816:
882:
While asking the enforcing administrator and seeking reviews at AN or AE are not mandatory prior to seeking a decision from the committee, once the committee has reviewed a request, further substantive review at any forum is barred. The sole exception is editors under an active sanction who may still
849:
Administrators are free to modify sanctions placed by former administrators – that is, editors who do not have the administrator permission enabled (due to a temporary or permanent relinquishment or desysop) – without regard to the requirements of this section. If an administrator modifies a sanction
328:
Accept. I realize the RfC was on his admin voting (which I don't find problematic, at least not to the point of making a case out of it) rather than the general pattern of incivility which is the issue at hand, but his response to that and other attempts at dispute resolution suggest another RfC
890:
All actions designated as arbitration enforcement actions, including those alleged to be out of process or against existing policy, must first be appealed following arbitration enforcement procedures to establish if such enforcement is inappropriate before the action may be reversed or formally
886:
These provisions apply only to contentious topics placed by administrators and to blocks placed by administrators to enforce arbitration case decisions. They do not apply to sanctions directly authorised by the committee, and enacted either by arbitrators or by arbitration clerks, or to special
180:
Boothy443 has been a long term disruptive influence on
Knowledge. He is repeatedly incivil, he repeatedly does everything in his power to prove a point even if it is only for the purpose of proving a point (i.e. his votes on RFA) and blocks against him thus far have been useless as have been
204:
concerns me dearly. He sometimes does good edits but it looks like he loves getting into controversy and he doesn't mind or care about it. Other users tried to solve that conflict via his talk page and his RFC, but with no success. He had been blocked plenty of times before
43:
Please do not edit this page directly unless you wish to become a participant in this request. (All participants are subject to
Arbitration Committee decisions, and the ArbCom will consider each participant's role in the dispute.) Comments are very welcome on the
783:
Appeals may be made only by the editor under sanction and only for a currently active sanction. Requests for modification of page restrictions may be made by any editor. The process has three possible stages (see "Important notes" below). The editor may:
227:
414:
prohibits editors from reverting an article more than three times in any 24-hour period, except in cases of simple vandalism. This rule should not be construed as an entitlement to three reverts, nor does it endorse reverts as an editing technique.
850:
placed by a former administrator, the administrator who made the modification becomes the "enforcing administrator". If a former administrator regains the tools, the provisions of this section again apply to their unmodified enforcement actions.
845:
Nothing in this section prevents an administrator from replacing an existing sanction issued by another administrator with a new sanction if fresh misconduct has taken place after the existing sanction was applied.
773:
This procedure applies to appeals related to, and modifications of, actions taken by administrators to enforce the
Committee's remedies. It does not apply to appeals related to the remedies directly enacted by the
883:
request an easing or removal of the sanction on the grounds that said sanction is no longer needed, but such requests may only be made once every six months, or whatever longer period the committee may specify.
740:
0) Should any user subject to a restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be blocked, initially for up to one month, and then with blocks increasing in duration to a maximum of one year.
60:
690:
4) When a request for mediation was made in a matter involving him Boothy443, not only did not join in the request or participate but removed his name as one of the parties involved in the dispute
803:
489:
672:
668:
664:
660:
641:
637:
56:
49:
469:, rather than voting. Because of this, though it is not required, it is requested that editors provide reasoning for positions they have taken, such as support or opposition on
45:
230:. I could give you plenty of other examples of policies that Boothy broke, but it would be too long to list. I've come to the conclusion that Boothy443 has violated
710:
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
720:
2) Boothy443 is placed on personal attack parole. He may be briefly blocked if he engages in personal attacks for up to a week in the case of repeat violations.
238:
and countless other policies on purpose, has ignored requests to stop, and it doesn't look like he will stop violating those rules anytime soon. Thank you --
903:
792:
747:
169:
443:
384:
375:
363:
345:
336:
323:
319:
Accept, though I'd like to see evidence than is presented here. I don't believe Boothy's voting against all arbitrators is grounds for recusal.
