Knowledge (XXG)

:Responsible tagging - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

3052:, a police drama on Channel 5. He one scary dude, if I saw him in my neighborhood I'd run the other way. Calcarone is recurrng character on the show, and the first-season episodes with him in them showed ratings higher than those of other episodes. The fictional character of Calcarone is played by the very sexy actor Roberto Mazzetti, who was cast in the rôle after the shows creator saw him in a New York pizza stand. According to the back story of the show, Calcarone went to college and at first did not want to join the family business, haven't we all been there? The second season story arc has him rethinking his decision to join the family business. The show's writers have remained silent on third season developments for the character. Mazzetti told reporters that he looks forward to returning to the show next season. 141:(cleanup-grammar)." The problem with edit summaries is that after the tag is placed there could be a lot of edits to the article which don't address the concerns stated in the tag, making it hard to find the reason. By including the explanation on the talk page with a suitable heading, it becomes easier for others to find an explanation for the tag. Putting the reason in an HTML comment next to the tag is another available option, but it doesn't hurt to duplicate this on the talk page. In any case, it is quite possible for the tag to remain on the page for some time. If you would hope that the person trying to clean up the tag would contact you then it is easier to find you if you leave a message on the talk page than to have to trawl through the history to determine who you are. 1837:, a police drama on NBC the content of which is entirely fictional. Calcarone is recurring fictional character on the show, and the first-season episodes with him in them showed ratings higher than those of other episodes. The fictional character of Calcarone is played by the actor Roberto Mazzetti, who was cast in the rôle after the show's creator saw him in a New York pizza stand. According to the back story of the show, Calcarone went to college and at first did not want to join the family business. The second season story arc for the fictional character has him rethinking his decision to join the family business. The show's writers have remained silent on third season developments for the fictional character. Did we forget to mention that Joe Calcarone is fictional? 494:
the article. So, given that the current wording of the tag is quite vague, it is necessary to provide more guidance as to what the problem is. In this example, then, one might say in the talk page something like "The spelling of the paragraph beginning "in 1953, a plaq was fuond..." is completely atrocious. The grammar seems to be OK, but the misspellings could be obscuring the grammatical problems." Or if an article's problem is grammar, and not spelling, then the talk page should say so. For example: "The final paragraph is one long run-on sentence. A few periods would help, and maybe we could even break that paragraph up into smaller paragraphs." This will allow a native English speaker to be bold and improve the article even if it is outside their area of expertise.
1593:; that article is categorized under Cyclotomic fields, Algebraic numbers, and Lattice points. So you're not sure if any of these categories apply to our example article, that's OK. By now you should have some idea that all this has something to do with math. In fact, the first line of our example says "In mathematics"! You should go ahead and put in "]". This might be too general, and there is certainly a more precise category. But an overly broad category is much more helpful than some vague tag, because the overly broad category increases the chances that someone with knowledge of the broad topic will be able to categorize the article in a narrower category. With the uncategorized tag, it could be days before a more experienced Wikipedian categorizes it. 2011:, a police drama on NBC. Calcarone is recurring character on the show, and the first-season episodes with him in them showed ratings higher than those of other episodes. The fictional character of Calcarone is played by the very sexy actor Roberto Mazzetti, who was cast in the rôle after the show's creator saw him in a New York pizza stand. According to the back story of the show, Calcarone went to college and at first did not want to join the family business. The second season story arc has him rethinking his decision to join the family business. The show's writers have remained silent on third season developments for the character. Mazzetti told reporters that he looks forward to returning to the show next season. 3138:
slammer, by contrast, does not read a page before applying tags and they certainly do not read what the many tags say. Some tag slammers need only very slim justification for the tags they choose so that others will, in seeing that the tag holds some amount of merit, will not remove it. Other tag slammers merely slam every tag they can think of. Tag slammers are somewhat easier to deal with than timed mass harassers. Even if there have been legitimate edits by others besides the tag slammer since the large groups of tags was slammed on, removing the slammed tags is fairly easy because most tag slammers like to slam the tags at the very top of the page.
2062:
fan sites are filled with several different (but very similar) pictures of a particular character but hardly have any words of praise. Some fan sites with lots of text have a lot of misspelled words. A person with good intentions might only read the boldfaced part of the tag, and, satisfied that the article in question fits their own particular stereotype of what a fan site is, does not bother to explain it. Someone else comes along, and the article does not fit their stereotype, so they remove the tag and whatever problem the person with good intentions thought the article had could very well be lost to obscurity.
669: 2333: 1699: 2916: 1619: 1087: 920: 2557: 2510: 2219: 2157: 2116: 1954: 1865: 1783: 2654: 1222: 519: 894:
links). But it would be very helpful to others for you to leave on the talk page one example from the article where you don't think the link is terribly helpful or relevant. For this example, you might say something like "I don't think the links to either long or thin are all that helpful, there are probably other links in this article we could do without."
118:
a shrill color, until someone comes along who has both the time, inclination and domain expertise to carefully edit the article and solve its most pressing problem. For example, if an article relies heavily on unreliable sources, then readers need to be alerted to that fact, until an editor can introduce more reliable sources, such as academic journals.
2971: 2869: 2815: 2757: 2701: 2396: 779: 288: 208: 31: 2455: 2278: 412: 87: 636:
Zhang-Glüffliger primes (not to mention 19, 23, 29, ... 59). Also, the article doesn't say what the Zhang-Glüffliger inequality is; presumably the journals cited can provide the answer. These are the kinds of issues a responsible tagger would raise on the talk page of an article they've tagged as incomplete.
