3052:, a police drama on Channel 5. He one scary dude, if I saw him in my neighborhood I'd run the other way. Calcarone is recurrng character on the show, and the first-season episodes with him in them showed ratings higher than those of other episodes. The fictional character of Calcarone is played by the very sexy actor Roberto Mazzetti, who was cast in the rôle after the shows creator saw him in a New York pizza stand. According to the back story of the show, Calcarone went to college and at first did not want to join the family business, haven't we all been there? The second season story arc has him rethinking his decision to join the family business. The show's writers have remained silent on third season developments for the character. Mazzetti told reporters that he looks forward to returning to the show next season.
141:(cleanup-grammar)." The problem with edit summaries is that after the tag is placed there could be a lot of edits to the article which don't address the concerns stated in the tag, making it hard to find the reason. By including the explanation on the talk page with a suitable heading, it becomes easier for others to find an explanation for the tag. Putting the reason in an HTML comment next to the tag is another available option, but it doesn't hurt to duplicate this on the talk page. In any case, it is quite possible for the tag to remain on the page for some time. If you would hope that the person trying to clean up the tag would contact you then it is easier to find you if you leave a message on the talk page than to have to trawl through the history to determine who you are.
1837:, a police drama on NBC the content of which is entirely fictional. Calcarone is recurring fictional character on the show, and the first-season episodes with him in them showed ratings higher than those of other episodes. The fictional character of Calcarone is played by the actor Roberto Mazzetti, who was cast in the rôle after the show's creator saw him in a New York pizza stand. According to the back story of the show, Calcarone went to college and at first did not want to join the family business. The second season story arc for the fictional character has him rethinking his decision to join the family business. The show's writers have remained silent on third season developments for the fictional character. Did we forget to mention that Joe Calcarone is fictional?
494:
the article. So, given that the current wording of the tag is quite vague, it is necessary to provide more guidance as to what the problem is. In this example, then, one might say in the talk page something like "The spelling of the paragraph beginning "in 1953, a plaq was fuond..." is completely atrocious. The grammar seems to be OK, but the misspellings could be obscuring the grammatical problems." Or if an article's problem is grammar, and not spelling, then the talk page should say so. For example: "The final paragraph is one long run-on sentence. A few periods would help, and maybe we could even break that paragraph up into smaller paragraphs." This will allow a native
English speaker to be bold and improve the article even if it is outside their area of expertise.
1593:; that article is categorized under Cyclotomic fields, Algebraic numbers, and Lattice points. So you're not sure if any of these categories apply to our example article, that's OK. By now you should have some idea that all this has something to do with math. In fact, the first line of our example says "In mathematics"! You should go ahead and put in "]". This might be too general, and there is certainly a more precise category. But an overly broad category is much more helpful than some vague tag, because the overly broad category increases the chances that someone with knowledge of the broad topic will be able to categorize the article in a narrower category. With the uncategorized tag, it could be days before a more experienced Wikipedian categorizes it.
2011:, a police drama on NBC. Calcarone is recurring character on the show, and the first-season episodes with him in them showed ratings higher than those of other episodes. The fictional character of Calcarone is played by the very sexy actor Roberto Mazzetti, who was cast in the rôle after the show's creator saw him in a New York pizza stand. According to the back story of the show, Calcarone went to college and at first did not want to join the family business. The second season story arc has him rethinking his decision to join the family business. The show's writers have remained silent on third season developments for the character. Mazzetti told reporters that he looks forward to returning to the show next season.
3138:
slammer, by contrast, does not read a page before applying tags and they certainly do not read what the many tags say. Some tag slammers need only very slim justification for the tags they choose so that others will, in seeing that the tag holds some amount of merit, will not remove it. Other tag slammers merely slam every tag they can think of. Tag slammers are somewhat easier to deal with than timed mass harassers. Even if there have been legitimate edits by others besides the tag slammer since the large groups of tags was slammed on, removing the slammed tags is fairly easy because most tag slammers like to slam the tags at the very top of the page.
2062:
fan sites are filled with several different (but very similar) pictures of a particular character but hardly have any words of praise. Some fan sites with lots of text have a lot of misspelled words. A person with good intentions might only read the boldfaced part of the tag, and, satisfied that the article in question fits their own particular stereotype of what a fan site is, does not bother to explain it. Someone else comes along, and the article does not fit their stereotype, so they remove the tag and whatever problem the person with good intentions thought the article had could very well be lost to obscurity.
669:
2333:
1699:
2916:
1619:
1087:
920:
2557:
2510:
2219:
2157:
2116:
1954:
1865:
1783:
2654:
1222:
519:
894:
links). But it would be very helpful to others for you to leave on the talk page one example from the article where you don't think the link is terribly helpful or relevant. For this example, you might say something like "I don't think the links to either long or thin are all that helpful, there are probably other links in this article we could do without."
118:
a shrill color, until someone comes along who has both the time, inclination and domain expertise to carefully edit the article and solve its most pressing problem. For example, if an article relies heavily on unreliable sources, then readers need to be alerted to that fact, until an editor can introduce more reliable sources, such as academic journals.
2971:
2869:
2815:
2757:
2701:
2396:
779:
288:
208:
31:
2455:
2278:
412:
87:
636:
Zhang-Glüffliger primes (not to mention 19, 23, 29, ... 59). Also, the article doesn't say what the Zhang-Glüffliger inequality is; presumably the journals cited can provide the answer. These are the kinds of issues a responsible tagger would raise on the talk page of an article they've tagged as incomplete.
