1227:
That issue should indeed be fully developed, but since
Wertham is not even close to the first thing tha pops up in one's mind when thinking of Batman, it'd make an interesting link, but is wasting the Batman's article space. The section is not being impartial enough from my POV. It's sensoring the fact that DC has not gone on record backing any of that. Specially the Batwoman part. So, as you see, even though there IS a possiblilty I'm wrong my intentions were good. I also provided lately some oficial quotes and reserched facts on the Batwoman case, all in a single mini-line , but apparently that wasn't good enough for Simmel, owner of the Batman article so I let go... As you see Nothing was done in bat faith to my favorite superhero. I wrote my basic thoughts on the issue all over again not to discuss about them once more, but to prove I didn't toy with the article as DA has toyed with some articles only to mess with me for his amusement.
908:'s knoledge is questionable. I just re-read myself. I probabbly made the article a bit longer, but notice how Haiduc (also a non-native English speaker) and others like to write long lines on unknown names in the world of Batman like a Wertham, a Christopher Lee (apparently your next door nobody who made his College thesis on Batwoman), Batwoman and non.redhead version Batgirl you don't know about if you are not a really, really, really unlikely hardhardcore. Fan. Did anyone notice how little do they talked about the red head Batgirl you known from the Arnold Schwartzeneger movie or the 60s series? Whatevah'.
164:
good faith in the absence of definite evidence to the contrary.) Once an editor has given reason to suspect bad faith, monitoring is appropriate, but constantly nit-picking is always a violation of required courtesy. There are hundreds of administrators available to monitor problem users...Following an editor to another article to continue disruption (also known as wikistalking). The term "wiki-stalking" has been coined to describe following a contributor around the wiki, editing the same articles as the target, with the intent of causing annoyance or distress to another contributor.
1759:
have to do to prove this? WHAT? HE FOLLOWS ME! Sorry to get excited, but I have already explained all this. Just how long does this arbitration process go on? PLEASE give us a verdict/judgment/sentence, whatever is it that you do. I will edit what I please, when I please, until I am shut down. I will, as always, seek the consensus of other editors for major changes, and work with reasonable editors to come to a middle ground. Ask those of us who had to deal (and still are dealing) with T-Man's edits to the homosexual section of
2409:
and impartial, but I would direct the arbitrator's to ignore my comments and evaluate the evidence as they see fit. It's certainly possible minor comments can be seized upon and in a different light appear to mean something more than they did; however, if those comments can affect other user's behaviour and actions, then they at least need to be examined within this process. I would assert that the two users are incapable of communicating or editing together peacefully.
2266:), we were able eventually to reach a consensus that the page should be reorganized by medium, in the manner T-Man had originally initiated. In short, T-Man had a good idea to improve the page, but at the time he did not communicate effectively with other editors, which caused undue frustration and misunderstandings. These misunderstandings were exacerbated by T-Man's writing style, which was somewhat abrasive and occasionally difficult to understand.
1141:--But he did knew it was important enough!! Because of T5-b!! He was just acting as the big sensoring authoritarian jerk he is. All I did to expand projecs like the Bat-Embargo, Justice League Unlimited or the Enemies of Batman, I did without knowing there was the Dr. Who references I could have used as a templates. But my 2 biggest censorers did and played as if they didn't know. And apparently there are also Buffy, Angel references, so there
374:: Here DA is vandalizing my own talk page, besides cynism, which I can't take (because of my temper and in, that's the kind of behavior that have made me lose my temper and insult him in the pastHe claims I did if Because of my edits on Batman. Needless to say that was a waste of words, links and time on his part, since that's not considered vandalism and T1-b is an invation and a disrespect to my rights to have my own space.
1272:
among foreigners. Keep in mind that not so many people over the world love your culture, languaje and idioms and are as open minded as myself when it comes to undertand, forgive and forget fool errors like that. Gillespee just sliped (my povagain), but DA... And to think he is
Canadian! "Trudeau would be so proud!" Please no need to reply here. I already forgot this, don't make me remember.
873:, one of the 3-ish pages I learned from during my brief time of monitoring on DA, he is also blind reversing info he (as Exhibit T3-a implies) ignores about. He somehow seems to be thinking he is very Civil, by stangely not insulting me on the summary and rather asking for "concensus". Yeah, how conveinient. He first blind reverts acording to his worthless (again, E T3-a) oppinoin and
2349:
sort the wheat from the chaff. D.A. is attempting to improve these articles, and has become frustrated by the work involved in cleaning up T-Man's contributions. He has come to believe that T-Man's contributions are without merit, and has not been shy in saying so. T-Man has taken this as a personal affront, and has lashed out at D.A., causing D.A. to attack him in return.
1096:. C'mon man, those were other times, give me some credit now, please. How would you feel if I do the same to you with your first article?? Vote don't, please. C'mon, Bud!, Do it for me...the T-man. The chaos dude hates me since day one*, way before I met you. He is going to act in bad faith, I feel it in my gut. Please, revote. For me. I'm begging here.--
2231:, which I worked on a fair amount last year (but have neglected recently). Shortly after T-Man's first edit of that page, he began a major reorganization. The page had previously been mostly an alphabetical list of fictional characters regarded as villains, and T-Man decided it would be better to organize the characters by their medium of origin
871:
complaining about and never actually showing me (as I asked on several ocations). And it's not the fist time this kind of thing happens with my contributions. The same thing happened on
Seinfeld, List of Villains and (...) other articles. :[http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Legends_of_the_Dark_Knight&action=history Here, on Exhibit T3-e
2051:(not T-Man), as I have become a fan of the animated series. I simply copyedited a section... I did not erase his edits, but there were about 100 edits by him, so I am sorry if I did so by accident (evidence please). I would ask T-man to stop with the "scary" claims... I am 1000s of kilometres away and not interested in him in the least.
2272:, once he got the hang of using talk pages and working towards consensus, T-Man made some very valuable contributions to the page. He did the lion's share of the reorganization, which I think has made the page a more useful index. Although he did continue to show a short fuse and made occasional personal attacks on the talk page
516:. Not that it should matter. Properly said with a good reason, should not only ok, but it should be taken as a sign that something is not ok. We are not in a convent, people. We've all used the word at least when it is worth ussing it. We should not use it Carlin style here, but when it's right said words usualy screamed like
1259:
2462:. Previous to this, I also find myself concerned by an edit war on T-Man's talk page which involves personal attacks from T-Man but these need to be contextualised by Dyslexic agnostic's continued reinsertion of a warning, and also by the fact all these edits occurred within a roughly two hour period on
2408:
I don't really want to comment on the evidence, I'm not sure that's my place; surely arbitrators should assess and examine the evidence, and evaluate context and meaning. That said, I have to offer something to avoid this section appearing as a simple list of links. I have tried to remain objective
2348:
on multiple occasions. Indeed, it's pretty clear to me that the personal attacks on both sides have stemmed from a failure to assume good faith. T-Man is attempting to add relevant information to comics-related articles, but his inconsistent command of
English and verbose style make it difficult to
1670:
I do think that somebody monitoring me is a great idea, only not by someone who acts like DA has. Monitoring should be an available service. I'd love someone with actual knoledge of my areas and writing skills like the great Josiah Rowe has. Or maybe some one who may not know about the topics but has
870:
Exhibit T3-d]: Like I knew it was going the to happen sooner or later a couple of smarter guy with real knoledge and greater skills (Wesley Dotts and Josiah Rowe) came to the rescue of the info I was working on. Doing what
Exhibit T3-b shows DA did do. Fix those little details and errors DA is always
619:
Here I get to show you that I did reach DA for help. Of coure since, as evidenced above, DA barely knows about the details of the info I posted him, and he knew a mistaken edit would evidence him as ignorant of the topic ehe refused. He didn't wan't to get "burned" by a sure wrong edit he'd have made
163:
In the matter of Cool Cat (talk • contribs) (aka User:Coolcat) — a case decided on
October 5, 2005 — the ArbCom voted that wikistalking was unacceptable in the following circumstances: It is not acceptable to stalk another editor who is editing in good faith. (Note that everyone is expected to assume
1307:
I did reply to most of DA's comments. But, since most of those comments were obvious half-truths and lies to appeal to the readers (and it's my belief that nobody buys them in the first place, anyways), I decided to move those replies to make this page shorter. If someone need clarifications on DA's
1226:
Everything I did to that section until I gave up, was in good faith. I do think those described the issue better. That
Wertham guy is actually homophobic and he stated Batman was a pedophilic to THEN imply he and robin are living a gay fantasy... And DA critiziseme for caring too much about details.
