21:
120:
There is a nominal deadline for a nomination of seven days before closure, but a bureaucrat has the power to expand or reduce the deadline if there are reasons to do so; for example if the nomination hasn't acquired enough data to build consensus, the bureaucrat might decide that it should run for a
46:
As
Knowledge has grown, there has arisen a need for trusted people to have more tools and responsibility than the typical editor. The main problem the community faces with this role is determining to whom to grant such privileges. To aid this determination, it is suggested a process be followed.
74:
Even though you can classify a potential nominee using statistical analysis (edit counts etc.), this should be discouraged, as quality is preferred in front of quantity. Nethertheless, some guidelines can be made to specify a minimum activity required by a nominee.
109:
comments. The outcome of the nomination isn't the quantity of comments of each faction, but the relative consensus aqquired by those comments, but as a guideline, there should be more
139:
97:
The process should not be interpreted as a vote, but to ease the burden on the closing bureaucrat, three different types of comments can be made: these are
35:
Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the
36:
134:
62:
The nominee should have taken part in administrative work, for example
Articles for deletion (optional, but preferable).
121:
couple of days more, and he/she might also close a nomination if there is a clearly consensus that it should not pass.
28:
20:
90:
In order to create a functional nomination process, the following points should be adhered to:
128:
94:
A nomination must be made, with the nominee accepting the nomination.
15:
65:
The nominee should be able to keep cool in a conflict.
27:
This page is currently inactive and is retained for
8:
140:Matters related to requests for adminship
55:Proposed criteria for a nominated user:
7:
14:
19:
1:
80:list of minimum requirements
59:The nominee must be trusted.
156:
135:Inactive project pages
70:Analysing the Nominee
44:
43:
147:
40:
23:
16:
155:
154:
150:
149:
148:
146:
145:
144:
125:
124:
88:
72:
53:
34:
12:
11:
5:
153:
151:
143:
142:
137:
127:
126:
123:
122:
118:
113:comments than
95:
87:
84:
83:
82:
71:
68:
67:
66:
63:
60:
52:
49:
42:
41:
33:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
152:
141:
138:
136:
133:
132:
130:
119:
116:
112:
108:
105:comments and
104:
100:
96:
93:
92:
91:
85:
81:
78:
77:
76:
69:
64:
61:
58:
57:
56:
50:
48:
38:
32:
30:
25:
22:
18:
17:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
89:
79:
73:
54:
45:
37:village pump
26:
129:Categories
111:Supportive
101:comments,
99:Supportive
31:reference.
29:historical
115:Opposive
103:Opposive
51:Criteria
107:Neutral
86:Process
117:ones.
131::
39:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
