502:
terms, blaming them for a bias he perceives in their edits even when other users do not spot any bias, while insisting, contrary to the analysis of others, that he is blameless, innocent and utterly neutral. The range of editors he has clashed with suggests that this is not a case of one admin attacking a blameless editor, but of an editor whose actions are the cause of the conflict that seems to follow him. He has routinely ignored appeals from users to show restaint, while perceiving his less than tactful responses and frequent attacks as merely a statement of neutrality and objective facts. I would urge the arbcom to take on this case. It can then decide whether all that is required is merely parole or more broadbased sanctions. Without intervention there appears to be little likelihood that the ungoing problems will stop. Blocks seem simply to add to his belief in his own victimhood so some outside intervention from a neutral body like the arbcom would be wise before the situation spirals out of control. (Al is new to the procedure and so some allowances need to be made for that. Nevertheless the contribution above, as usual, focuses on accusations against his critics, and allegations of bias, than on the substantive issue. Regrettably that it part of a regular pattern.)
431:
fellow editors to be. Numerous editors and administrators have politely requested, asked, cajoled, threatened, demanded, and begged him to address his edits and edit summaries to content instead of to the people he is engaged in disputes with. To date, he has been unable or unwilling to do this. Alienus frequently describes his interactions with
Knowledge (XXG) administration in hostile terms, and generally rejects any suggestion that his behavior is at issue, instead describing most of his blocks as the result of corrupt or incompetent administrators. I urge Arbcom to accept this case, either to address what I believe is Alienus' severe and continuing misbehavior — especially his constant use of
1008:
spend less energy "enforcing" good behavior and more exemplifying it. Many an edit war is much better addressed by jumping in with a compromise edit or a smart question or two than by handing out blocks, even if someone has passed 3RR. SOPHIA made some very good related observations above, specifically in the three paragraphs starting at "Al has gone..." I hope that we, as a community, know how to allow for someone's development and improvement, while affirming their dignity, and I encourage each of us to think about what that means.
757:
I have had as a professional has stopped me from responding in kind. Maybe Al doesn't have that background - who knows - but he is getting the hang of things - his civility has increased and his challenging approach (with help and guidance) is absolutely essential to the long term health of wikipedia. The current gut reaction seems to be to cleanse the system of this type of person but that is the route that will ultimately lead to the stagnation and extinction of this project as all the intellectual bio-diversity will be gone.
515:
749:
considerably and is contributing in a positive way to articles where angels would fear to dread. Certain topics attract very strong POV's and any challenge to the cozy status quo of the incumbent editors is not going to be received well. Such intellectual conflict is absolutely necessary to ensure the article does not degrade into POV trash. It's unfortunate for Al that he picks these topics but fortunate for the integrity of the encyclopedia.
992:
however, become involved in certain patterns of editing behavior that generate "more heat than light". The responsibility for maintaining these patterns lies with all of us, and I believe there are specific things that
Alienus can do, and that members of the community around him can do, that would significantly reduce the unproductive generation of heat in the form of edit wars, personal attacks, blocks, AN/I threads, etc.
941:, asking again for Alienus to address the issues. He evaded the question. As I said to him: "... if you ignore the evidence presented the first time, what is the point in presenting it again? One has to conclude that presenting you with evidence of your inappropriate behaviour simply does not work. I'm reluctant to agree with your call for an RfC for that reason."