657:
Batman's foes form one of the most distinctive rogues galleries in comics. In the 1930s and 1940s some of the most familiar Batman villains evolved. First among these is The Joker, being thief, clown, pracical joker, killer, and insane. Other key villians include
Catwoman, the Penguin, Two-Face, The
1758:
attempts to do same. If I am no longer permitted to fix grammar and spelling on those pages perpetrated by T-Man, then someone else has the added responsibility. And, I have worthwhile things to contribute to all of those pages. I DO NOT FOLLOW T-MAN... I see his edits on MY WATCHLIST! What do I
1680:
I am a little saddened that this case was actually accepted by the ArbCom. I would like to point out that since the beginnings of the arbitration began, T-Man and DA have been working better together. It will probably continually linger in my mind that an RfC would have worked out better, since the
966:
and erases other people works. When I fist met him he was trying to downsize the
Superman article. An awarded page, that was heavy in terms of memory space, but was well sectioned. Where does he get the guts to mess with an awarded page just because of his preferences and write material I've proven
2285:
and an occasional editor of comics-related pages, and had seen his edits in both contexts, and had had no signficant problems with him or his edits. I was vaguely aware that there was bad blood between him and T-Man, since I had T-Man's user talk page on my watchlist from prior conversations. On
2223:
I was reluctant to get involved in this matter, but since comments on my user page have been cited as evidence I suppose it's my duty to give my perspective on the issues and personalities involved. I will be primarily focussing on T-Man, since I have had more dealings with him than with
Dyslexic
2136:
Unfortunately my recent attempts to smooth the situation between myself and T-man have led to the opposite outcome; namely, that T-man has such a negative view of me and a distrust of my word that he lashes out, and as a result has received a further block. This was not my intention, and if he is
323:
Alright... I apologize for the user page prank... a moment of weakness. I am NOT stalking him, just monitoring his efforts on Superman and Batman related pages. he doesn't get that his changes are without consensus, and are NOT improvements. I am more lenient on the sub articles, but the main ones
54:
Please make a section for your evidence and add evidence only in your own section. Please limit your evidence to a maximum 1000 words and 100 diffs, a much shorter, concise presentation is more likely to be effective. Please focus on the issues raised in the complaint and answer and on diffs which
1910:
would be like putting "lipstick on the Mona Lisa just because you think it'd be better". T-man set the tone for any future dealings with his insults and rudeness; I admit to having responded in kind on occasion. You will see that he accuses me of "stalking" at that point, even though I had never
1271:
POV on Gillespee's last line: He knows better than that. Also: That was probbably the last time I explained I'm obviously not a native English speaker, but it was not even close to the first. Another pov: People with comments like that are encouraging hate issues against North America and England
40:
As such, it is extremely important that you use the prescribed format. Submitted evidence should include a link to the actual page diff; links to the page itself are not sufficient. For example, to cite the edit by Mennonot to the article Anomalous phenomenon adding a link to Hundredth Monkey use
926:
Look, T-Man, it is not my goal to get you down or to dampen your excitement for wikipedia. I admit to a tendency to be critical, and sarcasm may not be the best way to try to get my points across. Reverting you is NOT the first thing I do each day (it's the third) (See! The sarcasm is too deeply
65:
Be aware that the Arbitrators may at times rework this page to try to make it more coherent. If you are a participant in the case or a third party, please don't try to refactor the page, let the Arbitrators do it. If you object to evidence which is inserted by other participants or third parties
2356:
shows that when treated with patience and good faith, T-Man can be a valuable contributor. However, it is also clear that he needs to learn not to take edits personally, and to control his temper on talk pages and in edit summaries. D.A. has been provoked, but should also be more patient with
1010:
pages. Also a show of his lack of knoledge on the topic's he edits. Not like I'm some sort of supreme authority of the comics knoledge, but at least I know where I stand. If his knoledge of the topics is so evidently poor where does he gets the guts to consciently make up terms like meta-series
2054:
Unfortunately, T-man is currently modifying his comments up above to make it very difficult to read what came when. He usually does this, and in addition to his already poor command of the English language, ts makes it very hard to see what was said and what was replied to. Therefore, please
1957:
to show only the most recent), yet once again T-Man shows up and claims some kind of ownership: ironically he says this to me: "Notice how creepy it is to go to a page I've never been before make some coments, and have your damn apathic opinion some minutes later". Firstly, I don't see why my
1011:(comics) or stating "It is unknow if 6-9 issues limited series are miniseries or maxiseries" (could it be becouse those are regular limited series: Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhh) without sources and impose his missunderstood minimalism, (I'm an Architect, he is not going to explain me what the word for
2106:
So, now I get to hear from what must be the tenth time about my grand error. I guess T-Man believes that rampant misspelling, poor grammar and sentence structure, all these are perfectly fine (because SOMEONE will clean up after him), but that a factuall error is a cardinal sin punishable,
2098:
this on the same day, but instead of just correcting the dates, he reverted his whole poorly written article back, despite the fact that I and others had done copyedits, posted a cleanup notice, fixed typos,etc. I then reverted to the consensus version, except that I fixed the Bane "error",
1043:
like I do on every single article I touch. He (Exibits T1-a to T1-e) doesn't have respect or love for info and knoledge like I do (I realize how silly it looks when you take in mind I'm talking about comic boocs info and knoledge, but I have to make a case, here. Hehe. Still, no info or
699:. Recently, new enemies have appeared, such as Hush, David Cain (father of Cassandra Cain, the new Batgirl), and a new Red Hood (in fact former Robin Jason Todd apparently back from the dead). These new enemies, like Bane, know Batman´s true identity and threaten to use this against him.
763:. Recently, new enemies have appeared, such as Bane, Hush, David Cain (father of Cassandra Cain, the new Batgirl), and a new Red Hood (in fact former Robin Jason Todd apparently back from the dead). These new enemies know Batman´s true identity and threaten to use this against him.
1753:
I have read T-Man's comments above. I DO NOT accept his solution. I should be allowed to "monitor" all the pages I have always "monitored"... what have I done in my edits to any of those pages, or any pages at all, that are not improvements to Knowledge (XXG), or at least
1860:
imagery in an attempt to make a point, which is not permitted. Those are the facts, with evidence attached. Please review the Batman-homosexual discussions on the Batman talk page to understand how out of line those edits were. Unfortunately, this is not over... see
2137:
reading, I apologize. I REALLY REALLY want to try to fix the relationship, but am not sure I know where to start. I will, as suggested, stop leaving messages on this or any subject on T-man's talk page, until the tension can be reduced and the trust somehow rebuilt.
