Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Yanksox

3598:

I am not entirely an expert in the subject, so I really couldn't assist directly but act as a mediatator (which I can do as a regular editor, but obviously as an admin I could unblock) in the matter. I think another issue is that we have alot of eager users that want to contribute what they know about the world, however, what they know or want to talk about doesn't meet our guideline suggestions or seem to merit an article in the eye of some editors. I have been involved in alot of AfD discussions and speedy deletions, and people get confused and flustered when they think we are moving away from our "values." Personally, I think a huge issue is the conflicting outside views of Knowledge compared to those of editors whom contribute as often as they can. Alot of people that I personally know, seem to think that Knowledge is going through an "identity crisis." I don't think it's an identity crisis, as opposed to the real issue, which is complete misconceptions of how we function and how hard this can be at times. Obviously, as an administator, my tools couldn't help except with following policy and as an editor in explaining how we work. I know that this may seem to be rambling answer, but it's rather complicated and it will continue to follow the project as long as it exists. It's important to guide new users that have encountered the complex underworkings, and try to keep their enthuasim so that they can better the project. I guess the easiest solution would be to keep doing what we do, understand the suggested guidelines, use our given intelligence, and be completely open.

3331:

100% Minor edits: 99.81% Average edits per day: 44.29 (for last 500 edit(s)) Article edit summary use (last 326 edits): Major article edits: 100% Minor article edits: 100% Analysis of edits (out of all 5000 edits shown on this page and last 22 image uploads): Notable article edits (creation/expansion/major rewrites/sourcing): 0.8% (40) Significant article edits (copyedits/small rewrites/content/reference additions): 0.6% (30) Superficial article edits (grammar/spelling/wikify/links/tagging): 14.36% (718) Superficial article edits marked as minor: 34.82% Unique image uploads (non-deleted/updates): 10 (checks last 5000) Breakdown of all edits: Unique pages edited: 2764 | Average edits per page: 1.81 | Edits on top: 16.88% Edits marked as major (non-minor/reverts): 42.36% (2118 edit(s)) Edits marked as minor (non-reverts): 31.52% (1576 edit(s)) Marked reverts (reversions/text removal): 23.38% (1169 edit(s)) Unmarked edits: 0.88% (44 edit(s)) Edits by Knowledge namespace: Article: 35.76% (1788) | Article talk: 5.14% (257) User: 2.68% (134) | User talk: 32.14% (1607) Knowledge: 23.36% (1168) | Knowledge talk: 0.4% (20) Image: 0.2% (10) Template: 0.22% (11) Category: 0.02% (1) Portal: 0% (0) Help: 0% (0) MediaWiki: 0% (0) Other talk pages: 0.08% (4)

3667:), but I think it's more of a page that is done in jest and could possibly be misinterpreted by anyone whom is new to the project. Again, the same can be said for the cat of Rouge admins, however, I wouldn't add myself to said category. The reason being that: A) It seems to be judged upon admin actions and reactions to said actions, of which I have no idea about since I am not currently an admin and B) My userpage is meant to be a friendly page in which both current members of the community and people not yet enriched here can be assisted. I don't think someone would understand the joke if they saw that cat on my page, and they could hold an objection against me or the community. Of course, this could see over anxious, but I believe anyone, and I repeat anyone, that can gain access to this project is fully capable of bettering the project, and I do not wish to defer them from doing so. 3633:(one big long question about categories of admins and your thoughts about them) Are you aware of the notion of adminstrators saying they're willing to be voluntarily recalled or reviewed, by a less onerous process than a new RfA (or worse) arbComm action? What do you think of the idea? Would you consider placing yourself (placement should only be done by oneself) in such a category if you were made an admin? Why or why not? Are you aware of the notion of Rouge admins? What do you think of the notion? Do you see it as purely humorous or do you see what it's driving at? Would you consider allowing yourself to by placed in this category (placement is traditionally done by someone else) if you were made an admin? Why or why not? (note: both these categories have some controversy attached to them, for different reasons, and note also, although I am a policy and process 2736:. You are wrong. Edits do not show experience — though it helps. There are some new editors who achieve over 6000 edits in a couple of months. However, they never take the time to slow down and actually learn things. Additionally, people leave the project very quickly: we do not need an admin that may leave when he/she suddenly discovers that he/she is bored. This is why many people prefer that a user has been here for a while: it shows commitment, rather than a new-found fad/hobby (if it were up to me, an editor would have to be here for a year. But then again, I wouldn't have been an admin until last month, and many people would become frustrated. Also, I'm going to stop rambling now and get back on track). Anyway, with all that said, and with the currect standard that the community has set, it baffles me how 2601:

incident. Also, said incident was one of the main reasons why I started to really actually study up on policy (I made flash cards, and have a notebook full of the stuff), since I didn't understand it at that time. But since the incident I honestly believe that I have drastically improved as an editor and a member of the community. I think a really bad analogy would to say that if this was a football/soccer match, intially, I picked up the ball with my hands and threw in the air. Now, I have practiced to try to improve myself that I could assist the team (every Wikipedian) to improve. I understand and respect your reason for opposing me, but I would like to clarify that I am a much different and more mature user since my "newbie" learning experience.

82:) – Nick, a.k.a. Yanksox, has been a bizarrely impressive editor since his arrival early this year. He's contributed to this project in so many ways: all kinds of deletion debates, RfA, AN/x, vandal fighting, newpage patrol. Most importantly, Nick is a valued member of the community. Newbies and established users frequently consult him, and at least a half-dozen users have expressed interest in nominating him. Over the past few months, I have become close friends with Nick IRL and I am highly impressed with his dedication and maturity, so much so that I frequently solicit his input on my edits. Nick is also the editor primarily responsible for uncovering the infamous 2565:

project in mind, even though there might be over-conscientiousness in this case — but rather that than the reverse, in my book. It's not fair to criticise him for proposing CSD in less than a minute, as the article was just an external link in its first appearance, and to all intents and purposes CSD was correct. That is a strong testimony to Yanksox's efficiency in monitoring New Pages Patrol, and his dedication there has been very beneficial to the project. Everyone is bound to make errors at times, and this was a relatively minor one from good motivations. The important thing is how people deal with errors. Yanksox displayed exceptional humility in his response,

2544:

tremendously respect you and your opinion, and I actually can look at Al McKay as a learning experience that I shouldn't have had but did. The only reason it occured was since I was just getting into the CSD, and didn't really learn it as well as I should have. I was confused, and trying to find my place in this great big place. It was an unfortunate event that occured, but as I have stated earlier, "I have made mistakes," I wish it didn't happen, but it did, and I believe everything occurs for a reason. The reason for that was I had to do sommething really "idoitic," so that I could become a better editor.

3040:, in that Knowledge would only be hurting itself by compelling strict verifiability requirements. I don't think this was running a "Fan club" or "advocacy group", but simply an action in the interest of Knowledge. In regard to your latter comment, I don't think it's appropriate to speculate as to what is the cause of that warning because it is of a personal nature, and what happened is a matter of speculation and none of our business. No indication that it had anything to do with conflicts on Knowledge. 2640:"Idiocy" is certainly an apt description of Yanksox's actions in biting a newbie and later asking for a decent article to be deleted; he admits as much, and I am impressed by his frankness in that regard. As for "erring in the defense of quality", that's not the same as "do not under any circumstances wait five minutes to see if it might be a progressive save from someone who will turn out to be a valuable new user". It's called using common sense, and it's a Good Thing. 476:: Yanksox offered some kind words of encouragement to me during my early days at Knowledge, at a time when I was feeling discouraged by vandalism and linkspam. Each time I have crossed paths with him since, he's been nothing but friendly, encouraging, and helpful. He's beaten me to the punch countless times in vandalism & new page patrol. In short, I see nothing but good things for Knowledge coming out of Yanksox's inevitable adminship. -- 3074:— may change in the future. "Mistakes - None." Are we kidding here? No one's perfect. I wish I could have seen one of your mistakes. I would then be able to judge your reaction to very intense, controversial situations, and how you go about 'correcting' your mistakes (yes, I'm giving the "through experience comes wisdon" speech). Additionally, is there any article to which you have contributed significantly, and not just copyedited? 3425:. It seems are certain times when I am online there are no admins to examine the requests, and I would obviously examine each one and grant semi-protection if heavy vandalism from new or anonymous users or full protection if a massive editing dispute is resulting in an editing war that no solution is being reached on the talk or elsewhere. Of course, I would decline any request that didn't seem to require page protection. 3446:

of the true nature of NPP. As Mailer diablo stated in his RfA, "These 'newborn articles', some unwikified, need tender-loving care and attention to integrate with the ever-growing encyclopedia." I fully believe in this and assist with new pages with slight cleanup, wikifying or applying the necessary tags if they are needed. It's through this that I learn something new everyday

2586:

than a minute after an article has been created, it most certainly is — if efficiency is gained at the expense of newbies who could well be on their way towards creating a good article (or at least, as here, a good stub), then efficiency can go to hell. If you don't have that approach, then you're doing more harm than good. I'm glad that Yanksox is learning; is Tyrenius?

