Knowledge (XXG)

:What adminship is not - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

307:, not about "how much they do". This is not personal; it does not mean that the community fails to appreciate your contributions. A number of exceptional editors are not admins and will never be, some through choice, some through communal consensus. A number of admins regularly ask to drop their adminship, to leave behind administrative chores and get back to editing instead. Sometimes good contributors simply do not have the proper temperament to be admins; but they are still valuable. No number of edits or length of time on Knowledge (XXG) entitles one to adminship. 382:, conflict resolution, knowledge of policy, and appropriate use of their tools, they are also expected to use their tools within compliance of the relevant policies at all times. Admins who repeatedly fail to do this, or who cause significant community concerns regarding their behaviors and the expected responsibilities of administrators and their use of their tools can be readily blocked, stripped of their admin tools, or banned. Admins must follow all of Knowledge (XXG) policies (such as the 127:. They can draw a line based on policies, norms and judgement, and enforce that line with the tools. They often have good insight and suggestions to users, and they should be good at gaining others' co-operation and working with people. But they do not, ever, act as "managers" to people in the business sense. They implement policies in which the community in a broad sense has agreed upon. Thus, for example: 261:. Administrators will find they have no extra sway in policy or other decisions because of an RfA. It does not affirm a user's contributions as an editor and is not an award for good editing or other good service. You will not gain more respect simply by being an administrator. It may help to consider the other meaning of the word administrator, that is one who facilitates, rather than one who controls. 35: 98: 467:
other Wikipedians to have an RfA is not a game and is serious. When you are an administrator, you don't just get to block and unblock who you want, delete and undelete what you want, go around editing protected pages when you want, or go protecting and unprotecting whatever you want. It's important
140:
a page can only do so after a consensus has been reached: in accordance with the communal decision. Whilst they are implementers, they do not decide the policy. Likewise, admins implement a standard of editorship and use of blocking and protection which has already gained consensus via a discussion
424:
do not wish to become administrators—despite having the expected levels of experience and community support. Users may always reject the opportunity or nomination to stand for adminship. Additionally, many tools and site areas exist for ordinary users to help in ways they might not have initially
337:
with their changes that require it. They are consistently civil with other users that they interact with - even those who aren't civil towards them. They take the lead and help other users toward the correct solution, and they demonstrate experience in areas that show an abundance of knowledge of
531:
Adminship is not meant to be anything special beyond access to extra editing tools which, pragmatically, cannot be given to every user. It does not give any extra status, weight in discussions, or special privileges beyond what is necessary to technically use those extra tools.
177:
to operate the tools. If an admin goes for a year without making an edit, it doesn't necessarily have an impact on their trustworthiness when they return to editing. Hence an admin's obligation isn't to "do" any specific role; rather, to act responsibly if or when they do take
264:
Adminship is simply a statement that the individual is a normal user whom the community views as likely to use the extra tools responsibly if given access to them. An admin is just a normal user with a mop and a bucket. It certainly does
468:
to realize that any action you do with these functions can be reversed by another admin. Administrative actions should be used with good judgment at all times. Be sure there is a consensus that exists before you take your next action.
512:
should have access to the extra tools that were granted onto your account. They are not to be shared in any way, shape, or form with other users. Giving another user access to your account in order to make administrative actions is