2069:
In our example, the tagger had good intentions. Prompted by the words "very sexy actor" they put on the fan site tag. The tagger was actually not bothered by the list of episodes
Calcarone has appeared in (and the tag now says something about "lists"). So the tagger would have saved everyone a lot of
1761:
Some topics just don't span the whole world. However, in some cases, the persons editing a particular article have focused entirely on one small corner of the globe to the exclusion of other parts of the world where the topic also applies. In such a case, one ought to leave on the talk page a list of
1185:
is a surgical operation in which a long, thin tube is inserted into the bronchial aperture and a reading is taken. Since 2002, bronchial entuberances are preferred for patients with kidney conditions. Bronchial contuberances have a 53% chance of success in patients with no other respiratory ailments,
117:
We have to admit that many
Knowledge (XXG) articles have serious problems which require painstakingly careful and time-consuming editing to fix, and which render their content quite unreliable even for the most error-tolerant applications. It is necessary to clearly tag such articles, preferably with
3072:
Not all tags mean that there is something wrong with a page, just some important difference readers need to be aware of. Even though these tags don't indicate a problem and their misapplication probably wouldn't cause edit wars, one is still responsible for choosing the most specific tag applicable
2099:
For those cases there is the multiple issues tag, an umbrella tag under which several different tags can be brought together under one box. Theoretically, this tag should be used when an article has two or more different issues, but technically it can be used when an article has only one or even no
1061:
But let me be clear on one important point: while placing an unreferenced tag does not obligate you to find references for the article, it does obligate you to make an effort to point people in the right direction. You must think that references can be found for the article in question, even though
893:
Not every case of overlinking will be clear. When every word is a link the problem is obvious. If you tag an article as "overlinked", no one expects you to actually review each link (as you probably don't have the time to do so, and if you did it would just be easier for you to cut down some of the
753:
The rewrite tag is frustratingly vague. Its canned text does not point to a specific problem (unlike copy edit tags like the grammar and spelling tags). The canned text also says that the Talk page "may contain suggestions." It had better, or probably no one else will know why you tagged it. In our
635:
In the example, you don't have to be a mathematician to be able to tell that the article states there are just six Zhang-Glüffliger yet only lists four: 2, 3, 17, 61. No reason is given as to why the fifth and sixth Zhang-Glüffliger are not listed, nor can we even be sure that none of 7, 11, 13 are
2065:
So before placing this tag, ask yourself: Is there a better, more specific tag? Or is there something I could do right now to fix the problem which would only take me a couple of minutes? If the article has way too many pictures that convey very little addition information about the topic, why not
2061:
Even good people with good intentions sometimes use this tag. But the problem is that there is great diversity to fan sites, and likewise there is great diversity to the stereotypes about fan sites. Some fan sites are filled with "irrelevant praise" but have very little data, trivial or not. Other
493:
In a few rare cases, it will be clear that the entire article is filled with misspellings and grammatical mistakes. But it will happen more often on
Knowledge (XXG), where many editors are not native English speakers, that the two or three offending paragraphs are buried somewhere in the middle of
472:
in 1953, a plaq was found in
Hawaiii wit teh inscription "j. reedparrot here lies, but alas, wihtout his tresure!" this has led historiands to speclate that reedparot went to hawai to dei, andnot California as msot biograhpers wrote. furtermore, and withuot belaboring the point, it appears in 1960
166:
The person who placed this tag isn't completely wrong, but failed to notice that a citation is in fact given. Granted, it needs formatting (such as italics for the journal title), and a concluding page number, if available, but the citation needed tag is incorrect. A "refimprove" tag at the top of
148:
This essay is not about current events tags nor future tags, nor is it about deletion tags. The
Articles for Deletion tag directs people to a separate page to ponder the reasons, while the proposed deletion tag requires a reason to be given within the tag itself. This essay will give fictionalized
113:
sees a problem with a
Knowledge (XXG) article, they clearly label the problem with the appropriate tag. As needed they then leave information clarifying what should be done on the talk page. The outcome is a communication protocol that minimizes the use of reviewer's valuable time while maximizing
3096:
When an event is in progress, there might be some lag in reporting what is going on, so readers need to be aware that more complete information could surface in the very near future. Note that not all types of events having future tags have current tags, especially events that don't last for very
3084:
Most predicted or scheduled events usually happen, though rarely exactly as forecast or planned. Examples include: solar eclipses, hurricanes, parliamentary elections, championship games. Readers need to be aware who predicted or planned the event and that the information in the article will most
256:
This is of course a fictional example, so we're assuming that there really is such a surgical procedure. What's wrong with the article? There are no misspellings, no informal language, no off-topic digressions. The general clean up tag provides both a link to the talk page and a link to a list of
1026:
is a surgical operation which replaces bronchial contuberancesor patients with kidney conditions. Bronchial contuberances have a 53% chance of success in patients with no other respiratory ailments, and is not at all recommended for patients with low blood calcium, as in indicated in Dr. Brown's
144:
Another important thing about the explanation: it needs to show to others that you actually read the specific article and you honestly believe it has the deficiency indicated by the tag, it shows that you're not just tagging on a whim. It also shows you did not just copy and paste from a similar
3063:
The tags discussed above should be used if the tagger believes the article could actually be improved if the deficiencies listed were addressed. But if the tagger honestly believes the article can't be improved at all and doesn't even belong in
Knowledge (XXG), then it is better to nominate the
3137:
A responsible tagger would read each page before applying any tags, and then leave on the talk page a message that shows that they indeed read the page, honestly believe it applies, and are not acting under a whim or worse, in a sinister plot to wear down those who disagree with them. The tag
2078:
Tags should be placed at the top of the section to which they apply. Tags that apply to an entire article may be placed at either the top or the bottom of the article (uncategorised is normally at the end, where the categories would be). But if a tag applies to more than one, but not all, the
3122:
With this technique, an irresponsible tagger waits for a time recent change patrollers are unlikely to be logged on to bombard several dozen pages pertaining to a particular topic with the same tag. That way, when the recent change patrollers get around to it, they might perhaps give up in
2057:
Another vague tag. This tag is typically slammed on with in-universe and original research tags, and for the tag slammer it is enough to see that the article is long to not bother checking whether the article really does contain "excessive trivia and irrelevant praise, criticism, lists and
140:
In some cases, the explanation might be short enough to fit on an edit summary. Writing brief but complete edit summaries is always encouraged. However, it's still a good idea to include it on the talk page, preferably with a heading saying something like "Reason for grammar clean up tag
1843:
The tagger refuses to explain the tag on the talk page, and the other contributors are tripping over themselves to point out that Joe
Calcarone is fictional so that no one could possibly miss this fact. What would it take to satisfy the tagger? The other contributors have no idea.
754:
fictional example, the tagger put only the rewrite tag and no others, and the article had no other tags whatsoever. If someone removes a rewrite tag you place, you'd be very well advised to look for a more specific tag, instead of simply slapping the vague rewrite tag back on.
3175:
A domain expert may know so much more than the average reader that they may create an article that is simply unintelligible to the average reader. By stating the source of confusion it is possible to elicit from the domain expert an article that is more useful to general
3089:
to find the template that is best suited for the future event article at hand. Once it is verified that the event is actually happening, or happened, the future tag should be removed. Tags for future events have been deprecated. They could be restored in the future.
1585:
installed, and for them it usually just as quick to add at least a high level category as it is to tag an article as uncategorised. Ideally this tag should only be used by inexperienced editors, or when you don't have the foggiest idea what the article is about.
1057:
format: you must have determined that there are zero citations in any format. If you don't actually have the time to read the article to make sure it really has no references, consider using a less severe references needed tag, or better yet, leaving it alone.
757:
Before placing a rewrite tag, please look long and hard for a more suitable tag. If you honestly can't find one, then follow the canned text's link to the Talk page and leave a concise but detailed message explaining what in the article needs to be rewritten.
497:
Even if the entire article is misspelled, it will be very useful to say it on the Talk page, since it will allow the next editor to inform the others of something like "I cleaned up the first two paragraphs but didn't have time to go through the rest of it."
1571:
1762:
places one thinks the topic might also apply (or if it's worldwide, say so). In our example, the writer seems to have limited themself to a Polish enclave in New York, ignoring the
Eastern European country where these pastries were probably invented.
2095:
things wrong with it. The problem with putting an individual tag for each of these problems is that the lead line of the article is pushed way down (and perhaps off) the screen, and then it looks like tag bombing even if that wasn't the intention.
1192:
It would of course be silly to place an "unreferenced" tag on this page. The talk page ought to give some kind of idea as to what additional references would be helpful. For example, "It would be nice to use references from journals other than the
572:
satisfying the Zhang-Glüffliger inequality. There are only six Zhang-Glüffliger primes, meaning that the set of Zhang-Glüffliger primes is finite. 2 is the only even Zhang-Glüffliger prime, while 3 and 17 are the Zhang-Glüffliger primes to also be
129:. In fact, the identification and labeling step is often botched, resulting at best in a long delay until the problem is fixed, and at worst in an edit war in which several people revert the tagger, who refuses to explain the reason for the tag.