1989:
header to create two articles in one? The comic book is a long running series; the animated show reference is ONE episode. It is clearly mentioned in (over)sufficient detail already in the article (should be trimmed), and no one else has been flocking to expand it.
1660:
If he acepts these terms, I'll start assuming good faith in him and ask everybody to do the same. I now know how to provide vandalism evidence quickly with good efficiency, and I know what happens de facto if I insinuate or say the "scary, mean and bad" word
134:
There have been very harsh words in all of those thrown around, and generally not benefiting Knowledge (XXG). When I mediated there was a point where it appeared to have done the trick (Shanel and I had not realised the extent of this feud at the time)
620:
then. However, days later he though he had the cappability to do it, and instead of reaching for help as I did, he somehow, out of the blue, got the nerve to put the piece of crap that serves as my Exhibit T3-c directly on the Enemies of Batman Page.
2247:
and I were the most active editors on the page, and in the absence of discussion we both reverted his changes to the old alphabetical organization. After some tedious back-and-forth reversions, T-Man finally joined the discussion on the talk page
1805:, all completely without consensus and in fact expressly against what was on the talk page. Maybe he thought these were legitimate changes; any casual reader would have assumed it was vandalism, as I did, and sent the warning. Even others like
822:
In the 1990s and 2000s, new enemies have appeared, such as The Joker's assistant Harley Quinn,Bane, Hush, David Cain (father of Cassandra Cain, the new Batgirl), and a new Red Hood (in fact former Robin Jason Todd apparently back from the dead).
66:
please cite the evidence and voice your objections within your own section of the page. It is especially important to not remove evidence presented by others. If something is put in the wrong place, please leave it for the arbitrators to move.
971:
page, wikipedia clearly states that articles should not lack of details, but when the details are too much, the section is ready to become an article. This is the policy I've always followed. DA is stopping this evolution process I consider
1587:
Even though I think of him as a cynic person obsessed with me, DA is not the Devil. He shouln't be blocked. I think we have all alredy learned from this unfortunated situation. I just don't want him doing any "monitoring". So, I propose
877:
as for concensus. Notice how I wasn't the author of most of the brief but useful erased material. He did the same that he always does to me to that editor, imposing his will and censoring info... And remember I'm talking about this guy:
296:
policy wikistalking doesn't include "checking up on an editor to fix errors." I don't think DA was attempting to harass T-man by following him around, I think he was trying to fix T-Man's edits which, due to admitted limited English
445:
as a reply to actions like the above or a cynic comment from the author. Good faith has a limit. We are not dealing with utopic people, and we're not even close. There is several evidences of me assuming good faith on DA. But I'm no
1763:. Yes, I messed with T-Man's page ONCE, a whole MONTH ago, and never again. Unfortunately, to defend myslef in this process, I must raise issues best left unsaid, as I truly believe things were going to get much better before
1958:
comment is apathetic. Secondly, "I" am the one creeped out by T-Man following ME to this page, when he has never edited here before. I don't want T-Man talking to me at all, yet he continues to do so. When will this end?
961:
It's very hard to determinate that he is stalking me. Right now I learned hedid some minor edits in the Enemies of Batman and Batman pages. He does goodwork by fixing links, spelling and stuff like that. But he call himself
74:
2073:
T-Man claims I made a mistake doing an edit. However, rather than simply fixing the mistake, as i have fixed hundreds of T-Man's typos, he chooses to repeat this over and over and over... therefore I want to address the
1688:
article, I'm more concerned with the Rogues' Galley of the Flash. However, in what I have seen from T-Man, he does strike me as a bit of an enthusiastic editor. However he also does seem to have lots of trouble involving
2163:. Despite the 48-hour ban, he continues to use his own page to attack me, now attacking my credibility and professionalism!!! I ask for someone to intervene and stop it, and remove the attacks from history! Please!
2335:
It appears that my advice was largely in vain, as the edit war and personal attacks continued to escalate. I am mostly a peripheral observer of this conflict, but it seems to me that both parties have violated
1086:, which shows he knows how detailed can articles about details be, leads me to believe his merger and delating of the bat-embargo proposals were done in bad faith. It also comes in conflict with Exhibit T5-c:
1299:
2041:(current form): I agree with T-man on this: I have fixed T-Man's grammar and spelling on numerous occasions, as have many other editors. The combined loss in creative effort and time must be very large.
1720:. Almost every entry from December 26th deals with T-Man in some way or another. This is about as far as I can go with evidence, I'm fairly busy with college work. (No rest for the engineering major). --
70:
1249:, but his authoritarian style, coldness and lack of kindness and tolerance makes me not like him. Notice how on that very exhibit, there is also friction between him and DA because of the same reasons.
2298:. Shortly thereafter, I noticed that Dyslexic Agnostic had made what appeared to me to be a good-faith effort to improve relations with T-Man and explain his edits on a rational, not personal basis
825:
These new enemies know Batman´s true identity and threaten to use this against him (still 3 errors, he put HQ in the "1990s and 2000s", but by doing so, he implied that she knows Batman's identity).
1876:
Those are my points. I stress that I mean T-man no ill will, but I guess to job here is to rebut his allegations, so I am doing so. i am frankly more interested in going back to editing though.
417:: Here there is one that I didn't knew 'til todaywhich makes his vandalism a current issue. He said he vandalized me the last time a "MONTH ago". I'm loving the fact that I get to point he is
1911:
interacted with the man before. THIS is the origins of "stalking"... and that's why I should be banned from pages T-Man edits? Please... let's look at the facts, not unsourced allegations.
1181:, but exibit T3-a and T3-b already established that he ignores most things about those characters. And that makes him likely to ignore the very sugestive material by Bruce Timm, creator of
238:
I see no evidence of wikistalking in this case on the part of Dyslexic Agnostic. True, he does have overlapping interests with T-man, but Dyslexic began editting many of the pages first.
176:
I am getting a bit confused by arbitration policy: are Shanel and I, as third parties, also having our action scrutinised by the arbitration committee or just T-man and Dyslexic Agnostic?
2234:. (Although at this time T-Man did not discuss the major changes he was initiating on the article's talk page, he did make several comments about the page's content on the page itself
967:
he doesn't know about? Nobody opens an encyclopedia to learn as little as possible, with summarized facts that somebody got wrong because he doesn't like when the info is too much. The
816:
Other well-known villains emerged in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s including the Man-Bat,Clayface, Mr. Freeze, Poison Ivy, Ra's Al Ghul and daughter Talia, Killer Croc(1), Black Mask (2)
73:. /Workshop provides for comment by parties and others as well as arbitrators. After arriving at proposed principles, findings of fact or remedies voting by Arbitrators takes place at
846:(Don't blind revert. the intro is useless; it's too short and to plane: If the intro is going to be so short why to put it at all?? Stop blind reverting. Copyedit, and longer please)
21:
2224:
Agnostic. Much of this may seem unrelated, but I think it illustrates T-Man's strengths and weaknesses as a contributor, and may be helpful in showing a larger perspective.
2029:(prior to T-man's removal): Nice language, do you kiss your momma with that mouth? For those who missed it (T-Man removed it after I commented, here it is in all its glory:
1994:
T-man is really stretching to find questionable activity... is THIS the kind of thing that the arbitration committee wants to dedicate their time to? PLUS, check out the
1283:
yet. How come I try never to ofend other editors on the summaries like DA or certain guy who seems to be an authorithy on a war with everyone on the history page of the
1717:
The only assertion I will make is that they make personal attacks against eachother. There is a long collection of evidence of incivility and personal attacks here:
989:
the first person who replies again with his apathic pov was not other but obsessive stalker Dyslexic Agnostic. Creepy!!! I really hope he is Canadian, I really do.