996:
effect would be met with a very positive response by the community. An openness to try a different strategy in content disputes should be all that's needed as regards handling the actual articles, i.e., not "being drawn into" edit wars. He and I have discussed this topic in emails, and I'll be happy to get my
Wikitime back soon (I'm currently between
1058:
I realise my statements above are slightly incoherent but I have to go catch a plane in two minutes, so I don't have time to edit them so that they flow properly. However, I hope that I have gotten my main point across. Alienus is interested in wikipedia, not in its editors. He is not breaking 3RR to
1003:
Besides this reverting habit, there's that swarm of less-than-civil interactions which seems to follow
Alienus around, in which I confess I've been a participant. This isn't unrelated to the content dispute problem, except insofar as it's self-sustaining, with incivilities exchanged over warnings or
828:
On a update, I really dispute the ideal that this editor is a consistent or indefinite block canidate. His contributions have been constructive and I note a indescriminate pattern of competent behavior. However, I would suspect that such remedies as attack parole and possibly other restrictions would
777:
I don't know much about the specific situation that has led to this RfAr, but I can definitely agree with Sophia on one point: since I first encountered
Alienus on Knowledge (XXG), he has definitely shown improvement in civility. Has it been enough improvement? I don't know and I really don't want
756:
Knowledge (XXG) has grown enormously recently and edior groups that have "owned" articles are having to make way for a broader POV base that reflects the world outside their narrow area of interest. I have been on the receiving end of the frustration of these established editors and only the training
1054:
It is frankly irrelevant whether
Alienus has criticised admins for being corrupt or incompetent. Doing so is not against the rules; it is rather like criticising a bad edit. Has he made personal attacks whilst doing so? If he has, does that automatically mean that his points are invalid? I trust his
933:
that I put together some months ago, listing several examples of inappropriate behaviour. Though it was never filed, Alienus decided to respond. Rather than address the issues raised, he made a variety of accusations, stated that "In short, I pissed them off, and I'm proud of it," and "In the end, I
995:
I think the best way
Alienus could respond to this RfC would be to acknowledge that he could approach content disputes more productively, both in the way that he carries out the disputes and in the way he interacts with other disputants. I suspect that a sincere and humble statement by him to that
973:
The exception noted, and text adjusted accordingly. As for feeling attacked, please don't. It's intended to be objective criticism of what I perceive to be a real problem. Whether I'm right or wrong, please ask yourself why people (including myself) have this impression. Ask yourself what you could
857:
The fact that this case has already been accepted in spite of this statement is highly troubling, and makes me seriously question the intentions of those who will carry it out. If you are so quick to take on a case that has by no means exhausted other avenues (two RfCs were begun, but have not been
752:
Knowledge (XXG) is a continuous learning process for us all. If it can be shown that Al has made no progress in civility and colaborative editing then a ban would be justified. However if you examine his recent treatment at the hands of some admins with whom he has previously clashed you will see a
1044:
The only problem with
Alienus is that he is too keen on improving wikipedia, that he sometimes forgets to abide by the rules, and sometimes forgets to respect opposing editors (this may or may not be provoked or justified). This may piss some of you admins off. But then again, all I see is someone
1007:
A lot of the energy sustaining the acrimony I've seen around
Alienus comes from other sources, though, and I think a solution would be incomplete, and somewhat undermined, without addressing the ways in which we reinforce, sustain, and exacerbate incivility by our responses to it. We admins could
851:
A request for arbitration is the last step of dispute resolution. Before requesting arbitration, please review other avenues you should take. If you do not follow any of these routes, it is highly likely that your request will be rejected. If all other steps have failed, and you see no reasonable
744:
for a disputed PA where admins were outraged that Al would not admit to his "error" - he has made great grounds in being civil. Yes he slips sometimes - but we are supposed to be mature people here and the only way this project will succeed is to cut each other some slack and stop looking for the
430:
Alienus is clearly an intelligent and ardent editor who understands
Knowledge (XXG) policies. From my perspective, the reason he keeps running in to trouble is that he either can not or will not refrain from framing arguments in terms of what he imagines the attitudes, beliefs, and creeds of his
401:
In the view of many administrators and users, Alienus is an inveterate edit warrior who is prone to making personal attacks and gratuitously assuming bad faith towards anyone with whom he has a dispute. In the view of Alienus and some of his supporters (he has some), he is a fearless opponent of
801:
may warrent a investigation from the committee. He/she commonly engages in the boderline commentary of trolling and unwanted behavior. I've no idea if this is a result of previous history or if its justly good faith. However, I've noted this editor never fails to defend the actions of disruptive
1034:
I see that all evidence points to Alienus' conduct AFTER HIS EDIT WARS. This is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT as he may have been provoked into such behaviour by said edit wars and behavious of admins in reaction to them. It also gives ABSOLUTELY NO INSIGHT into his intentions, whether they are good or
501:
I have experienced Alienus's behaviour on a number of the abortion pages. His claim that not all admins have been fair to him has some merit. However he is frequently his own worst enemy, constantly making presumptions as to his own innocence and other users' guilt. He criticises users in stark
991:
I have had numerous interactions with Alienus, both in the context of working on articles and also in discussions of Wiki-etiquette, Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines, etc. I think he is a dedicated and productive editor who is clearly interested in the success of this project. He has,
802:
users that comprimise the well-being of the encyclopedia on discussion pages, and this has given me great case for concern (see the comment below for elaboration). This along with comments of administrators and the false accusations of policy violation is something that I did not appreciate. -
1004:
blocks for incivility, which is just silly. Again, a frank acknowledgement on Alienus' part that he could employ more diplomacy, and a genuine committment to do so, would go a long way. Eventually, he'll be due an epiphany regarding the true meaning of AGF, but you can't rush these things.
