92:) - I first edited in 2003, but I have been an active editor since the latter part of 2005. In that period of time, I have created and edited numerous articles mostly in the realm of ancient history and geography, participated in Afd's and Cfd's and on several WP policy pages, and on removing vandalism. I believe that Knowledge (XXG)'s reputation is at stake each time a viewer consults us, so we should strive to have the best, most up-to-date, and accurate articles. I'm proud of what I have contributed to that positive experience. One area where we are always in need is the numerous admin backlogs that need attention; with admin tools, I could contribute to reducing that backlog and improve Knowledge (XXG).
1787:. Statistically, carlossuarez46 looks like he'd be the perfect Knowledge (XXG) admin - lots of main space edits, many of them constructive rather than just maintenance, lots of participation in WP:space, etc., etc. But there seems to me a tendency to be a bit too combative, and a bit too touchy, which leads me to not trust him with administrative tools, as there is no recourse to remove him if he does abuse the tools. I believe the chance he'll be an abusive admin is low, but if that combativeness comes out, he could cause quite a lot of damage with no good way to remove him. Therefore, I must oppose. If admins were required to be reconfirmed, or were removable short of ArbCom, I'd support.
302:
going on. I don't see it changing markedly - I wish I could promise it would increase, but that's easy to say and probably what you want to hear, but ultimately likely to be proven wrong. I think some of the time I put into editing ancient geography articles would get transitioned to administrative tasks, which would be fine otherwise I wouldn't have made the request, but the time spent in aggregate is unlikely to go up greatly.
346:
exceptions which improve WP at the expense of slavish adherence to rules or an uncited example of IAR in action. If I am promoted, as an admin, I don't see a real difference in my use up to now. I still think that a compelling explanation of why we should depart from practice or a rule in a particular situation seems better to generate discussion and consensus.
502:
was "tried and acquitted of having sex with an underage boy." That's the only content of that edit which could match the block explanation of "posting libellous allegation of child molestation against a public figure". I'm assuming there's more to it, as I'd be shocked if that was the only reason for
1681:
A good editor, but I'm worried about his particiapation in CFDs and AFDs, while he is very active there, but what I seen from him, most of his comments there are keep or delete per above or nn or pointless votes, which isn't a good sign, remember AFD isn't a vote, instead it's a finding of consensus
187:
if the response is especially out of line. I also realize that on some points in the Xfd world, my views are not majoritarian - that's fine and I can live with that. Sometimes my views change, sometimes the majority or consensus changes, and sometimes I'm just the in the minority to stay, which is
178:
A: I haven't been in "edit wars" since my newbie days. What sometimes causes me stress is how discussions at Afd or Cfd move from the relevant to the personal attack. I have been subject of some, which is disappointing. Generally, my response is to return the focus to the discussion point, with a
301:
Good question. There are days when I spend hours on WP, and some days I skip. I guess some of those edit count tools would give a more precise breakdown - although I also spend a lot of time as a user/reader that wouldn't be reflected. But my time at WP largely depends on what other things I have
345:
pretty much aligns with my sense of the policy. In all my edits I cannot recall ever invoking IAR. However, I have at times offered an opinion that we should do something even though contrary to the text of the "rule" and sometimes consensus builds to do just that. One can view that as making
835:
Knows what he's doing. Been here long enough to show proven dedication and commitement. Even if the block was legitimate, it's so far in the past that I'm willing to AGF and assume
Carlossuarez46 has learnt from whatever happened. A great candidate.
972:. His edits history shows that he has an incredible array of experience. His comments in AfD discussions are insightful. I'm also struck by his extremely consistent civility. All in all, I think that he will be an excellent administrator.
950:, like the answers and the contributions. I've seen this user regularly over at AfD discussions and his contributions are always valuable and demonstrate a good grasp on policy. This user would make a good admin.
1179:
I don't know him personally, but his work is excellent, and he seems to have a good knowledge of policy and procedure. I think someone who works hard, and earns trust should have a chance to contribute more.