490:. I've found Yanksox to be willing to cooperate and open to dialog, and has developed a great grasp of policy pretty quickly. Most important, he has shown he values the humane aspect of the project by consistently helping others and approaching fellow editors in need. That is a true virtue, which makes me give him nothing shorter of my wholehearted support. 3506:. After that incident, I really started to develop as an editor. I don't know which one of us acted improperly, but I tried to be as neutral as I could. The incident really taught me that deletion of other people's work is a serious matter, and not to be taken lightly. I have since kept that philosophy in mind since that moment. 3003:(which is not negotiable) if we happened to really like a certain article. That kind of attitude really disturbs me, and we need admins who understand we're writing an encyclopedia here, not running a fan club or advocacy group. Similar behavior on at least one other AfD, though he retracted it. Also, 3597:

I was wondering when one of these would come back to bite me =). I, myself, am not entirely sure of the "greatest" burden, since there are a great deal of things that we can repair. I do have to agree with you on colateral damage of IPs and good faith users/editors that use AOL and the like. However,

3544:

I did have one other userpage, that was User:Yanksox/Messiahtest, which was a joke page that I created stating that in order to garner a vote from me, a user would need to "make any supreme being envious." It was a page that didn't get used often and I didn't see any purpose for it and I tagged it as

3386:

First and foremost I would assist in any area that I was needed or anywhere where a backlog needed to be tended to, but I would not do so in a manner which would be borderline reckless in which I would create more harm than help. Just as important, is for me to note, that I, if I was deemed worthy of

3053:

said basis was flawed, he erred on the side of wishing to help Knowledge. Personally, I'd rather have an admin who makes a dozen errors in favor of the project over an admin who makes 1 error that is detrimental. I second Adambiswanger1's sentiments above that the Wikibreak seemed personal in nature,

173:

Having been shocked to find out Yanksox was not an admin, I too had planned on nominating him for adminship. Reviewing his history, and watching/interacting with him in discussions, I have been consistently impressed at the professional way in which he conducts himself. Nick is already doing a large

3445:

I am highly active in the maintenance aspect of Knowledge, which is quite strange, considering I first came to the site just to read numerous articles about things I knew or wished to learn more about. The work I do at New Page Patrol is not limited to just applying CSD tags, that's less than half

3428:

And, finally, I would close any XfDs that have reached their full maturity and consensus has been gained or is beyond the point of a coherent consensus. I have participated in AfDs, MfDs, and RfDs, and would assist in closing any in those three categories. I have been acitve enough (especially AfD)

3330:

Viewing contribution data for user Yanksox (over the 5000 edit(s) shown on this page) (FAQ) Time range: 49 approximate day(s) of edits on this page Most recent edit on: 5hr (UTC) -- 22, Jul, 2006 || Oldest edit on: 15hr (UTC) -- 3, June, 2006 Overall edit summary use (last 1000 edits): Major edits:

3277:

I would also like to address, that I do infact make mistakes. The statement about my not having any mistakes is from one of my nominators, and his opinion. I have been engaged in heated discussions and recieved some extremly harsh insults, but I think I've learned how to shake such comments off and

3019:

I actually realized that my behavior at said AfD was out of line and completely unacceptable, and I apologize for that. My stating that I was "leaving," was not actually Wiki related but actually related to my situation in real life that emotionally damaged me to a point that I felt if I made edits

2843:

As per other opposes already expressed. Also on the fact that the same group that has supported most of the rfa's as of late, has again supported this one. My objection, ahead of time, is that this group, at least for the most part, is a clique and far from a well-rounded representation of the wiki

2543:

I'm actually quite glad that you posted this mistake of mine. Personally, I think it should be noted that was when I was first getting my feet into the water and I, myself, was a "newbie" at the time. I think that this is actually a prime example to show how I have improved drastically as a user. I

298:

time. But just look at all he's done!!! He's reverted TONS of vandalism, helped a lot of newcomers, voted in (and closed!) AfDs and MfDs, copyedited extensively, mediated... All in all, with over 8,000 edits, he is experienced, levelheaded, intelligent, and eager. I have to say I'm very proud of

294:- Yes, I know, most people will think I have a bit of a bias (a 25 month relationship with the nominee). But in sharp contrast to what most of you may think, it's in the other direction. I'd like to oppose because then he might get discouraged and decrease his editing times - thus increasing his 3663:

what exactly constitutes an "editor in good standing." Of course, no matter what the outline for such an editor, it will be disputed and contested. I view the Rouge admin page as an amusing page and I believe it should be viewed as such. I do understand what the deeper meaning of the page is (like

3662:

my RfA was to successfully pass with community consensus, I would absolutely add my name to Admins open to recall, since I think I should be reminded that being an admin is a privilege and not a right, and I should act within reasonable lines. I do have some concerns about admins open to recall in

2654:

I very much respect your protection of the "newbie" editor. There are conflicting values in this, as in many situations, and it is necessary to make a judicious and balanced evaluation. We disagree where that lies, but the matter has been thoroughly worked through and now the community can make up

2585:

who "upholds process" in the face of the Right Thing to Do is detrimental to the project, so Yanksox's movement towards attaining Clue since that incident is heartening, but not enough to get me to support him so soon. As for whether or not it's "fair" to criticise him for proposing a speedy less

2564:

and, judging from Yanksox's general good behaviour, is not likely to be true. The evidence indicates Yanksox's motivation was upholding process, namely the instruction that article creators should not remove CSD tags (for obvious reasons), and therefore he was acting with the best interests of the

3529:

The reason for this was because when I first registered I actually placed personal information about myself that would make it easy for someone to find me. I do trust Knowledge and it's users and editors on the whole. However, I did not want to place myself or anyone else close to me in danger of

2600:

Mark, let me again state that I highly respect you and your opinion and am pleasently surprised that you have taken the time to even post on this page. I do believe it is right to critize me for the actions that I committed on Al McKay, however, I think I have strived to improve myself since that

2898:

There are a number of people whose names recur on RfA because they take a particular interest in it. This has the advantage of giving them expertise in assessing candidates. When there is a good candidate, they naturally support, and with a bad candidate they oppose. That doesn't mean they are a

3415:, I have noticed a bit of a backlog exists in WP:RM. I posted here once after a user made inappropriate page moves, and I couldn't revert the move. I believe as an admin, I could help clear this backlog without necessarily causing a massive sweep of excessive moves that are not necessary. 2463:

Are you joking? I thought Yanksox already was an admin. This guy has more experience than plenty of actual sysops (8200 edits?! I'll never amount to that in my entire life!!!). With all my heart and the strongest vote possible, I say to wikipedia: YANKSOX ROX MY SOX! VOTE YANKEE FOR

2667:

read "Al McKay is a crafty guitarist, songwriter, producer and former Earth, Wind & Fire band member." There is a potential article there, but this isn't it, and there is nothing to be gained from keeping inanities like that in the history. Imagine someone writing an article on

2899:

clique, because there are plenty of occasions when that unity divides over a candidate whose suitability or lack of it is not so straightforward. I suggest you bring the subject up on RfA talk page. It is, to say the least, a questionable reason to oppose a specific individual.

3352:

Username Yanksox Total edits 8210 Distinct pages edited 4522 Average edits/page 1.816 First edit 21:20, 5 February 2006 (main) 3652 Talk 455 User 211 User talk 2355 Image 16 Image talk 3 Template 12 Template talk 1 Category 1 Knowledge 1478 Knowledge talk 25 Portal talk 1

1158:

woah! I can't believe that in the 12 hours since I last checked there've been this many comments. I needed to seek assistance from an admin a few days ago so I thot I'd seek help from Yanksox. I was amazed to learn that this editor wasn't an admin. He really should be!

