1513:
pages have gotten very long and they will get huge if
Knowledge (XXG) survives even just five or ten years longer. I often find that an IP's edits consist of nothing but blatant vandalism (non-test type edits like profanity and repeatedly replacing text with gibberish) and that it has gotten many warnings (half a dozen to dozens), but has never been blocked. If the IP is making absolutely no useful edits day after day despite warnings, this template should be slapped on the talk page and the IP should be blocked for a few days to a week. If they continue to vandalize after the block runs out, they should be blocked for a month. If they still won't stop, the IP should be blocked from six months to a year at a time. If they still won't stop, they should be hunted for sport and meat (animal feed only to prevent the transmission of disease). I am uncomfortable with indefinite blocks, even with the anonymous users only option, since the IP might be reassigned or might actually be dynamic but not appear to be because the user has an always-on cable/DSL modem, which can be on for weeks or months without being disconnected, if they have a reliable ISP and electric company. --
1157:- JzG nailed it on the head. "Smilies" don't do anything to further WP as an encyclopedia, and leaving this opens the door for all sorts of social networking images and templates that don't belong here. I don't find any of the arguments for keep particularly compelling; if you're not able to communicate your feelings without using a graphic, perhaps some brushing up on vocabulary is in order. We don't keep things here just because they're "nice"... and erasing said things doesn't make anyone "mean", by the way, it's just part of keeping this project as academically legitimate as possible. Think of how silly Britannica would look if the public found notes between its editors were covered with little yellow happy faces.
534:— I think it is very useful in helping to keep discussions on talk pages civil. A joke or wry comment can be completely misunderstood without some sort of indicator that it was meant as humor. While typographical smileys (e.g. :-)) are okay, my personal experience has show that the graphical variety has less chance of being misunderstood. If this indeed causing a load on the servers, then the instructions on the template page should be updated to mandate that it be substituted for text (i.e. use "subst:")--
1326:- It is bad if this is a dynamic IP and a new user gets the smackdown for making a single bad edit. Because of the prevalence of always-on broadband connections I think it is much more common though for even a "dynamic" IP to be leased to the same user week over week. So when you have the same person at the same IP come back off a block and immediately start vandalizing, why do we need to warn them again, since it was obviously not a deterrent before? —
1392:
actually a very difficult task unless you have a very long userhistory to analyze. The repeatvandal tag bridges the gap. 3) To the best of my understanding, the schoolblock tag and the repeatvandal tag are complementary, not mutually exclusive. The repeatvandal tag can be added during the investigation to determine if a schoolblock is appropriate (and if so, for how long).
1596:
pretty much per Daniel Case who I think lays out the issues clearly. I vividly remember the days when I was on RC patrol without the admin bit and this was indeed a very useful tag to have on IP addresses that were home to repeat offenders. Its just as useful for me now I'm an admin because it alerts
1461:
Yes, I really don't like that template. I've been thinking of removing it outright from IP talk pages because it gives vandal reporters the wrong impression (and might be the reason for the whole slate of immediate AIV reports I've been seeing lately). It was likely created back when we didn't really
1413:
It's placed on lots of pages, certainly, but is it actually used? How often are vandals blocked without warning when, had this template not been on their talk page, they would have been warned first? Very rarely, I would guess. I don't think many admins on AIV block unwarned IP addresses just because
1512:
and edit so that it says IP addresses that have been warned and/or blocked repeatedly, not just blocked repeatedly, as it might make admins less timid about blocking repeat offenders, non-admins less timid about reporting them to AIV, and would allow the periodic blanking of the page, as some of the
1432:
to not say that the IP can be blocked without warning. I have no doubt of how prolific this template is, and before the days of the AO-flag, I would gladly use this template myself. However, now that the AO-flag is around, this template doesn't really need to be used anymore, or at least it doesn't
1394:
I will even disagree with the assertion that this template is being inappropriately used on anon IP addresses. On the contrary, the presence of this template on the anon page can help to explain to the good-faith users of that address why their account is being shut down so aggressively. It prompts
675:
A comment placed using the smileys has a greater effect on the intended party since it helps a greater deal than the
Wikilove smile templates. I am a person who have engaged in many arguments and I would like to point out here that these smileys have played a major role in expressing ideas not only
587:
Talk pages are for communications among editors. Graphic smileys facilitate expressing the tone of those communications. This is a valid consideration when coveying and interpreting a message. Claiming such communications do not support the process of building the encyclopedia reflects a biased POV
899:
Some editors like using them, and per Tewfik, if there are no techinical reasons to delete them why do so? If transclusion is a problem have them required to be substituted (or make a bot (ie a slave :) to do it) Yes, they don't have any enclyclopedic value, but then neither do userpages, and they
1391:
To the specific recommendations in the nomination: 1) When used on a non-shared ID, an indef block can be excessive. Sometimes, the repeatvandal tag is all that's needed to bring a user in line. 2) Some anon IPs are not shared. Telling which are shared and which are used by only one person is
509:
Graphical smileys are great in social networking sites. Knowledge (XXG) is not a social networking site. A quick look at what links here shows that it has been transcluded in many article talk pages, which is a bad sign. Technically, server load and image transclusion makes it undesirable;
1476:
Hi
Deathphoenix. I don't follow you. You are saying that now we have AO-block, you do block school IPs on sight, but you don't think its appropriate to have a tag that says you will? It seems to me that AO makes it more reasonable to AO-block without warning, so the repeatvandal tag is more
1525:
The wording has caused problems for me in the past, as I have understood it to mean that due to a very long history of vandalism, if a user has returned from a block and started vandalising again, there is no need for me to start issuing new warnings, but instead i can go straight to AIV.
1106:
The TfD template should not be noinclude— this template is only on talk pages anyway, it's not like your messing up articles. By taking away the link to this debate participation is being stifled. Also it has been a year and a half since the other TfD you mention, I think it's time for a
1437:
reports for templates without adequate warning (ie, a recent "final warning" with vandals having edited after that final warning). Sometimes people just send a final warning and post on AIV at the same time because they believe the IP can be blocked without warning or extra vandalism.
880:
per
Elipongo. These serve an invaluable role in keeping otherwise heated discussion on the cool side. Knowledge (XXG) would be worse off without these images, so while if there is a technically compelling reason to delete I would have to support that, no other reason would suffice.
1462:
have a way of dealing with IPs with a long history of vandalism. Now that we have the AO-only flag, there's no real need for a template advocating a block without warning. For example, I simply AO-block school IPs for a very long time if they have a long history of vandalism. --
292:
Well, there are already several "I'm a Harry Potter Fan" userboxes, so this is slightly redundant, but if the author feels this version is better than any others, why not let him keep it in userspace. In any case the Fair Use image has to go (see fair use guidelines).
1386:. This template is in use as a transclusion over 200 times. It's in use as a substituted template many many times more than that. The frequency of its use is strong evidence that this is a widely used and successfully used tool in the fight against vandalism.
1388:
This template is an essential alert to editors that the user in question has been repeatedly blocked for cause. It triggers admins to scrutinize the block log carefully to determine whether an escalation in block length or severity is appropriate.
783:
per
Elipongo. I'm aware that it's about 1 KB per smiley and was really considering delete for that reason, until Addhoc's "Strong Delete" challenged me - I'm anything but a bored teenager! Compared to that, Elipongo's argument has to prevail. —
1335:
If it's someone that's just come of a block, then can be immediately reblocked without needing a template at the top saying so. This template is placed on user talk pages permanently, not just for a couple of days following a block.
1526:
Apparrrently this is inocorrect, and is a misunderstanding that has been shared by others. I would assume that a small but significant porportion of rejected AIV requests could be a result of confusion generated by this template.
1597:
me to check the block log and contribution history of IPs I am engaging with to see when its time for more aggressive action. As I noted above, the fact we can now implement soft blocks makes the tag more useful, not less, IMHO.
1582:
need are some clearer guidelines for its use ("repeat" means at least three blocks in most cases, IMO) and some active effort to tag multiply-blocked IPs' talk pages (many of which I have often found lack this) with this.