152:
A quick word about inline tags: inline tags such as the "citation needed" tags provide more context for future editors, but even these tags can create some of the issues associated with maintenance tags. Take this fictionalized example:
3105:
There are no permanent tags for articles, but there are permanent tags for talk pages, project pages, category listings, etc. The essay tag at the top of this article is one example of a tag that should stay on the page permanently.
1062:
you don't have the time to dig them up yourself right now. In the example, you might suggest "Try medical journals for surgeons." If you honestly think no one will be able to find any references to support this, then nominate the
159:
In the third issue of 1998 of the Canadian Quarterly Journal of Integer Sequences, starting on page 347, Helmutz showed that the Schmuckelberg theorem can be extended to complex integers only if the Riemann hypothesis is true.
126:
1754:
is a pastry usually eaten on the 3rd Monday after Lent, generally filled with strawberry jelly. You can buy some from Mikolaj's on the way to LaGuardia, though the A & P supermarkets make decent zdroplaksczies. ...
257:
more specific clean up tags. If you don't have the time to look at the more specific clean up tags, at least take a minute to write a few lines in the talk page as to what kind of clean up you think is necessary.
249:
is a surgical operation in which a long, thin tube is inserted into the bronchial aperture and a reading is taken. Since 2002, bronchial entuberances are preferred for patients with kidney conditions. ...
746:
are the foundation of a planetary measurement institute and the explanation of the principle of the retrograde. He is credited with designing innovative astrolabes, including one that bears his name. ...
631:
For the sake of keeping the example short, we have used a stub. In practice, it might be better to reserve the use of this tag for articles too long to be considered stubs yet still somehow incomplete.
136:
If you are going to put a tag on an article that proclaims it as seriously faulty, you should leave an explanation on the talk page of that article, even though the reasons seem plainly obvious to you.
260:
This tag used to have a link to help users find more specific clean up messages. For some reason, this has been removed, making it harder for responsible taggers to find the appropriate specific tag.
1672:
reforms infieffment laws in the state and brings them into line with federal infieffment laws in the U. S. Code. Infieffment laws in the state have been in effect since colonial times. ...
648:
which provide a more specific location of the issue and specifies what needs fixing in the main body of the article. This type of tag is self documenting and will get a result even faster.
2100:
issues. However, just because this tag takes up less space than several individual tags doesn't mean one shouldn't carefully select the tags that would be most helpful to other editors.
3166:
This stems from an information asymmetry between experienced editors who lack fact but can identify problems, and domain experts who know the material but are uninformed about editing.
99:
add the most relevant and specific tags, and leave an explanation on the talk page so that others can understand what the problem was and determine if they can do anything to fix it.
2930:
1678:
The talk page should explain, to those unfamiliar with any of the sides in the argument, what the sides are and try to point to some neutral language that all sides might agree on.
1459:
613:
180:, Smith writes that Taft independently came up with the Schmuckelberg theorem the same year as Schmuckelberg did. Everyone agrees the Schmuckelberg does not hold under closure.
362:
tag lacks any context and so only creates new confusion. If you're going to put this tag on a talk page, you should try to explain what was it that you found so confusing:
2241:
2229:
1805:
1793:
2343:
1709:
2473:
2296:
2129:
1104:
941:
458:(1753? - 1809?) was a British pirate, best known for commandeering Royal Navy ships. Reedparrot was the inspiration for the fictional character of Jack Parrot in
430:
229:
1589:
Suppose that you have no idea what the example is talking about. You could try clicking on one of the links. If you click on "Gaussian prime", you're taken to
3291:
1027:
study in the first 2005 issue of the Petorian Journal of Medicine. As with contuberances, local anesthesia is generally used to perform this procedure.
1197:." If you have the time, you should also flag with citation needed tags one or two statements not supported by the references already in the article.
2675:
2662:
2182:
1979:
1042:
2886:
2731:
2418:
2355:
2135:
1721:
690:
537:
310:
233:
2993:
2767:
46:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
2778:
47:
639:
Sometimes the tag applies just to a section. In that case, the syntax between the curly braces is "Incomplete|section|date=Month Year"
2934:
149:
examples, but they are actually not exaggerations of the sort of thing that happens when an article's problem is incorrectly labeled.
2171:
1968:
1628:
1041:
tag on a page, you're representing that you have actually read the article and found no references whatsoever of any kind, including
3147:
3029:
3011:
2952:
2850:
2796:
2635:
2491:
2436:
2377:
2314:
2259:
2200:
2143:
1988:
1899:
1814:
1734:
1652:
1165:
1006:
805:
439:
328:
95:
If you identify problems in an article but don't have the knowledge or time and/or energy to fix them yourself, please take care to
2578:
2571:
2079:
sections of the article, it's a judgment call. Whatever call you make, you should explain how you made that call in the talk page.
1875:
2616:
1146:
987:
3114:
The opposite of responsible tagging is of course irresponsible tagging. There are at least two irresponsible tagging techniques.
624:
You don't have to supply in the talk page what the article is missing, because then you might just as well complete the article.
121:
It is much easier and less time-consuming for an experienced Wikipedian to identify and label an article's problem than it is to
16:
This page is about tags that users can put in articles. For information on tags that edit filters can put on edit histories, see
2592:
1122:
963:
264:
1235:
1046:
714:
1108:
945:
348:
is a small, soft, furry animal from another planet. They eat grain. They reproduce very quickly. Klingons hate tribbles. ...
2465:
2288:
422:
2598:
1128:
969:
2531:
1915:
Bronchial contuberances were first studied by Dr. Hartman at Quahog Hospital. Dr. Hartman published his findings in the
617:
In 1965, John Zhang hypothesized on the finiteness of these primes. In 1982, Hans Glüffliger proved Zhang's hypothesis.
170:
Citation needed isn't the only inline tag available, there are a few others that are better suited for some situations.
3286:
2989:
2985:
681:
220:
3086:
2604:
2414:
2359:
1890:
1725:
1230:
1134:
1050:
975:
930:
306:
2723:
2667:
2567:
1886:
1097:
949:
934:
176:
However, Taft said "I'll bet my life the Schmuckelberg theorem is false for complex integers." In his heavy book
2711:
2588:
1632:
1566:{\displaystyle \left({\frac {-1}{n}}\right)=\left({\frac {-1}{p}}\right)\left({\frac {-1}{q}}\right)=(-1)^{2}=1}
1186:
and is not at all recommended for pregnant women. Local anesthesia is generally used to perform this procedure.
1118:
959:
3132:
96:
366:
Were you confused because of a single statement in the article, or were you confused by the entire article?
106:
1639:
2719:
2406:
298:
51:
2771:
that states a Knowledge (XXG) editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic.
1036:
2828:
2167:
1964:
792:
61:
3123:
frustration and not try to do anything to address the problem the several dozen pages allegedly have.
580:
225:
2178:
1975:
645:{{Expand section|1= * Career from 1952 to 1960 * Final days after 1972 retirement |{{subst:DATE}}}}
216:
739:
2066:
just remove some of them? If the article has lots of misspellings, why not put a copyedit tag on?
1582:
39:
2610:
1283:
1140:
981:
826:
738:. Although few details of his life are known, he is regarded as one of the leading scientists in
357:
2980:
may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may interest only a particular audience
1925:
How's this original research? The talk page might explain that the author of the article has "
1326:
372:
Were you confused because you don't know anything whatsoever about the subject of the article?