314:
281:
268:
796:
659:
3) Boothy443 has in a number of ways displayed his alienation with
Knowledge's administrative structure and dispute resolution procedures, see
600:
108:
918:
937:
507:
5) A user who disrupts editing of an article may be banned from editing that article, In extreme cases they may be banned from the site.
17:
594:
561:
102:
220:
and I noticed that after he took a one month wikibreak, he came back and quickly mass opposed every candidate who was running
673:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Boothy443/Workshop#Failure_of_Boothy443_to_participate_in_dispute_resolution_in_good_faith
156:
82:
341:
Accept — while the evidence here before us is scanty, the log of blocks of Boothy indicates that we should take a good look
523:
359:
917:
Any block, restriction, ban, or sanction performed under the authorisation of a remedy for this case must be logged at
527:
431:
807:
430:
2) Knowledge users are expected to behave reasonably and calmly in their dealings with other users and to observe
350:
Accept on the basis of incivility and other questionable behaviour, rather the narrow basis of his admin voting. —
867:(i) the clear and substantial consensus of (a) uninvolved administrators at AE or (b) uninvolved editors at AN or
838:
prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" below).
624:
132:
606:
333:
114:
842:
Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped.
612:
381:
311:
298:
244:
242:
190:
150:
120:
307:
Accept. If Boothy's behaviour is not productive, this is something that we are tasked with looking at.
435:
661:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Boothy443/Workshop#Disruption_of_Wikipedia_to_illustrate_a_point
588:
555:
295:
278:
239:
146:
96:
669:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Boothy443/Workshop#Boothy443.27s_attitude_about_administrators
439:
265:
76:
330:
355:
308:
831:
No administrator may modify or remove a sanction placed by another administrator without:
372:
231:
209:
48:, and will be read, in full. Evidence, no matter who can provide it, is very welcome at
551:
342:
292:
275:
235:
217:
201:
228:
Category:Municipalities in
Philadelphia County prior to the Act of Consolidation, 1854
931:
530:, especially in the earlier steps of negotiation, consulting sources, and mediation.
470:
466:
411:
320:
261:
213:
183:
72:
223:
for arb-com for no apparent reason. I asked him why on his talk page and he replied
447:
351:
200:
This is my first time making a statment in a RFAr so I hope I'm doing it right.
665:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Boothy443/Workshop#Redirection_to_Sheep_vote
55:
Arbitrators will be working on evidence and suggesting proposed decisions at
274:
Reject, for the time being. Please provide evidence of an on-going dispute.
226:
rather silly, then quickly entered a edit war and was blocked for a 3RR on
873:
is required. If consensus at AE or AN is unclear, the status quo prevails.
835:
the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or
522:
7) Users are required to participate in the give and take of
Knowledge's
473:, so that those judging the outcome may better make informed decisions.
686:
Failure of Boothy443 to participate in dispute resolution in good faith
788:
ask the enforcing administrator to reconsider their original decision;
806:. If the editor is blocked, the appeal may be made by email through
488:
4) Editors should not disrupt
Knowledge to illustrate a point. (See
582:
90:
904:
procedure for the standard appeals and modifications provision
208:
including indefinitely for mass consent violations including
716:
Personal attack parole without a year ban after five blocks
906:
adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.
750:
adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.
564:) makes a large number of good contributions to articles.
691:
630:
618:
490:
Knowledge:Don't disrupt
Knowledge to illustrate a point
483:
254:
224:
221:
206:
138:
126:
255:
Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (8/0/1/0)
181:attempts to work with him to change his behavior.
518:Participation in dispute resolution in good faith
748:procedure for the standard enforcement provision
291:Changing to accept, based on Epopt's reasoning.
450:procedures instead of making personal attacks.