921::Hmmm, yes they why don't we start removing all user pages, userboxes and other templates like this one? If anybody wants to start another project for Userpage Deletion as UfD please start by deleting my userpage ;-) --
326:(none with an image), I personally feel that they are the most bland userboxes I ever saw, thus I too side with Amarkov to the extent that the best design should prevail. And in my opinion the best userbox is
676:
for me but also for many other users. It is very well clear to me that
Knowledge (XXG) is a serious attempt to write an encyclopedia. But how can we achieve that target unless we resolve the problems here? --
547:; though I often do wish to be twenty or so years younger, the bored teenager label doesn't really apply to me.<this would be a good place for a graphical smiley to show that I'm amused, not annoyed: -->
1077:— Last night all the smileys had a link to this debate, now that link is no longer there. What's up with that? Is this standard procedure or is somebody trying to limit participation in the debate here? --
1499:
by an oh-so friendly admin who accused me of breaking policy by reporting a vandal with that template to AIV. So I also suggest that if the template is kept, admins should be made aware that it exists.
699:
461:
817:, server load isn't a reason to delete per se.; unless anybody has heard that too many smileys are crashing the servers. The problem becomes zero anyway if you simply subst: the template.--
951:
is not the option. This template serve an invaluable role in keeping otherwise heated discussion on the cool side. So lets keep and change this template as WP:SUBST friendly mechanism. --
600:
As a fifty-something editor with thousands of contributions, including on a number of featured and high-level pages, it's crap like this that encourages me to periodically reconsider how
1052:
The smileys help to clarify the mood, the specific intent of the language that the user is typing. Will help to avoid future conflict, due to smileys helping clarify tone of voice.
42:
37:
1291:
IP addresses should always be warned. If it's definitely not a shared address, it can be indef blocked, if it's a school, it can be AO blocked. Any other case deserves at least a
256:
I suppose I did not word it very well, but what I was trying to say was what
Amarkov said: there are other templates, without FU images, thus making this one superfluous. --
1414:
the template says they can. I'm not proposing a change in policy, I'm proposing we stop putting a template on talk pages that doesn't accurately reflect what happens. --
1566:. For those of us without admin powers who do RCP, this is very informative when the time comes to issue a warning. When I see this on a talk page, I don't start with
1125:. A lot of people would be disappointed with the project to see this go. It's a nice little community-building thing that makes people happy... leave it alone.
209:
To best of my belief the userbox in question do not fall under any of the categories, hence it should be removed from the list of proposed
Templates for deletion.
970:
727:
1089:
As noted above, these templates are likely/allowed to be speedily deleted per CSD general rule 4 "Recreation of deleted material" per the last TfD. --
389:
21:
1686:
Very useful as a quick way to know if an IP has been blocked 54 times previously. I'd be ok with removing the "blocked without warning" though.
1554:. Particularly useful in the case of IP addresses which have been blocked over and over and over again and just haven't got the message. --
1807:
1395:
the user to evaluate the contribution history of the IP and sometimes even sparks the good-faith anon users to better police their peers.
1185:
974:
17:
360:
323:
138:
702:), once betacommand's bot orphans them. Another TfD appears unnecessary (or if it is, it should be expanded to include them all). --
280:
165:
739:
1767:
1910:
1888:
1731:
1705:
1230:
1204:
452:
426:
76:
1266:
402:
900:
use loads of transcluded userboxes. They all just help make what we call the
Knowledge (XXG) community what it is. --
1792:
Useless. This navbox links two articles, which can easily be linked directly to each other without this template. -
588:
against visually-oriented editors, such as myself. Deleting communication tools based on such a POV is unjustified.
1895:
1880:
1863:
1826:
1812:
1758:
1751:
1715:
1690:
1674:
1660:
1638:
1626:
1609:
Sometimes persistent abuse comes from a static IP, and shouldn't get the same leeway that a dynamic IP should get.
1601:
1587:
1558:
1546:
1517:
1504:
1481:
1471:
1447:
1418:
1406:
1378:
1353:
1340:
1330:
1318:
1305:
1250:
1189:
1165:
1147:
1134:
1111:
1093:
1081:
1067:
1058:
1044:
1029:
1017:
981:
961:
931:
909:
891:
872:
861:
835:
821:
805:
788:
775:
757:
743:
715:
706:
686:
633:
617:
608:
592:
577:
552:
538:
523:
468:
411:
371:
314:
284:
248:
227:
213:
169:
96:
1775:
613:
Can you please elaborate on how a policy of "don't include image smilies on talk pages" constitutes a POV bias? —
1909:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
1730:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
1704:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
1229:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
1203:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
451:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
425:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
337:
112:
75:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
1803:
266:
239:. This is most certainly redundant to another better designed template, once you discount the fair use image. -
151:
1182:
629:
per nom. Knowledge (XXG) is a serious attempt to write an encyclopedia, not a chat room for bored teenagers.
