251:
edits: 98.03% Minor edits: 100% Average edits per day: 20.23 (for last 1000 edit(s)) Article edit summary use (last 441 edits): Major article edits: 100% Minor article edits: 100% Analysis of edits (out of all 5000 edits shown on this page and last 4 image uploads): Notable article edits (creation/expansion/major rewrites/sourcing): 0.02% (1) Significant article edits (copyedits/small rewrites/content/reference additions): 0.26% (13) Superficial article edits (grammar/spelling/wikify/links/tagging): 3.92% (196) Unique image uploads (non-deleted/reverts/updates): 3 (checks last 5000) Superficial article edits marked as minor: 38.46% Special edit type statistics: All edits to deletion pages: 0.86% (43 edit(s)) Marked XfD/DRV votes: 0.18% (9 edit(s)) Article deletion tagging: 0.04% (2 edit(s)) Page (un)protections: 0% (0 edit(s)) Page moves: 0.08% (4 edit(s)) (2 moves(s)) Page redirections: 0.16% (8 edit(s)) User talk warnings: 9.76% (488 edit(s)) Breakdown of all edits: Unique pages edited: 3442 | Average edits per page: 1.45 | Edits on top: 16.96% Edits marked as major (non-minor/reverts): 22.82% (1141 edit(s)) Edits marked as minor (non-reverts): 20.28% (1014 edit(s)) Marked reverts (reversions/text removal): 45.54% (2277 edit(s)) Unmarked edits with no summary: 10.82% (541 edit(s)) Edits by
Knowledge namespace: Article: 44.38% (2219) | Article talk: 1.74% (87) User: 4.96% (248) | User talk: 34.36% (1718) Knowledge: 7.88% (394) | Knowledge talk: 0.52% (26) Image: 4% (200) Template: 1.24% (62) Category: 0.52% (26) Portal: 0.02% (1) Help: 0.04% (2) MediaWiki: 0% (0) Other talk pages: 0.34% (17)
167:. Looking at these four specifically, it could appear that what I do is noninclusive and deletionist, however I do not see my activities as such. Through these parts of the project, I preserve article integrity, resolve conflicts with other editors, preserve the integrity of anonymous contributors and maintain a quality baseline for the content we provide to all who wish to access it. By participating in these areas and more, I am already having to perform the actions that the public eye sees administrators do the most: civilly interact with others. In this stead, as an administrator, I will be getting back into areas in which written interaction with others is not far enough. I do not plan on straying far from where I am active as far as the janitorial work of an admin, but I will be getting involved with more maintenance tasks such as CAT:NS, CAT:NL (which I created the shortcut for), and WP:OP (where admin tools are necessary). I will remain active in IRC and available to any editor that comes to me with a conflict.
194:
contributions I believe is out of the job description. The person who keeps an art gallery clean should not be going around and modifying the artwork to make it better. In fact, the word "better" is in itself part of why I disagree with those who desire this accomplishment of administrator candidates. It is an opinion. Don't get me wrong as we are all entitled to our own opinions, but just as much, I am entitled to mine in saying that there are
220:
there is a disagreement (or sometimes just someone who has slipped through the cracks) will encounter someone such as myself who is willing to step in and see things from an outside perspective. Mediating such issues has never caused me stress, although it does do so for the users involved, but I am one who remains calm in times of conflict in order to keep a clear mind and open perspective to the involved parties.
