I'm pleased with your experience in time and in edits. --
722:
712:
634:
122:
1819:
239:
1975:
1569:
1540:
1313:
1203:
1129:
1040:
890:
757:
696:
342:
322:
1370:- friendly, and I assume that he knows the tools well, from being on the test wiki.
405:
where the final result was one of no consensus reached. A similar situation occured
215:
1776:
1718:
1510:
1498:
1391:
1372:
1359:
1110:
796:
611:
597:
496:
484:
382:
1750:
1635:
1552:
1416:
1190:
1052:
992:
984:
948:
940:
688:
672:
664:
540:
364:
356:
170:
162:
143:
135:
63:
191:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
1956:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1760:
1737:
1227:
We need more guys like him that are willing to take care of the mundane tasks
936:
870:
854:
due to low WP edits and didn't really like A1. Other than that, they'll do.--
1584:
257:
154:
1467:
because Xyr is a great user, polite, and he's done well on The Test Wiki.
1415:
good editor, although I would prefer more thorugh explanations of xfDs.--
1123:
1011:
886:
525:
338:
252:
247:
1010:
High-standard user and firmly deserves a place in adminship. Agree with
285:
where I can be found giving advice where possible and I am a member of
270:
262:
1966:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
134:
I am honoured to be nominated and I accept with the same thought. —
158:
306:
1014:, when matured even more will make an excellent administrator.
325:) involving several other wikipedians and a complex mediation (
1241:. Has the experience and capability of being a fine admin. --
132:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
386:
As always all additional questions are completely optional.
121:, keep the vandals in check and smooth the editing process.
1551:
per nominator; helpful, productive user, strong history. --
1283:
in every situation, and also works a lots on Vandalproof.
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1794:
1789:
266:
111:
108:
105:
98:
95:
92:
89:
86:
83:
80:
77:
1535:
Somewhat odd distribution of edits, but still gets my
1384:
Has satisfied my admin req's. Can only get better.--
1267:- good balance of experience, and shows maturity.
1090:I just missed a support number ending in 0 support
629:I was too busy trying to clear out a backlog to
1838:per Bobet, I don't see much in article writing
1631:First-RfA-edit-in-two-months Support on wheels
327:one (scroll around for some more on that page)
107:and makes good use of it to revert vandalism
8:
645:, I've a good impression of him from AfD.
218:, I should think I will have a lot to do.
88:(more than one edit) and removals from
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
7:
234:Aside from trying to play a role in
91:from articles. Gives sensible third
85:. He has made good contributions to
1279:He deserves to be an admin, always
979:and notes on a destewardised user
24:
1982:Successful requests for adminship
394:involved any "borderline" cases?
556:
193:Category:Knowledge (XXG) backlog
1516:
1511:
1477:
1472:
1468:
1130:
960:
920:
689:
76:) – Let's see, Xyrael is civil
1526:
1486:
1482:
656:Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh
647:Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh
1:
1931:
1722:11:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1710:02:31, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1680:18:53, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
1650:13:53, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
1626:08:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
1586:
1402:
1171:
1135:
988:
944:
828:
697:
668:
559:
507:
360:
166:
139:
1943:
1937:
1824:Research, Research, Research
1717:. This is admin No 1,000. --
1521:
1392:
1387:
1292:
1285:
1176:
1166:
1124:
823:, good and friendly user. --
553:
497:
492:
201:administrators' reading list
1949:14:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
1917:12:23, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
1897:05:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
1876:02:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
1845:17:04, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
1831:02:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
1803:22:49, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
1780:01:20, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
1766:23:14, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1754:19:25, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1741:13:25, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1614:10:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
1594:03:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
1573:03:00, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
1556:18:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
1544:17:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
1531:09:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
1502:01:02, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
1490:21:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
1460:16:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
1437:09:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
1425:00:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
1408:23:38, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
1397:
1377:20:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
1363:15:22, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
1352:03:50, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
1332:02:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
1320:01:49, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
1299:01:13, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
1272:00:35, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
1260:00:31, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
1234:00:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
1220:00:07, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
1208:23:38, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1194:22:14, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1182:22:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1156:20:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1141:19:23, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1114:19:18, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1102:18:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1085:17:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1056:17:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1044:16:36, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
997:18:09, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
971:17:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
953:16:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
931:16:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
910:15:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
898:15:33, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
876:14:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
861:14:00, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
847:13:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
816:13:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
788:12:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
765:12:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
746:12:40, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
734:12:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
704:11:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
677:11:47, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
659:11:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
650:11:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
638:11:38, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
625:11:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
565:19:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
543:'s edit summary usage with
513:02:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
502:
369:14:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
350:14:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
337:for getting things done? ++
180:Questions for the candidate
175:11:25, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
148:11:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
126:11:09, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
1998:
1810:1. Very few article space
246:which is making progress.