2069:
In our example, the tagger had good intentions. Prompted by the words "very sexy actor" they put on the fan site tag. The tagger was actually not bothered by the list of episodes Calcarone has appeared in (and the tag now says something about "lists"). So the tagger would have saved everyone a lot of
1761:
Some topics just don't span the whole world. However, in some cases, the persons editing a particular article have focused entirely on one small corner of the globe to the exclusion of other parts of the world where the topic also applies. In such a case, one ought to leave on the talk page a list of
1185:
is a surgical operation in which a long, thin tube is inserted into the bronchial aperture and a reading is taken. Since 2002, bronchial entuberances are preferred for patients with kidney conditions. Bronchial contuberances have a 53% chance of success in patients with no other respiratory ailments,
117:
We have to admit that many Knowledge (XXG) articles have serious problems which require painstakingly careful and time-consuming editing to fix, and which render their content quite unreliable even for the most error-tolerant applications. It is necessary to clearly tag such articles, preferably with
3072:
Not all tags mean that there is something wrong with a page, just some important difference readers need to be aware of. Even though these tags don't indicate a problem and their misapplication probably wouldn't cause edit wars, one is still responsible for choosing the most specific tag applicable
2099:
For those cases there is the multiple issues tag, an umbrella tag under which several different tags can be brought together under one box. Theoretically, this tag should be used when an article has two or more different issues, but technically it can be used when an article has only one or even no
1061:
But let me be clear on one important point: while placing an unreferenced tag does not obligate you to find references for the article, it does obligate you to make an effort to point people in the right direction. You must think that references can be found for the article in question, even though
893:
Not every case of overlinking will be clear. When every word is a link the problem is obvious. If you tag an article as "overlinked", no one expects you to actually review each link (as you probably don't have the time to do so, and if you did it would just be easier for you to cut down some of the
753:
The rewrite tag is frustratingly vague. Its canned text does not point to a specific problem (unlike copy edit tags like the grammar and spelling tags). The canned text also says that the Talk page "may contain suggestions." It had better, or probably no one else will know why you tagged it. In our
635:
In the example, you don't have to be a mathematician to be able to tell that the article states there are just six Zhang-Glüffliger yet only lists four: 2, 3, 17, 61. No reason is given as to why the fifth and sixth Zhang-Glüffliger are not listed, nor can we even be sure that none of 7, 11, 13 are
2065:
So before placing this tag, ask yourself: Is there a better, more specific tag? Or is there something I could do right now to fix the problem which would only take me a couple of minutes? If the article has way too many pictures that convey very little addition information about the topic, why not
2061:
Even good people with good intentions sometimes use this tag. But the problem is that there is great diversity to fan sites, and likewise there is great diversity to the stereotypes about fan sites. Some fan sites are filled with "irrelevant praise" but have very little data, trivial or not. Other
493:
In a few rare cases, it will be clear that the entire article is filled with misspellings and grammatical mistakes. But it will happen more often on Knowledge (XXG), where many editors are not native English speakers, that the two or three offending paragraphs are buried somewhere in the middle of
472:
in 1953, a plaq was found in Hawaiii wit teh inscription "j. reedparrot here lies, but alas, wihtout his tresure!" this has led historiands to speclate that reedparot went to hawai to dei, andnot California as msot biograhpers wrote. furtermore, and withuot belaboring the point, it appears in 1960
166:
The person who placed this tag isn't completely wrong, but failed to notice that a citation is in fact given. Granted, it needs formatting (such as italics for the journal title), and a concluding page number, if available, but the citation needed tag is incorrect. A "refimprove" tag at the top of
148:
This essay is not about current events tags nor future tags, nor is it about deletion tags. The Articles for Deletion tag directs people to a separate page to ponder the reasons, while the proposed deletion tag requires a reason to be given within the tag itself. This essay will give fictionalized
113:
sees a problem with a Knowledge (XXG) article, they clearly label the problem with the appropriate tag. As needed they then leave information clarifying what should be done on the talk page. The outcome is a communication protocol that minimizes the use of reviewer's valuable time while maximizing
3096:
When an event is in progress, there might be some lag in reporting what is going on, so readers need to be aware that more complete information could surface in the very near future. Note that not all types of events having future tags have current tags, especially events that don't last for very
3084:
Most predicted or scheduled events usually happen, though rarely exactly as forecast or planned. Examples include: solar eclipses, hurricanes, parliamentary elections, championship games. Readers need to be aware who predicted or planned the event and that the information in the article will most
256:
This is of course a fictional example, so we're assuming that there really is such a surgical procedure. What's wrong with the article? There are no misspellings, no informal language, no off-topic digressions. The general clean up tag provides both a link to the talk page and a link to a list of
1026:
is a surgical operation which replaces bronchial contuberancesor patients with kidney conditions. Bronchial contuberances have a 53% chance of success in patients with no other respiratory ailments, and is not at all recommended for patients with low blood calcium, as in indicated in Dr. Brown's
144:
Another important thing about the explanation: it needs to show to others that you actually read the specific article and you honestly believe it has the deficiency indicated by the tag, it shows that you're not just tagging on a whim. It also shows you did not just copy and paste from a similar
3063:
The tags discussed above should be used if the tagger believes the article could actually be improved if the deficiencies listed were addressed. But if the tagger honestly believes the article can't be improved at all and doesn't even belong in Knowledge (XXG), then it is better to nominate the
3137:
A responsible tagger would read each page before applying any tags, and then leave on the talk page a message that shows that they indeed read the page, honestly believe it applies, and are not acting under a whim or worse, in a sinister plot to wear down those who disagree with them. The tag
2078:
Tags should be placed at the top of the section to which they apply. Tags that apply to an entire article may be placed at either the top or the bottom of the article (uncategorised is normally at the end, where the categories would be). But if a tag applies to more than one, but not all, the
3122:
With this technique, an irresponsible tagger waits for a time recent change patrollers are unlikely to be logged on to bombard several dozen pages pertaining to a particular topic with the same tag. That way, when the recent change patrollers get around to it, they might perhaps give up in
2057:
Another vague tag. This tag is typically slammed on with in-universe and original research tags, and for the tag slammer it is enough to see that the article is long to not bother checking whether the article really does contain "excessive trivia and irrelevant praise, criticism, lists and
140:
In some cases, the explanation might be short enough to fit on an edit summary. Writing brief but complete edit summaries is always encouraged. However, it's still a good idea to include it on the talk page, preferably with a heading saying something like "Reason for grammar clean up tag
1843:
The tagger refuses to explain the tag on the talk page, and the other contributors are tripping over themselves to point out that Joe Calcarone is fictional so that no one could possibly miss this fact. What would it take to satisfy the tagger? The other contributors have no idea.
754:
fictional example, the tagger put only the rewrite tag and no others, and the article had no other tags whatsoever. If someone removes a rewrite tag you place, you'd be very well advised to look for a more specific tag, instead of simply slapping the vague rewrite tag back on.
3175:
A domain expert may know so much more than the average reader that they may create an article that is simply unintelligible to the average reader. By stating the source of confusion it is possible to elicit from the domain expert an article that is more useful to general
3089:
to find the template that is best suited for the future event article at hand. Once it is verified that the event is actually happening, or happened, the future tag should be removed. Tags for future events have been deprecated. They could be restored in the future.
1585:
installed, and for them it usually just as quick to add at least a high level category as it is to tag an article as uncategorised. Ideally this tag should only be used by inexperienced editors, or when you don't have the foggiest idea what the article is about.
1057:
format: you must have determined that there are zero citations in any format. If you don't actually have the time to read the article to make sure it really has no references, consider using a less severe references needed tag, or better yet, leaving it alone.
757:
Before placing a rewrite tag, please look long and hard for a more suitable tag. If you honestly can't find one, then follow the canned text's link to the Talk page and leave a concise but detailed message explaining what in the article needs to be rewritten.
497:
Even if the entire article is misspelled, it will be very useful to say it on the Talk page, since it will allow the next editor to inform the others of something like "I cleaned up the first two paragraphs but didn't have time to go through the rest of it."
1571: 1762:
places one thinks the topic might also apply (or if it's worldwide, say so). In our example, the writer seems to have limited themself to a Polish enclave in New York, ignoring the Eastern European country where these pastries were probably invented.
2095:
things wrong with it. The problem with putting an individual tag for each of these problems is that the lead line of the article is pushed way down (and perhaps off) the screen, and then it looks like tag bombing even if that wasn't the intention.
1192:
It would of course be silly to place an "unreferenced" tag on this page. The talk page ought to give some kind of idea as to what additional references would be helpful. For example, "It would be nice to use references from journals other than the
572:
satisfying the Zhang-Glüffliger inequality. There are only six Zhang-Glüffliger primes, meaning that the set of Zhang-Glüffliger primes is finite. 2 is the only even Zhang-Glüffliger prime, while 3 and 17 are the Zhang-Glüffliger primes to also be
129:. In fact, the identification and labeling step is often botched, resulting at best in a long delay until the problem is fixed, and at worst in an edit war in which several people revert the tagger, who refuses to explain the reason for the tag. 152:
A quick word about inline tags: inline tags such as the "citation needed" tags provide more context for future editors, but even these tags can create some of the issues associated with maintenance tags. Take this fictionalized example:
3105:
There are no permanent tags for articles, but there are permanent tags for talk pages, project pages, category listings, etc. The essay tag at the top of this article is one example of a tag that should stay on the page permanently.