748:
Al has gone from being very incivil quite frequently to occasionaly pushing his luck. As he has no luck now and a bevy of admins waiting to jump, these minor incidents get blown out of all proportion. He should be seen as a success story for the mentoring of the community as he has improved
858:
allowed to come to fruition), could it be that you have already made up your minds? Could it be that you have assumed guilt where you have seen accusation? I sincerely hope that the answer to these questions is negative, and that the reasoning behind this RfA case will soon be made clear.
461:
attacks when his edits are challenged, thus creating a very toxic environment that is not conducive to collaboration. Requests for civility are routinely ignored by Alienus, based on his own assessment that he is not attacking editors, but stating what he considers to be facts.
402:
corrupt and lax administrators. If the former is true, a personal attack parole and revert parole might do the trick. If the latter is true (and the two claims may not be mutually exclusive) then there is a greater problem caused by corrupt (or incompetent) administrators.
884:
to be disruptive or mean-spirited: it was because he saw an opportunity to remove POV and make an article more neutral, because he saw personal biases that were interfering with the facts of a controversial topic, because he knew what he had to do to make it better. This is
43:
Please do not edit this page directly unless you wish to become a participant in this request. (All participants are subject to Arbitration Committee decisions, and the ArbCom will consider each participant's role in the dispute.) Comments are very welcome on the
1011:
Regarding choice of venue, I realize these remarks are more suited to a Request for comment than to a Request for arbitration, but this seems to be where people are focused, and I see no problem having a good conversation wherever we happen to be standing.
631:
716:
not the subject of a similar block to the one given Al - infact why wasn't the admin even admonished? And since when did we get so sensitive that people get blocked for 3 days (effectively 4 now due to admin "help") for this level of comment?
876:” when it comes to removing POV. Yes, he has been through edit wars. (How many among us haven’t?) He has broken 3RR. But if you would look closely at the instances of this, graciously presented to us by Tony Sidaway, you will see that it was
597:
Uhm, I haven't gotten around to commenting on it directly, but some of these RfM's involved me only peripherally and others were launched by me. Once again, the truth is not going to be found by zooming out and taking a head count.
408:
As involved parties I have listed Alienus and those administrators (including myself) most prominently involved in the dispute. I am engaged in compiling a fairly complete history of Alienus' involvement with administrators at
861:
I have heard various admins mention, during the course of this case, that it is the editing that is important, that building Knowledge (XXG) is what we are all trying to do. Will Beback, the latest blocking admin, stated,
1026:
I agree totally with what GTBacchus and Romarin mentions above. If anyone hasn't read them, I urge them to do so. Especially to note that Alienus is firmly dedicating to writing an encyclopedia, instead of rule-obeying.
1263:
2) Alienus also has a very extensive history of incivility, including personal attacks, unwarranted assumptions of bad faith, and ad hominem arguments, for which he has been blocked, at present, seven distinct times.
621:
626:
537:
I think it is a waste of everybodys time to level insubstantial accusations. I encourage everyone to examine these links for themselves, and not to be impressed or intimidated by the sheer number of them.