2724::How is newness a factor? He's made 8,200 edits in his entire duration. That seems to prove that he's more devoted to Knowledge than others. It shows that he can make constructive edits quickly.I think that that amount of edits proves experience. 3588:

What do you think is the biggest burden facing Knowledge? Specifically, how could you as an admin fix it? (This is, of course, optional, and you said that you were "Pleasently surprised by the answer," so I'm just curious on how you'd answer it)

207:

I too, was just going to nominate him just two days ago, I was just going to ask him if he would accept a nom from me, and then I had to go to work. I completely support this nomination and wish to add my nominator-seal to it if possible! Go

2706:

userpage vandal reverter. It's hard to go around Knowledge and not notice your hard work... But you're still too new to be an admin in my opinion. You've only really been contributing a few months. Sorry, but that's what I think.

3657:

Great question. I am actually aware of both admins open to recall and the proposed admin review. I really like the idea of both, I particularly like the idea of keeping everyone honest since I believe fully in accountability.

3421:: I often read this page with fascination and have posted here a few times (both for protection and unprotection), and have read admin's summaries for declining or accepting requests, which has given me more insight into the 2960:

Shannon, if you have a good reason to oppose, as you say you do by supporting the other oppose voter's concerns, then fine. But why add these clique comments everywhere? Do you not realise that they fly in the face of

3191:

The RfA seems to be steering towards promotion, and that might be the right thing. It is my hope that the candidate will consider these points about procedure vs. what's right during his/her career as an admin. -

3387:

adminship by the community, I would slowly adjust myself so that I could properly use the tools. But I believe that I would, without any reservation, assist and participate around the following places around Wiki:

2508:), and the author removed the tag once he judged the article was good enough to avoid being speedied (he was right). Yanksox wanted the article deleted to punish its author for removing the tag. (For reference: 2451:-O.K. I'm on the bandwagon. The catch on the hoax is impressive. I do wish the guy would keep personal activities elsewhere, but I don't see any more "love" pages around so this seems to have cut back already. - 534:

I checked into Yanksox past comments with others. I believe this person would make a fine admin. I see no problems with giving this person the advanced tools to further the cause of this project. Yes, I support!

3020:

during that time I would have harmed the project more than I would have assisted. I would like to thank you for pointing this error out as I do believe it is unacceptable behavior for any user to begin with.

3174:—Strict policy at the cost of doing what's best for the project is a sweet, sweet, intoxicating nectar, but the fruit from which it is extracted has terribly sharp thorns. I share Mark's concerns. - 1725:, in the few months I've been here, I've constantly seen his name popping up on page histories and talk pages. Obviously very prolific, and seems like a decent sorta guy too. Good enough for me! 247:

I am truly flattered and honored by these nominations. After personally reflecting about this nomination, I gratefully accept and ardently await the opinions of other members of the community.

2517:). Now, I'm heartened that he Saw The Error Of His Ways afterwards, but the mere fact that he was capable of getting Knowledge procedure so completely, heart-rendingly, indescribably awfully 164:. He knows and can apply policy firmly, but is not heavy-handed. He's a good communicator and knows his way around the project. I wanted to nom, but CrazyRussian said he had first claim! 3405:: I have posted here several times and have helped admins by removing users that have been blocked. I would continue to assist and respond to the obvious vandalism posted on this page. 2560:

This incident (which occurred over 2 months ago) has been somewhat dramatised. To say Yanksox wanted to "punish" its author is pure conjecture without any evidence, certainly does not

3483:

Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

922:

of someone who will be as great an asset to wiki as a dedicated and conscientious admin as he is as an editor, and who, it is obvious from this page, is his own harshest critic.

3149:. I was going to endorse on his stats and "no big deal" but the account open only for two months? Too new, I'm sorry. Even another month would have made this an easy support. 3049:

In looking through that AfD, the only thing I see is an editor adamant about, hmm, Knowledge. I take no position on the basis of his argument at the AfD mentioned above, but

2996: 155:

Yanksox is top class admin material. He has a stable, measured temperament and has proved he does not rise to the bait even over extreme abuse, but maintains his objectivity.

338:(although the Yankees and sox blow ; )) Very rational, civil, and intelligent user. I don't forsee any obstacles for you in this process. Should be a cakewalk. Good luck 118:

History recently cleared to remove inadvertently disclosed personal info, but the sysops among us are invited to verify that there was nothing controversial there either.

127: 390: 736:

He makes me look like a Gnome :). I've no problems with past jibs; I think he's matured enough. Personal opinions in votes do not reflect actions as administrators.

3223:

The nominator was a little enthusiastic... :) I'd be happy to try to address any specific concerns you might have - feel free to post here or contact me privately. -

1384: 3361:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

2525:

uneasy about. I appreciate he's a good vandal-hunter, but newbies attract enough teeth marks as it is ... and as for making up policy out of whole cloth — that's

2728: 3695: 3500:. As the page was originally created, it appeared no effort was made in stressing importance, and the article was deleted three times by three different SysOps 2617:

I certainly recognise I have things to learn and always make efforts to do so, and would be grateful for any guidance, but that's not the subject of this page.

1108:, despite Fuddlemark's links, which are valid. The explanations provided satisfy me Yanksox won't do it again; we've all learned from past editing mistakes.-- 2136:

Yanksox was helpful and later encouraging during my RfA. I do not see anything wrong with his attitude or edits. Definitely, this user should be admin. --

3713: 2900: 2863: 1517: 3578: 503: 3399:, that now when I tag an article I apply what the article falls under in my edit summary. It's strange since I have a good chunk of them memorized. 3377: 2801: 3503:. Lentisco and I then had a debate on William Sams and his notability over each others talk pages. I don't feel that I acted completely properly 1325:

Despite my respect for Mark, and he makes a very good point, I think Yanksox's adminship will help Knowledge more than it will hurt Knowledge.

2623:""Newpages patrol and RC patrol are unpleasant tasks, and the workload is such that the admirable people who do it may well make mistakes," 560: 457: 2813: 1820: 1130: 190:). Giving him the tools is a natural extension of his current contributions, and it is my honor and privilege to join in this nomination. 2631:

The point is that tolerance is extended to the hard workers in this situation, and we should not come down on them like a ton of bricks!

1511: 1490: 829: 650: 216: 1736: 1402: 161: 83: 2655:

its mind. Thank you for being so conscientious in exploring this incident. (PS "defense" is the correct US spelling, albeit not UK.)

3054:

and I applaud Yanksox for having the foresight to consider taking the break as to ensure his editorial judgement was not clouded. --

720: 626: 273:: Well rounded, brilliant editor. His work on the Satchel Cohen hoax was exceptional. He will make an excellent administrator -- 3036:(edit conflict)I was also involved in that discussion, and I can say that Yanksox perfectly and wisely suggested that we refer to 3097: 2763: 1825: 370: 33: 17: 2769: 773: 548: 446: 231:

Guess this is a quintuple nom...Yanksox is rediculously qualified. I would have nominated him if I knew he wasn't an admin.

1980:

per nom(s). Sorry I didn't get back to you on your email question, but it looks like you have it figured out! Good luck. --

3395:: Without any question, I have done new page patrol and tagged numerous articles as speedys and have gained experience in 3294:

Please check the history of this RFA before commenting as it may have been vandalised by an AOL editor that targets RFAs.

2005: 1535: 724: 79: 3234: 2877: 2243: 1627: 1446: 1368: 689:

First I remove my co-nom lest that section should get too long, and then I discover that I can't even make the first 15

405: 145: 3214:

It's hard to tell. I partially agree with the concerns about experience. The nomination sounds too good to be true. --

1838: 1553: 1169:

Not only did I think he was an admin, but I also thought he was a b-crat too! support + triple edit conflict support

3369: 3340: 3135:

I'm starting to pack my bags for this site... I will not stand by idley while 's being cut down but it's own rules.

3133:, still a bit too new and emotional for my liking, as evidenced by the Al McKay CSD thing and the Meta-wiki AfD: " 2148:

Yanksox is civil, intelligent, and hard-working. I have no doubt that the sysop tools will be put to good use. --

3646: 3439:

Of your articles or contributions to Knowledge, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

2386: 2199: 2117: 2020: 1740: 454: 280: 3373: 3225: 2941: 2868: 2577:

He's earnt my respect, but not my endorsement. Two months ago is still too recent when you consider the sheer

1815: 1618: 1437: 1359: 1126: 665: 136: 2809: 1687: 1657: 1279: 319: 2973: 955: 2645: 2591: 2534: 2288: 1943: 1505: 1486: 1400: 645: 274: 2850: 3313: 3113: 1846: 1732: 1240: 1042: 2805: 2676:

proved many theorems. His entire possessions fit in a suitcase." Entirely true, and entirely deleteable.

