Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming/Evidence

3184:"Amazing Power of REAL Mind Control, ancient teachings, Modern teachings scientifically researched. For YOU to GAIN ADVANTAGES & POWER in Secret, Hidden and Lost disciplines: Mind-Power, Mental Magic, Invisible Body, Miracles, Secret Prayers, Mental Atmosphere, Remote Influence, Mental Suggestion, Psychic Attack, Psychic Self-Defense, Mental Healing, Abundance, Mental Power, Psychotronic Power, Mentation, Subtle Body, Seduction, Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP), hypnosis, Self-Hypnosis, Mesmerism, Mind Control, Remote Viewing, Manifestation, Invisibility, Orgone Energy Generators, Time Lines, Brain Waves, Psychic Influence, Astral Travel, Fluidic Body, Mental Plane, Psychic Powers, Mental Influence, Zipping Protection, Energy Healing, Martial Arts, Qi Kong, Remote Viewing Past, Controlling Future, Manifesting, Dream Control, Dream Invader, Cloud Bursting, Magick, Kahuna, Huna, Secret Technologies, Pranic Energy, Psychokinetic Phenomena, Mental Radio, Voodoo, The "God" Spot, Aura Shielding, Meridians, Magnets, Psychic Mind Control, Demons, Psychic Functioning, Prophecy, Black Magick, Precognition, Dream Precognition, Time Distortion, Size Distortion, Auto-Suggestion, White Magick, Brain Training, Pendulum, Depossession, Out-of-Body, Luck, Psychic Laws, Ha Prayer Ritual, Secret Banishing, Mana Charging, Diagnostic Methods, Intuition, ESP Brain Wave Secrets, Distance Influence, Alpha Brain Wave, L-Rods, Guarding Mana, Theta Training, Secret Door to Delta, Accessing the High Self Consciously, Bio-Plasma, Bio-Energy, Psi Secrets, Suggestology, Eyeless Sight, Radionics, Supernatural, Psionics Generators, Evil Eye, Dowsing, Mind Expansion, Levitation, Life Readings, Intercepting Telepathy, Dream Secret School, Pyramid Energy, Radiesthesia, Spiritualism, Spontaneous Telepathy, Telepathic Hypnosis, Thought Power, Odic Force, Orgone Energy, Aura of Energy, Mind Clarity, Subconscious Mind hookup, and much, much more." 3079:

NLP, advocating that others remove all criticisms, stating a committment to reducing the views to two key authors claiming that those authors are the only primary sources, making sneaky edits using minor edits to cap the more NPOV ones, making sneaky edits to images (and not announcing them), making many many multiple unreasonable accusations of personal attack on other editor's pages, and posting sockpuppet labels on ALL nonNLPpromotional editors' pages (a kind of slur campaign) and posting his own pov on the article. Joining this club is just a desperate attempt to whitewash his months of several misdeeds a day. I believe miracles are possible, though I also believe you have just got a 3rd rate sociopath in your Christmas stocking. Merry Christmas.

1510:. Firstly HeadleyDown's reversion was blind and did not take into account the recent discussion and contributions of other editors. Additionally, added references that do not match the attribution -- The NCAHF, Raso, Barrett references are currently being debating in the discussion, adding mispresentations of critics does not help matters. To , What is your evidence to say that NCAHF has weight? The article you cite has no external citations. NCAHF has a low alexa rank. Loma is an unknown author. Raso's opinion is already included in the article elsewhere. It seems to be a circular reference except for Druckman and Swets who can be cited directly. No reputable university would accept this sort of intellectual dishonesty. -- 2702:

discussion I feel that some editors had been taking a turn toward the dramatic rather than even being remotely faithfully in stating what NLP is. Research was strong in one area but not other areas where I might suppose the editor thought the information wasn't important. The continued likenesss to engrams, Dianetics 9which involves talking to trees), cults and rituals (If I started talking about NLP and say it is a cult and they do rituals this might inspire a person to think it is some kind of witch craft or that I drink goats blood if they were so inclined) Without stating in what way NLP is like a cult or what rituals NLPers undergo i find these to be veiled insults to the institution and misleading to the reader

1935:"Alternatively, lets revert all of Comaze's attempts to transform scientists and other experts into narrow minded fringe web page writers. There have already been many deleted views of scientists and other such experts. These were deleted through Comaze's advocacy for censorship. His attempts at censorship have sometimes been rewarded, and thus reinforced. If this article is further clarified by briefly placing the views of experts, then the NLP fanatics will be punished. In fact anything that clarifies the article will lead to NLP fanatics being punished. Looks like we have no choice but to torture Comaze and co by clarifying the article some more. 2153:"Alternatively, lets revert all of Comaze's attempts to transform scientists and other experts into narrow minded fringe web page writers. There have already been many deleted views of scientists and other such experts. These were deleted through Comaze's advocacy for censorship. His attempts at censorship have sometimes been rewarded, and thus reinforced. If this article is further clarified by briefly placing the views of experts, then the NLP fanatics will be punished. In fact anything that clarifies the article will lead to NLP fanatics being punished. Looks like we have no choice but to torture Comaze and co by clarifying the article some more. 2820:

them (even though engrams are scientifically recognised and support the notion that NLP is science:), you adding your own biased views without supplying citations (because they don't exist). ANd you have not even slightly opened my can of NLP worms that I have stored away. Mmm, Yummy! However, I do think you have not given it enough time. As you have most definitely not represented the present mediation with any view to neutrality, I don't think you will be able to handle arbitration at all, let alone the article itself. With respect, its a nice offer, but you would do very nicely with VoiceOfAll on all balance. Best regards

115:(NPOV violation) First, the editors critical of NLP generally insert statements in the article such as "NLP is pseudoscientific (Smith)" when they need to write it in the form of "Smith states that NLP is pseudoscientific". The first version states someone's view as if it were fact (with a name in parens to downplay that it is actually just someone's view). The second version clearly reports the view from the source who says it. This wouldn't be a problem if it were a rare occurrence, but this format is used throughout the article, which gives a heavily biased slant to the article. 118:(verifiability issue) Second, if these same editors cite a source, they cite the source with a name in parenthesis. They are not giving enough information that an uninvolved editor could verify that the person named actually said what the editor claims they said. A name in parenthesis is not enough for someone who knows nothing about the topic to verify another editor's work. Often an editor paraphrases some source and places a name in parenthesis, requiring other editors to take on faith that the paraphrasing was an accurate representation of the source's view. 2658:, please feel free to edit your post adding more information why your vote should be included even though you have never made other contributions to the encyclopedia under this IP. It's not personal, I'm sure you are bona fide, but I'm sure you understand that even the appearance of bias would be best avoided, in the interest of scrupulous fairness, especially as there have been sock puppet accusations between other editors in the past. Please reply if you feel there are facts to consider that will change this, or indeed, contribute to the discussion. 1573:"Engrams has no relevance in NLP. It has never been mentioned in any NLP training that I've done in the Grinder, Bandler, Gilligan, or Hall lineage. I cannot find any reference to engram in ANY of the reputable NLP literature. I will continue to revert your contribution if you continuing adding this. One comprimise would be to move all your current references to engram to one paragraph, as long as it is framed as who uses this idea, and who does not (ie. Bandler, Grinder, Gilligan, Delozier, Cameron Bandler, Dilts, Andreas, Hall, etc). regards, -- 1772:- Comaze asks for a RfC and Camridge return with another personal attack, " Listen Comaze, there is no way you are going to get away without someone pointing out your uncooperative behaviour. You have demanded so much, but you continue to deny the facts. These are not personal attacks. Truly the only personal attacks are the ones made by the promoters you work with towards nonpromotional editors, and I will repeat what the mediator VoiceOfAll has stated about you; "YOUR BEHAVIOUR IS TEDIOUS AND UNPRODUCTIVE". 2631:. Things have not improved much in the week or so since then. And it seems clear that NPOV policy is either grossly misunderstood by a number of editors or simply being flagrantly ignored. Numerous attempts to explain NPOV have been ignored. I don't have experience with the whole history of this article and all 16 points, but I support the notion that NPOV policy is not being followed here. ANd I'd be willing to submit evidence to arbitration regarding my experience on the NLP article. 2038:, except to add that engram is not a majority view in NLP which has been demonstrated in the discussion and agreed to by the mediator. This is another example where Camridge and group of editors have seeked to "own" the article by reverting without proper discussion. This is also an example of how you are "pushing POV" by promoting a fringe view that say NLP can be explained by engrams with the intention of confusing NLP with dianetics and scientology. 1765:- "Comaze, if that means you doing your thing of trying to chuck out references on the basis that they do not promote NLP or that they contain evidence that places NLP as a fringe new age pseudopsychological fad, then I think you are on the wrong path. Clearly you seem to think there is something very wrong with the references that have been provided at your own insistance." 948:(FuelWagon) Edit summary says "This is criticism and belongs in the criticism section of intro, with plenty of sources to support use of such biased words". And HeadleyDown found a website selling witchcraft training tapes that said it used NLP techniques. That is like saying since abortion bomber Eric Rudolph is christian, then the introduction to the 882:(FuelWagon) The disputed content is "The foundation for Bandler and Grinder's NLP is based in" followed by "spirituality" or "New Age". The block quote provided in the article immediately below this assertion never uses the phrase "New Age", but mentions that NLP is based on spirituality. I change the content to match what the sourced quote supports. 2654:. But you have only the one contribution under this address, and traditionally people with few edits are notrmally asked not to vote on matters like this, to avoid suspicion that they are accounts created by one "side" or the other just for the purpose. If you have an account, or have regularly watched this debate, and are not just a 998:(FuelWagon) The content says NLP has also been identified by the ] as quintessential ]ry (Parker 1999). {{dubious}}. It was marked with a "dubious" tag and given how inflamatory a statement it is, I deleted it saying that it required some means to verify it. My edit summary ends with "please provide a URL for verification." 2893:"... so that it has some indication of how many view it as pseudoscience. Has there been some sort of poll you could cite? Otherwise, "often regarded" is a little too fuzzy. Perhaps there is some psychologist/psychotherapist organization that has come out saying that NLP is pseudoscience, and you can report that?..." 3078:

Hi folks. Ding dong merrily on high and so on. If you could convert Comaze from NLP fanaticism to NPOV fanaticism, that would indeed be a miracle worthy of Christmas. For those unaquainted with him, he has spent the past months since summer performing 10 reverts per day, removing all criticisms of

2573:

Please vote below if you would be supportive, against, or have other opinions on this matter at this time. Note that ArbCom does not in fact require a consensus to accept a matter, so this is more a "straw poll" of feeling. (Sock puppets and suspected sock puppets, including unknown anon IPs, may be

1318:

This comment amounts to an intention to reinstate inappropriate or redundant criticism that was removed under mediation and negotiation... HeadleyDown says, "What else can I say. Just look at his history. And look at the past versions of the article. There is a whole lot of support for the views that

2999:

The only solution is to delete his extreme provocation and hilight it as the work of a fanatical sociopath who's only goal is to delete criticisms, and promote NLP, whilst whitewashing his own tedious and unconstructive anti-NPOV behaviour. He has been working hand in hand with the other editors who

2556:

As a result of the above aggressive POV warring and other persistent breaches of wikipedia policy, progress on the article has been and is being unacceptably stalled by the inability of these people to grasp basic concepts such as "NPOV", "courtesy" and "writing for the enemy", despite many requests

2819:

Wow FT2. That is an extremely appetising offer!.. Can you imagine- Comaze and others reverting facts during the arbitration, so called NLP experts adding the wrong theories, other so called NLP experts inadvertently adding pseudoscientific argument and refs about engrams and then trying to delete

2799:

I am a patient person and also agree that arbitration is a long way off. You have been here only a short while and you are calling for arbitration already. I think most people would feel that is rash. Also, I feel people should be a lot more patient considering the compromises already made by the

2783:

Hello FT2. I think you are treating VoiceOfAll's expert efforts unfairly. He has stepped in to remove direct insults, and has made very clear instructions of what you should and should not do (eg accusations section). It still seems to me that further exploration towards actual proceedings is in

1912:

contains yet another personal attack against me. You've made it very obvious that you have no interesting in resolving the content disputes and every intention of attacking me in order to get some sort of reaction. Well I refuse to react to you bait, and never will. If you wish to resolve I am more

2909:

Not only is that a completely groundless and patently untrue avoidance of a citation, whats worse is, the one fact you did allege is also false, because you didn;t check your facts. In fact not even the BPS agrees with you. They don't count it as pseudoscience in the sense you are describing, much

54:

Please make a section for your evidence and add evidence only in your own section. Please limit your evidence to a maximum 1000 words and 100 diffs, a much shorter, concise presentation is more likely to be effective. Please focus on the issues raised in the complaint and answer and on diffs which

3416:

shows in the 3 months you've been here you've edited exclusively in the NLP article namespace except for the one time you took the NLP conflict to another page so that the two pages could cross-reference each other's disputed facts. I'm still open to an apology and I would appreciate you at least

3195:

Morons have polluting the Knowledge page, trying to link NLP to Dianetics and Scientology, because obviously enneagrams = engrams....(even though nobody in NLP uses the term engram, other than some fringe loser author who absolutely nobody references except for these cranks -- who, it seems, have

2918:

as fields supervised by the other main UK accrediting body in the psychotherapy field, the UK College of Psychotherapists. This is a major European accrediting body. If you check their view on NLP, you'll find that the Association of NLP International has had a seat on the governing board not too

2711:

Hello FT2. Considering your recent additions of your own views to the article, I suggest that you need to go back to the reality check stage. We are in the constructive process of mediation, and if you hadn't noticed, the mediator is working well. He has even been moving or deleting criticisms

2701:

9:54 am 11th November 2005. My first edit was about three months ago where the meta model was discussed. The topic of generalisations using meta model questions was lobbed together with a question for a simple deletion. I changed this twice more. It was reverted twice more then upon enterring for

1682:

Camridge respond to request for comment with a personal attack on the NLP talk page saying, "Comaze, Media13 actually has a vetting policy quite similar to that of a published paper journal. I suggest you are most definitely the most biased and zealous fanatic on this article. If anyone want's to

125:

A more subtle issue is that critics of NLP generally take the worst of NLP and use it as an excuse to present it as if it represented the core of what NLP is. Positive sources of information have been deleted and more oddball sources have been inserted as an attempt to present NLP as "occult" and

121:

I've tried numerous times to rewrite "NLP is pseudoscientific (Smith)" to "Smith states that NLP is pseudoscientific" but these editors refuse to follow policy. I've also told them numerous times that they need to provide more than just a name for verifiability purposes. The title of a book and a

40:

As such, it is extremely important that you use the prescribed format. Submitted evidence should include a link to the actual page diff; links to the page itself are not sufficient. For example, to cite the edit by Mennonot to the article Anomalous phenomenon adding a link to Hundredth Monkey use

2995:

Hello all. I have been working with VoiceofAll to make the article more concise. However, Comaze has repeatedly tried to baffle my efforts and has made many multiple accusations of personal attack. The ridiculous amount of extra work Comaze has provoked has also succeeded in creating conflict

2241:

EBlack's page it states "D.Right, Dave Right, Headley Down, JP Logan, Carl Oxford - actually come to think of it ... I'm actually a bit schizophrenic when it comes to getting my POV across, all tactics are justified." Note: Checking the history of this page finds that the comment was posted from

65:

Be aware that the Arbitrators may at times rework this page to try to make it more coherent. If you are a participant in the case or a third party, please don't try to refactor the page, let the Arbitrators do it. If you object to evidence which is inserted by other participants or third parties

3389:

I'm sure Knowledge has nothing against someone's belief in remote influence, Kahuna sect, or Ha Prayer Rituals, and of course it is a free world mostly and one should not be banned or persecuted for remote viewing, telepathic hypnosis, or pyramid energy development as they wish. However, that

2561:

I am inclined to take the matter of these two editors, and possibly others, to the Arbitration Committee. If so, it will not be on the broad "he said/she said", or "Group A/Group B" basis that the request for Mediation was based upon. It will be directly undertaken myself, and specifically for

2691:

in several areas this page is not the NLP as it is described in the core books of the field (those written between 1974-1980) - a blatant example to me is the use of the word engrams. I also believe some "skeptics" are overdoning their case, by even misrefresenting their refeences (e.g. the

2471:

Example - this text, comprising major corrections and explanations of what exactly NLP says, and including some citations and references, is based on citable source material, and this was noted on the Talk page. Despite this, it was reverted to a less complete and moderately inaccurate once

2461:

Valid and significant information based on original material are deleted by them on a frequent basis or replaced with POV wording. Established fact such as what NLP itself has identified as its goal, or direct textual based information, is described as "NLP claims.." and "supposedly...", ie

2237:

And with HeadleyDown creating an account and then rewriting the history of NLP with a Scientology/Dianetics bias, that when they intentionally used the confusion about engrams. (NOTE: Engram is the central concept in Dianetics and Scientology, and is only used by a small minority of NLP

2712:

from sections that your promoter team demanded to have supplied by neutral editors but then decided not to like. VoiceOfAll is working well for now. In future arbitration is always an option. I think it would be silly to pass up such a tolerant mediator as the present one. Regards

2502:

Ignorance of fundamental subject material, as demonstrated by lack of knowledge of full research, and edits to material changing it from material represented in NLP texts, to material of non-standard (but pseudoscience style) authors, which is then used as evidence it is pseudoscience.

2727:

apparently being resolved by mediation, and this is what I am seeking to visit ArbCom with. Adequate requests and courtesy have been given, adequate concern was given that if the personal attacks and vehement warring continued then it would probably be felt that mediation was

1841:- "Comaze, your anti-NPOV agenda is clear from your history. I have also noticed that RichardCleen and Blauregen are similarly credential-less. Looks to me like they are all meatpuppets of yours, or are siding with you in your long march to delete/obscure facts on Knowledge. 3417:

admitting your error in accusing me. I've been more than tolerant of you and I have refrained from bringing further evidence against you to this arbitration case as I believe it's just fueling a wildfire. However, it seems you are doing your best to step on my toes. Peace.

2538:

When I eventually got HeadleyDown's (somewhat grudging) agreement to mediation, within hours of thanking him and giving factual private explanations for discussion, intended to help bridge the gap, HeadleyDown's response was personal attack and POV warring against even

2408:

Look up there, FuelWagon just accused me of writing "NLP, just like other pseudoscientific subjects" as if it is a hanging offence. ITS NOT FAIR! The evidence is all over the place article. FuelWagon is clearly trolling!:) Banish him into the wilderness! Cheers

1419:

even reinstates errors that I corrected. BUT my biggest concern is that you moved the detached the entire NLP applications section from the corresponding applications I have no idea what is your intention for that move apart from some agenda to confuse the article.

1657:

Comaze requests mediation: "Would you like to get meditation (3rd opinion) on these matters? Additionally, based on the style and content of your posts I suspect that you are also a sockpuppet of HeadleyDown. I would like to get a third party opinion on this.

129:

I don't know if sockpuppetry has occurred on the NLP page, but it is fairly hard to prove without an objective IP check. If it isn't a difficult task, I think a check for sockpuppetry on the following accounts would be prudent, just to put the issue to rest.

2722:

VofAll has been working on the mediation. Small edits to the article have taken place. But the personal attacks, the major POV warring, and the instant dismissal (as you have done yourself) of anyone seeking NPOV as part of "the pro group" or a "promoter" is

2513:

On several occasions, facts (or the significance of some material) appear to have been invented, exaggerated, selectively chosen, or not checked at all, and equally valid facts not desired by the above-named to be suppressed, attacked or reverted. Example:

1014:"), rewords it to passive tense so the source (Jan Damen) is not mentioned and the opinion is presented more as fact, and then reinserts it into the pro-NLP section, making it look as if a pro-NLP source describes NLP as "occult". (Violation of WP:NPOV) 888:(FuelWagon) POV wording "NLP is an amoral, pseudoscientific psychocult (Smith)" needs to be rewritten to "Smith states that NLP is an amoral, pseudoscientific psychocult". I've done this a dozen times. it keeps getting reverted, so I deleted this one. 1883:- Camridge responds to direct question with an attack with attack the man, "Comaze, your question has been answered already. Your objection/suggestion is as unreasonable as your months of unsuccessful attempts to delete scientifically based criticism. 742:

AliceDeGrey adds POV terms "idiosyncratically", "charismatically or evangeliestically taught", "magic", "new age fad", "considered as pseudoscience", "charismatic appeal, wish-fulfillment, quick fixes, and lack of critical faculty" (violation of NPOV)

1319:

are present on the article. All we need to do is revert it. Comaze and the other NLP fanatics are their own worst enemy. If they like, they can have all the past criticisms reverted back to the present artcle. HeadleyDown 13:15, 3 January 2006 (UTC)"

74: 66:

please cite the evidence and voice your objections within your own section of the page. It is especially important to not remove evidence presented by others. If something is put in the wrong place, please leave it for the arbitrators to move.

