1456:. I'm flabbergasted how anyone could nominate this template for deletion. It is widely used, a superb link between articles and an ideal navigational tool. Not alone IMHO is this nomination absurd in the extreme, posting that ruddy great deletion deletion line has managed to screw up large numbers of articles, with text pushed off to the side. One feature article is now an unreadable mess thanks to that. As to that stuff about "those who need to compulsively group things" — that is what encyclopaedias
1473:
1115:. Many of these templates survived recent TfD discussions. T1 should not be applied until objective criteria can be established for divisive and polemic. It is one thing to say you support something. It is quite another saying someone else can not support something or should be denied a right. The former is not divisive while the later is. Once this can be codified then T1 should be useable without debate for every single deletion. --
558:- This is a template that is used for substing, and it helps saves users time. Why should it be deleted? Is it taking up too much database space or something? Please. And I don't see how copy&paste is "better" than this ... where are you going to copy from? You'll have to go back to a Barnstars page and copy the text from there instead of just using subst:barnstar? Please. There's no reason to inconvenience people like that. --
1304:- Serves little purpose as a template, while there's already a category that's perfectly relevant. And some of the things listed on it aren't in the headgear category - seemly because they're in a subcategory. Thus, why should they be possessed of the template?
526:
I don't know a whole lot about templates, but it seems to me that you'll mess up a whole lot of people's user pages if you delete the
Barnstar template and many of those people might not know how to redo the Barnstars someone awarded them in non-template form.
107:
already serves this purpose. A link to the category CAC 40 takes up far less space on the article than the template, and occurs automatically by being included in the category. As having both on an article page is redundant, only the category should exist.
505:
Agree with nominator. There's nothing in this template that can't be replicated easily through copy & paste. If you're giving out a
Barnstar, it would seem polite to put a bit more effort in than simply using a cookie-cutter template.
333:, which state that if the answer to the question "Is a given article in the series likely to mention the article before or after it in the series outside of the box?" is no, then "a category or list is probably more appropriate".
121:, which state that if the answer to the question "Is a given article in the series likely to mention the article before or after it in the series outside of the box?" is no, then "a category or list is probably more appropriate".
678:
that this template would NOT be deleted without first arranging for the code it contains to be substituted directly into the pages on which it appears. When a template is simply deleted, it is ALWAYS removed from usage
169:
I would view this template as answering the above questions as "Yes, No, Yes", respectively. Please consider this as a further argument for the template's deletion given that a category is most suitable for its scope.
1499:
So what that categories can also do the job. It is a good thing to have more than one way to do things. Multiple competing and contrasting organizational methods is good and positive in the organization of data.
1370:: this is a navigational template which provides a context and sequence for navigation between related articles. This is one of the intended uses for templates: there is no good reason for deleting it. HTH HAND —
1097:
Deletion processes are discussions, not votes, and any template (or article, or image) which fits a speedy deletion criterion or which is otherwise blatently in breach of policy may be deleted regardless.
134:
In my experience, a user is more likely to find other articles through a template as opposed to a category. In many cases, category lists are simply ignored. I think templates are much more useful. --
1524:, it's a navagation box for moving around the main topics of a subject. Categories serve a slightly different purpose (they categorise articles), and are not always useful when browsing.
346:- Navigational templates are a better way of displaying information than categories, which have to be clicked through to even see (and still aren't as nicely organized). Nuff said. --
184:- Navigational templates are a better way of displaying information than categories, which have to be clicked through to even see (and still aren't as nicely organized). Nuff said. --
42:
37:
1063:
since that seems to be the chosen (or unilaterally decreed) fate of userboxes supporting/opposing political points of view. It's either all stay or all go as far as I'm concerned. –
161:
Are the elements of the box all going to generate articles substantial enough that the box will not look like an unmanageable blight on an otherwise tidy computer monitor?
320:
already serves this purpose. A link to the category Kraft brands takes up far less space on the article than including the template. Only the category should exist.