1642: 328: 3523:

You user page history has been completely deleted. If you don't mind, what was the rationale for this?

2181: 1795: 1500: 1482: 1014: 938: 716: 622: 160:

He has an intelligent, enquiring, thorough mind, as in his brilliant initial investigation exposing the

3694:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either

1393: 1392:

The first time I get to say, "I thought he was an admin already." I feel like I've lost my virginity.

617: 609: 3230: 3091: 3058: 2933: 2873: 2757: 2239:

I rarely participate in RfAs, but I think I know this user well enough to give a full endorsement. --

2207: 2160:. The one mistake MarkSweep mentioned was just that - a mistake. I think it's reasonable to forgive. 2122: 2081: 1623: 1607: 1573: 1478: 1442: 1364: 1234: 991: 835: 583: 480: 451: 443: 366: 222: 198: 141: 3634: 745: 3678: 3649: 3609: 3559: 3513: 3325: 3305: 3289: 3256: 3247: 3238: 3218: 3204: 3186: 3164: 3153: 3141: 3125: 3103: 3060: 3044: 3041: 3031: 3014: 2981: 2953: 2935: 2921: 2907: 2893: 2881: 2857: 2831: 2788: 2785: 2716: 2680: 2659: 2649: 2635: 2612: 2595: 2572: 2555: 2538: 2468: 2455: 2443: 2406: 2389: 2362: 2338: 2321: 2309: 2263: 2248: 2231: 2215: 2185: 2169: 2152: 2140: 2128: 2085: 2068: 2052: 2036: 1996: 1984: 1972: 1960: 1948: 1922: 1911: 1900: 1883: 1871: 1859: 1848: 1830: 1810: 1807: 1798: 1790: 1780: 1768: 1746: 1717: 1700: 1698: 1670: 1668: 1645: 1631: 1594: 1577: 1471: 1450: 1429: 1404: 1372: 1341: 1329: 1317: 1305: 1302: 1293: 1289: 1266: 1247: 1224: 1214: 1202: 1175: 1163: 1150: 1134: 1123: 1114: 1100: 1083: 1072: 1062: 1046: 1029: 1017: 1005: 975: 963: 943: 926: 914: 907: 898: 890: 878: 866: 854: 839: 817: 805: 793: 781: 753: 728: 705: 697: 678: 655: 631: 612: 600: 587: 563: 554: 542: 526: 514: 482: 468: 465: 460: 430: 408: 375: 354: 342: 339: 330: 310: 286: 258: 235: 226: 202: 168: 149: 3011: 2621:

is unnecessary and uncalled for. I think is is more fitting to follow David Gerard's observation,

2568:, as he has in his responses on this page. He has earnt and deserves our respect and endorsement. 1219: 3200: 3182: 2855: 2641: 2587: 2530: 2506:

tagging for speedy less than a minute after first save and using an inappropriate deletion reason

2257: 1931: 1764: 1426: 1338: 1196: 1081: 912: 875: 790: 640: 383: 2504:

as a speedy candidate because its author was using progressive saves (note the newbie-biting in

2100: 984: 62: 2725: 1529: 1381: 737: 3673: 3604: 3554: 3412: 3295: 3284: 3026: 2821: 2712: 2607: 2550: 2064: 2049: 1908: 1855: 1843: 1835: 1728: 1461: 1314: 1222: 1038: 972: 253: 232: 73: 3111:

per W.marsh. The incident still shakes my confidence, but I'd rather not oppose on old stuff.

3664: 3215: 2949: 2435: 2423: 2177: 2165: 1326: 1172: 935: 851: 712: 702: 693:

s. Oh well. All that I'd have to say has already been said, and more succinctly at that.

418: 402: 2629: 2521:

in his over-enthusiastic participation in Chinese Whispers Policy Wonkism is something I'm

100:

Time around - Edited as anon before February 2006. Massive contributions begin in May 2006.

3429:

that I understand how it functions and I have experience in how to properly close already.

3075: 3055: 2930: 2741: 2348: 2240: 2204: 2196: 2149: 2112: 2077: 1993: 1709: 1566: 1059: 998: 895: 887: 826: 576: 523: 477: 362: 305: 213: 209: 191: 2627:"it's ok for people doing newpages patrol (especially) to err in the defense of quality." 3422: 3138: 2926: 2782: 2430: 1981: 1957: 1894: 1777: 1776:

A little green, but has given me every reason to trust that he'll make a good admin. --

1692: 1682: 1662: 1652: 1541: 1284: 1276: 1261: 766: 536: 491: 2500:

he didn't even think the article should be deleted himself. The reason? The article

416:

Absolutely admin material, although I find "Mistakes? None" quite hard to believe. --

3707: 3642: 3570: 3497: 3418: 3402: 3396: 3253: 3244: 3193: 3175: 3161: 3037: 2978: 2970: 2962: 2904: 2891: 2845: 2656: 2632: 2569: 2561: 2493: 2403: 2382: 2344: 2327: 2295: 2225: 2034: 1760: 1754: 1191: 1160: 1109: 1093: 1077: 960: 952: 923: 694: 572: 348: 175: 165: 3637:

I am in both categories, and finally, note that there is no wrong answer here...) ++

2797:. Too few namespace edits, come back in a few months and I will be happy to support. 3668: 3599: 3574: 3549: 3493: 3408: 3336: 3279: 3021: 2918: 2737: 2708: 2602: 2545: 2465: 2452: 2333: 2318: 2272: 2061: 2045: 1969: 1880: 1590: 1348: 1211: 814: 248: 69: 2999:, just six weeks ago. Declared that we really didn't need to follow principles of 3470: 3150: 3010:(though he came right back). Not really a good way to handle stress/conflict. -- 3000: 2945: 2677: 2418: 2161: 1919: 1026: 863: 848: 802: 597: 399: 3538:

Do you have any other pages in your user space that were deleted? If so, why?

3368:

What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out

3243:

Personally, I think a few more co-noms would've elucidated things nicely... :)

3688:

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.

3469:.I have also contributed to articles on Baseball and articles that regard the 2669: 2302: 2137: 2096: 1868: 300: 295: 862:

per nom, will make a good admin despite your poor taste in baseball teams ;)

3548:

Thank you for your questions, and feel free to ask any more if you wish to.

2740:

can perceive the candidate as "new". "New" is in the realm of 2-3 months. --

1956:, prolific vandal fighter and researcher. Valuable member of the community. 1889: 1422: 1256: 1143: 684: 2664:

Sorry for wandering in, but the last version that Yanksox tagged a speedy

3638: 3622: 2887: 2485: 2399: 2378: 2030: 1968:. Valuable editor, exhibits good common sense, we need more like him. -- 1185: 103:

Civility? - Always. No personal attacks ever in high-pressure situations.

3392: 2917:

There must be an oppose clique as well. Can you spot the members? :) --

1418: 1414: 1352: 1037:

my twin. We started editing in a difference of merely three hours :) —

3504: 3007:, he kept threatening to leave Knowledge and supposedly even did quit 3698:

or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

1122:

per nom. Even if he's too new, we sometimes have to make exceptions.

318:

Phenomenal editor; I had originally intended to nominate him myself

3530:

being harmed. It was more an issue of privacy and not controversy.

2886:

Do you really think 84 people (as of this edit) are a "clique"?

3252:

Lol. However, I'm quite happy to stand by my co-nom statement.

2969:

and believe us when we tell you there is no RfA cabal. Please!

596:- doomed never to be able to edit articles again support :) -- 1759:. Editcount impressive, pleasantly suprised by the answer. ;) 1313:

Wow...I would have nominated him if I knew he wasn't one. :-O

3158:

His account's been open since early February (i.e. 5 months)

245:

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

2862:

Your oppposition is becoming a good luck charm around here.

2820:

Anonymous users are not allowed to vote. Please log in.

2317:: just one less than a century, but many more to come! -- 29:

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a

3501: 3490: 3467: 3465: 3463: 3461: 3459: 3447: 3159: 3008: 2665: 2566: 2515: 2512: 2509: 2505: 2501: 1559: 1547: 1523: 1055: 188: 186: 183: 181: 179: 158: 156: 1867:

Excellent, trustworthy, and highly productive editor.