2861:...No claims or statements are made that are unverifiable as far as I can tell, 4/ It explains both terms. Any criticisms please bring here, do not full-revert as I am unaware of anything controversial or disputed written in that section... 2022:

In response to what I (Comaze) thought was neutral editing of images, Camridge posts, "==COMAZE HAS ONCE AGAIN BUTCHERED IMAGES ON THE NLP ARTICLE== Comaze, your intense antagonism and tedious, unconstructive nuisance is once again noted.

2396:- Sunray attemps to write in some NPOV. included, "Some fundamentalist Christians regard NLP as being similar to what they categorize as "new age" movements (examples given are" This was immediately edited to, "Some critics regard NLP..." 2787:

For example. One way to go, is to continue fulfilling the issues requirements that VoiceOfAll has provisionally set out. I can see we are getting closer to doing that. Certainly I have plenty of information that can help out there.

1415:"This recent reversion is another attempt to take ownership of the article by reverting any edits that do not agree with you personal agenda. You have stated that you will blindly revert my contributions and this is unacceptable. This 1403:. Saying that I have a "concerted agenda to remove cited facts" or "sociopathic" is not the behaviour of a wikipedian. It is your choice, simple stop making the personal remarks or I will filing all of this evidence against you. -- 1256:"Comaze. I am just wondering what it would look like if you went through and "copyedited" the article. Somehow I think it would need some further adjustments:) I'm not psychic, I just have a powerful intuition about these matters! 1869:: "Comaze, your objections hold no weight. Your agenda is clear from your history (deletion of science and critical facts, persistent harrassment, and general NLP-zealot behaviour). You, and co-antagonists will simply be ignored. 2853:...So lets see. I can find citations for any facts in doubt, but as I don't know what is common ground on this, I'll list what I see, and you can always ask for a source citation on any points raised. Would that work for you?... 2795:

I wish somehow to resolve that to some extent also. I'm wondering whether giving the article a more educational flavour may help (eg, pointing out the difference between science and pseudoscience etc). Whatever way is fine.

3028:

Comaze is bent on provoking attacks, but my responses were accurate descriptions of his fanatical slur campaign. I attack his persistently bad faith, uncooperative, antagonistic, fact deleting, rabble rousing actions, not his

1295:- This is the third time you have personally attacked me today, says "If you are here simply to cause trouble, have tantrums, and remove cited facts, just go away and don't come back. That includes you Comaze and Akulkis" see 1350:. I will answer you here this time becaues you have ignored the private messages. It is a violation of wikipedia policy to ignore and revert blindly as you have just stated. It also not not fair on other editors and is called 3411:

shows in my two weeks registered here at Knowledge I've made reasonable contributions to at least 5 article namespaces, including Buddhism, Censorship, NLP, Melbourne city, filibuster, polyphase, and more. In stark contrast,

1744:- "Comaze, there are libraries in the world full of the information you claim to seek (but refuse to accept). Again you prove yourself to be here primarily as a censor of criticism. Your track record in that area is clear. 70: 1382:. Saying that I have a "concerted agenda to remove cited facts" or "sociopathic" it not the behaviour of a wikipedian. It is your choice, simple stop making the personal remarks and I will filing evidence against you. -- 1299:. The rest of the message outlines your intention to "own" the article with your group of editors. I urge you to co-operate with the others editors and respond directly to question rather than attacking the messenger. -- 2221:

It seems in an attempt to link NLP with Scientology (Dianetics) is the source most of the content disputes on the page. From my investigations, this started with EBlack adding links to NLP from the Scientology page....

2791:

I have tried to point out people's clear biases and they tend to be based on vested and reputational interests (NLP teachers). But I realise there will always be fanatics who will come here to deface the facts.

1758:- "Comaze is still playing the same game as ever, and just trying to wind people up on their own userpages, making baseless objections to mediators/arbs whilst deleting as much as he can here in the process." 1334:. I think you are just trying to take take ownership of the article again. We're all meant to work together here! This is wikipedia. Plesae check out the official policies regarding ownership of articles. -- 942:. ANd it's impossible to tell if the Council Against Health Fraud mentions Dianetics and Landmark, or if "Loma" mentions them, or if HeadleyDown inserted them on his own. Unsourced and unclear assertion. 1464:

seem to be designed to disrupt the article. The most serious would be the removal of common NLP techniques and the complete removal of the meta model and milton model section. This was not discussed. --

21: 3407:

Hi Bookmain. I addressed your accusations already, both on your talk page and on the NLP page. The request you refer to went out after I joined wikipedia, so it is impossible that I responded to it.

2800:

mediator and non promoters. Certainly, the mediator is a force of good for wikipedia and has proven to handle things well. So I consider him a friend to all wikipedians. A good force to work with.

807:" also, later on adding "NLP has belief systems and social control methods. Certain cults use these in combination with the occult and pseudoscience" (violation No Original Research, violation NPOV) 797:" also, later on adding "NLP has belief systems and social control methods. Certain cults use these in combination with the occult and pseudoscience" (violation No Original Research, violation NPOV) 896:"Many such courses appear to depend more upon charismatic appeal, wish-fulfillment, quick fixes, and lack of critical faculty, than actual quantifiable results, and so are often considered pure 2080:

with DaveRight are biased. I'm preparing to lodge a formal complaint against you. I also suspect that you are a sockpuppet of DaveRight/HeadleyDown and group, so I will seek comment on this. --

952:

article should say that christianity is promoted by people who bomb abortion clinics. As far as I know, the poeple who developed NLP do not associate themselves or NLP with occult practices.

2481:

by HeadleyDown, despite at least two requests on the Talk page to identify any specific statements that were inaccurate or not common knowledge, which request was also ignored multiple times.

2996:

sometimes, whereby pointing out his nonsense is required. His many accusations are unfounded. Here is evidence of Comaze's intense harrassment, sometimes several times a day.

73:. /Workshop provides for comment by parties and others as well as arbitrators. After arriving at proposed principles, findings of fact or remedies voting by Arbitrators takes place at 1811:- "Its good advice Dave. Comaze is as persistently damaging as anyone could be to any editor's state of mind. Lets all just be reasonable, chill out and get on with research/editing. 1730:- "I suggest you are most definitely the most biased and zealous fanatic on this article. If anyone want's to join your ranks Comaze, they will definitely be labeled in the same way. 910:

Both sentences present as fact what is actualy disputed opinions of NLP, namely calling NLP "wish fullfillment", "pseudoscience", "amoral", and "psychocult" (Violation of WP:NPOV)

749:

DaveRight adds "because he could not resolve the dispute through the use of NLP", which is equivalent to "doctor, heal thyself". (violation of original research, violation of NPOV)

725:

HeadleyDown deletes positive reference to research by PHD Patrick Merlevede that had a verifiable URL. Edit summary says "one single dissertation is irelevant." (violation of NPOV)

701:

AliceDeGrey deleted successful use of NLP as "spam". Yet other critical editors have cited more oddball uses of NLP as proof that NLP is used for "witchcraft". (violation of NPOV)

1858:"Comaze's EXTREME ANTAGONISM surfaces again with his butchery of images (zealous fanatical censorship), Solution: Revert his nonsense, and report his deliberately tedious actions" 2784:

order. As you said, personal attacks etc. These do indeed need to be resolved. I think I am coming closer to an answer that is more related to how we resolve differences.

1930:

06:11, 21 December 2005 (UTC) Camridge says, "Comaze will not stop his sociopathic harrassment, and my relatively mild comments (certainly in comparison with most NLP zealots"

1049:

HeadleyDown removes one quote from Druckman that says studies of NLP are limited and insert a different quote more critical. Should at least report both views from Druckman.

2545:

that if this continues, Arbitration will result, possibly including an article ban, and asked for collaboration and a cooling down to avoid that. But nothing has improved.

1358:

should really be sorted out via private discussion. It is also also off topic because rather than a direct reply to topic of this thread (Loma, Raso, Barrett, NCAHF) you

2253: 1893:" responds again to request to stop with another personal attack. This just does not make sense. I've invited everyone to go through and remove all personal attacks... 2455:"some of the most biased editing I've read... If you're a POV warrior using Knowledge to advocate against something, you need to find a different encyclopedia to edit" 2043:- admission of attempting to "own" the article, stating, "Comaze's method of making edits that will definitely be reverted" I suggest that you retract this statement. 2098:

contain the same type of bias, even more serious because you remove statements that show other points of view. This is a violation of wikipedia policy: neutrality. --

2366:- D.Right removes this text "A research framework for NLP patterns was published (Grinder & Bostic 2001), as well as framework for further research assigned to 48: 870:(FuelWagon) HeadleyDown needs to rewrite "NLP is pseudoscience (Smith)" to "Smith states that NLP is pseudoscience". I've done it a dozen times and got reverted. 2732:

doomed, and not only by me, and the situation is not fundamentally changed or likely to change; personal attacks and POV warring contuinue despite all the above.

1066:

DaveRight calls those supporting NLP "supporters" and those who are critical of NLP to be "scientists". No source. (violation NPOV, violation original research)

2915:

The BPS's actual stance, if you had cared to check for yourself, is that they count it along with Psychotherapy, Cognitive behavior therapy and Hypnotherapy

2533:, and again on HeadleyDown's talk page (with thanks and courtesy), all flamed in reply, typical response to label it "evangelism" and accuse of bias (again) 2574:

ignored) But I would want to think very carefully about such a step if mediation may yet succeed, or if I am in fact alone in thinking this is appropriate.