446:. If disputes arise, users are expected to use
484:Don't disrupt Knowledge to illustrate a point
8:
870:(ii) a passing motion of arbitrators at ARCA
725:Passed 8 to 0 at 16:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
698:Passed 8 to 0 at 16:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
680:Passed 8 to 0 at 16:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
649:Passed 8 to 0 at 16:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
569:Passed 8 to 0 at 16:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
546:Boothy443 makes many valuable contributions
535:Passed 8 to 0 at 16:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
512:Passed 7 to 0 at 16:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
497:Passed 7 to 1 at 16:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
478:Passed 8 to 0 at 16:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
455:Passed 8 to 0 at 16:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
420:Passed 8 to 0 at 16:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
760:
52:. Evidence is more useful than comments.
170:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Boothy443
808:Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee
763:
887:functionary blocks of whatever nature.
654:
444:Knowledge:Writers' rules of engagement
406:Edit warring and the three-revert rule
919:Knowledge:Arbitration enforcement log
59:and voting on proposed decisions at
7:
810:(or, if email access is revoked, to
793:arbitration enforcement noticeboard
802:submit a request for amendment at
655:Boothy443's attitude of alienation
329:wouldn't be particularly helpful.
24:
18:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration
465:3) Knowledge's processes work by
860:For a request to succeed, either
814:
827:Modifications by administrators
30:on 02:51, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
1:
779:Appeals by sanctioned editors
524:dispute resolution procedures
385:11:40, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
38:on 16:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
765:0) Appeals and modifications
376:03:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
364:01:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
346:18:51, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
337:18:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
324:16:42, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
315:13:57, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
299:19:11, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
282:12:04, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
269:05:04, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
245:05:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
191:04:58, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
938:Knowledge arbitration cases
891:discussed at another venue.
797:administrators’ noticeboard
736:Enforcement of restrictions
432:Knowledge:Assume good faith
391:Temporary injunction (none)
954:
815:
756:Appeals and modifications
902:In accordance with the
881:
746:In accordance with the
575:Disruption by Boothy443
912:Log of blocks and bans
791:request review at the
471:Requests for adminship
636:has been involved in
250:Preliminary decisions
196:Statement by Aranda56
436:Knowledge:Wikiquette
176:Statement by party 1
164:Requests for comment
503:Ban for disruption
448:dispute resolution
440:Knowledge:Civility
61:/Proposed decision
897:
896:
795:("AE") or at the
712:
642:violations of 3RR
412:three-revert rule
188:
945:
821:
819:
818:
817:
761:
708:
635:
634:
601:deleted contribs
585:
541:Findings of fact
382:Charles Matthews
186:
182:
143:
142:
109:deleted contribs
93:
67:Involved parties
953:
952:
948:
947:
946:
944:
943:
942:
928:
927:
914:
898:
854:Important notes
813:
811:
766:
758:
738:
733:
718:
706:
688:
657:
586:
581:
580:
577:
548:
543:
520:
505:
486:
463:
428:
408:
403:
398:
393:
257:
252:
198:
184:
178:
166:
94:
89:
88:
69:
39:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
951:
949:
941:
940:
930:
929:
925:
913:
910:
909:
908:
895:
894:
893:
892:
888:
884:
880:
877:
876:
875:
874:
871:
868:
862:
861:
840:
839:
836:
829:
828:
824:
823:
800:
789:
781:
780:
768:
767:
764:
759:
757:
754:
753:
752:
737:
734:
732:
729:
728:
727:
717:
714:
705:
702:
701:
700:
687:
684:
683:
682:
656:
653:
652:
651:
576:
573:
572:
571:
547:
544:
542:
539:
538:
537:
519:
516:
515:
514:
504:
501:
500:
499:
485:
482:
481:
480:
462:
459:
458:
457:
427:
424:
423:
422:
407:
404:
402:
399:
397:
396:Final decision
394:
392:
389:
388:
387:
378:
366:
348:
339:
334:(spill yours?)