1583:- let me explain why, as much i want to suppot someone wanting to work with image management there are a few concerns, first I have been rather strict about a 9 month minimum recently. also, I try to give support to article writters more, and the answer to question 2 shows that this is clearly not the case, best of luck --
219:
Fortunately, I have never been in a direct conflict with another contributor over any matter regarding the project. Instead, I have been in many situations where I have successfully mediated a conflict between other users. Working at
Requests for Investigation, someone asking for help in a case where
202:
should be the guiding hand to these contributors ensuring that their work is not obstructed by those who mean the project of theirs harm. As an administrator, I will be "particularly pleased" to be able to help those editors even more, for that is what I enjoy doing and will continue to do so long as
1634:
I understand, and I'm taking your word for it sense there's little or no evidence you being a hothead. And the support votes indicate you might may be a worthy admin so I'm changing my vote. Note that I start with the idea to oppose until I see that there's reason to support, nothing against you in
89:
failed, though he racked up over 2 000 edits in two months the consensus was he needed a couple of more months. I was in that chorus of, "Too new! Too new!" but nearly a half year later I think it's time. He is insightful on AfD, I have not seen any allegations of incivility, and he more than meets
1620:
I apparently don't see why my involvement in a dispute would qualify me such a position. Are you implying that it is better for me to have had a conflict with another user than to have not to? As mentioned in question #3, I am one who can keep a cool head in situations even when those involved do
250:
Viewing contribution data for user Zsinj (over the 5000 edit(s) shown on this page) (FAQ) Time range: 192 approximate day(s) of edits on this page Most recent edit on: 9hr (UTC) -- 16, Aug, 2006 || Oldest edit on: 17hr (UTC) -- 6, February, 2006 Overall edit summary use (last 1000 edits): Major
193:
I know that someone will bring up the question of whether or not I have brought an article up to featured status and I would like to address that now before someone mauls me for it later. For an administrator to give such attention to one page as to bring it up to FA status as a result of their
297:
Username Zsinj Total edits 6523 Distinct pages edited 4447 Average edits/page 1.467 First edit 11:05, January 5, 2006 (main) 3073 Talk 115 User 305 User talk 2168 Image 214 Template 79 Template talk 8 Help 2 Category 27 Category talk 9 Knowledge 493 Knowledge talk 29 Portal 1
183:
All of my contributions to the project please me because they are all for the greater good of the project. (No I'm not sucking up to anyone in saying that, haha.) It takes a lot of effort to make
Knowledge tick and being able to contribute as much as I do is what I consider a
1058:
Ah, well in that case, I can tell you exactly what happened. The hero of the day was Zsinj, a canny newbie who had his eye on the relevant monitoring graphs, and alerted us to the problem immediately, using very specific terms, allowing us to track down and fix it
1677:, which I believe is a sign of insufficient article building experience. Apart from that, seems like a great user and I will support on the next go around. I suspect the nom will get the mop on this go, and wish him the best of luck.
1592:
I understand this and apologize for not quite being up to muster in your eyes. Rest assured, I will continue to work with the project for many months to come, and who knows, I may just take up encyclopedic writing as a hobby. :-)
1686:
I hope you will allow me to assume that your support would be garnered "on the next go around" if I were to contribute more in the article talk space, not just in the event there is a 3rd go around. :-D Thanks for your input!
1062:
He has already proven more than trustworthy, I have no reason to believe that lowly tools such as deletion and rollback should be denied to someone who already got to see the inner sanctum of server administration.
327:
has lead to the tagging of hundreds of unsourced and/or unlisenced images that qualified for and were subsequently deleted. According to
Interiot's tool on the toolserver, I have over a thousand deleted edits.
537:. Very good answers to the questions, I particularly like the comments made about featured articles. I am satisfied that Zsinj will use the tools wisely and in the best interests of the project.
94:. That he is willing to serve as an administrator here is a benefit to us all. I would also point out this nomination is unsolicited, he has not "campaigned" to become an administrator.
213:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
1565:
I welcome all votes regardless of someone's past voting history. I am not intimidated by the user's vote, as I recognize that there is always room in which to improve. --
578:. I held off on the earlier RFA because I saw great potential with alas a short time in residence. Now I can fully support and just hope that he doesn't bring his
126:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
517:
1723:
1611:
most edits seem to be reverts and anti-vandalism related. I'd like to see how Zsinj treats others in dispute, especially when he is involved in the dispute. --
1741:
91:
1364:
For clarification, I was granted temporary emergency sysop on simple.wp by Danny due to recent vandalism, as mentioned here. Just so everyone know
1638:
142:
1551:
781:
1041:
442:
I opposed his first nom for being too new, I did say I'd support the next one if his contributions continued to be on and above par.
