647:
441:..... my ip address, 67.62.103.180, has never been accused of being asockpuppet of France A. I did use it 6 months ago to leave messages on 2 of France A's discussion pages where I called him a wanker. I told you it wasn't vandalism at the time and there wasn't repeated instances of this behavior. My IP (which was not mine before June 11) has never been used for vandalism of wikipedia pages.--
644:'s request, since checkuser is not any good at proving innocence; it can only provide evidence of guilt. But since I'd unearthed these annoyances, I checked Dr who1975, and found no IP or geographic relationship between the Dr and the SaxonUnit gang. Different hemispheres, actually. In checkuser language,
480:
sockpuppet of France A (confirmed with chekuser) and he has engaged in edits this very day. Time is of the essence as the edits become satle and therefore ussless for checkuser... plus, I am not allowed to request one for myself. A checkuser request is the only sure way to provemy guilt or innocnce.
429:
accounts of France a left silly messages just like that on the pages of the previous ones that had already been blocked. Therefore, when a DrWho fanatic leaves a silly message just like that on the pages of a previous one that has already been blocked, I see a certain correlation.--08:01, 19 January
256:
I can put up more examples if you like. If you look at the history of my edits, the behavior in no way matches any of France A's behavior. The only thing I have in common with him is an interest in Dr. Who.
35:
No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user,
369:
I think the last comment about my "medical school backround" was a joke (i.e. the "Dr" in my name). I have never claimed to be a doctor. I'd be laughing if it was on my discussion page instead of here.--
276:
202:
I made an unsportsmanlike edit but I am not France A. I have never made the type of vandalising edits France A has made to Doctor Who pages. The edit of mine above was a response to
213:
France A started activity on "13:09, 24 January 2007"... my first edit was on "01:30, 17 June 2006". France a wasn't even on the scene when I started my account.
37:
437:
Simply stating something does not make it true. You have to provide evidence. Which ID's of France A's left such a message... you have to cite instances where
338:
it's hard to defend against a sockpuppetry complaint because it requires proving a negative. How can someone prove they didn't do something. Nevertheless,
357:
526:
477:
187:
145:
73:
562:
120:
640:
was unblocked by me; some email conversation led me to think perhaps I'd misidentified him as a sock. Normally we automatically refuse
754:
67:
17:
578:
502:
166:
610:
235:
Has France A or any of his sockpuppets ever put up a lot of user boxes saying things like they have degrees from FSU and GSU.
114:
619:
Brinstar appears to be active even today. I desperatly need a checkuser against any or all of them to prove my innocence.--
594:
670:
Different hemispheres..as I suspected... the Saxon gang is in Europe (or maybe
Austrailia/New Zealand), I'm in the U.S.--
194:
to another of their userpages. This is characteristic of all the socks, to edit each others' userpages and make insults!
546:
79:
556:
508:
172:
279:
yesterday... I doubt France A, who probably lives in
Engalnd, would ever take an interest in Louisiana politics.--
315:'s complaint is insufficient on its face. The complaint rightly shows a single instance of vandalism. However:
126:
85:
240:
Has France A or any of his sockpuppet's ever shown an inetrest in local
American political figures such as
132:
496:
160:
552:
761:
732:
702:
688:
679:
657:
628:
512:
450:
413:
387:
378:
364:
288:
269:
224:
176:
491:
edited since July 2007, actually, which is probably something to do with the fact that he's blocked.--
748:
698:
675:
624:
540:
446:
374:
284:
265:
220:
61:
492:
312:
156:
572:
721:
604:
241:
108:
588:
384:
361:
743:
I am not the least bit convinced by these accusations. Archiving and untagging the suspect
230:
Has France A or any of his sockpuppets ever shown an interest in The Untied States
Congress?
744:
694:
671:
641:
620:
442:
402:
370:
353:
339:
333:
319:
304:
280:
261:
216:
56:
46:
758:
568:
465:
249:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry.
685:
654:
637:
600:
518:
469:
410:
406:
342:'s defense, while not great, is still more than sufficient to dismiss this complaint.
329:
103:
584:
260:
Porcupine is being overzealous. France A has upset a lot of us. I made a mistake.--
646:
536:
245:
720:
per all of the above, it is pretty obvious this should be dropped ASAP.
322:, who has had a WP account much longer than the suspected sockpuppet;
318:
that vandalism was not planted anonymously- it clearly belonged to
206:. I apologize if this behavior has inadvertantly mislead anybody.
204:
France A vandlising my home page through one of his sockpuppets
277:
Louisiana's 6th congressional district special election, 2008
684:
Aside: I've reconsidered
Brinstar and blocked him again. --
525:. All of the following confirmed France A sockpuppets from
325:
vandalism is not enough to make a case for sockpuppetry;
203:
191:
138:
91:
348:
Therefore, I believe this complaint should be dropped.
463:
I need somebody to submit a
Checkuser between me and
693:
Just as long as everybody knows I'm still not him.--
521:. It was an easy enough mistake to make since
8:
358:I don't think he/she is even a doctor at all
527:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/SaxonUnit
439:a confirmed sockpuppet left such a message
529:have activity within the last two weeks.
328:the complaint does not make a case that
209:It should be obvious I'm not France A.
186:One of the many blatant sockpuppets of
405:is the same individual that operated
7:
275:Here's another one, I just created
24:
356:'s medical school background and
645:
18:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets
1:
762:04:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
733:08:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
703:20:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
689:19:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
680:04:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
658:04:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
629:22:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
513:22:15, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
451:02:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
414:19:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
401:What evidence is there that
388:21:29, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
379:19:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
365:18:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
289:15:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
270:14:45, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
225:16:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
177:10:45, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
352:On the other hand, I doubt
779:
40:for detailed instructions.