983:

A fine user. Would make a good admin in my opinion. --

398:

Lots of edits, useful editor; would be a good admin. -

299:

him and all he's done here; it's truly remarkable. :)

134:

Please join me in supporting Yanksox for sysoppery! -

1232:

per... well, the nom about covers it, doesn't it. --

813:. Go ahead. But please don't thank me for voting. -- 3489:

I sometimes make edits that may be out of line(i.e.

2997:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

1337:

Through experience and per all above. Good luck. --

174:number of admin tasks, such as removing users from 847:I have been consistently impressed with Yanksox.-- 353:: An excellent user if WP has ever had one. --Slgr 2995:Not really wild about his behavior in and around 123:Any edit warring/blocks? - No blocks and no wars. 2060:all my dealings with this user have been great. 1274:per nom. You mean he wasn't an admin already? -- 1255:, after reading the response to Mark below. -- 874:great editor with right interests for an admin 93:Here's your rundown (stolen from RfA/Gwernol): 3492:). My first real stressful situation was over 2343:I wish I had thought of that. Welcome to the 522:A great editor in all that I know of him. -- 185:) and closing AfDs (that have been decided) ( 8: 1930:Does all of the right things to earn a mop. 3458:In addition to NPP I do lots of copyediting 1992:had only good encounters with this user. -- 1380:This guy is just what we need in an admin. 1013:No problems that I can see. Batter up!!!!! 3347:Yanksox's edit count using Interiot's tool 2398:much"? Geez, Chief, that should have been 2044:, good editor, deserving of the promotion. 2581:of his actions — I strongly believe that 1435:Struck out vote from indefblocked sock - 2332:I confess I was waiting to do this :P -- 663:Will make a fine addition to the ranks. 1498:This vote was innapropriately added by 2781:. Mark's concerns trouble me as well. 2193:; ridiculously qualified candidate. -- 2488:for speedy deletion fairly recently, 7: 2377:. Needs more co-noms though. :) ++ 1413:, though I don't know if you're a 24: 3714:Successful requests for adminship 569:Crazy co-nom monkey support!1!111 440:Although I don't support Yankees. 106:Edit summaries - 100% all around. 18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 2916:<cabal paranoia mode on: --> 3278:continue to work on my edits. 2940:Too late, it's already on the 951:Great user, no problems here! 1: 2494:candidate for speedy deletion 3378:administrators' reading list 2195:May the Force be with you! 3357:Questions for the candidate 3339:'s edit summary usage with 2029:, good for the community. 2023:) 21:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1651:Blocked indef as imposter. 1610:comment added by ] (] • ]) 1347:Super-ridiculously-delayed 971:, great name to choose :) 3730: 3496:and his "notability" with 3372:, and read the page about 3370:Category:Knowledge backlog 3679:02:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 3650:22:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 3610:16:01, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 3560:04:32, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 3326:05:32, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 3306:16:42, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 3290:04:37, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 3257:02:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 3248:23:52, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 3239:14:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 3219:12:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 3205:15:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 3187:16:18, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 3165:21:55, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 3154:18:28, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 3142:14:26, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 3126:05:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 3104:03:20, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 3061:03:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 3045:03:03, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 3032:02:58, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 3015:02:55, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 2982:15:08, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 2954:10:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 2936:12:47, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 2922:08:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 2908:02:11, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 2894:23:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 2882:20:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 2858:20:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 2832:17:15, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 2789:18:33, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 2770:04:21, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 2729:03:32, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 2717:07:55, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 2681:03:01, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 2660:14:55, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 2650:14:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 2636:14:09, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 2625:and Jimbo's endorsement, 2613:13:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 2596:13:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 2573:12:10, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 2556:11:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 2539:07:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 2469:02:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2456:19:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 2444:18:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 2407:19:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 2390:14:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 2363:14:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 2339:13:53, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 2322:13:38, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 2310:12:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 2264:09:51, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 2249:07:03, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 2232:19:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 2216:16:51, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 2210:($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 2186:13:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 2170:10:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 2153:23:15, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 2141:22:26, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 2129:21:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 2086:07:39, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 2069:04:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 2053:01:27, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 2037:23:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1997:20:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1985:18:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1973:16:27, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1961:14:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1949:03:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1923:03:01, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1912:21:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 1901:20:53, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 1884:20:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 1872:18:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 1860:16:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 1849:09:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 1831:05:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 1799:04:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 1781:16:43, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1769:16:09, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1747:13:43, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1718:12:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1701:11:46, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1671:11:46, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1646:10:40, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1632:12:49, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1595:09:40, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1578:05:41, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1472:05:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1451:01:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1430:05:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1405:04:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1385:03:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1373:02:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1355:primary-nominator