1650:
877:
1354:
33:
17:
1082:
1477:
1249:
817:
267:
76:
134:
1167:
455:
346:
177:
Of your articles or contributions to
Knowledge, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
718:
677:
138:
1273:
user does seem to be very civil and does seem to be a good candidate. Note: I changef my vote from oppose to
1474:
1466:
1161:
1039:
1142:. Seen his edits around, very civil response to opposes, good editor can be trusted with the extra tools.--
621:- Insightful, dedicated, knowledgable in terms of policy, civil... what more could we possibly ask for? :)
1498:
984:
233:
1646:
1405:
1020:
873:
835:
755:
1722:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
1032:
710:
868:
860:
1350:
1143:
1007:
901:
813:
443:
605:
1704:
1695:
1681:
1674:
1629:
1615:
1601:
1587:
1573:
1559:
1537:
1505:
1482:
1457:
1438:
1420:
1408:
1400:
1390:
1376:
1359:
1338:
1313:
1292:
1281:
1265:
1253:
1236:
1232:
1214:
1198:
1185:
1152:
1129:
1116:
1098:
1086:
1072:
1067:
1043:
1023:
1011:
991:
968:
956:
936:
930:
907:
882:
863:
837:
821:
801:
789:
758:
746:
738:
722:
714:
703:
690:
667:
652:
641:
613:
588:
570:
558:
541:
529:
502:
481:
470:
460:
434:
408:
394:
367:
336:
318:
289:
285:
245:
115:
98:
1531:
1134:
965:
526:
510:
479:
388:
312:
83:
for the mop and bucket. With over 7 000 edits since his first logged in edit on
January 05, 2006
87:
59:
597:
1452:
1303:
1227:
1095:
1052:
977:
663:
580:
495:
1642:
1612:
1502:
1289:
1278:
830:
751:
1701:
1693:
1678:
1627:
1599:
1571:
1417:
1374:
1346:
1195:
1000:
953:
891:
808:
764:
743:
735:
632:
550:
334:
263:
113:
70:
1326:
1544:
1387:
1224:
916:
798:
774:
649:
492:
417:
152:
151:
I am currently active at several admin-intensive areas of the project and they include
1735:
1700:
Yes, that was the natural assumption I was assuming would be assumed by the assumer.
1526:
1469:
1306:
1208:
1178:
1126:
945:
585:
475:
383:
307:
164:
156:
1447:
1330:
1300:
949:
846:
660:
324:
160:
416:
Good deal of user_talk edits, and seems to have learned the tools of the trade. --
1334:
1262:
1245:
1064:
700:
567:
405:
95:
133:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out
1688:
1622:
1594:
1584:
1566:
1435:
1369:
622:
364:
342:
329:
257:
108:
66:
1716:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1416:, seems to understand things like copyright, which is important for admins.--
1080:
has great qualities and will be an excellent addition to the sysop group. --
763:
Yes. Good bad-image-worker, acts like a janitor already - give him the mop!
1107:
1520:
538:
377:
301:
1094:, of course. This is a great editor, and would make a superb admin. --
1726:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
403:
How did someone beat me? I just created this page...</grumble: -->
1543:
Subsequent discussion moved to talk page per
Masssiveego's request.
80:
1322:
105:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
86:
he has proved his dedication to this project. His first RfA
1465:
Seems like a great editor who will not abuse the tools.
468:
A very good user who is unlikely to abuse admin tools. --
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1428:, will use the tools well. --13:11, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
797:. I was too slow to get around to nominating in time...
1277:. My comments can be seen under the oppose section. --
277:
271:
84:
1222:, and I'm a little disturbed by the opposes below. —
944:
and I wish you luck with the consistant backlogs at
709:
This vote was actually made anonymously by AOL user
107:I am honored to have been nominated and accept. --
1244:, a civil, responsive, and experienced editor.--
198:worldwide who do this kind of work and enjoy it.