332:is in anyway related to
32:Please do not modify it.
53:Suspected sockpuppeteer
517:You're right, I meant
303:: I've been asked by
100:Suspected sockpuppets
634:Some clarification:
152:Report submission by
242:Sandy D'Alemberte
770:
730:
649:
553:ShadowpuppetKing
142:
121:deleted contribs
95:
74:deleted contribs
34:
778:
777:
773:
772:
771:
769:
768:
767:
766:
722:
403:User:Dr who1975
354:User:Dr who1975
340:User:Dr who1975
334:User:Dr who1975
320:User:Dr who1975
305:User:Dr who1975
146:Loads more too!
106:
59:
50:
47:User:Dr who1975
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
776:
774:
765:
741:
740:
736:
735:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
663:
662:
661:
660:
617:
616:
615:
614:
598:
582:
566:
550:
533:
532:
531:
530:
476:Brinstar is a
466:User:MrClaxson
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
432:
431:
417:
416:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
383:Yes it was. —
350:
345:
344:
343:
336:
326:
323:
313:User:Porcupine
309:
308:
297:
296:
292:
291:
250:Jamie Eldridge
200:
199:
184:
183:
154:
153:
149:
148:
143:
101:
97:
96:
54:
49:
44:
43:
42:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
775:
764:
763:
760:
756:
753:
750:
746:
738:
737:
734:
731:
729:
727:
719:
716:
715:
704:
700:
696:
692:
691:
690:
687:
683:
682:
681:
677:
673:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
659:
656:
652:
648:
643:
639:
636:
635:
633:
632:
631:
630:
626:
622:
612:
609:
606:
602:
599:
596:
593:
590:
586:
583:
580:
577:
574:
570:
567:
564:
561:
558:
554:
551:
548:
545:
542:
538:
535:
534:
528:
524:
520:
519:User:Brinstar
516:
515:
514:
510:
507:
504:
501:
498:
494:
490:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
479:
475:
471:
470:User:Brinstar
468:
467:
462:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
435:
434:
433:
428:
424:
421:
420:
419:
418:
415:
412:
408:
404:
400:
397:
396:
389:
386:
382:
381:
380:
376:
372:
368:
367:
366:
363:
359:
355:
351:
349:
346:
341:
337:
335:
331:
330:User:France a
327:
324:
321:
317:
316:
314:
311:
310:
306:
302:
299:
298:
294:
293:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
273:
272:
271:
267:
263:
258:
254:
253:
251:
247:
243:
237:
236:
232:
231:
227:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
205:
197:
196:
195:
193:
189:
181:
180:
179:
178:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
158:
151:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
134:
131:
128:
125:
122:
119:
116:
113:
110:
105:
102:
99:
98:
93:
90:
87:
84:
81:
78:
75:
72:
69:
66:
63:
58:
55:
52:
51:
48:
45:
41:
39:
33:
27:
26:
19:
751:
742:
725:
723:
717:
650:
618:
607:
591:
575:
559:
543:
522:
505:
499:
488:
473:
464:
460:
459:
438:
426:
422:
398:
347:
300:
259:
255:
239:
238:
234:
233:
229:
228:
212:
211:
208:
201:
185:
169:
163:
155:
135:
129:
123:
117:
111:
88:
82:
76:
70:
64:
31:
28:
739:Conclusions
523:I'm not him
497:prickle me!
307:to comment.
161:prickle me!
745:Dr who1975
695:Dr who1975
672:Dr who1975
642:Dr who1975
621:Dr who1975
443:Dr who1975
430:2008 (UTC)
371:Dr who1975
281:Dr who1975
262:Dr who1975
217:Dr who1975
133:block user
127:page moves
86:block user
80:page moves
57:Dr who1975
759:Jehochman
651:Unrelated
569:SaxonUnit
493:Porcupine
478:confirmed
474:MrClaxson
246:Pam Resor
192:this edit
157:Porcupine
139:block log
92:block log
38:read this
755:contribs
686:jpgordon
655:jpgordon
638:Brinstar
611:contribs
601:Brinstar
595:contribs
579:contribs
563:contribs
547:contribs
503:contribs
425:All the
407:France a
399:Question
295:Comments
188:France a
182:Evidence
167:contribs
115:contribs
104:France a
68:contribs
726:BQZip01
585:Nosxalc
487:He has
461:Request
385:Markles
362:Markles
198:Defense
718:Oppose
509:status
423:Answer
360::-). —
301:Oppose
190:- see
173:status
537:MrWez
427:other
409:? --
248:, or
16:<
749:talk
699:talk
676:talk
653:. --
625:talk
605:talk
589:talk
573:talk
557:talk
541:talk
472:...
447:talk
411:Kife
375:talk
285:talk
266:talk
221:talk
109:talk
62:talk
757:).
489:not
724:—
701:)
678:)
627:)
511:)
449:)
377:)
287:)
268:)
244:,
223:)
215:--
175:)
752:·
747:(
728:—
697:(
674:(
623:(
613:)
608:·
603:(
597:)
592:·
587:(
581:)
576:·
571:(
565:)
560:·
555:(
549:)
544:·
539:(
506:·
500:·
495:(
445:(
373:(
283:(
264:(
252:?
219:(
170:·
164:·
159:(
141:)
136:·
130:·
124:·
118:·
112:·
107:(
94:)
89:·
83:·
77:·
71:·
65:·
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.