1062:
you don't have the time to dig them up yourself right now. In the example, you might suggest "Try medical journals for surgeons." If you honestly think no one will be able to find any references to support this, then nominate the
159:
In the third issue of 1998 of the Canadian Quarterly Journal of Integer Sequences, starting on page 347, Helmutz showed that the Schmuckelberg theorem can be extended to complex integers only if the Riemann hypothesis is true.
126: 1754:
is a pastry usually eaten on the 3rd Monday after Lent, generally filled with strawberry jelly. You can buy some from Mikolaj's on the way to LaGuardia, though the A & P supermarkets make decent zdroplaksczies. ...
257:
more specific clean up tags. If you don't have the time to look at the more specific clean up tags, at least take a minute to write a few lines in the talk page as to what kind of clean up you think is necessary.
249:
is a surgical operation in which a long, thin tube is inserted into the bronchial aperture and a reading is taken. Since 2002, bronchial entuberances are preferred for patients with kidney conditions. ...
746:
are the foundation of a planetary measurement institute and the explanation of the principle of the retrograde. He is credited with designing innovative astrolabes, including one that bears his name. ...
631:
For the sake of keeping the example short, we have used a stub. In practice, it might be better to reserve the use of this tag for articles too long to be considered stubs yet still somehow incomplete.
136:
If you are going to put a tag on an article that proclaims it as seriously faulty, you should leave an explanation on the talk page of that article, even though the reasons seem plainly obvious to you.
260:
This tag used to have a link to help users find more specific clean up messages. For some reason, this has been removed, making it harder for responsible taggers to find the appropriate specific tag.
1672:
reforms infieffment laws in the state and brings them into line with federal infieffment laws in the U. S. Code. Infieffment laws in the state have been in effect since colonial times. ...
648:
which provide a more specific location of the issue and specifies what needs fixing in the main body of the article. This type of tag is self documenting and will get a result even faster.
2100:
issues. However, just because this tag takes up less space than several individual tags doesn't mean one shouldn't carefully select the tags that would be most helpful to other editors.
3166:
This stems from an information asymmetry between experienced editors who lack fact but can identify problems, and domain experts who know the material but are uninformed about editing.
99:
add the most relevant and specific tags, and leave an explanation on the talk page so that others can understand what the problem was and determine if they can do anything to fix it.
2930: 1678:
The talk page should explain, to those unfamiliar with any of the sides in the argument, what the sides are and try to point to some neutral language that all sides might agree on.
1459: 613: 180:, Smith writes that Taft independently came up with the Schmuckelberg theorem the same year as Schmuckelberg did. Everyone agrees the Schmuckelberg does not hold under closure. 362:
tag lacks any context and so only creates new confusion. If you're going to put this tag on a talk page, you should try to explain what was it that you found so confusing:
2241: 2229: 1805: 1793: 2343: 1709: 2473: 2296: 2129: 1104: 941: 458:(1753? - 1809?) was a British pirate, best known for commandeering Royal Navy ships. Reedparrot was the inspiration for the fictional character of Jack Parrot in 430: 229: 1589:
Suppose that you have no idea what the example is talking about. You could try clicking on one of the links. If you click on "Gaussian prime", you're taken to
3291: 1027:
study in the first 2005 issue of the Petorian Journal of Medicine. As with contuberances, local anesthesia is generally used to perform this procedure.
1197:." If you have the time, you should also flag with citation needed tags one or two statements not supported by the references already in the article. 2675: 2662: 2182: 1979: 1042: 2886: 2731: 2418: 2355: 2135: 1721: 690: 537: 310: 233: 2993: 2767: 46:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
2778: 47: 639:
Sometimes the tag applies just to a section. In that case, the syntax between the curly braces is "Incomplete|section|date=Month Year"
2934: 149:
examples, but they are actually not exaggerations of the sort of thing that happens when an article's problem is incorrectly labeled.
2171: 1968: 1628: 1041:
tag on a page, you're representing that you have actually read the article and found no references whatsoever of any kind, including
3147: 3029: 3011: 2952: 2850: 2796: 2635: 2491: 2436: 2377: 2314: 2259: 2200: 2143: 1988: 1899: 1814: 1734: 1652: 1165: 1006: 805: 439: 328: 95:
If you identify problems in an article but don't have the knowledge or time and/or energy to fix them yourself, please take care to
2578: 2571: 2079:
sections of the article, it's a judgment call. Whatever call you make, you should explain how you made that call in the talk page.
1875: 2616: 1146: 987: 3114:
The opposite of responsible tagging is of course irresponsible tagging. There are at least two irresponsible tagging techniques.
624:
You don't have to supply in the talk page what the article is missing, because then you might just as well complete the article.
121:
It is much easier and less time-consuming for an experienced Wikipedian to identify and label an article's problem than it is to
16:
This page is about tags that users can put in articles. For information on tags that edit filters can put on edit histories, see
2592: 1122: 963: 264: 1235: 1046: 714: 1108: 945: 348:
is a small, soft, furry animal from another planet. They eat grain. They reproduce very quickly. Klingons hate tribbles. ...
2465: 2288: 422: 2598: 1128: 969: 2531: 1915:
Bronchial contuberances were first studied by Dr. Hartman at Quahog Hospital. Dr. Hartman published his findings in the
617:
In 1965, John Zhang hypothesized on the finiteness of these primes. In 1982, Hans Glüffliger proved Zhang's hypothesis.
170:
Citation needed isn't the only inline tag available, there are a few others that are better suited for some situations.
3286: 2989: 2985: 681: 220: 3086: 2604: 2414: 2359: 1890: 1725: 1230: 1134: 1050: 975: 930: 306: 2723: 2667: 2567: 1886: 1097: 949: 934: 176:
However, Taft said "I'll bet my life the Schmuckelberg theorem is false for complex integers." In his heavy book
2711: 2588: 1632: 1566:{\displaystyle \left({\frac {-1}{n}}\right)=\left({\frac {-1}{p}}\right)\left({\frac {-1}{q}}\right)=(-1)^{2}=1} 1186:
and is not at all recommended for pregnant women. Local anesthesia is generally used to perform this procedure.
1118: 959: 3132: 96: 366:
Were you confused because of a single statement in the article, or were you confused by the entire article?
106: 1639: 2719: 2406: 298: 51: 2771:
that states a Knowledge (XXG) editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic.
1036: 2828: 2167: 1964: 792: 61: 3123:
frustration and not try to do anything to address the problem the several dozen pages allegedly have.
580: 225: 2178: 1975: 645:{{Expand section|1= * Career from 1952 to 1960 * Final days after 1972 retirement |{{subst:DATE}}}} 216: 739: 2066:
just remove some of them? If the article has lots of misspellings, why not put a copyedit tag on?
1582: 39: 2610: 1283: 1140: 981: 826: 738:. Although few details of his life are known, he is regarded as one of the leading scientists in 357: 2980:
may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may interest only a particular audience
1925:
How's this original research? The talk page might explain that the author of the article has "
1326: 372:
Were you confused because you don't know anything whatsoever about the subject of the article?