1751:
553:
existed, occurred within the first 146 posts by
Carlossuarez46 on Knowledge (XXG). Carlossuarez46 now has 11,013+ posts and over a year and a half have passed since that time. This is a non-issue. --
1868:
1657:
I reviewed all of your contributions and can find no reason to oppose; you have a healthy involvement in the
Knowledge (XXG) side of things (notably CfD's). Not only do I think you will
1088:. Carlossuarez46, in regards to Jaranda's oppose below, as long as you read up on how to close AfDs I think you'll be fine. I don't see evidence that you will interpret AfD as a vote.
1807:. It is for concerns like yours that this ideology exists, given that (statistically) far, far more users promoted partially on this rationale are civil and helpful than are abusive.
1932:
373:
109:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge (XXG) as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
55:
635:
Although I don't see that much AIV or CSD work, the huge amount of work in CfD is impressive. The candidate may wish to re-consider their question 1 answer though ;)
342:
174:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
1729:
Kurt Weber opposes lots of self-noms for this reason and much discussion has not persuaded him otherwise. It is probably better not to respond to this oppose.--
413:
1750:
rather than paste that sentence in every self-nom. Note also that Kurt was one of the rare people who thought it was hilariously funny to support the recent
223:, the article had many adds and removed of speedy tags untill an admin deleted it, in that situation as an admin what would have you done (for more info see
400:
1950:
143:
A: I am proudest of the articles on the various cities named after the
Seleucid and Ptolemaic royals: many (though not all) of the articles linked at
125:
1682:
and if the article meets wikipedia policy, and I'm afraid that Carlos will close AFDs by counting votes. I could change my vote later but until then
121:
407:
443:
437:
897:
456:
393:
89:
1294:
219:
A while back an article called Small
Mercies was created, Small Mercies is a band that had it's song on the popular Australain TV show
40:
17:
672:
295:
How much time to you spend on WP now? (either per day or per week), and how do you see that changing if you were to become an admin?
369:
1871:
devoted to the molestation allegations, this is a tolerable slip-up within Carlos' first 100 edits to the site, and long before our
595:
I think you were right to raise the issue (it was a block, after all) and it presented the opportunity to clarify the matter. --
778:
1767:
every single self-nom, without exception, with the same message. I trust that the closing bureaucrat will be aware of this. --
917:, seems to be sensisble and bright enough. Note that I don't think one block 18 month ago should be any kind of an obstacle.
1408:
1307:
Thoughtful and always civil at CfD, if a bit deletionist for my taste. Knows policy well, and can be trusted with the tools.
1123:. Long-standing editor with solid contributions to the encyclopedia and a reasonable rationale for wanting the admin tools.
1572:
707:
329:
1020:
699:
Has been here for a long time and has amassed a respectable amount of edits, good edits too, by the looks of things. --
578:
474:
224:
23:
241:
and in that article there was no reference to the band. For what it's worth, the show is popular in the US as well.
1773:
628:
1107:, a great mainspace editor, that I have long admired for his ancient city articles and for his work with Smith's
148:
455:
Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review
1347:. Great answer to question three (bonus for using the word "majoritarian" :-)) and good contributions to XfDs.
824:- good answers show a thorough understanding of how things work. I'm sure this user would make a good admin :)—
701:
387:
83:
622:
Has a good range of experience, and has contributed in essentially every admin-related aspect of wikipedia. --
468:
Could you explain the issue of your block? I know it was over a year and a half ago, and am mainly curious.
1919:
1883:
1855:
1819:
1798:
1775:
1758:
1737:
1724:
1704:
1692:
1665:
1649:
1637:
1623:
1609:
1596:
1580:
1547:
1535:
1523:
1507:
1486:
1463:
1438:
1412:
1389:
1371:
1357:
1338:
1323:
1311:
1299:
1289:
1275:
1267:
1248:
1222:
1198:
1184:
1171:
1159:
1127:
1115:
1099:
1080:
1076:
I found as a very fine example of both your civility, and thoughtfulness in communicating with others here.