Support 1342:00:49, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1330:00:11, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1318:00:08, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1306:23:31, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1294:23:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1267:22:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1248:22:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1225:22:14, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1215:21:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1203:20:49, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1176:19:57, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1164:19:53, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1151:19:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1135:19:21, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1115:18:45, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1101:16:49, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1084:16:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1063:16:14, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1047:15:46, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1030:15:31, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1018:15:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1006:14:20, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 976:14:08, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 964:14:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 944:12:48, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 927:12:30, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 915:12:14, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 899:10:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 879:09:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 867:08:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 855:08:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 840:07:55, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 818:07:43, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 806:06:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 794:06:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 782:06:30, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 754:06:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 729:05:43, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 698:05:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 679:05:15, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 656:04:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 637:Not an admin yet? support 632:04:38, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 601:04:26, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 588:04:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 564:04:21, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 555:04:13, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 527:04:08, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 515:04:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 483:04:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 469:03:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 431:03:45, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 409:03:29, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 391:03:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 376:02:49, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 343:02:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 331:02:33, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 311:02:28, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 287:02:20, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 259:02:19, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 236:00:08, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 227:07:55, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 203:17:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 169:04:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 150:03:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 3691:Please do not modify it. 3512:Optional questions from 3005:because of that conflict 2416:- Passes my standards. — 90:to serve us as a sysop. 3621:Optional question from 3569:Optional question from 823:Third Nominator Support 386:This Fire Burns Always 39:Please do not modify it 1111:Firsfron of Ronchester 474:Wholeheartedly support 88:ridiculously qualified 86:. In summary, Nick is 2804:comment was added by 2484:. Yanksox nominated 1806:, excellent user. -- 763:-were-awesome Support 559:Well-rounded user. -- 112:Email enabled? - Yes. 34:request for adminship 561:Nearly Headless Nick 506:The Wiki Soundtrack! 126:FA participation? - 1025:Killer of vandals! 115:Userpage? - Clean. 97:Edit count - 8200+. 2965:? Please, try and 2901:Another cup of tea 2279:11:07, 28 July '06 1201: 162:Satchel Cohen hoax 84:Satchel Cohen hoax 3665:the wrong version 3423:protection policy 3237: 3197: 3179: 2967:assume good faith 2880: 2817: 2212: 2104: 2066: 1947: 1767: 1749: 1630: 1612: 1495: 1481:comment added by 1449: 1371: 1292: 1184: 553: 507: 429: 374: 285: 148: 3721: 3693: 3676: 3671: 3607: 3602: 3557: 3552: 3322: 3319: 3316: 3311:Last 5000 edits. 3303: 3298: 3287: 3282: 3229: 3195: 3177: 3122: 3119: 3116: 3100: 3094: 3088: 3081: 3029: 3024: 2976: 2872: 2853: 2848: 2829: 2824: 2799: 2766: 2760: 2754: 2747: 2610: 2605: 2553: 2548: 2440: 2439: 2433: 2428: 2427: 2421: 2360: 2353: 2307: 2300: 2293: 2280: 2275: 2260: 2246: 2230: 2228: 2214: 2211: 2208: 2202: 2106: 2099: 2065: 2018: 2016: 2015: 2012: 2009: 1941: 1939: 1935: 1897: 1892: 1858: 1841: 1828: 1823: 1818: 1813: 1763: 1743: 1726: 1715: 1712: 1695: 1685: 1665: 1655: 1622: 1611: 1604: 1571: 1564: 1563: 1518:deleted contribs 1494: 1475: 1469: 1464: 1441: 1398: 1363: 1288: 1282: 1264: 1259: 1246: 1243: 1237: 1199: 1194: 1188: 1148: 1112: 1098: 1092:for adminship -- 1080: 1075: 1070:A great user. -- 1003: 996: 989: 958: 941: 893: 832: 779: 751: 748: 743: 740: 710: 677: 675: 670: 653: 648: 643: 615: 608:, great user. -- 581: 551: 545: 541: 539: 511: 508: 505: 501: 495: 463: 449: 427: 424: 421: 388: 360: 357: 326: 325: 308: 283: 279: 256: 251: 219: 196: 140: 109:Mistakes - None. 41: 3729: 3728: 3724: 3723: 3722: 3720: 3719: 3718: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3696:this nomination 3689: 3674: 3669: 3605: 3600: 3555: 3550: 3354: 3332: 3320: 3317: 3314: 3299: 3296: 3285: 3280: 3120: 3117: 3114: 3098: 3092: 3082: 3076: 3027: 3022: 2974: 2851: 2846: 2825: 2822: 2800:—The preceding 2764: 2758: 2748: 2742: 2608: 2603: 2551: 2546: 2437: 2436: 2431: 2425: 2424: 2419: 2354: 2349: 2303: 2296: 2289: 2281: 2278: 2273: 2258: 2244: 2226: 2224: 2209: 2200: 2194: 2158:Pile-on support 2093: 2013: 2010: 2007: 2006: 2004: 1937: 1933: 1895: 1890: 1854: 1839: 1826: 1821: 1816: 1811: 1741: 1713: 1710: 1693: 1683: 1663: 1653: 1605: 1567: 1503: 1499: 1476: 1465: 1462: 1394: 1280: 1262: 1257: 1241: 1235: 1233: 1197: 1192: 1186: 1144: 1110: 1094: 1073: 1071: 999: 992: 985: 956: 939: 891: 830: 778: 770: 749: 746: 741: 738: 706: 671: 668:(aeropagitica) 666: 664: 651: 646: 641: 630: 613: 577: 549: 543: 537: 509: 504: 499: 493: 461: 447: 422: 419: 384: 355: 321: 320: 306: 281: 254: 249: 217: 192: 58:Final (104/4/7) 55: 37: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3727: 3725: 3717: 3716: 3706: 3705: 3701: 3700: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3619: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3577:(suprise!) on 3567: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3533: 3532: 3531: 3514:JamesTeterenko 3510: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3426: 3416: 3406: 3400: 3389: 3388: 3374:administrators 3359: 3358: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3344: 3341:mathbot's tool 3329: 3309: 3308: 3292: 3271: 3270: 3266: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3144: 3128: 3106: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3042:AdamBiswanger1 2992: 2991: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2942:list of cabals 2924: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2806:141.158.40.105 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2662: 2478: 2477: 2473: 2472: 2458: 2446: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2394:"Missed it by 2367: 2366: 2365: 2324: 2312: 2282: 2277: 2266: 2251: 2234: 2218: 2188: 2172: 2155: 2143: 2131: 2107: 2088: 2071: 2055: 2039: 2027:Strong support 2024: 1999: 1987: 1975: 1963: 1951: 1925: 1914: 1903: 1886: 1874: 1862: 1851: 1833: 1801: 1783: 1771: 1753:On our way to 1750: 1720: 1703: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1643:Mailar diabIow 1636: 1635: 1634: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1396:Baseball,Baby! 1387: 1375: 1344: 1332: 1320: 1308: 1303:JamesTeterenko 1296: 1272:Strong Support 1269: 1250: 1227: 1217: 1205: 1178: 1171:- per myself. 