17: 1590: 1303: 1053:. It is not enough to determine that the article lacks Knowledge (XXG)'s most commonly used 1063: 1049:
and websites that actually support the article content, but that have been mis-labeled as
473:
wit digging up of teh hms chloroform a reasesssment is needed of reedparrot's reptation.
3097:
long (for example, the airing of a new half-hour episode of a popular television show).
668: 536:
Please expand the article to include this information. Further details may exist on the
1256: 1054: 728: 3280: 1440: 1252: 731: 708: 132:
This essay will give advice about specific tags, but the general gist of it is this:
483:
The Reedparrot Museum in New Jersey opened in 2004, to coincide with the release of
54:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. 2727: 1643: 1279: 574: 569: 2915: 2556: 1926: 1248: 1086: 919: 561: 1066:. Don't waste people's time with requests you think are impossible to fulfill. 369:
Were you confused because the article contradicts something in another article?
871: 735: 2992:
any relevant information, and removing excessive detail that may be against
884: 845: 743: 2933:
and add information such as author, title, date of publication, publisher,
2653: 1221: 518: 375:
Were you confused because of an excessive use of technical terms or jargon?
2879: 848: 114:
the likelihood that the article's maintainers will improve the article.
875: 852: 378:
Were you confused because of an excessive use of mathematical formulas?
2242:
explain the fiction more clearly and provide non-fictional perspective
1929:" for their username, or that there is in fact no such journal as the 1806:
explain the fiction more clearly and provide non-fictional perspective
881: 841: 830: 1893:. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. 1933:. (In the latter case, there might be a better template, I think.) 577:. 61 is the only Zhang-Glüffliger prime to satisfy the congruence 381:
Were you confused because of an excessive use of musical notation?
2529:
parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article.
878: 867: 856: 837: 834: 2964: 2909: 2862: 2808: 2750: 2694: 2647: 2550: 2503: 2448: 2389: 2326: 2271: 2212: 2150: 2109: 1947: 1858: 1776: 1692: 1612: 1216: 1080: 913: 772: 662: 512: 405: 281: 202: 81: 25: 712: 387:
Were you confused because of an excessive use of screenshots?
145:
explanation for a related article with the tag in question.
2768:
personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay
384:
Were you confused because of an excessive use of diagrams?
2890: 2832: 2774: 2351: 2237: 1882: 1801: 1717: 796: 686: 69: 2228:
describes a work or element of fiction in a primarily
1792:
describes a work or element of fiction in a primarily
1462: 583: 2070:
confusion by simply removing the words "very sexy".
1302:. This means that the factors of a Blum integer are 532:
Error: you must specify what information is missing.
263:
This has understandably sparked some annoyance, see
3085:likely change once the event actually happens. See 1111:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 390:
Were you confused for some other reason altogether?
127:
the importance of identifying and labeling problems
1565: 1238:to it so that it can be listed with similar pages. 607: 1447:of +1, although -1 is not a quadratic residue of 502:The missing information tag (Missing information) 460:Pirates of the Pacific 2: Destination California 2468:for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling 2291:for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling 425:for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling 2885:There might be a discussion about this on the 2730:. Please discuss this issue on the article's 2340:The examples and perspective in this article 1706:The examples and perspective in this article 1070:Additional references needed tag (refimprove) 354:Without an explanation on the talk page, the 8: 2417:. There might be a discussion about this on 626:But you DO have to give a good, general idea 309:. There might be a discussion about this on 2185:of quality, and to make it neutral in tone. 2144:Learn how and when to remove these messages 1982:of quality, and to make it neutral in tone. 1581:Experienced Wikipedians will probably have 948:. Unsourced material may be challenged and 485:Pirates of the Pacific: Talking Man's Curse 1642:. Please do not remove this message until 1420:is a permutation. The inverse function of 3030:Learn how and when to remove this message 3012:Learn how and when to remove this message 2953:Learn how and when to remove this message 2851:Learn how and when to remove this message 2797:Learn how and when to remove this message 2636:Learn how and when to remove this message 2492:Learn how and when to remove this message 2437:Learn how and when to remove this message 2378:Learn how and when to remove this message 2315:Learn how and when to remove this message 2260:Learn how and when to remove this message 2201:Learn how and when to remove this message 2083:The multiple issues tag (multiple issues) 2014:Episodes Calcarone has appeared in so far 1989:Learn how and when to remove this message 1900:Learn how and when to remove this message 1815:Learn how and when to remove this message 1735:Learn how and when to remove this message 1653:Learn how and when to remove this message 1551: 1516: 1493: 1467: 1461: 1166:Learn how and when to remove this message 1007:Learn how and when to remove this message 806:Learn how and when to remove this message 582: 440:Learn how and when to remove this message 329:Learn how and when to remove this message 2678:of all important aspects of the article. 2519:needs attention from an expert in Sample 1638:Relevant discussion may be found on the 48:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines 3183: 3159: 1349:has precisely four square roots modulo 600: 598: 3292:Knowledge (XXG) essays about templates 2674:Please consider expanding the lead to 2577:Please improve this article by adding 2534:may be able to help recruit an expert. 