325:
from view. My review, and re-review, of the two editors contributions indicate very different ways of dealing with criticism and personal interaction (although I am aware that blanking pages is sometimes a method of not allowing similarities to be noted...) Lastly, I don't see any abuse within article space; no false consensus, to team tag editing, etc. The awarding of
Barnstars...? My personal opinion is that while I believe that the two editors are not the same, there is no abuse to warrent CU in any place.
329:
that account. Carol Sutton also appears to be a limited interest account, one specific sculptor and a few edits to that artistic genre. This is different to both other accounts, who seem to be vandal fighters and wikignomes (although not so succesful in
Bridwaters case). The one aspect that Carol Sutton shares with Bridwater is a certain lack of clue in some areas, whereas Chris19910 appears quite knowledgeable.
231:. Bridwater also seems to have a strange interest in awarding Chris19910 barnstars and Chris doesn't have a problem with Bridwater blanking his page. Although I have seen some legitimate editing, I see a lot of vandalism and edits that just don't make a lot of sense. I can't see how the use of both of these accounts is legitimate.
420:
Yes I do have a previous identity on wikipedia which if needed will be disclosed for the case. This is why I am so familiar with the layout of wikipedia and how i know my way around. I had twinkle previously with no problems at all and over 10,000 successful edits without any queston of vandalism or
332:
My concluding opinion is that all three are sufficiently different in different ways (one will share a similarity with one, but not the other, in some cases) to be different individuals. I am also aware that it is very rare that puppetmasters and socks portray themselves as different genders, as the
328:
I have had no previous interaction with Carol Sutton, and my comments are from a review of their contribution history only. Firstly, this was the first of the three accounts to be created - my understanding is that the puppetmaster usually creates their "own" account first and then socks to support
324:
I concur that Chris19910 noted that they permitted
Bridwater to blank and revert the formers userpage (and by reverting Bridwater was reblanking as other editors had already performed that action, which lead to the AIV report and my block) which, I suggest, is a pretty useless way of hiding a sock
308:
don't have a problem with
Bridwater clearing my page because I gave this user permission to do it in order to test their Twinkle see my usertalk page for conformation of this from the admin that blocked Bridwater for doing it. As for the user bridwater being a sockpuppet of 'mine'then that is
336:
While I have advised Chris19910 that a checkuser can clear as well as condemn I have yet to have a reply, and I am aware that the editor has intimated elsewhere that they have a previous account which may give them reason for their ip identity not to be
333:
facade of the "wrong sex" is difficult to maintain, yet while Carol Sutton appears to identify as female and
Bridwater and Chris19910 appear to be male. Other than the matter of Barnstars and adoption, I see no abuse that would justify a CU.
403:) and is asking someone to reinstate his admin status. Seems particularly strange to me. The "right to vanish" is exactly that. You can't vanish but save your admin status, if he ever was an admin in the first place.
35:
No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user,
309:
absolute rubbish because I have no reason to create another account because my editing is going perfectly well. As for putting the speedy delete tags on the pages I believe that the pages needed it.
234:
I don't have very much evidence that Carol Sutton is the same person besides the fact that they all started editiing around the same time the end of March 2008 and Chris19910 has adopted Carol Sutton
273:
Check user has determined that Chris19910 has been operating multiple accounts and a category has been set up at
Category:Knowledge sockpuppets of Chris19910. So far,
37:
163:
384:
Under the terms of an attack page the content falls into that catagory im not going to argue about it. Chris19910 (talk) 14:04, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
74:
122:
215:
Their MOs seem to be the same, reverting edits of users randomly, claiming vandalism, or calling for speedy deletion when not warranted. See
157:
68:
17:
116:
379:
I cant remember what exactly was on the page because it has already been deleted Chris19910 (talk) 13:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
169:
397:) Extremely unusual behavior for a new user. Bridwater account was created March 31, and that 28th edit was on April 11.
374:
It was aimed at a page that had been created by you not personally at you. Chris19910 (talk) 13:40, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
80:
175:
128:
345:
86:
255:
134:
151:
110:
557:
509:
488:
294:
201:
561:
542:
529:
513:
492:
469:
430:
415:
349:
318:
298:
267:
205:
518:
440:
426:
314:
278:
62:
497:
105:
444:
341:
282:
452:
412:
361:
274:
261:
242:
456:
480:
146:
553:
505:
484:
290:
197:
549:
422:
310:
286:
57:
46:
539:
526:
522:
448:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry.
408:
249:
364:). He incorrectly tagged it as an attack page as it had nothing but legit edits (
535:
501:
464:
521:
is another sock that was blocked for disruption. I am going to take this to
367:) I challenged Chris19910 on it, and the user was evasive about answering. (
483:'s user page now indicates that she has retired from editing wikipedia.--
368:
459:
400:
He is supposedly a "former admin" according to this edit on April 1 (
552:'s talk page now indicates he has retired from editing wikipedia.--
360:
A simple stub article I created was tagged for Speedy
Deletion (
463:
Chris19901 I would expect that these are genuine socks.
