364:. Clearly a good user, but not really enough experience yet - wait a couple of months, gain some more experience (extensive participation in XfDs is always a good idea, for instance), then try again. I would be happy to give you any help and advice you need. (Although in response to the opposers, I have to say that working out someone's percentage of edits to userspace seems a
745:
I will remain neutral on this. Your edits, although low, show activity in a decent range of
Knowledge, which is encouraging, but the gap between Knowledge edits from January to June did pique my interest. Rather than oppose I will remain neutral and hope that you continue to stay with the project and
519:
make an experienced editor. But if you think I should work more on them, I will. But could aynyone be so kind as to explain how editing a main space article make one an experienced editor? And all the edits I make to my user page are for reference (and adding userboxes). By the way, may I know what
716:
edits to compensate for this :) And... yeah, while there are perfectly legitimate reasons to edit in your own userspace (article sandboxes, etc.), you might want to go easy on them for a while. Re-apply one day when you're a bit more experienced (but not any time in the next 6 months otherwise
321:
is excellent). Your input to the project is much valued and appreciated. I can't offer a full support, as I feel your main space edits are insufficent for you to have a full grasp of policy at this time - or at least for me to judge that you do. However I wish you well in this RfA;
82:, and have been in several MfDs. Besides, I have also made quite a number of edits to articles. I hope that you will give me your fullest attention and voice whatever opinion that may come into your mind. I still have the need to improve myself. Cheers! Sincerely, -
460:
Heh. Bear in mind there's no way Jimbo would pass an RfA at today's standards, if he were just another user. He doesn't even meet the edit count requirements any more... and he'd lose points for being "too controversial", too. (I can see it now.
118:
A: I generally prefer to take part in MfD and AfD works. I have been in several discussions, I find them rather interesting. If I were to be an
Administrator, then I would do whatever I can to solve a particular debate or
134:
A:They would be regarding the articles about geography. I have some reliable sources where I get my information from. Besides, I had fun editing the articles, and am happy that I can share my knowledge with the
182:
You wrote that you "behaved rather irrationally" during a conflict. Can you provide a diff (web link) to the incident? Also, can you provide an example of a conflict in which you behaved more rationally?
78:) - I am aware that my edit counts are rather low for an RfA (550+). However, there is no mention whatsoever about edit counts on the front page, so I'll go on. I have received positive response from my
587:
I would, but if you'd take a look at the page, you'll see a quote from Jimbo Wales (bless him!) saying that autograph pages are okay, as long as they promote hapiness and frendliness in the 'pedia. -
765:
209:
150:
A:Yes. Once. I was new to
Knowledge then, and behaved rather irrationally. But if I were to come across the situation again in the future, then I would be sure to keep a calm head.
107:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
236:
146:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
167:
You wrote that you would "do whatever I can to solve a particular debate or discussion". What do you envision that an admin can do to solve debates and discussions?
712:. Not going to pass, so no point opposing. Make more edits, people love counting 'em round here. Just don't revert too much vandalism, else you'll need to make even
249:
578:
Yes, and...er... you ought to get rid of that autograph page, too. This isn't MySpace. I wouldn't put it past people to oppose you just for having one of those –
783:
243:
292:
229:
75:
550:
520:"something major going on" means? The "majorest" major thing I can think of is the Gnome Week, and I chanced upon that by accident. Cheers!!! -
424:
I calculated my own edits to userpage at 2.2% of total edits. Come back when your edits to your user page drop to less than 5% of total edits. -
691:, I'm not going to be an idiot and say 5,000 edits are necessary, but with well under a thousand edits are the tools even that beneficial? --
279:
273:
205:
554:
632:
Insufficient grasp of major policy issues, I seem to remember some odd stuff with
Esperanza, as well. Probably needs some more time.
30:
17:
679:
to low for me. I don't really support people with less than 5,000 edits. Get more edits, and I will be happy to support you.