1301:
warning before being blocked. This template should be deleted and substed versions removed from IP pages. --
385:
328:
103:
60:
1747:
1466:
1442:
1433:
need to say that this IP can be blocked without warning. It's because of this message that we get so many
1257:
1246:
1214:
398:
297:
92:
1173:- I can't see a real need to delete this, perfectly legitimate template that only promotes friendliness.
1857:
1372:
1274:
1179:
1026:
1455:
345:
182:
First of all I would like to ask if using a FU image satisfies the criteria for deletion of an userbox?
120:
510:
philosophically, graphical smileys that make the servers groan have no obvious encyclopaedic purpose.
1671:
1397:
The template should not be added to a page lightly but when it is, it is usually very well-deserved.
484:
406:
1793:
276:
161:
1365:
This template gives users a quick and short notice about vandalism, definitely a template to keep.
1086:
The TfD template was made "noinclude" to stop the layout disruption it caused. Standard procedure.
1041:
771:
Unprofessional, unnecessary, and visually-distracting. As annoying as flag icons in signatures. --
1687:
1501:
1159:
994:
959:
929:
785:
754:
735:
712:
684:
944:
1724:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
1223:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
492:
445:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
69:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
1743:
1463:
1439:
1402:
1242:
1127:
859:
831:
801:
570:
393:
368:
307:
244:
224:
210:
88:
814:
1852:
1653:
1619:
1584:
1528:
1367:
889:
750:
Ouch! That's hilarious - given that I was the one who started the G-something nomenclature!
1434:
1346:
990:
973:(which I presume we shouldn't...), communication is a good thing. (mumbles something about
721:
377:
201:
The template is not used (note that this cannot be concluded from the absence of backlinks)
1892:
1871:
due to lack of information. It can be recreated when their is atleast 8 pages to link to.
1649:
1615:
669:
659:
475:
465:
436:
188:
1876:
1823:
1570:
901:
649:
271:
262:
258:
156:
147:
143:
1635:
1108:
1090:
1078:
1064:
1038:
952:
922:
851:. This is not a networking site, and this is not what the Template namespace is for.
818:
772:
731:
703:
677:
605:
589:
549:
535:
518:
512:
1836:
1598:
1478:
1398:
1130:
869:
852:
827:
797:
565:
294:
240:
993:
myspace, and per precedent on deleting other text-icons such as voting templates.
1514:
1315:
1295:
1053:
883:
630:
826:
It's somewhat annoying too. I don't have a strong opinion either way, though. -
1644:
1610:
1555:
1415:
1350:
1337:
1327:
1302:
1144:
614:
1496:
978:
700:
Knowledge (XXG):Templates for deletion/Log/Deleted/August 2005#Template:Sad
222:
1345:
Yeah but it's a handy "heads-up" to vandalism fighters to take them to
364:
190:, the reasons for which the templates or userboxes can be deleted are
1477:
appropriate than before. I think I've misunderstood what you said?
1314:- agree with nom this template has caused unnecessary confusion...
460:
The result of the debate was: speedily deleted as a re-creation of
711:
Can someone please translate the above into
English? - Thanks! —
367:
that FU images cannot be used in Templates or navigational boxes
363:. However I concede the point raised by CharonX and validated by
1903:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1698:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1197:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
419:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
943:: I have personally experienced difficulties when perform the
698:
I believe these are all going to be CSD G4 by David Levy (per
198:
The template is redundant to another better-designed template;
1822:
unless it is expanded. Should include at least four or five.
562:. No obvious use that :o) or other ASCII cannot be used for.
218:
I will further request that the userbox be reverted back to
724:
general reason number 4— "Recreation of deleted material".
195:
The template is not helpful or noteworthy (encyclopaedic);
796:. Quite a lot of server load, for no important reason. -
645:: These three templates are in use to promote Wikilove.