2620:

I believe my first edit to this article was about a week ago, on 22:04, 26 October 2005, in which the very first sentence of the article opened like this:

2424: 1561:"HeadleyDown added a picture of Jesus to the Neuro-linguistic Programming page, and removed content that was not in dispute. This is a warning. regards, -- 1043:

HeadleyDown inserts therapies "have been found to be pseudoscientific." Should rewrite "(name) found therapies to be pseudoscientific" (Violation NPOV)

30:

Anyone, whether directly involved or not, may add evidence to this page. Please make a header for your evidence and sign your comments with your name.

3236: 1152:

DaveRight reports in the pro-NLP section of introduction that NLP is "fringe", where the term "fringe" is POV, biased, and disputed. (violation NPOV)

1670:

Camridge ignores multiple offers of RfC on conduct issues and content disputes, Comaze asks, "Will you agree to get a third party opinion on this? --

1140:

reports in the pro-NLP section of introduction that NLP is used for "occult" purposes, where "occult" is POV, biased, and disputed. (violation NPOV)

1281:. I'm sending you these notes each time you make personal remarks against me until you lift your game and argue based on the merits of the facts. -- 386: 154: 2745:

reasons why you believe it will be fruitless. My reasons for believing the latter is the case, are given above, and I believe ultimately mediation

126:

other deragaory terms. This occurred less often then the NPOV and verifiability issues mentioned above, but it is another form of NPOV violation.

2882:

Last, because I think you really need to consider your own actions as an editor (I did say it wasn't just Headley and Logan), did you notice that

1163:

HeadleyDown inserts statement that NLP is used for "fringe therapy", "psychic activities", "covert seduction", and the "occult". (violation NPOV)

2259:

The follow events show that these users are working together to push a certain POV on the article. Attempts to correct or discuss were dismissed.

2874:...Can anyone think of a good new religious name for NLP? How about The Church of New Rolling Wizdicks?DaveRight 06:24, 28 October 2005 (UTC)... 3350: 3293: 3063: 560: 270: 3421: 3399: 3111: 3083: 3033: 3004: 2979: 2957: 2943: 2933: 2836: 2824: 2808: 2777: 2764: 2716: 2671: 2662: 2643: 2617: 2606: 2595: 2584: 2413: 2157: 2138: 2123: 2102: 2084: 1939: 1917: 1900: 1887: 1873: 1845: 1815: 1790: 1776: 1748: 1734: 1703: 1687: 1674: 1662: 1577: 1565: 1553: 1537: 1518: 1491: 1468: 1424: 1407: 1386: 1366: 1338: 1303: 1285: 1260: 1197: 98: 62:

and provide counter-evidence, or an explanation of why the evidence is misleading. Do not edit within the evidence section of any other user.

502: 444: 3145: 1600:

Note: Most of these complaints involve attacking the man rather than argue based on merits and weight to be give to various points of view.

328: 212: 3386:

joined soon after the message was sent. There were also some anonymous IPs that also joined in the fact deletions and advocacy thereof.

122:

page number would be acceptable. A URL would be even better. But for the most part, this requirement for verifiability has been ignored.

3009:

Hi again. I attack Comaze's actions, not his person. All of his objections are unreasonable under the circumstances of his misdeeds.

3408: 3230: 618: 17: 2832:

Wow, it's so very kind of you to consider what we will do 'very nicely' with. I've never known you to be so concerned before. Thanks

2520:(claim that critic is "world renowned" and performed "research" when he is a comparative nobody and wrote basically just an article) 380: 148: 3046:(I'm not a party to this dispute. I will only add evidence here that I have to "clean up" from pages outside of the NLP dispute.) 1999:- Camridge says, "...I must identify you as a fervent promoter of NLP, and it is my duty to undo any nonsense you have created..." 1487:. You have deleted the text in the NLP meta model article. I think this is extremely biased and outside normal wikipedia rules. -- 2950: 2849:

Also, please check your facts, which you (in common with Headley and Logan) are often abysmal at doing when it doesn't suit you:

1953: 1717: 1355: 3344: 3287: 3181:

has been recruiting meatpuppets from the Mindmastery Essentialskills yahoo group. Here is the subject area of the said group:

3059: 2441:(and others) have consistently shown little idea of, and minimal respect for, Wiki policy and have shown this for some time now 2059: 1977: 1113:

DaveRight inserts text including "NLP, in addition to other pseudoscientific therapies, is criticised for..." (violation NPOV)

554: 264: 713:

AliceDeGrey, after deleting two positive sources above, inserts a critical source, showing editor's bias. (violation of NPOV)

3413: 2508:

Requests to discuss reverts on the talk page first, or to state exactly which facts were disputed, were ignored or dismissed

496: 438: 2529:

I have attempted to make a start to sort out basic issues both on a separate page, and via a section explicitly described as

3139: 322: 206: 2364:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Neuro-linguistic_programming&diff=next&oldid=21565907 11:34, 22 August 2005

3100: 1991: 1804:- "Removing Comaze's lies. Engram is used in the field, and it is associated with the unconscious, just as Hubbard did." 612: 1635:

DaveRight comments, "NPOV tags removed (the NLP cultists are stalling because those sections are perfectly factual)"

2939:

Hello FT2. I can see that you are not using the libraries to your advantage. Stop surfing and start researching.

2677:

User previously warned vopte would not be counted; warning removed as user has identified self and is a known editor

3260: 1786:- "Do you want to post a meatpuppet label on my personal page together with Comaze's many unreasonable objections? 2562:

aggressive POV warring, personal attacks, and persistent irreconcilable non-compliance with wikipedia policies by

1277:

This is minor personal attack, but at the moment I have zero tolerance after being attack twice by you today, see

781:

HeadleyDown adds "often promoted for the use of remote ESP" and "classed as pseudoscientific" (violation of NPOV)

3242: 2667:

Sorry FT2. Yes I've posted plenty here I think you'll agree. Any probs let me know - sorry about the IP address.

410: 178: 1533:

Comaze asks, "What is your source and intention for including this in the first paragraph of the NLP article? --

3248: 876:(FuelWagon) "pseudoscience" is POV, and in this diff, the word is unsourced, reported as fact, violating NPOV. 707:

deletes positive reference to research by PHD Patrick Merlevede that had a verifiable URL. (violation of NPOV)

392: 160: 2749:

be fruitless and is doomed, because there is simply no sign whatsoever that Headley or JPLogan can comprehend

2385:- D.Right comments "Yeh! I prefer the Scientology version also!" and adds the Scientology-POV-history back in. 3374: 3317: 1359: 584: 398: 294: 166: 1096:

HeadleyDown needs to rewrite this to "Drenth, Levelt consider NLP to be pseudoscientific" (violation NPOV)

1025:

JPLogan inserts "occult practices". Edit summary says "needs no references whatsoever" (violation of NPOV)

787:

DaveRight adds "inconclusive findings" with no source. (violation of No Original Research. violation NPOV)

142: 89:

Main Arbitration evidence being collated at present (Nov 28). Will be presented shortly in a few more days.

3356: 3299: 3224: 2923: 2883: 2801: 1549:

concept? You reference Grinder & Bandler (1975a) but there is no reference to engrams in that book. --

566: 526: 468: 276: 3338: 3281: 2843: 2651: 2640: 818:

DaveRight reverts with the edit summary "I think that deserves some punishment." (violation of WP:Point)

719:

HeadleyDown inserts "occult" applications of NLP. (violation of No Original Research, violation of NPOV)

3362: 3305: 3169: 2688: 1169:

HeadleyDown inserts statement that NLP is "Similar to other amoral pseudoscientific psychocults such as

572: 508: 450: 374: 352: 282: 236: 2010:

in regard to engrams - a minority view that is current presented with too much weight. (NPOV violation)

695:

DaveRight edits opening sentence of entire article to call NLP "pseudoscientific". (violation of NPOV)

1010:

HeadleyDown removes a critic of NLP's opinion from the criticism section ("Jan Damen describes NLP as

3151: 2444:

There has been ongoing aggressive POV warring by these two (and possibly others) in the NLP article.

1834:"NLP is fringe, and you are a fringe devotee. You are minority, and NLP is minority next to science." 514: 456: 334: 218: 3080: 3049: 2821: 2410: 2402: 2067: 1588: 3157: 3108: 3053: 2922:

and also that the ANLP's Counselling and Therapy arm is still a member in good standing as at 2005

1351: 642: 548: 340: 258: 224: 2034:- Camridge reverted this comprimise that was carefully paraphrased to not change any meaning, see 684:", where the term "pseudoscientific" is clearly POV, disputed, and biased. (Violation of WP:NPOV) 2374:(Grinder 2003). " with a misleading edit comment of "Making more concise and explaining part".... 1927:- Camridge says, "I will continue to stay mild even during 's fanatical sociopathic accusations." 1721: 624: 490: 432: 3000:

begged for this arbitration because they could not get their way through reasonable mediation.

1434:- Personal attack, "As it stands, you have proved yourself to be just as destructive as Comaze." 1031:

JPLogan use of "some say" should be rewritten to directly attribute source. (violation of NPOV)

669:, where the term "quasi-spiritual" is clearly POV, disputed, and biased. (Violation of WP:NPOV) 2833: 2603: 3418: 3133: 630: 316: 200: 1072:

Bookmain adds "Although NLP is has been found to be largely ineffective" (violation of NPOV)

3094: 2940: 2805: 2774: 2713: 2563: 2557:

by multiple editors, and courteous reminders that it will not be acceptable if it continues.

2434: 2360:- EBlack makes some minor change and adds it again, commenting it as "a broader perspective" 2337:- Sunray (Neutral third person) reverts - removing the Scientology-NLP history, and then ask 2063: 1257: 1204: 894:

DaveRight does a blanket revert of a number of edits, reinserting a bunch of text including

95: 2971: 3199: 3192:

Date: Thu Dec 15, 2005 7:31 pm Subject: NLP on Knowledge akulkis2 Offline Send Email

2698: 606: 2311:- HeadleyDown adds the Scientology stuff again and starts adding unreferenced information 1090:

HeadleyDown needs to rewrite this to "Singer states that NLP is..." (Violation of NPOV)

3104: 3069:(I've reformatted the section header into bold to avoid affecting this page's layout): 3040: 2887: 2614: 1060:

DaveRight adds "However, as with other pseudoscientific subjects," (violation of NPOV)

106: 1084:

Bookmain adds "However, as with other pseudoscientific subjects," (violation of NPOV)

3396: 3030: 3001: 2754: 2628:

I removed the POV declaration that NLP is factually declared to be pseudoscientific.