330:
149:
118:
1328:- I find it borderline but it's probably useful in some cases. When I look at the guidelines for TfD I don't see a clear reason that this should be removed. --
624:
It allows a user to align barnstars in a more orderly fashion. I mean it is possible to get them from left or right without using {| . Great
Template --
1080:
802:
21:
991:
POV, and does nothing to help us write a better encyclopedia. I really hate doing this but similar userboxes have been deleted in the past.
17:
1028:- Oh, light. Maybe I should create a userbox with the text "This user supports Knowledge (XXG)" and nominate it for deletion. —
778:
659:
834:
1088:
Who makes the call on actually deleting the userboxes? Is what I read above an actual vote, or just peoples concerns? --
384:
Knowledge (XXG) should not have corporate distinctions take precedence on the article space. Food type templates instead.
1543:
1194:
1175:
922:
903:
422:
403:
282:
263:
69:
543:, the "What to type" column could easily be changed to show a copy-able image tag, rather than the template call. --
1528:
1516:
1504:
1491:
1479:
1448:
1444:. Ugly and not useful; categories do the same job less obtrusively for those who need to compulsively group things.
1436:
1424:
1407:
1395:
1378:
1362:
1336:
1320:
1308:
1296:
1276:
1261:
1212:
1160:
1136:
1119:
1105:
1092:
1083:
1067:
1055:
1043:
1020:
1008:
995:
946:
888:
876:
849:
805:
788:
766:
751:
730:
704:
687:
669:
645:
633:
616:
585:
564:
550:
531:
518:
496:
437:
388:
376:
364:
352:
337:
324:
300:
248:
236:
224:
202:
190:
174:
138:
125:
112:
87:
158:
Is a given article in the series likely to mention the article before or after it in the series outside of the box?
1316:
I've used it before and although it is not as useful as some other templates I've seen it still serves a purpose.
93:
1542:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
1193:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
1174:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
921:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
902:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
421:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
402:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
281:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
262:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
68:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
1052:
968:
873:
244:
Multiple competing and contrasting organizational methods is good and positive in the organization of data.
822:
317:
1375:
1234:
959:
952:
716:
for deleting this. If this is to be deleted because a simple copy-paste can replicate it, I don't see why
459:
135:
1036:
865:
740:
579:
540:
1291:
1155:
513:
218:
976:
1391:
1116:
1102:
1089:
1029:
870:
862:
783:
762:
713:
664:
547:
1242:
1004:- There is absolutely nothing divisive about this userbox and userpages do not fall under NPOV. --
467:
166:
If the answer to any of these questions is "no", a category or list is probably more appropriate."
1419:
1403:
It's usefulness is diminished since categories are available, which is all this template serves.
1333:
943:
845:
830:
749:
373:
306:
372:- If you think about the average reader, the navigational template is better than a category. --
1187:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
915:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
415:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
275:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
62:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
1525:
1513:
1472:
1371:
1359:
1225:
1218:
610:
490:
450:
443:
155:"Is the subject of this box something that would be mentioned on every article in the series?
1477:
1285:
1144:
1131:
507:
360:- Categories seem preferred for browsing per the guidelines, and we surely don't need both.
329:
Additionally, this navigational template (an article series box) violates the guidelines of
215:
117:
Additionally, this navigational template (an article series box) violates the guidelines of
1488:
1445:
1404:
1387:
1274:
1099:
727:
528:
104:
884:-- while a very small template, it makes life a lot easier, I'm in favour of keeping it.
1501:
1075:. Could someone explain why it has been deleted when all but one vote is to keep it? --
1064:
1005:
992:
935:
812:
So is the discussion over? We need an admin to close it, no? Anyways, I agree with the
773:
758:
720:
654:
597:
544:
385:
245:
726:
should be retained as well, as a simple typing operation would replicate it easily. --
1416:
1329:
1317:
1284:
Whilst it is a strange topic for a template, I don;t really think it needs deletion.