1106:exactly per Rory above (that was easy!) :) -
8:
773:, an excellent user. Will be a great admin.
489:great editor, more than ready for the mop.--
584:down too heavily on all the poor hawkbats.
402:as nominator, of course. (<grumble: -->
675:Looks like another good admin candidate.
999:, deserves the mop and the bucket. --
647:Honest-to-God {{RfA-cliche1}} support.
323:I would like to add that my work with
203:there is a Knowledge to contribute to.
7:
1337:that were created by vandals. --Slgr
1055:after a database crash/DoS attack:
24:
1742:Successful requests for adminship
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
1510:You've been opposing (almost)
1434:Friendly, trustworthy editor.
1:
1368:I deleted those pages. ;-) --
79:) – I am pleased to nominate
765:JesseW, the juggling janitor
143:administrators' reading list
1705:16:34, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1696:12:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1682:05:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1630:02:44, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
1616:02:06, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
1602:12:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1588:04:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1574:12:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1560:12:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1538:03:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1506:03:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1483:00:47, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
1458:17:58, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
1439:15:27, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
1421:04:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
1409:03:10, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
1391:23:53, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1377:00:14, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
1360:20:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1314:13:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1293:05:03, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1282:05:32, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
1266:05:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
1254:02:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
1237:21:03, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
1215:03:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
1199:18:56, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
1186:13:45, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
1153:04:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
1130:20:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1117:19:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1099:19:34, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1087:19:30, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1073:19:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1044:19:20, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1024:18:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1012:18:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
992:17:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
969:16:27, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
957:16:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
937:16:13, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
908:14:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
883:13:44, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
838:11:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
822:10:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
802:10:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
790:08:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
767:08:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
759:07:27, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
747:07:03, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
723:06:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
704:05:20, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
691:04:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
668:04:18, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
653:03:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
642:02:48, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
614:02:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
596:I'm fer it, great answers.
589:02:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
571:02:15, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
559:02:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
542:02:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
530:01:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
518:01:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
503:01:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
482:01:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
461:01:27, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
435:01:13, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
409:00:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
395:00:54, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
368:13:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
345:'s edit summary usage with
337:01:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
319:01:03, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
286:01:03, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
246:09:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
122:Questions for the candidate
116:00:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
99:00:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1758:
137:, and read the page about
135:Category:Knowledge backlog
1635:the opposition. Thanks.
1083:That Guy, From That Show!
1719:Please do not modify it.
1675:my article talk criteria
1261:, no issues whatsoever.
829:. Give him the tools. --
508:Schwarzenegger Support'
231:User's last 5000 edits.
39:Please do not modify it
1386:no reason to oppose.
1641:comment was added by
1321:. I met him today on
1171:08:03, 17 August 2006
852:13:36, 16 August 2006
34:request for adminship
1446:Nothing wrong here.
1175:Cleared for adimship
284:contributions as of
1514:RfAs. What exactly
1206:looks good to me. —
1194:Great work so far.
734:. Great candidate.