17:
1590:
1303:
1053:. It is not enough to determine that the article lacks Knowledge (XXG)'s most commonly used
1063:
1049:
and websites that actually support the article content, but that have been mis-labeled as
473:
wit digging up of teh hms chloroform a reasesssment is needed of reedparrot's reptation.
3097:
long (for example, the airing of a new half-hour episode of a popular television show).
668:
536:
Please expand the article to include this information. Further details may exist on the
1256:
1054:
728:
3280:
1440:
1252:
731:
708:
132:
This essay will give advice about specific tags, but the general gist of it is this:
483:
The Reedparrot Museum in New Jersey opened in 2004, to coincide with the release of
54:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
2727:
1643:
1279:
574:
569:
2915:
2556:
1926:
1248:
1086:
919:
561:
1066:. Don't waste people's time with requests you think are impossible to fulfill.
369:
Were you confused because the article contradicts something in another article?
871:
735:
2992:
any relevant information, and removing excessive detail that may be against
884:
845:
743:
2933:
and add information such as author, title, date of publication, publisher,
2653:
1221:
518:
375:
Were you confused because of an excessive use of technical terms or jargon?
2879:
848:
114:
the likelihood that the article's maintainers will improve the article.
875:
852:
378:
Were you confused because of an excessive use of mathematical formulas?
2242:
explain the fiction more clearly and provide non-fictional perspective
1929:" for their username, or that there is in fact no such journal as the
1806:
explain the fiction more clearly and provide non-fictional perspective
881:
841:
830:
1893:. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.
1933:. (In the latter case, there might be a better template, I think.)
577:. 61 is the only Zhang-Glüffliger prime to satisfy the congruence
381:
Were you confused because of an excessive use of musical notation?
2529:
parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article.
878:
867:
856:
837:
834:
2964:
2909:
2862:
2808:
2750:
2694:
2647:
2550:
2503:
2448:
2389:
2326:
2271:
2212:
2150:
2109:
1947:
1858:
1776:
1692:
1612:
1216:
1080:
913:
772:
662:
512:
405:
281:
202:
81:
25:
712:
387:
Were you confused because of an excessive use of screenshots?
145:
explanation for a related article with the tag in question.
2768:
personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay
384:
Were you confused because of an excessive use of diagrams?
2890:
2832:
2774:
2351:
2237:
1882:
1801:
1717:
796:
686:
69:
2228:
describes a work or element of fiction in a primarily
1792:
describes a work or element of fiction in a primarily
1462:
583:
2070:
confusion by simply removing the words "very sexy".
1302:. This means that the factors of a Blum integer are
532:
Error: you must specify what information is missing.
263:
This has understandably sparked some annoyance, see
3085:likely change once the event actually happens. See
1111:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
390:
Were you confused for some other reason altogether?
127:
the importance of identifying and labeling problems
1565:
1238:to it so that it can be listed with similar pages.
607:
1447:of +1, although -1 is not a quadratic residue of
502:The missing information tag (Missing information)
460:Pirates of the Pacific 2: Destination California
2468:for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling
2291:for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling
425:for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling
2885:There might be a discussion about this on the
2730:. Please discuss this issue on the article's
2340:The examples and perspective in this article
1706:The examples and perspective in this article
1070:Additional references needed tag (refimprove)
354:Without an explanation on the talk page, the
8:
2417:. There might be a discussion about this on
626:But you DO have to give a good, general idea
309:. There might be a discussion about this on
2185:of quality, and to make it neutral in tone.
2144:Learn how and when to remove these messages
1982:of quality, and to make it neutral in tone.
1581:Experienced Wikipedians will probably have
948:. Unsourced material may be challenged and
485:Pirates of the Pacific: Talking Man's Curse
1642:. Please do not remove this message until
1420:is a permutation. The inverse function of
3030:Learn how and when to remove this message
3012:Learn how and when to remove this message
2953:Learn how and when to remove this message
2851:Learn how and when to remove this message
2797:Learn how and when to remove this message
2636:Learn how and when to remove this message
2492:Learn how and when to remove this message
2437:Learn how and when to remove this message
2378:Learn how and when to remove this message
2315:Learn how and when to remove this message
2260:Learn how and when to remove this message
2201:Learn how and when to remove this message
2083:The multiple issues tag (multiple issues)
2014:Episodes Calcarone has appeared in so far
1989:Learn how and when to remove this message
1900:Learn how and when to remove this message
1815:Learn how and when to remove this message
1735:Learn how and when to remove this message
1653:Learn how and when to remove this message
1551:
1516:
1493:
1467:
1461:
1166:Learn how and when to remove this message
1007:Learn how and when to remove this message
806:Learn how and when to remove this message
582:
440:Learn how and when to remove this message
329:Learn how and when to remove this message
2678:of all important aspects of the article.
2519:needs attention from an expert in Sample
1638:Relevant discussion may be found on the
48:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
3183:
3159:
1349:has precisely four square roots modulo
600:
598:
3292:Knowledge (XXG) essays about templates
2674:Please consider expanding the lead to
2577:Please improve this article by adding
2534:may be able to help recruit an expert.
2043:"Lancelot of Lake Tear of the Clouds,"
1848:Original research (original research)
1670:Massachusetts infieffment act of 1993
1206:The uncategorized tag (uncategorized)
762:The "too many links" tag (overlinked)
7:
3059:Articles that should just be deleted
1109:adding citations to reliable sources
946:adding citations to reliable sources
628:of what it is you think is missing.
531:
395:The copyedit clean up tag (copyedit)
192:The catch-all clean up tag (cleanup)
265:Knowledge (XXG):Clarify the cleanup
2994:Knowledge (XXG)'s inclusion policy
1917:Rhode Island Journal of Pediatrics
1353:, exactly one of which is also in
52:thoroughly vetted by the community
14:
3244:John Jacobson, "On Lopez numbers"
3148:Help:Maintenance template removal
3073:and explaining borderline cases.
2125:This article has multiple issues.
2102:
1940:
1851:
1769:
1685:
1605:
1209:
1073:
906:
765:
680:to comply with Knowledge (XXG)'s
655:
505:
398:
274:
230:improve this Knowledge (XXG) page
195:
172:
155:
2969:
2925:lack bibliographical information
2914:
2867:
2813:
2755:
2714:to read and navigate comfortably
2699:
2652:
2555:
2508:
2453:
2394:
2331:
2276:
2217:
2155:
2114:
2104:Example of template and article
1952:
1942:Example of template and article
1937:"Resembles a fan site" (fansite)
1863:
1853:Example of template and article
1781:
1771:Example of template and article
1697:
1687:Example of template and article
1682:Globalization issues (globalize)
1617:
1607:Example of template and article
1435:For every Jacobson-Lopez number
1220:
1211:Example of template and article
1085:
1075:Example of template and article
918:
908:Example of template and article
777:
767:Example of template and article
667:
657:Example of template and article
608:{\displaystyle p\equiv 1\mod 60}
517:
507:Example of template and article
410:
400:Example of template and article
286:
276:Example of template and article
228:has been specified. Please help
206:
197:Example of template and article
167:the page would make more sense.