1017:
841:
826:
745:
697:
334:
321:
171:
122:
109:
482:
The template only contains an image tag, I see no logical reason why this is needed
1433:
1345:
625:
605:
574:
485:
233:
1461:
1305:
1258:
1207:
1128:
885:
682:
434:
361:
313:
295:
199:
82:
1271:
1076:
798:
757:
The result of the debate was interesting. This template was speedy deleted. --
642:
198:- Redundancy seems to be unhelpful, and the category seems more appropriate.
559:
347:
185:
712:
Unnecessary revisionism. Most users use it. Also, I see no consensus on
653:
as outlined above. Its deletion could be disruptive on a massive scale.
331:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories, lists, and series boxes#Article series boxes
150:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories, lists, and series boxes#Article series boxes
119:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories, lists, and series boxes#Article series boxes
628:
211:
100:
772:
Given that the template still exists, was this an attempt at humor?
1487:. Categories would suit this topic much better than a template. -
1536:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1168:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1016:
Why does it need to help write an encyclopedia? It's a userbox.
896:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
396:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
256:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
641:
as per TomThe Hand. Removing it could annoy a lot of people. --
103:
stock market index. However its existence is unnecessary as
99:
This template has a scope of containing all companies in the
1051:
per dragon, MiraLuka. props to Cuivië for being whitty.
1250:
1246:
1238:
1230:
984:
980:
972:
964:
475:
471:
463:
455:
312:
This template has a scope of containing all brands of
316:. However its existence is entirely unnecessary as
1197:). No further edits should be made to this page.
925:). No further edits should be made to this page.
425:). No further edits should be made to this page.
285:). No further edits should be made to this page.
72:). No further edits should be made to this page.
593:— I forgot, as of consensus, this template equals
816:agreements above. Keep this one for ease of use.
1546:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1178:). No further edits should be made to this page.
906:). No further edits should be made to this page.
406:). No further edits should be made to this page.
266:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
1460:!!! They link things by topic and category.
152:, also known as navigational templates:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Templates for deletion
7:
1270:. Might be useful to some people.--
930:The result of the debate was moot -
210:. The category and the list on the
28:
1257:This template is just a catagory
1471:
539:- Doesn't save much typing. On
1:
1529:08:39, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
1517:21:49, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
1505:04:32, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
1492:01:21, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
1480:00:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
1449:16:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
1437:00:03, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
1425:03:38, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
1408:01:42, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
1396:20:40, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
1379:09:55, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
1363:06:25, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
1337:02:57, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
1321:12:32, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
1309:01:16, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
1297:21:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
1277:20:44, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
1262:17:09, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
1213:00:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
1202:The result of the debate was
1161:03:27, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
1137:13:43, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
1120:19:51, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
1106:06:18, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
1093:05:57, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
1084:00:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
1068:09:30, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
1056:08:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
1044:05:20, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
1021:04:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
1009:02:40, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
996:00:23, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
947:09:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
889:06:25, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
877:08:41, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
850:05:14, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
806:00:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
793:The result of the debate was
789:07:13, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
767:09:32, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
752:14:06, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
731:07:31, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
705:04:40, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
688:03:17, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
670:23:56, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
646:22:45, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
634:22:39, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
617:17:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
586:17:41, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
565:17:39, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
551:17:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
532:15:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
519:11:12, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
497:10:50, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
438:06:32, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
430:The result of the debate was
389:04:37, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
377:11:23, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
365:01:13, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
353:17:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
338:17:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
325:14:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
301:00:45, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
290:The result of the debate was
249:04:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
237:00:33, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
225:06:31, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
203:01:04, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
191:17:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
175:17:29, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
139:16:15, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
126:17:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
113:14:58, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
88:00:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
77:The result of the debate was
30:
232:. Use the Category instead.
1415:- Still a useful nav tool.
1077:Victim of signature fascism
799:Victim of signature fascism
1563:
797:. MarkSweep ignored it. --
541:Knowledge (XXG):Barnstars
214:page seem better suited.