1064:
1044:
1030:
1006:
988:
976:
964:
942:
930:
909:
888:
866:
844:
830:
816:
804:
785:
762:
740:
728:
723:
709:
694:
677:
653:
630:
605:
588:
563:
528:
517:
484:
350:
306:
275:
245:
96:
74:
1283:
Great editor with many, many great contributions. Very trustworthy. I know he will use admin tools well. --
1839:
1746:
on the part of the candidate and remind him also that many many editors have asked him to discuss this on
668:
550:
1804:
1768:
905:
757:
623:
512:
1931:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
1747:
1742:
Ah yes, probably best not to say anything... except perhaps remind him and others that this is clearly
1181:
1431:
996:- Has long been qualified to be an admin; I'm glad to see Carlossuarez46 stepping up to the plate. --
962:
1503:
1124:
542:
1053:
1077:
883:
775:
525:
495:
383:
365:
347:
303:
242:
237:
Unfortunately, I have to be vague: I cannot see the content that was deleted. However, I did read
93:
79:
1699:
1687:
1619:
1544:
1384:
1794:
1755:
1592:
1402:
1284:
1264:
1095:
1036:
939:
748:. I'm not seeing any major red flags in this user's history, and don't expect any admin abuse. -
718:
70:
494:
just one minute before imposing the block. Looking at the block summary, and the edit, I assume
184:
1702:
1690:
1604:
1564:
1481:
1387:
1354:
1348:
853:
813:
664:
291:
262:
1460:
650:
1880:
1734:
1646:
1632:
1516:
1368:
1025:
902:
749:
583:
504:
479:
1872:
1743:
1380:
180:
1912:
1808:
1495:
1446:
1334:
1215:
1152:
690:
636:
499:
795:
985:
984:
that block was at the end of 2005. That's not a reason to oppose. This is a good user.
973:
923:
875:
771:
1944:
1790:
1589:
1532:
1398:
1257:
1090:
999:
800:
737:
598:
556:
65:
1764:
1721:
1556:
1476:
1308:
1272:
1232:
781:
238:
220:
202:
1876:
1730:
1194:
1015:
951:
838:
573:
469:
1906:
1901:
Pending further information and response by candidate on the historical block.
1662:
1454:
1320:
1209:
1136:
1112:
686:
644:
524:
I was a newbie then, but as far as I know, that was the reason for the block.
320:
1925:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1816:
1754:. It would be nice to see him contribute more constructively to RfA instead.
918:
825:
152:
144:
1135:
A good, solid editor with a good understanding of policies and procedures.
1168:
156:
1752:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Not
Knowledge (XXG) Administrator
1661:
abuse the tools, but I think you will have an excellent use for them. --
1935:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
1256:- Con mucho placer. Buena suerte aunque creo que no la necesitas. --
1191:
661:- Very experienced, and am impressed with the CfD work - stands out.
160:
812:. Great answer to question three. Looks like a good editor overall.
332:, and in what circumstances would you invoke it or not invoke it?
1206:
1) Contributions 2) Knowledge of Policy 3) Activity 4) Civility.
770:. Fantastic contributions, I see absolutely no reason to oppose.
874:
Experienced, can't find any reson why they can't take the mop.
139:
What are your best contributions to
Knowledge (XXG), and why?
1867:. Michael Jackson may not be gay, but given that we have an
736:. Most definitely. CFD contributions are very helpful. --
1543:
No reason to believe that he'll abuse administrator tools.
36:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1864:
1861:
1073:
546:
538:
534:
491:
431:
425:
419:
120:
A: I plan to work most in the backlogged areas such as
1167:
I see no big reasons to not support him. Good luck.--
1072:- I see a very broad aray of contributions, and this
24:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/carlossuarez46
1052:
good editor from what I have seen from his edits.--
719:
572:That's why I said I was just curious :). Thanks!
1150:
1137:
1014:I like what I see...and I vote how I see it :).
541:That December 28, 2005 block, apparently using
116:What admin work do you intend to take part in?
1803:Recall Jimbo's rationale in terming adminship
1189:Wow... I had no idea you were so prolific! --
1499:
343:Knowledge (XXG):What "Ignore all rules" means
8:
1332:
685:- See no reason not to afford him the bit.
490:Just guessing, the blocking admin reverted
1496:
724:
1698:Forget it, I don't know what I'm saying.
1531:Nothing to suggest will abuse the tools.
1379:but no more pointless per above votes in
1353:oops... didn't mean to vote twice... :-)
938:, good editor, time to give him the mop!