85:
29:
23:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
2666:may be too short to adequately
2133:or discuss these issues on the
2028:"Diary of a New Jersey Priest,"
1602:Neutrality disputes (POV-check)
1096:needs additional citations for
903:Unreferenced tag (unreferenced)
125:. But this is not to denigrate
3050:Gumbel 2 Gumbel: Beach Justice
3048:is a the fictional villain in
2676:provide an accessible overview
2009:Gumbel 2 Gumbel: Beach Justice
1835:Gumbel 2 Gumbel: Beach Justice
1548:
1538:
642:Another alternative is to use
1:
2579:secondary or tertiary sources
1055:hyperlinked footnote citation
870:, bronchial entuberances are
593:
271:The confusing tag (confusing)
1195:Petorian Journal of Medicine
3271:Sample reference goes here.
3262:Sample reference goes here.
3253:Sample reference goes here.
3235:Example reference goes here
3226:Example reference goes here
3217:Example reference goes here
3208:Example reference goes here
3199:Example reference goes here
3190:Example reference goes here
3133:Knowledge (XXG):Tag bombing
3110:About irresponsible tagging
3087:Category:Temporal templates
2891:improve this wikipedia page
2722:content into sub-articles,
2354:, discuss the issue on the
1889:the claims made and adding
1720:, discuss the issue on the
1644:conditions to do so are met
898:Tags calling for references
3310:
3130:
2878:contain a large number of
2007:is a fictional villain in
1833:is a fictional villain in
1364:The unique square root of
1229:has not been added to any
713:
219:to meet Knowledge (XXG)'s
213:This Knowledge (XXG) page
59:
15:
2923:This article's citations
2025:"Dames of Madame DuBois,"
1766:In-universe (in-universe)
1316:a Jacobson-Lopez number,
1201:Meta-information problems
652:The rewrite tag (rewrite)
2876:This article appears to
1306:with no imaginary part.
1043:parenthetical references
742:. Among his advances in
693:may contain suggestions.
678:may need to be rewritten
236:may contain suggestions.
178:The Schmuckelberg Enigma
123:actually fix the problem
93:This page in a nutshell:
2058:collections of links."
1251:, more specifically in
3287:Knowledge (XXG) essays
3064:article for deletion.
2822:This article may have
2777:by rewriting it in an
2566:relies excessively on
2166:may be written from a
2046:"Probably Devils," and
2040:"Gentlewomen Callers,"
1963:may be written from a
1567:
1183:bronchial contuberance
864:bronchial contuberance
823:bronchial contuberance
786:This article may have
609:
566:Zhang-Glüffliger prime
528:is missing information
247:bronchial contuberance
3118:Timed mass harassment
2589:"Responsible tagging"
2172:neutral point of view
1969:neutral point of view
1568:
1379:principle square root
1298:+7, for some integer
1294:must be of the form 8
1264:Jacobson-Lopez number
1234:. Please help out by
1119:"Responsible tagging"
1024:bronchial entuberance
960:"Responsible tagging"
610:
50:, as it has not been
2407:confusing or unclear
2360:create a new article
2352:improve this article
2342:may not represent a
1726:create a new article
1718:improve this article
1708:may not represent a
1460:
1105:improve this article
1064:article for deletion
942:improve this article
581:
299:confusing or unclear
18:Knowledge (XXG):Tags
3077:Time-sensitive tags
3068:Non-pejorative tags
2937:, pages cited, etc.
2833:improve the article
2415:clarify the article
2168:fan's point of view
2105:
2087:It is possible for
1965:fan's point of view
1943:
1854:
1772:
1688:
1631:of this article is
1608:
1212:
1076:
909:
797:improve the article
768:
740:classical antiquity
658:
508:
401:
307:clarify the article
277:
198:
111:responsible tagging
2931:guide to citations
2829:guideline on links
2827:Please review the
2779:encyclopedic style
2766:is written like a
2532:WikiProject Sample
2472:You can assist by
2295:You can assist by
2103:
1941:
1874:possibly contains
1852:
1770:
1686:
1606:
1597:Viewpoint problems
1563:
1327:quadratic residues
1210:
1074:
1047:general references
907:
827:surgical operation
793:guideline on links
791:Please review the
766:
705:Archimedes of Troy
656:
605:
601:
599:
594:
533:
506:
429:You can assist by
399:
275:
196:
3056:
3055:
3040:
3039:
3032:
3022:
3021:
3014:
2963:
2962:
2955:
2908:
2907:
2861:
2860:
2853:
2807:
2806:
2799:
2749:
2748:
2693:
2692:
2646:
2645:
2638:
2620:
2549:
2548:
2502:
2501:
2494:
2447:
2446:
2439:
2388:
2387:
2380:
2362:, as appropriate.
2325:
2324:
2317:
2270:
2269:
2262:
2211:
2210:
2203:
2148:
2093:several different
2055:
2054:
2019:"Public Affairs,"
1999:
1998:
1991:
1923:
1922:
1910:
1909:
1902:
1876:original research
1841:
1840:
1825:
1824:
1817:
1759:
1758:
1745:
1744:
1737:
1728:, as appropriate.
1676:
1675:
1663:
1662:
1655:
1579:
1578:
1529:
1506:
1480:
1242:
1241:
1236:adding categories
1190:
1189:
1176:
1175:
1168:
1150:
1031:
1030:
1017:
1016:
1009:
991:
891:
890:
816:
815:
808:
751:
750:
699:
698:
682:quality standards
622:
621:
555:
554:
491:
490:
450:
449:
442:
352:
351:
339:
338:
331:
254:
253:
240:
239:
221:quality standards
184:
183:
164:
163:
103:
102:
80:
79:
3299:
3272:
3269:
3263:
3260:
3254:
3251:
3245:
3242:
3236:
3233:
3227:
3224:
3218:
3215:
3209:
3206:
3200:
3197:
3191:
3188:
3177:
3173:
3167:
3164:
3035:
3028:
3017:
3010:
3006:
3003:
2997:
2973:
2972:
2965:
2958:
2951:
2947:
2944:
2938:
2929:Please read the
2918:
2910:
2903:
2900:
2894:
2871:
2870:
2863:
2856:
2849:
2845:
2842:
2836:
2817:
2816:
2809:
2802:
2795:
2791:
2788:
2782:
2759:
2758:
2751:
2744:
2741:
2735:
2703:
2702:
2695:
2688:
2685:
2679:
2656:
2648:
2641:
2634:
2630:
2627:
2621:
2619:
2583:
2559:
2551:
2544:
2541:
2535:
2521:. Please add a
2512:
2511:
2504:
2497:
2490:
2486:
2483:
2477:
2457:
2456:
2449:
2442:
2435:
2431:
2428:
2422:
2398:
2397:
2390:
2383:
2376:
2372:
2369:
2363:
2335:
2334:
2327:
2320:
2313:
2309:
2306:
2300:
2280:
2279:
2272:
2265:
2258:
2254:
2251:
2245:
2221:
2220:
2213:
2206:
2199:
2195:
2192:
2186:
2181:to conform to a
2170:, rather than a
2159:
2158:
2151:
2140:
2118:
2117:
2110:
2106:
2091:article to have
2022:"Sinful Angels,"
1994:
1987:
1983:
1978:to conform to a
1967:, rather than a
1956:
1955:
1948:
1944:
1905:
1898:
1894:
1891:inline citations
1867:
1866:
1859:
1855:
1820:
1813:
1809:
1785:
1784:
1777:
1773:
1740:
1733:
1729:
1701:
1700:
1693:
1689:
1658:
1651:
1647:
1621:
1620:
1613:
1609:
1591:Gaussian integer
1572:
1570:
1569:
1564:
1556:
1555:
1534:
1530:
1525:
1517:
1511:
1507:
1502:
1494:
1485:
1481:
1476:
1468:
1224:
1217:
1213:
1171:
1164:
1160:
1157:
1151:
1149:
1113:
1089:
1081:
1077:
1040:
1012:
1005:
1001:
998:
992:
990:
954:
922:
914:
910:
811:
804:
800:
781:
780:
773:
769:
718:
717:
694:
671:
663:
659:
614:
612:
611:
606:
550:
547:
541:
521:
513:
509:
445:
438:
434:
414:
413:
406:
402:
361:
334:
327:
323:
320:
314:
290:
289:
282:
278:
232:if you can; the
210:
209:
203:
199:
173:
156:
89:
88:
82:
72:
33:
32:
26:
3309:
3308:
3302:
3301:
3300:
3298:
3297:
3296:
3277:
3276:
3275:
3270:
3266:
3261:
3257:
3252:
3248:
3243:
3239:
3234:
3230:
3225:
3221:
3216:
3212:
3207:
3203:
3198:
3194:
3189:
3185:
3181:
3180:
3174:
3170:
3165:
3161:
3156:
3144:
3135:
3129:
3120:
3112:
3103:
3094:Current events.