167:
275:
456:
in one of WP's policy talk pages. After a few days of editing these articles I found Alienus to have a very abrasive and uncivil manner of engaging people that do not concur with his views, resorting to
1051:- this assertion is supported by one piece of evidence and I declare it to be false. When he an I were working on Ayn Rand a while back, he only made arguments against Ayn Rand and none of the editors.
1159:
60:
1293:
3) Alienus has frequently responded to blocks with further incivility. It has become clear due to Alienus' extensive history of warnings and blocks that he is not likely ever to modify his behavior.
221:
944:
I have seen this time and time again - his talk page makes for interesting reading - and the pattern is the same. Alienus is almost always innocent, in his assessment. How, then, can he change?
926:
I have had a significant amount of contact with Alienus. He is, as the arbitrators will have gathered, an extremely aggressive editor who has a long history of incivility and personal attacks.
1000:
homes) and find Alienus ready to get to work on some articles and practice the whole non-revert-based strategy, which I'm convinced will speak for itself once he gives it a good-faith chance.
329:
892:
Please consider the evidence carefully, please look behind the accusations and inflammatory statements (of both parties) to examine the heart of the matter. That is where the truth lies.
398:
I feel that this case cannot be resolved by the community, and it persists in drawing in good editors and administrators, wasting their time, and reducing the civility of interactions.
1277:
1273:
1269:
1247:
56:
49:
575:'s use of participation in mediation - some of which Al actually logged - as some sort of "black mark" is a worrying mischaracterisation of both Al and the mediation process. As
485:
At this point, an RfAr seem premature and is not likely to be at all productive. Therefore, I'm petitioning that those who filed for an RfAr allow the pending RfC to continue.
614:
Alienus has had eleven blocks placed on his account by nine different admins. The account has been unblocked five times, three of which were to lengthen or change the blocks.
45:
641:
763:
why is this process being speeded along with indecent haste? This case has been accepted before Al is even unblocked and given the chance to respond to his accusers.
405:
Blocking does not seem to significantly improve the situation because of the acrimony that results between a growing snowball of involved administrators and editors.
1308:
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
651:
646:
636:
381:
Tony Sidaway's opinion, disputed by Alienus, ^^^James^^^ Romarin and SOPHIA, is that Alienus is an inveterate edit warrior prone to making personal attacks. See
889:
what Will is referring to, is it not? That sometimes we have to break the rules for the good of Knowledge (XXG). I see no difference in Alienus’ actions.
1214:
1333:
1352:
1141:
1132:
1119:
1110:
1100:
1090:
1045:
who is set on one target - improving wikipedia. Don't drive him away just because he broke 3RR too much. He's contributed a lot whilst doing so.
846:
First of all, I would like to express my concern at both the direction and the speed that this is going. I quote from the top of this page:
17:
89:
1188:
should not be construed as an entitlement or inalienable right to three reverts, nor does it endorse reverts as an editing technique.
661:
131:
239:
852:
chance that the matter can be resolved in another manner, you may request that it be decided by the Arbitration Committee (ArbCom).
1180:
is considered harmful. When disagreements arise, users are expected to discuss their differences rationally rather than reverting
143:
251:
185:
161:
149:
366:
657:
In addition, two users have prepared RfCs recently regarding Alienus, although they have't posted them on the RfC page yet.
269:
257:
137:
1202:
1185:
1243:
1) Alienus has an extensive history of edit warring. At present he has eight blocks for edit warring since February, 2006.
1318:
1) For edit warring, personal attacks, and incorrigibility, Alienus is banned from editing Knowledge (XXG) for one year.
864:
Here, our overarching concern is writing an encyclopedia. If we have to ignore all of the rules in order to do so, we will
245:
197:
155:
83:
938:
793:
On June 16, 2006 I made a note on Alienus's behavior in comparison with his involvement with a currently banned editor:
627:
Knowledge (XXG):Mediation Cabal/Cases/6 December 2005/Alienus and Loxley edit war over Dennett and Philosophy of the Mind
263:
215:
203:
1332:
Any block, restriction, ban, or sanction performed under the authorisation of a remedy for this case must be logged at
526:
I don't think it's appropriate to offer an opinion on the matter before Alienus has had a chance to make a statement.