487:Very Strong Support
1536:
393:
317:
92:personal standards
1654:
1562:
1519:
1358:
1170:
1136:
820:
721:
711:User:64.12.117.11
665:
376:
300:
1749:
1721:
1636:
1557:
1542:
1534:
1529:
1523:
1480:
1472:
1455:
1450:
1344:
1341:
1311:
1230:
1213:
1211:
1183:
1166:
1150:
1133:
1113:
1070:
1037:
1021:SynergeticMaggot
1005:
989:
982:
924:
905:
895:
866:
849:
833:
812:
787:
741:
717:
689:
687:
682:
664:
639:
629:
611:
608:
603:
600:
594:Southern Support
556:
553:
515:
500:
498:
478:
473:
458:
453:
449:
446:
432:
427:
422:
391:
386:
380:
315:
310:
304:
293:
280:
274:
242:
239:
236:
41:
1757:
1756:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1724:this nomination
1717:
1637:—The preceding
1556:
1548:
1532:
1527:
1521:
1478:
1470:
1453:
1448:
1339:
1307:
1252:
1228:
1209:
1207:
1179:
1144:
1109:
1068:
1033:
1001:
985:
978:
935:
920:
899:
893:
881:
864:
859:, good user. --
853:
847:
831:
786:
778:
739:
683:
680:(aeropagitica)
678:
676:
633:
624:
609:
606:
601:
598:
554:
551:
511:
496:
491:
471:
469:
456:
451:
447:
444:
428:
423:
418:
389:
384:
378:
313:
308:
302:
299:
290:Interiot's tool
283:
278:
272:
255:
252:
240:
237:
234:
52:
37:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1755:
1753:
1745:
1744:
1734:
1733:
1729:
1728:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1667:
1666:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1604:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1563:
1550:
1540:
1518:your criteria?
1491:
1490:
1486:
1485:
1460:
1441:
1429:
1423:
1411:
1393:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1316:
1295:
1284:
1268:
1256:
1248:
1239:
1217:
1201:
1189:
1172:
1155:
1137:
1119:
1101:
1092:Strong support
1089:
1075:
1061:
1056:
1049:Strong support
1046:
1035:Baseball,Baby!
1026:
1014:
994:
971:
959:
939:
929:
910:
885:
871:
854:
851:
840:
824:
806:yes, please -
804:
792:
780:
771:Strong support
768:
761:
749:
732:Strong support
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
715:CanadianCaesar
670:
655:
644:
616:
591:
573:
561:
544:
532:
520:
505:
484:
463:
437:
411:
397:
370:
358:
357:
353:
352:
350:
347:mathbot's tool
339:
296:
295:
294:
261:
249:
229:
228:
224:
223:
222:
221:
207:
206:
205:
204:
200:Administrators
188:
187:
186:
185:
171:
170:
169:
168:
139:administrators
124:
123:
119:
118:
55:Final (59/2/1)
51:
46:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1754:
1743:
1740:
1739:
1737:
1727:
1725:
1720:
1714:
1713:
1706:
1703:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1694:
1692:
1691:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1669:
1668:
1664:
1663:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1628:
1626:
1625:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1614:
1610:
1609:
1605:
1603:
1600:
1598:
1597:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1586:
1582:
1579:
1575:
1572:
1570:
1569:
1564:
1561:
1555:
1554:
1546:
1541:
1539:
1535:
1530:
1524:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1493:
1492:
1488:
1487:
1484:
1481:
1476:
1473:
1468:
1464:
1461:
1459:
1456:
1451:
1445:
1442:
1440:
1437:
1433:
1430:
1427:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1415:
1412:
1410:
1407:
1403:
1402:
1397:
1394:
1392:
1389:
1385:
1382:
1378:
1375:
1373:
1372:
1367:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1343:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1327:deleted pages
1324:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1305:
1302:
1299:
1296:
1294:
1291:
1288:
1285:
1283:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1269:
1267:
1264:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1240:
1238:
1235:
1234:
1231:
1226:
1221:
1218:
1216:
1212:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1197:
1193:
1190:
1187:
1184:
1182:
1176:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1164:
1159:
1156:
1154:
1151:
1149:
1148:
1141:
1138:
1135:
1132:
1131:
1128:
1123:
1120:
1118:
1115:
1112:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1097:
1093:
1090:
1088:
1085:
1084:
1079:
1076:
1074:
1071:
1066:
1060:
1054:
1050:
1047:
1045:
1042:
1040:
1038:
1036:
1030:
1027:
1025:
1022:
1018:
1015:
1013:
1010:
1009:
1006:
1004:
998:
995:
993:
990:
988:
983:
981:
980:Funky Monkey
975:
972:
970:
967:
966:Mailer Diablo
963:
960:
958:
955:
951:
947:
943:
940:
938:
934:
933:
928:
927:
923:
919:
914:
911:
909:
906:
903:
897:
896:
889:
886:
884:
879:
875:
870:
867:
862:
858:
855:
850:
844:
841:
839:
836:
834:
828:
825:
823:
819:
815:
811:
810:
805:
803:
800:
796:
793:
791:
785:
784:
776:
772:
769:
766:
762:
760:
757:
753:
750:
748:
745:
742:
737:
733:
730:
724:
720:
719:Et tu, Brute?