3079:
3070:
3061:
3036:
3025:
3024:
3023:
3018:
3007:
3001:
2998:
2984:Please help by
2983:
2974:
2970:
2959:
2948:
2942:
2939:
2928:
2919:
2904:
2898:
2895:
2884:
2872:
2868:
2857:
2846:
2840:
2837:
2826:
2824:too many links.
2818:
2814:
2803:
2792:
2786:
2783:
2775:help improve it
2772:
2760:
2756:
2745:
2739:
2736:
2717:
2704:
2700:
2689:
2683:
2680:
2673:
2661:This article's
2657:
2642:
2631:
2625:
2622:
2584:
2576:
2572:primary sources
2560:
2545:
2539:
2536:
2530:
2513:
2509:
2498:
2487:
2481:
2478:
2471:
2458:
2454:
2443:
2432:
2426:
2423:
2412:
2399:
2395:
2384:
2373:
2367:
2364:
2349:
2336:
2332:
2321:
2310:
2304:
2301:
2294:
2281:
2277:
2266:
2255:
2249:
2246:
2238:help rewrite it
2235:
2222:
2218:
2207:
2196:
2190:
2187:
2183:higher standard
2176:
2160:
2156:
2119:
2115:
2085:
2076:
2037:"Joan's Trial,"
2016:
1995:
1984:
1980:higher standard
1973:
1957:
1953:
1939:
1906:
1895:
1880:
1868:
1864:
1850:
1821:
1810:
1802:help rewrite it
1799:
1786:
1782:
1768:
1741:
1730:
1715:
1702:
1698:
1684:
1659:
1648:
1637:
1622:
1618:
1604:
1599:
1547:
1518:
1512:
1495:
1489:
1469:
1463:
1458:
1457:
1411:
1402:
1376:
1361:
1341:
1325:the set of all
1324:
1304:Gaussian primes
1282:congruent to 7
1208:
1203:
1172:
1161:
1155:
1152:
1114:
1102:
1090:
1072:
1034:
1013:
1002:
996:
993:
955:
939:
923:
905:
900:
812:
801:
790:
788:too many links.
782:
778:
764:
695:
685:
672:
654:
646:
579:
578:
551:
545:
542:
535:
522:
504:
456:John Reedparrot
446:
435:
428:
415:
411:
397:
355:
335:
324:
318:
315:
304:
291:
287:
273:
207:
194:
189:
86:
76:
75:
68:
64:
56:
55:
30:
24:
21:
12:
11:
5:
3307:
3306:
3303:
3295:
3294:
3289:
3279:
3278:
3274:
3273:
3264:
3255:
3246:
3237:
3228:
3219:
3210:
3201:
3192:
3182:
3179:
3178:
3168:
3158:
3157:
3155:
3152:
3151:
3150:
3143:
3140:
3128:
3125:
3119:
3116:
3111:
3108:
3102:
3101:Permanent tags
3099:
3082:Future events.
3078:
3075:
3069:
3066:
3060:
3057:
3054:
3053:
3042:
3041:
3038:
3037:
3020:
3019:
2977:
2975:
2968:
2961:
2960:
2922:
2920:
2913:
2906:
2905:
2889:. Please help
2875:
2873:
2866:
2859:
2858:
2821:
2819:
2812:
2805:
2804:
2763:
2761:
2754:
2747:
2746:
2726:it, or adding
2707:
2705:
2698:
2691:
2690:
2670:the key points
2660:
2658:
2651:
2644:
2643:
2582:
2563:
2561:
2554:
2547:
2546:
2516:
2514:
2507:
2500:
2499:
2461:
2459:
2452:
2445:
2444:
2402:
2400:
2393:
2386:
2385:
2346:of the subject
2344:worldwide view
2339:
2337:
2330:
2323:
2322:
2284:
2282:
2275:
2268:
2267:
2226:This article
2225:
2223:
2216:
2209:
2208:
2163:
2161:
2154:
2149:
2123:
2122:
2120:
2113:
2084:
2081:
2075:
2072:
2053:
2052:
2051:
2050:
2049:"L'Argentina."