1166: 1156:Strong Support 1153: 1137: 1117: 1103: 1086: 1065: 1052:Strong Support 1049: 1032: 1020: 1008: 978: 966: 946: 929: 920:Co-nom support 917: 901: 881: 869: 857: 845:Strong support 842: 820: 808: 796: 784: 772: 756: 734:Strong Support 731: 700: 687:-sized support 681: 658: 634: 620: 603: 590: 566: 557: 529: 517: 485: 471: 433: 411: 393: 378: 349:Shoot-the-Moon 345: 340:AdamBiswanger1 333: 313: 289: 271:Strong support 267: 266: 262: 261: 241: 240: 239: 238: 205: 171: 132: 131: 124: 121: 120: 119: 113: 110: 107: 104: 101: 98: 54: 49: 47: 45: 44: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3726: 3715: 3712: 3711: 3709: 3699: 3697: 3692: 3686: 3685: 3680: 3677: 3672: 3666: 3661: 3656: 3653: 3652: 3651: 3648: 3644: 3640: 3636: 3632: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3624: 3611: 3608: 3603: 3596: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3587: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3580: 3576: 3573:(stolen from 3572: 3561: 3558: 3553: 3547: 3546: 3543: 3540: 3539: 3537: 3534: 3528: 3525: 3524: 3522: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3515: 3505: 3502: 3499: 3498:User:Lentisco 3495: 3491: 3488: 3485: 3484: 3482: 3479: 3478: 3472: 3468: 3466: 3464: 3462: 3460: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3448: 3444: 3441: 3440: 3438: 3435: 3434: 3427: 3424: 3420: 3417: 3414: 3410: 3407: 3404: 3401: 3398: 3394: 3391: 3390: 3385: 3382: 3381: 3379: 3375: 3371: 3367: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3356: 3355: 3348: 3345: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3333: 3328: 3327: 3324: 3323: 3307: 3304: 3302: 3293: 3291: 3288: 3283: 3276: 3273: 3272: 3268: 3267: 3258: 3255: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3246: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3228: 3227: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3217: 3213: 3210: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3184: 3180: 3173: 3170: 3166: 3163: 3160: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3152: 3148: 3145: 3143: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3129: 3127: 3124: 3123: 3110: 3107: 3105: 3101: 3095: 3089: 3087: 3086: 3079: 3073: 3070: 3062: 3059: 3057: 3052: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3030: 3025: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3013: 3009: 3006: 3002: 3001:verifiability 2998: 2994: 2993: 2989: 2988: 2983: 2980: 2977: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2934: 2932: 2928: 2925: 2923: 2920: 2915: 2909: 2906: 2902: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2892: 2889: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2870: 2865: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2856: 2854: 2849: 2842: 2839: 2833: 2830: 2828: 2819: 2818: 2815: 2811: 2807: 2803: 2798: 2796: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2787: 2784: 2780: 2777: 2771: 2767: 2761: 2755: 2753: 2752: 2745: 2739: 2735: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2727: 2723: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2705: 2701: 2698: 2682: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2666: 2663: 2661: 2658: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2634: 2630: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2611: 2606: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2554: 2549: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2513: 2510: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2492:it was not a 2491: 2487: 2483: 2482:Strong oppose 2480: 2479: 2475: 2474: 2470: 2467: 2462: 2459: 2457: 2454: 2450: 2447: 2445: 2442: 2441: 2434: 2429: 2422: 2415: 2412: 2408: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2369:Missed it by 2368: 2364: 2361: 2359: 2358: 2352: 2346: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2337: 2335: 2331: 2329: 2325: 2323: 2320: 2316: 2313: 2311: 2308: 2306: 2301: 2299: 2294: 2292: 2286: 2283: 2276: 2270: 2267: 2265: 2262: 2261: 2259:Tijuana Brass 2255: 2252: 2250: 2247: 2242: 2238: 2235: 2233: 2229: 2222: 2219: 2217: 2213: 2206: 2203: 2198: 2192: 2189: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2176: 2173: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2156: 2154: 2151: 2147: 2144: 2142: 2139: 2135: 2132: 2130: 2127: 2125: 2121: 2120: 2116: 2115: 2111: 2108: 2105: 2102: 2098: 2092: 2089: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2072: 2070: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2056: 2054: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2040: 2038: 2035: 2032: 2028: 2025: 2022: 2017: 2003: 2000: 1998: 1995: 1991: 1988: 1986: 1983: 1979: 1976: 1974: 1971: 1967: 1964: 1962: 1959: 1955: 1952: 1950: 1945: 1940: 1936: 1929: 1926: 1924: 1921: 1918: 1915: 1913: 1910: 1907: 1904: 1902: 1899: 1898: 1893: 1887: 1885: 1882: 1878: 1875: 1873: 1870: 1866: 1863: 1861: 1857: 1852: 1850: 1847: 1845: 1842: 1837: 1834: 1832: 1829: 1824: 1819: 1814: 1809: 1805: 1802: 1800: 1797: 1793: 1792: 1787: 1784: 1782: 1779: 1775: 1772: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1756: 1751: 1748: 1744: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1724: 1721: 1719: 1716: 1707: 1704: 1702: 1699: 1696: 1691: 1690: 1686: 1681: 1678: 1672: 1669: 1666: 1661: 1660: 1656: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1644: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1620: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1609: 1602: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1593: 1592: 1588: 1585: 1579: 1576: 1575: 1572: 1570: 1561: 1558: 1555: 1552: 1549: 1546: 1543: 1540: 1537: 1534: 1531: 1528: 1525: 1522: 1519: 1516: 1513: 1510: 1507: 1502: 1501:64.12.116.134 1497: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1483:64.12.116.134 1480: 1474: 1473: 1470: 1468: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1439: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1403: 1401: 1399: 1397: 1391: 1388: 1386: 1383: 1379: 1376: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1361: 1356: 1354: 1350: 1345: 1343: 1340: 1336: 1333: 1331: 1328: 1324: 1321: 1319: 1316: 1312: 1309: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1297: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1286: 1283: 1278: 1273: 1270: 1268: 1265: 1260: 1254: 1251: 1249: 1244: 1238: 1231: 1228: 1226: 1223: 1221: 1218: 1216: 1213: 1209: 1206: 1204: 1200: 1195: 1189: 1182: 1179: 1177: 1174: 1170: 1167: 1165: 1162: 1157: 1154: 1152: 1149: 1147: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1125: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1113: 1107: 1104: 1102: 1099: 1097: 1091: 1087: 1085: 1082: 1079: 1076: 1069: 1066: 1064: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1033: 1031: 1028: 1024: 1021: 1019: 1016: 1015:TruthCrusader 1012: 1009: 1007: 1004: 1002: 997: 995: 990: 988: 982: 979: 977: 974: 970: 967: 965: 962: 959: 954: 950: 947: 945: 942: 937: 933: 930: 928: 925: 921: 918: 916: 913: 911: 910: 905: 902: 900: 897: 894: 889: 885: 882: 880: 877: 873: 870: 868: 865: 861: 858: 856: 853: 850: 846: 843: 841: 837: 833: 828: 824: 821: 819: 816: 812: 809: 807: 804: 800: 797: 795: 792: 791:Mailer Diablo 788: 785: 783: 777: 776: 768: 764: 762: 757: 755: 752: 744: 735: 732: 730: 726: 722: 718: 714: 711: 709: 704: 701: 699: 696: 692: 688: 686: 682: 680: 676: 674: 669: 662: 659: 657: 654: 649: 644: 638: 635: 633: 628: 624: 619: 616: 611: 607: 604: 602: 599: 595: 591: 589: 586: 585: 582: 580: 574: 571:. This is so 570: 567: 565: 562: 558: 556: 552: 546: 540: 533: 530: 528: 525: 521: 518: 516: 512: 502: 497: 496: 489: 486: 484: 481: 479: 475: 472: 470: 467: 464: 459: 456: 453: 450: 445: 441: 437: 434: 432: 426: 425: 415: 412: 410: 407: 404: 401: 397: 394: 392: 389: 387: 382: 379: 377: 372: 368: 364: 359: 352: 350: 346: 344: 341: 337: 334: 332: 329: 327: 324: 317: 316:Fully Support 314: 312: 309: 304: 303: 297: 293: 290: 288: 284: 278: 277: 272: 269: 268: 264: 263: 260: 257: 252: 246: 243: 242: 237: 234: 230: 229: 228: 224: 220: 215: 211: 206: 204: 201: 200: 197: 195: 189: 187: 184: 182: 180: 177: 172: 170: 167: 163: 159: 157: 154: 153: 152: 151: 147: 143: 139: 138: 129: 125: 122: 117: 116: 