1145:
be episode articles of stupid series besides pop-cult gigants like, from my understanding, Dr. Who is (I'm guessing, Star Treek-big?). He also erased Info about "
2320:
article naming conversation. At this point, I put D.A.'s user page on my watchlist, and shortly thereafter I saw that T-Man had posted a personal attack there
1903:
48:
1651:
NOTE: He can keep links from those pages on his own page. To get to those articles quickly. I just don't want him to use those pages to monitore me anymore.
733:(look, if you have a fact to corrrect, CORRECT IT, don;t just add your unreadable droning. I changed Bane to the 1990s (if that's even true) just for you.)
751:
Other well-known villains emerged in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s including the Man-Bat,Clayface, Mr. Freeze, Poison Ivy, Ra's Al Ghul and daughter Talia,
687:
Other well-known villains emerged in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s including the Man-Bat,Clayface, Mr. Freeze, Poison Ivy, Ra's Al Ghul and daughter Talia,
598:. He doesn't know about the topics he usualy blind reverts (a practice that is not allowed, and knowing so, he still chooses to repeat systematically):
30:
Anyone, whether directly involved or not, may add evidence to this page. Please make a header for your evidence and sign your comments with your name.
1121:
Sorry, but I can't... I don't see why this Bat-embargo is so important! It only applies to DC animated series, which are not important in themselves.
900:"insanity i did". How ever notice how I you can get a Batman expert, I'm sure no fact from that edit was wrong. Also notice how the very first word
2302:
1070:, can someone quote me one of the many times I showing DA that link in the past before I realized he was never going to read it, as Exibit T5-@@2?
2173:
I blocked T-man at first for 48 hours, but since he continued to personally attack Dyslexic agnostic, I lengthened his block to one week. See the
790:(T-Man up to his old bad editing tricks again... i reverted, but changed Harley Quinn to the 1990s. What, no Batman enemies created in the 1980s?)
561:, they confessed to their closest priest for the "sin of reading it" and though I was some punk. So here we are all now, a couple of insinuated
89:
1062:
of blind reversing my edit's leaving insults on the summaries (can someone link those like billions exhibis T5-@@1) very likely to be acts of
62:
and provide counter-evidence, or an explanation of why the evidence is misleading. Do not edit within the evidence section of any other user.
1092:
uh, and i've a personal favor as a frien to ask you. please re vote on the merge thing. You started the voting back when you were doing this
213:
You did good and nobody is doing anything for ya. And if someone dares to talk bad about Shanel I'll loose all my faith in wikipedia editors.
17:
2082:
I didn't actually make a factual mistake. What I did was try to correct what I considered practically illegible verbiage. The wording of
1844:
a section entitled "Some more explicit ambiguosity in the Bat-Mythos", which was completely and intentionally unencyclopedic, and added it
1684:
I have had little interaction with T-Man. I have had some more interaction with Dyslexic agnostic, however. I have no real interest in the
2278:, over time T-Man's behavior improved, and his style became less abrasive. He also continued to show an admirable enthusiasm and energy.
324:
have to maintain a certain quality. I will keep reverting his blanket changes, but will work with him on any reasonable efforts to improve
2427:
seems incapable of keeping his temper with regards Dyslexic agnostic, and an exchange this morning, 3rd February, between the two users,
2059:
1898:
is case it gets archived or changed. This was how T-Man and I met, with him criticizing what I felt were quite well done edits to bring
1308:
cynic comments and insults to the readers inteligence (the same kind that in the past made me lose my temper), he can use the link above.
1003:
923:
879:
604:
720:(bane and HQ (ho is mr. j lover indeed) are from the early 90's. Also: no need to keep it short. Don't make this short when editing.)
1789:, we can certainly do that. I urge the panel to review all actions that day by both T-Man and myself. How can anyone really think
1021:, where I spoted him erasing stuff T3-a doesn't aloud to have, not by that time even if he really "became a fan". Which would Imply
1100:
2628:
2393:
2210:
2181:
2167:
2141:
2126:
2111:
2005:
1962:
1915:
1880:
1734:
1730:
As I now see what has transpired since I wrote this, T-mans is really reminding me of GabrielSimon, minus the 3RR violations.--
1724:
1125:
951:
223:
210:
And someone better recomend me an advocate I can trust... I'm sinking and my freaking ADHD is making me dig deeper my own tomb.
193:
183:
143:
607:
How is anybody to asume that the articles, wikipedia or myself are not jokes to him. I think we are this guy's mocking hobbie.
2563:
2446:
2424:
2414:
2309:
as an insult and bristled a bit, and I attempted to clarify the comment and relevant arguments. (The entire conversation is
1476:
1097:
852:
Dyslexic agnostic (revert wholesale bad edit, but moved Black Mask and Killer Croc to 1980s (baby steps, T-Man, baby steps!))
220:
2389:
hasn't been exactly inspiring. Simply put; they show signs of being able to work usefully, but need to be kept apart.
1396:
1067:
1059:
2554:
User:Dyslexic agnostic removes personal attack, replacing it with what is, given context, at least inadvisable comment
1182:
1063:
1279:
I do have trouble drawing the line between replying and a personal attack. I do ignore the criteria. I have not read
945:
2205:
1973:
1540:
1146:
1018:
1058:
Exibits T1-a to T1-e already established DA's tendencies to vandalism. Making his still recurrent to present-day,
168:
also by comapring the articles each has edited nearly 100% of the time wihn around 36 hours the other turns up.
1906:. I was quickly accused thereafter of all kinds of bad behaviour, just because he thought that any changes to
1428:
1045:
963:
2122:
T-Man has exceeded 100 edits on this arbitration page, each one a personal attack on me. What does this say?
2380:. The history includes personal attacks from both sides in comments and in text. I've asked both editors (
1093:
784:(dude! Harley is from the 90's that's basic. I did some copyedit, but still needs more. Don't blind revert)
469:
293:
2567:
2456:
2410:
2164:
2138:
2123:
2108:
2056:
2002:
1959:
1912:
1877:
1742:
1508:
1217:
evidence of him lying and insulting readers intelligence again , because I think he knew better than that.
1122:
105:
Firstly I assert that personal attacks have been flying left, right and centre between these two users :-
2194:
2473:
plcaing of vandalism warning on User talk:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow on warning by User:Dyslexic agnostic
1870:
1866:
1865:
for T-man's continued attempts. The Bat-embargo page is voted down TWICE for deletion, most recently
1492:
1460:
1412:
968:
2190:
I have further extended it to one month and protected his user talk page for further attacks on DA.
1731:
1721:
1698:
1444:
2341:
2281:
I have had fewer interactions with dyslexic agnostic. I am a regular editor of pages related to
1706:
1694:
1246:
2357:
well-intentioned contributions, and should attempt not to respond to personal attacks in kind.
582:
HOW MANY TIMES HAVE ANYBODY SEEN DYSLEXIC AGNOSTIC FIXING MY DAMN STUPID FOREIGN VERVOSE PROSE?
130:
128:
126:
124:
2291:
2083:
1685:
1570:
1380:
869:
267:
2327:
189:
Oh, and a note to the arbitrators, T-man is seeking an advocate before adding his statement.
2625:
2353:
2228:
2023:: I use my watchlist, not my user page, to monitor pages. I am not monitoring his activity.
1833:
1697:, and has also repeatedly inserted debated material into an article. He reminds me a bit of
1041:
DA does not edit (classic blind reverse+insults on the summary combo) my edits on good faith
498:
mistake was a direct cause-effect consecuence of the above mentioned actions from DA's part.