195:, and read the page about
153:As stated on my userpage,
741:- Explains himself well.
244:the Awareness WikiProject
79:, friendly while editing
1959:Please do not modify it.
1032:) 16:14, 26 August 2006.
417:and along with another,
409:. I changed my view in
39:Please do not modify it
1775:per Bobet and Wafulz.
1527:Jimbo's 40th Birthday!
935:I must note here that
1020:comment was added by
603:11:31, 26 August 2006
100:opinions. Trusted as
34:request for adminship
110:, and welcome users
1564:consistent with my
1281:Assuming good faith
315:assuming good faith
275:several nice images
1329:Williamborg (Bill)
1180:
1139:
403:The Medaille Trust
1947:
1579:VandalProof Cabal
1350:
1164:
1122:
1033:
117:help clear those
1989:
1961:
1945:
1939:
1935:
1933:
1927:more interactive
1873:
1868:
1863:
1695:
1678:
1608:
1590:
1583::) 'nuff said -
1528:
1523:
1518:
1513:
1509:per nominator!--
1488:
1484:
1479:
1474:
1470:
1458:
1455:
1449:
1404:
1399:
1394:
1389:
1342:
1316:
1311:
1296:
1289:
1269:Metamagician3000
1257:
1252:
1247:
1206:
1178:
1173:
1168:
1137:
1132:
1126:
1072:
1015:
990:
966:
965:
946:
926:
925:
859:
830:
812:
810:
808:
806:
786:
784:
779:
762:
731:
725:
715:
701:
694:
670:
622:
600:
561:
558:
555:
509:
504:
499:
494:
362:
168:
141:
41:
1997:
1996:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1988:
1987:
1986:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1964:this nomination
1957:
1871:
1866:
1861:
1828:trialsanderrors
1708:
1693:
1676:
1669:
1606:
1453:
1447:
1445:
1423:
1309:
1307:
1253:
1248:
1243:
1215:per above also
1202:
1083:
1068:
1016:—The preceding
961:
921:
855:
845:
804:
802:
800:
798:
780:
777:(aeropagitica)
775:
773:
758:
729:
723:
713:
618:
604:
598:
572:
473:responded to me
423:this discussion
381:Questions from
52:
37:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1995:
1993:
1985:
1984:
1974:
1973:
1969:
1968:
1952:
1951:
1919:
1899:
1878:
1853:
1852:
1848:
1847:
1833:
1805:
1782:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1743:
1730:
1729:
1725:
1724:
1712:
1698:
1682:
1674:
1652:
1628:
1616:
1596:
1575:
1558:
1546:
1533:
1504:
1492:
1462:
1439:
1427:
1419:
1410:
1406:
1379:
1365:
1354:
1334:
1322:
1301:
1274:
1262:
1236:
1222:
1210:
1196:
1184:
1158:
1143:
1116:
1104:
1087:
1077:
1058:
1046:
1034:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
912:
900:
878:
866:Strong support
863:
849:
835:
818:
790:
767:
748:
736:
706:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
640:
627:
605:
602:
590:
589:
585:
584:
577:
576:
575:
569:
568:
567:
548:
545:mathbot's tool
536:
535:
531:
530:
511:
483:Question from
480:
479:
478:
477:
458:
457:
456:
455:
433:
432:
431:
430:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