128:, proposed moves and mergers, and in AIV.
126:Category:Attack pages for speedy deletion
537:a reason given for the block was posted
1426:wanting to help better the encyclopedia
852:no concerns here, got the experience. —
122:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
1335:The user formerly known as JackLumber
7:
457:Special:Contributions/carlossuarez46
1618:
997:
596:
554:
31:
1951:Successful requests for adminship
1397:. Good 'pedia builder. cheers,
261:is an American show, actually. —
1850:
1847:
1843:
1840:
1835:
1573:
1565:
1557:
1432:
1238:
1236:
1234:
1233:
956:
953:
753:
750:
508:
505:
208:
206:
204:
203:
372:. For the edit count, see the
1:
1515:Fantastic editor. Good luck.
1447:
793:A very experienced editor. --
637:
1518:
1430:
1000:
599:
557:
328:What is your opinion on the
1720:evidence of power-hunger.
1504:
1455:
645:
368:'s edit summary usage with
105:Questions for the candidate
1967:
1617:good user, no problems. -
381:Links for carlossuarez46:
1920:07:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
1884:05:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
1856:03:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
1820:23:29, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1799:21:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
1776:23:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1759:15:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
1738:04:27, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
1725:02:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
1705:01:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1693:21:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
1666:13:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1650:21:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
1638:16:00, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
1624:14:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
1610:03:30, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
1597:03:24, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
1581:20:57, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
1548:17:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
1536:15:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
1524:13:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
1508:01:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
1487:17:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
1464:22:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
1439:16:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
1413:23:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1390:23:55, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1372:21:58, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1358:21:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1351:21:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1339:20:31, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1324:19:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1319:per interactions in AFDs
1312:18:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1300:17:06, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1276:13:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1268:11:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1249:10:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1223:07:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1199:03:23, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1185:00:32, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1172:00:31, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1160:23:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
1128:23:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
1116:23:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
1100:22:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
1081:21:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
1065:21:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
1045:20:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
1031:19:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
1007:18:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
989:18:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
977:18:08, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
965:17:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
943:16:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
931:13:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
910:12:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
889:11:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
867:11:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
845:08:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
831:07:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
817:07:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
805:06:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
786:05:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
763:04:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
741:04:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
729:01:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
710:00:06, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
606:20:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
589:19:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
564:18:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
529:16:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
518:04:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
485:03:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
351:17:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
307:04:48, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
276:11:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
246:16:36, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
149:Seleucia (disambiguation)
75:21:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1928:Please do not modify it.
695:22:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
678:22:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
654:22:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
631:22:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
97:21:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
1744:not assuming good faith
498:was blocked for noting
330:ignore all rules policy
319:Optional question from
46:Please do not modify it
1716:— I view self-noms as
1420:— I view self-noms as
717:An impressive editor.
547:14:32, 1 December 2005
41:request for adminship
1903:Moving to Support.
703:Anonymous Dissident
545:(which was created
341:The explanation at
1860:This block is for
706:
551:these instructions
459:before commenting.
1918:
1765:Kurt Weberopposes
1266:
1221:
784:
760:
700:
693:
676:
549:) at a time when
515:
292:User:Rocksanddirt
22:(Redirected from
1958:
1930:
1917:
1915:
1904:
1854:
1852:
1849:
1845:
1842:
1837:
1818:
1814:
1811:
1797:
1770:Anthony.bradbury
1763:For the record,
1684:Regretful Oppose
1622:
1595:
1577:
1569:
1561:
1520:
1505:
1501:
1498:
1484:
1479:
1457:
1451:
1436:
1434:
1337:
1297:
1292:
1287:
1263:
1260:
1245:
1244:
1242:
1240:
1220:
1218:
1207:
1169:†Sir James Paul†
1158:
1148:
1147:
1142:
1062:
1059:
1056:
1043:this message! -
1028:
1023:
1018:
1005:
1002:
958:
955:
928:
921:
908:
886:
882:
878:
863:
860:
841:
828:
803:
798:
774:
758:
755:
752:
726:
721:
704:
689:
675:
662:
647:
641:
625:Anthony.bradbury
604:
601:
586:
581:
576:
562:
559:
513:
510:
507:
492:this information
482:
477:
472:
447:
406:
359:General comments
272:
269:
215:
214:
212:
210:
48:
27:
1966:
1965:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1957:
1956:
1955:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1933:this nomination
1926:
1913:
1905:
1834:
1812:
1809:
1788:
1588:
1494:Great editor. -
1482:
1477:
1475:Best of luck --
1459:
1295:
1290:
1285:
1258:
1216:
1208:
1157:
1143:
1138:
1125:Espresso Addict
1060:
1057:
1054:
1026:
1021:
1016:
927:
924:
919:
901:
884:
880:
876:
861:
855:
839:
826:
796:
794:
702:
663:
649:
584:
579:
574:
543:Template:Defban
500:Michael Jackson
480:
475:
470:
466:
399:
382:
361:
270:
264:
107:
59:
44:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1964:
1962:
1954:
1953:
1943:
1942:
1938:
1937:
1922:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1761:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1671:
1669:
1668:
1652:
1645:Great editor.