283:
2345:
2337:
1702:
1690:
1280:
2306:
1942:
1934:
1317:
Here is a table I'll be working on to show the most notable edits and comficts in order.
798:
m the one doing the bad editing tricks again?) An he left the article with still 2 errors:
1190:
1082:
I also know he knows about the Dr. Who detailed articles per every single episode. This
2390:
2362:
2301:. Shortly after that, D.A. made a (well-intentioned) proposal about article naming at
2201:
1671:
the kindness and talent of Shanel Kalicharan. One should be able to choose his monitor.
1524:
2244:
2055:
consider my comments above to be in reply to an earlier version of T-man's comments.
1891:
1265:
Here I explain how I see some coments done by other people while providing evidence:
453:
1775:
T-Man claims above that I vandalized his talk page when I warned about vandalism on
939:
861:
Any Batman fan knows that stuff. But why bother if you don't know the info, anyways?
641:
This was his first short version of my writing; he wrote 4 huge erros and one minor:
339:
2094:, which left the article suggesting that Bane first showed up in the 1980s. T-Man
1623:
II. For the same purposes, he is forbiden to have thise articles on his watch list:
448:
2543:
replacement of warning by User:Dyslexic agnostic, with smiley face in edit summary
2533:
replacement of warning by User:Dyslexic agnostic, with smiley face in edit summary
2260:(not to mention indirectly referring to Turnstep and me as "Hitler and Mussolini"
1998:... T-Man shows up on this page for the FIRST TIME immediately after I edit it...
1681:
chances are the two would have solved their differences without having sanctions.
924:
User talk:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow#New relationship for the new year Exhibit T4-a
106:
2417:, and appears to have formed himself into a one man T-Man correction squad, note
1153:)!! Do you start getting the picture why do I insist so much on DA being cynical?
557:, and none of you cared. All people like Khaoswork (who I deeply resent) saw was
2622:
2313:.) Following up on that small incident, I posted a comment on D.A.'s talk page
2178:
1806:
1783:
1776:
905:
901:
894:
468:
is delating and obsesively monitoring me and calling me and my words things in "
2566:
has breached civility and personal attack guidelines. Examples of breaches by
1701:, to be honest. I can say that DA has not been a perfect angel, and has broken
270:
article which brought about this arbitration, DA began editing article 19 days
2548:
User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow removes again and replaces with personal attack
2538:
User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow removes again and replaces with personal attack
2528:
User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow removes again and replaces with personal attack
2518:
User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow removes again and replaces with personal attack
2305:
which was not well received by project members. D.A. perceived one comment by
1764:
929:
I do check on you because I know your edits are sometimes too out there for me
190:
180:
140:
1207:"Some more explicit ambiguosity in the Bat-Mythos", which was completely and
2191:
1194:
456:. I'm a good person, but it's not easy to always believe the person who did
420:
2576:
moving T-Man's user page to User:T-man, the Stalker, 05:42, 18 January 2006
2107:
figuratively, by death, but actually, in wikipedia, by lifetime expulsion.
1840:
erased my other changes with no thought to it. Then he changed tactics by
136:
2000:
I think we can lay to rest the question of who the stalker here really is.
1612:
c. My contributions list or any page that alouds him to see my activities.
58:
If you disagree with some evidence you see here, please cite the evidence
1907:
1899:
1346:
593:
DA has virtually NO KNOLEDGE ON THE TOPICS of the pages we clash the most
243:
33:
When placing evidence here, please be considerate of the arbitrators and
1193:] and that in the popular best-seller Hush story-ark written by popular
2290:
for my opinion on the problems he was having. I took a brief look at
2476:
1760:
1367:
1362:
1284:
946:
user talk:cleared as filed/2005#heeeeeeeeeeeeeeelp!!!!!! Exhibit T4-c
854:
And he left the article with only a minor error in the 1st paragraph.
255:
2016:
T-Man replied above to some of my assertions. Here is my rebuttul:
1904:
Knowledge (XXG):Guide to writing better articles#Long article layout
37:. Long, rambling, or stream-of-conciousness rants are not helpful.
2376:
was perfectly civil as far as I'm concerned. However, afterwards
1902:
within recommended size, by spinning off subarticles, all as per
868:
Enemies of Batman article on ists current status serves to me as
565:
later, counting my "fuqs" to see if you should burn me like some
261:
T-man's first edit was on December 23, almost a full month later.
2572:
altering a template to insert an attack, 23:17, 26 December 2005
1786:
1779:
2316:, making sure that he was all right with the resolution of the
1197:, published on Batmam #608 to 619, the same character said she
904:
added was "generaly" before "Batman does not kill". This means
472:". And that he really wants to be my "budd" and "work with me".
2420:. I'm also concerned by the comments expressed in this diff,
2048:
2507:
User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow removes again and loses temper
69:
The Arbitrators may analyze evidence and other assertions at
153:
wiki-stalking has been taking place, at least on some level
282:
to the thread T-Man has editted most (and before DA), the
2423:, which indicate some level of keeping an eye on T-Man.
1245:
knows how detailed info about tv series should be. KW is
996:
The pages I followed him to on the week of - - - to - - -
985:. Notice how I got to a page I never visited before and
47:
This page is not for general discussion - for that, see
2614:
2601:
2579:
2575:
2571:
2553:
2547:
2542:
2537:
2532:
2527:
2522:
2517:
2512:
2506:
2501:
2496:
2491:
2486:
2480:
2472:
2460:
2453:
2450:
2443:
2440:
2437:
2434:
2431:
2428:
2421:
2418:
2386:
2383:
2381:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2330:
2324:
2321:
2314:
2310:
2299:
2295:
2287:
2276:
2273:
2264:
2261:
2258:
2255:
2252:
2249:
2241:
2238:
2235:
2232:
2174:
2160:
2156:
2152:
2100:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2031:
1995:
1982:
1978:
1955:
1952:
1949:
1946:
1938:
1930:
1926:
1895:
1862:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1837:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1718:
1238:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1150:
1083:
982:
952:
User talk:Josiah Rowe/Archive 1#hey, rowe! Exhibit T4-a
897:
883:
658:
Riddler, The Scarecrow, Hugo Strange and The Mad Hatter
629:
616:
465:
461:
457:
414:
401:
384:
371:
343:
298:
290:
280:
274:
271:
262:
259:
250:
247:
156:
154:
120:
118:
116:
114:
112:
110:
108:
42:
2251:. Despite his variable English, occasional brashness
172:
request for a small clarification from the arbitrators
82:
ALL COMMENTS EVER DONE BY DA ON T-MAN'S USER TALK PAGE
2323:. The same day, T-Man responded to my earlier advice
1812:
these changes, calling them "insanity", and tried to
1782:. Fine, if T-man wants to talk about what he did on
1149:" episode knowing we can do articles about episodes (
514:* Also notice: I did misspelled on purpose the f word
2590:
Both users have claimed the other as stalking them:
2497:
removal once again by User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow
2487:
removal of warning by User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow
2368:
I came to this dispute whilst revert patrolling. I
1068:"Knowledge (XXG): Don't blind revert" as Exibit T5-a
122:
2509:, posts personal attack in light of previous edits.
2413:appears unable to assume good faith with regards
1201:before Batman took the last one to justice again
338:-Dyslexic agnostic 00:36, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
55:illustrate behavior which relates to the issues.