356:
I second the "fishy" nature of Chris19910 and
Bridwater.
436:
401:
395:
365:
235:
228:
224:
220:
216:
181:
140:
92:
394:
by
Bridwater was giving Chris19910 two barnstars? (
525:to make sure we find and shut down all the socks.
500:has been indefinitely blocked for vandalism by
421:of any objections to my speedy deletion tags.
8:
289:have been found to be his sockpuppets. --
7:
24:
534:The puppetmaster was blocked by
18:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets
240:Please see the results of the
1:
580:
514:14:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
493:13:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
431:08:16, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
416:00:57, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
350:21:40, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
319:19:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
268:13:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
206:18:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
40:for detailed instructions.
390:I noticed the 28th edit
32:Please do not modify it.
562:19:29, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
543:19:07, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
530:19:06, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
470:20:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
299:19:26, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
53:Suspected sockpuppeteer
101:Suspected sockpuppets
519:User:Computermadgeek
279:User:Computermadgeek
193:Report submission by
283:User:Electricdancer
362:Andrea Parhamovich
275:User:Cookingexpert
270:
571:
467:
439:to my talk page
264:
258:
252:
247:
245:
185:
164:deleted contribs
144:
123:deleted contribs
96:
75:deleted contribs
34:
579:
578:
574:
573:
572:
570:
569:
568:
567:
550:User:Chris19910
465:
441:Computermadgeek
287:User:Topgearmad
262:
256:
250:
241:
149:
108:
60:
50:
47:User:Chris19910
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
577:
575:
566:
565:
564:
547:
546:
545:
516:
498:User:Bridwater
495:
477:
476:
443:revealed that
405:
404:
398:
388:
387:
386:
381:
376:
354:
353:
352:
342:LessHeard vanU
338:
334:
330:
326:
306:
305:
213:
212:
195:
194:
189:
186:
145:
103:
102:
97:
55:
54:
49:
44:
43:
42:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
576:
563:
559:
555:
551:
548:
544:
541:
538:for a month.
537:
533:
532:
531:
528:
524:
520:
517:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
496:
494:
490:
486:
482:
479:
478:
474:
473:
472:
471:
468:
462:
458:
454:
453:Rattus nonnus
450:
446:
442:
438:
433:
432:
428:
424:
418:
417:
414:
410:
402:
399:
396:
393:
389:
385:
382:
380:
377:
375:
372:
371:
369:
366:
363:
359:
358:
357:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
322:
321:
320:
316:
312:
303:
302:
301:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
271:
269:
266:
265:
259:
254:
253:
244:
238:
237:
232:
230:
226:
222:
218:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
192:
191:
190:
187:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
148:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
124:
121:
118:
115:
112:
107:
100:
99:
98:
94:
91:
88:
85:
82:
79:
76:
73:
70:
67:
64:
59:
52:
51:
48:
45:
41:
39:
33:
27:
26:
19:
481:Carol Sutton
460:
434:
419:
406:
391:
383:
378:
373:
355:
307:
272:
260:
248:
239:
233:
214:
196:
188:
178:
172:
166:
160:
154:
147:Carol Sutton
137:
131:
125:
119:
113:
104:
89:
83:
77:
71:
65:
56:
31:
28:
554:Cdogsimmons
506:Cdogsimmons
485:Cdogsimmons
475:Conclusions
291:Cdogsimmons
243:UserCompare
198:Cdogsimmons
536:User:Nakon
502:User:EVula
423:Chris19910
311:Chris19910
176:block user
170:page moves
135:block user
129:page moves
87:block user
81:page moves
58:Chris19910
540:Jehochman
527:Jehochman
437:this edit
182:block log
141:block log
106:Bridwater
93:block log
38:read this
445:hot20024
409:Fuzheado
340:Thanks.
304:Comments
211:Evidence
158:contribs
117:contribs
69:contribs
523:WP:RFCU
449:200345
337:known.
246:tool.
223:. See
466:nancy
457:Dmits
16:<
558:talk
510:talk
489:talk
455:and
427:talk
413:Talk
392:ever
346:talk
315:talk
295:talk
285:and
263:Love
251:Lara
236:here
229:here
227:and
225:here
221:here
219:and
217:here
202:talk
152:talk
111:talk
63:talk
504:.--
435:In
407:--
560:)
512:)
491:)
461:is
451:,
447:,
429:)
411:|
370:)
348:)
317:)
297:)
281:,
277:,
204:)
556:(
508:(
487:(
425:(
344:(
313:(
293:(
257:❤
200:(
184:)
179:·
173:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
150:(
143:)
138:·
132:·
126:·
120:·
114:·
109:(
95:)
90:·
84:·
78:·
72:·
66:·
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.