595:
565:
528:
223:
90:
69:
750:
737:
725:
697:
683:
667:
650:
636:
611:
602:
582:
573:
544:
535:
506:
484:
473:
455:
428:
419:
387:
372:
356:
342:
97:
59:
733:. You may make a fine admin one of these days, but need more mainspace editing experience. Keep up the good work.
291:
Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review
588:
558:
521:
219:
201:
83:
65:
369:
79:
350:
Seen you around often, and I think you'd make a good admin. You definitely need more experience though. —
764:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
503:
692:
663:
680:
541:
425:
416:
463:
Any time anything major happens here, he always seems to be involved. It's almost as if he goes
158:
734:
436:
384:
317:
Because of the self-nom and some not bad answers to the questions (your reminder that it's
722:
645:
608:
607:
But they don't! They just annoy people, especially when linked to in unrelated contexts –
579:
479:
470:
448:
351:
335:
656:
777:
633:
502:- the edit count is very low... which may show that the editor lacks experience too.
326:
it fail take it in good spirit, and lets hope the editcounters stay clear for once.
660:
747:
642:
442:
329:
56:
758:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
435:
Using the wanabekate tool I calculated my own userpage edits at 2.93% and
409:
Highest number of edits to single page is to own userpage 117 in total
768:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
411:. Come back when your edits to your own page drop to less than
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
540:
I take it you've never heard of BLP or badlydrawnjeff? -
439:
to be at 2.98%. I think sub 5% seems realistic! Cheers!
130:
What are your best contributions to
Knowledge, and why?
267:
261:
255:
415:of your total edits instead of the current 21%. -
114:What admin work do you intend to take part in?
641:Don't think candidate sufficiently 'gets it'.
8:
549:Er...no. What would it be, excactly? Is it
293:Special:Contributions/Zachary crimsonwolf
407:only 141 mainspace edits, 564 in total.
746:in due time give this another try. --
7:
515:If I may, I say that edit counts do
784:Unsuccessful requests for adminship
24:
717:someone will oppose you just for
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
217:Links for Zachary crimsonwolf:
208:. For the edit count, see the
1:
55:FINAL (3/7/3); Withdrawn by
204:'s edit summary usage with
103:Questions for the candidate
800:
751:15:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
738:13:57, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
726:13:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
698:18:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
684:17:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
668:17:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
651:17:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
637:14:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
612:15:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
603:14:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
583:14:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
574:13:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
545:13:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
536:13:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
507:13:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
485:14:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
474:13:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
456:13:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
429:12:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
420:12:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
388:18:57, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
373:17:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
357:14:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
343:12:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
98:14:08, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
60:20:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
761:Please do not modify it.
553:, incidentally? Sign my
157:Optional questions from
40:Please do not modify it.
31:request for adminship
675:Your edit count is
220:Zachary crimsonwolf
202:Zachary crimsonwolf
66:Zachary crimsonwolf
49:Zachary crimsonwolf
695:
295:before commenting.
693:
454:
341:
159:User:Richardshusr
791:
763:
648:
600:
593:
570:
563:
533:
526:
482:
453:
451:
440:
354:
340:
338:
327:
283:
242:
195:General comments
95:
88:
42:
799:
798:
794:
793:
792:
790:
789:
788:
774:
773:
772:
766:this nomination
759:
646:
596:
589:
566:
559:
529:
522:
504:Francisco Tevez
480:
449:
441:
383:Just a little?