293:
292:
291:
290:
222:
221:
220:
219:
197:administrators
182:
181:
151:
150:
51:
46:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1994:
1983:
1980:
1979:
1977:
1967:
1965:
1960:
1954:
1953:
1950:
1946:
1940:
1934:
1928:
1923:
1920:
1918:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1900:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1886:
1882:
1879:
1877:
1874:
1869:
1864:
1858:
1855:
1854:
1850:
1849:
1846:
1843:
1841:
1837:
1834:
1832:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1812:contributions
1809:
1806:
1804:
1801:
1800:
1795:
1791:
1786:
1785:Strong oppose
1783:
1781:
1778:
1774:
1771:
1767:
1764:
1763:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1752:
1747:
1744:
1742:
1739:
1735:
1732:
1731:
1727:
1726:
1723:
1720:
1716:
1713:
1711:
1707:
1706:damage report
1704:
1701:
1697:
1696:
1691:
1686:
1683:
1681:
1677:
1671:
1668:
1665:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1647:
1643:
1642:
1638:
1637:
1632:
1629:
1627:
1624:
1620:
1617:
1615:
1612:
1609:
1604:
1600:
1597:
1595:
1592:
1589:
1582:
1580:
1576:
1574:
1571:
1567:
1562:
1559:
1557:
1554:
1550:
1547:
1545:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1532:
1529:
1524:
1519:
1514:
1508:
1505:
1503:
1500:
1496:
1493:
1491:
1485:
1480:
1475:
1466:
1463:
1461:
1456:
1450:
1443:
1440:
1438:
1435:
1434:Mailer Diablo
1431:
1428:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1411:
1409:
1405:
1400:
1395:
1390:
1385:
1383:
1380:
1378:
1375:
1374:
1369:
1366:
1364:
1361:
1358:
1355:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1340:
1335:
1333:
1330:
1326:
1323:
1321:
1318:
1315:
1312:
1305:
1302:
1300:
1297:
1295:
1290:
1288:
1287:Daniel's page
1282:
1278:
1275:
1273:
1270:
1266:
1263:
1261:
1258:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1232:
1230:
1226:
1223:
1221:
1218:
1214:
1211:
1209:
1205:
1200:
1197:
1195:
1192:
1188:
1185:
1183:
1179:
1174:
1169:
1162:
1159:
1157:
1154:
1151:
1150:Mike Christie
1147:
1144:
1142:
1138:
1133:
1127:
1120:
1117:
1115:
1112:
1108:
1105:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1088:
1086:
1082:
1081:
1076:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1062:
1059:
1057:
1054:
1050:
1047:
1045:
1042:
1038:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1013:
1009:
1006:
998:
994:
991:
986:
982:
978:
974:
973:
972:
969:
967:
964:
956:
955:
954:
950:
947:
942:
938:
934:
933:
932:
929:
927:
924:
916:
913:
911:
908:
904:
901:
899:
896:
892:
888:
884:
879:
877:
874:
873:
867:
864:
862:
858:
853:
850:
848:
843:
839:
834:
831:
826:
822:
819:
817:
814:
813:
794:
791:
789:
785:
783:
778:
771:
768:
766:
763:
761:
755:
752:
749:
747:
744:
740:
737:
735:
732:
726:
721:
720:
716:
711:- Of course.