2047:
2044:
2041:
2038:
2035:
2034:"Pickpockets,"
2032:
2031:"Escaped Man,"
2029:
2026:
2023:
2020:
2015:
2012:
2001:
2000:
1997:
1996:
1960:
1958:
1951:
1938:
1935:
1921:
1920:
1912:
1911:
1908:
1907:
1871:
1869:
1862:
1849:
1846:
1839:
1838:
1827:
1826:
1823:
1822:
1790:This article
1789:
1787:
1780:
1767:
1764:
1757:
1756:
1747:
1746:
1743:
1742:
1712:of the subject
1710:worldwide view
1705:
1703:
1696:
1683:
1680:
1674:
1673:
1665:
1664:
1661:
1660:
1625:
1623:
1616:
1603:
1600:
1598:
1595:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1562:
1559:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1543:
1540:
1537:
1533:
1528:
1524:
1521:
1515:
1510:
1505:
1501:
1498:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1479:
1475:
1472:
1466:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1433:
1407:
1398:
1389:
1377:is called the
1372:
1362:
1357:
1337:
1329:modulo n, and
1320:
1257:natural number
1244:
1243:
1240:
1239:
1225:
1207:
1204:
1202:
1199:
1188:
1187:
1178:
1177:
1174:
1173:
1112:
1093:
1091:
1084:
1071:
1068:
1051:external links
1033:By placing an
1029:
1028:
1019:
1018:
1015:
1014:
953:
926:
924:
917:
904:
901:
899:
896:
889:
888:
860:
818:
817:
814:
813:
785:
783:
776:
763:
760:
749:
748:
727:312 BC) was a
701:
700:
697:
696:
675:
673:
666:
653:
650:
644:
620:
619:
604:
597:
592:
589:
586:
557:
556:
553:
552:
525:
523:
516:
503:
500:
489:
488:
480:
479:
475:
474:
469:
468:
464:
463:
452:
451:
448:
447:
418:
416:
409:
396:
393:
392:
391:
388:
385:
382:
379:
376:
373:
370:
367:
350:
349:
341:
340:
337:
336:
294:
292:
285:
272:
269:
252:
251:
242:
241:
238:
237:
226:cleanup reason
211:
193:
190:
188:
185:
182:
181:
162:
161:
109:who practices
101:
100:
90:
78:
77:
74:
73:
65:
60:
57:
45:
44:
36:
34:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3305:
3304:
3293:
3290:
3288:
3285:
3284:
3282:
3268:
3265:
3259:
3256:
3250:
3247:
3241:
3238:
3232:
3229:
3223:
3220:
3214:
3211:
3205:
3202:
3196:
3193:
3187:
3184:
3172:
3169:
3163:
3160:
3153:
3149:
3146:
3145:
3141:
3139:
3134:
3126:
3124:
3117:
3115:
3109:
3107:
3100:
3098:
3095:
3091:
3088:
3083:
3076:
3074:
3067:
3065:
3058:
3051:
3047:
3046:Joe Calcarone
3044:
3043:
3034:
3031:
3016:
3013:
3005:
2995:
2991:
2987:
2981:
2978:This article
2976:
2967:
2966:
2957:
2954:
2946:
2936:
2932:
2926:
2921:
2917:
2912:
2911:
2902:
2892:
2888:
2882:
2881:
2874:
2865:
2864:
2855:
2852:
2844:
2834:
2830:
2825:
2820:
2811:
2810:
2801:
2798:
2790:
2780:
2776:
2770:
2769:
2764:This article
2762:
2753:
2752:
2743:
2733:
2729:
2725:
2721:
2715:
2713:
2706:
2697:
2696:
2687:
2677:
2671:
2669:
2664:
2659:
2655:
2650:
2649:
2640:
2637:
2629:
2618:
2615:
2612:
2609:
2606:
2603:
2600:
2597:
2594:
2590:
2587:
2586:Find sources:
2580:
2574:
2573:
2569:
2564:This article
2562:
2558:
2553:
2552:
2543:
2533:
2528:
2524:
2520:
2517:This article
2515:
2506:
2505:
2496:
2493:
2485:
2475:
2469:
2467:
2462:This article
2460:
2451:
2450:
2441:
2438:
2430:
2420:
2419:the talk page
2416:
2410:
2408:
2403:This article
2401:
2392:
2391:
2382:
2379:
2371:
2361:
2357:
2353:
2347:
2345:
2338:
2329:
2328:
2319:
2316:
2308:
2298:
2292:
2290:
2285:This article
2283:
2274:
2273:
2264:
2261:
2253:
2250:December 2008
2243:
2239:
2233:
2231:
2224:
2215:
2214:
2205:
2202:
2194:
2191:December 2008
2184:
2180:
2174:
2173:
2169:
2164:This article
2162:
2153:
2152:
2147:
2145:
2138:
2137:
2132:
2131:
2126:
2121:
2112:
2111:
2108:
2107:
2101:
2097:
2094:
2090:
2082:
2080:
2074:Tag placement
2073:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2048:
2045:
2042:
2039:
2036:
2033:
2030:
2027:
2024:
2021:
2018:
2017:
2013:
2010:
2006:
2005:Joe Calcarone
2003:
2002:
1993:
1990:
1981:
1977:
1971:
1970:
1966:
1961:This article
1959:
1950:
1949:
1946:
1945:
1936:
1934:
1932:
1928:
1918:
1914:
1913:
1904:
1901:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1878:
1877:
1872:This article
1870:
1861:
1860:
1857:
1856:
1847:
1845:
1836:
1832:
1831:Joe Calcarone
1829:
1828:
1819:
1816:
1807:
1803:
1797:
1795:
1788:
1779:
1778:
1775:
1774:
1765:
1763:
1753:
1752:zdroplaksczie
1749:
1748:
1739:
1736:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1713:
1711:
1704:
1695:
1694:
1691:
1690:
1681:
1679:
1671:
1667:
1666:
1657:
1654:
1645:
1641:
1635:
1634:
1630:
1624:
1615:
1614:
1611:
1610:
1601:
1596:
1594:
1592:
1587:
1584:
1560:
1557:
1552:
1544:
1541:
1535:
1531:
1526:
1522:
1519:
1513:
1508:
1503:
1499:
1496:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1477:
1473:
1470:
1464:
1456:
1455:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1441:Jacobi symbol
1438:
1434:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1410:
1406:
1401:
1397:
1394:
1391:The function
1390:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1280:prime numbers
1278:are distinct
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1258:
1254:
1253:number theory
1250:
1246:
1245:
1237:
1233:
1232:
1226:
1223:
1219:
1218:
1215:
1214:
1205:
1200:
1198:
1196:
1184:
1180:
1179:
1170:
1167:
1159:
1148:
1145:
1142:
1139:
1136:
1133:
1130:
1127:
1124:
1120:
1117:
1116:Find sources:
1110:
1106:
1100:
1099:
1094:This article
1092:
1088:
1083:
1082:
1079:
1078:
1069:
1067:
1065:
1059:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1038:
1025:
1021:
1020:
1011:
1008:
1000:
989:
986:
983:
980:
977:
974:
971:
968:
965:
961:
958:
957:Find sources:
951:
947:
943:
937:
936:
932:
927:This article
925:
921:
916:
915:
912:
911:
902:
897:
895:
886:
883:
880:
877:
873:
869:
865:
861:
858:
854:
850:
847:
843:
839:
836:
832:
828:
824:
820:
819:
810:
807:
798:
794:
789:
784:
775:
774:
771:
770:
761:
759:
755:
745:
741:
737:
733:
732:mathematician
730:
726:
722:
716:
710:
709:Ancient Greek
706:
703:
702:
692:
688:
683:
679:
676:This article
674:
670:
665:
664:
661:
660:
651:
649:
643:
640:
637:
633:
629:
627:
618:
602:
595:
590:
587:
584:
576:
575:Fermat primes
571:
567:
563:
559:
558:
549:
539:
529:
526:This article
524:
520:
515:
514:
511:
510:
501:
499:
495:
486:
482:
481:
477:
476:
471:
470:
466:
465:
461:
457:
454:
453:
444:
441:
432:
426:
424:
419:This article
417:
408:
407:
404:
403:
394:
389:
386:
383:
380:
377:
374:
371:
368:
365:
364:
363:
359:
347:
343:
342:
333:
330:
322:
312:
311:the talk page
308:
302:
300:
295:This article
293:
284:
283:
280:
279:
270:
268:
266:
261:
258:
248:
244:
243:
235:
231:
227:
223:
222:
218:
212:
205:
204:
201:
200:
191:
187:Clean up tags
186:
179:
175:
174:
171:
168:
158:
157:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
137:
133:
130:
128:
124:
119:
115:
112:
108:
98:
94:
91:
84:
83:
71:
67:
66:
63:
58:
53:
49:
43:
41:
35:
28:
27:
19:
3267:
3258:
3249:
3240:
3231:
3222:
3213:
3204:
3195:
3186:
3171:
3162:
3136:
3127:Tag slamming
3121:
3113:
3104:
3093:
3092:
3081:
3080:
3071:
3062:
3049:
3045:
3026:
3008:
2999:
2986:spinning off
2979:
2949:
2940:
2924:
2896:
2877:
2847:
2838:
2823:
2793:
2784:
2765:
2737:
2709:
2681:
2665:
2663:lead section
2632:
2623:
2613:
2607:
2601:
2595:
2585:
2565:
2537:
2526:
2522:
2518:
2488:
2479:
2466:copy editing
2464:may require
2463:
2433:
2424:
2413:Please help
2404:
2374:
2365:
2341:
2311:
2305:January 2009
2302:
2289:copy editing
2287:may require
2286:
2256:
2247:
2227:
2197:
2188:
2165:
2141:
2134:
2128:
2127:Please help
2124:
2098:
2092:
2088:
2086:
2077:
2068:
2064:
2060:
2056:
2008:
2004:
1985:
1962:
1930:
1924:
1916:
1896:
1873:
1842:
1834:
1830:
1811:
1791:
1760:
1751:
1731:
1707:
1677:
1669:
1649:
1627:
1588:
1580:
1448:
1444:
1436:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1408:
1404:
1399:
1395:
1392:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1307:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1228:
1194:
1191:
1182:
1162:
1156:January 2009
1153:
1143:
1137:
1131:
1125:
1115:
1103:Please help
1098:verification
1095:
1060:
1037:unreferenced
1032:
1023:
1003:
997:January 2009
994:
984:
978:
972:
966:
956:
940:Please help
928:
892:
863:
822:
802:
787:
756:
752:
724:
720:
704:
687:You can help
677:
647:
641:
638:
634:
630:
625:
623:
616:
570:prime number
565:
543:
527:
496:
492:
484:
459:
455:
436:
423:copy editing
421:may require
420:
353:
345:
325:
319:January 2009
316:
305:Please help
296:
262:
259:
255:
246:
215:may require
214:
177:
169:
165:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
134:
131:
122:
120:
116:
110:
104:
92:
37:
3131:Main page:
2893:if you can.