161:". Users do things, admins just handle the few exceptions where for practical reasons we don't let every new user do so. Even very experienced admins—including those elected to higher positions than admin—usually don't know how 206:
users who are allowed to act as custodians of the tools that for pragmatic reasons need to be restricted in access (due to the presence of many people on the Internet who would use them for purposes that don't help the
190:, but frankly no user is obligated to respect or listen to them (it's not a requirement of editing), and many will not. Blocking is not merely a tool to be used instead of talking to people. 601: 299:
and a dedication to Knowledge (XXG) often demonstrate reliability and aptitude for adminship. However, candidates with high edit counts sometimes fail to pass a
420:
Administrators have access to useful tools not available to other users, and are able to use these to serve Knowledge (XXG) in additional ways. However, some
606: 464: 300: 106:
Being a Knowledge (XXG) Administrator basically means that you have been trusted to use tools which, as a technical matter, cannot be given to just anyone.
576: 566: 561: 556: 551: 482:
being thrown towards you as justifiable under the circumstances. On some occasions, a poor blocking history can result in an admin being desysopped.
426: 210:
users who are trusted to only use the tools provided to enact a decision within the standards that the community has decided, and not otherwise.
364:
Every administrator must keep in mind that admins simply hold tools that aid in Knowledge (XXG) maintenance, and nothing more. This means that
581: 50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
51: 546: 391: 517:, and your administrative tools may be revoked if you are caught sharing your account or allowing someone else to use your account. 196:
High standards are required, but many people will have misconceptions of what it is that admins actually do. Mostly, admins are:
571: 383: 258: 596: 478:. Poorly placed blocks can result in you becoming unpopular with prominent members of the community, and with apparent 541: 374: 153:. But they do need to know enough not to misuse what they touch, and to conduct themselves well. The emphasis is on " 254: 430: 421: 472:
Blocking in particular is one of the most contentious acts an administrator can perform and is considered a
296: 526: 387: 55: 491: 446: 403: 347: 278: 225: 137: 65: 434: 378:. On top of being expected to play a lead role and set the example when it comes to areas such as 43: 331: 327: 479: 379: 334: 323: 319: 17: 590: 250: 58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. 203:
users who have consistently good standards on general conduct as editors.
125:
Admins do not have "command authority" in the sense that some imagine
429:. Users can label the ways they contribute by, for example, joining 398:
Adminship is neither compulsory nor necessary to aid Knowledge (XXG)
141:(in which admins have absolutely no special authority of any kind). 318:
of wisdom, knowledge, and expertise on Knowledge (XXG) with its
310:
It's important to know that the administrator user right is a
200:
users the community have chosen based on experience and trust.
92: 29: 253:
within Knowledge (XXG). It is not the user-equivalent of a
322:, and who demonstrate their respect for Knowledge (XXG)'s 249:
Being an administrator does not place you in an elevated
499: 454: 411: 355: 286: 240: 233: 80: 73: 582:Knowledge (XXG):What (other) user rights are not 175:Admins are users that the community has trusted 151:They do not need to know how "everything works" 577:Knowledge (XXG):Adminship is not for new users 567:Knowledge (XXG):Advice for new administrators 562:Knowledge (XXG):Administrator Code of Conduct 303:, because RfA is about a user's approach and 8: 557:Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' reading list 552:Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' how-to guide 314:toolset for users who have demonstrated a 602:Matters related to requests for adminship 372:as they would to any other user – if not 52:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines 607:Knowledge (XXG) essays about adminship 547:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship 269:give you any Sergeant-like authority. 7: 342:Adminship is not diplomatic immunity 134:They do not "decide what people see" 394:as if they were any other editor. 