326:
317:
304:
303:
302:
301:
286:
285:
271:
256:
253:
251:
248:
197:
194:
177:
174:
173:
172:
165:
162:
161:
160:
144:
86:
68:
65:
42:
34:
26:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
950:
939:
936:
935:
933:
926:
923:
922:
920:
911:
907:
905:
900:
899:
889:
885:
879:
878:
872:
869:
866:
865:
864:
863:
859:
858:
857:
855:
851:
847:
843:
837:
834:
833:
832:
826:
825:
820:wikimedia.org
809:
805:
801:
798:
794:
790:
787:
786:
785:
778:
777:
776:
775:
770:
769:
762:
755:
751:
749:
744:
743:
742:
735:
730:
726:
723:
722:
721:
715:
713:
711:
703:
699:
696:
695:
694:
692:
685:
681:
678:
677:
676:
674:
670:
666:
662:
650:
647:
646:
645:
643:
639:
632:
629:
626:
623:
620:
617:
614:
611:
608:
607:nuke contribs
605:
602:
599:
596:
593:
590:
584:
574:
570:
567:
566:
565:
563:
560:
557:
553:
545:
540:
536:
533:
532:
531:
529:
525:
517:
513:
510:
509:
508:
502:
498:
495:
494:
493:
491:
479:
476:
475:
474:
472:
468:
460:
456:
453:
452:
451:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
425:
421:
418:
417:
416:
413:
405:
400:
395:
390:
386:
383:
379:
377:
374:
370:
367:
365:
361:
357:
353:
352:Matthew Brown
349:
347:
344:
340:
338:
335:
332:
327:
325:
322:
318:
316:
313:
310:
306:
305:
300:
297:
294:
290:
289:
288:
287:
284:
283:
280:
277:
272:
270:
267:
263:
259:
258:
249:
247:
246:
243:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
222:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
195:
193:
192:
187:
175:
171:
168:
167:
163:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
140:
137:
134:
131:
128:
125:
122:
119:
116:
115:nuke contribs
113:
110:
107:
104:
101:
98:
92:
87:
84:
81:
78:
74:
71:
70:
66:
64:
62:
58:
53:
51:
47:
40:
37:
32:
29:
19:
924:
916:
915:
901:
853:
852:
848:
844:
841:
830:
782:
772:
771:
745:
739:
724:
719:
709:
707:
697:
689:
679:
658:
648:
638:edit warring
627:
621:
615:
609:
603:
597:
591:
578:
568:
558:
549:
534:
521:
511:
506:
496:
487:
477:
464:
454:
429:
419:
409:
368:
331:Mindspillage
273:
199:
179:
153:
135:
129:
123:
117:
111:
105:
99:
79:
54:
41:
35:
33:
27:
25:
921:, not here.
799:("AN"); and
731:Enforcement
36:Case Closed
28:Case Opened
774:Committee.
625:block user
619:filter log
528:good faith
401:Principles
373:Neutrality
343:➥the Epopt
133:block user
127:filter log
812:arbcom-en
631:block log
583:Boothy443
552:Boothy443
467:consensus
461:Consensus
293:Mackensen
276:Mackensen
202:Boothy443
139:block log
91:Boothy443
57:/Workshop
50:/Evidence
46:Talk page
932:Category
704:Remedies
595:contribs
562:contribs
426:Civility
380:Accept.
321:Sam Korn
309:James F.
262:Dmcdevit
260:Recuse.
232:WP:CIVIL
210:WP:CIVIL
185:Jtkiefer
157:contribs
147:Aranda56
103:contribs
83:contribs
73:Jtkiefer
410:1) The
240:Jaranda
236:WP:DICK
218:WP:DICK
804:"ARCA"
671:, and
442:, and
369:Accept
312:(talk)
296:(talk)
279:(talk)
214:WP:NPA
550:1.1)
189:----
16:<
613:logs
589:talk
556:talk
216:and
151:talk
121:logs
97:talk
77:talk
579:2)
526:in
492:.)
63:.
934::
856::
822:).
693:.
675:.
667:,
663:,
644:.
640:,
438:,
434:,
371:.
362:)
234:,
633:)
628:·
622:·
616:·
610:·
604:·
598:·
592:·
587:(
559:·
554:(
360:C
358::
356:T
354:(
266:t
264:·
212:,
159:)
154:·
149:(
141:)
136:·
130:·
124:·
118:·
112:·
106:·
100:·
95:(
85:)
80:·
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.