352:
336:
328:
302:
235:
218:
197:
105:
91:
84:
52:
38:
35:did not succeed
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
797:
795:
787:
786:
776:
775:
771:
770:
754:
753:
740:
728:
701:
700:
686:
670:
653:
639:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
555:autograph page
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
376:
375:
359:
345:
306:
305:
301:
298:
288:
287:
286:
284:
214:
213:
206:mathbot's tool
196:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
176:
175:
174:
173:
155:
154:
153:
152:
140:
139:
138:
137:
124:
123:
122:
121:
104:
101:
51:
46:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
796:
785:
782:
781:
779:
769:
767:
762:
756:
755:
752:
749:
744:
741:
739:
736:
732:
729:
727:
724:
720:
715:
711:
708:
707:
706:
705:
699:
696:
690:
687:
685:
682:
681:Politics rule
678:
674:
673:Strong Oppose
671:
669:
665:
662:
658:
654:
652:
649:
644:
640:
638:
635:
631:
613:
610:
606:
605:
604:
601:
599:
594:
592:
586:
585:
584:
581:
577:
576:
575:
571:
569:
564:
562:
556:
552:
548:
547:
546:
543:
539:
538:
537:
534:
532:
527:
525:
518:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
505:
501:
498:
486:
483:
477:
476:
475:
472:
468:
466:
459:
458:
457:
452:
446:
445:
438:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
427:
423:
422:
421:
418:
414:
410:
406:
405:Strong oppose
403:
402:
401:
400:
389:
386:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
374:
371:
368:pedantic...)
367:
363:
362:Moral support
360:
358:
355:
349:
348:Moral support
346:
344:
339:
333:
332:
325:
320:
316:
315:Moral Support
313:
312:
311:
310:
304:
303:
299:
297:
296:
294:
285:
281:
278:
275:
272:
269:
266:
263:
260:
257:
254:
251:
248:
245:
241:
238:
234:
231:
228:
225:
221:
216:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
198:
194:
188:
185:
184:
181:
178:
177:
172:
169:
168:
166:
163:
162:
161:
160:
151:
148:
147:
145:
142:
141:
136:
132:
131:
129:
126:
125:
120:
116:
115:
113:
110:
109:
108:
102:
100:
99:
96:
94:
89:
87:
81:
80:Editor review
77:
74:
71:
67:
63:
62:
61:
58:
50:
47:
43:
41:
36:
32:
27:
26:
19:
760:
757:
742:
730:
718:
713:
709:
703:
702:
688:
676:
672:
597:
590:
567:
560:
557:!! Cheers! -
530:
523:
516:
499:
467:for trouble.
464:
462:
443:
412:
408:
404:
398:
397:
365:
361:
347:
330:
323:
318:
314:
308:
307:
290:
289:
276:
270:
264:
258:
252:
246:
239:
232:
226:
186:
179:
170:
164:
156:
149:
143:
133:
127:
117:
111:
106:
92:
85:
72:
64:
54:
53:
48:
39:
34:
28:
735:Majoreditor
655:Per above.
598:crimsonwolf
568:crimsonwolf
531:crimsonwolf
390:MoodyGroove
385:MoodyGroove
119:discussion.
93:crimsonwolf
481:Crazytales
437:this bloke
353:Crazytales
300:Discussion
262:block log
210:talk page
778:Category
694:Phoenix2
634:Moreschi
478:xDDDD. —
230:contribs
76:contribs
743:Neutral
731:Neutral
710:Neutral
704:Neutral
591:Zachary
561:Zachary
524:Zachary
465:looking
309:Support
237:deleted
135:public.
86:Zachary
689:Oppose
500:Oppose
399:Oppose
370:Walton
366:little
324:should
748:Ozgod
723:Gurch
664:Joker
657:Slade
643:Riana
609:Gurch
580:Gurch
471:Gurch
469:") –
450:Chat
444:Pedro
337:Chat
331:Pedro
244:count
57:EVula
33:that
16:<
721:) –
719:that
714:more
274:rfar
256:logs
224:talk
200:See
70:talk
677:way
661:The
551:BLP
517:not
319:fun
280:spi
250:AfD
780::
666:)
447:|
413:1%
334:|
268:lu
187:A:
180:5.
171:A:
165:4.
144:3.
128:2.
112:1.
37:.
659:(
647:⁂
572:#
542:N
461:"
426:N
417:N
282:)
277:·
271:·
265:·
259:·
253:·
247:·
240:·
233:·
227:·
222:(
212:.
73:·
68:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.