2523:replacement of warning by User:Dyslexic agnostic
2513:replacement of warning by User:Dyslexic agnostic
2502:replacement of warning by User:Dyslexic agnostic
2492:replacement of warning by User:Dyslexic agnostic
2326:, so I took the opportunity to encourage him to
321:Exhibit T1-a. 12 consecutive acts of vandalism:
90:User talk:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow/Oblivion Box
77:. Only Arbitrators may edit /Proposed decision.
2459:refrain from communicating directly with T-Man.
1199:(...) and Poison Ivy had a nice thing going on
1873:so he can try to bring it back a third time!
1767:'s interference. But I must, so here we go.
158:supported by a previous arbcom case ruling:-
8:
948:: DA following me to cleared as filed's talk
286:, but that hardly constitutes wikistalking.
2303:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Doctor Who
2263:, which he himself called a "little prank"
735:An he left the article with still 3 errors:
436:I don't recall messing with him in this way
2227:I came to know T-Man through his edits to
1237:*Khaosworks, my other censor, as shown on
759:. The Ventriloquist emerged in the 1980s,
1929:on my talk page, complaining that I left
1890:I thought it would be useful to consider
1869:... does this stop him? NO! He creates
761:as did Joker's assistant Harley Quinn (3)
691:. The Ventriloquistemerged in the 1980s,
404:: Here was the thing that started it all.
292:but according to my understanding of the
289:DA did admit to checking up on T-Man here
2294:and a few other pages, and came up with
1319:
844:I copyedited and wrote in the summary :
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration
1260:My replies to commets done on this page
954:: DA following me to Josiah Rowe's talk
820:The Ventriloquist emerged in the 1980s.
782:I copyedited and wrote in the summary:
718:I copyedited and wrote in the summary:
2378:the entire debate is quite instructive
942:: DA following me to Khaosworks's talk
632:: From Enemies of Batman history page:
528:should come to the mind of the reader.
2275:or on the page itself in hidden text
1793:warning was improper, when T-Man did
300:, are often difficult to understand.
7:
2385:) to keep away from each other, but
915:Dyslexic Agnostic AS A WIKI-STALKER
249:T-man first arrived on December 21.
2151:I am under TOTAL PERSONAL ATTACK,
1941:there. I am a frequent editor on
1397:User Talk:T-man the Wise Scarecrow
28:
2613:accuses T-Man of stalking him on
2219:Evidence presented by Josiah Rowe
1034:, EDITS IN GOOD FAITH. DA DOESN'T
2597:User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow:
1048:edit should come from the guts).
486:Evidences agaisnt me showing my
2600:accuses DA of stalking him on [
2578:, and this unnecessary comment
1977:: Does anyone actually believe
1574:
1558:
1544:
1528:
1512:
1496:
1480:
1464:
1448:
1432:
1416:
1400:
1384:
1358:
1342:
1275:POV on Toffile's observations:
229:Evidence presented by Gillespee
2564:User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow
2447:User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow
2425:User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow
2415:User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow
2399:Evidence presented by {Hiding}
2352:I think that my experience at
1477:User:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow
1165:He is acusing me about this:
1015:is) by deleting valuable info.
221:T-man... ""worst vandal ever""
80:
1:
2580:regarding T-Man, 3rd February
2475:, with regards many edits at
2211:02:52, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
2182:03:20, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
2168:02:26, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
1925:New developments: T-Man left
1676:Evidence presented by Toffile
1126:17:54, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
1101:07:11, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
689:Killer Croc(1), Black Mask(2)
258:article on November 27, 2005.
2629:12:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
2394:20:55, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
2142:00:42, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
2127:05:32, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
2112:06:03, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
2060:05:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
2006:16:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
1963:15:45, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
1916:00:10, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
1892:Talk:Superman#Article length
1881:06:38, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
1735:01:20, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
1725:06:42, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
1046:"deletionist" (exhibit T5-a)
569:. But that's onli my opinion
266:Even on the hotly contested
224:04:29, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
194:06:40, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
184:05:01, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
144:03:11, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
2550:and accusation of stalking.
2012:Comments to T-man's replies
1183:Batman: The Animated Series
304:Evidence presented by T-man
96:Evidence presented by benon
2647:
2445:, resulted in me blocking
2090:. I did a cleanup attempt
1974:Legends of the Dark Knight
1937:talk page in reply to his
1816:what T-Man kept deleting,
1541:Legends of the Dark Knight
1147:Legends of the Dark Knight
1094:Knowledge (XXG):Harassment
1019:Legends of the Dark Knight
294:Knowledge (XXG):Harassment
279:DA did make one minor edit
1856:, even adding completely
2610:User:Dyslexic agnostic:
2257:and insults to Turnstep
1894:(the current version is
1429:Justice League Unlimited
1300:Reply to DA's Assertions
2011:
1981:is an improvement over
1836:, but to no avail. He
1646:e. DC animated universe
1060:anti-wikipedic behavior
2568:User:Dyslexic agnostic
2562:As can be seen above,
2457:User:Dyslexic agnostic
2411:User:Dyslexic agnostic
1741:Evidence presented by
1595:I. You block him from:
1509:List of limited series
964:wikipedia: deletionist
893:He claims others like
246:article on October 29.
2449:for personal attacks
1709:a few times as well.
1643:d. Scarecrow (comics)
1205:. His acusation was:
1006:: Limited series and
987:just 35 minutes later
494:in my favour when my
254:DA first editted the
242:DA first editted the
2147:I am under attack!!!
1637:b. Enemies of Batman
1413:DC Animated Universe
1321:Prettytable example
978:and he doesn't learn
695:, Joker's assistant
2370:listed for deletion
2286:December 30, T-Man
1640:c. List of villains
1322:
1098:T for Trouble-maker
927:engrained...), but
492:MUST be NEUTRALIZED
60:in your own section
2372:a page by T-man.
1445:Scarecrow (comics)
1320:
1211:(?) unencyclopedic
913:Fourth assertion:
549:. I was screaming
75:/Proposed decision
2292:Enemies of Batman
2243:.) At that time
2165:Dyslexic agnostic
2139:Dyslexic agnostic
2132:My recent efforts
2124:Dyslexic agnostic
2109:Dyslexic agnostic
2084:Enemies of Batman
2057:Dyslexic agnostic
2003:Dyslexic agnostic
1960:Dyslexic agnostic
1913:Dyslexic agnostic
1878:Dyslexic agnostic
1743:Dyslexic agnostic
1686:Enemies of Batman
1579:
1578:
1571:Enemies of Batman
1381:Enemies of Batman
1123:Dyslexic agnostic
268:Enemies of Batman
22:Dyslexic Agnostic
2638:
2586:Second assertion
2354:List of villains
2229:List of villains
2197:
2045:Fourth assertion
2039:Second assertion
2027:Second assertion
1771:Second assertion
1609:b. My talk page.
1606:a. My user page.
1493:List of Villains
1356:Knowledge (XXG)
1323:
1028:5th. assertion:
547:I really ment it
284:List of villains
149:Second assertion
2646:
2645:
2641:
2640:
2639:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2615:18 January 2006
2588:
2455:and requesting
2406:
2404:First assertion
2401:
2366:
2221:
2209:
2195:
2149:
2134:
2120:
2071:
2032:PROFANITY ALERT
2021:First assertion
2014:
1970:
1968:Fifth assertion
1943:Infinite Crisis
1935:Infinite Crisis
1923:
1921:Fourth asserion
1888:
1886:Third assertion
1773:
1751:
1749:First assertion
1746:
1715:
1713:First assertion
1678:
1584:
1575:Pay your bills
1559:Pay your bills
1545:Pay your bills
1529:Pay your bills
1513:Pay your bills
1497:Pay your bills
1481:Pay your bills
1465:Pay your bills
1461:The Bat-embargo
1449:Pay your bills
1433:Pay your bills
1417:Pay your bills
1401:Pay your bills
1385:Pay your bills
1315:
1263:
1037:
1027:
998:
969:perfect article
918:
753:Killer Croc (1)
697:Harley Quinn(4)
596:
591:3rd assertion:
585:
580:2nd assertion:
425:(Exhibit T0-a).