410:
382:
868:." This is a slap in the face for Alienus, and for the rest of us who see the work that he does as just that. Alienus
293:
191:
553:
an "edit warrior". This arguably insubstantial charge and disproportionate punishment caused a heated discussion on
830:
817:
813:
669:(though never posted, it nonetheless gained a second certifier, a response from Alienus, and input from nine users)
209:
305:
323:
311:
962:
apologies gracefully. Your characterization of me is demonstrably inaccurate and borders on personal attack.
723:
can someone please explain why an admin tried to present a new longer block as a radical point in Al's favour?
1201:
2) Knowledge (XXG) users are expected to behave reasonably and calmly in their dealings with other users, to
898:
471:
299:
1276:. In addition, he has received numerous warnings which have not had any visible effect upon his behavior. (
1246:. In addition, he has received numerous warnings which have not had any visible effect upon his behavior. (
1206:
1059:
piss people off, to push POV, nor for any other reason, but only as a side-effect of his thorough editing.
1087:
930:
666:
414:
317:
125:
1107:
233:
107:
1210:
1177:
1016:
978:
968:
948:
916:
833:
820:
806:
782:
771:
677:
604:
587:
561:
491:
475:
452:
I recently encountered Alienus when an editor placed a request related to the group of articles about
439:
417:
673:
These represent efforts by a variety of users to resolve problems with Alienus's editing behavior . -
1041:
dedicated to keeping a neutral POV. I shall by way of good faith extend this to his other dealings.
812:
I still endorse every word I said. This editor's abuse is quite serious. Also see the discussion on
435:— or to address the conspiracy of administrators that he apparently believes he is the victim of.
179:
95:
576:
558:
535:"all represent efforts by a variety of users to resolve problems with Alienus's editing behavior."
1129:
1084:
913:
803:
514:
120:
77:
1138:
1097:
674:
572:
542:
530:
228:
1222:
554:
642:
Knowledge (XXG):AMA Requests for Assistance/Archive5#Assistance with Cartesian materialism
632:
Knowledge (XXG):Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-03-22 POV Tag on Creation-Evolution Controversy
467:
287:
1218:
753:
pattern of nit-picking and "supervision" that would drive the best of us to distraction.
731:
how does a subpage of selected quotes by an interested party pass as dispute resolution?
48:, and will be read, in full. Evidence, no matter who can provide it, is very welcome at
1013:
436:
174:
1346:
1125:
1030:
I myself have had a few dealings with Alienus and have never had trouble with him.
963:
907:
893:
798:
779:
599:
546:
486:
72:
1049:
Numerous editors have asked Alienus to address arguments to content and not people
1116:
764:
580:
557:
which ultimately led to this RFA. The block was eventually resolved and lifted.
503:
1068:
Tony Sidaway is a party and is thus recused from clerk activities in this case.
975:
945:
741:
550:
463:
282:
617:
Alienus has been involved in several mediations, and requests for mediation:
55:
Arbitrators will be working on evidence and suggesting proposed decisions at
929:
I have never seen Alienus admit that he was in the wrong. An example is the
872:
concerned with writing an encyclopedia, and as he has demonstrated, he can “
453:
637:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation/Rejected 2#Cartesian materialism
622:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation/Medical analysis of circumcision
579:
says - please review the details - don't just go by weight of numbers.
1037:
I have worked with Alienus on Objectivism-related articles and he was
652:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation/Rejected 6#Objectivism et. al.
959:
955:
778:
to be involved in that decision. But, improvement there has been.
647:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation/Rejected 3#Joseph Smith, Jr.
1225:. Personal attacks by editors on other editors are prohibited.