2043:"Lancelot of Lake Tear of the Clouds," 1848:Original research (original research) 1670:Massachusetts infieffment act of 1993 1206:The uncategorized tag (uncategorized) 762:The "too many links" tag (overlinked) 7: 3059:Articles that should just be deleted 1109:adding citations to reliable sources 946:adding citations to reliable sources 628:of what it is you think is missing. 531: 395:The copyedit clean up tag (copyedit) 192:The catch-all clean up tag (cleanup) 265:Knowledge (XXG):Clarify the cleanup 2994:Knowledge (XXG)'s inclusion policy 1917:Rhode Island Journal of Pediatrics 1353:, exactly one of which is also in 52:thoroughly vetted by the community 14: 3244:John Jacobson, "On Lopez numbers" 3148:Help:Maintenance template removal 3073:and explaining borderline cases. 2125:This article has multiple issues. 2102: 1940: 1851: 1769: 1685: 1605: 1209: 1073: 906: 765: 680:to comply with Knowledge (XXG)'s 655: 505: 398: 274: 230:improve this Knowledge (XXG) page 195: 172: 155: 2969: 2925:lack bibliographical information 2914: 2867: 2813: 2755: 2714:to read and navigate comfortably 2699: 2652: 2555: 2508: 2453: 2394: 2331: 2276: 2217: 2155: 2114: 2104:Example of template and article 1952: 1942:Example of template and article 1937:"Resembles a fan site" (fansite) 1863: 1853:Example of template and article 1781: 1771:Example of template and article 1697: 1687:Example of template and article 1682:Globalization issues (globalize) 1617: 1607:Example of template and article 1435:For every Jacobson-Lopez number 1220: 1211:Example of template and article 1085: 1075:Example of template and article 918: 908:Example of template and article 777: 767:Example of template and article 667: 657:Example of template and article 608:{\displaystyle p\equiv 1\mod 60} 517: 507:Example of template and article 410: 400:Example of template and article 286: 276:Example of template and article 228:has been specified. Please help 206: 197:Example of template and article 167:the page would make more sense. 85: 29: 23:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG) 2666:may be too short to adequately 2133:or discuss these issues on the 2028:"Diary of a New Jersey Priest," 1602:Neutrality disputes (POV-check) 1096:needs additional citations for 903:Unreferenced tag (unreferenced) 125:. But this is not to denigrate 3050:Gumbel 2 Gumbel: Beach Justice 3048:is a the fictional villain in 2676:provide an accessible overview 2009:Gumbel 2 Gumbel: Beach Justice 1835:Gumbel 2 Gumbel: Beach Justice 1548: 1538: 642:Another alternative is to use 1: 2579:secondary or tertiary sources 1055:hyperlinked footnote citation 870:, bronchial entuberances are 593: 271:The confusing tag (confusing) 1195:Petorian Journal of Medicine 3271:Sample reference goes here. 3262:Sample reference goes here. 3253:Sample reference goes here. 3235:Example reference goes here 3226:Example reference goes here 3217:Example reference goes here 3208:Example reference goes here 3199:Example reference goes here 3190:Example reference goes here 3133:Knowledge (XXG):Tag bombing 3110:About irresponsible tagging 3087:Category:Temporal templates 2891:improve this wikipedia page 2722:content into sub-articles, 2354:, discuss the issue on the 1889:the claims made and adding 1720:, discuss the issue on the 1644:conditions to do so are met 898:Tags calling for references 3310: 3130: 2878:contain a large number of 2007:is a fictional villain in 1833:is a fictional villain in 1364:The unique square root of 1229:has not been added to any 713: 219:to meet Knowledge (XXG)'s 213:This Knowledge (XXG) page 59: 15: 2923:This article's citations 2025:"Dames of Madame DuBois," 1766:In-universe (in-universe) 1316:a Jacobson-Lopez number, 1201:Meta-information problems 652:The rewrite tag (rewrite) 2876:This article appears to 1306:with no imaginary part. 1043:parenthetical references 742:. Among his advances in 693:may contain suggestions. 678:may need to be rewritten 236:may contain suggestions. 178:The Schmuckelberg Enigma 123:actually fix the problem 93:This page in a nutshell: 2058:collections of links." 1251:, more specifically in 3287:Knowledge (XXG) essays 3064:article for deletion. 2822:This article may have 2777:by rewriting it in an 2566:relies excessively on 2166:may be written from a 2046:"Probably Devils," and 2040:"Gentlewomen Callers," 1963:may be written from a 1567: 1183:bronchial contuberance 864:bronchial contuberance 823:bronchial contuberance 786:This article may have 609: 566:Zhang-Glüffliger prime 528:is missing information 247:bronchial contuberance 3118:Timed mass harassment 2589:"Responsible tagging" 2172:neutral point of view 1969:neutral point of view 1568: 1379:principle square root 1298:+7, for some integer 1294:must be of the form 8 1264:Jacobson-Lopez number 1234:. Please help out by 1119:"Responsible tagging" 1024:bronchial entuberance 960:"Responsible tagging" 610: 50:, as it has not been 2407:confusing or unclear 2360:create a new article 2352:improve this article 2342:may not represent a 1726:create a new article 1718:improve this article 1708:may not represent a 1460: 1105:improve this article 1064:article for deletion 942:improve this article 581: 299:confusing or unclear 18:Knowledge (XXG):Tags 3077:Time-sensitive tags 3068:Non-pejorative tags 2937:, pages cited, etc. 2833:improve the article 2415:clarify the article 2168:fan's point of view 2105: 2087:It is possible for 1965:fan's point of view 1943: 1854: 1772: 1688: 1631:of this article is 1608: 1212: 1076: 909: 797:improve the article 768: 740:classical antiquity 658: 508: 401: 307:clarify the article 277: 198: 111:responsible tagging 2931:guide to citations 2829:guideline on links 2827:Please review the 2779:encyclopedic style 2766:is written like a 2532:WikiProject Sample 2472:You can assist by 2295:You can assist by 2103: 1941: 1874:possibly contains 1852: 1770: 1686: 1606: 1597:Viewpoint problems 1563: 1327:quadratic residues 1210: 1074: 1047:general references 907: 827:surgical operation 793:guideline on links 791:Please review the 766: 705:Archimedes of Troy 656: 605: 601: 599: 594: 533: 506: 429:You can assist by 399: 275: 196: 3056: 3055: 3040: 3039: 3032: 3022: 3021: 3014: 2963: 2962: 2955: 2908: 2907: 2861: 2860: 2853: 2807: 2806: 2799: 2749: 2748: 2693: 2692: 2646: 2645: 2638: 2620: 2549: 2548: 2502: 2501: 2494: 2447: 2446: 2439: 2388: 2387: 2380: 2362:, as appropriate. 