56:thoroughly vetted by the community 25: 572:Knowledge (XXG):General sanctions 330:with their edits to articles and 188:Admins should gain broad respect 96: 33: 27:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG) 427:Contributing to Knowledge (XXG) 326:at all times. They demonstrate 273:Adminship is not an entitlement 542:Knowledge (XXG):Administrators 338:Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines. 1: 521:Adminship is not a big deal 463:Putting yourself up for or 114:what adminship is and isn't 623: 524: 489: 444: 401: 345: 276: 223: 63: 486:Adminship is not for sale 220:Adminship is not a trophy 368:apply to administrators 104:This page in a nutshell: 441:Adminship is not a game 433:and using the relevant 320:policies and guidelines 597:Knowledge (XXG) essays 18:Knowledge (XXG):TROPHY 515:absolutely prohibited 392:neutral point of view 301:Request for adminship 112:This essay describes 54:, as it has not been 324:founding principles 287:WP:ANOT#ENTITLEMENT 155:not making mistakes 412:WP:ANOT#COMPULSORY 384:three-revert rule 215:More specifically 110: 109: 91: 90: 16:(Redirected from 614: 502: 480:personal attacks 457: 414: 358: 356:WP:ANOT#IMMUNITY 335:reliable sources 289: 259:featured article 243: 236: 100: 99: 93: 83: 76: 37: 36: 30: 21: 622: 621: 617: 616: 615: 613: 612: 611: 587: 586: 538: 529: 523: 506: 505: 498: 494: 488: 461: 460: 453: 449: 443: 425:considered—see 418: 417: 410: 406: 400: 362: 361: 354: 350: 344: 293: 292: 285: 281: 275: 247: 246: 239: 232: 228: 222: 217: 136:. An admin who 122: 97: 87: 86: 79: 72: 68: 60: 59: 34: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 620: 618: 610: 609: 604: 599: 589: 588: 585: 584: 579: 574: 569: 564: 559: 554: 549: 544: 537: 534: 522: 519: 504: 503: 495: 490: 487: 484: 476:serious matter 459: 458: 450: 445: 442: 439: 416: 415: 407: 402: 399: 396: 360: 359: 351: 346: 343: 340: 291: 290: 282: 277: 274: 271: 245: 244: 237: 234:WP:ANOT#TROPHY 229: 224: 221: 218: 216: 213: 212: 211: 208: 204: 201: 194: 193: 192: 191: 182: 181: 180: 179: 169: 168: 167: 166: 145: 144: 143: 142: 121: 118: 108: 107: 101: 89: 88: 85: 84: 77: 69: 64: 61: 49: 48: 40: 38: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 619: 608: 605: 603: 600: 598: 595: 594: 592: 583: 580: 578: 575: 573: 570: 568: 565: 563: 560: 558: 555: 553: 550: 548: 545: 543: 540: 539: 535: 533: 528: 520: 518: 516: 511: 501: 497: 496: 493: 485: 483: 481: 477: 475: 469: 466: 456: 452: 451: 448: 440: 438: 436: 432: 428: 423: 413: 409: 408: 405: 397: 395: 393: 389: 386:) and uphold 385: 381: 377: 376: 371: 367: 357: 353: 352: 349: 341: 339: 336: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 308: 306: 302: 298: 288: 284: 283: 280: 272: 270: 268: 262: 260: 256: 252: 242: 238: 235: 231: 230: 227: 219: 214: 209: 205: 202: 199: 198: 197: 189: 186: 185: 184: 183: 176: 173: 172: 171: 170: 164: 160: 156: 152: 149: 148: 147: 146: 139: 135: 132: 131: 130: 129: 128: 126: 119: 117: 115: 105: 102: 95: 94: 82: 78: 75: 71: 70: 67: 62: 57: 53: 47: 45: 39: 32: 31: 19: 530: 527:WP:NOBIGDEAL 514: 509: 507: 500:WP:ANOT#SALE 473: 471: 470: 462: 455:WP:ANOT#GAME 431:WikiProjects 419: 373: 369: 366:all policies 365: 363: 315: 312:senior-level 311: 309: 304: 294: 266: 263: 255:good article 248: 195: 187: 174: 162: 159:doing it all 158: 154: 150: 133: 124: 123: 113: 111: 103: 41: 422:Wikipedians 297:edit counts 157:", not on " 42:This is an 591:Categories 525:See also: 465:nominating 328:neutrality 316:high level 163:everything 508:You, and 435:Userboxes 388:consensus 305:attitudes 241:WP:TROPHY 226:Shortcuts 207:project). 66:Shortcuts 536:See also 510:only you 492:Shortcut 447:Shortcut 404:Shortcut 380:civility 348:Shortcut 279:Shortcut 375:more so 370:exactly 178:action. 138:deletes 120:General 81:WP:WAIN 74:WP:ANOT 390:and a 251:status 165:works. 295:High 44:essay 474:very 332:cite 267:not 257:or 593:: 437:. 116:. 46:. 20:)

Index

Knowledge (XXG):TROPHY
essay
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
thoroughly vetted by the community
Shortcuts
WP:ANOT
WP:WAIN
deletes
Shortcuts
WP:ANOT#TROPHY
WP:TROPHY
status
good article
featured article
Shortcut
WP:ANOT#ENTITLEMENT
edit counts
Request for adminship
policies and guidelines
founding principles
neutrality
cite
reliable sources
Shortcut
WP:ANOT#IMMUNITY
more so
civility
three-revert rule
consensus
neutral point of view

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