716:
712:
708:
707:
706:
705:
702:
698:
694:
693:
692:
688:
686:
681:
674:
671:
669:
666:
662:
659:
656:
654:
651:
648:
645:
643:
640:
637:
631:
630:
628:
620:
617:
615:
612:
604:
595:
592:
590:
587:
583:
582:
577:
574:
572:
569:
565:
562:
560:
557:
548:
545:
543:
540:
536:
533:
531:
528:
524:
521:
519:
516:
514:
509:
506:
504:
501:
499:
494:
488:
485:
483:
480:
477:
474:
467:
464:
462:
459:
450:
441:
438:
436:
433:
431:
426:
421:
415:
412:
410:
407:
401:
398:
396:
392:
387:
381:
374:
371:
369:
366:
363:
360:
359:
355:
354:
351:
348:
344:
340:
338:
335:
333:
332:
326:
322:
321:
320:
316:
311:
305:
291:
287:
281:
275:
269:
268:Contributions
265:
259:
254:
253:
248:
247:
244:
243:
226:
225:
218:
215:
214:
212:
209:
208:
201:
197:
192:
191:
190:
189:
182:
179:
178:
176:
173:
172:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
147:
146:
144:
140:
136:
132:
129:
128:
127:
121:
120:
117:
114:
112:
111:
106:
103:
102:
101:
100:
97:
93:
88:
85:
82:
78:
75:
72:
68:
64:
63:
61:
56:
50:
47:
43:
40:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
1718:
1715:
1689:
1670:
1623:
1607:
1606:
1595:
1580:
1567:
1552:
1515:
1511:
1494:
1467:Wikipediarul
1462:
1443:
1431:
1425:
1413:
1399:
1395:
1383:
1370:
1365:
1331:Paris Hilton
1318:
1308:
1297:
1286:
1274:
1270:
1258:
1241:
1223:
1219:
1203:
1191:
1180:
1174:
1162:
1157:
1146:
1145:
1139:
1125:
1121:
1110:
1103:
1091:
1081:
1077:
1057:
1053:Tim Starling
1048:
1034:
1028:
1016:
1008:
1002:
996:
986:
979:
973:
961:
941:
931:
925:
921:
917:
912:
898:
892:
887:
856:
842:
826:
809:CrazyRussian
807:
794:
782:
770:
731:
696:
695:
684:
679:
672:
657:
646:
635:
626:
623:
618:
593:
579:
575:
563:
546:
534:
522:
513:Rama's arrow
512:
507:
490:
486:
465:
439:
429:
424:
419:
413:
399:
372:
361:
330:
232:
230:
216:
210:
199:
195:
180:
174:
148:
130:
125:
109:
104:
73:
65:
58:Ended 2:34,
57:
54:
53:
48:
38:
30:
28:
1643:HResearcher
1613:HResearcher
1581:Weak Oppose
1503:Masssiveego
1335:Ryan Stiles
1325:, where he
1290:Betacommand
1279:HResearcher
932:Talk to me!
752:Merovingian
525:looks good
1702:Themindset
1679:Themindset
1196:TomTheHand
1051:. Quoting
954:Stubbleboy
279:Block Logs
184:privilege.