94:Template:CAC 40 companies
1539:Please do not modify it.
1190:Please do not modify it.
1171:Please do not modify it.
918:Please do not modify it.
899:Please do not modify it.
418:Please do not modify it.
399:Please do not modify it.
278:Please do not modify it.
259:Please do not modify it.
65:Please do not modify it.
1386:per Michael Ralston.
1432:per Michael Ralston.
318:Category:Kraft brands
960:Template:User Chavez
953:Template:User Chavez
1053:Mike McGregor (Can)
738:per Gurubrahma. --
714:Template talk:Award
307:Template:Kraftprod
1226:Template:Headgear
1219:Template:Headgear
1211:
1134:
1081:There is no cabal
848:
839:
825:comment added by
803:There is no cabal
765:
763:(call me collect)
702:
695:useful template.
686:
631:
537:Subst: and delete
451:Template:Barnstar
444:Template:Barnstar
299:
136:Horses In The Sky
86:
55:February 18, 2006
51:
50:
1554:
1541:
1475:
1469:
1355:
1352:
1349:
1294:
1288:
1255:
1254:
1210:
1192:
1173:
1158:
1153:
1150:
1147:
1132:
1042:
989:
988:
920:
901:
868:
844:
838:
819:
786:
781:
776:
761:
748:
743:
725:
719:
700:
696:
685:
667:
662:
657:
629:
613:
608:
602:
596:
582:
577:
562:
516:
510:
493:
488:
480:
479:
420:
401:
350:
298:
280:
261:
222:
188:
85:
67:
47:
36:
31:
1562:
1561:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1544:deletion review
1537:
1512:. Very useful.
1462:
1353:
1350:
1347:
1306:Michael Ralston
1292:
1286:
1228:
1224:
1222:
1195:deletion review
1188:
1182:
1176:deletion review
1169:
1156:
1151:
1148:
1145:
1117:StuffOfInterest
1034:
962:
958:
956:
923:deletion review
916:
910:
904:deletion review
897:
866:
820:
784:
779:
774:
741:
739:
723:
717:
698:
665:
660:
655:
615:
611:
606:
600:
594:
580:
575:
560:
514:
508:
495:
491:
486:
453:
449:
447:
423:deletion review
416:
410:
404:deletion review
397:
362:Michael Ralston
348:
310:
283:deletion review
276:
270:
264:deletion review
257:
220:
200:Michael Ralston
186:
105:Category:CAC 40
97:
70:deletion review
63:
57:
52:
45:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1560:
1558:
1549:
1548:
1532:
1531:
1519:
1507:
1494:
1482:
1451:
1439:
1427:
1410:
1398:
1381:
1365:
1339:
1323:
1311:
1299:
1279:
1256:
1221:
1216:
1200:
1199:
1183:
1181:
1180:
1164:
1163:
1139:
1122:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1086:
1070:
1058:
1046:
1023:
1011:
990:
955:
950:
932:speedy deleted
928:
927:
911:
909:
908:
892:
891:
879:
855:
854:
853:
852:
809:
808:
791:
755:
754:
733:
707:
690:
672:
648:
636:
619:
603:
588:
567:
553:
534:
521:
483:
481:
446:
441:
428:
427:
411:
409:
408:
392:
391:
379:
367:
355:
309:
304:
288:
287:
271:
269:
268:
252:
251:
239:
227:
205:
193:
178:
177:
167:
164:
163:
162:
159:
156:
142:
141:
96:
91:
75:
74:
58:
56:
53:
49:
48:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1559:
1547:
1545:
1540:
1534:
1533:
1530:
1527:
1523:
1520:
1518:
1515:
1511:
1508:
1506:
1503:
1498:
1495:
1493:
1490:
1486:
1483:
1481:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1468:
1467:
1459:
1455:
1452:
1450:
1447:
1443:
1440:
1438:
1435:
1431:
1428:
1426:
1423:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1411:
1409:
1406:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1382:
1380:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1366:
1364:
1361:
1360:
1357:
1356:
1343:
1340:
1338:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1324:
1322:
1319:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1303:
1300:
1298:
1295:
1289:
1283:
1280:
1278:
1275:
1273:
1269:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1260:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1227:
1220:
1217:
1215:
1214:
1209:
1205:
1198:
1196:
1191:
1185:
1184:
1179:
1177:
1172:
1166:
1165:
1162:
1159:
1154:
1143:
1140:
1138:
1135:
1130:
1126:
1123:
1121:
1118:
1114:
1111:
1107:
1104:
1101:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1091:
1087:
1085:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1071:
1069:
1066:
1062:
1059:
1057:
1054:
1050:
1047:
1045:
1040:
1039:
1033:
1032:
1027:
1024:
1022:
1019:
1015:
1012:
1010:
1007:
1003:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
994:
986:
982:
978:
974:
970:
966:
961:
954:
951:
949:
948:
945:
944:Mailer Diablo
941:
937:
933:
926:
924:
919:
913:
912:
907:
905:
900:
894:
893:
890:
887:
883:
880:
878:
875:
872:
869:
864:
860:
857:
856:
851:
847:
843:
836:
832:
828:
824:
818:
817:
815:
811:
810:
807:
804:
800:
796:
792:
790:
787:
782:
777:
771:
770:
769:
768:
764:
760:
753:
750:
747:
744:
737:
734:
732:
729:
722:
715:
711:
708:
706:
701:
694:
691:
689:
684:
680:
676:
673:
671:
668:
663:
658:
652:
649:
647:
644:
640:
637:
635:
632:
627:
623:
620:
618:
614:
609:
599:
592:
589:
587:
584:
583:
578:
571:
568:
566:
563:
557:
554:
552:
549:
546:
542:
538:
535:
533:
530:
525:
522:
520:
517:
511:
504:
501:
500:
499:
498:
494:
489:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
452:
445:
442:
440:
439:
436:
433:
426:
424:
419:
413:
412:
407:
405:
400:
394:
393:
390:
387:
383:
380:
378:
375:
371:
368:
366:
363:
359:
356:
354:
351:
345:
342:
341:
340:
339:
336:
332:
327:
326:
323:
319:
315:
308:
305:
303:
302:
297:
293:
286:
284:
279:
273:
272:
267:
265:
260:
254:
253:
250:
247:
243:
240:
238:
235:
231:
228:
226:
223:
217:
213:
209:
206:
204:
201:
197:
194:
192:
189:
183:
180:
179:
176:
173:
168:
165:
160:
157:
154:
153:
151:
147:
144:
143:
140:
137:
133:
130:
129:
128:
127:
124:
120:
115:
114:
111:
106:
102:
95:
92:
90:
89:
84:
80:
73:
71:
66:
60:
59:
54:
44:
41:
39:
33:
32:
23:
19:
1538:
1535:
1526:SeventyThree
1521:
1514:Deltabeignet
1509:
1496:
1484:
1465:
1463:
1457:
1453:
1441:
1429:
1420:
1412:
1400:
1383:
1367:
1358:
1346:
1344:Still helps
1341:
1325:
1313:
1301:
1281:
1267:
1223:
1204:NO CONSENSUS
1203:
1201:
1189:
1186:
1170:
1167:
1141:
1124:
1112:
1072:
1060:
1048:
1037:
1030:
1025:
1013:
1001:
957:
939:
931:
929:
917:
914:
898:
895:
881:
858:
821:— Preceding
813:
794:
756:
735:
709:
692:
677:
674:
650:
638:
621:
590:
573:
569:
555:
536:
523:
502:
448:
431:
429:
417:
414:
398:
395:
381:
369:
357:
343:
328:
311:
292:NO CONSENSUS
291:
289:
277:
274:
258:
255:
241:
229:
207:
195:
181:
145:
131:
116:
98:
79:NO CONSENSUS
78:
76:
64:
61:
1454:Speedy keep
1287:Chairman S.