314:
306:
236:
234:First assertion
231:
202:
174:
151:
103:
101:First assertion
98:
93:
85:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2644:
2642:
2633:
2620:
2619:
2618:
2617:
2607:
2606:
2605:
2604:
2587:
2584:
2560:
2559:
2558:
2557:
2551:
2545:
2540:
2535:
2530:
2525:
2520:
2515:
2510:
2504:
2499:
2494:
2489:
2484:
2405:
2402:
2400:
2397:
2365:
2359:
2220:
2217:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2213:
2199:
2185:
2184:
2148:
2145:
2133:
2130:
2119:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2104:
2070:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2052:
2042:
2036:
2024:
2013:
2010:
2009:
2008:
1969:
1966:
1922:
1919:
1887:
1884:
1772:
1769:
1750:
1747:
1745:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1714:
1711:
1677:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1667:
1666:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1648:
1647:
1644:
1641:
1638:
1635:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1610:
1607:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1590:
1589:
1583:
1580:
1577:
1576:
1573:
1568:
1565:
1561:
1560:
1557:
1554:
1551:
1547:
1546:
1543:
1538:
1535:
1531:
1530:
1527:
1525:Limited series
1522:
1519:
1515:
1514:
1511:
1506:
1503:
1499:
1498:
1495:
1490:
1487:
1483:
1482:
1479:
1474:
1471:
1467:
1466:
1463:
1458:
1455:
1451:
1450:
1447:
1442:
1439:
1435:
1434:
1431:
1426:
1423:
1419:
1418:
1415:
1410:
1407:
1403:
1402:
1399:
1394:
1391:
1387:
1386:
1383:
1378:
1375:
1371:
1370:
1365:
1360:
1357:
1353:
1352:
1349:
1344:
1341:
1337:
1336:
1333:
1330:
1327:
1314:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1293:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1273:
1262:
1257:
1255:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1213:. I call that
1209:intentionally'
1203:(Exhibit T5-e)
1189:character, on
1159:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1076:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1052:
1050:
1049:
1036:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1016:
1013:more with less
997:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
974:
973:
958:
957:
956:
955:
949:
943:
934:
933:
932:
931:
917:
911:
910:
909:
890:
889:
888:
887:
863:
862:
858:
857:
856:
855:
848:
838:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
828:
827:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
776:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
757:Black Mask (2)
739:
738:
737:
736:
726:
725:
724:
723:
712:
710:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
693:as did Bane(3)
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
645:
644:
643:
642:
636:
635:
634:
633:
624:
623:
622:
621:
611:
610:
609:
608:
595:
589:
587:...As I said.
584:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
476:
475:
474:
473:
439:
429:
428:
427:
426:
408:
407:
406:
405:
398:
390:
389:
388:
387:
378:
377:
376:
375:
365:
364:
363:
362:
353:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
313:
311:DA AS A VANDAL
309:1st assertion:
307:
305:
302:
277:
276:
264:
252:
235:
232:
230:
227:
217:
216:
215:
214:
211:
201:
200:Clarifications
198:
197:
196:
173:
170:
161:
150:
147:
102:
99:
97:
94:
86:
84:
79:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2643:
2634:
2631:
2630:
2627:
2624:
2616:
2612:
2611:
2609:
2608:
2603:
2599:
2598:
2596:
2595:
2594:
2591:
2585:
2583:
2581:
2577:
2573:
2569:
2565:
2555:
2552:
2549:
2546:
2544:
2541:
2539:
2536:
2534:
2531:
2529:
2526:
2524:
2521:
2519:
2516:
2514:
2511:
2508:
2505:
2503:
2500:
2498:
2495:
2493:
2490:
2488:
2485:
2482:
2478:
2474:
2471:
2470:
2469:
2468:
2467:
2465:
2464:Christmas Day
2461:
2458:
2454:
2451:
2448:
2444:
2441:
2438:
2435:
2432:
2429:
2426:
2422:
2419:
2416:
2412:
2403:
2398:
2396:
2395:
2392:
2388:
2384:
2382:
2379:
2375:
2371:
2364:
2360:
2358:
2355:
2350:
2347:
2343:
2339:
2333:
2331:
2329:
2325:
2322:
2319:
2315:
2312:
2308:
2304:
2300:
2297:
2296:this response
2293:
2289:
2284:
2279:
2277:
2274:
2271:
2267:
2265:
2262:
2259:
2256:
2253:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2239:
2236:
2233:
2230:
2225:
2218:
2212:
2207:
2203:
2198:
2193:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2183:
2180:
2176:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2166:
2162:
2158:
2154:
2146:
2144:
2143:
2140:
2131:
2129:
2128:
2125:
2117:
2113:
2110:
2105:
2102:
2097:
2093:
2089:
2086:was as found
2085:
2081:
2080:
2079:
2077:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2058:
2053:
2050:
2046:
2043:
2040:
2037:
2034:
2033:
2028:
2025:
2022:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2007:
2004:
2001:
1997:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1988:
1987:"=level one="
1985:? Using the
1984:
1980:
1976:
1975:
1967:
1965:
1964:
1961:
1956:
1953:
1950:
1947:
1944:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1928:
1920:
1918:
1917:
1914:
1909:
1905:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1885:
1883:
1882:
1879:
1874:
1872:
1868:
1864:
1859:
1858:inappropriate
1855:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1811:
1808:
1804:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1785:
1781:
1778:
1770:
1768:
1766:
1762:
1757:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1733:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1723:
1719:
1712:
1710:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1687:
1682:
1675:
1669:
1668:
1664:
1659:
1658:
1650:
1649:
1645:
1642:
1639:
1636:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1611:
1608:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1586:
1585:
1581:
1572:
1569:
1566:
1563:
1562:
1555:
1552:
1549:
1548:
1542:
1539:
1536:
1533:
1532:
1526:
1523:
1520:
1517:
1516:
1510:
1507:
1504:
1501:
1500:
1494:
1491:
1488:
1485:
1484:
1478:
1475:
1472:
1469:
1468:
1462:
1459:
1456:
1453:
1452:
1446:
1443:
1440:
1437:
1436:
1430:
1427:
1424:
1421:
1420:
1414:
1411:
1408:
1405:
1404:
1398:
1395:
1392:
1389:
1388:
1382:
1379:
1376:
1373:
1372:
1369:
1366:
1364:
1361:
1355:
1354:
1350:
1348:
1345:
1339:
1338:
1334:
1331:
1328:
1325:
1324:
1318:
1313:Evidence Line
1312:
1306:
1301:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1261:
1258:
1256:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1206:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1179:inappropriate
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1128:
1127:
1124:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1103:
1102:
1099:
1095:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1085:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1047:
1042:
1039:
1038:
1035:
1033:
1020:
1017:
1014:
1009:
1005:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
995:
988:
984:
981:
980:
979:
976:
975:
970:
965:
960:
959:
953:
950:
947:
944:
941:
938:
937:
936:
935:
930:
925:
922:
921:
920:
919:
916:
912:
907:
903:
899:
896:
892:
891:
885:
881:
876:
872:
867:
866:
865:
864:
860:
859:
853:
849:
847:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
826:
824:
819:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
797:
796:
791:
787:
786:
785:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
764:
762:
758:
754:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
734:
730:
729:
728:
727:
721:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
700:
698:
694:
690:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
665:
662:
659:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
640:
639:
638:
637:
631:
628:
627:
626:
625:
618:
615:
614:
613:
612:
606:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
594:
590:
588:
583:
579:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
529:
527:
523:
519:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
497:
493:
489:
485:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
471:
470:WP:good faith
467:
463:
459:
455:
454:Mother Teresa
451:
450:
444:
443:NOT vandalism
441:An insult is
440:
437:
433:
432:
431:
430:
424:
423:
422:
416:
412:
411:
410:
409:
403:
399:
397:
396:My User page:
394:
393:
392:
391:
386:
382:
381:
380:
379:
373:
369:
368:
367:
366:
361:
360:My talk page:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
345:
344:Exhibit T1-a'
341:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
325:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
312:
308:
303:
301:
299:
295:
291:
287:
285:
281:
275:
273:before T-man.