2623: 2486:

Concerns over NPOV are met with personal attack or repeatedly treated with contempt.

2154: 2055: 2024: 1973: 1949: 1936: 1884: 1870: 1842: 1812: 1787: 1773: 1745: 1731: 1713: 1684: 1649: 1642: 897: 2450:(by DaveRight; although it is citations, it seems a very slanted group of citations) 1963:"09:30, 19 December 2005 Camridge (removed Comaze's psychotic harrasment yet again)" 3196:

some financial and/or professional-status motivation to slander the NLP community.

2954: 2898:

Your response to this request for a citation was as follows: "...Sure, VoiceOfAll.

2567: 2463: 2438: 2367: 949: 2916: 770:

AliceDeGrey needs to rewrite this to "Morgan stated that ..." (violation of NPOV)

2920: 1270:- HeadleyDown says: "Comaze has already proved he has bad faith - its called NLP" 3090: 2655: 2592: 2371: 2250: 2135: 2120: 2099: 2081: 1914: 1897: 1700: 1671: 1659: 1574: 1562: 1550: 1534: 1515: 1511: 1488: 1465: 1421: 1404: 1383: 1363: 1335: 1300: 1282: 1194: 1184: 1483:

Deletion of entire text in the meta model article without discussion, "In this

3208:

Plus, 10 people can pick apart the arguments of these cranks better than one.

2668: 2637: 2149:

WP:POINT violation (disruption of article) and POV Editing: Camridge/DaveRight

3103:) has recently added himself to the ranks of the Harmonious Editing Club. — 2494:

Questions to ascertain extent of knowledge were ignored many times. Example:

2015:- We negotiated that to rename engram to "Neuro in NLP" this comprimise was 1170: 905: 3200:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Neuro-linguistic_programming#Engrams_-_enneagr

2266:- HeadleyDown rewrites the history of NLP with a Scientology/Dianetics bias 1037:

HeadleyDown iserts "promotion of these dubious therapies" (violation NPOV)

1395:"Today you have engaged in multiple personal attack against me. see diffs 1374:"Today you have engaged in multiple personal attack against me. see diffs 1354:--- against the spirit of wikipedia. Now, your post also contains another 58:

If you disagree with some evidence you see here, please cite the evidence

3205:

It's time to bring some people more knowledgeable than myself into this.

2976: 2930: 2761: 2659: 2581: 1683:

join your ranks Comaze, they will definitely be labeled in the same way.

82: 33:

When placing evidence here, please be considerate of the arbitrators and

3390:

background may cause a slight bias towards pseudoscientific thinking.

1699:"If you wish to resolve I am more than happy to engage a third party. -- 1223:- Request to direct personal attacks by email "in a less public venue". 1107:

DaveRight adds "NLP's pseudoscientific misconceptions" (violation NPOV)

2204:

Editing from a Dianetics/Scientology bias: EBlack, D.Right, HeadleyDown

1546: 985: 803:

HeadleyDown adds that NLP is "often promoted for the use of ... remote

793:

AliceDeGrey adds that NLP is "often promoted for the use of ... remote

755:

AliceDeGrey adds that NLP is "often promoted for the use of ... remote

1968:- "Comaze's extreme antagonism, and uncooperative, tedious censorship" 2190:

Camridge enters the discussion and reverts the mediators' corrections

2131:- "This edit remove neutral statements... with misleading commments: 1011: 989: 981: 680:

JPLogan modifies the first sentence of the entire NLP article to say

3218: 2208:

Notice the similar style images submitted by HeadleyDown and Eblack

2185:

Voice of All (mediator) makes corrections to DaveRight's reversions

37:. Long, rambling, or stream-of-conciousness rants are not helpful. 2902:, The British Society of Psychologists calls NLP pseudoscientific" 665:

HeadleyDown modifies the first sentence of the introduction to say

368: 136: 2526:

Mediation was attempted and seems to have failed before I got here

2162:

A very similar comment was made by HeadleyDown the following, day:

2900:

Apart from all the psychologists, psychotherapists, and linguists

2517:(Deletion of commonly ignored source model despite citation) and 3332: 3275: 2523:

The article does not actually even describe NLP as it stands (!)

542: 252: 759:

influence" (violation of No Original Research, violation NPOV)

484: 426: 3127: 2692:

references to cults, which I already tried to correct 2 times)

904:"Similar to other amoral pseudoscientific psychocults such as 804: 794: 756: 310: 194: 1631:

Removal of sectional NPOV and sectfact tags without consensus

1228:

Comaze offers comprimise to have engram in one sentence only.

69:

The Arbitrators may analyze evidence and other assertions at

1346:"HeadleyDown, You recent post on wikipedia discussion page, 667:"(NLP) is a quasi-spiritual behavior-modification technique" 2531:"Not for flames but for better understanding of the issues" 600: 2974:. Individual users have been notified on their talk pages. 2970:

A request for arbitration has been filed. It can be found

2753:

meaning of "neutral" or other key WP policies. Please see

1119:

AliceDeGrey edit summary "Scientific view will prevail."

2453:

At least one editor has called the results of their work

1976:; Ignoring offers and reversion of comprimses; violation 2953:. It's not your place to tell other editors what to do. 1986:- Removing dubious tags while still awaiting evidence, 1506:

Misrepresentation of Raso / Barrett / NCAHF: "bias, see

47:

This page is not for general discussion - for that, see

3380: 3368: 3323: 3311: 3266: 3254: 3187:

Here is Aaron's message to the group (dated 15th Dec):

3175: 3163: 3067: 3024: 3022: 3020: 3018: 3016: 3014: 3012: 3010: 2997: 2903: 2891: 2876: 2864: 2856: 2629: 2552: 2549: 2546: 2543: 2534: 2518: 2515: 2509: 2498: 2495: 2490: 2487: 2479: 2476: 2473: 2467: 2457: 2448: 2445: 2425:

Talk:Neuro-linguistic_programming/_archive5#Arbitration

2393: 2382: 2363: 2357: 2351: 2345: 2334: 2324: 2319: 2309: 2299: 2294: 2289: 2284: 2279: 2274: 2269: 2264: 2231: 2226: 2198: 2196: 2194: 2186: 2176: 2174: 2172: 2170: 2164: 2142: 2132: 2129: 2117: 2113: 2110: 2106: 2095: 2092: 2088: 2077: 2074: 2044: 2041: 2035: 2032: 2028: 2016: 2013: 2007: 2004: 2000: 1997: 1987: 1984: 1966: 1961: 1943: 1931: 1925: 1921: 1909: 1906: 1894: 1881: 1877: 1863: 1859: 1853: 1849: 1839: 1835: 1832: 1826: 1823: 1819: 1809: 1805: 1798: 1794: 1784: 1780: 1770: 1766: 1763: 1759: 1756: 1752: 1742: 1738: 1728: 1707: 1678: 1666: 1636: 1626: 1624: 1622: 1620: 1618: 1616: 1614: 1612: 1610: 1608: 1606: 1604: 1602: 1581: 1569: 1557: 1541: 1522: 1507: 1495: 1484: 1472: 1461: 1447: 1432: 1428: 1416: 1411: 1400: 1396: 1390: 1379: 1375: 1370: 1347: 1342: 1331: 1320: 1296: 1293: 1289: 1278: 1275: 1271: 1268: 1264: 1254: 1243: 1231: 1226: 1221: 1216: 1176: 1166: 1160: 1149: 1143: 1133: 1122: 1116: 1110: 1104: 1093: 1087: 1081: 1075: 1069: 1063: 1057: 1046: 1040: 1034: 1028: 1022: 1007: 1001: 995: 977: 966: 960: 945: 935: 924: 918: 891: 885: 879: 873: 867: 856: 850: 844: 838: 832: 826: 815: 800: 790: 784: 778: 767: 752: 746: 739: 733: 722: 716: 710: 704: 698: 692: 677: 662: 648: 636: 590: 578: 532: 520: 474: 462: 416: 404: 358: 346: 300: 288: 242: 230: 184: 172: 42: 1311:

Blind Reverts - Ownership of article (obsessive edits)

1218:- Comaze offers alernative disputes resolution options 2542:

I have given several warnings, as have other editors

2245:

I think EBlack is the original editor in this group;

1896:. Again, you intention is beyond my understanding. -- 2872:

Additionally, in terms of NPOV, how does this rate:

2286:- D.Right adds the Scientology/History of NLP again. 1450:

HeadleyDown (mopping up NLP zealot's fanatical spew)

1191:

If I have time I will clean up, and expand the notes

2910:

less "complete charletanary" as was in the article.