1127:per above.
1073:Speedy keep
1026:Speedy Keep
1002:Speedy Keep
882:Strong Keep
846:Talk to me‼
736:Strong Keep
651:Strong Keep
622:Strong Keep
509:Chairman S.
314:Kraft Foods
43:February 19
38:February 17
1489:Zimbabweed
1446:PeteVerdon
1405:Snafflekid
1388:SchuminWeb
1100:Physchim62
1090:myselfalso
993:James Bond
785:talk to me
728:Gurubrahma
666:talk to me
572:per above
529:TomTheHand
1502:WAS 4.250
1065:Doug Bell
1031:Cuiviénen
1006:Dragon695
936:MarkSweep
842:Ian Manka
759:MarkSweep
561:Cyde Weys
545:Netoholic
386:WAS 4.250
349:Cyde Weys
246:WAS 4.250
187:Cyde Weys
1330:Dhartung
1318:Sotakeit
1018:MiraLuka
835:contribs
827:IanManka
823:unsigned
699:Jtkiefer
335:Kurieeto
322:Kurieeto
172:Kurieeto
123:Kurieeto
110:Kurieeto
20: |
1466:ÉIREANN
1434:Kwertii
1239:history
973:history
746:iva1979
626:Fir0002
591:Comment
464:history
234:Kwertii
148:: From
146:Comment
1485:Delete
1442:Delete
1430:Delete
1401:Delete
1384:Delete
1302:Delete
1259:Jon513
1208:Splash
1133:(talk)
1129:helohe
1103:(talk)
1061:Delete
1038:Cuivië
940:enough
886:Tawker
683:Splash
679:first.
576:Sceptr
503:Delete
435:Shanel
382:Delete
374:Thorri
358:Delete
296:Splash
230:Delete
216:Flower
212:CAC 40
208:Delete
196:Delete
101:CAC 40
83:Splash
1421:Moore
1354:Gizza
1272:Kross
1247:watch
1243:links
981:watch
977:links
874:e Ong
859:Keep'
775:Radio
721:award
703:----
656:Radio
643:Bduke
598:award
472:watch
468:links
219:party
46:: -->
16:<
1522:Keep
1510:Keep
1497:Keep
1464:Fear
1413:Keep
1392:Talk
1376:Talk
1372:Phil
1368:Keep
1342:Keep
1334:Talk
1326:Keep
1314:Keep
1293:Talk
1282:Keep
1268:Keep
1251:logs
1235:talk
1231:edit
1142:Keep
1125:Keep
1113:Keep
1049:keep
1014:Keep
985:logs
969:talk
965:edit
942:) -
831:talk
814:keep
795:keep
780:Kirk
710:Keep
693:Keep
675:NOTE
661:Kirk
639:Keep
612:Toth
570:Keep
556:Keep
524:Keep
515:Talk
492:Toth
476:logs
460:talk
456:edit
432:keep
370:Keep
344:Keep
242:Keep
182:Keep
132:Keep
35:<
1417:Jon
1206:. -
934:by
863:Ter
630:www
607:Aza
487:Aza
294:. -
81:. -
22:Log
1458:do
1394:)
1374:|
1332:|
1290:|
1249:|
1245:|
1241:|
1237:|
1233:|
1079:|
983:|
979:|
975:|
971:|
967:|
871:nc
861:--
840:—
837:)
833:•
801:|
724:}}
718:{{
601:}}
595:{{
512:|
474:|
470:|
466:|
462:|
458:|
1476:\
1390:(
1351:a
1348:D
1253:)
1229:(
1157:ε
1152:e
1149:o
1146:M
1041:)
1035:(
987:)
963:(
938:(
867:e
829:(
742:S
681:-
604:→
581:e
548:@
484:→
478:)
454:(
221:■
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.