114: 111: 108: 105: 102: 99: 96: 95: 94: 91: 89: 85: 81: 78: 75: 71: 67: 66: 64: 61:Ended 02:40, 59: 53: 50: 48: 43: 40: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 3690: 3687: 3659: 3654: 3630: 3620: 3618: 3594: 3585: 3568: 3541: 3535: 3526: 3520: 3511: 3494:William Sams 3486: 3480: 3442: 3436: 3413:Arthur Rubin 3383: 3365: 3360: 3346: 3312: 3310: 3300: 3274: 3226:CrazyRussian 3224: 3211: 3171: 3146: 3134: 3130: 3112: 3108: 3084: 3083: 3077: 3071: 3050: 3004: 2966: 2869:CrazyRussian 2867: 2840: 2826: 2794: 2793: 2778: 2750: 2749: 2743: 2738:Lord Deskana 2733: 2721: 2709:Lord Deskana 2703: 2699: 2673: 2646:befuddle me! 2626: 2622: 2618: 2592:befuddle me! 2582: 2578: 2535:befuddle me! 2526: 2522: 2518: 2502:started life 2497: 2489: 2481: 2460: 2448: 2417: 2413: 2395: 2374: 2370: 2356: 2355: 2350: 2336: 2326: 2314: 2304: 2297: 2290: 2284: 2268: 2256: 2253: 2236: 2220: 2190: 2174: 2157: 2145: 2133: 2123: 2118: 2113: 2109: 2094: 2090: 2073: 2057: 2041: 2026: 2021:penguin logs 2001: 1989: 1977: 1965: 1953: 1932: 1927: 1916: 1909:DrunkenSmurf 1905: 1888: 1876: 1864: 1803: 1789: 1785: 1773: 1752: 1729:riana_dzasta 1722: 1705: 1688: 1679: 1658: 1639: 1638: 1619:CrazyRussian 1617: 1606:— Preceding 1600: 1599: 1589: 1586: 1574: 1568: 1556: 1550: 1544: 1538: 1532: 1526: 1520: 1514: 1508: 1477:— Preceding 1466: 1458: 1457: 1438:CrazyRussian 1436: 1410: 1409: 1395: 1389: 1377: 1360:CrazyRussian 1358: 1346: 1334: 1322: 1310: 1298: 1275: 1271: 1252: 1229: 1207: 1180: 1168: 1155: 1145: 1139: 1119: 1105: 1095: 1089: 1067: 1051: 1039:Ambuj Saxena 1034: 1022: 1010: 1000: 993: 986: 980: 973:Mostly Rainy 968: 948: 931: 919: 908: 903: 883: 871: 859: 844: 822: 810: 798: 786: 774: 760: 758: 733: 707: 690: 683: 672: 667: 660: 636: 605: 593: 584: 578: 568: 531: 519: 498: 492: 487: 473: 439: 435: 417: 413: 395: 385: 380: 347: 336:Huge support 335: 322: 315: 301: 291: 275: 270: 244: 199: 193: 137:CrazyRussian 135: 133: 128:Probably not 92: 87: 76: 68: 60: 57: 56: 51: 46: 38: 30: 28: 3471:New England 3216:HResearcher 2844:community. 2498:even though 2490:even though 2347:, Yanksox. 2287:per above — 2178:Sarah Ewart 1765:Talk to me! 1327:Pepsidrinka 1290:talk. o.o;; 1173:GeorgeMoney 1088:Sure, I'll 936:Computerjoe 934:of course! 906:per nom. -- 3056:AbsolutDan 2931:AbsolutDan 2864:Cup of tea 2702:. You are 2674:Paul Erdos 2672:, saying " 2670:Paul Erdos 2642:fuddlemark 2588:fuddlemark 2531:fuddlemark 2464:SYSOPPERY! 2241:mboverload 2223:per nom! — 2150:Kicking222 2101:2006-07-26 1994:Bachrach44 1879:. per nom 1616:IP vote - 1569:Alphachimp 1554:block user 1524:filter log 1427:Go Yankees 1236:Aguerriero 1183:of course! 1060:Eluchil404 811:Green lamp 579:Alphachimp 524:TeaDrinker 478:AbsolutDan 428:(joturner) 194:Alphachimp 63:2006-07-29 31:successful 3571:Ian Manka 3139:Kimchi.sg 2783:Mackensen 2523:extremely 2078:Dwaipayan 1982:Fang Aili 1958:Accurizer 1796:rant-line 1778:InShaneee 1761:Ian Manka 1560:block log 1423:White Sox 1335:Suppoert. 1210:per nom. 1056:this diff 876:abakharev 827:zappa.jak 801:per nom. 767:RandyWang 713:rovingian 685:Mo Vaughn 538:JungleCat 494:Phaedriel 323:hoopydink 214:zappa.jak 3708:Category 3376:and the 3269:Comments 3254:Tyrenius 3162:Tyrenius 2905:Tyrenius 2888:User:Zoe 2814:contribs 2802:unsigned 2657:Tyrenius 2633:Tyrenius 2619:"Idiocy" 2570:Tyrenius 2527:Not Good 2486:Al McKay 2404:Agent 86 2269:Support. 2227:Khoikhoi 2031:User:Zoe 1944:ahoy-hoy 1938:american 1791:Blnguyen 1706:Support. 1608:unsigned 1512:contribs 1491:contribs 1479:unsigned 1425:fan. 1323:Support. 1311:Support. 1161:Agent 86 1096:Pilotguy 924:Tyrenius 909:Draicone 888:DarthVad 627:Contribs 371:contribs 367:messages 292:Soxport! 166:Tyrenius 80:contribs 3575:Yanksox 3411:: Like 3393:CAT:CSD 3337:Yanksox 3301:kantari 3275:Comment 3212:Neutral 3196:HAIRBOY 3178:HAIRBOY 3172:Neutral 3147:Neutral 3131:Neutral 3109:Neutral 3072:Neutral 3012:W.marsh 2990:Neutral 2927:WP:TINC 2919:Ligulem 2827:kantari 2734:Comment 2722:Comment 2471:Crisspy 2466:Crisspy 2461:Support 2453:MrFizyx 2449:Support 2414:Support 2400:my line 2375:Support 2334:Srikeit 2330:Support 2319:Bhadani 2315:Support 2285:Support 2274:FireFox 2254:Yessuh! 2237:Support 2221:Support 2191:Support 2175:Support 2146:Support 2134:Support 2110:Support 2091:Support 2074:Support 2062:Viridae 2058:Support 2042:Support 2002:support 1990:support 1978:Support 1966:Support 1954:Support 1928:Support 1917:Support 1906:Support 1881:Anger22 1877:Support 1865:Support 1808:King of 1804:Support 1786:Support 1774:Support 1757:Support 1723:Support 1680:Support 1640:Support 1601:Support 1587:Support 1467:kantari 1459:Support 1419:Red Sox 1415:Yankees 1411:Support 1390:Support 1378:Support 1353:Shabbos 1299:Support 1253:Support 1230:Support 1220:Jaranda 1212:Molerat 1208:Support 1181:Support 1140:Support 1120:Support 1106:Support 1078:iva1979 1068:Support 1035:Support 1023:Support 1011:Support 981:Support 969:support 949:Support 940:'s talk 932:Support 904:Support 884:Support 872:Support 860:Support 815:Ligulem 803:Michael 799:Support 787:Support 759:I-wish- 691:support 673:(talk) 661:Support 618:nce Ong 606:Support 594:Support 550:contrib 532:Support 520:Support 488:Support 436:Support 414:Support 396:Support 381:Support 351:Support 265:Support 70:Yanksox 52:Yanksox 3579:my RfA 3545:a U1. 3419:WP:RPP 3403:WP:AIV 3397:WP:CSD 3151:Ifnord 2963:WP:AGF 2946:Stifle 2841:Oppose 2795:Oppose 2786:(talk) 2779:Oppose 2700:Oppose 2678:Dr Zak 2583:anyone 2579:idiocy 2476:Oppose 2345:WP:100 2328:WP:100 2205:shth91 2162:Stifle 2103:10:40Z 1920:Dr Zak 1755:WP:100 1711:Kungfu 1349:Shomer 1339:AaronS 1027:Seivad 864:BryanG 849:Chaser 652:050389 598:Tawker 573:WP:100 423:abjotu 400:Goldom 307:(talk) 176:WP:AIV 3473:area. 3409:WP:RM 3315:Voice 3297:Nacon 3235:email 3115:Voice 3099:cont. 2878:email 2823:Nacon 2765:cont. 2519:wrong 2373:much 2357:Chimp 2138:Osbus 2097:Quarl 1934:young 1869:Xoloz 1856:Andeh 1628:email 1530:WHOIS 1463:Nacon 1447:email 1369:email 1146:Grue 1090:clear 775:rants 442::) -- 420:tariq 358:ndson 302:Srose 296:Sable 276:Samir 210:Twins 146:email 65:(UTC) 16:< 3670:Yank 3635:wonk 3601:Yank 3551:Yank 3335:See 3318:-of- 3281:Yank 3231:talk 3118:-of- 3093:talk 3023:Yank 2979:Halo 2950:talk 2874:talk 2866:? - 2852:nnon 2810:talk 2759:talk 2726:'sed 2713:talk 2604:Yank 2547:Yank 2396:that 2371:that 2182:Talk 2166:talk 2114:Buck 2082:talk 2008:Gang 1844:hway 1714:Adam 1684:Iola 1654:Iola 1624:talk 1591:Will 1548:http 1542:RBLs 1536:RDNS 1506:talk 1487:talk 1443:talk 1382:'sed 1365:talk 1277:Core 1242:talk 1054:See 1043:talk 961:Halo 836:talk 642:Will 623:Chat 544:talk 455:comm 452:rran 363:page 282:धर्म 250:Yank 223:talk 212:! - 142:talk 74:talk 3675:sox 3639:Lar 3623:Lar 3606:sox 3581:): 3556:sox 3321:All 3286:sox 3245:Joe 3137:". 3121:All 3080:ran 3038:IAR 3028:sox 2847:Sha 2816:) . 2746:ran 2704:the 2609:sox 2562:AGF 2552:sox 2420:Mir 2402:! 2379:Lar 2197:Shr 2124:ofg 2119:ets 2050:R/W 2046:DVD 2011:sta 1970:Avi 1896:ert 1891:Rob 1694:ana 1664:ana 1421:or 1315:1ne 1301:-- 1281:des 1124:Roy 1058:. 695:Joe 647:Mak 610:Ter 458:and 403:‽‽‽ 255:sox 233:1ne 3710:: 3660:If 3655:A: 3641:: 3631:7. 3595:A: 3586:6. 3542:A: 3536:5. 3527:A: 3521:4. 3516:: 3487:A: 3481:3. 3443:A: 3437:2. 3384:A: 3380:. 3366:1. 3203:) 3185:) 3102:) 3096:• 3051:if 2971:Th 2952:) 2944:. 2929:-- 2903:? 2812:• 2768:) 2762:• 2715:) 2707:-- 2648:) 2594:) 2537:) 2529:. 2514:, 2511:, 2496:, 2381:: 2305:un 2298:in 2271:— 2184:) 2168:) 2084:) 2076:-- 2019:~( 2014:EB 1853:-- 1840:ig 1794:| 1745:• 1739:• 1735:• 1731:• 1727:— 1708:-- 1603:. 1565:. 1493:) 1489:• 1417:, 1357:- 1285:at 1263:ah 1258:he 1142:. 1133:. 1045:) 1001:pm 987:Tu 953:Th 886:. 838:) 789:. 780:) 765:. 727:) 723:, 719:, 639:-- 625:| 575:. 513:- 438:. 369:- 365:- 225:) 36:. 3647:c 3645:/ 3643:t 3625:: 3449:. 3343:. 3233:/ 3201:☎ 3199:( 3194:C 3183:☎ 3181:( 3176:C 3090:( 3085:e 3078:O 2975:ε 2948:( 2890:| 2876:/ 2808:( 2756:( 2751:e 2744:O 2711:( 2644:( 2590:( 2533:( 2438:n 2432:e 2426:l 2387:c 2385:/ 2383:t 2351:α 2291:M 2245:@ 2201:e 2180:( 2164:( 2126:✐ 2095:— 2080:( 2048:+ 2033:| 1946:) 1942:( 1836:H 1827:♠ 1822:♣ 1817:♦ 1812:♥ 1788:. 1742:e 1737:c 1733:t 1697:| 1689:k 1667:| 1659:k 1626:/ 1562:) 1557:· 1551:· 1545:· 1539:· 1533:· 1527:· 1521:· 1515:· 1509:· 1504:( 1485:( 1445:/ 1367:/ 1351:- 1245:) 1239:( 1198:e 1193:H 1190:. 1187:G 1131:A 1129:. 1127:A 1074:S 1041:( 994:s 957:ε 896:r 892:e 852:T 834:( 831:e 825:- 771:/ 769:( 761:I 750:e 747:k 742:e 739:T 725:@ 721:C 717:T 715:( 708:e 703:M 629:) 621:( 614:e 592:' 547:/ 510:♪ 500:♥ 466:r 462:e 448:e 444:T 406:⁂ 373:) 361:( 356:@ 221:( 218:e 178:( 144:/ 130:. 77:· 72:( 42:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Requests for adminship/Yanksox - Knowledge

Index