1078:Bookmain adds weasel words "attempt" and "claims" 3393:I will post the appropriate meatpuppet messages. 2348:- EBlack posts it again, offers minor comprimise. 992:practices." completely unsourced, unverifiable. 55:illustrate behavior which relates to the issues. 1330:"HeadleyDown, Please explain this blind revert, 1233:- Attempt to comprimse with energy / new age POV 682:"NLP is a pseudoscientific self help development 77:. Only Arbitrators may edit /Proposed decision. 2626:development proposed for programming the mind, 2419:Material from decision to request arbitration 2354:- Sunray reverts the Scientology-NLP history. 1825:- "Comaze, your denial borders on delusion". 1211:Comprimse and dispute resolution were offered 8: 1146:DaveRight "NLP is dubious" (violation NPOV) 940:"Dianetics and Landmark Forum is off topic." 736:HeadleyDown deletes valid reference to NLP. 2991:Evidence of fanatical harrassment by Comaze 2321:- Scientology-NLP History is removed again. 980:(FuelWagon) "quick fix or lay therapy, NLP 1238:Removal of dubious tags without discussion 3121:Just so we know who we are dealing with: 1652:; Ignores requests for dispute resolution 1125:FuelWagon rewrites POV statement to NPOV 1004:FuelWagon rewrites POV statement to NPOV 969:FuelWagon rewrites POV statement to NPOV 963:FuelWagon rewrites POV statement to NPOV 927:FuelWagon rewrites POV statement to NPOV 921:FuelWagon rewrites POV statement to NPOV 859:FuelWagon rewrites POV statement to NPOV 853:FuelWagon rewrites POV statement to NPOV 847:FuelWagon rewrites POV statement to NPOV 841:FuelWagon rewrites POV statement to NPOV 835:FuelWagon rewrites POV statement to NPOV 829:FuelWagon rewrites POV statement to NPOV 2622:Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is a 3191:From: Aaron Kulkis <akulkis@...: --> 2180:DaveRight removes the NPOV section tags 3215:According to the NLP article history, 3064:Knowledge talk:Harmonious editing club 2169:POV Editing DaveRight: 3 January 2006 1913:than happy to engage a third party. -- 2863:(my edit of 16:01, October 29, 2005) 2855:(my edit of 05:41, October 30, 2005) 2570:and possibly others (to be decided). 2296:- HeadleyDown adds the section again. 2193:POV Editing Camridge: 3 January 2006 1856:Camridge wrote this in a subheadline: 1460:"This recent reversion and series of 94:It is time to come up with something 7: 2925:. "Pseudoscience"? Or POV warriors? 2271:- Comaze reverts HeadleyDown's post 1442:HeadleyDown: impolite edit comments 3066:at 20:54, December 20, 2005 (UTC) 28: 18:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration 3124:It has come to my attention that 2305:...This continues for a while... 1802:Personal remark in edit comments: 1528:Scientology Bias Engram/Dianetics 112:There are two basic issues here: 3117:Suspected meatpuppets of Akulkis 2951:Knowledge:avoid personal remarks 2846:for what neutrality means, Dave. 2341:people to take it to talk page. 2276:- D.Right reverts to HeadleyDown 1954:Knowledge:avoid personal remarks 1718:Knowledge:avoid personal remarks 1514:03:54, 18 December 2005 (UTC) -- 2741:mediation has formally failed, 2242:anonymous FTP (located in UK). 2060:Knowledge:Neutral Point of View 1978:Knowledge:Ownership of articles 1956:in edits comments on talk page 1867:Personal attack, word "zealot" 1554:23:29, 21 September 2005 (UTC) 1538:10:20, 20 September 2005 (UTC) 1: 3422:05:30, 23 December 2005 (UTC) 3400:02:44, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 3112:07:23, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 3084:04:54, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 3034:07:05, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 3005:05:32, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 2980:10:07, 13 November 2005 (UTC) 2804:12:02, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 2414:03:45, 23 November 2005 (UTC) 2389:...this repeats some more... 2139:06:53, 10 December 2005 (UTC) 2119:also contain similar bias. -- 1918:10:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 1901:09:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 1888:05:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 1874:05:20, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 1846:06:08, 19 December 2005 (UTC) 1816:03:28, 10 December 2005 (UTC) 1704:10:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 1545:"What is your source for the 1519:03:37, 18 December 2005 (UTC) 1492:23:12, 19 December 2005 (UTC) 1469:16:07, 17 December 2005 (UTC) 1425:02:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 1408:04:50, 18 December 2005 (UTC) 1387:04:50, 18 December 2005 (UTC) 1367:07:33, 17 December 2005 (UTC) 1339:03:14, 17 December 2005 (UTC) 1304:09:30, 18 December 2005 (UTC) 1286:07:57, 18 December 2005 (UTC) 1198:10:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 99:15:15, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 2958:21:39, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 2944:14:25, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 2934:12:55, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 2837:11:25, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 2825:10:48, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 2809:12:04, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 2778:12:26, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 2773:No support. Just patience. 2765:10:19, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 2717:10:02, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 2672:05:20, 4 November 2005 (UTC) 2663:12:55, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 2644:11:42, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 2618:18:02, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 2607:10:35, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 2596:09:54, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 2585:07:55, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 2326:- HeadleyDown adds it again. 2124:05:20, 7 December 2005 (UTC) 2103:07:55, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 2085:04:24, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 1992:Knowledge:Disputed_statement 1791:04:10, 9 December 2005 (UTC) 1777:03:29, 9 December 2005 (UTC) 1749:09:47, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1735:03:57, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1688:03:57, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1675:06:34, 9 December 2005 (UTC) 1663:08:49, 2 December 2005 (UTC) 1501:Misrepresentation of sources 1261:11:46, 1 December 2005 (UTC) 22:Neuro-linguistic programming 2890:asked you to cite a source 2158:06:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 1940:06:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 1641:Personal Conduct Complaint 1587:Personal Conduct Complaint 1578:23:30, 8 October 2005 (UTC) 1566:11:33, 4 October 2005 (UTC) 1392:- Multiple personal attacks 1203:Personal Conduct Complaint 3443: 2429:In view of the fact that 2019:without proper discussion. 1173:and EST" (violation NPOV) 938:(FuelWagon) Edit summary: 2076:- "Camridge, your recent 2116:with DaveRight and here 2027:09:31, 20 December 2005" 1595:Personal Attacks/Remarks 1249:Personal remarks/attacks 663:06:58, 23 September 2005 3074:A sociopathic christmas 2447:and and possibly also 1448:09:17, 17 December 2005 1179:Mysekurity locks page. 1177:05:18, 17 November 2005 1167:02:33, 17 November 2005 1161:01:55, 17 November 2005 1150:03:35, 16 November 2005 1144:03:27, 16 November 2005 1134:01:23, 16 November 2005 1123:15:12, 15 November 2005 1117:06:35, 15 November 2005 1111:03:18, 15 November 2005 1105:03:09, 15 November 2005 1094:11:11, 14 November 2005 1088:11:37, 14 November 2005 1082:10:11, 14 November 2005 1076:10:04, 14 November 2005 1070:09:58, 14 November 2005 1064:03:05, 14 November 2005 1058:02:47, 14 November 2005 1047:03:52, 13 November 2005 1041:03:43, 13 November 2005 1035:03:18, 13 November 2005 1029:02:25, 13 November 2005 1023:02:10, 13 November 2005 1008:17:13, 12 November 2005 1002:17:02, 12 November 2005 996:16:20, 12 November 2005 978:16:16, 12 November 2005 967:02:24, 10 November 2005 961:02:23, 10 November 2005 3039:Evidence presented by 2949:Admin warning: Please 2401:Evidence presented by 1183:Evidence presented by 946:05:33, 7 November 2005 936:05:29, 7 November 2005 925:16:41, 5 November 2005 919:04:51, 5 November 2005 892:03:39, 3 November 2005 886:02:14, 3 November 2005 880:02:37, 3 November 2005 874:02:33, 3 November 2005 868:02:31, 3 November 2005 857:04:33, 2 November 2005 851:02:06, 2 November 2005 845:00:09, 2 November 2005 839:00:07, 2 November 2005 833:00:06, 2 November 2005 827:00:04, 2 November 2005 816:03:24, 1 November 2005 801:15:11, 31 October 2005 791:09:53, 31 October 2005 785:03:30, 31 October 2005 779:01:40, 31 October 2005 768:05:59, 29 October 2005 753:08:48, 28 October 2005 747:06:12, 28 October 2005 740:05:27, 28 October 2005 734:02:28, 28 October 2005 723:17:13, 27 October 2005 717:14:53, 27 October 2005 711:08:01, 27 October 2005 705:07:19, 27 October 2005 699:07:18, 27 October 2005 693:06:31, 27 October 2005 678:02:52, 25 October 2005 105:Evidence presented by 81:Evidence presented by 2842:See above comment to 2689:User:PatrickMerlevede 2466:. Example reversion: 2394:06:38, 23 August 2005 2383:13:54, 22 August 2005 2378:...another revert... 