60:2006-08-23
31:successful
1553:fix me up
1545:RandyWang
1497:Fails my
1406:rant-line
1388:Dionyseus
799:Petros471
783:fix me up
775:RandyWang
650:Kimchi.sg
581:Iron Fist
527:abakharev
493:digital_m
373:1 Support
1736:Category
1673:. Fails
1651:contribs
1639:unsigned
1499:criteria
1401:Blnguyen
1355:contribs
1351:messages
1210:Khoikhoi
1192:Support.
1181:Pilotguy
1158:Zsupport
1059:rapidly.
878:Contribs
736:DarthVad
586:Syrthiss
547:Support.
227:Comments
141:and the
77:contribs
1671:Neutral
1665:Neutral
1621:not. --
1463:Support
1444:Support
1432:Support
1426:Support
1414:Support
1396:Support
1384:Support
1319:Support
1298:Support
1287:Support
1275:support
1271:Support
1259:Support
1242:Support
1225:Deckill
1220:Support
1204:Support
1140:Support
1122:Support
1104:Support
1096:Rory096
1078:Support
1029:Support
1017:Support
1003:Grafikm
997:Support
987:(talk)
974:Support
962:Support
942:Support
913:Support
888:Support
869:nce Ong
857:Support
848:FireFox
843:Support
827:Support
795:Support
697:Support
685:(talk)
673:Support
661:Viridae
658:Support
619:Support
576:Support
568:Michael
564:Support
535:Support
523:Support
476:iva1979
466:Support
440:Support
414:Support
400:Support
362:support
356:Support
196:editors
153:WP:AIAV
1608:Oppose
1495:Oppose
1489:Oppose
1323:SIMPLE
1263:BryanG
1246:danntm
1147:Dakota
1127:Szvest
946:WP:RFI
832:Ghirla
701:Calton
552:Kungfu
406:Ifnord
288:using
165:WP:CSD
163:, and
157:WP:RFI
96:Ifnord
1690:Zsinj
1624:Zsinj
1596:Zsinj
1585:T-rex
1568:Zsinj
1436:Xoloz
1371:Zsinj
1342:ndson
1188:(UTC)
1163:Samir
950:WP:OP
918:Mr. L
902:Reply
818:email
365:Benon
343:Zsinj
331:Zsinj
325:WP:UI
258:Zsinj
235:Voice
161:WP:OP
110:Zsinj
90:most
81:Zsinj
67:Zsinj
62:(UTC)
49:Zsinj
16:<
1647:talk
1501:. --
1479:2221
1449:Yank
1418:Peta
1347:page
1333:and
1304:isza
1168:धर्म
1065:Tito
964:. -
948:and
874:Chat
814:talk
756:Talk
636:talk
627:rose
555:Adam
457:talk
420:Nish
341:See
273:Logs
264:Talk
256:See
238:-of-
71:talk
1653:) .
1516:are
1512:all
1454:sox
1366:how
1329:on
1160:--
1124:--
926:fty
894:Jay
861:Ter
539:Rje
425:kid
260:'s
241:All
1738::
1687:--
1649:•
1593:--
1558:)
1404:|
1353:-
1349:-
1309:13
1177:--
1108:Gl
1069:xd
1031:-
1019:.
976:--
952:.
915:--
890:--
876:|
845:—
788:)
754:-
713:.
699:-
566:.
549:--
454:|
430:64
404:)
328:--
292:*:
276:▪
270:▪
266:▪
217:A:
211:3.
181:A:
175:2.
159:,
155:,
149:A:
145:.
131:1.
36:.
1645:(
1549:/
1547:(
1533:e
1528:H
1525:.
1522:G
1475:s
1471:e
1398:-
1357:)
1345:(
1340:@
1301:M
1250:C
1233:r
1229:e
1114:n
1111:e
922:e
904:)
900:(
880:)
872:(
865:e
816:/
779:/
777:(
744:r
740:e
638:)
634:(
625:S
610:e
607:k
602:e
599:T
497:e
472:S
452:S
448:O
445:K
390:e
385:H
382:.
379:G
375:!
349:.
314:e
309:H
306:.
303:G
282:)
262:(
74:·
69:(
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.