700:
chance to try to flame the stuation with unacceptable comments
954:
You don't have to go any further than my talk page to see me
1077:
939:
User talk:Randall Brackett#Your comment at Alienus' RfAr
1267:
1265:
1244:
866:
724:
714:
701:
358:
353:
348:
343:
113:
101:
1078:
Arbitrators' opinions on hearing this matter (4/1/0/0)
713:
why were the same "edit warrior" comments by an admin
338:
Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
934:
invoke WP:IAR in my defense for all of my actions."
696:
why did Tony Sidaway haunt his talk page jumping at
1217:. If disputes arise, users are expected to use the
529:I also think it is a gross mischaracterization for
737:would any of you like to be treated as he's been?
533:to state that the various mediations listed below
375:If not, then explain why that would be fruitless
1163:(vote counts and comments are there as well)
8:
1322:Passed 8 to 0 at 15:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1297:Passed 8 to 0 at 15:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1284:Passed 8 to 0 at 15:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1254:Passed 8 to 0 at 15:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1229:Passed 8 to 0 at 15:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1215:Knowledge (XXG):Writers' rules of engagement
1192:Passed 8 to 0 at 15:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
427:I concur with Tony's summary of the case.
1334:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration enforcement log
52:. Evidence is more useful than comments.
703:? Comments that passed without remark by
690:then please explain where the RfC went?
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration
449:I concur with Nandesuka's assessment.
974:do differently to avoid creating it.
59:and voting on proposed decisions at
7:
829:assist in curbing the situation. -
797:On another note, a smilar editor,
740:Since his last week long block by
662:User talk:DavidBailey/RfC: Alienus
24:
1353:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration cases
1203:Knowledge (XXG):Assume good faith
411:User:Tony Sidaway/Sandbox/Alienus
383:User:Tony Sidaway/Sandbox/Alienus
365:Confirmation that other steps in
937:I recently raised this point at
513:
541:I would also like to note that
1259:Alienus makes personal attacks
39:on 15:22, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
1:
1221:procedures instead of making
745:inevitable errors in others.
761:If Al is not being picked on
735:If Al is not being picked on
729:If Al is not being picked on
721:If Al is not being picked on
711:If Al is not being picked on
694:If Al is not being picked on
688:If Al is not being picked on
1148:Temporary injunction (none)
789:Comment by Randall Brackett
549:for three days for calling
31:on 13:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
1369:
1207:Knowledge (XXG):Wikiquette
1137:Reject, please try an RfC
880:for the fun of it, it was
814:User talk:Randall Brackett
1022:Outside view by Infinity0
807:17:35, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
545:is the admin who blocked
522:Outside view of ^^James^^
394:Statement by Tony Sidaway
1211:Knowledge (XXG):Civility
1142:20:45, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
1133:04:08, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
1120:18:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
1111:16:44, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
1101:14:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
1091:01:55, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
1017:15:29, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
979:08:48, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
969:08:33, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
949:21:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
917:15:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
834:09:42, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
821:08:55, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
783:10:00, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
772:19:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
678:19:25, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
610:Statement by Will Beback
605:10:11, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
588:10:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
571:I agree with James that
562:18:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
492:08:21, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
476:23:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
440:22:36, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
418:21:20, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
1158:All numbering based on
874:ignore all of the rules
842:Outside view of Romarin
1327:Log of blocks and bans
987:Statement by GTBacchus
683:Outside view of SOPHIA
667:User:Jakew/Alienus RFC
497:Outside view of jtdirl
423:Statement by Nandesuka
1073:Preliminary decisions
922:Outside view by Jakew
433:argumentum ad hominem
1289:Alienus is obstinate
1270:Nandesuka's evidence
481:Statement by Alienus
389:Requests for comment
1197:No personal attacks
1219:dispute resolution
1160:/Proposed decision
445:Statement by Jossi
367:dispute resolution
61:/Proposed decision
1310:
1302:Proposed remedies
1239:Alienus edit wars
1205:, and to observe
1186:three-revert rule
915:
474:
1360:
1306:
1274:Jossi's evidence
1234:Findings of fact
1223:personal attacks
1108:Charles Matthews
966:
912:
905:
831:Randall Brackett
818:Randall Brackett
769:
602:
585:
517:
511:
489:
466:
333:
279:
225:
171:
117:
90:deleted contribs
67:Involved parties
1368:
1367:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1343:
1342:
1329:
1316:
1304:
1291:
1261:
1241:
1236:
1199:
1174:
1169:
1155:
1150:
1080:
1075:
1065:
1024:
989:
964:
924:
899:
844:
791:
765:
685:
612:
600:
581:
524:
504:
499:
487:
483:
447:
425:
396:
391:
369:have been tried
285:
231:
177:
123:
75:
69:
40:
32:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1366:
1364:
1356:
1355:
1345:
1344:
1340:
1328:
1325:
1315:
1314:Alienus banned
1312:
1303:
1300:
1290:
1287:
1260:
1257:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1232:
1198:
1195:
1173:
1170:
1168:
1165:
1154:
1153:Final decision
1151:
1149:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1135:
1122:
1113:
1104:
1093:
1088:(spill yours?)