2358:08:04, 22 August 2005 2352:07:38, 22 August 2005 2346:07:18, 22 August 2005 2335:07:06, 22 August 2005 2884:User:VoiceOfAll(MTG) 2232:05:17, 1 August 2005 2227:05:15, 1 August 2005 2094:- "Your most recent 2062:; Biased edits with 2844:User:203.217.56.137 2652:user:203.217.56.137 2315:...time goes by... 1360:ad hominem argument 1352:Knowledge:ownership 60:in your own section 2737:ArbCom state that 1722:Knowledge:Civility 75:/Proposed decision 3414:your edit history 3062:) posted this to 3434: 3385: 3384: 3351:deleted contribs 3335: 3328: 3327: 3294:deleted contribs 3278: 3271: 3270: 3237:deleted contribs 3221: 3180: 3179: 3146:deleted contribs 3130: 3089:For background, 2624:pseudoscientific 2301:- Comaze reverts 2291:- Comaze Reverts 2281:- Comaze reverts 2238:practitioners). 2064:User:HeadleyDown 2006:- reversion of 1696: 1695: 1205:User:HeadleyDown 653: 652: 619:deleted contribs 603: 595: 594: 561:deleted contribs 545: 537: 536: 503:deleted contribs 487: 479: 478: 445:deleted contribs 429: 421: 420: 387:deleted contribs 371: 363: 362: 329:deleted contribs 313: 305: 304: 271:deleted contribs 255: 247: 246: 213:deleted contribs 197: 189: 188: 155:deleted contribs 139: 3442: 3441: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3409:My edit history 3336: 3331: 3330: 3279: 3274: 3273: 3222: 3217: 3216: 3131: 3126: 3125: 3119: 3044: 2993: 2802:203.186.238.214 2421: 2406: 2368:neuroscientists 2206: 2151: 2112:- "Your recent 2058:; violation of 1646: 1592: 1439:Personal attack 1356:personal remark 1208: 1188: 1158: 1131: 1102: 1055: 1020: 984:seduction, and 975: 958: 933: 916: 865: 824: 813: 776: 765: 731: 690: 675: 660: 604: 599: 598: 546: 541: 540: 488: 483: 482: 430: 425: 424: 372: 367: 366: 314: 309: 308: 256: 251: 250: 198: 193: 192: 140: 135: 134: 110: 86: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 3440: 3438: 3429: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3213: 3189: 3118: 3115: 3087: 3086: 3076: 3043: 3037: 2992: 2989: 2987: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2963: 2961: 2960: 2937: 2936: 2927: 2926: 2912: 2911: 2906: 2905: 2895: 2894: 2888:User:FuelWagon 2879: 2878: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2858: 2847: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2813: 2782: 2770: 2768: 2767: 2758: 2757: 2734: 2733: 2709: 2708: 2704: 2703: 2693: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2665: 2647: 2646: 2641:203.217.56.137 2632: 2609: 2598: 2587: 2559: 2558: 2554: 2540: 2536: 2527: 2524: 2521: 2511: 2506: 2500: 2492: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2478:and yet again 2459: 2451: 2442: 2420: 2417: 2405: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2387: 2386: 2376: 2375: 2361: 2355: 2349: 2339: 2338: 2330:...repeats... 2328: 2327: 2322: 2313: 2312: 2303: 2302: 2297: 2292: 2287: 2282: 2277: 2272: 2267: 2261: 2260: 2235: 2234: 2229: 2219: 2218: 2214: 2205: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2191: 2188: 2183: 2178: 2150: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2127: 2108: 2090: 2071: 2070: 2068:User:DaveRight 2051: 2049: 2048: 2039: 2030: 2020: 2011: 2002: 1995: 1990:(Violation of 1981: 1980: 1970: 1969: 1964: 1958: 1957: 1946: 1945: 1933: 1928: 1923: 1904: 1891: 1879: 1861: 1851: 1837: 1830: 1821: 1807: 1796: 1782: 1768: 1761: 1754: 1740: 1725: 1724: 1710: 1709: 1697: 1680: 1668: 1654: 1653: 1645: 1639: 1633: 1632: 1597: 1596: 1591: 1589:User:DaveRight 1585: 1584: 1583: 1571: 1559: 1543: 1530: 1529: 1525: 1524: 1503: 1502: 1498: 1497: 1480: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1457: 1456: 1452: 1451: 1444: 1443: 1440: 1436: 1435: 1430: 1413: 1393: 1372: 1344: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1312: 1308: 1307: 1291: 1273: 1266: 1251: 1250: 1246: 1245: 1240: 1239: 1235: 1234: 1229: 1224: 1219: 1213: 1212: 1207: 1201: 1187: 1181: 1157: 1154: 1130: 1127: 1101: 1098: 1054: 1051: 1019: 1016: 974: 971: 957: 954: 932: 929: 915: 912: 864: 861: 823: 820: 812: 809: 775: 772: 764: 761: 730: 727: 689: 686: 674: 671: 659: 656: 655: 654: 596: 538: 480: 422: 364: 306: 248: 190: 109: 107:User:FuelWagon 103: 102: 101: 85: 79: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3439: 3430: 3423: 3420: 3415: 3410: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3398: 3394: 3391: 3387: 3382: 3379: 3376: 3373: 3370: 3367: 3364: 3361: 3358: 3357:nuke contribs 3355: 3352: 3349: 3346: 3343: 3340: 3334: 3325: 3322: 3319: 3316: 3313: 3310: 3307: 3304: 3301: 3300:nuke contribs 3298: 3295: 3292: 3289: 3286: 3283: 3277: 3268: 3265: 3262: 3259: 3256: 3253: 3250: 3247: 3244: 3243:nuke contribs 3241: 3238: 3235: 3232: 3229: 3226: 3220: 3212: 3209: 3206: 3203: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3188: 3185: 3182: 3177: 3174: 3171: 3168: 3165: 3162: 3159: 3156: 3153: 3152:nuke contribs 3150: 3147: 3144: 3141: 3138: 3135: 3129: 3122: 3116: 3114: 3113: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3099: 3096: 3092: 3085: 3082: 3077: 3075: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3068: 3065: 3061: 3058: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3042: 3038: 3036: 3035: 3032: 3026: 3025: 3023: 3021: 3019: 3017: 3015: 3013: 3011: 3007: 3006: 3003: 2998: 2990: 2988: 2981: 2978: 2975: 2973: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2959: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2942: 2935: 2932: 2929: 2928: 2924: 2921: 2917: 2914: 2913: 2908: 2907: 2904: 2901: 2897: 2896: 2892: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2880: 2877: 2875: 2871: 2870: 2865: 2862: 2859: 2857: 2854: 2851: 2850: 2848: 2845: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2835: 2826: 2823: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2811: 2810: 2807: 2803: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2780: 2779: 2776: 2771: 2766: 2763: 2760: 2759: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2735: 2731: 2726: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2715: 2706: 2705: 2700: 2697: 2694: 2690: 2687: 2684: 2683: 2678: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2670: 2666: 2664: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2648: 2645: 2642: 2639: 2636: 2633: 2630: 2627: 2625: 2619: 2616: 2613: 2610: 2608: 2605: 2602: 2599: 2597: 2594: 2591: 2588: 2586: 2583: 2580: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2571: 2569: 2565: 2555: 2553: 2550: 2547: 2544: 2541: 2537: 2535: 2532: 2528: 2525: 2522: 2519: 2516: 2512: 2510: 2507: 2505: 2501: 2499: 2496: 2493: 2491: 2488: 2485: 2480: 2477: 2475:, then again 2474: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2465: 2460: 2458: 2456: 2452: 2449: 2446: 2443: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2427: 2426: 2418: 2416: 2415: 2412: 2404: 2400: 2395: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2384: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2362: 2359: 2356: 2353: 2350: 2347: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2336: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2325: 2323: 2320: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2310: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2300: 2298: 2295: 2293: 2290: 2288: 2285: 2283: 2280: 2278: 2275: 2273: 2270: 2268: 2265: 2263: 2262: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254:Contributions 2252: 2248: 2243: 2239: 2233: 2230: 2228: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2217:] HeadleyDown 2216: 2215: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2203: 2199: 2197: 2195: 2192: 2189: 2187: 2184: 2181: 2179: 2177: 2175: 2173: 2171: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2163: 2159: 2156: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2137: 2133: 2130: 2128: 2125: 2122: 2118: 2115: 2111: 2109: 2107: 2104: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2091: 2089: 2086: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2073: 2072: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2056:User:Camridge 2054: 2053: 2052: 2046: 2042: 2040: 2037: 2033: 2031: 2029: 2026: 2021: 2018: 2014: 2012: 2009: 2005: 2003: 2001: 1998: 1996: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1983: 1982: 1979: 1975: 1974:User:Camridge 1972: 1971: 1967: 1965: 1962: 1960: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1950:User:Camridge 1948: 1947: 1944: 1941: 1938: 1934: 1932: 1929: 1926: 1924: 1922: 1919: 1916: 1911: 1907: 1905: 1902: 1899: 1895: 1892: 1889: 1886: 1882: 1880: 1878: 1875: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1862: 1860: 1857: 1854: 1852: 1850: 1847: 1844: 1840: 1838: 1836: 1833: 1831: 1828: 1824: 1822: 1820: 1817: 1814: 1810: 1808: 1806: 1803: 1799: 1797: 1795: 1792: 1789: 1785: 1783: 1781: 1778: 1775: 1771: 1769: 1767: 1764: 1762: 1760: 1757: 1755: 1753: 1750: 1747: 1743: 1741: 1739: 1736: 1733: 1729: 1727: 1726: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1714:User:Camridge 1712: 1711: 1708: 1705: 1702: 1698: 1693: 1689: 1686: 1681: 1679: 1676: 1673: 1669: 1667: 1664: 1661: 1656: 1655: 1651: 1650:User:Camridge 1648: 1647: 1644: 1643:User:Camridge 1640: 1638: 1637: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1625: 1623: 1621: 1619: 1617: 1615: 1613: 1611: 1609: 1607: 1605: 1603: 1601: 1594: 1593: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1579: 1576: 1572: 1570: 1567: 1564: 1560: 1558: 1555: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1542: 1539: 1536: 1532: 1531: 1527: 1526: 1523: 1520: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1504: 