2325: 2324: 2317: 2270: 2269: 2262: 2211: 2210: 2203: 2148: 2093:several different 2055: 2054: 2019:"Public Affairs," 1999: 1998: 1991: 1923: 1922: 1910: 1909: 1902: 1876:original research 1841: 1840: 1825: 1824: 1817: 1759: 1758: 1745: 1744: 1737: 1728:, as appropriate. 1676: 1675: 1663: 1662: 1655: 1579: 1578: 1529: 1506: 1480: 1242: 1241: 1236:adding categories 1190: 1189: 1176: 1175: 1168: 1150: 1031: 1030: 1017: 1016: 1009: 991: 891: 890: 816: 815: 808: 751: 750: 699: 698: 682:quality standards 622: 621: 555: 554: 491: 490: 450: 449: 442: 352: 351: 339: 338: 331: 254: 253: 240: 239: 221:quality standards 184: 183: 164: 163: 103: 102: 80: 79: 3299: 3272: 3269: 3263: 3260: 3254: 3251: 3245: 3242: 3236: 3233: 3227: 3224: 3218: 3215: 3209: 3206: 3200: 3197: 3191: 3188: 3177: 3173: 3167: 3164: 3035: 3028: 3017: 3010: 3006: 3003: 2997: 2973: 2972: 2965: 2958: 2951: 2947: 2944: 2938: 2929:Please read the 2918: 2910: 2903: 2900: 2894: 2871: 2870: 2863: 2856: 2849: 2845: 2842: 2836: 2817: 2816: 2809: 2802: 2795: 2791: 2788: 2782: 2759: 2758: 2751: 2744: 2741: 2735: 2703: 2702: 2695: 2688: 2685: 2679: 2656: 2648: 2641: 2634: 2630: 2627: 2621: 2619: 2583: 2559: 2551: 2544: 2541: 2535: 2521:. Please add a 2512: 2511: 2504: 2497: 2490: 2486: 2483: 2477: 2457: 2456: 2449: 2442: 2435: 2431: 2428: 2422: 2398: 2397: 2390: 2383: 2376: 2372: 2369: 2363: 2335: 2334: 2327: 2320: 2313: 2309: 2306: 2300: 2280: 2279: 2272: 2265: 2258: 2254: 2251: 2245: 2221: 2220: 2213: 2206: 2199: 2195: 2192: 2186: 2181:to conform to a 2170:, rather than a 2159: 2158: 2151: 2140: 2118: 2117: 2110: 2106: 2091:article to have 2022:"Sinful Angels," 1994: 1987: 1983: 1978:to conform to a 1967:, rather than a 1956: 1955: 1948: 1944: 1905: 1898: 1894: 1891:inline citations 1867: 1866: 1859: 1855: 1820: 1813: 1809: 1785: 1784: 1777: 1773: 1740: 1733: 1729: 1701: 1700: 1693: 1689: 1658: 1651: 1647: 1621: 1620: 1613: 1609: 1591:Gaussian integer 1572: 1570: 1569: 1564: 1556: 1555: 1534: 1530: 1525: 1517: 1511: 1507: 1502: 1494: 1485: 1481: 1476: 1468: 1224: 1217: 1213: 1171: 1164: 1160: 1157: 1151: 1149: 1113: 1089: 1081: 1077: 1040: 1012: 1005: 1001: 998: 992: 990: 954: 922: 914: 910: 811: 804: 800: 781: 780: 773: 769: 718: 717: 694: 671: 663: 659: 614: 612: 611: 606: 550: 547: 541: 521: 513: 509: 445: 438: 434: 414: 413: 406: 402: 361: 334: 327: 323: 320: 314: 290: 289: 282: 278: 232:if you can; the 210: 209: 203: 199: 173: 156: 89: 88: 82: 72: 33: 32: 26: 3309: 3308: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3270: 3266: 3261: 3257: 3252: 3248: 3243: 3239: 3234: 3230: 3225: 3221: 3216: 3212: 3207: 3203: 3198: 3194: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3180: 3174: 3170: 3165: 3161: 3156: 3144: 3135: 3129: 3120: 3112: 3103: 3094:Current events. 3079: 3070: 3061: 3036: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3018: 3007: 3001: 2998: 2984:Please help by 2983: 2974: 2970: 2959: 2948: 2942: 2939: 2928: 2919: 2904: 2898: 2895: 2884: 2872: 2868: 2857: 2846: 2840: 2837: 2826: 2824:too many links. 2818: 2814: 2803: 2792: 2786: 2783: 2775:help improve it 2772: 2760: 2756: 2745: 2739: 2736: 2717: 2704: 2700: 2689: 2683: 2680: 2673: 2661:This article's 2657: 2642: 2631: 2625: 2622: 2584: 2576: 2572:primary sources 2560: 2545: 2539: 2536: 2530: 2513: 2509: 2498: 2487: 2481: 2478: 2471: 2458: 2454: 2443: 2432: 2426: 2423: 2412: 2399: 2395: 2384: 2373: 2367: 2364: 2349: 2336: 2332: 2321: 2310: 2304: 2301: 2294: 2281: 2277: 2266: 2255: 2249: 2246: 2238:help rewrite it 2235: 2222: 2218: 2207: 2196: 2190: 2187: 2183:higher standard 2176: 2160: 2156: 2119: 2115: 2085: 2076: 2037:"Joan's Trial," 2016: 1995: 1984: 1980:higher standard 1973: 1957: 1953: 1939: 1906: 1895: 1880: 1868: 1864: 1850: 1821: 1810: 1802:help rewrite it 1799: 1786: 1782: 1768: 1741: 1730: 1715: 1702: 1698: 1684: 1659: 1648: 1637: 1622: 1618: 1604: 1599: 1547: 1518: 1512: 1495: 1489: 1469: 1463: 1458: 1457: 1411: 1402: 1376: 1361: 1341: 1325:the set of all 1324: 1304:Gaussian primes 1282:congruent to 7 1208: 1203: 1172: 1161: 1155: 1152: 1114: 1102: 1090: 1072: 1034: 1013: 1002: 996: 993: 955: 939: 923: 905: 900: 812: 801: 790: 788:too many links. 782: 778: 764: 695: 685: 672: 654: 646: 579: 578: 551: 545: 542: 535: 522: 504: 456:John Reedparrot 446: 435: 428: 415: 411: 397: 355: 335: 324: 318: 315: 304: 291: 287: 273: 207: 194: 189: 86: 76: 75: 68: 64: 56: 55: 30: 24: 21: 12: 11: 5: 3307: 3306: 3303: 3295: 3294: 3289: 3279: 3278: 3274: 3273: 3264: 3255: 3246: 3237: 3228: 3219: 3210: 3201: 3192: 3182: 3179: 3178: 3168: 3158: 3157: 3155: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3143: 3140: 3128: 3125: 3119: 3116: 3111: 3108: 3102: 3101:Permanent tags 3099: 3082:Future events. 3078: 3075: 3069: 3066: 3060: 3057: 3054: 3053: 3042: 3041: 3038: 3037: 3020: 3019: 2977: 2975: 2968: 2961: 2960: 2922: 2920: 2913: 2906: 2905: 2889:. Please help 2875: 2873: 2866: 2859: 2858: 2821: 2819: 2812: 2805: 2804: 2763: 2761: 2754: 2747: 2746: 2726:it, or adding 2707: 2705: 2698: 2691: 2690: 2670:the key points 2660: 2658: 2651: 2644: 2643: 2582: 2563: 2561: 2554: 2547: 2546: 2516: 2514: 2507: 2500: 2499: 2461: 2459: 2452: 2445: 2444: 2402: 2400: 2393: 2386: 2385: 2346:of the subject 2344:worldwide view 2339: 2337: 2330: 2323: 2322: 2284: 2282: 2275: 2268: 2267: 2226:This article 2225: 2223: 2216: 2209: 2208: 2163: 2161: 2154: 2149: 2123: 2122: 2120: 2113: 2084: 2081: 2075: 2072: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049:"L'Argentina." 