272:
269:
265:
263:
260:
257:
253:
251:
248:
245:
241:
240:
239:
233:
228:
226:
225:
222:
212:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
199:
195:
192:
188:
187:
186:
185:
182:
177:
171:
169:
166:
165:
159:
157:
155:
148:
146:
145:
142:
138:
137:
132:
131:
129:
127:
125:
123:
121:
119:
117:
115:
113:
111:
109:
107:
100:
95:
92:
91:
87:HERE: --: -->
83:
78:
76:
72:
67:
63:
61:
56:
52:
50:
45:
43:
38:
36:
31:
23:
19:
2632:
2621:
2592:
2589:
2561:
2463:
2407:
2387:the reaction
2374:his response
2367:
2361:Evidence by
2351:
2334:
2317:
2282:
2280:
2269:
2268:
2226:
2222:
2150:
2135:
2121:
2118:Perspective?
2075:
2072:
2067:
2047:: I monitor
2044:
2038:
2030:
2026:
2020:
2015:
1999:
1996:edit history
1986:
1972:
1971:
1924:
1889:
1875:
1774:
1755:
1752:
1716:
1699:Gabrielsimon
1683:
1679:
1662:
1567:1.618033989
1553:1.618033989
1537:1.618033989
1521:1.618033989
1505:1.618033989
1489:1.618033989
1473:1.618033989
1457:1.618033989
1441:1.618033989
1425:1.618033989
1409:1.618033989
1393:1.618033989
1377:1.618033989
1316:
1292:
1276:
1264:
1254:
1242:
1239:Exhibit T5-b
1215:Exhibit T0-b
1214:
1210:
1204:
1202:
1198:
1191:Exhibit T5-d
1187:Harley Queen
1186:
1158:
1151:Exhibit T5-b
1142:
1120:
1091:
1084:Exhibit T5-b
1075:
1051:
1040:
1031:
1029:
1012:
1007:
1004:Exhibit T5-@
986:
983:Exhibit T4-d
977:
940:Exhibit T4-b
928:
914:
884:Exhibit T3-c
880:Exhibit T3-a
874:
851:
850:His answer:
845:
837:
821:
817:
815:
794:
793:
789:
788:His answer:
783:
775:
760:
756:
752:
750:
732:
731:His answer:
719:
711:
696:
692:
688:
686:
663:
660:
656:
630:Exhibit T3-c
617:Exhibit T3-b
605:Exhibit T3-a
597:
592:
586:
581:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
525:
521:
517:
515:
495:
491:
487:
483:
466:Exhibit T1-e
462:Exhibit T1-d
458:Exhibit T1-c
449:Ned Flanders
447:
442:
435:
419:
418:
415:Exhibit T1-e
402:Exhibit T1-d
395:
385:Exhibit T1-c
372:Exhibit T1-b
359:
352:
340:Exhibit T1-a
322:
310:
288:
278:
237:
218:
204:My opinion:
203:
178:
175:
167:
162:
160:
152:
139:
133:
104:
88:
81:
68:
64:
59:
57:
53:
46:
41:this form:
39:
34:
32:
29:
2479:, example:
1834:DrachenFyre
1832:, shouted
1784:25 December
1777:25 December
1582:Negotiation
1277:He is right
1066:. I'm using
559:"obscenity"
551:"BACK OFF!"
421:lying again
297:proficiency
2318:Doctor Who
2307:Khaosworks
2283:Doctor Who
1030:THE T-MAN
1008:now merged
490:* insults
35:be concise
2593:Examples
2481:this edit
2391:Mozzerati
2363:mozzerati
2328:stay cool
2175:block log
1756:bona fide
1634:a. Batman
1359:^______^
1195:Jeph Loeb
1064:bad faith
496:"obscene"
488:"obscene"
71:/Workshop
49:talk page
2602:25/12/05
2342:WP:CIVIL
2245:Turnstep
1908:Superman
1900:Superman
1810:reverted
1707:WP:CIVIL
1695:WP:CIVIL
1347:Superman
1287:article.
1247:WP:Civil
1185:and the
972:natural.
898:reverted
244:Superman
179:Thanks,
20: |
2270:However
2096:noticed
2076:mistake
2068:Mistake
1939:comment
1933:at the
1838:blindly
1814:restore
1732:Toffile
1722:Toffile
1335:Action
664:(minor)
555:"HELP!"
522:"fire!"
434:Notice
2623:Hiding
2477:Batman
2346:WP:NPA
2338:WP:AGF
2179:Shanel
1842:adding
1807:Haiduc
1761:Batman
1703:WP:NPA
1691:WP:NPA
1368:Batman
1363:Batman
1285:Batman
1281:WP:NPA
1177:, and
1032:ALWAYS
906:Haiduc
902:Haiduc
895:Haiduc
256:Batman
2288:asked
1854:again
1850:again
1846:again
1830:STOP!
1765:Benon
1588:this:
1343:Cake
1332:Page
1329:Date
1326:User
1175:again
1171:again
1167:again
567:Faust
484:NOTE:
191:Benon
181:Benon
141:Benon
16:<
2626:talk
2574:and
2570:are
2344:and
2311:here
2177:. --
2161:here
2159:and
2157:here
2155:and
2153:here
2101:here
2092:here
2088:here
2066:The
1983:this
1979:this
1931:this
1927:this
1896:here
1871:this
1867:here
1863:here
1852:and
1848:and
1826:over
1824:and
1822:over
1820:and
1818:over
1803:this
1801:and
1799:this
1797:and
1795:this
1791:this
1787:2005
1780:2005
1705:and
1564:Moo
1550:Moo
1534:Moo
1518:Moo
1502:Moo
1486:Moo
1470:Moo
1454:Moo
1438:Moo
1422:Moo
1406:Moo
1390:Moo
1374:Moo
1351:NO!
1340:100
1243:also
1173:and
1169:and
875:THEN
563:fuqs
553:and
526:bomb
518:wolf
464:and
2430:,
2192:NSL
2049:JLU
1663:fuq
1241:,
1143:CAN
722:...
524:or
452:or
413:2.
400:1.
383:2.
370:1.
51:.
2582:.
2466::
2452:,
2442:,
2439:,
2436:,
2433:,
2340:,
2332:.
2254:,
2240:,
2237:,
2078:.
1954:,
1951:,
1948:,
1828:.
1693:,
1556:]
882:,
818:.
795:I'
755:,
520:,
460:,
219:--
44:.
2556:.
2483:.
2208:)
2206:C
2204:+
2202:T
2200:(
2196:E
2103:.
2035:.
1945:(
1665:.
1302::
886:.
792:(
661:,
438:.
342:,
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.