710:
707:
705:
702:
700:
695:
693:
687:
684:
678:
674:
671:
666:
662:
661:
660:
657:
653:
652:
651:
648:
644:
641:
639:
636:
632:
628:
626:
623:
621:
616:
613:
610:at last! ;-)
609:
606:
601:
596:of course. —
595:
592:
591:
587:
586:
583:
580:Final tally:
579:
578:
574:
573:
566:
563:
562:
549:
546:
542:
538:
537:
533:
532:
527:
522:
517:
516:
515:
514:
510:
505:
500:
495:
490:
487:
486:
474:
469:
466:
465:
463:
460:
459:
452:
448:
444:
441:
440:
438:
435:
434:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
399:
396:
395:
392:
389:
388:
387:
385:
384:
370:
366:
363:
358:
353:
352:
351:
348:
344:
340:
335:
334:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
301:
300:
298:
295:
294:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
259:
254:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
230:
229:
227:
224:
223:
217:
213:
208:
205:
204:
202:
198:
194:
190:
187:
186:
185:
179:
178:
177:
176:
172:
169:
164:
160:
156:
149:
145:
142:
137:
133:
130:
129:
128:
127:
124:
120:
114:
112:
109:
106:
103:
99:
96:
93:
90:
87:
84:
81:
78:
75:
72:
69:
65:
61:
60:
58:
55:Ended 11:31,
50:
47:
43:
40:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
1958:
1955:
1921:
1901:
1880:
1856:
1835:
1823:
1811:
1807:
1797:
1784:
1772:
1761:
1745:
1733:
1714:
1702:
1688:
1684:
1666:
1663:Doctor Bruno
1662:
1658:
1654:
1644:
1639:
1634:
1630:
1618:
1598:
1587:
1577:
1566:RfA criteria
1560:
1548:
1536:
1506:
1494:
1464:
1441:
1429:
1412:
1381:
1371:
1367:
1356:
1339:CrazyRussian
1337:
1324:
1303:
1293:
1286:
1276:
1264:
1254:
1249:
1244:
1238:
1224:
1212:
1198:
1186:
1160:
1145:
1118:
1107:Weak Support
1106:
1089:
1079:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1060:
1048:
1036:
1007:
962:
922:
915:Weak Support
914:
882:
871:
865:
852:Weak support
851:
820:
797:
792:
781:
776:
769:
759:
753:
750:
738:
718:
708:
698:
691:
685:
642:
630:
619:
607:
593:
581:
551:
482:
481:
467:
461:
442:
436:
397:
390:
380:
379:
302:
296:
283:IRC channels
256:
231:
225:
214:et al. As a
206:
188:
183:
152:
131:
115:
82:and helpful
70:
62:
54:
53:
48:
38:
30:
28:
1820:is built on
1700:wreak havoc
1690:riana_dzast
1189:per above.
1094:GeorgeMoney
1080:Talk to me!
1022:Anthony cfc
903:Merovingian
279:VandalProof
102:VandalProof
1623:Ugur Basak
1448:Aguerriero
1442:Yar bugger
1217:Hello32020
743:Agathoclea
529:community.
411:one debate
216:metapedian
157:is indeed
104:moderator
57:2006-09-02
31:successful
1932:JungleCat
1646:criticism
1611:tianpower
1119:Of course
963:hoopydink
923:hoopydink
635:Petros471
633:first...