2047: 2044: 2041: 2038: 2035: 2034:"Pickpockets," 2032: 2031:"Escaped Man," 2029: 2026: 2023: 2020: 2015: 2012: 2001: 2000: 1997: 1996: 1960: 1958: 1951: 1938: 1935: 1921: 1920: 1912: 1911: 1908: 1907: 1871: 1869: 1862: 1849: 1846: 1839: 1838: 1827: 1826: 1823: 1822: 1790:This article 1789: 1787: 1780: 1767: 1764: 1757: 1756: 1747: 1746: 1743: 1742: 1712:of the subject 1710:worldwide view 1705: 1703: 1696: 1683: 1680: 1674: 1673: 1665: 1664: 1661: 1660: 1625: 1623: 1616: 1603: 1600: 1598: 1595: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1562: 1559: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1543: 1540: 1537: 1533: 1528: 1524: 1521: 1515: 1510: 1505: 1501: 1498: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1479: 1475: 1472: 1466: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1433: 1407: 1398: 1389: 1377:is called the 1372: 1362: 1357: 1337: 1329:modulo n, and 1320: 1257:natural number 1244: 1243: 1240: 1239: 1225: 1207: 1204: 1202: 1199: 1188: 1187: 1178: 1177: 1174: 1173: 1112: 1093: 1091: 1084: 1071: 1068: 1051:external links 1033:By placing an 1029: 1028: 1019: 1018: 1015: 1014: 953: 926: 924: 917: 904: 901: 899: 896: 889: 888: 860: 818: 817: 814: 813: 785: 783: 776: 763: 760: 749: 748: 727:312 BC) was a 701: 700: 697: 696: 675: 673: 666: 653: 650: 644: 620: 619: 604: 597: 592: 589: 586: 557: 556: 553: 552: 525: 523: 516: 503: 500: 489: 488: 480: 479: 475: 474: 469: 468: 464: 463: 452: 451: 448: 447: 418: 416: 409: 396: 393: 392: 391: 388: 385: 382: 379: 376: 373: 370: 367: 350: 349: 341: 340: 337: 336: 294: 292: 285: 272: 269: 252: 251: 242: 241: 238: 237: 226:cleanup reason 211: 193: 190: 188: 185: 182: 181: 162: 161: 109:who practices 101: 100: 90: 78: 77: 74: 73: 65: 60: 57: 45: 44: 36: 34: 22: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3305: 3304: 3293: 3290: 3288: 3285: 3284: 3282: 3268: 3265: 3259: 3256: 3250: 3247: 3241: 3238: 3232: 3229: 3223: 3220: 3214: 3211: 3205: 3202: 3196: 3193: 3187: 3184: 3172: 3169: 3163: 3160: 3153: 3149: 3146: 3145: 3141: 3139: 3134: 3126: 3124: 3117: 3115: 3109: 3107: 3100: 3098: 3095: 3091: 3088: 3083: 3076: 3074: 3067: 3065: 3058: 3051: 3047: 3046:Joe Calcarone 3044: 3043: 3034: 3031: 3016: 3013: 3005: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2981: 2978:This article 2976: 2967: 2966: 2957: 2954: 2946: 2936: 2932: 2926: 2921: 2917: 2912: 2911: 2902: 2892: 2888: 2882: 2881: 2874: 2865: 2864: 2855: 2852: 2844: 2834: 2830: 2825: 2820: 2811: 2810: 2801: 2798: 2790: 2780: 2776: 2770: 2769: 2764:This article 2762: 2753: 2752: 2743: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2715: 2713: 2706: 2697: 2696: 2687: 2677: 2671: 2669: 2664: 2659: 2655: 2650: 2649: 2640: 2637: 2629: 2618: 2615: 2612: 2609: 2606: 2603: 2600: 2597: 2594: 2590: 2587: 2586:Find sources: 2580: 2574: 2573: 2569: 2564:This article 2562: 2558: 2553: 2552: 2543: 2533: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2517:This article 2515: 2506: 2505: 2496: 2493: 2485: 2475: 2469: 2467: 2462:This article 2460: 2451: 2450: 2441: 2438: 2430: 2420: 2419:the talk page 2416: 2410: 2408: 2403:This article 2401: 2392: 2391: 2382: 2379: 2371: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2347: 2345: 2338: 2329: 2328: 2319: 2316: 2308: 2298: 2292: 2290: 2285:This article 2283: 2274: 2273: 2264: 2261: 2253: 2250:December 2008 2243: 2239: 2233: 2231: 2224: 2215: 2214: 2205: 2202: 2194: 2191:December 2008 2184: 2180: 2174: 2173: 2169: 2164:This article 2162: 2153: 2152: 2147: 2145: 2138: 2137: 2132: 2131: 2126: 2121: 2112: 2111: 2108: 2107: 2101: 2097: 2094: 2090: 2082: 2080: 2074:Tag placement 2073: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2048: 2045: 2042: 2039: 2036: 2033: 2030: 2027: 2024: 2021: 2018: 2017: 2013: 2010: 2006: 2005:Joe Calcarone 2003: 2002: 1993: 1990: 1981: 1977: 1971: 1970: 1966: 1961:This article 1959: 1950: 1949: 1946: 1945: 1936: 1934: 1932: 1928: 1918: 1914: 1913: 1904: 1901: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1878: 1877: 1872:This article 1870: 1861: 1860: 1857: 1856: 1847: 1845: 1836: 1832: 1831:Joe Calcarone 1829: 1828: 1819: 1816: 1807: 1803: 1797: 1795: 1788: 1779: 1778: 1775: 1774: 1765: 1763: 1753: 1752:zdroplaksczie 1749: 1748: 1739: 1736: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1713: 1711: 1704: 1695: 1694: 1691: 1690: 1681: 1679: 1671: 1667: 1666: 1657: 1654: 1645: 1641: 1635: 1634: 1630: 1624: 1615: 1614: 1611: 1610: 1601: 1596: 1594: 1592: 1587: 1584: 1560: 1557: 1552: 1544: 1541: 1535: 1531: 1526: 1522: 1519: 1513: 1508: 1503: 1499: 1496: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1477: 1473: 1470: 1464: 1456: 1455: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1441:Jacobi symbol 1438: 1434: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1410: 1406: 1401: 1397: 1394: 1391:The function 1390: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1280:prime numbers 1278:are distinct 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1258: 1254: 1253:number theory 1250: 1246: 1245: 1237: 1233: 1232: 1226: 1223: 1219: 1218: 1215: 1214: 1205: 1200: 1198: 1196: 1184: 1180: 1179: 1170: 1167: 1159: 1148: 1145: 1142: 1139: 1136: 1133: 1130: 1127: 1124: 1120: 1117: 1116:Find sources: 1110: 1106: 1100: 1099: 1094:This article 1092: 1088: 1083: 1082: 1079: 1078: 1069: 1067: 1065: 1059: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1038: 1025: 1021: 1020: 1011: 1008: 1000: 989: 986: 983: 980: 977: 974: 971: 968: 965: 961: 958: 957:Find sources: 951: 947: 943: 937: 936: 932: 927:This article 925: 921: 916: 915: 912: 911: 902: 897: 895: 886: 883: 880: 877: 873: 869: 865: 861: 858: 854: 850: 847: 843: 839: 836: 832: 828: 824: 820: 819: 810: 807: 798: 794: 789: 784: 775: 774: 771: 770: 761: 759: 755: 745: 741: 737: 733: 732:mathematician 730: 726: 722: 716: 710: 709:Ancient Greek 706: 703: 702: 692: 688: 683: 679: 676:This article 674: 670: 665: 664: 661: 660: 651: 649: 643: 640: 637: 633: 629: 627: 618: 602: 595: 590: 587: 584: 576: 575:Fermat primes 571: 567: 563: 559: 558: 549: 539: 529: 526:This article 524: 520: 515: 514: 511: 510: 501: 499: 495: 486: 482: 481: 477: 476: 471: 470: 466: 465: 461: 457: 454: 453: 444: 441: 432: 426: 424: 419:This article 417: 408: 407: 404: 403: 394: 389: 386: 383: 380: 377: 374: 371: 368: 365: 364: 363: 359: 347: 343: 342: 333: 330: 322: 312: 311:the talk page 308: 302: 300: 295:This article 293: 284: 283: 280: 279: 270: 268: 266: 261: 258: 248: 244: 243: 235: 231: 227: 223: 222: 218: 212: 205: 204: 201: 200: 191: 187:Clean up tags 186: 179: 175: 174: 171: 168: 158: 157: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 137: 133: 130: 128: 124: 119: 115: 112: 108: 98: 94: 91: 84: 83: 71: 67: 66: 63: 58: 53: 49: 43: 41: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3267: 3258: 3249: 3240: 3231: 3222: 3213: 3204: 3195: 