1079:
1076:
1074:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1064:
1061:
1023:
1020:
988:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
923:
920:
855:
854:
843:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
790:
787:
786:
785:
707:admin at all.
684:
681:
671:
670:
664:
655:
654:
649:
644:
639:
634:
629:
624:
611:
608:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
523:
520:
498:
495:
482:
479:
446:
443:
424:
421:
395:
392:
390:
387:
386:
385:
371:
370:
362:
361:
356:
351:
346:
340:
339:
335:
334:
280:
226:
172:
118:
68:
65:
35:
27:
26:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1365:
1354:
1351:
1350:
1348:
1341:
1338:
1337:
1335:
1326:
1324:
1323:
1319:
1313:
1311:
1309:
1301:
1299:
1298:
1294:
1288:
1286:
1285:
1281:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1268:
1266:
1258:
1256:
1255:
1251:
1249:
1245:
1238:
1233:
1231:
1230:
1226:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1196:
1194:
1193:
1189:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1171:
1166:
1164:
1162:
1161:
1152:
1147:
1143:
1140:
1136:
1134:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1121:
1118:
1114:
1112:
1109:
1105:
1103:
1102:
1099:
1094:
1092:
1089:
1086:
1082:
1081:
1072:
1067:
1066:
1062:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1040:
1036:
1031:
1028:
1021:
1019:
1018:
1015:
1009:
1005:
1001:
999:
993:
986:
980:
977:
972:
971:
970:
967:
961:
957:
953:
952:
951:
950:
947:
942:
940:
935:
932:
927:
921:
919:
918:
914:
911:
910:
906:
904:
903:
897:
896:
890:
888:
883:
879:
875:
871:
867:
865:
859:
853:
849:
848:
847:
841:
835:
832:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
819:
815:
810:
809:
808:
805:
800:
794:
788:
784:
781:
776:
775:
774:
773:
770:
768:
762:
758:
754:
750:
746:
743:
738:
736:
732:
730:
726:
725:
722:
718:
715:
712:
708:
706:
702:
699:
695:
691:
689:
682:
680:
679:
676:
668:
665:
663:
660:
659:
658:
653:
650:
648:
645:
643:
640:
638:
635:
633:
630:
628:
625:
623:
620:
619:
618:
615:
609:
607:
606:
603:
589:
586:
584:
578:
574:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
539:
536:
532:
527:
521:
519:
516:
512:
510:
509:
496:
494:
493:
490:
480:
478:
477:
473:
469:
465:
460:
455:
450:
444:
442:
441:
438:
434:
428:
422:
420:
419:
416:
412:
406:
403:
399:
393:
388:
384:
380:
379:
378:
376:
368:
364:
363:
360:
357:
355:
352:
350:
347:
345:
342:
341:
337:
336:
331:
328:
325:
322:
319:
316:
313:
310:
307:
304:
301:
298:
295:
292:
289:
284:
281:
277:
274:
271:
268:
265:
262:
259:
256:
253:
250:
247:
244:
241:
238:
235:
230:
227:
223:
220:
217:
214:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
176:
173:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
122:
119:
115:
112:
109:
106:
103:
100:
97:
94:
91:
88:
85:
82:
79:
74:
71:
70:
66:
64:
62:
58:
53:
51:
47:
41:
38:
33:
30:
19:
1339:
1331:
1330:
1321:
1320:
1317:
1307:
1305:
1296:
1295:
1292:
1283:
1282:
1262:
1253:
1252:
1242:
1228:
1227:
1200:
1191:
1190:
1182:ad infinitum
1181:
1178:Edit warring
1175:
1172:Edit warring
1157:
1156:
1095:
1085:Mindspillage
1057:
1053:
1048:
1047:
1043:
1038:
1033:
1032:
1029:
1025:
1010:
1006:
1002:
997:
994:
990:
943:
936:
928:
925:
908:
901:
900:
894:
891:
886:
881:
877:
873:
869:
863:
860:
856:
850:
845:
811:
796:
795:
792:
766:
760:
759:
755:
751:
747:
739:
734:
733:
728:
727:
720:
719:
710:
709:
704:
697:
693:
692:
687:
686:
672:
656:
616:
613:
596:
582:
540:
534:
528:
525:
507:
505:
500:
484:
458:
451:
448:
432:
429:
426:
415:Tony Sidaway
407:
404:
400:
397:
374:
372:
326:
320:
314:
308:
302:
296:
290:
272:
266:
260:
254:
248:
242:
236:
218:
212:
206:
200:
194:
188:
182:
164:
158:
152:
146:
140:
134:
128:
121:Tony_Sidaway
110:
104:
98:
92:
86:
80:
54:
42:
36:
34:
28:
25:
1336:, not here.
1139:Fred Bauder
1098:Fred Bauder
1063:Clerk notes
1055:judgement.
675:Will Beback
573:Will Beback
543:Will Beback
531:Will Beback
354:Will Beback
306:protections
252:protections
229:Will_Beback
198:protections
144:protections
37:Case Closed
29:Case Opened
1167:Principles
1115:Accept. -
464:≈ jossi ≈
459:ad hominem
318:page moves
264:page moves
210:page moves
156:page moves
108:block user
102:filter log
1014:GTBacchus
931:draft RfC
577:^^James^^
559:^^James^^
437:Nandesuka
349:Nandesuka
312:deletions
258:deletions
204:deletions
175:Nandesuka
150:deletions
114:block log
57:/Workshop
50:/Evidence
46:Talk page
1347:Category
1278:evidence
1248:evidence
1126:Dmcdevit
1124:Accept.
1083:Accept.
454:Ayn Rand
294:contribs
240:contribs
186:contribs
132:contribs
84:contribs
1106:Accept
1096:Accept
887:exactly
799:Alienus
780:Kasreyn
508:ÉIREANN
344:Alienus
73:Alienus
1213:, and
1184:. The
1117:SimonP
1039:always
960:accept
767:Sophia
583:Sophia
555:WP:ANI
324:rights
300:blocks
270:rights
246:blocks
216:rights
192:blocks
162:rights
138:blocks
976:Jakew
946:Jakew
742:Jayjg
551:Jossi
359:Jossi
283:jossi
16:<
1272:and
1035:bad.
998:ISPs
958:and
956:give
804:Zero
506:Fear
413:. --
288:talk
234:talk
180:talk
126:talk
96:logs
78:talk
1176:1)
909:rin
895:rom
882:not
878:not
816:. -
705:any
698:any
330:RfA
276:RfA
222:RfA
168:RfA
63:.
1349::
1280:)
1250:)
1209:,
965:Al
870:is
601:Al
547:Al
488:Al
470:•
377:)
1130:t
1128:·
1012:-
902:a
862:“
518:\
472:@
468:t
373:(
332:)
327:·
321:·
315:·
309:·
303:·
297:·
291:·
286:(
278:)
273:·
267:·
261:·
255:·
249:·
243:·
237:·
232:(
224:)
219:·
213:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
178:(
170:)
165:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
129:·
124:(
116:)
111:·
105:·
99:·
93:·
87:·
81:·
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.