1640:
1626:
1612:
1599:
1583:
1550:
1538:
1526:
1510:
1489:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1453:
1415:
1392:
1374:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1326:
1314:
1302:
1278:
1270:
1254:Strong support
1251:
1225:
1201:
1187:
1182:old windy bear
1174:
1162:
1151:
1130:
1118:
1102:
1083:
1078:Hiberniantears
1067:
1047:
1033:
1009:
991:
979:
967:
948:Strong support
945:
936:Strong Support
933:
925:
912:
891:
869:
847:
833:
819:
807:
788:
772:Matt/TheFearow
765:
743:
731:
712:
697:
680:
656:
643:
633:
611:
610:
609:
608:
592:
591:
567:
566:
531:
526:Carlossuarez46
521:
520:
496:carlossuarez46
465:
462:
452:
451:
450:
448:
384:Carlossuarez46
378:
377:
370:mathbot's tool
366:carlossuarez46
360:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
348:Carlossuarez46
326:
325:
312:
311:
310:
309:
304:Carlossuarez46
290:Question from
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
251:
250:
249:
248:
243:Carlossuarez46
229:
228:
200:Question from
193:
192:
191:
190:
188:just fine too.
168:
167:
166:
165:
133:
132:
131:
130:
106:
103:
101:
94:Carlossuarez46
80:carlossuarez46
62:(57/3/0) final
58:
56:carlossuarez46
53:
52:
51:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1963:
1952:
1949:
1948:
1946:
1936:
1934:
1929:
1923:
1921:
1916:
1910:
1909:
1902:
1899:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1885:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1863:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1853:
1846:
1832:
1831:two years ago
1828:
1825:
1821:
1815:
1806:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1796:
1793:
1792:
1791:User:Argyriou
1786:
1783:
1777:
1774:
1772:
1771:
1766:
1762:
1760:
1757:
1756:Pascal.Tesson
1753:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1712:
1711:
1706:
1703:
1701:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1691:
1689:
1685:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1672:
1667:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1644:
1641:
1639:
1636:
1635:
1634:~ Infrangible
1630:
1627:
1625:
1621:
1616:
1613:
1611:
1608:
1607:
1603:
1600:
1598:
1594:
1591:
1587:
1584:
1582:
1578:
1576:
1570:
1568:
1562:
1560:
1554:
1551:
1549:
1546:
1542:
1539:
1537:
1534:
1530:
1527:
1525:
1522:
1521:
1514:
1511:
1509:
1506:
1502:
1493:
1490:
1488:
1485:
1480:
1474:
1471:
1465:
1462:
1458:
1452:
1450:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1437:
1435:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1416:
1414:
1410:
1407:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1393:
1391:
1388:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1375:
1373:
1370:
1366:
1363:
1359:
1356:
1352:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1336:
1330:
1327:
1325:
1322:
1318:
1315:
1313:
1310:
1306:
1303:
1301:
1298:
1293:
1288:
1282:
1279:
1277:
1274:
1271:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1246:
1229:
1226:
1224:
1219:
1213:
1212:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1197:
1196:
1193:
1188:
1186:
1183:
1178:
1175:
1173:
1170:
1166:
1163:
1161:
1156:
1155:
1149:
1146:
1141:
1134:
1131:
1129:
1126:
1122:
1119:
1117:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1103:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1092:
1087:
1084:
1082:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1068:
1066:
1063:
1051:
1048:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1037:Mailer Diablo
1034:
1032:
1029:
1024:
1019:
1013:
1010:
1008:
1004:
1003:
995:
992:
990:
987:
983:
980:
978:
975:
971:
968:
966:
963:
960:
959:
949:
946:
944:
941:
940:Politics rule
937:
934:
932:
929:
922:
916:
913:
911:
907:
904:
899:
898:Contributions
895:
892:
890:
887:
879:
873:
870:
868:
865:
864:
858:
851:
848:
846:
843:
842:
834:
832:
829:
823:
820:
818:
815:
811:
808:
806:
802:
799:
792:
789:
787:
783:
780:
777:
773:
769:
766:
764:
761:
756:
747:
744:
742:
739:
735:
732:
730:
727:
722:
716:
713:
711:
708:
705:
698:
696:
692:
688:
684:
681:
679:
674:
670:
666:
660:
657:
655:
652:
648:
642:
640:
634:
632:
629:
627:
626:
621:
618:
617:
616:
615:
607:
603:
602:
594:
593:
590:
587:
582:
577:
571:
570:
569:
568:
565:
561:
560:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
535:this warning,
532:
530:
527:
523:
522:
519:
516:
511:
503:the block. -
501:
497:
493:
489:
488:
487:
486:
483:
478:
473:
463:
461:
460:
458:
449:
445:
442:
439:
436:
433:
430:
427:
424:
421:
418:
415:
412:
409:
405:
402:
398:
395:
392:
389:
385:
380:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
362:
358:
352:
349:
344:
340:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
331:
323:
322:
317:
314:
313:
308:
305:
300:
297:
296:
294:
293:
288:
285:
284:
277:
274:
273:
267:
260:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
247:
244:
240:
236:
233:
232:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
217:
216:
198:
195:
194:
189:
186:
182:
176:
175:
173:
170:
169:
164:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
140:
138:
135:
134:
129:
127:
123:
118:
117:
115:
112:
111:
110:
104:
102:
99:
98:
95:
91:
88:
85:
81:
77:
76:
72:
68:
67:
63:
57:
54:
50:
47:
42:
39:
34:
33:
25:
19:
1927:
1924:
1907:
1900:
1897:
1891:
1890:
1838:
1830:
1826:
1789:
1784:
1769:
1717:
1713:
1683:
1680:
1674:
1673:
1670:
1658:
1654:
1642:
1633:
1631:Rock solid.
1628:
1614:
1605:
1601:
1585:
1574:
1566:
1558:
1552:
1540:
1528:
1517:
1512:
1491:
1472:
1448:
1429:
1425:
1424:evidence of
1421:
1417:
1405:
1394:
1376:
1364:
1355:IronGargoyle
1349:IronGargoyle
1344:
1343:
1328:
1316:
1304:
1280:
1253:
1231:
1227:
1210:
1203:
1190:
1176:
1164:
1153:
1144:
1139:
1132:
1120:
1108:
1104:
1089:
1085:
1069:
1049:
1040:
1011:
998:
993:
981:
969:
952:
947:
935:
914:
893:
871:
856:
854:
849:
837:
821:
814:IronGargoyle
809:
790:
767:
745:
733:
714:
682:
665:ck lostsword
658:
638:
624:
619:
613:
612:
597:
555:
467:
454:
453:
440:
434:
428:
422:
416:
410:
403:
396:
390:
338:
327:
318:
315:
298:
289:
286:
265:
263:
259:Prison Break
258:
239:Prison Break
234:
221:Prison Break
201:
199:
196:
179:citation to
177:
171:
142:
136:
119:
113:
108:
100:
86:
78:
64:
61:
60:
45:
37:
35:
1869:entire page
1805:no big deal
1718:prima facie
1647:Valentinian
1519:Wikidudeman
1445:high five*
1422:prima facie
1230:Why not? --
961:•
1829:For block
1722:Kurt Weber
1586:Hell yeah.