137:
This userbox has a FU image, whereas the other two that
1783:
1779:
1771:
1763:
1282:
1278:
1270:
1262:
1063:
Text emoticons are fine, and don't cause outrage :-) --
751:
500:
496:
488:
480:
376:
I have removed the fair use image from the userbox per
353:
349:
341:
333:
219:
128:
124:
116:
108:
1207:). No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1734:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1233:). No further edits should be made to this page.
455:). No further edits should be made to this page.
322:As indicated by Fbv in his earlier post, there are
79:). No further edits should be made to this page.
204:The template isn't a Neutral Point of View (NPOV)
1913:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1708:). No further edits should be made to this page.
429:). No further edits should be made to this page.
971:Knowledge (XXG):Don't worry about performance
8:
1850:Only contains a small amount of information.
947:of this template. But for that, simply says
1634:. Useful. (I'm biased, I invented it.) --
388:or even the one I userfied months ago at
86:deletion, as redundant and untranscluded.
1875:
390:User:Royalguard11/userboxes/HarryPotter
18:Knowledge (XXG):Templates for deletion
7:
384:as it is utterly redundnt to either
975:a picture is worth a thousand words
1493:Keep but perhaps alter the wording
1458:) of my opinion on this template:
1139:Well it clearly makes some people
847:: unnecessary, distracting, and a
604:I should support Knowledge (XXG).
28:
1889:Template:Rival Schools characters
1240:to keep, let the rewording begin.
1841:05:34, Wednesday, January 31 '07
1454:Here's a copy & paste (from
1739:The result of the debate was
1238:The result of the debate was
84:The result of the debate was
1:
1759:Template:Rival Schools series
1716:Template:Rival Schools series
30:
1896:22:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
1881:22:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
1864:16:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
1827:05:09, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
1813:04:31, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
1752:01:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
1691:15:54, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
1675:21:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
1661:20:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
1639:20:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
1627:20:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
1602:20:24, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
1588:17:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
1559:22:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
1547:11:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
1518:10:34, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
1505:00:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
1482:20:21, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
1472:14:12, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
1448:18:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
1419:18:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
1407:16:54, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
1379:16:51, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
1354:17:07, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
1341:18:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
1331:16:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
1319:16:31, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
1306:16:24, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
1251:01:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
1190:15:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
1166:10:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
1148:06:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
1135:03:52, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
1112:22:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
1094:21:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
1082:21:44, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
1068:21:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
1059:19:37, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
1045:17:00, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
1030:15:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
1018:12:29, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
982:11:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
969:- Even if we were to ignore
962:09:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
932:04:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
910:05:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
892:03:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
873:03:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
862:02:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
836:23:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
822:02:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
806:01:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
789:00:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
776:07:25, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
758:02:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
744:00:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
722:Criteria for speedy deletion
716:00:05, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
707:23:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
687:04:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
634:23:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
618:19:55, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
609:02:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
593:23:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
578:23:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
553:00:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
539:23:13, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
524:22:52, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
469:16:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
412:17:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
372:14:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
315:13:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
285:02:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
249:23:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
228:16:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
214:16:07, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
170:22:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
97:01:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
1497:recently bitten pretty hard
1930:
1906:Please do not modify it.
1727:Please do not modify it.
1701:Please do not modify it.
1495:As it so happens, I was
1226:Please do not modify it.
1200:Please do not modify it.
448:Please do not modify it.
422:Please do not modify it.
72:Please do not modify it.
386:User:NickW557/HPUserbox
1258:Template:Repeat vandal
1215:Template:Repeat vandal
1075:Comment & question
187:As per guidelines set
730:comment was added by
329:Template:User fanofhp
104:Template:User fanofhp
61:Template:User fanofhp
543:Revising my vote to
324:two userboxes on HP
1430:modify the wording
1025:per Radient! :) --
1811:
1750:
1405:
1249:
849:small server load
834:
804:
747:
522:
410:
247:
95:
51:
50:
1921:
1908:
1874:
1860:
1855:
1842:
1839:
1801:
1799:
1788:
1787:
1746:
1729:
1703:
1659:
1656:
1625:
1622:
1575:
1569:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1523:Delete or reword
1401:
1375:
1370:
1300:
1294:
1287:
1286:
1245:
1228:
1202:
1188:
1162:
1133:
1107:re-evaluation.--
1014:
1012:
1010:
1008:
1006:
957:
927:
886:
857:
830:
800:
725:
682:
674:
668:
664:
658:
654:
648:
573:
568:
516:
505:
504:
450:
424:
396:
382:Delete or Userfy
358:
357:
302:
290:Delete or Userfy
269:
243:
154:
133:
132:
91:
74:
47:
36:
31:
1929:
1928:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1911:deletion review
1904:
1872:
1858:
1853:
1837:
1835:
1795:
1761:
1757:
1748:(Упражнение В!)