3186: 3171: 3162: 3136: 3127:Tag slamming 3121: 3113: 3104: 3093: 3092: 3081: 3080: 3071: 3062: 3049: 3045: 3026: 3008: 2999: 2986:spinning off 2979: 2949: 2940: 2924: 2896: 2877: 2847: 2838: 2823: 2793: 2784: 2765: 2737: 2709: 2681: 2665: 2663:lead section 2632: 2623: 2613: 2607: 2601: 2595: 2585: 2565: 2537: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2488: 2479: 2466:copy editing 2464:may require 2463: 2433: 2424: 2413:Please help 2404: 2374: 2365: 2341: 2311: 2305:January 2009 2302: 2289:copy editing 2287:may require 2286: 2256: 2247: 2227: 2197: 2188: 2165: 2141: 2134: 2128: 2127:Please help 2124: 2098: 2092: 2088: 2086: 2077: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2008: 2004: 1985: 1962: 1930: 1924: 1916: 1896: 1873: 1842: 1834: 1830: 1811: 1791: 1760: 1751: 1731: 1707: 1677: 1669: 1649: 1627: 1588: 1580: 1448: 1444: 1436: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1408: 1404: 1399: 1395: 1392: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1307: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1228: 1194: 1191: 1182: 1162: 1156:January 2009 1153: 1143: 1137: 1131: 1125: 1115: 1103:Please help 1098:verification 1095: 1060: 1037:unreferenced 1032: 1023: 1003: 997:January 2009 994: 984: 978: 972: 966: 956: 940:Please help 928: 892: 863: 822: 802: 787: 756: 752: 724: 720: 704: 687:You can help 677: 647: 641: 638: 634: 630: 625: 623: 616: 570:prime number 565: 543: 527: 496: 492: 484: 459: 455: 436: 423:copy editing 421:may require 420: 353: 345: 325: 319:January 2009 316: 305:Please help 296: 262: 259: 255: 246: 215:may require 214: 177: 169: 165: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 134: 131: 122: 120: 116: 110: 104: 92: 37: 3131:Main page: 2893:if you can. 2728:subheadings 2230:in-universe 2179:clean it up 1976:clean it up 1794:in-universe 1439:, -1 has a 1412:defined by 1286:8. That is 1249:mathematics 829:in which a 723:. 384 BC – 562:mathematics 546:August 2009 38:This is an 3281:Categories 2990:relocating 2724:condensing 2708:This page 2599:newspapers 2568:references 2474:editing it 2409:to readers 2368:April 2009 2297:editing it 2130:improve it 1883:improve it 1629:neutrality 1231:categories 1227:This page 1129:newspapers 970:newspapers 885:conditions 736:astronomer 431:editing it 301:to readers 107:Wikipedian 70:WP:RESPTAG 3002:June 2009 2943:June 2009 2899:June 2009 2887:talk page 2880:buzzwords 2841:June 2009 2831:and help 2787:June 2009 2740:June 2009 2732:talk page 2720:splitting 2718:Consider 2684:June 2009 2668:summarize 2626:June 2009 2540:June 2009 2482:June 2009 2427:June 2009 2356:talk page 2136:talk page 1927:DrHartMan 1887:verifying 1722:talk page 1640:talk page 1426:f (x) = x 929:does not 872:preferred 846:bronchial 844:into the 795:and help 744:astronomy 715:Ἀρχιμήδης 691:talk page 538:talk page 358:confusing 234:talk page 3176:readers. 3142:See also 2712:too long 2350:You may 1716:You may 1633:disputed 1414:f(x) = x 1342:. Then: 876:patients 866:. Since 849:aperture 842:inserted 62:Shortcut 2773:Please 2710:may be 2611:scholar 2405:may be 2236:Please 2177:Please 1974:Please 1881:Please 1800:Please 1385:modulo 1141:scholar 982:scholar 950:removed 935:sources 853:reading 346:tribble 297:may be 217:cleanup 105:When a 2523:reason 1583:HotCat 1308:Given 1270:where 1268:n = pq 887:. ... 882:kidney 851:and a 734:, and 689:. The 530:about 224:. No 3154:Notes 2617:JSTOR 2605:books 2525:or a 2358:, or 2232:style 1796:style 1724:, or 1262:is a 1147:JSTOR 1135:books 988:JSTOR 976:books 825:is a 729:Greek 568:is a 478:... 467:... 40:essay 2935:ISBN 2593:news 2527:talk 1931:RIJP 1668:The 1626:The 1443:mod 1428:mod 1424:is: 1416:mod 1290:and 1274:and 1255:, a 1123:news 964:news 933:any 931:cite 879:with 874:for 868:2002 857:take 838:tube 835:thin 831:long 564:, a 97:only 2988:or 2570:to 2240:to 2089:one 1885:by 1804:to 1573:... 1381:of 1368:in 1284:mod 1266:if 1247:In 1107:by 944:by 855:is 840:is 719:) ( 596:mod 560:In 3283:: 2591:– 2581:. 2139:. 1919:. 1750:A 1542:− 1520:− 1497:− 1471:− 1403:→ 1393:f: 1333:∈ 1314:pq 1312:= 1181:A 1121:– 1045:, 1039:}} 1035:{{ 1022:A 962:– 862:A 859:- 833:, 821:A 725:c. 711:: 615:. 603:60 588:≡ 487:. 462:. 360:}} 356:{{ 344:A 267:. 245:A 3033:) 3027:( 3015:) 3009:( 3004:) 3000:( 2996:. 2982:. 2956:) 2950:( 2945:) 2941:( 2927:. 2901:) 2897:( 2883:. 2854:) 2848:( 2843:) 2839:( 2835:. 2800:) 2794:( 2789:) 2785:( 2781:. 2742:) 2738:( 2734:. 2716:. 2686:) 2682:( 2672:. 2639:) 2633:( 2628:) 2624:( 2614:· 2608:· 2602:· 2596:· 2575:. 2542:) 2538:( 2495:) 2489:( 2484:) 2480:( 2476:. 2470:. 2440:) 2434:( 2429:) 2425:( 2421:. 2411:. 2381:) 2375:( 2370:) 2366:( 2348:. 2318:) 2312:( 2307:) 2303:( 2299:. 2293:. 2263:) 2257:( 2252:) 2248:( 2244:. 2234:. 2204:) 2198:( 2193:) 2189:( 2175:. 2146:) 2142:( 1992:) 1986:( 1972:. 1903:) 1897:( 1879:. 1818:) 1812:( 1808:. 1798:. 1738:) 1732:( 1714:. 1656:) 1650:( 1646:. 1636:. 1561:1 1558:= 1553:2 1549:) 1545:1 1539:( 1536:= 1532:) 1527:q 1523:1 1514:( 1509:) 1504:p 1500:1 1491:( 1487:= 1483:) 1478:n 1474:1 1465:( 1451:: 1449:n 1445:n 1437:n 1432:. 1430:n 1422:f 1418:n 1409:n 1405:Q 1400:n 1396:Q 1387:n 1383:a 1374:n 1370:Q 1366:a 1359:n 1355:Q 1351:n 1347:a 1339:n 1335:Q 1331:a 1322:n 1318:Q 1310:n 1300:t 1296:t 1292:q 1288:p 1276:q 1272:p 1260:n 1169:) 1163:( 1158:) 1154:( 1144:· 1138:· 1132:· 1126:· 1101:. 1010:) 1004:( 999:) 995:( 985:· 979:· 973:· 967:· 952:. 938:. 809:) 803:( 799:. 721:c 707:( 684:. 591:1 585:p 548:) 544:( 540:. 534:. 443:) 437:( 433:. 427:. 332:) 326:( 321:) 317:( 313:. 303:. 42:. 20:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Tags
essay
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
thoroughly vetted by the community
Shortcut
WP:RESPTAG
only
Wikipedian
the importance of identifying and labeling problems
cleanup
quality standards
cleanup reason
improve this Knowledge (XXG) page
talk page
Knowledge (XXG):Clarify the cleanup
confusing or unclear
clarify the article
the talk page
Learn how and when to remove this message
confusing
copy editing
editing it
Learn how and when to remove this message

talk page
mathematics
prime number
Fermat primes

quality standards

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.