1500: 1499: 1496: 1493: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1481: 1477: 1476: 1473: 1470: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1458: 1454: 1453: 1449: 1446: 1445: 1441: 1438: 1437: 1433: 1431: 1429: 1426: 1423: 1418: 1414: 1412: 1409: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1391: 1388: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1371: 1368: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1343: 1340: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1328: 1321: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1310: 1309: 1305: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1292: 1290: 1287: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1274: 1272: 1269: 1267: 1265: 1262: 1259: 1255: 1253: 1252: 1248: 1247: 1244: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1232: 1230: 1227: 1225: 1222: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1214: 1210: 1209: 1206: 1202: 1200: 1199: 1196: 1192: 1186: 1182: 1180: 1178: 1174: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1162: 1155: 1153: 1151: 1147: 1145: 1141: 1139: 1135: 1128: 1126: 1124: 1120: 1118: 1114: 1112: 1108: 1106: 1099: 1097: 1095: 1091: 1089: 1085: 1083: 1079: 1077: 1073: 1071: 1067: 1065: 1061: 1059: 1052: 1050: 1048: 1044: 1042: 1038: 1036: 1032: 1030: 1026: 1024: 1017: 1015: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1003: 999: 997: 993: 991: 987: 983: 979: 972: 970: 968: 964: 962: 955: 953: 951: 947: 943: 941: 937: 930: 928: 926: 922: 920: 913: 911: 909: 907: 901: 899: 898:pseudoscience 893: 889: 887: 883: 881: 877: 875: 871: 869: 862: 860: 858: 854: 852: 848: 846: 842: 840: 836: 834: 830: 828: 821: 819: 817: 810: 808: 806: 802: 798: 796: 792: 788: 786: 782: 780: 773: 771: 769: 762: 760: 758: 754: 750: 748: 744: 741: 737: 735: 728: 726: 724: 720: 718: 714: 712: 708: 706: 702: 700: 696: 694: 687: 685: 683: 679: 672: 670: 668: 664: 657: 650: 647: 644: 641: 638: 635: 632: 629: 626: 625:nuke contribs 623: 620: 617: 614: 611: 608: 602: 597: 592: 589: 586: 583: 580: 577: 574: 571: 568: 567:nuke contribs 565: 562: 559: 556: 553: 550: 544: 539: 534: 531: 528: 525: 522: 519: 516: 513: 510: 509:nuke contribs 507: 504: 501: 498: 495: 492: 486: 481: 476: 473: 470: 467: 464: 461: 458: 455: 452: 451:nuke contribs 449: 446: 443: 440: 437: 434: 428: 423: 418: 415: 412: 409: 406: 403: 400: 397: 394: 393:nuke contribs 391: 388: 385: 382: 379: 376: 370: 365: 360: 357: 354: 351: 348: 345: 342: 339: 336: 335:nuke contribs 333: 330: 327: 324: 321: 318: 312: 307: 302: 299: 296: 293: 290: 287: 284: 281: 278: 277:nuke contribs 275: 272: 269: 266: 263: 260: 254: 249: 244: 241: 238: 235: 232: 229: 226: 223: 220: 219:nuke contribs 217: 214: 211: 208: 205: 202: 196: 191: 186: 183: 180: 177: 174: 171: 168: 165: 162: 161:nuke contribs 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 138: 133: 132: 131: 127: 123: 119: 116: 113: 108: 104: 100: 97: 93: 92: 91: 90: 84: 80: 78: 76: 72: 67: 63: 61: 56: 52: 50: 45: 43: 38: 36: 31: 23: 19: 3428: 3419:Metta Bubble 3395: 3392: 3388: 3377: 3371: 3365: 3359: 3353: 3347: 3341: 3320: 3314: 3308: 3302: 3296: 3290: 3284: 3263: 3257: 3251: 3245: 3239: 3233: 3227: 3219:Metta_Bubble 3214: 3210: 3207: 3204: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3183: 3172: 3166: 3160: 3154: 3148: 3142: 3136: 3123: 3120: 3097: 3088: 3073: 3056: 3048: 3045: 3027: 3008: 2994: 2986: 2969: 2962: 2938: 2899: 2873: 2860: 2852: 2831: 2812: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2781: 2772: 2769: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2729: 2724: 2710: 2695: 2685: 2676: 2634: 2621: 2611: 2600: 2589: 2578: 2572: 2560: 2530: 2504: 2464:weasel words 2454: 2428: 2422: 2407: 2388: 2377: 2340: 2329: 2314: 2304: 2246: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2220: 2207: 2161: 2152: 2050: 1952:; violation 1866: 1855: 1801: 1716:; violation 1691: 1634: 1599: 1598: 1455:Biased Edits 1190: 1189: 1175: 1165: 1159: 1148: 1142: 1137: 1136:HeadleyDown 1132: 1121: 1115: 1109: 1103: 1092: 1086: 1080: 1074: 1068: 1062: 1056: 1045: 1039: 1033: 1027: 1021: 1006: 1000: 994: 976: 965: 959: 950:Christianity 944: 939: 934: 923: 917: 903: 895: 890: 884: 878: 872: 866: 855: 849: 843: 837: 831: 825: 814: 799: 789: 783: 777: 766: 751: 745: 738: 732: 721: 715: 709: 703: 697: 691: 681: 676: 666: 661: 658:23 September 645: 639: 633: 627: 621: 615: 609: 587: 581: 575: 569: 563: 557: 551: 529: 523: 517: 511: 505: 499: 493: 471: 465: 459: 453: 447: 441: 435: 413: 407: 401: 395: 389: 383: 377: 355: 349: 343: 337: 331: 325: 319: 297: 291: 285: 279: 273: 267: 261: 239: 233: 227: 221: 215: 209: 203: 181: 175: 169: 163: 157: 151: 145: 128: 124: 120: 117: 114: 111: 88: 87: 68: 64: 59: 57: 53: 46: 41:this form: 39: 34: 32: 29: 2941:HeadleyDown 2806:HeadleyDown 2775:HeadleyDown 2751:wikipedia's 2714:AliceDeGrey 2656:sock puppet 2650:I'm sorry, 2564:HeadleyDown 2435:HeadleyDown 1910:recent edit 1258:HeadleyDown 1156:17 November 1129:16 November 1100:15 November 1053:14 November 1018:13 November 973:12 November 956:10 November 902:as well as 369:AliceDeGrey 137:HeadleyDown 96:Fred Bauder 3375:block user 3369:filter log 3318:block user 3312:filter log 3261:block user 3255:filter log 3170:block user 3164:filter log 2213:] - Eblack 2008:comprimise 931:7 November 914:5 November 863:3 November 822:2 November 811:1 November 774:31 October 763:29 October 729:28 October 688:27 October 673:25 October 643:block user 637:filter log 585:block user 579:filter log 527:block user 521:filter log 469:block user 463:filter log 411:block user 405:filter log 353:block user 347:filter log 295:block user 289:filter log 237:block user 231:filter log 179:block user 173:filter log 35:be concise 3381:block log 3333:Blauregen 3324:block log 3276:DejaKitty 3267:block log 3176:block log 3105:Saxifrage 3081:DaveRight 3050:DaveRight 3041:Saxifrage 2919:long ago 2822:DaveRight 2615:FuelWagon 2411:DaveRight 2403:DaveRight 2372:linguists 2045:see diffs 1827:see diffs 1694:Media13 ( 1478:Vandalism 1417:reversion 1171:Dianetics 906:Dianetics 649:block log 591:block log 543:HansAntel 533:block log 475:block log 417:block log 359:block log 301:block log 253:DaveRight 243:block log 185:block log 71:/Workshop 49:talk page 3397:Bookmain 3345:contribs 3288:contribs 3231:contribs 3140:contribs 3101:contribs 3060:contribs 3031:Camridge 3002:Camridge 2955:Uncle Ed 2730:de facto 2707:Comments 2155:Camridge 2025:Camridge 2017:reverted 1937:Camridge 1908:- "Your 1885:Camridge 1871:Camridge 1843:Camridge 1813:Camridge 1788:Camridge 1774:Camridge 1746:Camridge 1732:Camridge 1685:Camridge 908:and EST" 613:contribs 555:contribs 497:contribs 485:AMaulden 439:contribs 427:Bookmain 381:contribs 323:contribs 265:contribs 207:contribs 149:contribs 83:User:FT2 20:‎ | 3128:Akulkis 3029:person. 2696:Support 2686:Support 2635:Support 2612:Support 2601:Support 2590:Support 2579:Support 2568:JPLogan 2439:JPLogan 1547:engrams 986:psychic 311:D.Right 195:JPLogan 3329:, and 3211:Aaron 3202:\ ams 3091:Comaze 2755:WP:Arb 2739:either 2699:Justin 2593:Comaze 2433:Users 2251:EBlack 2247:EBlack 2136:Comaze 2121:Comaze 2100:Comaze 2082:Comaze 1915:Comaze 1898:Comaze 1701:Comaze 1672:Comaze 1660:Comaze 1575:Comaze 1563:Comaze 1551:Comaze 1535:Comaze 1516:Comaze 1512:Comaze 1489:Comaze 1466:Comaze 1422:Comaze 1405:Comaze 1384:Comaze 1364:Comaze 1336:Comaze 1301:Comaze 1283:Comaze 1195:Comaze 1185:Comaze 1012:occult 990:occult 982:trance 2669:GregA 2638:GregA 2539:that. 2423:From 2143:diffs 2114:edits 2096:edits 2078:edits 2036:diffs 1988:diffs 1692:NOTE: 1508:diffs 1462:edits 1348:diffs 1332:diffs 1297:diffs 1279:diffs 1138:again 601:JaseC 16:< 3363:logs 3339:talk 3306:logs 3282:talk 3249:logs 3225:talk 3158:logs 3134:talk 3095:talk 3054:talk 2972:here 2886:and 2834:Lee1 2747:will 2604:Lee1 2551:and 2548:and 2497:and 2489:and 2437:and 2370:and 1720:and 1485:edit 1401:here 1399:and 1397:here 1380:here 1378:and 1376:here 1362:. -- 631:logs 607:talk 573:logs 549:talk 515:logs 491:talk 457:logs 433:talk 399:logs 375:talk 341:logs 317:talk 283:logs 259:talk 225:logs 201:talk 167:logs 143:talk 2977:FT2 2931:FT2 2762:FT2 2725:not 2660:FT2 2582:FT2 988:or 805:ESP 795:ESP 757:ESP 51:. 3272:, 3107:| 2743:or 2566:, 2160:" 2141:" 2134:-- 1994:). 1865:- 1800:- 1690:" 1677:" 1658:-- 1420:-- 1193:-- 900:." 44:. 3383:) 3378:· 3372:· 3366:· 3360:· 3354:· 3348:· 3342:· 3337:( 3326:) 3321:· 3315:· 3309:· 3303:· 3297:· 3291:· 3285:· 3280:( 3269:) 3264:· 3258:· 3252:· 3246:· 3240:· 3234:· 3228:· 3223:( 3178:) 3173:· 3167:· 3161:· 3155:· 3149:· 3143:· 3137:· 3132:( 3109:☎ 3098:· 3093:( 3057:· 3052:( 2249:- 2182:] 2126:" 2105:" 2087:" 2066:/ 2047:. 1942:" 1920:" 1903:" 1890:" 1876:" 1848:" 1829:. 1818:" 1793:" 1779:" 1751:" 1737:" 1706:" 1665:" 1580:" 1568:" 1556:" 1540:" 1521:" 1494:" 1471:" 1427:" 1410:" 1389:" 1369:" 1341:" 1306:" 1288:" 1263:" 651:) 646:· 640:· 634:· 628:· 622:· 616:· 610:· 605:( 593:) 588:· 582:· 576:· 570:· 564:· 558:· 552:· 547:( 535:) 530:· 524:· 518:· 512:· 506:· 500:· 494:· 489:( 477:) 472:· 466:· 460:· 454:· 448:· 442:· 436:· 431:( 419:) 414:· 408:· 402:· 396:· 390:· 384:· 378:· 373:( 361:) 356:· 350:· 344:· 338:· 332:· 326:· 320:· 315:( 303:) 298:· 292:· 286:· 280:· 274:· 268:· 262:· 257:( 245:) 240:· 234:· 228:· 222:· 216:· 210:· 204:· 199:( 187:) 182:· 176:· 170:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming/Evidence - Knowledge

Index