307:catalysts
287:Esperanza
258:Discworld
155:knowledge
123:Petros471
1976:Category
1893:contribs
1816:This one
1657:per nom
1497:per nom
1483:=hello?=
1229:Appleboy
1204:Khoikhoi
1041:Db099221
1030:contribs
1018:unsigned
760:Pilotguy
594:Support,
582:(54/6/4)
534:Comments
526:freenode
521:WP:ADMIN
311:civility
253:freenode
248:PolyHeme
199:and the
119:backlogs
97:and rfa
74:contribs
1944:contrib
1922:Neutral
1902:Neutral
1881:Neutral
1857:Neutral
1851:Neutral
1840:Jaranda
1777:Singopo
1719:Ligulem
1715:Support
1685:Support
1655:Support
1619:Support
1599:Support
1581:Support
1561:Support
1549:Support
1537:support
1507:Support
1499:Anger22
1495:Support
1465:Support
1430:Support
1413:Support
1382:Support
1368:Support
1360:JoshuaZ
1357:Support
1325:Support
1314:iva1979
1304:Support
1277:Support
1265:Support
1239:Support
1225:Support
1213:Support
1199:Support
1191:Michael
1187:Support
1177:rtinp23
1161:Support
1146:Support
1111:Ageo020
1061:Support
1049:Support
1037:Support
1008:Support
883:Support
833:nce Ong
821:Support
793:Support
782:(talk)
770:Support
754:Cleared
739:Support
709:Support
631:support
608:Support
599:FireFox
588:Support
489:this?--
485:Chili14
447:website
421:. With
383:JoshuaZ
263:L-space
212:WP:RFPP
1872:050389
1836:Oppose
1808:Oppose
1773:Oppose
1751:Wafulz
1746:Oppose
1734:Oppose
1728:Oppose
1675:E Mail
1636:Werdna
1553:Kuzaar
1478:tails!
1417:danntm
1153:(talk)
1053:Ixfd64
751:clared
541:Xyrael
451:WP:AIV
267:before
94:, afd
64:Xyrael
49:Xyrael
1885:Arnzy
1762:Where
1738:Bobet
1541:Steel
1539:. --
1348:email
1066:Mr. L
937:Where
872:Where
857:Andeh
554:Voice
271:after
159:power
59:(UTC)
16:<
1938:talk
1910:heru
1906:Aran
1889:talk
1862:Will
1790:Here
1641:talk
1512:Tdxi
1454:talk
1444:. --
1432:. -
1373:Will
1344:talk
1245:Nish
1098:talk
1026:talk
985:Xyra
981:here
977:here
941:Xyra
907:Talk
714:Iola
686:Duh.
665:Xyra
615:isza
557:-of-
539:See
427:here
419:here
415:here
407:here
357:Xyra
313:and
238:and
163:Xyra
136:Xyra
68:talk
1914:nar
1867:Mak
1603:Cel
1570:Joe
1250:kid
1201:. —
1074:fty
1012:Lar
983:. —
887:Lar
869:--
825:Ter
724:ana
692:jam
643:Yes
560:All
339:Lar
331:two
323:two
319:one
236:AfD
1978::
1895:)
1891:•
1822::
1799:GT
1687:—
1621:--
1607:es
1585:GI
1517:an
1403:14
1398:li
1393:hi
1336:-
1255:64
1100:)
1092:.
1063:--
1051:--
1028:•
995:/
951:/
905:-
889::
885:++
840:|
811:a
756:--
699:es
690:--
675:/
620:13
508:14
503:li
498:hi
468:A:
443:A:
398:A:
367:/
341::
329:,
321:,
309:,
303:A:
297:3.
269:,
240:3O
232:A:
226:2.
207:A:
203:.
189:1.
173:/
146:/
113:.
36:.
1941:/
1912:|
1908:|
1887:(
1703:|
1694:a
1672:/
1667:_
1659:_
1591:n
1588:e
1522:g
1487:«
1473:c
1469:»
1457:)
1451:(
1421:C
1388:C
1346:/
1310:S
1294:☎
1172:a
1167:M
1136:e
1131:H
1128:.
1125:G
1121:.
1096:(
1070:e
1024:(
993:l
989:e
949:l
945:e
895:c
893:/
891:t
844:)
842:C
838:T
836:(
829:e
809:g
807:o
805:c
803:r
801:o
799:J
730:T
727:•
719:k
673:l
669:e
612:M
547:.
493:C
462:3
437:2
391:1
365:l
361:e
347:c
345:/
343:t
289:.
265:(
171:l
167:e
144:l
140:e
71:·
66:(
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.