1109:Dictionary
779:(Contribs)
464:Discussion
321:User:NAHID
38:successful
1875:policy.--
1383:. Thanks
986:Acalamari
974:Trusilver
687:≈ jossi ≈
426:block log
374:talk page
159:, and at
153:Ptolemais
145:Antiochia
1945:Category
1602:Support!
1533:Davewild
1409:contribs
1399:Casliber
1259:FayssalF
1001:Jreferee
738:Kbdank71
600:Jreferee
558:Jreferee
394:contribs
185:WP:CIVIL
157:Laodicea
90:contribs
1898:Neutral
1892:Neutral
1700:Jaranda
1688:Jaranda
1655:Support
1643:Support
1629:Support
1620:Zeibura
1615:Support
1606:Peacent
1559:Agεθ020
1553:Support
1545:Bart133
1541:Support
1529:Support
1513:Support
1492:Support
1473:Support
1418:Support
1395:Support
1385:Jaranda
1377:Support
1365:Support
1345:Support
1329:Support
1317:Support
1309:Johnbod
1305:Support
1281:Support
1273:Terence
1228:Support
1204:Support
1177:Support
1165:Support
1133:Support
1121:Support
1105:Support
1086:Support
1070:Support
1050:support
1041:approve
1012:Support
994:Support
982:Support
970:Support
915:Support
894:Support
881:fireboy
872:Support
850:Support
822:Support
810:Support
801:iva1979
791:Support
768:Support
746:Support
734:Support
720:Captain
715:Support
683:Support
659:Support
620:Support
614:Support
401:deleted
1877:Chaser
1827:Oppose
1795:(talk)
1785:Oppose
1748:WT:RFA
1731:Chaser
1714:Oppose
1686:Sorry
1675:Oppose
1381:WP:AFD
1369:Ghirla
1296:050389
1039:and I
906:styles
896:- see
840:Daniel
776:(Talk)
751:auburn
691:(talk)
533:After
506:auburn
181:WP:AGF
161:Apamea
124:, and
1914:Chat
1908:Pedro
1865:edits
1862:these
1813:notes
1810:Grace
1663:Ozgod
1500:flash
1497:Lemon
1478:omtay
1449:Giggy
1433:Клоун
1321:Corpx
1217:Chat
1211:Pedro
1113:Aldux
1091:Andre
903:Comet
782:(Bot)
754:pilot
725:panda
639:Giggy
539:here.
509:pilot
408:count
155:, at
151:, at
147:, at
66:Andre
16:<
1593:khoi
1590:Khoi
1403:talk
1367:. --
1286:Will
1195:not?
1154:talk
1140:Jody
1096:talk
1035:I'm
1017:Jmlk
920:Neil
900:..--
885:Talk
827:arf!
759:talk
575:Jmlk
514:talk
471:Jmlk
438:rfar
420:logs
388:talk
364:See
225:here
84:talk
71:talk
1873:BLP
1851:mit
1848:her
1659:not
1333:---
1331:.
1291:Mak
1111:.--
1074:dif
1061:gle
1058:rin
1055:Sef
957:yan
954:Ark
444:spi
414:AfD
183:or
1947::
1911:|
1879:-
1844:ki
1841:Wi
1833:.
1733:-
1579:)
1575:ФC
1571:•
1567:ΔT
1555:--
1483:38
1428:.
1411:)
1262:-
1214:|
1098:)
877:Jh
862:as
432:lu
287:5.
271:as
197:4.
172:3.
137:2.
114:1.
73:)
43:.
1881:T
1836:~
1817:§
1735:T
1563:(
1461:P
1456:U
1406:·
1401:(
1243:s
1241:i
1239:r
1237:h
1235:C
1192:Y
1145:B
1094:(
1027:7
1022:1
926:╦
859:n
857:A
797:S
673:C
671:•
669:T
667:•
651:P
646:U
585:7
580:1
481:7
476:1
446:)
441:·
435:·
429:·
423:·
417:·
411:·
404:·
397:·
391:·
386:(
376:.
339:A
324::
316:6
299:A
268:n
266:A
235:A
227:?
213:s
211:i
209:r
207:h
205:C
163:.
87:·
82:(
69:(
49:.
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.