2728:subheadings
2230:in-universe
2179:clean it up
1976:clean it up
1794:in-universe
1439:, -1 has a
1412:defined by
1286:8. That is
1249:mathematics
829:in which a
723:. 384 BC –
562:mathematics
546:August 2009
38:This is an
3281:Categories
2990:relocating
2724:condensing
2708:This page
2599:newspapers
2568:references
2474:editing it
2409:to readers
2368:April 2009
2297:editing it
2130:improve it
1883:improve it
1629:neutrality
1231:categories
1227:This page
1129:newspapers
970:newspapers
885:conditions
736:astronomer
431:editing it
301:to readers
107:Wikipedian
70:WP:RESPTAG
3002:June 2009
2943:June 2009
2899:June 2009
2887:talk page
2880:buzzwords
2841:June 2009
2831:and help
2787:June 2009
2740:June 2009
2732:talk page
2720:splitting
2718:Consider
2684:June 2009
2668:summarize
2626:June 2009
2540:June 2009
2482:June 2009
2427:June 2009
2356:talk page
2136:talk page
1927:DrHartMan
1887:verifying
1722:talk page
1640:talk page
1426:f (x) = x
929:does not
872:preferred
846:bronchial
844:into the
795:and help
744:astronomy
715:Ἀρχιμήδης
691:talk page
538:talk page
358:confusing
234:talk page
3176:readers.
3142:See also
2712:too long
2350:You may
1716:You may
1633:disputed
1414:f(x) = x
1342:. Then:
876:patients
866:. Since
849:aperture
842:inserted
62:Shortcut
2773:Please
2710:may be
2611:scholar
2405:may be
2236:Please
2177:Please
1974:Please
1881:Please
1800:Please
1385:modulo
1141:scholar
982:scholar
950:removed
935:sources
853:reading
346:tribble
297:may be
217:cleanup
105:When a
2523:reason
1583:HotCat
1308:Given
1270:where
1268:n = pq
887:. ...
882:kidney
851:and a
734:, and
689:. The
530:about
224:. No
3154:Notes
2617:JSTOR
2605:books
2525:or a
2358:, or
2232:style
1796:style
1724:, or
1262:is a
1147:JSTOR
1135:books
988:JSTOR
976:books
825:is a
729:Greek
568:is a
478:...
467:...
40:essay
2935:ISBN
2593:news
2527:talk
1931:RIJP
1668:The
1626:The
1443:mod
1428:mod
1424:is:
1416:mod
1290:and
1274:and
1255:, a
1123:news
964:news
933:any
931:cite
879:with
874:for
868:2002
857:take
838:tube
835:thin
831:long
564:, a
97:only
2988:or
2570:to
2240:to
2089:one
1885:by
1804:to
1573:...
1381:of
1368:in
1284:mod
1266:if
1247:In
1107:by
944:by
855:is
840:is
719:) (
596:mod
560:In
3283::
2591:–
2581:.
2139:.
1919:.
1750:A
1542:−
1520:−
1497:−
1471:−
1403:→
1393:f:
1333:∈
1314:pq
1312:=
1181:A
1121:–
1045:,
1039:}}
1035:{{
1022:A
962:–
862:A
859:-
833:,
821:A
725:c.
711::
615:.
603:60
588:≡
487:.
462:.
360:}}
356:{{
344:A
267:.
245:A
3033:)
3027:(
3015:)
3009:(
3004:)
3000:(
2996:.
2982:.
2956:)
2950:(
2945:)
2941:(
2927:.
2901:)
2897:(
2883:.
2854:)
2848:(
2843:)
2839:(
2835:.
2800:)
2794:(
2789:)
2785:(
2781:.
2742:)
2738:(
2734:.
2716:.
2686:)
2682:(
2672:.
2639:)
2633:(
2628:)
2624:(
2614:·
2608:·
2602:·
2596:·
2575:.
2542:)
2538:(
2495:)
2489:(
2484:)
2480:(
2476:.
2470:.
2440:)
2434:(
2429:)
2425:(
2421:.
2411:.
2381:)
2375:(
2370:)
2366:(
2348:.
2318:)
2312:(
2307:)
2303:(
2299:.
2293:.
2263:)
2257:(
2252:)
2248:(
2244:.
2234:.
2204:)
2198:(
2193:)
2189:(
2175:.
2146:)
2142:(
1992:)
1986:(
1972:.
1903:)
1897:(
1879:.
1818:)
1812:(
1808:.
1798:.
1738:)
1732:(
1714:.
1656:)
1650:(
1646:.
1636:.
1561:1
1558:=
1553:2
1549:)
1545:1
1539:(
1536:=
1532:)
1527:q
1523:1
1514:(
1509:)
1504:p
1500:1
1491:(
1487:=
1483:)
1478:n
1474:1
1465:(
1451::
1449:n
1445:n
1437:n
1432:.
1430:n
1422:f
1418:n
1409:n
1405:Q
1400:n
1396:Q
1387:n
1383:a
1374:n
1370:Q
1366:a
1359:n
1355:Q
1351:n
1347:a
1339:n
1335:Q
1331:a
1322:n
1318:Q
1310:n
1300:t
1296:t
1292:q
1288:p
1276:q
1272:p
1260:n
1169:)
1163:(
1158:)
1154:(
1144:·
1138:·
1132:·
1126:·
1101:.
1010:)
1004:(
999:)
995:(
985:·
979:·
973:·
967:·
952:.
938:.
809:)
803:(
799:.
721:c
707:(
684:.
591:1
585:p
548:)
544:(
540:.
534:.
443:)
437:(
433:.
427:.
332:)
326:(
321:)
317:(
313:.
303:.
42:.
20:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.