1732:deletion review
1725:
1719:
1712:
1706:deletion review
1699:
1654:
1647:
1620:
1613:
1573:
1567:
1537:
1535:
1533:
1531:
1529:
1373:
1368:
1298:
1292:
1260:
1256:
1247:(Упражнение В!)
1231:deletion review
1224:
1218:
1211:
1205:deletion review
1198:
1186:52278 Alpha 771
1180:Fenton, Matthew
1174:
1160:
1126:
1004:
1002:
1000:
998:
996:
953:
923:
884:
853:
726:—The preceding
678:
672:
666:
662:
656:
652:
646:
571:
566:
478:
476:Template:Smiley
474:
462:deleted content
453:deletion review
446:
440:
437:Template:Smiley
433:
427:deletion review
420:
331:
327:
298:
267:
152:
106:
102:
93:(Упражнение В!)
77:deletion review
70:
64:
57:
52:
45:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1927:
1925:
1916:
1915:
1899:
1898:
1886:Keep but merge
1883:
1879:
1866:
1844:
1843:
1829:
1790:
1789:
1737:
1736:
1720:
1718:
1713:
1711:
1710:
1694:
1693:
1677:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1629:
1604:
1591:
1561:
1549:
1520:
1507:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1451:
1450:
1422:
1421:
1410:
1409:
1396:
1393:
1390:
1387:
1381:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1321:
1289:
1288:
1236:
1235:
1219:
1217:
1212:
1210:
1209:
1193:
1192:
1168:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1087:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1050:Strongest Keep
1047:
1032:
1020:
984:
964:
937:
936:
935:
934:
913:
912:
894:
875:
864:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
791:
778:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
692:
691:
690:
689:
637:
636:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
580:
557:
556:
555:
507:
506:
458:
457:
441:
439:
434:
432:
431:
415:
414:
374:
317:
287:
251:
233:
232:
231:
230:
216:
206:
205:
202:
199:
196:
192:
191:
185:
184:
183:
135:
134:
82:
81:
65:
63:
58:
56:
53:
49:
48:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1926:
1914:
1912:
1907:
1901:
1900:
1897:
1894:
1890:
1887:
1884:
1882:
1878:
1870:
1867:
1865:
1862:
1861:
1856:
1849:
1846:
1845:
1840:
1833:
1830:
1828:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1809:
1805:
1800:
1798:
1785:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1760:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1742:
1735:
1733:
1728:
1722:
1721:
1717:
1714:
1709:
1707:
1702:
1696:
1695:
1692:
1689:
1688:Kaisershatner
1685:
1681:
1678:
1676:
1673:
1669:
1666:
1662:
1657:
1651:
1646:
1643:COI! COI! :P
1642:
1641:
1640:
1637:
1633:
1630:
1628:
1623:
1617:
1612:
1608:
1605:
1603:
1600:
1595:
1592:
1590:
1589:
1586:
1581:
1572:
1565:
1562:
1560:
1557:
1553:
1550:
1548:
1545:
1544:
1524:
1521:
1519:
1516:
1511:
1508:
1506:
1503:
1502:Pascal.Tesson
1498:
1494:
1491:
1490:
1483:
1480:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1470:
1469:
1465:
1460:
1459:
1457:
1453:
1452:
1449:
1446:
1445:
1441:
1436:
1431:
1427:
1424:
1423:
1420:
1417:
1412:
1411:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1385:
1382:
1380:
1377:
1376:
1371:
1364:
1361:
1355:
1352:
1349:right away. —
1348:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1339:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1329:
1325:
1322:
1320:
1317:
1313:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1304:
1297:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1259:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1241:
1234:
1232:
1227:
1221:
1220:
1216:
1213:
1208:
1206:
1201:
1195:
1194:
1191:
1187:
1184:
1181:
1177:
1172:
1169:
1167:
1164:
1163:
1161:Tijuana Brass
1156:
1153:
1149:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1132:
1129:
1124:
1121:
1120:
1113:
1110:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1095:
1092:
1088:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1080:
1076:
1073:
1069:
1066:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1057:
1056:
1051:
1048:
1046:
1043:
1040:
1039:User:Lahiru_k
1036:
1033:
1031:
1028:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1016:
1015:
992:
988:
985:
983:
980:
976:
972:
968:
965:
963:
960:
958:
956:
950:
946:
942:
939:
938:
933:
930:
928:
926:
920:
917:
916:
915:
914:
911:
908:
907:
904:
898:
895:
893:
890:
888:
887:
879:
876:
874:
871:
868:
865:
863:
860:
858:
856:
850:
846:
843:
837:
833:
829:
825:
824:
823:
820:
816:
812:
809:
808:
807:
803:
799:
795:
792:
790:
787:
782:
779:
777:
774:
770:
769:Strong Delete
767:
759:
756:
752:
749:
748:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
723:
719:
718:
717:
714:
710:
709:
708:
705:
701:
697:
694:
693:
688:
685:
683:
681:
671:
661:
651:
644:
641:
640:
639:
638:
635:
632:
628:
627:Strong Delete
625:
619:
616:
612:
611:
610:
607:
603:
599:
596:
595:
594:
591:
586:
585:
581:
579:
576:
574:
569:
561:
558:
554:
551:
546:
542:
541:
540:
537:
533:
532:
528:
527:
526:
525:
520:
515:
514:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
477:
473:
472:
471:
470:
467:
463:
456:
454:
449:
443:
442:
438:
435:
430:
428:
423:
417:
416:
413:
408:
404:
400:
395:
391:
387:
383:
380:#9. Anyways,
379:
375:
373:
370:
366:
362:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
330:
325:
321:
318:
316:
313:
312:
310:
305:
304:
301:
296:
291:
288:
286:
282:
278:
274:
273:
270:
264:
261:
260:
255:
252:
250:
246:
242:
238:
235:
234:
229:
226:
223:
221:from present
220:
217:
215:
212:
208:
207:
203:
200:
197:
194:
193:
189:
186:
181:
178:
177:
176:
175:
174:
173:
172:
171:
167:
163:
159:
158:
155:
149:
146:
145:
140:
139:already exist
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
100:
99:
98:
94:
90:
87:
80:
78:
73:
67:
66:
62:
59:
54:
44:
41:
39:
33:
32:
23:
19:
1905:
1902:
1885:
1868:
1851:
1847:
1831:
1819:
1796:
1791:
1744:RyanGerbil10
1740:
1738:
1726:
1723:
1700:
1697:
1683:
1679:
1670:per Kjkolb.
1667:
1631:
1606:
1593:
1579:
1577:
1563:
1551:
1527:
1522:
1509:
1492:
1467:
1464:Deathphoenix
1443:
1440:Deathphoenix
1429:
1425:
1383:
1366:
1362:
1323:
1311:
1290:
1243:RyanGerbil10
1239:
1237:
1225:
1222:
1199:
1196:
1175:
1170:
1158:
1154:
1140:
1122:
1074:
1054:
1049:
1034:
1022:
995:
986:
966:
955:♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪
954:
948:
945:substitution
940:
925:♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪
924:
918:
905:
902:
896:
882:
877:
866:
854:
848:
844:
810:
793:
780:
768:
695:
680:♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪
679:
642:
626:
601:
598:STRONG KEEP.
597:
583:
582:
563:
559:
544:
530:
529:
511:
508:
459:
447:
444:
421:
418:
394:Royalguard11
381:
369:Legaleagle86
319:
311:
308:
303:
299:
289:
265:
257:
253:
236:
225:Legaleagle86
211:Legaleagle86
179:
150:
142:
136:
89:RyanGerbil10
85:
83:
71:
68:
1834:per above.
1818:Definitely
1585:Daniel Case
1564:Speedy keep
941:Strong Keep
878:Strong Keep
545:Strong Keep
1893:SeizureDog
1891:into it.--
1672:TheQuandry
1183:Lexic Dark
466:David Levy
407:Review Me!
365:use policy
141:do not. --
55:January 31
43:February 1
38:January 30
1877:Iced Kola
1824:Alex43223
1794:A Man In
1741:deletion.
786:Sebastian
755:Sebastian
720:He means
713:Sebastian
602:seriously
361:other two
1808:past ops
1804:conspire
1636:jpgordon
1578:What it
1143:happy. —
1109:Elipongo
1091:Quiddity
1079:Elipongo
1065:Quiddity
819:Elipongo
773:Quiddity
740:contribs
732:Elipongo
728:unsigned
704:Quiddity
606:Rfrisbie
590:Rfrisbie
550:Elipongo
536:Elipongo
359:and not
20: |
1838:Jorcoga
1772:history
1684:Modify?
1599:Gwernol
1479:Gwernol
1399:Rossami
1271:history
1042:RaveenS
977:...) -
919:Comment
903:snowolf
870:Savidan
855:Prodego
815:WP:PERF
811:Comment
696:Comment
643:Comment
489:history
342:history
320:Comment
254:Comment
117:history
1869:Delete
1859:addict
1848:Delete
1832:Delete
1820:Delete
1515:Kjkolb
1456:WT:AIV
1435:WP:AIV
1426:Delete
1403:(talk)
1374:addict
1347:WP:AIV
1316:Addhoc
1312:Delete
1176:thanks
1155:Delete
1131:Warren
1055:Real96
1023:Delete
991:WP:NOT
987:Delete
949:Delete
885:Tewfik
867:Delete
845:Delete
813:— Per
794:Delete
670:smile3
660:smile2
631:Addhoc
560:Delete
378:WP:FUC
295:Charon
237:Delete
1854:Telly
1797:Bl♟ck
1780:watch
1776:links
1645:EVula
1611:EVula
1571:test1
1556:Yamla
1416:Tango
1369:Telly
1351:Dgies
1338:Tango
1328:Dgies
1303:Tango
1279:watch
1275:links
1145:Dgies
997:: -->
828:Amark
798:Amark
650:smile
615:Dgies
584:Keep.
519:Help!
497:watch
493:links
350:watch
346:links
241:Amark
125:watch
121:links
46:: -->
16:<
1784:logs
1768:talk
1764:edit
1680:Keep
1668:Keep
1650:talk
1632:Keep
1616:talk
1607:Keep
1594:Keep
1580:does
1552:Keep
1538:UBT•
1510:Keep
1384:Keep
1363:Keep
1324:Keep
1283:logs
1267:talk
1263:edit
1171:Keep
1123:Keep
1037:per
1035:Keep
1013:<
979:jc37
967:Keep
897:Keep
832:moo!
802:moo!
781:Keep
736:talk
572:VEЯS
531:Keep
501:logs
485:talk
481:edit
403:Desk
399:Talk
354:logs
338:talk
334:edit
309:talk
245:moo!
180:Keep
129:logs
113:talk
109:edit
35:<
1682:...
1652://
1648://
1618://
1614://
1534:ILL
1428:or
1128:-/-
1027:Doc
665:or
567:RED
513:Guy
392:. -
283:||
272:del
259:Fbv
168:||
157:del
144:Fbv
22:Log
1806:|
1782:|
1778:|
1774:|
1770:|
1766:|
1658://
1624://
1574:}}
1568:{{
1536:DO
1530:•C
1438:--
1336:--
1299:}}
1296:bv
1293:{{
1281:|
1277:|
1273:|
1269:|
1265:|
1141:un
989:,
906:D4
753:—
742:)
738:•
673:}}
667:{{
663:}}
657:{{
655:,
653:}}
647:{{
548:--
499:|
495:|
491:|
487:|
483:|
352:|
348:|
344:|
340:|
336:|
281:☛c
279:/
277:☑t
275:/
263:65
166:☛c
164:/
162:☑t
160:/
148:65
127:|
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
1873:
1810:)
1802:(
1786:)
1762:(
1655:☯
1621:☯
1576:.
1532:H
1468:ʕ
1444:ʕ
1285:)
1261:(
1178:/
1011:t
1009:n
1007:a
1005:i
1003:d
1001:a
999:R
746:.
734:(
575:〉
564:〈
521:)
517:(
503:)
479:(
464:—
409:)
405:·
401:·
397:(
356:)
332:(
306:/
300:X
268:e
153:e
131:)
107:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.